for the campaign at the age of 26, she had zero political experience back then, not any more. she has been by the president's side every day from the first campaign event. her status in the inner circle solid now with today's announcement. that is our broadcast on a busy wednesday night. and thank you for joining us. good night for all of us at nbc headquarters in new york. it is a weird time in the news right now. it's a weird time in american life honestly. we're keeping an eye on a few different stories that have been cooking today and stories that are still continuing to develop tonight. there is a story that has just broken in the last few minutes that i need to tell you about. just moments ago, we learned from "the new york times" that the president's lead lawyer on the russia investigation has just done something you would not expect from a person who has that particular job.

i mean, mostly you would expect somebody in that job to be busy, right? even if one of the things that had maybe hurt you, or been a distraction in your professional life, was that you were like a controversy magnet, you were known for sticking your foot in your mouth whenever you had the opportunity to, you'd think being the president's lead lawyer on a scandal as big and threatening as the russia investigation, would actually cure that problem for you, right? you would be protected from getting involved in other unrelated controversies, just because you'd be buried in work. you're leading the president's defense on the biggest national security scandal. to ever afflict any american president. you would be too busy to get in trouble, right? think. the president's lead lawyer on the russia scandal today apparently had some extra time on his hands, and he decided to use that extra time to forward this information to a number of journalists. quote, you cannot be against

general robert e. lee and be for general george washington. there literally is no difference between the two men. john dowd's e-mail also says that the group black lives matter, quote, has been totally infiltrated by terrorist groups. again, this was sent out today by the president's lead lawyer on the russia investigation. now, he's not to be confused with the guy who started out as the president's lead lawyer. that was on the russia investigation. mark kasowitz started out as the lead leader. he ended up making national news for threatening random strangers over e-mails saying things like, watch your back -- the thing that rhymes with ditch. mark kasowitz since his all-night, late night e-mail storm threatening random strangers has since basically disappeared. although nobody will just come out and say he's no longer part of the president's russia legal

team. the president also put a well-known christian rights lawyer on his legal team. we don't know exactly what his role is on the russia team, he spent much time on the fox news channel talking about everything from north korea to hillary clinton. it's hard to believe he's spending a ton of hard working hours actually crafting the president's russia defense. in fact, when he has actually talked about the president's russia defense, it has not gone very well. so, you know, if you were the only president of the united states to ever face a serious special counsel-led fbi counterintelligence investigation while you were in office, you would want to make sure that you have the best lawyers on earth. right? working harder than any lawyers have ever worked on anything. right? you would think. this president's legal team on the russia issue is this guy, jay sekulow, who argues like ten commandments cases, and spends

all day, every day on fox news. also the incredible disappearing mr. watch your back. also, there's john dowd, who is apparently now as of today spending his time e-mailing out pro-confederacy musings to journalists and friends. that's according to michael schmitt, this story that just posted tonight. reporters apparently called john dowd for comment after they got his pro-secessionist statement. you've got your nose in my personal e-mail? people send me things. i forward them. he then hung up. end quote. now, to be fair, we do not know why the president picked john dowd to run his legal team on the russia investigation.

but from our perspective as americans, just watching the scandal unfold and wondering about the president's legal representation here, from our perspective, knowing he picked john dowd to lead that team, no matter what the president sees in him, we probably should have seen this coming. >> cnbc caught up with mr. dowd just a short time ago. >> [ bleep ]. that's what i've got for cnbc. >> get the [ bleep ] out of here. >> that was mr. dowd's previous, most high-profile case. when his client was not only convicted, but given the longest sentence ever in an insider trading case. he's now leading the president's legal team and he's now sending secessionist e-mails to reporters. so that happened. we're going to post a link to this new "new york times" story that just posted. if you're ever going to be a united states president under fbi investigation, this may be something to study in terms of

putting together your legal team. at a time of intense anxiety about this presidency, one of the things we're going to be reporting on tonight is some unusual movements by the vice president. i don't think anybody's expecting president trump to resign, or to try to flee the country or do anything dramatic, but things are weird enough right now for this presidency that the vice president making dramatic and unexplained changes in his schedule. that has people a little bit on edge. we're going to have more on that ahead coming up in just a moment. the president, of course, lost his manufacturing advisory council today. he also lost his strategic and policy forum, whatever that was. neither of these groups appear to have ever done anything substantive. the manufacturing council, for example, never once met. but as of today, those groups of ceos and business leaders who are supposedly advising the president, those groups are gone

