that will lead to trials unless a lot changes. so we tried to answer some of your questions. if you have more, as always, the best place to get us is facebook.com/thebeat with ari. i will be answering some of the question there's when you post them. that does it for me. i'll see you back at 6:00 p.m. eastern tomorrow. now it's "hardball with chris mathews." russian interests. let's play "hardball." >> good evening. i'm chris matthews up in new york on a day of historic developments in the russian investigation. first there was today's indictment of donald trump's campaign manager paul manafort and manafort's long-time associate rick gates. the 12 counts against them include conspiracy against the united states, moneylaundering, and failure to report foreign bank accounts. this afternoon both men stood in a washington courtroom and plead

not guilty to all counts. according to the indictment from special counsel robert mueller, quote, in order to hide ukraine payments from the united states authorities over the period of ten years, manafort and gates laundered the money through scores of the united states and foreign corporations partnerships and bank accounts. the charges don't mention the trump campaign or russian meddling in the election, something his lawyer emphasized this afternoon. >> well, i think you all saw today that president donald trump was correct there is no evidence that mr. manafort or the trump campaign included with the russian government. mr. manafort represented pro-european campaiunion campair the ukrainian. in that he was seeking to further democracy and to help the ukraine come closer to the united states and the eu. those activities ended in 2014.

over two years before mr. manafort served in the trump campaign. >> meanwhile, in what might be a far more significant development today, news broke that a former trump adviser plead guilty three weeks ago to lying to federal officials about his contacts with individuals linked to the kremlin. george papadopoulos was arrested back in july. his guilty plea indicates he is cooperating with the mueller probe. the court documents unsealed today lay out contacts between papadopoulos and two individuals with connections to russian government officials. in the spring of 2016, one of them described as a professor told papadopoulos that the russians possessed dirt on hillary clinton in the form of thousands of e-mails. the document also lays out communications between papadopoulos and unnamed trump campaign officials who encouraged him on. in august of last year, there was a discussion of potential off-the-record meeting with russian officials including a document a campaign supervisor

told papadopoulos i would encourage you and another foreign policy adviser to the campaign to, quote, make the trip if it is feasible. well, yahoo news is reporting that that supervisor is sam clovis, the co-chair of the campaign. for more on everything we learned today, i'm joined by msnbc news justice correspondent pete williams. pete, in order of importance, the two actions we learned about today, is it about manafort or about papadopoulos? >> well, papadopoulos by far, for two reasons. number one, it's more directly connected to the campaign. and secondly we know, as you suggested, we know that papadopoulos is cooperating with robert mueller's prosecutors because the court documents explicitly say that after he was arrested in july, he has been repeatedly questioned by them and has been answering their questions. and we also know it because it seems like they're willing to cut him a deal in return for his guilty plea. he is charged with lying to federal agents and they would

recommend a sentence of zero to six months which means basically they'd be willing to let him out on probation. i think it's important to point out, the only criminal allegation, the only thing he pleaded guilty to that is illegal is lying to the fbi when he said -- when he had all these contacts with the russian, he was not working for the campaign. that turns out not to be true. the other things that the guilty plea talks about, these meetings with the russians, trying to set up a meeting, that's of course not illegal. >> when you look at the pattern, what do you see in terms of the dynamic here? are they using the charges against paul manafort and his associate rick gates to pressure him with huge penalties in terms of prison time? are they using george papadopoulos to try to provide information? because it seems to me the supervisor that is referenced here may well be manafort. and that is all about responding to a russian overture where the russians offer information on hillary clinton. and there is some kind of response by the trump team.

and we're going to have to find out what that response was to see if there is collusion. >> well, it's clearly his role in the campaign that interests them. you would certainly think that the prosecutors are going to use these charges against manafort and gates that are very serious and could carry sentences of many years in prison to try to get their cooperation. you'd also assume, chris, that the prosecutors already tried to get their cooperation, just like the deal they cut with papadopoulos. whether that's going to happen or whether they're going tough it out, we just don't know yet. >> within guy is facing huge numbers and one guy is facing zero to six months. within guy is cooperating. thank you so much. you see through these things so well. >> you bet. >> nbc news justice correspondent pete williams. i'm joined by schmidt, and jennifer rogers. in order, michael first. when you read through the tea leaves, not the tea leaves, the

evidence, you're getting a sense that the russians through papadopoulos, a guy who has not been in the picture for many of us at for a while, you get the sense that they're sending the word they have some stuff on hillary clinton. some e-mails. they want somebody to come to russia and pick them up. they want an overture from the trump campaign as they were doing very well in may of last year. they looked like the nominees pretty clearly. they wanted them to show some sort of back and forth. we're willing to play ball with you. and it's not clear how or if they did play ball. your notion of it now as a reporter. michael? >> this is now the third time that we've seen the trump campaign going after so-called russian dirt about hillary clinton. it shows sort of a determined effort. and in the case of papadopoulos, as you were pointing out, it shows the campaign officials above him knew what he was doing. he was not a rogue element here. they were abreast of these communications. and that's significant. and today would have been a bad day for donald trump if it had just been manafort and gates. but this really sort of takes the story to the next level and raises these questions about why

