sanction. >> i think the democrats' responsibility is to actually save america, and they need to be focused as much on that as trying to stick to it donald trump, understanding that he is a symptom of something bigger than just himself, and that we need to get rid of him, sure, but this is about the democracy. it's about our constitution. that's why need to act. >> aisha moodie-mills and rick wilson, thank you for joini ing us. good evening, rachel. the one thing that is as close to exciting as swearing on tv is narrowly averted swearing on tv. it's almost as good. >> did you see my reaction? did you see how happy i was that i was narrowly avoided? >> i think you might have put an exclamation point on your reaction. thank you, my dear. and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. montana governor steve bullock is our guest tonight. he has just joined the democratic race for president. you have never seen him on cable news in this context, although you have seen him on this show before. i'm very excited to have him here tonight. today was the deadline on the

subpoena for the justice department to hand over any of the counterintelligence information that was turned up by the robert mueller investigation. the justice department as of today appears to be defying that subpoena, or at least they're not handing anything over. congressman adam schiff, the head of the intelligence committee did a sort of bombshell interview with "the washington post" today in which they suggested that the counterintelligence investigation that was announced by james comey in the spring of 2017, that counterintelligence investigation into potential links between the russian government and their interference effort and people associated with the trump campaign, shift suggesting in this interview today that that counterintelligence investigation appears to have disappeared, and he and the rest of the intelligence committee at least have not been able to get any information out of the justice department or the fbi as to whatever happened to that investigation, whether it continued, whether it was cut off, or what any of its findings were. in defying that subpoena to hand

over any counterintelligence information turned up by mueller, the justice department today also appears to be defying that subpoena by that same committee to hand over the unredacted version of mueller's report and to hand over its underlying evidence. and it's one thing to refuse a request. it's another thing to refuse a subpoena. we will see what the result of that is, but this appears to be the justice department again standing in defiance of a lawful congressional subpoena. so we'll see how that resolves. in the short-term puts an even hotter spotlight on the question of whether or not robert mueller himself will testify to congress about his findings and his investigation. there continues to be this strange ambiguity around this seemingly simple question of whether or not mueller is going to testify. the continuing ambiguity around that question has led some observers to question whether the aim here might not be just to get robert mueller alone testifying to congress, but instead to get robert

mueller and his team from the special counsel's office testifying together as a unit as to what they discovered in their investigation and what they did and what they turned up, and what they didn't investigate, which is now becoming an even more interesting question. both jerry nadler, chairman of the judiciary and adam schiff, chairman of intelligence, both as of today making sort of increasingly urgent public claims about that expected testimony from mueller and/or his team, but still no apparent movement from the justice department on allowing that to happen. so that is still pending, still out there. on top of all that today, the white house counsel sent this remarkable letter to congress making clear that the trump white house position is that they really are planning just to defy all subpoenas. one year of watergate is enough. you must stop investigating. no witnesses will be made

available. no testimony will be provided. no documents will be handed over, nothing. this is their official stance in writing now from the white house counsel. we saw them -- we saw the president's private lawyers, counsel for the president that have been hired to try to keep his taxes and his finances secret, we saw those lawyers make basically that same argument yesterday in court in the oral arguments in the mazar's case, where the president's lawyers are arguing that the oversight committee can't rightfully subpoena financial evidence about the president from his accounting firm. there was that strange hearing in court yesterday when to the judge's astonishment, the president's lawyers argued bluntly that across the board congress has no right to investigate a president for alleged corruption or any alleged crimes. the judge appeared to be plainly astonished by that claim from the president's lawyers yesterday in the mazar's case, but they apparently are going with that as their argument.

both in court and as their political argument including from the white house counsel today. it's the same grounds on which the white house counsel today said he would refuse to hand over any witnesses or any testimony at all in any congressional investigation. i mean this -- stepping back from this a second, this does mean that we are now already at the point in the trump presidency where between him and william barr and his white house counsel trump really could shoot somebody on fifth avenue, like he said during the campaign, and not only get away with it, but nobody could even investigate it. i mean remember when trump said that during the campaign? i could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot somebody and i would get away with it. think about that. the attorney general now asserts bluntly that the president cannot be criminally charged. the attorney general also asserts that if the president can't be criminally charged, then he can't be criminally investigated either. the attorney general also says that if the justice department is investigating the president

and the president believes that's bad, the president believe that's wrong, that he's been wrongly accused, he definitely didn't do anything wrong, nobody should be looking at me, that's grounds enough for the president to end that investigation and fire the investigator. and now both the president's private lawyers and the white house counsel and the justice department in defying the subpoenas, they are all arguing one way or another that congress has no right to investigate the president for corruption or other crimes at all. so if you can't be charged, you can't be investigated. anybody who does start investigating you, you can fire. and oh by the way, congress can't investigate you either. i mean you really could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone. i mean, i don't -- i don't know what we the rest of the country are supposed to do with this new revelation about this view of the presidency. i guess stay off fifth avenue. but also look on the bright

