and so people's reservations about elizabeth warren are based in them playing pundit as opposed to any lack of real excitement or enthusiasm. >> michelle goldberg, dave, thank you for being with me. that is all this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening. >> i promise in all the time you and i share adjacent shows on this tv network we will never have a crossover like the one you just played from fox. >> my god. my god. >> the thing -- i think i'd heard something about that. i heard it existed. >> i could talk about this for an hour, not 30 seconds. >> the thing that was scariest about it was the distance between the facial expressions and the conversation. i mean, that was like hide under a table this is a scary family fight. >> that's exactly what it was. it had real family fight vibes to it. >> anyway. >> i hope everyone is making up and making amends. >> yes. i want the best for everybody if only because i feel afraid by

proxy. >> my strong feeling, too. >> thank you, my friend. i appreciate it. eek. i have congratulations to offer. congratulations, you guys. we are getting a new boat. not right away. we have to wait and see if, in fact, there is a conviction. if there is, look at what we are getting. now when i first read this in the indictment i thought, oh, we're getting a little sailboat thing. it's a catamaran and a number, i thought like a little training sailing boat. full disclosure, that misconception on my part might be because i know nothing about boats. i do own a canoe, but i still don't even understand how to control that. if i tried to do it myself, i would go around in circles. the only way i can operate is if susan wants to paddle me around in which case i catch gigantic fish like that.

grain of salt here, i don't get boats. i'm reading through this part of the indictment and it describes that we, the american taxpayers, are about to get a catamaran, to me, boat concepts, that seems no big deal. then you look the thing up by the hull number that is in the indictment, the catamaran hull number and it's not some training sailboat. it's a 40-foot-long catamaran. and it's a speedboat thingy. do we have the picture? thank you very much. this is it. this is a 40-foot catamaran, this plush speedboat thing. this is what we are getting. which is very nice, right? congratulations are in order. we're getting one of these. it's a 2018. brand-new. nice brand. we're also getting a 2018 ford f-150, also a trail they're goes with it. and i think we're also going to get these two items from caterpillar. this is the first one.

i don't think of these things as the sort of thing people bring home for personal use, but how fun would this be? a model just like this is described in the indictment as a tractor. when you look it up based on the model number, it's what caterpillar calls a small dozer. which would be fun. imagine tooling around on that on your back lawn. also we're getting one of these. it's a model 320 medium sized caterpillar hydraulic excavator. we, the american taxpayers, are getting one of these to play with. plus about $5 million in cash. because if it turns out you were only able to obtain all that cash and all of those things, that surprisingly large boat and the small dozer and all the rest of it, if you were only able to get all of those great things because of your crimes, specifically in this case because of your bribery of the main official charged by the

trump administration with overseeing the rebuilding of puerto rico's infrastructure and power grid after hurricane maria, well, then if you are, in fact, convicted of those crimes for which you are now accused, you will have to give up the fruits of those crimes. you will have to give up the loot, the cash, the amazing medium sized hydraulic excavator and the fast 40-foot catamaran and the boat and the trailer and the truck and all the rest of it. in any other presidential administration after 3,000 americans were killed in a catastrophic hurricane and a botched federal response there after, it would be the scandal of the year. it would be a presidency defining, if not presidency ending scandal, if the top person who the federal government put in charge of infrastructure rebuilding after that hurricane got arrested and charged with ten felonies for allegedly taking bribes from the

contractor who got huge contracts to do that work. oh, and by the way, the work still isn't done and it's an ongoing disaster. the contractor himself was charged with eight felony counts. he will have to hand over his surprisingly fast boat and the bulldozer and the truck and the cash and all the rest. in addition to him, a fema deputy chief of staff charged with three felony accounts for allegedly setting herself up with a private sector job while working on fema contracts for the company she was getting to hire her at something roughly approaching triple her fema salary and, of course, there's the deputy regional administrator in fema in puerto rico who was designated the sector lead there for power and infrastructure following the hurricane maria disaster. do you remember why all those people died after the hurricane had blown through? no power, including no power to the hospitals and all the rest of it. that trump administration

official is now facing ten felony charges, bribery, conspiracy, honest services, wire fraud. in terms of this ongoing disaster, you may remember how some of this shook out, that the first contractor who got a gigantic, inexplicable contract from the trump administration to rebuild the power grid in puerto rico, thousands of people's lives were hinging, the first contractor who got that huge contract from fema to rebuild puerto rico's grid was a mysterious previously unheard of contractor from montana who seemed to have links to the trump administration maybe. a firm with basically no employees. two full-time employees. after lots of controversy over who they were and how they got this very, very important gig, they ultimately lost the gig when they couldn't explain, among other things, why they were planning to charge the u.s.

