>> that is "all in" for this evening. but rachel maddow starts right now with joy reid in for rachel. good evening. rachel has the night off but she will be off tomorrow. meanwhile, we have a big night of news to work our way through. the political world is still sorting out the sight of a president of the united states introducing a new supreme court justice with a partisan speech thanking his fellow partisan combatants. we're going the take a deep dive into the landscape that is coming into the view for the election that is just 29 days from now. also, late this evening, we got a new jolt of news from the mueller investigation into the trump campaign. this time the story involves a deputy from the trump campaign and the inauguration. rick gates struck a plea deal with the special counsel back in february. he agreed to cooperate fully with mueller's prosecutors. tonight "the new york times" reports on an apparent attempt by rick gates to help the trump presidential bid, potentially

via a campaign of social media manipulation and intelligence gathering. we're going to be joined by one of the reporters on that big story in just a moment. but we begin tonight here. it is done. this weekend, after being confirmed by an historic narrow 50-48 in the united states senate, brett kavanaugh was sworn in as the newest justice of the supreme court. he was sworn in immediately before anything else could happen. and then this evening, he got a formal installation ceremony at the white house with donald trump and a bunch of his conservative friends. it was 89 days from kavanaugh's nomination to his confirmation on saturday. 89 long, long days. but brett kavanaugh's nomination was not the longest nomination battle in recent history. if you set aside for a moment the merrick garland debacle, because of course his nomination was never actually taken up by the senate thanks to mitch mcconnell, then kavanaugh clocks in as the second longest in the last 27 years. the longest is clarence thomas.

and on an october night in 1991, after the senate had debated all day long and narrowly confirmed him, clarence thomas, the newly confirmed supreme court justice spoke, something he really doesn't do that much anymore. he merged from his home in alexandria, virginia and addressed the nation, accompanied by his wife, future tea party activist virginia thomas, and also by the nearly 90-year-old arc segregationist senator strom thurmond. >> congratulations, judge thomas. [ cheering ] >> my wife and i came out just

to say a few words. first of all, i'd like to say that i'm thankful, we're thankful that the process is over, that it's finally come to a conclusion after three and a half months. but this is more time for healing, not a time for anger or for animus or animosity. >> not a time for anger or for animus or animosity. we have to put these things behind us. and who can say exactly what effect clarence thomas' speech on his front lawn that night had, whether it helped at all to calm some of the turmoil around his nomination. but tonight at the white house, where justice kavanaugh was sworn in for a second time, the president did not seem to want to let the fight over his nomination end. kavanaugh tried to reset himself as the impartial justice unity and healing guy, despite his hyper partisan weepy fury during the confirmation battle. but the president apologized on behalf of the nation to brett

kavanaugh and declared that he had been, quote, proven innocent, which of course isn't true. if one thing has become clear in the 48 hours since brett kavanaugh was confirmed by the senate, it's that republicans do not want this to be the end of it. they think the battle over brett kavanaugh was great for them, and they don't want anyone to forget about it any time soon. >> the behavior of first democrats on the senate judiciary committee and then the overreach of the protesters at the capitol have actually energized the republican base. i want to thank the other side for the tactics that have all allowed us to kind of energize and get involved our own voters. >> all i can say is this is going to the streets at the ballot box. i've never campaigned against a colleague in my life. that's to be change. >> i think it really has energized conservatives across the state of texas. i think a lot of texans, a lot of americans watched what happened the last few weeks and were disgusted by the behavior

of senate democrats. >> i think the analysis that the republican base is very much activated as a result of this. >> i think a lot of democrats are going to vote republican, because i have many friends that are democrats. the main base of the democrats have shifted so far left that we'll end up being venezuela. this country would end up being venezuela. i think a lot of democrats are going to be voting republican on november 6th. >> literally everyone in the gop is reading from the same talking points right now. it's been impossible to turn on a tv in the past couple of days without hearing that the kavanaugh nomination couldn't have gone better for the republicans. that the democrats and the women mob have given the republicans a gift one month before the midterms. is that actually true? well, we'll find out one month from tomorrow. but here are a couple things to keep in mind. first of all, this particular supreme court nomination has left a lot of loose ends hanging. there are thousands, if not

millions of documents related to brett kavanaugh's time in the george w. bush white house that the senate and the public never got to see. more of those documents will be released, and even more will be foiaed over time, and more evidence may emerge that kavanaugh lied under oath about his activities during that time. we've also learned that chief justice jean-roberts has received more than a dozen judicial misconduct passed along on the d.c. court of appeals where kavanaugh was a judge until this weekend. we don't know what if anything may become of those complaints now that kavanaugh is the chief justice's colleague. and "the new yorker's" ronan farr farrow, who broke the story of kavanaugh accuser deborah ramirez hinted this weekend there might be more accusers yet to share their stories of sexual misconduct by kavanaugh. we really do not have a road map for how to handle the prospect of a supreme court justice with so many outstanding complaints or potential complaints against him.

