allow impeachment. that's the sort of -- >> everyone understands that history. >> and the thing is, the democrats, they love it as a fund-raising tool. they would love it if republicans actually impeached the president. that would be a huge political victory for the -- >> it would be a political victory but real consequence. >> it would be a shame for our country. >> ben jealous, msnbc contributor josh barro. that is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" begins now. that was the best on-set debate i've seen on cable for a long time. >> thanks very much. >> good guests, good host. thanks to you for joining us the next hour. if you or someone know especially if it's a fancy new model jeep cherokee with the fierce buck tooth front end i really like, there's a pretty good chance if you know somebody who owns one of these sweet new jeep cherokees, there's a good chance it was built here. at the toledo assembly complex. which is on chrysler drive in

toledo, ohio. this plant is more than 300 acres. that campus 300 acres. the floor space is more than 3.5 million square feet. but you know what? if all of the things that you know and believe in the world are things you know and believe because you saw them in american political ads, that plant should not exist. that plant does exist. it's doing great. they're making jeep cherokees at that plant right now this very second. they're making so many of them, they're operating even with a third shift. they're making them at night, they're making them right now. toward the end of the last presidential election campaign in this country, one of the signs things were getting desperate and weird in that campaign, when the republican nominee for president, mitt romney, went to ohio, he went to the football stadium at defiance high school an hour outside toledo, an hour from that plant and he said something totally untrue about that plant and the jeeps that were being made there. >> i saw a story today that one of the great manufacturers in this state, jeep, now owned by the italians, is thinking of moving all production to china.

>> he's an hour outside toledo, where thousands of people are employed at this huge plant making jeeps. and mitt romney gets up there right before the election and he says, you know what, all jeep production is being shut down in the united states of america. we're not going to make jeeps in this country anymore. it's all moving to china. what? and this is not some esoteric trade statement, right? everybody understandably freaks out. thousands of people work for chrysler in ohio making jeeps. there were probably people in the audience hearing him that night who worked at that plant and mitt romney gives this speech in ohio, he says all the jeep plants in america are shutting down. he shocks the ohio press by saying this. he then makes a tv out of it when he doubles down on it. and the thing is, it was completely made up. i mean, the ohio press, naturally, tried to follow up on

this bombshell news from mitt romney, so they went and asked chrysler, hey, mitt romney says you're shutting down all jeep production in the united states. you're moving it all to china. is that true? if so, why are we learning it from this guy, mitt romney, and not learning it from you? here's chrysler's response. "jeep production will not be moved from the united states to china." and then, again, reiterating, "jeep has no intention of shifting production of its jeep models out of north america to china." but mitt romney would not take it back. i mean, he gave this speech. he's now running ads about it, reiterating the claim. finally chrysler kind of loses its mind about the whole thing and has their spokesman tell the press, "we have clearly entered some parallel universe. at this stage, we are looking at hubbell telescope-like distances between campaign ads and reality." that jeep plant in ohio that mitt romney said was about to close down the italians were going to shut it down and move it to china, that plant not only stayed open but this past march they added 1,000 more jobs. that all happened at a kind of

weird time in the campaign. the stuff about the jeep plant closing down, that wasn't really closing down, that was at the same time the romney campaign had sent out former senator norm coleman to go tell people, tell audiences around the country that mitt romney had no interest in overturning roe v. wade. at the same time, mitt romney, himself, was telling people that if he had the chance to, he would be delighted to overturn roe v. wade. he actually used the word "delighted" which somehow made it a more awkward thing for a campaign surrogate to have to lie about. that was also the time in the campaign when the romney folks started re-airing something from earlier in the campaign. something that it sort of felt like first time around it had hurt them. it had been debunked and debunked and debunked a million times over to the point where it actually felt like this provably false thing they had earlier campaigned on was hurting them because it was so obviously untrue. it led to this narrative that the romney campaign and mr. romney, himself, just couldn't

be trusted that they didn't tell the truth. in the sort of desperation of the late summer of the presidential campaign, in august of the campaign year that year, the romney campaign went back to their famously debunked ads about welfare. these first surfaced around the time that the political class was fixated in washington about how badly mitt romney needed to win basically all white voters in the country. in august, the "national journal's" ron brownstein did the math on turnout and democrat graphics and voter registration and came up with this bombshell conclusion. he found in white people were going to make up the same proportion of the electorate in 2012 as they had in the previous election, mitt romney was going to have to win 61% of the votes of all white people voting in the election. 61%. that means he would need to get a higher proportion of the white vote than john mccain did in 2008, higher proportion of the white vote than george w. bush got in either 2004 or in 2000. bob dole did not win the election the year that he ran, but he did pretty well with white people.

