that is happening monday, october 21st. tickets available now. you can buy yours at msnbc.com. that does it for us. the rachel maddow show begins now. good evening, rachel. >> good evening, chris. thanks, my friends. i love these live shows. so great. thanks to you at home. happy friday. wow. what a day. i mean, when the white house released the phone call that has led to these impeachment proceedings against president trump, when they released the call of president trump speaking with the ukrainian president about how president trump wanted that foreign government to do investigations for him, wanted to do him a favor and give him something he might be able to use against the democrats and joe biden in 2020, the most amazing thing about the release of that transcript, of course, was just the fact that the white house released that transcript. right? i mean the whistle-blower complaint, which we knew a little bit about at the time,

had suggested that the president had done this bombshell thing. he had actually gone to this foreign government and asked them for help against the democrats. it was amazing that the white house then in response to the furor of that whistle-blower complaint, the white house released this document, the notes of that call, proving that that's in fact what the president had done, that the whistle-blower was right. but the most chilling thing about it was what president trump said on that call about one particular u.s. government employee. while he was speaking with this foreign leader seeking help on his re-election effort, the president brought up a senior state department official who he had just fired, who he had just recalled as ambassador to that foreign country. according to the white house's own notes from the call, which they released, the president told that foreign leader without prompting, quote, the former ambassador to the united states,

the woman, was bad news. he then told the ukrainian president, quote, well, she's going to go through some things. that was chilling. in fact, that ambassador, that woman, as the president puts it, marie yovanovitch, a 33-year veteran of the u.s. state department, is now going through some things. we're starting to realize she may have been the wrong person to mess with, though, at least the way she comported herself. god forbid you or i ever find ourselves in this kind of circumstance with this kind of pressure on us, with this kind of incredible power, a raid against us and with stakes this high, right? but if it happens to any of us, really the most you could hope for from yourself is that you would have the stones and the dignity to be one-tenth as brave

and sort of righteous asthma rio vaug -- as marie yovanovitch was today. she still works for the u.s. state department, even though they fired her at the ambassador to ukraine. we learned only today that once again in the dead of night the state department apparently on orders from the white house phoned her up in the middle of the night and told her they wouldn't allow her to testify this morning. she was prohibited from showing up and talking to congress today. well, we also learned that in anticipation of that act from the white house and the state department, the impeachment committees planned ahead. they appeared to have a subpoena for her ready to go. marie yovanovitch decided today to obey that subpoena. she showed up on capitol hill today. she didn't have like some car service with blacked out windows drop her off near one of the back entrances where nobody could see. she got dropped off right in front, walked all the way across the capital grounds, unafraid, walked into the impeachment committees and testified for hours. and it was on the basis of her testimony today that you got these headlines across every major news organization in the country today.

"the washington post," ousted ambassador tells congress trump pressured state department to remove her. "wall street journal" trump pressed for ukraine's removal. "the new york times," trump had ukraine envoy removed on false claims, she says. and there were other headlines that emerged over the course of the day while she was testifying, that, for example, despite the state department under mike pompeo putting out this bogus statement that he was leaving her post in ukraine as planned, not only was her departure not as planned. it was abrupt. she was literally told to get on the next plane, according to her testimony today. she says the number two official at the state department under mike pompeo told her that she was being recalled on orders of the president and also that she had done nothing wrong. you have also seen headlines from the testimony today concerning these guys. testifying apparently in detail today about how the people working in ukraine to spread

false information about her appeared to include these two guys who seemed to have been carrying out this op along with the president's lawyer, rudy giuliani. the reason we have mug shots of these guys is because these are the same two guys who have just been arrested and are facing criminal charges in the southern district of new york for, among other things, an alleged scheme to illegally funnel large russian donations to various republican campaigns. but the other truly -- i don't know the word -- baller -- the other baller thing she did today was that although her testimony was behind closed doors at the request of the impeachment committees, she decided to release her opening statement publicly. and i don't know if she will ever testify in public. i don't know if this is the only way we will hear from her as the american public. but if this statement we got to see from her is her legacy in

the impeachment inquiry, it would be hard to imagine a more sort of stirring and cogent statement about the way government is supposed to work. on a nonpartisan basis, just the way good government works and the way american values are supposed to be conveyed overseas by our foreign service officers. this was her talking about government as it is supposed to be, as opposed to what has just happened under this administration, which has led to the president now being impeached. let me just read a little bit from her statement today. marie yovanovitch. for the last 33 years, it has been my great honor to serve the american people as a foreign service officer. over six administrations. four republican and two democratic. i have served in seven different countries, five of them hardship posts and was appointed to serve as an ambassador three times, twice by a republican president and once by a democrat. throughout my career i have stayed true to the oath that foreign officers take and observe every day, that i will