how will such complaints be adjudicated if and when they come to light? that's one thing to keep in mind as we go forward. we are in completely uncharted territory right now. the other thing to think about is this. it's not really clear that the republicans have much data or historical precedent to back up their conviction that imposing kavanaugh on an unwilling majority of americans is going to give them a boost to victory next month. cnn is just out with this new poll tonight, taken thursday through sunday. so the final days of the fight over kavanaugh's nomination, and through his confirmation vote this weekend. the poll found that a majority of americans are opposed to kavanaugh's confirmation, and that they opposed him by a ten-point margin, just in the last few days. this poll, like other recent polls, did also find an increase in republican enthusiasm for kavanaugh. but it's worth remembering that increased republican enthusiasm has not always been a silver bullet in the current climate.

after alabama republican senate nominee roy moore was accused of sexual misconduct in the middle of his senate race, polls show that republicans stood by him as partisans rallied around a candidate they saw as under attack. but ultimately, that was not enough. the backlash to roy moore was so strong, alabama elected its first democratic senator in 25 years who incidentally just cast a vote against brett kavanaugh. and in indiana, where senator joe donnelly is considered one of the democrats' most endangered incumbents, in a state that went for trump by 19 points in 2016, recent fox news polling found that donnelly's vote against kavanaugh would have a negligible impact on his chances. a third of voters in the poll said it would make them more likely to vote for him. a third said less likely, and a third said it would make no difference. but the greatest cautionary tale for republicans probably remains the fight over clarence thomas. that night in october, 1991, the freshly confirmed clarence

thomas told the nation it was time to put the fight behind them. but a year later, an unprecedented number of women were elected to congress, many of them inspired to run for office by the shabby treatment of anita hill and the elevation of thomas to the high court despite her allegations. and this year, of course, there are more women running for congress than ever in american history, and a new "washington post" survey of 69 battleground districts in this year's midterms finds that democrats have a narrow edge in the race to control the house. thanks to a nearly 20-point swing in those districts from preferring republican candidates to preferring democrats. and joining me now is scott clement, polling director for "the washington post," the pollster who conducted that survey. mr. clement, really appreciate your time tonight. >> certainly. good to be here. >> so let's talk first of all how you chose the districts that wound up in this poll. >> sure. so we started off with the districts that the cook political report rates as toss-up or leaning republican or

leaning democrat at the beginning of the fall campaign. so late august. well also had some additional districts that post political staff identified as potentially competitive. well drew a random sample of voters in those districts and ended up viewing more than 2600 likely voters. >> a and so of course the write-up of your poll, of the 69 districts included in your survey, 63 are held by republicans. just 6 are held by democrats. trump carried 48 of the districts. hillary clinton carried the other 21. likely voters are split in the trump won district. 48 for the democrat, 47 for the republican, and in the districts carried by clinton, democrats have a clear advantage, 53-43. can you just quantify us, how dramatic of a swing is that overall? >> well, it's substantial. it shows that likely voters at this stage in the campaign are looking at the congressional candidates in a different way than they were two years ago. and a big factor in that is trump's approval rating. most of these are republican-held districts. so trump's approval rating is a few percentage points higher

than it is nationwide. but it's still underwater. so you have a slight majority who disapprove of the president's job performance. and that means that it's going to be a struggle for some of these candidates to outrun that. we saw this with barack obama in 2014. very few senate candidates could get too far above his job approval rating in the state. and that makes him a liability. >> and i'm looking just at the -- some of the states where these districts are located, in states like arizona, california, lots in california, colorado, florida. is the challenge republicans going to face that some of these states like california or republicans are already pretty endangered and states like colorado that seem to be going more blueish-purple than reddish-purple. is that a challenge or the president's approval rating? >> a little bit of column a and a little bit of column b, particularly in the districts that clinton won in 2016. those are the districts where republicans tend to be most endangered because they were already places where there was a lot of split ticket voting.