taxpayers an hourly rate for all the linemen who would be working on electrical lines in puerto rico, charging an hourly rate for those linemen of $300 per hour. per lineman. and so that contract fell apart in scandal. that was the first contract they gave out after hurricane maria to set up the grid. then they brought this other contractor onboard. through fema this other contractor called cobra was going to get paid $1.8 billion as the plan b second choice contractor to rebuild puerto rico's electrical grid. they got paid $1.1 billion before their contract, too, was canceled because of mysterious irregularities discovered only after $1.1 billion had already been dispersed to them. those irregularities are less mysterious now that we can see this littany of bribery charges laid out in this indictment. this has been a disastrously

managed man made catastrophe from beginning to end and it continues. the people of puerto rico have paid and are paying the human price for it. now we have these three arrests and depending on how the prosecutions turn out we, the american people, may not only see some people in jail for these alleged crimes, we may get a new boat and some other new stuff, too, the forfeiture section of this bombshell indictment. it turns out this is a story that keeps getting more astonishing by the day. you probably heard about this indictment already, right? get this. so the high-ranking fema official who was just arrested, turns out she had a deputy at her position for fema in puerto rico. she was the trump administration's sector lead for power and infrastructure in puerto rico. her number two was the deputy sector lead for power and infrastructure in puerto rico. what's his background? as first reported by cbs news, it turns out that he, too, the

deputy, has recently been arrested in a totally different giant u.s. government bribery scandal. he was a navy officer who was suspended from his navy command over his alleged involvement in the fat leonard scandal which we've covered quite a bit on the show. the biggest navy bribery scandal involving lots of money and lots of classified information and lots of hookers and lots of really expensive meals at terrible sounding restaurants. this guy was suspended from his navy command because of his alleged involvement in the fat leonard bribery scandal in the navy. nevertheless when the trump administration took office in 2017, they decided that that's the guy they would hire to the senior role in fema. did they ask the military why it guy had been suspended from his navy command by any chance before they hired him? i don't know. any mystery around that part of the guy's past would have been cleared up this past year in august when he was indicted by a

federal grand jury for his alleged involvement in that navy bribery scheme. he was arrested thereafter. the number one person assigned to oversee restoration of power in puerto rico, the restoration of the power grid in puerto rico, that person has now been arrested on ten felony counts for bribery. her deputy on the job has also been arrested and indicted on multiple federal accounts. in his case it's a whole different bribery scheme. they must have gotten along so well at the office, right? secret santa, oh, look, you got me a ski mask. is that a fingerprint removal kit? oh, my god. who wants the fake i.d. for opening swiss bank accounts? i'll trade you that for the lock picks. what was going on? how do you end up with -- if you were aiming at hiring multiple

felony bribery indicted -- i mean, the and the -- but don't worry. the trump administration has decided to shake things up and get control over there. earlier this year the trump administration announced president trump's new nominee to be the new head of fema. now they announced him in february. they formally announced him a couple months later. it's been six months. six months. whatever happened to that nomination investment recent days there have been these sort of vague, slippery reports there might be something going wrong with this nomination. there was a personal issue in the nominee's background that was tripping up his nomination process. nobody was willing to say what the personal issue was or why it didn't surface when he went through his confirmation hearing and was cleared by committee why it might only be surfacing as his nomination should have been heading to the floor for a final senate vote. it was later reported the

personal issue might have had something to do with an altercation. okay. but still no specifics on that. given the republican controlled senate's willingness to confirm basically anybody from the trump administration for any purpose, the holdup with this guy started to seem a little worrying. think about all the people they've let through, right. it is holding this guy up. now it emerges from reporting done by nbc news investigative producer laura strict letter that this guy who trump nominated to be the new head of fema, whatever his personal issues may be, whatever the altercation was, whatever else is going on with him, turns out he was the person at fema headquarters who was personally individually the point of contact at fema headquarters in d.c. for the official who just got arrested on ten felony counts for bribery. charged with alleged crimes that

