thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. happy wednesday. since donald trump was elected president november 2016, there have been ten state legislative houses, either state senates or state houses, that have flipped in terms of which party controls them. the first one was in washington state. the senate there flipped from republican control to democratic control. and then all on one night, election night 2018, the colorado senate flipped, the maine senate flipped, the minnesota house flipped, the new hampshire house flipped, the new hampshire senate flipped, the connecticut senate flipped, the new york senate all flipped, and all of them flipped from republican control to democratic control.

and then last night the first call we got from the associated press at 9:29 eastern time was that the virginia senate would also flip, also from republican control to democratic control. and then after i got off the air for the first iteration of our show last night, the ap made the call not just for the virginia senate but the virginia house as well. and so what that means is since donald trump has been president, in all, in eight different states the house or the senate in the state legislature, ten state legislative houses overall have flipped party control. since trump has been president. and every single one of them has flipped from republican control to democratic control. and that result last night with the whole virginia legislature, both the house and the senate, flipping from republican control to democratic control, while democrats also control the governorship in the state of virginia, not just going to have a huge impact in terms of policy

and priorities in the state of virginia, you're now going to have democratic-controlled government in the state of virginia. after the courts repeatedly struck down electoral maps that the republicans had drawn in virginia when they had control of the legislature, after courts repeatedly struck down those republican-drawn maps for being discriminatory at one level or another, what happened last night in virginia with democrats taking both houses of the legislature, it also means that republicans aren't going to have another shot at trying to rig the electoral maps in their state to ensure that republicans win even when they get far fewer votes. so virginia is going to be a big, big change in terms of policy and in terms of house districts and in terms of future legislative districts. that result last night in virginia was a big deal. a big hairy consequential deal, and it was a surprise. we were also up late last night watching the returns roll in in the kentucky governor's race

where nbc news fairly last evening declared that the democrat in the race, andy beshear, would be the apparent winner over incumbent republican governor matt bevin. as of today, as of right now, matt bevin is still not conceding that race. he's demanding all of the votes be recanvassed which is not exactly the same thing as a recount. it basically means they tally the votes again. nobody's quite sure if bevin is going to ultimately demand a recount and if that's going to happen. nobody's quite sure how this can work out in kentucky. there's a few weird off-ramps they could take through the state legislator or state government in kentucky if they want to try to do that. but if bevin insists on not conceding, it's uncertain how this proceeds. with all precincts reporting, it looks like andy beshear beat matt bevin by more than 5,000 votes. but bevin is saying he won't step down, he won't concede he's

been beaten, so we shall see. another governor's race last night in the great state of mississippi. republicans are able to celebrate if nothing else from last night, they're able to celebrate the fact they were able to hold on to the governorship in mississippi last night. it should be noted for context that mississippi is a state that donald trump won by 28 points. last night the republican candidate for governor who president trump campaigned for in person right up to election day, he was only able to pull off a single-digit, 5-point victory in that state where trump had just romped to victory not long before. so last night's off-year elections are exciting to democrats. right? even in a deep red state like mississippi where they didn't quite pull it off in terms of the top election in the state, last night's election results are energizing to democrats for obvious reasons. and for converse reasons, the same results i'm sure made today feel pretty overcast, pretty

cloudily, from the point of view of, say, the republican party broadly, the republican-controlled white house looking ahead to 2020, specifically, the west wing in that white house where there sits republican president donald trump staring down the start of his re-election campaign and his simultaneous impeachment in washington. today was just a remarkable day on that front. you will recall that one of president trump's personal lawyers, michael cohen, long-time personal lawyer, is already serving time in federal prison as we speak. and remember the day we first reported that mr. cohen had retained his own lawyer, the president's lawyer had to get a criminal defense lawyer for himself. that seemed like a bad sign at the time. indeed it turned out to be a bad sign since michael cohen is now in prison. i don't know what you have to call it, though, when you have to report that same thing for a second time. but tonight we can report that the president's new personal lawyer, the one who isn't in

prison tonight, he too has had to hire his own criminal defense lawyer. that was the news that we got today about the president's current personal lawyer, rudy giuliani. rudy giuliani has hired his own criminal defense lawyer now. and of all the lawyers in the world that rudy giuliani could have hired, it turns out, sure, why not? he hired the guy who had been michael cohen's criminal defense lawyer back in the day. despite the fact that that worked out with michael cohen ultimately going to prison, it's like there's only ten of these guys in the world, right? like, really? michael cohen's is the president's other personal lawyer. he's in jail. you're hiring his lawyer? first of all, you both had to get criminal defense lawyers. you both decided to get the same one? it's like literally there's ten of these guys and they're all in joint defense agreements, they're all in each other's personal indictments. maybe someday they'll open a wing for them in the federal prison system. the commissary will all be like

