awareness, our friends over at axios report "forecasters are warily eyeing as many as seven to nine tropical cyclones that may spin up in the atlantic and pacific oceans in the next week." what could go wrong? have a good weekend, everybody. that is our broadcast on there friday night and for this week. thank you so very much for being here with us. good night from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. >> friday, man. fridays. we should change the name of the last day of the workweek to news day. instead of friday. it's annoying. i like to take fridays off every once in awhile. now my boss is like friday, are you kidding me?

for the controversial supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh. we learned during his confirmation hearings that there is a record of him saying that he does not think that roe versus wade should be viewed as settled law, despite that he said exactly the opposite of that to key pro-choice senators in order to try make them comfortable with the idea of voting for him. we learned in the hearings that he really does hold quite outside the main stream views about whether or not a president should be protected from any investigation or any legal liability while he or she is in office. democrats had signaled ahead of these hearings they thought that kavanaugh's views on that subject might be way out of keeping. from normal conservative lawyering. and they had suggested, particularly senator cory booker of new jersey had suggested that those out of keeping with normal conservative legal views' positions specifically on a president's susceptibility to investigation, senator booker and others suggested that maybe his views on that subject in

particular might have been why kavanaugh was picked for the nomination in the first place. brets kavanaugh did not disabuse anyone of that notion during his hearings this week which ultimately culminated in this dramatic testimony from john dean as the testimony wrapped up. >> if a president shot somebody in cold blood on fifth avenue, that president could not be prosecuted while in office. >> john dean today one of a number of witnesses whose testimony rounded out the confirmation proceedings making these witness who's we heard from today sort of the forth major character in the proceedings after brett kavanaugh himself and the senators questioning him and, of course, there was as interesting fourth player in these hearings this week, the protests are who were a near constant feature of the whole confirmation

proceedings. they made a huge huge impression in the hearing room. they were thrown out of the hearing room one after the other, day after day after day. there were also arrested at committee chairman chuck grassley's office, as well. over 200 people arrested this week over the course confident brett kavanaugh hearings. more than 200 of arrests the majority of whom were women. as to whether or not brett kavanaughing will get confirmed, one of the sort of surprise endings in the hearing ended up being not just about kavanaugh on policy and positions he had taken on things and issues he had been involved with that republicans in the white house apparently tried to keep under wraps by not providing access to records from kavanaugh's time working in the george w. bush white house, what ended up potentially being the most potent twist in the hearings is the evidence that was prepped by democrats that showed that kavanaugh may have lied to the senate pretty extensively in order to attain the current seat

that he already has on a federal appeals court. good news for judge kavanaugh is his confirmation hearings are now over and he may well end up becoming a supreme court justice. the bad news is whether or not they decide to elevate him to the high court, dude might some day find himself being impeached thanks to what democrats proved about his statements under oath that were not true. during not just this proceeding but more importantly the one more than ten years ago that got him the judgeship he's got right now. more on that coming up tonight. and today turned out to be the day that former president barack obama decided he would come out to play ahead of the midterm elections which are now less than two months away. >> we are americans. we're supposed to stand up to bullies. not follow them. we're supposed to stand up to

discrimination. and we're sure as heck supposed to stand up clearly and dun quibcally to nazi sympathizers. how hard can that be? saying that nazis are bad? >> president trump says that he is going to campaign in these mid-term elections way more than a president typically would with approval ratings as bad as president trump's are right now. now we know as of today, that president trump's participation in the mid-terms will apparently be matched by a just as unusual decision by the immediate past president that he too will campaign in these midterms, only his approval ratings are doing pretty swimmingly both in absolute terms and particularly in comparison to president trump. the headline there on the

left is on trump. you see it. trouble for trump. disapproval at a high. half favor impeachment. on the right, the equivalent headline except it's about president obama. americans rank president obama as the best president of their life times. so they will both be campaigning for their respective parties during the mid-term elections. president obama will be campaigning tomorrow morning for democrats trying to pick off republican held house seats in california. and he is going to be making specific appearances for specific candidates and groups of candidates apparently between now and the first week in november. clearly he knows every time he campaigns from here on out, it will be national news. and it is a rare thing for former presidents to do this. but president obama has decided that he is not going to be shy about talking about his successor and controversies that are plaguing his successor. >> by the way the claim that everything will turn out okay because there are people inside

