olivia nuzzi and gabe sherman, thank you. if you can't catch us live, tune in to the "all in" with chris hayes podcast. you can listen to the entire thing for free. the rachel maddow show starts right now. on the dot 9:00. >> on the dot, like creepy at the start of the 9:00 turning into zero-zero! like the rocket landing. the two most impressive thing that happened today, the rocket landing and me hitting that on the dot. >> now if there were only two of you and that was happening simultaneously -- thanks, my friend and thanks at home for joining us this hour. like chris was saying, it is one thing to see the thing going up, that's impressive enough. i'm not sure that i will ever get used to seeing it come down. >> 10, 9, 8, 6, 5, 3, 2, 1. [ cheers and applause ]

>> and it was up with the force of 18, 747 aircraft combined. tens of thousands of people gathered on the florida space coast to watch. the biggest crowd since the last space shuttle flight. and then once this thing was 37 miles up, 60 kilometers up in the sky, two of the booster rockets, the two on the sides, they split off and they started a controlled flight back to earth and it went a few more miles up, up to 90 kilometers, 56 miles up and then the core booster, the center booster, broke off, too. now, the core booster was supposed to come down on a drone barge in the ocean. as it was coming down, we lost the feed of that one and we couldn't tell from the video whether the core booster, the central booster, landed or not.

you could on the broadcast, you could hear a voice at one point say "we lost the center core." so we thought that probably meant the core booster, the center booster, the core booster was lost, elon musk later confirmed that the center core booster did not survive the landing on that drone ship. but remember, there were three of them and those first two that broke off, the side boosters that were supposed to come down not at sea but on land, boy did they come down beautifully. these are the cameras shots on the side boosters shot from the upper left is from cape canaveral when they're coming back to earth. now watch. watch this. [ cheers and applause ] >> and the falcons have landed.

side booster one, side booster two has landed. >> reusable booster rockets. see them both standing there. both of these have flown in previous launches and if today's perfect landing is anything to go by, they will fly again in future launches as well. so it's just incredible. this was cape canaveral, this was the space coast in florida, this actually was the exact same launch pad used to send men to the moon 50 years ago. now it's being used to send a billionaire tech guru's personal red convertible into space to orbit the sun. so it's different. this is a national achievement but in a different kind of sway. spacex is an american company founded by an immigrant from africa, elon musk, born in pretoria in 1971, a u.s. citizen

now since 2002. his company pulling off this spectacular launch and the landing of the booster rockets today. this was the falcon heavy, the most powerful rocket in the world right now. even if you don't care about space exploration, admit it, this was legitimately thrilling to see. didn't even seem real. and then very soon thereafter the president announced today that he would "love to see a shutdown of the government" this week if democrats do not agree to his anti-immigration demands. and then the white house chief of staff explained that a lot of immigrants to this country are people who are "too lazy" to get off their asses. and then, seriously, the "washington post" reported that the president has ordered the pentagon to plan a giant military parade for him in washington. the president reportedly went to the pentagon and met with top military officials about it in

person because he's serious, he wants a big military parade for himself. he wants tanks and missile launchers in washington. he specifically wants them on pennsylvania avenue and so that is apparently what we are getting. you know, we sometimes have military parades to mark the ends of wars, in this case it's apparently just because the president wants to see all the tanks and stuff. he just likes it. so now the military is working on this and the white house has defended it and the taxpayers will pay many, many millions of dollars for it, including having to rebuild pennsylvania avenue after the treads from 70-ton tanking churn it up and turn it into rubble. so today was in some ways a very inspiring day of the news. other parts of the news today may have created other feelings for you. your mileage may vary.

