[ no audio ] in 1984 in the last state of the union address, january 1984, ronald reagan at that state of the union made a very sober promise to the country on a very serious issue. >> this year we will intensify our drive against these and other horrible crimes like sexual abuse and family violence. >> that was january 1984. ronald reagan telling congress the government will intensify our drive against sexual abuse and family violence. this was one line in a sort of dark part of regan's state of

the union address that year. that was part of the speech where he also talked about kidnapping and about child pornography. but when he got to the line about intensifying our drive against family violence, one american woman, this woman, her name is charlotte fedders, when she heard that part of ronald reagan's state of the union address that year, it caused her to write a letter to president regan, and because of who she was, she had reason to believe her letter would get through. quote, i'm a victim of wife abuse for over 16 years of marriage, my husband periodically beat me. i've had a broken eardrum, wrenched neck, several black eyes, many, many bruises. once he even beat me around the about while i was pregnant with my first baby. fetters wrote that story is because her violent, abusive husband worked for ronald

reagan. alt -- at a very senior job. he was john fedders. he was the enforcement director. that's an intimidating job and he was an intimidating guy. he was 6'10". but ronald reagan made that mention about intensifying the drive and his wife wrote a letter documenting the phenomenon. in the marriage of one of his own high-ranking appointees. that letter she wrote was given to regan's white house counsel but after reading that letter, the white house decided to do nothing. john fedders kept his job. at the s.e.c. when that letter had zero effect despite the fact it got to the white house counsel, charlotte fetters sister decided to push it further. she picked up the phone and got the white house counsel on the phone to raise the issue with him again. charlotte fedders' sister explained what the white house counsel told her when she informed him a powerful government official appointed by

president regan was violently abusive to his wife, who was her sister. he said the president would never knowingly keep a spouse abuser in a top administration job but at this point he said it was a private dispute. he did ask me, have you ever seen him hit her, and i said no but i've seen the black eyes, bruises and broken eyeglasses. even after that phone call from charlotte fetterers sister, the white house still did nothing with that information. they stayed quiet. john fedders stayed on at his high-profile job at the s.e.c. but by february of 1985, that story which the white house was trying to push aside and not pay attention to, that story made it to the front pages of the "wall street journal". quote, mrs. fedders said the beatings began practically from the start of their marriage.

he broke one of her eardrums with a blow to the side of her head in october of 1968. barely two years after they were married. she said john attacked me with his fists and hands and said he didn't care if he killed me or the baby. she said he beat her in the abdomen. he blew up for an $80 bill from a marriage counselor. and attacked her as she was bathing one of their sons. quote, he came in and just started hitting me. he said i don't care if i kill you. at that time she fled with the children to the home of a neighbor and said she appeared with tears and showed bruises. that were developing on her shoulders. mrs. fedders still suffers severe pain from an injury in november 1981 when he yanked her around by the hair after trying to throw her over a banister in their home. two of their sons witnessed that. first he tried to throw her over the banister. the oldest son luke recalls in an interview. she dropped down to the ground. he tried to pick her up by the hair and he just shook her. luke says he no longer speaks to his father and adds his mother wears an orthopaedic collar

around her neck when it's really bothering her. that was february 25th, 1985 front page of "the wall street journal." that apparently did the trick. page one in "the wall street journal." that was the third time the regan administration had seen these allegations against in high-ranking official. first two times didn't result in them doing anything about it. it was only this third time when it ended up in the newspaper they decided to act. they didn't do nothing once it was in the paper. they leapt into action to defend john fedders. the white house put out statements that said he was doing an outstanding job. at the s.e.c. he was not being asked to resign. next day, though, john fedders was gone. >> until today john fedders was one of the top law enforcement officials of the u.s. government. he was the enforcement chief of the securities and exchange commission but fedders had personal problems and today

personal problems and today he resigned after revelations he beat his wife. >> the resignation came after two days of news stories and admitted that he physically abused his wife but claimed he was not a wife beater. the stories came after his wife charlotte described the beatings during their divorce trial in the suburban maryland courthouse. in one incident she said he slapped her and broke her eardrum and another he beat her up when she was three months pregnant. >> john attacked me with his fists and his hands and hitting me around the abdomen and yelling at me he didn't care if he killed me or the baby. >> charlotte fedder said there were other incidents where she was left with a black eye and bruises and has a permanent neck injury from a time her husband tried to throw her over a banister. in court john fedders admitted he was violent but claimed he never meant to hurt his wife. >> that was 1985. white house had been alerted multiple times about the abuse happening at the hands of this high-ranking official regan