now, after ceos started to peel off and leave. and the president then scrambled to disband the groups before they could further embarrass him by continuing to drop out one by one. so we've been watching that drama unfold today. as this president who very much wants to be seen as a business leader, loses the highest profile business leader window dressing that the white house had set up for him. i will tell you, though, that pursuant to that story about the ceos all quitting those advisory groups, the prevailing feeling right now in many newsrooms across this country is a feeling that we're all waiting for the other shoe to drop. this piece led politico.com all day today. and i actually think it's pretty emblematic of what a lot of people in the news business are watching right now and wondering right now. i mean, all these white house sources are professing to reporters anonymously that they feel uneasy about being associated with this president after his remarks this week.

praising white supremacists. they're wrestling with the president's remarks, praising white supremacists. white house staffers are telling reporters that they were startled by the president's remarks. what the president is doing now, and how he's behaving on this issue, it's being described as an intensely awkward thing, even for the most senior people at the white house. okay. therefore, naturally, everybody's been expecting that people will start to resign. right? either they'll resign explicitly with the president aligning himself with nationalists, or people will resign in a less brave way and say they want to spend more time with their cat or whatever. that's the expectation. but so far, there have been no resignations from the administration. from people who have actual jobs there at least. this make work window dressing advisory board is hollowed out, but that's it. in terms of people actually

working in the administration, apparently everybody is fine, nobody is leaving. they're all okay with it. i mean, so honestly, like everybody else, we are watching and wondering about whether there are going to be any white house resignations. or administration resignations. there's a lot of noise out there in the administration of people in the white house saying how bad they feel about how the president's behaving. but anybody stepping up and resigning because of it, honestly, i think people thought that would happen today, and it did not happen today. we're monitoring some very interesting signs of dissent against the president, though, from the top brass of the military. that's an interesting thing. we're going to have more on that ahead tonight. and that is a thorny constitutional issue. we're also keeping an eye on an increasingly high-profile bid for democrats to convince their republican colleagues to at least censure the president for the remarks that he made on white nationalism this week. we'll have more on that ahead tonight as well. but i want a foreground tonight a different type of personnel change.

one that is an actual surprise, and is potentially an important signal on the team of prosecutors and investigators who are working on the special counsel investigation led by former fbi director robert mueller. you'll remember robert mueller got the job of being special counsel, running the special counsel investigation in may of this year. but we also know from congressional testimony from former cia chief john brennan and fired fbi director james comey, that the bob mueller special investigation didn't just start this may when robert mueller got named special counsel. the nut of that investigation, the core of it started last year. the fbi opened its counterintelligence investigation into the russian attack on our election and whether or not the trump campaign helped with that attack, or was involved in that attack. they opened that investigation all the way back last year, last summer. the cia director said his agency had seen enough information

about unexplained contacts and communication between trump associates and representatives of the russian government, that they convened a task force last summer to look into it, and the result was the fbi opening their counterintelligence investigation. last year. last july. well, when the fbi set up that investigation last year, last july, they reportedly put in charge of it, put as the supervisor of that investigation, the chief of the fbi's counterespionage section. he was in charge of supervising the investigation. his name is peter strzok, i think that's the way you say his last name, strzok. according to previous reporting in "the new york times," he's an experienced previous fbi investigator, involving chinese spying, and russian spying in the united states. so he's not only a high-ranking fbi official, he has the fbi job that you would most like to have if you're a fan of that tv show, the americans. this is like the really sexy

counterespionage part of the fbi. counterespionage means that you work to thwart other countries in their efforts to spy here in the united states. so you try to find foreign agents operating here. you try to find americans who have wittingly or unwittingly been turned, or are being used by foreign governments who are operating espionage operations here in the u.s. and this senior fbi officer, he had reportedly risen in the ranks of the fbi to become the lead guy at the fbi section that tries to find and uproot all foreign spying operations here in the united states. so he's got the job that they make movies about, right? obviously it's a very important job, sensitive job. everything that happens in that part of the fbi is very secret. for obvious reasons. and i think because of that, we don't actually know a lot about him. even with the last name as google-able as this -- his last

