Skip to main content

tv   Hardball With Chris Matthews  MSNBC  July 8, 2019 4:00pm-5:00pm PDT

4:00 pm
>> millions more viewers tuned into the women's world cup final than the men's final in 2018. did you know that. u.s. women's game actually generate more revenue than the higher paid men's games. this was a special moment and we at "the beat" want to wish everyone congratulations. that does it for us. "hardball" starts now. a 2020 reckoning. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm ali velshi in for chris matthews. it remained in washington today. a lot. these are the scenes in the nation's capital where a flash flood emergency was issued. flights were cancelled. motorists stranded. even the white house basement was flooded. in short, it was a total mess, and that is why i am anchoring "hardball" tonight.
4:01 pm
chris matthews was supposed to be in washington but his flight was delayed and delayed and delayed again. so he'll be back tomorrow. in the meantime, we've got a lot of news to get to. federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment against jeffrey epstein on the charge of sex trafficking women, some as young as 14. the wealthy financier once palled around with donald trump and bill clinton among other powerful figures. at the end of the hour, the extraordinary public battle between speaker nancy pelosi and some of the democratic party's most well-known liberals, including alexandria ocasio-cortez. but we begin with some big 2020 news. former vice president joe biden is trying to put to rest the controversy over his remarks about working with southern segregationist senators in the 1970s. after three weeks of resisting calls to apologize, he did just that at an event in the critical early primary state of south carolina. on saturday.
4:02 pm
>> folks, now, was i wrong a few week ago to somehow give the impression to people that i was praising those men who i successfully opposed time and again? yes, i was. i regret it. i'm sorry for any of the pain or misconception they may have caused anybody. >> meanwhile, a new poll found biden, still the democratic front-runner, to be the only democrat with a clear lead over president trump in a head-to-head matchup. "the washington post"/abc news poll shows biden beating president trump by ten points among registered voters. now senators bernie sanders and kamala harris narrowly defeat president trump in a head-to-head matchup. elizabeth warren and pete buttigieg run even with him. the same poll also showed president trump's job approval rating rising to the highest point in his presidency. 47% among registered voters, and
4:03 pm
that's up from 42% back in april. meanwhile, the crowded democratic field got just a little less crowded today. california congressman eric swalwell became the first candidate to bow out. he said he's returning to washington to focus on his work on the house intelligence and judiciary committees. for more on all this, i'm joined by robert costa, national political reporter for "the washington post." neera tanden, ceo of the center for american progress and jason johnson, politics editor for theroot.com. welcome to all of you. >> good to be here, ali. >> a short time ago on "meet the press daily", steve kornacki asked his campaign manager why his apology took so long. >> he's someone who listen and hears. when he felt like an apology was owed he had no problem making one. you heard him make a forceful case for the fact that, lock,ok
4:04 pm
he's been in public life for many years and you know what? he's been at the forefront of change and making change in this country and you're going to hear him talk about that, he's also not going to allow anybody to mischaracterize or take his record out of context. >> neera tanden, do you buy the explanation and the apology? >> i think the apology is definitely one thing. i do think a lot of the energy in this exchange was about the issue of actually seeming to sanction racist and segregationist views. and i think it's actually really important that the vice president spoke out and said he was sorry and wrong about that. and i don't think it really answers the question as to why he didn't do this before the debate. i do think they probably think it would have been better to do this before the debate so he didn't leave this space open for kamala harris. but i also think you see from cory booker and some other campaigns that they'd like to move on. and this is -- this will be a
4:05 pm
and e question of whether the vice president can successfully pivot and move on to other issues. he does have this ghoul poood p him. >> jason johnson? >> he dropped ten points. i mean, he dropped ten points in almost every single post-debate number to poll. that's the only reason joe biden apologized. when he spoke to reverend al sharpton in south carolina, other interviews afterwards, he was fiercely, fiercely defensive, he insisted he did nothing wrong, but when those polls came out he realized, oh, my gosh, i can't keep this position. i don't think joe biden's learned his lesson. he's still the front-runner but he's got work to do. you can't spend three weeks in american politics before you realize you made a mistake. he would have done it in 48 hours and we wouldn't be talking about it three weeks later. >> robert costa, so far as
4:06 pm
everybody agrees it took him too long, has he put it behind him by doing it? >> this is a candidate who began his video by calling out president trump's response to the tragedy in charlottesville and you have a candidate who is trying to bring the conversation back to his time with president obama. the eight years as vice president. and not get bogged down in talking about his long record in the senate. and senator harris, like a prosecutor, politically came at him, talking about bussing. his aides even admit for vice president biden he fumbled the response. he did take too long. he finally did respond. he's talking about the senate years and not the vp years, the more he's going to face these sort of challenges. >> as for the vp years, former first lady michelle obama was asked for her thoughts about the confrontation between biden and kamala harris on saturday night at the essence music festival in new orleans. let's watch. >> what, if anything, would you