side. if you have ever, ever personally had truly epic, truly wicked criminal ambitions for yourself, now you know what the job is for you. i mean if you were so lucky as to get elected president, you could not only by definition not commit any crimes, you could not be charged. you could not be investigated. you'd be the freest criminal on earth if you were lucky enough to be elected president of the united states and if you had attorney general william barr working for you. so, i mean, clearly that's not the way america is set up, right? that's what they're trying to argue now. clearly that's untenable. but it just means that we are in an untenable situation right now, which means there will be change. we've got these assertions from the white house. we've got these subpoenas from congress. we've got the judiciary now getting involved in the first time, trying to handle these remarkable claims from the white house about how they are immune from all scrutiny. but that's where we are.

mark this moment in history. that's where we are. so there is a lot going on in the news. as i mentioned, we are going to have the first live interview in just a moment with the latest democrat to announce he is running for president, montana governor steve bullock. that is coming up. but there is one other story that i want to make sure that we get to tonight at the top, along with some expert help. i want to start with this map. this is where republicans have full party control of state government. 22 red states, 22 republican-controlled states across the country the republicans have control of the house and the state senate and the governor's mansion. 22 of those. by comparison, democrats have control over just 14 state governments. it's true that republicans did get pummelled in the 2018 midterms, but on the state level, it's a different picture. republicans have really kept a very stable foothold in a large part of the country. and in practical terms, that level of state domination by the republican party is starting to

have consequences for your rights. for example, a brand-new total abortion ban in the state of alabama. this new law that has now been signed by the state's governor bans all abortions statewide. a doctor who performs an abortion in alabama would face up to 99 years in state prison. there was a big fight before it passed as to whether there would be any exceptions for women who became pregnant by virtue of rape or incest. the answer from alabama legislature was no. total ban, except i should say the republican sponsor of the banduring last night's debate and vote on the bill, he did still seem to think there was one exception. but i'll have to let him try to explain to you what he thinks it was. >> does the deal make exception for patients who are victim of rape? and of course i kind of know the

answer. can you tell me why it doesn't? >> it allows for anything that's available today is still available up until that woman knows she's pregnant. >> up until the woman knows she's pregnant -- hold on. maybe this is one of these things that is easy to misunderstood. what it sounds like the republican sponsor of the alabama abortion ban is saying here is that a woman will still be allowed to get an abortion in alabama as long as she doesn't know she's pregnant. i think that's what he's saying here, but that is incomprehensible. just roll that part of the debate again. say it again. >> does the bill make exception for patients who are victim of rape? and of course i kind of know the answer. can you tell me why it doesn't?

>> it allows for anything that's available today is still available up until that woman knows she's pregnant. so there is a window of time, some say seven day, some say ten. there is a window of time that every option that's on the table now is still available. so she has to take a pregnancy test, she has to do something to know whether she is pregnant or not. you can't know that immediately. it takes some time for all those chromosomes and all that that you mentioned. it doesn't happen immediately. >> all those chromosomes and all that, it takes some time for that voodoo that you do that happens in there. i don't sweat the details, but what i'm saying is that you guys are overreacting because any woman in alabama will be free to get an abortion as long as she doesn't know she's pregnant yet.

so you just go get yourself an abortion every day just in case, and it's legal until the moment that you find out you're pregnant, and then what you just did is going to put your doctor in prison for 99 years. i mean, honestly, sponsor of the bill, that's what they're arguing here. you can get abortions, as many as you want, until you know you're pregnant, and then you can't have any more abortions. i don't -- but if you want to see the republican party's gobsmacking approach to this, and if you want to see it get sort of scary fast, he will tell you that later when that same republican lawmaker was asked how under his total ban on abortion a woman who had a miscarriage could prove that she'd had a miscarriage and not a criminal felony abortion, his reply was, quote, the burden of proof would be on the prosecution, not on the female. the prosecution would have to prove that.

