tonight. appreciate you spending some time with us. i'll be back live from washington tomorrow, 6:00 eastern for the eve of the mueller hearings with, i promise, some very special guests tomorrow. don't go anywhere. "hardball" with chris matthews is up next. no truce. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. in just a moment, brand-new reporting on efforts by the department of justice to convince robert mueller to limit his testimony this week. i'll talk to the vice chair of the judiciary committee. first up, president trump is not stopping his attacks on four minority congresswomen, now with his latest argument against the squad. after he spent last week trying to reverse the fallout from his racist tweet the weekend before, attacking the quartet, today president trump went on offense

again. in a tweet this morning, the president argued the squad is a very racist group of trouble makers who are young, inexperienced and not very smart. adding they are so bad for our country. well, trump doubled down on that argument at the white house this afternoon. >> well, i think they're very bad for our country. i really think they must hate our country. the congresswomen, what they've said about israel, what they've said about our country, when they talk about disgusting people, when they talk the way they talk, when the one mentioned that brown people should speak for brown people and muslim people should speak for muslim people, and you hear all this, it's not what our country's all about. >> but even before the president fired off his latest attack, one of the four congresswomen, rashida tlaib of michigan, blasted the president at the naacp convention in detroit. >> yeah, i'm not going nowhere!

not until i impeach this president! and it's beyond just the four of us. the squad is all of you. and i can tell you, there's -- you are all the squad. trust me. if you support equity, you support justice, you are one of us. >> well "the washington post" reported on the attempt last week to manage the crisis from the racist tweet. "advisers wrote new talking points and handed him reams of opposition research on the four congresswomen. pivot to patriotism, focus on their ideas and behavior, not identity. some would still see a racist agenda." the argument went but at least it would not be so explicit. anyway, the president took issue with that reporting writing, now, really, does that sound like me? what advisers? there were no talking points except those stated by me and reams of paper were never given to me. well, in fact, a photo of the president's notes from an event last week shows otherwise with this set of bullet points calling the women dangerous. that's a quote from the talking

points. anti-semitic. that's also on the talking points. anti-american. among other things. i'm joined by peter baker, chief white house correspondent for "the new york times." jason johnson, politics editor for theroot.com and adrian elrod. what's this anti-semitic thing? it's like this weird precious bodily fluid. it comes out of nowhere. every time he goes after the quartet, he brings it up. is this playing to the evangelicals? the conservative jewish voters? who is he after here. >> yes, all of those things. let's face it, congresswoman ilhan omar has said a number of things that are taken to be anti-semitic, even by fellow democrats. she said that the democratic support for israel was all about the benjamins, meaning money, which is an old anti-semitic trope. she said a number of other things that have been condemned even by fellow democrats.

at the same time, she's criticizing israel for its policies and its treatment of the palestinians. so there is a real fine line there between, you know, a perfectly legitimate policy debate and, you know, comments that are perceived to be about hate toward jewish americans or israeli jews. and that's what the president's leaning on. he's leaning on that in part because it's a shield, i think, against the racism accusations against him. how can he be racist when he is going after them for being hate mongers themselves. >> yes. from the street corner. >> basically. he's trying to recalibrate the debate. look, don't forget what they said. >> jason, your thoughts about this? because it gets very tribal. the president knows how to play that game better than anybody. the four women aren't laying up either. so both sides want a fight here, clearly. your thoughts about who is right. >> well, look, the president wants a fight, chris. these four women -- i always think this is important before people say squad or anything like that. they're from the heartland.

we're talking michigan, minnesota, working-class voters in new york. the president is actually attacking the very types of voters that democrats say they want to keep. in all honesty, he wants this fight for identity politics and racism works for him. i think in the case of the democratic party and these four members of congress, they're still trying to pass legislation. they are on defense because this is not the identity that they placed upon themselves. this is one that donald trump placed upon them, and i think -- >> why do they call themselves a squad if they don't want to identify with each other? >> it's not an issue of wanting to identify with each other. they don't necessarily want to be the face of the democratic party. that is something that has been -- >> they don't? >> i don't necessarily think so. >> you don't think they're challenging -- just to be honest here, you don't think they're challenging nancy pelosi for the direction of the party on issues like, you know, what we're talking about here? >> i think that they, just like katie porter, who is a very liberal white woman who has talked about financial issues, i think you have a lot of very liberal freshmen who have been able to establish themselves as

being new leaders and freshmen in the party, and i think they want to push the party in a particular direction. i don't think any of these people are challenging for leadership and i don't think any of them think that they're the face of the democratic party. these are vastly different individuals. you've got aoc, who is 29 years old. you've got ayanna presley who is 45. they come from different places, different districts, and i think it's easy to clump them all together, certainly for republicans, and say look at this brown menace trying to move the party in a radical direction, when in fact a lol lot of their policies are similar to a lot of democrats that got elected in 2018. >> the president's charge that the four congresswomen themselves are racist comes just a day after white house senior adviser stephen miller offered his own deflection while defending the president's attacks. >> i think the term "racist," chris, has become a label that is too often deployed by the left, democrats in this country, simply to try to silence and punish and suppress people they disagree with. speech that they don't want to hear. the reality is that this

