>> that is "all in" for this evening. a very happy bastille day and a very happy anniversary to you, babe. i love you. "the rachel maddow show" starts with steve kornacki filling in. >> good evening, chris. thanks for that. and thanks to you at home for staying with us for the next hour. rachel has the night off. i'll start by asking if you remember the kiss. in case you haven't heard the story, it starts back in november 2004. it's when george w. bush was re-elected as president over john kerry. in the following february, that's february of 2005, bush was set to give his first state of the union address since being re-elected. obviously this was a big deal. the first speech to set the course of his second term as president. it was february 2nd, 2005. that was the date to be exact. after bush finished delivering that speech, that state of the union address, he made his way up along the aisle in the house chamber and toward the exits. the scene you've seen on tv every year, it seems. those members of congress, they reach out, try to shake his hand, try to get a word in with him.

maybe try to get their picture taken. maybe try to get on the news while the president is trying to leave the building. on his way out that night back on february 2nd, 2005, bush spotted one particular senator who he wanted to stop. who he wanted to talk to. so he stopped, he leaned over, and he put his hand on joe lieberman of connecticut and then as you see there, he kissed him. it was an unexpected move. got a lot of attention. it ended up playing a big role in the history of american politics for the past decade because joe lieberman was still a full fledged democrat back then. he'd been his party's candidate for vice president back in 2000. he'd run for president, himself, in 2004. in 2005, democrats were starting to turn on him. because it was then that the iraq war was spiralling out of control, and lieberman wouldn't stop standing with bush. that's why bush was so happy to see him in the chamber that night. to those democrats who were starting to turn on lieberman, this was a big moment. this was an image that crystallized their feelings.

this was the ultimate symbol of how close to bush lieberman had become. and so following year, in 2006, when lieberman ran for re re-election in connecticut, he got a challenge in the democratic primary and opponents put that kiss image on buttons, in ads. the image was a big reason lieberman went down in that primary. why he lost his party's support. why he ended up spending the rest of his time in the senate as an independent. and now here's the thing. there was actually around that same time, around that time of that kiss, there was actually another democrat who george w. bush also looked forward to seeing during his state of the union addresses. and he made that very clear the year after the lieberman kiss. this was in the 2006 state of the union address. right after bush had finished husband speech, he was also making his way out of the capitol. he was trying to exit. working his way through the crowds and that's when he saw his other favorite democrat. texas congressman named henry

cuellar. what he's doing isn't a kiss, but a cusping of his cheeks. we can call it a clasp. it was the clasp. less famous than the kiss, but it's very significant right now. the clasp. the thing is, when that picture was taken, henry cuellar was running for re-election in texas, just a month after that picture was taken. that picture, clasp, happened a few months before in the heat of a primary campaign when he was being challenged in the democratic primary. the picture could have been toxic. could have been the equivalent to the kiss. it could have been what the kiss was to joe lieberman. henry cuellar was facing the same basic charge lieberman was facing in connecticut. liberals who believed he was way too close, way too friendly to george w. bush and wanted him gone. it didn't work. here's the henry cuellar story. in the 2000 presidential election, when he was a state representative in texas, he chose to back then-republican

governor george w. bush for president over his own party's candidate, al gore. he was basically a bush surrogate. bush campaign proceeded to use cuellar in bush for president ad campaign to attack gore, quoting cuellar, saying, "as a democratic member of the house appropriations committee, cuellar said by criticizing the state's fiscal health, gore is attacking us, the legislature." following year in 2001, republican governor rick perry appointed henry cuellar secretary of state in texas. it's a position he held basically for the next year. in 2004, though he did back john kerry over bush that year, cuellar decided to run for congress not against any democrat but the chairman of the congressional hispanic caucus, ciro rodriguez was his name. it was a very contentious race and over the initial tally gave rodriguez a 145-vote lead. after a recount, cuellar moved ahead by 58 votes.

the race ended up going to court and in the end, henry cuellar was declared the winner of the seat. he upset a sitting democratic member of congress in a primary. in 2006, rodriguez came back to try to get his revenge. cuellar, of course, by then had infuriated national liberal groups. the conservative group, the club for growth, you've probably heard of them, they came in and endorsed henry cuellar. i was reporting on that race back then when i was at "roll call." the very first time ever the club for growth endorsed a democrat. and so, that was the context for george w. bush clasping henry cuellar at his 2006 state of the union address. he sees his old buddy before that 2006 election and gives that buddy a good luck clasp. cuellar ended up surviving, though. in spilt of the clasp. democrats after that election stopped trying to oust him. for as long as he wanted to, they figured he was going to be representing that slice of south texas in congress. but now, flash forward to right now, all these years later, we are being reminded why he drove

democrats nuts in the first place. >> so congressman, by that i take it you mean he should be seeing the border? >> well, i hope that doesn't become a president obama katrina moment. >> should he be going to the border today? he's in texas. >> absolutely. he'll be 500 miles from dallas, and in fact, 242 miles in austin, in the other fund-raiser he'll be having. he's so close to the border. let me say this. when i saw -- i hate to use the word bizarre, but under the circumstances when he is shown playing pool in colorado, drinking a beer, and he can't even go 242 miles to the texas border? >> congressman, president obama is visiting texas today but not going to the border. is that a mistake? >> i think it is. look, he's going to be in austin 242 miles away from the border. he's going to be in dallas, 500 miles away from the border. last night, we saw some of the photographs where he was in colorado drinking a beer, playing pool.