started right after hurricane maria october 2017. according to the indictment her alleged crimes started in october 2017 and continued through april of this year, april 2019. we have obtained an april 2019 fema org chart. here is the deputy regional administrator for the caribbean area, as it says at the top of the chart, the person who was charged with ten felony counts for bribery. there is one line that shows where she connects to fema headquarters. the line that goes to the right out of her little box and there's one guy's name in that box that she connects to and that is the guy trump nominated to be the new head of fema. according to a statement fema gave us tonight, quote, the dotted line on this organization at chart represents a coordinating relationship. okay. i mean, separate and apart from the personal issue with this nominee to run fema and whatever

the altercation may have been with this guy if there was one. they have to give the guy a redo confirmation hearing? tell us more about the billion dollar federal bribery scheme in region two. did they coordinate that with you? how were your other regions? did you know the person just arrested in the bribery scheme had a deputy recently arrested in a another gigantic bribery scheme vochg the u.s. government? was that a problem in the office? was that a red flag at all? and you're going to run the whole agency now. well, apparently we can now report mr. beyer does not want a redo confirmation hearing. the white house is pulling this new nomination to run fema. it was a barroom altercation. we can report exclusively here tonight that jeff byard sent a

letter to the acting director of homeland security last thursday formally requesting his nomination be withdrawn or at least we can tell you about the existence of a letter written to the acting director of homeland security dated last thursday. i don't know when it was written but it is dated september 12th. here is the letter. i think this is exclusive, the first anybody has seen this letter as far as we are aware. quote, secretary, sir, please accept this as my formal request to withdraw in the federal emergency agency. so that is that apparently. we have been communicating about the byard nomination and have had a lot of back and forth about the official arrested, her deputy who was also arrested on different bribery charges, on byard's role as the person at

fema headquarters who had a coordinating relationship with her, the only person on the org chart connected directly to her office. we've been talking about that for a couple days now and a lot today. i just want to tell you they called us literally five minutes before show time tonight to tell us that actually jeff byard had withdrawn his nomination last thursday. they didn't mention his -- we're asking about byard for days. they didn't say anything about his nomination being withdrawn. five minutes before show time today they said, oh, yeah he's been gone for a week. make of that what you will. the letter they gave us tonight is dated last week. it is dated september 12. tonight axios reports although jeff byard's nomination was not formally withdrawn president trump had a new guy in mind already.

i'm sure he'll be great and i'm sure he's been carefully vetted otherwise they wouldn't put his name out there. this is another on the pile of indictments since he has been president. it is the career destroying soul sucking horror movie that is the trump administration's refusal or complete inability to vet people for senior jobs or even not so senior jobs in the u.s. government. on yet another level this is a fairly keen insight into just how well the trump administration has taken care of the people of puerto rico. especially in the aftermath of the natural disaster that would not have claimed 3,000 american lives had it not been so drastically botched as a disaster relief effort when it comes to infrastructure and power grid of puerto rico. but if you look at it from the trump administration's own perspective in terms of what they care about and what they want to be known for and what

they want to be seen doing, i mean, there's president trump today at the border in california signing a piece of the border, literally writing his name on a piece of the border. and here's the trump administration happily in a million different lawsuits and reasonable concerns including national security concerns to instead take money from wherever the president can including the u.s. military because it has to go instead to the border because the border must be secured because homeland security is everything. this is the stuff they most care about, the stuff they most want to be judged on, where they're putting all of their effort to the detriment of even other stuff that has real political cost when they low ball it, right? the department of homeland security is led by an acting secretary who is supported by an acting defensementy secretary. you might have seen the news today they just fired the general counsel of the homeland security as well, the top

lawyer. quote, we thank john for this service and we wish him well. the top lawyer in homeland security. they pushed him out so suddenly yesterday the trump administration still doesn't know who will replace him. the white house says one guy. the department of homeland security says some other guy. who knows? he had to be fired immediately. and whoever is going to come in to be the new general counsel will be acting, too, acting secretary, acting deputy secretary, acting general counsel. the sort of chief operating officer is the under secretary of management. that's an acting person right now as well. customs and border patrol is an acting commissioner. i.c.e., an acting director. u.s. citizenship, an acting director. and of course fema, where do i begin. like i said, i'm sure the new guy, the new, new guy will be great. i wonder who they'll find to replace the folks against whom all the felony bribery charges are pending.

