related, i'm actually going to be hosting a "headliners" edition on michael cohen that debuts this sunday night at 9:00 p.m. for the first time on msnbc. that does it for me. thanks for watching "the beat." "hardball with chris matthews" is up next. mission formosc moscow. let's play "hardball." is . good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. tonight we're learning new details about that infamous meeting in june of 2016, between members of the trump campaign and the russians at trump tower. that meeting brought together three top officials from the trump campaign, donald trump jr., paul manafort, and jared kushner, with an entourage of russians, and their associates. and now nbc news is reporting that a key figure in that meeting, russian lawyer natalia

vessel na veselnitskaya has a relationship with a top official previously unknown. she's been in league with the prosecutor general in russia since at least 2014. up until now, she's maintained she's just a private attorney, telling the senate judiciary committee, i operated independently of any governmental bodies. but when confronted with those e-mails, in an interview with nbc's richard engel, she described herself as an informant, in other words, a spy for the top kremlin prosecutor. she's working for the kremlin. here's how engle pressed her about the nature of her kremlin connections. >> reporter: the only reason i'm asking these questions is because of the contacts that you had with the most senior people who are now in our government

. >> you said your relationship with the prosecutor general is, what? >> i'm a spy. anywhere in that interview, veselnitskaya further acknowledged that since 2013, i have been actively communicating with the office of the russian prosecutor general. this is all significant, because the so-called dirt on hillary clinton, which was promised to the trump campaign in that meeting was said to come from the top prosecutor in russia. in other words, she promised to deliver dirt about hillary clinton to the trump people, including family members to help them in the campaign, if they would respond by softening the economic sanctions against moscow. we're talking real collusion here, as an intermediate wrote to donald trump jr. in early june of 2016, the crown prosecutor of russia offered to provide the trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate hillary. trump jr. famously applied, if that's what you say, i love it. that's donald jr. speaking for

his father. the reported subject of the meeting, which took place six days after that exchange was about u.s. sanctions relief to russia. however, the participants have downplayed the significance of the meeting ever since. of course, they have. joining me right now are four msnbc contributors, david corn, the author of a great new book, "russian roulette," jane wine banks, paul butler as well as ken dilanian right here. dave, you just got into chicago. glad you could make the show tonight. this is hot stuff. this pretense that she was an intermediary, you know, i'm a cupid, turns out she's working for the kremlin in delivering promised dirt on hillary in exchange for us easing the economic sanctions. your thought? how does this fit into the context of collusion between trump and the russians? >> it's always been a fiction that she was a private attorney. in the book i did, we noted that

she used to tell people she had fsb connections. this all began because basically, the prosecutor general, the attorney general of russia, sent a message to trump's business partner and miss universe of an oligarch to trump's campaign, to his -- actually, to his son that russia wants to help you. we have a secret plan to help you, we're going to give you dirt on hillary. and the real significance here is that donald trump jr., jared kushner and paul manafort said, bring it on. they signaled that they were willing to conspire with a secret moscow plan to do dirt on hillary. and it was all through this woman. she was working hand in glove with the kremlin, with the top judicial figure in the kremlin, and so there's not a lot -- you know, for trump and others to say, there's nothing to this meeting, there's a lot to this meeting. and we're still learning more about it, even though the house intelligence committee is shut

down. >> paul, if the republicans had this on hillary clinton, that she met with the russians, from moscow, to get dirt on donald trump, in exchange for lessening our economic sanctions against moscow, they would be hanging her by her ankles right now, in times square. i'm being metaphorical here, but they would be going wild. >> absolutely. so we've always known that this meeting is unethical and un-american. now that we know, now we know it was also a crime. so we have a quid pro quo. we have the trump campaign operatives, the pig guns looking for dirt on hillary, and now we know this russian lawyer wasn't just a lawyer, she was a snitch and an agent of the russian government. she's like, what you want? >> i want to get this to you. i'm learning here, the law. i audience if you're involved with assisting a conspiracy, you're a conspirator. >> that's right.

>> russians had conspired to try to allthrow our elections away hillary and to the other guy, trump. and if you assist in that conspiracy by going to a meeting, trying to set down some sort of ground rules for exchanging getting dirt, promises to lift sanctions, that looks to me like assisting the conspiracy. >> yeah. and here's the thing, chris. all you have to do is try. so we already know don jr., kushner and manafort were trying really hard to get dirt. so i think mueller had his predicate case. what is important about this is mueller's super-big decision. he thinks, okay, i have a lot of evidence against kushner and trump jr. and some evidence against the president, the question is, do i bring the case. now it wasn't just talk about collusion, this was actually collusion. that means he brings this case. >> let's get back to joe on this and then i'll get to ken. what do you make of the crime here? it seems to me we're looking for collusion and we see the outlines of it. a quid pro quo meeting being put together by the presidential candidate's son, his

