london. >> i always had a good relationship with emanuel. sometimes he'll say things he shouldn't say. sometimes he does things that are counterproductive for his own country. >> macron doesn't wait long to strike back. that's coming up next. royal pains. moments from now president trump meets with prince charles who has distanced himself from his brother prince andrew. >> i had just been abused by a member of a royal family. i couldn't comprehend how at the highest levels of government, powerful people were not only allowing it to happen but participating in it. and going large. house democrats are divided over whether to stick to ukraine or also charge the president with more articles of impeachment stemming from the mueller probe. >> what the president did with ukraine has him interfering in

the next election. the mueller report talked about what happened in the past. and i think it is absolutely critical. to me that's the urgency. and good day, everyone, i'm andrea mitchell in washington. president trump is at the nato summit in london, blasting america's oldest ally, france, after emmanuel macron criticized the u.s.'s southern withdrawal from syria, leaving french forces in the lurch. >> we have, uh, tremendous spirit as it pertains to nato, i would say except for perhaps one country. i heard that president macron said nato is brain-dead. i think that's very insulting to a lot of different forces including the man that does a very good job of running nato. they had a very rough year. you can't go making statements like that about nato. it's very disrespectful. when france makes a statement

like that about nato, it's a very dangerous statement for them to make. >> meeting face-to-face hours later, president macron did not back down. >> my statements created some reactions. i do stand by them. it's impossible just to say we have to put money. we have to be clear on what nato should be. this is not the case today. >> joining me now from london, nbc white house correspondent kristen welker, "new york times" london bureau chief mark landler. and here with me in our studio, "washington post" columnist eugene robinson and andrea kendall taylor, a former cia analyst. welcome, all. kristen, first to you, i think you were hearing from the president for more than two hours today at a variety of photo opportunities and he hasn't even met with prince charles yet. why don't you go over what you thought were the biggest

headlines. >> there were a number of headlines, andrea. and you're right, president trump was in a very talkative mood today. he took questions at all of these bilateral meetings on a range of issues. i do think these tensions with french president emmanuel macron may be the biggest headline so far coming out of this nato summit. remember, these two leaders were once so close, their relationship was described as a bromance. then macron criticized the united states' decision to pull out troops from syria. he said nato appeared to be brain-dead. president trump earlier today called those comments insulting and nasty. now, while the two leaders were sitting side by side, they did try to downplay those differences, andrea. but there's no doubt that it is sparking questions about a rift forming in this relationship. it's not just that, andrea.

president trump says he's open to the possibility of imposing tariffs on all french imports if france moves forward with taxing u.s. tech companies. president trump believes they're going to work through that. still, it's raising eyebrows. president trump rattled markets for another reason today, andrea. he said he's open to not resolving his trade way wir wit china until after the election. that had stocks, investors quite jittery this morning. and it all comes as president trump is not meeting with the leader of the host country, british prime minister boris johnson who is of course up for reelection. that's going to happen in about a week. he's keeping his distance from the american president. so a range of headlines so far here in london. and president trump still has a business day. this evening he's going to be attending an event at buckingham palace with the queen and other world leaders and then he will go to 10 downing street.

there will be a number of other leaders at that event as well, andrea. >> mark landler, you've been posted to london and have been there for quite some time now but have also covered this president elsewhere on the world stage and in washington. you're so well-positioned to take what he is saying today, he has blown up previous nato summits, this is the 70th anniversary of nato, a defense alliance which he has rattled with his withdrawal from syria and also withdrawals from afghanistan, leaving the brits and the french in the lurch along with the syrian kurds. how do you see him performing here today? >> well, i guess, andrea, what struck me about today, is that in previous summits, as you say, president trump has sort of played the role of the great disrupter. he's the one that's put european leaders on the defensive, asking for more money, challenging the underpinnings of the alliance, asking whether it's worthwhile for the u.s. today i think we sort of saw almost the reverse that have

with emmanuel macron, you saw macron putting trump on the defensive, at one point snapping at him when he tried to make a joke, "let's be serious," likewise with the british election, you saw president trump extremely quiet, not weighing in on the election, refusing to be drawn in. he's heeding the wishes of boris johnson who doesn't want the president to interfere, largely because he fears it will backfire on him. so i think that in contrast to previous summits, this is a case where president trump is sort of the one who i think was a little off-balance, not throwing others off-balance but who is himself dealing with a new and more complex reality. >> and of course impeachment realities back home. at the macron bilateral meeting he talked about his relationship

