what would have given him the best chance at winning this seat at all. >> casie hunt, thank you very much. again, the breaking story, the rolling story tonight in georgia, that goes on. that does it for us for this hour. rachel maddow taking over. o. foreign affairs is out with the new issue titled present at the destruction trump in practice. it's illustrated with this pictogram of air force one jetting directly into, volcanic eruption? mushroom cloud? giant mountain? end of the world? you get the idea. that picture and idea set the

tone for the content of this new issue of "foreign affairs." there's a detailed look at the initial behavior of this new president on foreign affairs. and how, if that behavior continues, that could lead directly to three brand-new separate wars with three different countries. there's also long piece about why the experts believe you probably don't have to worry about an immediate descent into full-on fascism any time soon but, yeah, we are maybe sliding into what the experts may call a competitive authoritarianism. the editor of foreign affairs is gideon rose. he opens this hair-raising collection today with this question. it's more of a game than a question. the game is, stupid or nefarious? every administration spins, fights with the press and the bureaucracy, pushes its own

agenda and tries to evade intrusive oversight. but ordinary white houses do not repeatedly lie, or declare war on mainstream media institutions or pursue radical goals while disdaining professional input, nor do they refuse to accept independent scrutiny. how seriously you take these behaviors depends on how you assess the motivations behind them, generating a game that some have taken to calling "stupid or nefarious"? do slow appointments to the new administration signal poor management or a deliberate attempt to deconstruct the administrative state? is dismissing experienced senior officials en masse just a clumsy way of handling a presidential transition or is that a purge of potential obstacles and whistleblowers? are all the lies mere venting or are they a deliberate plot to distract critics and undermine reasoned discourse? that's your choice. stupid or nefarious?

stupid or nefarious? i'd like to take door three if those are my options. tonight we've got our eyes on a few developing stories. the congressional election that happened today in a republican district in the great state of georgia. the republican incumbent there was tom price. he left congress to become health secretary in the new administration. this is the special election to replace him. and every special election is unique. they're all local affairs. you should never extrapolate too much from any one special election, but democrats have felt like even though this has been a republin-held seat since the 1970s, democrats feel this maybe could be within reach for them. democrats have been trying very hard to flip this district, to flip this georgia district as basically a pushback against trump and against the republicans in congress. so we have been watching that special election. we have been watching these returns come in. you see the percentage of returns in is in the upper right-hand corner.

we've been watching these numbers tonight as they trickle in. we'll have more on this over the course of the night as we get in more data. even though this is a race for just one congressional seat, everybody interested in u.s. politics has been watching this special election today to the point where i think it may have driven the white house to distraction. you probably heard the british prime minister has called a snap election for june. british elections are scheduled to happen every five years but the government can make a decision to call one sooner. prime minister theresa may has decided to do that. this is a moment in british politics where the other parties seem particularly out of it and disorganized and unpopular. so theresa may is seizing the moment calling a snap election right away in a matter of weeks. prime minister theresa may apparently called the white house today to talk about that decision. to talk about the fact that britain is about to have a

national election. after that phone call, did you see this today? the white house issued what's called a readout about that call. when you get a description from your government in a leader to leader phone call. the white house released this read-out of the call with theresa may today. and they screwed it up. you'd think they would be particularly sensitive about not screwing stuff up related to her. they put out that announcement when theresa may was visiting the white house that misspelled her name three times. you'd think they'd be sensitive about not screwing stuff up. they are still screwing stuff up. this is from the read out today. president donald j. trump receives a phone call from prime minister theresa may of the united kingdom to call a special election in june. it's not a special election. it's a snap election if you want to add an adjective. the special election, that's what's happening today in georgia today. that's not what's happening in the uk. it's a different thing. they're not having a special

election in britain. we're having a special election here. it's not like the readout was like a big complicated thing. two sentences. one of them was wrong. the white house apparently also screwed up its readout of a call between trump and the profit turkey yesterday. -- president of turkey yesterday. turkey is a republic, a parliamentary democracy, but president erdogan and turkey is doing his best to end all that and turn the country into a dictatorship. the referendum was conducted under a state of emergency after erdogan locked up tens of thousands of people he's labeled his political opponents. e referendum will concentrate power in erdogan's hands, gets rid of that country's prime minister and parliamentary democracy. it consolidates all power basically in him. and this referendum was an incredibly close result. international observers say the election was not free and fair. the opposition is rejecting the results of the referendum. the opposition says they're not conceding this is how the vote went down. erdogan is claiming victory.

