another's word. we moe tknow the president is lg with this i and i alone policy. the market saying maybe president trump isn't listening. these are president trump's views. president trump might not have a lot of views on health care, for example. he's got a lot of views on trade and business. he is very against amazon. he thinks if i'm going to go against amazon and i will bring back mom and pop stores. the president's sensibility in business and all else is out dated. we don't have the big stick that we once did. he can go into the president with a much longer view than the president who does have to worry about trump states. >> that's it for us. thank you for watching this hour. i'll be back here at 3:00 p.m. here is andrea mitchell.

right now, question time. the list of reported questions that robert mueller wants to ask the president as passed along to his lawyers and reported by the new york times. showing the focus of this investigation for the first time. >> more than half of these questions are about obstruction. they are about actions the president took since he came into office. idiot proof. detailing how john kelly talks about the president behind closed doors in the west wing. with kelly making no secret of how he feels about being chief of staff. >> i did something wrong and god punished me, i guess. seeking shelter. more than 100 migrants, mostly women and children in search of asylum. the trump administration allows only eight people to cross. >> many call this the point of no return.

a desperate journey with one last roadblock that may be impossible to pass. good day. president trump is lashing out in response to two big stories. first on the front page of the new york time, a reported list of 49 questions read by bob muell mueller's investigators to the president's lawyers. one question about what the president knows about paul manafort reaching out. mr. trump's chief of staff slamming his boss behind closed doors calling his boss an idiot on several occasions.

we begin with the russia investigation and new york times. welcome both. matt, first to you. tell us about the story and what it tells you. how does it inform you about the direction of the mueller probe as we understand it. >> my colleague and i spent all of yesterday pouring over those questions. one of things that jumped oult to us is just how perilous this interview is. you can get a sense from reading these one after another, why there was such concern among the president's lawyers about putting him in a room with prosecutors and these open ended

questions and obviously one question leads to another question. what did you do when you -- what did you think when you saw fbi director comey testify? then what happened. pretty soon you're down an avenue and this is a president who is obviously known for hi hyperbole and saying things that aren't true. there's a real risk. you can see from the list where the pitfalls were. >> one of the questions popped out was "what knowledge did you have of any outreach by your campaign including to paul manafort to russia about assistance to the campaign?" that issue had never been raised publicly in any of the previous stories or testimony. we know lots of evidence between

russias and the campaign. the campaign reaching out asking for assistance. one of the things we did find was there was a story on cnn that actually referenced some intercepts that the united states had obtained in which russian officials were talking about the fact that manafort had sought their assistance. that's not something that got a lot of traction. that's the only sign or indication that might be what bob mueller is talk about. >> there was another questions, what did you do in reaction to the march 20th meeting with intelligence officials with coats and the cia director. how did you follow up? what do you think the

significance of that could be? >> that's another one. we know that after james comey testified and revealed the scope of the fbi investigation there was some pressure applied by the president to try to get dan coats, the director of national intelligence to try to put some pressure on comey to slow down that investigation or maybe limited scope. this was the first we heard where they said what did you think and what did you do when you learned that the special counsel was going to talk to your top intelligence officials. now, it's possible, of course, that's just an open ended question. bob mueller is just curious. more likely the investigators have obtained some information from those intelligence officials or others they've interview second-degred at the that made them intrigued. >> that's a perfect segue to ask barbara. what do you think they're going after? this is part of a negotiation

trying to get lawyers and the president to agree to an interview. so many of these questions have to do with his time in office and with possible obstruction charges, right? not with the russia probe. >> i think so. more than half relate to what appears to be obstruction of justice, there's still a sizable number of questions that relate to russian interference. a significant portion are about obstruction. it doesn't surprise me they are asking questions about what did you know? what were you thinking? a key element and the hardest element to prove in obstruction of justice is someone's corrupt intent. this is president trump's opportunity to tell his side of the story. no doubt robert mueller has gathered a lot of evidence from other witnesses and documents and circumstantial evidence of fact to put together a strong

case there is obstruction of justice going on here. this is president trump's opportunity to tell his side of the story. if he doesn't want to avail himself of it, it seems robert mueller had sufficient evidence to go forward with the charge. >> very likely this did not come from the mueller team. this came from people who had been briefed wi t eed by the no who are were the president's lawyers or related to that side of the case. how does it relate to the fact that john dowd resigned at some point for these questions were specified? >> that's really intriguing. i would love to ask matt that question and i know he won't tell us the answer. it seems unlikely this came from robert mueller's camp. he has his reputation for being tight lipped. i don't see how it advances his

