scroll through our feed. we have brand new episodes every tuesday and you can find them wherever you get your podcasts. that is "all in" for this evening. we'll be back after the holidays and i hope you have a great one. good night. good evening. thanks for being with us this hour. all right, it has only happened six times in history. there have been six times that the republicans and the democrats have had their presidential nominating conventions in the same city in the same year. 1884 a former speaker of the house named james blaine was the republican nominee for president that year. his convention happened in june at chicago's lakefront interstate exposition building. the following month grover cleveland had his convention in chicago, too, from the competing party but they had the same convention venue, the same building by the lake where james blaine had had his convention

just a few weeks earlier. and about 50 years later ish it happened for a second time, 1932, again in chicago. both parties that year rented out a different venue, the chicago stadium. once the republicans were done with the place in 1932 they just switchover the hoover signs to roosevelt signs, rushed in a new set of delegates from the other party and started the whole thing over again. 12 years later, 1944 they did it again, again in chicago, again at the chicago stadium and then again in 1948 this time it was in philadelphia. and one more time in chicago, 1952. and it makes sense a little bit, right? logisticly two major parties nominating conventions aren't that different from one another. when you share a venue yeah i guess you contrast the parties for the voters in terms of their geographical choice for convention, you give that up.

but you gain shared bunting. you can keep the same crew for the lighting and the sound and, you know, keep the same hot dog vendors, all the rest of it. so it sort of makes sense. there have been a handful of times in history where the two parties shared their venue from their nominating convention, but it hasn't happened for a while. the last time it happened was 1972. george mcgovern officially becoming the democratic nominee for president on stage at the miami beach convention center in 1972. after the dems went in miami beach in '72 the original plan was for nixon and the republicans to do their convention across the country in san diego. nixon was from south california, he loved san diego. he used to call san diego his lucky city. the rnc picked nixon's lucky city to host their 1972 convention for the president's re-election campaign. they had the venue picked out in san diego. they booked it, they made all the arrangements.

it was all set. but then just three months before it was all supposed to happen, three months before the convention was due to happen, the republicans announced that actually they changed their mind. they're yanking the convention out of san diego. it was such a late decision it left no time to make all the long lead time arrangements that you need to make for a big, you know, high security political event like this. and so by bailing on san diego so abruptly and so late the only option the republicans had for where else they could do their convention that year on short notice was the other place that was outfitted for a convention that year, a place the democrats were already planning on using in miami beach for which all the logistics and planning it already been done. and the republican party gave a bunch of contradictory explanations why they had to make this sudden last move. first they said it was a problem with the venue, with the arena

in san diego. then they'd thought there would be riots, riots in san diego specifically. then they said they thought there weren't enough hotel rooms in san diego for the republicans to have a successful conveng. after more than a year of planning the republicans realized at the very last second they didn't book enough hotel rooms so call the whole thing off? yeah, turns out that was not the real reason they couldn't do their convention in san diego. the real reason was a memo, an incriminating memo and a pushy reporter. february 1972, a few months before the san diego convention was due to happen that summer a reporter named jack anderson published a memo that had been written by a lobbyist for a big phone company at the time. a company called itt. the memo was marked personal and conference. and in this memo the phone company lobbyist spelled out how that company had made a secret illicit deal with richard nixon's justice department.

the justice department had been pursuing an anti-trust lawsuit against itt to stop them from gobbling up other companies and becoming an even larger conglomerate. to try to evade that legal scrutiny and get out under that anti-trust investigation itt made a secret deal with the nixon administration. the deal was that the justice department would basically let itt go and go easy on itt and in exchange itt would pay. itt would help make richard nixon's beloved san diego convention fantasy a reality because itt would donate $400,000 to the republican party's san diego convention. and that whole scheme was written down in an internal itt memo. jack anderson published the memo and spelled out how the whole scheme worked. quote, the memo not only indicates that the anti-trust case had been fixed but that the fix was a pay off for itt's pledge of up to $400,000 for the

convention in san diego. and again he reports on the memo but he also publishes it which is how we see that the lobbyist even says in the memo if anybody found out about this scheme -- quote, if the convention commitment gets too much publicity, you can believe our negotiations with justice will wind up shot down. the attorney general is definitely helping us but cannot let it be known. and the memo ends with an instruction to destroy it. literally the last line is, quote, please destroy this. huh? note to self, if you ever have to say something like that in a memo, this must be destroyed, you probably should not send that memo. you probably shouldn't have even written it down in any form already you geniuses. and of course in the end that memo was not destroyed. jack anderson dug it up and put it in the newspaper, and so nixon had to yank his nominating convention out of his home state