i mean, the outtakes are just horrible. >> you think he looks detached at this moment? >> yes, unfortunately, i think he does. >> we've been hearing a lot from congressman henry cuellar during the border crisis. he's a democrat, a member of the congressional hispanic caucus. he has emerged as an unusually blunt critic of president obama. a lot of the attention he gets stems from the fact that he's a member of the president's own party. any republican, after all, can attack the administration and say that the president is detached or bizarre or whatever. but when a democrat does it, it becomes much bigger news. it's much more powerful when a democrat does it about a democratic president. today, we learned that republican texas senator john cornyn and democratic congressman henry cuellar are now prepared to release a bipartisan, bicameral bill to deal with the current border cry us. a bipartisan proposal being introduced in congress tomorrow. the bill would essentially rewrite the current 2008 george w. bush law so that minors from

central american countries can be treated like those from mexico and canada. they can be deported more quickly. under the plan, unaccompanied minors from any country would be able to have an immigration court hearing within seven days of their processing by health and human services and an immigration judge would be required to rule on their case within three days. while it appears the mip strags isn't totally against this bill, they have jet to officially get behind it. many democrats, including the hispanic caucus have indicated they don't have plans to support the legislation. now, we asked congressman cuellar to come on the show tonight, he said he had a scheduling conflict. what are the prospects of this bill getting through congress? allen, let's start with this bill and, if you can help us understand it a little bit, because right now we're hearing so much about this 2008 law that's in effect that basically treats unaccompanied minors coming in from the central

american countries different than unaccompanied minors that might come in from mexico, say. what specifically would happen if this bill were enacted? what would happen to an unaccompanied minor coming in from central america that's not happening right now? >> well, to put it very simply, right now they wait about two years before they get a hearing to determine whether they're going to stay in the country or whether they're going to go back. this would make that about a two-week process. the way the law is written now, if you come from a contiguous state, mexico or canada, obviously we're talking about mexico here, that process is a matter of days. a border patrol agent can make the determination of whether you qualify for asylum, for refugee statuses or any of the number of visas that are available for kids who are trying to get here and immediately hand them over. part of the reasoning is we can do that safely and directly to mexican officials and we know they're going to take care of them. the reason this law was introduced back in 2008 is that it's a more involved process. obviously, it involves a plane

flight. it involves looking at the specific cases that they're facing back home. we don't have the same relationship with these governments that we do with mexico. so, the thinking was, let's have more protections for these kids so when we send them back, we know it's a safer situation. we know, we understand better where they're headed. so, what they're trying to do now with this bill is to treat all those other kids as we treat kids from mexico or canada. speed up that process and make it a lot quicker. the law doesn't require that they face an immigration judge. but that's usually the practice. they end up being here so long, they end up going before a judge. this law would actually require that for the first time. so it kind of balances it out. they do have the guarantee where they're going to see a judge, but it's going to be a heck of a lot quicker. >> so, where are the politics, sort of, on capitol hill and in washington about this. we have, i guess the congressional hispanic congress is already denouncing the proposal. they're going out there and saying congressman cuellar does not speak for us on this. at the same time -- >> right. >> i've seen reporting that the white house has basically indicated, and they've done this

in this sort of indirect way, they won't say it officially but have people tell reporters off the record. the white house seems to be sending the message that, hey, we'd like congress to do this, tie it to this funding request. is this something the white house wants but doesn't want to come out and say they want right now? >> well, exactly what you're saying. the -- they were the first ones to actually bring this up. this was about a week ago when the president made that speech in the rose garden, a week ago monday. and he announced he was going to be asking for some more money. and he said he was going to be looking for some changes into the laws. you know, we found out that it was specifically this law and it was this very thing we're talking about. being able to treat these central american kids. >> why is the white house so hesitant to say that publicly and to publicly embrace it? what's keeping them back politically? >> i'm not sure about that. but i can tell you that as soon as that kind of broke out, all of a sudden they started getting blowback from a lot of democrats on the hill. senator patrick leahy, chairman of the judiciary committee in the senate who orchestrated the

immigration bill last year that passed the senate, he said he would fight, quote, tooth and nail to oppose it. other senators have been lining up. dick durbin, a close ally of the white house, had said he wants more money for kids to get lawyers. other democrats in both chambers are saying that this is really an unfair trade-off, just to get some money to take care of these kids. the blowback has been pretty sharp and been pretty heated just in the last couple days since this start materializing. >> and what about -- so, we went through some of the history here. i remember when i was covering congress in '06 when cuellar beat rodriguez in the primary. people thought he was going to lose that primary. he bragged to us. i just gave him a south texas beating. i remember that's the expression he used. so obviously, you know, he's been getting a lot of, you know, sort of blowback within the democratic party for how he has been talking about the president and the president's handling of the immigration crisis, the border crisis right now. with his fingerprints on a bill like this, does that actually make it more radioactive with democrats? is that how they're now responding to henry cuellar?