brother-in-law he brings in, he brings in the campaign chairman. i don't know who heavier he could have bring to that meeting. he brought the best dogs he brought to that meeting to to receive the dirt. and then his father, who happens to be the candidate, donald trump, later on spins the whole thick like, all they were doing was talking about, oh, adopting russian kids. i mean, give me a break! it looked to me like -- it looks like a big conspiracy with the republican candidate for president very much involved. your thoughts? >> chris, you're completely right. first of all, there was always the crime of accepting something of value from a foreigner, which is a violation of our campaign laws. that always existed, no matter what you thought. but anybody who didn't think that don jr. told his father immediately, i've been offered dirt on hillary, the russians want to help us defeat her, they want to help you win. now you have the republicans issuing a report today that

challenges that conclusion of the entire community of our intelligence officers, that says that the russians wanted to help defeat hillary and help donald to win. they've challenged that. this is proof that they were there, trying to help donald trump become president of the united states. it shows collusion, it shows a violation of the campaign laws, it was always obvious that she was there as a representative of the government and now she's been caught with her own e-mails and the proof is there. i can't wait to see richard engel's full interview of her. that will be a very exciting thing to watch. >> well, we're going to see a lot more on rachel's show tonight at 9:00. after republicans in the house intelligence committee today released a one-sided report, basically concluded the investigation -- concluding the russian investigation, democrats issued a minority report, detailing several leads that their college refused -- the republicans -- refused to explore. and one of those leads raises new questions about whether donald trump was aware of that

trump tower meeting, something he's publicly denied. two days before that meeting flump tow trump tower, don jr. had two calls from the son of a russian oligarch. his phone records also show a blocked number at 4:27 p.m. between the two calls. trump jr. claimed he did not know who was associated with that blocked number. and clauorey lewandowski told t committee that donald trump's primary residence has a blocked phone line. house democrats note, the majority was unwilling to pursue the matter. ken dilanian, let's talk about this. the lack of appetite for the republicans on the house intelligence committee for digging up the truth is amazing. this paul revere character, nunes, who runs down to the white house to get the talking points, basically, and delivers the talking points back to the west wing. and now he has this whole troupe of followers saying, case closed. and then this woman,

veselnitskaya comes out and says, well, wait a minute, i was an informant for moscow, and i was setting up that meeting, and yes, it was about eveninxchangi information like dirt on hillary for lessening the sanctions. it seems to me they're getting right near the target zone, proving collusion and maybe the president's personal involvement beforehand, as well as afterwards. an accomplice before the fact, not just afterwards, in trying to spin it away. and they say, we're not interested. what do you make of the republicans? >> the incuriosity is incredible. this blocked number is a perfect example of how very valid leads were not followed by the republicans. >> why would they -- >> the democrats were pushing, get the phone records. let's figure out who made this phone call. they wouldn't do it. look, isn't it obvious to all of us that donald trump would have been read in on this meeting? his son, his senior aides are going to have a meeting with rup russians and he doesn't know about it. >> dirt for hillary. >> but it's more complicated than we've been talking about

here. there is no evidence that any meaningful dirt was handed over. >> they were promising it, though. >> they were promising. >> we don't know what mueller thinks yet. let's go to david on this. how important do you believe it is that mueller believes that trump knew before this meetinging that donald trump himself knew about the meeting, not just afterwards when he tried to cover it up. >> i don't know where mueller is, but the thing is, mueller is not the arbitrator here. he has one job, to prosecute crimes. not everything's that's wrong is a crime. and if donald trump is in on this, it makes everything worse. why does it make everything worse? because he and his crew throughout the whole fall and summer of 2016 kept saying that reports about russia attacking the election were nothing but hoaxes. they had evidence, they knew more than anyone else on this panel right now, that the russians were trying to rig the election or do what they can to

help donald trump. yet they kept denying this was happening, and by doing that, whether there was collusion or not, they were aiding or abetting the russian attack on the election, by providing cover for them. whether that's a crime, paul and others can talk to that. but it is, it's basically protecting an act of warfare, and that's betrayal. >> i want to go back -- i think you're right. let's go back to joe on that from the watergate days. nixon, when he had halderman call over to the cia and say, get the fbi off this case, say it has something to do with the bay of pigs, don't get involved, excuse me, it didn't work. nixon still was kicked out of office. so failing in the mission doesn't make you innocent. your thoughts? >> it definitely doesn't. trying is enough. they clearly were ready to accept help from the russians. and i think that it's important to keep in mind, to follow up on something david said, that the congress has a very different role than the prosecutor.

