a moment. let's go to the white house. >> he said if elected he might meet with the russian leader before his inauguration? what do you think of the approach to putin and how it would affect america's interests on the international stage? second second secondly does it distress you that folks at the fbi and state department talked about the proper level of classification and e-mails on secretary clinton's server. would you acknowledge the appearance of impropriety and should officials look into this? and for prime minister renzi with the critical governing referendum happening what would passage mean for your ability to lead the country and what would failure mean to your political future as well as to italy's role in the european union. >> i will be subdued in my

discussions of the republican nominee in this context that i might be on the campaign trail. let me speak broadly about russia. when i came into office, russia under the previous administration invaded parts of georgia. created a frozen conflict there. there was a new president and we tried to initiate a more constructive path with respect to u.s./russia relations. we showed russia plenty of respect acknowledging enormous differences and different values. trying to find ways in which we could cooperate together. we initiated the new star tree. we assist ed russia with the wt.

we worked on common international challenges together. when the previous president was replaced with mr. putin i met with him. we discussed ways in which we could constructively work together. the challenge we have had with russia is very much centered on russian aggression in some very particular areas around the world. in ukraine where they have engaged in similar conduct to what they did in georgia and even there we have tried to broker and work with the europeans to broker it an agreement that would peacefully resolve those issues. in syria, one of my earliest

meetings with putin was to suggest to him if assad stayed in power given the brutality with which he treelted his own people you would see a civil war that would not be good for the world anywhere. rather than to work with us to try to solve the problem he doubled down on his support for assad. we know the situation that exists there. any characterization that somehow we have improperly challenged russian aggression or have somehow tried to encroach on their legitimate interests is

just wrong. and mr. trump's continued flattery of mr. putin and the degree to which he appears to model many of his policies and approaches to politics on mr. putin is unprecedented in american politics. it is out of step with not just what democrats think but out of step with what up until the last few months almost every republican thought, including some of the ones who are now endorsing mr. trump. you will have to explain to me how some of the members of the republican party who were constantly haranguing us for even talking to the russians and who consistently took the most

hawkish approaches to russia including mr. trump's selection for vice president now reconcile their endorsement of mr. trump with the previous views. the bottom line is we think russia is a large important country with military that's second only to ours. and has to be a part of the solution on the world stage rather than part of the problem. but their behavior has under mined international norms and rules in ways we have to call them out on. anybody who occupies this office should feel the same way because these are values we fought for and protected. we can't go around talking about human rights, freedom of the

press or democracy. or freedom of religion or nondiscrimination or basic laws of war or the sovereignty and territorial integrity of countries no matter how small. and extol the virtues. mr. trump surprises me. i'm more surprised and troubled by the fact that you have republican officials who historically have been adamantly anti-russian and, in fact, attacked me for even engaging them diplomatically and in some cases echoing his positions. it's quite a reversal. you have to ask them how to

explain it. with respect to the fbi reports we have heard from the fbi and the state department that the notion or accounts that have been put out there aren't true. you can question them again but based on what we have seen, heard, learned. some of the more sensational implications or appearances as you stated them aren't based on actual events and based on what actually happened. i think it was from overly broad characterizations of interactions between the state department and the fbi that

happened a lot and happened between agencies. i think that covers me. >> it's not a very good year to organize a referendum. i think the referendum is simply in the message. it's about the fight against bureaucracy. and we need a great investment against bureaucracy in italy. for a lot of reasons. we changed the government in 70 years. a few times we joked about it with the president because it's unbelievable in a country to have a government change one year, every year. but it's a normal political

discussion. it's very strong. my opinion is very easy. if in december we would win this referendum for italy would be more easy to continue the battle to change europe. it's more important for italy. important for institutions in brussels and europe. the only consequence in the political debate in my view is if we'll win, italy will be stronger. and the debate in e.u. so i work strongly and oddly to achieve the victory. i'm sorry. [ speaking italian ] you are american, not italian.

>> american. >> well, ask the question in english or italian. so let's talk about the referendum that you hope to win, of course. with found many investors atwal street who are worried about the fact that you might lose the referendum. these are investors with faith in italy. and that threaten. what can you tell them to reassure them if there is a negative outcome would you stay on? would you continue with the reforms? and one last thing this evening. will you bring wine to the dinner with the president? this is an italian custom. >> i agree with the president, your accent the beautiful. your italian accent, of course.