he immediately declared another state of emergency. he's claiming the vote is a ratification of his efforts to basically become just an outright dictator in turkey. in the middle of that scary process in that big important country we got this readout from the white house yesterday. president trump had called president erdogan to congratulate him on his recent referendum victory. and the rest of the world was like, what? really? to congrat -- to what? because no other western leader in any other country in the world called the turkish president to congratulate him on his dictatorship referendum. there's a real question as to whether that referendum result should be seen as final or legitimate. so stupid or nefarious? is the new stance of the united states government to be

congratulatory and welcoming to the world's newest dictatorship? in a formerly democratic country? or was that just a screw-up? oops. that readout was yesterday. since then we've had a whole day of contradiction between the president's reported congratulatory phone call and the rest of the government, including the state department not quite knowing what to say about what just happened to turkey. tonight it culminated on air force one when a white house spokesperson tried to tell reporters that when president trump called to offer his congratulations on that referendum, he did not mean to convey that the results of that referendum were a good thing. or even that they were results. it was just the other meaning of the word congratulations. so to be clear, the united states position on what just happened in turkey is that we as a government, we as a country do not necessarily accept the results of that referendum. but the president has congratulated the turkish president on the results of that referendum. okay? good.

this is a fraught time in the world in a lot of ways. a lot of the very basic stuff about our fragile international order is changing or straining or just flat out falling apart. before our election in november, europe lost a cornerstone. britain voted to leave the eu. that was last summer before our presidential election. now britain is going to be facing a new national election in very short order. france, another cornerstone of europe, they've got their elections this weekend. two of the top four candidates in the french presidential election want to pull france not only out of the eu but out of nato as well. oh. turkey is in nato. turkey is the biggest military in nato other than us. if turkey becomes a full-blown dictatorship, do they get to stay in nato? nato is a military alliance. it's a pact whereby we agree to mutually defend our nato allies

as we would expect them to defend us. but if they're going to be a dictatorship now, how does that work out? erdogan locks up a few hundred thousand more people? and we still plan to send the 82nd airborne in to defend him in the event he says he needs help? and then on top of all of that, there's north korea, right, which was worrying enough on its own terms before we had to start playing stupid or nefarious to figure out our own government's behavior toward them. i started off tonight by mentioning this new issue of "foreign affairs" magazine. here's the lead article right now at the "atlantic" magazine. how did the trump administration lose an aircraft carrier? this story unraveling today is like nothing i've ever seen. this thing started off wrong a week ago and it has gotten more and more wrong every day. we thought the last week was worrying when it came to north korea. we had no idea how worrying it

was when it came to us. to the point where tonight, this story is now the front page of every news site in america and still nobody can believe this happened. apparently this has just happened. honestly, i need historical perspective to know if anything like this has ever happened because this is absolutely bizarre. started last saturday. april 8th. that was the start of it. an unnamed u.s. official told reuters the u.s. was diverting an aircraft carrier. a strike group. all of its support ships were going to go over to the korean peninsula as a show of force to intimidate north korea. first word of that was an unnamed government official speaking to reuters saturday, april 8th. last saturday. following day on the fox news channel, sunday morning, the national security adviser h.r. mcmaster was asked about it and he confirmed it. >> i'm going to have to ask you sort of lightning round quick questions, quick answers. why the carrier strike force to the korean peninsula? >> well, it's prudent to do it, isn't it?

>> it's prudent to do it, isn't it? we got the national security adviser confirming that we are doing it. that was last sunday. then two days later on tuesday, a white house briefing and naturally, the white house spokesman gets asked about it. >> the strike carrier group in the sea of japan in that region is that also a messaging circumstance, or simply protective for our allies in japan and korea. >> a carrier group is several things. the forward deployment is deterrence, presence. it's prudent, but it does a lot ofhings. >> prudent. there's that word again. carrier strike group going to the korean peninsula. so told to a newspaper -- to a wire service on saturday. confirmed on a sunday, shows on sunday morning, confirmed at the white house on tuesday. the same day at the pentagon, james mattis, the one everyone is comforted by, the adult in the room. that same day, tuesday, he

