tv Politics Nation With Al Sharpton MSNBC November 17, 2018 2:00pm-3:00pm PST
2:00 pm
and that's wraps it up for me this hour. i'm richard liu. i'll see you tomorrow. you can catch me on twitter and facebook. let me know what you think, if you have any ideas. for now its over to reverend al sharpton, politics nati"politic >> good evening and welcome to politics nati"politics nation". we're following two breaking stories for you tonight. first, the florida recount drama is drawing to a close. less than 24 hours before all returns are due to finally decide the state's razor thin senate race. next, to georgia, that state's high profile governor's race is finally over as democratic hopeful stacey abrams ends her
2:01 pm
historic campaign with everything but a concession. we'll get in to both stories shortly, but first, president trump is in california visiting with officials and communities ravaged by the deadliest wildfire in the state's history. at this hour, 71 people have been confirmed dead, more than 1,000 unaccounted for, with thousands more displaced. joining us now from chico, california, in the heart of the devastation is nbc news correspondent scott cohen. tell us what's going on at this point. >> reporter: the president is just about to leave northern california, spent a little less than two hours here, now on his way to southern california, and also that mass shooting in thousand oaks, to pay respects there. he spent time in the devastation
2:02 pm
in paradise that community that's been basically decimated by the so-called camp fire and spent some time meeting with first responders. he was accompanied by jerry brown and gavin newsom. both the governor and governor-elect, of course, talk a lot about climate change but the president said that the issue still here remains, forestry management. listen. >> does seeing this devastation change your opinion at all on climate change? >> no, no. we're going to have forest that's are very safe because we can't go through this every year, we go through this and we'll have safe forests and that's happening as we speak. >> you said change in the fire management, should the state -- >> we'll work together with the federal government -- no, state, local and federal government. federal government's going to work with the state and we'll help them with funding and
2:03 pm
we're -- its going to take a lot of funding. >> reporter: and the governor and governor-elect didn't call him on that. in fact, there's a lot of agreement there that there does need to be better forestry management. the underlying cause, of course, is the subject of continued debate. i'll give you a sense of where i am here. this is one of a half a dozen evacuation centers from the so-called chico fire. this one alone has 177 people here and the big issue -- you know, we have 1,000 plus people missing and this is one of the ways that they are -- go right ahead, this is the ways that they are trying to account for people and this is literally involves people coming here, looking for loved ones to see if they're here, writing the name on the board and you check to see if that person is here. that's how daunting a task we have here. as you can see, very few names have been crossed off the list. meantime, the red cross is also trying to connect people and one
2:04 pm
of the things they're doing is actually going out into the community and trying to connect with people saying, are you an evacuatee, getting the names so the loved ones can find the people who are missing, but with more than 1,000 people missing and all of the devastation here, the totals already 71 dead, the fear is that number's going to go higher. >> thank you, scott cohn. now let's bring in our panel. first congressman john garamendi. he's the former lieutenant governor of california. also with us david brock, chairman of american bridge and founder of media matters for america, and there's copeland, a gop strategist and founder of the urban conservative and chris liu, former manager of president obama's cabinet and former deputy secretary of labor. he is now senior fellow at the
2:05 pm
university of virginia. let me go to you, congressman. you were a lieutenant governor. >> sure. >> you know about management, forestry management. it seems the president even in the midst of this and in the midst of the democratic governor brown, jerry brown and incoming governor gavin newsom, a democrat taking the high road, he still blaming it, basically, on the forestry mismanagement as his terms and playing down the climate change aspects. how do you react to that as one that help run the state of california that went through wildfires before, maybe not as deadly as this one, but have gone through crisis and emergencies like this before that was climate related? >> i certainly been through many of these dating back to the oakland hills fire when i was the insurance commissioner in california. that was 29 dead in that fire and that was in the oakland hills.
2:06 pm
so, yes, i've seen many, many fires over the years and what i have seen is a change in the nature of the fires. more fires, larger fires, hotter fires, more destructive fires and also the president is, at least partially correct, we do have a forest management problem. the national forest and the state forest, they are under serious stress as a result of climate change. the number of dead trees, dying trees in our forests both national, state and private is over-the-top and probably the hundreds of millions of trees. that is definitely a forest management problem caused by climate change. this particular fire, the fire at paradise was not a forest fire issue, it was an urban fire started in the grasslands, brushlands of california, swept into the city and just wiped it out. 26,000 people, the entire city is virtually gone.