>> you seem to be in agreement that there is a need to go ahead with the policies you have pursued on being more flexible on the fiscal side. the problem is brussels is very rigid with it. therefore jeopardizing the efforts. what can you see to brussels, especially after brexit. they seem to be moving on that front. you know, how important it is to move forward in the direction. do you think in case the referendum would not go well for the prime minister he should stay on and continue in his reforms? thank you. >> translator: i have a feeling and i think that rightly so our american friends are a little

bit more interested in november 8 than in the italian vote on constitutional reform. so are we. might i add. in terms of what you were asking very, very briefly, this is a time in which many investors throughout the world are coming back to invest in italy. we are extremely happy about this. we are happy about the investments, innovation in terms of technology. apple is investing in naples. amazon is going to open an artificial intelligence center in turin. for the economic and financial world they are starting to see italy as an area in which to create opportunities and business. therefore open doors. i don't believe that there will be any major disasters if the

"no" wins at the referendum. to have no doubts i would rather win. i will do everything i can due to this doubt will not be able to come about. what's fundamental and true is the message goes through. this referendum doesn't have to do with the great world events. the great world issues. very simply do you want to simplify the institutional system in italy giving greater stability and certain times in which to have greater stability? this is something to simplify things in our country. based on the question asked on europe we respect the european rules and we are totally inside the european rules although sometimes we do this half heartedly we'd like to do things differently. so long as rules don't change we'll respect them. italy has made its reputation one of the key words in its

mandate. we work to change them. if they are there, we are going to respect them. now what will happen within the next few months will be seen as a great italian singer says we will discover this by living. i'm almost certain the yes will win so we have no grounds to ask this question. >> during the course of my presidency, i have had repeated conversations with brussels, with angela, with francois and others around how we could most effectively recover from the crisis of 2007-2008. it is fair to say that we have made more progress more quickly what i have tried to point out

is the reason we were able to make progress is we focused very early on in providing a large infusion of demand through our fiscal policies, rebuilding roads, bridges, investing in schools, teachers, clean energy, putting people back to work. tax cuts, put money in the pockets of consumers. saving the auto industry. but then also what was very important was quickly trying to fix the banks in infusing capital making sure they were more stable and transparent and would attract confidence so the system was working again. i'm proud of our economic track

record. we have grown faster and created more jobs. this past year seeing incomes rise and poverty fall more quickly than a lot of our counterparts in europe. i recognized that europe is a more complicated collection of states and it is more difficult to move. some are in the euro zone and some are not. i don't expect that everything we have done can immediately translate to europe. there are some parts of what europe does that we could learn from. in terms of the social safety net, for example. but what i do know is that given the very slow growth that's taken place in europe or contraction over what's almost a decade now, we have a generation

of european youth who are not attaching themselves to the labor market fast enough. and if you don't reverse some of the trends it becomes a generational loss. now that countries like italy and others have made progress on their finances. and their deficits. there is more confidence in their position. now would be a good time. i believe, to refocus attention on growth. making investments. because one of the reasons we have been able to cut our deficits by two-thirds is not simply because we cut spending

by two thirds. we disciplined spending and grew fast enough that more revenue came in. that's one of the best ways for you to arrive for a sound fiscal position. monetary policy is not sufficient. mario dragi and the european central bank have done good work trying to maintain a positive trajectory in europe. ultimately there is only so much monetary policy can do if not combined with fiscal policy. my hope would be that matteo is right. italy has been true to its word and met its obligations. hopefully the debate broadens as europe moves forward around how to grow more quickly.

put more people back to work. see incomes rise. create a greater sense of momentum and optimism. i do believe there is a connection between stagnation and some of the less constructive populist impulses that have been rising up and those trend lines about europe concern me. if you look at the european experiment over the last 40 years i said this hanover probably no group has enjoyed more prosperity than a united europe. if it begins not splintering because their senses, the global capitals and elites aren't attentive to the ordinary

concerns of people. that would be a tragedy. my hope is that discussion led by matteo and others will continue. by the way, yes. i think -- i won't weigh in on the referendum. the reforms matteo is initiating on the economic side are the right ones. in a global internet driven world the governments have to be able to move fast and quickly and transparently. i am rooting for success. he should hang around for a while no matter what. >> thank you, mr. president. i have to ask you about the election. donald trump is telling supporter that is the election is rigged and asking them to

monitor certain areas on election day. how concerned are you about the potential for violence and what about after election day? are you worried the results of the election may be distrusted? and for prime minister renzi, the offensive has begun. are you concerned about what happens after liberation and if you want to weigh in on that as well i appreciate it. >> i do. okay. one of the great things about america's democracy is we have a vigorous, sometimes bitter political contest and when it is done historically regardless of party the person who loses the election congratulates the winner, reaffirms our democracy

and we move forward. that's how democracy survives. because we recognize that there is something more important than any individual campaign. that's making sure the integrity and trust in the institutions sustains itself. because democracy by definition works by consent. not by force. i have never seen in my lifetime or in modern political history any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the election process before votes have even taken place. it's unprecedented.

