we've been covering this story for a long time. this is a development and we will stay on this and stories like this here on "the beat." that does it for us tonight. i'll be back at 6:00 p.m. tomorrow. don't go anywhere. "hardball" is up next. big casino. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. donald trump, who says his whole life has been a bet, is gambling all his chips on a box office economy in 2020. he's out there now accusing his enemies of conspireing against him, amid mounting signs that the u.s. economy may be on shaky ground. after a record ten years of economic growth, recent market volatility and a trade war with china have raised concerns about the possibility of a serious economic downturn. yet the president's dismissing those warnings and finding new

targets to blame for the anxiety. earlier today trump attacked democrats as well as the chairman of the federal reserve he appointed, writing on twitter, our economy is very strong, despite the horrendous lack of vision by jay powell and the fed, but the democrats are trying to will the economy to crash for -- now "the new york times" is reporting in making those attacks the president is, quote, lashing out at what he believes is a conspiracy of forces against him. in private conversations with aides and allies, trump's insisting that his critics are trying to take away what he sees as his calling card for re-election. the associated press reports that the president is even wondering if the media and establishment figures are manipulating the data to make him look bad. according to two republicans close to him. this comes as a new survey today

by the national association for business economics finds that, quote, 74% of economists predict the next recession will hit by the end of 2021. in other words, more than two years from now, yet trump is downplaying the chances that an economic downturn is even possible. here's how he responded yesterday when asked if his administration has a plan to deal with the potential recession should one occur. >> are you doing any planning or are you going to be directing your administration to plan for the possibility of a recession? >> i don't see a recession. i mean, the world is in a recession right now. and although that's too big a statement. honestly, i'm prepared for everything. i don't think we're having a recession. we're doing tremendously well. our consumers are rich. i gave a tremendous tax cut. they're loaded up with money. >> loaded up with money. i love the way he talks, grossly conversational there. aside that rosy outlook, privately trump is growing

increasingly worried the economy won't look so good come election day. i'm joined now by former u.s. congressman barny frank of massachusetts. the white house reporter for npr and charlie sykes is editor and chief of the bulwark. i don't know what he's talking about, the bureau of labor statistics, the congress department run by his friend wilbur ross, where are these phony numbers coming from? >> well, donald trump always wants to have his own reality, right? and, unfortunately, he knows he owns the economy. this is the strongest card he has for re-election. how else is he going to explain this except there are people plotting against him. don't pay attention to what your eyes are telling you, listen to what i am saying. this is a very dangerous situation for a president of the united states who insists on having his own alternative reality. of course you have the cognitive dissonance. if there is no recession, why is he pressuring the fed for 100 basis point rate cut? why are his staffers now talking about proposing a possible payroll tax cut? so he hasn't gotten his story

straight yet, has he? >> well, aisha, you know the story. is he aware that the economic news is real? >> well, i don't know -- i would think that they would know that the economic news is real. it's coming from his own administration. it's coming from the federal government. but what i think president trump wants to try to do now is try to put the attention on someone else and say that if there is bad news, it's not my fault, it's jay powell's fault, it's the fault of the media, it's the democrats against me -- >> yeah, but is the fault for there being a real economic recession coming or somebody said there is one coming? because when unemployment starts to rise again, which it apparently will at some point. it's a lagging indicator. that's real. >> and that's the issue. because you can't talk your way out of that and you can't just blame someone else if there are real economic problems. it does seem like this administration is taking it seriously. now, i talked to a white house official who said they're not considering a payroll tax cut right now, but they are considering pushing other tax cuts right now. so that to me sounds like an administration that's concerned

about the economy. >> congressman frank, what do you think about this with trump? i didn't know this was coming. all of a sudden a cup ouple of weeks ago we hear leading indicatesers of trouble. he is denying the red flags or blaming them on somebody else. >> the somebody else, by the way, is not chairman powell. he has appointed several fed governors. he owns the fed. he's appointed several people there. of course it's a pattern where donald trump claiming to be the chief executive. one of the things you want from an executive is to appoint good people. by donald trump's judgement, he has appointed incompetent people in law enforcement, the economy, national security and the foreign policy of the united states. those are all people he denounces having appointed. i think what he's doing is kind of tricky for him. if you look at who is now talking in a way that suggests there's weakness in the economy, number one is donald trump. there is no way you would be banging away at your own