confirms at the pentagon, that strike group is on its way to the korean peninsula. >> she's just on her way up there because that's where we thought it was most prudent to have her at this time. there's not a specific demand signal or specific reason why we're sending her up there. >> it's just unusual for us to know about a ship movement in advance. that was sort of what got everyone's attention. so why was that? why was it put out in advance? was it just to signal to north korea that there would be a show of presence there? >> i believe it's because she was originally headed in one direction for an exercise and we canceled our role in that exercise and that's what became publicly explained why she wasn't in that exercise. >> none of that is true. no one was asking why the "uss carl vinson" pulled out of military exercise which necessitated this further explanation. nobody was asking why she pulled out of a military exercise because the "uss carl vinson"

didn't pull out of the exercise. that carrier strike group is doing those military exercises right now. despite what the white house and the national security adviser and the defense secretary all said, the "uss carl vinson" was not steaming toward north korea. was not steaming north toward the korean peninsula. in fact, while they were all saying that the "uss carl vinson" s steaming north toward korea, the "uss carl vinson" was steaming south in the opposite direction to, in fact, go do those exercises with the australian navy that jim mattis said were being cancel and required an explanation. huh? i mean, one of the things that's been scary about the past week is not knowing what north korea is going to do. it's also now scary to figure out the behavior of our own government, particularly because we were all told that our government just sent an aircraft

carrier to loom over north korea when that, in fact, was not happening. it's a whole different kind of scary to realize now at the end of this week that just was that the whole administration up to and including the white house spokesman, national security adviser and the defense secretary were either all lying or they all apparently believed that the "uss carl vinson" and its support ships were headed to the sea of japan and korean peninsula when they were not. they were headed in no such direction and they were thousands of miles away. of course, it goes without saying the president got this one wrong, too. >> we are sending an armada, very powerful. >> whether it is a good idea or not to send an armada, an aircraft carrier strike group to the korean peninsula at a time like this. it's a good idea for the united states government to have some basic idea of where all our aircraft carriers are at any given moment. i mean, in this case, it's more worrying, not less, to realize

that this is a problem that goes well beyond just the president screwing something up. the president screws stuff up. at this point with this president, it's not even weird to realize that he might not even know who the leader of north korea is. in the middle of this supposed standoff with them. >> i'm not like other administrations where they say we're going to do this in four weeks and that doesn't work that way. we'll see what happens. i hope things work out well. i hope there's going to be peace but they've been talk with this gentleman for a long time. you read clinton's book. he said we made such a great peace deal and it's a joke. you look at different things over the years with president obama. he's been outplayed. they've all been outplayed by this gentleman. we'll see what happens. >> bill clinton's book does talk about dealings with north korea. talks about a 1994 deal that was initially negotiated with north korea's founder kim il-sung. kim il-sung died in july of

1994. that 1994 deal was then funeral -- finalized with kim jong-il who took over after his father died. kim jong-il then died in 2011 and now there's a whole new guy, kim jong-un. all three of these men are apparently in our president's mind conflated as somebody who he calls this gentleman. it's three different people. this guy hasn't been doing anything for a long time. only been there since 2011. not the same guy negotiate with clinton. he was a baby. it's a remarkable thing to realize about your president. but when the white house spokesman and the national security adviser and the defense secretary back up the president's crazy apparent ignorance about something as big a deal and as physically large as a carrier strike group, that is a -- that's a different level of weird. this is not the president getting something wrong. this is the administration getting something really, really, really wrong. for days. and it's a big deal. and it's close to the most hair-trigger place on earth in

terms of the prospect of an actual nuclear war. and apparently they were just going to, like, let this one slide? i mean, i don't know what this is. i don't know if this is stupid or nefarious or neither or something in between. but i do want to know if there is anything in u.s. history that helps us understand what to do in a circumstance like thi what this kind of thing might lead to. hold that thought. that's next.

say hello to the new unlimited data plans from at&t and never pay overages again. so now the whole family can binge,... ...surf, shop, navigate, listen, game, stream and more. all without the hassle of worrying about overages or running out of data. only with at&t, you can now get unlimited data with hbo included. and remember, it's our best, wireless unlimited deal ever. so get at&t, get unlimited and get everyone more for less. it can seem like triggers pop up everywhere. luckily there's powerful, 24-hour, non-drowsy claritin. it provides relief of symptoms that can be triggered by over 200 different allergens. live claritin clear. with all the things you'll never learn from a book. expedia. everything in one place, so you can travel the world better.