it happens to be based on no facts. every expert regardless of political party, regardless of ideology, conservative or liberal who has ever examined these issues in a serious way will tell you that instances of significant voter fraud are not to be found and keep in mind elections are run by state and local officials which means that there are places like florida for example with a republican governor who is a republican appointee running and monitoring the bunch of the election sites. the notion that somehow if mr. trump loses florida it's because of those people that you have to watch out for.

that's both irresponsible and, by the way, really doesn't show the kind of leadership and toughness you want out of a president. he starts whining before it's even over? when things are going badly and you start blaming somebody else, then you don't have what it takes to be in this job. there are a lot of times when things don't go our way or my way. that's okay. you fight through it. work through it. try to accomplish your goals. but the larger point i want to emphasize here is there is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig america's elections.

in part because they are so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved. there is no evidence that it's happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time. i would invite mr. trump to stop whining and make his case to get votes. if he got the most votes then it would be my expectation of hillary clinton to offer a gracious concession speech and pledge to work with him in order to make sure the american people benefit from an effective government. it would be my job to welcome mr. trump regardless of what he said about me or my differences with him on my opinions. and escort him over to the capitol in which there would be a peaceful transfer of power. that's what americans do.

that's why america is already great. one way of weakening america, making it less great is that you start betraying the basic american traditions that have been bipartisan and have helped to hold together the democracy now for well over two centuries. with respect to mosul, we are seeing the iraqi forces with the support of the coalition that includes the united states and italy and other nations moving forward and encircling mosul. the intention is to drive isil out of what was its first urban stronghold and what continues to

be one of the key organizations and logistical hubs. it will be a tough fight and a difficult fight. it is iraqedis doing the fighti. they are performing effectively and bravely. and taking on significant casualties. there will be ups and downs in the process. my expectation is ultimately it will be successful. this will be a key milestone in what i committed to doing when isil first emerged which is we were going to role them back and ultimately drive them out of population centers and destroy them and defeat them so they are not in a position to carry out

attacks against our friends and allies or innocent people inside of iraq and syria. we have seen steady progress. if, in fact, we are successful, how do we deal with what could be a humanitarian crisis because when isil occupies territories it bleeds them dry. it feeds off of them. it oppresses the population. it's not good at governance. basic functions like electricity or water running down. people are fleeing from their homes. it will be significant displacement. this will be part of the coalition in conjunction with major aid organizations. plans and infrastructure for

dealing with a potential humanitarian crisis with the military plans. that doesn't mean. executing will be difficult. it will be a tough environment to operate under. no doubt there will be instances where we see heartbreaking situations if, in fact, large numbers of people flee. it's hard when you leave your home. you already didn't have enough because of the barbarist regime. it's hard to leave your home in a war zone. it's not something i expect will be easy. perhaps it hasn't been publicized enough at least in the american press the degree of planning and assets and resources we are devoting.

if we aren't successful in freeing these guys fleeing from isil that makes us vulnerable to the return and feeding on resentments of mosul being liberated. there is strategic interest in us getting that right. >> i think the considerations of the president are very clear. for the italian side we have particularly committed -- there is a dangerous dam. we support an italian company or work to restore the dam because it could be a problem for the population. for the rest we are engaged in the rest of the coalition. to the iraqi people the possibility of a future. let me be great to the italian

army, particularly the italian carboneri who provide learning. the local police. we are not worried for the future of mosul. soon the reconstruction and rebuilding will be a priority for every member of the international community. italy is engaged and worked with the united states and their allies. last. >> thank you, mr. president. there is a geopolitical priority for italy, mainly because of the constant flow of migrants and is there a common strategy on this and on libya and can italy act as a bridge between europe and

