we support that. also cost effective. and i can tell you our update. because of you, we have sold out of these beat wine glasses in minutes. i didn't even give the website on air, but you found it. they are out of stock. when they get back in stock, we'll update so that you know. i'll be in washington tomorrow covering the bill barr hearings. don't go anywhere now. "hardball" is up next. mission from moscow. let's play "hardball." >> good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. tonight, we're witnessing something entirely unprecedented in this country's history. for the first time a sitting american president has come under scrutiny for being an agent of a hostile foreign power. it now appears the fbi suspected that trump's firing of james comey was to protect russia and its activities in the 2016

election. that trump's possible obstruction of justice in asking the fbi director could itself have been a collusion with russia. according to "the new york times," quote, law enforcement officials became so concerned by the president's behavior that they began investigating whether he had been working on behalf of russia against american interests. specifically investigators wanted to know whether the president's actions were, quote, a possible threat to national security. and whether, quote, trump was knowingly working for russia or had unwittingly fallen under moscow's influence. on sunday came another bombshell story. this one from "the washington post." revealing how, quote, president trump has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal details of his conversations with russian president vladimir putin. both the times and the post exposes are highly damaging, obviously, to the president, as he tries to escape the historic reckoning that may soon come from special counsel robert

mueller. when asked point blank this weekend about "the new york times" story, trump didn't deny being an agent of russia. >> are you now or have you ever worked for russia, mr. president? >> i think it's the most insulting thing i have ever been asked. i think it's the most insulting article i have ever had written. and if you read the article, you would see that they found absolutely nothing. >> trump's failure to give a direct answer to that fundamental question even raised alarm among his allies. according to the associated press, quote, white house aides expressed regret that the president did not more clearly and forcefully deny being a russian agent. it was clear by early today, however, that trump had to give a direct answer. >> mr. president, yes or no, have you or are you now, have you ever worked for russia? yes or no. >> i never worked for russia, and you know that answer better than anybody. i never worked for russia. not only did i never work for

russia. i think it's a disgrace that you even asked that question. because it's a whole big fat hoax. it's just a hoax. >> i'm joined by michael schmidt, who broke the story for "the new york times" this weekend. iamec alcindor, and greg brown and a former federal prosecutor. michael, an amazing story. the story is national security interests, the fbi agents, not politicians, but fbi agents, were looking into whether this president was working for the russians. what was their concern? >> here's why this matters. our collective understanding of this from the beginning has been the president facing a criminal obstruction investigation. the fbi, we now know a year and a half ago, was not comfortable with his relationship with russia. they could not understand why he fired comey. they thought there was something more there. there was enough to take the extraordinary historic step, a historic step to actually open this investigation into the president's ties to a foreign

adversary. they were so unnerved in the aftermath of the comey firing, they didn't understand what he was doing, they didn't understand what he was saying. it led them to this point. haupt we don't know is what mueller did with it. but what we do know, mueller and harris' investigation, as recently as november, he wanted the president to answer russia questions. so did the president, who responded in writing, actually provide answers to a counterintelligence investigation of himself that he didn't even know about? >> as "the new york times" reports and your report, there were clear occasions when the president linked his decision to fire comey to the russian investigation. and did so publicly. when deputy attorney general rod rosenstein drafted a letter to justify comey's firing, which didn't include the russia probe, he directed mr. rosenstein to mention the russian probe anyway. >> regardless of recommendation, i was going to fire comey, knowing there was no good time to do it.

and in fact, when i decided to just do it, i said to myself, i said, you know, this russia thing with trump and russia is a made-up story. >> this russia thing, well then the day after comey's firing, the president hosted russian diplomats in the oval office and told the russian visitors, quote, i faced great pressure because of russia. that's taken off. so why did trump want the world, including moscow, to go he was trying to kill the probe into russia's 2016 mischief? i want to follow up with you, michael, in this. that's what grabbed me in the story, the constant effort by trump to tell the world, anybody listening, hey, i wanted to stop the russia investigation. why did he want anybody -- did he want russia to know he was stopping the russia investigation? that's what it smells like. >> that was part of the investigation. we learned of this -- >> is that why the fbi jumped on him? they think why is he blasting out the news that this was for russia? >> correct. was the president trying to fire comey as a way of slowing interfering with the

investigation, the larger investigation into russia's meddling in the election, to help russia? that, the fbi's general counsel testified on capitol hill, was the national security concern of the firing. they saw the firing as a counterintelligence issue, an intelligence issue. not just a criminal thing, not, hey, let's make a case. it's hey, let's use all the authorities and powers we have to figure out whether the president is tied to russia and firing comey to stop the investigation. >> you know what grabs me in this reporting? that we thought a long way for months now, more than a year, that the investigation by the fbi is whether trump was protecting himself through obstruction of justice. now comes the report he was obstructing justice to protect the russian role in the 2016 election. he was working for moscow. that's what stunning about this. >> what's stunning about this, and mike, as someone who is your former colleague, this was a remarkable, remarkable report. something that's going to go down in history. when i was reading it on friday around the table with other reporters, our mouths dropped