i mean, i don't think -- from our back and forpt th of fema d they try to assure us they would not be staying on while charges pend, while they're out on bail? fema, i think, was assuring that wouldn't happen. it is hard to get good people these days. and this is what they want to be best at. this is what they want to be seen working on to the exclusion of everything else. and now tonight as the fema director's nomination is pulled in very weird circumstances, tonight there is new news of what is just now falling apart in the plan to take money from the military to pay for the wall instead. brand-new news on that front next. stay with us.

at verizon, we're building the most powerful 5g experience for america. that's why the nfl chose verizon. because they need the massive capacity of 5g with ultra wideband, so more screaming, streaming, posting fans... can experience 5g all at once. this is happening in 13 stadiums all across the country.

now if verizon 5g can do this for the nfl... imagine what it can do for you. yeah, i've had some prettyeer. prestigious jobs over the years. news producer, executive transport manager, and a beverage distribution supervisor. now i'm a director at a security software firm. wow, you've been at it a long time. thing is, i like working.

what if my retirement plan is i don't want to retire? then let's not create a retirement plan. let's create a plan for what's next. i like that. get a plan that's right for you. td ameritrade. ♪

we have breaking news right now on a mystery we have been following over recent days. "the washington post" has just posted a fairly jaw dropping story on a subject we have been trying to cover for the past few days. this just broke while i was doing the "a" block within the last couple of minutes about the whistleblower we first learned about friday night from the house intelligence chairman adam

schiff.ased a letter. a whistleblower had come forward from inside the intelligence community with an urgent and credible complaint. the director of national intelligence was refusing to turn that complaint over to congress despite federal law that said he had to do so within seven days. the dni blowing through the deadline is something no director of national intelligence had ever done before. the director of national intelligence said he wasn't handing over the complaint despite the law because he claimed it contained privileged material. he also took the unusual step of consulting with the justice department about what to do about this complaint. the justice department should be totally outside this process. all of those strange circumstances led chairman schiff to conclude the whistleblower complaint might have something to do with the president or senior administration officials close to the president. tonight "the washington post" has just broken this news. a scoop that suggests chairman adam schiff was on to something.

trump's communications with foreign leaders are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff between spy chief and congress. here's the lead. the whistleblower complaint that has triggered a tense showdown between the u.s. intelligence community and congress involves president trump's communications with a foreign leader. according to two former officials familiar with the matter. trump's interaction included a promise -- promise is in quotes -- a promise that was regarded as so troubling that it prompted an official in the u.s. intelligence community to file a formal whistleblower complaint with the inspector general for the intelligence community. it was not immediately clear which foreign leader trump was speaking with or what he pledged to deliver, but his direct involvement in the matter has not been previously disclosed. it raises new questions about the president's handling of sensitive information. now in terms of what the information was or how it came into the hands of this whistleblower, one former official is telling "the washington post" the communication in question was a phone call.

so a phone call between president trump and a foreign leader. in terms of who it might have been, well, according to "the post" the complaint was filed with the inspector general's office on august 12th. on august 12th, a date on which president trump was at his golf resort in new jersey. white house records indicate trump had conversations or interactions with at least five foreign leaders in the preceding five weeks. among them was a phone call with russian president vladimir putin which was initiated by the white house on july 31st. in that same time period trump also received at least two letters from north korean leader kim jong-un. trump also had meetings with other foreign leaders at the white house in july including leaders from pakistan, the netherlands and qatar but, again, according to one source speaking with "the washington post" the troubling communication by the president was a phone call. and in terms of trump's phone calls with foreign leaders, at least one of the phone calls in

that period was with vladimir putin. we don't know what the troubling promise was. we also don't know how this whistleblower would have known about the contents of the president's phone call with the foreign leader. joining us now by phone is "washington post" reporter who contributed to this just breaking story from "the post." thanks for joining us on short notice. i really appreciate it. >> of course, rachel. it's a pretty sensational event tonight learning about this which we've been trying to chase the last few days since adam schiff's letter and now this new information has come to our great "washington post" colleague. >> the lead reporters on this, carol, you contributed to this. i want to -- first, i should ask you if i hit the high points there. it seems to me this information was a communication by the president, it was a communication by the president with a foreign leader, it was a troubling promise that he made in that it was a conversation by