support and defend the constitution of the united states against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that i will bear true faith and allegiance to the same. like all foreign service officers, i have understood that oath as a commitment to serve on a strictly nonpartisan basis, to advance the foreign policy determined by the incumbent president and to work at all times to strengthen our national security and promote our national interests. ukraine is a sovereign country whose borders are in violet and whose people have the right to determine their own destiny. these are the bedrock principles of our policy. because of ukraine's position bordering russia on the east, it's the warm waters of the oil rich black sea to its south and four nato allies to its west, it is critical to the security of the united states that ukraine remain free and democratic and that it continue to resist russian expansionism. russia's purported annexation of crimea, invasion of ukraine and it's de facto control over the

sea make clear russia's malign intentions toward ukraine. if we allow russia's actions to stand, we will set a precedent that the united states will regret for decades to come. she then talks a little bit in her testimony about the threat of corruption and why corruption is bad, the kind of damage it does, why we should all fight against it, why it is in our nation's interest we fight against it. i know in this statement she is talking about ukraine. but it is hard not to hear america in the background given what we are going through right now and given the revelations surrounding this impeachment and this administration. she says, quote, the revolution of dignity and the ukrainian's people demand to end corruption forced the new government to take measures to fight the ramp anxiety corruption that has permeated that country's systems. why is this important? put simply, anti-corruption efforts serve ukraine's

interests. they serve ours as well. corrupt leaders are inherently less trustworthy. while an honest leadership makes a u.s./ukraine partnership more reliable and more valuable to the united states. a level playing field, one with a european land mass succeeded by russia and one of the largest populations in europe creates an environment in which u.s. business are more easily trade and invest and profit. corruption is a security issue as well because corrupt officials are vulnerable to moscow. in short, it is in our national security interest to help ukraine transform into a country where the rule of law governs and corruption is held in check. to be clear, she says, ukraine is filled with many citizens and officials who want the very things we have always said we want for our own country, a government that acts in the interest of its people, a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. she then goes on to describe the circumstances under which she was ousted and the campaign that was run against her by

conservative media, frankly, and by rudy giuliani and by these two guys who have now just been arrested. she says i want to state that i have never myself or through others directly or indirectly ever directed, suggested or in any other way asked for any government or government official in ukraine or elsewhere to refrain from investigating or prosecuting actual corruption. equally fictitious is the notion that i am disloyal to president trump. i have heard the allegation in the media that i supposedly told the embassy team to ignore president trump's orders, quote, since he was going to be impeached. that allegation is false. i have never said such a thing to my embassy colleagues or to anyone else. contrary to other similar reports, she says, quote, the obama administration did not ask me to help the clinton campaign or harm the trump campaign, nor would i have taken any such steps if they had. and then she talks about her firing. after being asked by the department in early march to

extend my tour until 2020, i was then abruptly told the following month in late april to come back to washington from ukraine, quote, on the next plane. you will understandably want to ask why my posting ended so suddenly. i wanted to learn that, too, and i tried to find out. i met with the deputy secretary of state, john sullivan, who informed me of the curtailment of my term. he said the president lost confidence in me and no longer wished me to serve as his ambassad ambassador. he added there had been a concerted campaign against me and that the department had been under pressure from the president to remove me since the summer of 2018. he also said that i had done nothing wrong and this was not like other situations where he had recalled ambassadors for cause. she says, i deported ukraine for good this past may. and then this was the part that somebody somewhere is going to get tattooed on them. although i understand that i served at the pleasure of the president, i was nevertheless incredulous that the u.s.

government chose to remove an ambassador based as far as i can tell by unfounded and false claims by people with questionable motives. i have served this nation honorably for 30 years. i have proudly promoted and served the american interests as the representative of the american people. throughout that time, i, like my colleagues at the state department, have always believed that we enjoyed a sacred trust with our government. we make a difference every day on issues that matter to the american people, whether it's war and peace, trade and investment or simply helping with a lost passport. we repeatedly uproot our lives and frequently put ourselves in harm's way to serve this nation. we do that willingly because we believe in america and its special role in the world. we also believe that in return our government will have our backs and protect us if we come under attack from foreign interests. that basic understanding no longer holds true. today we see the state department attacked and hollowed