there is some breaking news from the "washington post." the white house right now is deciding whether or not to allow the release of a classified memo prepared by democrats on the intelligence committee basically to rebut a classified memo the white house released last week from trump-supporting republicans in congress. that republican memo released on friday, it did not go off like the bomb they hoped and promised it would, but it did make clear that what the white house and congressional republicans think is their best shot at derailing the russia investigation, der l derailing robert mueller's special counsel investigation, they think their best shot at it is to try to turnish the fbi's whole investigation of the russia attack, to tarnish the whole counterintelligence and criminal investigation of the trump campaign for its potential cooperation in that attack, they want to tarnish that investigation, discredit it, and thereby try to make it go away by trying to claim that the whole fbi investigation was based on information given to the fbi by this guy, christopher

steele, the former lead agent on russia matters for mi6 in britain. attacking him really appears to be the centerpiece if not the whole game plan for what is now a republican full court press to try to save this presidency and stop the investigation into him that has already brought -- resulted in two guilty pleas and multiple felony charges against two trump campaign officials. now, in the house, republican devin nunes has released his classified memo that he now admits misstates how the fbi used chris steele's information in court to get a surveillance warrant. that's what's happening in the house against christopher steele. in the senate it's republican senator chuck grassley along with republican senator lindsey graham. they are literally trying to get the justice department to bring criminal charges against christopher steele and in the middle of this scrum with the president reportedly meeting in person today at the white house with deputy attorney general rod

rosenstein to discuss the democrats' classified memo on this matter with the white house actively engaged in making its decision about releasing the democratic information or not, letting the republican attacks on the fbi and chris steele stand unanswered or not as they have a five-day clock ticking and today is day two, now in the middle of that the "washington post" has published a whole bunch of new reporting we have never seen before about what actually happened between this guy christopher steele and the fbi. quoting from the lede here, "in the fall of 2016, a little more than a month before donald trump was elected president, christopher steele had the undivided attention of the fbi. for months, the british former spy had been working to alert the americans to what he believed were disturbing ties trump had to russia. he'd grown so worried about what he learned from his russia network about the kremlin's plans that he told colleagues it was like sitting on a nuclear

weapon. he was now being summoned to rome where he spoeent hours in a discreet location telling american officials, some of whom had flown in from the united states, about his findings. the russians had damaging information about trump's personal behavior and finances that could be used to pressure the gop nominee. what's more, the kremlin is carrying out an operation with the campaign's help to tilt the u.s. election a plot steele said was ordered by vladimir putin. the fbi investigators treated steele as a peer, a russia expert so well trusted he assisted the justice department on past case, he provided briefing materials for british prime ministers and at least one u.s. president. during intense questioning that day in rome, they alluded to some of their own findings of ties between russia and the trump campaign." so this is new information. by this point, by the fall, september or october, 2016, before the election, christopher steele had been a key source for

the fbi in its investigation of corruption in international soccer. that was an investigation that led to 14 soccer executives getting charged in the united states. in private practice as an investigator in 2014 and 2015 he passed along intelligence he gathered on russia and ukraine to the u.s. state department. "he offered us that reporting free so we also could benefit from it." after he started working on the trump research in 2016 where his initial findings to him were so hair-raising that he sent the first memo in the dossier by physic physical courier instead of trusting it to any transmission, he contacted an fbi official he knew who came to meet with him in london in july. later that month, he reached out to the u.s. state department, again, an organization, an agency to whom he had previously provided intelligence from his private research work.

the state department told him "this is the kind of thing that needs to go to the fbi, not us." thereafter, he spoke with a justice department official, an official he had worked with on the soccer case, justice department official bruce ohr. then after that, while he was ringing alarm bells wherever he could about what he saw as the seriousness of what he was finding out, that's when he ended up meeting with those fbi agents in rome. that's where he reportedly gathered that the bureau had independently developed information that appeared to match some of his reports. soon thereafter we had the election, trump won, after the election steele "quickly provided a full review of his findings for a senior british official, a step he had told the fbi in rome he would take in the case of a trump victory. " then in december a former british diplomat arranged to meet with republican senator john mccain on the sidelines of

a security conference in canada, again to try to ring alarm bells about the seriousness of trump's relationship with russia and how it may have affected the campaign. now, we've known that john mccain has been read in on the steel dossier and that he had provided its content to the fbi directly to james comey after he received it from british officials. but thanks to the "washington post," we have an account of what happened when they met in canada. "sir andrew wood, former british ambassador to russia described steele's research for mccain and told mccain he could arrange for him to review it. mccain, he recalled, was visibly shocked. the senator expressed interest in reading the full report, wood said, recalling that mccain responded "thank you for seeing me, you did the right thing and i'm grateful. my first thought has to be for my country." my first thought has to be for my country, or for chris

