joining us this hour as well. happy halloween. i this year am obviously dressed up as an out of shape -- on the day the house of representatives voted to move forward on impeachment of president donald j. trump it just happened to be halloween. it also happened to be a day when basically all of washington, d.c. was gloriously floridly deeply hung over after the hometown washington nationals won game 7 of the world series, giving the nation's capitol its first national championship since the only one it has ever won before, which was all the way back in 1924. if the nationals can win the world series, then my god, yes, in washington, d.c. anything really is possible.

and if you want yet another sign from the news gods that we really should open our minds to what may have previously been unimaginable, another sheer coincidence today is that on halloween and on the day that washington woke up to its first national championship in 95 years and on the day that the house voted to move forward for only the third time in modern american history with impeachment proceedings against a sitting president, on this same day, our great allies overseas, the brits, today started their own election. because as nutty as this brexit thing is that they are going through, and as nutty as a lot of things are about british politic, the brits do actually have one very, very sensible thing in their politics that i would do anything to have us dopt here, which is that they have a really strict time limit on their elections. their elections are six weeks, full stop, that's it.

unlike us where even the primary process takes more than a year in our presidential elections and presidential elections themselves are basically fought over a period of, like, two plus years and that's generous, i mean, it already feels right now like we've been in the thick of the 2020 presidential election process forever. the 2020 election is still more than a year away. but the brits are having their election in mid-december. m mid-december this year, six weeks away. so they kicked off their national election campaign today. and then it will be over six weeks from now. i could cry just thinking about it. imagine the opportunity costs, imagine what we as a country could accomplish if all of the energy and all of the effort and all of the money and all of the attention that we put into our never ending presidential electioneering instead all got compressed to six weeks and

instead for six weeks we worked on other stuff? but in terms of us being humble about the realm of possibility, about what may come to pass, about how things will play out in the long run, i think today it's worth considering this guy. he is the speaker of the british parliament. it's not a direct consequence of the brexit fight or the election they're going to have next month largely about the brexit fight, but it is sort of a collateral development of all the things that happened today, today also was the last day that john bercow will be speaker of the house of commons. and whether or not you follow british politics, whether or not you know the name john bercow, you will nevertheless recall his signature style when you see this clip. >> in order to take no deal off the table. >> order.

order. order. very rude for members. order. order. i take to the chancellor of the duchy when he turns up at our children's school as a parent he's a very well-behaved fellow. he wouldn't dare behave like that in front of collin hall and don't rant. spare us the theatrics. behave yourself. be a good boy. be a good boy. order. yes, we know the theatrics that he perfected -- not interested. not interested. be quiet. >> honestly, talking about things that it would be nice to import from british politics it would also be kind of awesome in u.s. politics we had somebody

who had that job to keep order. but here's the thing, with all the other things happening on the same day today, the speaker, john bercow, today the guy stepping down in britain, this guy who's known for this sort of thing. >> order. order. order. >> as john bercow steps down today, today as a gift from the news gods to remind of us of our own humility before them as we cannot foresee how things will turn out when they start out, today we went back and looked how john bercow started in his job as speaker of the british parliament when he became speaker basically a decade ago, this order order guy who's become this sort of international figure of wonder for the way he handles the british parliament. i want you to see this.

this was the very first time he ever called the british parliament to order. this is what he was like on day one of that job per coverage that day of the bbc. >> having abandoned the additional ropes for a suit suit and gown all eye were on mr. bercow as he began proceedings. >> order, order, the club will proceed to read a private bill for consideration of this day. >> order, order. okay, is that okay with everybody? okay, cheers, order, order? the way things start like this gentleman on the left, often gives you no real idea at all as to what they're going to become, aka, the same gentleman on the right. things don't always end up the way they start. a reminder, i think, as the house formally starts these impeachment proceedings against president donald trump today. it's a reminder i think that any

confident forecast of how this is going to play out in the end is probably falling. we should be humble before this process. we just haven't done this very many time as a country. we haven't impeached very many presidents. we haven't tried to impeach very many presidents. and honestly with this one, we don't know how it's going to go. thequiry is very much in process. the political consequences of what appears right now to be a likely impeachment, i mean those political consequences are quite opaque to us from this vantage point. yes, you can guess about it but we should be humble about it. this is historic day today. it's not a time for speculation and pragnastication. even as the vote was taking place in the house today the impeachment committees were in their secure conference room