cause for the world to see the questions. i think president trump's tweets suggest a strategy of trying to demonstrate it's about obstruction of justice. it seems consistent with that strategy. now that rudy giuliani is on board they have a different outlook on how to pursue the strategy. that's one speculation as to how these came into the public view. >> doesn't it make it -- weigh in on that first. >> sure. you know probably as well as anybody in washington that when you break a story, it triggers some sort of parlor game to try to guess a source. we weren't trying to be cute with this. we put -- we got this information from somebody who was not involved in the trump legal team. obviously, we were not trying to be cute on that.

we also said that these were orally briefed to trump's lawyers and were put in a document. yeah, obviously, that's the origins of this and we're trying to protect the people who are helping us tell the public what's going on. >> barbara, doesn't it make it clear the president while not a target, because technically he can't be a target if mueller is following the office of legal counsel guidance that he cannot be indicted while in office. he's not a target but he clearly, from these questions, it's about what did you know? what did you do at that time? what was your thinking? he's a subject. >> absolutely. the definition of a subject is someone whose conduct comes in the scope of an investigation. it's quite clear this is the person we're going to charge we're you're a target.

i think the fact that he's a subject is not surprising. i agree with you that these questions indicate he's not just a witness here. they're not just interested in what he observed but what he did. >> thank you so very much. matt congratulations to you. you've done it again. way to go. we have breaking news this hour involving two key figures in president trump's past. his long time personal doctor in new york and the former director of oval office operations was his top assistant before that and has since left. anna, you had done the first interview with the doctor in new york. now what is he telling you about what happened more than a year ago after the new york times published some interviews that he had done. >> we feels spurned. there were three men that showed up at his office and took all of president trump's medical

records. they were unannounced and he feels that didn't really have to happen. they were under lock and key. a person familiar with the incident says that there was a letter from the white house doctor at the time, ronnie jackson. >> the letter from ronnie jackson asking for the president's records. this came after the new york times, the doctor lawrence altman who has covered presidential medical records for decades. writing with interviews on the record for the first time revealing that the president takes a number of medications including propecia for hair growth. a prostate medication that can promote hair growth. >> that's right. the story published on february 1st and february 3rd, three representatives of trump went to pick up the medical records.

>> including keith shiler who was the director of oval office operations. >> that's right. it was early in the morning. they showed up unannounced asking for the records and even a photo of donald trump and dr. bornstein together hanging on the wall in the waiting room wads taken down. he says they asked him to take that picture down. >> let me play a bit of your interview just now. >> what were they looking for? >> methdical records, pictures. anything i could find. they must have been here for 25 or 30 minutes. it created a lot of chaos. i couldn't believe anybody was making a big deal about a drug that's to grow his hair which seemed to be so important. it's not a breach of medical trust to tell somebody they take propecia to grow their hair. what's the matter with that?

>> this doctor, he's been way very public about the president's medical conditions. you can understand, i think, how someone going to a doctor would not want the doctor to talk about it without being authorized. >> i think that's right. i think dr. bornstein felt spurned. he was his doctor for 35 years. he didn't get the job in the white house. he wasn't communicated with the president after the election. he did start to talk about it. when the gentlemen showed up, he calls it a raid. that characterization is disputed but he calls it a raid. >> thank you very much. now to our nbc news exclusive reporting on john kelly's private criticisms of the commander in chief.

taking a page from rex tillerson who called the president a moron and never recovered. ended up being fired. four witnesses say john kelly has called mr. trump an idiot on multiple occasions. the chief of staff pushing back hours after saying in part i spend more time with the president than anyone else and we have an incredibly candid and strong relationship. he knows where i stand and he and i know this story is total bs. president trump weighing in on twitter writing the fake news is going crazy making up false stories and using only unnamed sources who don't exist. joining me nbc white house correspondent kristen welker and nbc national political reporter. kristen, first to you on whether or not john kelly gets passed this given he was already on thin ice no matter what they say. >> reporter: it's a good question and remains to be seen. you saw the very firm pushback from the chief of staff and from