because you're like, oh, my god, the fbi is as alarmed as you think americans are. for months now, or maybe now for years, you had people say we really don't feel comfortable with the way president trump deals with putin, that helsinki summit where i was in the room when the president was talking about whether or not he believes russia over u.s. counterintelligence, and he basically took russia's side. people sat back and thought this is a moment. why is the president not standing up to vladimir putin? now we know all the things that maybe people thought, experts, other people thought, that the fbi itself, the place that's supposed to be dealing with this the most, they were as alarmed as everyone else. that to me is remarkable. >> greg, the question is, by most people on all sides of this fight, why didn't he deny it? >> it would have been awfully easy to say no or of course not or anything like that. it's hard to understand why he couldn't deny it. what's important about the reporting is that it, according to the reporting, it confirms at least senior fbi agents did think there was enough to

predicate an investigation, and presumably, the lawyers across the street at doj agreed or at some point later, at least, agreed. we just don't know when we won't find out until the mueller findings are made public, exactly what happens in response to the development that michael and adam and others reported on. >> was thinking all along, we put these things, and everybody who is a journalist here knows, in two kettles. one was one bucket or kettle, whatever you want to call it, is the question of collusion. the other question was did he obstruct justice? what i get from your reporting, which is so stunning about it, is it was a continuum. he was working for the russians, and they're back and forth during the campaign, if it's all true, and second, he was working for the russians and covering up their role in the campaign, as the second phase. it was all part of one continuous effort of the fbi investigating the russian role in 2016 and coming upon the role played potentially by the president. in that work. in other words, it was like back when they picked up nixon, back with dealing when the '68

election. they picked it up by they were bugging the south vietnamese and they picked up nixon. they weren't bugging nixon, but they caught him dealing with the south vietnamese. i think that's a pretty good parallel. >> if you're a counterintelligence agent at the fbi, and you started this investigation, you worked on it, how do you see the president's most recent comments? how did you see helsinki? how did you see the comments about afghanistan that lined up with the kremlin's talking points about why the ussr invaded afghanistan? how do you walk away from an investigation like that when the president continues to say things like that? >> let me go to jackie speier of california. i'm going to ask you a big question. you're on the intelligence committee. i had a pretty open attitude about a couple things trump was saying on the campaign. i wasn't against him personally. i thought there were real problems, but let's put that aside. i thought maybe, maybe, what this guy was going to do is cut a big bargain, a grand bargain with moscow, dealing with, of

course, fundamentally or essentially with syria, and work out some deal in the middle east that really was going to be history making. that would be a motive for a lot of this. but this motive in backing russia on every account, as michael schmidt just pointed out, how else do we account for his kowtowing to putin except that putin's got something on him or they got something together? how else do you account for it? >> it's kompromat. that's what it is. i would say we have to go back to the comments made by the trump boys earlier, where they said we don't need u.s. banks. we get all the money we need from russia. there are lots of clues that have sprinkled along this path that added together probably had something to do with the opening of this counterintelligence investigation. i think we don't know the half of it. and we're just trying to grasp

at various elements. but for them to -- for the fbi to start a counterintelligence investigation in the first three or four months of the trump presidency is pretty remarkable. so i think they maust have something we don't know about. >> what was your reaction when you read the times story. when you read about the whole question, the fbi agents going after trump because they thought he was part of the russian effort in 2016, trying to help them cover it up? what did you think when you read that? >> well, frankly, i thought there's something here that i don't know about. i think that it's either you've got a useful idiot or you've got an unwitting participant or agent here. but for trump, it all comes done to money. i'm convinced that it had to do with the fact that he had so many of his condos that were purchased by russians, hundreds of them, there were so many of the llcs that we believe have

russian addressed. so the combination of all of that, the comments by his sons, i think that all will come together in a nice big fat package at some point. >> well, today, donald trump, the president, is responding to the revelation he was investigated as an agent by the fbi, by blasting the fbi as, quote, dirty cops. this is james cagney stuff. you dirty rats. he says they're just out to get him. here we go. the president doing his street corner response. >> the people doing that investigation were people that have been caught, that are known scoundrels. i guess you could say they're dirty cops. >> well, it follows an avalanche of attacks the president offered up on twitter this weekend, all attempting to scapegoat the fbi. however, as we have seen since the outset of this investigation, trump has used one excuse after another to