>> yeah, i mean, you can see it a couple of dufrpt way differe. i mean, when you look at the sort of traditional party breakdown, once you get right to the border, things get a little different. on the one hand, we're talking about henry cuellar as if he's a staunch republican trying to hammer on these immigrants. at the same time, he's one of the strongest opponents of extending the border wall. he says it's an old solution that can't really work and that's a traditional republican thing to be pushing for to secure the border. so, he's got this -- his brother's a sheriff down there along the border. he understands these issues very well. so it's -- and it's very complicated -- when you start talking to the folks down along the border, about what they think needs to work and what they think can solve the problem. >> i'm just curious, though, he really has, it seems, gone out of his way in the last couple weeks to be going after president obama to be picking a public fight with -- what are the politics of that? it's a democratic district he comes from. is there a political angle, you know, behind this? is there some history with him and obama maybe that we done don't know about? >> i mean, as far as their

history together, i'm not really sure. he's in a safe district. he, you know, last year, he won with, like, 67% in the democratic primary and he ran unopposed the year before that, there wasn't even opposition in the democratic party. obviously he's a little insulated. he has the opportunity to do things other democrats cannot do. so, what his point in doing this, why he's kind of making this point? as the clup you showed, when he's talking about the president's actions as being bizarre, when he brings up that question of, is this obama's katrina moment? those are republican talking points they've been parroting the last week or so. yeah, you wonder where he's coming from. i'm not exactly sure what the impetus of his push is. but i can tell you, it's not that he's worried about his district. whether he's looking for another office or if this is what he truly believes and wants to push to get things done, you know, it would be nice for him to get out here to explain this a little bit. >> yeah, i mean, every republicans' favorite democrat, they said that about lieberman a

decade ago and the last two weeks i've been hearing it about henry cuellar. alan gomez for "usa today." thank you for helping us understand this tonight. appreciate. that we've got lots more ahead, including multibillion dollar bank fines. the rise of elizabeth warren as the democrat's go-to red state campaigner, believe it or not. and a chris christie you have never heard before and possibly neither has he. but first, a one more thing regarding the crisis of central american kids coming into the country without documentation. united states today deported 21 girls and boys from honduras, back to their home country on a charter flight, departed from new mexico for the city with the highest murder rate in the world. children reportedly range in age from 18 months to 15 years old. this was the first such deportation flight since president obama pledged to fast track the returnle of undocumented immigrant kids to their home countries. be right back. it's a complete checkup of the services your vehicle needs. so prepare your car for any road trip by taking it to an expert ford technician.

because no matter your destination good maintenance helps you save at the pump. get our multi-point inspection with a synthetic blend oil change, tire rotation, brake inspection and more for $29.95 or less. get a complete vehicle checkup only at your ford dealer. this is mike. his long race day starts with back pain... ...and a choice. take 4 advil in a day which is 2 aleve... ...for all day relief. "start your engines" c'mon, you want heartburn? when your favorite food starts a fight, fight back fast, with tums. heartburn relief that neutralizes acid on contact. and goes to work in seconds. ♪ tum, tum tum tum... tums!

[ roars ]

[ cat meows ] ♪ ♪ da-da-da-da-da, bum-da, bum-da ♪ ♪ bum-da, bum-da ♪ the animals went in two by two ♪ ♪ the sheep and the frog and the kangaroo ♪

♪ and they all went marching, marching in two by two ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] the nissan pathfinder, with intuitive four-wheel drive. an adventure worth sharing. nissan. innovation that excites. almost one month ago exactly, on the afternoon of june 17th, some surprising news broke that immediately became front page headlines. this was news leaking of the capture of one of the suspected ring leaders of the attacks on the diplomatic mission in benghazi, libya. u.s. special forces has taken him in a raid a few days before and that big news sort of upstaged another announcement the obama administration was hoping to deliver that same day, because that same someday when the justice department planned to break the news that the federal government was going to sue one of the country's largest banks. lead prosecutor for the doj had

been flown in from colorado, a press conference room had been booked in preparation for the announcement that they were going to go after citigroup for its role in the financial crisis. doj hoped the suit would send a clear public message. message that the obama administration was serious about holding wall street accountable. but then at the last minute, prosecutors pulled back. because they feared the benghazi news was taking over the day. so justice department officials decided to postpone filing their suit. this was a suit that had been in the works since citigroup balked at a reported $12 billion settlement demand from the justice department. bank's original offer had been far less gigantic, $360 million. they were at an impasse. the bank was told to be ready for a federal lawsuit. when the benghazi arrest happened, the suit didn't come. and that allowed more time for negotiation, culminating in today's announcement that citigroup will be shelling out $7 billion to pay for their financial sins. this case, knowingly selling investments and bad mortgages that brought the u.s. economy to its knees six years ago now.

settlement includes a record $4 billion. that's $4 billion with a "b." a $4 billion penalty for their misdeeds along with $2.5 billion earmarked for so-called consumer relief. that reportedly will go to helping those struggling to pay their mortgages and to finance affordable housing. today's announcement is the latest of justice department settlements with the big banks. november, jpmorgan chase settled for a landmark $13 billion, a sizable chunk of the tunes and fees that big banks have agreed to pay in the fallout from the credit crisis. "wall street journal" has been keeping a stunning tally of the payouts which top more than $100 billion, that's as of today. bank of america is leading the pack so far having already forked over $56 billion. in various settlements since 2010. and they are still in negotiations with the department of justice about what they owe the federal government. the mortgage settlements are the last of the unfinished business from the collapse of 2008. disaster that caused upwards of

