>> great reporting from the field tonight, chris. thanks. thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. there is a lot going on in the news today. and even into tonight. we're going to have more coming up on the south carolina shooting which has resulted in that north charleston police officer being charged with murder. we'll have more coming up on that story a little later on this hour. also, of course, today was the day that dzhokhar tsarnaev was found guilty on all counts related to the boston marathon bombing. we're going to be talking about that verdict this hour. but specifically, about what's going to come next after the verdict. because it's actually the penalty phase of the trial. the sentencing part of his trial. the question of whether or not he's going to get the death penalty that has even more suspense to it, than today's very dramatic verdicts did. so that's just some of what is coming up this hour. we've also got a decoder ring for you this hour. a story that lots of people on the political right are very, very upset about, but if you're

not on the political right, you probably have no idea what they're upset about. we've got that story decoded for you in case you haven't been watching fox news for the past week. so a lot going on this hour. that's all still to come. but we start in tennessee. because in tennessee, something has started there as i think basically a bit of slightly random home state excitement and confusion. a little bit of state news. used to be just a local thing to tennessee, but it is about to turn into kind of a nightmare for the entire 2016 field of presidential candidates. almost the entire field. these guys, look at that roster there. these guys are all about to be at the same place. look. this is basically the whole republican field for 2016. there's one guy on there who is definitely not running for president, a sheriff from wisconsin. there's one other guy who we now know is not running for president, although he might have made a run before he bungled his way into a pr disaster for his state. and now his state is still

reeling. nobody quite understands anything that mike pence says anymore. mike pence might have been a contender before last week, but no longer potentially running. other than those two guys, though, everybody else in that set of pictures, that's basically the whole republican presidential field for 2016. mike huckabee, scott jindal, even donald trump all going to be there. at the nra convention which starts this week in nashville, tennessee. honestly, it is the whole field. the only ones who have been left out as far as i can tell are chris christie, who was not invited, the nra does not like chris christie, even though he likes them. interestingly, rand paul was also not invited. although the nra is not explaining that in terms of them having some beef with rand paul. they just say they didn't have time to invite everybody. and that meant not inviting him. aside from those two, though, the entire republican presidential field is going to

be attending the nra convention that starts this friday in nashville. they're expecting 70,000 people. this is a huge event. and because it is such a big event every year, cities and states compete to try to host this thing. it's an economic jolt to any local economy to get 70,000 people there for any purpose. so nashville was obviously very excited to get the nra convention at their convention center this year. and the tennessee state legislature was just over the moon that nashville was going to be hosting the nra. the legislature has gone not just republican in recent years, they've gone like three-quarters republican. look, this is the partisan divide in tennessee house and senate right now. just huge republican majorities in both chambers of tennessee. and in their excitement about the nra convention, this huge convention of nra members coming to tennessee, republican legislators in that state set aside a whole week in the legislature last month to be gun

week. basically to figure out what sort of in you state gun laws they could give to the nra as a thank you present for the nra bringing their convention to their state. republicans in the state legislature considered everything from eliminating all gun permits in the state. what could possibly go wrong. they considered allowing people to travel with guns in ways that they legally cannot in tennessee. ultimately what they decided to go ahead with was this bill. which would override any local law in tennessee, overrule any local community that wanted to ban guns from a public park in tennessee. weirdly the law said cities and towns could still keep up their existing signs, saying that they don't allow guns in parks. the signs could stay up. but they would no longer actually reflect the law. what was proposed by republican state legislators this year, thanks to the nra for the convention coming to town, is

that any legally permitted gun owner in tennessee could ignore any sign banning their gun from a public park, and that gun owner could take their gun to the public park despite any local statutes otherwise if they wanted to. that was their plan as their sort of sarificial offering at the feet of the nra. republicans in the state legislature got working on that last month. their plan was to pass it quickly. this is interesting. most new laws passed in tennessee, you pass something in tennessee, it goes into effect january 1st of the following year. or if they're really rushing it, and you pass your new law in the first half of the year, you can set it so it goes into effect july 1st. july 1st of the year in which the law is passed. for this one they made a special dispensation for bring your gun to the park law. they wrote the bill so it would take effect immediately. the law would change and the bring your gun to the park rule