so don't worry. alabama woman who has just had a miscarriage with all of the attendant grief and terror and upset this has caused you in your life, don't worry if you've had a miscarriage, you'll be fine, as long as the prosecutor can prove that you had a miscarriage. guess how the prosecutor is going to prove it? yeah, guess. the voodoo in the chromosomes, who knows. that total ban on abortion in alabama passed the senate last night. tonight the state's republican governor signed it into law. this is the strictest abortion ban to pass the legislature. it's not just happening in alabama. it is happening all over the country in all the states where republicans have full control. this is what republicans are doing with their control of state government. including alabama. we've got radical restrictive abortion bans passing at least one chamber of the state legislature. so far in already half, already 11 of the 22 states under republican control, plus one more in montana where republicans control the legislature, but there the democratic governor, that

democratic governor who vetoed one of these anti-abortion bills in his state last week, he is going to be here in just a moment to -- they say they have never seen anything like what we are seeing this year in 2019. quote, the extreme nature of this year's bills is unprecedented. but that's what republicans, that's what the republican party is doing, where they have control in the states. they're not moving anymore to limit abortion. they're moving to ban it all together, full stop. it's happening all at once in a new radical republican party wide draconian effort that we have never seen before. and that sounds unconstitutional, right? because you're not supposed to be able to been abortion that would be against the law. that's of course the entire point here, though. with republicans being very pleased with their position on the supreme court right now with the merrick garland nomination from president obama having been denied as improper by mitch

mcconnell as the republican leader in the senate and mitch mcconnell calling that one of his proudest moments in the senate since the current president put brett kavanaugh on the supreme court, for the first time conservatives think they've got a solid right wing majority on the high court that will overturn roe v. wade as long as they get the chance. they have to get a law up to the supreme court that they believe will provoke the supreme court fight that will go to those five conservative justices in the way they want to receive that fight so they can overturn roe and claire that abortion can be overturned in states that anybody wants to do it across the country. all these republican-controlled states this year are tripping over themselves to make it happen. but alabama so far is in a class by itself. lots of other states are trying to ban abortion at six week, which is before -- 90% of women wouldn't even know they were pregnant. alabama isn't even bothering with exceptions for pregnancies that took place because of rape or incest.

this guy who wrote alabama's total and complete abortion ban says bringing one of those laws was the exception to the supreme court right now. he said that would be a wasted opportunity. he said, quote, why not go all the way? in response to this alabama ban, the "new york times" editorial board interestingly sort of pulled the ripcord today. i read this as them breaking glass in case of emergency with "the times" editorial published today was essentially a primer for americans to get ready and start preparing to live in a post roe v. wade america. they literally published a guide with how to organize with your local reproductive rights organization, how to protect women going in for what are still available abortion procedures. how to learn about acquiring abortion pills on your own as you anticipate your access to a possible abortion being cut off where you live. quote, don't let abortion rights fade from consciousness as these extreme laws become america's new normal.

joining us is dahlia lithwick. thank you for being here. >> thank you. >> the theory of the case here is that the republicans wherever they have control, they are unleashed because they believe the real competition here is a beauty contest for the prettiest anti-abortion law that those five male justices will like the most that will lure them into overturning roe. and it's just a matter of who gets there with just the right pitch, but it's going to happen this year. >> i guess if that were the theory, alabama is probably not winning, because what alabama did was just bonkers. this is not attractive to john roberts. this is not attractive to brett kavanaugh. this is an all-out ban, no exceptions for rape or incest. this is a cruel and heartless deliberate vehicle, but it doesn't look like anything that the court would bless, particularly thinking about going into an election year. the court has a long game, i think. john roberts has a long game. we know how he feels. we know i think how the five conservative justices feel about

roe v. wade, and we know largely because of how they voted just three years ago in the texas abortion case. but you can do away with roe with a chip, chip, chip, slow erosion of rights. you can do it as i think the court had planned to do by just simply taking tiny incremental steps saying this too is not an undue burden. we'll close more clinics. we'll do what has been happening in red states for years, right? just say nothing is an undue burden. you have to pave the halls with gold, and that's okay. and that was a strategy that i think was going to work eventually at the supreme court when kavanaugh comes on the court. when alabama kind of jams the court like it did today and said here's this completely crazy ban that doesn't care at all about the welfare of women, that forces the court into a position that i don't think this court wants to be in. >> but you've got ohio, and you've got these other states that are pursuing the next best thing to what alabama did, which

is the six-week bans. that's essentially a 90-% abortion ban because went don't know they're pregnant at six weeks. all operating under the theory of the case i was laying out. they're all pushing -- it's not that we haven't been seeing lots of abortion restrictions lately. we haven't seen abortion bans this complete. presumably that's because they think the kavanaugh court wants a complete ban. no longer wants to chip away, no longer wants to make it impossible to access. they want a ruling that a fetus is a voting adult who you can murder by exercising your right to choose. >> i think that's right. and i think that that is -- look, there has been a real split in the pro-life -- i'm hesitant to call it that after today. >> anti-abortion rights. >> into the anti-abortion community. and the split has been do we do this fast door we do this slow? i think there has been a general consensus for a long time. we'll do it slow and not force the issue and not test the court

