to dump rob porter for spousal abuse. his son-in-law may be skimming business opportunities on the side. all the time, the potter himself, donald trump, has to show he's not sweating. somehow, through all of this, show that, yes, even in the 21st century, this father knows best. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. see you monday night at 7:00 eastern. my dad on the phone told us jenny was gone. >> a house in flames. the body of a woman inside. >> we have a body. i need a medic. >> but it wasn't the fire that killed her. she was dead before it started. >> accidents will happen. this was no accident. >> who wanted her dead? her boyfriend said he knew. >> there's people after us. >> what does that mean? >> they're trying to get us. >> but police knew better.

>> strangulation is a very personal killing. that's a very angry killing. >> hello. welcome to "dateline extra." i'm craig melvin. at first, a fatal fire that struck a young couple's home appeared to be an accident. then investigators took a closer look, and what they discovered about this fire and this couple left them with "burning suspicion." here's keith morrison. >> is everybody out of the house? >> i don't know, but it's on fire. >> the fire in the cottage on addison avenue was hungry, devouring almost everything in the bedroom. >> we'll have fire department on the way. do you see smoke coming out of the windows? >> it's pouring out of the house. >> within minutes, the firefighters knocked it down. the smoke clearing. the sooty water running in the streets.

and then as the mop-up began, the word flashed out like something electric. the house was occupied. someone didn't get out. and up through the ashes, a mystery flared like a stubborn ember that glowed and smoldered and demanded an answer. the inhabitants of the rented cottage, as investigators soon learned, were two young, beautiful people. the successful glossy types that you might expect to see on a reality show. their names are paul zumot and jennifer schipsi. jennifer, an ambitious, award-winning real estate agent who lived like a rock star, or so said her buddy roy. >> she's like, i'm knocking them out like dominos. i just worked out, went to starbucks and on my way to a meeting, and it's only 6:33. >> so paul seemed to be the right kind of guy for jennifer, said roy. >> because he was an entrepreneur. and he seemed like he was a very

driven person. and that's definitely a quality that jennifer was looking for. >> jordanian-american paul zumot, sleek, attractive, educated, engaging. paul owned a local hangout, a cafe. unusual place by north american standards where customers could smoke flavored tobacco pipes called hookahs. the place and paul were popular. this man was a fan. >> he's a good-looking man. he looks good, smells good, he's witty, he's smart and he's just affectionate. >> so love at first sight? well, maybe. said their friends. >> from the minute he told me about her, he always talked about how wonderful she is and how she's perfect. >> he definitely was very charismatic and liked to joke around. >> and money? there was a lot of it around apparently, too.

and jennifer and paul worked hard to get it. they seemed only too happy to spend it. >> when jennifer and paul first got together, paul took jennifer to new york city. >> and i remember he was like a kid in a candy store, just planning all of these elaborate, wonderful things that they were going to do together. >> they were passionate, these beautiful people. they both had strong personalities. their love burned hot. >> jennifer was a strong, independent woman, and she would not accept anyone disrespecting her or even looking at her inappropriately. and she was very strong-willed. >> me, like i always did, told him you need to be careful because girls can be evil. so he said, no, she's different. i love her. i already love her. she's great. >> and so in september 2009, paul and jennifer moved into the charming little cottage on addison avenue here in palo alto.

time to play house. paul started to think about marriage. and for paul's 36th birthday, jennifer planned a party full of promise. >> she invited most of his close friends to dishdash, one of his favorite restaurants, and i think they had over a dozen people, almost 20 people or something. and jennifer created a cute table setting. she created a perfect party for paul. cake and everything. >> in fact, people who were there described the party as almost like a wedding reception. it lasted through the evening, into the wee hours of the morning. and now, here it was, just the very next evening, and it was gone in ashes, all of it. the excitement, the glamour, the promising future up in smoke along with the house on addison and the person inside. >> we have a body. i need medics. we have a body badly burned.