had installed at the s.e.c., but repeatedly they took no action. they sat on those allegations for months and defended it but because of his history of spousal abuse ended up on the front of a national newspaper. that was 1985. you recognize this pattern. we saw something similar play out last year. after donald trump was elected, he nominated a man named andy puzder to be his labor secretary. soon after, politico.com reported on an episode that episode of the oprah winfrey show in the 1990s. we knew that tape existed. the incoming white house knew it too, but oprah's production company said they couldn't locate that tape. there was fierce interest for it after that politico reporting. the tape for whatever reason was missing. nobody could get it from the original source.

and andy puzder stayed on track to become the next labor secretary. but then about a month down the road, the tape turned up. >> he vowed revenge. he said i'll see you in the gutter. this will never be over. you will pay for this. andy puzz der's wife wearing a disguise appearing on the oprah winfrey show but interesting, it was not the oprah winfrey show that found that tape. you know where that tape came from? charlotte fedders. the woman whose husband tried to throw her over the banister in front of her sons, the reason charlotte fedders had the tape of that particular show is because she also appeared on that same episode which is about domestic violence in upper class families. we're pretty sure that's her on the left hand side in the purple dress with the pearls. last year when charlotte fedders saw the news about andy puzder, potentially becoming the next

labor secretary and these allegations about how she abused his wife, she remembered that she had that tape. she took her personal copy of that that tape. she gave it to politico and the day that tape came out, andy puzder with drew his nomination. to be secretary of labor. charlotte fedders, remarkable story, right? starting in terrible violent threatening circumstances, nevertheless she put her name to her own story about domestic violence by putting it in black and white in the national news. she took down a powerful government official in the regan administration despite the resistance from the regan administration to doing anything about it. then a generation later, she does it again this time with a decades-old vhs tape. "washington post" has a stomach-churchds story on the front page churning story on the front page of the website right now. this is the actual headline. for the weary white house, florida shooting offered a reprieve from scandals. reprieve is in courts because

a white house official actually said that word, saying it was a reprieve expressing great relief that the trump white house felt upon hearing the news of a massacre of high school kids. here is how the story starts, the white house was under siege. domestic abuse allegations against a senior aide were ignored, pointing to a potential high-level coverup. two cabinet secretaries were caught for luxury travel. a playboy centerfold alleged an extra march 'til affair and the russia investigation was intensifying. the item multiwas so intense there was speculation the president might fire his chief of staff. but a gun massacre at a florida high school last wednesday that left 17 dead seemed to shift the media glare away from the trump scandals and gave embattled aids an opportunity to refocus. some aides privately acknowledged the tragedy offered a breather from the political storm. there had been a tentative plan for white house staff john kelly to address the news media on wednesday where he would have faced intense scrutiny over his

role in the mishandling of domestic abuse allegations against former staff secretary rob porter. after the shooting in florida, though, that plan was scuttled. for everyone it was a distraction or a reprieve said a white house official. a lot of people here felt like it was a reprieve from seven or eight days of just getting pummeled. but the official said as we all know, sadly, when the coverage dies down a little bit, we'll be back through the chaos. sadly, eventually the coverage will die down and the white house will be sad about that because for them, it's been an awesome relief to have these massacre in the news. look at that headline there again. that's a direct quote. the white house sees the massacre as a reprieve, a bit of a breather. outside the white house people see that massacre differently. in just a few days, it has led to a kids movement, a teenagers

movement or organized angry people balancing the funerals they have to go to with a lightning national campaign that is already under way to get gun laws changed. this is something new under the sun what these teenagers are doing. we're going to be talking with one of the young people who's helping to lead this uprising a little later on this hour. the other thing, of course, that broke in the last pew days that changed that conversation around the white house scandals is when the special counsel handed down that big indictment on friday. that indictment apparently initially made president trump excited and happy, which is amazing but who knows how people talk to him about these things. by this weekend, the president changed his attitude and seemed to be very worked up about the indictment to the point where his twitter traffic was rattled and upset seemingly more than normal. special counsel robert mueller is now signaling new charges against trump campaign chairman paul manafort, and inferior now multiple reports that

