bookstore. i'm excited about it. there's tickets still available. if you're in the area, checking account it out. hopefully my voice won't be gone by then. we'll have the details on my facebook page. rachel maddow starts right now. >> i have fisher men's phrase tucked in my top drawer if you want to stop by on your way out. thank you for joining us this hour. in 1952, we've got some great images of this. in 1952, iraq's king, iraq's teenage king came to visit the united states. he was a teenager. he was only 17 years old. he apparently loved baseball. while he was here, he met jackie robinson. he also net secretary of state. he met president truman. he had been king since he was a little kid. but he came to the u.s. at the age of 17. he became officially an adult the following year which i want from 1953 on, the more or less

bolderly teenage king of iraq, he assumed his position as the rural of his country. it didn't last. he was only 23 years old when a coup was launched against him in july 1958. in that coup, he was murdered along with much of his family. july 1958. the monarchy was deposed. nationalists took over, they overthrew the iraqi monarchy. that didn't last either. act favors after they killed the king and the military took over, the military was overthrown as well or at least the faction of them that had been in charge. by then it was 1963, february 1963. disproportionate group that took over iraq then and ruled it for 40 years thereafter, that was the bath party. we think of saddam hussein is the patternification of the bath

paurt. he took over iraq in 1979. the bath party itself, they took over iraq all the way back in 1963, which was basically the exact same time that the bath party also took over next door in syria. the batharty mounted their coup in baghdad by the 8th of march 1963, one month later, they mound their coup in damascus as well in syria. the bath party took over in iraq in february, they took over in syria in march. in syria as in iraq, thereafter they had a few different stops and starts in terms of what their new govern nance would look like. they had a couple more up heavals in terms of their leadership in syria. but by 1970 in syria, they had their leader forlife. his life was had a fez al assad.

hafez. he took over in 1970 and never gave up power. in iraq, saddam ruled for a long time, 24 years. saddam's rule in iraq only ended when the united states military ininvaded iraq and overthrew him and then the occupied iraqi government executed saddam. had a fez had a heart attack in the summer of 2000. and syria technically is not supposed to a kingdom. in the quote election to pick his successor, there was only one candidate on the ballot, his son. he was the only one on the ballot and it was illegal for anyone to run against him in

that election so he got 99.7en of theote in in 2000 and that's how he got power. that's how we got bashar al assad as the not quite king of syria. it's basically a die nsa i can dictator ship. he inherited it from his dad. at the start of bashar al assad's second decade in power in 2011 when demonstrators started demonstration in the streets for relief from corruption, for real democrats, for a reform agenda that was different from down country but at heart it was for a relief from corrupt arbitrary rule when the protests off the arab spring started parking in 2010 and 2011

and 2012, every country handled it differently. the opposition that started with peaceful street protests in 2011 in syria, it kwielk voefd from not just a protest movement, it voefd into an armed resist, an armed opposition movement. since then, syria has spent two, three, four, five, now six years sliding deeper and deeper and deeper into increasingly impossible, increasingly complex catastrophic civil war. a half million people killed. half million people. 5 million people flung out of syria fleeing for their lives by taking refuge anywhere else in the world and bashar al assad still in power.

and russia's propping him up. and iranians are propping him up, and the majority population of syria is sunni. they're never going to be okay again. they will never be okay again with being ruled by a nonsunni dictator who inherited the gig from his dad and then spent his own second decade in power slaughtering syrians by the hundreds of thousands. the solution to this is not rocket science. the solution to this is way more complicated than rocket science. do you think our current administration is going to be the administration that comes up with the genius solution to this? that comes up with the answer? the new administration in our country released what they want to be seen as a situation room type photo from last night. what they're going for obviously