were there so many contacts and why were they trying so hard to get this dirt from the russians. >> for days now, huckabee sanders has been putting out the word this thing is about to be snuffed. this is reaching its last legislation. how does that look today, that claim? >> well, it doesn't appear to be that accurate. if anything, i think we're maybe in the third or the fourth inning. look, there is -- it looks like mueller is building a case here. he is trying to put pressure on folks. he is trying to move forward with his own investigation. i think she may be thinking that the interviews of white house officials may be wrapping up, and that mueller wants to get them done by thanksgiving. but that we're coming to the end of this is wrong and the facts i think bear that out. >> how it looks like mueller is proceeding. i notice he is going with papadopoulos who is the first example back in may of last year, may of 2016.

the first evidence we have of an overture from the russians, that they want to provide some dirt on hillary clinton. and the first evidence that perhaps, and mother than perhaps, the trump team is responding. they want to go back and meet. they are suggesting who should go pick up the documents. it does have sort of a crime scene atmosphere to it, a dealing that is taking place here. renato, give us a sense of what you think the prosecutors are up. to. >> sure. what i think, chris, it's clear that they flipped papadopoulos. he is a cooperator. and i agree that this is only the beginning. what i would be concerned about if i was in the trump camp is who has papadopoulos been talking to, who has he communicated with. we have seen reporting. i believe you had mentioned earlier, chris, about how sam clovis is also co-chair of the campaign is one of those individuals that papadopoulos was communicating with. he's just been -- excuse me, nominated to be undersecretary

of agriculture. so he is somebody who potentially papadopoulos could be testifying against and providing information against. so those e-mails raise some very serious questions there is one passage in there that i talked about on twitter about how there is a footnote that says we should not -- let's not send somebody high level. let's send a low level person to deal with the russians. and that suggests to me a consciousness that this is a very problematic activity. and the fact that there is suggestion from the white house that this is going to wrap up quickly is either willful, you know, misdirection or it's hopeful thinking. >> well, jennifer, this isn't the only attempt by the russians to sell dirt on hillary and try to establish a relationship with the trump team. this is in may of last year. in june they had the infamous meeting at trump tower where they did the same thing. the woman lawyer came in with i've got some stuff.

turns out she didn't have anything in hand, but she is offering something. like a lot of us have watched "the americans" for years, trying to figure out how russians, kgb people operate. putin is the ultimate kgb person. it looks like they're trying to entrap, if you will, engage the trump team with some russian plan to proceed with their interests. >> that's right. and of course when the news started coming out about that june meefgt last year, the immediate response was oh, yes, we had that meeting, but they didn't give us anything. nothing happened. in fact, all we talked about was adoption, et cetera. so now we know kind of yet again that that narrative isn't really the right one. that in fact they were actively engaged in and interested in getting dirt from the russians and were pursuing that as an active strategy for the campaign. >> well, what would you think if you thought -- sheer guy, donald trump, president of the united states. first of all, he has consistently said there was no effort by the russians to interfere with our elections last year. and then he said there is

absolutely no response by our team with negative do with them. the walls keep crumbling on his notion of the alternative truth. >> that's true. >> is he a credible witness? would trump be a credible witness in court on this case based on what he said? >> when he first started doing it, he said with james comey, i and tons of other people said if it's a really credibility contest between the two of them, comey wins that hands-down. trump has again and again proven to be someone who speaks inaccurately, to say the very least. i think he is not a credible witness. i think his view is just deny, deny, deny. and hope that ultimately the case doesn't get up to as high as he is. >> let me get back to mike on this. i've been following your reporting so well. i have to tell you, you and have i watched movies about prosecutors. and they have a wall somewhere. on the wall they have all the faces, and they're trying to put them together. and you have papadopoulos, a smaller face in the story. yet it turns out he may have been the first one to receive

the russian overture. and then you've got manafort, who was sort of a russian-oriented guy to begin with. you've got all these russian connections. carter page, all of them. michael flynn. everybody's got a russian deal. i've never seen anything like it. i've been following american politics since i was 5 or 6. and i never heard of russian connections in any regard in any campaign in any party by anybody, by any candidate. all of the sudden we have a candidate comes along, donald trump has got russia all over the place. i do think of jackie mason saying he walks through the blood, he walks around the blood with o.j. why so much russian? how do you put it together on a chart on a wall, papadopoulos today getting indicted for a couple of months in allenwood maybe to play tennis up there, and the other guy facing 30, 40 years together. how do you put it together in terms of filling out that chart and tracing, if there was, a conspiracy? >> well, you don't. and what you try and do is try and take every piece of information like the piece that we have today and contextualize