the deputy campaign chairman rick gates is about to change his plea to guilty in an arrangement that will see gates reportedly starting to cooperate with prosecutors. that is potentially a big turn in the case. we'll have more on that story coming up, too. there really have been a lot of big news stories that have broken in the last few days that may or may not feel like a reprieve for white house officials depending on how things are being explained to the president on any given day. but in the next few days, this week, this white house scandal that started as the rob porter domestic violence story, the modern day iteration of the john fedders story from the reagan administration, led to a profile of charlotte fedders, the rob porter domestic violence story is about to come roaring back alongside the other things happening in the news and will go off like a stink bomb in

the oval office for a specific reason. the rob porter white house domestic violence story, the allegations resulted in rob porter never getting cleared by the white house to hold a permanent security clearance. that exposed the fact the trump white house kept rob porter in his job for more than a year literally controlling the flow of sensitive and secretive documents that cross the president's desk even though he wasn't able to get the clearance you need to be allowed to see those documents. that being exposed at the white house is a serious problem for the white house in general. for john kelly, for the white house counsel. but very specifically for the president's son-in-law who is a senior advisor to the president and who famously has also able to obtain a permanent security clearance. last near at the "new yorker," it was reported kushner's difficulty in obtaining a security clearance is a subject of fascination among national security specialists with people trying to figure out why it is he can't get a clearance.

that report was also where we learned that despite the fact that he can't get a permanent clearance, jared kushner nevertheless gets access every day to the president's daily brief from the intelligence community which is a very highly classified document. "washington post" has since reported that despite kushner's inability to clear the background check to get a false security clearance, quote, apart from the staff at the national security counsel, kushner issues more requests for information to the intelligence community than any other white house employee. now, we don't know why jared kushner can't get a permanent security clearance but there is a lot of feverish speculation as to why at a might be at the "new yorker." it was reported that kushner made the unusual and risky decision to meet alone one on one with the chinese ambassador even though that leaves him open to china making any characterization what he wants what kushner said or did in the

meetings and report that u.s. intelligence intercepts caught the chinese ambassador saying home to beijing saying jared kushner discussed his business interests alongside government policy when he was supposed to do things like plan the chinese president's mar-a-lago visit with the chinese ambassador. last year "the new york times" reported eight days after the election, jared kushner met with an insurance company reportedly considering pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into a struggling property owned by kushner's family business. a property for which they have to make a $1.2 billion mortgage payment this time next year despite the fact there are no clear signs they will be able to actually make that payment. last march, the times was first to report one of the foreign meetings jared kushner failed to initially report on his clearance application was a meeting with a large sanctioned state-run russian bank. a meeting that happened during the transition. the banker put out a statement at the time saying he took that

meeting and kushner's capacity as the chief executive of kushner companies. now tonight, cnn reports robert mueller special counsel investigation is looking into kushner's efforts to secure financing for his company from foreign investors during the presidential transition. so there is all of this worrying stuff that has been reported about jared kushner in terms of his suitability for a security clearance and suitability for handling secret information given his ties to foreign governments and foreign business interests. lots of reporting. we don't know the reason why the president's son-in-law can't get a security clearance, nor do we know why the white house nevertheless is letting him read the daily brief to make more requests for intelligence. but this has been an on going situation with jared kushner and there is now a gigantic spotlight on the problem because of the rob porter domestic violence scandal. and now into the news that the

white house is enjoying or suffered through in the past few days depending who you ask, on friday night the white house chief of staff john kelly just flung this into the fray. quote, effective one week from today discontinue any top secret or compartment level interim clearances for individuals whose background check investigations or adjudications have been pending since june 1st, 2017, or before. effective one week from today. discontinue interim clearances for people whose background check investigations have been pending since june? jared's has been pending since january, at least. he's not able to get a permanent security clearance for lots of reasons we can speculate about but none that we actually know. well, the white house chief of staff friday night in the middle of the news breaking, you might not have seen it but john kelly recommended that the new white house policy will be to yank interim clearances and access to