and his lucky city, and it all had to be kicked over to florida to the venue democrats had already just used. because with this sordid scandal out in the open it didn't look great that a phone company had helped pay for that stage. in exchange for this monetary favor for the president and his party. nixon's, you know, would have been, could have been san diego convention was not the only casualty of the itt scandal, though. the itt scandal also led to the first ever criminal conviction of a u.s. attorney general. nixon's attorney general richard -- had lied about the itt scandal when he was questioned about it. he was caught for that, ultimately convicted for it. and he eventually told investigators looking into the itt matter that president nixon

had personally ordered him to shutdown the justice department's investigation into itt in exchange for that big fat check. so it wasn't something nixon's guys were doing on speck, nixon ordered it. and he was caught on tape admitting to it and sort of bragging about it in the oval office. >> he cut a deal with itt. now this is very, very hush-hush and it has to be engineered very delicately and it'll take six months to do properly. but -- >> does itt have any money? >> oh, god, yes, does he ever. >> does he have any money? oh, god, yes, that's part of this ball game but that part is hush-hush. you know there's a taping system in this room, right, which you

installed? did that slip your -- here's the sitting president of the united states ordering his just s department to drop an ongoing investigation into this big company in exchange for that same company giving a whole bunch of money to benefit the president's re-election campaign. it's just wildly corrupt, almost unbelievably explicitly corrupt for a sitting president to step on his own justice department to score that cash in that way for his own re-election effort. and getting caught for it on tape and his attorney general being convicted for it. first time in history an a.g. gets criminally convicted, it's just nuts. and yet the itt scandal has become this sort of arcane footnote to the nixon presidency. because as nutty and big as that was, that scandal was swallowed up in our national memory by another corruption scandal of the nixon presidency, and one for which that president ultimately got impeached, the watergate scandal that ultimately led to nixon's

resignation. and this is the thing about impeaching a president, we have actually brought article of impeachment against so few presidents in our nation's history that when it happens, it's so big it ends up being the kind of thing that just sucks all of the light and all of the air out of every other news cycle. i mean, it's the news cycle version of a black hole. the nixon itt scandal is the example of that sort of thing and actually presidency ending news had it not been overshadowed and lost down the impeachment black hole. instead it's ended up being barely a blip in history. and now at the end of this year, now we are living through another impeachment of another president, just the fourth impeachment effort in the history of this country, the third impeachment of a president, we're seeing that same dynamic at work again now in the trump administration. one of the things that has happened this year which has not even made the cut of being a

side line story, it has been marginal, off the edge of this -- it's been the ongoing and frankly shakespearean catastrophic collapse of what used to be the most conservative political entity in the united states of america. this is happening all around us. like i can't focus, too much else to worry about. the national rifle association, the nra, has been a powerhouse in washington when it comes to lobbying and influence. its power has been legendary. politicians cross the nra at their peril. but something very different has been happening with the nra recently. i mean first there was the 2016 election, which was a weird time for the nra its in own right. for some reason the nra in 2016 just exploded its previous spending records. they pumped $30 million into trying to get trump elected in 2016. i mean, for context that's triple what they spent the last time around on mitt romney.

triple, almost. why do that for donald trump? i mean with frankly his ambivalence at best, his disinterests, his ignorance an every issue having to do with guns, i mean it's not like donald trump is charles hesten. why would the nra triple down on him, on guns compared to what they've done for other republicans? i don't know. and then there was the weird 2016 russian twist in american gun politics with a russian agent maria butina ingratiating herself into the nra as a way to gain access and influence in conservative political circles ahead of the 2016 campaign including crazy stuff like an all expenses paid trip to moskow by a delegation of nra officials. and maria butina's boyfriend, an american political operative offering a back channel between trump and putin. and butina's handler showing up

at nra conferences and chatting up donald trump, jr. it's been nearly two years since it was first reported amid all of that craziness that the fbi was investigating whether the nra's gigantic 2016 campaign spending on behalf of trump might have been partly foreign money, russian money illegally funn funneled through the nra to support trump's candidacy. whatever happened to that investigation? and i don't know if all that weird russia stuff and the unprecedented campaign spending in 2016, i don't know if it's all connected to what has been happening at the nra more recently. but over the last few months, over the course of this year i mean we have watched this conservative political behemoth with really no equal in conservative politics. we have watched it collapse at breathtaking speed. starting in april of this year with this reporting in "the new yorker," quote a small group of executives and contractors and vendors have extracted hundreds of millions of dollars from the

