e-mails, they did not bother to redact any of the personal information contained in them, including e-mail addresses, home addresses, work addresses, even phone numbers of these people who had the temerity to make public comment. we asked the white house about that. they said they warned people that their comments including any personal information in them might be made public. they say they made that warning notice posted in the federal register on july 5th. so you should have seen it. but sorry if you missed that notice in the federal register. too bad. now we're publishing your phone number. don't worry. all the rest of your personal that does it for us tonight. thank you. see you on monday. there was another russian in the meeting with trump's son.

and now tonight the president has another new lawyer. trump will always have paris. another trip is overshadowed as "the 11th hour" gets under way on friday night. just after donald trump left for france on wednesday night, we shared with you, if you'll recall, a politico report that said, quote, top west wing aides are exasperated by the risk that more damaging news has yet to emerge. and about that more damaging news that had not yet emerged, it came out this morning, prior to the president's return from france. nbc news was the first to report that also in that meeting with don junior and the russian lawyer in trump tower last june, a man who was formerly a member

of a soviet counterintelligence unit, we now know that rin rinat akhmetshin still has ties with russian intelligence. something, we should point out, he has denied. he said i never thought this would be a big deal, to be honest. you'll remember the original explanation for this meeting was adoption policy under u.s. sanctions. one american investor, who worked on that policy, told business insider this when he found out who was also in the room. "in the world of russian intelligence, there is no such thing as a former intelligence officer. so, in my opinion, you had a member of putin's secret police directly meeting with the son of the future next president of the united states asking to change u.s. sanctions policy crucial to putin. and in light of today's

headlines, it's worth remembering that the president and his aides this week applauded donald trump jr. for his transparency. and on tuesday, after releasing his e-mails about this meeting, don junior said not once but twice, this is everything. >> i have a quick statement that i'll read from the president. my son is a high-quality person and i applaud his transparency." >> more than happy to cooperate with everyone. i want the truth to get out there. i'm not trying to drag out the story. they want to drip a little today so i'm like, here it is. i'm more than happy to be transparent with everybody and cooperate with everyone. >> so as far as you're concerned, this is all of it? >> this is everything. this is everything. >> can you explain why there's this plague of amnesia that affects all of these people associated with the campaign and one country and one country

only? >> every day we do our best to give the most accurate information that we have and have offered to be as transparent as possible with all committees and anyone looking into this matter. >> how refreshing to have somebody take responsibility, be transparent and earnest. admit that maybe he would have done things differently. >> it's called opposition research or even research into your opponent. i think the press made a really big deal. >> ken delany is with us and boston globe columnist and the chair of journalism ethics at pointer and rick stengel from the state department and former managing editor of time magazine. welcome to you all.

mr. delanian, you brought us today's news. maybe nothing happened of consequence at that meeting, but the drip, drip, drip nature of it sure looks like it's not nothing. >> that's absolutely right, brian. that's really an interesting point. even if you take the innocent explanation that it really was a nothing burger, the kind of things this lawyer and lobbyist were talking to the trump campaign about were of no consequence, the way the trump folks handled it is just so deeply suspicious, the story changed like three times and then even when don jr. went on fox news said eye i've told you everything today we learn he didn't tell us everything. and the person that -- whose presence was not disclosed happens to be a kind of a political fixer who has represented russian interests in some way as suspicious character maybe not as quote i don't think he is a agent of putin's secret police. but he is certainly a guy kind

of operating in the shadows in washington, has represented causes that are near and deer to the putin government and somebody whose presence at the meeting is going to interest bob mueller and house and senate investigators. so to not disclose that, you just have to wonder, as a political matter, what the trump folks are thinking. >> and ken, this may not be answerable, may not be known. you may know and be unable to say just nod your head. is there going to be any more from this one meeting? and of course, there were others. >> well, brian, at the end of the today we sort of concluded here at nbc news we still don't fully under how many people were in the meeting. there is talk of a translator being there whose name has been out we haven't confirmed. there is potentially another person in the meeting. there are things to be learned about this meeting still which is incredible, brian. because you know there's been so many chances for the trump administration to set the record straight and disclose everything. >> indira, while i ask for your

