Skip to main content

tv   Hardball With Chris Matthews  MSNBC  June 20, 2019 4:00pm-5:00pm PDT

4:00 pm
safety is important and they're taking it seriously and briefing members of congress. mike warner said i was curious about these press reports. anything that involves pilot safety is important to me so this is a very real thing happening on the film. that's "the beat." "hardball" starts now. >> hope says nope. let's play "hardball." good evening, i'm chris matthews in washington with breaking news. the house judiciary committee has just released the official transcript from hope hicks closed door testimony yesterday. here it is. a lot of paper. not sure what's in there. the close campaign aide to president trump appeared before the committee for over seven hours yesterday, much of that time being blocked by white house lawyers from answering any questions. for example, hicks wouldn't even say whether she had been truthful in her testimony to
4:01 pm
robert mueller. also new tonight, we've got a report that former vice president joe biden phoned cory book jer last night in an attem to smooth things over about working with old time segregationists. first up tonight, testimony from hope hicks. according to the committee, four trump administration lawyers were present during the hearing yesterday and they intervened on 155 occasions to stop hicks from answering questions. the word appearing most prominently and repeatedly in the transcript i have here from yesterday is objection. the word objection. hicks could, however, speak about the campaign. among other things, hicks said she supported trump's use of illegally hacked emails to attack hillary clinton in 2016 defending it as, quote, publicly available information to draw a contrast between the candidates. those were her words. when asked if she would accept foreign dirt again today she
4:02 pm
said she would not. she said she would report it to the fbi. if i thought it was legitimate enough to have our law enforcement dedicate their time to it. additionally hicks said she was very surprised to learn there were over 100 contacts between the trump campaign and people connect ted to the russian government but hicks was repeatedly blocked from discussing the president's obstructive behavior. she also did not address michael flynn's resignation, jeff session's recusal, james comey's firing or the president's attempt to remove robert mueller as special counsel himself. i'm joined by cynthia absolutely, mike memely, davide you. what is this thing, this word objection? this is loaded, all this wasted paper, a lot of this paper simply has the word objection on it. >> right. another half of it has the word absolute immunity, which is not a thing.
4:03 pm
the white house is saying no senior official has to comply -- can be compelled to testify about what's happened in the white house. it is not a legal -- legally supported -- supportable argument, and the only time it's come up in court, it was shot down. what the -- the good news about absolute immunity is because it's a constitutional question it can be handled rather summarily by the courts. it can be done quickly. the bad news is that after if comes back, she'll just claim executive privilege. we're going nowhere with this. she's not going to give anymore information. >> even if you had her under subpoena. even if you brought her in and said -- she said, i'll answer your questions. she says, i don't remember that. i don't remember that. >> there's a lot of i don't recalls. it's trump's spin. did you know that this woman -- they didn't even swear her in before she testified. this is ridiculous waste. i mean, look, you and i have all of this paper. >> in a real world where real
4:04 pm
people have honest conversations, which we're not in, what i always thought of her as a confidante of the president, somebody that he implicitly trusts not to rat him out. he can say anything. i can't stand that guy or i'm bsinging here. he would share everything with her. she knows it all about the russians, about roger what's his name, all these people. >> and one of the things -- the democrats wanted this to be the moment where they bring the mueller report alive. they didn't do it here in one part because this is all happening behind closed doors first of all. >> just to say it, she knows it all? >> she does. that's one thing that comes through very clearly. she was as close if not the closest confidante in the entire operation. she was the only press staffer. she invokes her white lies. she admits to the committee that she was being asked to draft statements that she did not even bother to ask then candidate president trump whether they were true or not. she was doing so including with
4:05 pm
carrie mcdougall. >> i read the transcript. she said he had -- it had nothing to do with her. did he have anything to do with her? no. she said, the right answer was i don't have anything to do with this porn star or this model. >> what's interesting though in the same token, democrats also asked her about her relationship with the president now. she's only talked to him five to ten times since she left the white house. the other part which was interesting, have you read the mueller report? she said, no, i lived the mueller report. >> she's laughing at this thing? >> she is dismissive to members of the committee. she accuses them to borrow the president's phrase -- >> forget the law because obviously the president ignores the law. he has taught his people how to behave like him. >> yeah, sure. >> laugh at the fact you can lie. laugh at the fact you can deny reality. >> which is why politically house democrats need to make a decision do they go with the information they have or not?