budget. from gratuitous payment, sweetheart deals and opaque financial arrangements. hundreds of millions of dollars they've taken out of the nra? hundreds of millions? and that reporting based on federal tax forms and charity records and contracts and corporate filings, that reporting appeared to kick off a whole series of lawsuits and counter lawsuits within the nra itself and between nra leadership and some of their contractors and former leaders the organization ousted its former president, oliver north, yes that oliver north who insisted at the time he was a whistle-blower trying to uncover terrible misbehavior at the nra. the nra insisted he was an extortion artist, he was trying to launch a coup with the nra. what resulted is a cascade of terrible and increasingly damning and embarrassing revelations about what happens

to the donations the organization gets from nra members. the nra, for example, apparently spent more than $200,000 of its members donations on taylor made outfits for nra ceo wayne lapierre. and dues and donations also bought him more than a quarter million dollars worth of trips to a five-star resort in lake comeo italy and four seasons in but budapest and really long nice trip in the bahamas including $200,000 in private jets. plus there was the 10,000 square foot texas mansion the nra very nearly bought for wayne lapierre and his wife until at the last minute the organization thought better of it.

flying wayne and the reason all of this is not just embarrassing but potentially real trouble is the nra is a non-profit organization and there are rules how the non-profit and add that to evidence hundreds of thousands of dollars flowed through the nra to its own board members, that's them paying themselves, adding the red flags about the way the nra has diverted money from what's supposed to be its charitable foundation. but it all together it's no wonder the nra appears to be very worried about a ever widening investigation by the attorney general of the state of new york. and it's new york because new york is where the nra is chartered. this summer new york's attorney general -- james subpoenaed 90

member of the board. just this month she issued a new subpoena which according "the new york times" covers campaign finance, payments to board members and tax compliance. new york could conceivably revoke its non-profit status and shut it down which is what the state of new york just did to donald trump's charitable foundation this year. more on that later. but meanwhile, this is huge deal. this would be like a show stopping deal at any other time. the once fearsome nra, the most powerful entity in conservative politics, i mean they're in free fall. they shutdown their bombastic pro-trump tv network this summer. top officials have resigned, board members and rank and file members alike are demanding answers. it was actually gun reform groups, gun control groups that outspent the nra for the first time anybody can remember. and i think it's fair to say at any other time in any other news

environment the implosion of the country's most fearsome conservative political machines and this maelstrom of self-dealing and petty incrimination and revelations about lavish spending at beverly hills batiks, i mean we would be watching that slow motion car crash endlessly. that would be the biggest political news story in the country for a long time. but with this president in the middle of an impeachment it's like, you know, just one more tree falling in the forest. and, you know, it's not just that story, i mean there are other stories of that magnitude that have been swallowed by the impeachments and we've got more of that coming up. stay with us. hments and we've g of that coming up. stay with us apps are used everywhere...

except work. why is that? is it because people love filling out forms? maybe they like checking with their supervisor to see how much vacation time they have. or sending corporate their expense reports. i'll let you in on a little secret. they don't. by empowering employees to manage their own tasks, paycom frees you to focus on the business of business. to learn more, visit paycom.com

there was the $10,000 he spent on a 4-foot tall portrait of himself. there was the $20,000 he spent on a 6 foot tall portrait of himself. there was the $12,000 he spent on a signed tim tebow football helmet and a quart of a million dollars he spent to settle legal disputes related to his hotels and other properties. before he was president back when he was just a candidate for

president david farenhold uncovered the rampant -- for years the trump foundation was founded exclusively with other peoples money. the trump family didn't put a dime into it. and it turns out what trump was actually doing with this charity to which other people had donated money as if was an actual charity, he was actually buying himself fun presents, lots and lots of pictures of himself, for example. he was also paying off legal fines and making illegal political contributions that charities aren't allowed to make, and ultimately he used it to do a bunch of stuff to promote his presidential exam pain, which again is something a charity can't do. that reporting in "the washington post" landed david a pulitzer prize. it also landed the president and his three oldest children in a middle of a lawsuit filled by