name is s-t-r-z-o-k. forgive me if i'm getting the pronunciation wrong. but even a name that google-able, there's very little you can find out about peter strzok in the record. i mean, there is that "the new york times" reporting that he ran secretive operations against russian and chinese espionage. we know from some of the deep journalistic dives that he was involved in the high level of the fbi's investigation into hillary clinton, using a private e-mail server when she was secretary of state. after that clinton investigation got wrapped up, mr. strzok got put in charge of the fbi's investigation into the russian attack on the election. and that crucial question of whether or not the trump campaign was involved in it. he was the fbi supervisor coordinating russia investigation, that started last summer. that ran through the fall, that ran through the election, that ran into the new year, and was finally disclosed to the public in the spring. the fbi first publicly confirmed

that open counterintelligence investigation in march. when james comey testified about it to congress. and we all know what happened next, right? within a matter of weeks after that testimony, james comey himself was fired. the fbi reportedly opened yet another investigation into whether comey's firing might have been an effort to obstruct justice on the part of the president. very quickly thereafter, robert mueller was named special counsel and he was put in charge of it. he quickly rolled up all these ongoing investigations related to the russia matter and trump campaign, he put them all under the purview of his special investigation. he rolled up the investigation of mike flynn, that produced grand jury subpoenas for financial and business information related to flynn and his company. mueller took that investigation over. mueller also took over the ongoing investigation into trump campaign chair paul manafort.

an investigation that also had already produced subpoenas from a federal grand jury. robert mueller also absorbed that relatively new obstruction of justice inquiry that the fbi started after james comey was fired. and, of course, robert mueller absorbed the big one. the big russia inquiry that the fbi started last summer into the russian attack, and the trump campaign's possible collusion with that attack. well, that inquiry, that russia part, right, the nut of the investigation, that was reportedly being run by peter strzok. head of the counterespionage section of the fbi. abc news reports today that peter strzok only is not running the russia part of the investigation anymore, abc is reporting that he is no longer part of the mueller inquiry at all. and according to abc, while mr. strzok might have previously run the counterespionage section at the fbi, now they report he's working in human resources.

and nothing against human resources, but what happened there? i mean, that was like you were the principal, and now all of a sudden you're working in the cafeteria. what happened there? i mean, this is a single report from abc news. other news outlets today have echoed this reporting. but nobody's independently confirmed it. we contacted the special counsel's office today to see if they would either confirm or deny this reporting from abc or give us any comment on it, tell us anything about peter strzok's role. and when it continues in the investigation. why it may not have changed this dramatically, as abc is reporting that it did. special counsel's office would not talk to us about it at all. if this is true, though, i guess this could be the first indication of trouble, or at least bumps in the road when it comes to the robert mueller inquiry. and i would love to tell you more about what this means. i would love to tell you whether or not this really indicates that there's something wrong inside the mueller investigation. i'd love to give you any further

information about this strange new piece of news that i could. but i can't. because the one thing i can confirm is that the mueller investigation is not very leaky. at least not to us. or to anybody that we know, or work with. we squeeze, we cajole, we needle, we really can't get anything out of them at all, even when a competing news organization has put out a very provocative report. so we will wait to find out more. "the new york times" this morning did report that the fbi investigation being led by robert mueller, it might have its first actual human witness for the russian side of the russian attack on the election. it's a ukrainian hacker. a guy who produces code and malware and hacking tools and sells them online. he doesn't appear to have wittingly worked with the russian government last year. in their attack on the

democratic party in the clinton campaign last year. but apparently some of his code is what the russian military intelligence unit that carried out the attack, it's what they used as their weapon to attack the dnc. well, the guy who created that weapon, the guy who created that code, he's now reportedly working with ukrainian officials, and more or less cooperating with the fbi in their investigation. and that's important, because that's apparently the first time they've had a human material witness for the technical part of the russian government's hacking attack. their effort to hack into and steal information from the democratic party and the clinton campaign, and turn it back to the american public, in a way that was designed to help donald trump. and while that news about that cooperating witness is interesting, in terms of how that mueller investigation is unfolding, what they've got to work with, it turns out it also comes with a stark and somewhat stomach-turning reminder of why there's a real sense of urgency to this investigation. not just to make sure justice is

done, and people are brought to account for that russian attack, and we all come to know if there are american confederates in our midst or in our government who knowingly helped with that russian attack, that all gives it some urgency. but the other reason there's a real sense of urgency to getting this thing done, to getting this investigation followed to the end, is because it does not appear, it really doesn't appear that the russian attack is over. and we've got some disturbing new information about that today, and that story's next. (vo) my name is bryan. i'm proud to make dog chow in davenport, iowa. dog chow's been a part of my family's life for over 40 years.

