not there are going to be checks and balances in this country, and whether or not the executive wranch is -- branch is going to be accountable to anyone. i think the answer has to be yes. >> congressman, thank you for joining us. that's all in for this evening. t"the rachel maddow show" start right now. >> thank you. thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. in 15 days, so two weeks from tomorrow the democratic presidential candidates are finally going to square off. or octagon off or double decagon off. that's a ten-sided figure. we have a double decagon. we know the basics of what the two ten sided debates are going to look like starting two weeks from tomorrow. nbc, msnbc, and telemundo are

the hosts. ten candidates the first night and ten different candidates the second night. just today they announced the moderators for the first debates. and the basic logistics. the debate is in miami. when? it's wednesday and thursday, the 26th and 27th of june. 15 days from now. both nights of the debate will be two hours. from 9:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. eastern. who is going to be participating? well, there's two sides of that. it's complicated. in terms of the moderators, lester holt is there for both hours both nights. from 9:00 to 11:00 p.m. he's the host for the whole thing. for the first hour of the debate from 9:00 to 10:00 lester is joined by savannah guthrie and jose. and for the second hour of the debate savannah and jose swap

out and chuck todd and i swap in for the second hour. that pattern holds for the first night and the second night of the debate. lester throughout. savannah and jose for the first hour. chuck and me moderating for the second hour. who is on the stage? much harder question. thankfully that is for the dnc, the democratic party to figure out. you may have noticed there are a couple dozen declared candidates for the democratic presidential nomination. there's only going to be 20 slots for the first debate. ten the first night and ten the second night. over the next few days the dnc will announce which 20 of the democratic candidates are going to be making the stage for that first two-night debate. the criteria for people was announced back in february. they announced back then to make

the debate candidates could qualify for the debate if you get 1 % or more in three polls. the polls have to either be national polls or polls from one of the four early states, iowa, new hampshire, south carolina, or nevada. that's only one track. if you can't make that polling threshold, again, 1 % in three polls, there is a second path set by the dnc which is a fundraising path. you can also qualify for the debate even if you don't qualify on polling. you can qualify if you're able to get donations from 65,000 different donors and all of those donations can't all come from the same part of the country. you need at least 200 unique donors per state in at least 20 states. you can see how the democrats are trying to set these thresholds to basically measure strength. one way is to show your strength is to turn up in the polls. another way to show strength is to show your appeal to a very

broad swath of democratic donors. they set those two paths. now, again, it is the dnc that set that criteria, and it is the dnc's responsibility to check whether candidates meet either or both of those cry tiitercrit. and it will be the dnc's job to find out what to do if they have more than 20 candidates who meet the criteria. for the first contest, they set the threshold requirements in february. and it is totally possible that more than 20 of the democratic candidates are going to meet either or both thresholds to qualify to get into the debate. but the dnc is being firm that there will only be 20 slots. so if that happens, if they've got more technically qualified candidates than they do slots on stage, the dnc says they are not going to add more podiums, more podia to the stage. the dnc will instead win now out

the lowest performers until they take it down to around 20. at which point some small version of hell will break out presumably in the democratic contest. now that they've made the announcement about the basic logistics and the moderators, here's a couple things i can let you know. first, the announcement of who is in and who is out, the announcement of which 20 democratic candidates are going to make that first two-night debate, that is going to happen on thursday night. so the dnc is going to make their announcement about who the 20 candidates are in the debate the day after tomorrow. thursday night. and then we expect that shortly thereafter we will get the announcement of which of those candidates are going to be on the first night of the debate and which of them are going to be on the second night of the debate. that's particularly interesting if there's a particular matchup that you were hoping to see. right?

well, which ten candidates will be on stage together? we don't know yet. that announcement will happen sometime after they pick the 20 candidates who are in the debate on thursday night. that announcement about who's on which night of the debate, that announcement could come as early as friday. we don't know. we shall see. and one last thing to keep in mind about this debate as we're closing in on it. i mentioned the first debate starts 15 days from now. well, in the original criteria set by the dnc for how democratic candidates can qualify to get into the first two-night debate, the dnc said candidates could qualify based on polling. specifically in polls publicly released between january 1st of this year and 14 days prior to the date of the debate. so that's the window of time in which you can qualify on the basis of your polling. from the start of this year until 14 days before the debate. well, tomorrow is 14 days prior to the date of the debate.