voters voting for hillary clinton for president and voting for the republican candidate for congress. it's -- the largthe larger chun districts where trump won where the race is nearly even in our survey. and that means that a number of those candidates are going to be in danger. >> were you able to quantify sort of what was driving this shift towards the democrats? is it national politics are these really issues of things like health care? we knew those kinds of issues were important to voters before this kavanaugh nomination. >> well, voters said a lot of issues were really important to them. health care ranked highly. so did supreme court appointments. no surprise given the timing the poll was conducted. but when we asked people to choose between those issues and also the importance of president trump, trump stood out as the single most important issue, really issue or item or reason for the congressional vote. and this was particularly true

among democrats. so 40% of democrats and democratic-leaning independent voters said trump was the single most important issue in their vote. that compares to roughly 15% of republicans who said the same. >> interesting. so a check on the president being an important issue to these voters. scott clement, "washington post" polling director. i always love talking polls. thank you very much for being here tonight. >> thank you. >> joining me is kareem jean-pierre. let's talk about it. we just had scott clement go through some of the date. health care, important. supreme court, important. but trump most important. is that the way democrats are going to run into? it's really a tailwind. >> there is no denying it that donald trump is on the ballot, for sure. the divisiveness, the racist kind of rhetoric he has done for the past two years, the way he attacked dr. ford and continues to attack women who have accused women that he knows of sexual assault. it is going to be on the ballot. he will be on the ballot for sure.

i do have to say since mitch mcconnell wants to thank us for exciting their base. >> the mob, the lady mob, yes. >> i have to thank mitch merchandise for making us excited about the scotus pick which we know it's not usually a deem based excitement around the scotus pick. >> one of the challenges the republicans have is the base of the democratic party tends to be presidential focused. younger voters, younger women don't really vote in midterms. are you seeing any evidence on the ground that that might change this year and that the kavanaugh nomination might be fueling additional voting among those? >> the way like to talk than is yes, they were talking about a kavanaugh bump for the last week or so. and then the other side was really excited about it. but it's not really the bump. it's the outcome of the kavanaugh hearing. now if republicans had lost, i would say oh, no, they're going to be energized in 29 days. >> right. >> and they're probably going to come out. but they won and we lost. and the energy on our side is just there.

and it's so funny because they were excited about a bump, right. but they were in the gutter. of course, the only way they can go was up. we have been consistent, democrats have been consistent for a year with the energy, with the generic ballot. and it hasn't gone down. it's been consistent. and so that's what's important. what we have seen in the long-term. virginia, we won because of health care. that was the number one things that people cared about. well took alabama, as you guys were talking about, a seat that 25 years ago was the last time a democrat held. so the energy is there. and in virginia, women, suburban women crossed over. >> right. >> and the governor, the democratic -- ended up being the governor won by higher margins than hillary clinton a year prior. so the energy is there. we just have to get people out. that's the big thing right now. . that is the big thing is getting people out and also making sure that people's voter registrations are still valid. >> exactly. i would argue election day is happening now. >> yeah. >> people are voting early.

so we have to get folks out as soon as we can, if you can vote early in your state. >> what is the core message democrats are putting out? is it a check on trump? what is the core message democrats are using to get people out? >> the way i've gone out on the road, people have really understood that republicans in congress are not a check on this president, and they understand the people, we the people have to be that check. so they understand the importance of their vote this time around, and just the divisiveness of this president, the racism, the sexism, the misogyny. and there is a lot of anger for that. and of course they care about health care. they care about economy, education, all of those things are really important, and we are actually on the right side of history on all of those issues. >> people already managed to stay mad for eight entire years of obama. all the democrats have to do is manage to stay mad for 29 more days new for being here. thank you very much, my friend. always great to see you. a new window open tonight in the mueller investigation. one of the reporters who broke

that story joins us next. and here. see? opportunity. hi! cinturones por favor. gracias. ev-er-y-where. about to be parents. it's doing a lot of kicking down there. meeting the parents. it's gonna be fine. and this driver, logging out to watch his kid hit one out of the... go dani, go! opportunity is everywhere. all you have to do to find it is get out... here. ♪

we're tumbling end we haover end up here.ms. what are the chances your not coming back? five seconds to mandatory abort. that's one small step for man, [ alarms blaring ] one giant leap for mankind. first man. rated pg-13. yes. it's a targeted medicine proven to help prevent severe asthma attacks, and lower oral steroid use. about 50% of people with severe asthma have too many cells called eosinophils in their lungs. fasenra™ is designed to work with the body to target and remove eosinophils. fasenra™ is an add-on injection for people 12 and up with severe eosinophilic asthma. don't use fasenra™ for sudden breathing problems or other problems caused by eosinophils.

fasenra™ may cause headache, sore throat, and allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth, and tongue, or trouble breathing. don't stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to. tell your doctor if your asthma worsens or if you have a parasitic infection. fasenra™ is a targeted treatment for eosinophilic asthma. that's important. ask an asthma specialist about fasenra™.