$14 trillion in economic damage, which is an amount of money too abstract, too enormous to comprehend. if we're able to compare that double digit trillion-dollar figure with $100 billion in fees that big banks have paid out, it raises the question of, whether the punishment has fit the crime. have the too big to fail banks made real changes to ensure another crisis is not just around the corner? joining us now, andrew ross sorkin, "the new york times" columnist and co-host of "squawk box" on cnbc. thanks for joining us. >> thanks for having me. >> okay. headline this morning. $7 billion settlement, fine, however you want to phrase that. okay. another headline this afternoon. citi's stock goes up. >> up. >> so, this isn't a real punishment, right? >> it's not a real punishment. look, this is too little, too late. had they wanted to do this in 2009 when homes were being foreclosed upon, perhaps we could argue that this is the right type of thing that happened. but if you really look at what happened here, who's paying this? nobody's going to jail.

the shareholders of citigroup today, not the shareholders who were there, by the way, six, seven, eight years ago, they're the ones that are paying for this. and so, like at this situation, and i say, it looks to me very much like the executives of citigroup using shareholder money, not their own, have effectively bribed the government to say, go away. and on the other side, to some extent, i would argue, if i wanted to argue the other point, i would say, the government clearly not having a case against any individual or at least not deciding to bring one has decided to bribe citigroup and their shareholders so that they can come up with a statement and a press release. >> so what is -- let's look at this. $2.5 billion in consumer relief. that's the -- what does not mean? $2.5 billion sounds like a big -- what does that mean to the consumer? will they feel it? >> no. that's why i said if they had done this five years ago, you could have felt it. what's almost comical about this at this point is that citigroup has very little mortgage business. in fact, they don't have

mortgages to change the structure of. in fact, so much so that what they're doing now, part of the deal, is they're going to subsidi subsidize, effectively, affordable housing, which has basically nothing to do with this case. by the way, the case itself was actually about defrauding investors, it wasn't, oddly enough, about defrauding -- so, i'm not sure -- the punishment fits the crime, i'm not sure the crime -- it's just, the whole thing. >> i mean, it reminds me -- i was saying to somebody earlier it reminds me of a scene from the "sopranos." tony soprano would beat up the guy and throw a couple 20 dollar bills at him. go get your jaw fixed or whatever. it's the money i have to fork over to do what i really want to do. >> i think that's the answer. that's become the cost of doing business. that's what this has become. >> is there any way the government could have extracted more? why is the government settling for so little if citibank -- >> i'm not sure if it's so little. i'm not sure what the right answer is. look, i'm not somebody who believes that corporations are people, to use an overcliched expression. if there's a crime, they should go after the people who are

responsible for the crime and then they should go after the company. >> do you think there were crimes? >> oh, i'm sure there were crimes here. >> why -- what's been the reluctance there? >> i think they went after this too late. they didn't go after this aggressively enough. and ultimately, the crimes that did happen probably were too far down the chain to make the impact that they wanted to in terms of getting that poster boy. that's what they wanted and they don't have it. >> i think holder was saying today there's still the possibility of some kind of criminal -- >> yes, but that's -- >> it's not going to happen, is it? >> it's very difficult to believe. the statute of limitations has kind of run out. the dodd/frank legislation tries to extend it. but anybody who brings a case is going to then, of course, face a whole other legal challenge. just on the fact of whether they can actually bring the case or not. >> so citibank, the other big banks, wall street, five or six years. okay. >> five or six years. >> we've had dodd/frank, all these incremental settlements here and there. right now, has wall street, has the big banks, has citibank

changed in any fundamental way that we can feel good about versus five or six years ago? >> the answer is actually yes. if you asked me two, three years ago i would have said no. but i do think that wall street has changed to a large degree. citigroup looks like a very different firm than it did then. there is less risk being taken in the firm than before. having said that, there are other risks now building up in the system. in other places, frankly, that aren't regulated. and so, will we have another crisis, of course we'll have another crisis. will it be a banking crisis? maybe not. >> the rearview mirror problem. looking at the last thing and forgetting about the thing -- >> the ultimate problem every single time. >> on that optimistic note, andrew ross sorkin -- >> sorry to depress you. >> -- "new york times" columnist, co-host of "squawk box" on cnbc. thanks for being here. okay. let's say you are a democrat, say you're running for office. which party big wig do you want out on the trail with you right now? think about that for a second and ask yourself if you're really sure. we'll explain why just ahead. ♪ in the nation, the safest feature in your car is you.

add vanishing deductible from nationwide insurance and get $100 off for every year of safe driving. which for you, shouldn't be a problem. just another way we put members first, because we don't have shareholders. join the nation. nationwide is on your side. when the pressure's on... only secret offers clinical strength invisible solid and clear gel with 100% odor protection. secret clinical strength. let's show 'em what a breakfast with whole grain fiber can do. one coffee with room, one large mocha latte, medium macchiato, a light hot chocolate hold the whip, two espressos. make one a double. she's full and focused. [ barista ] i have two cappuccinos, one coffee with room, one large mocha latte, a medium macchiato, a light hot chocolate hold the whip, and two espressos -- one with a double shot. heh, heh. that's not the coffee talkin'. [ female announcer ] start your day with kellogg's frosted mini wheats cereal.