my fellow citizens, let no one doubt that this is a

difficult and dangerous effort on which we have set out. no one can foresee precisely what course it will take or what course or casualties will be incurred. many months of sacrifice and self-discipline lie ahead. months in which both our patience and our will will be tested. months in which many threats and enunciations will keep us aware of our dangers. but the greatest danger of all would be to do nothing. >> president kennedy addressing the nation about the cuban missile crisis in 1962. as it happened, that crisis did not take months. ran its course in 13 days. 13 days during which we now know the united states and the soviet union repeatedly came very close to war. which very easily could have been nuclear war. tonight the current administration is struggling to explain whether it lied on purpose or whether it just lost track of an aircraft carrier.

a carrier strike group that the administration said was on its way toward north korea this past week when that aircraft carrier definitely was not on its way to north korea this past week. not just the president but the white house spokesman, the national security adviser and defense secretary all misleading the public on that very big fact just in the last few days. we thought we had enough to worry about when it came to nuclear north korea. joining us for some much-needed perspective is michael beschloss. thank you for being with us. >> pleasure, rachel. >> so i want to put aside for the moment the prospect that the administration has concocted a deliberate, elaborate lie that they had spoken by the white house spokesman, the president himself, the national security adviser and the defense secretary.

i want to set aside that possibility because that's a different thing and just talk about this as, i guess what would be a better scenario which is that they're confused and they screwed this up and messed it up and they didn't really know where that aircraft carrier was. if that is the case, is there any historical analogy that helps us understand the gravity of that? >> nothing like this in a crisis this serious. and, you kw, part of american power is the impression that our government is competent and we do things well. so if at the beginning of a crisis like this you have the white house, the defense department, others saying that this ship, this armada as the president said, is somewhere very different from where it is doesn't exactly help. this kind of thing never must happen again. >> one of the contextual things which happened, which is a small thing but seems relevant as we try to sort this out. on friday night we reported that a spokesman for centcom came out and gave inflammatory quotes to the hill newspaper saying in part the president said during the campaign he wants to bomb the bleep out of isis. that's now what we're doing.

very inflammatory language. centcom came out late on friday night and said actually that wasn't an authorized -- that wasn't a person authorized to speak for centcom. that's somebody who shouldn't have been giving quotes in centcom's name and retracting those statements without ever saying how that happened. there is history of the white house, the administration, the government and the military being on different pages in situations like this. but how should we see that interplay between the military as a professional force and decisionmakers at a time like this? >> shouldn't happen this way. you so rightly showed jfk. when kennedy was dealing with a missile crisis, he thought the biggest danger would be that crisis would escalate unnecessarily and it would be a nuclear war with 50 million people dead. that didn't have to happen. so kennedy when he was at the beginning of the crisis he said, i want everyone statement even from middle level officials, i want to clear it personally. i want to know where every plane is, where every ship is, about all these troop movements.

i don't want to send a message accidentally to nikita khrushchev and the russians that may cause them to think we're going to do a first strike or somehow cause a wathat will cause this nuclear war to happen unnecearily. when you have something like this happen, it is so different from the atmosphere that jfk set in that missile crisis. >> in that case, so i'm clear here, what jfk was essentially doing with that directive was ensuring that there would never be a mixed message where the president and the white house and the political side, the elected government was asserting something about real life, but the soviets might be reading something different from the military or for some other action at the government. >> he wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page, plus he wanted to make sure that there might not be some pentagon official who thought that he was being too moderate and who wanted to escalate the war saying something that would get

into the press and cause the soviets to think that perhaps we were being more war-like and cause them to retaliate. >> on the other side of this, i guess the -- asking about the opposite scenario, one of the reasons that i'm concerned here by what appears to be the role of h.r. mcmaster and the defense secretary james mattis is that a lot of people have imbued them with their hopes for this administration. that even if there are parts of the elected government, including the presidency that may seem unstable now, those are two experienced national security experts who know what they're doing. if they are involved in this screw-up about this carrier strike group, that shakes that a little bit. have there been scenarios, historical scenarios where the military, national security apparatus was actually sort of a check when the government was less stable? >> oh, sure. absolutely. in the last days of richard nixon's presidency, there was some talk, i don't know how