the president i wouldn't be surprised if sarah sanders pushes back vigorously from the podium today. we know, based on our conversations with a number of current and former white house officials and administration officials, that in addition to disparaging the president behind his back, john kelly has made some comments that have concerned some of the female staffers, including saying they are more emotional than men can be. this is raised some real concerns. adding to all of that and compoundsing all of this is there's been some real tensions between the chief of staff and the president when it comes to determining staffing decisions, for example. policy choices and messaging. there's been some tensions that are at the backdrop to all of this. is john kelly leavleaving. a number of white house officials say july marks his one year since taking this position. would that be a time for him to go. they are look at that date very

closely to see if there's any potential moves around that time. others say there's no way to know. there's been a lot of speculation surrounding a number of different white house officials. sometimes it's right. sometimes it's wrong. there is broad agreement that his standing has really dimin h diminished. a lot of folks feel it's important to have a strong chief of staff. >> another part of that is his defense of rob porter and diminishing of women saying porter needed to be restored, rehabilita rehabilitated. what can you tell us about that? >> there are two things going on here. the president's relationship with the white house staff and kelly's relationship with the white house staffer a and kelly relationship with the president. there were many senior officials in the white house who felt like kelly was saying one thing or putting forward a story publicly in one way and then doing things

differently behind the scenes. there was this disconnect between what he was saying and what he was doing. they told us that he was -- he was saying during that time he had access to information that others didn't about porter's marriages and what he was seeing didn't match up with the stories that had come out about rob porter and he really defended him for many hours after the first story published where kelly then went to senior officials and said you can tell everybody that i moved to fire him within an hour which really just took a lot of senior staff by surprise. >> and courtney, we've seen a lot of disconnects where kelly doesn't seem to be involved. he wasn't there for the call with vladmir putin. he doesn't seem to have that key, the pivotal role that he

had previously especially connecting back and forth with defense secretary mattis on important foreign policy decisions. >> that's absolutely right. you know kristen mentioned a diminished role. that's what our reporting found. john kelly was brought into this white house about a year ago, just under a year ago to restore order to what had become a lot of chaos. unfortunately for him, president trump likes chaos. he's said that on numerous occasions. that's a tough job he had to undertake. as he was undergoing that, we have several stories cases in our reporting where he actually did that. where president trump wanted to do something and john kelly was able to draw him back in. while this is all occurring he started to have trouble getting along with and his dealings with other staff, senior staff in the white house, including some congresswomen.

d -- women. he made comments that bothered some women. there was the rob porter incident that carol mentioned. he made comments that women found offensive. saying things like women are more emotional than men. while he was undertaking this difficult effort to try to restore order, it really caused more and more morale problems among the senior staff in the way he was doing it. >> i wanted to ask you about ronnie jackson. there's now reporting there had been a warning about ronnie jackson that came from karen pence, the vice president's wife through the vice president's medical doctor alerting the white house that there was a problem with the way ronnie jackson was operating that office. >> reporter: that's right. this reporting is confirmed that the chief of staff to the vice president brought those concerns to john kelly effectively.

there was some concern about the way ronnie jackson was handling karen pence's medical information. we don't have the specifics around that and we don't know if the president was aware of this. it's important to point that out as well. it does underscore there's been concerns raised about ronnie jackson prior to this latest incident when there were a number of ethical questions raised ahead of his confirmation process for v.a. secretary which he wound up dropping out of. >> let me ask you a follow up question because one of the criticisms of the appoint of john kelly is he was not of politics. he was a military guy. if he was not attuned to know that someone as important as nick airs said that karen pence had a problem here, you would think that john kelly would say to the president, we may have a problem with ronnie jackson. that's a big enough tell that the chief of staff should have

made sure the president was aware of it. >> reporter: really important point. you can bet white house officials at the senior level will be asking this very question, was this brought to the president. this basic qechoes what we saw e handling of the rob porter incident. some of the red flags raised by rob porter weren't taken immediately to the president by the chief of staff. this, again, becomes part of the broader picture and a part of this relationship that seems to be continually deteriorating around all of these revelations. >> what team work. you are the best. >> thanks. >> great reporting. thanks so much. hard sell. israel's prime minister making a high profile pitch to try to kill the iran deal. when is the president going to decide? we'll have more on that coming

up. we check the facts with the former energy secretary who helped write that agreement. >> tech: don't wait for a chip like this to crack your whole windshield. with safelite's exclusive resin, you get a strong repair that you can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> singers: safelite repair, safelite replace.

