Skip to main content

tv   Pulse of America  MSNBC  June 25, 2017 12:00pm-1:01pm PDT

12:00 pm
hello, everyone, i'm richard lui in new york city on this sunday. thanks for being here on the pulse of america, where your voice can be heard in real time and here are the stories we want your pulse on today. >> and i'm not voting for something that looks just like obamacare and still doesn't fix the fundamental flaw of obamacare. >> mitch mcconnell facing five republican holdouts on the senate health care bill, more than enough to kill it, and more could join that list. now, if it does become law, states could be asked to take on much more of the health care burden, but will that improve the system? president trump has rarely
12:01 pm
acknowledged russia's meddling in last year's election, but now he's sharply criticizing former president obama for how he handled it. did president obama do enough? president trump's travel ban hangs in the balance as the supreme court prepares to wrap up its current term tomorrow. what's likely to happen there, and they are protected from deportation, but so-called dreamers do not qualify for lower in-state college tuition. i'll talk to one student who fears for her future. to voice your opinion, grab your digital device, phone, laptop, go to pulse.msnbc.com/america. top story, one of the biggest critics of obamacare is adamant he doesn't want the gop senate health care bill to go through, at least for now. ron johnson of wisconsin and four fellow republicans remain the biggest obstacle to president trump and mitch
12:02 pm
mcconnell. johnson told chuck todd on "meet the press" that he wants things to slow down. >> i would like to delay the thing. there's no way we should be voting on this thing next week. no way. >> are you going to work to stop it, stop a vote next week? >> i have a hard time believing wisconsin constituents or even myself will have enough time to properly evaluate this, for me to vote for motion proceed. i've been encouraging leadership, the white house, anybody i can talk to for quite some time. let's not rush this process. >> meanwhile, more senate republicans could be considering a no vote, including susan collins of maine, who is sharing concerns today on two big fronts. >> that makes absolutely no sense to eliminate federal funding for planned parenthood. you can't take over $800 billion out of the medicaid program and not expect that it's going to have an impact on a rural nursing home that relies on medicaid for 70% of the costs of
12:03 pm
its patients. it's hard for me to see the bill passing this week. >> despite the roadblocks in his own party, president trump remains optimistic, suggesting last minute changes are coming to save the bill. he's responding to critics like former president obama. take a listen. >> some people might say the level of anger is unpress dence, but president obama came out on facebook, he said your bill, mr. president, not a health care bill, it's a massive transfer of wealth, it's going to harm americans, it's mean. what do you say to the former president? >> he used my term, mean, that was my term, because i want to see -- and i speak from the heart. that's what i want to see. i want to see a bill with heart. >> the infighting is leading to questions about how states would absorb another health care overhaul. right now 11 states and washington, d.c., use state-run marketplaces. the battle over trumpcare has supporters of single parent
12:04 pm
health care hoping their mission will gain some traction now. that brings us to our first pulse question of the day. agree or disagree, states should determine health care, not the federal government. pulse.msnbc.com/america, let us know what you think. start thg hour with mark almaday. thanks for being with us. >> thanks for having me, richard. >> you heard president trump say he wants a bill with heart. does the bcra, the senate republican bill, have heart? >> well, i don't know yet, because i haven't looked it over completely, but i can tell you this, that when the house bill came out, there was a lot of us, myself included, that were not in favor of the bill, so i expect the senate bill to go through evolution, too, in terms of trying to get to where they need to be to pass the bill. >> what would be one of the tweaks, based on your high level of understanding of the bcra? >> well, i'll tell you this, one of the challenges, and listening to the show, you know, people talk about medicaid, but saying
12:05 pm
medicaid in a blanket thing is actually not doing anybody any good to talk about the issue. you have traditional medicaid, which is pregnant moms, children, handicapped people, and old folks, and then you have the expansion, so it would help when you're talking about who's doing what to where and where that money is arguably coming from, if people would differentiate, because quite frankly, the objective to mess with traditional medicaid is one that i haven't experienced. everybody's talking about, for instance, the expansion of it, which in my state in the last 48 months according to the kaiser folks has expanded 300%, so you've got to get your arms around those issues in terms of going forward with the best possible course. >> well, your state was voting whether or not to expand the idea of statewide medicaid, that your state would be, therefore, funding it. it did not make it through, the governor vetoed it. did you support that? >> well, actually, the whole argument there, when you say do you support it, there's two
12:06 pm
areas. it's what's covered, what's the policy on health care, but the other one, which is, quite frankly, the basis of the fight, richard, is who's going to pay for it. and i understand why governors want to keep medicaid expansion the way it is, because the federal government covers 90% of the cost while they get to go ahead and run the pro program. the problem is, when you look at the cost of that, and in my state, total medicaid, traditional, and also the expansion is about 13% of the pomlati population. so it's not that they are not important, they are, but quite frankly, you have another 93%, 94% of the population of your state that you have to try to get the policy right for, too. >> so given who now is benefiting from medicaid, vis-a-vis aca in your state, do you want to freeze it? >> well, here's -- i ended up -- listen, it's interesting watching the senate, because i started out as a no. after looking at medicaid expansion and talking with the folks in tom price's office and asking them to talk to the
12:07 pm
nevada medicaid folks, you know, it's interesting, because in our state basically what the proposal was, this, nobody gets kicked off unless you make more than 138% of poverty. or unless you choose to get off because you've got a job. our governor, and rightfully so, is bragging about the way jobs have increased and the unemployment rate is going down. richard, over half the people in nevada get their health insurance through their employment, and that includes public employee, city, county, state, federal, like myself. so when you talk about that, you have to say, listen, we need to do the right thing by those 7% or 8% of the folks on expansion, but you've got to keep your eye on the rest of it, and by the way -- >> really quick, i only got a certain amount of time, representative, because you talked about getting your insurance through those who employ you. in the bcra, they will not guarantee low cost -- i should say affordable health care insurance for large companies. and that will hurt a lot of folks.