president has been a president for all of americans. >> well, going home, go home, if you don't like it here is a racist trope. >> yeah, of course it is. of course it is. donald trump has no interest in stop that racist trope from being used at his rallies. here's what he's doing, chris. donald trump wants this to be the news. he wants this to be him versus the squad. he wants this to drive the news right now because he essentially failed on all the promises he made to his base, right? immigration is still a mess. the tax cut bill that he passed has not helped the working class americans that supported him in large chunks in 2016. this is what he wants to drive the news right now. and the more, frankly, that we're out here talking about it, the more i think he thinks it helps him. >> let me go back to peter on this. i wonder if there are enough angry white people basically to win this thing for him in 2020, the argument i'm hearing is that there are people fraying at the edges around the core of his people.

they are losing interest. they're not thrilled. they don't think anything's enough in terms of their anger, you know, to be satisfying, if you will. they can't stay angry enough. trump is trying to rewind them up again for 2020 because if he doesn't he won't get the core back there form again. is that's what's going on, peter? he needs to wind them up again? >> look, president trump likes to have a foil, an enemy. he likes to have somebody to play off of. hillary clinton was that person obviously in 2016, and quite honestly, through much of 2017 and 2018 as well. we don't have a democratic nominee yet for him to play off of, and so he has chosen these four young congresswomen as his foil for the moment. if he manages to brand the entire democratic party with this idea of, you know, socialism or extremism or radicalism, then he creates a choice for people who might be tired of him but might be more turned off by the other side. that's the gamble he's making. >> right. >> do you think he went out serendipitously by getting

pelosi to close ranks around the four in the squad. by doing that he got the democrats to circle the wagons. in a sense he's actually promoted them as really the heart of the democratic party. i don't think he is that smart. >> no. >> jason, your thought there? i'll get to you. do you think he's that smart that he figured out i can get them all to bunch together, i can get pelosi to round and support them and become really with them, making the democratic party very left, when in fact pelosi doesn't want to do that. she wants to position the party center-left and left. >> right. >> and this made the -- the president by attacking those four getting pelosi to defend those four circle the party further left than pelosi thought was smart. your thoughts, jason? >> no, no, i don't think -- i agree with you, chris, i don't think the president is that smart. and let's be clear, nancy pelosi has come to the defense of these four members, these four freshmen members of congress because the president threatens their safety with this kind of racist invective. she had made that abundantly clear to anyone willing to listen.

they're just four votes. they don't run this party. so i don't think the president has successfully managed to clump them together. he's gotten the democratic party to make sure, hey, look, these people aren't in danger. chris, this is the other thing that i think is really important. the president knows that he has to rile up his people, as we mentioned before. his approval rating with republicans went up five points in some polls after these sort of racist attacks. but the other thing to remember is this, the democratic base is watching as well, and these four freshmen representing the heartland and new york and minnesota and massachusetts and everything else like that, there are lots of democrats who are looking at the party to make sure that these freshmen are being protected as well. so i think this is actually galvanizing both sides, which is not something i think donald trump expected when he attacked them initially. >> do you remember -- wehile i have you on here, jason. i always think in terms of general elections and what you have to do in the end. you know how jesse jackson was always recruited by whoever beat him in the primaries to give him a couple million bucks and the airplane to go out there and do registration or whatever. >> right. >> they've become -- ironically,

they've become the auxiliary, whoever wins the nomination, left or center-left. we got to get the african-american vote in the big cities. >> yes. >> we got to get the progressives out. they didn't come out for hillary. we got to do it. maybe the four will go out and do it, you know, that kind of thing. >> yes, they will be. think about it -- >> flying squadron, i think they call them in the irish. >> they'll fly in -- think about it, rashida tlaib is from michigan. not every single voter in michigan obviously would agree with all of her policies and positions but she is popular in that state. minnesota is a place that republicans have targeted. new york is a place where democrats want to make sure they run up the score. they want to make sure they keep congressional seats. so all of these women end up being of value to the democratic party. whoever the nominee is, especially if it is a centrist democrat is going to surround themselves with people like aoc, stacey abrams, ayanna presley because that is the group that has it turn out for democrats to

win the americmidwestern states retake the white house. >> the president called the north carolina rally-goers patriots. i think he likes it when they do it. yesterday, vice president mike pence weighed in on that controversy. >> the president wasn't pleased about it and neither was i, and the president's been very clear about that. but what we're also not pleased about is the fact that there are -- >> right, but did you -- >> members of congress who are engaged -- >> this president's relationship with his supporters is as close as anyone has ever had in american politics. this could all go away with one simple word or a phrase or something. you have a chance to say it right now. don't do it again. >> major -- >> is that your message? >> major, the president was very clear. >> was he? >> that he wasn't happy about it and that if it happened again he might -- he might -- he'd make an effort to speak out about it. >> he will make an effort to speak out about it? >> that's what he's already said. >> adrian, nobody does piety better than mike pence. that is his specialty. that pious manner of sit in

sadness, not in happiness -- >> it's a skill, i guess. it's a skill. i don't know. look, i think what we saw this past sunday on all these past sundays with mike pence, mercedes schlapp. if you want to remain viable in that white house, if you want to remain in trump's orbit and influential, you have to go out there and basically kiss the ring and do whatever he says. so you had the people in the white house -- by the way, i don't know why stephen miller keeps going out because he's not a very effective surrogate for trump. if you want to remain in trump's good graces you have to go out and defend him on everything. it was interesting to see how the surrogates on the sunday shows sort of tried to make excuses while also sounding, you know, a little legitimate and without compromising their own integrity. >> this has always been a kellyan kellyan kellyanne specialis kellyanne specialty. running around in this pious way saying that's not what he meant. he meant go back to your district.