>> the next day, jim schipsi was driving with his parents to a dinner engagement. his phone rang. it was an old friend. he picked it up. >> i said, jake, you're going to tell me something bad, aren't you? and he said, jim -- >> he just kept repeating your name? >> yeah. said it like three times. i said, jake, hold on. i've got to pull over. i didn't want to hear it. i didn't want to hear what he had to tell me so i gave the phone to my dad. and he told my dad. my dad hung up the phone, and he held out his arms and my mom and we were like all holding each other, and he told us jenny was gone. >> it was his jennifer, his daughter who died in that fire. and now along with almost

unbearable grief, something else started to burn inside jim. something searing. it was suspicion. >> you know, accidents will happen. there's a lot of tragic things that happen to a lot of people in this world, but this was no accident. it didn't have to happen. coming up -- police give paul the bad news. >> i don't know how to tell you this, man, but there's a body in the house that's been burned. >> when "burning suspicion" continues. a few years ago, me and my wife was actually saving for a house. but one day we're sitting there and we decided that, something needed to be done about what was going on in our inner-city. instead of buying a house, we decided to form this youth league. these kids mean everything to me and i just want to make sure i give something positive to do. ♪ ♪ wow, that's amazing. that's a blessing right there. to know that someone out there cares and is passionate

about what we're trying to do in our communities. you excited? yes. yeah, we're gonna to look good right? yup. awesome. alright come on, bring it in man. love these guys right here. this one's below market price and has bluetooth.n.

same here, but this one has leather seats! use the cars.com app to compare price, features and value.

welcome back to "dateline extra." jennifer schipsi and paul zumot seemed like the perfect couple. she, a gorgeous and successful real estate agent and he, a handsome entrepreneur.

they were both passionate about their lives and passionate about each other. but one day, a terrible house fire left one of them dead and the other facing questions from investigators. here again is keith morrison. >> while the deadly fire was burning at his home on addison avenue, paul was at his hookah lounge just minutes away. someone called, told him about the fire. he rushed over but could only pace helplessly back and forth as firefighters did their job. soon after that, he sat down with the palo alto police to help sort out what happened, though, as you can see on the video recording, sat is probably not the best description. paul was full of nervous energy and frantic questions. at this point, nobody had told him that jennifer was in that fire. >> i'm worried about my house. what about my girlfriend? what caused the fire, and i don't care about this.

i just want to know about jennifer right now. >> i'm not sure i know anything more than you do. my job is to talk to you and find out what exactly you know because you probably know more than me at this point. >> no. no. >> so, together, police and zumot talked about the hours before the fire. where had she been? what had she and paul been doing? >> well, yesterday was my birthday. we went out, and everything was fine, you know. >> who's "we"? >> me and her and all of our friends. >> who is her? >> jennifer. >> your girlfriend? >> yeah. >> paul explained that he spent the afternoon at an appointment in san jose and got back in time for his cafe to open in the evening. >> there was traffic, i got to the cafe because that's when they open. i had to log into the computers. as soon as i sat down -- i have a hookah lounge. my landlord calls and says your house is on fire. i flew through the red lights

and i'm here. i'm really frustrated and confused and exhausted and i want to know what happened. i care less about the house but jennifer's safety. i cannot think anything right now. i just cannot think anything. >> then in the middle of his conversation with detectives, paul's phone rang. it was jennifer's mother who told him she hadn't seen or heard from her daughter. you can see what happened. paul fell to pieces. >> yeah, i know. i know. i know. i can't find her. they're not telling me anything. >> to this point, he told detectives that he had been clinging to the hope that jennifer might be with her mother. anywhere but at home. but she wasn't with her mother. wasn't anywhere. and that's when the officer broke this news. >> i don't know how to tell you this, man, but there's a body in the house that's been burned. and we have no way of knowing who that is. [ crying ]