taking yet another deposition from behind closed doors from yet another senior trump administration official. this time it was tim morrison, a close ally of the recently ousted national security advisor john bolton. john bolton himself has been summoned to testify before impeachment as well. there's been a lot of speculation, a lot of blind sourced quotes what he was expected to say. in the end the headlines coming out of his testimony were very consistent with what we've been seeing from other witnesses. you're used to now seeing headlines like the one we saw today from morrison's testimony. white house aide confirms he saw signs of a quid pro quo from ukraine. and the subhead, tim morrison, national security aide said a top diplomat close to president trump suggested a military aid package from ukraine was conditioned on investigations into trump's political rivals. "the washington post" much the same. white house official corroborates diplomat's account

trump intended to seek quid pro quo. top national security russia official confirms key testimony linking trump to quid pro quo. this is what it's like, these headlines out of every impeachment witness now, right inas the impeachment committees have been taking testimony behind closed doors, you've had all these different officials come through, career officials, republican appointees, national security officials, diplomats. we've had all of these people come through and provide what appeared to be mutually corroborating accounts about the core allegation at the heart of the impeachment inquiry, which is that the president pressured a foreign country into bringing investigations and announcing investigations that he thought could damage the democrats' prospects ahead of his re-election effort for 2020. all of these mutually corroborating accounts. now, the president pressuring that foreign country, the president pressuring ukraine, that pressure alone was enough to start the impeachment inquiry in the first place.

but now that it has started and now they've had testimony from witness after witness after witness showing it wasn't just pressure on ukraine, it was withholding things of value from ukraine, things of value both from that country and our own supposed foreign policy. it wasn't just pressure, it was extortion. it was a quid pro quo effort. it was trying to force them to cough up what the president wanted to help him in his re-election. and so we've got news tonight on a bunch of different aspects of this. first of all we've got the chairman leading the impeachment proceedings joining us live here in just a couple of minutes to talk us through what changes now with today's historic vote. also some really specific questions for chairman schiff like what kind of report they're going to make to the public about their findings. that's one of the things in the rules that they will make a public report of their findings. what should we expect in terms of that?

also in terms of timing. "the new york times" interestingly was reporting all day long it was the house's intention to start public hearings in the impeachment of the president a week from monday, as of november 11th. that was in their main impeachment news article all day. this evening they dropped that -- excuse me, they dropped that detail out of the article without any sort of note explaining why. we'll speak with congressman adam schiff tonight to talk more about that, see if he can give us any clarity then we can divine from the press. there was also an important court proceeding today on the issue of whether witnesses have to show up when the impeachment committees tell them to even if the white house tells them not to. really interesting court proceedings today, quite sparky on the part of the judge. we will get to that as well this evening. there was also a slightly ominous development this evening for the president's lawyer, the gentleman on the left, the one who's actually not featured here in a mug shot. interesting and probably worrying developments for the white house tonight in terms of mr. giuliani's potential

personal criminal liability in the federal criminal cases that appear to be unfolding in parallel with this impeachment investigation on capitol hill. like i said there's a lot going on, busy night, historic day. we're going to get into all that stuff. but before we do that, i will tell you i am doing this partly because impeachment is so big that it tends to suck all the oxygen out of the room for all other news stories. but i also want to do this story i'm about to do tonight because just on its face, this is thing that happened today that is likely to get squeezed out of the news because of everything going on in washington and all the other things happening around the globe today. but this thing happening today is absolutely flabbergasting on its own terms. yes, we are going to talk about what's going on with impeachment tonight in detail. before we get there, though, i just want you to know about this other totally unrelated thing that is unfolding right now in the great state of missouri.