which means tomorrow is the drop dead date for any candidate on the bubble right now in terms of qualifying by polling. tomorrow is the last chance for any poll to be published for any candidate who is trying to hit or her numbers in a national poll from any one of the early states. tomorrow polling-wise, it's the last chance, and we know there's at least one new poll. t a poll out of nevada. it's conducted by monmouth. that poll is due to be published tomorrow. that will be a potential last chance lifeline for any candidate who has not yet hit 1 % in three different polls. that nevada poll coming out tomorrow might be the last chance. so good luck, everybody. let the gnashing of teeth begin. let the twin decagon battles take shape. there is a new national head

to head general election poll that's out today from quipollin that pits president trump against six of the different democratic hopefuls in hypothetical one on one general election matchups. this is super interesting. it has to be driving the white house crazy. in this new poll which is a nationwide survey, they put trump up against six different democrats. in the nationwide poll trump loses to booker by five points. he loses to pete buttigieg by five points. he loses to elizabeth warren elizabeth warren by seven points and kamala harris by eight points and loses to bernie sanders by nine points and he loses to joe biden by a whopping 13 points nationwide. and those head to head national matchup polling numbers are as this headline in the washington

post suggests, brutal for president trump. and those head to head polling numbers arrive at the same time that the new york times has just written an article -- just published an article in which they obliquely reference what they describe as a devastating 17 -state poll conducted by trump's campaign pollster. now, we don't have access to that polling. it's internal polling created just for use by his campaign, but if trump's own pollster just did a 17 -state poll that produced devastating results in terms of trump's campaign prospects, well, well, you can see why the president and the white house might be feeling wobbly about how reelection looks right now, and how the democrats are looking to try to run against him. the president today told reporters at the white house that it's the phony witch hunt in his words. that's the only thing that's hurting him in the polls.

maybe that's true. not that it's a phony witch hunt, but maybe it's true the ongoing scandal surrounding the white house and the president's campaign and his business, maybe it's possible that's what's hurting his prospects for reelection. we have news, for example, co coming up just tonight about the president's eldest son having to testify tomorrow before congress after members of congress loudly expressed concern that he may have lied to them under oath the last time he was there. so the existential scandals surrounding this presidency are still circling. in some ways they are still accelerating. we'll get that don junior ahead tonight. but honestly, two and a half years into this, this far into the trump era in republican politics, if we have learned anything, we should have learned this president's ability to shock and to generate scandal is really limitless. it's not like there's just that

one thing trailing around behind him and everything else is fine. i mean, just right now, for example, he appears to be cooking up a whole new cabinet scandal that might be worse than any of his other previous cabinet sandals and by now he's pretty good at cabinet sandals because he's had so many in a short time. this latest one has a hook at the end that could prove to be a problem for the president and his administration but also for republicans in the united states' senate which is a constituency the president can't afford to get in too much trouble right now. when it comes to the president's cabinet officials and tipirneni appointees this has been the long slow simmering ongoing scandal of his office. his cabinet officials, these are the most powerful people in the federal government. they're appointed by the president to run agencies with billions of dollars and millions

of people under their control and command. but two and a half years into this presidency, i mean, this administration right now doesn't even have full-time fully fledged confirmed people running any of this stuff. there's an acting commissioner of the food and drug administration. an acting administrator of the small business administration, u.s. citizenship and immigration, the acting ambassador to the united nations. an acting fema director. the acting secretary of the air force. acting homeland security secretary. an acting defense secretary for months. we know that part of the reason the upper echelons of the trump administration have been so filled with holes in what is now a persistent way, we know part of the reason is because senior people get flung off from the administration into the ether so quickly and so regularly, people don't bother to change their address or forward their mail when they get trump administration jobs in

washington. it's obvious. even if you only look at the top tier of the roster in terms of who trump has tried to put in place to run the federal government, it's obvious there's something wrong when it comes to trump's cabinet and senior appointees. them failing and falling out and resigning in disgrace and leaving in scandal and in some cases them getting arrested, it started less than a month in when the first trump national security adviser had to go, mike flynn. and then the white house press secretary, sean spicer and then reince priebus, and then anthony scaramucci and then dooef bannon who was the last manager of his campaign. and then the health secretary tom price had to resign. and then the white house staff secretary when we learned the dark reasons why he couldn't get a security clearance. and then the chief economic adviser and secretary of state rex tillerson and another white