4:07 pm
like to say about the kamala/biden dustup? he apologized today. you've been following that. do you have any thoughts about that? >> i do not. >> okay. >> neera, what does that -- what does that tell you about the future, that she had no comment? >> i think that the obamas have made a decision to stay out of the primary for awhile. i think that barack obama, the president -- president obama says pretty regularly that the vice presidential pick was one of his best picks but that's pretty much where they've left it. i think the one thing i would say about the vice president is, i think he has made an electability argument and this "washington post" poll really helps him. i think a lot of people thought he would drop against trump after the debate performance. and the fact that he didn't, at least in that poll, it is only one poll, does give his campaign i think a little bit of an ability to reset. but i think jason johnson is right that politics is
4:08 pm
unforgiving these days and he has to have better performances in the next debate and the other exchanges to come. >> so, jason, trump -- biden does well as of now amongst african-american voters. having barack obama's endorsement would make him do more well, but barack obama and michelle obama do not seem to be willing to go out on a limb for joe biden, particularly now. >> right. and they shouldn't. they shouldn't. i mean, michelle obama's response is basically sips tea, i have nothing to say, right? she's not going to. here's what's key, though, ali. guess what would have been more important than an endorsement, had vice president biden been there. it's one of the largest gatherings of african-american women of all classes and biden wasn't there. he's got to be out talking to the kinds of voters that matter. african-american women are the
4:09 pm
backbone by turnout and interest and passion in the democratic party. joe biden's got to fix that problem on his own. >> all right. michigan congressman justin amash, this is new, is not ruling out running for president. in a july 4th op-ed in "the washington post," amash declared his independence from the republican party. he criticized both parties, saying the two-party system has evolved into an existential threat to american principles and institutions. now, amash had been the only republican in congress to support an impeachment inquiry into president trump. in an interview on sunday, he was asked what he's heard privately from republicans about his decision to leave the party. >> when i was discussing impeachment, i had fellow colleagues and other republicans, high-level officials contacting me saying thank you for what you're doing, so there are lots of republicans out there who are saying these things privately, but they're not saying it publicly, and i think that's a problem for our country. >> obviously, robert, president trump came out and tweeted all
4:10 pm
sorts of nasty things about justin amash and being a loser and whatever the case is. and normally nobody knows who justin amash is and running for president wouldn't be a threat to anyone, except the guy's from michigan. >> and that's one of the key states for president trump in 2020. it's one of the five or six states in 2016 that he had a very narrow margin of votes. if he wants to win the white house again he has to do well in a state like michigan. for the last few months, william weld, the former massachusetts governor, has been running in in the republican primary against president trump. he's been the only place for that anti-trump republican voter to go. the problem for the white house, they don't think amash's candidacy if he runs for president would be a a nuisance. >> neera, what do you make of
4:11 pm
this? >> i am glad that he came out for impeachment, but i have to say, i mean, we've gone years of republicans saying they're concerned and anxious and i just have a hard time relying on any republican to put up on this stuff. >> right. >> so i really -- i hope he actually follows through with this principles but generally they all tend to cave in the end. >> jason? >> i don't see how you win the game if you take your ball and go home. look, if justin amash really wanted to make that much of a difference, he would stay in the republican party and continue to light a fire under the butts of his colleagues and tell them they need to stand up for american sovereignty and address a fact that you have a president possibly engaged in impeachable offenses. quitting the party doesn't impress me. the only republican running against donald trump in the primary in 2020 is if he had to stand on a debate stage and actually face other republicans who say you should be impeached. that would be interesting and
4:12 pm
possibly affect some of the never trumpers out of there. as a practical matter, nobody knew who justin amash was before this and now that he doesn't have the republican machine, nobody will remember him again. >> put your warm-up caps on. this is going to be tough. president trump tweeted out what appeared to be a former quote from ronald reagan praising donald trump. it showed an actual photo of the two together, but the quote attributed to reagan was fake. it reads, for the life of me, and i'll never know how to explain it, when i met that young man, i felt like i was the one shaking hands with a president. all right. the account that originally posted that quote has since been suspended. a reagan library official confirmed the quote was false. the website politifact called it a "pants on fire lie." neera? >> i mean, we have so many pants on fire lies, one could ask, why do you have a president so insecure that he would need to lie and make up a quote by a
4:13 pm