classified permanently material and wants that done by when? one week from today. he put that out on friday which means this friday barring some change in course or some special presidential family members, jared kushner is going to be out at the white house or they will have to move him to a job in the cafeteria or something where he doesn't have to have access to anything sensitive. you're not going to be the mideast peace envoy if you're not allowed to see secret information. according to the document from john kelly, jared should be out by the end of this week. i have no idea what a crisis like that involving the president's family might shake loose in this chaotic white house. but if this guidance from the chief of staff is about to go into effect, there is the jared kushner factor. we could also be looking at a really big title wave of resignations or firings from the white house by the end of this week.

remember, nbc news broke the news just a few days ago that more than 130 people with top jobs at the white house had only interim security clearances as recently as november, unless those numbers have turned around since november, if this policy in fact about to go into effect, that means dozens of high-ranking people inside the white house are about to get kicked out. they are about to get jettisoned from their jobs or at least moved into other jobs. low-ranking gigs where they don't see anything sensitive and this is due to happen now but the end of this week, by friday. including members of the president's family. i think this week will be insane. buckle up. ♪

when you have a cold, stuff happens. [ dog groans ] [ coughs and sneezes ] nothing relieves more symptoms than alka seltzer plus maximum strength liquid gels. [thud] [screaming & crying] ♪ [screaming & crying] [phone ping] with esurance photo claims, you could have money for repairs within a day... wow! that was really fast. that's insurance for the modern world. esurance. click or call. alright, i brought in high protein to help get us moving. ...and help you feel more strength and energy in just two weeks! i'll take that. -yeeeeeah! ensure high protein. with 16 grams of protein and 4 grams of sugar. ensure. always be you.

ancestrydnand now,y $69. with more than 150 ethnic regions to connect to... ...it's the perfect time to find out where your greatness comes from. save 30% at ancestrydna.com.

i don't know what the normal thing is to do when you get fired from running a presidential campaign. what do you do the day you step down from a job like that? i'd go to a bar or stand in a river and pretend to know how to catch fish. maybe you can imagine yourself going for a feel sorry for yourself long drive.

i don't know. you've just been fired for running a presidential campaign. i don't know what the right thing is to do but when paul manafort was fired in august 2016 he did something unexpected that day. the day of his resignation, he created a shell company called summer breeze l.l.c. that same day that he quit the campaign. within a few weeks, summer breeze received a $3.5 million loan from a new york financial firm with ukrainian connections called spruce capital. then in november, the month of the election, summer breeze got another really big loan, $9.5 million, this time from a small bank in chicago called the federal savings bank. two months later in january, he got another really big loan, $6.6 million from that same bank in chicago. those big loans from that little bank in chicago, they are strange for a couple reasons apart from the timing.

the first sort of strange thing to know about those loans is that that was really small bank run by a trump economic adviser and that bank specifically caters to military veterans. paul manafort is not a military veteran. that was one weird thing about those loans. secondly, i mentioned it's a small bank. those $16 million in loans, $16 million in loans made up almost a quarter of the reserves. why were they loaning a quarter of their troevz one guy? especially a guy whose not a veteran when they are a financial institution and set up to loan to veterans. those loans were subpoenaed the bank looking for money laundering and fraud. that was last summer before manafort was indicted on felony accounts with conspiracy and failing to register as a foreign agent, et cetera. now, bank fraud was mentioned

several times in the indictment, but didn't actually show up in any of the charges, which was a little puzzling at the time, but mow we may be about to figure some of that out if any friday night's news was dominated by indictments of 13 russians for attacking the election in 2016, but another big development from the special counsel's office as we went to air on friday night that understandably received less attention but it's turning out to be really, really interesting. it was a filing from the special counsel about the terms that paul manafort and lawyers negotiated to keep him free on bail and out of jail while he awaits trail. this was the headline about it in politico.com. on friday night. quote, mueller levels new claim of bank fraud against manafort. this is what it said in the filing friday night. quote, the proposed package is deficient in the government's view, meaning the bail package, in light of additional criminal conduct we learned including a series of bank frauds and bank

fraud conspiracies including criminal conduct relating to the mortgage on paul manafort's property in fairfax, virginia. the government has evidence he paul manafort secured this mortgage through a series of false and fraudulent representations to the federal savings bank. and maintained it by providing the bank with doctored profit and loss statements to the tunes of millions of dollars. the special counsel's office is telling the court now that they have substantial new evidence of additional criminal conduct by campaign manager paul manafort. the way they are describe it appears to be related to the loans, the big oddly timed loans that he took right after he left the trump campaign. why are we learning this now? why is this special counsel getting new information about paul manafort? what is their new source of information about his alleged bank fraud?