4:06 pm
because i think if they try to extrapolate more information, we're going to see a lot of episodes like this. look, what she did is provide kind of a look in the mirror for trump's personality and for everybody around him. what i found most ironic, most intriguing, chris, she acknowledged that -- she said, look, we didn't have advanced notice of the wikileaks and/or russia collusion but we were ready. we had a messaging campaign when the wikileaks release dropped, we wanted to be ready to seize on that type of interference, if you will. then she's asked, well, during the transition did you speak with the president about how to message about russian interference? and she said, oh, yeah. we decided to blame the intel agencies because the president was concerned that if it looked like we were seizing on these moments, it would undermine the legitimacy of his election. this hope hicks, as much as she said objection or her lawyers wouldn't let her testify, the reality is we got a perfect glimpse into the soul of this administration, which is they took whatever help they could get and then they're just going
4:07 pm
to ignore it and say, hey, nobody can touch us though. don't worry about it. >> you raised a question, they didn't even think to swear her in. i was noticing the courtesy, the extreme courtesy they showed her. sheila is a pretty tough democrat. are the cameras bothering you? let's get the cameras out of the room. they're bothering you. >> they were nice to her. they let her testify privately. >> yeah. >> there's no reason why they did that, especially if the goal is we're going to try to bring this to life. she's privately. she's not sworn. half of -- half the lawyers in washington, d.c., represented her, they were all in the room. i mean -- >> well, that's the -- this is the dramatic point. what the democrats who were pushing for some action, the ones that are still hopeful they can actually get 218 in the house for impeach. and a shot at a conviction in this senate argue what's missing from the mueller testimony is the live person doing it. then, you know, it sounds like if they're going to get mcgahn to ever testify, the president's
4:08 pm
lawyer, who did hear the president say fire mueller, he knows what the obstruction sounded like and was, then don't do it in back rooms, too. we'll get a pile of paper the next day and once again lost drama. >> they were differential to hope hicks because they needed to get somebody in. they're five months, sixth month in the majority and they haven't been able to get anything. there's a real pressure building on chairman nadler, speaker pelosi. my understanding is they hope on bringing mueller in. they're insisting on one public hour of testimony. they want the public to hear him. they may move on. >> that's what they should do, get weissman, jenny reed. >> if you have to subpoena, do you think they'll be dramatic? if you are forced to -- >> these are trial lawyers. they know how to tell the story. come on. >> they don't want to tell it. >> you don't know that. you -- >> mueller doesn't want to come in. >> mueller doesn't want to come in, whatever the reason is. i'm a huge mueller fan.
4:09 pm
disto mueller. get somebody else. there are other trial lawyers perfectly capable of doing it. let's get them in. >> among the episodes that hicks did not address in her testimony yesterday was the misleading statement used to cover up the trump tower meeting with russians during the campaign, that infamous meeting on the plane. hicks was aboard air force one on that day that the news first broke in july of 2017 when he was president and she helped him craft the cover story on behalf of his son. according to the mueller report trump rejected an initial draft of the statement because he said it said too much about the offer of russian dirt on clinton. instead the president con cocked this. say this, only that trump jr., donald jr., took a brief meeting and it was about russian adoption. what was it about russian adoption? >> no, it wasn't about russian adoption. >> she was coming in with dirt that she was offering the campaign on hillary? >> that's right. the president had just met hours before with putin and i'm sure
4:10 pm
when the information finally comes out, that putin helped feed him that story. that's what they did and they've gotten away with it. >> hicks also asked if she thought trump was joking in his abc news interview when he said he would accept dirt from a foreign power. hicks said i don't think that was a joke based on what i saw. what do you make of that, david? it sounds like she gave a whisper of truth there. >> sure. >> there was no joke. >> no, it wasn't. i think we should believe donald trump when he says he would accept interference. he did. the only reason he cleaned it up the next day was because of the fallout of it. i think, chris, though to some of your earlier question is if house democrats are hoping for a smoking gun by bringing anybody in to testify, they're not going to get it. these are going to be imperfect witnesses. what she said about wikileaks, we didn't coordinate ahead of time but we were ready to react. on lewandowski she was asked were you concerned that donald trump asked lewandowski to have sessions unrecuse himself? she said, i wouldn't say concerned but maybe it was odd.
4:11 pm
what she's -- what the house democrats will get from any witness is imperfect testimony and so they actually have to be careful. if they think they're going to draw this out in the public eye, that strategy could very well backfire. i still would make the case, stay within the four corners of the mueller report. go with what you have. if it means impeachment or kren su censure, fine. i don't think they'll get much more traction. >> i thought she was very well prepared for this. you're used to clients being prepared. she seemed like she was going to defend trump under the law under this immunity bs but when it came to her own future, she's very young, she's a professional, she was very clear to say i know they shouldn't have done it. >> right. >> hooiindsight, they shouldn't have taken money, information, basically wealth from a foreign power. >> right. she covered herself that way. she covered herself on some of the gray areas saying i just don't remember. i don't recall.