deflect blame and discredit the work of real law enforcement. >> i call it the russian hoax. one of the great hoaxes. >> it's a democrat hoax that was brought up as an excuse for losing an election. >> it is incredible the deep state where they don't even look at her. isn't it incredible? >> it is a witch hunt. if you look at the fbi statements with strzok and his lover, lisa page. >> you look at brennan, clapper, hayden. >> i think bruce orr is a disgrace. >> some of the people at the top were rotten apples. james comey was one of them. >> during the course of the election? >> how many times do i have to answer this question russia is a ruse. >> i have nothing to do with russia. >> they're investigating something that never happened. >> let's talk about being human beings. an american, most americans, i think, are patriotic in different ways and different ways they express it. if you're accused of being a foerb agent against this country, your reaction would be, i think, personal. you would begin to say, let me

explain to people who are listening to me, i was trying to cut a deal with the russians. i wasn't going to be knee jerk. i didn't want to do all the diplomatic professors were doing, falling back in the trap with the cold war. i was trying to work nice. i was trying to a couple things. trying to explain, if he's innocent, but his defense has been, screw you. his defense has been to trash the people going after him, including all kinds of government bureaucrats and good fbi agents. he doesn't act in a way, it seems to me, most normal -- i want to get to greg on this, most normal people do if they're accused. >> you also have to remember this was a president who ran on being a law and order president. he calls himself a nationalist because he says it's a patriotic term. and he also said his campaign slogan was make america great again. i would think he would offer that as someone who understands media and messaging and saying i love america. this is what i believe. instead, it took him more than 24 hours to say i don't work for russia. that's pretty remarkable and

it's telling that even people inside the white house were saying you need to get this answer right, and when we put you out on the white house lawn this morning, you better answer that question in a very definitive way, which is what he did. >> a great movie many years ago called "no way out" with kevin costner. at the end of the movie, he turns out to be the agent. i sometimes think we're getting near that. he's going to start talking to us in russian, yelling at us. you have dealt with defendants. is there a normal way a defendant behaves when they're innocent? >> that's a good question. most aren't, of course, in criminal cases. but it is one thing, of course, chris, as you mentioned, for the president to criticize the men and women of the fbi and doj the way he has. but what he's in effect doing oftentimes is criticizing his own appointees. chris wray, director of the fbi, and rod rosenstein, the deputy attorney general. they have been part of much of most of this investigation, at least in recent months. it makes no sense at all for him

to criticize them. what's striking about that criticism, it's not surprising at this point, but what's striking is that we hear nothing from capitol hill. we hear nothing from otherwise very, very supportive members of congress, supportive of the fbi and doj and of law enforcement generally, criticizing the criticism that the president has levied against those public servants. >> the last time i remember that happening, when george bush senior who passed away defended the fbi because, and he quit the nra for a while because they called them thugs. the republicans should be for law enforcement, i think. the u.s. congressman jackie speier, thank you for joining us. michael schmidt, congratulations. another huge story. yamec alcindor, always great to have your analysis. >> another explosive report. "the washington post" is reporting president trump hid details, hid the details of all his five meetings with vladimir

putin from his own staff. he confiscated notes from his interpreter in one meeting and told him not to tell any other government official. this is the president of the united states. don't tell anyone else in my government what he and putin talked about. so what did happen behind the closed doors between trump and putin? we'll get to that, and that is one hell of a story. stick with us. that's coming up. this is "hardball," where the action is. e action is. bipolar i disorder can make you feel like you have no limits. but mania, such as unusual changes in your mood, activity or energy levels, can leave you on... shaky ground. help take control by asking your healthcare provider about vraylar. vraylar treats acute mania of bipolar i disorder. vraylar significantly reduces overall manic symptoms, and was proven in adults with mixed episodes who have both mania and depression. vraylar should not be used in elderly patients with dementia, due to increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, or confusion, which may mean a

life-threatening reaction or uncontrollable muscle movements, which may be permanent. side effects may not appear for several weeks. high cholesterol and weight gain; high blood sugar, which can lead to coma or death; decreased white blood cells, which can be fatal; dizziness upon standing; falls; seizures; impaired judgement; heat sensitivity; and trouble swallowing may occur. you're more than just your bipolar i. ask about vraylar.

just your bipolar i. i am a techie dad.n. i believe the best technology should feel effortless.