the prosecutor has to look at who has violated existing laws. congress should be looking at what laws do we needed to pass to protect us from future interference in our elections. and they haven't done that. they have not had a serious investigation of what even happened. they are not willing to, as has been pointed out, look at who made the phone call? if there's nothing to hide, why wouldn't they look at that? they need to -- instead of saying there's no collusion, which is music to donald trump's ears, they should have said, we haven't done a full investigation, so we don't know whether there's any collusion or not. because they can't possibly draw that conclusion without having had all the witnesses. they didn't have flynn, they didn't have manafort, they didn't have papadopoulos, they didn't have gates, and they didn't look at this phone number and many other things. so they think the seriously say, to use watergate language, at this point in time, they could say they haven't found collusion, but at this point in

time it's because they haven't looked for it. they didn't want to find it and they haven't. >> okay, let's talk politics for a second. i'm going to go back to, if this was on the other shoe, ten days, eleven days before the election and comey said, we've got to go anthony weiner's laptop because there might be something in there that's classified that accidental his wife, huma abedin, put on that laptop. so instead of getting that information to follow up on, forget that, he had information that hillary clinton had met with the russians to get dirt on donald trump. i'm sorry, that would be a game-changer ten times what that -- in the other direction. trump would have been gone! >> and he would -- >> if you want to get tough on comey. instead of richard engel finding out about the deal who was putting this little cupid operation together, you know, putting them together, between us and -- trump and the russians, imagine that in the hands of a reporter a week and a

half before the presidential election? trump would have died. >> and who trump has to worry about in the hands of is robert mueller. and guess what, mueller already knows. so the house republicans may have been too wimpy to subpoena it will telephone records. we should safely assume that mueller has those. and again, there's another lawyer term called consciousness of guilt, which means if this meeting was so innocent, why did hope hicks and president trump on air force one gin up this false narrative about -- >> about the adoption agency. hah! anyway, i'm going to speak my political sense and you can get the last word in, ken. speaking for -- not that i'm one of them, but i know a lot of them through my relatives, the reagan democrats. the conservative democrats. those who would went for trump, they would have gone the other way 180 if they had found he was dealing with moscow. and if they had gotten the word in time for their election decision. instead of voting, i don't really like hillary, i don't really like trump, would have gone the other way. >> i can't agree more. and it's a travesty we knew all

about the investigation into hillary clinton's e-mails but knew nothing about this other fbi investigation into potential collusion with russia. that's something that james comey and obama administration officials will have to answer for in history. >> they were sitting there looking at anthony weiner's laptop. anyway, thank you, david corn. i'm just being sarcastic, because i love to be that. joan winebanks, thank you. david corn, we tracked you down in chicago, thank you. your book is fabulous. "russian roulette." and ken dilanian, for keeping us honest here at nbc news on this one. coming up, the house intelligence committee led by trump crony, crony, toady, devin nunes. nunes must mean something like knows nothing. didn't bother to fully investigate allegations of collusion between the trump campaign and russia. i noticed that. so why should anyone believe their so-called report released today? that there wasn't any collusion, that was their conclusion, no collusion. well, there's one person hailing that report. guess what, donald trump loves

it. he loves what the republicans covered up. and now he's calling for an end to the investigation by the democrats and mueller. plus, a your breakthrough today between the korean -- the koreas, as the leaders of north and south korea vow end to their war and denuclearize the korean peninsula. and why do so many people in trump's orbit end up damaged goods? that's the question "the new york times is asking after a record number of trump associates find themselves in legal, professional, and personal trouble. finally, let me finish tonight with trump watch. this is "hardball," where the action is. when you can do it out there. with this clever little app called audible. you can listen to the stories you love while doing the things you love, outside. everyone's doing it she's binging... they're binging... and... so is he. so put on your headphones, turn on audible and binge better.

we can'twhy?y here! flat toilet paper! i'll never get clean! way ahead of you. charmin ultra strong. it cleans better. it's four times stronger and you can use less. enjoy the go with charmin. that skills like teamwork, attention to detail, and customer service are critical to business success. the kind of skills, that work for you. well, president trump says he may travel to israel next month for the opening of the u.s. embassy there in jerusalem. trump made the announcement while standing next to german chancellor angela merkel, one of the world leaders opposed to moving from embassy from tel aviv to jerusalem. trump declined to say who else would attend the embassy opening, although his son-in-law, jared kushner and

ivanka are also expected at the event. the embassy is set to open on may 14th. we'll be right back. p of mind. that's because they have a shield annuity from brighthouse financial, which allows them to take advantage of growth opportunities in up markets, while maintaining a level of protection in down markets. so they're less concerned with market volatility and can focus more on the things they're passionate about. talk with your advisor about shield annuities from brighthouse financial- established by metlife. this one's below market price and has bluetooth. same here, but this one has leather seats! use the cars.com app to compare price, features and value.