>> i have to get out of here. get me out of here, please. [ crying ] >> okay. and i'm trying to be as sensitive as i possibly can because i understand that this is your -- i don't know that this is jennifer. >> i hope not. i hope not. >> listen, we have not confirmed who this is, okay? >> it's a really odd set of circumstances, okay? we need to figure out, is this on purpose? is this an accident, okay? this is just -- unfortunately, this is just the beginning for all of us, okay, to try to answer some questions.

okay? >> but of course, it had to be jennifer. and it probably wasn't an accident. as that news sank in, paul began to think about who might have wanted to harm jennifer and came up with some potentially helpful information. two brothers, hisham and tony ghanma. they'd already threatened her, said paul. there's been a confrontation just weeks earlier. >> what happened is, he called me and said he was going to kill me. he spoke in arabic. i speak it fluently. so we called the police. >> he and jennifer filed restraining orders against both brothers. >> now she was scared from him. literally scared from him. i'm scared from the guy. so i know those guys like this. now yesterday she walked home and she said, hey, somebody probably was stalking me. >> had the brothers killed her, too?

police listened, took some notes, and then just as a precaution, of course, had paul give them his clothes for forensic testing. questioned by police, his home destroyed, his girlfriend dead, paul zumot was very nearly in shock, said his friend. >> his mind was, are they sure jennifer is gone, and oh, my god, she's never coming back. >> as the weeks went by, paul was in a kind of daze. >> the gist of our conversations for the first few weeks is that jennifer's not coming back. he was completely distraught about the fact that jennifer was in that fire. >> meanwhile, as those same weeks went by, investigators went quietly and steadily about their task, picking through the cinders of the fire and coming to the conclusion that none of it smelled right. literally. coming up -- >> was gasoline there? >> no question at all. it's in her hair. you can smell it, and you can

smell it when you walk in just with your own nose. >> investigators now knew the fire was not an accident. what they discovered next was an even bigger shock. when "burning suspicion" continues. you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase.

he gets the best deal on the perfect hotel by using. tripadvisor! that's because tripadvisor lets you start your trip on the right foot... by comparing prices from over 200 booking sites to find the

right hotel for you at the lowest price. saving you up to 30%! you'll be bathing in savings! tripadvisor. check the latest reviews and lowest prices. welcome back to "dateline extra." investigators believe the fire that killed jennifer schipsi was no accident, but who would have wanted her dead and why? here again is keith morrison. >> the morning after the fire on addison avenue, the ruins still

warm, a yellow lab named rosie sniffed around what was by then a sealed crime scene. rosie was trained to identify some of the tools of arson -- kerosene, oil, gasoline. rosie stopped in her tracks. she'd apparently found something. chuck gillingham is a deputy district attorney in palo alto. was gasoline there? >> no question at all. it's in her hair. you can smell it when you walked in just with your own nose, and the remnants of the gas can was found next to her right hip. there was still enough remnants of the gas can to identify the type and make and model of the gas can. >> wow. that's like somebody leaving a gun beside the body with their fingerprints all over it, isn't it? >> no fingerprints and no physical evidence beyond that. >> but it was so clear that it was an arson? >> correct. and the arson was not at issue. >> no, it was cold-blooded

murder that was at issue because jennifer schipsi did not die in the fire. according to forensic experts, she was dead before the fire started. the method? a particularly intimate form of killing. death by strangulation. >> strangling someone is a very personal killing. it's a very angry killing. it's not like shooting someone from a long way away, i don't imagine. you're touching the person and feeling their life's blood ebb from them. >> who could have been so angry with jennifer? paul had told detectives that he and jennifer had taken out restraining orders against those brothers, hisham and tony ghanma. both part of his social circle, men who he considered friends. >> they're trying to get us. they are trying to harm me. >> who is that? >> hisham. >> the guy you have a restraining order against? >> several restraining against him. he hit me.