former republican president about himself? but this is just one of the myriad insanities of the trump age. >> it does, robert, make you wonder, and you've wondered about this and i'm sure you've investigated it. does he just do this stuff or is it his people? >> it's hard to say, but, look, the president has been praised in the past by richard nixon. richard nixon notably wrote a letter to then businessman donald trump saying mrs. nixon really enjoyed meeting him, he really enjoyed meeting him, but president reagan never wrote such a note. there is a photo that is signed by president reagan. but this is, again, the president using social media in a way that's not checking the facts, that's not accurate, but he really seeks that adulation and he likes to spread the idea that he's popular online. it's nothing new. it's a shame that something that's not accurate would get such public disbursement, but it's not a surprise in terms of his political tactics. >> jason, you're a younger man than i am but you're old enough to remember a time that kind of stuff would have been
4:14 pm
embarrassing and cause for a statement. but this doesn't matter anymore, does it? >> no, it doesn't. i'm thinking back to that brilliant quote from abraham lynn contin lincoln when he was posting on instagram and saying "don't believe everything you read on the internet." people don't read. they don't pay attention to history. anything the president tweets out they get excited about it. it's indicative of the lowering of the standards we have pretty much caused by this president. >> i'll say the president benefits by never having any shame. >> right. >> donald trump doesn't experience the emotion of shame. >> i often wonder what life would be like like that, neera. >> he's able to do these things any normal human being would feel some degree of shame over. >> it's the end of shame. great to see the three of you. thank you for helping us get this kicked off. robert costa, neera tanden and jason johnson. jeffrey epstein pleads not
4:15 pm
guilty to charges of sex trafficking involving dozens of underage girls. epstein could have been responsibling the past decade behind bars if not for a current member of donald trump's cabinet. speaker nancy pelosi and congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez exchanging sharp criticism over immigration and working with republicans. who wins this ideological struggle in the long run? much more ahead. stay with us. more ahead. stay with us ♪ limu emu & doug look limu. a civilian buying a new car. let's go.
4:16 pm
limu's right. liberty mutual can save you money by customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. oh... yeah, i've been a customer for years. huh... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
4:17 pm
most of us don't know how much data we use, but we all know we're paying too much for it. enter xfinity mobile. america's best lte with the most wifi hotspots, combined for the first time. when you're near an xfinity hotspot, you're connected to wifi, saving on data. when you're not, you pay for data by the gig. use a little, pay a little. use a lot, just switch to unlimited. get $400 back when you buy the new lg g8. call, visit or click today.
4:18 pm
. welcome back to "hardball." jeffrey epstein, the new york multimillionaire hedge fund manager, has travelled in some of the world's most elite political circles. from president bill clinton who flew on epstein's plane on several occasions, according to flight records reviewed by nbc news, to prince andrew, epstein has cultivated ties with some of the world's most powerful people. president trump told "new york" magazine in 2002 that he had known epstein for 15 years and called him a terrific guy,
4:19 pm
adding, "he's a lot of fun to be with. it's even said that he likes beautiful women as much as i do, and many of them are on the younger side. no doubt about it jeffrey enjoys his social life." today epstein pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking of mineors ad conspiracy. he will remain in jail until his bail hearing on thursday. in 2007, epstein pleaded guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution and felony solicitation of prostitution. as the "miami herald" reported, he received an extraordinary plea agreement that would conceal the extent of epstein's crimes and the number of people involved. the deal is called a non-prosecution agreement, an npa agreed to by former u.s. attorney of miami, alex acosta, who now serves as president trump's labor secretary. according to "the herald," it allowed epstein's lawyers unusual freedoms in dictating
4:20 pm
the terms of the non-prosecution agreement. in february, press secretary sarah sanders said the white house was looking into acosta's role in that plea deal. epstein ended up serving 13 months with work release privileges. for more on this, i'm joined by nbc news correspondent who covered today's hearing and cynthia oxney, former federal prosecutor. bring us up to speed. it's an amazing story what happened in 2007 in the non-prosecution agreement. what has happened now? >> okay. what has happened now is that federal prosecutors here have brought forward this case and they have looked at all the conduct between 2002 and 2005 that they've been able to find so far and be able to say, look, here is how this scheme worked. basically this guy would arrange massages and then would allegedly have increasingly sexual contacts or increasingly sexual sessions with these underage girls. in some cases according to the indictment the girls would turn around and recruit more girls to
4:21 pm
be his next underage victim, according to the allegations. as you mentioned, jeffrey epstein has pleaded not guilty to this. >> that's the trafficking part. it was getting people. others were setting this up for him. other people are named, his associates. they're not named but they're referred to. >> there are three employees you're referred to. boy, we wouldn't want to be them. we're working on those names to see if we can report. other people worked for him who did testify to local police back in 2005 when they initially opened their investigation into him. so you have these people here that are talking about it that said the things that epstein would do. one person who worked for him said that he would get up to three massages a day, so you can imagine the amount of victims that it would have taken to essentially satisfy that requirement for him. another person who worked for him stated that at one point in time he was ordered to send a dozen roses to a local high school in florida. so one of the things i think bears repeating and bears