when you're in charge of a presidential campaign, everything you do seems to take on extra importance.

this is a picture of paul manafort riding in an elevator at the republican national convention. check out the official caption on this picture from reuters. paul manafort, campaign manager for republican presidential candidate donald trump rides the elevator at the republican national convention in cleveland, ohio. stop the presses! and that's just one in a series of paul manafort doing mundane, routine things at the rnc that have been preserved for all eternity by the press corps. here is paul manafort opening a door. here's paul manafort sitting in a folding chair. here's a woman fixing paul manafort's lapel. here's paul manafort talking on his cell phone. here's a woman fixing paul manafort lapel while he is talking on his cell phone. can you handle the history? now those photos might not always totally capture it, but paul manafort actually was super busy at the rnc in 2016. the whole reason paul manafort was on the trump campaign in the first place was so that he could whip delegate votes a the convention. as the primary started winding down, there was major fear in

the trump campaign that their candidate would not have enough delegates to clinch the nomination, that no republican candidate would outright win. in that case, the rnc would be a brokered convention, a floor fight. it would be up to the candidates to whip votes on the convention floor and persuade individual delegates to swing the nomination in their favor. and that is why the trump campaign hired paul manafort. he was supposed to be their delegate guru, the expert pulling the strings behind the scenes to make sure donald trump got the delegates he needed to clinch the nomination and face off against hillary clinton in the general election. the idea was to get paul manafort to work his magic. that's what the trump campaign was doing in public in the summer of 2016 to secure the delegates needed to win the nomination. well, tonight more than two years later we have new details about what the campaign was apparently doing in private. this is brand-new from "the new york times." trump campaign aide requested online manipulation plans from

israeli intelligence firm. quote, a top trump campaign official requested proposals in 2016 from an israeli company to create fake online identities to use social media manipulation and to gather intelligence to help defeat republican primary race opponents and hillary clinton, according to interviews and copies of the proposals. the campaign official rick gates sought one proposal to use bogus personas and target and sway 5,000 delegates to the 2016 republican national convention by attacking senator ted cruz of texas, mr. trump's main opponent at the time. and that was not the only service the israeli intelligence firm reportedly was offering to the trump campaign. quote, another proposal describes opposition research and complimentary intelligence activities about mrs. clinton and people close to her. a third proposal sketched out a month's long plan to help mr. trump by using social media to help expose or amplify division

among rival campaigns and factions. the times tonight reports that those are the proposals that were sent to the trump campaign by the israeli firm offering their services. the paper says the condolence w correspondence was conducted in secret. in addition to the times apparently containing these formally secret documents, the documents were also obtained by one special counsel robert mueller. quote, investigators working for robert mueller have obtained copies of the proposals and questioned side group employees. according to people familiar with those introduce. "the times" identifies manafort deputy rick gates as that person who sought the proposals from the israeli intelligence firm. rick gates, of course, pleaded guilty in february in the mueller investigation, and he's agreed to cooperate fully. so what could the special counsel's office make of this? and what happens now?

joining us now is ronan bergman, one of the "new york times" reporters who broke this story. he is a staff writer for "the new york times" magazine based in tel aviv. mr. bergman, thank you so much for joining us tonight. >> thank you, joy. thank you for inviting me. >> thank you. we have a slight delay. first let's talk about this company, sy group. who the are they? >> sy group someone of those israeli intelligence company, private intelligence companies. there are a few of them. you probably heard of another company black cube that was involved in the harvey weinstein case and some others. but what is common to all of them, they're staffed with former operatives of the israeli mossad, israeli military intelligence, people who has great expertise in the different realms of intelligence, surveillance, human and manipulation of the social media, collecting of intelligence and deploying this intelligence to manipulate

people. the veteran israeli agents wanted to make some money and formed one of them, side group that specialized in the surveillance and manipulation of the social media, offered their services to countries and organization worldwide. they are now in liquidation, but during the years of 2014, 2015, '16 and '17, they were very, very successful. as you said that. >> offered their service. they were solicited to offer their services to the trump campaign. >> do we know how they were solicited? how they were connected to the trump campaign in the first place? >> yeah. a person by the name of sager connected an election election expert by the name of george birnbaum. he was close to finkelstein, the master of the victory of prime minister netanyahu back in 1996.