nbc news has not confirmed but over the weekend, the "l.a. times" reported that manafort's deputy and business and deputy on the trump campaign rick gates will change his not guilty plea to guilty and "the times" is reporting rick gates agreed to testify against paul manafort. possibility was first reported by cnn. the "l.a. times" report put meat on the bones this weekend. that has been matched by cbs news. if that's about to happen, does it make sense rick gates flipping and becoming a cooperating witness explains why we're seeing allegations of new criminal conduct against paul manafort? if that's happening, what should we expect to see and if there is a new list of alleged criminal conduct against paul manafort, why is it the special counsel's describing these allegations in a filing like this? does this actually mean there

are new charges ending up against him? if so, how serious are the charges? how do we tell? joining us is former u.s. barbara mcquade. thank you for being so patient with me and explaining these things that are very obvious to you. >> no, happy to be here. >> great. this filing is not new charges being brought against paul manafort but a filing about his bail conditions that says the mueller investigation has additional criminal conduct. why would you say you have that without bringing new charges? >> they haven't brought new charges yet. it doesn't mean they won't. it appears they had to file this document taking a position with respect to the bail, and wanted the judge to know that they have this additional information because it could be that manafort may additional time. it could be that he is demonstrated that he can't comply with a court order because here he is on bond continuing to commit crimes and it could be this collateral, the security he's pledged, is property that he doesn't own

rightfully anyway and might be foreclosed upon later. their hand was forced here to share this information at this time. it may be they plan to file it later but wanted the court to have this information making the bond decision. >> does it make sense this new information and the special counsel's office describes this as being substantial new evidence implying that they had this now and didn't have it before? does that make sense they might be getting this information, whatever is backing up these allegations because of potentially having a new cooperating witness or some other access to new information? >> it does. it says right in the document this is information that the government has only learned about since the initial bail hearing several months ago. somehow they got this information. it could be because they have sat down with rick gates and had cooperation and received information, could be other sources. i read reports that new york attorney general eric sniderman is investigating paul manafort they may have shared that information with him. and even though they are indicted that doesn't preclude the prosecute from continuing to

look into other criminal activity by that defendant for a possible superseeding indictment. it may indicate information on gates but that may not be the only possible source. >> there is reporting about gates changing his legal representation, which we've seen evidence of in terms of activity around the court. there's been a few different tiers of reporting now that gates is planning to cooperate, that there was reporting last week that he's done, the queen for a day interview last week. it was reported last week sometime in the last month he's done at a kind of interview. all of this reporting isn't confirmed by nbc news. we see no direct evidence of it. if he is becoming a cooperating witness, it seems to be an important development. howl we, the public, know that that has happened? is that something that could be kept secret for a long time in this case? >> it is something that could be for some pferiod of time.

he could enter the guilty plea under seal as we saw with george papadopoulos and find out about it later but my guess is what's going on right now is the cooperation portion of it because before the prosecutor offers the plea deal, they want to be able to evaluate and assess the value of the cooperation. the first part that would be that would happen queen for a day arrangement where they sit down and talk and that could take several sessions to listen to what he has to say and make a plea offer and only then would a court date be set to enter that plea on the record so maybe a public hearing, maybe a secret hearing that gets unveiled later. but at some point in time we'll know whether it's happened or not. >> barbara mcquaid, former u.s. attorney in michigan, thank you very much for being with us tonight. nice to see you. >> thanks, rachel, you too. >> lots ahead tonight. stay with us. don't we need that cable box to watch tv? nope.