that's not what he meant, peter. >> that's not what he said. of course the tweet was really clear. originally said they're from other countries and they should go back. they're not from other countries. three of them are not from other countries and the fourth, of course, is a naturalized american citizen. the assumption behind that that was so powerfully revealing. it wasn't just that these were immigrants, these are -- these are americans, american-born congresswomen and american citizens. so that's what riled people up. but i think he wanted to get into the middle of a democratic fight that was going on. you know, the four young women versus pelosi, who as you said said they're only four votes. they're not that powerful. he kind of wanted to stir things up and instead, of course, he made it all about himself. so the democrats kind of came together behind a unifying thing of him being the adversary. so whether that paid off for him, he thinks it has, but it also interrupted a democratic internal debate. >> well, luckily for the democrats and luckily for a lot of good people, the president's not so smart because a week before when ayanna presley came

out and said black members of congress should vote black, be black, talk black, identity politics personified, he should have let that lay there and let the country savor that argument for awhile because then he would have come out on top in the last two weeks instead of playing defense. thank you. coming up, much more on trump and racism, which is the story right now. why the democratic presidential campaign should not be an ideological struggle but a frontal attack on the moral issue. this campaign is shaping up. if the democrats get it right of good against evil. and anti-racism activists tweets out there went very viral on this issue and joins me to talk about the dangers of normalizing president trump, running against him as if he's another republican. plus, we're less than 48 hours now away from robert mueller's congressional testimony. judiciary committee chair jerry nadler now says he believes there is substantial evidence the president is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.

so what are the chances wednesday's hearings are going to lead to impeachment? much more ahead. stick with us. s. uor when you trade? i want free access to research. yep, td ameritrade's got that. free access to every platform. yeah, that too. i don't want any trade minimums. yeah, i totally agree, they don't have any of those. i want to know what i'm paying upfront. yes, absolutely. do you just say yes to everything? hm. well i say no to kale. mm. yeah, they say if you blanch it it's better, but that seems like a lot of work. no hidden fees. no platform fees. no trade minimums. and yes, it's all at one low price. td ameritrade. ♪

you eat right... mostly. you make time... when you can. but sometimes life gets in the way, and that stubborn fat just won't go away. coolsculpting takes you further. a non-surgical treatment that targets, freezes, and eliminates treated fat cells, for good. discuss coolsculpting with your doctor. some common side-effects include temporary numbness, discomfort, and swelling. don't imagine results, see them. coolsculpting, take yourself further. ♪ mmm, exactly!ug liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. nice! but uh, what's up with your partner? oh! we just spend all day telling everyone how we customize car insurance because no two people are alike, so... limu gets a little confused when he sees another bird that looks exactly like him. ya... he'll figure it out. only pay for what you need.

♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ mno kidding.rd. but moving your internet and tv? that's easy. easy?! easy? easy. because now xfinity lets you transfer your service online in just about a minute with a few simple steps. really? really. that was easy. yup. plus, with two-hour appointment windows, it's all on your schedule. awesome. now all you have to do is move...that thing. [ sigh ] introducing an easier way to move with xfinity. it's just another way we're working to make your life simple, easy, awesome. go to xfinity.com/moving to get started.

welcome back to "hardball." the country's bracing right now for impact as all of washington gets ready for robert mueller's highly anticipated testimony wednesday. democrats whom a committee staffer has said never prepared for a hearing like they have for this one intend to show how the president's actions meet the threshold of high crimes and misdemeanors. here's house judiciary chair jerry nadler yesterday. >> the report presents very substantial evidence that the president is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and we have to present the -- or let mueller present those facts to the american people and then see where we go from there because the administration must be held accountable and no president can be -- can be above the law. >> and now politico has revealed that the justice department warned mueller to limit his testimony to his public

findings. in other words, what's in the report. according to a former u.s. official, the justice department is "taking the position that anything outside the written pages of the report, the mueller report, are things about which presidential privilege hasn't been waived." well, cbs news has also acquired a letter to mueller dated today in which the justice department says any testimony must remain within the boundaries of your public report. meanwhile, president trump tweeted his opposition to mueller's testimony today again saying "mueller should not be given another bite at the apple. in the end it will be bad for him. and the phony democrats in congress." he also reported -- repeated his assertion that he won't watch the hearings, though he conceded that he might catch some of it. >> no, i'm not going to be watching, probably. maybe i'll see a little bit of it. i'm not going to be watching mueller because you can't take all those bites out of the apple. he still ruled no collusion, no obstruction. and this thing should have ended