he has a restraining order against me. >> and just one night before, after paul's birthday celebration, paul told police some guys in a truck tried to follow jennifer home. >> she had broken her heel and she says somebody was stalking her. it's fine. it's okay with me but we had people threatening us in the past, okay? i don't know what's going on. i believe that's what caused the fire. i believe somebody was threatening us. >> so was paul zumot on to something? detectives went to talk to the brothers and, of course, checked to see where both men were the day of the fire. and there was no doubt they were nowhere near the fire. they had alibis. >> at the time of the fire, we know exactly where both of them were. one of the ghanma was in their cafe, and he's on videotape and the other was at fry's electronics and home depot 20 miles away. we have videotape and receipts from both of those locations. >> so once the ghanma brothers

were in the clear, cops do what they always do in cases like this. it's practically police work 101. they took a closer look at the victim's boyfriend paul. and there was a curious moment in that police interview the day of the fire when paul admitted he wasn't always the best sort of boyfriend. >> me and my girlfriend were broke up, and thanks to palo alto pd, put a restraining order on me because they said paul threatened me, blah, blah, blah. i said, no, she came to the cafe and broke the door. we always have problems like this. i never touched a girl in my life. you can see the police reports. >> suspicious? sure. but as they asked around among the couple's friends, police learned a few things that put paul's behavior into context. maybe he wasn't any more to blame than she was. >> their relationship was chaotic. there's no disputing that, absolutely. but he was no more violent in the relationship than she was.

whether it be physically, verbally, emotionally. >> as police gathered evidence, bit by bit, asking around about paul, one of them noticed something a little odd. paul told a friend, also a policeman, by the way, two slightly different stories about his whereabouts the day of the fire. first conversation, day of the fire, reported the cop friend, paul said he wasn't home all day. then, second conversation, next day, paul said he stopped briefly at home en route to his hookah cafe. as we say, odd. but people's memories can be tricky. was that one little difference enough to add up to suspicion of murder? police apparently thought so, especially once they added that to the rest of what they discovered. paul was arrested. >> i'm going to wait for my attorney. >> what's that? >> i will wait for my attorney. >> okay. >> they charged paul zumot with

arson and murder, which struck some observers as strange. after all, there had just been that one little inconsistency. and though paul and jennifer did fight sometimes, they seemed crazy in love, too. paul had been shopping for a diamond ring, for heaven's sake. >> there was a part of paul that was mourning his girlfriend, and then there was a part of him that was -- he didn't understand why he was in custody. and he didn't understand why he couldn't just cry for his girlfriend and for his life that had just changed 100%. >> it certainly did. paul zumot was taken to jail to await trial on a charge of murder in the first degree. big mistake, said paul zumot. >> when i first saw him, he -- all he was really still telling me is, you know, me being in custody, all of this is going to blow over with. you know, they're going to realize i'm not the person who

did this, and this will be over with. coming up -- drawing back the curtain for a peek of life with paul in jennifer's own words. >> candles everywhere, flowers. >> when "burning suspicion" continues. pop-culture trivia, but it gets pretty intense. -ahh. -the new guy. -whoa, he looks -- -he looks exactly like me. -no. -separated at birth much? we should switch name tags, and no one would know who was who. jamie, you seriously think you look like him? uh, i'm pretty good with comparisons. like how progressive helps people save money by comparing rates, even if we're not the lowest. even if we're not the lowest. whoa! wow. i mean, the outfit helps, but pretty great. look at us.

wow. i mean, the outfit helps, but pretty great. was a success for lastchoicehotels.comign badda book. badda boom. this year, we're taking it up a notch. so in this commercial we see two travelers at a comfort inn with a glow around them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com". who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. nobody glows. he gets it. always the lowest price, guaranteed. book now at choicehotels.com

you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. we need to be ready for my name's scott strenfel and r i'm a meteorologist at pg&e. we make sure that our crews as well as our customers are prepared to how weather may impact their energy. so every single day we're monitoring the weather, and when storm events arise our forecast get crews out ahead of the storm to minimize any outages. during storm season we want our customers to be ready and stay safe. learn how you can be prepared at pge.com/beprepared. together, we're building a better california.