serious it really was, but worry that richard nixon in order to stay ioffice at the time of watergate when he was about to be impeached might do something like roll the 101st airborne on to the white house lawn or commit some military exercise to try and stay in power and consolidate power behind himself. the secretary of defense, james schlesinger required if there was any order like that, it had to be countersigned by the secretary of defense to make sure it didn't happen. >> wow. the limits of -- the limits of -- >> just to cheer you up tonight. >> thanks. my narcolepsy is fine now. >> michael beschloss, thank you very much. appreciate it. >> great to see you, as always. as i mentioned, tonight we're watching the unfolding story of the georgia congressional election. democrats have been very excited about the possibility of flipping this seat. we've got fresh returns for you. polls are closed there now. we're watching the returns come in. that's straight ahead.

stay with us. ♪ ♪ i'm dr. kelsey mcneely and some day you might be calling me an energy farmer. ♪ energy lives here. hey, ready foyeah. big meeting? uh, hello!? a meeting? it's a big one. too bad. we are double booked: diarrhea and abdominal pain. why don't you start without me? oh. yeah. if you're living with frequent, unpredictable diarrhea and abdominal pain, you may have... ...irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, or ibs-d. a condition that can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi, a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage

both diarrhea and abdominal pain at the same time. so you stay ahead of your symptoms. vibei can cause new worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have or may have had: pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse, long-lasting or severe constipation, or a blockage of your bowel or gallbladder. if you are taking viberzi, you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d... ...with viberzi. gave us the power to turn this enemy into an ally? microsoft and its partners are using smart traps to capture mosquitoes and sequence their dna to fight disease. there are over 100 million pieces of dna in every sample. with the microsoft cloud, we can analyze the data faster than ever before. if we can detect new viruses before they spread, we may someday prevent outbreaks before they begin.

whether you're after supreme performance... ♪ ...advanced intelligence... ...or breathtaking style... ...there's a c-class just for you. decisions, decisions, decisions. lease the c300 sedan for $389 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. pg&e learned a tragic lesson we can never forget. this gas pipeline ruptured in san bruno. the explosion and fire killed eight people. pg&e was convicted of six felony charges including five violations of the u.s. pipeline safety act and obstructing an ntsb investigation. pg&e was fined, placed under an outside monitor, given five years of probation, and required to perform 10,000 hours of community service. we are deeply sorry. we failed our customers in san bruno.

while an apology alone will never be enough, actions can make pg&e sar. and that's why we've replaced hundreds of miles of gas pipeline, adopted new leak detection technology that is one-thousand times more sensitive, and built a state-of-the-art gas operations center. we can never forget what happened in san bruno. that's why we're working every day to make pg&e the safest energy company in the nation. we have breaking news for you now. this is the race in the northern suburbs of atlanta. it's the 6th congressional district. this is the special election to replace former congressman tom price who has left congress to serve as health secretary in the trump administration. here with the latest is my

colleague. >> updating you on breaking news out of georgia's 6th congressional district where votes are still being counted. 30-year-old democrat jon ossoff raised $8 million in his bid to flip his congressional seat from red to blue. there are 18 people running in this election, 11 republicans, five democrats and two independents. the question tonight is whether ossoff or other candidates can clear 50%. if so that person wins the seat. if not there will be a run off election june 20 for the top two finishers. right now with 84% jon ossoff at the 48%. republican karen handelwith 19%. behind her are trump supporting business executive bob gray and former georgia state senator

juddson hill. telling reporters to hang tough as votes are being counted. >> we may not know the outcome for some time but let me tell you this, there is no doubt that this is already a victory for the ages. >> this race is of national interest for outside groups. it is president tweeting out election data. republicans held the seat since the 1970s e. so a democratic victory can signal a shift in lectoral demographics. results are seen as reflection of trump's popularity. results so far jon ossoff is at

48%. karen handelwith 19%. behind her are bob gray and judd judson hill. hey, the future, what's her problem? apparently, i kept her up all night. she said the future freaks her out. how come no one likes me, jim? intel does! just think of everything intel's doing right now with artificial intelligence. and pretty soon ai is going to help executives

like her see trends to stay ahead of her competition. no more sleepless nights. - we're going to be friends! - i'm sorry about this. don't be embarrassed of me, jim. i'm getting excited about this! we know the future. we're going to be friends! because we're building it. doctors recommend taking claritin every day distracting you? of your allergy season for continuous relief. claritin provides powerful, non-drowsy, 24-hour relief. for fewer interruptions from the amazing things you do every day. live claritin clear. every day. what's the best way to get v8 or a fancy juice store?s? ready, go! hi, juice universe? one large rutabaga, with eggplant... done! that's not fair. glad i had a v8. the original way to fuel your day.