trump-themed chopkys. red baseball hats. i'll trade you a baseball hat for an extra long tie. but as the president's personal lawyer, yet another one of them had to get his own criminal defense lawyer today. we also got big impeachment proceedings -- big developments in the impeachment proceedings on capitol hill. first of all a senior state department witness showed up to testify today. that's notable because the white house and state department have told everybody they can't testify, they're not allowed to testify in the impeachment committees, so every time a currently serving administration official does show up anyway in defiance of those instructions, it sort of changes the dynamic a little bit in terms of those instructions, in terms of how everybody else in the administration is going to treat their subpoenas and whether or not that white house instruction that they shouldn't testify is seen as binding or more binding than a lawful congressional subpoena. the witness who, surprise, did

show up and testify today for more than six hours is david hale. he's the number three official at the u.s. state department. unlike some other officials who have testified at the impeachment committees, we didn't receive a prepared opening statement of mr. hale's remarks. so compared to other witnesses at this point, we don't know much about what he said. we do, however, as of today know quite a bit about the recent and explosive testimony from another senior state department official, ambassador bill taylor. he was the first witness to lay out in clear detail how this whole scheme worked for the president and rudy giuliani were demanding investigations to be announced by ukraine, investigations that could help trump in his re-election effort, and in order to try to pressure ukraine to handing those investigations over, to announcing those investigations, the core elements of american foreign policy toward that country were put on the line. things like a white house meeting for their new president,

even military assistance that had been ordered by law, by congress. bill taylor is the first one who laid that out in detail and crucially told the impeachment committees that he takes copious contemporaneous notes and had documentation to back up a lot of what it said. well, today the intelligence committee released more than 300 pages of verbatim testimony from bill taylor, from his closed-door deposition several weeks ago. they also simultaneously announced that bill taylor will be a witness at the first public hearing of the impeachment proceedings against donald j. trump. that first public hearing is now on the calendar. it's going to be a week from today. ambassador bill taylor and another senior state department official named george kent, they're going to be the first public testimony in the impeachment proceedings a week from today. and then two days later, next friday, there will be a second public impeachment hearing, and that one will feature testimony from the u.s. ambassador to

ukraine, marie yovanovitch, the one who was called from that post and sort of inexplicably fired, essentially it seems to get her out of the way so rudy giuliani and president trump could pursue their scheme in ukraine, the scheme for which the president is now being impeached, presumably for which mr. giuliani has now obtained his own defense counsel. the closed-door depositions are continuing for now. other people have been asked to testify, others have been subpoenaed to testify. most of those people who have been summoned to give more closed-door depositions, we expect them not to show up i guess at this point on orders from the white house. although with each day you never know who's actually going to turn up. i'll tell you one of the witnesses who's been asked to testify behind closed doors who is expected to show up is somebody whose testimony i am really interested in. and she's going to be testifying tomorrow. she's not a big name, not a high-profile person, but i'll tell you why i'm super interested in her testimony tomorrow. we'll get to that a little later

on in tonight's show. as they finish up with these closed-door depositions, the first public impeachment hearings are on the calendar now. so here we go. and remarkably, simultaneous to all of that today in federal court in washington, d.c. they finished jury selection and started opening statements in the trial of the president's longtime friend and oldest political advisor, a man who's gone to great lengths to make him seem too ridiculous for serious news coverage, a man named roger stone. now, whether or not you're interested in mr. stone himself, and speaking from personal experience i can say that interest is hard to sustain on a personal level, no offense, i just don't care. but the reason mr. stone is being prosecuted and the way prosecutors are carrying out this case that started today in

federal court is like, forget roger stone. i mean, yes, his criminal liability here is of interest, but forget roger stone. the case is about something way bigger than that, and we've known that was a possibility when we first saw the charges against stone in the way they laid out the case against him in the indictment, but i did not expect it to be like this in court today. just listen to this. we got the transcript today. i had no faith we would get it in time for tonight's show, same day that it happened, right? but just before i came down to the studio and we got on the air tonight, we got the transcript of what happened today in court. so i have marked it up. this might be a little rocky because we haven't had it for very long. let me just lay it out here in terms of how the prosecutors are making this case because you can tell what it's about, and you do not have to care about roger stone to recognize this is big freaking hairy deal. all right, here's how the opening statement starts. the judge says, all right, you can proceed. she says that to the prosecutor. aaron zelensky.

this is aaron zelensky talking. you may recognize his name, he was one of the prosecutors who worked on the mueller investigation. here's zelensky. he says, quote, we are here today because one man obstructed congress' investigation into russian interference in the 2016 election. in a critical investigation of national importance the defendant, roger stone, repeatedly lied under oath to a congressional committee and then tampered with a witness to cover up his tracks. now you'll hear in 2016 the democratic national committee, which is the organization that runs the democratic party of the united states, they announced their computer system had been hacked by the russian government. you'll hear not long after that a website called wikileaks began to release thousands of e-mails that were related to the dnc. after wikileaks began releasing these dnc e-mails you'll also hear that the defendant, roger stone, started bragging he was in contact with wikileaks and he knew what wikileaks' plans were. at the time the defendant's longtime friend and associate, donald trump, was running for president of the united states against hillary clinton.