a long time ago. this has been going on for 2 1/2 years. >> well, trump has been trying to downplay his interests in the hearings. nbc news reports that his schedule only includes a routine lunch and aides report of his executive time as a natural window for trump to take in snippets of the coverage. i'll bet more than that. i'm joined by democratic congresswoman of pennsylvania, the vice chair of the house judiciary committee and heidi przybyla is correspondent for nbc news. congresswoman, thank you for joining us. what is your, i don't know, i guess this isn't fair, but what's your greatest hope for wednesday from mueller? >> well, we hope that the american people tune in to actually watch bob mueller testify, and when they do, they will see that the president's been peddling fake news. he's been saying no obstruction, no collusion and, in fact, that's not what the mueller report says. >> what about the justice department apparently putting accomplish pressure now, clearly public pressure on mueller not to go anywhere beyond his brief,

what's in the written report? no word beyond it. >> well, i mean, this is what we've been seeing for months is that the justice department and the administration have beenat trying to suppress onwitnesses, redact the report and hide the evidence. i think the president is terrified. >> it's not exactly like p pantangelo's brother showing up in the hearings, but they seem to beea saying they've got something on mueller. they've got some power over him. isn't he a retired official at the justice department? what power do they really have? >> i think they -- they are under -- seriously underestimating bob mueller because bob mueller is nothing if not a patriot and i think he's shown throughout this entire proceeding that he's going to do the right thing.t he's going to do his job. he's going to perform an investigation. and he's going to bring out the truth, regardless of what the president wants. >> well, let me ask you about your andyo your caucus, your

democratic -- you're one of the leaders of the caucus in thatcr committee. you know, watching these hearings like iow do, most peop watch on television, there is always a pattern. the five-minute rule creates sort of a new event every five minutes. a member of congress comes on, anyway sort of introduce themselves, they sort of make a play out there for people to like them, i guess, and then they finally get to some questions and they don't seem to haveee any coherent relationshi to what we just heard from the congress person asking questions a minute or two before. is there going to be a coherent developing of questioning following up on the other or is it going to be the same old sort of individual show? >> well, i can't speak for the republican caucus. i know that a few of them have said things that my impression is that they're m trying to tur it into a circus, but, you know, the democratic side of the aisle, we've been preparing for this for months. >> coherently. >> we expected to see bob mueller immediately after he released his report. but the president's been holding it. >> willen it be a coherent set questions, one following the other, or will individual

members of congress freelance?h? >> i expect that it will be a coherent set of questions, although we're going to have the interruption of republican members questioning mr. mueller in between. >> i know. but your two-hour prep session tomorrow -- we heard you're going to have a two-hour prep session on the democratic side of the committee. will you be doing that as a chain of questioning so one person follows up with the other when mr. mueller may not get to the point you want him to? will you be following up with each other? >> you know what? i haven't been briefed on what we're going to do in that session. we have been having prep sessions for, you know, weeks. >> thank you so much. well, anyway, bob mueller's made clear his reluctance to testify this week, and this isn't his first rodeo either. according to "the new york times," mueller's appeared before congress about 88 times dating back to 1990 and throughout those appearances he showed little patience for politics. here is one fiery exchange

mueller had with republican congressman louie gohmert of texas after the boston marathon bombing in 2013. >> why did no one go to the mosque and say who are these guys? they may attend here. why was that not done since such a thorough job was done? >> your facts are not all together -- >> i point out specifically -- >> may i finish my -- >> point out specifically. sir, if you're going to call me a liar, you need to some point out specifically where any facts are wrong. >> we went to the mosque prior to boston. >> prior to boston? >> prior to boston happening, we were in that mosque talking to the imam several months beforehand as part of our several outreach efforts. >> heidi, let's talk about this. there are two sides to this fight. congresswoman has one side, the democratic side generally speaking. the republicans see it as an opportunity to bring down mueller, don't they? >> of course they do. this is the only strategy that they -- would have going into this.

and given that nancy pelosi has told her members to keep it even, no drama, just lay out the facts, let them speak for themselves. on the republican side, the strategy is all about going back to the lovers that, you know -- >> peter strzok. >> and lisa page. talking about the origins of the dossier. and, you know, with this five-minute rule, no matter how disciplined the democrats are in painting this narrative and following it up, it will get messed up by the drama on the other side of the aisle. and we all know how that works with kind of sound bites and the cameras on them. so if there is any room for drama here, it's definitely going to be on the republican side. but i do think based on the democrats i've talked to, chris, they do have a strategy in place and it is to establish early that when mueller said that he could not reach a conclusion because of the olc opinion, he was emphatic about that in his statement. that is foundational.