mitt romney would need to beat the bob dole share of the vote with white people by 15 points. he'd need to win more of the white vote than poppy bush did either time he ran when he lost or upon. he'd need a higher proportion of the white vote than any republican candidate elected in the last 28 years. 61% of all white people had to vote for mitt romney for him to win. this freaked out washington basically and freaked out the romney campaign. turns out rightfully so. that analysis said that mitt romney would need to get 61% of the white vote in order to win the presidency. ultimately, he didn't get 61%. he got 59% of the white vote and he did lose the presidency. he lost the election. and two years ago in august, when this prescient analysis first came out, the romney campaign responded by taking a sort of jarring turn toward race issues, toward the sort of coded racial campaign tactics that are awkward for anybody but were particularly awkward with them. it's an awkward thing to try to juice white turnout because everybody can tell what you're doing.

that was the time in the campaign when mitt romney took a brief turn into making birther jokes. do you remember that? remember when mitt romney did that for a little while? this was him talking in michigan in front of a mostly white crowd. >> i love being home in this place where ann and i were raised. where both of us were born. ann was born in henry ford hospital. i was born at harper hospital. no one's ever asked to see my birth certificate. they know this is the place we were born and raised. >> yeah, yeah. i get it. you definitely look like an american president. if you know what i mean. nobody's ever asked you for your birth certificate, huh? says the man whose father was born in mexico. not an issue, though, for him, if you know what i mean. if you know why i mean.

yeah. not subtle. but if you are trying to get your share of the white vote up to 61%, sometimes you have to be unsubtle and sometimes you have to be awkward. that was the same time when mitt romney first started running what became known at least around my office, in which i sit alone, as his aggrieved white worker ads. he and his campaign made up a particularly insidious lie about the obama administration. and they hoped it would resonate with very specific voters for very obvious reasons. >> in 1996, president clinton and a bipartisan congress helped end welfare as we know it. by requiring work for welfare. but on july 12th, president obama quietly announced a plan to gut welfare reform by dropping work requirements. under obama's plan, he wouldn't have to work and wouldn't have to train for a job. they just send you your welfare check. and welfare to work goes back to being plain old welfare. mitt romney will restore the work requirement because it works. >> i'm mitt romney, and i approve this message. >> the aggrieved white worker

ads. he's mitt romney and these are the aggrieved white workers. featuring in the romney ad about welfare. and that ad, the central allegation in that ad was not just wrong, it was the opposite of the truth. it was one of those moments in the campaign when everybody who looked at that ad and that central assertion in the ad agreed that what mitt romney was saying is something that didn't happen. this allegation about taking away the work requirements from welfare, it's just not true. the obama administration had never dropped the work requirements from welfare. to the contrary, they said yes to a group of republican governors and democratic governors who had asked for flexibility in administering welfare funds at the state level. the white house agreed to give the states this leeway on the condition that the work requirement would not be weakened. that's what they did. states could change up the welfare rules as long as they moved more people off of welfare and on to work, not fewer. so the romney campaign was

running their aggrieved white worker ads. alleging the opposite of something that president obama did. right? they're saying president obama doesn't want you to work. he wants to send you a check. he's a welfare president, not the work president. are you working? president obama wants to steal your money and give it to lazy welfare recipients. that's the claim. wow. the romney campaign needed 61% of the white vote. and they loved that welfare ad. no matter how untrue it was. and that late august, they were running a dozen ads in total. most of the ads they were running were on the welfare issue which they made up. they were running more ads on that than health care, more than the economy, more than the single ad they ran introducing paul ryan as their vice presidential nominee. they did the welfare thing more than anything a that time loved this welfare ad though it was completely false. i mean, when mitt romney had been governor of massachusetts, he had been one of the governors who signed on to the letter to the white house asking for that flexibility on welfare. he'd been one of the guys. i mean, when that letter came out, that turned the debunking on this thing up to stun. i mean, not only were they describing the opposite of what

really happened, but mitt romney was personally involved in it. and there's his signature in black and white. but they did not care. they tried it anyway. sure, it was false, but maybe it would energize enough white people to get out and vote republican anyway. it was an ugly time in the presidential campaign. and today, it's back. in "usa today" republican house speaker john boehner has just run an op-ped explaining why he and house republicans are filing a lawsuit against president obama. the speaker says in his op-ped, "president obama has overstepped his constitutional authority. i believe the president's actions in a number of areas exceed his constitutional authority including waiving the work requirements in welfare." he never waived the work requirements in welfare. ever. he did the opposite. and what he did was at the request of republican governors, anyway. this has been totally litigated,

totally debunked. the romney campaign tried it, didn't work. the republicans are apparently going back to this stuff now. they're going back to this stuff from the bad old days of national campaigning against president obama when they were trying to maximize the aggrieve the white vote, right? trying to tap into, or this case make up things for white voters to be aggrieved about about this president. the whole idea behind the welfare claim in the first place for mitt romney, newt gingrich's main contribution to the presidential campaign that year against president obama which was newt gingrich calling president obama the food stamps president. that was subtle. there was the point in the campaign where we got rick santorum talking about bla people, definitely not black people being given other people's money, he was talking about bla people being given other people's money. remember? >> and i've looked at all the economic plans, but president obama wants to do, his economic plan is to make more people dependent upon the government. i don't want to make bla