appointees at the federal reserve substantially to reduce interest rates and maybe back on the quantitative easing if you didn't think there was trouble coming. now he's got this dilemma because he is, in fact, by banging away at the fed contributing to this notion, but he's taking out recession insurance. i think it's pretty clear that trump is being warned that the rush that we got from his tax cut for the very rich is piddling out and that things are going to start to turn down and he's desperately trying to blame somebody else when the bad news comes. >> charlie, here's my question. this was, you know, like an historic tax cut. it was wrong -- wrong in its values, wrong in its distribution, everything is wrong about it. i don't know any regular people who got anything out of it. most importantly, it had no macro economic juice to it. nothing really got going with the economy. it wasn't a supply side or any kind of tension cut that brought long term -- now they're whispering about a payroll tax, which basically, you know, we

have an underfunded medicare account, social security and all that stuff, but to just start playing around with a little cap pistol like that that has a short-term impact. temporary cut in payroll tax sounds like a band-aid. what do you think? >> it's definitely a band-aid. here's the problem, they fired all the bullets they would have had. we've had virtually zero interest rates for so long and the tax cut has created a trillion a year deficit. if the country does plunge into a recession, how is congress and the president going to be able to deal with it? are they going to expand the deficit beyond $1 trillion? are they going to have a massive spending program, more tax cuts? this is part of the problem, that their options are completely limited here. >> thank you. barny, that's the same thing i keep thinking about, a trillion-dollar deficit to start with. what's left in your toolbox when you're really facing a horror? >> you're right.

i mean, trump retires the trophy as the uber kingsian of all time. he has done more to stimulate in the short term the economy with fiscal deficits and tax cuts. and here's the problem. one logical thing to do right now would be to begin to implement a good infrastructure program. >> yeah. >> to provide employment. to provide employment to people who didn't necessarily go to college. to increase the productivity. the problem -- the fundamental pre-em problem is he spent the infrastructure money on the tax cut for the very rich. >> thank you. >> the argument was this would improve productivity. they've gone away from that. remember, the argument was if we get the tax cut for corporations, we'll get 3% growth. no one thinks that's coming. so the fundamental curse that this administration inflicted on itself was in the first year to take the money that should have gone for a sensible infrastructure program, there could have been a bipartisan one, and put it into a tax cut for the rich which had a

short-term effect and no long-term benefit. >> ayesha, the same way the former congressman puts it, i think you only have a few tools in your chest. you can cut spending. raise inflation. cut taxes during a potential recession you can work monetary policy to some extent to create more money. if it's going to be invested. right now i'm hearing the country, the rich people are swilling, swirling with cash. they don't want to invest it. they don't believe in it. they don't want believe in this rock 'em sock 'em economy of trump's. they bought back stock at the corporate level. they benefitted from it in terms of their own wealth. you buy back stock, you own more, right? >> yeah. >> everything worked out for them. now we have a situation with no more tools. facing perhaps economic trouble. >> and that's the fear, is what happens now if there is a recession, is president trump, is this administration ready for it? and this is not an administration that has been great with crises and usually it's creating the crisis on the

their own. >> the biggest thing he did, and i agree with the congressman on this, betrayal. betrayal. he promised two things as a candidate. no more stupid wars and big rebuilding of america from new york, from lax in l.a. all the way back to penn station in new york. we're going to rebuild this country. sounded great to me. meanwhile, the president is also taking aim at fox news over fox's latest poll. the fox poll is a good poll. we've always used it here. it is been independent for years. it's solid. he doesn't like this number, biden beating him by 12. among other things, the polls show trump losing to biden in a hypothetical matchup. here is how the president reacted to that fact yesterday. >> knocfox is a lot different t it used to be, i can tell you that. fox has changed. there is something going on at fox, i'll tell you right now, and i'm not happy with it, and i think fox is making a big mistake because, you know, i'm the one who calls the shots on that -- on the really big debates. i'm not happy with fox.

>> i'm going to take my ball and go home. did you just hear that? if you don't play ball with me and let me win in your poll, i'm not going to show up for your debate. it was like the little rich kid. i'm sorry, he once was that. your thoughts, charlie? >> well, he obviously thinks that fox news is a house organ of trumpism. >> well, it has been. >> you're supposed to be for me. look, this is a president that doesn't understand how media operates. he doesn't understand how the news media operates, except as in the binary choice you're either for trump or against trump. so he's tried this before. he's tried threatening. he's tried bullying fox. i suppose you can argue to a certain extent it has succeeded in the past, but the poll is consistent with other polls. so once again we find the president insisting on an alternative reality and he's insisting that his spear carriers always, you know, play from the same script as he wants them to. >> spear carriers. i just love the image. running along beside him doing