you start with that. and i talked with madeline dean who is on the committee as well, one of the members who told me this, you start with that foundation and you build on top of that. you build the building blocks. did you say no collusion in your report? very basic. the answer to that is obviously no. did you say no obstruction? again, no. so these things, they can build, you know, have the building blocks, but, of course, it will get just because of this five-minute rule messed up by what's going on on the other side of the aisle. >> congresswoman, do you think establishing the fact that mr. mueller didn't actually go ahead and indict the president is because he didn't believe the president can be indicted while in office would give you as members of the congress on the democratic side a chance to pursue the prosecution, basically? >> well, his report reads like a prosecutorial document. he says at the outset "i did not indict because i could not, but here are all the facts that i fountain." he also says if i could have said no obstruction, i would have, but i could not say that

because there is so much evidence. he goes through, he details ten different incidents of obstruction of justice. some of which amount to criminal conduct. so, you know, think it's really important that we lay all that out and, you know, if we get to the bottom line, i think trump's initial reaction to the mueller investigation was the appropriate one. he said, oh, my god, this is terrible. this is the end of my presidency, and i think he was right. >> how do you progress further if you're a member of the house democratic side, assumingly, who wants to see impeachment proceeded with. what's your standard coming out of the hearing on wednesday? what do you want to think -- what headline do you want that would give you the juice to proceed further with the -- with an impeachment? >> impeachment is essentially a political decision, and it's going to have to be the american people who reach that conclusion. i hope that after this hearing a lot of americans are saying, oh, my god, i had no idea that was in the report.

>> and you think that would be enough to stimulate a national call for impeachment? >> i think it could. we certainly saw during the watergate hearings that when the hearings started, when the evidence started being put forward, the american public wasn't there, but as they learned what was really going on in the white house, they came to that conclusion themselves. >> the real opportunity here, chris, is not necessarily on the obstruction side. i have to disagree just a little bit because we've seen the numbers on impeachment notched down to about 20% now, the public. a lot of the democrats who i talk to privately acknowledge that those numbers are unlikely to move dramatically. this is part of a much longer evolution. but the real opportunity here is to get out in front of the american people and make it so difficult for the republicans to not be cooperating with them when it comes to russian interference. >> how will pelosi look about after all this? >> points through 126 million americans reached through the russian -- by russian i.r.a. in

attempts to influence our election. >> i hope so. let me ask you the partisan question, will pelosi look good after this in her attempt to sort of slow this push to impeachment down? will she look like she was the wise one? >> i think it would be net-neutral. i think she had to do this. she's not going to declare victory after this and say, okay, let's go ahead with these impeachment hearings now. that's not going to happen. but to satisfy her base and just to do the right thing, she had to do this, and in fairness to the democrats, it's been really difficult for them to get mueller. they have a witness who is bordering on uncooperative. he does not want to be there. he's made that clear. >> great coming on tonight. thank you so much for coming on. heidi przybyla, thank you. up next, donald trump captured 2.9 million fewer votes than hillary clinton in 2016, almost 3 million less than her and still won in the electoral college. is it possible that trump could lose the popular vote again by millions more in 2020 and win again? you better believe it.

more details straight ahead. you're watching "hardball." carl, i appreciate the invite here. as my broker, what am i paying you to manage my money? it's racquetball time. (thumps) ugh! carl, does your firm offer a satisfaction guarantee? like schwab does. guarantee? (splash) carl, can you remind me what you've invested my money in? it's complicated. are you asking enough questions about the way your wealth is being managed? if not, talk to schwab. a modern approach to wealth management. if not, talk to schwab. this is his family, the world he's built, for 72 years. ♪ this is hal's heart. it's been torn. broken.

and put back together. this is also hal's heart. this is the cardiologist his brother recommended. and this is hal's relief, knowing he's covered. this is hal. his heart and memory keeper, and it's beating better than ever. this is what medicare from blue cross blue shield does for hal. and with easy access to quality healthcare, imagine what we can do for you. this is medicare that cares back. this is the benefit of blue. i felt i couldn't be at my best wifor my family. c, in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c every day. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. even hanging with friends i worried about my hep c. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. mavyret is the only 8-week cure

for all common types of hep c. before starting mavyret your doctor will test if you've had hepatitis b which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b, a liver or kidney transplant, other liver problems, hiv-1, or other medical conditions, and all medicines you take including herbal supplements. don't take mavyret with atazanavir or rifampin, or if you've had certain liver problems. common side effects include headache and tiredness. with hep c behind me, i feel free... ...fearless... ...and there's no looking back, because i am cured. talk to your doctor about mavyret. most people think a button is just a button. ♪ that a speaker is just a speaker. ♪ or - that the journey can't be the destination. most people haven't driven a lincoln. discover the lincoln approach to craftsmanship at the lincoln summer invitation.