it and see if there is anything larger there. this is a significant thing. we've had different incremental developments along the way here, some bigger than others. the trump tower meeting being one of them. and that is another one that sort of elevates the story again. it doesn't provide all the answers we want. and we won't have that for some time. but we do today have a better understanding of what the campaign knew and what their efforts were. and that's significant. and that's what's different. that's what's different about this story. >> back to you, renato. how do you see the dynamic of the prosecution now? mueller starting from the very beginning. he is starting with the first sign of a russian attempt to hook up, if you will, with the trump people. and then you see -- you have a guy who they may be able to squeeze for more because he was a big shot in the campaign last may. he was the kind of guy that papadopoulos would have to deal with at the top in terms of agreeing to a trip back to russia to pick up the stuff, to agree to accept the stuff, more generally, to agree to play ball with putin. this is a serious business that somebody at the top has to make that decision, i would think.

>> well, no question about that, chris. and what i think will happen is mueller is going to be putting pressure. he has already put pressure on papadopoulos. so what they've already been doing, one thing we learned today, chris, is that papadopoulos was arrested back in july. this deal was consummated on october 5th. so mueller is running a pretty tight ship. and he has been putting the screws on papadopoulos for months now, getting papadopoulos to cooperate against others. i would imagine now the next target is going to be whether it's clovis or someone else who is directly dealing with papadopoulos. and in the meantime, just to be clear, you know, if you're manafort's attorney, i know he made sort of a bold statement that you played earlier. but he is facing some serious charges. and there could be more to come. >> why is that lawyer out there sounding like he is trump's lawyer instead of manafort's lawyer? our producers were saying this guy doesn't make sense as an

attorney. >> i'll tell you how. the only way it makes sense, chris, is one word, pardon. because otherwise that statement was foolish. it was actually it was unprofessional and it was doing a disservice to his client. blasting the prosecutor when your client is facing ten years or more in prison and very serious charges that are going to be difficult to defend. it's literally -- it's malpractice. and at this point if there is not a pardon that is forthcoming for paul manafort, he should be considering cooperation. and so i assume that's what his attorney is trying to get. >> counselor, i just heard the word bingo in my mind, bingo, the pardon. thank you so much, michael schmidt. thank you renato mariotti and jennifer rogers. much more to get on this breaking, plus what more do we know about george papadopoulos whose guilty play was announced today. boy, he got off easy. zero to six months at a nice place. what other trump officials would be implicated by papadopoulos himself? we'll get the latest, next. plus, the white house spin

machine. the trump team is ramping up its response, but you've heard it all before. trump says there was no collusion. and then attacked of course as usual suspect hillary rodham clinton. and as special prosecutor robert mueller makes his first move, what happens if trump decides to fire him? tonight democrats are warning trump against doing just that. but will he be able to stop snims. finally, bobby kennedy, a raging spirit. this is "hardball," where the action. ♪ ♪ ♪

a programing note now about the nationwide tour for my new book, "bobby kennedy, a raging spirit" whose official publication date is tomorrow. tonight at 9:00 p.m. eastern i'll be a guest on the "the rachel maddow show" and then be back up first thing tomorrow to discuss the book on "morning joe." that's the kickoff, the big day for this book. "bobby kennedy, a raging spirit" arrives in stores tomorrow, october 31st. and we'll be right back.

dad: molly! trash! ( ♪ ) whoo! ( ♪ ) mom: hey, molly? it's time to go! (bell ringing) class, let's turn to page 136, recessive traits skip generations. who would like to read? ( ♪ ) molly: i reprogrammed the robots to do the inspection. it's running much faster now. see? it's amazing, molly. thank you. ( ♪ )

welcome back to "hardball." the news that two trump associates have been indicted and another already pleaded guilty to charges in connection with the russian probe is an indication that mueller, bob mueller is getting closer to showing collusion. most significant is the news that former trump campaign adviser george papadopoulos is cooperating with investigators. so how does this little known adviser connect to trump and others inside the campaign? well, in an interview with "the washington post" back in march of last year, trump names papadopoulos along with carter page as members of his foreign policy advisory team. trump even vouched for papadopoulos, calling him an excellent guy. >> we heard you might be announcing your foreign policy advisory team soon. >> if you want, coy give you some of the names. >> be delighted. >> i wouldn't mind. carter page, ph.d. george papadopoulos. he is an oil and energy consultant. excellent guy. >> well, now documents in connection with his plea show