and the defendant, roger stone, thought that those e-mails would help his friend trump, and they would hurt clinton. so you'll hear in august of 2016 that mr. stone proclaimed over and over and over again that he was in contact with wikileaks, and that he had information about what was coming. and you'll hear that mr. stone publicly said that he knew this information because he had an intermediary, a go-between, somebody that he was talking to that was talking to the head of wikileaks. one year later you'll hear the united states congress and particularly the house intelligence committee was undertaking an investigation into russian interference in the 2016 election. and because of the allegation that russia was responsible for the hacking of the dnc's server and the e-mails that were subsequently released by wikileaks, the intelligence committee focused on wikileaks and they focused on roger stone. and the intelligence committee wanted to know what information stone had gotten from wikileaks, how he'd gotten it, and who he was talking to in the trump campaign about it. roger stone you'll hear

testified to the committee under oath on september 26, 2017, and you'll hear that when mr. stone testified, he told the committee five categories of lies. that's the preamble, that's how he starts. in terms of the five categories of lies, stone is facing seven felony counts altogether. one of them, very serious, witness tampering. that carries a 20-year potential prison term. i'll mention that in case any united states senators are listening right now. witness tampering carries a potential 20-year prison term. in addition to that he's facing five counts of lying to congress and a count of obstruction of justice. each of those come with a five potential years of their own. but the prosecution goes through at the outset all of the categories of lies that roger stone is alleged to have told under oath. first category is this, the second category is this, and the third category is this. and the final category of lies they describe him as telling is this. quote, the last lie roger stone told the committee was about the trump campaign.

he was asked by the committee whether he'd ever discussed what he learned from his intermediary with the trump campaign and roger stone told them he hadn't. you will hear that roger stone discussed what he was learning with the senior levels of the trump campaign. you might ask why didn't roger stone just tell the truth to the intelligence committee? the evidence in this case will show that stone lied to the intelligence committee because the truth looked bad. the truth looked bad for the trump campaign, and the truth looked bad -- excuse me, and the truth looked bad for donald trump. so this is a case about roger stone. but the prosecution made clear there in their opening statement that the reason stone lied in the prosecutor's telling, the reason he's on trial right now for these felony counts is because he couldn't tell the truth because, and i quote, the truth looked bad for donald trump. this is a case about the president. i mean, it's about roger stone

but it's about the president. and it's in part, you know, while the house is already in the midst of impeachment proceedings against the president, this case that started today in criminal court in washington is about in part whether president trump's sworn written statements about roger stone were true. whether his sworn written statements about what he knew about what stone was doing, whether he was any part of that, this case in part is about whether the president's written answers might themselves have been illegal false statements. back to zelensky here. quote, just after stone got this message about new expected dumps of stolen information about the democrats, roger stone e-mailed the chairman of the trump campaign paul manafort. paul manafort wasn't just the chairman of the trump campaign he was also a longtime friend of roger stone. stone wrote to manafort on august 3rd he had an idea in his words to, forgive me, save trump's ass.

and he asks manafort call him. you'll also hear roger stone emailed steve bannon. he told bannon that trump could still win, but time was running out. and he said he knew how to win this, but, quote, it ain't pretty. roger stone knew how to win this, and he was telling that to the trump campaign ceo, but his way in his own words, quote, ain't pretty. now at the same time in august you'll hear roger stone was bragging. he was bragging publicly and bragging loudly and bragging repeatedly he was in contact with wikileaks. that he had a go-between that was telling him information about what was coming that he had an intermediary. stone regularly updated people in the trump campaign at the senior levels about whatever information he thought he had about wikileaks. make no mistake roger stone could have easily told the truth to the intelligence committee. stone could have testified he had many e-mails and texts about wikileaks and julian assange. including the ones you see here today. he could have said he had the messages with steve bannon,

with paul manafort, with jerome corsi, about julian assange. roger stone could have told the truth that he told corsi to get to assange, to get the pending wikileak emails that he told corsi to get an associate of theirs to get to julian assange. stone could have told the house intelligence committee that in fact corsi had responded back to him and told him there would be, quote, dumps coming in october, impact planned to be very damaging. and stone could have told the committee he had all of this in writing, in his e-mail accounts and text messages at the time of his testimony. stone could have told the committee the truth that he asked to pass along a question to julian assange, that he requested information from assange about whether or not he had e-mails concerning hillary clinton and libya. and stone could have told the committee that he spoke with steve bannon and others about what he was learning regarding wikileaks. stone could have truthfully stated he had hundreds of