2:07 pm
now, what is that caused by? well, climate change once again. very dry, very hot conditions, very dry vegetation as a result of the additional heat that has been brought on by climate change. >> we all have our various opinions, but we can't have different facts. if, in fact, as just stated by the congressman, we're dealing with urban fire that was accelerated by climate change, wouldn't it have been more responsible for the president to say, yes, we have to deal with climate change and we also have to deal with the forestry management? >> i said to, liz, right now. >> sorry. >> no worries. i actually agree with you. i think that you're seeing the president react to the midterm elections. its said to be an indication of the voters are repudiation of this president or the president
2:08 pm
in office and instead of having a conversation about his contribution to that, he pivoted over to criticizing which he does anything and any one and he pinpointed forestry management as an opportunity to criticize california, a state that he lost by a wide margin. so we're talking about people who are losing their lives, people who have lost property, thousands of people who are missing and instead of sending his concerns being the president and the leader of this country, he sends out a tweet blaming forest management and then saying, maybe, we shouldn't even send federal money to support those people who have been harmed by the fire. its disgusting to say the least the way this president can react when he should be the centered moral compass and the moral leader, the voice of reason of this country, he tends to not be able to do that. >> and you're the republican on the panel, but let me -- >> and i'm the republican. >> let me go to you, chris liu. you worked in the obama administration in various
2:09 pm
capacities. i know because i sat across the table from you on many of our civil rights issues. when you look at this from one who worked in and around the white house, how do we deal with as liz says, 71 people are dead, over 1,000 missing, thousands displaced. at what point do those in the white house say the moral issue here, the concern for the loss of human life and families and people that are still displaced supercedes trying to play the blame game here? >> you're exactly right. i was with president obama in 2011 when we had devastating tornadoes in missouri and alabama, killed over 200 people. could you imagine if barack obama had blamed those states or the residents for those disasters? that's not what a president, much less a decent person does. and so, its important -- i applaud president trump for going to california, for seeing this upfront. that's certainly a step forward.
2:10 pm
but its also important to understand that the way that he has denigrated federal employees over the last two years. these federal employees are the ones that are helping to respond to these disasters and are going to be on the ground to help these communities respond, and its important, yes, forest management is part of the issue, but its also important to realize that 60% of california's forests are under the control of the federal government and so if the president is serious about solving this problem, he has to look into his own house and ask his own people to help address this issue. >> david, you founded media matters. the media focus on this and the disaster and the victims has been consistent, but has the media really dealt with the insensitivity that the president has shown criticizing all the way up until this visit and repeating it in the visit, those
2:11 pm
that are really out there dealing with this issue, on the front lines, that are the first responders and dealing with solely there management and those that are handling this rather than assessing that, seeing how the federal government can help and really making the majority of his delivery there the compassion for those families that have lost loved ones because of a natural disaster that had no bearing at all on what they could have been possibly responsible for? >> i think the media appropriately is focusing on the tragedy, but a number of the facts that just came out on this panel such as the fact that 60% of these lands are under federal management, that president trump as he usually does wants to blame others and escape responsibility, he never takes responsibility, and i think there hasn't been an appropriate focus on how much president trump has tried to politicize
2:12 pm
what is a terrible tragedy and far be it from me to agree with the republican on the panel, the reality is this is classic trump and media really need to focus on facts here and one of the facts that's underlying this is climate change and we're not really reading enough about that and we're not seeing enough about that in the tv coverage. >> congressman, i did note that both governor jerry brown and incoming governor newsom took the high road and said that they would tour with the president and they said this was something that was above politics and even on this panel, you have david brock and al sharpton agreeing with liz. some people can rise above politics. how did you react to it with jerry brown and with gavin newsom did today in your state? >> well, they did it exactly right. they did what they should do as the governor and the soon to be governor of the state and how do we rebuild and how do we take
2:13 pm
care of the people that are displaced? i just left just before i got here one of the evacuation centers south of the fire more than 120 people there, they are seriously impacted. these are mostly poor people. they were living in low income or rental or in some cases shacks up in the mountains. so we have a responsibility as citizens of this state, as officials of the state to see that they're taking care of. there's a second step in this and that's the step of the federal government coming forward with its support through the fema programs and the small business administration to provide the money to rebuild a city. we're not talking about a few houses here, some 9,300 homes have been destroyed and an entire city of 26,000 people. so that's going to take an enormous amount of support from the federal government, we're going to need to put that money into the omnibus bill which will
2:14 pm
be voted on hopefully before middecember and then we've got to go about how do we build resilient communities in the future and what are we going to do about evacuations. interestingly, just six months ago, i introduced a bill in the house, one in the senate to provide for evacuation programs. >> these are the kind of things we need to focus on. i'm going to have to leave it there. thank you, congressman. >> thank you. >> the panel is sticking around. coming up, senator bernie sanders, will he be running for president again in 2020? but first, stacey abrams says democracy failed georgia as she ends her bid for governor. who exactly is she blaming? we'll be right back. hi dad. no. don't try to get up. hi, i'm julie, a right at home caregiver.