here is i think they want their version of this icon i can shot during the bin laden raid. what we got from this white house was different because the administration last night was not had hadded at the white house in washington. they are, of course, at the president's paid membership resort in south florida. their photo which they released, it sort of looks like a situation room photo, but if you look more closely, you see it's not really the same thing. for one it was taken at a function room at mar-a-lago where we're told the president and his advisers were sat at a table for wedding receptions. you see how the chairs are gilt? this is photo they released of the first obvious caption when

you're looking at this photo is lesson one in how jared stays favorite. look what everybody else in the photo is doing. they're all staring at the left side of the photo while jared kushner gazes intently at his father-in-law. you want there to be a new job in the united states called crown pins, this is how you will that job into existence. but it's also a notable photo. the mar-a-lago situation room photo. it's also notable for who's there, who's in on that decision, that moment. in the real situation room photo, the bin laden situation room photo, there's the secretary of state, the national security adviser, the vice president, the defense secretary, there's the director of national intelligence, the cia chief, the chairman of the joint chief of staff, you recognize these people. in the mar-a-lago photo, some of those same people with those same titles are there, but

there's jared, the president's son-in-law. there's also the top economic adviser to the president. there's the white house spokesman back there. there's other people we don't know at all and sort of right next to the president, there's the treasury secretary and the secretary of commerce. why are they there? we are told this is the situation room photo. this is the critical military briefing on a possible u.s. military strike in syria. why is the commerce secretary there? i don't have an why wilbur ross is there. but wilbur ross does appear to have no idea what was going on around him at that moment. i have a little bit of tape to play for you. this is not on camera. it's just audio. a reporter asked the commerce secretary, wilbur ross, today what it was like to be right there in the president to be in that makeshift mar-a-lago situation room in this key moment and asked him what he thought of what he witnessed. we know from the photo that wilbur ross, he definitely was there. he was right there, right in the

middle of it. he's making clear that -- he seems to have misunderstood some details about what was going on around him in that moment. listen. >> in terms of the strikes themselves, it's my understanding that they took out something like 20% of the entire syrian air force. so it was huge not just in terms of number of planes, but relative to the scale of their air force. >> commerce secretary wilbur ross under the impression that 20% of the entire syrian air force was destroyed last night in this one u.s. strike on a tertiary airfield. i don't think that's what happened. secretary of state rex tillerson lasht tried to layoff it wasn't 20% of the a force, maybe of us the 20% of one wing of the syrian air force that was

destroyed maybe? maybe it was 20 planes that were destroyed. maybe it was 20% of some economic figure that wrelevant s strike. i don't know. but at least wilbur ross was right there at the president's side to help make this call, even though he doesn't know what the call was even afterwards. what has changed in terms of u.s. military involvement in thetational intractable syrian civil war as of last night is a pretty specific thing. last night was not the first time that the u.s. military has shot tomahawk missiles into syria from u.s. navy shipsz. this footage you're looking at is from r67 when president obama ordered that 47 tomahawk missiles should be fired at fighters inside syria that were thought to be allied with al qaeda.

the united states also led a coalition of arab nations in manned aircraft bombing raid in syria starting september 2014. the united states alone and with along with other countries have continued bombing raids in syria for years now both with drones and with manned melinda. those air strikes have been targeting isis. those u.s. attacks inside syria continued right through the end of the obama administration and into the start of the new administration too. none of that is now in terms of our u.s. military involvement in the syrian civil war. what is new as of last night is that now we're bombing both sides in that war. previous air strikes and the casual commando raid targeted the al qaeda if i wouldn't fighters. they also targeted tsarnaev government as well, the syrian military. the forces of bashar al assad. whether you like this turn of

events or not. it's truly not clear why the u.s. government has made that this change. bashar al assad undoubtedly is a bifrp with the blood of hundreds of thousands of people on his hands as well as the ultimate responsibility for what has been the wholesale destruction of his own country. but he's been a butcher all this time. there are hundreds of thousands of people who have died in that war. the syrian goverent under bashar al assad there appears to be an industrialized, this has been true all along. that has been true for years. and it does appear that bashar al assad may have abused chemical weapons against his own civilian population again this week. but this president was emphatic after a much larger chemical