this week you might have seen this headline floating around. kansas city star headlines don't always go national, but no matter what paper it's from, no matter what part of the country it's from, a headline like this is going to go national and get some national attention. as you can see the headline there is, quote, missouri health director kept spreadsheet of planned parenthood patients' periods. let me read that one more time. the missouri health director kept a spreadsheet of womens periods. and if you're thinking that can't be right, maybe this is punctuation issue. maybe it got typoed as semicolons and somebody made it into periods. this is for real. the health director there has been tracking womens periods on a computer spreadsheet as part

of his government job, which means taxpayers have been paying him to do that. reporter crystal thomas from the kansas city star was able to get that story this week because she was in the courtroom for an ongoing hearing. sort of like a court proceeding, it's an administrative hearing going on all week. it's about the efforts of that state health director which you see here, their efforts to try to shutdown the last remaining abortion provider in the entire state of missouri. the republican led state government in missouri is trying to make that state the first state in america to go completely dark in terms of access to abortion. and they're doing it by trying to shutdown the last clinic in the state which does abortions which is planned parent hood clinic. abortion, of course, is legal in this country. access to it is constitutionally protected right in this country. but missouri's republican state government want to try to find away around that inconvenient facts. they want to find a way to effectively ban abortion in that

state by putting every abortion provider that remains in the state out of business using state regulations. they want to use state regulations under the direction of the state health director to regulate the last clinic in the state in such a way it loses its license and is forced to close. that's how they're trying to limit access to abortion in missouri. and that's what these hearings have been about all week. and the state health director confirmed that, yeah, he actually has been tracking womens menstrual periods on a spreadsheet. >> and you'll see here that it includes the patient i.d. number, date of procedure, gestational age, right, sphthe last column includes the department's calculation of the womens last normal period. >> yes, sir. >> the state health director of missouri who is trying to yank the license of the last abortion provider in the entire state. and a state administrative board

is trying to adjudicate that issue right now. in the course of those proceedings he has admitted he's been rooting around in patients private medical records and making like a star chart of their periods. >> and in the last column there it includes the department's calculation of the woman's last normal period, right? >> yes, sir. >> yes, sir. that is how we are regulating the provision of abortion services here in missouri. so williams gave that testimony earlier this week, a couple of days ago after the kansas city star wrote about it, and it got a ton of national attention. it also led to calls that the missouri state health director should resign. it led the democratic leader in the legislator demanding the governor should immediately investigate this matter as to what this state health director has been up to. so williams gave that testimony on tuesday that the state health department under his leadership created a period tracker as part of their efforts to yank the

license to operate from the last abortion clinic in the state. len late last night more than 24 hours after williams admitted the existence of that spreadsheet under oath, more than 24 hours after reporters started calling his office from all over the country to ask questions about it the missouri state government put out a statement about it. quote irresponsible reporting has led to false claims that dr. randall williams tracks the menstrual cycles of women in planned parenthood. nothing in the testimony could in any way be cited to support this false claim. the state gumt of missouri says nothing could be cited to support this false claim. state health director randall williams doesn't track the menstrual cycles of women seeking abortions at planned parenthood, no way, right, dr. williams? >> the last column there includes the department's calculation of the woman's last normal period, right?

>> yes, sir. >> so this is just a -- this is just a remarkable thing. there's one other piece of this i really want you to see. we have been following this story in missouri for months as missouri republicans, the state government there tries to eliminate all access to abortion in that big state. and you may recall from that earlier coverage that it was the same state health director randall williams, the guy in the bow tie here who in going after the last clinic in the state last year, he is the one who decided to order any woman who wanted to get an abortion in the state of missouri would henceforth be forced under his orders to undergo an extra unnecessary internal pelvic examination. doctors already give patients a pelvic exam before a surgical abortion. that is necessary thing. but starting this year randall williams and the state health department told the last clinic

in missouri, new orders, you now have to start doing this pelvic exam, an extra one, an extra internal vaginal examination, mandatory, at least three days before the woman actually gets her abortion. so we covered that earlier this year. it's just astonishing. and there was a bunch of national attention to the issue. the clinic ultimately defied those orders from the state health department. and after that randall williams and the state government caved and they stopped forcing them to do that. but today this is just jaw dropping to me. today at the same hearing, the same hearing that's been happening this week where the state health director has now admitted he's got a computer spreadsheet tracking womens menstrual periods, today there was testimony from shannon who's been a guest on this show, she's the director of surgical services at that planned parenthood. she testified today in the state hearing about what it was like when randall williams sent his inspectors to the last abortion