2:15 pm
and if i'd been caring for tom's dad, i would have noticed some dizziness that could lead to balance issues. that's because i'm trained to report any changes in behavior, no matter how small, so tom could have peace of mind. we'll be right there. we have to go. hey, tom. you should try right at home. they're great for us. the right care. right at home. ♪ ♪ the united states postal service makes more holiday deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country.
2:16 pm
2:17 pm
2:18 pm
welcome back. minutes ago the state of florida passed the latest deadline in its statewide recount. this one reassesses thousands of mail-in and provisional ballots rejected over mismatched signatures, a likely for malty in the state's race for governor. with this week's updated returns showed ron desantis maintaining his lead over andrew gillum and thus avoiding the concluding hand recount.
2:19 pm
that will decide the senate race between rick scott and bill nelson, who is chances are now slim at best with less than 24 hours. before all recounts, results, manual and machine are finally due, meanwhile, in georgia, the secretary of state has just certified brian kemp as governor-elect after stacey abrams ended her hard fought campaign friday with a forceful parting shot at her opponent. >> to watch an elected official who claims to represent the people in the state baldly pin his hopes on the suppression of the people's rights to vote has been appalling. let's be clear. this is not a speech of concession, because concession means to acknowledge an action is right, true or proper. as a woman of conscientious and
2:20 pm
faith, i cannot concede that. >> the panel is back and joining us is legal analyst mya wildly. let me go to you first, maya. stacey abrams made it very clear that this was voter suppression and he may have won the seat but he won it in an unfair and unjust way. he was the referee as well as the opponent and there were voters punched, there were machines closed. really, if section 5 of the voting rights act was still in place, they would have had to preclear that, the fact that they removed section 5, he could do what he wanted. your reaction to stacey abrams' statement and the end results. >> i think stacey abrams was sending just as you're saying a very strong message about a system of suppression that was blocking black people from the
2:21 pm
ballot and that -- remember, brian kemp, back in 2010, he actually has a long history of doing this, back in 2010 he actually prosecuted leaders, black leaders and black folks who had elected to a school board first time in the history of that county, that blacks were a majority on that school board and he actually took them -- arrested them, charged them with voter fraud for essentially get out the vote registration work four years of ruining peoples' lives, zero convictions. and the purging -- voter purging, the other things we've heard, even his statement that black people vote its harder for republicans to win is all civil rights violation. >> that was directly quoted. chris liu, you worked in the justice department, we looking at something that clear spells
2:22 pm
out the weakening of the voting rights act was also something that helped set a climate for this because this would have had to be preclear, prethe shelby decision because georgia was one of the states cited in the voting rights act and was on the map that was listed in section 5 that was taken out? >> you're exactly right. its the weakening of the voting rights act. it is all of the different obstructions that have been put in front of people voting. the irony is that this president started his presidency by creating a voter fraud commission which turned up nothing and was disbanded. the real voter fraud is not only the what we're seeing down in georgia, it is voter i.d. laws, it is long lines at polling places in poor african-american communities, its what we're seeing in florida right now with badly designed ballots as well. so those are the things that we should be focusing on and its
2:23 pm
important, really, for democrats as well to be focusing on the secretary of state races which for so long we haven't really focused on. and in georgia, for instance, there is a secretary of state race coming up to replace brian kemp. so hopefully that's a seat that we can take back. >> liz, do you think republicans can really find any joy in the process being accused of being less than fair in order to win? i mean there were major losses. there was a blue wave and now you have a governor in georgia -- i'm sorry, a governor in georgia now certified, a governor-elect that dealt clearly whether one agrees with the term suppression or not, clearly did purge 53,000 voters and did close some polling sites in select areas. >> i think that's a really good question, the majority of
2:24 pm