12:08 pm
>> well, listen, i'm not going to sharp shoot the senate. i'm just going to tell you i appreciate the minority leader saying -- i don't think he was a big fan of the house bill, he said it was mean, he said theirs was meaner, so i guess chuck schumer liked the house bill. yeah, chuck, thanks for the kudos, big guy. >> talking about the senators, what's your thought about your senator, who is now at the moment being a major holdout in terms of supporting the bcra? talking about, of course, senator heller. >> well, i'll just say this, i started out as a no, did my homework, took a deep dive, swum around in the deep end of the pool to get to the point where i thought the medicaid expansion people were going to be protected, and the state still got basically reimbursed at the affordable care act rate. i would expect senator heller is doing the same thing i was doing, which is looking at the homework, figuring out how that
12:09 pm
affects people in his state, and then going ahead and trying to do all the value judgments, but the thing that everybody's missing is, there's a big forest fire burning west of town, richard, and guess what, health care's a problem. and so while nobody likes the -- it's like are you going to be a firefighter or leave town and hope the whole place doesn't burn down? we've got to address the forest fire that's coming to town. >> are you the firefighter? >> yes. >> okay. congressman, thank you so much from the great state of nevada. thank you. >> thanks, richard. democratic congressman of florida now who voted against the house health care bill, he joins us right now. congressman, thanks for being here with us. let me ask you this, as you have seen what has been happening in the senate, and you see now five senators that are lined up not going to do it, obviously, there are two or three others that could join that team, do you believe that this bcra, the senate health care bill, will
12:10 pm
have the needed support? >> well, i certainly hope not. it's, i think, little wonder, richard, that the bill in the senate was cooked up behind closed doors. the reason is really simple. when you put out a product that's going to gut health care for millions of people in this country, you listen to the people trying to defend what the senate is doing, and all they are doing is finding new ways to say we want to cut medicaid, we want to do away with the pre-existing language provision so that people can be discriminated against because of those conditions. it's okay for us to drive up costs on everyone and to reduce coverage. that's why they are trying to look for other kinds of things to talk about, but that's ultimately what this bill does. just one last point on medicaid, which i know you spent a fair amount of time talking about, medicaid isn't just a blanket program that helps poor people get access to health insurance. it's also a program that ensures that people with substance
12:11 pm
abuse, especially given the opioid crisis, people all across this country, millions of people have access to care and it's a program that ensures that seniors are able to afford to live in nursing homes. all of that is on the chopping block under the senate bill, and that's why at the end of the day my guess is it will be a close vote, but my hope is it will be defeated because there's a reason this is so unpopular in this country and those are some of them. >> did you read the bcra, the 140 pages plus? >> the bill on our side -- >> no, i'm talking about the senate bill. >> i haven't read the -- i haven't read the senate bill. i've looked at the detailed analysis of the senate bill provision by provision, and it's clear that what this bill does, like the house bill that passed, is going to result in a situation where there is a massive reduction in medicaid spending. there are millions of people who
12:12 pm
are going to lose their access to health insurance, and it's going to drive up costs, especially for people over the age of 50 and even more for people over the age of 60. this is a bad piece of legislation that doesn't seek to work to make health insurance more accessible. instead, it's a massive, a massive, cut in health care spending in order to provide an equally massive tax cut and that's a tradeoff that's not in the best interests of the american people. >> yes or no, should, when we talk about health care, should that be a decision for states? we've seen a lot of activity about states taking it upon themselves, despite aca being out there. california, nevada, vermont, new york tried for a little bit, too, they didn't make it through, but a lot of energy going on there. is that what should be done? >> one of the problems, i come from florida where unfortunately our governor has refused to expand medicaid. he's putting his partisanship
12:13 pm
over the best interests of the people in the state. there are close to a million floridians who don't have access to health care who would, so i don't want to leave it up to people like the governor of florida to decide what should be in these health policies. this bill will gut the essential health benefits that people rely upon and will leave it up to governors to make decisions about what to include. people will be getting less coverage. it will cost them more, and that's not a situation that serves the american people well. >> thank you so much, congressman ted deutsche from florida. thank you. doctors are also weighing in on the health care debate, including health and human services secretary tom price. he believes the bill is headed in the right direction and says it's actually better for doctors and patients. >> it's significant reform. it's a move in a much better direction, because it is a patient-centered move where patients and families and doctors will be making decisions, not washington, d.c. >> let's bring in dr. steven clasko, ceo of thomas jefferson