house communications director hope hicks. and then h.r. mcmaster and the v.a. secretary and the ridiculous nominee who was supposed to replace the v.a. secretary. and then the head of the epa has to resign and another corruption scandal. and then the attorney general and the interior secretary and another corruption scandal. and then another white house communications director, the guy from fox news has to go, and then the defense secretary james mattis resigns in protest and then the homeland security gets fired as well. there might be more just tonight. i know i might have missed about 30 ones of those riffing those off the top of my head. we have seen this incredible roller coaster of scandal and disgrace and criminal trouble for all of these high-ranking federal appointees and nominees from president trump. but now as his reelection effort

sort of needs to kick into gear and as democrats get ready to start their campaigns against him, now there's a problem in a specific corner of trump's cabinet that may be bigger than the others in terms of substance and implications for the president's most important allies on capitol hill, because president trump's transportation secretary elaine chao is married to the republican leader of the senate, mitch mcconnell. there's now a snowballing series of corruption around elaine chao and how she's been running the transportation department. it started when it was reported elaine chao had been directed by ethics officials she needed to divest from a company that was directly related to her work at the transportation department. ethics officials told her if you're going to be secretary of transportation, you need to divest from this particular company in which you hold a whole bunch of stock. she was directed to do that. she said she would, but she did not divest from the company.

she was told to do it officially. she signed off an ethics agreement saying she would do it. she said she would do it and didn't. instead she sat on hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of stock in that company. that company happens to be in the words of the wall street journal, the country's largest supplier of crushed stone sand and gravel used in road paving and road building. i mean, she's the federal official in charge of road paving and road building for the country. she's the secretary of transportation and she's decided to secretly keep her stock, her tons of stock in the country's biggest asphalt company that makes roads? i mean, really? like, that's the one thing we can all admit you should -- i mean, you know how it's become a joke that the trump white house proclaims infrastructure week and never does it. every time the trump administration does that, every

time they tout their infrastructure plans, which they never do, but every time they talk them up, one thing that happens is the stock price of that asphalt company jumps up, the one that elaine chao holds stock in. she gets richer every time she talks about it because she didn't divest in the company even though she said she did, she didn't. that alone is about the size and shape of the corruption scandal that led to the resignation of trump's health secretary tom price. but that's just one of them for elaine chao. last week "the new york times" reported that when she planned her first visit to china as trump's labor secretary her office called ahead to the u.s. embassy in beijing because she wanted to arrange meetings for her family members with members of the chinese government while she was visiting. her family runs a big shipping company that does a lot of business in china. she wanted to arrange meetings

for her relatives with chinese government officials and she wanted the u.s. government to do that for her. the official who had just departed as department chief of mission at the u.s. embassy at beijing when she went the requests he called it alarmingly inappropriate. it was flagged by the embassy back to state department head quarters in washington. he was flagged to ethics officials in both the state department and the transportation department after ethics officials in both of those departments were flagged to what elaine chao was trying to do with her family members, eventually she called off that trip. elaine chao's father and sister have served on the board of china state shipbuilding which is what you think it is. it's china state shipbuilding. while she as u.s. transportation secretary has tried to cut grants and funding for u.s. shipbuilding here at home.

her family's company has taken hundreds of millions of dollars in financing from banks controlled by the chinese government while elaine chao has brought her father who runs that company to in his words, talk business with president trump. elaine chao herself as transportation secretary has attended at least one celebration of a deal made between her family's company and another firm that has lots of mass transit contracts in the united states. think about that for a second. that would be a really terrible look if she was the kind of high ranking federal government official who had anything to say about mass transit funding in the united states. she's the transportation secretary. so in that case, we've got a firm with huge mass transit contracts. right? that means we've got a firm in a passion to benefit from mass transit decisions by her and that firm chooses to do a