would go into effect as soon as the governor signed the bill. hopefully like the day before the nra got there. so the confetti would still be falling when ted nugent and wayne lapierre rolled into town. that was a local plan in tennessee how they wanted to welcome the nra to their state. it quickly got very awkward. there may not be very many democrats in the tennessee legislature, but the ones who are left appear to be rather spunky. if republicans in the state legislature were going to override local community laws about where guns were allowed, and where they were not allowed, would republican legislators be willing to live under those same principles themselves? the democrats posed amending this legislation so it didn't just get rid of all the laws banning guns in local parks, their proposed amendment would also override the regulations that banned people from bringing guns and other forms of weaponry into the state capital.

kind of calling the question. let's sew how republican state legislators feel about anyone being able to pack any weapon they want in the legislative chamber where they go to work every day. republicans said no to that. no, they did not want people to be able to bring guns where they work. so that was awkward. then there was also what's been called locally tennessee's rambo problem. in tennessee, they call this guy the radner lake rambo. he's a guy who likes to walk around outside courthouses and particularly outside schools while wearing a bulletproof vest and carrying a very visible rifle. sometimes he carries a bolt action rifle, sometime it's a semiautomatic rifle. fitted with a silencer. he puts on his bulletproof vest, looking like a determined and well prepared school shooter,

freaking everybody out. and then he does this, and inevitably when police stop him to find out if he is in fact a school shooter, he records his interactions with the police. >> i don't mind if it is not loaded, but i need to know if it's loaded or not. if you end up shooting 12 people, whose fault is it, mine or yours? >> are you being detained? >> no. put your hands down. >> no. i don't want to get shot. >> nor do i. that's why we're stopping you. >> really? >> really. so for a while, tennessee's very own radner lake rambo, this guy has been stomping around outside schools and courthouses wearing his bulletproof vest, scaring the bejesus out of people, causing school lockdowns and all the rest of it. one state legislature in tennessee said, as long as we're having gun week, as long as we're trying to do some stuff on guns in advance of the nra

bringing 70,000 people to our state, with all the republican presidential contenders, right? as long as we're having gun week, and we're doing gun stop, there is this one little local gun related problem in tennessee that maybe we can do something about. because of the rambo guy, this republican state legislature proposed a new amendment in that tennessee guns in the parks bill that they're rushing to pals ahead of the nra arriving in town this week, the trick is, though, if you think about the strategy here, they can't do anything to that bill that might offend the nra, that might upset the republican party's positive relationship with the nra, right? as it happens, they did find some language that the republicans felt okay about, they didn't think would upset the nra, and republicans in the tennessee legislature actually voted for this change, for this amendment. it's in the bill now. what they were able to bring themselves to pass is this. this language with their new law, a ban on squirt guns.

it's a ban on fake guns, toy guns, things like squirt guns would be banned specifically anywhere near tennessee schools. no squirt guns, no fake guns within 150 feet of tennessee schools. real guns are still okay. but squirt guns and toy guns would be illegal outside of schools under the new law. the os sentencible reason was to respond to the rambo guy. he's actually carrying real guns, so he would still be okay to keep doing what he's doing under the new law. if your plan was to stop that guy with a super soaker, you would be a criminal now, not him. and so now you've got headlines in the local press like this one. which is hilarious. that's been the result of tennessee republicans and their effort to show off for the nra by okaying legal guns everywhere

while inexplicably banning toy guns near schools. that result has even been too weird even for tennessee republicans. so now it actually looks like there's not going to be any new nra endorsed gun law for the tennessee governor to sign before the time the nra gets to town at the end of this week. the whole thing has been slowed down a little bit as the process has just gotten too weird. but then, then there's the matter of what is actually going to happen in tennessee when the nra comes to town at the end of this week. i think it's weird the fake guns are banned, but real guns are okay. the nra obviously is a fierce advocate for guns being allowed everywhere. since the newtown elementary school massacre, they advocated for guns to be allowed in schools. the nra is advertising their convention for national this week, as nine acres of guns. when they host their big nra