steele's perspective "my first thought has to be for your country. how else can i sound this alarm?" now republicans in congress are trying to persuade the justice department to bring charges against him for having done that. joining us now is one of the reporters who broke this latest news and gave us this narrative detail about christopher steele, tom hamburger, national reporter for the "washington post," hamburg hamburger, thank you for being with us. >> thanks so much. good to be with you. >> this report comes in the midst of a concerted attack on christopher steele himself fr republicans in congress, they're alleging he was basically peddling false information to try to take down donald trump for political purposes. one of the things that you disclose in this new reporting here is that there were at least a couple of meetings between christopher steele and the "washington post" during the time that this reporting describes. given that, given that you at the "post" met with him, that you guys knew what he was

working on for some time, how does it strike you, these attacks that he was trying to sink trump for political reasons? >> well, rachel, it's true that christopher steele visited the "washington post" and other news organizations in 2016. we had a discussion with him that was off the record and were not released from our off-the-record agreement that we did get permission from mr. steele's associates to mention the fact that we had talked with him during the campaign. one of the things -- and because we had talked to him in september and october of 2016, we thought that, obviously we've been following what he's had to say and read the dossier as everyone else did when buzzfeed published it some months later. we, like the rest of the country and many investigators, have been wondering is this dossier with its salacious detail about donald trump, could this be true? can it be corroborated? it's a huge question.

what's happened now, rachel, is that christopher steele is sort of moved to the center of the polarized fight that we're seeing so you have the nunes memo from the house intelligence committee that suggests that the fbi really didn't appropriately alert the fisa court, the court that granted a search warrant for monitoring carter page. that there was insufficient disclosure of who christopher steele was. and senator lindsey graham has raised the question publicly and in his letters to the fbi saying is christopher steele an informant for the fbi or is he in fact a political hired gun, an opposition researcher? and he asked the question can you be both. and so, rachel, what we decided to do was to kind of dive into that question and understand as best we can who is christopher steele, what were his

assignments, and how did he deal, and did he deal, with what would seem to be an inherent contradiction? a guy who is talking to the fbi about things he's learned from russia sources on the one hand and a man, a professional, moved to the private sector, who feels he has obligations to a private client who happens to be working in this case for a law firm that represents hillary clinton and the democratic national committee. >> tom, you mentioned senator lindsey graham there. there has been this effort by senator graham and senator grassley to refer christopher steele to the justice department for possible prosecution and you have a striking report on that tonight. i'm going to quote from your article "friends and former colleagues say steele has been dismayed on the attacks on him, particularly about a criminal referral that two u.s. senators made to the justice department. the move was moved by some british lawmakers and long time intelligence officials as an

affront to the special bond between the united states and britain. could you talk about that, why the british are so affronted by what senator graham and senator grassley are doing? >> well, i think rachel, there are a couple things that we learned in talking to some of steele's former associates in the british intelligence community and we also talked with some members of parliament. one of the things we were struck by is how they seemed to be gathering around christopher steele, a person that they know, his record is considered quite credible during his many years, 22 years working for her majesty's secret intelligence service. and so the idea that a former intelligence official who has been -- who is considered both credible and reliable and did honorable service would be charged or have a criminal referral just somehow seemed to be an affront. and we talked with one member of

parliament who said to us, you know, here we view christopher steele as someone to whom we owe a debt of thanks because he helped warn not only the united states as he saw it but also britain because his dossier and the word that he put out as circulated widely and he said he's one of the first who sounded the alarm and we should be thank ful, not critical, and certainly not, in his view, filing criminal charges. >> let me ask you one last point that to me was just a very intriguing point that you made here. you describe how steele is struggling with what he can do with this information he's found which he thinks is explosive, dangerous, like sitting on a nuclear bomb was your -- the memorable quote that you had. at one point he goes to his former boss, the head of mi6 to ask for deerlove's advice for

what he should do with this information which he believes is dangerous information he's getting about trump. quoting from your article "dearlove said the situation reminded him of a predicament he faced years earlier when he was chief of station for british intelligence in washington and he alerted u.s. authorities to british information that an american vice presidential hopeful had once been in communication with the kremlin." that's an amazing piece of story telling in terms of the communication between these two guys but what's the underlying story there? >>. >> part of our assignment was to understand this guy christopher steele who had these two assignments, one for a private sector client in fact representing hillary clinton and her campaign and another, a guy who felt he had an obligation as he described it to friends, an obligation to tell authorities and alert people to what he had