remunerative deal with her family's company, and she as a federal official shows up to celebrate and applaud that deal. i mean, that would be something. right? that would be elaine chao, president trump's transportation secretary. and that was all leading up to the story we covered last night from politico.com where we learned elaine chao has designated a special liaison specifically to help her husband. her husband is the top republican in the senate. nobody involved denies that elaine chao as secretary of transportation has set up a unique process just for him inside the labor department to make sure that a special intermediary is always on hand to facilitate federally funded transportation department projects that her husband wants steered to his home state. while he runs for reelection bragging about all the federal

dollars he's been able to steer to his home state. according to politico so far this little special arrangement inside the transportation department has paid off for mcconnell to the tune of at least $78 million in federally funded projects so far. it's funny. no other senator has a special liaison in the transportation department to make sure their projects, their chosen projects that might help their reelection efforts get special attention. nobody else has that. and so here come the democratic presidential debates. right? i mean, in any other year in modern american history, this much scandal around one serving cabinet official would be the theme song and the propulsive force behind an entire presidential campaign to oust an incumbent president who had overseen something this rank.

i mean, as all of these stories have snowballed about elaine chao just over the past two weeks, her department is denying there's any impropriety, but this is the transportation secretary of the united states secretly profiting off her job from the world's biggest road building company and using taxpayer resources to try to hook up her family's company in china and an approval system to benefit her husband who runs the u.s. senate and who oversaw her confirmation there, and who has been given millions of dollars himself by her family. why do they have millions of dollars? because they run that company that she has used her office to promote. i mean, this is b movie stuff. that amalgamation, just those

two weeks of stories about elaine chao is worse on the surface than what ryan zinke and scoot pruitt resigned for. this is b movie stuff, but it is our b movie. this is our swamp now. and if nothing else, it does signify this would be a great time for there to be the start of a national election. joining us is chris lew. he worked as deputy labor secretary in the obama administration. i tried to put this in context against the fact that we know there have been a lot of scandals in the trump cabinet. there have been a lot of resignations, a lot of turnovers. right now there's a lot of acting secretaries because they don't want to try to put people through the confirmation process. i feel like the last two weeks of reporting about elaine chao

is sort of of a magnitude that's greater. >> yeah. so let's remember the tone ultimately gets set from the top. we've got a president who himself has mixed his own personal business and government business. we've got a president who has said it's okay to reward your political supporters and punish your opponents. he goes to and threatens to take money away from california and puerto rico, and yet he says alabama gets a plus treatment when they have a disaster. the idea their cabinet should be putting their sum on the scale to favor states or districts is not unusual. it's part of how they do their business. more broadly on the cabinet sandals, look at the central premise. the president said i could run government better as a businessman. i would hire the best people. and this is a smooth running machine. everything we've not only seen over the last couple weeks but really the last couple years disproves all of the central tenets about how he runs his

government. >> in terms of accountability here, obviously talking about the tone being set from the top and the general standards and expectations that exist for these hi-ranking officials in this presidency and this administration specifically, the congress doesn't have to go along with that if they don't want to. presumably these cabinet officials could be impeached on their own terms whether or not the administration was ever going to feel enough shame to force them out or whether or not the justice department was ever going to investigate any of these things if there was potential criminal behave. >> look, it is hard to keep track in this swirl of daily scandals what matters and doesn't matter. you've got the house oversight committee that might hold wilbur ross in contempt for not turning over documents, but he lied to congress. he was asked specifically about the origin of the citizenship question in the census. he said it came from the department of justice.

we know it did not come from the department of justice. that would be a major scandal in any administration that a cabinet member lied to congress and that's sort of like tier two in terms of scandal right now. but yes, ultimately congress should be holding these folks accountable. congress ought to be and house democrats ought to be holding oversight hearings. as importantly they should be using the power of the purse to try to punish the cabinet members. you can do a lot of things in terms of curtailing travel or front office spending or cutting their staff. you have to get these things through the senate. that's another powerful tool at the disposal of house democrats. >> i'm glad you brought up the issue of the contempt proceedings in the house. as you mentioned wilbur ross and william barr are both going to face contempt in the oversight committee because of elements of scandal around the question of adding a citizenship question to the census. but we've already seen with other committees and with other scandals and with regard to the