people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money. i want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money and provide for themselves and their families. >> these bla people sound terrible. who are these moocher bla people, rick santorum? who do you mean? >> i've looked at that quote. in fact, i looked at the video, and i don't -- in fact, i'm pretty confident i didn't say black. what i think i started to say a word, and sort of blah, sort of mumbled it and changed my thought. but i don't recall saying black. i was start to say one word and i sort of came up with a different word and moved on, and it sounded like black. >> sounded like black, but -- the blah, the blah. let me reiterate. the bla people. those were the bad old days of republicans trying to maximize the white vote against president obama. maximize white voters' grievances against president obama. i have to say, in reality, those were -- i can say those were the bad old days, but that was just

the latest round of that. right? that was two years ago. they roll out stuff like this periodically whenever they're strategizing against the president and think that white people are the key to how they can succeed. it is now happening again with them bringing back out the welfare lie to justify why they are suing president obama. suing president obama is kind of the main thing on their plate right now. this is the house republicans' work schedule from now until the election. you can see july is in the upper left hand corner there. this is the last week of july. this week they're finishing up the only significant block of work they're doing, not just between now and the election but between now and the end of the year. this month is the only time they've actually worked part of four consecutive weeks in one month. when they two home on thursday of this week, this is their work plan for august. look, there's no work days in it. then the no working continues all the way through the first

week of september. they work a grand total of ten days in the entire month of september. then in october, they work a grand total of two days. and then there's nothing at all until after the election. america, this is the best reason to run for congress. this is the world's greatest work schedule. so they're about to leave for a full month plus a week, plus a little bit more. and we're going to talk this hour about what conceivably might get done in congress before they leave this week for the whole rest of the summer. but we know from beltway reporting and from the house republicans' own statements that the only thing they see as a must-pass bill before they leave is their bill to authorize suing the president. and historically unprecedent lawsuit, unprecedented lawsuit against the president. and maybe they will pass some other stuff, but apparently this is their only must-do. and honestly, big picture, there has been some stuff getting done in washington over this summer. we spent a lot of time on the show earlier this summer and in the late spring talking about the oil trains that keep blowing up all over north america.

these apparently unsafe rail cars shipping really volatile oil particularly from the north dakota oil fields then derailing and crashing and blowing up all over the place. the transportation department did announce new rules including a timetable for getting the rail cars off the rails. it's a timetable more aggressive than the plans canada did after their terrible oil train explosion in quebec last year. the thing about the new rail cars, that just happened. it's in its public comment period now, but the department of transportation has acted aggressively. the u.s. sentencing commission which was created by congress but is not congress, they're a nonpartisan sort of technocratic group that looks at sentencing policies. they're getting something done. they voted unanimously to basically reset prison sentences for drug crimes. federal prison sentences for drug crimes have already been changed for anybody who's sentenced now. sentenced today. but the sentencing commission voted to apply those changes retroactively to people who are already in prison. it's going to have a really big effect on federal prisons and frankly on issues of justice and fairness in this country. they voted unanimously to do that and unless congress acts to

screw that up, that will go into effect next year. so the oil trains things got done. the sentencing commission thing which is going to have a huge impact, that got done. president obama also moved on his own to ban federal contractors from firing people on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. that discrimination protection applies to millions of people. the president was able to do that on his own. it's not like nothing's been going on this summer. some big stuff, consequential big policy stuff has happened in washington this summer, and it's been happening in washington over the past couple of weeks and months, and the problem is that none of in is happening in congress. and congress, as we tick tock, tick tock down to the last couple of days, they're going to be there for the whole rest of the summer and the last sustained period of time that

they're going to be there at work for the whole rest of the year, as congress finishes now, having done nothing, having done less than any other congress in the modern history of congress. they appear to mostly be motivated right now with their own efforts and their own desire to tell the president that he should stop doing stuff, too. and there's their lawsuit. there was this rally outside the white house today. people who want immigration reform holding, in effect, a big cheerful rally telling the president to go big on immigration. telling the president to act unilaterally to reform the immigration system. as that was happening outside the white house today, republican senator jefferson sessions iii insisted inside congress if congress is going to do anything at all on immigration, on the spike at kids at the border, caring for those kids, money for border control, yet alone immigration policy, he insisted if congress is going to do anything at all, anything congress passes, he says, must also include language prohibiting president obama from issuing more executive actions on immigration laws.