right now, get 0% apr on all 2019 lincoln vehicles plus no payments for up to 90 days. only at your lincoln dealer. welcome back to "hardball" in a piece out for nbc news, political analyst dave wasserman writes the ultimate nightmare for scenario for democrats is that trump loses the popular

vote by more than 5 million votes but trump wins re-election by two electoral votes. nate coen who writes -- covers for "the times" argue that the president's electoral college advantage comes from his strength in tipping point states, which are states most likely to push the candidate over the electoral college threshold. in one example he argues that wisconsin, which decided the 2016 election, the president's approval rating stands stade around 47%. which is all he needed to win last time. i'm joined by jonathan allen, nbc news digital correspondent. so let's get into the fearsome numbers for progressives and moderates and whoever else that don't like trump. when you see national polls that show trump down by five, what's it mean? >> it doesn't mean that much. it means something in terms of measuring his popularity at the moment but he doesn't have an opponent so we don't know who he's fighting. it's candidate "x." that's meaningless. it does mean a measurement of how he's approved versus how he was earlier. it does not mean how he's doing

state by state, which as we all know is how the electoral college is won. the nightmare scenario for democrats is they lose the next election, and it doesn't matter whether they lose the next election -- >> well. >> by one electoral vote or ten electoral votes. and it certainly doesn't matter, you look at the electoral votes and this is the point that dave wasserman is making in his piece. they can win california by one vote or 5 million -- >> they can win california by 10 million votes with kamala and buttigieg. they could win with a ticket like that and get killed all across the country until you get to new york. >> right. potentially you can lose a ton of states and run up the score in california. you can even get close in a big state like texas and pad some of your popular vote margin and lose the electoral college. >> let's talk about that. what happened last time. and that is that hillary clinton did very well in the popular vote. she won by about three or four. it was closer to four. yet, in the states like wisconsin, michigan, pennsylvania, she just lost by a

little. >> about 70,000 to 80,000 votes across three states made the difference in the electoral college. >> according to nate coen, that pattern is following up this time. trump, despite his problem in terms of the popular vote, he is doing pretty well in comparative to those states right now. good enough to win. >> the problem with these analysis right now is we're a year and a half out and we have no idea what the electorate is going to look like. >> your challenging what i'm saying. >> the theory is apt, but all these prognostications fail to know for sure who is going to show up and where they're going to show up. >> we know where trump's strength is. we know trump. >> we know trump's strength and trump knows what his strength is and that's why we're seeing him make these blatantly racist appeals. >> do you think he's appealing with the quartet so he knows that will hurt him on the coast but help him inside? is he that smart? >> he knows it's not only going

to hurt him on the coast and help him in some of the interior places, but specifically where he says, look, if you want to run up the vote in ilhan omar's district in minneapolis or rashida tlaib's district in detroit, i might be able to get some resentment in the suburbs around them and try to flush out some of those people who support me but didn't vote for me last time. he's trying to get every last trump supporting person out to the polls. >> i think he goes after this anti-semitic thing, he focused on that because he knows where that opposition of those people is going to come from. he's going to play that with evangelicals and some jewish voters. he figures i'm going to make them the bad guys. >> it's really about the evangelical voters. jewish voters are such a small part of the population. >> especially conservative jewish voters. the evangelicals are everywhere, right? >> it's a huge portion of his base. >> thanks so much. that's why he's going to keep mike pence on the ticket. thank you so much, jonathan allen. policy proposals won't be enough to beat trump next year, why the democratic nominee will

need to focus on one overriding issue, the dangerous nature of trump's racist behavior. you're watching "hardball." trump's racist behavior. you're watching "hardball. mm, uh, what do you do for fun? -not this. ♪ -oh, what am i into? mostly progressive's name your price tool. helps people find coverage options based on their budget. flo has it, i want it, it's a whole thing, and she's right there. -yeah, she's my ride. this date's lame. he has pics of you on his phone. -they're very tasteful. he has pics of you on his phone. ♪ (music plays throughout♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

age-related macular i've degeneration, with which could lead to vision loss. so today i made a plan with my doctor, which includes preservision. because it's my vision, my morning walk, my sunday drive, my grandson's beautiful face. only preservision areds 2 contains the exact nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression.

because it's my sunset, it's how i see my life. it's my vision. preservision

welcome back to "hardball." democrats face a choice in 2020. do they take on donald trump as if he's just another republican president whose policies they say are wrong or do they argue something more dire? that the man seeking a second term in the white house presents a moral danger to this country. do they make 2020 a fight between good and evil? well, in a series of tweets that went viral this weekend author and anti-racism argument tim weise argued the challenge that democrats face now to the argument they faced when david duke, the leader of the kkk was running in the early '90s. argued this weekend that the democrats will blow this election if they fail to focus

on the evil that trump personifies. wise writes, "people who say the democrats should ignore trump's race baiting because it's some political generous strategical calculate to distract us are idiots. he's no genius. if you downplay it, you normalize him. you make this about policy, you normalize him." . he adds, if anything, i would say crafting an argument that this is an existential crisis for the nature and making it about trump's bigotry and who we want to be as a country would be far more effective. wow. tim wise says that as democrats prepare for 2020, there is a lesson they can learn from republicans. wise joins us next. you're watching "hardball." ardb. like job. when he was diagnosed with cancer, his team at ctca created a personalized care plan to treat his cancer and side effects. so job could continue to work and stay strong for his family. this is how we inspire hope.

this is how we heal. we love you, daddy. good night. i love you guys. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now. cancer treatment centers of america. ♪work so hard give it everything you got♪ ♪strength of a lioness tough as a knot♪ ♪rocking the stage and we're never gonna stop♪ ♪all strength, no sweat... just in case you forgot♪ ♪all strength, no sweat... ♪no no no sweat... has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. hi.