president trump talking trade on twitter saturday tweeting the united states has an $800 billion yearly trade deficit because of our very stupid trade deals and policies. thursday he proposed tariffs on steel and aluminum. and the georgia legislator votes to punish delta airlines for ending a program that gave discounts to members of the nra. republicans killed a tax break that would have saved delta millions of dollars. now back to "dateline."

welcome back to "dateline extra." i'm craig melvin. on the surface paul zumot and jennifer schipsi. here again is keith morrison. >> in the days after the fire on addison avenue, after paul zumot was charged with murder and hauled off to jail, events in palo alto seemed to freeze somehow. in confusion and denial from paul's point of view and unrequited grief from the people who loved jennifer. >> it hurt. it hurt a lot. >> unrequited partly because for some reason, even though he'd been arrested, paul wasn't entering a plea, which is what this was all about. candlelight vigils outside of paul's hookah lounge by jennifer's friends and family. >> we decided to stand in front of his establishment every night until he made his plea.

>> eventually, no surprise, paul did plead not guilty. and prosecutor chuck gillingham found himself sifting through the records of a two-year romance studded with restraining orders, bitter quarrels, scratches, bruises, 911 calls. >> these are two people who had makeups and breakups and she gave verbally as good as she got. >> after one of their flare-ups, paul was ordered to attend anger management classes. went to one the day of the fire, as a matter of fact. so why did people who fought so much stay together for so long. there was an audio recording of jennifer herself. gillingham got hold of it. listen to her explanation. >> he wins your heart so the first couple of months is amazing. sweeps you off your feet. candles everywhere, flowers, not money items but just romancing, sweet talking and parading you around and wanting to introduce you to everybody.

it gets me loving him and admiring him that he admires me, and then it makes me trust his opinion and what he says about me and thinks about me so then as soon as he gets to that point, he flips it and calls me ugly, fat, a gold digger. >> by the way, the person she's talking to is hisham ghanma. one of the brothers he told police she and jennifer were afraid of. here she was confiding in him. mind you, it's a phone conversation that was recorded a few months before the fire, but then she was not happy about paul, not at that point, anyway. >> i have pictures of the damage that he did to all of my furniture. he kicked in my car. somebody saw him at starbucks spit in my face on my way to work. >> but things clearly changed after that. remember, they were all lovey-dovey and paul was even talking marriage the night

before the fire. and now here he was not more than a year later on trial for her murder, listening to the prosecutor take the jury inside the last days of paul's relationship with jennifer. how did gillingham do that? jennifer's cell phone. detectives discovered -- and this was rather curious -- that most of her text message history had been deleted. but law enforcement has changed a lot. it's had to, to keep up with high tech. the palo alto cops managed to find a phone expert all the way across the country in new hampshire who had a very deep look into that cell phone and was able to pull up thousands, literally thousands of deleted text messages between jennifer and paul in the last few months of her life. and, oh, boy. from jennifer, you're nothing but a selfish cold-hearted scam artist liar. furious.

that didn't read like any old quarrel. and the timing? jennifer sent that text to paul right at the end of the elaborate birthday party she threw for him when she had perhaps 12 hours to live. she was so upset about something that she refused to go to the hookah lounge after the party. walked all the way home on a broken heel texting all the way. jennifer -- good, stay away from me. i just got home. paul, i'm staying away this time for good. what a way to end my birthday. >> for jennifer to walk home alone at night with a broken heel and upset, she had to have been -- i don't even know if i've ever seen her that mad. >> but that was the night before. angry messages buzzing back and forth. then, as the cell phone revealed, the pair made love during the night before jennifer's morning text messages

again turned red hot angry. the subject seemed to be a debt she claimed he owed her. >> right around 10:30, 10:45 into 11:16 in the morning she's now referring back to those text messages and telling him, he better bring a check and don't come back or she's going to the san jose police department to file a charge by 3:00 that day. and that's the last text message anyone has with her, the last contact she has ever with anyone. >> and just before noon is when paul lost his temper and choked her to death, drove to a gas station, bought a can of gasoline. later, returned home and torched the house. and somewhere along the way, said the prosecutor, he erased all of those angry text messages she sent him. >> every single one between the defendant and her, every single one is gone. months worth. >> and then paul used jennifer's cell phone to send fake texts to her friends so they believed she was still alive.