republicans shouldn't, they can't really take joy in an election that has been tainted with even the assertion of fraud or just not playing by the rules. you mentioned earlier, not only was he a player but he was also a referee. talking about kemp. in georgia -- i want to preface my next statement with this one, as a republican, i do believe voter suppression actually occurs. i do not believe there's rampant voter fraud in this country that when our president was elected he claimed -- i think he also just made a statement in florida that people were going and voting, coming back outside, changing putting on a disguise and going back in, but in georgia, brian kemp's responsibility and administrative responsibility based on georgia's law of use it or lose it was to administratively remove inactive voters from their rolls. i do not classify that as voter suppression. however, there was a significant amount of acts that took place
2:25 pm
in georgia that one could certainly conclude was voter suppression, certain areas as you spoke to populated by african-americans, you have an african-american woman running to be the first african-american governor of that state, it doesn't seem like its coincidence that they closed certain polling places. so, no, republicans shouldn't cheer that we would win a governor's seat by any effect that would depress or minimize the ability for people to exercise their right to vote. >> david, we really sounding the alarm as loudly as we should about these acts of voter suppression, including voter i.d. and other things that have been proven to be impediments to voters and disproportionately to voters of color, particular blacks? >> finally, yes, i think we are and the silver lining in what we saw in georgia was bringing national attention to the issues of voter suppression to restrictive voter i.d. laws and
2:26 pm
when you have officials who are overseeing their own elections. i think you've reached a critical turning point here and this obviously is a problem that goes well beyond georgia. this is a republican tactic that has been going on for quite some time that continues and they simply feel that they win when fewer people vote and i think stacey abrams has done a tremendous service by spotlighting this issue, finally and going forward, think donors, voters are going to be energized for strategy in the south and the southwest where we saw some critical gains in seats in the house in georgia. we saw what happened in arizona and so i think there's continued investment in these places. >> no question about it. the panel, stay with me. we'll be back to you. up next, guess who believes democrats change shirts so they can vote illegally twice? yep, the latest make believe about voter fraud. be right back. i just got my cashback match,
2:27 pm
2:28 pm
...to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. [grunting noise] i'll take that. 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. ensure max protein. in two great flavors. you get the price match guarantee. so if you find your room at a lower rate, hilton is like... we're gonna match that rate and give you an extra 25% off. what would travel sites do if you found a different price? that's not my problem, it's your problem. book at hilton.com and get the hilton price match guarantee.
2:29 pm
hey, what are you guys doing here? we've been helping you prepare and invest for retirement since day one. why would we leave now? because i'm retired now. so? we're voya. we stay with you to and through retirement... with solutions to help provide income throughout. so you'll still be here to help me make smart choices? well, with your finances that is. we had nothing to do with that, uh, tie. or the suit. or the shirt. voya. helping you to and through retirement.
2:30 pm
2:31 pm
public. this time he said this, quote, the republicans don't win and that's because of potentially illegal votes. when people get in line that have absolutely no right to vote and they go around in circles, sometimes they go to their car, put on a different hat, put on a different shirt, come in and vote again. nobody takes anything. its really a disgrace what's going on. now, mr. trump, its obvious you don't know much about the voting process. let me help you out. here in new york where you and i both reside and grow up, you have to go into your voting poll, you have to identify your election district and your assemble district and you have to sign in a book. you can't just walk in and vote, but in trump world, you not only just walk in and vote, you can then go to your car, put on some glasses, put on a hat and go
2:32 pm
right back to the same people and they are too silly, i guess, to know that i'm the person that just came in and voted. not only is it insulting to election workers, it is sad for you to say that and its even more sad if you believe it. be right back. erage accounts. and zero minimums to open an account. we have fidelity mutual funds with zero minimum investment. and now only fidelity offers four zero expense ratio index funds directly to investors. because when you invest with fidelity, all those zeros really add up. ♪ so maybe i'll win ♪ saved by zero you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory.
2:33 pm
prevagen. healthier brain. better life. (pirate girl) ahoy!!!!! gotcha! (girl) nooooooooooooo! (man) nooooo! (vo) quick, the quicker picker upper! bounty picks up messes quicker, and is two times more absorbent. bounty, the quicker picker upper. you'll make my morning, buty the price ruin my day.ou? complicated relationship with milk? pour on the lactaid, 100% real milk, just without that annoying lactose.