concert this weekend in nashville, when they host jeff foxworthy doing his comedy thing, and alan jackson doing his thing, no guns will be allowed at those events. wouldn't be safe. they also will not allow any of the exhibiters at the convention, the people laying out the nine acres of guns, they will not allow any of those guns to be operational. they are mandated to all their exhibiters they physically remove the firing pins from all the weapons so none of them will be operational. again, wouldn't be safe. at the same time, though, that's not just -- that's not kind of a blanket prohibition that they're putting over everything at their event. it's not like a local law requires them to do this. it's not like they've got a no guns rule at every location for the nra convention, where they're hosting these 70,000 gun-owning conventiongoers. it's not a blanket rule.

sure, there's no guns allowed when alan jackson is singing or jeff foxworthy is performing his comedy show. but in the ball room where the entire presidential field will be speaking this week, when all the governors and senators and presidential hopefuls will be speaking at their events, guns are fine. the nra has decided to let everybody carry guns at the speeches for scott walker, and ted cruz, and bobby jindal, and mike huckabee, and rick perry, and marco rubio, and rick santorum, and jeb bush. come see jeb bush at the nra convention. bring your loaded weapon. all of you. the nra told the spokesperson for the venue that they're doing this at in nashville that gun owners with proper gun permits will be allowed to bring their weapons inside to attend the speeches of all the 2016 candidates.

we asked the venue today, called the music city center in nashville, we asked them, and we asked the nra as well, whether the nra has plans to actually check people's gun permits as they enter the ball room. they say if you've got a permit for your gun, it's fine if you want to bring your gun to jeb bush's speech. we asked whether they are actually going to check permits, check to see if the people who show up carrying guns are properly permitted to carry those guns. in response to that direct question from us tonight, the nra spokesperson told us tonight, quote, i don't think so. but the nra has basically just arranged for almost every republican candidate running for president in 2016 to appear before a large crowd of people carrying presumably loaded weapons. and before you stop watching this and googling whether or not these guys have secret service protection, none of them do. that doesn't come until later in the process.

if the convention organizers at the nra decide to change their minds, if they decide they maybe want to keep guns out of that hall, maybe they want to put up metal detectors or something like that, we'll let you know. but for now the plan is open carry, all the candidates. everybody just hope for the best. wish your skin could bounce back like it used to? new neutrogena hydro boost water gel. with hyaluronic acid it plumps skin cells with intense hydration and locks it in. for supple, hydrated skin. hydro boost. from neutrogena. doug, we have the results, but first, we have a very special guest. come on out, flo! [house band playing] you have anything to say to flo? nah, i'll just let the results do the talking. [crowd booing] well, he can do that. we show our progressive direct rate and the rates of our competitors even if progressive isn't the lowest. it looks like progressive is not the lowest! ohhhh! when we return we'll find out whether doug is the father.

wait, what? in this moment your baby is getting more than clean. your touch stimulates her senses and nurtures her mind. and the johnson's® scent lather and bubbles help enhance the experience. so why just clean your baby when you can give her so much more™?

upsetting late developments tonight on an incident that took place earlier this morning involving u.s. troops in afghanistan. this is in eastern afghanistan. a convoy of u.s. troops was there this morning providing security for a u.s. diplomat who was meeting with provincial governors in that part of afghanistan. the u.s. diplomat in this case, you see here on the left, departed that meeting with the afghan officials, departed that meeting by helicopter. soon thereafter, the military convoy that had been providing security for him at jalalabad came under attack. we're told that a man dressed in an afghani military uniform opened fire on the u.s. troops. we're told the shooter was ultimately killed.

we're told by u.s. officials this morning that one american soldier was killed in that fire fight. what we are now learning in addition to that information, is that seven other americans were also shot and wounded in that incident. it's unclear at this point whether the shooter in this case actually was a member of the afghan military or whether he was just posing as one. but this incident, one killed and seven reported shot and wounded, this marks the first time since december that an american soldier has been killed in afghanistan. we will have more on this story as it develops. stay with us.