", no member, house or senate, democrat or republican, should support any bill with respect to the border crisis that does not include language explicitly prohibiting the administration from taking such action. congress must disclose authority of these unlawful actions before congressional funding is granted." that's what happened today in congress on the border and immigration. we probably aren't going to do anything, but if we do do something, it's going to be ensure that you do nothing, too. ta-da! in a normal congress, in a normal democracy, what the two sides are supposed to fight about, what the two sides are supposed to disagree about and then fight about through politics is policy. what we have right now instead is a congress that is not actually proposing policy on immigration and lots of other issues. they don't necessarily have policy that they want. what they are proposing is that president obama can't have one, either. i've always had that issue with the seeds getting under my denture. super poligrip free --

it creates a seal of the dentures in my mouth. even well-fitting dentures let in food particles. super poligrip is zinc free. with just a few dabs, it's clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. super poligrip free made the kiwi an enjoyable experience. [ charlie ] try zinc free super poligrip. made the kiwi an enjoyable experience. which is why he's investing ain his heart health by eatingw. kellogg's raisin bran ® good morning dad. hi, sweetie. here's another eye opener, not only is kellogg's raisin bran ® heart healthy, but its a delicious source of potassium. mom make you eat that? i happen to like raisins. now that's what i'm talkin' about. invest in your heart health.

yyyup. with xfinity internet witsoyour family can usean ®. all their devices at once. works anywhere in the house. even in the garage. max what's going on? we're doing a tech startup. we're streamlining an algorithm. we're going public! [cheering] the fastest in-home wifi for your entire family. the x-1 entertainment operating system. only from xfinity. this is bill. his doubleheader day at the park starts with back pain... and a choice. take 4 advil in a day or just 2 aleve for all day relief. peanuts! peanuts! crowd cheers! car insurance companies say they'll save you by switching, you'd have, like, a ton of dollars. but how are they saving you those dollars? a lot of companies might answer "um" or "no comment." then there's esurance. born online, raised by technology and majors in efficiency. so whatever they save, you save. hassle, time, paperwork, hair-tearing out, and, yes, especially dollars.

esurance. insurance for the modern world. now backed by allstate. click or call. esurance. insurance for the modern world. "i've still got it" when you think aarp, then you don't know "aarp". life reimagined gives you tools and support to get the career you'll love. find more real possibilities at aarp.org/possibilities ultimately what we want to do is see the president follow the laws, but the president took an oath to faithfully execute the laws of this land, and he's not. we've made it clear, we're going to put options on the table to allow, to allow the house to take legal action against the

president when he overreaches his authority. >> when eric cantor, the number two house republican, was beat in his republican primary earlier this summer, the number two, the number two was out, so the number three guy, kevin mccarthy, moved up to replace eric cantor. republican congressman steve scalise is the new number three guy who moved in to replace kevin mccarthy then eric cantor. it was his job to talk about how house republicans are to bring a historically unprecedented lawsuit against president obama. joining us, david nakamora, white house reporter for the "washington post." thank you very much for being with us. i appreciate your time. >> thanks, rachel. >> what does congress have to do legislatively in order for this house lawsuit to go ahead? do they need to pass a bill to make it happen? >> they do. i think they're voting on thursday on this, and it looks very likely this is going to go forward very easily. as you have been saying, this is something that galvanized. i covered the white house. it's something president obama is talking about, himself. he brings it up when he goes and talks around the country where he's talking to sort of ordinary residents and people and saying, why does the congress want -- why do the house republicans want to bring a lawsuit against me? it's because of sort of acting

where i can because they're not helping. why can't they join me? i think the white house looking at this as something that's going to backfire on republicans, going to go too far, and the white house is okay to talk about it. they really think ordinary people around the country do not want to talk about this, do not want to talk about benghazi. they want to talk about getting things done. they want to talk about pocketbook issues and the president is talking about even though they're small scale, all those executive actions that he's taking in. >> terms of what's going to happen between now and the end of this week, when congress leaves for really a quite remarkable vacation, they're going to be gone for a month plus a week, plus some more. it is interesting to me that they're essentially treating the lawsuit bill, the bill to authorize the lawsuit, as must-pass legislation. is there anything else of any substantive significance that really is must-pass? not something they want to pass or they'll try to get to, but they will definitely get done before they leave? >> that's a big one. the one they're going to put a lot of attention on.

there is today a development, looks likely there might be some kind of agreement on the veteran administration, how to reform that. the republicans rightly so enacted a political price from president obama who fired eric shinseki when it became public there were long delays for veteran care. there's a lot of confidence right now in congress this actually could go forward on a veterans bill that would spend $17 billion to speed up processing time, allow veterans to go outside the system if they don't get care and allow those employees who don't act properly to be fired more quickly, more accountability. that's something i think republicans are looking at. we need to support this. we've got that political price already. and this is thing that we can do to support veterans which is going to play well certainly among their base. other than that, though, the