with russia, with vladimir putin. >> with russia, you feel we can get along with russia, we've discussed that before. anything it's a good thing to get along with russia. and, uh, i campaigned on it, people like it. >> andrea, let's talk about the u.s./russia relationship in the world of donald trump. >> clearly we're still at an all-time high in the tensions between the united states and russia. and i think this nato summit is really almost another own goal when it comes to u.s./russia relations because as we saw with the meeting between macron and president trump, there's clearly growing tensions between the united states and europe but it's also between european countries themselves. for putin, that's music to his ears, because it really is the cohesion of the alliance that's among nato's most important factors in deterring russia. >> and you see macron trying to

replace angela merkel, who is about to leave the world stage. france frankly doesn't have the economic clout that germany has, nor the military clout. >> no, it doesn't have the clout, but macron does seem to have a knack for getting under president trump's skin. one of the points he's making about nato is that nato is an organization that has always had strong american leadership. and if president trump isn't going to provide that strong leadership, then wither nato? at a trump/nato summit, we're always fortunate, in my opinion, if at the end there is still a nato. and there will still be a nato, but there will be a lot of unanswered questions about the direction of this alliance. even the reason for this alliance. there are questions about turkey, questions obviously about the trump administration's

leadership. and so we'll see what macron can do. that's an awfully big void for him to fill if he's going to fill it himself. >> one of the nato allies is turkey, who is really responsible, is erdogan, for the withdrawal from syria, by persuading the president to do this unilaterally, leaving the french and brits stranded there without american air support and american supply lines. the queen is welcoming him to buckingham palace, the president about to have tea with prince charles at clarence house, and then the question, who is really responsible for the banishment from the summit of prince andrew? >> it's interesting that prince andrew is now conspicuous by his absence. if you remember, back in the state visit in june, the duke of york played a central world, he

showed the president around with his wife melania, hosted a business meeting for them. photographs were released of them strolling the palace grounds. now the duke is nowhere to be seen, following a documentary last night which made for very uncomfortable viewing for the palace. he's now retreated from public life. as a consequence that means he's not involved in the welcoming committee and will not be there tonight at buckingham palace alongside his mother because effectively prince andrew has been exiled. the president himself seemed to have a hazy memory of his meetings with the duke and with jeffrey epstein. >> let's play the president saying he doesn't really having met him. >> i don't know prince andrew. but, uh, it's a tough story, it's a very tough story.

i don't know him. >> camilla, as you just pointed out, he was with him just last june at the state visit, and we have actually found another picture, if we have that picture, showing the year 2000. >> palm beach, florida. >> exactly, at mar-a-lago. you have then donald trump, not yet in political life, with of course melania, prince andrew, and look who is there in the background. i think maxwell is on the side, but jeffrey epstein is right there. the president is saying now, when that picture was unearth, that he takes pictures with a lot of people. he surely does, but there's certainly a lot of awkwardness around prince andrew. was it prince charles, do you think, that actually had the decision, stepping up to the problem of prince andrew and what to do with him, with this

scandal, camilla? >> i think ultimately, actually it was the queen's decision, but she was heavily supported by the heir to the throne, saying andrew should step back. it was the prince's idea, really, there was a sense the monarchy itself was being tarnished about all the allegations about andrew and epstein and they had to cut him loose from what they call the family firm. sometimes it runs like a family that needs to insulate itself from outside forces. in this case they were protecting themselves from one of their own going forward into the future. donald trump is meeting with prince charles who is almost playing the role of the shadow king right now, with the queen at 93 and her husband retired to private life. prince charles is the one doing the groundwork in terms of the diplomacy needed between the

white house and buckingham palace. >> mark landly, you've been reporting on all of this for "the new york times." >> i have, and, you know, the television program last night with virginia roberts was yet another nail in the coffin, if you will, for prince andrew. i think for british audiences, the picture of this woman tearfully recounting the harrowing treatment that she said she had at the hands not just of jeffrey epstein but of people that epstein trafficked her to, including, she says, prince andrew, that's an indelible image for people here. it's hard to overstate the degree of public revulsion toward prince andrew, not just his behavior but the sort of indifference he showed in his own first interview with the bbc, where he really didn't display much sympathy for the victims of jeffrey epstein and had very poor answers for why he continued to stay at jeffrey epstein's home even after he had