mueller report, we've seen committees push the issue of potential contempt of congress against william barr in ways that seems to have been productive both the intelligence committee and the judiciary committee were able to essentially get concessions to get access to materials that the justice department was otherwise denying them by pushing of contempt vote against barr right up until the point where they were ready to do it and barr kind of cried uncle at the last moment and handed stuff over. i wonder if the contempt proceedings have traditionally been used this way or if you see it as an appropriate way to sort of get these cabinet officials into compliance and to get them to do things they need to do so congress can oversee them. >> look, traditionally being held in contempt of congress is not something that any cabinet member or public citizen wants to be doing. and so hopefully with the recent concessions out of the justice department, there's been cooler heads that indicated even if we

don't want to comply or the president tells us this is not his posture, this is not a good thing for the justice department or bill barr. and let's not forget. i mean, even when republicans controlled the house of representatives, a sufficient amount of pressure was put so that tom price and scott pruitt and ryan zinke eventually resigned in part because of the dogged reporting. the crazy things we learned about scott pruitt and the mattress and the $50 room we've all forgotten about. the press pressure, the public pressure, and ultimately congressional oversight can hold some of these folks accountable. it's like a game of whack a mole. so many things pop up and given the swirl of news about trump, it's hard to keep track of all this. >> agreed on every point. sir, thank you for being here. i appreciate it. >> thank you. >> much more to get to tonight. stay with us. onight stay with us liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need.

nice! but uh, what's up with your partner? oh! we just spend all day telling everyone how we customize car insurance because no two people are alike, so... limu gets a little confused when he sees another bird that looks exactly like him. ya... he'll figure it out. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ nueven if you try to eat well,. you might fall short in key nutrients. get more by adding one a day. it's the #1 multivitamin uniquely designed for men and women. one serving, once a day. one a day. and done.

patients that i see about dry mouth. they feel that they have to drink a lot of water. medications seem to be the number one cause for dry mouth. i like to recommend biotene. it replenishes the moisture in your mouth. biotene definitely works. [heartbeat] and i don't add trup the years.s. but what i do count on... is boost® delicious boost® high protein nutritional drink has 20 grams of protein, along with 26 essential vitamins and minerals. boost® high protein. be up for life.

there are roadside attractions. ♪ and then there's our world-famous on-road attraction. the 2019 glc, starting at $40,700. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. mno kidding.rd. but moving your internet and tv? that's easy. easy?! easy? easy. because now xfinity lets you transfer

your service online in just about a minute with a few simple steps. really? really. that was easy. yup. plus, with two-hour appointment windows, it's all on your schedule. awesome. now all you have to do is move...that thing. [ sigh ] introducing an easier way to move with xfinity. it's just another way we're working to make your life simple, easy, awesome. go to xfinity.com/moving to get started. the democratic controlled house passed resolution 430 today. along party lines resolution 430 streamlines the process for enforcing subpoenas by congress

and for taking people to court when they defy the subpoenas. that means congress will have more leverage now against don mcgahn and william barr defying subpoenas related to the mueller investigation as well as other current and former white house officials who choose to tell congress no when they get that legally binding subpoena in the mail. importantly today's resolution against -- which passed the house, it also allows the judiciary committee and their chairman jerry nadler to ask a federal judge to release the information to congress redacted from the mueller report. a lot is grand jury material, a federal judge must issue an order for that stuff to be used outside the grand jury process and shown to anyone. the committee has been asking attorney general william barr to go along with them on making a request for that material to a federal judge. william barr refused.

after this vote they will no longer have to wait on barr and the justice department to make that request together. instead they can go ahead to with the request to a federal judge themselves. >> we'll move as quickly as possible to go to court against don mcgahn, the president's former counsel and any subsequent witnesses who disobey a committee subpoena. we are going to move quickly to court for access to grand jury material in the mueller report. we have other subpoenas outstanding including for hope hicks and annie donaldson. if they don't show up when they supposed to, they'll be the targets of court enforcement. >> jerly nadler saying they're going to move as quickly as possible to enforce their subpoenas in court, and in addition they will be going to move to court quickly to ask for the grand jury material to be released to them from court. it passed on a party line vote and clears the way for all of that.