with whole wheat goodness on one side and a hint of sweetness on the other, it's a delicious way to get the nutrition you want. take them on the way you always have. live healthy and take one a day men's 50+. a complete multivitamin with 7 antioxidants to support cell health. age? who cares.

there are obvious reasons

that new jersey governor chris christie became a national star in the republican party. years before his prominent leadership in the crisis management of superstorm sandy in 2012, way before his administration became entangled in whatever that was at the george walk washington bridge, before the committees, before the u.s. attorneys, before all the rest of what's been a politically challenging 2014, before all that, there was this chris christie, circa 2010. >> this is who i am. like it or not, you guys are stuck with me for four years and i'm going to say things directly when you ask me questions, i'm going to answer them directly, straightly, bluntly, and nobody in new jersey is going to have to wonder where i am on an issue. >> that was chris christie and he knew it was his political trump card. the idea was no matter what people thought of where he stood on issues, they liked his pugnacious style enough they elected him governor twice. that makes chris christie most recent evolution pretty

remarkable because chris christie has now been out there making news as only a politician like chris christie could, by not letting anyone know what he thinks. now, why would that be the case? the story, coming up. really... so our business can be on at&t's network for $175 dollars a month? yup. all five of you for $175. our clients need a lot of attention. there's unlimited talk and text. we're working deals all day. you get 10 gigabytes of data to share. what about expansion potential? add a line anytime for 15 bucks a month. low dues... great terms... let's close. introducing at&t mobile share value plans... ...with our best-ever pricing for business.

i'm d-a-v-e and i have copd. i'm k-a-t-e and i have copd, but i don't want my breathing problems to get in the way my volunteering. that's why i asked my doctor about b-r-e-o. once-daily breo ellipta helps increase airflow from the lungs for a full 24 hours. and breo helps reduce symptom flare-ups that last several days and require oral steroids, antibiotics, or hospital stay. breo is not for asthma. breo contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. it is not known if this risk is increased in copd. breo won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden copd symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. breo may increase your risk of pneumonia, thrush, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking breo. ask your doctor about b-r-e-o for copd. first prescription free at mybreo.com

car insurance companies say they'll save you by switching, you'd have, like, a ton of dollars. but how are they saving you those dollars? a lot of companies might answer "um" or "no comment." then there's esurance. born online, raised by technology and majors in efficiency. so whatever they save, you save. hassle, time, paperwork, hair-tearing out, and, yes, especially dollars. esurance. insurance for the modern world. now backed by allstate. click or call. esurance. insurance for the modern world. this summer,now go get him. what we're up against. this mission will take precise handling. let's show 'em what it means to be built ford tough. ready to save the world? i'll drive. the ford summer spectacular sales event. now playing at ford dealers everywhere.

heading into the 2008 presidential election, the democratic party did not have a clear, obvious presidential nominee. democrats had a couple of leading choices and the race between them ended up staying close for months. barack obama tended to do better in the states that allotted delegates in a caucus system. hillary clinton did better in the states that had primaries. even though clinton ended up losing overall, there were some states where she just plain shellacked obama and one of those states stands out. at the very end of that campaign when it was clear obama had the delegates he was going to need to win the nomination, even then, he nonetheless lost the west virginia primary to clinton by 41 points. 20% of the voters in west virginia that day actually identified race as a factor in their decision. in 2012, four years later, president obama returned to the democratic primary ballot in west virginia.

this time as the incumbent. this time as the clear favorite with no clinton running against him, with no big-name democrat of any kind running against him. but technically the president wasn't running unopposed in that democratic primary. he was actually running against someone named keith judd of texarkana, texas. by texarkana, texas, that actually means the federal correctional institution in texarkana, texas. because keith judd was a federal prisoner, a convicted felon who was serving a sentence of 210 months for extortion. from behind bars he described himself as, quote, a candidate with conviction. even though he's just a classic political gad fly, keith judd somehow got his name on the ball lot in west virginia in 2012. when he did, he did great. he got 41% of the vote. he didn't win the primary, but he did better in west virginia in 2012 as a convict than barack obama did in 2008 as a united states senator. keith judd, the candidate who was sitting in prison actually

won ten whole counties in that democratic primary. ten whole counties against the president of the united states. he did well enough that he bothered trying to contest the results. or maybe that was just a way of passing time because he was bored. in any case, come november in the general election, president obama lost west virginia to mitt romney by 27 points. the president lost every single county in west virginia. all 55 of them. safe to say that west virginia really, really doesn't like barack obama. now that we are in the heart of this year's midterm election campaign, you can start to see, state by state, where the president is unpopular, at least where he's an iffy proposition politically. sometimes you can see that by direct polling, sometimes you can see it by how the candidates from his own democratic party are reacting to him. in arkansas, democratic senator mark pryor, one of the toughest fights for re-election this year. he's campaigning hard but not with president obama. in colorado, president obama showed up for a fund-raising event last week for democratic