welcome back to "hardball." when the house intelligence committee was created back in 1977, the speaker of the house, then tip o'neill vowed it would be a nonpartisan committee with nothing partisan about its deliberations. well, nearly 40 years later, that partnershbipartisan is sho. today they gave president trump the exoneration he's been clamoring for. >> but the report was very powerful, very strong. there was no collusion between the trump campaign and the russian people. as i've said many times before, i was very honored by the report. it was totally conclusive, strong, powerful. many things said that nobody knew about and said in a very strong way. they were very forceful in

saying that the clinton campaign actually did contribute to russia. so maybe somebody ought to look at that. >> well, the report from the republicans on the intel committee takes the intelligence community, the clinton campaign, and the fbi to ask, while ultimately determining there's no evidence of collusion wh whatever between the trump campaign and moscow. democrats responded, accused republicans in engaging in a systemic attempt to muddy the waters and deflect attention away from the president. all 13 republican members of the committee signed off on the report, while republican mike conway has been the public face of the russia investigation, chairman devin nunes has been calling the shots from behind the scenes. nunes who served as president trump's congressional toady poisoned the bipartisan nauture of the bipartisan committee in march of 2016 when he took his midnight run down to the white house. information he characterized himself. meanwhile, the senate intelligence committee continued

its bipartisan investigation with no end in sight. i'm joined by u.s. congressman, joaquin castro of texas, he's a democrat, and a member of the house permanent committee on intelligence. sk and eli stokols. congressman, there are some good members on the republican side. why are they going along with the toadyism of saying, this investigation is over, when we have all of this new information coming in about moscow connections. peter king, why is he doing this? he's independent. why are they toadies? >> you make a great point, chris. a that personally, there are a lot of good people on the other side of the aisle that are republicans, serious legislators. but i think it's more comfortable for them to basically protect the president. because this investigation was like a kindergarten investigation. it was a light once-over where witnesses were brought in. they gave us their version of events. the committee refused to issue any subpoenas to verify anything they told us at all. and then they said, okay, great,

guys, we're all done. wrote the report, and here we are. >> when you look over at your republican colleagues and you're all at one level politicians and you know you have you have to get re-elected and all of that. do they just giggle -- i'm showing them, by the way. i want everyone to pay attention that some of these guys and women are in tough races and they should be. these are all the toadies. the cover-up artists. it's embarrassing! and they come from new jersey and new york. they're not all from the red part of the country. there's no excuse with this kind of behavior. and they're saying, case closed. >> yeah. >> what do you think of the argument, case closed? just that? what do you make of it? they don't need anymore information about a russian connection, it's over. >> it's basically a hear no evil, see no evil maneuver. >> or evil. >> yeah. and most of all, chris, it's a disservice to the american people. the american people deserve a fair and thorough and honest investigation and they didn't get it. >> let me flip this around. tip o'neill, the reason he started the intelligence committee, he was tired of the

cia giving him all of this information. he didn't want to have it in his head. he put it in the hands of a bipartisan committee so there could be some kind of check on what the intelligence agencies were doing without giving it what e. but to be bipartisan about it. nancy pelosi the other day, i just said, there's going to be impeachment, it's got to be bipartisan. they've got to work together. >> and there have been some republicans, a few, who have used the word impeachment in saying, if the president goes so far as to fire the special counsel, meddle in the justice department, it would lead to impeachment. they're saying that word out loud, but those people are still outlie outliers. on the republican side, by and large, what you have is people who look at the incentive structure politically and see more reason to just keep their heads down than there is reason to stand up for the constitution and the system of checks and balances. >> one argument could be made that because he gets a complete clean bill of goods from the republicans, they say he's fine.

and then when the democrats and mueller continues to investigate, he'll say, well, i've got to fire mueller now. this may be a pretext for firing mueller. >> there's no question, i think the president is looking for a reason to be able to get rid of bob mueller and really, with i think anybody who would do a thorough and fair investigation and bob mueller certainly seems like he's doing that. but that's what the american people deserve. >> you've been watching this. and i want eli on this. what do you think is the most fertile ground? we've been looking at a lot of information about possible collusion, what looks like a quid pro quo meeting there? where do you see an impeachable offense most likely emerging? let me ask the congressman first on the committee. you're looking at all of this stuff. >> i think probably obstruction of justice would probably be the strongest thing. there's the issues potentially of money laundering and collusion, of course. but for a congress to act, probably obstruction of justice. >> eli, where do you see it?