the white house who secretly are not following the president's orders, that is not a check. i'm being serious here. that's not how our democracy is supposed to work. these people aren't elected. they're not accountable. they're not doing us a service by actively promoting 90% of the crazy stuff that's coming out of this white house and then saying, don't worry. we're preventing the other 10% that's not how things are supposed to work. this is not normal. these are extraordinary times. and they're dangerous times. but here's the good news. in two months we have the

chance, not the certainty but the chance, to restore some semblance of sanity to our politics. two months to restore sanity. two months until the midterm elections in between now and then, we will apparently be seeing a lot more of former president barack obama. two months till the midterms. and today, yet another member of the current president's campaign staff was in federal court. this time it was campaign foreign policy adviser george popped who was sentenced by a federal judge in washington, d.c. today for lying to investigators. because mr. papadopoulos had entered into an initial employee agreement when he initially pled guilty, there were initial expectations he wouldn't end up serving any jail time at all. but prosecutors did end up asking the judge to impose a custodial sentence because they said in the end, actually, he

was not all that cooperative. the judge obliged prosecutors in that wish and ordered papadopoulos to serve two weeks in jail. the judge said he had been inclined to give mr. papadopoulos a month in jail but he cut in it half because he was impressed by papadopoulos' remorse over what he had done. so george papadopoulos impressed the judge with his remorse. he will doll 14 days in jail plus a year of supervised release, plus 200 hours of community service plus a fine of $9,500. that sentence led to these ecstatic tweets from george's mom. kiki papadopoulos. it is amazing the number of people i've learned about who i would never otherwise encounter because of the criminal cases involving people close to the president and his campaign. mrs. papadopoulos said there had today after the sentence "just left courthouse. amazing judge. judge gave george two weeks of jail time! amazing. god bless america."

a few minutes later, judge moss is a fair and good man. everything went amazing. he is great. like tony the tiger. grreat. so george papadopoulos will go to jail for a very short stint. a dude holding a team putin sign outside the courthouse did throw an orange jump suit at him which landed on him outside the courthouse. his lawyers told the judge today in the courthouse that george papadopoulos's lack of cooperation couldn't have hindered or obstructed the muellerer investigation nearly as much as the president of the united states had hindered the investigation himself. that was an interesting line of argument. mr. papadopoulos's lawyer told reporter outside the courthouse today that he's pretty sure that the guy who told his client russia had hacked e-mails during the campaign, he's pretty sure that that guy must have been a

russian agent. >> you said misfud played him. who do you think he was working for. >> i have an opinion. i don't know what the intelligence agency's opinion is. my opinion is he was playing on behalf of russia. >> so playing on behalf of russia. george papadopoulos's lawyer. that's about the guy who gave george papadopoulos during the campaign advance notice that the russian government really had stolen democratic documents and e-mails to try help donald trump win the presidency. papadopoulos's lawyer saying, he thinks the guy who told george that was the guy playing on behalf of russia. maybe so seems entirely plausible. but there's one other big thing that happened today with papadopoulos other than him getting his short prison sentence that just seems important in terms of how the

papadopoulos aspect of this relates to the overall criminal case. right? how the papadopoulos criminal part of this fits into the larger russia scandal and the president's potential legal jeopardy. remember how we first learned about the importance of papadopoulos. right before the new year, december 30th, how the russia inquiry began. a campaign aide, drinks and talk of political dirt. that's how we learned on december 30th that the fbi according to four sources, opened its investigation in the first place into russian interference in the presidential election and whether or not the trump campaign colluded with it. they opened that investigation in late july 2016. that's also where we learned why they did so, what was the occasion of them opening that inquiry. "during a night of heavy drinking at an upcale london bar in may 2016, george papadopoulos

a young foreign policy adviser to the trump campaign made a startling revelation to australia's top diplomat in britain." russia had political dirt on hillary clinton. about three weeks earlier mr. papadopoulos had been told that moscow had thousands of e-mails that would embarrass mrs. clinton. apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign. two months later when the leaked e-mails began appearing online, australian officials passed the information about mr. papadopoulos to their american counterparts. to the fbi. the hacking and the revelation that a member of the trump campaign may have had inside advanced information about it were driving farcs that led the fbi to open an investigation in july 2016 into russia's attempts to disrupt the election and whereby any of president trump's associates conspired. he is the origin story, right? for the first time we've got a president under a serious counter intelligence investigation and he was under a serious counter intelligence investigation by the fbi when he

was running for president and when he became president. where that investigation came from is this guy. that is why george papadopoulos is so important to the whole overall russia scandal. he is why the fbi started looking into it in the first place. specifically him flapping his jaws about what the russians were doing to an australian diplomat who he met in london. when it emerged he wasn't making it up because it looked like the russians had stole a bunch of democratic e-mails how did that guy know in advance, the australian government told them about the contact. that's the whole reason he matters. and today on the day that guy was sent to prison for his role in the scandal, george papadopoulos also recanted that central point. today for the first time, he said he at least doesn't remember that happening. really?