that at a meeting late last march or late march with then candidate trump and then senator jeff sessions, papadopoulos said he had connections that could arrange a meeting between trump and vladimir putin himself. the filings also showed by late april, papadopoulos and perhaps others in the campaign were aware that, quote, the russians had e-mails of clinton, in fact thousands of e-mails, and that they have dirt on her. wow. well, that information was given to papadopoulos almost two months before news even arrived here of russia's hacking, which was made public then. we also know that papadopoulos regularly updated members of the trump campaign team about his russian contacts. i'm joined by ken delaney, investigative report were nbc news and frank deluzzi. gentlemen, thank you. these have become almost a play of characters like george papadopoulos, be so unknown to us and all of the sudden come about to be the first person really to receive the russian

overture of information of dirt on hillary? >> well, chris, one possible explanation for that is this is not the only russian overture. this is just the one we're finding out about right now. no one can claim that george papadopoulos was a well-known figure, even in the trump campaign. senior officials telling reporters they've never heard of this guy. that's believable. he is 30 years old. he was not a major player. but the point of fact he was clearly in contact, and you have frank here, one of the foremost on how the russians act. that's what this looks like. the fbi didn't quite spell that out in their documents that they released today. but that's exactly what most experts are say, you know. they were offering dirt on the russians and e-mails one month after -- we know now after john podesta's computer was hacked at the dnc. here was this professor with links to the kremlin offering this low level guy thousands of russian e-mails that is hugely significant, chris. >> well, let me go to frank on

that. follow up that reputation of greatness. i want to hear from you now. i watch "the americans." i was a little late but i've watched every one produced so far. people tell me it's an authoritative pattern how they do business, how they seduce people, how they find people with weaknesses with sexual or health or family problems and they use them. here they find young people who are perhaps not very sophisticated. they're naive. they went after jared kushner. they went after this young guy, papadopoulos. tell me how you see the pattern here, how it fit theirs normal pattern, the russians. >> sure, chris. if you look at all the developments today through the lens of a counterintelligence professional, and here is what i'm doing. i'm looking through that lens, and i'm seeing russian fingerprints all over this. so we've got a young man who is meeting with a professor who has links to the kremlin. he gets introduced to a ministry of foreign affairs official which we know mfa is often a cover for russian intelligence officers.

he gets introduced to a woman who claims she is a relative of vladimir putin, but we find out today that she is not. this is a classic cut-out recruitment type operation. and let's not forget the whole manafort-gates issue where they had represented for $17 million a pro-russian kremlin connected candidate for president of ukraine. and where did that $17 million consulting money go? cypress. and who else uses cypress to launder money? the russian intelligence services. so are we looking at a primer being hand todman fort and gates on how the russians can manipulate a campaign and manafort saying i wonder if they could do that for us. and the classic small guy, the papadopoulos guy who is the cut-out, he is expendable. make him go to the meeting, not d.t., as we see referred to in the document today, donald trump. >> what do they want from us, the russians? why do they want to get involved in our elections? >> u.s. sanctions are killing

the russians right now. they need to be able to get their oil and gas out. they need to be able to do business with american businesses, and they're not able to do that. and you've got all of the oligarchs who are friends of putin. their assets have been frozen around the world. they can't move their cash. they are not happy campers. so all of that is the target of change. and they're trying to see a candidate like trump who might be able accomplish that mission for them. >> well, nbc news is also reporting that manafort is one of the unnamed high-ranking campaign officials described in that papadopoulos plea deal, revealing that manafort was aware telephone effort to send trump to moscow. in fact, manafort didn't want trump to go, writing in an e-mail, quote, donald trump is not doing these trips. should it be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal. well, the plea further shows in august, papadopoulos and another adviser were, quote, encouraged by someone identified as the campaign supervisor to make the trip themselves. the supervisor has been identified by yahoo news as campaign co-chair and policy

adviser sam clovis. i'm going to go back to my friend ken. ken, if you look at this thing unwrapping, trump's current redoubt or the wall he puts up lately there was no russian attempt to influence our election, nub at all. that's huckabee sander's job to keep saying that and wait a minute here, if there is no collusion, why is papadopoulos, why was jared kushner your son-in-law, why were all so ready to meet any time the russians wanted to meet, they were there. they were trod show up and collude. >> that's right. >> i don't know how far this is going to go. but the idea they were totally innocent of any idea to collude is indefensible already. >> absolutely, chris. what is interesting about what you said about papadopoulos coordinating with senior campaign officials is that sarah huckabee sanders tried to say from the white house podium today that this was a low level campaign aide operating on his own. he had nothing to do with the campaign. that's manifestly untrue as exposed in these documents. and, you know, did the trump campaign call the fbi and report

an attempt by russian intelligence to infiltrate them? no, they did not. and did this guy papadopoulos tell these senior officials in the trump campaign that the russians had offered him hillary's e-mails? well, these documents are silent on that question. but you can bet that robert mueller knows the answer to that question, because he's got papadopoulos's e-mails, and he's got a lot of other information about who he was talking to in the campaign. >> it's great having you on, frank, frank figliuzzi and ken dilanian, you're my man. facebook estimates that, catch this, 126 million americans, roughly 1/3 of all of us receive content from fake russian-backed pages during the 2016 campaign, according to a prepared testimony given in the senate judiciary committee. i'm joined by the reporter of that. that's nbc news's carol lee. explain the significance of the sheer numbers involved here. >> well, it's a very high number, 126 million is i think more than people would have expected.