christmas day 2009, this

23-year-old man was arrested for trying to detonate plastic explosives that he had hidden inside his clothing on a delta operated plane flying from amsterdam. he pled guilty in u.s. federal court to multiple criminal counts, including the attempted murder of the 280 people onboard the plane with him. he was sentenced to four life terms, plus another 50 years. all without the possibility of parole. he will spend all of the rest of his days on earth at this super max facility in colorado. may 3rd, 2010, this man was arrested for planning a car bomb in a vehicle in times square in new york city. he pled guilty in u.s. federal court to ten criminal counts. a federal judge in the southern district of new york sentenced him to life in prison without the possibility of parole. he will also spend all the rest of his days on earth at that same federal super max facility in colorado. it barely makes national headlines anymore, at least for long, when these kinds of convictions happen. when these sentences go down and

they get sentenced to live out their days in well-deserved obscurity. but just because it doesn't make headlines all the time doesn't mean it isn't happening frequently. the trusted bin laden lieutenant who was just convicted earlier this year in a federal courtroom in manhattan, awaiting a sentence now that could be up to life in prison. earlier this month, it was loretta lynch, the federal prosecutor who president obama nominated to be attorney general, just got a conviction of a plotter fof the new york subway, and targets in manchester, england. that latest conviction this month was the fourth one tried so far. and the fourth one convicted. that was last month, actually, march, not april. those are just a couple of examples. but the u.s. criminal justice handles high-end terrorism trials with success. when is the last time a trial resulted in a not guilty verdict for the accused terrorist? after the boston marathon

bombing, a whole clutch of republican senators, john mccain, lindsey graham, kelly ayotte, they came out and said even though dzhokhar tsarnaev was a u.s. citizen committed this crime in the u.s., should be designated an enemy combatant. those republican senators demanded he be denied a defense attorney and be held indefinitely in detention to gather intelligence. they demanded that he be shipped off to some detainee prison somewhere, or guantanamo bay. they said, quote, the least of our worries is a criminal trial, which will likely be held years from now. the obama administration are rejected their demands, the obama administration decided that would not be an option. he is a u.s. citizen. our u.s. justice system can handle a case like this. today after 11 hours of deliberations over two days, the federal jury convened to hear this case in massachusetts. found dzhokhar tsarnaev guilty of all 30 of the charges against

him, including 17 of those 30 charges which would make him eligible for the death penalty. had dzhokhar tsarnaev been brought to guantanamo, who knows if he would have been tried. a practical, logistical and legal disaster. the "boston globe" editorialized against the early calls for tsarnaev to be sent to guantanamo. the globe described the good that has come from holding an untainted trial in the united states. the community learned important new details of the bombing and drew a step nearer to put the traumatic week of the bombing and manhunt in the rear view mirror. now that the verdict has come in, though, guilty on all counts, there is another not so fine distinction that is suddenly very important in this case. no, dzhokhar tsarnaev was not

tried in freakin' cubea, thank you very much. but it wasn't a massachusetts case ultimately, in which he was found guilty today. the feds took over the tsarnaev case. that ends up being very important now. because had dzhokhar tsarnaev been tried by the state, had he been tried in massachusetts state court, he would not be facing the death penalty right now. massachusetts abolished the death penalty in 1984. because the feds tried this case, now the same jury that has convicted him will have to decide if dzhokhar tsarnaev will live the rest of his life in prison, or if he will be killed. the federal government has the death penalty. the federal government kills prisoners by lethal injection when they do it. the federal reserve has only killed three prisoners in the last 25 years. what is the likelihood that dzhokhar tsarnaev will also go to federal death row. joining us now is michael coin, thanks very much for being here. i appreciate your time tonight.