found. he claims, at least to his friends and associates, that he was dismay bid whed by what he . so we talked to a guy who was his former boss at mi6, richard dearlove, and he told us that indeed steele and his partner christopher boroughs had come to him during 2016 asking for advice, they unburdened themselves, in a sense, he said, because they were in a difficult situation and were unsure what to do. dearlove called on his own experience before he was head of mi6, he ran -- he was a significant figure in the british embassy in washington and he recalled without providing detail an instance in which british intelligence had come across some artifact of information about a former vice presidential hopeful some years ago. and what dearlove told us he advised these two former employees of his was "what i did at that time was to recognize how sensitive this was. the most important thing is to

get the information out there." and what dearlove recommended was that the two go to a very senior british official and have them convey it subtly to the fbi so that it would not become an issue of britain trying to blow the whistle. he recommended handling it subtly and carefully. one of the things it appears is that steele and boroughs didn't entirely follow his advice because rather than going to a british official to subtly alert the fbi they went -- chris steele went directly to an old friend, a colleague at the fbi whom he'd known for years and told him what he had found while doing this work for the clinton campaign and the dnc's law firm. >> and then that incredible documented timeline of communication between him and his -- the person he knew at the fbi, those four fbi agents who he met with in rome, alerting the state department as well, his press contacts. you fleshed this out more than

anybody, even though we don't know who the vice presidential candidate was. tom hamburger, thank you for being with us. >> good to be with you, thank you. >> lots more to get to. stay with us. ♪ let your inner light loose with one a day women's. ♪ a complete multivitamin specially formulated with key nutrients plus vitamin d for bone health support. your one a day is showing. (sighs) i hate missing out missing out after hours. not anymore, td ameritrade lets you trade select securities 24 hours a day, five days a week. that's amazing. it's a pretty big deal. so i can trade all night long? ♪ ♪ all night long... is that lionel richie? let's reopen the market. mr. richie, would you ring the 24/5 bell? sure can, jim. ♪ trade 24/5, only with td ameritrade.

introducing walit's a great days. for a great deal! tender, center-cut sirloin or chicken on the barbie, fries, a draft beer or a coke, all for just $9.99. only for a limited time. so don't walk, run to outback. ♪ tripadvisor compares prices from over 200 booking sites to time to bask... in low prices! find the right hotel for you at the lowest price. refreshing, isn't it?. tripadvisor.

gathered here are the world's finest insurance experts. rodney -- mastermind of discounts like safe driver, paperless. the list goes on. how about a discount for long lists? gold. mara, you save our customers hundreds for switching almost effortlessly. it's a gift. and jamie. -present. -together we are unstoppable. so, what are we gonna do? ♪ insurance. that's kind of what we do here.

her name is ching hai, she's the leader of a religious cult. she had her own fashion line, she had a big chain of international restaurants, her followers were so devoted to her that i kid you not they used to buy her old socks. you get socks that wear them out, in her case her old warn t out socks, her followers would buy them and trade them amongst themselves like treasure. in the late '90s, ching hai, the supreme master of zen, she and a bunch of her many followers gave a really generous gift to the president of the united states. >> reporter: how would american followers of an obscure religious cult based in taiwan try to help bill and hillary clinton pay their legal bills. a cult with an odd blend of fashion, vegetarianism and buddhist teachings.

nbc news has learned many of them were told to by cult leaders here in the u.s., according to investigators. $640,000 much of it cult money, was brought to the clinton defense fund by charlie tri, a democratic fund-raiser and friend of the presidents. it's not clear where the money came from, ching hai followers in america donated thousands. she says they acted on their own. >> they asked me if they can help clinton, if it's political motivation or not, i say okay, just help quietly, don't blow trumpet about it. >> just help quietly, don't blow trumpet about it. the clintons ultimately returned the $640,000 of used sock money from the religious cult. they worried the money didn't come voluntarily from the followers who wanted to help president clinton pay their legal bills, there was worry that the cult was a money laundering scheme so president

clinton gave that money back. but that is a hard thing about legal defense funds, it can be hard to tell where that money is coming from. in presidential scandals, one of the places where people tend to get in trouble in terms of secondary scandals and in terms of legal troubles is in terms of legal defense funds. it happens over and over again. and we've got some very interesting news on that front coming up exclusively here next. stay with us. for... your bbf your backup singer. your frenemy your boo your roomie so one phone for you and one phone for someone in your squad. buy an iphone 8 and get a second iphone 8 on us. i had severe fatigue, became diagnosed with hodgkin's lymphoma.