as soon as the mr. papadopoulos was sentenced today "the new york times" publish there had interview with him. he basically says, i have to idea about the whole claim about talk together australian guy. i can't remember anything about that. look at this. going back to the meeting with the australian diplomat, what were you drinking? papadopoulos, i think i had a gin anton nick. >> did you drink a flub of gin anton i cans? how much did you brink? >> papadopoulos. no, i think i had one or two drinks. i think downer himself in numerous interviews kept explaining that had he one or two drinks. at least i don't remember being drunk. i think we had a couple drinks and we were just talking. >> in interviews downer has said ta beized having one drink, he has said that you brought up the russian dirt on hillary clinton. >> papadopoulos, i don't remember talking about that with him at all. >> so you don't remember at any

point in that meeting talking about russia dirt and hillary clinton? >> papadopoulos, i don't remember that at all actually. >> that's the whole origin story for the russia investigation at the fbi. papadopoulos is now like, huh-uh. imagine if you will, that george papadopoulos is telling the truth here that he honestly doesn't remember anything like that happening. and it is not that he doesn't remember because he was drunk. he says he wasn't drunk. maybe it didn't actually happen. if that's true, the whole story about how and why the fbi started investigating russian interference and the trump campaign potentially collaborating in it, that story no longer holds. oh! i would like too know more about that then please. and then on top of all that, bloomberg news just dropped this. this trump executives face u.s. campaign finance probe.

trump executives means executives at the trump organization, the president's business. they are not commenting to bloomberg news for this story and nobody else has matched the story. bloombergate admits even in their headline, this is a one source story so caution. what they are reporting that federal prosecutors from the southern district of new york, the same prosecutors who two weeks ago secured a guilty plea on eight felony counts from the president's personal lawyer, michael cohen, bloomberg news is reporting the same u.s. attorney's office that nailed cohen is now pursuing a federal criminal investigation of the president's business on crimes related to what michael cohen pleaded guilty to. turkly the two crimes where he stood up in federal court and said under oath that he had been directed to commit those felonies by president trump in an effort to influence the election. fridays.

i tell you. if this bloomberg reporting is true and executives are now under federal criminal investigation, who are we talking about here? how many trump organization executives are there really? it's not that big a company. if the president himself was involved in the alleged conduct that is now under criminal investigation by sdny, how are sdny prosecutors likely to handle that? is he after all the president. if this new reporting is correct, is there anything we can tell from the public record say from the michael cohen case or anything else, about how strong a case it might be? and how serious the legal jeopardy might be here for the president, for his business, for other executives at his business which we believe include his kids. joining us now is daniel goldman, former assistant attorney in the southern district of new york and a fellow at the brannan center for justice. thank you for being here. nice to have you here in person.

>> thank you. >> based on this bloomberg story, nbc has not matched this story. mcclatchy is on their own this. they've got a great track record on the story. i am inclined to be interested whatever they have to say but they're not even claiming more than one source. what would it mean for the trump organization to be under investigation? what does that mean for a business to be under investigation? >> i think that's just shorthand to discuss potential executives there. companies are very, very rarely charged criminally and when they are, it is when there's a systemic and method cal intentional breaking of the law like something like would ex-vegan where they tried to avoid emissions testing in a very methodical way. >> or enron who was involved in a company-wide scheme. >> yes. that actually has -- the fallout from enron and arthur andersen has even put the skids more on criminal prosecutions of corporations.