4:12 pm
it's like reading an old transcript of an oliver north testimony. >> protecting herself. meanwhile, two democratic members of the house have joined the growing list of lawmakers calling for impeachment inquiry. jane shakowsky, followed her illinois colleague, sean castor in urging the house of representatives to begin hearings. it's a total of 72 house members have pushed for public support offism peachment. nancy pelosi takes a stronger stance against impeachment. pelosi feels no pressure to pursue it and won't do so unless she has the votes to convict trump in the senate, that means 2/3 in the senate or she's not going. >> it can't be the democrats impeach in the house, the sane nate, in his view, exxonerate i the senate. this president must be held accountable. so i feel no pressure from my
4:13 pm
members to do anything and i have no pressure on them to do anything. >> well, pelosi also ruled out a vote to censure the president dismissing the possibility as an ineffective half measure. >> if you could not convict in the senate and you couldn't actually impeach, that the house could for history sake pass a censure resolution that would force the republicans to say something about the president's conduct. is this something that you're considering? >> no. i think censor is a way out. if you want to go, you've got to go. in other words, if the goods are there, you must impeach. >> jolly, let's talk about this. >> sure. >> i thought you wanted the truth at least as i know the truth. in the house when they need 218 for passage in either party and they know it's a tough vote, nobody wants to vote for that. so you haul a bunch of 20 or 30 people there and you hold them on the floor of the house and
4:14 pm
you hold them there as you need them. >> sure. >> you only need the ones so you don't hurt them at home. it looks to me like pelosi is doing something in football, the prevent defense. we let a couple a day release from the corral. you can be for impeachment, shakowski. you're from the lake shore. i'm not going to hurt you with your well-educated peeps. it's june, it's going to be july. she's not going to do impeachment. she has decided that months ago and yet she keeps talking about timing and all of that. i thought today was the clearest statement made, we're not doing it ever, ever. >> chris, she's running out the clock. six weeks until august recess. they'll come back to a debt limit debate and keeping the government open. they'll be looking at the holidays. she's dragging her feet because she does want to run out the clock. the irony, originally nancy pelosi said we're not going to move until the american people want us to until we've convinced the american people there's a
4:15 pm
lot of evidence. she has the rank and file members where the american people are saying to nancy pelosi through their representatives, please move on this. i believe nancy pelosi when she says she feels no pressure from her rank and file members, she has no pressure. she's the queen. the pressure will come from democratic voters but also, chris, maybe as early as next week 20 presidential candidates on national tv in primetime, how do they answer the impeachment question? if the presidential candidates on the democratic side of the aisle really start talking about impeachment, that's going to put the spotlight back on speaker pelosi. >> i'll make the gentleman's bet i do with every democrat i have on 9 show. i bet you they don't do it. it's not going to happen. i think this is kicking the can down the road like they do on immigration, like they do on every issue. this congress doesn't decide things, they kick it down the road. they don't do anything. they shouldn't be called lawmakers because they don't pass the law.
4:16 pm
they haven't passed a law since the voting rights act in '65. please all pay attention. don't do anything. cynthia, thank you. mike, it's all true. david, i hate to break your heart. thank you for joining. you're here. coming up, smoothing things over? we have new reporting between a phone call between joe biden and cory booker about, well, another democrat about what they've been criticizing biden over about working too warmly, i guess the phrase is, with old time seges. plus, days after president trump blamed iran for attacks on shipping tappingers, a u.s. drone is shot down by iranians. can trump de-escalate the situation or has it pushed into the point of no return? this drone, $100 million drone. plus, a democratic candidate's campaign launch is a viral sensation. take a look at this. >> i was sent to the front linings of iraq to rebuild. i got to tell you, it was a cluster. there was no reconstruction
4:17 pm
plan, no political foresight. our government couldn't even pay the security detail protecting americans. >> retired kernel kim alson trying to flip a congressional district. she's going to join us live tonight. much more ahead. get ready for the insurance-themed experience
4:18 pm
of a lifetime. it's "progressive on ice." everything you love about car insurance -- the discounts... the rate comparisons... and flo in a boat. ♪ insurance adventure awaits at "progressive on ice." tickets not available now or ever. at "progressive on ice." welcome to fowler, indiana. one of the windiest places in america. and home to three bp wind farms. in the off-chance the wind ever stops blowing here...