he was a good candidate for immune therapy, which is allowing his immune system to attack the tumor. learn more at cancercenter.com

we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why we show you exactly when we'll be there. saving you time, so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ renein the caribbean.onder...

for a limited time enjoy two free perks, like complimentary wi-fi and drinks. a savings up to $300 when you book now, during the celebrity cruises sail beyond event. renein the caribbean.onder... for a limited time enjoy two free perks, like complimentary wi-fi and drinks. a savings up to $300 when you book now, during the celebrity cruises sail beyond event.

we were first to report here last week on a new russia scandal legal defense fund that's been set up to help people on team trump pay their legal bills in the russia investigation. the first thing to know about this is that it's interesting. the white house still has made no announcement, no formal announcement whatsoever about this russia scandal legal defense fund. they have made no effort to publicize it or let people know this fund is on its way. we found draft papers for this patriot legal defense fund trust, we found the draft papers for it on the web site of the office of government ethics because the lawyers working on setting this thing up went to oge for advice for how to set it up. but you can see in these draft documents the whole fund is to pay for legal expenses that come from dealing with the russia investigation by either the special counsel or committees in congress. the draft documents spell out who is eligible to get help from

the russia scandal legal defense fund. employees, consultants, fund-raisers or volunteers for the trump campaign, the trump transition or the trump administration. that said, you can't get your legal fees paid for by this fund if you are the president himself. or a member of his family. and that means you, too, jared, no spouses. so we found this new legal defense fund, evidence of it, online. we reported it late last week. again, the white house still has not said anything publicly about it. the lawyers who have been working on setting this thing up are also not commenting on it at all. one lawyer for president trump wouldn't even let one of our producers get a question out of her mouth when she called to ask about it last thursday. she said "we have a couple of questions to ask you, sir." answer "no, you can't ask me anything. good night." [ laughter ] that's the president's lawyer john dowd answering our call. no you cannot ask me anything,

good night. which also would be a pretty good signoff for nightly news shows. good night. anyway, so they haven't announced they've set up this legal defense fund, they won't answer any questions about it but we reported that it exists and now this is starting to get reported out. and already a couple of issues have bubbled up, including the question of the president's own role and own money here. the idea for setting up a russia scandal legal defense fund appears to have come up after this sort of bizarre revelation that the national republican party and the trump campaign were using donors' money to pay russia scandal legal fees only for the president and his son donald jr. only donald trump sr. and donald trump jr. were getting help paying their legal fees in the russia scandal. everybody else was on their own. tapping the kids' college funds. now, based on the press coverage that they got at the time they said they were planning to

create this fun, it's clear that creating this fund was supposed to remedy that awkwardness. so they were announcing that the president, yeah, the dnc -- excuse me, the rnc and the trump campaign, these donors have been paying for his legal fees so far but the president will start paying for his own legal fees and he will also pay the legal bills of people who work for him as well. you see the headline there. trump to pay his own legal bills, set up fund to cover staff. so that -- if that is what they're going to use the fund for, so the president can help defray the legal costs of all of the people involved in trump orbit caught up in the russia scandal, that may sort of help the political problem, the strategic problem of him getting his bills paid for but everybody else having to cover themselves. but there's also an awkwardness to that solution because if the boss is paying your bills, the boss is the president, he's offering to help you with your legal bills, you're a staffer deciding what you're going to tell the special counsel about

the boss paying your legal bills this remains an open question. would the president start personally paying the legal bills of staffers in the white house being called to testify potentially for him or against him? seemed like that was what the fund was set up for but sure enough the day after we first reported on the new existence of this fund, cnn reported the president is unlikely to contribute to this fund because it will bankroll bills for multiple officials, some of whom may need to speak to special counsel investigators. so this is a sticky wicket. money for the president? yeah, maybe not. how do we deal with that with the fund? sticky. well, where else could the money come from to fund these legal fees with the russia scandal legal defense fund? on this point, on the point of where the trump legal defense fund is going to get it money, i