to support that claim, he introduced an expert witness who testified that texts from paul's phone and texts from jennifer's phone were hitting some of the same cell towers all afternoon. so her phone must have been right there with him in his car, which is why when she missed a meeting with her friend roy, the texts he got from her didn't make sense. they weren't a sensible response to the message he sent her. in fact, he got the same text twice. >> she didn't show up, and her phone was off. so as soon as i got that repeat text message, i was kind of worried because she wasn't responding to what i was saying. >> jennifer was nowhere to be found. jennifer was dead. >> now what prosecutor gillingham wanted the jury to think about is what happened or didn't happen much later after the fire. here was the scene, house burning, paul standing on the street outside watching the fire.

at this point he supposedly didn't know if jennifer was inside or outside, whether she was alive or dead. but -- in the time that he was there, he made 38 calls and text messages, two of which went to jennifer, and neither occasion did he leave jennifer a message. he left messages for others and spoke with others, text messages, for instance, the same friend multiple times. but in that two-hour period, at no time does he leave that location to look for jennifer perhaps, to go to the other side of the blocked off street. >> you know, if he called her and texted her once, surely that's enough. i mean, she'll call him back. >> the cell phone records actually bear out that he's a person that would call or text her 200 to 300 times a day if he wasn't around her, wasn't able to get ahold of her. his silence especially at the crime scene was deafening. because there was no text

message, and i did say to the jury, he stood at that location because he wanted people to see him there. >> how could the jury be sure that paul was guilty? the prosecutor offered her. remember rosie, the skillful police dog trained to alert to the faintest whiff of accelerant of the sort used in arson fire? she alerted when she smelled some of paul zumot's clothes. suspicious? yes. though, not exactly ironclad evidence. as you'll see, courtesy of paul's high-profile defense attorney, the man famous for defending scott peterson. his name, mark geragos. >> i've had many a client who i have no doubt was capable of the acts that he was accused of. this is just not one of them. coming up -- in the last hours of jennifer's life, something was caught on camera. does it prove paul is not guilty? >> so you had sex last night with her and videoed it? >> yeah. >> anybody who watches this is

never going to have the impression that this was somebody who was ready to kill her. >> when "burning suspicion" continues.

hello, and welcome back to "dateline extra." paul zumot's defense was about to portray him and his relationship with jennifer

schipsi in a whole new light. here again is keith morrison. >> defense attorney mark geragos has made a name for himself defending clients in difficult and highly celebrated cases, not the least, the scott peterson trial. but defending paul zumot would present its own set of challenges. zumot was accused of killing his girlfriend jennifer schipsi and then trying to hide that fact by burning the house down. but as the trial began, he had also been pegged by the prosecution as an abuser, a violent man, an image geragos set out to change. >> they both were passionate, romantic at times, hot at times, as you would characterize it. i don't think it was a one-way street, by any means. >> for a start, geragos tried to weed out possible jury members who might have been unduly swayed by angry text messages or stories about zumot's temper. >> what jurors do or what you want to get a jury to do is to want to help your client and to

kind of walk in the shoes of your client. >> and then when he presented his case, geragos set out to reframe the events after that infamous party the night before the fire. >> the party was at a place and it was for paul's birthday. and it was planned by jennifer and the -- and maybe 14 to 18 of their close friends that were there. and by all accounts at the party, everything was great. >> and the argument later, the angry texts? that was just a way that paul and jennifer always were, said geragos. his proof? after those angry text message exchanges, here's what happened, as zumot described in his police interview. >> we talked, we smoked hookah. everything is fine. we did what we did, you know. and we slept together and we took two xanaxes. she took two more before me and