like magic. at comcast, it's my job to develop, apps and tools that simplify your experience. my name is mike, i'm in product development at comcast. we're working to make things simple, easy and awesome. 24 hours after friday's bombshell "new york times" story, "the washington post" dropped its own explosive reporting. according to government officials, president trump sought to hide details of his meetings with russian president vladimir putin from his own staff. and other government officials. u.s. officials told the post that, quote, there is no detailed record, even in classified files, of trump's face-to-face interactions with the russian leader. at five locations over the past two years. trump reportedly went to dram

dramatic lengths. he took possession of notes from a translator, and he ordered another to keep the details of the meeting private. his actions stifled his administration's ability to understand what he and putin talked about. according to the associated press, president trump has been irked by the reporting by the times and the post. today, he pushed back on the post story. >> it's a lot of fake news. that was a very good meeting. it was actually a very successful meeting. and i have those meetings with everybody. i just know nothing about it. >> well, neither do we. i'm joined by michael mcfaul, and jonathan lemire. ambassador, tell me what normally happens when two top chiefs of state get together, representing their governments. what happens normally when they meet, even if they're sitting in a side room somewhere? >> so normally, and remember, i worked three years at the white house with president obama

before becoming ambassador, so i was in a lot of those meetings. you have a couple of advisers, usually the national security adviser, usually the chief russia person, that was my job. and oftentimes your chief russia adviser takes the notes and records a memcom. a memorandum of communication that will be distributed to other senior members in the government so that they know what happened. and then you usually have an interpr interpreter. that interpreter's job is to interpret the conversation. i know both that work for the president. they job is not to take notes to hand off to somebody else. even if we did get their notes, it wouldn't be a real tranzipt of what happened. >> this president doesn't like having a note taker there, right? >> and it's shocking. i don't understand how it serves the national interests. you know, his job, he's not just representing president trump. he's representing the united states of america.

his job is to advance our national interests. and to do that, you have to let the rest of your team know what you're saying so that when his secretary of defense meets with his counterpart, he knows what the two presidents said. i do not understand the logic, if we're talking about advancing american national interests. >> what do you find distinctive about trump in regard to the post story that he wanted the notes for himself? what do you make of that? whatever the notes they were, whether from the interpreter, cursory notes as the person was translating different sentences and trying to remember the full sentence or whatever, why would he want to grab that for himself, whether from the interpreter or a note taker. why did he take them for himself inwhat would be the motive? >> the motive, of course, would be to not let the rest of the government know what he was talking about. here's the other big thing that i think is important context about president trump. his administration has a pretty good policy towards russia. i actually support most of it.

they're tough on russia. they have sanctions. they have bolstered nato. they support ukraine, but there's one guy in the administration that doesn't sign up for it. that's the president of the united states. and time and time again, they will take a tough action, and he himself will not support it. that suggests there's a big disconnect between what the president wants to do with putin and what the rest of his government wants to do. >> you're a diplomat skilled at interpreting people's motives. the president could have grand motives which i thought he did for a while and he was going to try to cut a grand deal with the east-west against the south, dealing with terrorism. we have heard about that for decades, that somehow instead of the east against the west, it's going to be the east and west against the south, against the terrorists, against the aspiring powers in the south. like, well, we know who they are, the terrorists. >> right. >> now people say on this show a few moments ago, it was all about money. where are you on that? what is trump's motive for siding with putin? >> well, first, to the point you made earlier, i agree that if

there was concrete achievements from these secretive meetings and we got a breakthrough with the russians for things that were good for us, i would support it. the truth is, he hasn't had a successful meeting with vladimir putin. he's had no successes with the russians. he's had a luf setbacks, things i think are not in america's national interests. that suggests he's doing something else. i don't know. i want to be clear, there's lots of circumstantial evidence about the money they took in 2008 and maybe he's beholden. i don't want to connect those dots until i know the evidence, and that's why we need mr. mueller to finish his job. >> do you think it's kompromat, the dossier and the hotel room? >> i honestly don't know. i do know that that's the way putin does his business. he gives money to people for free, and then creates leverage. and he gathers kompromat on all kinds of people, in russia, in other countries. if you stay at the ritz-carlton, every that happens in the

ritz-carlton goes to the kremlin. that i know for sure. i just don't know what he has on president trump. >> well, "the washington post" is also reporting now that in july of 2018, several trump administration officials were unable to get a reliable read-out of what was discussed in a bilateral summit between putin and trump in helsinki. president trump and putin met for two hours in private with only their translators present. hours after that meeting with putin by his side, president trump seemed to buy putin's assurances that russia did not interfere in the 2016 election. let's watch this. >> would you now with the whole world watching tell president putin, would you denounce what happened in 2016 and warn him to never do it again? >> my people came to me, dan coats came to me, and some others. they said they think it's russia. i have president putin, he just said it's not russia. i will say this. i don't see any reason why it would be. >> he sounds like a defense

attorney. and his client is russia. of course your defense your client always says i didn't do it. his client said i didn't do it and he believed it. >> what was striking about helsinki was he was given the opportunity to ask who he believ believed? all of whom say russia interfered in the 2016 election. >> he denied it. >> exactly right, and did so to help president trump. and he did not answer the question. in fact, he sided with vladimir putin. since then, since that meeting, the two-hour private meeting which not only the media didn't receive a read out on, top members of the president's administration don't know what was discussed. >> is it your sense as a reporter and you go by day to day accumulation of information, does the information add up to he's working for the russians? >> it's impossible to know that right now, but it raises a lot of questions. as does this terrific reporting -- >> what's the alternative explanation for the behavior he's not working for the