served time in prison for his tich activities. it's been all in all a terrible week for the monarchy. i'm sure they're looking toward this reception at buckingham palace and the meeting with president trump to rebound a little bit. as camilla correctly points out, prince charles is at the center of all this and i think that's no accident, given the very difficult stretch they've just been through. >> and eugene, it's remarkable that the queen would be looking forward to donald trump for relief from this other scandal. >> the scandal is terrible. this is probably the worst moment for the british monarchy since the debacle immediately following the death of princess diana, when the queen came off as unfeeling and unsympathetic and the monarchy had to recover from that. that prince andrew interview with the bbc was worse than a train wreck. it was just awful. and the worst possible image for

the royal family. and i think you do see prince charles taking charge. i think you see him essentially acting as king, though he is not yet king. and i would be very surprised if he were not the dominant voice right now. >> andrea, in the midst of all of this, so many foreign policy decisions to be made, but decisions are not really likely to be made at this summit, given all of the stress among the allies. >> yes, i think the bar is incredibly low. if it's a quiet, quote unquote, boring summit, i think we'll all call it a victory. one of the important things to think about in the context of the nato summit is it's almost as if there are two natos. you have nato, the military alliance, and there the alliance is on quite solid footing. they've made a number of prudent steps in the wake of 2014 to address evolving challenges,

most notably a more assertive russia. but then you have nato as a political alliance. there, given the disagreements, the fissures, it will be nearly impossible to make any sort of substantial decisions. the greatest risk is if the infighting and decisions locks up nato decisionmaking, that nato can be the most capable military alliance in the world, but if decisionmaking gets locked up, all of that is undermined. >> thank you very much, all, so much. coming up, water's edge. donald trump attacking democrats overseas again while nancy pelosi on her own trip abroad this week is staying out of the fray. you're watching "andrea mitchell reports" on msnbc. reports" on msnbc. and save in more ways than one.

for small prices, you can build big dreams, spend less, get way more. shop everything home at wayfair.com there are things we would change about work. and there are things we wouldn't. ♪ when work is worth it. work is worth it. work can be closer to home... pay more... make us proud. careerbuilder. work can work. find your work at careerbuilder.com man 1 vo: proof of less joint pain woman 1 oc: this is my body of proof. and clearer skin. man 2 vo: proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... woman 2 vo: ...with humira. woman 3 vo: humira targets and blocks

a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the number one prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. avo: humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. man 3 vo: ask your rheumatologist about humira. woman 4 vo: go to humira.com to see proof in action. what are you doing back there, junior? since we're obviously lost, i'm rescheduling my xfinity customer service appointment. ah, relax. i got this. which gps are you using anyway? a little something called instinct. been using it for years. yeah, that's what i'm afraid of.

he knows exactly where we're going. my whole body is a compass. oh boy... the my account app makes today's xfinity customer service simple, easy, awesome. not my thing.

we don't get any witnesses. we want biden. we want the son, hunter, where's hunter? we want the son. we want schiff. i think adam schiff is a deranged human being. i think he grew up with a complex for lots of reasons that are obvious. i think he's a very sick man. this is a sick person. he's a liar. and by the way, nancy pelosi knew he was lying and she went on her stephanopoulos, and said he was lying. these people are deranged.

>> deranged. the president has been talking nonstop in london, saying he wants secretary of state mike pompeo, outgoing secretary of energy rick perry, all to testify in a senate trial where the republicans would control the rules and, he says, it would be fair. >> it's very unpatriotic of the democrats to put on a performance where they do that. i do. i think it -- i think it's a bad thing for our country. those calls that we made, two of them, were absolutely perfect calls. >> as compared to nancy pelosi, who refused to answer a question about impeachment yesterday while attending a u.n. climate conference in madrid. >> we aren't here to talk about impeachment or the president of the united states. we're here to talk about -- i have a rule of codels when we travel abroad. we don't talk about the president in a negative way.