weapons attack that that was no reason for the united states to get militarily involved whatsoever in the syrian civil war. i mean, if you didn't want to get involved, if you screamed and yelled and occasional went to all caps emphasis how stupid it would be to get involved after he killed 1400 people with chemical weapons not that long ago, why would bashar al assad killing 70 people with gas this week result in the new administration simultaneously refrgz its position on this war and getting in? and not just reversing its position from what the president had said when he was a private citizen in 2013. they have reversed their position, taken the exact opposition from their own pu pick up foreign policy position just last week.

>> i think the status and the longer term status of president assad will be decided by the syrian people. >> assad's role in the future is uncertain with the acts he's taken, it would seem there would be no role for him to govern the syrian people. >> first cli thereas rex tillerson secretary of state last week. second clip was rex tillerson this week. 180 degree change. and whether you like the new policy or you like the old one, we need to now try to figure out what the cause was of that change as americans. wasn't just an impulse i have thing from the new president, it wasn't an emotional thing. was he secretly inclined to intervene all this time and he campaigned on the opposition until a few days ago with a

stealth move? is it possible he was just ignorant about the syrian civil war before, even though he was taking public positions on them. now that he's president he's learning about what the civil war is and he's finding now that he gets it his instincts are to start shooting missiles. in the last few days, the new administration has threat understand that the united states will take unilateral action against north korea. secretary of state putting out a strange threatening statement a few days ing a saying the united states has spoken enough about north korea. we have no further comment. before the national security adviser got fired, there was also his vague, strange threat against iran. >> as of today, we are officially putting iran on notice. >> it's still not at all clear what that meant, what that was

about. is the notice still active now that michael flynn has been fired? could he deliver their notice through turkey since he was on the government payroll? iran is on notice. the raid on the yell, that was apparently approved after almost no deliberate process within the administration at all. that raid was a disaster, resulted in many civilian deaths and the death of a u.s. navy seal and injuries to four other navy seals. that raid also represented a significant circulation in military intervention by the u.s. administration. without a process to deliberate over that really at all. the new president apparently approved that raid and that major circulation in yemen at a dinner meeting that included jared, his son-in-law.

this new presidency is where we got what appears to have been a truly disastrous u.s. air raid in mosul, in iraq. an air raid that may have killed 200 civilians after u.s. and allied forces specifically told the civilians in those neighbors that they should not leave and they should stay in their homes right before u.s. planes then boemd those homes. and now, the new administration has launched 59 tomahawk missiles at the other side in the syrian war that we weren't yet fighting at the syrian military. why were steve mnuchin and jared kushner and the chief of the economic council and wilbur ross, why were they all in the room while that decision was being made? what military action decision requires the chief of the economic advisers to be there, or wilbur ross? the u.s. military's been

involved in the syrian civil war before. have never before deliberately taken a combatant role against the syrian military. who knows what will happen in response if anything? is the united states going to pursue a military strategy that's aimed at regime change in syria now? today, who knows? and next week, who wants to bet? we don't understand how it is the policy changed 180 degrees from last week. how will we know it's not going to change again next week? the founders of our country tried to invest the power to make war in the united states congress instead of in the presidency. and they did that for a reason. it's hard to get elected officials from all over the country to vote to start a war. congress wouldn't even take a vote on president obama's request to them to authorize

military force in syria in 2013. congress is structurally disinclined toward war, and the founders knew they would be. they knew that a deliberatetive body would be less likely to wage war rec leslie as compared to one person who can make that decision alone. over these past couple generations, we have let that constitutional imperative slip. and now we've got in power a person with the war making powers off a modern american president who is also a person that is the subject of a counterintelligence investigation by the fbi because of the possibility that he concluded with a foreign power in oer to become presen he also appears to have no morring whatsoever in the day-to-day basics of foreign policy. but he has just gotten the first good press of his young presidency, and he got it by turning on a dime doing

something completely contrary to his stated foreign policy and deciding what the heck, let's bomb something. whether or not you think that was a good decision, how do you feel about his decision-making process for coming to it? because the the snechbsz are about to get very perverse. more on this ahead. he's the one. (vo)...it was meant to be. and love always keeps you safe. we're fine. (vo) love is why we built a car you can trust. now and for a long time to come. the all-new subaru impreza sedan and five-door. a car you can love no matter what road you're on. the subaru impreza. more than a car, it's a subaru.