4:19 pm
the lights can keep on shining. thanks to our natural gas. a smart partner to renewable energy. it's always ready when needed. or... not. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. to help the world keep advancing. i felt completely helpless. trashed online, my entire career and business were in jeopardy. i called reputation defender. they were able to restore my good name. if you're under attack, i recommend calling reputation defender. and consider joining their groundbreaking campaign to give every american the right to remove old, inaccurate search results by going to righttobeforgotten.org. if you have search results that are wrong or unfair, call reputation defender at 1-877-866-8555. hey! i live on my own now! i've got xfinity, because i like to live life in the fast lane. unlike my parents. you rambling about xfinity again? you're so cute when you get excited... anyways... i've got their app right here,
4:20 pm
i can troubleshoot. i can schedule a time for them to call me back, it's great! you have our number programmed in? ya i don't even know your phone anymore... excuse me?! what? i don't know your phone number. aw well. he doesn't know our phone number! you have our fax number, obviously... today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'll pass. welcome back to "hardball." joe biden is facing sharp criticism even today from his democratic rivals after talking about segregationist senators in the '70s. he gave democratic opponents an opening to level their fiercest criticism of him so far. >> i think the bottom line here is why on earth would a democrat speak nostalgically of working with a segregationist. >> should joe biden apologize? >> he's going to have to make
4:21 pm
that decision, but let's be very clear, the senators that he is speaking of with such adoration are individuals who made and built their reputations on segregation. >> i don't think you should be bragging about working on a bipartisan basis with segregationists. >> a guy running to be the head of our party which is a significantly diverse and wondrous party doesn't understand or can't even acknowledge that he made a mistake. >> well, last night biden stood by his comments and dismissed criticisms from his rivals, including that senator cory booker right there, who said the former vp should have apologized immediately. >> i could not have disagreed with jim eastland more. he was a segregationist. i ran for the united states senate because i zdisagreed wit the views of the segregationists. what i was talking about was the voting rights act. i was able to pass the voting rights act when i was a young senator, he was still the
4:22 pm
chairman. >> how does it feel that your democratic rivals are implicitly saying that you have issues talking about race? >> they know better. >> are you going to apologize? >> apologize for what? >> cory booker's called for it. >> cory should apologize. he knows better. there's not a racist bone in my body. i've been involved in civil rights my whole career, period. period. period. >> well, booker shot back comparing biden's conduct to that of president trump. >> he's falling back into the defensive crouch that often people say which is cory called me a racist or i'm not a racist, which is not what i said and not what i'm calling him. and this is the problem. he knows better. and at a time when donald trump never apologizes for anything, starts to create that kind of i think toxic sentiment that you never apologize, never apologize, never apologize, i
4:23 pm
know joe biden. he's better than this. >> well, late today nbc news confirmed that biden called booker after that interview to smooth tensions but stood by his remarks. meanwhile, several prominent legislators out there have defended biden, notably jim kleiburn. he told politico, i worked with strom thurmond all my life. you don't have to agree with people to work with them. maxwell, senior producer and rnc chair, i guess i'll start with zurlina about this. what do you want to be said now? here it is thursday night. this thing started two nights ago. has this got legs? i think it has for the weekend. but what should be done now by the democrats to move somewhere with this positively if that's possible? >> look, i think this is a moment where the other democrats that are not joe biden saw an opportunity to draw contrast
4:24 pm
with joe biden. i think that there are generational differences with how people see whether or not you should be willing to work with people who literally deny my humanity or whether or not you should stand up and be an outspoken advocate. i think in this moment joe biden should take a hard look at the impact of his words. what critics are saying is he was tone deaf in his remarks and he should think about the impact of those communities about those policies and going back to the segregationists. i think it's a disconnect between where the party is and where joe biden is. he's going to have to reconcile that. >> michael? >> you know, politically i'm looking at this and i'm laughing because i'm saying if this is the fight you want to have now, oh, just wait until this sucker
4:25 pm
heats up. trump is going to sit there and ride this horse all the way to victory in 2020. set that aside for a moment. all of this apologizing for things that during context, place and time, all of that matters. where was the outrage then? it wasn't there because this was not how a lot of people looked at the politics of the day. you know, chris -- >> i was there. >> you know -- you were on the hill. you know a lot of -- >> i know what it smelled like when i got there in the morning in the '70s and all the cooking was southern cooking. they ran the congress of the united states, the southern grandees and seges, the guys that voted against the senate rights, they ran appropriations, armed services, judiciary, they ran it all. >> so the question becomes today, how does a joe biden articulate and have that conversation? i don't think it's something the
4:26 pm
country's overly enamored about or cares that much about at this point in the summer, but it is a lesson in politics for joe to recognize how they're going to come at him and how they're going to make for him account for time and place that no one else -- i mean, does barack obama now take back his eulogy of senator bird when he said that, you know -- >> robert bird. >> over the arc of his 92 years bent towards justice. really? the former, you know, grand poobah of the ku klux klan. this is the slope that democrats are finding themselves on and it's dangerous. >> some in biden's orbit have warned him against referencing segregationists and former senator james eastland, for example, in particular. according to the washington post one biden advisor said it might move him to pick a different senator, but he's not someone you can go to and just say,
4:27 pm
you've been doing this x many of years and you can't do it anymore. politico reports a campaign source said invoking segregationists has been a point of contention but there's only so much we can do. this is his decision. i agree with you, zurlina. i know how it sounds, and i do also know, i went back and read -- because i knew about ted kennedy as a young senator ten years before, had to go up there and sit there and drink scotch in the morning to the point of getting looped so this guy would give me your committee assignments because this guy, sege as he was, decided what some committees ted kennedy got to sit on. you had to bow down to that guy to get anything because it was an oligarchy in those days. you know this from history. you were young, but this all happened. you know what happened. they were running the place. your thoughts? >> yeah, i mean, i wasn't here for it, but obviously i read the books and i have to say this though, i think that, you know, it both shows that joe biden has been around a very long time so when he was talking about i was there as when we passed the
4:28 pm
voting rights act. >> he wasn't there. that was '65. he came in in '73. >> he was talking about the early '70s. when he's name dropping that, that does seem like a very large disconnect between where millennials are on these issues and joe biden. i think that i'm not laughing, michael. i don't think this is funny. i think that the conversation that we're having is actually serious. i think that, you know, the gaffe that joe biden made is minor in its context, but the larger conversation about race relations in this country, the impact on communities of color, the trump administration's policies, like caging children or most recently where he said he doesn't regret saying the central park 5 who were innocent men should have been executed. those types of things have a real impact in the real world and the democrats need somebody who can actually stand up and fight back against that and claiming that you can compromise with people who deny your humanity is not representative of a strong and vocal advocate. that is what i am saying.