provider in missouri this year as the state was trying to yank that clinic's license and she shared some new important and startling details about the conversation she had with those state investigators, the ones who were instituting this new medically unnecessary pelvic exam requirement. >> you mentioned that during chart review of cairn she had brought up why planned parenthood doesn't do a second pelvic exam. did you explain to her why during that conversation? >> i did explain to her why we didn't do a second pelvic exam. i explained to her it wasn't medically necessary, but he can explain medically why it was unnecessary. >> how did she respond when you explained to her why? >> so she said that she understood that we hadn't been doing it this way, and she also understood it may not have been medically necessary but they felt we should be doing it. we went back and forth with it so much she actually said plook, i'm sorry that it feels like

we're much harder than you on inspections than anybody else but we have bosses, too and there's things they want us to do. >> we have bosses too and there are things they want us to do. she went onto talk about what it's like at planned parenthood after the state of missouri went ahead with this policy, started mandating doctors had to do internal vaginal examinations of their patients for no medical reason other than the state was ordering them to do it. just watch this. >> what about the two pelvic exam issues that you raised? did planned parenthood agree to do those? >> so we did for a second. we wrote that in our planned correction we would start doing day one pelvic exams on surgical patients. >> did planned parenthood at some point decide not to do that anymore? >> we did. >> and why is that? >> because it was the worst and most horrible experience ever.

so patients were made to get undressed -- be violated for something that they already have to do. i don't know who cried the most that day. if doctor eisenberg did, if my staff did, if i did. we explained to our patients this was not our doing, and that we were only doing what we were told. you have patients that have been abused, raped and you were putting them through an invasive unnecessary pelvic exam for something that they already have to do on procedure day. and you have patients apologizing to us saying i'm sorry you have to do that to me. i have to sit in a room with the

doctor after that show he can emotionally get himself together to the point where he was saying i don't think i can do this. i cannot go on violating women and sticking my fingers in women every single day just because they want me to. and we decided whatever consequences we were going to have we were going to have to have because to look in those patients in the eyes the days we had to do that, it was unbearable. and not only was it my job to make sure that floor runs operationally but also i have staff who can menally and emotionally be able to do their job, and no one was able to do their job that day or any other day we made women take their clothes off unnecessary to be invaded. so, yes, that was horrible. so we decided we weren't going to do it anymore. >> is the state department of health still requiring that

patients receive two pelvic exams? >> so they changed the requirement to say it is still in the regs it is required, but now the physician can decide whether they want to do it on day one or day two. and then they have to document it. >> do you need to take a break? >> no, i'm fine. thank you. >> we'll take a short break. >> yes, let's take a five minute break. >> she said she was fine, but honestly the room needed a break after that. she left the witness chair to utter silence in that room. before the state took back that new extra medically unnecessary pelvic exam policy more than a hundred women in missouri got a vaginal probe they did not need on orders of the state government. more a hundred women later, dr. randall williams, the state health officer in missouri decided well, okay, he's roll that policy back. now we know that since then he's been running a spreadsheet

monitoring individual womens periods. this hearing in st. louis over whether or not abortion will stay legal in missouri, that hearing was scheduled to go through the end of this week. but that changed after her testimony today which you just saw. the state did have the opportunity to bring the state health director randall williams back up to testify some more, to deliver more testimony about all the good work he's been doing in missouri. after shannon's testimony today the state decided, a, they needed a break, and b, they would not put him back on the stand. so these proceedings are now over, and we the country wait for an answer about whether or not the state of missouri will renew planned parenthood's license to operate or whether that state government will succeed in making missouri the first state in the country since roe that doesn't have a single

legal abortion provider anywhere in the state. just remarkable. we'll be right back. just remarkable. we'll be right back. as a struggling actor, i need all the breaks i can get. line? liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. that's a lot of words. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