his work. polls, i keep telling people about polls. believe in polls. politicians believe in them. they say pay attention to nem. >> sure they do. >> they're not always right -- >> they paid for them. >> nothing's perfect but, you know what, they're not cheating. there is no reason to have a cheating poll. it doesn't make sense. >> he says he doesn't believe them, but when you look at his actions over the past couple of days and the way that he's tweeting, he's tweeting like someone who is concerned, right? >> he thinks everything is a fix. >> chris, can i -- >> go ahead, congressman. >> yeah, i want to raise a point here because this is part of his general attack on the media. and especially you'll remember this. years ago under reagan the right-wing argument was that there was a terrible act of censorship by the federal government called the fairness doctrine. it said on broadcast, radio and television there had to be fairness, there had to be balance. not equal time for candidates, but that in general there had to be a balanced approach. and the right wing said that was

the worst example of censorship and basically got the fcc to repeal it. they're bringing it back. this attack on the internet now is exactly an effort to bring back this fairness doctrine that they used to claim was the root of all evil. the other ones who are now claiming that purely private entities have some obligation, the source of which they don't tell us, to be fairer to them than they have been. so it is an effort to dominate the media and intimidate them across the board. >> i am the one that calls the shots. that is a trumpism. charlie, anyway, the president always said yesterday that he was still interested in buying greenland despite word from denmark which owns it it's not for sale. here's his comment. >> well, greenland, i don't know, got released somehow. it's just something we talked about. denmark essentially owns it. we're very good allies with denmark. we protect denmark like we protect large portions of the world. so the concept came up and i

said, certainly, i'd be -- strategically it's interesting. and we'd be interested. but we'll talk to them a little bit. it's not number one on the burner, i can tell you that. >> so this is the greenland new deal. i mean, really, i'm sorry, this is too weird. one side wants to do something on climate -- >> i love this. >> barny, go ahead. you have a thought. i can tell. >> i just want to mention apparently he has no idea of the problem of buying 50,000 human beings. we're not talking about buying dirt, we're talking about buying a country full of people. >> yeah. >> it is extraordinary that that apparently didn't occur to him. he's talking about one of the great people auctions of all time. >> okay. this is going to be big next year. this is going to be a litmus test for conservatives in the next year. think about it. i'm waiting for donald trump to stand up at one of his rallies and say and we're going to have mexico pay for greenland and then we're going to get china to pay for relocating all of the immigrants to the frozen tundra. and you can just sort of see

republicans say this is what we need in order to make america great again, something big. you know, and, again, maybe he's thinking small. go for greenland. maybe they throw in iceland. while we're buying countries, why not canada at some point? the president ought to focus on problems right in front of him. >> too many liberals in canada for them. >> thank you. well, barny -- bernie sanders wants the denmark economic model and this president wants to buy half the country. thank you, barny frank, ayesha rasko and charlie sykes. coming up, president trump is firing blanks on gun control. >> i don't want people to forget that this is a mental health problem. we have very strong background checks right now. >> well, it's a mental health problem. you're right. the president reversed a form proposing tougher background checks, then backing down. watch him, by the time the senate and the house gets back, there will be nothing on the plate, except these mental

health conditions that he's now all of a sudden concerned about after cutting the programs. plus, republicans on capitol hill reportedly call vice president pence the bobble head for his solemn nodding and adoring gaze. there he is. look at him nodding and gazing. allies not so much his friends anymore. it's hard to be loyal to this guy. how loyalty works in the trump world. coming ahead. stay with us. with us i've been diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration, which could lead to vision loss. so today i made a plan with my doctor, which includes preservision. because it's my vision, my morning walk, my sunday drive, my grandson's beautiful face. only preservision areds 2 contains the exact nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. because it's my sunset, it's how i see my life. it's my vision. preservision

(gasp) (singsong) budget meeting! sweet. if you compare last quarter to this quarter... various: mmm. it's no wonder everything seems a little better with the creamy taste of philly, made with fresh milk and real cream. our mission is to provide complete, balanced nutrition for strength and energy! whoo-hoo! great-tasting ensure. with nine grams of protein and twenty-six vitamins and minerals. ensure, for strength and energy. hi. maria ramirez!

mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams. hey! i live on my own now! mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! i've got xfinity, because i like to live life in the fast lane. unlike my parents. you rambling about xfinity again? you're so cute when you get excited... anyways... i've got their app right here, i can troubleshoot. i can schedule a time for them to call me back, it's great! you have our number programmed in? ya i don't even know your phone anymore... excuse me?! what? i don't know your phone number. aw well. he doesn't know our phone number! you have our fax number, obviously... today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'll pass.