>> well, i'm not on the committee, but talking to people around the president, what they're worried about more than anything else is the obstruction of justice case. neb they say, oh, it's a flimsy case. he didn't know what he was doing. he didn't mean to obstruct justice. that's the things they tell themselves. but that is where the fear is among those defending the president and close to the president. >> but would that be enough to move to the middle in the congress? obstructio obstruction? it would have to be collusion. >> honestly, right now, chris, i just -- i don't see it. remember, you've got to gate two-thirds vote of the senate. two-thirds vote of the senate. >> how about getting a majority in the house? >> you know -- >> if you take the house this november? >> then it's possible. i think that's possible. but, you know, you've still got to go get two-thirds of the senate and that will still be a big mountain to climb. now, i am hopeful for some of these republicans that after they get passed their midterm -- i'm sorry, once they get past their primary elections, that they're going to be more willing

to buck president trump, because right now, rather than taking on the president, what wave seen and eli and i were talking about this, rather than taking on the president, they decided to get out of the game. they decided to retire. so instead of taking him on, they're basically leaving. >> i think you're right. except the guys on their way out the door. and the ones that are out the door, whether it's charlie dent or flake from arizona or corker or it's ryan costello, you can tell a guy is about to leave, because he starts talking trash against this president. but it takes that, the door. they've got the see the door before they tell the truth. anyway, u.s. congressman joaquin castro, a future star, already a star of the democratic party of texas. and thank you, eli stokols. up next, the leaders of north and south korea hold an unprecedented summit. vowing to work towards denuclearization of the korean peninsula. it's a major breakthrough. it was something to see those guys. we'll show it again. for those who fought in the korean war, they must be overwhelmed by what they're

watching here. because both sides fought very hard in that war. this is "hardball," where the action is. then i learn type 2 diabetes puts me at greater risk for heart attack or stroke. can one medicine help treat both blood sugar and cardiovascular risk? i asked my doctor. she told me about non-insulin victoza®. victoza® is not only proven to lower a1c and blood sugar, but for people with type 2 diabetes treating their cardiovascular disease, victoza® is also approved to lower the risk of major cv events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. while not for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight. (announcer) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck or symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing, or swallowing.

serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. change the course of your treatment. ask your doctor about victoza®.

ayep, and my teeth are yellow.? time for whitestrips. crest glamorous white whitestrips are the only ada-accepted whitening strips proven to be safe and effective. and they whiten 25x better than a leading whitening toothpaste. crest. healthy, beautiful smiles for life. we're all under one roof now. congratulations. thank you. how many kids? my two. his three. along with two dogs and jake, our new parrot. that is quite the family. quite a lot of colleges to pay for though. a lot of colleges. you get any financial advice? yeah, but i'm pretty sure it's the same plan they sold me before. well your situation's totally changed now. right, right. how 'bout a plan that works for 5 kids, 2 dogs and jake over here? that would be great. that would be great. that okay with you, jake? get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change

from td ameritrade investment management. do you feel like it's your responsibility for this to eventually get settled between north and south korea? >> i think i have a responsibility. i think other presidents should have done it. i think the responsibility has fallen on the shoulders of the president of the united states. and i think we have -- i think i have a responsibility to see if

i can do it. and if i can't do it, it will be a very tough time for a lot of countries and a lot of people. >> welcome back to "hardball." president trump responded to the dramatic news from the korean peninsula earlier today when the leaders of north and south korea pledged to end the state of war between their two countries and work toward complete denuclearization. it was an historic moment, there it is, powerful symbolism. for the first time since the korean war in the early '50s, the leader of north korea stepped over the border to enter the south p. then the south's president stepped into the north. president trump said he was encouraged by today's events. this morning, he tweeted, "korean war to end. the united states and all of its great people should be very proud of what is now taking place in korea." this afternoon, president trump played coy on the question of whether he has spoken to kim jong-un yet, but he sounded an optimistic note about his upcoming meeting with the north korean leader. let's watch and listen.

>> you said that the relationship with north korea has been, uh, strong, or one of the words you used. have you spoken with kim jong-un himself or do you plan on speaking with him -- >> i don't want to comment on that. >> do you plan on speaking with him -- >> but we have a very good working relationship. we're setting up a meeting. things have changed very radically from a few months ago. you know the name calling and a lot of other things. we get a kick every once in a while out of the fact that i'll be watching people that fail so badly over the last 25 years explaining to me how to make a deal with north korea. i get a big, big kick out of that. but we are doing very well. i think something very dramatic could happen. >> i'm joined by gordon chang, a columnist for the daily beast, and shelby holliday, politics reporter for the "wall street journal." mr. chang, how's it look? it looked good. >> i think it's looking pretty good. at least right now, we have a pathway to denuclearization. there's going to be a lot of