messages, emails, texts, that showed the truth of what happened in 2016 that he had many written records that could help the committee establish what had actually happened. but roger stone didn't do that. he didn't even come close. instead he repeatedly lied to the house intelligence committee. he did it because if he had told the truth, as he said before, it wasn't pretty, it would look bad. and so instead he told these lies. roger stone did all of this to obstruct an investigation by the house intelligence committee into russian interference in the 2016 election. the committee was undertaking a critical investigation about an important moment in our nation's history. the house intelligence committee was trying to learn the truth about what had happened in the 2016 election, and roger stone, he was doing his best to stop it. and that is why after you've listened to all the evidence in this case and you've examined the documents and heard the witnesses, we are confident that you will return the only verdict justified on these facts, a verdict of guilty on all counts. thank you.

so the president's being impeached. just in the past few minutes i am advised that "the washington post" has just reported that the president asked the attorney general, bill barr, to hold a press conference saying the president did nothing wrong on the president's phone call to ukraine for which he's now being impeached. the attorney general, yes that attorney general bill barr, according to "the washington post" tonight reportedly turned the president down and said he would not hold such a press conference. also tonight the president's personal lawyer has just hired his own criminal defense lawyer. same defense lawyer the president's first personal lawyer used to have, but he's freed up now because the other guy who used to be the president's personal lawyer is already in prison, so his lawyers are available. the public impeachment hearings are going to start next week. and, and, and, and -- and in a courtroom in washington, d.c. as of today prosecutors are finally litigating for the first time not just the obstruction of the

russia investigation, right, but for the first time they are finally litigating what the president knew about russia's interference to help his campaign and when he knew it. they're finally litigating that question while he's already being impeached for something else. other than that, totally normal wednesday, right? we'll be right back. stay with us. atic orchestra) ♪ performance comes in lots of flavors. there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind. and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result. that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪ t-mobile's newest signal reaches farther than ever before...

with more engineers, more towers, more coverage. it's a network that gives you... with coverage from big cities, to small towns. introducing t-mobile's 600mhz signal. no signal reaches farther or is more reliable. and it's built 5g ready. stop dancing around the pain that keeps you up again, and again. advil pm silences pain, and you sleep the whole night. advil pm and my side super soft? be firm? with the sleep number 360 smart bed you can both...

adjust your comfort with your sleep number setting. so, can it help us fall asleep faster? yes, by gently warming your feet. but can it help keep me asleep? absolutely, it intelligently senses your movements and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. will it help me keep up with him? yup. so, you can really promise better sleep? not promise... prove. and now, during our veterans day sale, save $1,000 on the new sleep number 360 special edition smart bed, now only $1,799. only for a limited time. i need all the breaks as athat i can get.or, at liberty butchemel... cut. liberty mu... line? cut. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. cut. liberty m... am i allowed to riff? what if i come out of the water? liberty biberty... cut. we'll dub it. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

that's why xfinity mobile lets you design your own data. you can share 1, 3, or 10 gigs of data between lines. mix in lines of unlimited, and switch it up at anytime. all with millions of secure wifi hotspots... and the best lte everywhere else. it's a different kind of wireless network designed to save you money. switch and save up to four hundred dollars a year on your wireless bill. and save even more when you bring your own phone and upgraded your network. that's simple, easy, awesome. click, call or visit a store today.

one of the things that has been interesting and actually quite unique about covering this presidency is this president has had a terrible time of it in court. from the earliest days of his administration no matter how many judges he appoints and he seems to think that's his way out of it, but he just loses case after case after case on policy, on his tax returns. now he has impeachment to worry about in congress and multiple criminal cases related to his administration included related to the impeachment playing out in court. but just in the past few weeks something truly astounding happened in court even by the standards of this remarkable administration. a judge within the last few weeks threatened to send a trump cabinet member to jail. the judge told the trump cabinet secretary, quote, there have to be some consequences for the violation of my order 16,000 times.

the judge continued, quote, i'm not sending anyone to jail yet, but it's good to know i have that ability. somehow i do not think that education secretary betsey devos envisioned herself wearing a polyester jumpsuit eating baloney sandwiches when she signed up to be education secretary, but she made a federal judge mad enough to threaten it, mad enough to eventually hold secretary devos in contempt of court and to fine her $100,000 for her going ahead with a policy that the court had ordered her department to stop. we have some context for you tonight on how it is that a trump cabinet member got that close to jail. the story is about one of the country's largest chains of for-profit colleges. that chain of colleges was basically to bottom line it a total scam. they recruited largely poor and minority applicants by lying