4:22 pm
mentioning is that these were girls that were going there thinking that for $300, and they were coming from limited means, a lot of these girls. limited means. limited backgrounds. difficult, broken homes in in some circumstances. and they would go there saying all you got to do is give this guy a massage for $300. when i was reviewing the files, one victim in particular said he ordered me, he's this big, imposing guy. he's 6 feet tall, 180 pounds. he ordered me to take all my clothes and things went progressively downhill from there. basically today's indictment wraps up all of this, puts it into kind of a complete case and now they're going to move forward with it and they've not ruled out more challenges. they've not ruled out a potential superseding indictment down the line. >> cynthia, i have not been able to answer this question from people who have asked it it of me today. put yourself in the position of alex acosta back then and you've got this case to prosecute and you simply don't. there were allegations, there were charges, there were
4:23 pm
witnesses. why? why did this case not get prosecuted? why did it end up becoming a state case in which he got remarkable lenient terms? he got 12-hour work releases from this county jail on a daily basis to go do his work, his driver would pick him up and he would go to his office. >> he had a limousine pick him up. i find it to be outrageous and there is no excuse for it. it may be why the public corruption unit is the one doing the investigating. let's remember this. sometimes we spend a lot of time thinking about the legal implications and the moving pieces in these law cases. let's think about these victims. >> yep. >> because -- because this was allowed to happen and he was allowed to get this sweetheart deal and get out of jail free, essentially, there are a lot more victims than there should be. there are a lot of girls who should not have been sexually assaulted by this guy. and they were because our department of justice failed them. and i -- my guess is what we're going to find is after we go
4:24 pm
through the bail hearing and he gets no bail, which i very much hope happens, some people are going to come forward, some girls who are now grown up because they'll feel safer. they'll feel like they can come forward. >> it's already happening. >> that's happening already? >> we need that to happen. remember, that's on acosta. >> yeah. >> that's his legacy. more girls assaulted. >> so let's talk about acosta. according to politico, a former trump adviser who remains close to the white house said "the next 72 hours are critical for acosta. this is a settled matter for people in the white house. but it's usually the response that kills you." a current senior administration official added "we'd really have to see that he cut a deal that was improper, not unsavory but improper. that for some reason he was protecting himself or he was given money. those burdens are very high and that deal was 13 years ago." now, in the wake of the indictment, secretary acosta is facing renewed calls for his
4:25 pm
resignation. virginia senator tim kaine had this to say a short time ago. >> i'm glad that it took like the -- looks like there is going to be some real justice for epstein. i voted against epstein facosta secretary. he needs to go. the "miami herald" and others have laid bare this was such an egregious deal. he needs to go. >> another hat tip to the "miami herald," cynthia, whose reporting did a lot of the work that people say prosecutors should have done. but how does this not -- the next 72 hours being crucial for acosta, the outrage about this has got to be bubbling up. >> yes, it ought to be bubbling up within the department of justice. it ought to be bubbling up never acosta touches. people ought to be talking about it and pressuring him. does the man have no shame? why doesn't he resign? and why don't the republicans in the senate and the house begin to also call for his resignation? what he's done here is terrible. >> we were talking about how
4:26 pm
acosta -- how epstein, i'm sorry, had relations with a lot of famous people. former president bill clinton's press secretary issued a statement reading in part, "president clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes jeffrey epstein pleaded guilty to in florida some years ago or those with which he's, recently charged in new york. in 2002 and 2003, president clinton took a total of four trips on jeffrey epstein's airplane. staff, supporters of the foundation and his secret service detail travelled on every leg of the trip." there's more to that, tom, but the bottom line is president clinton getting out there fast to say, i didn't know about this. this is the problem because you heard the references that donald trump made to jeffrey epstein. and people team to have known for a very long time what jeffrey epstein was about. >> you know, by the time that the palm beach police department gets on to this and opens a formal inquiry in march of 2005, when you look at these files, this is something that was well-known. once they started getting into this, once they started talking to people, this exploded as an
4:27 pm