he is close to former and current israeli officials. george birnbaum was the one who met with rick gates of the trump campaign and spoke with him about side group. rick gates in that meeting in the mandarin hotel in d.c. expressed concern by the trump campaign highest authorities that delegates of the republican parties are going to sway away from trump and not vote for him, and asked or was pitched to a proposal, to ask for a pohl approximately from sy group to have their expertise into first identifying 5,000 delegates of the republican party, then deploy a fleet of bots of fictitio fictitious i'd tis of bots over the internet, approach the delegates, connect with them on

special different reasons, not necessarily about the elections, and then feed them with pro-trump and anti-ted cruz reasons why to vote for trump and not for anyone else. and this would be followed up sometimes by other means of connection, even phone calls. the legality of the proposal was also -- please. >> no go on. >> the legality of the proposal was under question and sy group even seek the help and the illegal review of a company of a legal firm in the u.s., one of the most prestigious one, and they have come up with legal review saying there are problems with the legality of this action and the company sy group have to maintain that much of the activity should be performed by u.s. citizens. and if the proposal was executed, they wanted to hire

many, many more operatives, some of them dual citizenship israeli and american and open a special office to execute the whole campaign. >> it sounds like cambridge analytica, but the targets being republican delegates at the convention. fascinating report. ronan bergman of "the new york times," a reporter based in tel aviv. thank you so much for your time tonight, and congratulations on the big scoop. >> thank you so much, joy. >> thank you. and this week, we've got not one, but two scoops from the muller investigation. the first was this story about the israeli intelligence firm. the second scoop is just ahead. stay with us. much more to come. to most, he's phil mickelson, pro golfer.

to me, he's, well, dad. so when his joint pain from psoriatic arthritis got really bad, it scared me. and what could that pain mean? joint pain could mean joint damage. enbrel helps relieve joint pain, helps stop irreversible joint damage and helps skin get clearer. enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious sometimes fatal events including infections, tuberculosis, lymphoma, other cancers, nervous system and blood disorders and allergic reactions have occurred. tell your doctor if you've been some place where fungal infections are common, or if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for heart failure, or if you have persistent fever, bruising, bleeding, or paleness.

don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. since enbrel, dad's back to being dad. visit enbrel.com and use the joint damage simulator to see how your joint damage could be progressing. ask about enbrel. enbrel. fda approved for over 16 years. after bill's back needed a vacation from his vacation. so he stepped on the dr. scholl's kiosk. it recommends our best custom fit orthotic to relieve foot, knee, or lower back pain so you can move more. dr. scholl's. born to move. >> tech: so you think this chip is nothing to worry about? well at safelite, we know sooner or later every chip will crack. these friends were on a trip when their windshield got chipped. so they scheduled at safelite.com. they didn't have to change their plans or worry about a thing. i'll see you all in a little bit. and i fixed it right away with a strong repair they can trust. plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. >> customer: really?! >> tech: being there whenever you need us that's another safelite advantage. >> singers: safelite repair, safelite replace.

not to the finish.t. but to the beginning. a fight that can only be won, if we stand together for one cause. him. expert care

for every new beginning. okay. file this one under mystery. last summer, t"wall street journal" was out with this scoop about a republican operative named peter smith. in the final stretch of the 2016 presidential campaign, peter smith was on a quest, hunting for what he believed to be e-mails stolen by russian hackers from hillary clinton's private e-mail server. "the wall street journal" interviewed mr. smith for that story. smith implied to the journal that his secret endeavor was somehow tied to michael flynn who had been an adviserer in the campaign. and then about ten days after he talked to "the wall street journal," peter smith died. he was found dead in a minnesota hotel room in an apparent suicide. before we had much time to digest that bombshell, the very next day "the wall street journal" was back for round two. according to the journal, it was not just mike flynn who peter

smith implied was connected to his search for hillary clinton's e-mails. according to smith, it was also a handful of other top tier campaign aides like kellyanne conway and steve bannon. and from the beginning, this whole story about the republican operative trying to get his hands on stolen e-mails has been kind of an outlier. it's been this obscure avenue of reporting that feels like it could be explosive, but it's kind of hard to nail down exactly what any of it means. well, today "the wall street journal" added a little bit more to the picture. here's the headline. "gop operative secretly raised at least $100,000 in search for clinton e-mails." quote, peter smith sought and collected the funds from at least four wealthy donors as part of the plan to obtain mrs. clinton's stolen e-mails from hackers just weeks before election day in 2016. his fundraising efforts were clandestine. mr. smith appears to have use and alias, not just for himself,

but also for the money he was raising, making references to a washington scholarship fund for russian students, which "the wall street journal" says they were unable to confirm even exists. and if you're wondering what all of this means, if you're wondering what might connect all these dots, you're in very good company. the journal reports that robert mueller is also investigating peter smith's quest for clinton's e-mails and mysterious donations for the russian scholarship programs the journal has not yet found. quote, associates of mr. smith have been interviewed by mueller's investigators or summoned before a grand jury as recently as this summer. robert mueller has obtained documents from mr. smith's estate, as well as his encrypted hard drives, and those hard drives are also in the hands of congress. the senate and house intelligence committee is investigating russia's attack on our election. and a member of the house intelligence committee joinses next. stay with us. next stay with us