your plaques are always there at the worst times. constantly interrupting you with itching, burning and stinging. being this uncomfortable is unacceptable. i'm ready. tremfya® works differently for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

with tremfya®, you can get clearer and stay clearer. in fact, most patients who saw 90% clearer skin at 28 weeks... stayed clearer through 48 weeks. tremfya® works better than humira® at providing clearer skin and more patients were symptom free with tremfya®. tremfya® may lower your ability to fight infections, and may increase your risk of infections. before treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. tell your doctor if you have an infection or have symptoms such as fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. before starting tremfya®, tell your doctor if you plan to or have recently received a vaccine. ask your doctor about tremfya®. tremfya®, because you deserve to stay clearer. janssen wants to help you explore cost support options for tremfya®.

mr. elliot, what's your wiwifi?ssword? wifi's ordinary. basic. do i look basic? nope! which is why i have xfinity xfi. it's super fast and you can control every device in the house. [ child offscreen ] hey! let's basement. and thanks to these xfi pods, the signal reaches down here, too. so sophie, i have an xfi password, and it's "daditude". simple. easy. awesome. xfinity. the future of awesome.

iran lied. big time. after signing the nuclear deal in 2015, iran intensified its efforts to hide its nuclear file. the iran deal, nuclear deal is based on lies. it's based on iranian lies and iranian deception. >> israel's prime minister putting on a display against the iran nuclear deal which has been opposing for dealing claiming the country remain a nuclear threat. doing in it english for an audience of one, president trump. who is prepared to tear up the nuclear deal as soon as next week. joining me is energy secretary under president obama who helped write the deal. today he is the co-chair and ceo

of nuclear initiative. first of all the implication by benjamin netanyahu is because they archived all of these hundreds of thousands of documents it can be restarted oon a moment's note. they got this stuff out of a warehouse, briefed to the president on march 5th in the white house. what about the argument that iran can restart its nuclear program? >> let me make several points. first of all, the announcement by the prime minister, in my view, re-enforces the importance of the iran agreement. i think it's also important to emphasize up front that we knew they had a weapons program. we said so publicly. the iaea said so. the fact they had a nuclear

weapon's program until the 2004 time frame wadss a condition of the negotiation. it's why we entered that with a don't trust and verify, verify attitude. what you have in the jcpoa as by the way secretary mattis said last week an agreement not based on upon trust but upon almost his words, an assumption of cheating puts in place an unparalleled verification regime which is what we need to prevent any new iranian activity and number two a process going through the international inspector's, a so called joint commission and the u.n. secretary council that will hammer iran if they resume nuclear weapons activities. >> what's the downside if the president does break out of it. it needs to be fixed. we need a broader agreement which the french president agreed with last week.

>> we've always said going back to 2015 that the agreement by design, as you say was to keep nuclear weapons verifiably off the table while we pursue all of our available options to address iran's other issues like missiles, syria, hezbollah, yemen, human rights, you name it. there is some of that. my view maybe not enough. the key is that we took nuclear weapons off the table. they remain off the table add long as we have the jcpo a in place. >> what's the downside if the president decides not to continue with it? >> we lose this verification regime. number two we lose the coherence of international community and there's a particular concern about iran being handed the opportunity of a wedge between us and our european allies.

the europeans are in favor of staying in the deal quite correctly. even as the governments in europe want to stay in the deal if secondary sanctions are re-imposed their own companies will be compelled to maintain connected to the american banking system and therefore to stop business with ie roon. it will be a violation of the agreement and complete confusion with our allies. >> what about the statement the white house put out a statement last night that said the united states is aware of information released by israel and it went onto say as israel did not that iran has had a robust nuclear weapon's program that it's failed to hide from the world and its own people. only after we went on the air and raised a fuss with the white

house, did they correct it. they didn't issue another statement. they just made has had on the white house.gov website. what do you think they were trying to do? >> i'm afraid the white house has muddied the waters quite often in this deal. here they eventually krcorrecte it. it was an incorrect statement. there's nothing to indicate iran has an active program. it's not the only example. i've been referred to say the president's tweets about repeating an argument that one sees all too frequently which is completely incorrect. the idea that after ten years of agreement iran is free to go and build a nuclear weapon's program. completely false. first of all, there's the commitment in the agreement to not do so.