what this is specifically, chris, this is content that was generated by page, fake pages that were backed by russia. so it was things like videos or fake news or, you know, pictures, things like that. and they were posted. and then, you know, the way they got to 126 million is initially 29 million people saw that content directly. but then they reposted it, shared it, liked it. and it got spread. so it grew and grew and grew to this 129 million number which as you mention is a significant number. potentially, about half of eligible voters in the u.s. would have seen this content. now facebook is really in too. the testimony we received is really downplaying this. they're saying this was extremely insignificant number when you put it in the context of the whole scheme of what facebook users typically see on their news feeds. but this is obviously going to be something of huge interest to

the congressional investigators during the testimony the next two day, i bet it will. thank you so much. great breaking news from carol lee of nbc. >> yep. up next, the trump spin machine is firing on all cylinders. the president of course is trying to deflect attention from the big indictments today. once again, they're going after as they call it crooked hillary, the same old suspect. they always blame her. this is "hardball," where the action is. [don't stop me now by queen] ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

♪ with over 500 flights every day, emirates brings the world together through dubai. fly emirates for a world of good times. ♪ accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments

and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn't a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i'm tom steyer, and like you, i'm a citizen who knows it's up to us to do something. it's why i'm funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who's mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what's political and start doing what's right. our country depends on it.

i'm richard lui in the msnbc

newsroom. netflix pulling the plug on "house of cards" after the sixth season ends next year. in a statement, it is deeply troubled over allegations of unwanted sexual advances in 1986 by kevin spacey against then 14-year-old anthony rapp. spacey saying he does not remember the incident. president trump and the first lady handed out candy to trick-or-treaters at the white house tonight for halloween. now back to "hardball." welcome back to "hardball." president trump, in an effort to distract from the russian probe, has fired up the spin machine, accuse hillary clinton and democrats of campaign crimes and questionable deals. shortly after news of manafort's indictment was released today, the president tweeted sorry, but this is years ago before paul manafort was part of the trump campaign. but why aren't crooked hillary and the dems the focus? also, there is no collusion.

over the weekend the president tweeted this russia talk right when the republicans are making their historic push for tax cuts and reform. this coincidental? not! does the president really believe blaming hillary and the democrats is his best defense tonight? for more i'm joined by bret stephens, columnist with "the new york times" and msnbc contributor and former congresswoman nan hayworth who is on the board of directors at the independent women's forum. brett, i want to start with you about strategy. this deflection to hillary have any value here? well, does it? open question. >> yeah, well, look, it's a terrific strategy because donald trump i think learned long ago that truth is what you can get away with. and i guess the corollary to that is truth is what people will let you get away with. trump saw an opening the fact that the clinton campaign seems to have either lied or at least not told the truth about its role in paying for some of the

research that went to fusion gps, some of the opposition research. this to me strikes me as irrelevant. the only relevant issue is whether the research in that dossier is true. but they've been able, as you said, to wave enough terrible towels in the face of the media that people are buying it. and don't be surprised if the next thing that trump does is simply issue a blanket pardon to everyone including manafort, page, and so on. perhaps including himself to simply put this behind him. these things work. >> let me go to congresswoman. do you believe donald trump at his word? >> i had no evidence to think otherwise in terms of any of these dealings that we've been talk about. >> okay, but donald trump spent a year saying barack obama is an illegal immigrant who snuck in this country, assumed a false identity, really didn't go to the schools he went to, nobody knew him and somehow became president. he stuck to that line until friday afternoon and dumped it

and said oh, i didn't really believe it. did you believe all those months? did you believe donald trump with his birther theory? did you? >> i believed that president obama was born in hawaii. but chris, that's not the point here. >> why do you not believe trump is telling the truth? is he a truth teller? >> that's not the point here. >> it isn't? i asked do you take him at his word? it's a simple question. >> i'm absolutely taking the president at his word about this russian collusion question. >> there was no russian involvement in the campaign, that the russian never tried to pursue an overture to his campaign to offer them dirt on hillary, even as we're getting this testimony. under oath. and you're denying the truth of that and believing trump when he says there was no russian attempt to influence our campaign, no russian influence in the campaign, nobody in my campaign had anything to do with flirting with them and to receive that information. you stick to that line? >> chris, what the president has said substantively is that the russians did not assist. he did not have assistance from the russians in winning the 2016 election, which he did not.