bumps on this road, because we've got to remember, in 1992, north and south korea agreed to denuclearization of the peninsula and less than two years after that, they almost went to war. that was the time of the agreed framework, which settled that. so, you know, this is -- kim has certainly got a play book. it's not something we're going to like. >> well, what's not to like of him getting rid of his nukes? >> oh, well, that's perfect. but we're not exactly sure that that's what he's thinking right now. he's probably thinking he can get sanctions relief from either moon jae-in, the south korean president, or from president trump himself, before he has to finally give up all his weapons. that's going to be the issue. who goes first, denuclearization of sanctions relief? >> but couldn't we put a string on it, and say, the sanctions go back in, they go back in the second you fail to meet the deadline of getting rid of your nukes? >> we could do that, but trump has said, and i think he's right, first of all, north korea has got to give up its weapons, and then we can do all kinds of

things, diplomatic recognition, sanctions relief -- >> your bet on that? this guy that actually lax like rocket man skpaand acts like ro man, he doesn't want to give up his claim to fame? he's got nuclear weapons. >> he doesn't want to. but this is not an issue of what kim wants. this is a question of whether trump will use the elements of american power to disarm kim. we can do that short of the use of force. and so, therefore, it's a trump question, more than a kim question. >> you know, let me -- shelby, trump is dancing on this thing. hays hot dogging it, obviously. he can't even answer a straight question. they ask him a good question, he keeps dumping on w. and dumping on obama. he can't avoid going ego nuts on this thing, but he is making it happen, it seems. >> well, he thinks he's making it happen. >> do you think there's a dynamic working here? >> he's very well aware of the fact that they were hurling threats on each other on twitter

and in official statements and now he's become the biggest cheerleader for this summit. and i think we focus a lot on president trump's negative tweets, but he is also a great cheerleader on twitter when he wants to be. >> yesterday, president trump applauded it was his tough rhetoric towards north korea that caused kim jong-un's change in attitude. let's listen to that again. >> right. >> look, it was very, very nasty, you know, with little rocket man with the buttons and my button's -- everybody said, this guy's going to get us into nuclear war! let me tell you, the nuclear war would have happened if you had weak people. >> how do you distill serious policy making from the carnival barker language he uses. like he's got a striped suit n n and waving a pole, outside of a tent, trying to get people come inside the tent for five bucks? that's the way he talks. what do you make of the policy of a little scare talk? >> the more important thing was the sanctions.

trump really enforced sanctions and he went to the skpun tightened those as well. and we have a lot of evidence that kim is running out of money. for instance, the south koreans say that north korea will run out of foreign exchange reserves by october. i don't think it's that dire, but nonetheless, we can show there's a lot of anecdotal evidence that kim needs money. >> but i also think that president trump is taking credit for that, as well. web he believes his tough talk with china brought china to the table to tighten the screws on north korea. i don't think we can discount president trump's role in making all of this happen. i will say, he's being very ambiguous for a reason. whether it's nafta, whether it's chinese trade practices, the president doesn't really say what he wants out of something. and that allows him to go into a summit and maybe claim the victory. >> thank you. i have so many thoughts -- we'll have to have you back miami trying to figure out what kim wants. does he want to have all of korea? >> yes, that's kim family policy for seven decades. >> i have to assume he's still heading that way. he's like jerry adams the northern ireland. i can get it all.

thank you. up next, the danger of being flump in trump's orbit. as "the new york times points out, it's become a way of ruining people's reputation. you know, lay down with dogs, you get fleas. and way do so many people in trump's circle end up becoming damaged goods? do you notice? you're watching "hardball." rtie. we all understand that this president would be replaced by another republican. this is much bigger than washington politics. it's about the safety and security of our country. no one is above the law. join us at needtoimpeach.com. let's tell congress that if they won't do something, we'll elect new representatives who will.

if yor crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current treatment hasn't worked well enough, it may be time for a change. ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. pml, a rare, serious, potentially fatal brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. this condition has not been reported with entyvio. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections or have flu-like symptoms or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's treatment isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.

these are the specialists we're proud to call our own. experts from all over the world, working closely uh learn more at cancercenter.com we need to help more tocalifornians get ahead.d, that's why antonio villaraigosa brought both parties together to balance the state budget with record investments in public schools... and new career training programs. as mayor of la, he brought police and residents together to get illegal guns off the streets and keep kids out of gangs, and on the right path. that's antonio villaraigosa. a governor for all of california. i we worked with pg&eof to save energy because wenie. wanted to help the school. they would put these signs on the door to let the teacher know you didn't cut off the light. the teachers, they would call us the energy patrol. so they would be like, here they come, turn off your lights!