what i would say much more importantly is that we're not building this on trust. we have a completely unique and unparalleled intrusive verification regime that was not there before the agreement. that's the most important thing. iran is not going to -- if iran chose to rebuild a weapons program, i think it's quite unlike they would do so through sights to which the iaea the inspect inspectors have routine access. it's about covert sites. that's what the agreement gives us and the international inspector and not only access to suspect sights but access within a fixed time period which no one else is exposed to. >> good to see you again. thank you. last recourt. conservative lawmakers drawing up impeachment articles against the man overseeing the mueller probe.

i accept i don't bike the miles i used to. i even accept i have a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat not caused by a heart valve problem. but no matter where i ride, i go for my best. so if there's something better than warfarin, i'll go for that too. eliquis. eliquis reduced the risk of stroke better than warfarin, plus had less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis had both. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily... and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures.

i'm still going for my best. and for eliquis. ask your doctor about eliquis. ♪ with expedia you could book a flight, hotel, car and activity all in one place. ♪ i've got a nice long life ahead. big plans. so when i found out medicare doesn't pay all my medical expenses, i looked at my options. then i got a medicare supplement insurance plan. [ male announcer ] if you're eligible for medicare, you may know it only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. call now and find out about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, it helps pick up some of what medicare doesn't pay.

and could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. to me, relationships matter. i've been with my doctor for 12 years. now i know i'll be able to stick with him. [ male announcer ] with these types of plans, you'll be able to visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. plus, there are no networks, and virtually no referrals needed. so don't wait. call now and request this free decision guide to help you better understand medicare... and which aarp medicare supplement plan might be best for you. there's a wide range to choose from. we love to travel - and there's so much more to see. so we found a plan that can travel with us. anywhere in the country. [ male announcer ] join the millions of people who have already enrolled in the only medicare supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp, an organization serving the needs of people 50 and over for generations. remember, all medicare supplement insurance plans

help cover what medicare doesn't pay. and could save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. call now to request your free decision guide. and learn more about the kinds of plans that will be here for you now - and down the road. i have a lifetime of experience. so i know how important that is. the smoother the skin, the more comfortable you are in it. and now there's a new way to smooth. introducing new venus platinum. a premium metal handle boosts control... to reveal up to 100% smooth skin. venus the escalating stand off between the justice department and trump ally republicans has taken a stark new turn. members of the house freedom

caucus have drafted articles of impeachment against deputy attorney rod rosenstein. the group's leader congressman mark meadows saying the move is a last request option if the justice department fails to respo respond. it's a latest to undermine the special counsel and try to protect president trump. joining me now is msnbc political analyst robert costa, washington post national political reporter and moderator of washington leak on pbs. what's going on here? is this like a hammer they are holding over his head? >> there's a lot going on here but in broef you have house republicans having a squabble with the justice department about documents related to the russia probe and other investigations. democrats and critics of the gop say this is an effort by mark

made d meadows, and his allies to undermine the russia investigation which is managed at doj by rod rosenstein. >> rod rosenstein has been under threat for quite some time. do you sense this is heating up again? >> it is heating up because house republicans have whispered to me and other reporters for months an impeachment move against rosenstein could be in the works. we have seen they have drafted articles of impeachment against rod rosenstein. the big question right now is will congressman meadows bring up impeachment legislation as a privilege motion in the house. that may force speaker ryan to make a choice about whether he would allow that sort of thing to happen. >> we have seen the speaker as well as on the senate side refusing to take action even after testimony chairman of the

judiciary committee permitted legislation to protect the mueller probe to move ahead. there's no votes on the floor. >> there's not any votes come on the floor and republicans read the president's tweets every day. him calling the mueller investigation a witch hunt and they say they'd rather not poke the president by moving legislation at this time. they still need him for the midterm election. you see an uneasy dance between the white house and congressional republicans with regard to this probe. >> thank you so much. hundreds of migrants are in limbo after traveling more than 2,000 miles to reach the u.s. border and what they thought would be safety. the trump administration refusing to provide temporary shelter to those waiting to enter the country to be processed. some are making due sleeping in the cold. so far only eight migrants from the so called caravan have been admitted into the u.s. to begin having their claims processed.

is it speeding up at all? is there any movement? they have not assigned extra border agents so process people. >> reporter: that's right. at this point many of the migrants remain optimistic after the news of eight were able to get up to the border patrol and surrender themselves. there are dozens and dozens of families. we're told about 140 some remain out here after those eight were able to enter border patrol and present themselves for asylum. the folks are sleeping on the ground. they are mostly families with small children. mostly women here who have brought their children to try to get asylum in the united states. they say they are fleeing violence in central america and have no other options here. getting help in the u.s. is their best chance at a new life.