12:14 pm
university and jefferson health. thank you for being with us. and tell us here, steve, when you look at the bcra, what do you focus in on and why? >> well, richard, it's great to be on. first of all, let's make this clear. this is not really repeal and replace. it's repeal, get rid of the democratic taxes and unlimited federal funding of medicaid and hope health care will change. at the end of the day, this is not meaner than the house bill, it's less mean. it will reduce premiums, but allow insurers to basically have much skinnier plans. so people will be left with situations where they are not covered for their problems. >> so what are they going to do? >> well, that's the issue. look, the problem, richard, what we have is a dollar to pay for $1.25 worth of health care, and the affordable care act said we'll give everybody a quarter. i think the republicans are saying that's not sustainable. and now what we're doing is
12:15 pm
cutting benefits and people, but we're not really dealing with the fact that i think the congressman from nevada was right, that we have a fire and that things are too expensive. best way to look at this for the republicans is like brexit. we want to get out of unlimited federal funding for medicaid, because that will break the bank. there's hard brexit, soft brexit. hard was the house bill, getting out right away. soft is we're going to give it a chance to phase and let the industry figure it out. >> will states be ready for this, do they have the administrative capabilities? only 11 states that currently have created their own exchanges. >> i don't think they do. i was in florida for nine years and we did not have medicaid expansion and people were cut out. in states that had medicaid expansion, richard, it ends up being more expensive with worse outcomes. why? because people get medicaid and there are doctors that don't cover medicaid, they end up in the emergency departments for much more expensive, much more
12:16 pm
fragmented care. so we really have to, as a country, we're here in the week that amazon is buying whole foods and we still haven't allowed telehealth to cross states. imagine every atm you had to have a different card. we're living in the '90s as it relates to trying to do some of the things that would affect both the care and the cost of health care. >> what should we expect as those who are uninsured, what will that means if it does pass, the senate republican health care bill, what's it mean when i go in to see a doctor? >> so, if you're a younger person with moderate to high income in a state like massachusetts, where health care is affordable, it will be better for you. if you're an older lower income person in a place that health care is expensive like arizona, it will be much worse for you. but even more importantly i believe that what will happen is you'll have a 26-year-old woman who will say i don't need
12:17 pm
maternity benefits because i don't want to get pregnant. then she'll get pregnant in my emergency room, insurers will say she's not covered, she got a skinny plan without maternity benefits, i'll take care of her, so it will be a disaster for the safety net hospitals. it will be a boon for certain insurers that can basically play with the snunumbers. >> yes or no, you've spoken to some of those who put this together. >> i have. >> yes, that's right. was there intent from your perspective to actually help your patients or intent to have a political win? >> yeah, i think it's a combination of both. i think that at the end of the day, obviously, the republicans campaigned on repeal and replace. it is somewhat amazing to me they haven't thought it out more, but at the end of the day i really do think secretary price has really tried to at least take the house bill, take the republican conservative, we have to get the tax cuts in
12:18 pm
there, we have to get rid of unlimited federal funding, and tried to think about certain groups of patients. the fact is, until you cut the costs of health care significantly and increase technology, you're going to have some people that fall between the cracks, and there are a lot of people that will fall between the cracks. i predict the cbo will say there's somewhere between 10 and 20 million people affected by this. >> 10 and 20 compared to 23 million by the house bill. thank you so much, steven. >> thank you, richard, it's been a pleasure. >> all righty. for our first pulse question of the day, we've been asking, agree or disagree, states should determine health care, not the federal government. overall numbers so far, 94% disagreeing with that statement. 6% agreeing, and breaking it down by political party, republicans are neutral. democrats and independents disagree. actually, most disagree of all three categories. breaking it down by age, all age groups pretty much disagreeing, 35 to 54 a little bit less.