people don't realize we have very strong background checks right now. you go in to buy a gun, you have to sign up. there are a lot of background checks that have been approved over the years. so i'll have to see what it is, but congress is meeting, bipartisan, a lot of people want to see something happen. but just remember this, big mental problem and we do have a lot of background checks right now. >> oh, yeah. welcome back to "hardball." as we approach the midpoint in the five weeks between the mass shootings in el paso and dayton and the return of congress from

a summer recess, president trump's support for expanded background checks appears to be fading. just ten days ago he came out for a, quote, intelligent background checks before heading off on his two-week vacation at his new jersey golf club. here he was just two weeks ago. >> frankly, we need intelligent background checks, okay? this isn't a question of nra, republican or democrat. i will tell you, i spoke to mitch mcconnell yesterday. he's totally on board. we need meaningful background checks. so that sick people don't get guns. >> as we await congress' return, however, the push for gun reform remains strong. rallies were held in over 50 states over this weekend calling on the president and congress to take action on gun violence. and new nbc news/"wall street journal" poll shows overwhelming support for some reforms, including, catch this, 89%, 9 out of 10 americans say they

want background checks for all gun sales because it makes common sense. for more i'm joined by eric swalwell. congressman, thank you for joining us. put your money on this. the house has passed a bill on background checks. what are the chances mitch mcconnell will do background checks when they get back in september? >> zero. >> thank you. >> zero chance. zero, chris. >> why do they want to do nothing when 90% of the country says -- 9 out of 10 says do something at least on background checks? what makes the republican leader of the united states senate think he can politically get away with doing nothing? >> it's fear of losing his job. it's fear of the nra dumping millions against them. and this president as well. he is also going to do zero, chris. i don't know if you -- i know a lot of your viewers probably do, own a dog, but this is how it works. when two owners tell a dog to do something, the dog usually does it. the nra is funded by the

russians. president trump is also funded by the nra. he's got the russians and the nra who don't want him to do anything on this. he's not going to do anything. >> you know, politicians like yourself understand timing. and two weeks ago trump was, you know, bullish, rather, he was going to to something on background checks. as time faded, as el paso fades a bit in the hearts of some people, not everybody. some people won't forget it for a long time. he says now the coast is getting clearer. so by september 9th when the senate comes back, by then it will be a little more faded pen he'll come out for something minimal like what he called it, i'll come out with a red flag thing about mental illness, but that's all i'm going to do. here is what president trump had to say after the horrific shooting at stoneman douglas high school in parkland, florida that took the lives of 17. >> they have to be strong. background checks, look, i'm the

biggest fan of the second amendment. many of you are. i'm a big fan of the nra, but i had lunch with them, with wayne and chris and david on sunday and said it's time. we got to stop this nonsense. it's time. you can buy a handgun. you can't buy one -- you have to wait until you're 21, but you can buy the kind of weapon used in the school shooting at 18. i think it's something you have to think about. the police saw that he was a problem. they didn't take any guns away. now, that could have been policing. i think they should have taken them away anyway, whether they had the right or not. >> that's how he talks right after a shooting. of course the president didn't follow up on any of those actions. instead, here is the president two months later speaking at the nra. >> your second amendment rights are under siege. but they will never, ever be under siege as long as i'm your president. the one thing that has always

stood between the american people and the elimination of our second amendment rights has been conservatives in congress willing to fight for those rights. >> chris, you're fighting the good fight on gun safety. the president sounds like he's doing the fight right after the claims because we're all in the same situation emotionally. then he gets up with that hand in the air, this oath-taking with the nra. it's almost like the new testament. he literally puts his hand up like jesus in the scriptural paintings. he knows those guys never change their tune. >> that's his belief, certainly. and the nra has demonstrated historically that they can be a powerful force. i don't think he's gotten the memo. he talks about the fact that the nra is not as powerful as it once was. he must recognize that in 2018 we have a gun violence prevention majority in the house of representatives. not by accident. all of the gun violence prevention groups outspent the

nra by 5 to 1. it is an organization in complete chaos, and relying exclusively on the nra for that support i think is a big problem, which is why some republican lawmakers are looking at this and saying maybe i need to rethink this, especially if i'm up for re-election in 2020. >> so what's lindsey graham going to do? we were talking before the show, lindsey graham is a big pal of the president's now. are they going to do anything when they get back, the senators? the house has already done something. >> yeah, the house has passed two different bills on background check expansion. and actually the issue there is we do have loopholes in the law. just to be very clear. president trump talked about the fact that background checks are done right now. yes, 3 million a year. the problem is 1 in 5 guns sold today is sold with no background check at all. the house passed a bill, very straightforward to fix it. mcconnell has to raise it. behind the scenes, lindsey graham is working on a bill, an extreme risk protection bill, that would actually ensure that law enforcement and family members are able to seek a