>> thanks for having me here. >> how will the part of the trial that comes next, the part where they decide his sentence, how is that different from what's in the trial so far? >> there's overlap. the government will still want to present evidence of the victims suffering and carnage that took place at the finish line. so there will be some redundancy in the evidence. but the rules of evidence are relaxed in this phase, and the defendant will be able to offer mitigating factors. his youth, his adolescence, his upbringing, social factors that might have influenced him here, and especially his corruptive, coerive influence of his older brother as he sees it. those will be mitigating factors that he will introduce. the government will introduce what we call the aggravating factors, the ones that justify the death penalty because we have young victims, vulnerable victims, a police officer, and we have maiming as a result of a weapon of mass destruction. >> because the trial is being

held in federal court, but in massachusetts, federal jurisdiction which has the death penalty, massachusetts state law would not have the death penalty, there's a sort of spotlight on whether or not the jury might have some resistance to the death penalty regardless of the crime. just to the death penalty as a punishment. do they screen for that when they chose this jury? >> yes. the jury is what we call death penalty qualified. they were extensively interrogated with respect to their views and whether they could apply it if the law demanded he be put to death. so they're already qualified. it is a difficult job for the government to get a jury in massachusetts to determine that the death penalty, most serious penalty we can impose on anyone, is in fact appropriate under the circumstances. but it's been said with respect to this case, if this case isn't the classic death penalty case, frankly, also with the classic death penalty jury at this point, a white middle class jury, then there isn't a better case that can be made for the imposition of the death penalty.

>> judy clark, the defense attorney in this case, one of the defense attorneys in this case, she has been very successful in arguing against the death penalty in other high profile cases. what you know of her other cases, nothing's exactly like this, but the way she's defended other people, do you have any insight as to how she might go about arguing against having him put to death? >> there is. this defense team has been called the death penalty dream defense team. they have highly talented lawyers led by judy clark, and what she's done in other cases is really tried to get the jury to empathize with the defendant. they will never understand how he got to the place he did, and participated in these mass destruction. but what she needs to do is try to get them to have some empathy for his upbringing, his adolescence, his immigrant status, and the coercive influence of his older brother. she's been very successful at being able to personalize her unlikable client so that the

jury can see that. she did this with susan smith with respect to the woman that killed her two children. and she was able to successfully defend that case. and avoid the death penalty for her client. she represented other mass murderers as well and been successful. she does so because she brings in expertise to the matter, brings an enthusiasm, and she's a tireless worker. she's a terrific advocate and he's fortunate to have this dream team of defense lawyers. >> it's interesting there is so much more suspense about this portion of the trial, after his conviction than there was even about the conviction itself. >> well, this is the much harder burden for the government here. most of us expected that the jury would return a guilty verdict with respect to the charges themselves. but 17 of them as you pointed out carry the death penalty. this will be an uphill battle for the government. >> michael coyne thank you very much.

the man shot and killed by a policeman in south carolina. the investigation of that case took a dramatic turn when the video of that incident was made public late yesterday. we have the victim's brother and family's attorney joining us straight ahead. i win again. paul george the all-star. you still got it. play for the check? nope, with papa john's new payshare it already split the check for us. so, we wont be needing this anymore. introducing payshare. new at papa john's. share your bill on any mobile or online order. like our philly cheesesteak pizza, with original philly cheesesteak company steak. a large for just $12. better ingredients. better pizza. papajohns.com

we have to really recognize the strength and fortitude and fearlessness it took to come

forward with cell phone video of a murder of somebody. this person came forward when there were many people who sees a random person do something and don't come forward. that's the kind of person that needs to be duplicated. >> lawyer for the family of walter scott yesterday calling as a hero the mystery bystander that took the video of walter scott's death by a shooting of a police officer saturday morning. well, today in charleston, south carolina, nbc got an exclusive interview with that bye stander who shot that video that changed everything. we'll have that for you as well as a live conversation with the brothers of walter scott, next.

you forgot the milk! that's lactaid®. right. 100% real milk just without the lactose. so, no discomfort? exactly. try some... mmm, it is real milk. lactaid®. 100% real milk. no discomfort.

leftovers. they get re-heated. re-nuked. and re-baked. even when they're done... there's stuff left over. new dawn platinum power clean. powers through tough dried-on messes in seconds. a drop of dawn and grease is gone. yesterday this video of a police officer shooting and killing apparently an unarmed man running away from him, it was made available to the family of the man who was killed in that video. after the tape became public, the police officer who fired the shots was charged with murder in

the death of 50-year-old walter scott. when we learned about the video yesterday, we did not know who made it. we did not know who made the remarkable decision to keep filming this encounter in south charleston, south carolina. even with the shots fired. a person who is plainly aware of what it was he had filmed, and then made the decision to get that video to the victim's family. what we did not know yesterday was the identity of the shooter of the video. now we know. the man who filmed the video, santana, he gave his first interview earlier this evening to nbc's lester holt. in that interview tonight, he describes what he saw before he started recording. >> was there a struggle? >> there was. they were down on the floor. they were down on the floor before i started recording. they were down on the floor. i remember the police had control of the situation. he had control of scott.