out from within. state department leadership with congress needs to take action now to defend this great institution and its thousands of loyal and effective employees. i fear that not doing so will harm our nation's interests perhaps irreparably. that harm will come not just through the inevitable and continuing resignation and loss of many of this nation's most loyal and talented public servants. the harm will come when private interests circumvent for their own gain. the harm will come when bad actors see how easy it is to use fiction to manipulate our system. in such circumstances the only interests that will be served are those of our strategic adversaries, like russia, that spread chaos and attack the institutions and norms that the u.s. helped create and which we have benefitted from for the last 75 years. i am proud of my work in ukraine. the u.s. embassy under my leadership represented and

advanced the policies of the u.s. government. our efforts were intended and succeeded in thwarting corrupt interests in ukraine fwho fough back by selling baseless conspiracy theorying to anyone who would listen. sadly, someone was listening. and our nation is the worse off for that. marie today denying the white house and the state department to give that testimony to the impeachment committees in the house after they subpoenaed her for that testimony. i mean, if there is still going to be a state department in this country, doesn't that make you want to be a foreign service officer? don't you want to grow up to be that nails whether or not you ever get to be an ambassador? but with this signal testimony today, this dramatic appearance today from ambassador yovanovit yovanovitch, let's be clear about what's going on here. the impeachment inquiry against president trump is still as

direct and simple as it ever was. the president is being impeached by the house of representatives because he tried to pull off this scheme in which he tried to get help against the democrats and against joe biden from a foreign country. that is illegal. it is illegal to solicit a thing of value for a u.s. election from a foreign entity. the president has done that. the white house has proven it. the impeachment inquiry is about that. but what yovanovitch shows us is not just how her story fits into this, but how that violation, both of american law and of the type of behavior that is expected of a president that will result in his impeachment for that behavior, how much that undercuts american interests at large. what yovanovitch's testimony shows us, what a whole bunch of other state department people who will be testifying next week will show us is this thing that is going to result in all of the evidence coming out, which is that the president couldn't pull this off alone.

he did try to implement this through the u.s. government. as such we are seeing this dynamic in which people knew what was going on and people who would not go along with it, people who were in the way, people who saw the illegality of the scheme and either called it that or wouldn't participate in it, those people had to be removed. those people had to be pushed out. and marie yovanovitch who put on this unbelievable display of bravery in washington is exhibit a for that. we know more about that today than we knew yesterday. and it turns out after her there is a big, long alphabet out there and the rest of that came into focus today, too, including a real potential problem for a trump cabinet secretary who is not the one that just resigned within the last hour. it is a different one. lots to get to. that's next. stay with us. your home at wayfair, you get more than free shipping. you get everything you need for your home at a great price, the way it works best for you, i'll take that. wait honey, no.

when you want it. you get a delivery experience you can always count on. you get your perfect find at a price to match, on your own schedule. you get fast and free shipping on the things that make your home feel like you. that's what you get when you've got wayfair. so shop now! introducing new vicks vapopatch easy to wear with soothing vicks vapors for her, for you, for the whole family. new vicks vapopatch. breathe easy.

♪ applebee's new pasta and grill combos. choose from up to 12 combinations starting at $9.99. ever since you brought me home, that day. i've been plotting to destroy you. sizing you up... calculating your every move.

you think this is love? this is a billion years of tiger dna just ready to pounce. and if you have the wrong home insurance coverage, you could be coughing up the cash for this. so get allstate and be better protected from mayhem, like me-ow.

today veteran public service officer, former ambassador to ukraine, marie yovanovitch, testified to the impeachment committees despite orders from the white house and the state department that she should not. she testified about president trump ordering her removal as

ambassador because her request for investigations or any other thing having to do with law enforcement, those should be handled under proper channels. there is a proper and legal way for governments to work together on law enforcement issues. that is reportedly what marie yovanovitch insisted on when it came to ukraine. that, of course, would not do for the type of scheme the president was trying to pull off with the help of his lawyer, rudy giuliani, and a couple of guys who were just arrested the other night at dulles airport trying to flee the country. when marie yovanovitch resisted the idea that what they were requesting should be handled off the books and unofficially, she was taken out of her job. we learned today that was on the president's orders. of course, we now know that within days of her get out on the next plane departure from ukraine, which was demanded by president trump and apparently carried out by mike pompeo, within days of her departure from ukraine, you may recall rudy giuliani within days was on

television bragging about how he personally was now headed off to ukraine to go get some investigations started, which he hoped would be, quote, helpful to my client. giuliani made that announcement on tv, that he was heading off to get some investigations cooking that would help trump. that was within days of her being told to get out of ukraine by president trump and mike pompeo. we know giuliani moved in on the ukraine embassy as if he were a u.s. government employee to try to enact this scheme in ukraine alongside the guys who were just arrested this week when their indictment was unsealed. and alongside a different u.s. ambassador, gordon sondland, who was detailed to this project alongside giuliani. the ambassador had no diplomatic experience whatsoever before his current job as ambassador to the eu which he got after he gave a million dollars to the trump inauguration. he funneled it through a few different llcs, but he did give