forgiveness for the no fewer than 15 pronunciations that i've used for your name, you have been a journalist all your life. i have to ask this about the trade. we don't know what we know because of government agencies being transparent and coming forward. it was another good week, a amid daily bash fake news it was a good week for a free and robust press. >> absolutely. when donald trump says, oh i applaud my son for his transparency. let's be honest there is no way at a donald trump jr. would have released the e-mails had "the new york times" not been on the phone with him saying we've got your e-mails and we're about to release them. that's the only reason he put them out there in order to try to get ahead of the story which was going to be out there anyway. in answer to the question token which is is there more come? absolutely there is more coming. everyone talks about is there another shoe to drop. there are more shoes in than in immelinda marko's closet. we're talking about how many

people in the meeting the latest reporting showing six, might have been seven, each person suffering from all the russo the amnesia wit a second no there was one else np no there was someone else. there was at translateser this person. i mean, it is incredible to me that donald trump jr. thinks that the worst thing about this meeting is that nothing came out of it. it's not that he actually accepted the meeting and said, oh, my goodness, i got an e-mail in which somebody said that the russian government is trying to help my father win the election. help. i'm here to report a crime. instead of saying that, he said, i love it, and went ahead with the meeting. and what he thinks is bad is that nothing came out of it. i mean, really, we have to ask ourselves that question. >> you're so right. that line, nothing came of it, has been the response of the president all through the surrogates and we have no proof of that yet. we don't know that to be true or

false. >> absolutely. >> rick, when you ran "time" magazine, the cover that means so much to donald trump, you knew the significance of optics. having said that, the optics this week don't look good. >> the optics look just god awful and, in fact, they have violated every rule of crisis communications that you could possibly have. rule one is to get it all out as soon as possible. what they are doing, which is aiding the people in the media, is having it come out in tiny little droplets. what that does is perpetuate the story. it's just a very, very unprofessional operation. the fact that we're talking about we don't know how many people are in the meeting, do off meeting here at nbc where you don't know how many people are in it or an assistant doesn't have a record?

it's kind of astonishing. i don't know how they ran the trump organization but they can't run the white house like this for much longer. >> ken, we've got this russian lawyer who is so russian, there has to be a translator to understand her for the americans in the meeting. we have this former intel guy, at least former that we know of, and let us not forget the two sergeys in the oval office. let us not forget the possible invite for putin to come to our white house having already come to our presidential election. so when people ask you, what is it with russia, knowing that we're still halfway down that road, what's your answer thus far? >> well, republican or democrat, that was before all of this stuff. now, this meeting to me, brian, was a bit of a game changer because for months they have been saying where's the evidence

of collusion? there's a lot of smoke, you say, but where is the evidence? now we have an e-mail from goldstone on behalf of the agalarovs offering direct help from the russian government to the trump campaign and donald trump accepts and takes the meeting. now, that's not proof but it's evidence of collusion and it seems like it's changed the game a little bit in terms of where the investigation is heading. what other meetings were accepted or what other communications happened along these lines. >> endera, can it now be said that this white house is a single issue white house consumed by all things russia? and secondly, was this particularly bad for credibility this week because you have the president tweeting about his son's transparency, you had the son giving kind of definitive statements about what a nothing the meeting had been? >> well, again, back to this whole question of the trump team trying to call this a nothing burger, i think to the rest of

america, we would consider this a double whopper giving the country indigestion and potentially heart failure. with a lot of hidden additives. we don't know what is in there, the secret sauce. what troubles me is the quality of this. everyone has a different investigation of what happened or didn't happen. were they talking about adoption, sanctions, did anything get passed? what happened in this meeting? and the latest soviet intel officer you say was in the meeting, he is saying something different than the russian lawyer. to your first question about whether it's become a single issue white house, i would say so. for anyone concerned about ethics and laws and democratic norms, yes, of course the white house says differently. they say everything is smooth sailing and going along as

always. but i thought it was very interesting, kenneth cruz tweeted out an article from "newsday" that ran eight days before president knicks con resigned saying, "president nixon's base is still with him, they still love him." eight days later, guess what, he had to resign. having your base with you does not necessarily guarantee that you're always going to be in power if you've broken the law or broken the democratic norms of our country. >> i'll speak with the two guys here with gray hair. we remember that going on. a former cia intelligence officer said, everything we know about the meeting from who it involved is in line with what intelligence analysts would expect in a russian influence operation to look like. it bears all of the haul marks of a professionally planned soft