my grandfather made it and now i'm making it. as a micro-biologist i ensure that dog chow leads with high quality ingredients.

anyone who calls it a hobby doesn't understand. we know that a person's passion is what drives them. [ clapping ] and that's why every memorial we create is a true reflection of the individual. only a dignity memorial professional can celebrate a life like no other. find out how at sanfranciscodignity.com.

the russian military intelligence unit that carried

out the dnc hack? that group is nicknamed fancy bear. they're apparently still working now, this summer, still against us, the american public. still on behalf of donald trump's interests. right after we learned last month about the trump tower meeting between donald trump's eldest son, donald trump jr., and his campaign chair paul manafort and his son-in-law jared kushner along with all those various russians promising dirt on hillary clinton, right after we learned about that trump tower meeting, you might remember that the trump white house launched kind of a pr counteroffensive to try to blunt the impact of that news. and a little bit of it was defense. they tried to excuse the meeting, dismiss it as no big deal. remember, they kind of argued that, oh, anybody would have taken that meeting. it's common political practice. everybody always takes op-ed research on their political enemies like putin.

who of us doesn't talk to the russian government when we need dirt on a fellow american? the trump white house hates playing defense as much as anybody in politics. and so alongside that kind of sad defense, they also simultaneously launched a counteroffensive, in which they claimed actually, that the real scandal, the real thorn collusion was done by hillary clinton. it was the hillary clinton campaign that colluded with a foreign power. i'm rubber, you're glue. white house officials, the president's russian legal team, shows on the fox news cham, the white house spokesperson speaking from the briefing room, they all started echoing this same counterclaim that there was no collusion scandal involving the trump campaign in russia, the real scandal was hillary clinton colluding with the whole different country. >> the white house on offense against what the president calls a, quote, disgraceful double standard. team trump pointing out the

democrats own alleged coordination happening with foreign governments. watch this. >> i do know for a fact the democratic party operatives went to the ukrainian embassy to coordinate oppositional research and attacks against our campaign. so that's a story. >> the double standard is upsetting. you see it every day. i would love to rant and rave about it, but candidly right now with everything that is going on i think people see it. >> why did the dnc have their operatives meeting with the ukrainians and getting information? why is that not one standard and this is another? >> live with the back story on the dnc's alleged ties to the ukraine. >> live in washington. that was fox news channel on july 12th. and that on july 12th, that started like five straight days on the fox news channel of them hyping this story. that the real collusion was hillary clinton's collusion. but, you know, that day, july

12th, a website started posting what they said were stolen hillary clinton e-mails. it was called cyber berkut. that proved this story, that bolstered this story, that the clinton campaign and the ukraine secretly colluded and worked together during the election. cyber berkut posted the supposed stolen e-mails from the clinton campaign on july 12th. posted the supposed stolen e-mails from the clinton campaign on july 12th. when is when fox news started going nuts on this stuff. cyber is believed by experts to be the russian government. they are believed to be the latest online alter-ego of the russian military defense unit that took all those democratic party stolen documents, they obtained by hacking, and then fed them back into the u.s. political system, into the u.s. media, in a way that was designed to help donald trump and hurt democrats.

that's what they did during the election. they apparently are still at it. this summer, they're still feeding anti-democratic, anti-hillary clinton story lines culled from materials that they hacked from the clinton campaign and the dnc. they're feeding them back into what isn't a campaign anymore, but it is still a u.s. political system and a u.s. conservative media universe that will do all they can to help the trump administration apparently no matter the source of their information. now, it's interesting, fox news really started pushing this stuff on july 12th, the day that this front for russian military intelligence started putting out its own data to support this story. the white house actually started pushing it two days before that. out of the blue, the white house resurrected these old claims that hadn't been circulating anywhere for months, about hillary clinton being the real colluder, the real collusion being clinton and ukraine.