have something that i would like to know. for several months we've been reporting on and asking about a bigable financial mystery concg the trump inauguration. the trump inaugural committee raised double the amount of money that had been raised for the previous record which was the first obama inauguration in 2009. trump folks raised over $100 million for an inauguration that i'm sure was loads of fun but it was not all that big. for an inauguration many times smaller than the obama 2009 inauguration the trump folks raised more than twice as much mon money. this is like one family buys a brand new full scale rock star tour bus and the neighboring family buys a second hand lawn tractor and then you find out that the second hand lawn tractor family paid twice as much. it doesn't make any sense. it doesn't make any sense.

the mystery that remains from day one of the trump administration, from the trump inauguration, is that it would seem just based on what it costs to produce the obama inauguration and the size of the trump one it would seem that the trump inauguration likely has tens of millions of dollars left over. and adding to the mystery and the intense of grieg arouintrig this, they can't say what happened to all that money or how they're accounting for it and what they plan to do with it. in june, the inaugural committee told the a.p. a full and kleecl external audit has been completed. they never released an audit publicly and we asked and they're not giving us one now. the inaugural committee said in september they'd publicly disclose their finances including gifts to charity they would make from their leftover money. they said they would do that in november. come november that did not happen. committee said in september they would wrap up the committee -- the committee would conclude in accordance with its charter in the next few months. as of january, no evidence that

they had wrapped up and more importantly no evidence of what happened to what we believe are their leftover tens of millions of dollars. they keep saying information is coming, there will be a full accounting, there will be dispersements to charity. they admitted they have lots of extra money. it's been more than a year and everything they said would happen hasn't happened. despite what they've said and what they've promised over months and months and months, as far as we know the committee is still open and they industrial a ton of money they're sitting on. their previous public statements about it have not borne out. there is something going on with the trump inaugural committee and it involves a ton of money. here's the thing to watch, though. if you are looking for a place for the leftover tens of millions of dollars from the trump inauguration to end up, we now know one place that money could go is to the brand new not yet announced russia scandal legal defense fund that they just set up. it is set up to allow for that.

the inaugural committee is a nonprofit that has to give its money away for a nonprofit use, the russia scandal legal defense fund is set up in a way to fit that bill. two different campaign finance lawyers have told us, yes, if they want to do it that way, the extra inaugural millions could go to this. i'll tell you, we've also contacted the inaugural committee again to ask about their plans, we still have no answer so we have this open question of where the legal defense fund is going to get its money. including whether the president might end up contributing even though that's very awkward. will the presidential inaugural committee end up doing the contributing? and we do know from the previous bizarre revelation about don jr. and don sr. getting their legal fees paid for while everybody else was personally paying for their lawyers, we also know that there are other means by which people can try to get their legal fees paid for, right? the republican national committee and the trump campaign have been paying some selected russia legal fees. and that brings me to this one last point.

we got the new financial reports from the trump campaign last week. the headline was about the outsized amount that had been going to pay lawyers. some of that trump campaign legal spending is going to a firm that also happens to represent the president's long-time personal lawyer in the russia investigation, michael cohen, the president's lawyer, he has -- the president's lawyer has a lawyer to represent him for the russia matter. that law firm got $214,000 from the trump campaign last year. now, this pile of money from the trump campaign stands out for a couple of reasons. first is that michael cohen was never a part of the trump campaign so why is the trump campaign paying his russia legal bills? he is the president's personal lawyer and he does have a lawyer for himself in the russia investigation. now trump campaign money is going to this firm that happens to represent the president's personal lawyer, they're called mcdermott, will and emery. they have about $214,000 in all from trump campaign donors. in real life, that firm lives in