>> making it even harder to do so. >> yes. it is so devastating to the companies if a company is charged. i do think what they're talking about here is the potential for more executives to be caught in the crosshairs of this campaign finance conspiracy that michael cohen has pled guilty to. that could be the personrenced in the michael cohen information as employee 2. everyone is of the belief at this point, there's been a lot of reporting that employee one referenced in that information who actually cuts the check to michael cohen to reimburse him for the payments that he made toy stormy daniels is allen weisselberg. but there hasn't been much reporting on who employee two was who received a request for authorization from allen weisselbe weisselbergburg. that's someone that may be in the crosshairs of this. >> and they would be in trouble.

there has also been reporting that allen weisselberg has been offered at least limited immunity in exchange for his testimony in conjunction of this case so that's another angle here. they would be in trouble here nor facilitating that payment which was designed to influence the election and trying to make it look like something else? is it essentially participating in a cover-up of the crime for which cohen has pled guilty? >> so there is a pathway to prosecution for that. but that's much more difficult because the trump organization is a private company. that's a like a books and records accounting fraud offense which is often you'll see with public companies where they itemize something in a false way. they don't include the proper expenses. and the proper explanations. and the michael cohen information somewhat notably

lays out in greater detail than necessary the cover-up as you point out. if someone were to be charged with campaign finance fraud, the conspiracy that cohen pled guilty to which is what bloomberg is reporting, they would have to be in on the conspiracy that michael cohen pled guilty to. >> that it's designed to influence the election that it's being disguised as something else that it is an illegal campaign contribution. >> they have to know that the payment was made to silence stormy daniels in this case so that the public did not hear about it. and that it was as you point out with the intent to influence the election. >> they had to be in on that element of it. >> and donald trump is the president of the trump organization. he has handed off supposedly control of the trump organization since he became president. but at the time of the alleged crimes he was still obviously the principal executive at that

institution. if he is implicated in this conspiracy as michael cohen said he was in court and he's implicated on the trump organization behavior side of it, as well if this being pursued by sdny now as bloomberg describes it, how does sdny deal with the fact that one of the targets in this investigation is now the president. >> >> my guess is they kick it down to mueller who will be making any decision about what to do with donald trump. ar at least they will consult with the special counsel's office. this is my hunch as to how these things work. my guess is when this case was referred to the southern district, there was an understanding that anything that was related to the president because of the sensitivity of that and the legal issues surrounding whether a president can be indicted would ultimately be decided by the special counsel and ultimately by rod rosenstein who is overseeing this part of the investigation.

they won't do anything without consultation. we run into the same issue that we run into with the potential collusion charge or obstruction of justice, can a sitting president be indict. based on the recording released with cohen and trump where it demonstrates that trump knew about these payments to some degree, and michael cohen pointing the finger at him in court, i don't think that would be enough to charge the president in and of itself. but if there is more evidence from a david pecker who may have also received immunity or from allen weisselberg who is compelled to tell the truth in front of the grand jury or from executive two who is unknown. there's a lot unknown but donald trump could have committed aid federal crime. we don't know that yet but then we run into the same issues that we've been talking about with the obstruction of justice investigation, particularly whether a sitting president can be indicted or not. >> if you're sure he can't be

indicted as president, there's a seat for you on the supreme court. daniel gold man former assistant attorney in the u.s. district of new york. thank you. >> thank you. much more to come this not quiet friday. stay with us. bundle and save big, but now it's time to find my dream abode. -right away, i could tell his priorities were a little unorthodox. -keep going. stop. a little bit down. stop. back up again. is this adequate sunlight for a komodo dragon? -yeah. -sure, i want that discount on car insurance just for owning a home, but i'm not compromising. -you're taking a shower? -water pressure's crucial, scott! it's like they say -- location, location, koi pond. -they don't say that. you shouldn't be rushed into booking a hotel. with expedia's add-on advantage, booking a flight unlocks discounts on select hotels until the day you leave for your trip. add-on advantage. only when you book with expedia.

for millions of baby boomers there's a virus out there. a virus that's serious, like hiv, but it hasn't been talked about much. a virus that's been almost forgotten. it's hepatitis c. one in 30 boomers has hep c, yet most don't even know it. that's because hep c can hide in your body silently for years, even decades, without symptoms and it's not tested for in routine blood work. if left untreated, hep c can cause liver damage, even liver cancer. but there's important information for us: the cdc recommends all baby boomers get tested for hep c. all it takes is a simple one-time blood test. and if you have hep c, it can be cured. ask your healthcare provider for the simple blood test. for us it's time to get tested. it's the only way to know for sure.

but he has plans today.ain. hey dad. so he took aleve. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve. all day strong.