i'm ken jacobus, i'm the owner of good start packaging. we distribute environmentally-friendly packaging for restaurants. and we've grown substantially. so i switched to the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. and last year, i earned $36,000 in cash back. that's right, $36,000. which i used to offer health insurance to my employees. my unlimited 2% cash back is more than just a perk, it's our healthcare. can i say it? what's in your wallet? and my brother ray and i started searching for answers. (vo) when it's time to navigate in-home care,

follow that bright star. because brightstar care earns the same accreditation as the best hospitals. and brightstar care means an rn will customize a plan that evolves with mom's changing needs. (woman) because dad made us promise we'd keep mom at home. (vo) call 844-4-brightstar for your free home care planning guide. it's a revolution in sleep. the new sleep number 360 smart bed is on sale now, from $899, during sleep number's fall sale.

it senses your movement, and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it even helps with this. so you wake up ready to put your pedal to the metal. and now, during our fall sale weekend special, the queen sleep number 360 c2 smart bed is only $899. plus, 24-month financing and free home delivery. ends monday. sleep number. proven, quality sleep. it was a surprise late last

month when devin nunes, the republican chair of the house intelligence committee, suddenly agreed to publicly release the transcripts of more than 50 interviews his committee conducted during the short russia probe, something the democrats on the committee had been clamoring for forbe months but republicans had blocked. those transcripts will first need to undergo an intelligence review, are expected to be released in the next few weeks. exactly why republicans on the committee had a change of heart is unclear. when one of the panel's democrats asked nunes if this decision was made in coordination with the white house or with trump's legal team, nunes refused to answer. the release is also selective because nunes is not releasing all of the witness interviews. the private testimony of former fbi director james comey, former cia director john brennan, and former nsa director mike rogers will remain secret, as will the transcripts of two sitting members of congress, debbie wasserman schultz who was in charge of the democratic national committee at the time of the russian hack, and california republican dana

rohrabacher. republicans said their transcripts were being withheld from public view as a, quote, professional courtesy extended to members of congress. however, wasserman schultz's office told us today they have zero issue with the congresswoman's testimony being released. adds for rohrabacher, different story. he has repeatedly cast doubt on whether russia hacked the dnc at all. he has met with several key russian figures in the probe and his staunch pro-russia sympathies has led him to be nick new year's day named putin's favorite congressman. rohrabacher said, quote, i'll think about it. well, now we may know the reason for his hesitancy. in an op-ed this weekend in "the sacramento bee," devin nunes's hometown newspaper, democratic member of the committee eric wa swalwell writes nunes buried evidence on russian meddling to protect trump. i know because i'm on the committee. quote, our investigation did reveal worrisome contacts between the russians and

candidate trump, his family, his businesses and the campaign, yet every time we sought to learn more, we were blocked. as for rohrabacher's testimony, i took part in that lengthy interview and i was disturbed by his contacts with russia before and during the 2016 campaign. democrats at our hearing moved to release rohrabacher's transcript. nunes killed our effort. he is burying that transcript to protect his friend. and joining us now as the author of that op-ed and member of the house intelligence committee, california congressman eric swalwell. congressman, thank you so much for being here. >> thanks for having me, joyce. >> first let's talk about mr. rohrabacher. what do you know about mr. rohrabacher rohrabacher involvement in meddling? >> that transcript should be released yesterday as the republicans promised. we saw just a number of concerning contacts that he had for decade was the russians, but particularly as the russians were interfering in our campaign. and he would run into russians all over the world and didn't seem to think there was anything

unusual that russians would be popping in and out of places where he has traveled. and, you know, that is quite concern, but also, his contacts with people on the trump campaign as the russians were interfering. the republicans said that from the very beginning, these transcripts should be made public. we have fought or the that every single time. ranking member schiff has pressed for them to keep that promise. and even today after voting these out two weeks ago the public still has not seen them. >> is it something potentially criminal? >> well, it sees this we should have been able to pursue more leads. we had a take them at their word investigation that the republicans led, which was they put people in the chair. republicans would say did you collude? no, great. all right. next witness. and we would learn a lot from our questions. what the public will see is it was almost 10-1 as far as the amount of time we spent questioning witnesses and what little the republicans asked. but every time we learned something, we would say well, why don't we subpoena a phone record here, why don't we