russians. >> the white house said this was beset by leaks, highly sensitive calls, those all found their way into the media. >> that's kellyanne's cover. >> they're saying the president, because he's fearful of that, particularly with someone like vladimir putin, where he knows there's a lot of scruttane on the meeting, therefore, he took the steps to prevent it. >> he doesn't trust the interpreter. >> he doesn't trust many people. he feels like he's been burned by leaks repeatedly and he's trying to cut down on it. >> your test on this, does he do it with every other leader? when he meets with theresa may or macron or justin trudeau? in every case, he grabs the notes and hides them in his pocket. >> the leaks have slowed down. >> i'm asking does he grab the noelts in every meeting or just with putin? >> what we don't know is if he takes those extreme steps with other leaders. >> thank you, michael mccaul, as always, sir. and jonathan lemire. >> up next, trump's hand-picked nominee for attorney general, william barr, will have his first confirmation hearing

before the u.s. senate judiciary committee tomorrow. what can we expect if barr gets confirmed and will he do with the mueller report what trump did with his notes to putin? they know how to hide stuff, don't they? this is "hardball," where the action is. action is. save up to 10% when you bundle with esurance. including me, esurance spokesperson dennis quaid. he's a pretty good spokesperson. ehhh. so when i say, "drivers who switched from geico to esurance saved an average of $412," you probably won't believe me. hey, actor lady whose scene was cut. hi. but you can believe this esurance employee, nancy abraham. seriously, send her an email and ask her yourself. no emails... no emails. when insurance is affordable, it's surprisingly painless. ultimate feast time it'sat red lobster.r own pick four of ten favorites to create the ultimate feast you've been dreaming of. like lobster mac & cheese. or tender snow crab. so hurry in before new create your own ultimate feast ends.

if you want to get the most details about your family history. my pie chart showed that i'm from all over europe, but then it got super specific. i learned my people came from a small region in poland and even a little bit of the history about why they might have migrated during that time. those migration patterns are more than just lines on a map, they're really your family's story. i can't wait to see what i'm going to discover next. 20 million members have connected to a deeper family story. order your kit at ancestry.com. to a deeper family story. ♪ ♪ with the chase mobile app, jason wu could pay practically anyone, at any bank, all while putting on a runway show for new york fashion week. ♪ ♪ he could. or, he could make it even easier - and set up recurring payments to his neighbor. for cat sitting. (meow) whoa. you've groomed her, too. (cell phone vibrating) and now she's ready for the catwalk. life, lived jason's way. chase. make more of what's yours. little things can be a big deal.

that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats moderate to severe plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla,75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you.

welcome back to "hardball." when special counsel robert mueller finishes his investigation, we don't know when, it will be attorney general of the united states who ultimately decides whether to

send it to congress. tomorrow, president trump's pick for that job, william barr, will head to capitol hill for his confirmation hearing in front of the senate judiciary committee. according to prepared remarks, barr is expected to tell senators, quote, it is vitally important that the special counsel, that would be robert mueller, be allowed to complete his investigation. however, democrats will likely question barr about his past criticism of the mueller investigation. in an unsolicited 19-page memo, barr sent to deputy attorney general rod rosenstein last year, barr wrote, quote, mueller should not be permitted to demand that the president submit to interrogation about alleged obstruction. well, apart from whether mueller has a strong enough factual basis for doing so, mueller's obstruction theory is fatally misconceived. that's william barr talking. so will barr do to the mueller report what trump reportedly did with the notes from his putin meeting -- ditch them? chris coons sits on the judiciary committee and joins us now. thank you for racing from the

train tonight, senator, and thank you. i don't know. i'm getting very skeptical about, rather wondering how far the president and his people will go. the president has apparently squirreled away the notes of all his meetings with putin. he doesp want even his own officials in his administration to know what he talked about. i wonder, are you worried about william barr and whether he will in fact deliver the robert mueller report to the public and to the congress? >> i am, chris. i'm looking forward to tomorrow's confirmation hearing. i had a chance to meet with william barr last week and to ask him a number of the questions i'm going to repeat tomorrow on the record in a confirmation hearing. i have an editorial that's just gone up in "the washington post" that repeats the context and why this isn't a normal time. i'm encouraged that president trump has nominated someone who previously served as attorney general and who has a lot of experience in the department of justice. but when william barr served as attorney general, more than 25 years ago, we didn't have a

president who was under investigation and whose personal attorney and campaign manager who national security adviser had either pled guilty to or been convicted of a variety of crimes involving lying to the government. so i'm going to be pressing william barr tomorrow to allow the mueller investigation to go to its logical conclusion. to release the report to the congress and the public, to submit to the ethics officials in the department of justice, to see whether he should recuse himself given that 19-page try-out memo you just referenced, and to get some clarity from him about whether he would defend and follow the special counsel integrity and independence act that senator lindsey graham and thom tillis has reintroduced along with senator booker and myself. >> are you going to try to get from him the commitment that elliot richardson gave to ted kennedy that he would resign if he were forced to fire mueller? >> yes.