maria ramirez! mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams. i felt completely helpless. trashed online. mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! my entire career and business were in jeopardy.

i called reputation defender. they were able to restore my good name. if you are under attack, i recommend calling reputation defender. vo: there's more negativity online than ever. reputation defender ensures that when people check you out, they'll find more of the truth, not trash. if you have search results that are wrong or unfair, visit reputationdefender.com or call 1-877-866-8555. when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah, and now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com.

welcome back to "hardball." as democrats work on their strategy to counter president trump ahead of the 2020 election. anti-racism activist tim wise who helped to defeat david duke in two campaigns in the 1990s provided this advice for democrats. what the left never understands we need to stop approaching elections like the debate team and start approaching it like the right does, like the cheerleading squad. the right knows psychology and we know public policy and sociology. great. the latter does not win elections. joining me now is tim weiss, the author of "white like me: reflections on racism from the

eyes of a racist son." and eugene robinson. i came to this conclusion serendipitously about the morality of the election and a struggle between good and evil. talk about your thinking, which is more analytical about it. >> yeah, you know, one of the things that we learned dealing with david duke -- and i'm not trying to say that duke and trump are the same, but they both appeal to white racial resentment as the yeast that makes their political bread rise. when you're dealing with a movement that focuses aboon tha in a sense a white identity cult, to act like they are just another candidate, yeah, you know, he is sort of racist, but look at my policy to make college affordable or look at my better health care plan that is going to be so much better than his is to miss the point. with duke, you know, what we learned is you have to make this a moral message that dukism and i would say now trumpism pose an existential threat to the values that americans hold dear. so in other words when they say

the squad hates america, no, no, no, your movement hates america as an idea, an idea of multicultur multiculturalism, of pluralism and democracy. that's the only way we're going to motivate the base. it's the only way we're going to get reasonable moderates and conservatives who probably are never going to agree on policy with the candidates the democrats have, but they can come together on the basis of a moral message and we can live to fight another day about the issues that we care about once the democrat has defeated donald trump. >> gene, your reaction to that? >> well, you know, i've read tim's threat with great interest over the weekend. in fact, i retweeted it. i thought it had great insights, particularly the bit about the debating team versus the cheerleading squad. >> yeah. >> and -- and, you know, you look at the field of democratic candidates and i totally agree that if it's -- if it's sort of emotionless policy, no matter

how wonderfully, finely constructed and put together, that's no competition to the sort of emotional visceral appeal -- >> right. >> -- that trump is making to his base. and i also agree that there are not a lot of persuadables here. there are not a lot of undecideds here. >> yeah. >> you know, after charlottesville, you know, after name your atrocity, i think the people who were part of trump's coalition in 2016 who said, you know, i've had enough with this guy, they probably have said that, right? >> right. >> they're probably not going to say it between now and then. they probably now are not still teetering on the fence. so i don't -- i don't know what you gain by trying to appeal to what i think is kind of a mythical group of people. >> right. >> that you're going to peel away from him. >> tim, i'm looking at the candidates. even after just one debate, everybody watching watched that debate. there will be another in a couple of weeks. each of the candidates on the democratic side already have banners they're carrying. >> yeah. >> they have a banner of

medicare for all, a banner on immigration issues of compassion on the border, whatever, student loan issues. they have a lot of banners they're already trucking out her. >> right. >> how do they put them aside or at least deflect them for a moment, you know what? it's not about left or right or policy prescriptions, it's about what kind of country we want to be. how does anybody sort of get themselves disarmed at least to make that point? >> well, i think any of those debaters on the stage in the debates coming up ought to lead by saying, listen, we have some disagreements on this stage and i happen to like my plans better than the podium next to me's plans, but the truth is everybody up here has better ideas for the country than donald trump and we hope that you check them out, but in the meantime please understand that this movement that he is leading poses a threat to the values that this country holds dear. it is a movement that is opposed to pluralism, opposed to multiculturalism. it is a white identity cult and we all can do better than that. now i also think it's important to take those issues and filter

them through a lens that contrasts them with the white resentment politics. so, for example, if i'm a candidate who wants to talk about wall street or how corporations don't pay their workers enough, i need to be saying, you know, donald trump wants you to think that the reason your paycheck isn't big enough is because taxes are going to support people of color or immigrants are taking your job. what we're telling you is, no, no, that's not the source of your problem, here's the source of your problem, but you're always linking it back and making it clear that donald trump is essentially a walking, talking opiate. we talk about the opioid crisis as being heroin and fentanyl. donald trump is a human opiate. what does it do? says i can take away your pain but doesn't solve the source of the pain. that's what we said against david duke in '90 and '91 and the only thing that prevented a nazi and former klansman from winning those campaigns.