temporary court order to remove guns from individuals at risk. >> so, if you see somebody around the corner or down the street or a nephew that looks a little wide-eyed, a little crazy, has some sort of ven den to going to going on, you can call that person's name to who? >> what you need as a family member or law enforcement -- let's look at california and how that system works. 17 states and the district of columbia have passed these laws. >> yeah. >> in california it says family members or law enforcement with evidence -- so you're indicating this person has stated threats or they've posted things on the innet. they go to a court and get an order to remove temporarily guns from that individual. >> according to the nbc news/"wall street journal" poll just out, 55% of americans say they're very worried about another mass shooting or attack by white nationalists. this comes as police stopped three mass shooting threats in the past week alone in ioohio,

florida and connecticut, all involving white males. there is no reason for an american to have a magazine with 30 or 40 or 50 bullets in it. deer hunters don't carry -- they wouldn't be that much of a hunter if they needed that many bullets. why would anyone want these magazines? why should they be out there on the market? >> they shouldn't be. they're only made to kill a large number of people. and, you know, i appreciate the interest by senator graham and red flag laws, but let me just say this, chris, it's like pollution. you can either deal with these issues downstream or stop them when they're upstream. the more that we prevent weapons from even being made like assault weapons, the more we know about people when they go to the point of sale to get the weapon, the more that they're able to require them to have a license and carry insurance, we can protect against downstream issues. also as a brother of two police officers, i don't want to just put this all on red flags and not do anything about background checks and keep assault rifles

out there and expect the men and women of law enforcement to be the last line of defense, the only line of defense against people who are dangerous who have firearms. >> i wonder about a person who has got wide eyes and they're out to do some damage how many days they're going to sit around while you go to court and go through all the paperwork. by the way, what is it about california that is so good on gun safety? i grew up in pennsylvania, which is deer hunter country, obviously. under dianne feinstein and people like you, why is it really good on gun safety, california as a culture? >> we've been rocked by gun violence. you know, there was the 101 california mass shooting. senator feinstein came into office as mayor because one of her colleagues was murdered by a firearm. so, you know, we've paid the price, but we didn't just grieve we acted. we're only as safe in california as the states around us. if arizona and nevada allow the sale of assault weapons, they're going to come into our state. so we need to ban them

everywhere and have background checks everywhere. >> thank you so much. u.s. congressman eric swalwell and kris brown of the brady organization. new polling shows president trump getting credit for a healthy economy, but the biggest but in history, even the people giving him credit for the economy and don't like him otherwise are not going to vote for him. the economy will not sell with the voter. by the way, steve kornacki, my colleague, is going to join me to drill through some of the surprising disconnect. this is a tough re-elect with this guy we're talking about. you're watching "hardball." any physical changes to this man's appearance are purely coincidental. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

♪

you can earn more when youhwab: invest your cash. you can get a satisfaction guarantee. you can also wonder why our competitors don't offer that. schwab, a modern approach to wealth management. announcer: at fidelity we're leading the charge on value. we have stock and bond index funds with lower expense ratios than comparable vanguard funds. and the industry's first true zero expense ratio index funds offered directly to investors. plus, we have fidelity mutual funds with zero minimum investment.

how many other firms give you this much value? absolutely zero. ♪ why don't they do what they say ♪ ♪ say what they mean ♪ oh, baby, one thing leads to another ♪ liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. i wish i could shake your hand. granted. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

welcome back to "hardball." a majority of registered voters now say they'd vote for whoever the democrats nominate, anybody over trump in 2020. according to that new nbc/"wall street journal" poll just out. 52% say they'd probably or definitely vote for the democrat, whoever it is. only 40% said they'd probably or definitely vote for trump. 52, that's a big spread, 12 points. at the same time, during trump's presidency a generic republican candidate polled ahead of him by only four points. so even back in the toughest times of obama, he was nowhere in this situation. and even more startling number for the poll right now involves white women with no college degree. a demographic that backed trump in 2016. women that didn't go to college or finish college, 49% now say they'd support a democrat, any democrat. 43 said they'd vote for trump again. in 2016, 61% of that group voted for trump. that was the motherload of votes

right there. i'm joined by msnbc international correspondent. steve, would that by the most troubling thing if you're in trump's corner? >> if you break it down on that race, gender, education line, there really is one group there with trump strongly that was there with him in 2016, white men without a college degree. in our nbc news poll here, he's winning them over this perspective democrat by about 45 points, but every other group to some degree is now with the democrat in this matchup. >> is there any cross tab to explain why the women have shifted and the men have stuck? the working guys, the working women? >> yeah, it's a question there of, you know, is there something about trump's message that it's not just blue collar, it's more specific to men? i think we've been talking about that for a while. i think, look, the most significant thing to me, though, is his ability to win ugly in 2016 is really being tested in these numbers. >> yeah. >> what i mean by that is when