4:29 pm
no one's calling joe biden a racist. no one is denying that joe biden has worked on these issues. it's something that he has to understand the time we're living in. >> i'm with you completely. i understand this. i'm going to say at the end of the show, biden better learn how to talk like a 2020 democrat not a 1972 democrat. he has to learn how to talk because he'll be speaking for the democratic party if he's lucky enough to win the nomination. back to the question. what would a senator do -- it's harder for you, a woman of color at your age to imagine this, lucky for us all. you walk into the united states senate, here's the deal, you want to work on civil rights, you have to get on judiciary. you want to work on immigration and you have to get on judiciary. this chairman is an old sege. you have to go into his office at dawn and what would you have done? >> as a woman of color in the year 2019 i have to navigate spaces and deal with people who don't think i am equal to them or as smart of them.
4:30 pm
people of color, women of color, women, we have to deal with this dynamic all the time. we have to deal with people that don't agree with us on issues or have abhorrent views to our literal existence in humanity. i'm not saying that you would not eventually come to some sort of compromise and push forward legislation. what i'm saying that in the democratic primary, he's not in office, he's not in the senate, he's talking about back in the day when he used to have a more civil tone with people who were segregationists and that's the problem. it's not the idea of compromise, it's the fact that you're talking about it with such tone deafness in this moment where it just seems like you're out of touch. >> we'll see. it's a great debate. thank you, zurlina and michael steele. up next, president trump says we'll soon find out how the u.s. will respond to iran shooting down a u.s. drone. look at this thing, this is not some little thing flying around your backyard. this is an airplane that isn't manned. we're back after this. s. anyone can stick a lime in a beer.
4:31 pm
at sam adams, we brew with lime, plus lemon, orange zest, summer wheat, and grains of paradise, for a new lighter and brighter summer ale. sorry, lime wedge. we've got this. sam adams summer ale. we're oscar mayer deli fresh your very first sandwich,m... your mammoth masterpiece. and...whatever this was. because we make our meat with the good of the deli and no artificial preservatives. make every sandwich count
4:32 pm
with oscar mayer deli fresh. like... a business borrowing solution to help get a little more space with a lot less mom. or home insight, to search for a new house within your budget. because, they really need their space. pnc - make today the day. toujeo provides significant a1c reduction, and stable blood sugar control, around the clock. find your groove with toujeo. ♪ let's groove tonight. toujeo is used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. get medical help right away if you have a serious allergic reaction such as body rash, or trouble breathing. don't reuse needles, or share insulin pens. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be life-threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose without talking to your doctor.
4:33 pm
tell your doctor about all medicines and medical conditions. check insulin label each time you inject. taking tzds with insulins may cause heart failure that can lead to death. ♪ let's groove tonight. ask your doctor about toujeo. that's ensure max protein, with high protein and 1 gram sugar. it's a sit-up, banana! bend at the waist! i'm tryin'! keep it up. you'll get there. whoa-hoa-hoa! 30 grams of protein, and one gram of sugar. ensure max protein.
4:34 pm
welcome back to "hardball." earlier this morning the commander in chief of iran's revolutionary guard announced it had shot down a u.s. military drone in iranian air space. u.s. central command confirmed the attack but disputed the location saying the drone was over international waters.