many are glad to hear the news the eight had been able to present themselves to border patrol. there was some concern no one would make it as far as reaching that border wall to surrender but now there's some optimism they will be able to do the same. they still have a long road ahead of them. history shows us that most people who apply for asylum don't get it. many say while they are not deterred by what is happened, they are holding out hope they will get this asylum. >> is there any signal at all from washington or from the officials there with you that they will relent at all or is this just waiting game? >> reporter: it sounds like it's waiting game for the most part. we know the vice president was along a stretch of the border wall yesterday and he said the migrants would have their opportunity to present themselves for asylum. that's why many people remain optimistic. they will still be able to surrender but there's been no

movement in terms of what the trump administration have said and what these folks believe are their right. sounds like these people are in imb limbo and they will wait it out. their journey began some four weeks ago, some 3,000 miles to get from their home country central america. they will wait as long as it takes to surrender. >> what do they need once they get into processing? many of these people don't have records. don't have legal aid to try to prove that they can qualify for asylum. that's a pretty tough standard. >> reporter: absolutely. volunteer lawyers say most of them will need documentation that they are leaving some type of persecution and nearly everyone says they don't have that paper work. lawyers are working with them on what will be required by government officials. they still do remain optimistic. they say they are fleeing

governments and area where is they simply are not safe at home. providing documentation and proving asylum is difficult. these families say they have no other choice. >> thank you so much. coming up, meet the boss. it's mike pompeo's first day at the state department. will he be able to turn things around? you're watching andrea mitchell reports on msnbc.

so, what's new? we just switched to geico and got more. more? they've been saving folks money for over 75 years. a company you can trust. geico even helped us with homeowners insurance. more sounds great. gotta love more... right, honey? yeah! geico. expect great savings and a whole lot more.

i just met with a great group of state department officers who work here at the mission. they may have been demoralized but they seemed in good spirits. they are hopeful that the state department will get its swagger back. that we will be out doing the things that they came on board the state department to do. >> secretary of state mike pompeo coming to the state department today trying to rebuild a broken institution after a world wind tour of first nato and then the middle east this weekend. today is his first day meeting the washington work force trying to reassure him he will fill

vacancies. he will listen to foreign service officers instead of isolating himself upstairs instead of talking to a small group of appointees. in 36 hours he did more to improve the state department than his previous predecessor did in 15 months. first of all, how different was it on the plane last night with pompeo? there was a briefing. i heard it. it sounds as though he were no longer isolated. >> that's true. first of all, i had flown to brussels on my own like we had done during the tillerson era and did expect to get on the secretary's plane at all. when it was going to be pompeo and he was not only going to go to brussels and do a middle east

tour and we asked to get on the plane and they said sure. that never would have happened in the tillerson era. >> never. >> one of the other things, just the feel of the trip wads so different. you know this as there was a sem tillerson that he was doing this like he was getting into a dentist's chair. he just didn't like the job. and everything about it. and he was a man who was sort of going through the motions and he was very grim about it. pompeo was clearly delighted. he was thrilled to be the secretary of state. there was sort of an obvious joy to each part of this trip. now, he didn't get everything he wanted. he told us for instance before he met the saudis that the big thing for him was solving this qatar crisis. it was clear that the saudis told him that was never going to

happ happ happen. and later he said they will figure this out on their own. so it is not a if everything went swimmingly, but it was clear throughout the trip that he was sort of having a great time and that when he met state department employees at each of these stops as the secretary does, that he gave them a message of energy and a message of i'm going to bring you back. you know, he's lifted the hiring freeze, he's done all kinds of things that have just created a great buzz in this building. >> and the fact is that he was confirmed on thursday by a vote and then got right on the plane. so as he points out, they did not know for sure until the last minute, they had counted heads, but they didn't know for sure that he have going to take this trip. so understandable that they weren't really organized going out, but the fact that they added brussels and expanded the trip, he wanted to go to the middle east right away, rex