ito treat your toughy nasal allergies... ...listen up. unlike pills that don't treat congestion, clarispray covers 100 percent of your nasal allergy symptoms. clarispray. from the makers of claritin. but i keep it growing by making every dollar count. that's why i have the spark cash card from capital one.

with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on all of my purchasing. and that unlimited 2% cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business... which adds fuel to my bottom line. what's in your wallet?

this is the time in the show when i thought we were about to be joined live by richard engle. richard is live for us right now

on the turkish side of syria. we have just been told that turkish authorities have told richard to take down his live shot. so even though he's there, as far as i know we cannot put him on camera, but i believe we've been able to get you by phone. are we with you? >> you are. and i'm sorry about this. we were up and ready to go, the lights were on, and then the police or intelligence services came and case us away, not because i was going to talk to you, because the situation here is tense. there's a referendum that's coming up that's very important, very politically sensitive here so they're nervous about journalists setting up shop and talking about almost anything. i really wanted to be part of your show because it's an incredibly important subject you're discussing. i was listening to your intro

and i was crying to myself. it's so important that people realize -- you were suggesting do we have a policy in syria, can this team in power be trusted to guide us through these waters? and i wanted to discuss that with you. >> richard, in terms of what's different here, i think it's important to be specific about the the fact there have been various types of u.s. military gaemt in syria over the last few years. there have been tomahawk strikes before. >> just now we've been bombing both sides. we've been bombing the extremist groups there. first we armed those groups, now we're the bombing government that's bombing those groups because that group did an atrocity and did it on

television and that's the key thing here. president trump saw it and decided to act either for emotional reasons or, if you were a cynical person, for political reasons. and i was told that the optics were also part of it. he did want to send a message to the chinese president that he's having dinner with that he's a tough guy, that times have changed, that he can be trusted to use the military as his discretion when he wants to. >> richard, do you think particularly in light of that disturbing reporting that this may have been something done not for strategic reasons but for political effect, do you think that the united stat government and the u.s. military should be expecting there will be a different kind of response to this strike targeting the syrian military than there has been to the other kinds of involvement we've had on the other sides of this war? >> so far there hasn't been any kind of catastrophic reaction to this because it was small, because there is a meeting

coming up next week between rex tillerson and putin in moscow. the russians don't want to rock the boat right now. i don't think the russians are going to forget about this. i don't think the syrians have forgotten about this. the syrian government, while you said they are running what has been described as a concentration camp system, today were baffled. they said what side is the u.s. on? we had an interview with someone very close to assad's office who was saying are you helping the terrorists? maybe that's what they call all the extremist groups there, who's side are you on? to a directors they have a point because it's not clear whose side we're on. >> he has had been askrichard, this broadcast. >> there will be more because what's coming next week. so this time there was a strike,

maybe there's not going to be regret consequences because it was limited but who knows where this is going. this is really delicate stuff. >> thank you, my friend. stay safe tonight in turkey. i want to bring into the conversation courtney cube by. you've been doing absolutely yeoman's work and really good reporting. you've been way ahead of the curb in terms of anticipating these things and describing them. i hadn't to grachg congratulate you and thank you for helping us report this over the last 24 hours. >> zblauch one of the things we had conflicting reports about today is how much damage was done. we got some sort of hard to read, hard to assess reports from the ground in syria saying not too much damage was done to this base. certainly it's still functioning as an air base.