lawsuit is the biggest and most exciting for republicans. obviously there's a crisis on the border and republicans are wrestling in their own caucus with how to address that. the president put the big plan out there. the senate is having trouble getting democrats on to the amount they want to spend. the republicans scaled way back on the amount they want to spend to just $1 billion, well under what president obama said is needed and they also want to change the 2008 law that provides more protection to these minors which has been very controversial among human rights group, immigrant advocates. the white house has sort of tacitly supported something like that. that will be a big signal whether john boehner can get that through the house this week and look like they're attacking what everybody agrees is a humanitarian crisis of these kids. >> i know i should not ask you this because of what your job is. you can shut me down if i shouldn't. my sense is, from the way you have described it, is you don't think it is likely they'll be able to pass something on the border that will actually become law even if they could pass it through the house. am i right in surmising that? >> you're absolutely right. i've been focused a lot on this. it doesn't look likely it's going to happen before recess. in september, they're going to

have to deal with spending bills and it's really unlikely they're going to have enough time. that's a big problem. i don't know what the white house sort of plan "b" is. they're running out of money at border patrol and i.c.e. for internal enforcement and that could be a real problem as these kids continue to come and need services. >> david nakamura, white house reporter for the "washington post." very clarifying. thanks very much. i appreciate it. >> thanks, rachel. >> we're going to have much more on the issue he was just talking about in terms of a possible deal on the va. that's coming up. plus, day one of what is turning out to be an amazing criminal trial on the edge of politics in virginia. stay with us. lots ahead. captain obvious: i probably wouldn't stay here tonight. man: thanks, captain obvious. captain obvious: i'd get a deal for tonight with deals for tonight from hotels.com. and you might want to get that pipe fixed. funtil to keep growing, theys hneeded a new factory,, but where? fortunately, they get financing from ge capital. we're part of ge, a company that's built hundreds of factories. so we can bring in experts to help them evaluate costs,

incentives, and zoning to make a decision that would make their founder proud. if you just need a loan, just call a bank. at ge capital, we're builders. and what we know, can help you grow. looks like we're about to board. mm-hmm. i'm just comparing car insurance rates at progressive.com. is that where they show the other guys' rates, too? mm-hmm. cool. yeah. hi. final boarding call for flight 294. [ bells ring on sign ] [ vehicle beeping ] who's ready for the garlic festival? this guy! bringing our competitors' rates to you -- now, that's progressive. celebrate your love of crab with gthis year's largest variety!. 'cause it's crabfest at red lobster! dig into a succulent selection of crab entrées. like new crab lover's trio! with sweet snow crab legs, split king crab, and jumbo lump crab over savory shrimp. crab three ways! all on one plate.

or try new jumbo lump crab over wood-grilled salmon. experience crabfest at red lobster today. only for a limited time. come in and sea food differently! the summer that summers from here on will be compared to. so get out there, and get the best price guaranteed. find it for less and we'll match it and give you $50 toward your next trip. expedia. find yours.

so friday night on this show, senator bernie sanders of vermont told us despite reports of fighting, in order to merge the house bill and senate bill to merge something for the va, he said he and jeff miller were planning to work through the weekend to try to reach a compromise. turns out that bit of overtime may have paid off. today, senator sanders and congressman jeff miller announced that they have reached some sort of deal. the proposed $17 billion legislation contains many of the same provisions that were passed by both houses of congress six weeks ago. including a provision to allow veterans who live far from a va facility, or can't get a timely appointment at their local one, to two to a private doctor for

care instead. the legislation would also let the va hire more medical personnel. so why didn't this happen six weeks ago when the senate passed their bill with 93 votes and everybody said it could two to the president's desk basically in this form? who knows. six weeks' delay for the sake of six weeks' delay. tom tarantino, chief policy officer of iraq and afghanistan veterans of america, he said today about the deal, "it's about time they're doing their jobs. still, though, you don't get a medal for doing your job." and to be clear, that job is nowhere near done yet. congressman jeff miller says he expects members of the conference committee to sign off on this legislation tonight. but if that happens tonight, it still then has to be filed in the house because it still requires a full vote in both the house and in the senate before it can go to the president's desk. and all of that needs to happen before all of congress skips town on thursday. so, yeah, progress, but still. tick tock.

ugh. heartburn. did someone say burn? try alka seltzer reliefchews. they work just as fast and taste better than tums smoothies assorted fruit. mmm. amazing. yeah, i get that a lot. alka seltzer heartburn reliefchews. enjoy the relief.

eachwon't have a claim.wners that's why allstate claim free rewards gives you money back for every year you don't have one. and why if you're part of the other 5%, allstate offers claim rateguard. so your rates won't go up just because of a claim. no matter what comes your way, your home protects you. ...protect it back allstate home insurance from an allstate agent. aaron burr was vice president of the united states, the third vp we ever had. the reason everybody remembers aaron burr is, of course, because of the duel. he was a former vice president and in a duel he shot the former treasury secretary alexander hamilton. they both shot at each other but burr's was the shot that actually him hamilton and that's how alexander hamilton died.