two questions about the brett kavanaugh nomination for the supreme court. number one, who will be in charge of rehydrating all those old people on the judiciary committee after four consecutive

marathon days of testimony? whew. second question, will brett kavanaugh get confirmed? i do not know the answer to either question. one of the unexpected things that happened in the hearings this week for kavanaugh is that he was revealed to have lied to the senate on a host of things. a couple blatant enough to potentially follow him home even if he doesn't get confirmed to the supreme court. the first has to do with his testimony in 2006 when he was a george w. bush white house lawyer. he was up for a judgeship on the d.c. circuit court of appeals. the senators understandably planned to and did grill him about controversial issues that happened during his tenure in the george w. bush white house. they particularly grilled him about the process of nominating juks by that white house and which of those nominations kavanaugh was involved in. >> charles pickering's

nomination to the fifth circuit is, the committee learns he collected letters of support from lawyers who appeared in his courtroom and practiced in his district. it became an apparent some of these lawyers had cases pending before him. when they wrote the letters judge pickering requested. did you know that judge pickering planned to solicit letters of support in this manner before he did so? if not, when did you become aware that judge pickering had solicited these letters of support? >> the answer to the first question, senator, is no. this was not one of the judicial nominees that i was primarily handling. >> brett kavanaugh telling it the senator under oath that this nomination of charles pickering was not one that i was primarily handling. his characterization of that work on the nomination of that judge has now been contradicted white house documents that republicans apparently intended to keep confidential so they couldn't be released to the public. those documents got released to

the public this week and it turns out according to the documents and his own e-mails brett kavanaugh was absolutely working in the white house putting together bind ares of information about that nominee, charles pickering, drafting a letter to a senator about charles pickering, working on an op-ed for the white house counsel about charles pickering, whether they would need tables for a pickering event. we know about now because we can see in it black and white. he denied having played a significant role in that nomination while he was before the senate the last time they had him under oath in 2006. so keep an eye on that question about his role. it is a name that is not a household name. back in the day, charles pickering was a disastrous nomination for the bush white house. he eventually got recess appointed because they couldn't get him through the senate. he had to step off the bench and it was a big embarrassment.

he did do stuff to get the seat that was seriously controversial. you might understand why he didn't want to be associated with that very controversial nomination. the bad nomination when he was such a bad headline for the bush white house. you understand why he might have done that. but saying he wasn't involved there, we know in black and white that he absolutely was, understandable as it may be, trying to save his own skin and stay away from controversial issues that appears to have been a really blaisent lie that he told in sworn testimony. judges aren't supposed to do that. also, there is the time that brett kavanaugh got e-mails that had been stolen from senate democrats. they were stolen by a republican staffer who then handed the stolen documents over to kavanaugh in the bush white house who then used them to plot strategy to get bush nominees through the senate. they had the democrats' game plan. it made it much easier.

it's easier if you have memos, draft questions, research, et cetera. that was a big scandal at the type. the computer servers inside judiciary committee got seized as evidence. people got fired. people were referred for prosecution. so brett kavanaugh as a bush white house lawyer nominated to become a judge once they had him under oath, yeah, he was definitely going to get asked if he had any role in that scandal, any knowledge of it. he appears to have lied in response to those questions you said oath. >> did he ever share reference or provide you with any documents that appeared to you to be drafted or prepared by democratic staff members of the judiciary committee? >> no. i was not aware of that matter ever until i learned of it in the media. >> i want to clear up the questions. you said that mr. miranda never provided these documents that were from this. had you seen them in any way?

did you ever come across memos from internal files of any democratic members given to you or provided to you in any way? >> no. >> thank you. >> no, never saw it. i had no idea that was going on. never saw that. nothing that looked like that. in 2004 when he was first nominated for a judgeship, he said no, he had seen nothing. he had been given nothing of the sort. he learned about it only from the media. his nomination was controversial and it languished for awhile. they first brought him up in 2004. he didn't get confirmed. they ended coming back to the senate with him in 2006. he had to do a whole second round of hearings here. this is still a controversial matter. he was asked again and lied about it again. >> i did not know about any memos from the democratic side. i did not suspect that. had i known or suspected, i would have immediately told judge gonzalez who i'm sure would have immediately talked to chairman hatch about it.

i did not know about it. did not suspect it. >> did not know about it, did not suspect it. i would have reported had i had any inkling. brett kavanaugh on the stolen memos in 2004 and 2006. roll tape from this week. >> when you worked at the white house, did anyone ever tell you they had a mole that provided them with secret information related to nominations? >> i don't recall the reference to a mole which sounds highly specific. >> reference to a mole. you mean the tiny rodent that's kind of blind? sounds highly specific. it is highly spec especially when a senator releases a memo to brett kavanaugh with the subject line spying. and the first line of the e-mail says i have a friend who is a mole for us. on the left.