yes. that's important precedent to remind folks about. the saturday night massacre back during the watergate investigation where president nixon ordered elliot richardson to fire the special prosecutor, he refused, and he resigned instead in protest. that followed a confirmation hearing where elliot richardson was asked exactly that question. if pressed to interfere or intervene with the investigation or to fire the special prosecutor, will you resign in protest? elliot richardson said yes, and he followed that commitment. that's exactly the sort of exchange i expect we'll be having tomorrow in the judiciary committee with william barr. >> by the way, in reference to that, nixon had the honor and respect for institutions to honor that deal. i'm not sure trump will. but let me ask you about this weekend's news. "the new york times" reported over the weekend that the fbi suspected that the president wasn't just covering up, he wasn't just obstructing justice to protect himself, but in furtherance of a soviet or a russian conspiracy. in other words, he was acting to

protect them from exposure for what they did in the 2016 election. that's astounding. what do you make of that charge, that he was in fact an agent? >> well, chris, that's exactly why i think we need to have robert mueller's investigation proceed to its logical conclusion and then have those results shared with congress and the public. i don't know whether those allegations are well founded or whether they aren't. there certainly has been some troubling, disturbing, unprecedented actions by our president in refusing to accept the conclusions of the intelligence community, of resisting efforts by senators both republican and democrat, to pass sanctions against russia after the 2016 elections. conducting himself in an unusual way in that helsinki summit with president putin. there are certainly concerning signs. but i don't have concrete evidence of this. and that's exactly why a well respected republican senior law

enforcement leader like robert mueller has been empowered to conduct this special investigation and needs to be allowed to do it and reach its natural conclusion. >> you know, i'm thinking about the difference between the modern day democratic party which has cleaned up its act from the dirty old days of the big city machines. the democratic party is almost like a suburban party in many ways now. the republican party picked up on all the bad behaviors of the democratic machines of 50, 60 years ago. have you noticed? you're going to let william barr have a fair hearing. you're talking to him, you might well confirm him. mitch mcconnell, operating in the dirty old ways of the old machines, he wouldn't even give merrick garland a chance, wouldn't talk to him, for a member of the supreme court. you guys are operating like gentlemen, to use an old term. do you notice? you're actually going to consider this guy and explain. why are you guys being decent when the republicans are indecent? just a thought. >> well, i'll also say, chris, one of the places that mitch mcconnell is absent is in any

conversation on how to end the shutdown. we're in day 24 of a government shutdown. if president trump will reopen the government, i think we could make progress on border security. the majority leader is nowhere to be found in these negotiations, and i think he bears some real responsibility in helping move forward a resolution to this impasse. i'm hearing from folks up and down my home state of delaware whether they're federal law enforcement officers who are serving without pay, who i called and asked about morale and operational effectiveness, to farmers and folks concerned about food safety, about where the department of agriculture or the food and drug administration is in terms of protecting our public health or supporting our agriculture community. we've got a lot of impacts from the shutdown, and i think mitch mcconnell should step forward and take his responsible role and help negotiate a resolution and get president trump to reopen the government. >> thanks so much, chris coons. he represents a state with a lot of agriculture in the south and big city thinking in the north. anyway, thank you, sir. from delaware. up next, with the shutdown

stretching into its fourth week, democrats in control of the house, and robert mueller apparently wrapping up his investigation, is trump's already rocky presidency about to get a lot rockier? could be. you're watching "hardball." the new capital one savor card. earn 4% cash back on dining and 4% on entertainment. now when you go out, you cash in. what's in your wallet? when did you see the sign? when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah! now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com. [indistinct conversation]

[friend] i've never seen that before. ♪ ♪ i have... ♪ you might or joints.hing for your heart... i have... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. -we're in a small room. what?! -welcome. -[ gasps ] a bigger room?! -how many of you use car insurance? -oh. -well, what if i showed you this? -[ laughing ] ho-ho-ho! -wow. -it's a computer.