that was 1804. aaron burr survived the duel, but then a couple years later he was arrested for treason. they arrested him in alabama. he was accused of plotting with spain to take over some of the territory that spain controlled here and then use it to create an independent republic. separate from the united states. in 1807 they hauled aaron burr up to richmond, virginia, to try him for treason on the creating the new country charges. tried him in the u.s. circuit court in richmond, virginia. ultimately aaron burr was acquitted of treason but the proceedings took months. aaron burr would have been executed if he was convicted. it was a huge trial at the federal court in richmond, virginia. that was 1807. 60 years after that, 1867, that same federal court in richmond

came up with another trial that was just as spectacular. it was the arraignment of the former president of the confederate states of america. jefferson davis. they first tried to pin the assassination of president lincoln on him but they settled for trying him for treason. the initial imprisonment and arraignment of jefferson davis on treason charges took place in richmond, virginia, and the jury in that trial was the very first racially integrated jury in virginia history. look at that. seven black men and five white men. the first integrated jury in virginia. ultimately that integrated jury never had to reach a verdict because the charges against jefferson davis were dropped. the federal court in richmond, virginia, has seen its share of drama, right? of high-stakes, hive profile proceedings involving very high-profile politicians. but today, the aaron burr trial and the jefferson davis trial are being cited by the local press in virginia in their crime news section as the relevant local precedence for the level of spectacle that people are expecting from the federal courthouse in richmond today. from the new trial that began at that courthouse today.

former governor bob mcdonnell of virginia and his wife facing basically life in prison if they're convicted on all the 14 felony counts they were charged with in january. it's a big raft of charges, but basically the allegation is corruption. that they conspired to enrich themselves in exchange for committing official acts. the case concerns a virginia businessman named johnny williams who was pushing a couple of tobacco-related supplements. while serving as governor of virginia, the indictment says bob mcdonnell asked the state health secretary to meet with that businessman and discuss his products. that meeting then happened. governor mcdonnell also asked the state health secretary to arrange another meeting at the executive mansion with somebody from the state health department and that businessman, again, to discuss his products. at the governor's mansion, governor mcdonnell hosted and spoke at a launch party for one of the businessman's new products. at a dinner in richmond, governor mcdonnell reportedly

attended that dinner and it was aimed at persuading doctors to recommend another one of the businessman's products. the governor spoke in favor of the product at the event and approved the company then using photos of him as governor speaking at their events. the governor's wife spoke at at least four similar promotional events for the businessman and his supplements all around the country. at a meeting with one of his own cabinet secretaries, governor mcdonnell allegedly pulled a bottle of the businessman's supplement out of his pocket and told that cabinet official he was meeting with that she should meet with the businessman and his company. why did the governor and his wife do all that stuff for this one businessman and his wacky tobaccy non-fda approved supplements? maybe it was out of the kindness of their hearts, maybe it was outs of the development interests that this man represented. maybe it's because the governor is a pices. maybe because the same businessman gave governor mcdonnell and his wife a catered chicken dinner for the governor's daughter's wedding, $10,000 for the wedding of the governor's other dollars.

airline travel for a bachelorette party. cape cod, including a yacht, private cottage. vacation at a boat house including a boat rented for their use during the stay and $190,000 white ferrari for governor mcdonnell to drive while there and on his way home. shopping sprees for the first lady. $5,695 at louis vuitton. and over $2,600 at bergdorf goodman. nice. more than $7,000 in golf. greens fees. golf equipment. food and drink consumed on the golf course at an exclusive golf resort to which the governor and his sons did not belong but where they played frequently and enjoyed themselves on the tab of that businessman. how about also a $6,500 rolex watch for mr. mcdonnell inscribed, "the 71st governor of virginia." also, i should not leave out a

$50,000 check made out to maureen mcdonnell, first lady. another $70,000 in checks made out to the real estate company that bob mcdonnell operated with his sister. should i go on? there was definitely quid and definitely quo. the mcdonnell defense is the two sides of the ledger are totally unrelated. there was no quid pro quo. but the trial started in richmond today. they picked their jury. all in one day. the list of exhibits the prosecution plans to offer is an amazing thing. apparently, for example, we may at this trial get to see not just pictures of the oscar de la renta sweater but the actual sweater, the actual golf clubs, the actual famous engraved rolex and, "photos of robert mcdonnell driving johnny williams' ferrari." oh, please, it's not quite aaron burr being tried for treason. what got under way in richmond, virginia, today, is a spectacle. ever since the "washington post" broke the story last march, the revelations never stopped.

today, the "washington post" broke new news, today, about how even while they were on their way out of office in virginia, with this federal indictment coming down on them, the first lady of the great state of virginia was still pushing her luck. trying, reportedly, to take home with her several important small boxes of state property. i'll have that for you in a moment. you know.... there's a more enjoyable way to get your fiber. try phillips fiber good gummies. they're delicious

and an excellent source of fiber to help support regularity. mmmm. these are good! the tasty side of fiber. from phillips thank ythank you for defendiyour sacrifice. and thank you for your bravery. thank you colonel. thank you daddy. military families are uniquely thankful for many things, the legacy of usaa auto insurance can be one of them. if you're a current or former military member or their family, get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life. dovisit tripadvisor new york. with millions of reviews, tripadvisor makes any destination better.