about how successful their programs were and the kinds of job placements their graduates would get. they sent those recruits to get student loans from the federal government. the colleges ultimately benefited from that. the government lends that money to the students, the students then pay it to that scam for-profit college. so the colleges collect all the money. the graduates are left with worthless degrees and a big student loan debt to pay back to the government. some students never even got the degree because the colleges went bankrupt in 2015 and shut their doors on one day's notice. the obama administration tried to do something to help those scammed students. the obama education department said to those students, listen, those colleges, those fake colleges were so bad we are not going to make this problem worse for you. we are going to forgive your student loan debt if you got duped by one of those schools. you can petition the federal government for relief from the debt that you got scammed into because that money shouldn't go

to those schools and you shouldn't be on the hook for it even though it did. that was how the obama administration handled this crisis. then came the trump administration and a new education secretary, betsey devos. she had a very different idea. so her top lawyer at the education department came up with a memo describing what would be the policy change on this matter under the trump administration. and we have obtained that memo here tonight. this is the memo. it's from december 2017, and what it says basically is actually some of these scammed for-profit college students should pay back their loans, they should be on the hook for that money. the idea as laid out in this memo is that the students must have gotten some benefit from these scam schools. if the department could show that these people ended up working in jobs that paid them more than if they had not gone to the school on average looking

at it statistically, in this memo the department claimed to have devised a formula for measure just that. how did that magical formula they came up with work out? one former student claimed she finished the course of study at this scam for-profit college. she never got a diploma because the company suddenly without warning went bankrupt. but she nevertheless tried to get a job in her field and she discovered that the college had not actually given her the required training to get a job in her field at all. but the trump education department under betsey devos through its magic formula determined that eligible student -- that that student was eligible to only have 20% of her loan forgiven. 80% of her education according to their new formula had actually been quite useful, but she got neither the diploma or training necessary to get a job in her field, they still wanted 80% of the money. and even without those painful consequences for the students,

even setting aside how this worked out in practice, a federal judge looked at this new policy of the trump administration and declared it illegal, determined that this whole formula they'd come up with had serious problems. for one it depended on the government taking private information about these students in a way that the judge said was a violation of the law. and so the judge ordered betsey devos and her education department to stop collecting money from these students and to stop using that illegal formula, and betsey devos and her education department ignored the judge's order. they didn't exactly ignore it, but they didn't stop collecting money from the students. thousands of students were told they still needed to make payments on those loans from the scam colleges, and their credit scores got dinged, and their paychecks got garnished and their tax refunds got seized. this department of education policy, the department's

determination to keep going with the policy despite the court order striking it down, i mean, it materially hurt these real americans who had already been injured, right? this damage was painful, it was personal. and they did it thousands of times. thousands of people hurt after the court told the education department and betsey devos to stop doing this, this illegal policy they had devised. and that's why the judge fined the education secretary $100,000 and threatened to put her in jail. the $100,000 the judge said should go to try to ameliorate the harm done by devos and the department violating the judge's order. well this memo laying out this policy under the trump education department, this memo we have obtained tonight, the thing that lays out the new formula for collecting money from these scammed students, this policy that got smacked down by a judge who then held the department and its cabinet secretary in

contempt, this memo came from the guy who at the time was the top lawyer at the education department. he has a name. his name is steven menashi, no longer at the education department. he now works at the white house, and president trump has nominated him for a lifetime seat on the federal appeals court, just one level below the united states supreme court. the senate judiciary committee scheduled a vote on his nomination tomorrow morning. but here's the thing, mr. menashi's nomination appears already to be in trouble. if they do vote on him tomorrow, that would be the third effort they've made to try to call a vote on him. his nomination keeps getting rolled over to new date after new date, because he is one of donald trump's most controversial nominees which is saying something given the roster of people who donald trump has tried to turn into judges. we've talked about him on the show and the paper trail left of his own writing. for example on an italian prime minister's proclamation of the

superiority of western civilization over islam. he says, quote, mr. berlusconi did nothing other than state the obvious inferiority of islam. he also wrote how offensive it was that the matthew shepherd murder got so much attention. that definitely didn't need as much attention as it got. he also opined on the movement against campus rape. against rape and sexual assault on college campuses. he said campus gyno-centrists are throwing around these accusations but there's no similar leeway for men. and there's of course his law review article entitled ethno nationalism and liberal democracy in which he argues, quote, the solidarity underlying democratic polities rests in large part on ethnic identification. surely it does not serve the cause of liberal democracy to ignore this reality. the article goes onto argue that ethnically heterogenous

societies, ethnically diverse societies, have less good stuff in them when it comes to being a good democracy, a working polity. ethnic heterogeneity, it's not ideal. just that stuff alone has been dragging behind the bumper of the steven menashi nomination like anvils and millstones. he has expressed regret for some of his writings, but it's stuck to him in part because there's so much of it. the senate judiciary committee has been voting very right wing judicial nominees right on through, but they've been holding up steven menashi, and now they have this new memo to consider, this education policy from steven menashi that proved disastrous for students and embarrassing and expensive and potentially incarcerating for our nation's secretary of education. we reached out to the white house with questions for mr. menashi about this memo. we haven't heard anything back