africa and how can the american administration have the efforts of the italian government. to face the challenge. thank you. >> i'm going to answer in italian for the first channel tg uno. our position is the same one. europe has to be more convinced and look to africa with more conviction. from this stance we can't go every time to ask for help to the united states without doing our part. the united states are busy in all the international theaters, the ones that are closer to us, we obviously need the support of our best friend because the united states, our best friend. but we also have to start an italian and european strategy. we can't always just sit and

wait for this type of support. therefore, the issue of the mediterranean and africa has been left aside during the last ten years in the european union. we have to give it priority again. we have to work as the commission had foreseen it would do. it's not doing it with the necessary speed. we'll do whatever we can with the agreements with certain states. with the five states that are our priority. we have to work for africa to be a priority, including a priority from the point of view of resources. local development. we will talk about this during the g-7 in sicily next year. in terms of investments, the political investments in the past few years has been sorely lacking before asking for help from the united states which is something we do.

italy and europe have to do their part. italy will increase efforts for international cooperation and the ranking of g-7 for international cooperation. we were the last in the classification. it's not a good position. we will reach the fourth place in the ranking in terms of gdp which each of us proposes. we have an increase in terms of the money in international cooperation, in funds and in terms of libya we know they are working. we want to stabilize the government. we want to make sure there is a block of all the brothers and sisters that leave their country every time they go to sea they risk dying. we are happy and very proud to help save lives, but the ocean is one of the worst places to do that. we don't want the mediterranean.

we have to have a long term strategy and short term as well. we are proud of what we are doing. the method cannot go on forever. we cannot think of being in charge by ourselves of all the problems libya and africa and from this stance on thursday and friday at the european council we will talk about this. >> extensive topic of conversation. let me make a few points. number one, it is a strategic interest of the united states to make sure that the migration crisis that's been taking place in europe is solved. it is a strategic interest because of the terrible loss of life we see as people attempt to reach europe.

also because of distorting effects it can have on european politics if the sense is that the influx of migration is disorderly, chaotic and overwhelms european countries. so we are deeply committed in europe's success in resolving this issue effectively. now obviously there are a lot of contributors to it. we are very focused on strengthening the government of national accord, as i indicated. secretary john kerry and others are working with his counterparts on a multilateral basis. to strengthen the government, resolve tensions that exist between the different portions of libya. and then to be able to invest

and build on their capacity to control their borders and waterways. because if we don't have a partner on the other side of the ocean it will be a problem. that's point number one. point number two, we are deeply appreciative of the generosity and humanitarian impulses of the italian people in rescuing so many people through operation sophia. what we did in warsaw was to indicate that while that's primarily an e.u. mission nato and the united states and our naval assets are prepared to assist in a robust way where appropriate. it is a matter of coordinating what you need. we'll help.

the same way we do in terms of helping to enforce turkey and the european union on that portion, that body of water. it's more long term and that's trying to help these countries having difficulties. where people feel either unstable, insecure or just hungry and in search of opportunity. how do we help them develop in a way people feel they can succeed and raise their families without fleeing to more developed countries. that's a longer-term proposition. we have to begin to make the investments now. i mentioned to matteo, we have different ideas about migration and net migration has been flat. in some cases even decreased or

we have seen reverse flows particularly with respect to mexico. one area where we have seep a big spike is actually from the smaller countries in central america. the economy is doing poorly. agriculture is done poorly in part because of changing weather patterns. violence brought on by narco traffickers. i gave vice president biden the charge of working with companies to come up with a development plan. congress on a bipartisan basis supported us putting more money into these countries for development. more effective policing. dealing with fighting the m ana traffickers. but that's not going to happen overnight. it will be a decade-long process. in the meantime we insist those

companies cooperate with us to send a message to the populations that it's a dangerous trip to reach the united states. if you get here, you are likely to be turned back to try to discourage this dangerous passage and also to try to undermine human traffickers preying on the desperation of people to make money. all the strategies have to be employed. one thing i would encourage and i have said this when i visited europe. you can't have a situation where italy, greece and germany are bearing the entire burden. if you have a european union then you are unified not just for the benefits but also for the costs. i do think it is important for europe collectively to be invested in solving the problem and not just leave it to one

country, in the same way that here in the united states obviously we are an actual nation state as opposed to a union of separate states. but we would not abandon one state and just say, here, you deal with the entire problem. if we have solidarity and benefit from that on a whole range of issues that means you have joint responsibilities. [ inaudible ] >> that's what i said. central america. they increased, david. why -- [ inaudible ] >> no, actually, david they spiked heavily in 2014, went down significantly in 2015, have gone back up this year in part