senator mark udall. mark udall was nowhere to be seen. he stayed in washington, which his campaign insisted was not a political decision but sure looked like one in the beltway press. and yesterday in alaska, democratic senator mark begich described himself to the "washington post" as a sharp object sent to the capitol to jab at president obama. quote, sort of, i'll be a thorn in his post posterior." senator begich told the "post," "there's times when i'm a total thorn, you know, and he doesn't appreciate it." it makes a certain pure political sense for democratic politicians to steer clear of his party's president when the president is not popular in their home state especially if you're campaigning in a state that obama lost by a lot. what's interesting, though, is who some of the democrats do think helps them this year. president obama lost in kentucky last time around by 22 points. he is very unpopular in kentucky. so, last month, the democratic hopeful for the senate there

brought in senator elizabeth warren instead. alison lundergan-grimes campaigning with a liberal democrat from massachusetts. warren brought her message to kentucky and was happy to have it. just today, in west virginia, a state where barack obama remains as unpopular as ever, in west virginia, where coal is king and obama is seen as the destroyer, in that state, today, the democratic senate hopeful called on elizabeth warren for help. you won't find her campaigning with president obama. you will find her betting that elizabeth warren will boost her campaign and her brand of populism is still popular. >> you can talk to them about what is at stake in this election. what it means for the families of west virginia. what it means for the future of west virginia. if west virginia decides to send a senator to washington who's going to be there to fight for

wall street. for those who've already made it. or what it will mean for west virginia to have a person who will get up every morning and go to work to absolutely work her heart out for the families of west virginia. i'm here because i believe in democracy. i believe in what we can do together. i believe in natalie tennant. she's going to be your next senator. make it happen. make it happen. make it happen. make it happen. >> elizabeth warren, democrats' surprising new campaign weapon in red states. joining us now, dave boucher, the capitol bureau chief for the "charleston daily mail" in west virginia. dave, thanks for joining us. so, when i look at a state like west virginia, kentucky, a lot of these red states where

control of the senate is sort of going to be determined this year, the prevailing logic there for i don't know how long is, a democrat that wants to win west virginia has to get as far away as humanly possible from anyone who is associated with the national democratic party. make it the west virginia democratic party and not the national democratic party, and now i see elizabeth warren, who is probably tone of the most popular figures in the national democratic party coming to west virginia. what can she do there that no other national democrat can do? >> well, the argument from the tennant campaign is she can come in and be a, quote, champion for the middle class. so, they expect that senator warren's message, and you mentioned it civil tiseveral ti populist message, will resonate with the residents and voters of west virginia. a vast majority or a large amount of west virginia's population relies on some of the welfare or social programs that national democrats tend to promote and historically democrats have, you know, done

very well in the state, and so, they're hoping that senator whateveren's policy stance is on some of these issues will sort of resonate with those vowers as opposed to some of her stances on the president's energy policy. >> so, i mean, the conventional wisdom about this race has been -- this is the senate seat that jay rockefeller, long-serving democrat, he's retiring this year. basically the assumption in washington is that republicans, shelley moore capito, the assumption is, she's going to win the race because west virginia at the federal level has become such a republican state. do you see it that way? >> that's certainly what you'll hear state-level republicans in the capito campaign talk about. the "charleston daily mail" commissioned a poll in may that showed congresswoman capito was up 11 points on secretary of state tennant and there was a consistent message that west virginia is slowly but surely turning into a republican-controlled state.

congresswoman capito has served in the congress since 2000. she's handily defeated her last several opponents. and she's faced similar criticism of being a friend of wall street or being too close with bankers and that didn't really derail any of her previous campaigns. so, i think that the state-level republicans here and the capito campaign are quite confident in where they stand in the race today. >> so how do you think the event went today? i mean, you mentioned it a little bit in the first answer there. i mean, there is some tension where, for instance, one of the reasons president obama is so unpopular in west virginia has to do with coal, has to do with his environment policies. when you get to the idea of moving away from coal, moving away from fossil fuels, elizabeth warren is right there with the president, right there with sort of these environmentalists who politicians in west virginia tend to rail against. certainly natalie tennant being one of them. was there some awkwardness today? was there any tension because of that? >> well, actually, the event

where the senator spoke with secretary tennant was in shepherdstown, which is about as far east as you can get in west virginia. it's approximately six or seven hours from the coal fields region of the state, and so from what i was told, that there was about 450 supporters at the event, and that there were, you know, quite a few people there who agreed with the message according to several media reports and the campaign. today in charleston, congresswoman capito appeared with representative paul ryan at a roundtable event with some local leaders in business, and that was -- the tennant event was also central to that roundtable, pointing out warren's, again, stances on energy policy. >> and so, talk a little bit, if you would, also, just the evolution of west virginia, because it's so fascinating to me. i wonder if there's a state that has swung more dramatically to one party from another in a shorter time than west virginia.