weit's not justt we'd be fabuilding jobs here,. it's helping our community. siemens location here has just received a major order of wind turbines. it puts a huge smile on my face. cause i'm like, 'this is what we do.' the fact that iowa is leading the way in wind energy, i'm so proud, like, it's just amazing. in the nation, the safest feature in your car is you. add vanishing deductible from nationwide insurance and get $100 off for every year of safe driving. which for you, shouldn't be a problem. just another way we put members first, because we don't have shareholders. join the nation. nationwide is on your side.

this is from the "washington post" today. this is amazing. "in their final days in the governor's mansion, governor mcdonnell was consumed with completing his final budget, highlighting the accomplishments of his administration. maureen mcdonnell was pressing to enjoy the final perks of office. according to several state employees familiar with her requests, she pushed to stay at the executive mansion as long as possible, asking for access to the home after her husband ceded office. her husband hat been elected to a four-year term and had not taken office until july 16th, four years earlier, so they should be allowed to stay five more days. in the end, the couple departed the mansion only on the morning of terry mcauliffe's inauguration. to allow state employees time to prepare for the new occupants." "about a month before the

mcdonnells' exit, the first lady also stunned members of the mansion's advisory council when she asked whether she could have keepsakes, four shoeboxes full of christmas ornaments. the citizens advisory council for furnishing and interpreting the executive mansion had raised the money to buy the ornaments and had donated them to the mansion." remarkable reporting from the "washington post," the pain who are broke the news of the virginia governor bob mcdonnell news. they were charged ten days after the governor left office this past january, a 14 count felony indictment, facing decades if not life in prison if convicted, and their trial started in richmond, virginia. joining us, rosalind helderman

who broke the story in "the washington post" more than a year ago and has been covering it comprehensively ever since. thank you for being with us. >> thanks so much for having me. >> i know opening statements will probably begin tomorrow morning. they did jury selection today. but i have to ask you about this anecdote in the "post's" reporting and your reporting today about the last days of the mcdonnell administration. she wanted to stay a few extra days and take some state property home with her? >> that's exactly what our reporting shows. it's really somewhat hard to believe given that in that timeframe, everyone knew that this reporting had been going on for months and months. everyone knew that this was a problem for them. the desire to get free things. the desire to sort of get as much out of being first lady as possible. it's kind of hard to believe that went on, but it did.

>> the indictment says that on the day governor mcdonnell was driving the ferrari, the day he got back from the lake house vacation that he didn't pay for and drove johnny williams' ferrari home, the indictment says that day the governor called the state health secretary and asked him to take a meeting with johnny williams. i mean, in terms of the defense here, it's amazing to me that, the timing. is the defense going to deny that that happened? did they dispute that those are the facts or are they just going to maintain that the timing was a coincidence, that those two things are just not connected. >> you know, we don't yet know what they're going to say about the timing which does seem troublesome. we know one thing they're going to say is that the things that the governor did for this man, johnny williams, were not official acts. they were basically normal political courtesies of the kinds that go on in politics all the time. he asked his health secretary to take a meeting. he didn't say anything needed to

come of the meeting. he didn't say that state government needed to give the man's company money of any kind. he hosted an event. he went to an event. they're going to say this is the kind of stuff that goes on in politics with campaign donors, at least, all the time. you take a meeting from someone who's been supportive as long as you don't pressure your staff to actually do anything for the man. >> one of the things that seemed like it may complicate that part of the strategy is the allegation in the indictment that one of the things governor mcdonnell did was give explicit permission to this guy's company that they could use pictures of governor mcdonnell speaking at one of their events. it was for a supplement that was an anti-smoking thing, something called cig-rx. he went to their event in virginia. he spoke at the event. it was designed to promote the product. he allowed the company to use the image of the governor promoting the product in their official materials. that -- that, to me, it seems like there's -- i don't understand if that is going to be construed as a political

courtesy. it would seem like governors have to be pretty tightly controlling about the way their images are used. >> you know, that's a really good point. we haven't yet heard from the defense in any kind of court filing or in any other way about that particular instant that you cited. i think one thing they're likely to do that the defense today submitted a list of exhibits that they're going to put forward and a lot of them seem to be kind of pictures and press releases that he did at other times. i suspect they're going to sort of say, look, a governor is supposed to promote business, and, you know, a lot of companies use the governor's photo. he went to their event. he went to a ribbon cutting. they took his picture. they used it in business promotion. that that's nothing unusual. >> i will say the exhibit list today on both sides, the defense and prosecution said, was fascinating reading. i'm telling you, if they're going to unveil the rolex, i'm going to be in the courtroom that day by hook or crook. rosalnid helderman, covering the bob mcdonnell corruption scandal from day one. thanks very much for being with us. keep up the great work. much more drama coming this time from the great state of kansas. that story's next. stay with us. (son) oh no...