4:35 pm
well, the pernt gontagon purpor released video. president trump offered a stark warning to iran. >> iran made a big mistake. this drone was in international waters clearly. we have it all documented. it's documented scientifically, not just words. they made a very bad mistake. >> how will you respond? >> you'll find be out. >> are you willing to go to war with iran? >> you'll find out. you'll find out. >> moments later the president suggested iran might not have done it intentionally. >> i have a feeling, i may be wrong and i may be right, but i'm right a lot, i have a feeling that it was a mistake made by somebody that shouldn't have been doing what they did. >> are you saying you think it wasn't intentional to strike the drone? >> i don't know. i find it hard to believe it was intentional if you want to know the truth. i think it could have been
4:36 pm
somebody that was loose and stupid that did it. we'll be able to report back and you'll understand exactly what happened, but it was a very foolish move, that i can tell you. >> interesting stuff. the escalating tensions began, of course, with president trump's decision to unilaterally withdraw from the 2015 deal limiting iran's nuclear capabilities. late today president trump, along with military officials, hosted top congressional leaders and several committee members and ranking members to brief him on the situation as it stands. senate minority leader chuck schumer told reporters he's worried that the president and this administration may bumble into a war. will both sides walk back from the edge or have we reached the point of no return? we should worry. this is serious. it's coming up next.
4:37 pm
woman: (on phone) discover. hi. do you have a travel card? yep. our miles card. earn unlimited 1.5 miles and we'll match it at the end of your first year. nice! i'm thinking about a scuba diving trip. woman: ooh! (gasp) or not. you okay? yeah, no, i'm good. earn miles. we'll match 'em at the end of your first year. yeah, no, i'm good. what do you look for i want free access to research. yep, td ameritrade's got that. free access to every platform. yeah, that too. i don't want any trade minimums. yeah, i totally agree, they don't have any of those. i want to know what i'm paying upfront. yes, absolutely. do you just say yes to everything? hm. well i say no to kale. mm. yeah, they say if you blanch it it's better, but that seems like a lot of work. no hidden fees. no platform fees. no trade minimums. and yes, it's all at one low price. td ameritrade. ♪
4:38 pm
this is a commercial and i know you're thinking. i don't want to hear about insurance. 'cause let's be honest... nobody likes dealing with insurance. right? see, esurance knows it's expensive. i feel like i'm giving my money away. so they're making it affordable. thank you, dennis quaid. you're welcome, guy in kitchen. i named my character walter. that's great. i'd tell you more but i only have thirty seconds so here's a dramatic shot of their tagline so you'll remember it. when insurance is affordable, it's surprisingly painless.
4:39 pm
welcome back to "hardball." amid heightened tensions between iran and the united states,
4:40 pm
national security advisor john bolton announced a trip to the region to meet with israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. bolton is dominating iran policy keeping a tight rein on information that gets to the president. that's pretty scary. house republicans called for a measured response for iran's actions. nicolas christof warned we are facing very real risks of a cycle of escalation without face saving for trump or kamcould h . nick, thank you. this is real, right? this is not a trumped up wag the dog situation by this administration, right? >> the risks are very real. i mean, you know, we don't know whether there will be an explosion, but we are essentially on a collision path and there are not a lot of exit ramps. i mean, there are some, but the basic problem is that we have
4:41 pm
two bellicose nationalists, each of whom is somewhat reluctant to go on a different path, and there are not a lot of face saving ways that they can avert it. there's a real risk of that collision but also simply other than the state, the navy, the u.s. navy is concerned there are so many ships in the gulf, so many hot heads around that you can have things go wrong and, you know, every iranian knows in 1988 the u.s. mistakenly shot down a civilian iranian airliner with 290 people on board. you know, both sides can make mistakes and then the escalation -- i'm not sure americans appreciate just how messy and how dangerous this could be, how much it could engulf the region. >> it's a real country. madam secretary, it seems to me that ronald regan, who looks very measured at this point,
4:42 pm
when colonel nicholson was there, he said i'm not going to war with it. when the korean airline was shot down, he said, i'm not going to blame the country for that. >> when pilots were downed in the e3 in china, president bush in a matter of ten days very quietly, calmly through careful diplomacy got them back safely. we lost an important ship that had a lot of intelligence on it, but that was the stakes that were played then. i think the real concern now is the one that nick pointed out, which is we are in an escalatory cycle of the hard hard liners here and the hard hard liners there and they are just symbiotic really getting each other to spiral up. you know, we all know that sometimes coercive diplomacy is the right thing to do. this administration is all about coercion and nothing about diplomacy. >> did you see the two janus masks of the president? i didn't. he said, they made a big mistake but maybe it was an accident.