i remember in 1988 michael dukakis getting crushed nationally and still won west virginia. walter mondale almost won west virginia in 1984. and now we're talking about it as, you know, one of the most -- look at all the stuff there we just put out about president obama and his standing in the state. what is behind that? what is behind that shift? >> well, i think some of the rhetoric amongst politicos on both sides of the aisle kind of comes back to just a general feeling that federal policy has shifted away from west virginia families. there are labor unions and teacher unions and just unions in general, had a huge uninfluence in the state for a long time and helped control the state for democrats, but just with shifts, most people point to the coal industry with some declines in the coal industry. people have started to align more with the republicans and typically, or just historically, democrats and a lot of people in

west virginia have had conservative social values and so especially leading up to the presidential campaign of george w. bush, republicans noticed that there could be a chance for some pickups in the state and they have continued to do better and better at the federal level. >> all right. david boucher, capital bureau chief for the "charleston daily mail." i appreciate the time. took a freedom of information request for the public to learn certain details about the central intelligence agency that will probably make you feel closer to america's most famous spying organization than you ever knew you were. stay tuned. woooo.

i know what you're thinking. you're thinking beneful. [announcer]and why wouldn't he be? beneful has wholesome grains,real beef,even accents of spinach,carrots and peas. it has carbohydrates for energy and protein for those serious muscles. [guy] aarrrrr! [announcer]even accents of vitamin-rich veggies. [guy] so happy! you love it so much. yes you do! but it's good for you,too. [announcer] healthful. flavorful. beneful. from purina. nineteen years ago, we thought, "wow, how is there no way to tell the good from the bad?" so we gave people the power of the review. and now angie's list is revolutionizing local service again. you can easily buy and schedule services from top-rated providers. conveniently stay up to date on progress. and effortlessly turn your photos into finished projects with our snapfix app. visit angieslist.com today.

♪ (vo) ours is a world of the red-eyes. (daughter) i'm really tired. (vo) the transfers. well, that's kid number three. (vo) the co-pilots. all sitting... ...trusting... ...waiting...

...for a safe arrival. introducing the all-new subaru legacy. designed to help the driver in you... ...care for the passenger in them. the subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. could help your business didavoid hours of delaynd test it's not just a sedan. caused by slow internet from the phone company? that's enough time to record a memo. idea for sales giveaway. return a call. sign a contract. pick a tie. take a break with mr. duck. practice up for the business trip. fly to florida.

win an award. close a deal. hire an intern. and still have time to spare. check your speed. see how fast your internet can be. switch now and add voice and tv for $34.90. comcast business. built for business. new jersey governor chris christie's battles with his state's supreme court are borderline legendary. his efforts to shift the balance of that court have been some of the most impassioned and most covered clashes in new jersey politics these last few years. after all, this new jersey state supreme court has long enjoyed a reputation as one of the most liberal state supreme courts in america which has long made it a favorite punching bag for republicans in new jersey. including chris christie. >> as a fundamental principle, i do not believe that it is the role of the state supreme court to determine what programs the state should and should not be funding. the court should not be dictating how taxpayer dollars

are spent and prioritizing certain programs over others. the supreme court is not the legislature. i've read the opinion, i've read both the majority opinion, the dissenting opinion. i think that what it is once again is an example of liberal activist judges running amok. i don't think the ruling was appropriate. i think it was wrong. i think it's typical of the problem we see in the new jersey supreme court and it's just another example of judicial supremacy rather than having the government run by the people we actually vote for. so i thought it was a bad decision. >> suffice to say there is no love lost between governor christie and his state's supreme court. when the court hasn't ruled the way he wants, he has had zero problem airing his grievances. airing them loudly and repeatedly. so, given how much he's railed against his own state supreme court decisions, when christie was asked recently for his thoughts on the u.s. supreme

court's hobby lobby ruling, you'd probably figure he had a strong opinion or two. >> was the supreme court right in its decision? >> who knows? it's a supreme court right. the fact is that when you're an executive, your supreme court makes a ruling and you've got to live with it unless you can get the legislative body to change the law or change the constitution. >> chris christie of all people saying, when your supreme court makes a decision, you've got to live with it. that's a new one coming from him. although, actually, the idea of ducking a tough political question, the idea of avoiding a potentially sensitive political issue, that does seem to be something that christie's doing a lot of these days. seems like maybe it's his new strategy. >> i've got a whole range of very different opinions on different subjects. i believe i'm a conservative. but there will be other people that say, no, he's a moderate. there's other people in my state who say, he's crazy, he's too far right. the point is, why should i give an opinion whether they're right or wrong. at the end of the day, they did what they did. this is the way you get bogged

down of those things. you know what? i don't think that's the most central issue we need to talk about when you look at the challenges that face our country. if i allow people to put me into that box, shame on me, i'm not a good politician, i'm in the a good leader. >> well, what this really sounds like, of course, is a guy who's getting ready to run for president. a guy who wants to walk the fence to avoid chasing the base and saying something that will haunt him in a general election for president. it's the same formula he used when he was approaching the debate over syria, as well as the debate over immigration. many people assume that bridgegate has sealed chris christie's political fate, there's one person who thinks he's very much in the 2016 mix and his name is chris christie. kid: hey dad, who was that man?