subpoena a bank record? why don't we find out in michael cohen went over to prague and look at his travelogues. and every single request they shut down. i think you saw a deep willingness on the trump campaign to work with the russians, and every evidence we needed to tie that all together they stopped. >> are you accusing chairman devin nunes of literally thwarting the efforts to investigate this and doing so on behalf of the white house? >> it was clear he was doing this on behalf of the white house. me did thwart every effort we took to get to the truth. look, this committee has always worked in a bipartisan way. it's one of the worst things that has come out of this russia attack is we should have had unity as an antidote, and instead you saw the chairman work to protect the president when we really needed a leader while our democracy was on the ropes. and i didn't take doing this lightly. i knew that it's rather unprecedented to write an op-ed in somebody's hometown. >> sure. >> but our democracy is truly on the ropes, and he is the one guy that controls the subpoena power on that committee, and there is so much that the american people

should see, and there is so much more we should learn if we had run the investigation the right way. >> and we're learning from "the new york times" and other reporting that there was even an operation. it was very similar to what cambridge analytica was doing to the general public. it was actually being done to republican delegates, or at least there was a proposal to potentially do it, to republican delegates. that something that the house intelligence committee would look into if democrats get ahold of it? >> yes. and some of the evidence that we saw, which was that whether it was the president who invited more hacking from the russians at a public press conference to as i son who said in an e-mail i love it when offered dirt on hillary clinton, up and down the campaign, there was just this eagerness to work with the russians. and now we're starting to see in this new reporting that it wasn't just the russians. they were willing to do anything it took to win. >> and we know that at least according to the polling, a check on the president is something that a lot of voters are expressing that they want. if democrats get the gavel on the house intelligence committee, what are the things that you guys are going to do? are you going to try to get donald trump's tax returns? will where will this committee do? >> do the investigations that

the republicans weren't willing to do. but i hope we can do it in a bipartisan way. i don't want to write off republicans who were fearful over the last two years. one republican on the committee said that when the president tweets at you, he wins. so i have seen that fear, but i don't think we should just write them off. we should hope that they see that the president is toxic. he can't save you, that it's time for us to do the right thing for the country, and hopefully these investigations are bipartisan. >> congressman -- >> i still have hope for that. >> all right. well, that's good. hope is good. congressman eric swalwell. >> my pleasure. >> thank you for being here. much more ahead tonight. stay with us. e ahead tonight. stay with us like here. and here. see? opportunity. hi! cinturones por favor. gracias. ev-er-y-where. about to be parents. it's doing a lot of kicking down there. meeting the parents. it's gonna be fine. and this driver, logging out to watch his kid hit one out of the... go dani, go! opportunity is everywhere. all you have to do to find it is get out... here. ♪

with advil liqui-gels, what stiff joints? what bad back? advil is... relief that's fast. strength that lasts. you'll ask... what pain? with advil liqui-gels.

should happen everydred five hundred years, right? fact is, there have been twenty-six in the last decade. allstate is adapting. with drones to assess home damage sooner. and if a flying object damages your car, you can snap a photo and get your claim processed in hours, not days. plus, allstate can pay your claim in minutes. now that you know the truth...

are you in good hands? this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome. stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows.

click, call or visit a store today. about a year ago, the president's son-in-law jared kushner made an unannounced trip to riyadh, saudi arabia. it was his third trip there, but this was a secret trip, so he decided to fly commercial. he went there to meet with saudi arabia's crown prince, known to most as mbs. kushner and mbs, both in their 30s, bonded. they reportedly stayed up into the wee hours of the night, quote, swapping stories and planning strategy. days after that trip, mbs rolled out what he called an anti-corruption crackdown throughout saudi arabia, where he rounded up hundreds of saudis and imprisoned them in riyadh's ritz carlton hotel. some were subjected to torture. the intercept later reported that mbs bragged that kushner had leaked information from the presidential daily brief that included names of saudis who were disloyal to the crown

prince. in response to that crackdown, donald trump said he had, quote, great confidence in the crown prince. they know exactly what they're doing that. was from november of last year. this 2018 the state department put out a report on human rights in saudi arabia. in the executive summary from that report they did not seem quite as confident as the president. quote, according to media reports members of the security forces coerced with relative impunity. at least some of the detainees to the point of requiring medical care. a little further down. quote, in september 2017, well-known saudi journalist jumalkhashoggi said he moved to the united states in self-exile and could face arrest upon returning home due to his writing. that journalist fled saudi arabia and moved to virginia. he started writing a column for "the washington post." about a week ago he entered the

saudi consulate in istanbul turkey around 1:30 tuesday afternoon to obtain documents he needed to get married, and he never came out. his fiancee waited for him outside until midnight and returned the next day when the consulate reopened. questions started to circulate what happened to him. to that jared kushner's buddy the crown prince of saudi arabia, mbs, insisted the journalist left the building not long after he entered, adding that turkey can feel free to search the consulate for the saudi journalist, because, quote, we have nothing to hide. since then there are reports that jamal khshoggi was killed and dismembered in the consulate. if you're keeping track so far the u.k. and french foreign ministries have both released statements on the disappearance of the saudi journalist.