last week the governor of alabama was forced to resign in a plea deal that aowed him to bee avd being prosecuted to

charges. he plead instead to a couple of misdemeanors and agreed to leave the governorship. now a few weeks before that happened, though, a few weeks before robert bentley resigned as governor, he did something as governor that has national importance. he picked a new u.s. senator. he picked somebody to fill the senate seat that had just been vacated by jeff sessions when jeff sessions left the senate to become attorney general of the united states. robert bentley on his own say so decided to give that u.s. senate seat to this man. to the alabama attorney general who was then in charge of investigating robert bentley's sex and ethics scandal. the governor handed that u.s. senate seat to alabama's top prosecutor, luther strange. at the time, luther strange would not confirm that there was an investigation going on into the governor. he also delayed a second investigation into governor bentley. he told the impeachment committee in the state

legislature that they should lay off their investigation and let his office take care of it. and then after all that, he accepted from governor bentley the kind offer of a seat in the united states senate. if you were thinking this whole thing looks a little sketchy and that senate seat is starting to smell a little bit, then you are picking up what alabama has been putting down. the alabama reporter says the senate appointment of luther strange prompted instant outrage among lawmakers. one alabama republican says he tried to warn the governor that appointing the attorney general who was investigating him would look terrible. there's been talk of asking the alabama ethics commission to investigate the appointment. for the record, senator luther strange says he did nothing wrong in accepting the seat or lobbying for it. but here's the thing. no matter how much outrage or weirdness attended the appointment of senator strange,

he is now the junior senator from alabama. he also set the special election to fill the seat permanently. and he set that special election not for this year but for 2018. so he not only appointed luther strange to that senate seat. he gave luther strange two years to sit in that senate seat before alabama voters could even decide whether or not they liked the agreements. which means alabama was kind of stuck with this unelected senator installed by their disgraced former governor. until today. today that changed. today the new governor of alabama, former lieutenant governor kay ivey who moved up into the governorship when bentley had to resign, today kay ivey said, no. we're not going to have a special election for this senate seat in 2018. we're going to move that up and have it this year instead. the primary happens in august.

the election will be in december, which is, frankly, great news for a small "d" democracy in alabama and for alabama voters who would like to weigh in on this. it's also bad news for senator luther strange who has to defend that seat a lot sooner than he otherwise would have to. in the great words of john archibald, quote, governor kay ivey takes a chainsaw to luther strange. now what? joining us now is john archibald, columnist for the "birmingham news." nice to see you. >> thank you, rachel. >> luther strange gets to run as the incumbent senator no matter when this special election happens. now that special election will be a lot sooner than it was otherwise going to be. how significant is this shift today? >> it's huge. it's very hard to imin is state right now that luther strange survives that. that incumncy is goi to be like an anchor going forward because the outrage is far more an he everld have

expected. >> i mentioned, john, that there was a state lawmaker who says that he spoke with the governor around the time the governor made this appointment. according to the state lawmaker, the way the governor explained it was that the governor said luther strange is corrupt. and i essentially appointed him to the united states senate in order to get him out of alabama. in order to get him out of state politics because we can't endure his corruption here anymore. that's been one of the strangest side bars to this story looking at it from a national perspective, from an outside perspective looking in. what do you make of that whole line? >> honestly, i disbelief it. i think governor bentley has done very stupid things, and i think luther strange has done the same, but it's hard for me to imagine both of them being stupid enough to hold that conversation with each other who were at that time mortal enemies. so it stretches my credibility