from them. i'm not taking it personally because they also apparently did not answer questions from "the new york times" which as of this evening is also reporting on this story. an excellent piece from erica green who's also obtained this memo. i'll read you the lead tonight from "the new york times." quote, a judicial nominee slated for a controversial vote on thursday, meaning tomorrow, helped devise an illegal i education department effort to deny debt relief to thousands of students cheated by their for-profit colleges. well put. yeah, he devised this illegal effort, it resulted among other things in not only people illegally having their wages garnished and their tax returns seized and their credit scores dinged and all the rest of that, people who absolutely should not have been subjected to that, thousands of people. it also resulted in the secretary of that agency being threatened with jail time and hit with a $100,000 fine. that's the guy they're putting

from a lifetime appointment. as a judge one level underneath the united states supreme court. and the senate judiciary committee is scheduled for now to be voting on steven menashi's appointment for a lifetime appointment to the bench tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. eastern. (dad) i think it's here. (mom vo) especially at this age. (big sis) where are we going? (mom vo) it's a big, beautiful world out there. (little sis) whoa... (big sis) wow. see that? (mom vo) sometimes you just need a little help seeing it. (vo) the three-row subaru ascent. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru.

you should be mad your neighbor always wants to hang out. and you should be mad your smart fridge is unnecessarily complicated. make ice. making ice. but you're not mad because you have e*trade which isn't complicated. their tools make trading quicker and simpler so you can take on the markets with confidence. don't get mad get e*trade and start trading commission free today. don't get mad get e*trade and start trading did you know even the cleanest looking cars can smell musty? ♪ that's because odors trapped in your car's soft surfaces get released, and are then circulated by your ac system. to stop the cycle of odors try febreze car vent clips. febreze stops the circulation of musty air by trapping and eliminating lingering odor molecules

for up to 30 days of fresh, clean air. plus, they come in a range of scents including extra light. stop the cycle of odors in your car with febreze car vent clips. brand power. helping you buy better.

ambassador bill taylor, the top american diplomat in ukraine, decades of diplomatic experience under presidents of both parties, when he was called to testify before the impeachment proceedings recently, we knew shortly after he showed up, when we got his

opening statement we knew he would confirm that, yes, president trump really did block military aid to ukraine to get that country to gin up some dirt on his domestic political rivals. that quid pro quo plot line is very simple, very consistent across all the testimony from all the witnesses so far. taylor is the one who first laid it out more clearly than anybody else. because that plot line is simple and direct and now been reiterated by all the other witnesses, to be honest you don't necessarily need all the details we got from the 324 page long transcript from bill taylor's testimony that the impeachment committees released today. even if you don't need it, you might want some of these details anyway. for example, there's this moment when ambassador taylor is describing the national security council having to convene a whole bunch of interagency meetings to try to figure out why the military aid to ukraine is being held up. taylor says in his testimony that literally everyone was in agreement that that military aid should be released without

delay. the defense secretary, cia director, national security advisor, everybody wants the aid released, so they're all scheduling meetings trying to get the president to release this stuff, trying to figure it out. but it turns out they were having trouble scheduling a meeting with the president to talk about this matter for a very specific reason. taylor says, quote, i think this was about the time of the greenland question, about purchasing greenland which took up a lot of energy in the national security council. chairman adam schiff, okay, that's disturbing for a whole different reason. the president is trying to shake down a foreign leader for dirt on his political opponents, he's holding up military aid to try to force them to do it, and his national security council can't find the time to get him to stop doing that because they're all too busy dealing with his stated efforts to buy a whole different country, to buy it.

that's -- that's a good day at the trump white house. so there's that. but then there's also the human reaction from these witnesses who, again, are mostly longtime public servants and experts in their field. at one point in his testimony new york congressman sean patrick maloney asked ambassador bill taylor, quote, what was your emotional reaction to these events? taylor gives a pretty sort of stunning response. he says, quote, i think ukraine is important objectively to the united states. the emotional piece is based on my time in ukraine in 2006, 2009, when traveling around the country i got to know ukrainians and their frustrations and difficulties and those kinds of things. and coming back and seeing it now where they have an opportunity, they've got a young president, young prime minister, young parliament. the prime minister is 35 years old. this new government has appealed to young people so idealistic, so pro-west, so pro-united states, pro-europe, that i feel an emotional attachment, bond, connection to this country and these people.

i cared about this country, i didn't want to see it screwed up. i wanted to see it succeed. congressman sean patrick maloney says, quote, and you didn't want to see it screwed up by some political agenda coming from washington, is that fair to say? ambassador taylor says, what i didn't want to do is have u.s. assistance to ukraine be blocked or suspended for no good reason i could see. and there are some bad reasons that i didn't want to see that blocked. bill taylor is going to be the first witness in the public testimony that has just been announced in the impeachment proceedings for one week from today. congressman sean patrick maloney joins us next. 448,134 to be exact. they answered 410 questions in 8 categories about vehicle quality. and when they were done, chevy earned more j.d. power quality awards across cars, trucks and suvs than any other brand over the last four years.