-we compare rates to help you get the price and coverage that's right for you. -that's amazing! the only thing that would make this better is if my mom were here. what?! an unexpected ending! ed gets copays as lowlily go to as zero dollars on is if my mom were here. medicare part d prescriptions. ed gets labels clear as day. and, lily.... lily gets anything she wants.

ed knows he could just have us deliver his prescriptions. but what's the fun in that? switch to cvs pharmacy. welcome back to "hardball." it latest explosive reports from "the new york times" and "the washington post" raised troubling questions about the extent of president trump's ties with russia. and added to what is an increasingly turbulent time for the president. he faces a potential onslaught of investigations from the newly controlled democratic house, while robert mueller's special counsel investigation is ongoing. "the new york times's" peter baker summed up the forces confronting the president, saying trump faces the prospect of an all-out political war for survival that may make the still unresolved partial government shutdown pale by comparison. i'm joined by annie linskey,

reporter for "the washington post." michael steele, former rnc chairman, and nadeem ashamy is former assistant to nancy pelosi. what great jobs you all had. i wonder about trump sometimes being donald trump. he's a person, he has to go to bed at night, eat, whatever we all do. how does he get through it reading a newspaper article saying he's a foreign article of an enemy. >> he didn't get through it well. we saw over the weekend this onslaught of tweets from trump saying i'm all alone in the white house. so you know, this is not something he wants to be talking about very obviously as he was eager to talk to anybody around him about literally anything else. >> he's accused of being a traitor. i mean, just put it down. he's working as an agent of a foreign government, who is not our friend. maybe they were in stalin days, but they're not our friend. >> they're not our friend. the more trump speaks about how

much of a nonstory this is, i harken back to mitt romney in that debate where he made it very clear who the enemy was and where you could find him. and so it stands in stark relief right now to your point that the president wants to talk about anything else but this. but the thing about donald trump is that he cannot answer the question when he knows it's a lie. so that fox interview when judge pirro asked him, were you or are you an agent, he went everywhere else around it -- >> explain why he can't answer the question? >> because for him, the truth is there. he knows it's right there. so to avert having to say, well, we do business, he talked about -- >> i want to try this on you. i think people wouldn't be angry about it. their feelings would be hurt. as americans, are you accusing me of betraying my country? i would have the billy budd

answer in melville. maybe not the right answer, but act like i was accused of being a traitor. >> he's extremely frustrated with the way he gives an answer. it's even beyond that. he's frustrated that the question is even being asked. he's frustrated that reporters are actually digging into stories. he's frustrated that democrats are going to be conducting the oversight. look, it's going to come to a point when this president is going to have to face the american people, is going to have to face the democratic congress, and answer the questions. they're going to be digging. they're going to be digging professionally at everything that deals with russia. these stories, there's so many things they could be looking at. the problem i think for democrats now is to be able to corral all this information and decide. >> coherent. meanwhile, with the palsh government shutdown now the longest in history, president trump doubled down on blaming the democrats for the standoff. that's useful. here he is. >> the government remains shut down for one reason and one

reason only. the democrats will not fund border security. >> but a new series of polls from quinnipiac, "the washington post," and cnn show the american public faults the president over democrats by a wide margin. rarely do you see polls, guys, that are so consistent. low to mid 50s blame the republicans and trump. low 30s generally blame the democrats. pretty consistent. over the weekend, south carolina senator lindsey graham offered an exit strategy of sorts for the president. >> i would urge him to open up the government for a short period of time, like three weeks, before he pulls the plug. see if we can get a deal. if we can't at the end of three weeks, all bets are off. see if he can do it by himself through the emergency powers. >> well, that's barney fife speaking. anyway, president trump was asked about graham's proposal this morning. >> that was a suggestion that linl

lindsey made, but i did reject it. i'm not interested. i want to get it solved. i don't want to just delay it. >> i don't understand lindsey. i always liked him, but i don't understand the boot licking. wait three weeks and then blow it up. what kind of proposal is that? >> all of this, all of this affirms for every american who is paying a scintilla of attention there is no national emergency at the border because if there were, you're not going to propose a three-week delay. you're not going to say, if you're the president of the united states, well, i may delay. i may -- >> he knows fox isn't covering this horrific crisis. even fox isn't covering it. >> like the caravan after the election. it went away. >> also, the government keeps reopening, parts of it keep reopening. people realize, oh, my gosh, people might not get their tax returns back, you know, golly, that gets reopened immediately. then the mortgage issue, that mortgages might not be processed. that somehow gets reopened. you wonder if there's going to be a slow trickle. >> you're a man of government,

you worked for pelosi. doesn't it distress you to know people are so uninterested in the government shutdown unless you work for the government. >> it's nuts. it's nuts to the point of republicans in the house and the senate want to talk to democrats in the house and senate. and they can't find a willing partner with this president. and you know, where do they go? they could sit there and negotiate all they want. mitch mcconnell threw up his hands. >> let's be tough here. nancy pelosi, the speaker of the house, again, is as hard and tough as trump. her iconic statement, it would be an immorality to build this wall, set up a counter, a marker against trump he can't deal with. it isn't that we're not ready to talk. we're not going to do this. >> up next, these three will tell me something i don't know. i'm a bunch of wind. and just like your stomach after that strip mall sushi, well, i'm a bit unpredictable. let's redecorate.