we went to bed. >> so you slept together that night? >> oh, yeah. made up and then we video ourselves. i mean, honestly, i probably shouldn't be saying that but that's -- her phone, her video. >> so you had sex with her last night and videoed it? >> yeah. >> sure enough. when police looked at jennifer's cell phone, there was a video. she and paul having sex after their fight hours before she was murdered. >> so enthusiastically that anybody who watches it is never going to have the impression or take away from that that this was somebody who was ready to kill her. >> and as for that cell tower evidence that the prosecutor gillingham presented that seemed to show that paul had jennifer's phone with him and sending out fake messages in her name? that was nonsense, says geragos. >> that was one of the pieces of information that was imploded. we went and got the engineer, the actual engineer from the

carrier to come in and say he looked at the evidence and what this guy said was the phone pinging off the same towers was not. it was just merged data from the cell phone. >> why is that important? because, says geragos, the prosecution's own timeline should have cleared paul zumot. investigators said jennifer was strangled several hours before the fire started, and it was lit no earlier than about 6:30 p.m. but early in the afternoon, after paul had left the area, geragos says, jennifer was still alive, sending real, not fake, text messages herself from her phone. >> by all accounts, she was alive at 1:17. >> okay. >> and at 1:17, paul was not at the house. >> so where was paul? trying to pick up paperwork at the palo alto police station and then at the hookah lounge where he appears on security camera

video footage around 1:37 p.m. and then from there he headed to his anger management class about 18 miles away. on the way, he stopped at the restaurant depot seen here on camera around 3:30. so there simply wasn't time in between, said geragos, for paul to go to the cottage, strangle his girlfriend and douse her body with gasoline. a solid alibi, said geragos. his client simply couldn't have killed jennifer, and he couldn't have started the fire. how could he have been in two places at once? and as for rosie, the yellow lab who alerted to a gasoline smell on zumot's clothes, those clothes were sent to the bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms, and they showed no evidence of gasoline at all. >> the atf has a protocol and the atf also put out a protocol

that said you never take a dog alert, a single dog alert and draw a conclusion. and, in fact, if the atf says negative, you should not allow in the dog alert. >> so why would people believe the dog over the atf? >> i think once again you get into this idea that people have dogs, they kind of ascribe supernatural powers to dogs. i have two large dogs and one -- having been through a couple of cases with dog evidence, as much as i love my dogs, i'm certainly not going to want to convict somebody and put their liberty at stake based on dog evidence. >> still, as he presented his case, geragos had a problem. and he knew it. >> what it came down to was the character assassination block of the case. the first two blocks of this case revolved around the -- what so-called scientific evidence, and that was absolutely destroyed. and then you ended up with the

character assassination block. >> the solution? paul zumot himself appears to have demanded it. the chance to defend himself to the jury by testifying. some courtroom observers believe the defense had already created a reasonable doubt that testifying was in fact, risky. especially for paul, said his friend. >> knowing paul the way i know paul and the way he could be interpreted incorrectly, i was very nervous about paul taking the stand. >> riskary not paul was determined to tell the jury his side of the story. coming up -- >> i thought, you know, if there was any way this jury thought this man was responsible for this, now they know for sure that he's not. >> but what did the jury think? when "burning suspicion" continues. i'm so frustrated. i just want to find a used car without getting ripped off. you could start your search at the all-new carfax.com

that might help. show me the carfax. now the car you want and the history you need are easy to find. show me used trucks with one owner. pretty cool. [laughs] ah... ahem... show me the carfax. start your used car search and get free carfax reports at the all-new carfax.com.