the white house started that on the 10th of july. they were like the on-ramp. and within two days, this russian military intelligence unit was feeding that stream of information with stolen e-mail. then fox news and other conservative media outlets picked it up and ran with it. now your conservative uncle, who types with a caps lock key on and forages stuff from breitbart and watches fox news all day, he believes there are two collusion scandals, if there are any. and the real proof is the one of hillary clinton. this presidency right now is in a rocky period. for a lot of reasons. most of them self-imposed. all of them self-imposed. but nobody's quitting the administration, nobody's resigning, nobody in active republican politics is calling on the president to resign or anything that dramatic. the continuing existential threat to this presidency is the russia issue led by robert mueller. today there are both intriguing and strange signs that there may be stuff going on inside that

inquiry that we don't understand, and that may not be a good sign for that inquiry. and, we've got a fresh look at how the russian attack that started this whole crisis, and that started this whole investigation, it continues to operate on donald trump's behalf. and with crucial implication from the white house itself, and from the conservative media universe that supports it. it's not over. stay with us. when a critical patient is far from the hospital, the hospital must come to the patient. stay with me, mr. parker. the at&t network is helping first responders connect with medical teams in near real time... stay with me, mr. parker. ...saving time when it matters most. stay with me, mrs. parker. that's the power of and. ugh. heartburn. sorry ma'am. no burning here. try alka-seltzer heartburn relief gummies. they don't taste chalky and work fast.

mmmm. incredible. can i try? she doesn't have heartburn. alka-seltzer heartburn relief gummies. enjoy the relief.

and life's beautiful moments.ns get between you flonase outperforms the #1 non-drowsy allergy pill. it helps block 6 key inflammatory substances that cause symptoms. pills block one and 6 is greater than 1. flonase changes everything. time's up, insufficient we're on prenatal care.es. and administrative paperwork... your days of drowning people are numbered. same goes for you, budget overruns. and rising costs, wipe that smile off your face. we're coming for you, too. for those who won't rest until the world is healthier, neither will we. optum. how well gets done.

a trio of democrats in congress, democrats in the house, on friday, the day after tomorrow, they'll introduce this new piece of legislation. it's a proposed censure of the president, for what they call his inadequate response to the white supremacist neo-nazi rally in charlottesville, virginia, over the weekend. the democrats want to reprimand him for not immediately naming and condemning the white supremacist groups. now, in the grand scheme of things, in terms of the ways we've got as a country to hold a president accountable, a censure is like kind of a biggy stuff. like the first rung on the ladder. basically a strongly worded letter from congress.

the major consequence of a censure is that historians will make a mental note that it happened. it's literally the least lawmakers could do. if they wanted to respond negatively to show displeasure with the president's defense of white supremacist yesterday. actually, i guess i should correct that, we sort of found out last night that this is the least lawmakers can do to denounce what the president did. they can send out some strongly worded tweets that don't actually mention the president by name, but make it very clear that they themselves aren't cool with nazis, okay? nothing else to say about it, or the president or whatever he might have said. just a heads-up, don't like nazis, all right? that's the least you can do. on a scale of congressional responses to a thing like this, a censure is like a fraction of a percent stronger than one of those pointless tweets. it would have no real consequence. but if congress wants to do it, they would have to actually pass this censure like an actual bill. assuming every democrat in the house would vote to pass this thing, assuming paul ryan would agree to put it on the floor, they would have to scrounge up

24 ralk -- republican yes votes in order for it to pass. it should be an easy test in reasonable times, republicans will have to decide how much they want to be associated with what the president did yesterday, and what he said yesterday. voting for censure would be one easy, uncomplicated way they could do that. to say that they did something, anything, however insignificant it might turn out to be in practical terms. it is almost the least they could do. i don't think anybody believes they could manage it. joining me is the president and director counsel of the naacp legal defense fund. i'm so glad you're here in person. thank you. >> thank you. >> we haven't spoken since the events of this weekend. i want to first get your top line reaction and how you're feeling these days after.