don't we need to run? nope. it just explodes in a high pitched 'yeahhh.' yeahhh! try directv now for $10 a month for 3 months. no satellite needed. can start in the colon constiand may be signs of an imbalance of good bacteria. only phillips' colon health has this unique combination of probiotics. it provides four-in-one symptom defense. it's your daily probiotic. imagine if the things you bought every day... earned you miles to get to the places you really want to go. with the united mileageplus explorer card, you'll get a free checked bag. two united club passes. priority boarding. and earn fifty thousand bonus miles after you spend three thousand dollars on purchases in the first three months from account opening plus, zero-dollar intro annual fee for the first year, then ninety-five dollars. learn more at theexplorercard.com

olay regenerist shatters the competition. hydrating skin better than prestige creams costing over $100, $200, and even $400. for skin that looks younger than it should. fact check this ad in good housekeeping. olay regenerist. ageless. we know that when you're >> tspending time with thelass grandkids... ♪ music >> tech: ...every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why at safelite, we'll show you exactly when we'll be there. with a replacement you can trust.

all done sir. >> grandpa: looks great! >> tech: thanks for choosing safelite. >> grandpa: thank you! >> child: bye! >> tech: bye! saving you time... so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪

you're about to see president richard nixon at a ceremonial signing from july 1971. july 1971. this is well before the watergate break-in. the white house is packed with young people, very young people, teenagers. these young people at this moment had just achieved the lowering of the national voting age from 21 to 18, and listen how president nixon describes them. describes them as filled with moral courage providing what the nation needs. >> as i speak with this group today, i sense we can have confidence america's young

generation will provide what america needs as we approach our 200th birthday. not just strength and not just wealth but the spirit of '76, a spirit of moral courage, a spirit of high idealism in which we believe in the american dream, but in which we realize that the american dream can never be fulfilled until every american has an equal chance to fulfill it in his own light. >> a spirit of moral courage of high idealism. that changed the voting age brought about in the form of the 26th amendment to the constitution. it passed like a lightning bolt from the time they started the constitutional amendment process until it passed, it was just over three months, which is incredibly fast. once the young people put their minds to it, it was a remarkable feat, a big change almost overnight. moral courage, high idealism,

strength and moral suasion applied by young people speaking out, marching, organizing and winning something that should have been really hard to win and made it look easy. sometimes it works. it's possible. hold that thought.

this is food made to sit down for. slow down for. put the phone away, and use a knife and fork for. and with panera catering, it's food worth sharing. panera. food as it should be. and with panera catering, it's food worth sharing. it's 6 am. 40 million americans are waking up to a gillette shave. and at our factory in boston, more than a thousand workers are starting their day building on over a hundred years of heritage, craftsmanship and innovation. today we're bringing you america's number one shave at lower prices every day. putting money back in the pockets of millions of americans. as one of those workers, i'm proud to bring you gillette quality for less, because nobody can beat the men and women of gillette. gillette - the best a man can get.

abdominal pain... ...and diarrhea. but it's my anniversary. aw. sorry. we've got other plans. your recurring, unpredictable abdominal pain and diarrhea... ...may be irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, or ibs-d. you've tried over-the-counter treatments and lifestyle changes, but ibs-d can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi,... ...a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage... ...both abdominal pain and diarrhea at the same time. so you stay ahead of your symptoms. viberzi can cause new or worsening abdominal pain. do not take viberzi if you have no gallbladder, have pancreas or severe liver problems, problems with alcohol abuse, long-lasting or severe constipation, or a bowel or gallbladder blockage. pancreatitis may occur and can lead to hospitalization and death. if you are taking viberzi,...

...you should not take medicines that cause constipation. the most common side effects of viberzi... ...include constipation, nausea, and abdominal pain. stay ahead of ibs-d with viberzi. today is presidents' day. most schools were closed and most students got to stay home today. then there were these kids and decided instead to lie in the street outside the white house in protest. this is what five days after a mass school shooting that took the lives of 17 people now looks like in our country. students' response to last week's mass shooting in parkland florida is angry and determined and well-organized. the group that organized today's protest was formed two days after the mass shooting founded by two 16-year-olds. students at marjory stoneman douglas high school have not been back and probably won't return until next week. in the meantime, they are very busy.