12:19 pm
the final scoreboard for you. 6% agreeing states should determine health care, not the federal government. 94% disagreeing. thanks for participating in that. next, president trump sharply criticizing his predecessor president obama over the russian hacking case. you can make your voice heard on our second pulse question of the day, agree or disagree, president obama should have done more to address russia's meddling in the 2016 election. go to pulse.msnbc.com/america. just like the people who own them, every business is different. but every one of those businesses will need legal help as they age and grow. whether it be with customer contracts, agreements to lease a space or protecting your work. legalzoom's network of attorneys can help you, every step of the way. so you can focus on what you do and we'll handle the legal stuff that comes up along the way. legalzoom. legal help is here. you on a perfect car,rch
12:20 pm
then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates... maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. liberty mutual insurance. (i wanted him to eat healthy., so i feed jake purina cat chow naturals indoor, a nutritious formula with no artificial flavors. made specifically for indoor cats. purina cat chow. nutrition to build better lives. asmy family tree,ing
12:21 pm
i discovered a woman named marianne gaspard... it was her french name. then she came to louisiana as a slave. i became curious where in africa she was from. so i took the ancestry dna test to find out more about my african roots. the ancestry dna results were really specific. they told me all of these places in west africa. i feel really proud of my lineage, and i feel really proud of my ancestry. ancestry has many paths to discovering your story, get started for free at ancestry.com
12:22 pm
it's a case of the blame game when it comes to the all important russia probe. president donald trump slamming the obama administration in a series of saturday night tweets. doing so also seems to acknowledge russia was involved in u.s. election hacking. here's part of the commander in
12:23 pm
chief's twitter offensive. "since the obama administration was told way before the 2016 election that was russians were meddling, why no action? focus on them, not t." that was yesterday. another tweet, "obama official said they choked when it came to russian meddling of election." agree or disagree, president obama should have done more to address russia's meddling in the 2016 election. nbc's kelly o'donnell at the white house. kelly, the leader of the free world behind you working heavily on his phone there putting out a bunch of tweets. >> reporter: he has been sort of pivoting back and forth between tweets that relate to the russian investigation broadly and health care and what needs to happen in washington this week for him to get that win that's been so elusive on the legislative front, but the russia issue, boiling it down to those few words, is something that really sticks in his craw, if you will, it's a stone in the president's shoe. and what is also notable about
12:24 pm
what he talked about there is that he is sort of turning this to try to say the public interest in this should look back into the last presidency to try to say there was evidence available to president obama, he did not act sufficiently, and there's some debate over that, and some in the obama era who say perhaps they could have done more, should have done more, but we are where we are now, and for president trump, this is something he's picking up and running with. this was exposed through the "washington post" extensive piece, but it's also notable that the president, who gets a presidential daily briefing and intelligence information, is now able to talk publicly about the obama time frame and learning about russian interference, but it's curious what he will say in this clip from a fox news channel interview that he's just learning about this. i'm wondering if he had it in his briefings or just saying he can publicly talk about it now, but here's what the president said in an interview that was recorded friday.
12:25 pm
>> i just heard today for the first time that obama knew about russia a long time before the election and he did nothing about it, but nobody wants to talk about that. if he had the information, why didn't he do something about it? he should have done something about it. >> reporter: well, one of the things we've heard from obama administration officials is they had concern about taking any action during the election year that might be perceived as tipping the scales towards hillary clinton, of course, the president was campaigning for her, but this was a much broader, more significant intelligence and international issue. the president's going to try to keep putting pressure back on president obama in an effort to distract from some of the questions around his own administration and contacts they've had with russia or how he's handled the firing of james comey. richard? >> nbc's kelly o'donnell at the white house on this sunday. thanks, kelly. jesse burns, associate editor at the hill and, kurt, your thought
12:26 pm
at this moment based on the responses we have heard from president trump on the way he's doing with russia and pointing his finger at president obama for not doing enough and moving fast enough when, according to reporting, that he learned of this situation. >> so, it's super interesting, this whole new journalistic complex we're in with anonymous allegations and sourcing, it's sort of at this point coming back to hurt president obama right now. i think it's, you know, the -- president obama reportedly felt that he couldn't intercede too much on the russia matter because he would be seen as tipping the election to hillary clinton. that certainly seems like a reasonable thing that the president would think. on the other hand, it is a really good case that president trump can bring out right now and it's interesting they haven't rolled it out sooner. >> what do you make of this here, jesse, and you heard adam
12:27 pm
schiff, the top democrat on again the house intel committee here looking at this and saying, hey, president obama didn't do enough. i mean, his own party, barack obama's own party, one of his major lieutenants, if you will, being critical of the former president and what he may have done. >> it's an absolutely legitimate question and i think you're going to see some kind of sniping from even democratic lawmakers who are frustrated that they are in the situation they are in now, several months into trump's presidency and they are having to still grapple with the fact that he is where he is and that these russia probes are, you know, trump has largely been dismissive of them and, you know, trying to deflect the blame to now the obama administration. i mean, it's a double bind essentially that trump has kind of put them in. he claimed throughout the campaign season that the election was rigged against him by democrats and now he's going after obama for not doing enough to stop russia, you know, that's not even mentioning the fact,