the inauguration a billion bucks. he is the one who according to new reporting from "the washington post" apparently blurted out at a white house meeting that ukraine was going to need to cough up some important investigations. he is the one who was pressing that ukraine needed to not just open investigations into joe booind, it -- biden, it needed to publicly announce that it was doing so because that obviously would have a better political impact, right, if the public knew that those investigations were under way. he's also the trump administration official who, according to republican senator ron johnson, told him directly that president trump had a quid pro quo going with ukraine here in which their military aid would be contingent on them launching those political salient investigations that the trump administration and the president himself were demanding. so, yeah, they needed to get rid of marie yovanovitch, who saw it as her job to stand up for the

u.s. government and american national interests on behalf of the rule of law and against the perversion of government powers for private or partisan political gain. marie yovanovitch would not be the one you would want there while you were carrying out this scheme, so they got rid of her and brought in these trump guys. the same thing happened around the withholding of the military aid to ukraine. this is what "the wall street journal" was first able to report last night. it's now been matched by the washington post. they both are now reporting that career officials inside the white house who worked on budget issues reportedly raised the alarm that trump withholding this military aid to ukraine, we now know as part of this deal for trump to get help with his re-election from ukraine in exchange for that military aid. career officials inside the white house reportedly raised the alarm that withholding that military aid was illegal. we now know from "the wall street journal" and "the washington post" that in

response to those expressed concerns by career white house officials, the white house took responsibility for the handling of those military funds away from those career officials and they instead brought in a guy who was a trump guy who had been the executive director of the wisconsin republican party, and they put him in charge instead of arguably illegally withholding those military funds. yahoo! news advances this story further today with a report that the pentagon, quote, went so far as to conduct its own legal analysis of the military aid being withheld. quote, determining that the holds were illegal. quote, a government official confirmed that such an analysis took place. so did several capitol hill staffers. they all described the conclusion of that analysis in similar terms, which is that it was illegal for president trump to be withholding that money. if you're trying to do something illegal, of course you want your own guy in there to be put in charge of that illegal thing you're trying to do so the career folks, the actual public

servants, would no longer be in the way. we see that happen with the ambassador to ukraine, with yovanovitch being pushed out, recalled abruptly, and they put in the guys from trump world who will play ball. we see that happening in the white house, right, with the military aid illegally being withheld while the people who know that's illegal, they got to go. let's put in our own guy. he'll play ball. even on the corrupt side deal alongside the effort to illegally enlist a foreign government in helping trump get re-elected, these guys who have now been arrested who were reportedly running this side hustle in which they were trying to get the leadership change at the biggest natural gas company in ukraine, even in that instance on the side hustle they still wanted to install their own guys who would hook them up with contracts from the biggest natural gas company in ukraine. i mean, from the federal indictment of these guys, we know that when they made a more

than $300,000 illegal donation to the biggest pro-trump super pac, they arranged the paperwork so it looked like it was from a natural gas company that they invented. it was a weird part of the indictment. why would they invent a fake natural gas company to make this donation rather than doing it in their own names? well, the fake natural gas company they invented may be connected to the fact that they were also running a side hustle where they were trying to take over and put their own people in charge of the biggest natural gas company in ukraine. again, in that side hustle, the same pattern holds, right, whatever purpose these guys had in mind for whatever they wanted to do with that company, right, you would want to get the real people out of the way, right? you want to get the people who might be doing the work, who might be alarmed by your scheme, you want to get them out of your way. nbc news has a fascinating long report on that part of the scheme today in which they note these guys who were working with giuliani trying to take over this natural gas company, what they were trying to do is push

out the existing ceo of that gas company in favor of somebody else who they wanted to install. the guy they were trying to push out was someone who, quote, had won high praise from u.s. and european officials for his anti-corruption efforts. right. we are starting to see how this goes. it's like a master class. if you are running a very big corruption scheme, you have to get the anti-corruption people out of the way. you have to get the not corrupt people out of the way. you have to get the people with integrity who know what is illegal out of the way. you have to get the ambassador fired, the white house employees who handled the disbursement of military aid pushed out. you got to get the ceo of the company who is there to make sure it is not corrupt. right? you have to get all of those folks out so you can install your own people and operate this scheme. the problem with all of this from tip to tail is that those human beings you have to push out, they are people of integrity.