midtown manhattan on madison avenue. but in the trump campaign papers that firm lives in a totally different place, a totally different address and this could be a wholly innocent clerical error, right name for the firm but wrong address, oops, you can see these crossed up addresses as totally an accident, except the wrong address, the place where the campaign says they sent that check, that so happens to be the exact office address of michael cohen whom mcdermott will & emery represent in the russia investigation. i know michael cohen's office building very well because it's also this building where i work. we're work neighbors a few floors apart. what happened here we don't know. on the one hand, it looks like the trump campaign could be paying the russia scandal legal bills for the president's lawyer, making their campaign donors pay for that even though he wasn't part of the campaign. on the other hand it looks like somebody maybe just fat-fingered the wrong button. so much of this, from how the legal defense fund is going to work to what will happen to the

inaugural committee money to this weird thing with the lawyer's address being wrong, so much of it could be cleared up if anyone involved would be willing to go on the record and talk about it. the silence is not helping anybody understand what is going on and what is going on looks super weird. hold together. a little to the left. 1, 2, 3, push! easy! easy! easy! (horn honking) alright! alright! we've all got places to go! we've all got places to go!

washington crossing the delaware turnpike? surprising. what's not surprising? how much money sean saved by switching to geico. big man with a horn. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. looking for a hotel that fits... whoooo. ...your budget? tripadvisor now searches over... ...200 sites to find you the... ...hotel you want at the lowest price. grazi, gino! find a price that fits. tripadvisor. and i recently had hi, ia heart attack. it changed my life. but i'm a survivor. after my heart attack, my doctor prescribed brilinta. it's for people who have been hospitalized for a heart attack. brilinta is taken with a low-dose aspirin. no more than 100 milligrams as it affects how well brilinta works. brilinta helps keep platelets from sticking together and forming a clot. in a clinical study, brilinta worked better than plavix. brilinta reduced the chance of having another heart attack... ...or dying from one. don't stop taking brilinta without talking to your doctor, since stopping it too soon increases your risk

of clots in your stent, heart attack, stroke, and even death. brilinta may cause bruising or bleeding more easily, or serious, sometimes fatal bleeding. don't take brilinta if you have bleeding, like stomach ulcers, a history of bleeding in the brain, or severe liver problems. slow heart rhythm has been reported. tell your doctor about bleeding new or unexpected shortness of breath any planned surgery, and all medicines you take. if you recently had a heart attack, ask your doctor if brilinta is right for you. my heart is worth brilinta. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. what can a president [ do in thirty seconds? he can fire an fbi director who won't pledge his loyalty. he can order the deportation of a million immigrant children. he can threaten an unstable dictator

armed with nuclear weapons. he can go into a rage and enter the nuclear launch codes. how bad does it have to get before congress does something? >> he's here in person, he's here in studio. joining us is michael beschloss, nbc news presidential historian. great to see you. >> great to be here. >> i almost missed you there. i'm used to high fiving you through the satellite. >> it's a pleasure to do it here. >> we broke this story a little bit in terms of the president setting up what appears to be a russia scandal legal defense fund and we were first to break the story that the legal document setting this thing up had been posted online with the office government ethics. we've started to figure out the sticky wickets including the question of whether the president's inaugural committee

left over money, of which there appears to be a giant pile, whether that could be shuttled in that direction. the reason i want to talk to about this is because it is my general sense that when there are presidential scandals, legal defense funds around those scandals are like a magnet for troub trouble. is that true? >> you were talking about charlie tri with the clinton legal defense fund. that's an example because often people give to legal defense funds for reasons that are not just charitable and a wonderful feeling that people help out the president. but the other thing is maybe the two words of the night should be hush money because -- >> ah. >> and it takes us right back to richard nixon because 1973 when nixon was faced with some of the watergate culprits threatthreat to go to the feds and blow this

scandal wide open nixon agreed to give people like howard hunt and other co-conspirators in the watergate scandal money to basically keep them quiet. the night he followed haldeman ander lick m er lilichman, he s money but it turns out he never paid it. there's a case of nixon and other politicians using noun try to silence aides who might be testifying against them. >> either with haldeman and erlichman, was he offering specifically to help them with legal expenses? i mean, these are people who got charged with stuff. that was the basis of this conversation. >> if you look at the tapes, that's what they're talking about and nixon is desperate to