2:34 pm
mmm, that's good. the new capital one savor card. earn 4% cash back on dining and 4% on entertainment. now when you go out, you cash in. what's in your wallet? the most highly recommended bed in america just got better. tempur-pedic is now more rejuvenating, more pressure-relieving than ever before. experience the superior sleep of tempur-pedic and save up to $500 on select adjustable mattress sets. visit tempurpedic.com to find your exclusive retailer today. visit tempurpedic.com unlike santa's presents, ours don't just magically appear. they're designed, meticulously.
2:35 pm
2:36 pm
don't let anybody use patriotism as a weapon. we all love our country. >> we have a president who has blurred, even destroyed, the lines between right versus wrong. >> this is a moment in time that is requiring us to ask this question, who are we? >> the democrats will control the house and change is coming to washington. >> this week the national action network held our annual legislative conference in washington and as you just heard, president trump loomed large over the proceedings, but would midterms mostly in the rear-view mirror, this year's conference also played like a role call of likely democratic hopefuls for the 2020 presidential race. well, earlier i spoke with potential 2020 presidential candidate, senator bernie sanders. >> we're joined now by senator bernie sanders.
2:37 pm
senator, in this week's legislative conference, i introduced you saying that i think you are more than anyone has impacted the 2016 primary season and the direction of the democratic party nationally and now that the midterms are over, i want to get to 2020 and you know i'm going to ask you about it, but before we go there, tell me what your takeaway is from the -- from the 2018 midterm elections? what message did it send to america and to the body politic as we know it today? >> first of all, the very good news is that four years ago in the midterm election we had the lowest voter turnout in modern american history. last week we had the highest voter turnout and that is a good thing and the result of that, of course, is the democrats won close to 40 seats in the house.
2:38 pm
they are going to control the house. they won seven governors races, they won hundreds of legislative races in state capitals all over this country and they won the popular vote by a significant amount. so the good news is that we mobilized the grassroots and they came out. obviously, a lot of republicans came out as well and we had some results that we were not happy about. second of all, i know a lot of people are saying what happened in florida, what happened in georgia, what happened in texas? truth is those three candidates, stacey abrams, andrew gillum, beto o'rourke won grassroots campaign and they excited people and they did better in their states running on a progressive agenda than any candidates in those states in recent years. the last point i would make on that al, is to me it is very clear that the american people support the progressive agenda. they do not support the
2:39 pm
republican agenda. the republicans want to give tax breaks to billionaires and cut social security, medicare and medicaid. nobody agrees with that. people do want to raise the minimum wage to 15 bucks an hour. they do want pay equity for women. they do want to make public colleges and universities either free or affordable. they do want health care for all as a right. they do want to create jobs, building the infrastructure. they support criminal justice reform, immigration reform, dealing with the crisis of climate change. those are our issues and we have got to win elections fighting on those principles. >> now, people voted in record numbers. the question now is to go into legislation and policy, some of which you have outlined, how do you think welfare in dealing with issues like voting rights
2:40 pm
and dealing with voter suppression and preexisting conditions, health care and other items that you mentioned and that we discussed this week in the conference in washington? how do we get the conversation there, because there's a lot of chatter about who should be the speaker, who should be this chairman or that chairman of committee, but the people voted because they wanted change? >> that's exactly right, al. i think we have got to be both. you will remember -- you will remember and i remember newt gingrich back with so-called contract with america. i disagreed with everything that he said, but he was bold and he said in 100 days we're going to do a to z and that's what we've got to do. we've got to raise that minimum wage up front, 15 bucks an hour, pay equity for women. we have got to go forward on medicare for all. al, the first, you know -- the first year of my four year phasein of medicare for all calls for lowering the
2:41 pm
eligibility age from 65 to 55 covering all of the children and lowering the cost of prescription drugs. my guess is 75%, 80% of the american people would support us. let us do that. let's rebuild the infrastructure. let us make public colleges and universities affordable. let us deal with climate change. let us deal with the outrages we see in criminal justice right now. these are not only good policy issues, it is what american people want. so my message is, let us be bold, not timid. let us show the american people that we are on their side. obviously we got to deal with trump and his racism and his sexism and his homophobia and religious bigotry and we've got to deal with his attacks on democracy, but we can't just do that, we need to stand up for working families and let them know that when they voted for
2:42 pm