>> joining me now, cnbc's geoff bennett on capitol hill. karen tumulty, columnist for "the washington post." karen, the president's attacks, "deranged," "maniacal," against adam schiff and nancy pelosi. >> it's a not only a violation of the norm of leaving domestic politics at home when you're on the world stage. i also think it's counterproductive. part of the point of having the president at this nato summit is to show him as the commander in chief, as a world leader, doing his job, that right now that is his best insurance policy of hanging on to that job, to have americans seeing him acting as the president and not sounding like he does every single day on twitter. >> and in fact that was the political advice he got from a

former democratic clinton adviser, mark penn, who was advising him, do your job, during impeachment. there was a private meeting, i think "the washington post" reported on this, at the white house, and the advice was, stay away from it, be presidential the waybill clinton got through what happened in the '90s. and on the plane, on air force one, en route to london, he was already tweeting, as soon as he got on the plane and before he landed in london, tweeting about the impeachment controversy. so geoff bennett, he's not leaving it at home at all. he's been talking about it nonstop. we're expecting to hear about the report going to the judiciary committee sometime tonight and according to your colleagues on the hill we're hearing that the articles on impeachment that are going to be drafted by judiciary could include one that relates to the mueller report, obstruction of justice, going back there, not just obstruction of congress regarding ukraine. >> right, and that is a point of

debate in the democratic caucuses, how far back to go when you're looking for impeachable conduct by president trump, to draw up articles of impeachment. two sources connected to the house judiciary committee tell our colleagues, leigh ann caldwell and heidi przybyla, one article of impeachment would be abuse of power, that's connected to bribery and extortion, president trump allegedly trying to press his ukrainian counterpart into the service of president trump's own reelection campaign, that's the theory of the democratic case, that's what all the evidence points to. another potential article of impeachment on obstruction or contempt of congress, that would be related to the epic stonewalling that house democrats have seen this white house put up as they've tried to carry out their constitutionally-mandated oversight responsibilities. the other, and this is where the mueller report comes in, would be obstruction of justice. and so that is something that adam schiff spoke to last night when he was interviewed by

rachel maddow, that the judiciary committee already has the mueller report, and that's something they're considering. certainly watch this space as the hearing tomorrow happens and then over the next couple of weeks towards the end of the year. >> the pushback from republicans, including republican senators, notably john kennedy of louisiana, has been that ukraine did it too, that ukraine was involved in interfering with the election, not just russia, in contradiction to all intelligence to the senate republican-led intelligence committee as well and all the other reporting, the mueller report. this is mitt romney today pushing back on that, separating himself from that false narrative. >> i saw no evidence from our intelligence community nor from the representatives today from the department of state that there is any evidence of any kind to suggest that ukraine

interfered in our elections. we have ample evidence that russia interfered in our elections. >> and today, lindsey graham seems to be backing down a tad from a week or two ago when he was suggesting going after the bidens, going after ukraine. take a listen to what he said after john kennedy was roundly criticized for his being used, as chuck todd made very clear, really as a dupe of vladimir putin and russian intelligence on the ukraine conspiracy theory. >> again, i have no knowledge that the ukraine did anything to interfere with our elections other than press reports and to suggest that we know that i think would be a stretch, because i don't think anybody knows that. >> so perhaps lindsey graham is shifting again, karen. >> i do think one of the most disturbing things of this whole saga that we are living through is the degree to which republicans that we used to think of as very sober and very sensible are just sort of

spouting whatever conspiracy theory the president comes up with. it's almost as if, you know, the president said giraffes could fly, they would tell you they just spotted one in the tree outside their window. and it is i think a positive development if some of them are sort of coming back off of that, because there is no evidence that ukraine interfered with the election and there is a lot of evidence that moscow did. >> karen tumulty, geoff bennett, thanks so much are frfrom the h a busy day. next, joe biden in attack mode, accusing pete buttigieg of stealing his health care plan. really? ally searching for a way to help stop your cold sore?

only abreva can get rid of it in... ...as little as 2 1/2 days when used at the first sign. abreva starts to work immediately to block the virus and protect healthy cells. abreva acts on it. so you can too.

gimme one minute... and i'll tell you some important things to know about medicare. first, it doesn't pay for everything. say this pizza is your part b medical expenses. this much - about 80% - medicare will pay for. what's left is on you. that's where an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company comes in. this type of plan helps pay some of what medicare doesn't. these are the only plans to carry the aarp endorsement for meeting their high standards of quality and service.

so call unitedhealthcare insurance company today and ask for your free decision guide. with this type of plan, you'll have the freedom to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. and when you travel, your plan will go with you - anywhere in the country. whew! call unitedhealthcare today and ask for your free decision guide.