12:28 pm
obviously, that the intelligence community believes russia intervened to help trump. >> i want to move on to the house oversight committee staying on russia, of course, trey gowdy, new head of the committee saying, nope, we're not going to focus on this very question that's in front of us, and you can see the headline, dems push leaders to talk less about russia. that's a different headline, because i'm eluding here to trey gowdy. what's the thought here, jesse, as to why and how that might play itself out? at some point might he do what the former chair did and was looking into? they did have an emphasis on this question? >> yeah, i think that we're seeing from trey gowdy, who is a former federal prosecutor, that, you know, he's moving, it's a sharp contrast from jason chaffetz and looking at trump and russia and that's not the focus that gowdy seems to want to take with this committee now under his purview, so he has said, he's cited robert mueller,
12:29 pm
the special counsel, saying he doesn't want to step on his toes, he's going to allow any criminal prosecution or investigation to continue separate from his committee, but we'll see. there are several panels, obviously, already in the house and senate looking at potential ties between trump and trump's campaign, rather, and russia, and so we'll see if that for the house oversight committee if there's not some pressure on them, at least the periphery to go after some of these trump associates who have been and reported to be under investigation. >> and the reports, what you were talking about, kurt, the "washington post" report, a treasure-trove of information, we have a lot of, if you will, folks leaking or giving information at very high levels. the question is, how will that then make its way back into the four investigations, plus, again, bob mueller's investigation as we start a new week? >> right. those are very high level officials. obviously, we don't know who they are, and, you know,
12:30 pm
president obama is maintaining an office in washington, you've got ex senior high level officials and current senior high level officials apparently leaking to outlets like "the washington post" and "new york times." it creates a huge cloud around what mueller is trying to do. it's chaos. >> all right. thank you very much, jesse burns, kurt mills. you all have a very good weekend, what's left of it, at least. still time to make your voice heard on this question, agree or disagree, president obama should have done more to address russia's meddling in the 2016 election. go to pulse.msnbc.com/america to let us know what you think. later, their status as dreamers protects them from deportation, but now an arizona court says they are not entitled to reduced in-state college tuition. we'll talk to one young woman whose future is now in doubt as a result of that.
12:31 pm
♪ ♪ isaac hou has mastered gravity defying moves to amaze his audience. great show. here you go. now he's added a new routine. making depositing a check seem so effortless. easy to use chase technology, for whatever you're trying to master. isaac, are you ready? yeah. chase. so you can.
12:32 pm
hidden in every swing, every chip, and every putt, is data that can make the difference between winning and losing. the microsoft cloud helps the pga tour turn countless points of data into insights that transform their business and will enhance the game for players and fans. the microsoft cloud turns information into insight. dentures to real teeth.rent they're about 10 times softer and may have surface pores where bacteria can multiply. polident kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria and helps dissolve stains. that's why i recommend polident. cleaner, fresher, brighter every day. . before fibromyalgia, i was a doer. i was active. then the chronic, widespread pain drained my energy. my doctor said moving more helps ease fibromyalgia pain.
12:33 pm
she also prescribed lyrica. fibromyalgia is thought to be the result of overactive nerves. lyrica is believed to calm these nerves. woman: for some, lyrica can significantly relieve fibromyalgia pain and improve function, so i feel better. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. or swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. with less pain, i can be more active. ask your doctor about lyrica. we've been asking you, agree
12:34 pm
or disagree, president obama should have done more to address russia's meddling in the 2016 election. this is what you've been telling us so far on this sunday. 69% say no, 31% saying yes. by gender, men and women are both neutral. men tend to agree a little bit more by a little. breaking it down by political party, republicans mostly disagree, and democrats and independents agreeing a little bit more that president obama should have done more. and the final scoreboard, 36% to 64%. next, down the wire to the supreme court. tomorrow is the final day of the current term and still no decision about president trump's travel ban. we're asking you in our third question, agree or disagree, the supreme court should decide whether to hear arguments on the ban before the summer recess. go to pulse.msnbc.com/america. ♪
12:35 pm
dynamic performance, so you can own the road. track-tuned handling, so you can conquer corners. aggressive-styling, so you can break away from everyone else. experience the exhilaration of the bold lexus is. experience amazing. and the wolf huffed like you do sometimes, grandpa? well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe. it can be hard to get air out, which can make it hard to get air in. so i talked to my doctor. she said... symbicort could help you breathe better, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. symbicort helps provide significant improvement of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort contains formoterol. medicines like formoterol increase the risk of
12:36 pm
death from asthma problems. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. you should tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing. watch out, piggies! (child giggles) symbicort. breathe better starting within 5 minutes. get symbicort free for up to one year. visit saveonsymbicort.com today to learn more. ykeep you sidelined.ng that's why you drink ensure. with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for the strength and energy to get back to doing... ...what you love. ensure. always be you. but when we brought our daughter home, that was it. now i have nicoderm cq. the nicoderm cq patch with unique extended release technology helps prevent your urge to smoke all day. it's the best thing that ever happened to me. every great why needs a great how.