can you fix it, dad? yeah, i can fix that. (dad) i wanted a car that could handle anything. i fixed it! (dad) that's why i got a subaru legacy. (vo) symmetrical all-wheel drive plus 36 mpg. i gotta break more toys. (vo) introducing the all-new subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. been all fun and games, here at the harrison household. but one dark, stormy evening... she needed a good meal and a good family. so we gave her purina cat chow complete. it's great because it has the four cornerstones of nutrition. everything a cat needs for the first step to a healthy, happy life. purina cat chow complete. share your rescue story and join us in building better lives.

one rescue at a time. take them on the way you always have. live healthy and take one a day men's 50+. a complete multivitamin with 7 antioxidants to support cell health. age? who cares. it's time to bring it out in the open. it's time to drop your pants for underwareness, a cause to support the over 65 million people who may need depend underwear. show them they're not alone and show off a pair of depend. because wearing a different kind of underwear, is no big deal. join us.

support the cause and get a free sample of depend at underwareness.com the summer of this.mmer. the summer that summers from here on will be compared to. where memories will be forged into the sand. and then hung on a wall for years to come. get out there, with over 50,000 hotels at $150 dollars or less. expedia. find yours. funtil to keep growing, theys hneeded a new factory,, but where? fortunately, they get financing from ge capital. we're part of ge, a company that's built hundreds of factories. so we can bring in experts to help them evaluate costs, incentives, and zoning to make a decision that would make their founder proud. if you just need a loan, just call a bank. at ge capital, we're builders.

and what we know, can help you grow. this is not quite a ransom note, more like a message in a bottle, sos. we found it on the website for this place in kansas city, kansas. aid for women. a clinic that does abortions. only clinic that does abortions in kansas city, kansas. they posted this. "we're being forced by republicans to use our website resources to say untruthful things about the state's pro-life website in hopes you will visit their website and change your mind away from having an abortion. we must have this signage or go to jail. republicans also don't believe that rape causes pregnancy, nor that there can ever be too many children. they are stupid. let's vote them out of office. however, here goes." as the state of kansas newly

requires all abortion clinics to do, aid for women on their website has to post this about the state's official talk you out of an abortion website. they have to say this. the kansas department of health and environment maintains a website containing objective nonjudgmental scientifically accurate information about the development of the unborn child as well as video of sonogram images of the unborn child at various stages of development, the kansas department of health and environment's website can be reached by clicking here. and the clinic has made clear as day in context that they think that is huey. that they've had to put on their website, but by law, they have to put it there so they posted it basically saying, here's a load of huey that you shouldn't believe, but they made us put it out. the kansas law requiring that link took effect in may. that's when aid for women have to adjust their website. over this past weekend, aid for women had to adjust their website again. posting this. "we closed our doors july 26th, 2014, and are referring our

abortion-seeking patients to the remaining abortion clinics. i'm sorry for the trouble this may cause you." we talked to the clinic manager today as he was packing stuff away. he said basically the fight had gone on so long and taken so much out of the clinic that they just couldn't continue. he said they've spent years now dealing with endless protesters and also the state passing regulations designed to make it harder for them to stay open. he told us, "we cannot seem to get some of these gen-xers to take it seriously and vote. why am i only one fighting this?" he told "the associated press" today this. "the generation of patients whom we have helped need to step up an carry the torch instead of assuming clinic workers will always fight their battle, the battle for the right to have safe, legal, easily accessible birth control instead of traveling to a few enlightened democratic states" to get them. the doctor is reasonably ready to retire. they said they searched eight years for somebody to replace that doctor, but it's hard to recruit a doctor to a job where simply going to work means facing down extremists and

possibly risking your life. in 2009, a man named scott roeder shot and killed the doctor who practiced in wichita, kansas. the night before scott roeder vandalized this particular clinic in kansas city. he was caught in surveillance video putting superglue in the locks twice. the week before that murder including the night before he killed dr. tiller. he tried to close that clinic that way before he closed a different clinic by killing its doctor the next day. on the news that the clinic where he glued the locks had finally given up, the antiabortion group promote this as a great success in kansas city, think they won there. of course, they're not winning everywhere. we just got back from a production trip to new orleans where we covered the antiabortion siege in that city this summer. we ended up getting an up close and harrowing view of tactics being used by these groups now. we got this footage back from new orleans today and brought it back into the offices and

started going through it for our reporting, it sort of blew everybody's minds here on the staff and that exclusive reporting and footage is coming up on tomorrow's show and i think you will not want to miss it, so please plan to check that out. that does it for us tonight. we're going to see you again tomorrow night. now it's time for "the last word." ari melber sitting in for lawrence tonight.