and scott was trying just to get away from the taser. the taser, you know, you can hear the sound of the taser. >> he had been tased at that point? >> yeah. i heard the sound. before i started recording. and i believe he just wanted to get away from the taser. but like i say, he never used the taser again. >> mr. scott runs away. >> he runs away. >> what does the police officer do? >> as you can see in the video, the police officer shot him in the back. i knew right away i had something in my hands. >> the bystander who took the cell phone video of the killing of walter scott, santana also spoke to craig melvin, and he said he almost deleted the tape once he had it. >> i thought about erasing the video and getting out of the community of charleston.

>> because you were that scared? >> yeah. i knew, like i say, i knew that as soon as i saw the video, i knew the cop didn't do that right. the right thing. like i say, i feel kind of scared over that. i saw the police report. i read it. it wasn't like that, the way they were saying. >> you read the police report? >> yes. yes. and i saw on the news, and i say, you know, this is not the right -- this is not what happened. a friend of mine, i showed the video to him, i tell him what i witness. and he was agreeing with me. so he told me think about what you want to do with this. like i say. and i just put myself in the position of the family, you know, that i know if i would have a family member, like i say, i didn't -- i couldn't tell what was going to be the decision in this case, the police would be charged or not.

but i wanted them to have this, and do something about it. because i know if i wouldn't give it to them, nothing would happen. >> the bystander video shot by santana, you just saw there. it did make it into the public view and changed everything about this case before the tape, the only public narrative about this case was the police officer's game he was fearing for his life in defending himself. today, after the tape was made public, north charleston patrolman michael slagger was arraigned on a murder charge. he spoke to a judge from jail. officer slagger has been fired from the north charleston police department. he also got a new attorney this afternoon, after the lawyer who had been representing mr. slager, after the video came out. at a press conference today, north charleston's police chief said there's more video the public has not yet seen, from the dashboard camera now in the hands of the state law

enforcement division, which is investigating the shooting. local police say that that agency will likely release that footage tomorrow. so plan for that. the mayor also announced that he has ordered 150 additional body cameras for police officers on top of the 100 or so cameras the city already had funding for, but had not yet started using. he said every officer on the street will use body cams as soon as a policy is established and the officers are trained in how to use them. tonight, though, in north charleston with all the developments among the living, walter scott's family is grieving his death. the family announced this evening that his funeral is set for saturday. joining us is walter scott's brother, anthony scott, as well as the scott family attorney, chris stewart. i appreciate you both being with us tonight. i know it has been a very difficult time for both of you. >> yes, it has. >> mr. scott, how are you holding up? how is your family holding up? >> we're not doing very well

right now. but we feel a little relieved that the arrest was made and he was charged with murder. and hopefully justice will be carried out. >> mr. scott, can i just ask you to describe what you first saw? i know that you actually arrived at the scene? your mother called to say your brother had been tasered in an encounter with the police. can you tell us what happened and what you saw that day? >> well, when i got to the scene, the first thing i saw was the cop -- the police car, and my brother's car wrapped in tape, police tape. they secured the area. and i knew something was wrong at that time. and then when i walked up to my nephew, he told me that my brother was gone. and then i proceeded to ask what happened to my brother. i know, because a traffic stop, that's no reason to have someone tasered to death. that's what i originally believed had happened. but what actually had happened,

he had gotten shot. i didn't learn that until later on that day. >> mr. stewart, i'll ask you. a lot of people in the national media in particular have been asking sort of counterfactual question, what would have happened had this video not come to light? what would have been the course of this case? and we're making it up honestly, we're speculating because only one thing happened, and the video did become visible. what the police had done, what was going to happen had that tape not come out? >> we'll never really know the answer to that. what we do know is what was shown to us in the beginning. and what was shown to us was the officer's story, the officer's incident report, and the police station actually making a statement saying the same thing that the officer said about him trying to take the taser and use it on the officer. none of that was true. and we now know the truth by