it's very clear, chris. it's clear to every american with any common sense that the russians have tried to manipulate on both sides of the aisle in the 2016 election. but in fact -- >> just reported 126 million people were given facebook advertisements from the russians to influence the campaign. isn't that significant a little? >> chris, listen to me. number one we all have to be discerning consumers of information. that's imminently clear, no matter what our political persuasion. but there has been an avalanche of information. use know, the fbi has just released a major in fact from his nda regarding the millions and millions of dollars that flowed into the clinton foundation, the clinton global initiative, the laugh millihalf that went to bill clinton to speak with a russian bank. all the while secretary clinton was one of nine cabinet members on the board approving effectively the sale of 20% of

our uranium supply to russia. that was huge and important. >> that was not illegal. that was done -- you can tharg. by the way, the uranium cannot reach any other country but the united states without the approval of the united states. so this idea that the rosenbergs and they should be executed is insane. let me go back. have you any evidence that hillary clinton got any help by the russians in the 2016 election? >> thing is plenty of evidence coming that hillary clinton effectively got help. >> where? where? >> and where were the 33,000 e-mails? connect the dots. >> give me some names. >> frank justra, collaborating with rose tam. gave under the cover of being a foreign citizen so it didn't have to show up on their disclosures. what a clever idea. >> what did that have to do with the campaign? >> millions and millions of dollars to the clinton foundation and the clinton global initiative. >> in exchange for what? >> so clueless or ignorant that she has no idea of it?

chris, that just defies common sense there is real russian collusion and intervention and cooperation there. >> congresswoman, you know this. you know that that uranium cannot be transported outside the united states. >> well, here is something -- >> why are you talking about it being some sort of a rosenberg case situation. kit not be sent outside the united states under federal law. why do you keep suggesting there was some intrigue here? >> okay, let me give you name. vadim milkarin. he is the only figure. he is one figure who was finally indicted after years and convicted after years of investigation of the collusion and the connections between the russians and the russian nuclear industry and the americans. and what he was doing was effectively bribing and overcharging for the transport of commercial uranium by russian sellers to united states nuclear plants, okay, nuclear fuel.

>> how does that provide strategic materials to russia? >> they were overcharging. >> what's this got to do with donald trump's problem right now, his campaign managers? on huge numbers of counts that could put him away for 30 or 40 years. he is being squeezed by the special prosecutor. you have papadopoulos who has just come out. it turns out he is getting overtures from the russians just like jared kushner was getting them a month later there is all evidence here that there was collusion or certainly close to collusion. and you're laughing because i know that technique. >> i'm only laughing because -- i'm laughing because the collusion is all very evidently on the clinton side, okay? so the russians were overcharging us for our own uranium, for heaven's sakes. they were reselling it to us. >> they're not allowed to get the uranium under our law, and you know that. >> they were selling commercial uranium to the united states nuclear plants at an inflated

profit with the apparent benign oversight by the united states government. >> is what you're saying now going to in any substantive way protect trump's operation from sflugs because it's moving forward, the prosecution. you have a guy pleading a case today, pleading himself out so he can talk. obviously papadopoulos. you've got another fellow who was chairman of your campaign last year, chairman of the president's campaign who now faces multi years of imprison. how can you say all we have to do is wave this little distraction and everybody is going to think about somebody else. it doesn't matter what right wingers think about something else. what matters is the prosecution and the evidence they're developing. and all your talk about distraction isn't going to help your side. >> but chris, only you can consider it a distraction. folks from the left consider it a distraction. robert mueller when he was fbi director was examining this entire relationship for years,

all the russian overcharging. >> congresswoman, thank you. >> and bribery. >> i think you're doing your best. i understand. i've seen this before in politics. >> get it. but it's not going to change reality. >> but it's the truth, chris. >> brett, i've got to give you the last word. i watched watergate in realtime like a lot of people did. after all the arguments and distractions and get off his back and rabbi korf and the hard hats on his side, in the end, it was the evidence. in the end, it was the evidence that he was part of the cover-up, the 23rd tape. will this case end on the evidence, do you think? >> well, look, it's hard to claim collusion between clinton and the russians when she was the one who suffered from the russian disclosures of her e-mails. i would say to the congresswoman, look, i'm on the political right. i voted for republicans in every election up until the last one. it's conservatives who should be most concerned about the fact that so many members, senior members of the trump campaign were so interested in changing the tone with russia to the point that they were willing to change the republican party

platform in order to appease russian interests. that was the same kind of policy and other republicans were criticizing when it was the reset under the obama administration with russia. it should be republicans who are most concerned that there was so much collusion between or cooperation or commonality of interest between the person who is now the president of the united states and the government of the soviet union. russia. >> by the way, congresswoman, with all due respect, and a lot of our viewers are chuckling including the idea that hillary is part of the american left. they don't believe that thank you, bret stephens and nan haywor hayworth. up next, bob mueller close in? maybe. he has been warned against it, but will he try to fire muler? you don't think it's that outland fish you know trump. he did try to fire comey. you're watching "hardball," where the action is. you actuall.