us, they will see a difference in their lives. we've got to deliver. >> now, 2020 everyone is talking about this candidate or that candidate. a central question is, will bernie sanders run again? >> and the answer is, al, i will make that decision at the appropriate time. i will be honest with you, you're a friend, you know, we're looking at it, but it is a very -- it is a very -- its a decision that impacts your family and i want to make sure that when i make that decision, if i decide to run, that i have concluded, in fact, that i am the strongest candidate who can defeat donald trump. we got some great people out there who are thinking of running. they are my friends. and i've got to make that decision that, based on my background, based on my past, based on my ideas that, in fact,
2:43 pm
i am the candidate that can defeat trump -- >> you're not ruling it out, you're saying you're seriously considering it? >> that is correct. >> now, what type of candidate do you think the democratic party and independents need to defeat the president if he's the candidate in 2020? >> i think you need a candidate who has -- can focus on -- two ways, two approaches. number one, we've got to deal with the ugliness of donald trump, his a thor tearion, his racism and sexism and all of that. that has got to be dealt with. we're talking about the future of american democracy. i think you and i who have known each other for a few years would never have thought that in 2018 we really would be talking about the need to protect the fundamentals of american democracy. >> right. >> from an authoritarian
2:44 pm
president. we would've talked about health care or the environment or criminal justice. not about the fundamentals of american democracy and to protect those fundamentals against an authoritarian president. obviously, you got to deal with that. second of all, going back to the work that you have done, jesse jackson has done. we've got to bring our coalition together. that means working people who are black and white and latino, asian american, native american to demand that we have an economy and a government that works for all. unemployment today is reasonably low. that's good. but there are tens of millions of workers today who cannot afford to take care of their families on nine, 10, 11 bucks an hour. 30 million people have no health insurance. people who can't afford prescription drugs. people all over this country are looking at their kids and see their kids will have a lower standard of living than they did. people are worried about the potential horrors of climate change and what it will mean to
2:45 pm
this planet. our job, al, is to bring people together, to do exactly the opposite of what trump does. he's trying to divide us up. we got to bring people together around an agenda that works for all of us and not just the 1%. >> senator bernie sanders, thank you for being with us. >> thank you, al. up next, president trump says he has finished his open book take home exam. i'll explain just a moment. that would eventually become verizon's. that call opened the door to the billions of mobile calls that we've all made since. i'm proud i was part of that first call, and i'm proud that i'm here now as we build america's first and only 5g ultra wideband network that will transform how we all live, once again. (bob) the first call that we've made on the cellular system.
2:46 pm
2:47 pm
2:49 pm
welcome back. president trump says he has answered all of the written questions from special counsel robert mueller and plans to submit them to the department of justice next week, but as far as in-person interview, the president says, they haven't even talked about it. will the two eventually meet face-to-face? back with me maya wildly, david brock, liz copeland and chris lu. let me go to you first, david. what do you take of the president announcing he's finished the written questions and he wrote them himself, not the lawyers and saying they haven't even talked about an in-person event while he continues at the same time to
2:50 pm
attack the mueller investigation in total? >> i think the attacks as we've seen for the last week and the fact that president trump seems to be coming unglued over what the progress over the process the mueller investigation is making. i think that he knows and the reason he's lashing out now is that he knows he blew it. the time to really obstruct this investigation was long ago. he's been complaining about jeff sessions and his lack of recusal for a year and a half and the backlash the whittaker appointment has seen not only among democrats, but among republicans, i think shows him the train has left the station and it's really closing in on him and it's too late for him to really do what he wants to do, which is shut this thing down. >> let me ask you as the republican on the panel, liz, your reaction to this big bash lash on the appointment of whitaker and where we are with the president. obviously people feel there's
2:51 pm
going to be congressional subpoenas, investigations. does this really become too bring us to a point i'd rather say to where the republicans might have to start stepping away from this president? >> i think that you see recently, with kellyanne conway's husband forming the checks and balance group of conservative lawyers. some of their members are the federalists society, which is a strict constructionalist group when they're viewing the constitution. i think that group speaks out to how republicans are concerned. about this president's ability to understand the constitution and his authority and the limits on it when you're talking about principle officers. can't just appoint someone to a position to be confirmed. you can nominate them, just can't decide who you want to ultimately manage an individual who is investigating your
2:52 pm