investigation for them. and, you know, today we're talking about activity that goes back to 2002 is in this indictment. well, that covers that 2002 and those 2003 plane trips. so when you look at it, look, is it possible that people didn't know? sure. it's possible that people didn't know. is it possible that they did not also engage in the behavior for which jeffrey epstein is now charged? of course it's possible that they didn't do that. but i think when you look at this, it raises some questions about what people knew and when. if people are talking about this guy having relationships with young girls. >> mmm-hmm. >> and certainly the women who were -- we know from the flight records that were on board those plane trips from the parties that donald trump attended to, according to some of the magazine articles have been written about this. it was very clear these are younger women. this is not a seasoned secretary, a seasoned assistant, a business associate. these are women that are in their late teens, early 20s that are working for him at the time and i think it does raise some questions as far as, you know, does this picture make sense when you're associating yourself
4:28 pm
with someone like this? so i'm curious to see where it goes. i'm also curious to see whether the corruption of this goes after the former state attorney that gave him that kind of sweetheart deal, barry krishener. so i think that's something we're going to have to look at going forward. >> tom just said something, cynthia, about the public corruption. this is handled by the southern district of new york public corruption unit. why? >> well, we don't know why. it could be as simple as there were people who were in the mansion or on the plane or in palm beach who are public officials. it could be they're investigating whether or not the deal itself was corrupt. and we just don't know the answer. i will say this, the plane was referred to sort of colloquially as the lolita express. >> wow. >> that is a name it got for a reason. >> that's remarkable. tom, cynthia, thank you to both of you. coming up next, trump says some migrants are very happy with conditions at overcrowded detention centers. our next guest sees it
4:29 pm
differently, trump employing intentional cruelty as part of america's new immigration policy. don't go anywhere. "hardball's" back after this. bs patients that i see that complain bs about dry mouth. they feel that they have to drink a lot of water. medications seem to be the number one cause for dry mouth. i like to recommend biotene. it replenishes the moisture in your mouth. biotene definitely works. [heartbeat]
4:30 pm
getaway deals starting from 15 percent off so their tacos are 15 percent tastier they're scooting 15 percent smoother and their kids love them 15 percent more
4:31 pm
with getaway deals with at least 15 percent off, you can be a booker at booking.com [ soft piano music playing ] mm, uh, what do you do for fun? -not this. ♪ -oh, what am i into? mostly progressive's name your price tool. helps people find coverage options based on their budget. flo has it, i want it, it's a whole thing, and she's right there. -yeah, she's my ride. this date's lame.
4:32 pm
he has pics of you on his phone. -they're very tasteful. . welcome back to "hardball." this weekend "the new york times" came out with another startling report about the conditions the children face at a migrant detention center in clint, texas. according to "the times," the agency's leadership knew for months that some children had no
4:33 pm
beds to sleep on, no way to clean themselves and sometimes went hungry. it's own agents had raised the alarm and found themselves having to accommodate even more new arrivals. in a tweet yesterday, trump called the reporting phony and exaggerated. he told reporters last week that the detention facilities were, "beautifully run" and tweeted if "illegal immigrants are unhappy with the conditions in the quickly built or refitted detention centers, just tell them not to come. all problems solved." i'm joined now by senator chris coons. thank you for being with us. >> your response to the president calling these detention facilities beautifully run? >> well, ali, this is another example of a tragic misstatement by a president who has demonstrated a willingness to use cruelty to children as a tool of immigration policy. i'll remind you a year ago his intentional decision was to follow a zero tolerance policy
4:34 pm
that led to children being separated from their parents are crossing our border. this latest episode where an internal investigation by the inspector general of the department of homeland security's own i.g. concluded that there were dangerously overcrowded and inhumane conditions at these detention facility. a significant number of children, ali, are being held in unlicensed and for-profit detention centers and i think all of us in congress should be doing more to make sure there is both effective oversight and that these conditions are improved significantly, promptly. >> and in some of those for-profit detention centers, the price per child per night that taxpayers are paying are former than any american would pay for a hotel room. in an opinion piece in "the washington post" former homeland security secretary jeh johnson argued that democrats need to be careful. "while americans should be outraged about the treatment of
4:35 pm
migrants they shouldn't espouse extreme policy proposals that are unworkable, like decriminalizing unauthorized entry into this country." i think he was making a reference to things that came up during the democratic debates. there have been suggestions by some democrats that it should not be a criminal matter if you enter the country illegally in an unauthorized manner. your take on that? >> well, ali, it's important that we continue to emphasize that democrats have voted for, have supported increased investments in border security and we don't support open borders. that will be one of the main lines of attack on us from president trump in the presidential campaign. for those of us who are facing re-election in the senate and the house. i have co-sponsored bills, i have voted for bills that would invest tens of billions of dollars in improving border security. there are folks who have been mischaracterized as supporting the abolition of law enforcement and border patrol. so i would agree with former