there were airplanes taking off today from there. can you thread that for us at all in terms of giving us an assessment there? >> sure. the base itself, the majority of the damage to the base itself was infrastructure. they did not pock up the runway. these strikes were very targeted. they didn't take out the syrian air force as some were calling for early yesterday. what they were trying to do was send a very clear message, a clear signal that the specific assets that were used for this chemical attack earlier this week on civilians near idlib, those are what were targeted. they went after 20 syrian aircraft and several hard understand aircraft heroines. ethey went after fuel depots, the places where they refuel the aircraft on the base. they went after the air defenses, they believe they took

out the defenses, a russian-made syrian made radar. they weren't intending to stop the syrian a few hours capability, frankly, they didn't stop the capability at that base. they still have the act like to fly in and out of that base today. >> acuwe couldn't this dramatic photo released by if white house today showing the sort of makeshift situation room they set up at the president's resort in south florida. it was a dramatic picture but an unusual cast of characters, the president's top economic adviser, the commerce secretary is there, the treasury secretary is there, mention the the president's son-in-law. is it clear in terms of white house decision making part of this that all those people were involved in this process? do we know what the chain of decision making was here? >> it was a relatively quick decision making process.

so earlier in the week on april 5th, president trump asked secretary mattis for specific plans for options to strike back at the syrian regime, specifically because of this chemical attack on april 4th. by that day, there were plans at the white house, and then it goes back and forth. the military and the administration likes to call it an interagency process, but basically what it is is medication. nsc go back and forth and talk through their options. by the next day on april 6th, yesterday, a proposal was sent forward by secretary mattis to president trump down at mar-a-lago. we don't know exactly whether president trump accepted the exact recommendation by secretary mattis or if there was a variation of several options that came forward. we just don't know. but in fact he did make the call at 4:30 yesterday. >> a president trump said go fad with the strikes.

i want it to be targeted and specifically against any of the assets that are involved in the chemical weapons attack earlier this week. and that's what the military did. think about that. 4:30 p.m. eastern time, president trump gave the order. there was a tank mting at the exact same time. i watched the chiefs walk into the office yesterday afternoon. and about three hours later the tomahawks starting firing off the coast of the eastern med. >> courtney could you be by who hasn't slept in the last 24 hours. thank you for helping us continued process. we have much more ahead. stay with us. i like that. [ all sounds come to a crashing halt ] ah. when your pain reliever stops working, your whole day stops. awww. try this. for minor arthritis pain, only aleve is fda approved to work for up to 12 straight hours with just one pill. thank you. come on everybody. aleve.

live whole. not part. a 401(k) is the most sound way to go. let's talk asset allocation. -sure. you seem knowledgeable, professional. i'm actually a deejay. -[ laughing ] no way! -that really is you? if they're not a cfp pro, you just don't know. cfp. work with the highest standard. there's nothing more than my vacation.me so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it. they offer free cancellation, in case i decide to go from kid-friendly to kid-free. now i can start relaxing even before the vacation begins. your vacation is very important. that's why booking.com makes finding the right hotel for the right price easy. visit booking.com now to find out why we're booking.yeah

but when we brought our daughter home, that was it. now i have nicoderm cq. the nicoderm cq patch with unique extended release technology helps prevent your urge to smoke all day. it's the best thing that ever happened to me. every great why needs a great how.