pitch and that's an interesting term of art. and the trump campaign's willingness to take the meeting and, more important, its failure to report the episode to u.s. authorities may have been exactly the green light russia was looking for to launch a more aggressive phase of intervention in the u.s. election. i heard another foreign intelligence officer talk about that, soft pish. they want to make sure you don't report it and that you're untroubled by the meeting. that green lights to them that you're a willing target and someone they can do business with in the future. >> you've got it so perfectly. it's interesting, nearly every former and current intelligence officer has the same view. it's the same one that you just articulated. what they say is it doesn't really matter whether this lawyer and lobbyist were dupes, willing participants, had a different story or, you know, the point is that the overture came in with an officer of help from the russian government and

came through the agalarov's who had a business relationship with the trump family. they were going to build a trump tower in moscow and were together on the miss universe in moscow. the trump organization showed it was willing to take the meeting. what happened after that, these intelligence officers say the trump campaign was willing to play. and so then the question becomes, well, what else happened in what other overtures were made. >> so it was said tonight, it's the most incompetent coverup he has ever seen. to your earlier point about malpractice and media management, does this now mean they will always be reactive? there's no getting the upper hand. they don't look institutionally willing or able to get the upper hand? >> i'm going to come back to that because at the state

department i dealt with russian active measures, as they call it, and i just want to add one thing to what the intelligence officers said. sometimes the russians do a thing where they make you want to think that they are doing something but they are not doing. that maybe they wanted us to think that they're tampering in this election. they have a term of art in the russian military called the gray zone and it's about the fact that nothing seems clear at all. that is what they like. they like frozen conflicts, things to not look clear. that's what they are doing now. to get to your actual first question, yes, they are completely on the back burner and probably will be forever while the investigation is going on. until that's consummated, they are going to be asking about this and you have a president who, by all accounts, is absolutely obsessed with this and may be watching about it. >> our great thanks to our starting panel. last day of the week but first segment on a friday night.

to ken, inira, rick, thank you so much. the legal team that keeps growing to deal with the russian response when our broadcast continues. one laugh, and hello sensitive bladder. ring a bell? then you have to try always discreet.

i didn't think protection this thin could work. but the super absorbent core turns liquid to gel. for incredible protection... snap! so it's out of sight... ...and out of mind. always discreet. for bladder leaks. i've discovered incredible bladder leak underwear that hugs every curve. can't tell i'm wearing it, can you? always discreet underwear. for bladder leaks. delicious pasta marinara. but birds eye made it from zucchini. mmm! bird: mashed potatoes and rice. but made from cauliflower. looks like i need a fork! oh, no. (giggling) bird: new birds eye veggie made. so veggie good. when you switch to progressive. winds stirring. too treacherous for a selfie. [ camera shutter clicks ] sure, i've taken discounts to new heights with safe driver and paperless billing. but the prize at the top is worth every last breath. here we go. [ grunts ]

got 'em. ahh. wait a minute. whole wheat waffles? [ crying ] why! wait a minute. whole wheat waffles? hey you've gotta see this. cno.n. alright, see you down there. mmm, fine. okay, what do we got? okay, watch this. do the thing we talked about. what do we say? it's going to be great. watch. remember what we were just saying? go irish! see that? yes!

i'm gonna just go back to doing what i was doing. find your awesome with the xfinity x1 voice remote. did you ever know that any other person from russia? >> i don't even know. i've probably not met in a formalized meeting because why would i? >> that was donald trump jr. earlier this week. now we know he did in fact meet with additional people from russia as did white house senior adviser and son-in-law to the

president jared kushner and former trump campaign chairman paul manafort. so what are the legal manifestations of this changing story? for the dni, these days anned a ju adjunyt professor. welcome to you both. i'm going to start with the president's new hire today. went out and got another lawyer under the category of you can't make this up sports fans will recognize the name. ty cobb. he's been hired to oversee the white house legal and media response to all these investigations. "top administration officials want someone to enforce

discipline in the white house regarding russia matters and that includes the president who frequent frequently vents his frustrations on twitter. two people familiar with the plan said. so carrie, in real life, the old ty cobb was known for drawing blood. is this kind of discipline the discipline people have been howling for, the role of a personal lawyer? >> well, certainly when there's outside investigations, we're up to four if you count the three congressional investigations and special counsel, former fbi director bob mueller's investigation. so clearly there is jeopardy for the president and for many individuals in the white house and there has been a complete lack of discipline with respect to lawyers all over town wondering how come the president's lawyers can't