even love it. and today, you can do things you never could before. ♪ ♪ you're developing ai applications on the cloud. finding insights hidden in decades of medical documents. and securing millions of iot sensors. so get back to it. and do the best work of your life. ♪ ♪ you're searching for something. work of ywhoooo.e. like the perfect deal... ...on the perfect hotel. so wouldn't it be perfect if... ....there was a single site... ...where you could find the... ...right hotel for you at the best price? there is. because tripadvisor now compares... ...prices from over 200 booking... ...sites ...to save you up to 30%... ...on the hotel you want. trust this bird's words. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. this one's below market price and has bluetooth.

same here, but this one has leather seats! use the cars.com app to compare price, features and value. [burke] abstract accident. seen ♪ video-it. covered it.c we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪

welcome back to "hardball." as robert mueller makes his first criminal charges today, democrats are already stepping up efforts to protect the special counsel. minority leader in the senate chuck schumer issued a warn in fact on the senate floor. >> the president must not under any circumstances in any way interfere with the special counsel's work. if he does, congress must respond swiftly, unequivocally, and in a bipartisan way to ensure that the investigation continues and the truth, the whole truth comes out. >> a white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders said there is no plan to fire the special counsel. but in some conservative quarter, people are openly calling for his removal. let's bring in the roundtable. heidi przybyla, jonathan allen for nbc news digital and jason,

politics editor for theroot.com. heidi, you start. what are the chances that trump will see the end coming and try to stop it by destroying mueller, getting rid of him? >> you see that the democrats are really concerned because they're look agent the president's own past statements, which is if mueller crosses a red line, which is looking into his finances, that that would be cause for firing him. and today we learned that's exactly what he is doing with these paul manafort charges. but at the same time, chris, i think right now there is just too much political potential downside to doing this. and the president is not going to do it. at least until it seems that this is going to be more focused on trump himself. and that paul manafort isn't the top of the fish head. i think it would take a archibald cox type saturday night massacre for president to get there. because he those go through the framework of the justice department. he'd have to pressure christopher ray or fire christopher ray.

so the logistics are difficult. and two, it would be devastating for his presidency at this point. he would lose all political capital. and i think the impeachment bell that has been really kind of subterranean. you only have a few democrats actually going in that direction, would start to ring a lot louder. >> and chris, heidi is absolutely right about that saturday night massacre reference. we all know how that turned out for president richard nixon. not very well. i think that was a moment when a lot of republicans decided that he was basically violating the law and left his side. you know, i also think there is a possibility, remote as it may seem right now, if the president fired the special prosecutor looking into him, robert mueller, that you would start to have some talk in the cabinet about whether to move on him from there. there is a 25th amendment scenario in which the cabinet can certify that the president isn't fit for office. i think we're a long way from that. but i also think we're a long way from the president firing mueller. i think that would be a tremendously bad move for him

politically. >> chris, it really depends on how close they think the dagger is. how close they think this is to getting to trump. on the one hand, you have some lawyers saying see, this proves it's all about manafort. it proves this doesn't have anything to do with trump. thing is a real calculation here, not just trump, but his closest advisers have to be thinking about it you notice we've had fewer leaks since the mueller investigation? you get rid of mueller, all the leaks come back. all the people who have problems with this administration, the deep state will say look, this is the only way we can stop this guy there may be a real sense let's just wait this out. let's see if other people get turned before trump does something that drastic. >> let's see if mueller announce she's going after trump's tax returns, how long his job exist. thank you. i don't think trump wants anybody near, anybody near his tax returns. anyway, the roundtable is sticking with us. we'll be back with them. "hardball," where the action is. this is a power plant. this is tim barckholtz.

that's me! this is something he is researching at exxonmobil: using fuel cells to capture carbon emissions at power plants. this is the potential. reducing co2 emissions by up to 90%... while also producing more power. this could be big. energy lives here. ltry align probiotic.n your digestive system? for a non-stop, sweet treat goodness, hold on to your tiara kind of day. get 24/7 digestive support, with align. the #1 doctor recommended probiotic brand. also in kids chewables. whoamike and jen doyle?than i thought. yeah. time for medicare, huh. i have no idea how we're going to get through this. follow me. choosing a plan can be super-complicated. but it doesn't have to be. unitedhealthcare can guide you through the confusion, with helpful people, tools and plans. including the only plans with the aarp name. well that wasn't so bad at all. that's how we like it.