in terms of what's happening in short order. tomorrow all eyes will be on the white house intelligence committee. tomorrow morning they're going to hold their first open hearing on mueller's findings. it's a hearing titled lessons from the mueller report. counterintelligence implications of volume one. volume one of the mueller report, of course, is about russia's attack on our election and russian contacts between the kremlin and trump's campaign in trump's orbit. that should be an interesting hearing tomorrow. that's the second open hearing the democrats have held on mueller's findings thus far. one earlier this week in the judiciary committee and one tomorrow in intel. we also got word today about something else that's going to happen tomorrow on the other side of capitol hill. this time will be in the senate intelligence committee. it has the potential to set off fireworks because it involves the president's family. and we know from experience that when the president's adult children are involved, it tends to be a super sensitive subject for everyone involved, especially for dad, the

president. but not just for him. that story is coming up. stay with us. stay with us when crabe stronger...strong, with new nicorette coated ice mint. layered with flavor... it's the first and only coated nicotine lozenge. for an amazing taste... ...that outlasts your craving. new nicorette ice mint. control your blood sugar around the clock. and with a $0 copay, ♪ let's groove tonight. that's something to groove about. toujeo is used to control high blood sugar

in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. get medical help right away if you have a serious allergic reaction such as body rash, or trouble breathing. don't reuse needles, or share insulin pens. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be life-threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor about all medicines and medical conditions. check insulin label each time you inject. taking tzds with insulins may cause heart failure that can lead to death. toujeo, ask your doctor. ♪ let's groove tonight.

-[ scoffs ] if you say so. ♪ -i'm sorry? -what teach here isn't telling you is that snapshot rewards safe drivers with discounts on car insurance. -what? ♪ -or maybe he didn't know. ♪ [ chuckles ] i'm done with this class. -you're not even enrolled in this class. -i know. i'm supposed to be in ceramics. do you know -- -room 303. -oh. thank you. -yeah. -good luck, everybody. -oh. thank you. -yeah. when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar.

balanceus.org who were the family members you briefed on the trump tower moscow project? >> don trump junior and ivanka trump. >> now, were these in the regular course of business or did the president or family request the briefing? >> this is the regular course of business. >> do you recall there's a question on the number of briefings. do you recall how many there might have been? >> i'm sorry, sir?

>> do you recall how many of these briefings there might have been? >> approximately ten. >> approximately ten briefings on that issue. right before michael cohen, the president's long-time personal lawyer went to prison for along other things lying to congress, he went back to congress for a final round of testimony before the house oversight committee. he said that although he had lied to congress previously he needed to correct the record. he wanted to answer the questions truthfully and lay all his cards on the table. and in that final sworn testimony michael cohen basically alleged among other things that the president's eldest son, donald trump junior, had not been truthful in his own previous sworn testimony to congress. now, this wasn't a total shock when michael cohen made that allegation. after don junior testified behind closed doors in the house, congressional democrats hopely charged they believed don

junior lied to them in the sworn testimony. don junior also testified to the senate judiciary committee. in that one for a bizarre series of reasons, that committee ended up releasing the transcript of his closed door testimony. so because we have that transcript, we can see what he told them when he was giving that sworn testimony. well, remember, what michael cohen told congress right before he went to prison is that he briefed don junior and ivanka on the trump tower real estate project in moscow approximately ten times. well, don junior was asked about that same matter when he was given sworn testimony in september of 2017. here's how that went. question, did you have any involvement in this potential deal in moscow? don junior, answer, quote, like i said, i was peripherally aware of it, but most of my knowledge has been gained since as it relates to hearing about it over the last few weeks. i was only peripherally aware of

it. that does not necessarily jibe with being briefed ten times on the matter. well, tomorrow the senate intelligence committee is going to get donald trump junior back for more testimony. that's a republican-controlled committee. they subpoenaed don junior in may after he failed to show up for two voluntary interviews with the committee. but now it looks like he has agreed to return to capitol hill for yet another closed door interview with members of the committee. it will happen tomorrow. this time, of course, it's happening with the president's long-time personal lawyer in jail in part for lying to congress on these specific matters. are there real stakes here for the president's son? is there serious liability for the president's son? if so how does that reverberate not just for him but for his pops? hold that thought. ld that thoug.