and the rest of the e-mail is democratic documents and research on judicial nominees. democratic senators posted a whole bunch of e-mails from that republican senate staffer who stole the stuff from the democrats. e-mails from that staffer to brett kavanaugh in the white house. this guy was providing kavanaugh quote intel on senate democrats. he was providing quote my info on what was happening among democratic staffers when it came to bush judicial nominees. he was describing a confidential letter sent by a senate democrat. so brett kavanaugh has gone from saying in 2004 that he didn't have that inside information. he never heard about it. to saying in 2006, no idea, no inkling. i would have reported it if i heard anything about that to now being confronted with the fact that he did have that information, he was told it was a mole. confidential stuff. do not circulate. confronted with that, his explanation for it this week is

that it is normal to have that kind of stuff. nothing weird about it. today the normer senate lawyer who wrote those democratic documents that were stolen made a forceful case at slate.com about this part of his record. lisa graves writing, even if kavanaugh could claim that he didn't have any hint at the time he received the e-mails that these documents were of suspect problem nance which i personally find implausible, there is no reasonable way for him to assert honestly that he had no idea what they were after the revelation of the theft. any reasonable person would have realized they had been stolen. certainly someone as smart as kavanaugh would have too but he lied under oath. she says not only should kavanaugh not be confirmed she says quote he should clearly be impeached. he should not be elevated to the high court. he should be hauled down from the federal bench he serves on now.

so yes, the hearings adjourned late this afternoon. senators have until monday to rest up and then they'll submit written questions before the process moves on to the next phase. fights play out all sorts of way. how this fight unrolls from here, we do not know. by republicans in the senate who enjoy a historically small margin in terms of their majority. but among the other things senate democrats believe they exposed to damage the kavanaugh nomination this week, senate democrats think they got him on at least a couple points that look like perjury. now they'll try to make that stick. it's funny how... you never listen to your dad when you're a teenager. my dad- he always gave me two pieces of advice. one was to always be humble. and the second was to always do the right thing. now that i'm the new ceo of uber, i've taken that advice to heart. and i'm using that advice to change our company.

moving forward, we're taking into consideration what's good for our driver partners, our riders, and the cities that we operate in. and it's going to make us a much, much better service. ♪ as moms, we send our kids out into the world, full of hope. and we don't want something like meningitis b getting in their way. meningococcal group b disease, or meningitis b, is real. bexsero is a vaccine to help prevent meningitis b in 10-25 year olds. even if meningitis b is uncommon, that's not a chance we're willing to take. meningitis b is different from the meningitis most teens were probably vaccinated against when younger. we're getting the word out against meningitis b. our teens are getting bexsero. bexsero should not be given if you had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose.

most common side effects are pain, redness or hardness at the injection site; muscle pain; fatigue; headache; nausea; and joint pain. bexsero may not protect all individuals. tell your healthcare professional if you're pregnant or if you have received any other meningitis b vaccines. ask your healthcare professional about the risks and benefits of bexsero and if vaccination with bexsero is right for your teen. moms, we can't wait. ♪ that's confident. but it's not kayak confident. kayak searches hundreds of travel and airline sites to find the best flights for us. so i'm more than confident. kayak. search one and done.

monitor their blood glucose every day. which means they have to stop. and stick their fingers. repeatedly. today, life-changing technology from abbott makes it possible to track glucose levels. without drawing a drop of blood, again and again. the most personal technology, is technology with the power to change your life. life. to the fullest.

after a lot of controversy about abortion rights during brett kavanaugh's hearings, amid certainty by observers on all sides that kavanaugh will definitely be the crucial fifth vote that conservatives need on -- to overturn roe versus wade and make abortion illegal, that was bolstered by a in e-mail exposed during the hearings in can i cav naug says that rowe shouldn't be considered the settled law of the land because the court can always overrule it. in addition to that emerging certainty this week, he did hit another trip wire on a similar and related issue in testimony under questioning from texas senator ted cruz.