the state of new york. the new york attorney general sued the president alleging that his would' be charity didn't function as a real charity and instead it was a vehicle for a campaign of illegal self-dealing and financial misconduct. and the president shutdown his foundation, but even with it shutdown, a judge agreed with the attorney general about those claims about trump's charity. and the judge ordered the president to pay $2 million to actual charities as punishment for him using his own fake charity as his personal checkbook. telling us the president did in fact have to follow through that court mandated menalty to pay out those millions of dollars as restitution essentially for the criminal fraud he perpetrated to use it for his own enrichment and advantage. the reporting that ended up shining a flashlight on the corruption within the president's fake charity started

before he was president. the lawsuit was protnor man a year ago. he just paid out that $2 million fine this month in the middle of his impeachment. it's actually the second multi-million dollar fraud settlement he's had to pay out. i mean, this is a remarkable and sometimes overwhelming time in the news right now. there's a lot going on and a lot to pay attention to. it is hard, believe me, i know. but big stories, important stories, one of the important things we're learning about them day in and day out in this administration is that sometimes those important stories have a long half life, right you follow for a little while and you think what happened to them, go back to them and circle back because they almost always come back. as we enter a new year and we continue to follow this presidency through its various scandals and now it's impeachment phase, you know,

keep your periscope up, keep paying attention. chase every story to the end because they do have to end somewhere. he is "the washington post" reporter who first broke up the

if you see wires down, treat them all as if they are hot and energized. stay away from any downed wire,

call 911 and call pg&e right after so we can both respond out and keep the public safe.

tropical storm into not just a hurricane but a category 5 hurricane. it was the strongest hurricane ever recorded in the western hemisphere. hurricane patricia ended up damaging or destroying more than 10,000 homes. but because of its magnitude particularly as it roared ashore, it was feared that it would do even worse. before that terrifying hurricane made landfall in mexico back in

2015, the man who's now white house senior policy advisor stephen miller, e-mailed a reporter about that storm. a reporter from the alt-right news website breitbart.com. it's actually the reporter who e-mailed stephen miller first. this is just a few hours before that mur cane makes land fall. the e-mail says, quote, this being the worst hurricane ever recorded what are the chances it wreaks destruction on mexico and drives a mass migration to the u.s. border? just two minutes later stephen miller replied, quote, a 100% and they'll all get temporary protected status, tps. and that needs to be the capital big, big story. the reporter responds, quote, wow, okay is there precedent for this? when stephen miller writes back he responds with a link, a link to this article warning people

that president obama might use that hurricane as a convenient pretext to invite, quote, a lot of mexicans into the united states. that article that stephen miller sent around -- around the time of that hurricane is from a racist anti-immigrant website called vvdare. it's named after virginiaidary who was reportedly the first child bor in the americas in the 1980s and this person has become a point of worship among white supremacists and white nationalists. the founder of vdare has called immigration policy in the united states, quote, adolph hitler's posthumus revenge on america, as in hitler is inflicting immigrants on america from beyond the grave. yeah, hitler is dead sure but he's winning his nazi race war

against us because people still immigrate to america and that's terrible. the founding ethos of vdare is the united states is explicitly a white nation. quote, the racial identity of america is legitimate and defensible. diversity per se is not strengthen but a vulnerability is their mission statement. that's vdare. in that e-mail where stephen miller flags and sends along that article from vdare something worth paying attention to because of what he expects to be a secret plot by barack obama to import mexicans into america, that was sent by stephen miller when he was a staffer working in the u.s. senate, working for then alabama republican senator jeff sessions. ultimately of course both sessions and stephen miller would go to work for donald trump. and the vdare thing to the reporter, that's just one in a big stack of stephen miller's e-mails from that time period.

e-mails obstained and published last month by the southern poverty law center. in total what those e-mails show is that one e-mail was not a copy and post error, it wasn't something that stood out from stephen miller's usual correspondence, that's kind of the guy he was at least at the time. here's another e-mail stephen miller sent in 2015, quote, did you see the pope saying the west must in effect get rid of borders? someone should point out the parallels to camp of the saints. sending this along to a reporter. what's camp of the saints? it's a grotesquely racist book that spins out this race fantasy plot where terrible basically satanic immigrants from india invade france and violently overthrow white society in france. it's ridiculous, it's notorious, it is a popular read among white nationalists because this is their fantasy of white genocide.