phone. it does seem like if those are all clues that "the post" has been able to ferret out it should be able to narrow it down in terms of the time frame and the potential things that could be within the realm of factual four corners that this could be. >> yes. it does mean -- keep in mind, rachel, the president speaks to a lot of foreign leaders every day. and some which are not obvious to us or recorded for posterity meaning there have been a lot of stories about the president having conversations that are not -- there are no note takers. we don't know for certain exactly whom he was speaking to. but the sources are saying that these are the critical pieces. somebody who used to work at the white house and now has returned to their intelligence agency has complained to the inspector

general this is such a serious and flagrant abuse that they want it on record, they want it noted, and the inspector general has also made it clear that this is something the gang of eight would normally be briefed about under the statute. it's serious. it's not a small thing. the sources are also saying and stressing that this is some sort of promise the president made. meanwhile, white house sources are saying to me that we have to keep in mind the president is the ultimate sort of declassifier in the government, and if the president decided that he wanted to share something sensitive or provide something sensitive or promise something sensitive, that he has full authority under the law to do that. the public may not love what he promised, if these sources are correct. but he does have the authority under the law to do that if

that's what's happened. >> although, carol, correct me if i'm wrong, the whistleblower process, particularly within the intelligence community going through the intelligence communities inspector general is such that something being classified shouldn't be a barrier toward it being treated as a whistleblower matter through this process, right, at every step of the way here both with the i.g. and with the director of national intelligence and with the intelligence community -- intelligence committees in congress. they're supposed to be able to handle classified information no matter how classified it is, if it is still, nevertheless, a matter of concern or grave abuse. >> oh, absolutely. it's not something the gang of eight can't know about. remember that one of the big clues here is that someone along the way, either the justice department or the white house or both were consulted and there was some issue of privileged communications outside the intelligence community, an

agency other than the intelligence community with some sort of privileged communications they felt made this that couldn't be shared with congress. that immediately screams out to a lot of reporters is some sort of white house executive privilege. we don't nope the answer to that yet. when i raise the issue of classified material, i'm just saying that say the president provided, promised, suggested he was going to provide something that was very sensitive, say intel sources and methods. that would make a lot of people rear up their heads and be very concerned if the foreign leader was an adversary or the information could be exploited, could put our national security or our allies at risk. still, the president has the authority to declassify as he chooses. he's the ultimate power there. i'm not saying that you couldn't share this kind of whistleblower

complaint with congress as a result of some of the information being classified. >> and, carol, to the point -- it's interesting the point you're raising about the gang of eight, obviously, again, the process in terms of intelligence oversight they're supposed to be able to see everything and they're supposed to be briefed on everything no matter its sensitivity. are there -- forgive my ignorance here, are there issues where the gang of eight has been deprived access to information about the government's own behavior or toward the president's own behavior on the basis of privilege in the past? is that grounds on which things are kept secret even from them? >> i have not seen that before. i don't expect -- it's impossible it's happened before. i'm not aware of it happening before. of course i'm drawing on fairly limited knowledge on breaking news deadline, not researched it extensively. i would say this to your smart question, though, rachel, this

white house has been far more aggressive in its claims that congressional oversight can be limited, curbed and constrained by the executive's desire to keep things under wraps and you've seen that in the efforts to even just review the findings of the mueller investigation. and in an effort to talk to witnesses in that probe and the privileges that have been cited, the idea of vague confidentiality or white house interests that can't be compromised, it's a pretty aggressive strategy and all white houses try to limit how the oversight peers into their world, but this one's gone more conservatively keeping the curtain closed. >> and perhaps the confrontation

with what the intelligence community has set up in terms of its own very controversial, very rigorous, very well earned oversight strictures. joining us on very short notice, contributor to this new reporting from "the post" thank you for helping us understand. i appreciate it. >> my pleasure. good luck, carol. >> part of a whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff between spy chief and congress. we have been watching this unfold since late on friday night when the intelligence committee chairman adam schiff let it be known he was aware somebody within the intelligence community came forward through proper channels to the inspector general and said i have a serious problem. this is credible and this is urgent. that set in motion stuff that's supposed to happen by rote without any pushback. they forwarded it and in this

case it was determined that should be the director of national intelligence. the dni was supposed to give it to the committee in congress within seven days. the dni refused to do it. we knew the inspector general was going to be in a -- there was going to be a closed session tomorrow. in the intelligence committee. closed doors. we won't be able to see it as the public about this matter. there's been threats of subpoenas from the intelligence committees if they need to get this and fast. "the washington post" is first to report what this may be. in, in fact, the president, as is claimed in "the washington post" reporting tonight, made some sort of claim to a foreign leader a, quote, promise, a promise that was regarded as so troubling that it prompted an official to file a formal whistleblower complaint, i imagine this one person is not the only person who knows what the promise is. they're coming forward now that the country knows how serious this may be, will be the start