featuring three new dishes that are planked-to-perfection. feast on new cedar-plank lobster & shrimp. or new colossal shrimp & salmon with a citrusy drizzle. tender, smoky, and together on one plank... ...but not for long- so hurry in! we're oscar mayer deli fresh your very first sandwich,m... your mammoth masterpiece. and...whatever this was. because we make our meat with the good of the deli and no artificial preservatives. make every sandwich count with oscar mayer deli fresh.

when crabe stronger...strong, with new nicorette coated ice mint. layered with flavor... it's the first and only coated nicotine lozenge. for an amazing taste... ...that outlasts your craving. new nicorette ice mint. who were the family members you briefed on the trump tower

moscow project? >> don trump junior and ivanka trump. >> okay. now, were these in the regular course of business or did the president or family request the briefings? >> this is the regular course of business. >> do you recall, there's a question on the number of briefings. do you recall how many there might have been? >> i'm sorry, sir? >> do you recall how many of these briefings there might have been? >> approximately ten. >> maybe michael cohen was still not telling the truth to congress when he testified that way earlier this year. but if he was telling the truth there and he briefed donald trump junior ten times on the trump tower moscow project, well, then trump junior may not have been telling the truth when he testified to congress that he was only peripherally aware of that secret russian real estate deal. tomorrow the senate intelligence committee will interview donald trump junior again amid lots of claims by democratic members of congress that mr. trump junior

appears to have not been truthful in his earlier testimony. how high are the stakes for him and what could the implications be? joining us is carol lennik on this story for the post now. carol, good to have you here. >> good to be here. >> i almost called you lenig. that was odd. >> i'll call you mad dow. >> it will sound like we're on a team. >> we know donald trump junior -- they did ultimate issue him a subpoena. then there was negotiations that set up tomorrow's testimony. what are the stakes here for him? is this a potentially risky situation? >> i think any time you're standing before a congressional committee under oath, every single witness as advised by their lawyers is on pins and needles to make sure that they

don't make a misstep and catch themselves in a false statement. whether you raise your right hand or you don't, you're essentially giving testimony to congress, and it's a serious risk if you misstate or intelligently l intentionally lie. in this case don junior is trying to head off a long, extensive interview a deja vu, if you will, that was like his last interview before the senate. nine hours of testimony. he didn't want that. he resisted that. he kept trying to negotiate with his attorneys to have less time. why should they have to answer all these questions again? it just increases that jeopardy. and now he's actually succeeded in whittling down the topics to a much smaller number and is hoping to be done, i'm hearing, you know, in the early part of the day. >> now that the mueller report has -- or the redacted version

of the mueller report has been made public, are there substantial areas of incongruents between what mueller found, what mueller described in his report and what we know trump testified to at least before a different committee? his previous system to the senate judiciary committee, the transcript was made available. we know the kinds of things he testified to that other committee. are there areas of incongruents in terms of factual assertions? >> yes, there are, depending an how you guild the lily, how you interpret. for example, you've highlighted one of them which is this idea of having a peripheral awareness. that's not technically wrong even if he did get briefings from time to time and wasn't really checked in and wasn't really listening. to our readers' ears, we're like peripheral awareness, ten briefings? that doesn't compute.

the other element that creates a discrepancy for donald trump junior is something michael cohen also said which is he alleged that he was in trump tower, in office when he was candidate and in came donald trump jr. to tell his dad in sort of a whisper, that meeting is tomorrow. i'll let you know what happens. it was a day or two before the trump tower meeting that the president has insisted he knew nothing about and don jr. has insisted he didn't tell and alert his father to. the -- i guess i'm going to foreshadow your next question, rachel, and just say that, you know, the risk here is ultimately even if both of those are in conflict is a minimal risk in the view, i believe, of donald trump jr. michael cohen has pled guilty to lying multiple ways, so is he the best witness to allege that

he knows what he told don jr. and it's different than what don jr. told congress. >> all right. if there is a he said/he said conflict here, probably nobody's in trouble. if her is a he said versus the provable truth here then he may -- then this may go additional steps. carol leonneg, investigative reporter for "the washington post." thanks for joining us tonight. you can call me anything you want, any time you want. >> i'm glad to be here. thanks for having me. >> thanks, carol. we'll be right back. stay with us. thanks, carol we'll be right back. stay with us biopharmaceutical researchers.