former vice president joe biden is slamming two democratic rivals who are pulling ahead of him in iowa. in a gaggle with print reporters on his campaign bus, biden

claims mayor pete buttigieg stole his health care plan and dismisses the notion that elizabeth warren is gaining momentum. joining me now, jim messina who managed the president's reelection in 2012 and david jolly, former republican congressman. welcome, both. jim, according to all of our fact checking from the correspondents covering him in the field and all of our unanimously, the public option was always a part of the wish list for expanding obamacare, the aca, down the road. it's been part of what biden has been looking at, it's part of what other democrats have been looking at for quite some time. >> yeah, this is really about health care in general. there are two issues that are defining the democratic primary right now, who can beat donald trump, and health care. and vice president biden staked out very early that he was against medicare for all, which a bunch of the other candidates have been for.

mayor pete has evolved on this issue, i think smartly, and is now more in the biden sort of public options space, which gets you to a much better political place in the general election. and i think mayor pete has been smart to move there. this is the vice president trying to stake the ground he's always had and be the candidate of kind of reasonable obamacare. don't forget, andrea, barack obama is the most popular political figure in the world, and especially in the democratic primary. so the more the vice president can be talking about obamacare and can be seizing on the differences with other candidates, he's going to do it, and i think he's smart to do it. >> wasn't mayor pete always for medicare for those who wanted it, wasn't there always a choice issue in that? >> yeah, although early came out pretty strongly for medicare for all, although he's always talked about having a choice for a public option. as you know, when i was in the

white house i helped pass obama, and public option became a very big political issue during that and continues to be. and now some of the more liberal candidates are talking about medicare for all. and biden has worked very hard to stake real differences between himself and primarily elizabeth warren and bernie sanders on this issue. >> david jolly, joe biden seems to be trying to make a virtue out of the fact that barack obama, as democratic leaders, former presidents would, is staying out of the primary race, not endorsing him. he's saying he can win without him. but the presumption is that people do associate joe biden of course with two terms of the obama administration. >> sure. yeah, and andrea, one of the more intriguing plot twists of this primary. but i think president obama is making the right decision, to let democratic voters assess the qualifications and capabilities of the many candidates and make a decision without president

obama tilting the scale. we know that joe biden worked with president obama. that is part of biden's rich legacy and his qualifications. the question for democratic voters, and it's a tough one, do you want to go with the steady hand and experience of someone like joe biden or do you go with the youthful energy and the vision, someone like a mayor pete or elizabeth warren, someone who is asking to bring transformational change. democrats are blessed with a lot of qualified voters who all share the same core values when it comes to a fair tax plan, immigration, gun control and so forth. they're rich with blessings. the question is who do they decide to go with as their nominee in 2020. >> jim, on the obama factor, biden was asked about a politico magazine article recently reporting how obama had confided to another candidate, this is all sourced so it's not on the record by anybody, that his

former vice president really doesn't have it when it comes to an intimate connection with voters. so biden responded by saying, he may have said that, and if it's true and he said it, there's truth to it, acknowledging. he sa is that the best way to pass that off? >> i think it is, the worst thing biden could do would be to get into a back and forth with obama on this. he handled it smartly and tried to stay focused on his support. congressman jolly is exactly right, barack obama is the most popular democratic figure here, he's going to stay out of this race. joe biden's candidacy is really about his connection to barack obama and the fact that he believes he's the best general election candidate to beat donald trump. and so he's going to use the word "barack obama" every single day as much as he can. that's not going to change no matter what unsourced quote comes up that barack obama may or may not have said. i would be surprised if he said that. but, you know, you never know. >> jim, it's undeniable he did

put his finger on the scale in blessing hillary clinton as the most viable candidate against donald trump and not joe biden, his sitting vice president. >> that is true, and i think we have learned the lessons of that. he reflected back and thought about 2008 when the entire establishment endorsed hillary clinton and he ended upbeating her and coming out of that primary in a much stronger position, ready for the general election. he's going to sit back and learn the lessons of the past. i think the congressman is right, we're going to come out of this with a strong candidate who is going to match up very well with donald trump because they've been through the fire of an incredibly big field. and, you know, eventually we'll have a democratic nominee. the problem for us democrats is that that "eventually" may not be until summer of next year.