4:36 pm
secretary of homeland security jeh johnson that it's important for us to continue to fight for border security and for humane immigration policies. the two can be achieved in our country. if, in fact, we should accept nothing less. >> senator, we have so much news to get to. i'm going to move on to another story. after leaked memos revealed the united kingdom's ambassador to the united states called donald trump inept, insecure and incompetent. the president is firing back. he tweeted today, "i do not know the ambassador but he is not liked or well thought of within the u.s. we will no longer deal with him." late today we learned the ambassador was disinvited from dinner with the amir of qatar. today the president took an opportunity to go after prime minister theresa may for how she handled brexit, writing, "i've been very critical of the way the uk and prime minister theresa may handled brexit. the good news is for the wonderful united kingdom is they will soon have a new prime minister." finally senator, late today the uk government released a statement calling the leak
4:37 pm
unfortunate, but says it continues to support the ambassador. what's your take on this? >> i know ambassador darroh. i've worked closely with him. and, frankly, the long and close and important relationship between the united states and the united kingdom shouldn't be disrupted by this dustup. the reason countries have ambassadors overseas is to offer their frank assessment on what's going on in foreign capitals. and this unfortunate leak by a newspaper in the united kingdom, of what was supposed to be a confidential cable, i don't think should be allowed to be a significant impediment to what is a really important relationship. we share values. we share history. we share priorities with the united kingdom. and the ways in which president trump has unsettled or destabilized our relationship with the united kingdom concern me greatly. i think this flap over this one cable by ambassador darroh will soon blow over. >> senator, you wrote a piece in
4:38 pm
"the atlantic" titled "democrats need to talk about their faith," in which you pointed out democrats can fight for our progressive values while also identifying with the religious backgrounds that are so important to tens of millions of americans. it's a great piece and i think everybody who can should read it. what's your -- >> thank you, ali. >> why did you write this? what was the point -- what prompted you to want to talk about faith and democrats? >> well, ali, first, you know, it's important to say that in a country with a separation of church and state, all of us who are elected at whatever level have to act and speak in a way that makes it clear that we value and we represent people of all faith backgrounds and those who have no faith background. we represent all of our constituents. and we need to do so in an inclusive and tolerant way. but i'm someone who like many of my colleagues in the democratic caucus in the senate was first called to public service through the values that i learned in my home, through my family and through my church as a child.
4:39 pm
and those are very progressive values. a lot of the values of the gospel or of the torah are values that talk about welcoming the stranger and foreigner, caring about those who are our neighbors, defining as neighbor a broader circle of people in our community and our world. a lot of what animated the u.s. civil rights movement was faith-based concern for the treatment of others in in our country. and i think it's important if we want the average american to understand the heart of those who seek to represent us as our next president, that our candidates who are running for office like joe biden, like cory booker, like elizabeth warren, like pete buttigieg, to continue speaking about how faith moves them. i know joe biden well. i know his character and i know his heart. and i know that his faith has gotten him through some incredibly hard times in his life and i think it, frankly, is a good thing when people understand that that's how he's been able to get back up after life has knocked him down. >> senator, it's a thoughtful
4:40 pm
piece. thank you for writing it. up next, congressional democrats are sparring over a $4.5 billion border bill signed into law by president trump last week. are these internal fractures threatening the democrats' agenda? more "hardball" after this. more "hardball" after this trong. with new nicorette coated ice mint. layered with flavor... it's the first and only coated nicotine lozenge. for an amazing taste... ...that outlasts your craving. new nicorette ice mint.
4:41 pm
4:42 pm
4:43 pm
. welcome back to "hardball." house speaker nancy pelosi facing new criticism from some freshmen democrats. speaking to maureen do you do of "the new york times," pelosi was asked about the pushback she received from alexandria ocasio-cortez, ilhan omar, rashida tlaib and ayanna presley for not fighting harder for stronger protections for children in last month's compromise border bell. pelosi said the four congress women made themselves irrelevant to the process. "all these people have their public whatever and their twitter world but they didn't
4:44 pm
have any following. they're four people and that's how many votes they got. alexandria ocasio-cortez responded on twitter over the weekend, writing, "that public whatever is called public sentiment and wielding the power to shift it is how we actually achieve meaningful change in this country." congresswoman tlaib had this to say. >> you know, people like us, people like me and ayanna, ilhan and alexandria, we're li-- it's very disappointing the speaker would try to diminish our voices in so many ways. >> this is not the first time pelosi has publicly minimize the significance of the outspoken progressive members. here she is on "60 minutes" in april. >> you have these wings, aoc and her group on one side -- >> that's like five people. >> no, it's the progressive group. it's more than five. >> i'm a progressive. yeah.