the u.s. state department which initially included them in their human rights report have not issued a statement. and today when donald trump was asked if he was concerned about the saudi journalist he said, i'm concerned. i do not like hearing about it and hopefully that will sort itself out. hopefully. joining us now is the global opinions editor for "the washington post," and mr. khashoggi's editor at the post. if those of you who didn't read your moving piece, tell us about about him and how you came to be his editor? >> it was about a year ago obviously we're reading more about the crack downs in saudi arabia. he was very often quoted in media reports talking to

officials, just giving insight into the kingdom. so we saw that and figured why not just have him explain to our readers what was going on in the kingdom. that particular op-ed, you know, in the previous six months or so he had actually been banned from writing. he had been told not to tweet. so in a lot of ways that was his sort of coming out so to speak. and in that op-ed that's where he discussed fleeing the kingdom and leaving his job, leaving his family. and also just saying that saudi arabia never had been that unbearable. and in that he said, you know, saudi arabia deserves better. so that's how he started. he started to do a lot more. we've done dozens of op-eds, and yes he was critical of mbs. there were opps where he compared mbs to putin. he just said the crack down on

this -- and even for people who initially supported the reforms were being locked up in jail. and he felt he could not remain silent. and as i've been saying, he didn't want to be labeled as a dissident. he wasn't trying to overthrow the regime. he was an advisor to the royal court for such a long time. he just really honestly wanted to advise the prince. there were times i was looking back over messages and there were times where he just said, i just want to advise this prince. i don't want to insult him, i don't want to pick on him. if you'll read it, i just hope he'll do the right thing. and that's where he was coming from. >> and to your knowledge, did he have reason to fear being inside that embassy in turkey? >> to my knowledge according to specific reports specific to this case he was warned by his fiancee, by friends. i heard he received personal

assurances from the ambassador here in washington. but he decided that it was fine. i think reporting said he said that the staff seemed friendly enough. but as far as whether or not he had any specific threats that he communicated to me -- i know he felt under pressure particularly with his family. his family being threatened or slapped with travel restrictions, his ex-wife divorcing him because of the pressures. he was under tremendous pressures and he often communicated how he felt sad he couldn't go home. >> most importantly, karen, we're so sorry this is happening. i can see your emotion coming through the screen. thank you so much for being here. and up next, what happened when one red state democrat went home for the weekend after voting no on brett kavanaugh. that story's next. no on brett h

that story's next. ♪ ♪ i don't care where we go ♪ and i don't care what we do ♪ just take me with you there are roadside attractions. and then there's our world-famous on-road attraction. the 2019 glc. visit your local mercedes-benz dealer for exclusive offers.

back pain can't win. now introducing aleve back and muscle pain. only aleve targets tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve back & muscle. all day strong. all day long.

so if you decided to avoid your television tonight during brett kavanaugh's swearing in, i totally feel you. the president's apology to brett kavanaugh on behalf of the nation, was the latest republican slap at the me too movement. in a steady stream of jolts during the kavanaugh hearings exposing republican's raw

contempt for all things me too. consider heidi heitkamp's republican opponent kramer who told "the new york times" he and others don't buy into the yes, i do, quote, you're just supposed to believe somebody because they said it happen. calling to me too movement a movement towards victimizization and saying the women in his family didn't relate. comments that did not sit well with his democratic opponent heidi heitkamp. my mom did, and i think it affected my mom her whole life, and it didn't make her less strong. heitkamp told "the times" reporter, quote, and i want you to put this there, it did not make my mom less strong that she was a victim. she got stronger and she made us strong. and to suggest this movement doesn't make women strong and stronger is really unfortunate. senator heitkamp says her mom

dorine who passed away in april was sexually assaulted as a teenager. she pulled herself together to sing with the band. you know the words. took a political risk with her vote this week to stand up for sexual assault seurvivors and fr her mom. i will see you on saturday morning for my show "am joy." now it's time for "last word" with lawrence o'donnell. well, the strangest meeting in history between a president and a deputy attorney general took place today on air force one. it was a meeting that president trump scheduled specifically to set up a competing television event on the day that christine blasey ford present