into giving us an adverse ruling that will set us back. now there seems to be some kind of foot race to be the ones to get there first and to do it in a way that completely disregards i think the fact that there are already two cases teed up at the court. the court has to think right now there is a louisiana case that has functionally the same admitting requirements that texas had the court upheld three years ago. the court is dancing around taking that. there is an indiana case before the court that would, again, jam the court up, but not in a way that is embarrassing, that would allow the court to continue to essentially say drip, drip, drip, we can make this go away. >> so you think these states are wrong? you think they've miscalculated how this court is going to handle these outright bans? >> i think that john roberts, everything you and i have ever said about jean-robeohn roberts institutionalist, incrementalist, incredibly aware of public opinion. i think the idea that you're

going to force jean-roberts to do something bonkers in an election year that will motive women in ways that we haven't seen before, i think john roberts is aware that he can get exactly the same outcomes by just waiting until louisiana and indiana, those other states do functionally the same thing as a ban. >> i don't know. i know you know more things about this than i do, and i know you understand this better than i do. i don't know. i feel like these guys all coordinate. i feel like the pro-life movement gets these judges elected. i feel like they socialize, they strategize together at the same events. i mean, we'll see. we'll see. we'll see. i'm not going to bet you, not even a beer. okay. dahlia lithwick, great to have you here, dahlia. we'll be right back. 'll be righ. then we noticed something...strange. oh, could you, uh, make me a burger? -poof -- you're a burger. [ laughter ] -everyone acts like their parents. -you have a tattoo. -yes.

-fun. do you not work? -so, what kind of mower you got, seth? -i don't know. some kid comes over. we pay him to do it. -but it's not all bad. someone even showed us how we can save money by bundling home and auto with progressive. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. but we can protect your home and auto. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. (indistthat was awful.tering) why are you so good at this? had a coach in high school. really helped me up my game. i had a coach. math. ooh. so, why don't traders have coaches? who says they don't? coach mcadoo! you know, at td ameritrade, we offer free access to coaches and a full education curriculum- just to help you improve your skills. boom! mad skills. education to take your trading to the next level.

only with td ameritrade. (woman) you have the support of a probiotic and the gastroenterologists who developed it. (vo) align helps to soothe your occasional digestive upsets 24/7 with a strain of bacteria you can't get anywhere else. (woman) you could say align puts the "pro" in probiotic.

so where you go, the pro goes. (vo) go with align. the pros in digestive health. and try align gummies. with prebiotics and probiotics to help support digestive health.

2006, the minimum wage in the state of montana was $5.15.

$5.15. that meant if you were working nine to five, five days a week, monday to friday, you never took a day off, you never took a sick day, a vacation, you worked five days a week for 52 straight weeks every single week of the year, cumulatively you would make for the year $10,712 as your annual salary, before taxes. in that state that year, 2006, they decided they would put a measure on the ballot to raise that state's minimum wage, raise it from $5.15 an hour to $6.15 an hour, and then importantly, they would tie the minimum wage to prices so when prices went up the minimum wage would automatically keep pace. it would tick up every year. $6.15 an hour still sucks, but that ballot measure that year would mean a dollar an hour raise right away for the lowest paid people in that state, and

it would mean the minimum wage would never fall that far again behind the cost of living. so it was 2006 that measure was on the ballot. it won in that state by a 46-point margin. margin. 73% of the state voted for it. only 27% voted against it. that was a landslide and an avalanche and a tsunami and all the other metaphors for bigness all piled up on top of each other. when a democrat named john test they're same night took a u.s. senate seat away from an incumbent republican senator that year in montana, that surprise victory that night was credited in part to the huge support for that sorely needed minimum wage increase that was on the same ballot. and the big turnout boost that came from people who wanted to go to the polls to vote for it who may also have decided to vote for jon tester while they were there. well, this was the voter information pamphlet in montana that year showing the argument for that minimum wage hike. $5.15 now. let's boost it to $6.15 and tie

to it price hikes. and you can see down there at the bottom of the page who was behind it, the director of raise montana, the private citizen who that year led that hugely successful effort to give people a raise in that state was a man named steve bullock who in 2006 was the director of raise montana. that's what steve bullock did for his state in 2006. two years later in 2008 he ran for attorney general in montana. not easy for a democrat to win statewide in a red state in a presidential election year. again, that was 2008. john mccain was at the top of the ticket. the republican party carried that state in the presidential race over barack obama, but steve bullock won his race for attorney general that year, even as the state went red for the presidency. then four years later in 2012, steve bullock ran for governor. again, not easy for a democrat to win statewide in a red state. again in a presidential election year.