you looked at the exit poll on election day in 2016, hillary clinton had a very negative -- her numbers were 55% negative. trump's were 60. but the key for trump was the voters who didn't like clinton or trump broke for trump by nearly 20 points. what we're seeing in this nbc poll is voters who don't like biden and don't like trump, they're saying pretty overwhelmingly in our poll they'd go for the democrat now. >> we wanted to try something new in '16. we don't like either. so let's go with somebody we think might be better. we already know we don't like the other thing. this time, same thing, right? we know we don't like trump. >> that's the possibility raised to me. the trump message in 2016. you heard a little bit of what do you have to lose? >> right. >> it's the idea of the guy running as the outsider who is the detonate button on the system. >> i am with you. i am with you. that is to me the game of '16,

blow this thing apart. it's terrible. anyway, the new poll shows that 49% of our poll approve of trump's handling of the economy, but that alone doesn't seem to be enough. among those who approve of his handling of the economy, nearly 3/4 said they would back a generic democrat. it seems to me the economy, ivan if it stays swell, which is troubling now, they're not going to vote just for that. they don't like the tweeting and the bad behavior. they're not going to vote for this guy. that's stunning to me. >> the 49/46 approval rating, if that was his overall approval rating, you'd probably say he's in solid shape headed into re-election. you say it's the behavior as president. ask voters in this poll how do you think trump handled the el paso and dayton shootings? >> it's terrible. >> it's a majority disapproval. we saw that with the pittsburgh synagogue. we saw that with charlottesville. all these other moments where presidents, democrat and

republicans in the past, have risen to the moment, brought people together, used the bully pulpit in a unifying way. he has not done that so far. >> let me ask you a question that is a test for you. you are the best there is. >> ow. >> what do you make of people when they say i'll vote for a generic democrat? because they have a picture in their head, men or woman, unhyphenat unhyphenated democrat. how do they know it's not going to be george mcgovern or mike dukakis, good people, terrible candidates. how do they know what that generic means? >> well, i think that's the million-dollar question in politics right now. what will voters see once who ever emerges from this democratic race gets in the arena with donald trump in this media atmosphere we now live in, this tribalized atmosphere, what do they look like after six months? are the feelings towards that democrat going to be as negative as they were towards hillary clinton on election day 2016 or do we find out that there was something at work in '16 that just can't be replicated in

2020? >> yeah, by the way, speaking of tribalized, i've never seen a candidate shake off a bad start as much as elizabeth has, elizabeth warren. the whole thing of pocahontas and all that nonsense and slurring and everything, it seems like even trump's impressed with that. she just shook it off. she went out and gave herself to the public, gave proposal after proposal. out there every day campaigning, showing herself. finally people say i'll make my own judgement about that candidate, mr. trump. it may well take her to the nomination. i don't know. steve, once again, you're the best. >> hey, thanks, chris. up next, tracing the roots of donald trump's mafia boss-like obsession with loyalty. you're watching "hardball." wow!

that's ensure max protein, with high protein and 1 gram sugar. it's a sit-up, banana! bend at the waist! i'm tryin'! keep it up. you'll get there. whoa-hoa-hoa! 30 grams of protein, and one gram of sugar. ensure max protein. this is jamie. you're going to be seeing a lot more of him now. -i'm not calling him "dad." -oh, n-no. -look, [sighs] i get it. some new guy comes in helping your mom bundle and save with progressive, but hey, we're all in this together. right, champ? -i'm getting more nuggets. -how about some carrots? you don't want to ruin your dinner. -you're not my dad! -that's fair. overstepped.

welcome back to "hardball."

for president trump two things have remained constant throughout his public career. he must always pledge allegiance to trump and to his brand and be careful if you don't. >> i want somebody that's loyal from the beginning, not somebody that's loyal because they're afraid. you see, i'm so loyal to people -- maybe i'm loyal to a fault, but i'm so loyal to people that when somebody's slightly disloyal to me, i look upon it as a great act of whoer. >> it has remained a guiding principle during his presidency, of course, which has only been surpassed by his commitment to revenge. something he foreshadowed years before his presidential bid. >> you got to get even with people because even if you don't come into contact with them, everyone else knows you're a fighter. and you're not going to take crap. and other people aren't going to take advantage of you. so i think it's really important if somebody screws you, screw them back in spades. >> anthony scaramucci, the

president's short-lived communications director, is a current example. amid scaramucci's public break with his old boss, the president launched a withering attack, tweeting, anthony scaramucci is a highly unstable nut job who was with other candidates in the primary who got shellacked. i barely knew him. he was a mental wreck. a kansas congressman named mike pompeo issued similar warnings about a trump presidency. >> you know, donald trump the other day said that, quote, if he tells a soldier to commit a war crime, the soldier will just go do it. he said they'll do as i tell them to do. we've spent 7 1/2 years with an authoritarian president who ignored our constitution. we don't need four more years of that. >> well, now as secretary of state, mike pompeo has become president trump's most loyal soldier. one senior white house official tells "the new yorker" magazine, quote, there will never be any daylight publicly between him

and trump. he is among the most sycophantic and own si-- the man who has ta public displays of loyalty to new heights, guess who he is? that's next. you're watching "hardball." u're. ♪ ♪ ♪ applebee's handcrafted burgers now starting at $7.99 now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.