actions and the russian influence prior to this presidency. during the campaign of 2016, but at the end of the day, while this new congress in the house, they're going to come in and start to investigate, they spoke abt. they're going to do a lot of investigation. i don't know for certain they're going to reveal, uncover anything in addition to what mueller is already doing. ipg we as a country, especially those within washington, d.c., those within this party, the republican party, need to support the process. need to support the rule of law and to make sure we speak out as president if he runs afoul of that. >> chris, you and the vus tis the president, how to you respond to where we are with whitaker and the president submitting this week his written answers, not committing, saying they're not even talking about an in person interview with him. >> it's important to understand that he has submitted written answers to only some questions. they're the questions that were asked about the preelection
2:53 pm
conduct. rudy giuliani has indicated they probably won't respond to the ones that deal with the presidential transition period and the special counsel hasn't even asked b about the obstruction issues, so we are a long way from this process being complete completed. we also have coming up soon, testimony potentially from people like manafort, cohen, mike flynn. other indictments coming down the road, so whether the president answers will have to be evaluated in light of the testimony of other witnesses. >> maya, as the one of the legal analysts here, how do you read, why, when does the president get passed the brag doe shouse stage? when does he begin to show he understands the seriousness of revealing here, talking about a foreign government that is
2:54 pm
adversary y adversarial, interfering with the elections of the united states. i think he understands how important it is or he wouldn't have put matthew whitaker in his u.s. attorney general. the reason for that is because it was very clear to him whitaker remember, made very, very public statements about mueller being out of bounds. he actually made statements about mueller, without knowing any of the evidence that robert mueller had because only robert mueller's team knows what robert mueller has. that robert mueller did not have evidence of a conspiracy to defraud the united states. to make those statements and by the way, we know from some reports that one of the witnesses in the mueller investigation is the one who suggest ed that in order to elevate his profile with president trump for appointments in the administration, that heshherd
2:55 pm
be a tv pundit and make those statements. that's who we have over the investigation. and trump put him there because he feels the heat. >> i have to stop you, but thank you. up next, my final thoughts. to sk you. up next, my final thoughts i landed. i saw my leg did not look right. i was just finishing a ride. i felt this awful pain in my chest. i had a pe blood clot in my lung. i was scared. i had a dvt blood clot. having one really puts you in danger of having another. my doctor and i chose xarelto®.
2:56 pm
xarelto®. to help keep me protected. xarelto® is a latest-generation blood thinner that's... proven to treat and reduce the risk of dvt or pe blood clots from happening again. in clinical studies, almost 98% of patients on xarelto® did not experience another dvt or pe. xarelto® works differently. warfarin interferes with at least 6 of your body's natural blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of blood clots. while taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. it may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. get help right away for unexpected bleeding or unusual bruising. do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. before starting, tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures and any kidney or liver problems. learn all you can... to help protect yourself from another dvt or pe. talk to your doctor about xarelto®.
2:57 pm
2:58 pm
[ready forngs ] christmas? no, it's way too early to be annoyed by christmas. you just need some holiday spirit! that's it! this feud just went mobile. with xfinity xfi you get the best wifi experience at home. and with xfinity mobile, you get the best wireless coverage for your phone. ...you're about to find out! you don't even know where i live... hello! see the grinch in theaters by saying "get grinch tickets" into your xfinity x1 voice remote. a guy just dropped this off. he-he-he-he. last sunday in midlothian, illinois, a man starting shooting in a neighborhood bar.
2:59 pm
immediately as people began running, a security guard there at the site tackled the man, brought him to the ground. when police arrived, this black security guard holding him down was shot by one of the police officers. the community, activists and clergy have called for justice. why would this officer u assume the black security guard was the assailant rather than the guy he was holding down, particular ly when the crowd was yelling, he's a skaurt guard, a security guard. i join them in saying this must be thoroughly investigated. we do not know the name of the officer. just told he was white and had been on duty seven years. what kind of justice is this that when you do your job and secure a scene where three people were injured by a gunman, you end up dead? we cannot keep having these
3:00 pm
mistak mistakes. and they go unaccounted for. that does it for me. thanks for watching. see you here tomorrow at 5:00 p.m. eastern. up next, dead lip white house, with my friend, nicole wallace. , with my friend, nicole wallace hi, everyone. it's 4:00 in new york. donald trump has finished his homework and he did it all by himself. the president announcing today that he has completed his written responses to robert mueller and he did it without stance. >> i write answers. i was asked a series of questions. i'm sure they're tricked up because ta like to catch people, was the weather sunny or rainy. he said it might have been a good day. hfs rainy. therefore he told a lie. he purgered himself. so you have to be careful when your
127 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
MSNBC West Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on