that's ensure max protein, with high protein and 1 gram sugar. it's a sit-up, banana! bend at the waist! i'm tryin'! keep it up. you'll get there. whoa-hoa-hoa! 30 grams of protein, and one gram of sugar. ensure max protein. in the state. in the state managing type 2 diabetes? dimitri's on it. eating right? on it! getting those steps in? on it! dimitri thinks he's doing all he can to manage his type 2 diabetes and heart disease, but is his treatment doing enough to lower his heart risk? [sfx: glasses clanking.] sorry. maybe not. jardiance is the number 1 prescribed pill in its class. jardiance can reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults who also have known heart disease. that means jardiance can help save your life from a heart attack or stroke. plus, jardiance lowers a1c and it could help you lose some weight. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration, genital yeast or urinary tract infections, and sudden kidney problems. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. a rare, but life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin

of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this bacterial infection, ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction. do not take jardiance if you are on dialysis or have severe kidney problems. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. lower a1c and lower risk of a fatal heart attack? on it... with jardiance. ask your doctor about jardiance. the type 2 diabetes pill that's on it. learn more at jardiance.com

quote, moments after president trump ended his phone

call with ukraine's president on july 25th an unsettled national security aide rushed to the office of white house lawyer john eisenberg, vindman the top ukrainian advisor at the white house had been listening to the call and was disturbed by the pressure trump had applied to the ukrainian president to investigate his political rivals. vindman told eisenberg, the white house's legal advise on national security issues, that what the president did was wrong. vindman in eisenberg's office read out loud the notes he'd taken of the president's call. eisenberg, scribbling notes on a legal pad and then suggesting the national security council should move records of the call to a classified legal system. he's told the president did something wrong on that call. he hears the notes from the trained national security official who's listening in who believes that what the president did was wrong, he is response is to lock up the notes. "the washington post" reporting

from tom hamberger -- i'm sorry from carol lenning and tom hamberger. the president is being impeached for him trying to get a forb country to help him out against the democrats for 2020. but then there's immediately that day this other issue. the white house covering that up, hiding the evidence or at least weirdly misfiling the evidence of what the president did. i mean, that's something the president couldn't do for himself. how does that factor into the impeachment inquiry? the white house lawyer who apparently responded to these alarmed reports from a uniformed military officer that the president was doing something wrong, the guy responded to that by saying, well, let's lock the notes up then, that lawyer john eisenberg has been summoned to appear. he's been told he must appear on monday. will he appear?

as we await that closed door testimony from key officials like john eisenberg and others who have been summoned for closed door depositions, as of today we're officially gearing up for a whole new phase of impeachment proceeding, one that will play out before the public. today's vote to move forward the impeachment of president trump changes the whole framework of impeachment process going forward. joining me now is adam schiff. sir, thank you very much for your time. i know you have a lot of things to be working on right now. >> it's good to be with you. >> so the house has formally approved the process going forward. by our count we believe 13 or so witnesses have already testified. we know you have four more who you want to interview on monday and who you expect to interview on monday. do you feel at this point you personally in your committee have a good understanding of what transpired? are you in just the corroboration phase, you feel

you have the facts or are there still fundamental parts of the story you ned to understand? >> we certainly learned an enormous amount and when you consider the call record only became public a month ago, it's really astounding how much we've been able to cover. i think we're hearing a reasonably consistent story in what happened months before that call, what happened in the weeks and months after that call. but there are still missing pieces, and there are still key witnesses that we want to bring in. and of course there are still key witnesses who are resisting coming to testify. and, you know, until they come in, until they're willing to do their legal duty and their constitutional duty there are going to be pieces of this puzzle that the american people don't get to see. but i think when we do go to it public hearings and the american people have a chance to hear from these witnesses directly, they'll certainly get a pretty good picture of the president's misconduct. >> we do have multiple reports now that seem to be mutually

corroborative if not exact on the details about the white house having taken extraordinary action to essentially hide the record of the president's call that led to these impeachment proceedings in the first place. can you give us any insight into how that fits into these impeachment proceedings? do you view that as part of the misconduct that has given rise to the impeachment proceedings? is that potentially going to give rise to some other sort of action or accountability for other people who did that, who weren't the president himself? >> well, you know, i would say there are a few issues within the ukraine portfolio that we're investigating in the intelligence committee and, you know, certainly issues around the conditioning of this well-sought after meeting, this meeting that the president of ukraine desperately wanted with the president of the united states to show the most important relationship he had with the pachrtron of ukraine a