12:37 pm
12:38 pm
all right, we're back. we're asking you this question, agree or disagree, the supreme court should decide whether to hear arguments on president trump's travel ban before the summer recess. the court wraps up its current term, but two main questions remain, what will happen with president trump's travel ban and will kennedy retire? joining us, amy hao and ari melber. great to have the two big brains sitting around here. i'll talk with big brain number one amy, what's going to happen tomorrow? >> there are a couple of different things that could happen. first of all, the justices have six decisions left on the current term. they normal issue decisions before they take their break for the summer recess, and there are a couple of big cases that we're still waiting on there, and then the court could act on the travel ban request. it was something that they considered at their conference last thursday, and under the
12:39 pm
normal course of procedures we could hear something as soon as 9:30 tomorrow morning. >> so, ari, that's pretty early. very busy for you, no doubt, my friend, being our chief legal correspondent here. lots of options in terms of what they can do with the travel ban, right? >> right, and that's partly because of the unique nature of this order. folks may remember this was not a permanent change in immigration policy. it was set up as the sort of 90-day pause, the administration had first taken the argument that it was urgent and they needed to immediately have the pause and later adjusting that for legal or practical reasons and now you're left with the debate over whether the supreme court wants to get into changing what the courts have done in the lower courts, which is basically pause the pause and that's why there is no travel ban in effect and whether they want to change that status quo, while waiting for the ultimate case, which is what we call the merits case, the resulting case of whether or not this can be a legal policy. >> will we hear arguments, will they be hearing arguments, not
12:40 pm
us necessarily here. what do you think, amy? >> well, i doubt they are going to hear arguments any time soon. the government hadn't really asked them to rush the oral arguments, and they are running out of time before their summer recess. if they wanted to hear oral arguments, they would have said so last thursday, shortly after their conference because there's such a short amount of time left before they go off on their summer vacations. they can, of course, decide to hear them in july, august, or september before they return to the bench, but as ari said, it's complicated, because even if they decide they want to review the lower court decision putting the travel ban on hold, there's, you know, the request for the stay and what do they do about that, the request to reinstate the ban, and if they reinstate the ban, as ari suggested, the whole thing could have run by the time they come back to hear oral arguments in the fall, so really sort of sailing in uncharted waters here. >> right. ari, that's a possibility.
12:41 pm
times out. there's that 90-day time frame. >> right, that was an open question the administration sought to address by basically formally amending the executive order and saying they wanted it to be interpreted they will reinstate it whenever they get the option from the courts so it wasn't muted, but this is the thing the court does sometimes, it likes to either take more time or go away. the supreme court does take its role seriously as kind of a last arbiter and if they think there's more time that will benefit the political working out of solutions or some other alternative, they'll usually leave that time. they are not in a rush and that's a good thing. we're a society where everyone is always in a rush, ask people how they are doing, i'm busy, i got to go, i have my messages. supreme court is the last of a different cultural mood. if they can put it off a year, they often do. >> speaking about patience, if you will, from the court, a full court finally. amy, it's possible you might be able to answer this question, justice kennedy turns 81 next
12:42 pm
month. might justice kennedy retire and they don't have a full bench? >> that's the $64,000 question. we started hearing rumors about a retirement, truthfully, shortly after the presidential election in november. there were two camps, one camp is, kennedy is a republican appointed by a republican president, he wants to make sure that a republican president can appoint his successor. the other camp is why would he retire now? he's, you know, at the peak of his influence at the court. 81, not that old for a supreme court justice. and he, by all accounts, is in good health and having a good time. you know, i suspect that he may be one of the only other people, and his wife, who truly know. one thing to keep in mind is that when other justices recently have retired voluntarily, justice john paul stevens and justice david souter, they both retired in the spring to give the senate enough time to hold hearings and have their successors be on the bench when the court returned in the
12:43 pm