those three young ladies were teaching the whole school about energy efficiency. we actually saved $50,000. and that's just one school, two semesters, three girls. together, we're building a better california. . ronny jackson, admiral, doctor, is one of the finest men that i've met over the last long period of time. high quality. high-quality family. i just met them. and i explained what happened. i explained that washington can be a very mean place. >> welcome back to "hardball." that was president trump today talking about admiral ronny jackson, his failed nominee for va secretary. well, jackson this week joined a long list of trump

administration officials who have seen their once-sterling reputations marred by scandal. as "the new york times" reported, for many, life can be can leave you bloody. tony schwartz tells "the times," people are not people to him, they're instruments of his ego. and when they serve his oego, they survive. and when they don't, they pass into the night. that ego was on full display at the white house today. and that's coming up next with the "hardball" roundtable. it can lead you on an unexpec ted journey... ...to discover your heritage. get ancestrydna for just $59. the lowest price of the year. jushis local miracle ear t at helped andrew hear more of the joy in her voice. just one hearing test is all it took for him to hear more of her laugh... and less of the background noise around him. for helen, just one visit to her local miracle-ear is all it

took to learn how she can share more moments with her daughter. just one free hearing test could help you hear more... laughter...music...life... call now for your free hearing test from an industry leader: miracle-ear.

welcome back to "hardball." president trump today said his failed nominee for va secretary, admiral ronny jackson, was brought down by false accusations. and in classic trump style, the president found a way to link jackson's treatment to his own troubles. >> i called him today, i said, in a certain way, you're -- in a very big way, you're an american hero. because you've exposed a system for some horrible things. i've had it happen to me with the russian collusion hoax. it's a hoax. but i came into the job understanding that things happen. he didn't. he's a great doctor, he's a great admiral. he didn't really think a thing like this could happen. and i think it's a disgrace. >> let's bring in the "hardball"

roundtable. jason johnson is politics editor of theroot.com and msnbc political contributor. dan everheart is a fund-raiser and annie linskey is national reporter for "the globe," "the boston globe," pronounced as that. "boston globe." i want to start with you, annie. this, trump, he does bring it back to himself. but it does seem to be, this is a messy game being a trumpy. zpl >> it really is. the amount of turnover "the times" revealed in that story, it's stunning to be reminded of that. and there do seem to be two buckets of people who get chewed up in this trump machine. there are people who come in with this sterling reputation and trump hangs them out to dry in some way. >> examples? >> rex tillerson is the best wing. and then you also have people who really weren't perhaps ready for prime-time and that becomes revealed when they're on the national stage. and the -- you know, the combination therein, you know,

having -- you're seeing so much turnover. >> dan, anybody look better than they came in? anybody looks better now than when they came in the door? >> i think rick perry has done fine. i think secretary perdue has done fine. i think nikki haley looks better. i think her stature has been enhanced. i think mike pence -- >> anybody in the white house circle look better now than they did coming into the white house? close in? anybody near the trumps that look better than when they came in. hah! >> i would say. >> you've got all the time you need. who looks good in the white house? >> mike pence. >> oh, in the white house, okay, fine. he's an elected official, go ahead. >> here's the thing. looking good means -- >> i'll give you time to think about it. >> any left the white house tomorrow and decided i was going to run for congressman or state senator in my home state, would that help me on my resume? and i would say almost nobody. there aren't a lot of people who could leave this administration and go back to any of -- any those purple states, any those

states that flipped red and said, hey win spent time in the trump administration, elect me. it's been a millstone. >> i'm thinking about the guys who came in with their own scent to begin with. roger stone with his reputation as -- you know, what do you call it? troublemaker. >> bannon, for example. >> bannon was known as a trouble guy. >> yeah. >> and trump seems to like those guys. and corey lewandowski, you know, going in, with going out, about the same. >> price is another example of someone who -- >> reince priebus came in as the party chairman, goes out as the guy who failed. >> i think there's a lot of people -- >> you've got time. >> -- that have succeeded in the trump administration. >> in the white house? >> kellyanne conway? >> you think she's looking good? >> yeah. >> i think she's done a marvelous job. i think her credibility has been enhanced. i also think the media -- >> her credibility? >> not a chance! not a chance! >> her credibility has been actually shredded. she's the one who came up with the term alternative facts. no one who is associated with

alternative facts can be considered a respected person when they leave this white house. sebastian gorka, steve bannon. people leave this white house and they are tainted. they're tainted by the man who is at the top who is sitting in the executive office right now. i don't see how anybody benefits coming from this place, unless you're going to a place that is ideologically in line with this president, and that is a shrinking number of locations. >> i don't think they're tainted by people -- i don't think they're tainted by their association with trump. i think that certain people have got -- have been unable to keep up with the pressure and the pace. i think trump moves at the pace of business. i think it's different from government and it's caused a lot of consternation in washington. >> i would say marc short would be one person who i think has done a really good job sort of keeping his head down -- >> marc short? >> yeah, he's a legislative director in the white house. he came from sort of the coke world. >> former pence chief of staff. >> rob porter. >> yeah, that's in the other category. >> it just seems to be a problem. >> there's also the -- >> do you need to think about this? >> how many people work in the