of the story. much more ahead on this. s. [dogs barking and whimpering] [dogs whimpering] ♪ the all-new 2020 ford explorer limited hybrid. can tow up to 5000 lbs and has an epa-estimated range of 500 miles per tank. it's the greatest exploration vehicle of all time. but when i started seeing things, i didn't know what was happening... so i kept it in. he started believing things that weren't true. i knew something was wrong... but i didn't say a word.

during the course of their disease around 50% of people with parkinson's may experience hallucinations or delusions. but now, doctors are prescribing nuplazid. the only fda approved medicine... proven to significantly reduce hallucinations and delusions related to parkinson's. don't take nuplazid if you are allergic to its ingredients. nuplazid can increase the risk of death in elderly people with dementia-related psychosis and is not for treating symptoms unrelated to parkinson's disease. nuplazid can cause changes in heart rhythm and should not be taken if you have certain abnormal heart rhythms or take other drugs that are known to cause changes in heart rhythm. tell your doctor about any changes in medicines you're taking. the most common side effects are swelling of the arms and legs and confusion. we spoke up and it made all the difference. ask your parkinson's specialist about nuplazid.

(classical music playing throughout)

you might remember early on in the trump administration the first summer he was in office there was a bombshell leak of a number of transcripts of the president's phone calls with foreign leaders including the president of australia and the leader of mexico including the president saying sort of embarrassing, ignorant and disparaging things both to those leaders and about those calls.

a lot of scandal around the fact "the washington post" obtained those transcripts that were created by white house staff. one of the changes the trump administration made thereafter they stopped putting note takers on calls between the president and foreign leaders. there stopped being formal and detailed readouts about what happened in those conversations. presumably the idea they didn't want another leak of what was going on in those calls even if the initial leaks this been essentially people trying to let it be known how the president was behaving to foreign leaders in a way unprecedented to what we've seen from any previous president. now tonight that makes it all the more remarkable "the washington post" has a new scoop that has just posted within the last half hour or so. that the president may have had a phone call with a foreign leader in which he made a promise that was regarded as so troubling that it prompted an official in the u.s. intelligence community to file a formal whistleblower complaint with the inspector general for

the intelligence community. this is a whistleblower complaint that has triggered a very intense showdown between the trump administration and the intelligence committee and the house in particular. they're supposed to get whistleblower complaints like this. there have been threats of subpoenas, a real standoff over this. "the post" is the first to report what this complaint might have been about is the president saying something very, very troubling to a foreign leader in a way that at least some in the intelligence community became aware it have and went through channels to raise a flag about what happened. joining us now, again, on short notice, chair on readiness, i have to tell you every time we book you to talk about something going on in your area of expertise, something else that is a bombshell and totally gonzo breaks. so thank you for doing this for us. >> happy to be with you, rachel. this is just astounding what's going on here. certainly the incident itself, whatever it might be is

extremely troublesome but one more brick the president is trying to build to stonewall the congress of the united states and the american people from things he has done as president and before he became president. in his own words he said under no circumstances will his people ever comply with a subpoena. well, here we go one more step on that. and this could be extraordinarily important because there are things at play right now that may very well have been the promise. one of which i've been dealing with as chairman of the armed services committee. >> when you say the promise, we don't know in terms of what t"te washington post" is reporting. >> that is correct. >> "the washington post" says trump's interaction with the foreign leader included a promise that was regarded as so troubling it prompted an official to file this formal whistleblower complaint. one former official telling "the times" it was on a phone call. we know the whistleblower

complaint was filed in august, august 12. that narrows it down in terms of what communication it might have been. i have to say, just thinking about this from a process standpoint, if this was the worst case scenario, the worst thing we could possibly imagine, what else is this whistleblower supposed to do besides go through this process that the trump administration is still bottling up? >> the law is clear. the information has to be made available to the intelligence community, the gang of eight. i have to tell you, i'm worried about the promise if there was one and if it was the president. if he was talking to putin one month after that august 12 period of time the president removed $770 million from the european deterrence initiative specifically money to push back on russia's incursion into ukraine and annexation of crimea. god help us if that was what the discussion was about.