this time the republican nominee was mitt romney, and mitt romney that year carried montana, won montana over barack obama by solid double-digits. unless, that same year, that same night in 2012, democrat steve bullock won the governorship, even as the state went red for the presidency again that same night. then four years later, 2016, he ran for reelection as governor. again, not easy for a democrat to win statewide in a red state, this time again in a presidential election year. this time it was republican donald trump who that same election night trounced hillary clinton by 20 points in montana. but even as the state went that red that night in november 2016, democrat steve bullock was re-elected governor that same night. and it's not like he's just squeaking by. by some measure, steve bullock is the most popular democratic governor in the country, and he's governing as definitely a democrat. i will note for the record that now that he is governor, he now

gets the privilege of announcing to the state when the minimum wage goes up every year because of that battle he led and won with such a huge margin back in 2006. this was the announcement this year about montana's minimum wage going up again because it is yoked to price increases. so it keeps pace with inflation. as a democratic governor with a very republican legislature, steve bullock has also figured out a bipartisan way to expand medicaid in his state. that got about 100,000 people in his state on to health insurance who hadn't previously had it. and that's -- 100,000? that's a lot, right, just hearing that as a number. but considering the fact that that's 100,000 people in montana finally getting health insurance in a state that only has about a million people. so that's i mean 10% of the state gets health insurance through medicaid expansion? that's a transformation in that state, and he did it with a republican legislature. bullock also figured out a way

to raise spending on public schools. he figured out a way to freeze college tuition in the state. he figured out a way to stop ruining people's lives at the stupid and petty point of the criminal justice system by no longer letting them seize your drivers license if you were late paying a fee or paying a fine. after citizens united gutted the no corporate money rule for its elections, steve bullock fought that all the way to the supreme court as attorney general. he then as governor worked with the republican legislature to ultimately enact some of the most progressive new campaign finance protection laws in the country that said, it is a red state, and it's a really republican legislature that he's got. steve bullock is pro-choice. that means he has vetoed approximately one gazillion efforts at abortion bans and abortion restrictions in the state, including one as recently as this month. he vetoed republican efforts to end same-day voter regulatiistr

in his state. after trump's fcc repealed net neutrality nationwide, bullock was the first governor in the country to sign an executive order requiring net neutrality in his state. he was the first governor to do that, but then other governors followed. so there is this democrat who keeps finding concrete ways to make progress in what is nevertheless this really, really red state. that democratic governor is as of yesterday now running for president. he is the only democratic candidate running who has won a state that trump won in 2016, but he has won statewide in that state three times, including on the night when trump took his state by 20 nights that night, the election night 2016, 20 to 30% of the voters in the state who voted for trump nevertheless that same night on that same ticket crossed over and voted for democratic governor steve bullock as well. now, is that what democrats are looking for in a presidential candidate this year? i don't know. democrats have every choice

imaginable and some that are unimaginable. at this point it's easier to list the democrats not running than the ones who are. but this is what it would look like for them to run steve bullock. day one of the republican congress after the trump election, as soon as the republican congress came in to start the new congress at the beginning of 2017, day one they passed a rules package that would make it easier to give away public lands. and then they literally put up this bill right off the bat. look at the title of it. "disposal of excess federal lands." disposal, really? they're excess, public land that's extra that nobody needs. it's just junk. let's give it away. let's dispose of it. a huge chunk of the land that congressional republicans decided in 2017, decided was excess and should be disposed of, should be given away to private interest, a huge chunk of that public land they wanted to get rid of was land in

montana. here's what steve bullock and montana had to say about that. >> it's time that we send a message to that floor of the building that proposes the transfer of public lands have no place in this building and no place in montana. [ cheering ] and the beauty is with a crowd like this, not only do we need them to hear us up here, we need them to hear us all the way to washington, d.c. look.

this ain't about politics, whether you're democrat or republican, a libertarian, a vegetarian, these lands belong to you. >> that bright idea right at the start of the republican congress in 2017, that bright idea in washington the take away three million acres of public land in montana and sell it off, that did not fly. republicans thought better of it, shelved it, backed off. you can see why from these pictures, right? but that was how the trump era started in 2017 in montana. now montana governor steve bullock wants to run against trump to get him out of the white house in 2020. governor bullock joins us live here next. s live here next.