control his various tweeting and public statements that are confusing and are related to the ongoing investigations. so certainly it makes sense to those in the legal community why there would be another attempt to bring in a lawyer who can bring some order and discipline to whatever is their legal and media strategy. >> brian, we know about the feds that they hate being lied to. in fact, it's a crime. you just never lie to the feds. how do they feel about kind of slow drip? >> look, you've got to understand that it doesn't do anybody good, whether it's the president or don junior, to hire a lawyer if you're not going to listen to him. the only way that ty cobb can do team trump any good is if he gets out his slugger and threatens everybody with it. there's an old saying in texas, the third time it's enemy action. every time don junior's story

changes, he's handing bob mueller and team mueller a ticket to dust off the hot seat for him. i just want everybody to be quiet, take a time-out, go to a commercial break. if you're not going to listen to ty cobb, what are you spending your money for, brian? >> and carrie, about mr. mueller, we've asked this from time to time. let's say that in his mind -- and it's a very closed shop around bob mueller. a very professional outfit. he's been at this before. he's got like a 16-month two-year time frame in mind with either an oral mechanism and if he comes across inundated on one particular bit of wrongdoing that is a clear and present danger that he needs to share with others, how does that happen? >> you know, that's a great question because actually the

special counsel framework is unclear what his deliverable will be in terms of any type of report. so certainly with respect to his investigation he will come up with potential criminal violations. we can go through the laundry list of what they may be looking at, whether it's obstruction, false statements, campaign fraud. that's the legal piece. if he has a criminal case to bring, then he will write that off in terms of a recommendation for prosecution and those particular matters will go towards criminal prosecution. but there's a separate matter that is separate and that's with respect to what does congress do if the outcome of his report and if he does have a mechanism to communicate that to congress if the investigation reveals that there was some type of cooperation with the russian government and the trump campaign regarding the election and that's a political question

that at some point -- and we don't know when that point is, that congress will have to take up. >> brian, let's say you have had it with all of that private sector law money and i hire you for mueller's job and make you an aggressive federal prosecutor. if you're looking to nick somebody, aren't these security forms, as far as you need to go now, there's something about ivanka's form answers. has she gone back and changed her answers or were they all correct from the get-go? >> you're absolutely right. those security form irssues, i think, could be a ticket to buying a lot to do and what is important is every time a story changes, every time you change your security clearance, that is everybody who has binge watched law & order is consciousness of

guilt and that's the kind of circumstantial evidence from which a judge or jury could conclude that you had the intent to violate the law. the "c" word is not cooperation or collusion. it's conspiracy. that's the toughest kid on the playground. and if mueller can show that there was an act, an attempt, an agreement to violate the law, commit a lawful act by unlawful means, that is what will get somebody jammed up for conspiracy and that's what i think the security clearance form and this ever changing story, again, my understanding is that it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better. i think carrie's absolutely right. there's a lot more that bob mueller knows that we know at 11:00 on a friday night, brian. >> speaking of 11:00 on a friday night, two excellent attorneys agreeing to join us for a terrific conversation. carrie, brian, thank you both so very much. another break for us.

up next, president trump and fellow republicans can't escape these russia questions. it's a political angle and a formidable one. our panel will talk about it next. hat holds strong until evening. fixodent plus adhesives. just one application gives you superior hold even at the end of the day fixodent. strong more like natural teeth.

and this word collusion is all over the place. everybody colludes in this city, right? >> i don't think democrats could find russia on a map until they found out or concluded that it could somehow be used to beat up

donald trump. >> if i meet with -- whether it's with a citizen or noncitizens and they give me information or an idea or talk about policy, there's nothing wrong with that. >> the ongoing effort to normalize russia and, more specifically, normalize the meeting that took place in trump tower. those were republican members of congress responding to questions about this russia investigation and that meeting donald trump jr. and then some and a list of others that grew today. well, all of that having been said, joining us to talk about it, bloomberg white house correspondent shannon pettypiece is back with us and we'll ask her about her article in "bloomberg." and jason johnson is with us and jim sharp is with us from his homestate of arizona.