driven each day to pursue life-changing cures... in a country built on fostering innovation. here, they find breakthroughs... like a way to fight cancer by arming a patient's own t-cells... and a new therapy that gives the blind a working gene so they can see again. because it's not just about the next breakthrough... it's all the ones after that. is that for me? mhm

aaaah! nooooo... quick, the quicker picker upper! bounty picks up messes quicker and is 2x more absorbent than the leading ordinary brand. [son loudly clears throat] [mom and dad laugh] bounty, the quicker picker upper. now with new prints featuring characters from disney/pixar's toy story 4 in theaters june 21.

ray pfeifer was a firefighter in new york city on 9/11. he responded that day. he survived. he spent eight months working the pile searching for the remains of the civilians who died in the attack and for the remains of his fellow firefighters. by 2009, eight years after the disaster, pfeifer had developed what started to be called the 9/11 cough. he was diagnosed with cancer, stage four kidney cancer. despite his worsening health, the following year he helped fight for the passage of the 9/11 health and compensation act, which is a bill to get health care benefits for survivors of the attacks and compensation for them as well so that they and their families will have resources they need to fight the cancers and other chronic illnesses that have plagued the heros who responded on 9/11. it took a lot of foot dragging, but ultimately congress passed that bill, but they only passed it into law for five years. so five years down the line in 2015, ray pfeifer and his fellow 9/11 first responders had to be back on capitol hill, even though that bill was popular,

congress still refused to months to take it up for a vote. instead of meeting with pfeifer and his colleagues, members of congress, according to ray, kept giving him their business cards. he memorably said he took those business cards and threw them in the garbage because in his pocket were the prayer cards from all the funerals he had gone to, funerals from his friends and members of his battalion that died on 9/11. ultimately the health care portion of that 9/11 bill was fully funded through 2090, but the compensation part of it wasn't, and it's now literally running out of money ahead of its expiration date in 2020. this time ray pfeifer isn't there to continue his advocacy. he died in 2017 at the age of 59. and so now it's up to the other 9/11 advocates to go to capitol hill now again to try to fight for that second part of the funding so that first responders who are battling 9/11 cancers and chronic illnesses can focus on that instead of also having to grapple with the associating crushing financial distress.

>> the great ray pfeifer would come down here, his body riddled with cancer and pain where he couldn't walk, and the disrespect shown to him and to the other lobbyists on this bill is utterly unacceptable. you know, i used to get -- i would be so angry at the latest injustice that's done to these men and women, and, you know, another business card thrown our way. as a way of shooing us away like children trick or treating, rather than the heros they are and always will be. ray would say, calm down, johnny, calm down. i got all the cards i need. and he would tap his pocket --

where he kept the prayer cards. of 343 firefighters. the official fdny response time to 9/11 was five seconds. five seconds. your indifference cost these men and women their most valuable commodity, time. it's the one thing they're running out of. this should be flipped. this hearing should be flipped. these men and women should be up on that stage and congress

should be down here answering their questions as to why this is so damn hard and takes so damn long and why no matter what they get something's always pulled back and they got to come back. thank god for people like ray pfeifer. thank god for all of these people who will not let it happen. they responded in five seconds. they did their jobs. with courage, grace, tenacity, humility. 18 years later, do yours! thank you. >> former "the daily show" host jon stewart today testifying alongside 9/11 first responders

and their widows and surviving family members. they all pleaded with congress to restore funding for the victims' compensation fund and this time to make it permanent, to make sure there's enough money to help victims for as long as they need it so they don't have to keep coming back and doing this. we're told they absolutely have the votes in the house to pass this. without delay the judiciary committee is expected to vote on it tomorrow. the bill is also fairly popular in the senate and so mitch mcconnell could pass it right away if he wants to. this issue has always been a no-brainer. there has never been substantial opposition to it. there's just been not caring enough to get it done. every time it's like pulling teeth. just astonishing. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you tomorrow. now it's time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. good evening, lawrence. >> good evening, rachel. i'm so glad you showed that jon stewart video. i think it's the viral video of the day. you just can't turn away from it when you watch it. >> jon ste