to get this political advantage, these investigations that would help the president's re-election campaign. but we're also look at the broad issue of obstruction, of cover-up. and i think that the degree to which this highly classified system may have been improperly used to conseal what i think many must have recognized was a highly problematic -- to put in the most diplomatic of terms -- call between the two presidents is one of the issues we're looking at. but i think it fits into the broader category of how this administration has sought to obstruct, to cover-up, to conseal the president's misconduct. >> we know from colonel vindman's account that at least according to him he believes that there were important factual details and important proper nouns that were left out of the white house call notes about that call. he says, according to his testimony, he wanted to correct those matters but his suggested

corrections even though he was asked to correct the transcript were not factored in. and the transcript ultimately -- i guess i wonder if you feel like that's a material issue, if you feel there is an importance for the committee to get to the bottom of what may have been the exact wording on that call and what may have been inaccuracies in those notes. and if you are going to pursue it, how you'll do so. >> well, one of the aspects of the resolution we passed today authorizes me to begin releasing transcripts. and i would expect that process would begin as early as next week. until we do release the transcripts, i really can't go into the substance of the testimony on that particular issue. that is was this call record accurate? if it wasn't fully accurate, why wasn't it fully accurate? i think the public will get a sense of those issues. we certainly have inquired about them when we began releasing the transcripts. and again, you know, the american people as well as the congress will be able to weigh

what's the significance of this, does this go to an effort of conseal? or is there some other explanation? but until we have those released i really can't go into the specifics. >> you're making news with us tonight already that those transcripts will start to be released next week. in terms of what the public is going to see here i know the rules voted on in the house also have a provision for a public facing report on your inquiry thus far. if you could hold on with us just for a moment, mr. chairman, i'll ask you on the other side. stay with us. r side stay with us performance comes in lots of flavors. there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind. and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result.

that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪ asbut when your team is always dealing with device setups, app updates, and support calls... you can never seem to get anywhere. that's why dell technologies created unified workspace, powered by vmware. ♪ a revolutionary solution that lets you deploy, manage, support and secure all your devices from the cloud. so you can stop going in circles, and start moving forward. it's an honor to tell you that [ applause ] thank you. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need.

i love you! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ doctor bob, what should i take for back pain? before you take anything, i recommend applying topical relievers first. salonpas lidocaine patch blocks pain receptors for effective, non-addictive relief. salonpas lidocaine. patch, roll-on or cream. hisamitsu.

...6, 7, 8 ♪ ♪ ♪ big dreams start with small steps... ...but dedication can get you there. so just start small... start saving. easily set, track and control your goals right from the chase mobile® app.

♪ ♪ chase. make more of what's yours®. joining us once again is the chair on of the house intelligence committee congressman adam schiff here tonight on this historic occasion of the house voting to move forward with these impeachment proceedings against the president. thanks again, mr. chairman for sticking with us. >> you bet. >> the rules call for your committee to write a report as far as i can tell reading those rules it looks like intended to be released to the public. what can you tell us about your intensions, your expectations for that report and what, we, the public should expect to learn from it, when we should expect to see it? >> we have of course studied the prior impeachments involving bill clinton, richard nixon for guidance both as to what the process and procedures ought to

be, and you'll see in the resolution we passed today we incorporate a lot of those processes, but there's one fundamental difference between this impeachment process and the ones that went before there's no special prosecutor, no independent prosecutor here to do the initial fact finding. and that's because when the criminal referral was made to bill barr's justice department he basically said i'm not going to look at this, i'm not going to authorize any criminal investigation, so we had to do that ourselves. so in some sense we step into the shoes of the independent council doing that fact find mchg and as the two models used between leon juwarsky or nixon or bill starr or clinton i'm much more inclined along the leon juwarsky route and that is presenting a fact based report to the judiciary committee. these are the facts that we found, these are the transcripts from our hearings. and then the judiciary committee will weigh what to do with those