with advil liqui-gels, you'll ask... what stiff joints? what bad back? advil is... relief that's fast. strength that lasts. you'll ask... what pain? with advil liqui-gels. billions of problems. morning breath? garlic breath? stinky breath? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath fresh breath oral rinse instantly fights all types of bad breath and works for 24 hours. so you can... breathe easy. there's therabreath at walmart. toujeo provides significant a1c reduction, and stable blood sugar control, around the clock. find your groove with toujeo. ♪ let's groove tonight. toujeo is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of

low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. get medical help right away if you have a serious allergic reaction such as body rash, or trouble breathing. don't reuse needles, or share insulin pens. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be life-threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor about all medicines and medical conditions. check insulin label each time you inject. taking tzds with insulins may cause heart failure that can lead to death. ♪ let's groove tonight. ask your doctor about toujeo. ♪ let's groove tonight. intrnow at outback.plete steakhouse dinner, get your choice of soup or salad, entrée like our signature sirloin,

and dessert, starting at $14.99. hurry in for this complete dinner before it's completely gone. outback steakhouse: aussie rules. welcome to fowler, indiana. one of the windiest places in america. and home to three bp wind farms. in the off-chance the wind ever stops blowing here... the lights can keep on shining. thanks to our natural gas. a smart partner to renewable energy. it's always ready when needed. or... not. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. to help the world keep advancing. roxana: when i got into teaching, it was this idea of really transforming our schools. marisa: one of my biggest responsibilities as a teacher is to serve as an advocate for my kids. newscaster: hundreds of teachers are hitting the picket lines. newscaster: thousands gathered here. rosanne: we need smaller class sizes. angelia: more counselors and more nurses. roxana: we have to be able to invest in our young people. angelia: every student has a right to quality education. ever: no matter what neighborhood you live in. roxana: our students don't have part-time needs,

so they can't have part-time solutions. rodney: because we know quality public schools... roxana: make a better california... marisa: for all of us. joining us now here for the interview is steve bullock. he is the governor of montana. he is the newest contender in the very large democratic presidential primary. thanks for making the trip. >> it's good to be here for sure. >> so you are joining the race as either number 22 or number

23. >> 37. >> 40. >> at this point. yeah. >> and people are looking differently at the 22nd candidate than they might have been at the second candidate. and why did you wait this long to get in? >> yeah, because fundamentally i would have loved to get in earlier, but i have a job to do. i have a 6% republican legislature. i had medication expansion. one 000 montanans lives were at stake to get that through. had freezing college tuition. had a foreign dark money ban that few other states have passed. i signed my last bill just monday. and now it's tuesday and here i am with you. so i really couldn't have -- if i was going to do my job, i think it would have been that much more difficult to get some real difficult things through this time if i was here with you instead of with people in montana. so i get that i'm late into it. but thing is a lot of room for me to do some things here. >> am i right that the legislature meets like 90 days every two years? like it's a pretty tight time

frame. >> 90 legislative days every two years. >> why has the democratic party never, ever, ever elected -- nominated a westerner president? lbj, texas, yes. but that's as close as you get. >> you know, i don't know if it's in part population in part. there is a bias towards the coasts. when we talk about public lands, when we talk about sort of the importance of winning in the places like i am, we really need to have sort of the western values on the ticket. i think it contributes significantly for sure. >> when you had that remarkable night in november 2016 when you won reelection while donald trump took your state by 20 points, you set out thereafter and tried to start a conversation with national democrats about the democratic party speaking to rural voters and speaking to people who they night not expect to support them, speak of people who might have crossed over to vote for trump. how do you assess the success of that overture that you made? do you think that the democratic party is taking that seriously or getting any better at that? >> well, i think they need to,

because fundamentally, two things. one of which if we don't win back some of the places we lost in 2016, we're not going to win this presidency. and second of which, even if you win, it's not just about cobbling together 270 electoral votes. you showed your map earlier. 22 states completely republican controlled. you're never going to get anything done in congress if there is a whole lot of the country that says well this democratic party just doesn't identify or fight for me or work for me. so i think that hopefully, you know, since even 2016, i've traveled quite a bit talking about what we need to be doing to win back places that we ought to have never lost in the first place, and this next step is going to be part of that for sure. >> the common wisdom about that divide has been that the republican party has been really good about picking cultural divisive social conservative issues to make rural democrats and working class democrats and potential crossover voters feel like the democratic party is

elite and cosmopolitan and against them on these issues. i think that was a long-standing diagnosis here. but now we're in sort of a different place. roe v. wade very well may get overturned this year. places where republicans are in control really are looking at banning abortion, and they're starting right now tonight in alabama. you yourself have been through a transformation on gun policy in recent years. those issues aren't just symbols. they're real policy issues that have real implications. i'm not sure the democratic party is going to go back in terms of being anti-abortion or being pro-gun in the way that they were. is that the right diagnosis about what's wrong with the democrats in talking to rural voter, or is it a totally different conversation? >> well, thing is a couple of different things. in montana i can't win just by going to patches of blue. i have to travel over the 407,000 square mile state. we're not even showing up, we're not ultimately going to win. second of which, if you look over the last decade or so, a third of the counties in the country actually had business