but it is troubling -- it is troubling when you start stacking all of these things up. $5 billion out of the coffers and the work the military does to build the border wall. it was nice he went down and signed that steel post. but that happened to have been a fence that was already in place before he ever got there, before he ever became president. it's one thing after another. this administration, its stonewalling, refusing to be held to account, is beyond anything that anyone has ever seen in the history of this nation. >> do you have confidence, sir, especially given your role in oversight of the u.s. military, do you have confidence in the military? do you have confidence in the inspector general's system so that when the most egregious things happen that the legally protected channels for letting it be known what's happening and why that those channels will be held open, or do you think that

the system is failing? >> i think there's an entire attitude of laxity with regard to activities, proper activities. it begins at the white house. the leader is clearly corrupt. there's no other way to describe it. the leader is clearly a liar. a leader has no use for the truth and will say anything at any time that advances his particular interest at that moment. and so that tends to sift down through the entire administration. you gave a long dissertation just in the early part of this hour about what's going on in fema and the tragedy in puerto rico as a result of the corruption, as a result of the laxity to laws and the normal correctness that ought to occur at every level. the military is outstanding. these are all very, very good people. but when the top makes it clear

that they welcome -- the president when he welcomes on to his property literally millions of dollars of taxpayer money to support him at mar-a-lago and at his other resorts, it doesn't surprise me that all across, in this case the military, that they see, well, why don't we go ahead and book some rooms at the resort at turnberry in scotland. this whole thing is just a corrupt administration. it sifts down. i don't believe there was any intentional wrongdoing on the part of the military. but the laxity of standard, it's endemic in so many places. as representatives of the people of america, the 535 of us in the house and in the senate, we have the obligation to hold the administration accountable, to uncover the deflects, to uncover the fraud, the corruption, and

to let the american people know there is three branches of government, and the administration cannot do anything it pleases to do even though it apparently has courts now that will let it do it, but we're still the representatives of the people and we have an obligation here to investigate and to let the public, our constituents, the american people, know what's going on. >> california congressman john garamendi, chair of the committee on readiness. thank you for being here and for always be a harbinger of breaking news. we have more ahead tonight. it's turning out to be a busy night. ces are crucial to help manage blood sugar, but it can be difficult to find a balanced solution. try great-tasting boost glucose control. the patented blend of protein, fat, and carbs is part of a balanced formula that's clinically shown to help manage blood sugar levels. in fact, it provides 60% more protein than the leading diabetes nutrition shake and contains only 1 carb choice.

enjoy the balanced nutrition of boost glucose control as part of a healthy diet.

i like to make my life easy. ( ♪ ) romo mode. (beep) (bang) good luck with that one. yes! that's why i wear skechers slip-ons. they're effortless. just slip them right on and off. skechers slip-ons, with air-cooled memory foam. doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere.

prevagen. healthier brain. better life. a story we've been following closely on the show purdue pharma the company behind the megaopioid oxycontin charged with fueling the epidemic that has claimed the lives of 400,000 americans. purdue is currently in bankruptcy court trying to settle thousands of lawsuits brought against the company, filing for bankruptcy almost

automatically putting all of those lawsuits against the company on hold. but crucial point. that doesn't stop the mounting pile of lawsuits against the family behind purdue pharma, which was enriched to multi billion dollar effect by the sales of oxycontin and that has taken billions of dollars out of the company as the company approached bankruptcy. so bankruptcy stops the lawsuits against the company but not against the family. except now tonight lawyers for purdue are asking the bankruptcy judge to also put on hold all the lawsuits against the sacklers personally which is an effort to try to shield the family wealth from these lawsuits. lawyers as of now are asking for an injunction against lawsuits against the sackler family personally because they say they are related parties to purdue in the overall bankruptcy case. this is a highly unusual move and suggests by filing for bankruptcy the sackler family is looking to protect themselves

too not just the company as a way to protect their own personal billions of dollars. my next guest is the first attorney general to sue the sackler family personally, the attorney general from massachusetts. she wrote a blistering op-ed in "the washington post" this week explaining why she and 20 plus other state attorneys general are rejecting purdue's settlement offer. she said in that op-ed in part, quote, accountability means making the sacklers reaching into their own pockets. it means telling the full truth. it means shutting down purdue for good. and accountability means listening to the families who are calling for justice. joining us now is the massachusetts a.g., mora healy, madame attorney general, thank you so much for joining us tonight. good to have you here. >> great to be with you, rachel. >> so we've been watching the legal accountability issue for the opioid crisis sort of spread out as the companies and the families enriched by the companies' behavior try to make their legal liability come to an end. they try to sort of cut these