there is a twitter account for the bad lands national park. but there's also a bad hombre hands national park twitter account. it's not a national park. obviously the national park service itself also has a twitter account, but there is also a nasty women of the national park service twitter account. they call it, quote, the unofficial resistances team of nasty lady rangers that your elected officials warned you about. here's another one. this one's pretty blunt, not at all e.p.a. since president trump took office, one of the things that's happened online is dozens of parody accounts have popped up. they're usually pretty open about the fact they're

alternative accounts. the alt department of energy on the alt department of labor, or the alt library of agreements that's also one account called alt immigration. it's the alternative account for the agency called the u.s. citizenship and immigration service. this account has been particularly critical of the muslim ban and the wall with the border of mexico. that parody was not well receivy the trump administration. on march 14th, the u.s. customs and border patrol, the real one, sent a summons to twitter, to the company twitter, asking for, quote, all records regarding the twitter account including user names, phone numbers and ip addresses. the real border payroll faxed that to twitter on march 14th. unfortunately they asked twitter to comply with the commons summ

the day before they sent it. yesterday twitter sued pretty much everybody involved in issuing this strange summons. they filed a case against the department of homeland security, u.s. customs and border protection, john kelly, as well as a bunch of officials from the agency. a lawsuit said skpuchlz border patrol didn't have grounds to even issue a summons like this. i know that sounds like weird legalese, until you see in fact the u.s. code that u.s.s. customs and border patrol cited when they demanded this information about the parody twitter account, what they cited was a part of the u.s. code that relates to inkwireries relating to the importation of merchandise. tweets are not merchandise, nor are they imported. but nice try. did you try to get them for

parking too? i don't know who the trump administration has working at the legal office at customs and border patrol, but we can tell for sure two things, one, they don't have a sense of humor, and they're not that awesome when it comes to the legal stuff. well, after twitter sued them yesterday, today customs and border patrol tried to make the whole thing go away. they rescinded the summons and dropped everything. they where do you it, so now twitter has dropped their lawsuit in response. but turned trump administration, that's your tax dollars at work.

various: (shouting) heigh! ho! ( ♪ ) it's off to work we go! woman: on the gulf coast, new exxonmobil projects are expected to create over 45,000 jobs. and each job created by the energy industry supports two others in the community. altogether, the industry supports over 9 million jobs nationwide. these are jobs that natural gas is helping make happen, all while reducing america's emissions. energy lives here. all while reducing america's emissions. my insurance rates are but dad, you've got... ...allstate. with accident forgiveness they guarantee your rates won't go up just because of an accident. smart kid. indeed. it's good to be in, good hands. he's a nascar champion who's she's a world-class swimmer who's stared down the best in her sport.

but for both of them, the most challenging opponent was... pe blood clots in my lung. it was really scary. a dvt in mleg. i had to learn all i could to help protect myself. my doctor and i choose xarelto® xarelto®... to help keep me protected. xarelto® is a latest-generation blood thinner... ...that's proven to treat and reduce the risk of dvt and pe blood clots from happening again. in clinical studies, almost 98% of patients on xarelto® did not experience another dvt or pe. here's how xarelto works. xarelto® works differently. warfarin interferes with at least six blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective... ...targeting just one critical factor, interacting with less of your body's natural blood-clotting function. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor as this may increase risk of blood clots. while taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. it may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. get help right away for unexpected bleeding, unusual bruising, or tingling.

if you've had spinal anesthesia, watch for back pain or any nerve or muscle-related signs or symptoms. do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. tell your doctor before all planned medical or dental procedures and before starting xarelto® about any conditions, such as kidney, liver, or bleeding problems. you've got to learn all you can... ...to help protect yourself from dvt and pe blood clots. talk to your doctor about xarelto®. there's more to know. at crowne plaza we know business travel isn't just business. there's this. 'a bit of this. why not? your hotel should make it easy to do all the things you do. which is what we do. crowne plaza. we're all business, mostly. why pause a spontaneous moment? cialis for daily use treats ed and the urinary symptoms of bph. tell your doctor about your medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away foanrection lasting more than four hours.

if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis. when supreme court justice antonin scalia died on a ranch in texas last year, only a few hours had passed before the top republican in the senate said president obama wouldn't allowed tooptd justice on the court to replace justice scalia. he said, quote, this vacancisy should not be filled until we have a new president. that was february 2016. that was the very start of the presidency primary season. president obama still had almost a full year left in office but the republicans in the senate declared as far as they were concerned he wasn't really president at all. president obama had no right to make a supreme court nomination and then they tried to persuade everyone else this was true.