facts rather than a highly opinionated and lengthy report along the lines of kenneth starr. >> interesting. and if in the course of your investigation you turn up evidence of criminal behavior by people other than the president, obviously this is an impeachment proceeding of the president, if you turn up evidence, serious evidence of serious crimes committed by other people either on the periphery of this or elsewhere in the administration, do you make criminal referrals in that information? do you include that in the type of fact based report you were just describing? >> we certainly can make criminal referrals and there are times we have referred matters to the justice department where we thought for example witnesses had committed or potentially committed perjury before our committee. so it's not uncommon for those referrals to happen. they're not certainly common, but that is a practice that the congress has used in the past. i don't know that would be a part of this report, which really the purpose of this report is for the judiciary

committee and ultimately the house if the committee were to act to weigh whether the conduct, whether the facts that have been found warrant this extraordinary remedy of impeachment. so that's really the focus of what our report will be. >> and sir, i know there's been no hard and fast announcement in terms of when we should expect public hearings to begin. we're getting the sense it will be sooner rather than later. but i have noted a few times on the show already since we started getting a sense of what these rules would be, i have to be honest have been positive on the fact that the rules say in those public hearings, some of the questioning can be done by staff members, by staff counsel rather than just being done by members themselves. i just want to afirm that you expect that that means that house counsel will be doing quite a bit of the questioning of these witnesses when the public hearings happen. and i want to ask you a question that you won't answer, which is are your members mad at you

about that? because it's taking -- >> i am more than pleased to answer both. on the first, you will see extensive periods of questioning by the staff counsel both majority and minority. that's the practice we use in the depositions. it's been very effective to bring out the facts. it's very conducive i think to telling the narrative of what happened. frankly, one of the most important purposes from my point of view of takelinging up the resolution today was to allow us to use that format which otherwise wasn't a part of the house rules. in term of whether the members were upset with me about that, i have to tell you the answer was unequivocally no. the members of committee said, hey, we want to use a format best conducive to bringing the facts forward and we think that's through staff led questioning. it's a tribute i think to members of our committee they felt that way without any sense of ego.

there is going to be a period for member questioning after these lengthy periods of staff questioning but i think the public will be impressed just how professional the questioning is. i'm just hoping we can avoid some of the circus tactics before the questioning ginz. >> can you give us a sense when those public hearings will start? >> we'd like to do them soon but there's still any number of witnesses we want to bring in for depositions and we want to do that before witnesses can align their stories. the challenge on timing is obviously some of these wnlss are doing their duty, they're following the law, they're abiding by the lawful subpoenas, others at the urging of the administration are fighting the subpoenas, refusing to show up. and we've seen court after court indeed in the mac gan hearing just today the judge expressed incredulity that administration witnesses, even those that left the administration are somehow completely immune from having to

answer congressional subpoena. but nonetheless the administration hopes to obstruct by delay, and often we don't know whether witnesses are going to testify until they show up or fail to show up. and not knowing that, it's hard to predict how soon we can go to the open hearings. >> adam schiff, thank you so much for giving us this time tonight. obviously a historic day but a lot happening and a lot changing all at once. having this clarity from you is really helpful. much more to get to tonight. stay with us. much more to get to tonight. stay with us uh... do you mind...being a mo-tour? -what could be better than being a mo-tour? the real question is... do you mind not being a mo-tour? -i do. for those who were born to ride, there's progressive. corrupt president in our nation's history. when i called for his impeachment two years ago, washington insiders

and every candidate for president said it was too soon. but i believed then, as i do now, that doing the right thing was more important than political calculations. and over eight million people agreed. we proved that there is no challenge that americans can't meet when we work together. i'm tom steyer, and i approve this message. panera's new warm grain full of flavor, color,. full of- woo! full of good. so you can be too. try our new warm grain bowls today. panera. food as it should be.

upbeat music♪ no cover-up spray here. cheaper aerosols can cover up odors in a flowery fog.