jason, you get to go first. we saw just that relatively small sampling of gop members of congress but we know they represent a larger group. we also know that the russian obsession is not shared by the trump base. so are there republicans you are watching who will be important if they turn a little bit, if something comes along that makes them angry at all of this, even if it's just, we're for the getting anything passed? >> yeah, brian. i think most of those things are likely to happen. number one, the republicans in the house and senate right now, they are still just really trying to get an agenda through. they'll tolerate this until they think it has serious electoral consequences. if we're perfectly candid about it, i think these leaks are very likely coming from people within the administration. they are likely coming from republicans. this isn't some mysterious conspiracy deep state. these are very likely loyalist

republicans who sold their souls to be part of this administration. they are disappointed at donald trump and that's how this information is getting out. i think the leaks themselves and the fact that we found out about this meeting is an indicator that some republicans have turned on this administration. >> shannon, some of your reporting that i found very interesting and important, you doubled back with the clinton campaign because they've been named throughout in this story but not dwelled on. tell the good folks in our audience what you found out. >> the question i had was, so, if this lawyer and lobbyist, they were going around to the trump campaign trying to say, list son, if you're elected, there's this important magnitsky act and this adoption program, we want you to know about it, we'd love you to know about it, doing lobbyist work. if they were doing this and aggressively on the hill, did you go to the clinton campaign and talk to them about it? so my colleagues and i went through a number of clinton

sources and we found out that, no, the clinton campaign was able to definitively say they were not contacted by these two individuals who were at the trump tower meeting. they did not meet with them. they don't know these people. there's no connection. so at least with these two, there was no effort being made to also try and reach out to the clinton campaign and sway the clinton campaign to come out against this act or to do any sort of quid pro quo if hillary clinton was to become president. >> jim, by way of welcoming you to the broadcast, i want to play something i know you've seen and heard and members of our audience may not have. there was a moment, a genuine moment today on fox news. shep smith was talking to chris wallace. two of their straight news guys. they were talking about this russian meeting in trump tower with don junior as new details broke during their conversation.

it was notable if you witnessed it. here it s we'll talk about it on the other side. >> fox news can now confirm new more, paul manafort, the lawyer from russia, the interpreter, the knew guy we found out about today and a mystery person. john roberts reports that there was an eighth person in that meeting. we don't know but there was an eighth. jared kushner filled out his form. i think it's an f-86, saying who he had met with and what he had done. very important stuff. you can go to prison for messing t it up intentionally. none of these people made it. they are still -- we are still not clean on this, chris. there's nothing there. and that's what they tell us. they tell us there's nothing to this. it's a nothing burger. wasn't even memorable. didn't write it down or tell you about it because i didn't even remember it with a russian

interpreter in the room at trump tower. if all of that, why all of these lies? why is it lie after lie after lie? if you're clean, come out clean. my grandmother used to say, when first we practice -- oh what a tangled web we weave at first when we attempt to deceive. there are people out there that believe we're making it up and one day they are going to realize we're not and look and and say where are we and why are we getting told all of these lies. >> in the context of all of cable news, it was somewhat of a cronkite moment. jim, what did you make of it and what can we draw from it? >> well, when you have shep smith quoting his grandmother, he's perplexed. i think a lot of people are perplexed. there are things that donald trump could be talking about and this is all they are talking

about and whether there's anything there or not, a nothing burger or a something burger, as i heard it described earlier, a double whopper with cheese, they have made this look awfully, awfully skittish and weird. just get out there. i did crisis communications as part of my career and this is something i would never, ever tell anybody to do and that is, change your story several times, it just doesn't look good. it's almost like, we don't know that an arson happened. there's an alleged arson but they're basically saying, i was holding a match at the time of the alleged arson. it's really just mind boggling that someone so successful in life as donald trump has been, in a lot of areas, you have to admit that, is not being very successful at this. >> we'll fit in a break and be back with jim and jason and shannon and we'll talk about what was to be a major signature initiative and that's health

care. that and then some when we come right back. people would ask me in different countries that we traveled, what is your nationality and i would always answer hispanic. so when i got my ancestry dna results it was a shocker. i'm everything. i'm from all nations. i would look at forms now and wonder what do i mark? because i'm everything. and i marked other. discover the story only your dna can tell. order your kit now at ancestrydna.com.