>> justice scalia served for 30 years so this clearly extends beyond president obama's term of office. it's that important. >> he served for 30 years so what gives this president the right to go ahead and try to replace him? after president obama never there he is nominated someone, he nominated gar hand to fill the seat even those who supported him, those republicans refused to meet with him, they refused to even schedule a marrying for him. they pretended like the nomination didn't exist. it's an unprecedented thing on the republicans part what they did to merrick garland. and further they started arguing with hillary clinton ended up winning the presidency, they would never fill that seat. they would hold it open for the entire time she was president. judge merrick garland wait 293 days far senate hearing, the longest any supreme court

nominee has ever had to wait. until his nomination ended without him ever getting a hearing. it stayed open for 14 months so republicans could wait until a republican was in place and they could get a republican candidate in that seat. we've never ever gone through a process like that before in this country. we've never filled a supreme court seat like this in this way. ever since justice scalia died, since the day he passed away, the process of filling this seat has ever been normal. today we found out who will fill that seat, republicans got rid of senate rules that have been there forever in order to get neil gorsuch confirmed to the seat. it's done. he will be sworn in on monday. there's nothing anybody can do about it. but the way it happened was so radical that in some ways it's occluded any view of what neil gorsuch should be expected to

be. if democrats nothing win back the senate next year, would this be the new normal? where the president from an opposing party no longer gets to put anybody on the supreme court and seats just get held open? if another supreme court justice retired or died on the skbench there was another opening statement on the supreme court f democrats were in charge of the senate would they not allow trump to unemployment anyone? is that what we do from here on out? is there any other remedy at this point ghaichb we just went through? joining us is the great dally will you identify if i can. dolly, it's great to see you on this first day of the new world order. >> hey, rachel. i feel like it's been 14 months of us talking about this theoretically and here we are. >> and that's sort of been our lives in this new political era. we talk about how amazing and strange and per verdict to the course of american history it would be if examination

happened, then x happens and we have to figure out what you do the next day. this is the way it goes and we don't know what happens next? or do you feel like we have a sort of tale foretold in terms of what happens now. >> i think this happens forever. something fundamental broke you and pit perfectly. what we and learned we learned with mitch mcconnell says that obstructing maker garland was one of the proudest moments of his career, that this is about power now. it's not about senate norms that suggest that supreme court justices are different. now it's just about power. it's about winning elections. it's about putting the most extreme person you can put up knowing thank you need 51 votes to confirm them. dot see this unrolling and i think the other thing i'd add is

84, anthony kennedy, 78 steve brierks this is not a theoretical question either. >> if you could wave magic wand, you could just determine what people were going to how people were going to deal with these matters is this a fix you could invent that would get us out of that very dire description that you just gave us. >> the depressing fix, rachel, is i think this is a situation where democrats have been awfully moderate and temperate over the last few decades. and so that when, you know, john roberts was put up, sam ali toe, right to quite far right nominees from republican presidents, we saw so to ma your, breyer, people who were sort of center left. so i think in one sense, retro

actively just keep putting up bren nans and marshall islands. put up people who are the center of the court is now anthony kennedy, one of the most conservative jurists in supreme court history. so i think some kind of parody of passion and force and enthusiasm. i think maybe that's the only thing that might have fixed this. >> dahlia, briefly, very briefly, do you subscribe to the common view now that judge gorsuch will be to the right of every justice on the court? >> whether he is to the right of alito or thomas, those are the questions we're asking. i think he is pretty consistently where scalia, thomas, alito are. certainly not to the left of any of them. >> dahlia lithwick, legal correspondent for slate and teller of hard truths. dahlia, thank you very much. good to have you here. >> thanks, rachel. >> all right. we'll be right back. stay with us.