[fa♪mers bell] now starting at $7.99 (burke) a "rock and wreck." seen it. covered it. at farmers insurance, we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ the first survivor of alzis out there.ase and the alzheimer's association is going to make it happen. but we won't get there without you. join the fight with the alzheimer's association. i'm a faster laptopd could help. plus, tech support to stay worry free. worry free. boom! ha.ha. boom! now save $249 on this lenovo ideapad, plus total tech solution at office depot officemax

or officedepot.com. doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. who used expedia to book the vacation rental which led to the discovery that sometimes a little down time can lift you right up. expedia. everything you need to go. woman 1: this... woman 2: ...this... man 1: ...this is my body of proof. man 2: proof of less joint pain... woman 3: ...and clearer skin. man 3: proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... woman 4: ...with humira. woman 5: humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation

that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the number one prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. (avo): humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. woman 6: ask your rheumatologist about humira. woman 7: go to mypsaproof.com to see proof in action. welcome back to "hardball." in trump world where we live, unfortunately, the president

demands complete loyalty. vice president mike pence has been the most successful at navigating the choppy loyalty waters using effusive compliments when necessary. >> president trump has been making history since the first day of this administration. >> i know i speak on behalf of the entire cabinet and of millions of americans when i say, congratulations and thank you. you've restored american credibility on the world stage. you've signed more bills rolling back federal red tape than any president in american history. you've spurred an optimism in this country that is setting records. i'm deeply humbled as your vice president to be able to be here. >> it's the greatest privilege of my life to serve as vice president to president trump. he's a man of his word. he's a man of action. >> well, it appears to be paying off. yesterday, reports that trump might swap out for former u.n. ambassador nikki haley. the president told reporters

he's sticking with his guy. >> i'm very happy with mike pence. i think mike pence has been an outstanding vp. i think that he's been incredible in terms of the love that a lot of people, especially if you look at the evangelicals and so many others. >> for more i'm joined by shannon pettypiece, senior white house for nbc news digital and robert costa, national political reporter, as high as you can get at "the post." is this the deal, what we just saw? >> you see a vice president who is very close to the president but he's politically close. he's not always personally close. he's not golfing with the president on the weekend, but he's thinking ahead to his political future. you talk to his confidants, they're already competing against secretary pompeo, ambassador haley. they're trying to position him adds the successor to president trump. >> really? who is doing this? >> some of the top conservatives in the party.

>> they think pence can win a general election. >> there is concern almost no one else in this republican party could win a general election. who else? >> nikki haley. >> i agree about nikki. i think she might be the first woman president. i mean, i don't know, i look at nikki, i say i think she's figured it out. she has the right sort of posture to win. >> trump is in an interesting spot at this point. when you look at this administration, who is left standing? the president has been through so many top advisers, so many cabinet secretaries and here you have the president, who he's been through with the campaign, and there are a few other people left from the campaign days still left in the white house but not who are really a pieer o the president. >> does he mind situational loyalty? does it bother him it's all transactional? that pompeo will jump and do what he wants because he likes the job. it's the greatest job in the world. i think secretary of state is the greatest job there is. he's been given it.

so obviously he's going to be loyal. >> he doesn't think about things in deeply personal terms. everything for president trump is transactional. he knows a lot of the loyalty in the republican party is transactional. he delivered a victory, they're going to deliver their loyalty. >> stephen miller, speaking of loyalty, senior adviser to the president. hasn't turned 34 yet. he's also utilized flatly to ingratiate himself with to president. everything i felt at the deepest levels of my heart were being expressed by a candidate for our nation's highest office. i got a thrill up my leg for obama. this outdoes me. this is a thunder bolt to his soul? >> right. you talk about people still left around this president, this is how you survive. loyalty. you do not criticize the president publicly. you can criticize him to his face in private -- >> but miller is more like an ideological leader of the president. he's not like a follower. i don't think he fits this mold. >> they see this president -- the vice president, stephen miller, as a way to carry out

their own personal agenda, whether it's immigration or the things the vice president has been able to accomplish when it comes to religious liberties or his own personal conservative agenda. >> when i first started as a reporter in washington, stephen miller was a press secretary for jeff sessions of alabama. he rode the wave of this ragy nationalism inside the republican party. from the fringe to the fore of politics. he's a true believer. an ideolog in an administration that is often transactional. >> if they play it right, i don't want to hear them do it, celebrate american citizenship. how great it is to be an american. it's not just a piece of paper. it really means something to you. build it up as a positive thing instead of just trashing hispanics. anyway, president trump, who makes no bones -- by the way, blamed the democrats for not supporting it. makes no bones about excessive viciousness of his attacks. he tweeted about scaramucci's wife. he goes after your family.