dad: he's our broker. he helps looks after all our money. kid: do you pay him? dad: of course. kid: how much? dad: i don't know exactly. kid: what if you're not happy? does he have to pay you back? dad: nope. kid: why not? dad: it doesn't work that way. kid: why not? vo: are you asking enough questions about the way your wealth is managed? wealth management at charles schwab you knowm... (vo) you know that dream... where you're the hero? hey... you guys mind warming this fella up for me? i'm gonna go back down, i saw some recyclables.

make it happen with verizon xlte. find a car service. we've doubled our 4g lte bandwidth in cities coast to coast. thanks! sure. we've got a spike in temperature. so save the day... don't worry, i got this... oh yeah, i see your spaceship's broken. with xlte on largest, most reliable network. get 50% off smartphones like the new lg g3. looki prefer today.eeks? clairol age defy color collection. with our best breakthrough gray coverage. lustruous, radiant color that looks 10 years younger. today. age defy color from clairol. at every ford dealership, you'll find the works! it's a complete checkup of the services your vehicle needs. so prepare your car for any road trip

by taking it to an expert ford technician. because no matter your destination good maintenance helps you save at the pump. get our multi-point inspection with a synthetic blend oil change, tire rotation, brake inspection and more for $29.95 or less. get a complete vehicle checkup only at your ford dealer. i make a lot of purchases foand i get ass. lot in return with ink plus from chase. like 50,000 bonus points when i spent $5,000 in the first 3 months after i opened my account. and i earn 5 times the rewards on internet, phone services and at office supply stores. with ink plus i can choose how to redeem my points. travel, gift cards, even cash back. and my rewards points won't expire. so you can make owning a business even more rewarding. ink from chase. so you can. i work for the cia.

i am not a spy. i just read books. >> as robert redford in the vastly underrated '70s spy thriller "three days of the condor." his character code named condor is a cia researcher who suddenly and quite unexpectedly finds his quiet office job has turned into a mysterious and murderous whodunit wherein he has to both outrun and outsmart the bad guys whose identity he doesn't know or understand, avoid detection, and get faye dunaway to be his girlfriend. and because this was the '70s, redford achieves it all, but he's still left disillusioned and uncertain whether in the grand scheme of things he's really succeeded. it was a really philosophical movie. this movie has one thing in common with every other spy movie that's ever been made, in that the cia agent is unflappable. rattled by nothing, adept even under the scariest circumstances. you know the type. crack foreign encryptions and

successfully avoid a shoot-out at your secret cia offices, of course. commandeer a cop car with four armed officers inside then drive that same car while handcuffed, no sweat. pop culture has consistently portrayed cia agents as the definition of cool under pressure. so it raises the question, what actually does get under the cia's skin? what irks them, what eats at them, what unsettles the nerves of these masters of composure? is there anything big enough, anything scary enough, anything dangerous enough to make them lose their cool? well, today we found out. "the jazz salad was supposed to be a sonoma grape and prosciutto salad. this is one of my favorites so i stand in line and notice there are no grapes. grapes are in the title of the salad. i asked them about it and the server pointed to the cherry tomatoes and said they're red grapes. i said, no, those are tomatoes. so should i just get grapes from the salad bar? she didn't give an opinion but i

did get grapes from the salad bar." all starting to unfold like a real novel, isn't it? here's another. "as of late there seems to be a shortage of almonds for the breakfast cereal such as oatmeal, cream of wheat. i'm sure i'm speaking for myself as well as others when i kindly request whomever is responsible for ordering food supplies note the level of usage and increase the almond purchases/supplies as appropriate." thanks to the freedom of information act and the rise of day journalism, we now have access to all kinds of information that otherwise probably would have never seen the light of day. and today, that means that we all now know that the cafeteria at the cia is pretty much just like the cafeteria at any other office cubicle farm in america. muckrock posted this set of documents awhile back and today they reposted them so a bunch of people including us found it for the first time. it is a treasure trove of cia employee complaints specifically about the office cafeteria. this is the stuff that rattles them.

"please put back the individual packets of ketchup, mustard, and mayonnaise. two times this the week i heard folks make comments about these pump boxes. comments have been made indicating this process is cumbersome, a pain in the neck, is causing frustration by some people. it would be appreciated by many to put out the individual condiment packets." "i had the russian meal today and am disappointed. first of all to try to be cute with a substitute, a backward "r," it's tacky. please realize many of us have really traveled to these countries and when you provide food like you did today, it causes me to not support this kind of cuisine in the future." "i have talked to numerous cafe employees to inform them the pepsi coming out of the regular pepsi spout is diet pepsi. they have the wrong pepsi tank hooked up to the wrong pepsi spout, yet no one has fixed this problem." feedback isn't all bad. this person thanks the cafeteria for fixing the salad dressing area. the one thing to learn from this cache of cia office complaints

is all these folks need, when they're not in the middle of some covert operation or drumming up classified intelligence briefing, is almonds on their cream of wheat, a few ketchup packets, maybe a regular pepsi. >> i think we're making broadcasting history tonight. i believe this is the first time steve kornacki has been more formally dressed on tv than i am. >> it's primetime, baby. the republican mayor of bellhaven, north carolina, begged, he just begged his state legislature and governor to accept the medicaid expansion in the affordable care act. because the mayor knew that without it, his local hospital would close. now that hospital is closed. and that mayor is marching from north carolina to washington, d.c. in protest. we join him on that 273-mile walk tonight.