just a little bit to think that that happened. but henry says it did. >> there's also been a little bit of noise that there may be an inquiry or maybe that there ought to be an inquiry into senator strange's appointment to see if the appointment itself was improper in some way, possibly the state ethics commission looking into that. do you expect that will happen? >> i fully expect complaints to be made with the ethics commission which we don't have privy yet to and there have been bar complaints against luther strange as well, or those are in the works. i think everybody that can apply pressure in any way right now is applying pressure. of course, everybody is lining up to fight him for that senate seat as well. >> in terms of how that election will go, obviously, it's early days. kay ivey's first week in office. she makes this announcement today that election is going to move. what is likely to happen in that election? it's hard to imagine alabama not sending another republican to the senate, even if they don't send luther strange back. >> it's hard to imagine somebody

you won't be calling about in a year and a half. roy moore, the suspended chief justice is probably a front-runner in that race, as are a couple of republicans who are now billing themselves as anti-corruption people, but who were also first and foremost in the pep rally to support our former house speaker who was indicted on serious ethics charges. so -- anti-corruption means different things on different days. >> to be clear, alabama has now lost its house speaker, which is arguably one of the -- probably the most powerful position in state government. indicted, convicted, sentenced. chief justice roy moore was taken off the court. and now the state's sitting u.s. senator replacing the current attorney general of the united states who is the nation's chief law enforcement office, has always been roped into this ethics scandal and facing bar complaints about potentially losing his own law license and

potential ethics inquiries in the state? >> that about sums it up. >> john, if this is a full employment program for political columnists, it is a nefarious one. thank you, john. appreciate you being here. >> thank you. >> john archibald, columnist for the "birmingham news." all right, coming up, tax day. this particular tax day today was unlike any other tax day we have ever had in this country for one very specific reason, and that's ahead. stay with us. all eyes are on olay ultimate eye cream.

allure best of beauty and marie claire's most wanted. eyes show emotion, not your age. olay eyes. ageless. tech: when your windshield needs to be fixed... trust safelite autoglass. for these parents, driving around was the only way to get their baby to sleep. so when their windshield got cracked... customer: we can't drive this car. tech: ...they wanted it fixed right. so they scheduled with safelite. our exclusive trueseal technology means a strong, reliable bond, every time. at safelite, we stand behind our work. bye, bye. because the ones you love, sit behind it. (parents whisper jingle) safelite repair, safelite replace. when it comes to heartburn... trust the brand doctors trust. nexium 24hr is the #1 choice

of doctors and pharmacists for their own frequent heartburn. for all day and all night protection... banish the burn... with nexium 24hr. thithis is the new new york.e? think again. we are building new airports all across the state. new roadand bridges. new mass transit. new business friendly environment. new lower taxes.

and new university partnerships to grow the businesses of tomorrow today. learn more at esd.ny.gov i am totally blind. and i live with non-24, a circadian rhythm disorder that can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the people, places, and things i love. the people i love have always been there for me. and now, i'm there for them, too.

talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424 to learn more. i'm not going to ask you for your favorite curse word. do you have a favorite curse word? >> poop. >> have you ever seen a woman like me look you straight in the face after you've finished some long explanation of something and then just said poop?

>> i don't know if she was warned but she persisted. poop. the not at all profane senator from massachusetts, elizabeth worn has remained a leading firebrand for her party. she's become a favorite target of the republican party and of the oppo groups. the professional oppo groups on the right that. they scare people with information that said boogie man is hiding under the bed. and coming to get them. the fear of elizabeth warren is very strong on the right which has made the professional right very excited to try to clip her wings as the party gears up to -- whether she likes it or not elizabeth warren shoulders a lot

of weight of the democratic party. as her party gears up to fight the trump administration, gets up to fight the republicans in congress, a lot of eyes are going to be on her. not just from the right but from every direction. what she does, what she says, what fights she chooses to fight. tomorrow night, some of those eyes will be here because senator elizabeth warren is going to join us tomorrow for an extended interview. we'll talk about the state of the country and her party. i'll probably get her to say poop in some context and then they'll have to end the segment and go to commercial. i'll also ask her if she's running for president and all that stuff. elizabeth warren here tomorrow night. we'll be right back. find ping-pong. okay, let's go. find your awesome with the xfinity x1 voice remote. that's amazin