because there is still desperation in central america. but are still not at the levels they were in 2014. but i appreciate you shouting out a question since i'm sure a lot of your colleagues want to do the same. thank you very much, everybody. appreciate it. >> president obama wrapping up a joint news conference with the prime minister of italy in the rose garden of the white house against the backdrop of a beautiful fall day here in washington, d.c. and a very heated presidential race. unprecedented may be the word of the news conference. a word president obama used twice to describe donald trump. once for his praise of vladimir putin and again for trying to suggest that the u.s. election is rigged. president obama saying i would invite mr. trump to stop whining and make his case to get the most votes. the president also weighing in on iraq and the fight to take back mosul saying i'm confident

we can succeed. here with me now to break it down congressman bob brady, democrat from pennsylvania and katy tur, chris cillizza, msnbc contributor and founder of the washington post's fix blog. thanks to you. congressman, thanks for sticking around. i will go to you first. some of the strongest words we have heard yet from president obama he said that's how the democracy survives. the loser accepts the loss and graciously concedes and helps the country move forward. what do you think the impact of the president's words will be? >> i happen to agree with him. he's 100% right. donald trump is a whiner, a crybaby, a bully. he's trying to pubully his way through and it won't happen.

the electoral process is on the up and up. he's trying to supress and intimidate. not going to intimidate me. not going to intimidate the city of philadelphia. he won't intimidate you. you're a philly girl. philly gal. you know that's true. he tried to intimidate the press. he's trying to under mine an election, cause chaos. it won't happen. he can't fool us or the american. he can't intimidate me or our citizens throughout the country. he cannot intimidate the city of philadelphia. undoubtedly won't stop donald trump from making the line of attack.

he's trying to appeal to the base and turn them out in the biggest numbers. the root of the strategy and do you think it's working given the backlash he's getting? >> it's working among supporters who say they believe the election will be rigged if donald trump doesn't win. they believe there aren't enough election monitors watching polling places. they believe even though the systems aren't technically hooked up to a nationwide internet connection that there will be folks monitoring the election who don't like donald trump and will try to sway the votes by themselves at individual precincts. we have never seen evidence of that happening in our country's history. there are multiple studies out that show it's just not the case. voter fraud is almost -- it almost never happens. there is a loyala university

study that said of a billion votes there were only 31 possible cases of voter fraud. it is highly unlikely. now it is affecting down ballot races, forcing senators who are facing their competitors and going up in debates in their various states. rudy giuliani saying there is no conspiracy to rig all 67 different counties. the republican party is pushing back. donald trump is still hammering this and he'll continue to do so, at least as of now up until november 8. >> we'll watch closely to see what he says. i want to go out to you. as katie mapped out so beautifully. this rigged election has been knocked down by just about everybody.

i have been reporting on it. fact checkersing noed it down. the president said he's whining because he's losing. he said it doesn't show the leadership and toughness from a president if you start whining before the game is over. talk a little bit about how the president's remarks today kind of added to this criticism that we are seeing on both sides. >> we really heard president obama saying donald trump isn't qualified to be president and he's really trying in some ways to get at the idea that the union isn't going to survive if donald trump continues to say these elections are rigged. the president was clear saying this is how we do politics in america. politicians might argue if donald trump wins he would welcome him into the white house. that's the way we do politics in america. president obama is really telling donald trump this is dangerous and you have to stop saying this.

>> i want to take the broader view and remind viewers that the president also weighed in on the fact that donald trump praised vladimir putin. again the president said it is just unprecedented. he's continued to try to make this argument that donald trump is disqualified for a host of reasons. hasn't made donald trump back down one bit. could it, in fact, lead to a larger turnout among his own coalition on election day? >> we saw this from hillary clinton on the democratic don vengs. we are seeing it that it is this argument less aimed at the democratic base than loosely affiliated republican voters, members of the republican establishment. independents. to say donald trump doesn't exist on the spectrum of traditional political thinking. not that we don't like him.

he's unqualified. he can't do this job. he would be dangerous. that's an appeal to say you may not like me, barack obama as a partisan but this guy cannot do the job. it's an intriguing argument for the middle three weeks. >> fascinating conversation after a really incredible news conference. thanks so much for helping me to break it down. really appreciate it. coming up, salt lake spoiler? independent presidential candidate evan mcmullen is giving trump and clinton a run for their money in utah. he joins me next. the interview you don't want to miss. stay with us. tion... this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain and protect my joints from further damage. this is humira helping me go further. humira works for many adults. it targets and helps to block a specific source

of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. humira has been clinically studied for over 18 years. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. ready for a new chapter? talk to your rheumatologist. this is humira at work.