he gets the best deal on the perfect hotel by using. tripadvisor! that's because tripadvisor lets you start your trip on the right foot... by comparing prices from over 200 booking sites to find the right hotel for you at the lowest price. saving you up to 30%! you'll be bathing in savings! tripadvisor. check the latest reviews and lowest prices. the toothpaste that helps prevent bleeding gums. if you spit blood when you brush or floss you may have gum problems and could be on the journey to much worse. help stop the journey of gum disease. try parodontax toothpaste.

and now with the conclusion to our story "burning suspicion" once again keith morris. >> defense attorney mark geregos had done what he could to poke holes, arguing the prosecution had no scientific proof or clear evidence zumont was anywhere near jennifer. and he asked if he attacked her, wouldn't she put up a fight? did the prosecution even have a case? paul zumont wasn't going to take any chances. in fact, he wanted to tell his side of the story. a way to show the jury that paul

could in fact interact well with a woman. but those observers were mistaken said geregos. >> well, i generally -- i don't think direct examination was my strong suit, and i was focusing on cross examineination ation o witnesses. >> and then he told them emotion building to a fever pitch how despite their roller coaster relationship he truly loved jennifer. his lawyer presented a love letter, in fact, she'd written to him and he broke down then, a flood of tears. >> i was so relieved. and i thought, you know, if there was any way this jury thought this man was responsible for this, now they know for sure he's not. because it's so obvious to me he's stelling the truth. >> but listening to all of this

with his experienced ear was prosecutor gillingham. you must have been pleased when you heard he was going to testify? >> i think that's an understatement. i was very, very pleased. >> more than that it was a gift said giggingham, an unexpected opportunity. but, well, the prosecutor had him right where he wanted him, questions designed to make paul crack and reveal what gillingham believed to be a red hot temper. >> my plan was for him to go through how had he act when he was angry and go through the questions he could not answer because he'd not considered those questions. >> after three long days in the hot seat paul zumont's testimony was finally over. had he persuaded the jurors that

he was innocent? >> do you feel he got a bit chippy or arrogant? >> i don't think he was arrogant but i think clearly he was angry and exasperated. >> but the jurors once they got the case said they were determined to look a just court theater. >> everyone was very committed to going over the evidence and discussing each of the witnesses and each of the crucial pieces of evidence. it was really encouraging. >> and it was crucial they decided to compare very carefully the different time lines claimed by the prosecution and the defense. >> so we analyzed the time line for the entire day. from his testimony where he said he was and then other pieces of testimony and evidence to either validate or contradict. >> the jury took less than 14 hours and came back with a verdict. guilty. >> all i remember was i heard that word guilty and there was just like this release -- this

release of tension. >> i was very shocked by the verdict. i think a lot of people were shocked by the verdict. because if you saw through the weeks and weeks of trial it's just inconceivable how they could get to the result they got to. >> but to the jurors the issues about text messages and whether paul had jennifer's phone all afternoon wasn't as important as zumont on the stand. that's what made the difference. his tears, for example -- >> sometimes i feel like i'm too cynical, but it was a universityally held opinion i think that the entire jury believed it was a manufactured mome. >> what was the problem with his testimony? >> there were two things that struck me. one was when he broke down on the stand. and to me it didn't seem genuine. and the other portion of his testimony was when he had the opportunity to tell us where he

was and what he was doing he chose to basically lie to us three times. and we were able to prove that he lied to us by the hard evidence that we had with the phone records and with the video surveillance and those items. and i just -- to me that hurt him very badly. >> if he hadn't testified, i can't say for sure but i don't think i could have convicted him. >> at his sentencing an angry paul zumont again protested his innocence but he was sent away for 25 to life for murder and plus eight years for arson. young people were still coming to the cafe to socialize and smoke hookah. paul, gone like the romance that burned too bright before it vanished with its victim in a cloud of smoke. >> and i can still hear her

voice and see her smile, and i know she's -- i know she's here. >> that's all for this edition of dateline extra. i'm craig melvin. thank you for watching. this is a tragedy on top of a tragedy now.