♪ and a thing called love. ♪ ♪ let me tell you 'bout the stars in the sk♪, ♪ a girl and a guy♪ ♪ and the way they could kiss on a night like this ♪ life's as big as you make it. introducing the all-new seven seater volkswagen atlas ♪ and a thing called love. ito treat your toughy nasal allergies... ...listen up. unlike pills that don't treat congestion, clarispray covers 100 percent of your nasal allergy symptoms. clarispray. from the makers of claritin.

adult 7+ promotes alertness and mental sharpness in dogs 7 and older. (ray) the difference has been incredible. she is much more aware. she wants to learn things. (vo) purina pro plan bright mind. nutrition that performs.

i know what you want. i know what you've been thinking. you should just own up to it. you've been sit issing there tonight all through the show thinking yes, yes, this is all fine, maddow. but man, i wish there was some new, even creepier details on that lurid sex scandal involving alabama's handsome 74-year-old governor. it's friday. i will not let you down. dirty text messages, open threats, including something rustling in the bushes. also something about a command to bow to the throne. and that's a quote.

put the kids to bed. maybe clear the room of anything you don't want to up chuck on. because it's about to get little weird. it's our final story of the night. thank you, alabama. that's next. you're going to be hanging out in here. so if you need anything, text me. do you play? ♪ ♪ use the chase mobile app to send money in just a tap, to friends at more banks then ever before.

you got next? chase. helping you master what's now and what's next. or how high the pollen count, flonase allergy relief keeps your eyes and nose clear. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances that cause nasal congestion and itchy, watery eyes. for relief beyond the nose. flonase.

for the past year, alabama's republican governor robert bentley has been under three separate investigations as the state has tried to figure out whether he used taxpayer funds to carry on and then cover up an affair with a top staffer. well, on wednesday this week we

reported that the state ethics commission had referred the governor for prosecution. well, today the alabama house impeachment committee released their investigative report on the scandal, and oh my. the report says the governor refused to cooperate with the investigation in any meaningful sense, which they say is itself grounds for impeachment. but despite his lack of cooperation, they're able to detail things like the governor dispatching alabama law enforcement officials to break up with his alleged girlfriend on his behalf. he also allegedly directed law enforcement officials to drive all over the state to confront people he thought might have sexy recordings of him and his alleged mistress. the report also details significant sums of money paid to his alleged mistress. and that part doesn't even cover the salacious stuff like the text messages discovered by the governor's wife because he didn't realize his cell phone was synced to his ipad, and she had access to the ipad.

messages where he talks with his alleged mistress about wanting to touch her body and wishing she could be sleeping next to him. and they say things like bless our hearts and other parts, to which he responds magnetic. on top of all that -- sorry. i want to rescind my facial expression. i take it back. recall. there are new revelations about the culture of fear and intimidation the governor established once he knew he was in trouble, including allegations of multiple threats against his then wife's chief of staff who helped set up the recording device that caught the governor red-not exactly handed, the governor apparently cornering her in the governor's mansion telling her you'll never work in the state of alabama again if you tell anybody about the affair and again reportedly confronted her in a parking lot warning her to watch herself because she didn't know what she was getting into. he also told her, allegedly,

because he was the governor, quote, people bow to the throne. the wife's chief of staff says somebody threw a rock through her window and scrawled death threats on her car. even before the report came out at 5:00 today, the leaders of the house and state senate, both of them republicans urged the governor to resign, but the governor said nope, he is staying. this afternoon a judge granted the governor's request for a temporary restraining order on impeachment proceedings. so noi ino impeachment proceedi for now. the court says the governor deserves time to respond to the report. i tell you, i kind of can't wait the see how he responds. i hope none of it is by text. that does it for us tonight. we will see you again on monday. have an excellent weekend. now it's time for "the last word with lawrence o'donnell." good evening, lawrence. >> rachel, i usually show up here with nothing planned to say