hillary clinton expanding efforts in deep red battleground states making a major push in utah where a potential spoiler is emerging challenging clinton and trump for the state's six

electoral votes. in the latest cbs news you gov poll evan mcmullin is tied with clinton at 20%. he joins me now. thank you very much for being here. >> thank you. great to be with you. >> we heard the news conference with president obama. i want to remind you what he had to say. when asked about the claims that the election the rigged. he said i have never seen a presidential candidate trying to discredit the process before votes have taken place. it's based on no facts. your reaction and response to trump making the claims? >> it's ironic. if there is any rigging of the election it is what russia is doing by interfering by conducting cyber attacks against the dnc. obviously i'm not a huge fan of the dnc, i don't align with them. but i am an american. when i see a foreign power

trying to under mine our democracy, i object. you are making the statement with some authority. >> absolutely. for those of us who have come from the intelligence world we see what russia is doing. it's plane as day. our faith in our political process. a lot of folks see your competitive race but for you to win the only chance is neither candidate gets 270 votes. then the race gets kicked to the house of representatives. the only time that scenario has happened is twice in our entire history. the last time in 1824. what do you say to critics who

say your campaign is symbolic, purely aimed at taking votes away from donald trump? >> we object to hillary clinton and donald trump. i believe the time has come in this country for a new generation of leaders. we see it in both candidates. both deeply corrupt, self-serving. donald trump is a bigot and misogynist who divided our country, race against race, religion against religion. we are building that. it is important we stood in this election to do that. yes, we stood up with three months to go because time was running out. i hoped somebody else would do it. they weren't so i got in. >> do you think it is a realistic path? >> we could block both of them.

even in your own state hillary clinton got endorsements from major newspapers and the salt lake tribune. are you seeking endorsements. have you spoken to someone like mitt romney? do you think he would ultimately endorse you? >> you cited an old poll. the most recent ras musen poll has me ahead of hillary clinton, neck and neck with donald trump. we are rising quickly. hillary clinton is flat there which is normal for a democrat. >> we are not depending on endorsements. people asked what about members of congress. are they going to endorse you? the last thing i will do is turn to people who wouldn't stand up to donald trump in the primary and look for validation from them. i have envieted them all to endorse me.

we are not standing by for that. we are building quickly at the grassroots level. you see it in the polls. we are excited about that. >> thanks so much for being here evan mcmullin. good luck. kids to get a repair estimate. liberty did what? yeah, with liberty mutual all i needed to do to get an estimate was snap a photo of the damage and voila! voila! (sigh) i wish my insurance company had that... wait! hold it... hold it boys... there's supposed to be three of you... where's your brother? where's your brother? hey, where's charlie? charlie?! you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you. liberty stands with you™ liberty mutual insurance listerine® total care strengthens teeth, after brushing, helps prevent cavities and restores tooth enamel. it's an easy way to give listerine® total care to the total family. listerine® total care. one bottle, six benefits. power to your mouth™.

you're at the top of your game.. at work or at play, you're unstoppable.

nothing can throw you off track. oh hey, she's cute. nice going man. things are going great for you. you've earned a night out. good drinks, good friends. yeah, we can go ahead and call this a good night. wait, is that your car? uh oh. not smart. yeah, i saw that coming. say goodbye to her. ouch! that will hurt your bank account. you're looking at around ten grand in fines, legal fees, and increased insurance rates. i hope you like eating frozen dinners. alone. let's try this again. smart move. because buzzed driving is drunk driving. 80% of recurrent ischemic, strokes could be prevented. and i'm doing all i can to help prevent another one.

a bayer aspirin regimen is one of those steps in helping prevent another stroke. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. that does it for a busy edition of "andrea mitchell reports." andrea will be back tomorrow ahead of the financial presidential debate. hallie jackson is up next. hey there, hallie. >> hi, kristen. we are coming to you live from the las vegas strip. right now caesar's palace specifically one day ahead of the final face-off between donald trump and hillary clinton. our set here where the action is. breaking this hour, we have a new wattle ground poll here in nevada showing clinton leading trump by seven points. this is a significant margin for her. moments ago president obama weighing in on this election is