they were discussing a case involving access to contraception in which the judge issues a controversial ruling in which he referred to birth control as quote abortion inducing drugs. whether or not he personally believes that contraception causes abortion, which it doesn't, he did rule in favor of employers who used that argument to deny their employees health insurance coverage for their birth control. senate republicans really are on the verge of cementing a supreme court majority that will likely be extremely hostile not just to core rights to have an abortion but also to a whole spectrum of reproductive rights including access to birth control if they do get kavanaugh onto the court. that's why the constant back drop has been woman after woman after woman after woman being dragged out of the hearing room while pleading with senators to protect women's rights by rejecting brett kavanaugh.

more to come. stay with us. >> go back. we will not go back. your hair is so soft! did you use head and shoulders two in one? i did mom. wanna try it? yes. it intensely moisturizes your hair and scalp and keeps you flake free. manolo? look at my soft hair. i should be in the shot now too. try head and shoulders two in one.

on the new sleep number 360 smart bed. it senses your movement and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it's the final days where all beds are on sale. the queen sleep number 360 c2 smart bed is now only $899. ends sunday. lojust use priceline.ls on travel? you can save up to 60% on hotels. that's like $120 a night back in your pocket. go to priceline to get deals

you won't find anywhere else. the wonderful thing about polident is the fact that it's very, very tough on bacteria, yet it's very gentle on the denture itself. polident's 4 in 1 cleaning system consists of 4 powerful ingredients that work together to deep clean your denture in hard to reach places. it kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria and it helps to remove stains. polident should be the first choice of every person that wears a denture, to clean their denture. this is the headline that just went up at "the new york times" website tonight. i think we've got it there. confirmed, brett kavanaugh can't be trusted. a perfect nominee for a president with no clear relation to the truth. a blistering long editorial that was just posted.

this is from the "new york times" editorial board. quote you and i piece of it, in a more virtuous world judge kavanaugh would be embarrassed by the manner in which he has arrived at the doorstep of a lifetime appointment to the supreme court. perhaps most concerning, judge kavanaugh seems to have trouble remembering certain important facts about his years of service to republican administrations. joining us now dolly lithwick. thank to you for being here. >> confirmation hearings have ended. how did they go? >> if you start from the proposition that all he had to do was tell the truth, he had the votes. there was very little he didn't -- he could have right up to shooting somebody on fifth avenue. and he had the votes. to just get time and time again into these kinds of nested lies within lies like the one you described or just refusal these new standards i can't talk about

politics, i can't even condemn charlottesville nazis, just the level to which it seemed as though he took that which was uncomplicated and made it harder and squirrely. it by the way doesn't help that the drip, drip, drip of these documents which such a great thing, right? withhold the documents. only give 7% but then not knowing what was coming as the documents came forth meant that he wasn't prepared to deal with those documents. i don't think senate republicans helped him almost by withholding them. >> and we will get more as time goes by. >> the documents i think we're hearing will be out by 2019, 2020. >> okay. the disseveral refusal to answer questions about politics, refusing to answer which cases were correctly decided, saying a

lot of words while saying nothing, i feel like that's become an art form. it gets a little bit worse with each new nominee. when judge kavanaugh was before the senate in 2006, he sang the praises of george w. bush, the president who nominated him. invited to do the same for president bush who was nominated this time around he said i couldn't possibly. we know why that is. that's because justice gorsuch issued a mild oblique rebuke of president trump when he was being considered for the nomination. we know president trump then considered rescinding the nomination in the midst of the hearings. so we see why it's happening. but you're talking about the lion. how much more serious is the lying? all you're talking about there is a bad vet and stuff not being well done. but the lying seems like it is serious. >> you know, i could ask the question if this were a hillary clinton nominee who had done what we saw happen in the last

three days. you know, just overtly saying, oh, i never ever knew about those documents or i didn't get those documents that said spying on them. >> right. which he forded forwarded as interesting mail. >> and said don't disseminate. >> so i think i just have this sense that, yes, this is a foregone conclusion. it doesn't matter. and yet the granular level of op fuss indicating on the handful things he's been cut out on is really dispiriting and stands in such contrast to these testimonials about his character and he's a good dad. and he is, rachel. it's worth saying. he's great objectively. doesn't matter. >> nice guy. >> doesn't matter. and the weirdness of just sort of having been a lifelong operative in this machine and those are all the things that, by the way, get him in trouble, right? what gets him in trouble is when he's saying it doesn't matter

what the process is because we're going to get these people on the courts. and that's such a pattern. in a way, it is such a paradox. this was trump's promise. it doesn't matter. we're going to get these people on the courts. that's kind of the through line here. that's what the obfuscation is about time and time again. it's that given the opportunity to be sort of an operative, he took it and now he's trying to say balls and strikes umpire. but all these documents are proving that he is exactly what he was, which is a part of this machinery, a huge machine that has had a decades long plan to install people like brett kavanaugh on the supreme court. >> dahlia lithwick senior editor and legal correspondent at slate.com. thank you for helping us cover this this week. we'll be right back. stay with us. icult, we're gonna have to start from scratch. we need to fail down here so we don't fail up there. this isn't just another trip, neil.