seeing the video. i think if the video never surfaced, it would just be the officer's word against mr. scott's. >> is it your belief that the -- that after the shooting and the video when you can see the officer drop something next to mr. scott's body on the ground, that he's dropping is his service issued taser? >> i think the video speaks for itself. it's pretty clear. if you put that together with the rationale that he wrote in the incident report, in his public statements, that he got ahold of my taser. i think he officially called it in. he got my taser. so he had to come up with a justification for just shooting somebody. he had to come up with a real justification for shooting somebody in the back, which he knew he had done. so he, on the video, ran back, grabbed the taser, that was nowhere near the body. and he casually tosses it on the ground. and that was going to be his story. he didn't know anybody was watching.

>> mr. scott, let ne just ask you one last question. i don't mean to impinge on your grief and what your family is going through, but i know you have made a public announcement about your brother's funeral planned for this weekend. do you expect -- obviously there's so much national concern, so many people want to be supportive of you and your family in terms of what you're going through, do you suspect there will be a lot of people who come out for your brother's funeral? what would be the most helpful to you and your family at this point? >> well, it's open to the public right now. but media is not welcome at this time. >> they really want it to be a family centered event, not a big publicity thing. no cameras inside at all. and just the family mourning the loss of their loved one. we're going to make that happen. >> chris stewart, scott family attorney, and anthony scott, thank you for your time tonight. i really appreciate having you here. >> thank you.

we've got a lot to still come. we have breaking news from the white house tonight. the story just broken late, nobody saw it coming. please stay with us.

breaking news tonight from the white house. one hallmark of this presidency saw a lighthearted petition of president obama about some issue or another. if you get enough signatures, the white house will make some kind of response. the famous example was the petition for the pentagon to build a star wars style death star. that got enough signatures for a response. it did get a response from the white house. but it was not the response that petitioners had hoped for. no death star. we the people petitions have proved so popular, the administration has raised the threshold for what you have to do to get a response. it's harder to get enough signatures to qualify for the white house to weigh in on your issue. that is where we are tonight

with one that was a meaningful petition that resulted in a big deal pronouncement from the white house tonight. the petition was inspired by lela alcorn, a transgender kid from ohio. in december, she posted a note saying that her life was not worth living, that she had been kept from transitioning by her parents, but instead she had been taken to religious therapists who told her she was wrong. after she postsed that note, she committed suicide. she threw herself in front of a truck. 17 years old. a week later the petition surfaced on we the people petition at the white house, to ban all lgbt petition. they asked president obama in banning therapy to try to fix or cure sexual minorities. they got enough signatures to qualify for a response. they met the new and higher threshold of 100,000 signatures in one month's time.

tonight they got their response. the white house tonight said president obama will in fact call for an end to so-called conversion therapy, or reparative therapy. "the new york times" reporting that the president will not call for an explicit federal ban but will say that he's open to conversations with lawmakers in both parties about how to deal with this issue and stop this kind of therapy. in the official response to the petition tonight, valerie jarrett noted that lawmakers have introduced so-called bans on conversion therapy. this is still very new news. we don't know how this is going to play out, what the president is going to announce or somewhat it will lead to. but this is real news from that petition site which has been treated mostly as a joke. this is real news and a surprise tonight. stay with us. more ahead. i bring the gift of the name your

price tool to help you find a price that fits your budget. uh-oh. the name your price tool. she's not to be trusted. kill her. flo: it will save you money! the name your price tool isn't witchcraft! and i didn't turn your daughter into a rooster. she just looks like that. burn the witch! the name your price tool a dangerously progressive idea.