so on behalf of chevrolet, i want to say "thank you, real people." you're welcome. we're gonna need a bigger room. (woman) you have the support of a probiotic and the gastroenterologists who developed it. (vo) align helps to soothe your occasional digestive upsets 24/7 with a strain of bacteria you can't get anywhere else. (woman) you could say align puts the "pro" in probiotic. so where you go, the pro goes. (vo) go with align. the pros in digestive health. and try align gummies. with prebiotics and probiotics to help support digestive health. you have power over pain, so the whole world looks different.

the unbeatable strength of advil. what pain? so w>>i'm searching for info on options trading, and look, it feels like i'm just wasting time. wasted time is wasted opportunity. >>exactly. that's why td ameritrade designed a first-of-its-kind, personalized education center. see, you just >>oh, this is easy. yeah, and that's >>oh, just what i need. courses on options trading,

webcasts, tutorials. yeah. their award-winning content is tailored to fit your investing goals and interests. and it learns with you, so as you become smarter, so do its recommendations. >>so it's like my streaming service. well exactly. well except now, you're binge learning. >>oh, i like that. thank you, i just came up with that. >>you're funny. learn fast with the td ameritrade education center. call 866-295-0917 or visit tdameritrade.com/learn. get started today, and for a limited time, get up to $800 when you open and fund an account. that's 866-295-0917, or tdameritrade.com/learn. ♪ so today we got more than 300 pages of testimony transcript from the top diplomat in ukraine, bill taylor. this is from his deposition in the impeachment proceedings, a deposition in which he laid out the story that has been confirmed now by witness after witness that the president held up military aid to ukraine to

try to get that country to gin up dirt on the president's political opponents. with everything else that's been turned up during the course of these impeachment proceedings that remains the core of what is happening here. joining us now is congressman sean patrick maloney. member of the intelligence committee. thank you for being here. >> my pleasure. >> so public hearings start a week from today. how should we prepare for that as people are going to be watching this to try to figure out what's happening overall with this story and what's happening in terms of the president's culpability? >> well, i think the transcripts are a great place to start. i know they're long and they can be dense, but there's a very important story there. it's also a very sad story. it's a story about failure at the highest levels of american political leadership and it's a story about advancing shabby political and financial interests over our national security. if you actually care about the american government, if you spent your youth thinking we were capable of great things, it's heartbreaking to read the conduct the american president engaged in. but it's important. and ambassador taylor lays it out very clearly.

>> in terms of the remaining closed-door depositions i know there was one today where a state department official david hale actually showed up. i know tomorrow you're expecting to hear testimony from a person who worked in the vice president's office. it's the first time as far as i know that a vice presidential adjacent person will be speaking. there was also a decision today to drop a subpoena for an official who had gone to court to try to have a judge decide whether or not he should obey the subpoena. can you tell us anything about that decision? >> in the last case the kupperman subpoena, as i understand it, the point is that we don't want to do anything that would advance the strategy to delay, through litigation, when in the mcgahn case, a separate case, the judge is going to rule very quickly on the same question. about whether there is some blanket, never heard of before, wall to wall immunity from the

authority of congress to do oversight on behalf of officials like this. it's a frivolous claim. it's going to be disposed of earlier, and as i understand it that's the point behind withdrawing that subpoena, to essentially take away mr. kupperman's dilatory legal arguments and have them advance more quickly through the mcgahn case. >> in terms of his dramatic revision to his testimony we saw from ambassador sondland yesterday, it was a remarkable document saying, i now refreshed -- i've had my recollection refreshed, i now recall things -- and basically what he discloses is that on the sidelines of a meeting that vice president pence had with the ukrainian president where vice president pence said you're not getting your military aid unless you give us these corruption actions that we want, corruption related actions we want, sondland is now admitting that on the sidelines of that meeting, he made crystal clear to the ukrainian government, what we mean is you're not getting your military aid unless you announce those investigations. now tomorrow somebody who works in the vice president's office is going to be testifying.

is vice president pence one of the people who carried out this scheme for president trump? >> well, i asked that question of some of the witnesses. i'm interested in that. he did meet with the president of ukraine in warsaw on september 1st. it is on the sidelines of that meeting that ambassador sondland delivered the explicit quid pro quo to the key aide of the ukrainian president, said you're not getting anything, not a white house meeting, not this desperately needed security assistance, until you issue an explicit statement, which you've been negotiating with giuliani, saying burisma, 2016 elections, the bidens are the heart of this thing. and sondland forgot that until 24 hours ago, but he adds an important piece of this puzzle, and it's good he's aligning his testimony with what has been corroborated by other witnesses and documents. it's an important piece of the puzzle. and the vice president's role is still a question mark on this. >> is it possible the vice president will be called to give testimony himself? >> i'm not prepared to say at this point. i think we need to have a lot more evidence of what he did on this.