>> at the convention. thank you both. coming up, the attorney general disagreeing with the inspector general of the justice department. stay with us right here on msnbc. e on msnbc. (little boy) he's coming! (make-a-wish volunteer) ok, he's coming, c'mon c'mon... here we go... ♪ (little santa) somali...alika? (little santa) where's kiara? (little santa) i got this for you. (vo) when you grant a child's wish, you change lives. (vo) you can choose make-a-wish to get two hundred and fifty dollars from subaru when you get a new subaru. (vo 2) get 0.9% during the subaru share the love event.

wean air force veteran made of doing what's right,. not what's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it - with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. because doing right by our members, that's what's right. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa mornings were made for better things than rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis. when considering another treatment, ask about xeljanz xr, a once-daily pill for adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis or active psoriatic arthritis for whom methotrexate did not work well enough. it can reduce pain, swelling, and significantly improve physical function. xeljanz can lower your ability to fight infections like tb; don't start xeljanz if you have an infection.

taking a higher than recommended dose of xeljanz for ra can increase risk of death. serious, sometimes fatal infections, cancers including lymphoma, and blood clots have happened. as have tears in the stomach or intestines, serious allergic reactions, and changes in lab results. tell your doctor if you've been somewhere fungal infections are common, or if you've had tb, hepatitis b or c, or are prone to infections. don't let another morning go by without asking your doctor about xeljanz xr. ♪

as first reported by "the washington post," attorney general william barr has told

associates he disagrees with one of the doj inspector general's key conclusions, that the fbi had enough information in july of 2016 to justify launching an investigation into the trump campaign and russia. joining me now is barbara mcquade, former u.s. attorney and an msnbc contributor, and matt miller, former chief spokesman to attorney general eric holder and an msnbc justice and security analyst. barbara, first to you, what would be the impact of william barr trying to pour cold water, if he does, on the ig report that we expect next week? >> it sounds an awful lot like what he did to robert mueller, when robert mueller came out with his report, that he disagrees with the outcome. the inspector general is independent and is permitted to submit and publish his report as is. but the other thing that's occurring at the same time in parallel is the criminal investigation that john durham,

u.s. attorney in connecticut, has been running. william barr could allow this inspector general report out there but could continue to persist with criminal charges against people in the justice department if he believes misconduct arose to that level. >> and matt, the inspector general is highly regarded, has served in several administrations, correct? >> right. >> what would be the impact if william barr does go public and tries to hold a news conference or issue a dissenting report? or some kind of opposing point of view. >> it would be a stunning move by the attorney general that would further undermine the confidence that the people at the department of justice have in him, whether he serves the department of justice or whether he serves the president and his partisan goals. it's one thing for an attorney general to criticize an inspector general report because they've been too critical of the department. that happens all the time. the attorney general has a

factual basis to do so, he's looked over the records and has some reason to believe the ig has been too tough, for example. i think it would be unprecedented, i don't know of any other examples where an ig has looked at what the department has done, confirmed that the department acted appropriately, and the attorney general has disagreed with that conclusion, especially because he would have no factual basis with which to do so. there's no other information that bill barr would have to bring to the table other than i think his partisan motivations, to say that the inspector general has this wrong. as you point out, this is a highly respected attorney general -- >> inspector general. >> inspector general, yes. at times he has been too critical, can be too nitpick-y. so if he gives it a clean bill of health and says everything was handled appropriately at the justice department, i think that means you can take it to the bank. >> barbara, when we look at

william barr's unprecedented travels overseas and bringing this u.s. attorney from connecticut in to investigate the origins, really the same issues, the origins of the fbi investigation, so-called dossier, a lot of the other issues, the steele and the rest of that investigation, it's already raising questions about him, especially after what he did with the mueller probe. >> yeah, i think this, you know, idea of investigating the investigators, people who work in government should welcome accountability and oversight and if things are done wrong, they should expect accountability. but there also is the possibility of a chilling effect, especially if the inspector general found things were done properly, with, it appears from reporting, some limited exceptions, but if the inspector general finds everything was done properly, for the attorney general to step in and say, i'm overruling that, i find there was a political

motivation to start this investigation, it has to have a chilling effect on people who investigate politics, people in public office or positions of power. that can't be good for the country because it permits those in power to run unchecked. >> and as we look toward tomorrow, we're going to have constitutional scholars at the house judiciary hearing, the impeachment hearing. this is going to be, matt miller, not fact witnesses but legal experts talking about impeachment. it could be frequently interrupted by republican opposition, points of order, roll call votes. this could be really another sideshow. >> i think that will clearly be the republicans' goal. that has somewhat been their goal all along, they don't want to fight on the facts so they're fighting on the process because the process is the one thing they've figured out they can always unify the republican party. this has been the president's strategy if he can just find a democratic opponent for them to rally against. it was obviously hillary clinton