the executives and officials and the anti-corruption folks, the people there to do a legitimate above board job, those people when you push them out, they turn into witnesses for what you did. they're alive. they can talk. they might even defy your orders not to talk. in behavior we saw modelled by marie yovanovitch today, they will defy orders from the white house not to speak and respond to a congressional subpoena to turn over to congressional oversight committees what they know. now, one of the people for whom this is very bad news is the secretary of energy, rick perry. he appears to have connections to that effort to replace the leadership at that ukrainian natural gas company, to replace the people that were there, including the anti-corruption guy who was ceo, to replace that guy and others with people who were more to the liking of rudy giuliani's now jailed henchmen.

secretary perry appears to have been caught up in that. he has now been subpoenaed personally. he also has said his department will cooperate fully with the impeachment investigation. we shall see now that he has a subpoena on his own desk. it is also terrible news for secretary of state mike pompeo, who was up to his neck in this before today, but now he is in a terrible position. he is not trying to cooperate. he has decided his legacy here will be his efforts to try to block all state department personnel from testifying to the impeachment committees. as of today, that is not working. secretary mike pompeo, you can order them all you want not to testify. in response to duly issued subpoenas from the impeachment committees, though, they can still turn up. it was marie yovanovitch today. it will be fiona hill on monday. it will be another career state department official, george kent, on tuesday. on thursday, it's going to be that trump donor guy that got sent in to replace yovanovitch and deliver the quid pro quo to the ukrainian government.

you won't get your military aid until we get our investigations. he was the guy alongside vice president mike pence who appears to have issued that directive to the ukrainian government. after him, there will be more state department officials who are expected to speak, both in terms of depositions that are already scheduled and depositions we know are coming. mike pompeo's own role in this scheme for which the president is being impeached appears to be kind of a marquee thing now. i mean, it is -- it is not hard to imagine secretary of state pompeo being impeached for exactly what the president is being impeached for here. he is the one that carried out the president's orders to recall that ambassador, which is apparently part of this scheme, to clear the way for what trump was trying to do with ukraine. pompeo's state department apparently up to the level of the number two guy in the department was aware that yovanovitch had done nothing wrong.

the state department put out this false statement that she was returning from ukraine as planned when, in fact, as they knew, she was being recalled early because the president demanded it. for two weeks, mike pompeo tried to pretend publicly that he had no idea what had gone on between president trump and the ukrainian president on the call for which the president is being impeached. in fact, mike pompeo was on that call listening in to the entire thing, even though for two weeks he made it seem like he had no idea what might have happened there. i mean, mike pompeo today seeing this brave ambassador walk across the capital grounds, check herself in and silt -- sit down for nine hours of testimony, seeing that ambassador deny his orders not to show up today, seeing her show up to say her piece, including releasing a blistering public version of her opening statement, i can imagine how today felt for mike pompeo. he might have thought he found a safe haven in his public schedule today. it was a religious freedom event in tennessee.

that at least should be safe. he clearly did not expect to run into local reporters who knew exactly what they were talking about who were absolutely read in on this subject, who knew what to ask, who wouldn't back down and were ready to advance this story even when he would not answer. watch this from nashville. >> the announcement yesterday, one of your most trusted senior advisers resigned. he is adding his voice to a number of career diplomats who expressed frustration over what they see as your failure to stand up for government servants, and for servants like ambassador yovanovitch that was caught up in the ukraine controversy. did you do enough to defend the ambassador privately and publically against the smear campaign being waged against her? and will you speak to that now? >> ma'am, you have some of your facts wrong so you should be

careful about things you assert as facts before you state them. >> can you speak to michael mckinley's resignation? >> i don't talk about personnel matters. >> did he speak to you personally built as he resigned? >> i don't talk about personnel matters. >> did you support ambassador -- the ambassador being recalled months before her tenure was up? >> i supported every mission that the state department has been engaged in. >> in mid-february you were in warsaw. so was rudy giuliani. during your time there, did you meet with giuliani? >> you know, i don't talk about who i meet with. i went to warsaw for a particular purpose. >> so you're not going to say whether you met with him? >> so when i was in warsaw, i had a singular focus. my focus was on the work we have done. >> it sounds like you are not going to say. >> when i was in warsaw, we were working diligently to accomplish the mission. >> text messages show that diplomats under your authority told the ukrainians that the good relationship with president trump was only possible if they investigated his political

opponent and theories about what happened in 2016. were you aware that this was happening? >> again, you have got your facts wrong. sounds like you are working at least in part for the democratic national committee when you phrase that predicate of a question in that way. it is unfortunate. >> the reporter asking those questions was nancy amens, which is a local nbc affiliate in nashville. wow did she do a good job there. secretary of state mike pompeo, listen, can't answer questions from local reporters, not when everybody can follow this very straightforward story. secretary of state mike pompeo may find himself getting impeached here not only for his role in this scheme but for how he has tried to cover it up since. mike pompeo tried to hide the fact he was on the call. for which the president is being impeached, for a couple of weeks. he appears clearly now in an interview with nbc's affiliate in nashville, tennessee, he