>> well, i'm pretty enraged, actually. i'm pretty furious. because i think, you know, anybody who was paying attention could have seen that what was going to happen this weekend was going to be something violent, was going to be something ugly. and not just what happened in charlottesville. but the atmosphere that has been created by this president, even when he was a candidate, and that really has been allowed by those in congress and other leaders where he has essentially unleashed something that we have all known exists in the united states. you can't be, as i am a civil rights lawyer, without knowing that there is this element in this country and has been for a very long time. what we have usually seen is a sense of responsibility by national leaders. a sense of responsibility by members of congress. a sense of responsibility by the president that even if they are on the right, there's a line that doesn't get crossed. and what you just described, you know, the unwillingness of members of congress to do more than tweet, to do more than make

oblique references, you know, to hate, disembodied hate without actually identifying who's doing the hating, talking about all sides as the president did, or many sides, or both sides. this is a complete abdication of responsibility for leading this country. because this country is stitched together of many pieces. and it's a patchwork, and it's been difficult. there's been bloodshed to bring us to the point that we're at today, which is not shangri-la, but it certainly is not 1860, and it's certainly not 1954. that took blood, that took sweat, that took lawsuits, that took sit-ins, that took sacrifice to bring us to that point. what we're seeing is the willingness of leaders to kind of cavalierly allow it to be dissipated. and that makes me angry. what i also am is very resolute that we will not be palmed off by tweets, expressions of condemnation.

by expressions of outrage. that's the least you can do, as you said, i said yesterday the president's remarks pretty much jumped the shark. i had been part of the group that was saying, get the white nationalists out of the cabinet, fire bannon. fire gorka. at this point it's the president. it's the president. so now we have three branches of government. we have a congress that has to take responsibility for what they can do, not what they can say. and there actually are things that can be done, that they can do if they mean what they say. if paul ryan really says he's repulsed by white supremacy, if members of congress, you know, republicans and democrats, have tweeted about, you know, white supremacy, and we don't stand with this, then let's talk about the white supremacy, what it actually is. let's talk about federal governments finding that the state legislature of texas, and the state legislature of north carolina created voter suppression laws for the purpose of discriminating against black and latino voters. that is white supremacy in action. so where have they been on that? what has paul ryan said?

we can't even get representative bob goodlott from virginia condemning the charlottesville rally to get a hearing on the amending the voting rights act to deal with the voter situation. do we really trust jeff sessions to prioritize hate crimes and to prioritize the investigation of these white supremacist groups? no, we need congress to now schedule oversight hearings of the department of justice, of the department of homeland security, specifically to find out from them what resources are they allocating to this. we know jeff sessions is allocating resources to ending affirmative action, to defending -- to challenging sanctuary cities, ms-13. i haven't heard hate crimes and white supremacy as part of that

prioritization. that's congress' job to make sure that the department of justice is properly prioritizing those things. so these are the actual tangible things that congress can do. we've been putting them up on our website, we put it on our twitter time line. i'm afraid that the window's going to close. this is not a situation that can be resolved with platitudes. you know, heather heyer is dead, she was killed. people were injured. our children, members of this country, have seen swastikas on flags and nazi flags. we've heard homophobic slurs, we've heard racial slurs, anti-semitic slurs in charlottesville, virginia. if they think we're going to move past this, as though this is just a political moment, this is an american moment. and if people really care about this democracy, and if leaders have been elected to lead this country, then we have the right to expect of them to use the powers that they have. i understand their powers are limited. but they do have power,

and they must use that power in this moment to get america back on track. >> president and director couple of the naacp legal defense fund. i want to talk to you, one question for you about what this behavior by the president does to the far right in terms of whether it makes them more capable of achieving their aims. we'll be right back. stay with us. ♪ music

edible arrangements for summer. order in store or online. if you have moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's, and your symptoms have left you with the same view, it may be time for a different perspective. if other treatments haven't worked well enough, ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works by focusing right in the gi-tract to help control damaging inflammation and is clinically proven to begin helping many patients achieve both symptom relief as well as remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. while not reported with entyvio, pml, a rare,

serious brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's medication isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach. when you clock out, i'll clock in... sensing and automatically adjusting to your every move. there. i can also help with this. does your bed do that? i'm the new sleep number 360 smart bed. let's meet at a sleep number store.