in 2016, it was nancy pelosi for a while, now it's adam schiff. what we're really moving from is the fact-gathering phase of this investigation, adam schiff did that with two weeks of public hearings, to the phase where the house has to decide what to do about it. you'll see the beginning that have with legal scholars presenting an historical analysis of what these facts mean and whether it merits impeachment and then it will be up to the house to decide what to do. >> matt miller, barbara mcquade, thanks very much. coming up, how save the children is helping child refugees around the world. stay with us on "andrea mitchell reports" on msnbc. reports" on msnbc. so we're in this little town near salerno and everyone has dad's eyebrows! we chose eleanor.

it was great-grandma's name. so apparently, we come from a long line of haberdashers, which is a fancy word for... they left everyone, and everything so they could get here. and start this family. every family has a unique story. this holiday season, help your family discover theirs.

doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? this holiday season, memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. us. it's what this country is made of.

but right now, our bond is fraying. how do we get back to "us"? the y fills the gaps. and bridges our divides. donate to your local y today. because where there's a y, there's an us. and welcome back. today is giving tuesday, a day encouraging support for those in need. in his thanksgiving day message, mark shriver is focusing on the number of refugees allowed into the u.s.

write i writing our youngest neighbors need a seat at our thanksgiving table. the numbers have been more than cut in half since the bush years and canada, a country with one tenth of the population takes in more refugees than we do here. according to the refugee agency. mark, it is great to see you. talk to me about rev gees and why this is so dramatic and so unjustified by any kind of data given how intensively the agency is screening refugees before they can even apply to come here. >> yeah, it is unbelievable. the united states, as you just showed, is only planning to september 18,000 next year.

and it is ironic, a couple days after thanksgiving when the pilgrims were refrefugees, righ? it is bringing in new talent, new skills, and new vie versety, and they have a policy in place not allowing families to come to america to share our skills. >> there was 4,000 iraqis supposed to get into the country last year. our troops during the war, and now, i believe last year only 465 iraqis were permitted in. they are down across the board, and save the children has been

working on this issue all around the world. whether or not it is in uganda, the border, is this is a huge issue for save the children. and for our advocacy network as well. we are hoping people will get engaged. it is the second biggest day of the year as far as raising money for nonprofits. we need people that are not only financial resources. but the leadership in washington and our state governments need to know that children are a priority. we need to know that they have been allowed in this country as they have been under administrations, republicans and democrats, throughout the history of this country, so we hope that people will get engaged and be active, to safe the children dorg, and people can give their money and their time. if you're in hr, a nonprofit,

and that is they let people in. they have added to our culture, to our country, to the economic growth, the emotional and spiritual growth of this country and we really need that support on so many different levels. >> mark shriver for who giving tuesday is every day of the year. >> thank you, i really appreciate it. >> for more on how you can donate to a cause, including save the children, log on to giving tuesday on msnbc.com. >> the latest from london, stay with us, we'll be right back. [grunting]

[maniacal laughter] gold. gold! right, uh...thank you, for that, bob. but i think it's time we go with gbtc. it's bitcoin exposure through a traditional investment account. nice rock. it's time to drop gold. go digital. go grayscale.

at chevy, we're all about bringing families together. this time of year, that's really important. so we're making it easier than ever to become part of our family. man: that's why our chevy employee discount is now available to everyone. the chevy price you pay is what we pay. not a cent more.

family is important to us. and we'd like you to be part of ours. so happy holidays. and welcome to the family. the chevy family! get the chevy employee discount for everyone today.

and before we go, we want to send our best wishes to jimmy carter. he was admitted to the hospital over the weekend for a urinary tract infection. mr. chart ecarter is feeling bed looking forward to coming home soon. he has several recent health challenges. we wish him, of course, a speeder recovery and return home to plains. that does it for us, here is ali

and stephanie. >> coming up on this hour of velshi and rule, the markets take a hit when president says that the tale with china might wait. he is training the alliance. >> and the house intelligence committee is set to drop it's report on the impeachment inquiry later today. republicans though have their own report ready, too. we're going to dig into all of that and what it means for president trump. >> let's begin with breaking with breaking news now. let's not break any noses on this show just yet. a nose dive in the markets. today's drop after president trump was asked about a deadline on the china trade talks earlier at the nato summit, he said this. >> i'm doing well on a deal