(de♪p breath) (phone ringing) they'll call back. no one knows your ford better than ford and ford service. right now, during the big tire event, get a $140 rebate by mail, on four select tires. ♪ explore your treatment options with specialists who treat only cancer. every stage... every day.... at cancer treatment centers of america. learn more at cancercenter.com/experts

ito treat your toughy nasal allergies... ...listen up. unlike pills that don't treat congestion, clarispray covers 100 percent of your nasal allergy symptoms. clarispray. from the makers of claritin. i will nevi wnevereverair again. wash my hair again now, i fuel it new pantene doesn't just wash your hair, it fuels it. with the first pro-v nutrient blend, making every... ...strand stronger don't just wash your hair fuel it

fuel your hair. because strong is beautiful. in october 1973, an employee of the irs leaked information about the president's tax returns. and this was october 1973. so other stuff was going on. this is a leak that was, in history now has been obscured by the unfolding watergate scandal. at the time it was a big deal. leaking tax information like this it was, is something you're really not supposed to do. and it really doesn't usually happen. but someone in the fall of 1973, someone apparently with the help of a photocopy machine at an irs office in martinsburg, west virginia, somebody sent president nixon's tax information to a reporter. a reporter at the "providence

journal bulletin" in rhode island. that reporter then published a story on it and what we learned from that leak and that publication was over the course of two years, president nixon had paid next to nothing in federal income taxes. he was earning $200,000 a year as president of the united states, but he was paying the government in taxes basically the same amount as if he was, quote, a wage earner with one exemption in the $7,000 income bracket. so he faced an onslaught of public pressure after that leak. and that revelation about how little he was paying in taxes and why was that anyway? president nixon after that happened, he eventually released five years of his tax returns. he released those tax returns to congress. he then promptly got socked with the bill for $470,000 in unpaid back taxes because it turns out he was not actually paying all of his taxes. and even though president nixon's financial situation, his

tax situation was now dire straits for all the world to see, some americans to supported him decided they actually felt quite charitable toward him on that whole issue. >> it's tax day for most people today, but because of his tax problems, president nixon has been given an extra 60 days to file his return. the white house said today that about 5,000 people have sent the president over $40,000 to help pay his huge bill for back taxes, but that although the gesture is appreciated, the money will be returned. >> 5,000 people sent nixon cash to send his back taxes. really appreciate the gesture but we can't accept. the president will send your money back and is paying his back taxes himself. that was an exciting tax day in 1974 after that leak in the fall of 1973 and had made this such a fraud issue. that's how we got thmodern traditn of presidents

releasing their tax returns. since then, presidents of the united states release and publish their tax returns. the information we learn within them is a little less exciting nowadays, right? usually more along the lines of, oh, look, president reagan got a $14 refund this year. or, oh, wow, the bidens, they gave 1.5% of their income to charity while the obamas gave 22%. i wonder if that's an issue between them. or here's an interesting issue. president obama's book sales have dropped. that's how -- that's the stuff we usually get tax day. if that's how we still did tax day in this country there would probably be stuff to talk about in terms of our current president. but instead today we watched as the president signed his big buy american, hire american executive order. even though trump family businesses have a hard time following that pledge themselves. they are known for hiring lots and lots of foreign workers. also on tax day today, we learned that on the same day the daughter of the president of the united states sat down for dinner with the president of china. on that same day, china approved

a bunch of her company's trademarks giving her company the right to sell jewelry, bags and spa services in her name in china. we also learned on tax day today that the lawsuit filed against the president earlier this year for violating the emoluments clause which says you can't accept payments from foreign governments, that lawsuit is expanding to include more people who say they are victims of the president's refusal to sell off his business holdings while he continues to benefit from foreign governments and foreign sources of income. so this is how we celebrate tax day now with more reminders about how little we really know about the president's financial situation. and that does not appear to be changing any time soon. this is now the new normal. the reason tax day became something a day on which we learned boring things about presidents in years past started in scandal with the nixon administration in the early 1970s.

once again, this is t anhe thing for which something that was a scandal in the nixon white house now seems quaint in comparison to what we're living through right now as day-to-day trump news. that does it for us tonight. now it's time for "the last >> rachel, what about the tax cut -- i refuse to use the word tax reform. that is not what the republicans are talking about. they're talking about a massive tax cut. what about legislating the massive tax cut when we don't know which of these provisions will mean how many millions to donald trump personally? >> and the little bit of taxes that we have seen, the two pages of federal tax return that we got and premiered on this show and that you and i talked about show that already, just with those little bits of tax information that we got from him, his tax cut, tax reform proposals would benefit him to the tune of tens of millions of dollars, even just in that one year. >> one of the many reasons of the modern tradition has become what it is is th