appears to be clearly now trying to hide something about when and where he was meeting with rudy giuliani while the scheme was being hatched. secretary pompeo, did you in fact meet with rudy giuliani in warsaw earlier this year before we all knew this scheme was under way? and everybody is trying to get as far away as they can from this, right? but with the first arrests, with not just one but multiple photos of the president and the vice president with these men who were just arrested and the president's eldest son with these men who were just arrested, with news about the white house dinner that president trump invited these men who were just arrested to just last year. that's him inviting them to the white house for a meeting, for a dinner meeting, right? i mean, this is a downward spiral at this point. the homeland security secretary resigned tonight, kevin m mcaleenan.

the energy secretary rick perry is facing a subpoena for his involvement in this. the secretary of state appears to be at risk of impeachment himself as he is multiply implicated in the president's scheme with a state department underneath him that now appears to have turned roundly against him, including the resignation in protest of his number two last night. buckle up. i tell you, here we go. and this is going to be another weekend when the news does not stop. stay with us. great riches will find you when liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. wow. thanks, zoltar. how can i ever repay you? maybe you could free zoltar? thanks, lady. taxi! only pay for what you need.

♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ the amazing new iphone has arrived. and so has t-mobile's newest signal. no signal goes farther or is more reliable. so you can get more out of the new iphone. better battery life, new ultra-wide camera, now on a network that goes farther than ever. and right now, switch at a t-mobile store and get the new iphone on us! that's right, the new iphone on us!

only at t-mobile. but in my mind i'm still 25. that's why i take osteo bi-flex, to keep me moving the way i was made to. it nourishes and strengthens my joints for the long term. osteo bi-flex - now in triple strength plus magnesium.

i think she has been a model diplomat and deserved better than the shabby treatment she received from this president and from the secretary of state. >> i just sat through eight hours that went like a new york second. it was that amazing, that powerful, that impactful and i just feel very fortunate to have been there. >> i think she is a courageous example for others, and i think all the members who are extraordinarily impressed with her testimony today. >> members of congress reacting to the testimony today from the former u.s. ambassador to ukraine. if nothing else, her testimony today appears from the outside to have been thorough. she emerged from that closed door deposition after nine plus hours. she didn't get out until 7:40 p.m. eastern time.

joining us now is tom melinowski. he served as an assistant secretary of state in both the state department and national security council. thank you for making time tonight. i know it's been a long day. >> thank you so much. >> i was struck by the congressman said there about how it was eight hours that went like a new york second that he seemed -- he seemed moved by the testimony. how would you describe the testimony today? >> i agree. you know, we spent nine hours with a diplomat, a patriot of tremendous courage and integrity who answered questions honestly, thoroughly and who set an example today that not only should you obey a legally binding subpoena, but you can. you can be a career civil servant or foreign service officer and despite the president's efforts to deny you the opportunity to compel you to not testify to congress, you can.

>> do you believe that she is at risk of retaliation or firing within the state department because of her decision today to obey this subpoena? i know that the state department reportedly on orders from the white house told her not to come. when she got the subpoena, she did. are you worried for her career, for her future? >> she better not be at risk. what she did was to follow the rule of law, and she set an example for everybody else in doing so. and, you know, secretary mike pompeo has a decision to make. right now he is showing that he either will not or perhaps cannot defend his employees, his institution. and if he can't defend his employees and institution, he has no business being where he is. >> after your career at the state department, sir, including serving as assistant secretary of state, i wanted to talk to you tonight, if i could get you, in part to the reaction to the news that mr. mckinley at the state department has resigned essentially in protest of

secretary pompeo's inability to stand up for career foreign service officers and other people who have within been caught up in this, including ambassador yovanovitch. that struck me as an important resignation, the kind of thing we have not seen often during this administration for all of its controversies. what was your reaction to that? >> well, he is someone i know and worked with when he was ambassador to afghanistan. he is a model career public servant. i haven't spoken to him, but this is a widespread concern in the state department that the secretary either will not or cannot defend them. you know, it is not just about defending our employees. it is about defending our interests. every single person at the state department, up to and including secretary pompeo is living under the tweet of damocles. they can't do anything. they can't say anything for fear that the next morning there will be something from the president that undercuts them. so they are frozen. they are paralyzed. and, you know, we're seeing it play out in the turkey/syria