and i wouldn't want to lose focus on the president, which is the central issue. what did the president of the united states do, why did he do it? and the evidence is overwhelming that this was a clear abuse of power for the worst possible reason, and i want to stay focused on that at least for now. i do think it's important that everybody involved in this answer for their actions. >> new york congressman sean patrick maloney, it's going to be a very busy week leading up to a very busy day, a week from today when those first public hearings happen, thank you. ormas in lots of flavors. there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind. and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result. that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪

we make aspirin to help save lives during a heart attack... so it never stops the heart of a family. at bayer, this is why we science. to put on our website? i mean i would have but i'm a commercial vehicle so i don't have hands... or a camera...or a website. should we franchise? is the market ready for that? can we franchise? how do you do that? meg! oh meg! we should do that thing where you put the business cards in the fishbowl and somebody wins something. -meg: hi. i'm here for... i'm here for the evans' wedding. -we've got the cake in the back, so, yeah. -meg: thank you. -progressive knows small business makes big demands. -you're not gonna make it, you're not gonna make it! ask her if we can do her next wedding too! -so we'll design the insurance solution that fits your business. -on second thought, don't...ask that.

we chose eleanor. it was great-grandma's name. so we're in this little town near salerno and everyone has dad's eyebrows. help your family discover their unique story, with a gift from ancestry.

this is footage from september 1, 2019, when vice president mike pence went overseas, met with the ukrainian president. what i was talking about with congressman sean patrick maloney about. you know who else was in that room? we've got that footage and that answer which will tell you about the most interesting thing going to happen in tomorrow's news next. stay with us. ir, you spend less and get way more. so you can bring your vision to life and save in more ways than one. for small prices, you can build big dreams, spend less, get way more. shop everything home at wayfair.com liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need.

i wish i could shake your hand. granted. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ (danny)'s voice) of course you don'te because you didn't!? your job isn't doing hard work... ...it's making them do hard work... ...and getting paid for it. (vo) snap and sort your expenses to save over $4,600 at tax time. quickbooks. backing you. and my side super soft? be firm? with the sleep number 360 smart bed you can both... adjust your comfort with your sleep number setting. can it help keep me asleep? absolutely, it intelligently senses your movements and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. and snoring? no problem... and done. will it help me keep up with him? yup.

so, you can really promise better sleep? not promise... prove. and now, during our veterans day sale, save $1,000 on the new sleep number 360 special edition smart bed, now only $1,799 only for a limited time. stop dancing around the pain that keeps you up again, and again. advil pm silences pain, and you sleep the whole night. advil pm this is september 1, 2019, vice president mike pence in europe meeting with the ukrainian president. at this meeting we believe that vice president pence told the ukrainian president, that, yeah, the u.s. government was holding up their military aid unless ukraine took some sort of action on corruption. which means in the context of this impeachment inquiry, vice president pence is the one who personally delivered "you're not getting your military aid" message face-to-face in that room. a look at who else was in that room at that time.

there's gordon sondland, u.s. ambassador to the eu who now admits after revising his testimony that, yes -- there he is -- on the sidelines of that meeting he was personally reinforcing to the ukrainians, no, you're not getting your military aid unless you announce these investigations. but if you keep panning there the person in the second row there, we believe, is also newly important to the story because that is state department veteran who was detailed to vice president pence's office. she surprisingly has just agreed to testify tomorrow. jennifer williams, one of two staff members from pence's office who was listening in on the july 25th call between the president -- president trump and the ukrainian president. her whole job at that point was to relay what happened on that call to vice president mike pence. she was on that call, she was in charge of ukraine issues for the vice president's office. she was in ukraine in the room when he demanded that ukraine wasn't going to get their military aid unless the

they coughed up what the administration wanted on corruption. and now that person, jennifer williams, says she will answer the impeachment committee's questions tomorrow. i know this is a lot. this is all nuts. tomorrow will be worse. that's going to do it for us for now. we will see you again then. it's time for the "last word" with lawrence o'donnell. >> good evening, rachel. and you have to wonder about jennifer williams testifying.ev one reason to do it could be that what she believes she has to say would be helpful to mike pence. that's one possibility. >> sure. >> other possibilities include she just doesn't want to deal with the kind of legal fees that she might be incurring by trying to steer her way around testifying and running up billable hours with an expensive washington law firm. h i think one of the most on fascinating stories we're going to get when, i don't know a year from now, whenever. this decision, a decision by people who got with these is requests and these subpoenas, that decision of do we fight it, do we go to work, and why do we