fall. so, you know, i think it's anyone's guess at this point. but we probably will know in the next week or so. >> ari, your thought on that, also got a show coming up. >> i'll tell you about both. number one, if we put up on the screen the years, that's the only indicator we have. 29 years puts him in much longer than anyone else, three more than thomas and more than ginsburg at 24 years, so he's been going a long time. we have no idea. i interviewed justice breyer once, how do you know when to retire? i have no idea, i guess i'll just know. for a lot of them that means they go a long time. >> time-out, if you will. >> your other question, we have ellen winetrob with a plan on russia. special report on leaks, good, bad, and the illegal, and we have a really interesting discussion with professor jack balkin about why he argues donald trump is more of a symptom than a cause of constitutional problems in our society and it's always fun to be on with amy. scotus blog is where i'll be blo
12:44 pm
logged in tomorrow. >> thanks so much. >> all right, thank you, amy howe, ari melber. do not miss his highly rated show "the point," 5:00 tonight. starts in about an hour and 15 minutes. egg timer, whatever you got. for our third pulse question today, agree or disagree, the supreme court should decide whether to hear arguments on president trump's travel ban before the summer recess. all right, 69% are saying you disagree. changed a little bit there, 73%. break it down by education, all education groups for the most part, more master's degree neutral, also neutral, then by gender, men and women, when we look at that, men and women pretty much disagree by the same numbers. and the final scoreboard number for you on this question, 37% agreeing the supreme court should decide whether to hear arguments on president trump's travel ban before the summer recess. next, a big setback for dreamers. the young undocumented people protected from deportation.
12:45 pm
an arizona court ruled they do not qualify for reduced in-state tuition. do you agree or disagree with this question, dreamers who pay taxes and contribute to this country should be eligible for that lower tuition. go to pulse.msnbc.com/america.
12:46 pm
david. what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two seconds! ♪ "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. ♪
12:47 pm
so that's the idea. what do you think? hate to play devil's advocate but... i kind of feel like it's a game changer. i wouldn't go that far. are you there? he's probably on mute. yeah... gary won't like it. why? because he's gary. (phone ringing) what? keep going! yeah... (laughs) (voice on phone) it's not millennial enough. there are a lot of ways to say no. thank you so much. thank you! so we're doing it. yes! start saying yes to your company's best ideas. let us help with money and know-how, so you can get business done. american express open. so you can get business done. the toothpaste that helps new parodontax. prevent bleeding gums. if you spit blood when you brush or floss you may have gum problems and could be on the journey to much worse. help stop the journey of gum disease. try new parodontax toothpaste. ♪
12:48 pm
tuition is expected to skyrocket for thousands of so-called dreamers in the state of arizona. state court of appeals decided tuesday they are not eligible for in-state tuition. tuition at arizona state university, the state's largest public university, that's about $10,000 a year for in-state residents, compared to more than $26,000 for nonresidents. that could make higher education, as you can see there, unaffordable for thousands of undocumented immigrants who came here as children, brought here by their parents. president obama created the daca program to prevent them from being deported, but their legal
12:49 pm
status remains in limbo under the current administration, which brings us to the fourth question of the hour, do you agree or disagree, dreamers that pay taxes and contribute to this country should be eligible for reduced in-state tuition? let's bring in a dreamer and a senior at arizona state university. what does this mean for you? >> so, what this ruling means, is that if it is implemented, all of the daca students in arizona are going to have their tuition tripled, and right now it is already hard enough for us to find scholarships, financial aid, or grants, because we are not eligible for those. that means that the majority of students who have daca will probably be driven out of school and not able to have higher education be accessible to them in arizona. >> what's your plan, what are you going to do? >> so, right now i'm not entirely sure what i will personally do, but i do know that our mission as undocumented
12:50 pm
students for education equity at asu is to combat this so it is not implemented and final. our number one agenda item is to fight this ruling. we are grateful to the maricopa county community colleges board for making the decision to give in-state tuition to dreamers and we hope they will continue this case. right now what we're asking is, when will it be enough? when will you stop attacking daca students in arizona? when will you stop wasting taxpayer money on attacking innocent kids who just want to go to school? and so to attorney general and the governor, we are telling them get your priorities straight, because right now arizona is 48th in the nation for education, so you would think that they would want to actually invest in education for the future of arizona instead of attacking students who just want to get their college degree.