4:45 pm
>> and as pelosi remains at odds with some of her members, president trump has reportedly compared ocasio-cortez to ethe charismatic first lady of argentina. the charismatic first lady of argentina. and side effects. so job can stay strong for his family. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now.
4:46 pm
cancer treatment centers of america. "burger! i want a sugar cookie! i want a bucket of chicken! i want....." "it's the easiest, because it's the cheesiest" kraft. for the win win. there's brushing and there's oral-b power brushing. oral-b just cleans better. it's the one inspired by dentists... with the round brush head. oral-b's gentle rounded brush head removes more plaque along the gumline... for cleaner teeth and healthier gums. oral-b. brush like a pro.
4:47 pm
did you know congress is working to end surprise medical billing? that's when patients are hit with medical bills they thought would be covered by insurance. the problem is big insurance companies want a one-size-fits-all approach that lets them decide what they'll pay doctors for yocare. letting insurance companies decide means it could be harder for you to see the best doctors when you need them the most. tell congress, "end surprise billing, and don't let insurance companies put profits over patients. paid for by physicians for fair coverage. but i can tell you liberty mutual customized my car insurance so i only pay for what i need.
4:48 pm
oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no... only pay for what you need. liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ most people think a button is just a button. ♪ that a speaker is just a speaker. ♪ or - that the journey can't be the destination. most people haven't driven a lincoln. discover the lincoln approach to craftsmanship at the lincoln summer invitation. right now, get 0% apr on all 2019 lincoln vehicles plus no payments for up to 90 days. only at your lincoln dealer. welcome back to "hardball." congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez is continuing to fire back at house speaker nancy pelosi for comments she made over the weekend, appearing to minimize the significance of a
4:49 pm
group of prominent progressive congress women. ocasio-cortez tweeted this afternoon, "a glass of water could have beat a 20-year incumbent. the green dream or whatever. the public whatever. these aren't quotes from me, they're from the speaker. having respect for ourselves doesn't mean we lack respect for her, it means we won't let everyday people be dismissed." meanwhile, "the guardian" published excerpts of the new book "american carnage" by tim alberta who says trump became star struck by ocasio-cortez during last year's midterms comparing her to argentina's eva perrone, popularly known as evita. the bad news, she doesn't know anything. she's got a good sense, an it factor which is pretty good, but she knows nothing, but with time she has real potential. for more on this i'm joined by the senior adviser to the hillary clinton campaign and brian fallon, executive director of demand justice and former
4:50 pm
national press secretary for the hillary clinton campaign. welcome to both of you. brian -- >> thank you. >> yesterday, you tweeted the four house freshmen whom pelosi dismissed in the dowd column have done more to define the vision and moral center of today's democratic party than all of the message bills pushed by the party leadership combined. explain. >> well, i think you can't be dismissive of these women and the role that they occupy in our party today. for one thing, ali, it's the representativeness. the leadership in our party is very talented in many ways but it's very old and it's very white. these women are young, they're people of color and they speak to a base we're going to need to mobilize in 2010. we need to mobilize the younger voters that came to the polls in 2018 that see sthefthemselves i these candidates. they have the unique ability to rise above the din and i think it inspires a lot of jealousy among rank and file members of the caucus who are wondering why
4:51 pm
i can't go viral. these women by their visits to the detention facilities brought more attention to the plight of the migrant children than any measures the house democrats can put on the floor. that's why trump is enamored with aoc. that's a megaphone and a platform that the democratic leadership should be leaning into not jostling against. >> adrian, the point that nancy pelosi often makes is my job is to get things done, not to get headlines. >> yeah, that's right, ali. i think that's why she made these comments. they were not unprompted. she was asked my maureen dowd and she made the comments she made. i agree with everything my friend brian fallon just said. nancy pelosi has a totally different job to do than some of these freshmen we're talking about, which is to regulate and moderate her caucus and actually get som done. she's got to legislate. it's her job. i served in congress. i was a chief of staff in congress for ten years in an era where nancy pelosi was the leader. she was the speaker at the time. we had a lot of members who disagreed with her, you know,
4:52 pm