whatsyamatter tanya, i thought you loved being spontaneous? i do. and if you've got the wrong home insurance coverage, i might break the bank too. so get allstate, and be better protected from mayhem, like me. ensure max protein... to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. (straining) i'll take that. (cheers) 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. ensure max protein. in two great flavors. we all make excuses for the things we don't want to do. but when it comes to colon cancer screening... i'm not doin' that. i eat plenty of kale.

ahem, as i was saying... ...with cologuard, you don't need an excuse... all that prep? no thanks. that drink tastes horrible! but...there's no prep with cologuard... i can't take the time off work. who has two days? and i feel fine - no symptoms! everybody, listen! all you need is a trip to the bathroom. if you're 50 or older and at average risk, cologuard is the noninvasive option that finds 92% of colon cancers. you just get the kit in the mail, go to the bathroom, collect your sample, then ship it to the lab! this is your year! own it! cologuard is not right for everyone. it is not for high risk individuals, including those with a history of colon cancer or precancer, ibd, certain hereditary cancer syndromes, or a family history of colon cancer. ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. covered by medicare and most major insurers. ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. fresh-baked, and hand-crafted, with 100% clean ingredients. just a few good reasons to give into your cravings.

now delivering. panera. food as it should be. cohigher!ad! higher! parents aren't perfect, but then they make us kraft mac & cheese and everything's good again.

>> he's now been basically cut off as a successful important congressman. >> well deserved. long overdue, apply that standard to the guy sitting at 1600 pennsylvania avenue.

>> supremacy, nationalism is one thing. >> right. but the guy down at 1600, president trump declared himself a nationalist. you can put white in front of it, you can put baptist in front of it. nationalism is nationalism. apply the same standard. >> i think that what the standards that need to be applied is to the republicans. they have to say the emperor has no clothes. it has to get to a point where they say enough is enough, and so far, they haven't done that. >> you know why the democrats do well? because they have people in the room. of all backgrounds, and they don't make stupid comments because they know who's in the room with them. republicans are in the room with people where they don't have diversity to keep them aware of who they're talking to. thank you. thank you for joining us. a pro, a real strategist. a real democrat, not some guy who drove for somebody once. by the way, we have a big guest tomorrow night. bill maher is coming here. his hbo show has been on for a

couple months so he has a lot to say. look at that guy. nobody draws a bigger audience that that fellow. let me finish with the astounding situation we're in. a president questioned about being a foreign agent. stick with us. you're watching "hardball." s. you're watching "hardball.

with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. so even when she grows up, she'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only with expedia. select hotels to your existing trip. ♪ like i feel baby ♪ then come on, ♪, ♪ oh come on ♪ let's get it on, applebee's.

now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. dad! hiding when i was supposed to be quitting. i thought, i should try something that works. i should try nicorette. nicorette mini relieves sudden cravings fast. anytime. anywhere. nicorette mini. you know why. we know how. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. great news for anyone wh- uh uh - i'm the one who delivers the news around here. ♪ liberty mutual has just announced that they can customize your car insurance so that you only pay for what you need. this is phoebe buckley, on location. uh... thanks, phoebe. ♪ only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

let me finish tonight with a strangeness of having a president being asked if he's

working for the russians. the questions astounding and so is the basis for it. we're talking about loyalty. we're talking about the president of the united states being asked if he's serving a foreign master. in this case a master most americans now see as menacing. what do we as americans think of this spectacle? that donald trump worked to cover up moscow in the 2016 election and that he had a hand in it any way, to tilt the election to him and goes further. do we believe that trump, the president of the united states, absconded with notes from his meeting with putin and to mask the nature of earlier meetings. do we put it all together believe that the electoral college chose a mall working for our russian adversaries. this is a startling charge. not just an intriguing storyline, just a tidbit of evidence in a cookie crumb trail. we're questioning the loyalty of

a president. and from now on must be guilty or innocent. there is something in between someone will have to tell me what it is. and that is "hardball." it really is for now. thanks for being with us. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on "all in." >> are you now or have you ever worked for russia, mr. president. >> i think it is the most insulting thing i've ever been asked. >> is the president of the united states working for russia? >> i never worked for russia. >> tonight "the washington post" reports that donald trump hit details of talks with putin and confiscated interpreters notes. >> i said to myself, i said, you know, this russia thing with trump and russia is a made up story. >> greg miller joins me live. >> plus the amount of public evidence the president was following directions from the li