4:43 pm
in other words, getting them off the hook. himself off the hook. >> yeah. i mean, frankly i thought that was -- it was welcome that president trump made that comment and also welcome that the other day he i think told "time" that the damage to the tankers was, you know, very minor, that he -- you know, it really does seem that president trump is aware of the possibilities of things going very wrong, of escalation, but the -- while he's aware of it, he's surrounded by aides, both bolton and pompeo, who see iran through this prism of hostility and seem to want to escalate and i'm not sure that president trump, you know, is prepared to take a face-saving way. i think for all of that seeming awareness he has, that things could still go very badly very quickly. >> to that point, lindsey graham
4:44 pm
who spoke to the president today had a warning for iran. >> so here's what iran needs to get ready for, severe pain inside their country, that their capabilities pale in comparison to ours. we're not going to let them disrupt navigation of the seas, attack our allies and u.s. interests without paying a price so if they're itching for a fight, they're going to get one. >> how close are we to doing that? how close are we to doing that? >> we're a lot closer today than we were yesterday and only god knows what tomorrow brings. >> you know, wendy, that's lindsey playing charles lawsuit ton in "advise and consent." the old southern guy wants to fight, it's a macho thing. >> there's a lot of macho going on between bolton and pompeo. we are getting closer and closer and closer to this blowing up. iran is not going to sit back,
4:45 pm
that's the problem here. the odd thing here is we're all counting on the president, donald trump, to save us in this situation. that's not a place i like to be. >> fire john bolton, that's a great sign. justifier the guy tonight and everybody will relax for a while. bolton is building up his strength in the n. ic. he's pushing people out, bringing people in. the american enterprise will be empty by next week. nicolas kristof, thank you. wendy sherman, it's good to have two sober minded people. i hope we have one at the white house. coming up next, my next guest calls herself kernel marvell. with a resume as impressive as hers, you would, too. stay with us. you would, too stay with us there was no hesitation, i went straight to ctca. after my mastectomy, it was maddening because i felt part of my identity was being taken away. when you're able to restore what cancer's taken away, you see that transformation firsthand knowing that she had options
4:46 pm
that she could choose, helped restore hope. my team made me feel like a whole person again. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now. cancer treatment centers of america. woman 1: i had no symptoms of hepatitis c. man 1: mine... man 1: ...caused liver damage. vo: epclusa treats all main types of chronic hep c. vo: whatever your type, ask your doctor if epclusa is your kind of cure. woman 2: i had the common type. man 2: mine was rare. vo: epclusa has a 98% overall cure rate. man 3: i just found out about my hepatitis c. woman 3: i knew for years. vo: epclusa is only one pill, once a day, taken with or without food for 12 weeks. vo: before starting epclusa, your doctor will test if you have had hepatitis b, which may flare up,
4:47 pm
and could cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. vo: tell your doctor if you have had hepatitis b, other liver or kidney problems, hiv, or other medical conditions... vo: ...and all medicines you take, including herbal supplements. vo: taking amiodarone with epclusa may cause a serious slowing of your heart rate. vo: common side effects include headache and tiredness. vo: ask your doctor today, if epclusa is your kind of cure. whether it's using rewards just pointsaway. toward things like complimentary maintenance. or for vehicle accessories. and with fordpass, a tap can also get you 24/7 roadside assistance.
4:48 pm
and lock your vehicle. only fordpass puts all this in the palm of your hand. fordpass. built to keep you moving. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. here are even more reasons to join t-mobile. 1. do you like netflix? sure you do. that's why it's on us. 2. unlimited data. use as much as you want, when you want. 3. no surprises on your bill. taxes and fees included. still think you have a better deal?
4:49 pm
bring in your discount, and we'll match it. that's right. t-mobile will match your discount. welcome back to "hardball." after beto o'rourke came close to winning in 2018, democrats are hoping to turn texas blue in 2020. one of their top targets is the 24th congressional district currently held by republican kenny marchin, a district that beto won. retired air force colonel kim olson released her ad. it went viral online. let's watch it. >> i was sent to the front lines of iraq to rebuild. i've got to tell you, it was a cluster. there was no reconstruction plan, no political foresight.
4:50 pm
our government couldn't even pay the security detail protecting americans. >> well, this morning she tweented colonel marvel tweeting. retired air force for duty. kim olson joins me now. i don't think i've ever used the word "cluster" the way you used it so provocatively, but you've got the right to do it. tell me, what about trump has edged you into this risky business of running for public office? what about trump? >> well, it's not just about trump, chris. and thanks for having me on the show. it's for kind of what it represents. that we have a nation in which those of us that wore the uniform swore an allegiance to the constitution of the united states of america, against all enemies, foreign and domestic. that i have that same expectation of our commander in chief. and those of us that served in the military to help defend those foundations that make this nation great.