this fantasy that white people and other people can't coexist, it's a fight to the death and white people must wage war on everyone that's not white or they'll go extinct. that's camp of the saints. stephen miller wants this real world development to be reported along side it's parallel tuesday the plot of camp of the sanlts. in other e-mails stephen miller repeatedly praises president calvin cool ijnot because he likes coolidge generally as a president, no he likes him specifically it steining signing a law based open the idea the gene pool has to be cleansed of the bad types of genes by deliberately controlling breeding. calvin coolidge himself embraced the racist argument that

immigrants from the eastern part of the world in particular his thinking even from eastern europe were genetically inferior to immigrants from more western parts of the world. i mean, calvin coolidge signed this law that severely limited it number of jews and italians and greeks and eastern europeans who would be allowed into this country on the basis of their supposedly genetic inferiority they were banned. one impact of that law signed by calvin coolidge is it prevented hundreds of thousands of people coming to the united states who were fleeing the nazis in the 11 1930s. one of the e-mails from stephen miller recently published he laments the gallery at ellis island won't have a calvin coolidge exhibit to celebrate. vdare, camp of the saints, calvin coolidge's racial impurity law from the '20s, this

is like white nationalism 101. literally if you were going to take a white nationalism 101 course, this would be the syllabus of white nationalist crazy you'd have to learn. and what we learned is they're also the building blocks of stephen miller's world view which he packed up from his alabama republican senator's office job and carried over to his new job. in normal times it would be almost incomprehensible to think that a person who has advanced these kinds of ideas could work in any white house. i mean maybe for calvin coolidge with a time machine. but in a presidency where there wasn't already an impeachment under way and multiple members of the president's campaign in prison and all the rest of it, i mean an unapologetic white nationalist working in the white house as adan advise door the president that would be a stop the presses hold everything kind of scandal. here in this administration i

guess it's one thing among many. but in terms of how this one goes down in history of course what will all be remembered from this part of this time in history is not just that stephen miller worked in the white house at this time while we were all citizens and we all knew it but stephen miller's specific job at the trump white house has been that he runs immigration policy for the administration. he is the chief architect of all the draconian trump immigration policies from taking children away from their parents and child incarceration and trying to end asylum for all refugees. i mean all of it. the e-mails showing stephen miller's white nationalist group have occasioned no real explanation, definitely no apology from the white house, no firing from stephen miller. but those e-mails have led to more than a hundred lawmakers demanding that stephen miller should resign with more than two dozen senators writing directly to president trump demanding he

fire stephen miller. one of the senators who signed that letter joins us next. stay with us. o signed that letter joins us next. stay with us i do not speed. and that's saving me cash with drivewise. my son, he did say that you were the safe option. and that's the nicest thing you ever said to me. so get allstate. stop bossing. where good drivers save 40% for avoiding mayhem, like me. this is my son's favorite color, you should try it. [mayhem] you always drive like an old lady? [tina] you're an old lady. skip to the good part with alka-seltzer plus. now with 25% more concentrated power. nothing works faster for powerful cold relief. oh, what a relief it is! so fast!

here's another cleaning tip from mr. clean. cleaning tough bathroom and kitchen messes with sprays and wipes can be a struggle. there's an easier way. try mr. clean magic eraser. just wet, squeeze and erase tough messes like bathtub soap scum... and caked-on grease from oven doors. now mr. clean magic eraser comes in disposable sheets. they're perfect for icky messes on stovetops... in microwaves... and all over the house. for an amazing clean, try mr. clean magic eraser, and mr. clean magic eraser sheets. i was on the fence about changing from a manual to an electric toothbrush.

but my hygienist said going electric could lead to way cleaner teeth. she said, get the one inspired by dentists, with a round brush head. go pro with oral-b. oral-b's gentle rounded brush head removes more plaque along the gum line. for cleaner teeth and healthier gums. and unlike sonicare, oral-b is the first electric toothbrush brand accepted by the ada for its effectiveness and safety. what an amazing clean! i'll only use an oral-b! oral-b. brush like a pro.