tillerson only went for the president's subject mitt, nev 's own to israel. >> the symbolism and directional signs here are positive. clearly this is a team that understands the value of instructing the trip the way they structured it. nato, [ inaudible question israel, si jordan. the fact nato was his first stop signals that just purely on estimate ebo symbolism grounds alone that he will take those relationships seriously. not that tillerson didn't, but he didn't give it the same level of heft and symbolic importance that this trip does. and clearly taking reporters along suggests that pompeo understands the value of the public relations part of this job. it isn't just to have a washington press core kocorps. it is to show the world that the

united states takes its message of free press and freedom of expression seriously. seriously enough to have american reporters who will be critical of the secretary of state following along and writing the good and the bad and everything in between. >> and it was very interesting that he went to the middle east immediately what you middle ebe policy has been run by jared kushner, jason greenblatt, not by the state department. was he signalling that i'm jumping in too, it is too important to ignore? >> very much so. he has relationships with a lot of these people from his time as cia director. he reminded us of that at every stop, that he knows these people, has had a long relationship with them. and as understand, there was a real sense that i am taking this back from others. as understand, jared kushner kind of came out of the

beginning of the trump administration and was given this brief for resolving the middle east peace crisis. everything we know, and ann could probably talk about this a little better than i, but everything that we've heard is that that process is really going nowhere. and that jared's, you know -- that jared's outreach has crushed itself on the rocks of palestinian fury. you know, it was notable that when pompeo went to jerusalem, he is taking this back, but he still didn't see any palestinians. palestinians basically refused to see mike pence and they refused to see p.ompeo. >> i was on that trip. >> and so there is a sense of, you know, this is a very different relationship to the middle east. this administration has clearly signaled that it is in with israel and will not criticize israel. pompeo despite these huge gaza

protests in which more than 40 people have died including a journalist shot by israeli soldiers, pompeo did not issue a peep of criticism of the israelis. whereas i think just about every previous secretary of state in previous administrations would have tried to be bralanced withn them. pompeo isn't that way. and the result was a meeting with netanyahu that was almost giddy on both sides. >> and let's quickly button this down. last night i was on the air with chris matthews when this statement came out and they said incorrectly in this white house official statement that iran has a robust clandestine nuclear weapons program. and it was clearly wrong. i called it out. tweeted about it. wrote about it. tried to reach the white house for a correction. or to find out what was going on. and they then said an hour and a half later, it was shortly after pompeo landed and gardner and i

were in communication, they said it was a clerical error. is that credible? how stupid can they be? >> well, certainly they have -- the white house has a history of typos and errors in press statements. so this wouldn't be the first of those. it is a pretty big one. it is the difference between -- >> consequential. >> exactly. it is the difference between a known fact that netanyahu was flushing out, that there was a clandestine program that had been shelved. and a current program that they are hiding. very big difference. >> big difference, could be to a lot of other things as well. i'm going to head to the state department. i'll be there when mike pompeo arrives to greet the workforce. we'll report live from there later. kasie hunt will pick up the coverage after a short break. and now you're working toward something together. can you afford it? is it the right time?

yes. and you feel good about it. because you're doing this for him in return for everything he's always done for you. at pnc, we're here to help you take steps today to make a plan to borrow and stick with it. bienvenido a casa, papá. pnc. make today the day. searching one topic. that will generate over 600 million results. and if you've been diagnosed with cancer,

searching for answers like where to treat, can feel even more overwhelming. so start your search with a specialist at cancer treatment centers of america. start with teams of cancer treatment experts under one roof. start where specialists use advanced genomic testing to guide precision cancer treatment... ...that may lead to targeted therapies and more treatment options. start where there's a commitment to analyzing the latest research and conducting clinical trials-to help each patient get the personalized cancer care they deserve. start at one of the cancer treatment centers of america hospitals near you. the evolution of cancer care is here. learn more at cancercenter.com/experts

♪ south l.a. is very medically underserved. when the old hospital closed people in the community lived with untreated health problems for years. so, with the county's help we built a new hospital from the ground up and having citi as an early investor worked as a signal to others to invest. with citi's help we built a wonderful maternity ward and we were able to purchase an mri machine. we've made it possible for the people who live here

to lead healthier lives and that's invaluable. ♪ good afternoon from washington, d.c. i'm kasie hunt in for my friend craig melvin today. nbc news exclusive, medical records raid. president trump's personal doctor who vouched for his health now says trump's bodyguard and lawyer raided his office and took medical files. what he told the media just days before it happened. plus, will he or won't he? president trump firing back after the "new york times" published a list of questions robert mueller reportedly wants to ask him. the big question now -- will he