he said his wife, scaramucci's, was driving his crazy. he says what was happening, they're getting divorced. trump announcing all this stuff about somebody he doesn't like now. just last week he lobbed an incredibly personal attack against congresswoman rashida tlaib who was granted access to the west bank to visit her 90-year-old grandmother but declined because she didn't like the restrictions put on her by the israeli government. this is the president of the united states talking. what kind of a shot is that? >> he made fun of a supporter at his rally for being overweight. >> fat shaming. >> yes. it's just as you played in that clip before -- >> the supporter apparently said fine. >> if someone screws you, screw them over tens times as hard. people are attacking the president about his policies. they don't like his policies. well, he is attacking people about their personality, their personal character, the way they look, calling them sleepy, calling them pocahontas, making fun of their appearance.

that's where he goes. he goes down to the personal level. >> what's he going to do? pocahontas isn't working anymore. she's climbing in the polls. he seems like he's a little afraid of her now. >> you see inside the administration real adjustments on the economy. they're trying to pressure the federal reserve to cut the interest rate. they see on the left it's not just about a seasoned hand in videotape biden, economic populism just like it took hold in the republican party is taking hold in the democratic party to some extent. senator warren is really gaining and i think the white house is paying attention. >> she is dear to hiscary to hi, right? >> i think it's split. she's on message. she's authentic. she's a good debater, but they think her policies are too far to the left. >> they can both we true. thank you, shannon pettypiece and robert costa. up next, a dangerous split in the democratic party in massachusetts, the bay state. you're watching "hardball." wat.

that's why with dell small business technology advisors. you'll get tailored product solutions, expert tech advice and one-on-one partnership. call an advisor today at 877-buy-dell. ♪ o♪ ozempic®! ♪ oh! oh! (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7 and maintained it. oh! under 7? (announcer) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (announcer) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? (announcer) ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens.

don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) if eligible, you may pay as little as $25 per prescription. ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®. and this is me now! i got liberty mutual. they customized my car insurance, so i only pay for what i need.

then i won the lottery, got hair plugs, and started working out. and so can you! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ how you watch it does too. tv just keeps getting better. this is xfinity x1. featuring the emmy award-winning voice remote. streaming services without changing passwords and input. live sports - with real-time stats and scores. access to the most 4k content. and your movies and shows to go. the best tv experience is the best tv value. xfinity x1. simple. easy. awesome. xfinity. the future of awesome.

"the new york times" reported over the weekend that congressman joe kennedy might go into a primary fight with senator edward markey of massachusetts. this would be an unusual situation, to put it lightly. it would be a member of the kennedy family engaging in an interparty fight with someone who has spent his career celebrating the kennedys. if nothing out, a statement as former massachusetts congressman barny frank said not in line with joe kennedy's career to date. so far kennedy has done everything right. two years in the peace corps.

prosecutor. law school. to go after ed markey would disregard the service of a progressive democratic colleague who has spent his career advocating for the same causes. an ally on so many good fights alongside the kennedys. senator markey who i've known for years and liked a lot has spent his years in public service taking the side of the consumer against the big corporations and in a larger sense, humanity for those who make the most doing the worst. to go off to do well in the private sector, while the senator himself sticks on with his commitment to looking out for the little guy. i would hate to see this commitment be threatened. the kennedys have built the most impressive record in american politics by championing the cause of the working families like ed markeys', the son of a milk man, to turn around and run against someone who has spent his life in alliance with the kennedys and their causes doesn't seem right. and that's "hardball" for now.

thanks for being with us. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on "all in" -- >> the fact is the fundamentals of our economy are very strong, and you know it. >> the white house insists there is nothing to see here. >> well, i'll tell you what, i sure don't see a recession. >> as the president all but demands emergency action. >> i don't see a recession. tonight, robert reich on donald trump and the "r" word. then why senator elizabeth warren was apologizing today. >> i know that i have made mistakes. i am sorry for harm i have caused. senator kirsten gillibrand on what appears to be a presidential retreat on background checks. >> people don't realize we have very strong background checks right now. and the conservative backlash to the 1619 project on the impact of slavery in america. >> the whole project is a lie. >> when "all in" starts right now.