gains, 150,000 new businesses were in a third of the counties of the country. two-thirds of the counties actually lost businesses. you take that map and line it up where donald trump won, and it's dang near the exact same thing. so fundamentally, i think that there are parts of it that certainly your cultural issues. but if you don't feel like your life is getting better, that you have a fair shot at success, when i was growing up, 90% of 30-year-olds are doing better than their parents. today it's only half. the average worker hasn't gotten a wage increase in 40 years in real terms. if you don't feel like you're life is getting better and the democrats aren't even giving you a path along that way, we're not giving them a reason to vote for us. >> i wonder how that maps for you on to the issue of climate. climate is a foreground issue for everybody who is running this year. >> you bet. >> i think the republicans are even starting to think that they may have to talk about climate. >> it's about time. >> i do think they're -- i think

they're doing their own assessment of how they're going to deal with that. montana is a coal state. governor jay inslee from washington, also another popular democratic governor, he is running this year, he is running on a climate change form will platform. he has oopsaid the two of you fundamentally disagree on what the science demands in terms of climate. how do you compete for a democratic elector and for a country that really wants climate to be tackled head-on. >> as i do. we're outdoors. i had any second worst fire season two years ago, 1.3 million acres burned. come to glacier park soon because the glaciers will be gone. i've doubled our wind generation just in my six years, quadrupled our solar, and i know we need to do things. scientist says ultimately we've got to get carbon neutral by 2050. i think we can do it before that. i think we can do it by 2040. and there are steps we can take. we have to be getting rid of a

billion tons of co2 globally a year. we need to rejoin paris. we are the -- we mitt about five billion tons a year. china is actually twice as much. we cannot do this alone. we need to regain our leadership in the world. we need -- we could actually then get back in the cafe standards. you also need to say let's actually figure out short-term and long-term how we get to 2040 there has been more coal plants closed in two years, two and a half years of trump than in eight years of obama. by and large, these were older plants. ice makes a difference and consumer prefers. >> do you think coal plants need to be phased out? >> i think the scientists say by 2050 -- >> some scientist says by 1950 would have been a better idea in you look at glacier park melting right now. >> i think you either have to --

you have more technological changes in your phone in the last five years than how we've ever generated energy from coal in the last 40 or 50. so there has been some efficiencies, but a lot of the old plants are just going away anyway. and think about from the perspective of george h.w. bush, the first bush 30 years ago said we're going to address the greenhouse effect from the white house effect. meaning we will lead from the very top. republicans don't even acknowledge the climate change exists because of the outside influences, the koch brothers and others that turn around, finance their elections and they can't even have a meaningful discussion. i think we are at a really exciting time where we're talking about the steps we need to take, and we'll be taking those steps and i'll be taking those steps. >> you have been a target of the koch brothers in recent elections. that's one of the things i want to talk with you about. i will be right back with montana governor steve bullock right after this. stay with us. with us (woman) when you take align,

you have the support of a probiotic and the gastroenterologists who developed it. (vo) align helps to soothe your occasional digestive upsets 24/7 with a strain of bacteria you can't get anywhere else.

(woman) you could say align puts the "pro" in probiotic. so where you go, the pro goes. (vo) go with align. the pros in digestive health. and try align gummies. with prebiotics and probiotics to help support digestive health. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. i have no idea how we're going to get through this. follow me. unitedhealthcare has the people and tools to help guide you through the confusion,

well that wasn't so bad at all. that's how we like it. unitedhealthcare. that's how we like it. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase. >> tech: at safelite autoglass, we every chip will crack.. this daughter was home visiting when mom saw a chip in her windshield. >> mom: honey is that a chip? >> tech: they wanted it fixed fast so they brought it to us. >> mom: hi. >> tech: with our in-shop chip repair service, we can fix it the same day... guaranteed. plus with most insurance a safelite chip repair is no cost to you. >> mom: really? drive safely. all right. ♪ acoustic music >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, ♪ safelite replace. we're back now with montana governor steve bullock, newly

announced democrat in the race for the presidency. thank you for sticking with me. >> great to be there. >> you have had a weird series of headlines most people haven't had to the deal with. there are democrats who are speaking anonymously to the press saying they wish you were running for senate instead. there's a republican senator in your state who is up next year who everybody thinks is vulnerable and everybody thinks you would beat. you don't want to be a senator. you're worried about that race. how are you thinking? >> rachel, this wasn't an either/or. i was never going to run for the senate. i do think that i have both the skills and abilities as an executive to bridge some divides. that's the kind of work i've always done. >> never been a legislator. >> never been a legislator. have great respect for the senators but this is something that never got me excited. >> uh-huh. one of the hurdles that i see for you is that the democratic electorate nationwide and in a whole bunch of important early states has a really keel