aarp medicare plans, from unitedhealthcare. ...has grown into an enterprise. that's why i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. now, i'm earning unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase i make. everything. what's in your wallet? up next, the "hardball" roundtable is going to give me three scoops about the russia investigation you'll be talking about forever. back after this. ♪ come on mom! ♪ let's go! ♪ mom! slow down! for the ones who keep pushing. always unstoppable.

your kids go to college and you start trading. >>yeah, 5 years already. 5 years, hmm. you ever call your broker for help? >>once, when volatility spiked... and? >>by the time they got me an answer, it was too late. td ameritrade's elite service team can handle

your toughest questions right away- with volatility, it's all about your risk distribution. good to know. >>thanks, mike. we got your back kate. >>does he do that all the time? oh yeah, sometimes he pops out of the couch. help from real traders. only with td ameritrade. when i was too busy with the kids to get a repair estimate. i just snapped a photo and got an estimate in 24 hours. my insurance company definitely doesn't have that... you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™ liberty mutual insurance. we're back the "hardball" round table. heidi, tell me something i don't know. >> chris, in the coming days you're going to see a concerted effort from this administration to distance itself from paul manafort. but we unearthed a quote from newt gingrich, who is very close to the administration from august of last year that i think we should all keep in mind. quote, nobody should underestimate how much paul manafort did to really help get this campaign to where it is right now.

paul manafort was right in the middle of everything at that time when the russia collusion -- or the potential russia collusion was at its height. >> good for the newtster. jonathan? >> manafort gives very few political contributions. one person he has given money to is dana rohrabacher who happens to be the most pro russia congressman on capitol hill. jason? >> we all know part of these charges are a fara violation, the foreign agent registration act where you have to admit that you're lobbying on the part of a foreign country. the department of justice did their own investigation on fara enforcement in 2016. they have only prosecuted seven people in the last 50 years for violating fara. manafort is now the eighth. >> number eight. thank you, heidi, heidi przybyla, jonathan allen and jason johnson. when we return, let me finish when we return, let me finish to

today, smart planning is helping the new new york rise higher than ever. as the world leader in unmanned aerial systems, we're attracting the world's best talent to central new york. and turning the airport into a first-class transportation hub. all while growing urban areas into vibrant places to live and work. across new york state, we're building the new new york. to grow your business with us in new york state, visit esd.ny.gov. when i feel controlled with usby frequent, state, unpredictable abdominal pain or discomfort and diarrhea. i tried lifestyle changes and over-the-counter treatments, but my symptoms keep coming back. it turns out i have irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, or ibs-d. a condition that's really frustrating. that's why i talked to my doctor about viberzi... ...a different way to treat ibs-d.

viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage both abdominal pain and diarrhea at the same time. so i can stay ahead of my symptoms. viberzi can cause new or worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have no gallbladder, have pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse, long-lasting or severe constipation, or a bowel or gallbladder blockage. pancreatitis may occur and can lead to hospitalization and death. if you are taking viberzi, you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d with viberzi. ♪ ♪ everyone deserves attention, whether you've saved a lot or just a little.

at pnc investments, we believe you're more than just a number. so we provide personal financial advice for every retirement investor. your insurance on time. tap one little bumper, and up go your rates. what good is having insurance if you get punished for using it? news flash: nobody's perfect. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. switch and you could save $782 on home and auto insurance. call for a free quote today. liberty stands with you™ liberty mutual insurance.

let me finish with the arrival tomorrow of "bobby kennedy: a raging spirt." the book offers a revival of the american spirit, a reminder that what we're seeing today is not the way it has to be. that instead of racial division between blacks and white, between police and community, we can actually have leaders who unite us, who believe law and justice must work hand in hand. instead of cynical manipulation of public emotions, we actually have leaders with true moral authority, as robert kennedy showed when he walked before a crowd of african americans to plead for peace and understanding just after the death of dr. martin luther king, who had white working class americans standing in fervent salute to him as his body was taken by train from new york to join his brother at arlington

cemetery, who believed and said so that cops and waitresses and firefighters were his people. "bobby kennedy: a raging spirt" revives the life of someone who believes minorities and working class whites could be united in political purpose. and that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "all in with chris hayes" starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> so to be clear, mr. trump has no financial relationships with any russian oligarchs? >> that's what he said. that's what i -- that's obviously what our position. >> the man who ran donald trump's presidential campaign is charged with conspiracy against the united states. >> by the way, paul manafort was replaced long before the election took place. >> three arrest, a guilty plea, and a surprise proactive cooperator who is actively trying to collude with the russian government. >> george papadopoulos.