and when youod sugar is a replace one meal... choices. ...or snack a day with glucerna... ...made with carbsteady... ...to help minimize blood sugar spikes... ...you can really feel it. now with 30% less carbs and sugars. glucerna. introducing the easiest way to get gillette blades noo text "blades" to gillette on demand text to reorder blades with gillette on demand... ...and get $3 off your first order

when i ran for president, i made a commitment to the american people to repeal and replace obamacare. i am pleased to report that we are very, very close to ending this health care nightmare. we are so close. >> that was president trump at his weekly video address. i'm confident that senate republicans will secure enough votes to pass their health care bill. they've lost two. they're at 50. they can't afford another loss. outside of a few remarks and a couple of twitter posts, the president, however, hasn't done much else to drum up public support or sway reluctant members of his own party. shannon, jason and jim are back with us.

jason, here's the kwi. is the gop better off with the president or stay away from it. >> i think they will be better off if the president owns it. donald trump, for all of the problems associated with 4i7, h the best salesperson. he has to sit down and explain this bill. i've said all along, if you're trying to do something with the aca, you can't pull out pieces without it falling apart. the only way to lift it out of the pit is if donald trump can explain it. the problem is, i don't think he can. i don't think he knows much about the policy. >> shannon, take the other side and i realize this comes if the democrats are better off and if

they don't own it at all. >> i don't think the democrats have much to gain by working with the president, by working with republicans on this. unless two things happen. they drop the repeal obamacare language and stop making this about obama and start making it about health care, maybe we should set the medicaid apart and get back to reformulate lat. that's where the concerns are and that's a very small piece of the affordable care act, of obamacare. maybe we focus on that and don't touch medicaid and we deal with that later. that's what is causing a mutiny among the republican governors. so that's where i see the path

forward. but it was interesting to see the president's remarks about, oh, we're so close. he told reporters on fair force one that the only thing more difficult than health care is negotiating peace between israelis and the palestinians. so he knows this is a do you have sell and a tough road ahead and they've really got to find a path. >> i caught that remark. jim, if we went onto the streets of any city or town in your state, i am guessing, thoughts, questions and concerns about health care out number the same about russia, about 10 to 1 because this is a real human each and this is causing genuine anxiety. >> well, especially arizona. every single one of our counties next year will only have one insurer available on the obamacare exchanges. we're going to see a 25% premium increase after 116% increase

last year. people want to see something done. your colleague chuck todd and i were talking this morning on my show and he pointed out that the senate health care bill, as rand paul explained it to me a couple days before that, it's really obamacare in a lot of ways. it keeps a lot of the regulations and taxes. when the democrats are back in power, they can reinsert everything else that is taken out even if it may fall apart, as the jenga game. here in arizona, this is something that people really want to talk about because they feel like obamacare is just circling the bowl at this point and it just can't sustain itself. >> interesting note to end on. that will have to do it. with our thanks to shannon pettypiece, jason sharpe. when we come back, an update on

another of the president's priorities that plan to defeat isis. a report card when we continue. i noticed it as soon as we moved into the new house. ♪ a lot of people have vertical blinds. well, if a lot of people jumped off a bridge, would you? you hungry? i'm okay right -- i'm... i'm becoming my, uh, mother. it's been hard, but some of the stuff he says is actually pretty helpful. pumpkin, bundling our home and auto insurance is a good deal! like buying in bulk! that's fun, right? progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents, but we can protect your home and auto. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents, how do you find ggreat deals anymore? well, priceline found a way with express deal hotels. we work with top hotels to fill their unsold rooms,

saving you up to 60%. just tap and go. ah, palm springs...wouldn't it be great to go there and unplug, i mean we're so crazy with technology these days... oh, did i insult you technology? i mean you don't even have any feelings. but i love you, kaley. creepers. hotels up to 60% off, check them out now at priceline. tha...oh, burnt-on gravy?ie. ...gotta rinse that. nope. no way. nada. really? dish issues? throw it all in. new cascade platinum powers through... even burnt-on gravy. nice. cascade.