advil liqui-gels minis. our first concentrated pill that rushes powerful relief. a small new size that's fast, cause it's liquid. woohoo! you'll ask, what pain? new advil liqui-gels minis. joining us once again is sherrilyn ifill, the president and director counsel of the naacp legal defense fund.

thank you for staying here. i have a question for you that i'm really struggling with. i've asked it a number of times on the air this week, and it's not a rhetorical question. i don't know how to get at the answer, though, because i feel it's uncharted territory for this century. which is the president made the remarks that bolstered a movement that waxes and wanes in our country but never goes away, the white supremacists, white nationalists, white separatists neo-nazi movement. i think he's doing it on purpose, i don't think he's screwing up. and my question, the thing that i can't foresee, and i'm worried about, is how it changes those groups and their power and their ability to achieve their designs that he has done this. how do you think we can try to either imagine that, or foresee that? >> i think that the isolation of the president and keeping him small to the extent that he is trying to engage in these actions is really important. and i think it's already happening. remember when the president tweeted out his attempt to create a transgender ban in the military.

and the general said the next day, no, don't listen to him, we're studying this thing, right? there are these ways in which he steps out and he tries to make a move, when there's pushback, it contains him. i think people have to be ready to stand up and contain him. the election integrity commission where the commission asked for information from 50 states, right, about every voter in this country. initially 40 of those states said, no, we're not going to do it. this goes back to what congress can do, what governors can do. that's the kind of thing you do to push back and say is this the guy you want to give all of that information. you do bring these lawsuits. it is the muslim ban. look what's happened with that. i think one of the things we have to be very careful about is he's got the bully pulpit, no question about that. we can't stop him from saying what he's saying, activating these groups, making them feel powerful, making them feel like they have a home in the white house. what we can use is the principle tool, we use law, number one, you've got to litigate the heck out of this.

i think groups like my organization, and the aclu and attorney generals are doing that, trying to hold that line. when you see the military saying, no, no, you're not going to tweet out some new thing that we haven't figured out, you're seeing some of that resistance. i think the last part is just mobilization on the ground. i think you know as we get to the end of august we heard the president was planning to have a big rally in phoenix, which could it be more irresponsible for him to have a rally in phoenix right now? the mayor has asked for him not to have a rally right now. there will be a big rally august 28th, the anniversary of the i have a dream speech, the march on washington. so i think putting all of those pieces together is about containment. then we have to remember that there's still an ongoing investigation by robert mueller, and we don't know what's going to happen there. and there are other ways in which this president can be constrained. but it begins with congress doing its job, to stand up to this president, to exercise their authority, to protect this republic.

and it's not with words, it's with deeds. sherrilyn ifill is the president and director counsel of the naacp legal defense funds. the naacp legal defense fund is a national treasure, obviously, so are you. thank you. >> thank you, rachel. >> we'll be right back. relive the thrill of beating the clock. the volkswagen model year end event. hurry in for a $1,000 apr bonus and 0% apr for 60 months on a new 2017 jetta or passat. this idive into the classicster. crab lover's dream or new dueling crab legs with dungeness and snow crab. only during crabfest. now this is seafood. and hurry in to enjoy our new crab melt part of our seafood lover's lunch for just $9.99.

you're searching for something. whoooo. like the perfect deal... ...on the perfect hotel. so wouldn't it be perfect if... ....there was a single site... ...where you could find the... ...right hotel for you at the best price? there is. because tripadvisor now compares... ...prices from over 200 booking... ...sites ...to save you up to 30%... ...on the hotel you want. trust this bird's words. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. and life's beautiful moments.ns get between you flonase outperforms the #1 non-drowsy allergy pill. it helps block 6 key inflammatory substances

that cause symptoms. pills block one and 6 is greater than 1. flonase changes everything. we have a question about your brokerage fees. fees? what did you have in mind? i don't know. $4.95 per trade? uhhh and i was wondering if your brokerage offers some sort of guarantee? guarantee? where we can get our fees and commissions back if we're not happy. so can you offer me what schwab is offering? what's with all the questions? ask your broker if they're offering $4.95 online equity trades and a satisfaction guarantee. if you don't like their answer, ask again at schwab.