situation. we're seeing it play out when perhaps even the secretary wanted to defend ambassador yovanovitch but felt that the next day trump could tweet something out throwing her under the bus and him under the bus. you cannot run our diplomacy in this way. >> do you believe that secretary of state pompeo is himself at risk of impeachment because of the way that he has been involved in this scheme that the president is being impeached for now and because of his behavior since? >> look, i think his behavior is shameful. i don't think we are out to impeach the trump administration. we are looking at the conduct of the president of the united states. he is responsible for everything that we are talking about today, and it is our highest constitutional duty to hold him responsible because there is no other institution that can do so. >> democratic congressman tom

malinowski, thanks for making team. >> thank you. >> much more to come, stay with us. ou. >> much more to come, stay with us . aleve it. aleve is proven better on pain than tylenol. when pain happens, aleve it. all day strong. so chantix can help it's you quit slow turkey. cold turkey. along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts

or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life-threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. talk to your doctor about chantix. enterprise car sales and you'll take any trade-in?rom that's right! great! here you go... well, it does need to be a vehicle. but - i need this out of my house. (vo) with fair, transparent value for every trade-in... enterprise makes it easy. ithere's my career...'s more to me than hiv. my cause... and creating my dream home. i'm a work in progress. so much goes into who i am. hiv medicine is one part of it. prescription dovato is for adults who are starting hiv-1 treatment and who aren't resistant to either of the medicines dolutegravir or lamivudine. dovato has 2 medicines in 1 pill to help you reach and then stay undetectable. so your hiv can be controlled with fewer medicines

while taking dovato. you can take dovato anytime of day with food or without. don't take dovato if you're allergic to any of its ingredients or if you take dofetilide. if you have hepatitis b, it can change during treatment with dovato and become harder to treat. your hepatitis b may get worse or become life-threatening if you stop taking dovato. so do not stop dovato without talking to your doctor. serious side effects can occur, including allergic reactions, liver problems, and liver failure. life-threatening side effects include lactic acid buildup and severe liver problems. if you have a rash and other symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking dovato and get medical help right away. tell your doctor if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis b or c. don't use dovato if you plan to become pregnant or during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy since one of its ingredients may harm your unborn baby. your doctor should do a pregnancy test before starting dovato. use effective birth control while taking dovato. the most common side effects are headache, diarrhea, nausea, trouble sleeping, and tiredness. so much goes into who i am and hope to be.

ask your doctor if starting hiv treatment with dovato is right for you. when donald trump filed his first financial disclosure report as president in 2017, it turns out he left a little thing off. the president left off that disclosure form any mention of his own role in the illegal campaign finance scheme that sent his former personal attorney to federal prison, a scheme for which the president was designated individual one by federal prosecutors who said explicitly that he directed the commission of that felony. he was financially involved in that crime. federal prosecutors say he directed its commission, but he left off his financial disclosure form any reference to his financial connection to that. just sure it was an oversight. him leaving off that reference to his involvement in that felony and later correcting it to add reference to his financial involvement to that

felony, that led the oversight committee in congress to maybe have a look at more of the information underlying the president's financial disclosures. you tend to get a closer look when you are shown to have left a little bit out that might have been politically inconvenient been invent. the committee decided they wanted to look into whether the dishe shall process itself should mayber more rigorous now that we have president who's have shown a propensity to not include the stuff related to felonies. that initial financial disclosure debacle, that is the very simple history behind what was a body blow legal ruling against president trump at the federal appeals court in washington, d.c. what "the new york times" calls, quote, the first test at the appeals court level of the trump legal team's sweeping challenges to the constitutional authority of congress to conduct oversight of his activities. that first test at the appeals court level today, the president lost badly.

the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the committee and we affirm the committee possesses authority under both the house rules and the constitution to issue the subpoena and mazears must comply. that was a 2-1 ruling against president trump and his legal team at the federal appeals level. today it was a terrible day for president trump in court on everything. his wall got blocked in court today. here's how nbc news' pete ruling skrik it. a federal judge ruled friday that president trump donald trump violated federal law when he used his declaration of a national emergency to get millions for building a wall on the southern border. he lost in three different states where judges blocked his attempt to have immigration policy so only those with a lot of money would be allowed in. trump lost his wall today. he also lost on that immigration

change today, too. three times over. and none of those rulings i just described today are about impeachment directly. but on the taxes one, this appeals court one, the president has a couple of really big problems. separate and apart from getting one step closer to having to hand over his taxes, which he seems desperate to not do. he's lost all the federal cases in which he's argued that he doesn't have to hand them over. he's lost all of those at the district level and now the first at the appeals level as well. he'll presumably dry the supreme court but this has not gone well for him. even today, it was two judges that votes against the president and one trump appointed judge who vote in his favor today. she lost. but even her dissent today was terrible for the president. in her dissent, she said the subpoena should be quashed. it is not within its right to demand financial records. the reason she said the committee can't get financial records is because the proper way to get them would be through