welcome back to "the 11th hour." the islamic state's affiliate in afghanistan was indeed killed in an air strike earlier this week as iraqi forces declared victory over isis in mosul after a nine-month-long fight backed by u.s. forces. take a look at what is left of iraq's second largest city. the u.n. estimating the cost of basic infrastructure repairs. that's plumbing, roads, safe buildings. $1 billion. it starts there. with us tonight, retired four-star u.s. retired general and decorated combat general of

vietnam and former drug czar with experience in military and government throughout the world. we wanted to have you on to get a status update and get a fact check on the status of isis. it's tougher to blot out an idea than it is just a fighting force. >> that's quite right. on the other hand, i'm personally amazed at how effectively the war operations in both iraq and syria have gone. this is remarkable. very small u.s. military footprint. 5 to 7,000 people in iraq and maybe 500 plus in syria and they've actually started to deprive isis of the caliphate, which will have a pretty substantial impact. by the way, the iraqi army got run out of there, two divisions worth, by maybe 800 isis

fighters. so the situation in iraq is clearly not stable. they'll never be a unitary state in syria, iraq, lebanon, afghanistan. we're just presiding over these terrible, internal comments did you find it notable that neither mattis nor mcmaster was in on the trump talks with putin? >> simply astonishing. i doubt that that's ever happened before. first of all, you want a note taker that can back brief the officials of government who were not present and who has a recommend random of record for it. in addition, the whole notion of not having mcmaster or mattis or

tillis present at these meetings is shocking. it goes back to this fact that trump doesn't appear to trust his own government, his own officials. this attempt to set up a private communications channel through the russian embassy simply is mind boggling. >> in your head or on your person, i want to hear you out on security clearances, people like jared kushner, people like ivanka, people we know to be under investigation and people whose stories about the past have migrated. is there a danger to you? >> i think this is way beyond security clearance.

having said that, if an assistant secretary of defense was in contact and on the face of it colluding with a hostile power of the united states, they would be out in the street that day so it's not security clearance so much. it's an indication that we're having difficulty trusting white house officials. >> we appreciate being able to call on you. thank you. our last break coming up. it was just one meeting. there were many others. it was just one e-mail chain, for that matter. there are many others but it was a show stopper in the russian story. we'll look at how it played out this week in slow motion. ♪

[vo] progress is seizing the moment. your summer moment awaits you now that the summer of audi sales event is here. audi will cover your first month's lease payment on select models during the summer of audi sales event.

i was playing golf love golf.... i used to love golf. wait, what, what happened? i was having a good round, and then my friend, sheila, right as i was stepping into the tee box mentioned a tip a pro gave her. no. yep. did it help? it completely ruined my game. well, the truth is, that advice was never meant for you. i like you. you want to show me your swing? it's too soon. get advice that's right for you. investment management services from td ameritrade.

♪ i love you, basement guest bathroom. your privacy makes you my number 1 place... ...to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. ♪ new febreze air effects with odorclear technology cleans... ...away odors like never before. because the things you love the most can stink. and try febreze small spaces to clean away odors for up... ...to 30 days. breathe happy with new febreze. jack knocked over a candlestick, onto the shag carpeting... ...and his pants ignited into flames, causing him to stop, drop and roll. luckily jack recently had geico help him

with renters insurance. because all his belongings went up in flames. jack got full replacement and now has new pants he ordered from banana republic. visit geico.com and see how affordable renters insurance can be. everything this week, we learn more about the meeting. trump tower, june 9th and one day at a time. just for our recollection, in donald trump jr. statement, we were made to believe the primary purpose of the meeting with russian lawyer was about the adoption of russian children. on monday we learned there was more. don junior enthusiastically took the meeting thinking that he'd gain info on hillary clinton.

the subject line almost comic ally and on wednesday, the president left for paris. he also defended his son tweeting, he was open, transparent and this is the greatest witch hunt. sad. and then saying in a press conference with the newly elected french president who is the same age as don junior, that most people would have taken that same meeting. so much for transparency. we've learned of the presence of a russian-american lobbyist in that same meeting with prior ties to the intelligence apparatus along with another russian there to translate. the question is, who knows what

we'll be covering by this time on monday night. but for now, that's our broadcast for tonight and for this week. thank you for being here with us. have a great weekend. good night from msnbc headquarters in new york. due to mature subject matter, viewer discretion is advised. ♪ how do i describe myself? i'm a mother [ bleep ]. >> an inmate tries to leave jail the hard way. >> she shoots him with the taser and he goes down. 50,000 volts. >> i went ahead and ordered a second drink. i don't remember anything after that. >> convicted of her fifth drunk driving charge, a female inmate