they are organizing. the day after tomorrow a group of students from the school will leave for tallahassee to meet with state legislators and the attorney general. they are scheduled to start the seven-hour trip to the state capitol right after the funeral of one of their classmates. if you have missed the articulate furry these young people have been pouring on to this issue, you should know this is happening. >> my message for the people in office is you're either with us or against us. we are losing our lives while the adults are playing around. >> there are funerals going on today, tomorrow, this entire weekend, and president donald trump right now is golfing. he'll be listening on wednesday. does anyone know where? does anyone know what time? has anyone been invited to this listening session? >> president trump, you control the house of representatives. you control the senate and you control the executive. you haven't taken a single bill for mental health care or gun

control and passed it and that's pathetic. we've seen a government shutdown, tax reform but nothing to save our children's lives. are you kidding me? you think now is the time to focus on the past and not the future to prevent the death of thousands of other children? you sicken me. >> we know they're claiming there are mental health issues and i'm not a psychologist, but we need to pay attention to the fact that this isn't just a mental health issue. he wouldn't have murdered that many students with a knife. [ cheers ] >> everything about these kids' lives changed on wednesday afternoon at 2:20 in the afternoon. that last student you heard there, 17-year-old emma gonzalez she says she wrote the speech she gave this weekend on the back of her app government notes because she's still in a.p. government class. despite the pressure these kids are under and the pressure of having gone through a huge trama themselves, students from the

high school have emerged as the most eloquent advocates out there on gun control. they are actively working within a week of this happening to them to create a whole new wave of pressure on public officials. they formed a group called never again. they have taken charge of momentum on this. they are already moving things forward in a way that didn't seem possible a week ago. it's a tall order and very brave. joining us is cameron haas can i, a student at the high school in parkland. he's one of the founders of the never again movement and the march for our lives event that will happen across the country next month on march 24th. mr. cass casky, thank you for joining us. nice of you to be here tonight. >> thank you for having me. >> i've been trying to describe the organizing efforts made by you and your students. it's moving you guys have tried to not just tried to, that you've done so much so

constructively so quickly after going through this trauma. can i ask about your own thought process, why you decided to pursue it this way and work in this organizing effort? >> absolutely. our voices were being heard. we were speaking out, and as more people were listening to us, we decided we needed a name. we needed something people could follow. we needed a lynch pin for everybody that's hurt and speaking out and demanding change and i was sitting down in my ghostbusters pajamas and thinking and i thought of never again msd as just for everyone who's hearing us to come together and grieve and demand action as one movement. and since then, we've gotten support from people we never thought we would get support from. everybody's listening and it's been amazing, and that's why we've been able to organize the march for our lives. >> what do you want to happen at the march for our lives? what's the tactics for what you want people to do and what are

you hoping it will accomplish? >> well, we want everybody to come out and i was -- i came here from a gun rally today where we had hundreds of people in delray beach. everybody was showing their support and we're just going to see more of that. people have been saying to us now is not the time to talk about gun control. now is the time to grieve and think about our community and while i don't necessarily agree and while i think not only is it not too early, it's way too late. we're listening and we're understanding, we're respecting people's needs to think about this. the time we'll talk about gun control is march 24th. we have marches in every major city, every minor city. we've been seeing people on facebook organizing groups -to-their march without reaching out to us. people are listening. people are caring and the support we've gotten from everybody, every age and every generation, every political party is what's keeping us going.

>> do you expect to be doing this down the road? i mean, obviously channelling this, the grief and the trauma that you guys have just been through personally over these last few days, it's been -- i have to tell you, it's a remarkable thing to watch what you guys have been able to do in terms of being so articulate, so clear, so unified so quickly, is this something you want to keep doing indefinitely, that this will be a sustained movement for you and your classmates? >> well, i have to tell you, a week ago if you had asked me this, the answer would have been completely different. a week ago i was a student at stoneman douglas high school. i was proud to be an eagle. i was in three musicals trying to keep my lines together for all of them but after this, after seeing all of this, after my community took 17 shots to the heart and instead of falling down, we've rose up and we're