who weren't always on the same page but we didn't often hear about it because social media was not as prominent. that's why i agree with my friend brian fallon who says, yes, these women have a megaphone that is largely unrivaled by almost anybody in the caucus, but at the same time, when it comes down to votes, they have the same individual single vote that every single other democratic member of congress has and nancy pelosi's job is to actually get some legislation passed, especially in this, you know, donald trump era of washington right now. she's the only thing that we have that's really able to work across the aisle and try to legislate and try to get things done, which means she can't often, you know, work with the far-left wing of the caulk who is often times trying to, you know, get people, you know, riled up and is make some noise. >> you know, nancy pelosi in her conversation with maureen dowd of "the times" said "if the left doesn't think i'm left enough, so be it. as i say to these people, come to my basement. i have signs about single-payer
4:53 pm
from 30 years ago. i understand what they're saying, but we have a responsibility to get something done which is different from advocacy. we have to have a solution, not just a twitter fight." brian, who wins this? how does this -- how does this -- how does this end? >> well, i think that's the irony of the comments you just read, ali, maybe 25 years ago nancy pelosi probably would be a member of this faction. before she was ever a member of democratic leadership, she was a movement progressive in her own right. she was somebody that broke glass ceilings of her own. i think she sees a lot of herself in these members, but what i think she's trying to send to them is a bit of a challenge. if you want me to do it your way, force me to do it. the old saying that lbj said to mlk, if you want me to go your way, add to your banks, build your support, force my hand. nancy pelosi didn't like how this debate over this emergency bill for the border worked out either. they ended up having to swallow mitch mcconnell's bill and i think there is a lot of
4:54 pm
bitterness toward the senate democrats, quite frankly, by undercutting the house democrats by going along with a bill that the republicans put forward. nancy pelosi didn't like this bill any more than aoc did. >> speaking of aoc, adrian, what do you make of donald trump's fascination with her as accounted in tim alberta's book? >> you know, ali, it seems to be the same fascination that donald trump has with other powerful women, namely nancy pelosi. hillary clinton, kamala harris, you know, women who he often times gives backhanded compliments to are the very women he's afraid of. he knows the force they have. knows aoc is here to stay. she's got this huge following of supporters. she's also in politics for a long time. she's very young and she's got a long life here in politics. and i think he knows that and makes him very nervous. he knows that she is going to be a very forceful voice as we go into 2020 in that she is a real threat to his candidacy.
4:55 pm
>> she's a lightning rod, brian, on the right. everybody in the media talks about her. they talk about her way more over at fox. >> yeah, i think they're afraid of her. they can't land a punch really on her when they try. it comes off as sort of a school disast schoolyard crush that a lot of these conservatives have. they don't quite know how to match her sophistication, her eloquence, her mastery of the issues and they understand that she speaks to a huge base that they are trying to compete for as well, in terms of young people, especially young people of color. so they're worried about her and it comes off in a very twisted way. donald trump respects her ability to command attention, and inspire feelings for better or for worse. >> adrian, real quick. do you think there is a truce at some point before the election? >> between democrats? >> yeah. >> yeah, sure. i mean, look, i think a lot of this is just, you know, a little manufactured or a little blown out of proportion. i think ultimately nancy pelosi wants to work with her caucus
4:56 pm
and wants to get things done. we're just hearing more about it because of the advent of social media. >> nancy pelosi actually said that. the press likes to make a story that is more about democrats divided than the fact that mitch mcconnell doesn't care about the children. thanks to both of you. stay with us. you're watching "hardball." oh! oh!
4:57 pm
oh! ♪ ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than seven and maintained it. oh! under seven? and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history
4:58 pm
of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ ask your healthcare provider today about once-weekly ozempic®.
4:59 pm
look limu. a civilian buying a new car. ♪ limu emu & doug let's go. limu's right. liberty mutual can save you money by customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. oh... yeah, i've been a customer for years. huh. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
5:00 pm
. hey, that's "hardball" for you. thank you for being with me. i'm ali velshi. chris matthews will be back tomorrow night. but for now, that's it. "all in" with chris hayes starts now. tonight on "all in" -- >> there's been a lot of speculation in the media about individuals affiliated or associated with the family of jeffrey epstein. >> the man trump once called a terrific guy back behind bars. >> he's alleged to have sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in new york city and in palm beach, florida. >> tonight, new charges against wealthy sex predator jeffrey epstein. >> the alleged behavior shocks the conscience. >> and new calls for the resignation of trump's labor secretary who gave epstein a plea deal in florida. >> that seems like a long time ago, but i know he's been a fantastic labor secretary. >> senator tim kaine joins me