keep had brand and erlichman in line. he says to haldeman is "i love you like a brother, keep the faith" and what he meant by that was shut up and don't get me into trouble. >> so there's a clinton legal defense fund around whitewater though they handled it by giving the money back, there's the nixon example then there's iran-cont iran-contra. with oliver north who was one of the highest profile figures, there was a gigantic amount of money. richard sicort, wasn't there a donation that we don't know? >> richard sicord was involved in the illicit arm sales to iran and he did it through a swiss bank and in the same swiss bank used to transfer the money back and forth to iran suddenly appears half a million dollars supposedly no one knows where that money came from. >> the same bank from the

illegal arms deal? >> and someone knew where to find the account of sicord and so this money appears and the question does occur what was the motive of the person does occur motive the person who was suddenly putting this money into his account. >> the legal defense fund. when you start to read about it like watch the defense funds and now we finally got one in this scandal. great to see you, michael. we'll be right back. stay with us.

it's 6 am. 40 million americans are waking up to a gillette shave. and at our factory in boston, more than a thousand workers are starting their day building on over a hundred years of heritage, craftsmanship and innovation. today we're bringing you america's number one shave at lower prices every day. putting money back in the pockets of millions of americans. as one of those workers, i'm proud to bring you gillette quality for less, because nobody can beat the men and women of gillette. gillette - the best a man can get.

so this is an electoral politics story we've been following one way or another for over a year. since the last presidential election where republicans did so well and democrats did so poorly things have really turned around for democrats all across the country. there's been special elections from a local level to even congressional and senate races. and even in places that are really, really, really red, we've seen these races going a lot bluer. and turns out that is happening tonight as we speak in a very unexpected place. this is story that's developing right now. we'll have full details for you after the break. stay with us.

♪ take off for mexico with expedia. ♪ one click gives you access to discounts on thousands of hotels, cars and things to do. like the papaya playa project for 49% off. ♪ everything you need to go. ♪ expedia. ♪ the things we do rising before dawn. sweating it out. tough to do it all. but we can always find time to listen to great thinkers and explorers whose stories take us places our hamstrings can't. all we have to do is listen. download audible to start listening.

let your inner light loose with one a day women's.

♪ a complete multivitamin specially formulated with key nutrients plus vitamin d for bone health support. your one a day is showing. so heads up about a small thing that is happening tonight that could end up being something quite important. in the great state of missouri tonight polls closed just a short time ago in special elections for four open state legislative seats there. all four of these seats were seats previously held by republicans. and all four of these districts were places that went for trump by huge margins, anywhere from 28 to 64 point margins for donald trump. in these statehouse district races these are such republican districts no democrat even bothered to run in any of these districts last year. republicans either ran unopposed or against an independent

candidate. well, tonight looks like a different story. and we've seen this coming for a little bit. for the last year democrats across the country have been winning special elections or coming closer to winning special elections that we're seeing this year before in places that they had no business competing yet alone winning. but in missouri tonight there are democrats running in all four of these special election races, again though democrats didn't bother running anybody last year. and check these out, one of these districts that went wildly for trump in 2016, it looks like a democrat might have just won that district. these are unofficial results and they still need to be certified by local election authorities and by the secretary of state. what i want you to know about this state district 97, this was a district that went for donald trump in 2016 by almost 28 points. and tonight it looks like it wept to a democrat. this is statehouse race in

missouri, a district just outside st. louis. mike revis is the democrat that appears to have won there. did i mention this was a district only republicans won and democrats didn't bother to run last year? the republican appears to have won there by a pretty good margin. but i want to tell you something about this race, too. trump won this district by a margin of 67 points. this democrat tonight has lost by 39 points. so even though she lost by a lot, this is such a republican district, and it shows a 22 point swing towards the democrats since november 2016. so this could end up being a big deal for democrats. could be a big deal for republicans in missouri who are trying tocopy a super majority that they've got in the state legislator. the missouri republican party has had a bit of bumpy ride in recent years. this is the party that brought us todd akin, who talked about

legitimate rape. if a woman is legitimately raped she can't get pregnant. he was the republican nominee against mccaskical in 2012, and she beat him. josh holly, just said the reason there's sex trafficking is because of the sexual revolution in the 1960s and '70s. and another is cortlen sykes. so missouri republicans have been having kind of a weird time of it even before their republican governor ended up in a grand jury investigation involving something i don't have time to explain right now. but, boy, look it up. but again tonight republicans in missouri may have lost a seat that they should have felt very, very comfortable about. we'll stay