4:51 pm
and it's my belief that this particular president is undermining all those institutions. >> let's talk about texas. it's a tough state, proud state. been republican for a while now. i can remember, i guess, as recently as '68, it voted for hubert humphrey over knicks ini ever since then, it's been a southern state. what can you to move it? >> well, i think that we showed we can move it in 2018. and you know, there are lots of warriors on the ground that got the vote out. we had record turnout for the first time in almost three decades because we had folks that did the hard work. look, anybody out there can be a warrior. and you win these little battles a little at a time. and that's how you turn states like texas from red to blue. because the issues we face in this state aren't blue issues and aren't red issues. they're red, white, and blue issues. and it takes all of us to get them fixed. >> are you a moderate, a
4:52 pm
progressive, ora conservative? >> i'm kim olson and i'm an american and i'm from texas. >> when you get your voting record out there after a couple of weeks in congress, people are going to know what you are. you'll vote progressive or moderate or conservative. they're going to know it. >> they are. so it depends on what the issues are. and i vote to represent the constituents, i vote for what's in the best interest of our nation. and again, you're there to serve. this isn't about you. this is about serving those who put you in office. and oh, by the way, those of us that are elected officials ought to work harder than the people we're representing, and i'm not sure that's actually happening these days. and that's why the video went viral. people are looking for leaders who can be reasonable and represent them. and actually speak truth to power. and stand up when things aren't right. and that's the kind of woman i've done, and i've done it in my entire career. and i'll do it when i get into congress. >> when i was growing up in politics, you had to have served in the military. you had to have some record as a service person to even think about running for national
4:53 pm
office. and now we've had, starting with bill clinton, since the cold war has been over, but we have all sorts of problems here. what is the advantage of someone who's been in it, who's been overseas in conflict, in combat. what's the advantage? >> well, i think the first -- just as you were saying earlier in your show. we're over here rattling our sabers to take on another country. and i remember, i was in iraq the first ten days after we stopped bombing it, trying to rebuild a country with no exit plan at all with no strategic foresight as to what we were going to do with this place. so having had boots on the ground. and right now i've got skin in the game. my son is deployed halfway around the world defending this country, wearing a uniform just like i did. as a matter of fact, working in the same kind of warfare that i did 20 years ago. you know, being in endless wars is not what great nations do. great nations need to be the peacemakers. they need to be the role models. and they need to be the ones that take the world out of constant warfare. >> good luck. i can give you all the advice
4:54 pm
i've got. it won't make a lot of difference, but getting on radio is a lot easier, social media. there are so many ways to meet people now. but, you know, you seem to have got the energy. and that could be it. the difference between you and the other guy. thank you so much. you got the energy and the will. >> thanks, chris. >> you bet you, sir. thanks for having me on, chris. >> i'm glad to have you on, colonel jim olson who knows what she's talking about. up next, it's weird, big fish. you're watching "hardball." big fish you're watching "hardball. my experience with usaa has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family
4:55 pm
and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. ♪ at panera, our salads with peak-season berries... creamy avocado... and a dressing fit for a goddess. come taste what a salad should be. and order online for delivery right to you. panera. food as it should be. will transform not just the automobile, but mobility itself. an autonomous-thinking vehicle protecting those inside and out. and it's the mercedes-benz of today that will help us get there. the 2019 e-class, with innovations
4:56 pm
that will change the way we drive from this day forward. visit your local mercedes-benz dealer for exceptional lease and financing offers. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. age-related macular i've degeneration, with which could lead to vision loss. so today i made a plan with my doctor, which includes preservision. because it's my vision, my morning walk, my sunday drive, my grandson's beautiful face. only preservision areds 2 contains the exact nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. because it's my sunset, it's how i see my life. it's my vision.
4:57 pm
4:58 pm
the south carolina primary is showing its strength this weekend. most of the democratic candidates for president are heading there tomorrow for congressman tim clyburn's annual fish fry. this is the first time a minority of their or a majority of them will vote altogether. several days before, 20 of them head -- they go head to head in the first debate of the 2020 race here on msnbc, nbc, and telemundo. what's important about south carolina and the picking of the democratic nominee is that it's the locale of the first 2020 contest that represents the modern democratic party in all its diversity. more than half of the voters in the 2020 democratic presidential primary there will be, in fact, african-american. these demographics are important. we all know the historic role
4:59 pm
that slavery played in expanding south carolina's large minority population. we all should know the role that minorities are going to play in the future of the democratic party. why? because of donald trump's birtherism and latest statements on the central park five has made the republican party a comfortable home for those opposed to african-american aspirations. this has emphasized the role the democratic party might play in advancing those aspirations. it explains this past week's heated democratic conversation about former vice president biden's words about his past dealings with democratic senators from the old segregationist south. it is up to the primary voters as to who the democrats run in 2020, whether they are young or old, from a minority community, or not. the important point, as we're hearing this week heading into the south carolina fish fry, is that the voice of the democratic nominee be that of the democratic party of 2020. whichever candidate is chosen,
5:00 pm
they must represent today's party, which all its freshness of hope, with all its diversity of wisdom and youth. with all of its demands for equal rights, equal treatment, equal respect and equal aspiration for all americans as we move forward into the new century. and that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> here's what iran needs to get ready for. severe pain. >> reporter: the usual suspects bang the drums of war, as a president says the iranian downing of an american drone was an error. >> i have a feeling that it was a mistake. >> tonight, the potentially catastrophic implications of war with iran that one is talking about. then -- >> here are some other specific examples from the mueller report. >> reporte >> filmmaker rob reiner on his high-profile push to get americans to read the mueller report. >> that's collusion. plus, the justice department