things off and try to protect themselves. what is your big picture view of where we are right now in terms of legal accountability for the crisis? >> well, you nailed it, rachel. this is about accountability. look, purdue going out of business is a really good thing. but the sacklers can't and shouldn't use the bankruptcy proceeding as a vehicle to shield themselves from liability. and from accountability and ultimately that would be wrong for the more than 400,000 families across this country who have lost someone to this deadly epidemic. i just think as background i want to be really clear. we were the first state to file a lawsuit naming the sacklers because the sacklers directly controlled and operated purdue for many, many years. in the course of those years sucked billions and billions of dollars from purdue. now, what's happened now is there have been hundreds of lawsuits filed against purdue and the sackler family and of

course purdue has now filed for bankruptcy. again, the sacklers are trying to use that as a vehicle to shut down litigation against them. and we say, no. i also want to be clear with the american public about what this bankruptcy deal is about and what it isn't. this deal wouldn't require the sacklers to pay back a dime from the profits they made. all of it would be funded from future sales of oxycontin which is so offensive to me. >> wow. yeah. >> that settlement would be funded by the sale of the very deadly and addictive drug that has ravaged communities across this country. the sacklers have done a good job over the years of hiding the truth from the american public. and this settlement would allow for that story, that truth to stay hidden forever. those are fundamentally some of the injustices here and why the deal just isn't right. >> if the deal isn't right and you and your fellow attorneys

general who are saying no to this carry the day and they go through with this bankruptcy proceeding as they are trying to do what is the other alternative? is this a high risk move? is there a possibility that communities and states and families around the country that are victims here won't get anything if they don't get this? >> rachel, i am so sympathetic to the needs of our states and our cities to get relief, to get money, to help with the damage created and caused in so many ways by purdue and the sackler family. i'll tell you what. fundamentally, the question here is who's going to pay for this? is it going to be the sacklers or is payment going to come from future and continued sales of oxy? to me the answer is clear. it should come from the sacklers. it shouldn't come from the continued sales of a drug known to cause such damage. we'll continue to fight this and will be in bankruptcy court opposing the proposed settlement and deal and will continue in our own state court. today my office won a big decision from a judge here where

purdue tried to dismiss our case and the judge said, no. go ahead. we're prepared to fight and see this through. bankruptcy isn't for billionaires and hopefully the courts will see through to allowing us to proceed against the sacklers. ultimately we have to do everything we can so the story is told and justice is obtained. that's really my job as a state attorney general to make sure we follow the facts, follow the law, and make sure we seek justice on behalf especially on behalf of the so many families in this country who have been so devastated by what is in our time the nation's largest public health crisis. >> maura healey attorney general for the great state of massachusetts. thank you so much for your time.

oh, wow. you two are going to have such a great trip. yeah, have fun! thanks to you, we will. aw, stop. this is why voya helps reach today's goals... ...all while helping you to and through retirement. um, you guys are just going for a week, right? yeah! that's right. can you help with these? oh... um, we're more of the plan, invest and protect kind of help... sorry, little paws, so. but have fun! send a postcard! voya. helping you to and through retirement. (classical music playing throughout)

performance comes in lots of flavors. ♪ (dramatic orchestra) there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind. and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result. that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪ this has been a wild night for breaking news. we were first to report right at the top of the show that the president's nominee for director of fema has withdrawn his

nomination. they are telling us tonight that he did so last week but, okay. it's breaking news as of tonight. then came news on this mysterious whistle blower case we've been following. "the washington post" saying tonight that an intelligence community whistle blower was so disturbed by something president trump said to a foreign leader on the phone, the whistle blower was so disturbed by some sort of promise in that interaction, that the whistle blower filed a formal complaint. this is something we've been trying to follow, trying to sus out over the last few days. the intelligence adam schiff saying today the actor will testify in open session next week but even sooner tomorrow morning they're going to have the inspector general for the intelligence community behind closed doors talking to the committee about this. i don't know what kind of read out to expect we'll get from that testimony tomorrow but wow. we are trying to get chairman schiff on the show tomorrow night to tell us what he can. what a wild night for n