impeachment proceedings. quote, impeachment provides the exclusive method to investigate accusations of illegal conduct of impeachable officials. throughout our history, congress, the president and the courts have recognized the gravity and accountability. presidents since george washington have decline demands to produce documents for legislative purposes while acknowledging that the same request might be treated differently. so this is the judge who voted trump's way today in that 2-1 ruling against him. even in disent, she's making cheer, hey, listen, if you're in impeachment proceedings, they can definitely compel documents and witnesses. hey, congress, if you really want to do that, you should try impeaching this guy. if you're impeaching him, you should get everything you want from him. that's the disent that went

trump's way today. even when things go badly, the worse it is. we have just the person to talk to about the president's very bad day in court joining us next. he served as acting solicitor general. great to see you. thanks for joining us tonight. >> great to see you. so lawyers for the president have been trying the shield him from investigation by congress. trying say congress has no right to do that. trying on block access to his financial records. it is my sense that he is losing all of these cases but that today's loss might be a bigger deal. >> absolutely. you called it a body blow. it is a body blow. and there were several other body blows as you mentioned today in the courts. the immigration loss, and the other losses that he faced today. and i think basically, you've got that and you've got congress really investigating the ukraine thing hard. and altogether, you've got a lot

of phenomenon all against the president. and i think it suggests really what that great legal scholar twisted sister. we are not going to take it anymore. you've got congress and the courts saying huh-uh, we have checks and balances in this country and you can't do all of these shenanigan that's you're engaged in. >> dee snider is rocking out to that aleutian you just made there. let me ask you. if my allegation about what might be dangerous for president trump even in the dissent today, even in the single trump appointed justice who voted his way today, by sort of ratifying the importance of the impeachment process, and its potency for compelling witnesses and documents, i felt like that was no safe harbor for him and that might potentially go poorly for him as this is either on bank or supreme court review. >> you're 100% on it.

two problems that trump has. number one, this dissent by the judge is not worth the paper it's printed. on it is unconvincing to the sentence that he hoped for some sort of rationale that would buy him traction in the u.s. supreme court. i don't think he got it today. that's problem number one. then number two is, to the sentence she identified a problem, it was paper problem that congress hadn't used the magic word impeachment. of course we all know congress is going toward using that magic word. so you're right in saying that even the dissend gives the democrats basically everything they want. that's how it should be in the constitutional system. the president is asserting preposterous arguments that he cannot be indicted, he cannot be investigated because he's a sitting president. now he's saying this week by his white house counsel, he can't even be impeached. the only person in our history that has ever been like that is king george iii and that's what

our revolution was against. even the minimum accept operation of powers. >> to have watched those arguments being made by the president and his legal teams has been stunning to see. the court saying, we're not going to take it anymore. it did feel like a big change. acting shis itolicitor general. thank you. >> i'll told we'll be back with breaking news. we'll be right back. eaking news. we'll be right back. rrive, we'll inform them that liberty mutual customizes home insurance, so they'll only pay for what they need. your turn to keep watch, limu. wake me up if you see anything. [ snoring ] [ loud squawking and siren blaring ] only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

steven could only imaginem 24hr to trenjoying a spicy taco.burn, now, his world explodes with flavor. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day all-night protection. can you imagine 24-hours without heartburn? (honk!) i hear you sister.

that's why i'm partnering with cigna to remind you to go in for your annual check-up, and be open with your doctor about anything you feel - physically and emotionally. but now cigna has a plan that can help everyone see stress differently. just find a period of time to unwind. a location to de-stress. an activity to enjoy. or the name of someone to talk to. to create a plan that works for you, visit cigna.com/mystressplan. cigna. together, all the way.

didn't i tell you the news would keep breaking this weekend. we just got a new report from "the new york times." we looked at in it one way, this is our fourth report, i think, that the president's attorney, giuliani jue is under some kind of criminal investigation for his work in ukraine. cnn was first to report that. abc and bloomberg had similar reports. all of those have tied reported investigation into giuliani to the arrest and indictments yesterday of these two people he's been working on. been working with. they were arresting on campaign finance related charges. the "times" adds a new wrinkle. the headline is giuliani is said to be under investigation for ukraine work. then the description is specific. prosecutors are investigating whether the president's lawyer broke laws meant to prevent covert foreign influence on the government.