12:51 pm
>> and their argument, and you've heard it before, they are saying we're building this institution of education for u.s. citizens and, therefore, those who are not should pay out of state, and it's sort of the way that they are, if you will, splitting the difference. >> so, what i always tell those who say that, you know, what about the citizens of this country, if daca recipients pay in-state tuition and want to get an education, that takes nothing away from those who are citizens and want to get an education, as well, and the reason why is because we are taxpayers and we pay tuition. we are not going to school for free. we actually have all the cards stacked against us as they are making our eligibility for scholarships unavailable. we cannot receive grants. we cannot receive financial aid, so it is actually ten times harder for us already, and they are trying to make it even harder. so, everyone deserves to get an education. it's a basic right.
12:52 pm
>> belen, would you consider going to another state where you might be able to establish residency and finish out your degree? >> i will not do that. i will stay here, because this is, arizona, is where i'm needed. it is my home. it is the home of thousands of other daca recipients and we'll continue to fight for the basic right of education, even if it costs us tooth and nail to continue to combat these oppressive and discriminatory policies that governor doocy and the attorney general have been advocating for. >> what's been the reaction on your facebook page? you became of note, shall i say, when you came out and you were writing about your experience as a dreamer, and you got a lot of very mixed, shall we say, opinions. >> so, i mean, my reaction to it is more people need to be informed. that is the whole reason why i made that viral post about me paying taxes, because the
12:53 pm
majority of the public doesn't know that undocumented people do pay taxes and that you don't need a social security number to do so. and the reaction that i got was some bad, but it was definitely a lot more good. and the reason why, is because so many people opened their eyes and realized these people are here because they just want a better life and because they actually contribute to our country, no matter where it is they came from, and before we are immigrants, we are also human beings, and human beings deserve basic rights, like being able to live in a clean environment, like being able to have the basic right to an education, and that we are not here as just free loaders or trying to take something away, because we actually put into the system, and they benefit from immigrants being here by paying taxes. we basically keep this economy going. we keep social security going. if all of us just disappeared one day, this entire country
12:54 pm
would probably fall apart. >> belen sisa, thank you so much, and good luck on your degree. >> thank you. all right, agree or disagree, dreamers who pay taxes and contribute to the country should be eligible for reduced in-state tuition? go to pulse.msnbc.com/america. we got your results next. remember our special night? abdominal pain... ...and diarrhea. but it's my anniversary. aw. sorry. we've got other plans. your recurring, unpredictable abdominal pain and diarrhea... ...may be irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, or ibs-d. you've tried over-the-counter treatments and lifestyle changes, but ibs-d can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi,... ...a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage... ...both abdominal pain and diarrhea at the same time. so you stay ahead of your symptoms. viberzi can cause new or worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have no gallbladder, have pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse,
12:55 pm
long-lasting or severe constipation, or a bowel or gallbladder blockage. pancreatitis may occur and can lead to hospitalization and death. if you are taking viberzi,... ...you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi... ...include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d with viberzi. adult 7+ promotes alertness and mental sharpness in dogs 7 and older. (ray) the difference has been incredible. she is much more aware. she wants to learn things. (vo) purina pro plan bright mind. nutrition that performs. and you're about in to hit 'send all' on some embarrassing gas. hey, you bought gas-x®! unlike antacids, gas-x ® relieves pressure and bloating fast. huh, crisis averted.
12:56 pm
12:57 pm
yep, we made it to our final pulse question of the day. we've been asking, agree or disagree, dreamers who pay taxes and contribute to this country should be eligible for reduced in-state tuition. this is what you've been telling us, and thank you for piping in on this question. you agree. 86% saying dreamers who pay taxes and contribute to this country should be eligible for reduced in-state tuition. i want to thank you for pulsing. that's our final, by the way, pulse of america program here on msnbc. we hope you enjoyed it. thanks for sticking around with us. we want to thank you for participating every sunday and
12:58 pm
telling us your opinions. much more news for you at the top of the hour. a crucial week ahead for health care and the u.s. will majority leader mitch mcconnell have the votes before the fourth of july recess? we're both stuck in this cube farm and you're about to hit 'send all' on some embarrassing gas. hey, you bought gas-x®! unlike antacids, gas-x ® relieves pressure and bloating fast. huh, crisis averted.
12:59 pm
gave us the power to turn this enemy into an ally? microsoft and its partners are using smart traps to capture mosquitoes and sequence their dna to fight disease. there are over 100 million pieces of dna in every sample. with the microsoft cloud, we can analyze the data faster than ever before. if we can detect new viruses before they spread, we may someday prevent outbreaks before they begin. a trip back to the dthe doctor's office, mean just for a shot.
1:00 pm
but why go back there, when you can stay home... ...with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection, which could lead to hospitalizations. in a key study, neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%... ...a 94% decrease. applied the day of chemo, neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the next day, so you can stay home. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to neulasta or neupogen (filgrastim). ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries, and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. so why go back there? if you'd rather be home, ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. you...smells fine, but yourin your passengers smell this

109 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on