constituency in african-american voters and african-american women in particular. montana is less than 1% african-american. you don't have experience talking with the black community in order to earn their votes and their trust and get them to vote for you. how do you anticipate meeting that challenge? >> i think i'll do it the same way i've been attorney general and governor in montana. certainly both trying to represent everyone but also recognizing there are unique challenges we're 7% native american. we've had significant challenges there, things i've done for the lgbtq community in a state like montana from repealing it hateful laws to orders protecting gender identity, things i've done on equal pay for equal work. i will approach this and the rest of sort of historically disadvantaged communities, i'll listen and listen hopefully more than i talk and recognize that this fair shot at the american

dream hasn't been available for everyone. there's no reason why an african-american woman is four times more likely to die in childbirth than nonor in month why an american indian has on average a life span 20 years less than a non-native. in each of these areas we'll come in and say i need to learn, but i've been successful i think in both listening and trying to bring everybody up and recognizing there are different challenges in different communities and i think now right now better than perhaps ever before not only does ot democratic party recognize that but the country recognizes it. >> tell me about your evolution on guns. you have changed your mind over time both about whether or not certain assault rifles should be banned and also on universal background collection. which surprised me. a few years ago you were not in favor of universal background

checks. but the background check issue to me feels very black and white. how as recently as a few years ago could you have believed you shouldn't have to get a background check to get a gun. >> i've signed bills and vetoed a lot of bills relating to guns. i've been asked to lower the flags by both presidents trump and obama 53 times in total. over a quarter of those were for mass shootings. when i drop off my sixth grader this year he started school, he learned his first week where to go if an active shooter comes. no sixth grader should have to deal with there. i looked at it as a public health issue more than a political issue. public health hish gun owners don't want guns to get in the wrong hands. universal background checks now make sense to me. and ultimately, they make sense to the majority of americans, gun owner and non. it was actually going to a march

for our lives rally where i was asked to speak that i said i don't want to speak. i'm just going to listen. when i went with my kids, that's when i said listen, assault weapon, it's not used for self-protection. it's rarely used for hunting. stores and chains like dick's and walmart have banned them. it's time to have this conversation. i think we can have a conversation because everybody wants to keep their family safe. everybody wants to keep guns out of the wrong hands. but even think post-vegas. it took a year plus to ban bump stocks. at some point we've got recognize and this again goes to the influences aren't necessarily in the buildings. it's the outside dollars. if the nra which was a hunting and a gun safety organization when i was a kid, now it's a political organization, not allowing any compromise. if we looked at this as a public elt issue more, we would take steps like that. >> steve bullock, democratic

governor of the great state of montana with a republican legislate tore has managed to get a lot of stuff done that a lot of democrats would feel envious of even in nontotally red states. i'm intrigues by your candidacy and happy to have you here talking about it. >> thanks. >> we'll be right back. stay with us. nks. >> we'll be right back stay with us

♪work so hard give it everything you got♪ ♪strength of a lioness tough as a knot♪ ♪rocking the stage and we're never gonna stop♪ ♪all strength, no sweat... just in case you forgot♪ ♪all strength, no sweat... ♪no no no sweat... the matters.ar... introducing the all-new 2019 ford ranger, it's the right gear. with a terrain management system for... this.

a bash plate for... that. an electronic locking rear differential for... yeah... this. heading to the supermarket? get any truck. heading out here? get the ford ranger. the only adventure gear built ford tough. listen to your mom, knuckleheads. hand em over. hand what over? video games, whatever you got. let's go. you can watch videos of people playing video games in the morning.

is that everything? i can see who's online. i'm gonna sweep the sofa fort. well, look what i found. take control of your wifi with xfinity xfi. let's roll! now that's simple, easy, awesome. xfinity xfi gives you the speed, coverage and control you need. manage your wifi network from anywhere when you download the xfi app today. that does it for us tonight. very happy to have you with us. i'll see you again tomorrow. now it's time for the last worded with lawrence o'donnell." >> good evening, raich. the situation in alabama is moving quickly. we'll have joyce vance join us, a former u.s. attorney fra alabama to tell us what the next legal step is. this is clearly a law, an abortion ban law not designed to be implemented but designed to go to court. >> yes. >> so we will hear from joyce what happens next. >> the great thing about having joyce on this issue too is joyce was doing