leading the rest of the nation, i can't even begin to tell you what is happening in the future. all i know, the people part of my team will be leading in the future and making the difference. the fact i've been able to be with david, emma, jackie and everybody else is great. we were all speaking out. we were all being heard and the fact we've been able to come together is proof that stoneman douglas, the future voters, the future lawmakers, they are coming from here. they are coming from people that have been afraid to go to school and this is going to be the last time a school shooting is going to have to be covered like this. this is the last time a school shooting is going to look like a terrorist attack. that's a promise. >> one of the founders of this never again movement. congratulations on what you've been able to do turnover last few days and good luck. thanks for talking to us

tonight. >> thank you so much. >> we'll be right back. when you say you need a heart transplant... that's a whole different ballgame. i was in shock. i am very proud of the development of drugs that can prevent the rejection and prevent the recurrence of the original disease. i never felt i was going to die. we know so much about transplantation. and we're living longer. you cannot help but be inspired by the opportunities that a transplant would offer. my donor's mom says "you were meant to carry his story".

anif you've got a lifee. you gotta swiffer

last fall the cia director mike pompeo was speaking at a public event when he was asked if he could say with certainty that the results of our last presidential election weren't skewed as a result of russian interference. here's how he responded to that question. >> we conducted an election that had integrity. yes, the intelligence community's assessment is that the russian meddling that took place did not affect the outcome of the election.

>> nope. that response is not true. it's completely false. and as cia director he should know better. he's not some jibber jabber on tv, we have it in print. this is their january report, quote, we did not make an assessment of the impact that russian activities had on the outcome on the 2016 election. we did not make an assessment of that. so the cia director misstated that and they had to walk back his remarks, quote, the intelligence assessment with regard to russian election meddling has not changed and the director did not intend to suggest that it had. that was the mike pompeo treatment of that issue in october. then a few days ago it happened again. >> first thing we all agree on is that irrespective of efforts that were made in 2016 by foreign powers, it is the

universal conclusion of our intelligence communities that none of those efforts had any effect on the outcome of the 2016 election. this is the accepted view. >> nope. that is not the accepted view. that's not the conclusion of intelligence communities. nope. what the vice president said there is not true, wasn't true when mike pompeo said it, still isn't true when the vice president said it. at least pompeo had to clean it up. when the vice president said that false thing last week we reached out to his office last week and again today to see if the vice president misspoke and wants two correct the record or knows something we don't and is standing by this assessment, we can't get a call back. but this weekend when sergei lavrov was asked about it, he went out of his way to say vice president mike pence recently

stated that russia didn't influence the outcome of the election. it's true, he said that. it was a lie. the vice president should correct this. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for psoriasis, 75% clearer skin is achievable with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and for psoriatic arthritis, otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain.

and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. tell your doctor if these occur. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ♪ otezla. show more of you. it's ok that everyone ignores it's fine. drive. because i get a safe driving bonus check every six months i'm accident free. and i don't share it with mom! right, mom? righttt. safe driving bonus checks. only from allstate. switching to allstate is worth it.

i really don't care. i'm like, i'm not the only person in the news business but i'm probably one of the only

people in the news business who when the white house briefing comes on i take that as my cue to go get a sandwich. you have to make choices as to what sort of information you take in and what you don't bother. and with the white house briefing, i don't bother. that said, tomorrow i'm going to bother. because tomorrow will be the first white house briefing in a week. white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders is expected to brief at 2:00 tomorrow. they cancelled the briefing last wednesday on a day they expected to put out white house chief of staff john kelly, they cancelled it in the wake of the shooting. kelly had been expected to face, basically, a furious press corp. who's been trying to get to the bottom of white house conflicting statements about the white house staff secretary rob porter and the domestic violence allegations against him, the security clearance scandal that followed.

briefing was chanced wednesday and they did not hold up with thursday or friday. tomorrow they'll hold one and i'll get takeout. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again tomorrow. now it's time to for the "last word with lawrence o'donnell." now it's time to for the "last word with lawrence o'donnell." >> i want to give you a tip about the white house briefings, i watch it a little more than you do. it's usually a zero information zone, easily ig noeshl and avoidable but when they say it's scheduled for 2:00 and you're planning your takeout, you could have a reservation at a restaurant for 2:00 and by the time you get to the office after that, it will probably be just about starting. don't be surprised if it starts at 3:15. >> here's my question about that, though. do they start it late and then let it run as late as it needs to go or do they have a closing time in mind and as it gets