white house in the old executive office building? you know, we know about the 10 or 15 or 30 people that the media puts up on the screen as the fallen angels. >> because they're the top people. >> but they're not all the top people. they're some of the top people. and there's another what, 500 people that work in the old executive office building. >> do you think sycophancy is a problem in this administration? where you have to bow down really below trump for him to like you? did you in any way become a cla colleague -- and i'm not sure he's the only guy like this in politics. but he seems to dislike it very much if anyone gets any ink besides him. >> you see this video of the whole table, almost like an old mob movie, of telling him how great he is before he starts signing bill and doing work. that doesn't end up being beneficial to you long-term. >> especially when he's walking around like robert de niro twirling the bat and waiting to see whose head gets knocked out. >> that was the image i liked. it wasn't the last supper, it's more like -- it's like -- let me

think of the movie. i think it's "the untouchables." i heard it in my ear, but i knew it before i heard it. up next, these three will tell me something i don't know. you're watching "hardball." from capital one. with it, i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. everything. what's in your wallet? hello. let's go for a ride on a peloton. let's go grab a couple thousand friends and chase each other up a hill. let's go make a personal best, then beat it with your personal better than best. let's go bring the world's best instructors right to you. better yet, let's go bring the entire new york studio - live. let's go anytime, anywhere, with anyone who's willing. and let's go do it all right here. ready to go? peloton.

♪ most people come to la with big dreams. ♪ we came with big appetites. with expedia, you can book a flight, hotel, car, and activity... ...all in one place. ♪ everything you need to go. expedia but prevagen helps your brain with an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to improve short-term memory.

prevagen. the name to remember. we're back with the "hardball" roundtable. jason, tell me something i don't know. >> so -- >> did you hear that? >> yes. so, of course, you know everybody wait s too long to be in line. but there's a commission that's supposed to address this. the presidential commission on election administration held a conference this weekend, this week in d.c. and they said the best times to vote in america are right at 12:00 and right at 5:00. so if you want to protect democracy, take an early lunch. >> 12:00 and 5:00. >> dan, what's the time for republicans to vote? they vote during the day, because they own all the businesses, they can decide wherever they want to vote. just a thought. go ahead. >> yeah. so governor rick scott has reduced the debt of the state of florida by one third. i think that shows that it can be done. >> you're not here promoting him, are you?

>> that's not a prediction, that's a promotion. that's the problem with these partisan people. i get your point. >> chris, as you know, this weekend is white house correspondents' association dinner. >> how can i forget? my 50th. >> it's only my third. and so -- i don't believe your viewers know who "the boston globe's" guest is. >> they will now. >> yes, they will. we are bringing somebody back from season one of the trump administration, so she will be in town again for this event, omarosa. >> omarosa. >> yeah. >> that's a great get. >> yeah. >> thank you, jason johnson, eberhart and annie linskey. need a change of scenery?

the kayak explore tool shows you the places you can fly on your budget. so you can be confident you're getting the most bang for your buck. alo-ha. kayak. search one and done.

trump watch friday, april 27th, 2018. let's talk about collusion. collusion between the donald trump presidential campaign and the russian government. we know that moscow tried tilting the 2016 presidential election in favor of donald trump. and tonight we learned of a new reason to believe that the russian government sought to give dirt on hillary clinton to the trump family, perhaps in exchange for a commitment to

lift economic sanctions. we already knew about the readiness of donald trump jr., son-in-law jared kushner, and campaign honcho, paul manafort to accept that promised dirt. i've said for months how strange this russian connection is. i've been following american politics for my entire career and have never come across a candidate or a family with such an appetite for the east. what is it about donald trump that drives him ever eastward? his miss universe contest in moscow, his desire to build a trump tower in moscow. his readiness to hire on so many people with russian connections. is it the huge amount of money in the poest-soviet union, all those oligarchs with money looking to put it somewhere. it's not clear if robert mueller will find trump guilty of collusion, but it's hard to believe that there was nothing meaningful about the meeting that occurred in trump tower that brought together agents of moscow with three top trump people to talk about trading dirt on hillary for a softer u.s. line on putin and his

oligarchs. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. all"all in with chris hayes" sts right now. >> there was no collusion with russia,.you can believe this one. >> as the president spins. >> she probably can't believe it. >> the pretext of the meeting was, hey, i have information about your opponent. >> new reporting that the russian lawyer from the trump tower meeting had much deeper kremlin ties than we ever knew. >> plus, what paul manafort's big loss in court means for the mueller probe. and why the sudden pause in the stormy suit. and the growing firestorm over paul ryan's decision to fire the house chaplain. >> may their efforts these days guarantee that there are not winners and losers under new tax laws. and as the president celebrates -- >> i get a big, big kick out of that. >> -- what to make of the historic peace talks between north