but febreze air effects eliminates odors. with a 100% natural propellent. it leaves behind a pleasant scent you'll love. [ deep inhale] freshen up. don't cover up. febreze. our mission is to provide complete, balanced nutrition... for strength and energy! whoo-hoo! great-tasting ensure. with nine grams of protein and twenty-seven vitamins and minerals. ensure, for strength and energy. some intriguing slash worrying new reporting tonight about the president's personal attorney. for the past few weeks media has been reporting rudy giuliani has been the subject of investigation by federal prosecutors in the southern district of new york as well as a separate counter intelligence investigation touching on him as well. last week politico reported that sdny and main justice, the department of justice headquarters in washington, quote, have been pressed to more

proict avly wo proictively work together on the giuliani investigation. that's a move quote causing heartburn at sdny. now tonight in the wake of that sort of intrigue and worry cnn is reporting that mr. giuliani is in advance discussions to hire a new white collar criminal defense attorney who's a veteran of sdny. the investigations into mr. joll yaw giuliani as far as we can tell intersect into his business associates who were arrested at dulles airport as they were about to use one way tickets to fly out of the country. last night they were arraigned on campaign finance charges. interesting today the lawyer who represents igor, mr. fruman toad wrote to the judge in the case.

mr. fruman emphasis lawyer gave the judge a heads up at that hearing tomorrow he's going to ask the judge to let igor ditch his ankle bracelet. quote, based on information after we agreed to this condition, such a condition is no longer the least restrictive condition that can reasonably assure the appearance of mr. fruman at trial. i respectfully request the permission to describe the reason for this request more fully on the record at the bail modification hearing tomorrow. what's that about? we reached out to our colleague former u.s. attorney joyce vance tonight to get her thoughts on why igor fruman's attorneys might be pitching this to the judge or reacting this way to his home detention and his ankle bracelet. she told us, quote, he's likely upset that probation is doing routine financial considerations on him because he's afraid they'll uncover evidence of other crimes. joyce says, quote, hilarious. been there before with

defendants. for what it's worth we don't know what information was learned after igor fruman agreed to home detention and wearing the ankle bracelet, information that his lawyer says will now convince the judge igor is a flight risk and he should be able to take that ankle monitor off, but we'll find out tomorrow at that hearing. i kind of can't wait. watch this space. g. i kind of can't wait watch this space and save in more ways than one. for small prices, you can build big dreams, spend less, get way more. shop everything home at wayfair.com

panera's new warm grain full of flavor, color,. full of- woo! full of good.

so you can be too. try our new warm grain bowls today. panera. food as it should be. stop dancing around the pain that keeps you up again, and again. advil pm silences pain, and you sleep the whole night. advil pm doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.

odd late breaking news num "the new york times" tonight. apparently last month president trump changed his official residence from new york city to palm beach, florida. he's now listing mar-a-lago as his residence. a person telling "the times" the reason is, quote, tax purposes. however that source also tells "the times" president trump was, quote, infuriated by a subpoena filed by cy vance, a manhattan district attorney seeking the president's tax returns. if changing his permanent residence is an effort to defeat the fact that under new york state law he and his business might be in criminal trouble, that's bonkers -- excuse me, that's probably misguided. quote, changing his residence to florida is not expected to have any effect on mr. vance's case. there's no indication changing his residency to florida is going to change his susce

susceptibility to getting his taxes. who knows what kind of advice he is giving himself or taking from his legal team on matters like this. s like this here's the thing about managing multiple clouds for your business. when you've got public clouds, and private clouds, and hybrid clouds- things can get a bit cloudy for you. but now, there's the dell technologies cloud, powered by vmware.

a single hub for a consistent operating experience across all your clouds. that should clear things up. at bayer, we're into the golden years. with better heart treatments, advanced brain disease research, and better ways to age gracefully. at bayer, this is why we science. ever since you brought me home, that day. i've been plotting to destroy you. sizing you up... calculating your every move. you think this is love? this is a billion years of tiger dna just ready to pounce. and if you have the wrong home insurance coverage, you could be coughing up the cash for this. so get allstate and be better protected from mayhem, like me-ow.

one quick follow-up to that report we just had about the president changing his official residence from new york city to florida. governor andrew cuomo has now responded to that report. the response from the governor is this. quote, good riddance. it's not like mr. trump paid taxes here anyway. he's all yours, florida. aww. that's does it for us tonight. we'll see you again tomorrow. now it's time for the "last word" with lawrence o'donnell. >> and i hope someone tells donald trump he's still going to have file new york tax returns every year since he derives a substantial amount of income from new york. so he doesn't escape filing the