in a park across the street from city hall in birmingham, alabama, there is a confederate monument 52 feet tall dedicated

to soldiers and sailors, dedicated 50 years after the civil war. earlier this year after some confederate monuments were removed in some other states alabama passed a law called the alabama preservation act which legally bans the relocation, renaming or other disturbance of any building or monument located on public property which has been in place for 40 or more years. in other words, hey birmingham, don't even think about moving that confederate monument that got put up in 1905. well, yesterday from birmingham's mayor, the confederate monument in city hall was not removed, it was covered up in tarp eed plywood. later, it was out of sight. today, the alabama attorney general's office filed a lawsuit against birmingham and their

mayor for violating the state law saying that the attorney general has otherwise disturbed the memorial. joining us, mayor bell, the mayor of birmingham, thank you for joining us. >> thank you for having me, rachel. >> let me ask if you expected this lawsuit from the alabama attorney general or if you thought your actions with that monument might have been outside the scope of that alabama law? >> no, we knew that we would be -- some action would be taken against the city and me as the mayor of the city by the state attorney general. >> why was it important to you to cover it up, to take this action? >> well, i think what we saw over the weekend in charlottesville was an indication of the direction that this country was going in, as related to monuments of this nature. by the emboldenment of the president of these hate groups

we felt that it was just a matter of time that statues and monuments in alabama would also become the focal point. when you realize what that represents, the subjugation of human beings, the sedition of a section of our country and treasonist acts, you realize that such a monument doesn't have a place in our society in this day and time. >> i spent some time in birmingham, it's a youthful city, a good place to spend time. it has a great night life. i am wondering what is the discussion like in your city and are there factions of people who feel strongly about this extraditi decision, is there going to be dissent over that decision? >> i have not seen that. as a matter of fact when i made my way through the city today i

heard positive comments about it. let me emphasize, we're not in the process of moving the monument but are in the process of telling the story as it is represented. right now it's a stand-alone item that touts the participation in the civil war. but what people have to understand about birmingham is that birmingham is not a civil war city. we did not exist until after the civil war. now we are a civil rights city that was the center of the human and civil rights movement of the '50s and '60s, in fact, birmingham was the epicenter of the civil rights movement. and from that perspective we don't have a link to the civil war. >> william bell, the mayor of birmingham, alabama, now being sued by the state's attorney general over the decision to cover that monument.

please keep in touch with us and let us know how this situation unfolds in your city and your state. thank you. >> all right, will do. >> we'll be right back. stay with us. ♪ fitting into my skinny jeans again? that's cool. feeling good in slim fit? that's cool. looking fabulous in my little black dress? that's cool. getting the body you want without surgery, needles, or downtime? that's coolsculpting. coolsculpting is the only fda-cleared non-invasive treatment that targets and freezes away stubborn fat cells. visit coolsculpting.com today and register for a chance to win a free treatment.

here is a weird one, today vice president mike pence announced he is cutting short his foreign trip to central and south america, he says he is cutting his trip early because he wants to go to a meeting

about afghanistan. that is what was said today. he was due to be in south america and central america all week but now he is going to skip out on a planned dinner with the president of panama, and will leave early tomorrow night. and once he is back in the united states he is cancelling the things he was going to do in the united states as well. his office announced he will cancel two political appearances he was going to make in virginia on saturday. now, we don't know what is happening, it is possible the vice president is homesick or caught a bug. it is also possible he wants to escape the press pool that is traveling with him, which keeps asking him about white supremacist and neo-naziism, every where he goes. but as to why he is clearing out his schedule? we just don't know. it's not all for that one meeting. that does it for us tonight.

now it's time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. >> good evening, we'll have the mayor of baltimore who managed to get rid of all of the monuments in baltimore complaining that local government can't get stuff done. i was like you want to see action? watch that coordinated thing. they moved fast and got it done. >> the mayor is going to tell us how she did it and how she made the decision, how quickly she moved. thanks, rachel. >> thanks. well, donald trump has become the divider in chief. he has divided this country. he has divided his party. he has divided the white house itself. so it was no surprise today when he did not do what his predecessor would have done. he did not attend heather heyer's memorial service in charlottesville, but heather's parents delivered more eloquence and wisdom in their remarks than this president of the united states ever could. >> if yoot