>> that's the joe biden strategy. go after trump. saying i didn't like what happened in charlottesville. i didn't like that president siding up with bad guys. i'm one of the other candidates, i say, you know what? that's biden's strategy. my strategy is to beat biden. >> well, right, exactly. first of all, first somebody's got to come out on top, right? so they're competing against each other. but i think it's a great -- look what happened to biden when he launched his campaign with that appeal. he immediately rocketed to the top. >> yeah. >> he is still at the top despite a -- >> right. >> can anybody else do this? >> weeks of uninspiring performance. >> what if kamala said i'm going to do that? >> she can totally -- >> they can all do that. marianne williamson is doing it. if marianne williamson's doing it, they can all do it. believe me. >> tim, you've been a great guest. great to have you on. see you in about five years. kidding. >> i'm teasing. >> thank you. it's a good argument. i had it this weekend. i think the moral issue is

important. in the end of history, it's going to matter the most. who were the good guys and who were the bad guys? >> right. >> and i think we're going to see that. one thing we know about this election, we were talking about it with our producers today, rarely in history do we know so much about one of the two candidates. we know about who he is, what he is and how he does business. we know donald trump from toe to head. we don't have to look any further to understanding who he is. we have to spend the next year and a half doing is finding somebody who can beat him. >> exactly. >> because i think we really know this guy. we don't need to know any more about donald trump. he's not going to change. that's the thought. i'm sticking with that one. good luck with the williamson campaign, tim. just kidding. you're a good teaser. thank you. you got me. thank you, tim wise. great thinking. i love it. eugene robinson, as always, thoughtful and wise. up next, i'm going to put this moral case against trump in historic terms. what you just heard, i think there is a whole history of this question of morality in american politics. if you step back a little, it's not all about unemployment rate

and things like that, it's about who we are and want to be. you're watching haf"hardball." fact is, every insurance company hopes you drive safely. but allstate helps you. with drivewise. feedback that helps you drive safer. and that can lower your cost now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? would shakespeare have chosen just "some pens?"s. methinks a tul pen would serve m'lady well. thanks! and a unicorn notebook! get everything on your list. this week's doorbuster - notebooks for 10¢, 10¢ in store or online from the advisors at office depot officemax.

we're going all in thion strawberries.ra, at their reddest, ripest, they make everything better. like our strawberry poppyseed salad and new strawberry summer caprese salad. strawberry season is here. panera. food as it should be. iand grew it toy i$36 billion dollars. 6 in 2010, i signed the giving pledge to fund good causes. then i left my business to combat climate change, fix our democracy, and hold president trump accountable. last year, we ran the largest youth voter mobilization in history - helping double turnout and win back the house. i'm tom steyer and i approve this message. let's make change happen!

doctor bob, what should i take for back pain? before you take anything, i recommend applying topical relievers first. salonpas lidocaine patch blocks pain receptors for effective, non-addictive relief. salonpas lidocaine. patch, roll-on or cream. hisamitsu. prpharmacist recommendedne memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. that's it. i'm calling kohler about their walk-in bath. [ sigh ] not gonna happen. my name is ken. how may i help you? hi, i'm calling about kohler's walk-in bath. excellent! happy to help. huh? hold one moment please... [ finger snaps ] hmm. the kohler walk-in bath features an extra-wide opening and a low step-in at three inches, which is 25 to 60% lower than some leading competitors. the bath fills and drains quickly, while the heated seat soothes your back, neck and shoulders.

kohler is an expert in bathing, so you can count on a deep soaking experience. are you seeing this? the kohler walk-in bath comes with fully adjustable hydrotherapy jets and our exclusive bubblemassage. everything is installed in as little as a day by a kohler-certified installe. and it's made by kohler- america's leading plumbing brand. we need this bath. yes. yes you do. a kohler walk-in bath provides independence with peace of min. i want to follow up on what we discussed before the break, the moral dimension of next year's election. much of our country's history has been a moral struggle, don't you think? we had the battle hymn of the republic playing as our country lost 600,000 lives in the war that ended slavery. and whatever else can be said about it, the civil war was profoundly about that.

ending the evil of one man owning another. and then a century later came another moral victory with the civil rights movement and the passage of the bill to end separate water fountains, white-only department store lunch counters and white-only restaurants and hotels. after that came the voting rights act. in each of these cases, the country's majority population backed the moral course, ending slavery, ending jim crow, ending the deprivation of voter rights, and we now face another historic point of moral conflict and for millions of voters moral decision. re-electing donald trump, given what he said from the very beginning as a national political force to his latest rants about sending home members of the united states congress, reeks of immorality. he cannot be a good american and mock the americanness of someone based on color or ethnicity for the simply reason that we are a country not based on such factors, but on more basic notions of liberty and human dignity. re-electing donald trump would take us into a dangerous moral

direction from which it will take a wrenching turn to get us back. instead of delivering us from evil, it would deliver us to evil. it's something to be said about looking toward 2020. it could be the most important thing to think about. and that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on "all in." >> if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. >> all eyes on robert mueller. >> no, i'm not going to be watching, probably. maybe i'll see a little bit of it. >> tonight how democrats are approaching the last best chance to hold the president accountable. >> the report presents very substantial evidence that the president is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. >> and why this week could be make or break for impeachment. >> let mueller present those facts to the american people and then see where we go from there. then -- >> major, the president was very clear. >> was he? >> that