we have serious problems. do you think you're coming back? five... four... three... two... first man. rated pg-13. my dbut now, i take used tometamucil every day.sh it traps and removes the waste that weighs me down, so i feel lighter. try metamucil, and begin to feel what lighter feels like. but let's be honest, nobody likes dealing with insurance. which is why esurance hired me, dennis quaid, as their spokesperson because apparently, i'm highly likable. see, they know it's confusing.

i literally have no idea what i'm getting, dennis quaid. that's why they're making it simple, man in cafe. and more affordable. thank you, dennis quaid. you're welcome. that's a prop apple. i'd tell you more, but i only have 30 seconds. so here's a dramatic shot of their tagline so you'll remember it. esurance. it's surprisingly painless. you shouldn't be rushed into booking a hotel. with expedia's add-on advantage, booking a flight unlocks discounts on select hotels until the day you leave for your trip. add-on advantage. only when you book with expedia.

this terrifying big guy is a long fin eel. long fin eels live in fresh water in new zealand. they've got wide set bug eyes. good morning. they're nocturnal. they like to live in covered up spaces. even for eels, they are thought to be secretive and mysterious. what you need to know this evening is they live a long, long, long time, longer than a lot of other species on earth. long fin eels have been known to live well over a century.

tonight as our final story, i'm going to unveil the human equivalent of the mysterious astonishingly elderly long fin eel. that's next. i'm ken jacobus, i'm the owner of good start packaging. we distribute environmentally-friendly packaging for restaurants. and we've grown substantially. so i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. and last year, i earned $36,000 in cash back. that's right, $36,000. which i used to offer health insurance to my employees. my unlimited 2% cash back is more than just a perk, it's our healthcare. can i say it? what's in your wallet? bundle and save big, but now it's time to find my dream abode. -right away, i could tell his priorities were a little unorthodox. -keep going. stop. a little bit down. stop. back up again. is this adequate sunlight for a komodo dragon? -yeah. -sure, i want that discount on car insurance just for owning a home, but i'm not compromising.

-you're taking a shower? -water pressure's crucial, scott! it's like they say -- location, location, koi pond. -they don't say that.

there was that time i did the show in a moon suit and cat ears. there was the time i read the news like a beat poem. there was the time my highlighter turned into a lightsaber and the time i won a trophy. i'm still confused about that. there were the dancing flamingos, the giant whale and the rinky dink zylophone. the time we cooked hot dogs in a tv studio. the time i made my producer deflate a bunch of footballs in the bathroom on live tv, the time we stuffed a cardboard cutout of a u.s. senator into an envelope. there was the one time i pretended to wear a dress literally the one time.

i still have the same haircut. i wear same $10 blazers. i still have that blazer in the top left from 2008. i'm telling you this because tomorrow is the ten-year anniversary of this show, which means we're really freaking old. in cable news years, we're like 1,000. we're like great uncle pete who is always falling asleep in the thanksgiving mashed potatoes. we are a long finned eel still swimming around new zealand ready to embark on its next mysterious face of its fish life after the age of 100. this show has had a nine lives effect over the years. there was a big period of time when the top stories were about the tea party or voting rights. there was a stretch when i was completely obsessed with this beauty pageant contestant and the yodeling contestant dummy or the pack of owls attacking people in salem, oregon. we are now in a different phase as a show and as a country, telling you tonight we will not

always be in this moment. i do not know what comes next, but i want to thank you all for being here for all ten years of it. i want to thank everybody who thank you for letting us know when you like what we're doing and when you don't. i hope you stick with us with whatever you do next. my executive producer wants me to promise you i will get some new blazers, but i'm not going to and i probably also will not get a new haircut. ten years. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again on monday. last word starts right now. >> we are americans. we're supposed to stand up to bullies, not follow them. >> a rare and scathing rebuke of a sitting president. >> i'm sorry i watched it.