as you might have noticed, the 2016 presidential race has now begun in earnest, at least on the republican side. there's one republican candidate who would very much like to be president but who is now waiting to see if members of his own inner circle will be indicted in federal court. there's new front page news tonight on the potential

indictments, and that is next. if you struggle with type 2 diabetes, you're certainly not alone. fortunately, many have found a different kind of medicine that lowers blood sugar. imagine what it would be like to love your numbers. discover once-daily invokana®. it's the #1 prescribed in the newest class of medicines that work with the kidneys to lower a1c. invokana® is used along with diet and exercise to significantly lower blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes. it's a once-daily pill that works around the clock... here's how: the kidneys allow sugar to be absorbed back into the body. invokana® reduces the amount of sugar allowed back in... and sends some sugar out... ...through the process of urination. and while it's not for weight loss it may help you lose weight.

invokana® can cause important side effects including dehydration, which may cause you to feel dizzy, faint, lightheaded, or weak especially when you stand up. other side effects may include kidney problems, genital yeast infections... ...urinary tract infections, changes in urination,... ...high potassium in the blood or increases in cholesterol. do not take invokana® if you have severe kidney problems or are on dialysis. stop taking and call your doctor right away if you experience symptoms such as rash swelling, or difficulty breathing or swallowing. tell your doctor about any medical conditions medications you are taking and if you have kidney or liver problems. using invokana® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase risk of low blood sugar. it's time. lower your blood sugar with invokana®.

imagine loving your numbers. there's only one invokana®. ask your doctor about it by name.

i want to ask you if you had one do-over, one thing you could go back and revisit and do it differently, what would it be? >> oh, gosh. i mean, i wouldn't -- i wouldn't have been as trusting with some people, i would have asked more questions on some things in general. and i wish i would have had that to do over again. >> how would that have worked? >> i don't know. >> you're talking about the bridge and you did ask people. if people are going to lie to you, they're going to lie consistently. >> it's true. for me, maybe i could have been more aggressive, i don't know. it's one of those things that's kind of surreal to me and i don't really understand it

still. but it's simply that has been, you know, a really bad period -- >> sure, sure. >> -- for me, both personally and professionally. >> new jersey governor chris christie wearing an apron, bearing his soul on a show called "pasta and politics," and it premiered tonight in new jersey. if chris christie could have one do-over, he said it would have been his handling of the bridge scandal, ordered up on purpose by one chris christie staffer for political reasons. it's a still unexplained scandal that's dogged the governor's administration since it was first uncovered in 2013. the federal prosecutor in the state of new jersey also opened a criminal investigation into the matter, which is ongoing.

among the key figures is this dan, david sampson, former new jersey attorney general, widely seen as chris christie's mentor. before david sampson stepped down a year ago, he was running the agency that controlled the bridge where that manufactured traffic jam took place. he's also a founding partner of a law firm that's raised millions in state business during the christie administration. prosecutors have been looking for possible signs of a conflict of interest between david sampson's government work and his position at that lucrative law firm. now comes word that david sampson has stepped down from that law firm. a spokesperson saying, after heading the firm and working relentlessly for 43 years, david sampson has been planning his retirement for some time. a very unusual turn, though. his firm is not just changing leaders, it's changing its name. wolf, sampson has become arguably the most powerful law firm in chris christie's new

jersey. but david sampson is now not just retiring, they're stripping his name off the firm. it's not going to be wolf, sampson anymore. i don't know what they're going to call it. but it's going to be a fresh start. as chris christie starts his run for president in 2016, it's hard to not wonder about when and whether the other shoe is going to drop in terms of federal indictments in the bridge scandal that chris christie says he regrets so much. "the new york times" posted this article saying indictments in the bridge case are imminent. they're coming as soon as next week. but honestly, we have seen that prediction before, and it's been 15 months so far with zero news from that new jersey prosecutor's office, which does not leak. that said, all those previous predictions did not come on the heels of chris christie's mentor resigning from his law firm.

so still, lots of intrigue here, but so far intrigue is it. watch this space. good morning. right now on "first look" this could be the most severe weather day this spring. 65 million americans in risk areas. details ahead a. anger in north charleston reaches a boiling point and this morning hear from a man who captured it all on video. the jury found him guilty. now they'll decide whether he lives or dies. and president obama calls for a ban on gay and transgender con vefrgs therapy. a major recall of one of america's favorite foods. thanks so much for joining us today. right now spring's biggest storm is marchin