there's no preamble, it just starts straight in. quote, dear mr. president we write to demand the immediate removal of stephen miller as your advisor. recent reports confirm he advanced white nationalist anti-immigrant ideologies. continuing to employ him as the senior architect of your imgrigz policies ensures those policies discriminate against individual of color to advance white nationalist ideals. he must be removed. these e-mails clearly show what is driving mr. miller. it is not national security. it is white supremacy. simply put mr. miller is unfit to serve in any capacity at the white house let alone as a senior policy advisor. we demand you remove stephen miller immediately. the letter is signed by 27 democrats in the united states senate. it was sent in the wake of the apublication of some of miller's e-mails. e-mailsthality promoted anti-immigrant white nationalist racist ideologies before he left

jeff segs alabama senate office and was brought up to the trump white house to be put in charge of immigration policy at the highest levels of the u.s. government. joining us now is one of the signers of that letter. senator, thank you so much for making time to be with us tonight. one of the things we're trying to coo tonight is focus on scandals in and around the trump administration that would be a gigantic deal in any other presidency. i guess i want to ask you about the premise of this interview and what i've been talking about in the last few minutes is the fact that stephen miller isn't as big of a scandal. the employ of this man under these terms in this white house would be sort of a showstopper. >> well, the thing is that stephen miller fits right in with the moral dead zone that is the trump white house. and we already know the

anti-immigrant policies that have been coming out of the trump white house since day one starting with the muslim ban and going forward. so stephen miller has been there all this while and his fingerprints are all over these anti-immigrant policies that emanate from the trump white house. >> since it it gives a window into the ideological bed that he has, have you had any response, do you expect there to be any response? >> i expect no response. i think the president welcomes miller's participation in the white house. these are the kind of people that the president surrounds himself with, and so i had said earlier with all of the very harmful hurtful kind of policies separating children at the border, ending daca, and i said there must be people, probably stephen miller and his little group he has there, every day they're think of new ways to

harm and hurt immigrants in this country and migrants to this country. >> more than a hundred democrats in the house have called for stephen miller to resign. of course unlike in the senate, in the house democrats are are control, and they have subpoena power. they of course can convene hearings on whatever they want. do you think there should be a congressional inquiry into mr. miller's continued employ at the white house? >> well, there's so many others there, too, because where you do you start because the president surrounds himself with yes men and women so sure they can investigate what is going on with stephen miller and all the kind of anti-immigrant pall aetss, but right now we all know that the house is very much involved in the impeachment proceedings. >> senator, let me just ask you as we're sort of heading towards the end of this remarkable year and heading into the election -- the re-election campaign provided the president isn't removed from office in the senate, what do you feel like is

foremost in your mind? and what do you think should be foremost in voters minds when you think about what we've been through these past few years, when they think about how politically involved naipt to be over the next year and how much the election means? >> first and foremost we have a president who has comitted impeachable acts. and i would like the american people to understand it is not okay for a president to shakedown the president of another country for his own political ends, and in fact jeopardizing our national security while he's at it and using $400 million almost in taxpayer money as bait, as a bribe. that is not okay. and if our country does not recognize that and certainly if the congress doesn't recognize that as the house has, and one hopes that the senate will, but i'm not holding my breath on that, where are we in our democracy that we have a president who thinks that he's above the law? so first and foremost i think the rule of law is definitely

something that we better adhere to, and with this president that pretty much dissolves the window into what we have is chaos and divisiveness and division in our country. and with the likes of stephen miller pushing forth his white supremacist views it seems -- not it seems. it is not okay for all these people who have these kinds of feelings and harbor these kinds of resentments towards immigrants and lgbtq people, women, to all come forward and exhibit their hatred, and this is why the hate crimes have gone up, so we have a lot of healing to do in our country regardless of who becomes president. and heaven forbid that it's trump once again because the divisiveness and the hatred i think will be compounded. >> senator mazy hiroano of hawaii, thank you for being here. we've got much more to come tonight. stay with us. t much more to com tonight. stay with us the united explorer card hooks me up.

getting more for getting away. rewarded! going new places and tasting new flavors. rewarded! traveling lighter. rewarded. haha, boom! getting settled. rewarded. learn more at the explorer card dot com. and get... rewarded!

are you currently using a whitening toothpaste, but not seeing results? try crest 3d whitestrips. its enamel-safe formula lifts and removes stains

to provide 100% noticeably whiter teeth or your money back. try crest 3d whitestrips.

i've got one last thing here tonight. it is an honor and a gigantic privilege to do this job. i'm grateful for it every single day. i'm thankful for having you on my tv and in your house. i can't tell you how much it means to me. but i also want to take a moment for one more thank you. i don't do this show alone. i am blessed to work with some of the smartest, funniest, most talented, most hardworking, most creative, most straight up good people in this entire business. this show would not happen without any of them. so i just want to take a moment to say thank you to all those guys, too. you guys are the absolute best in the business. ♪

♪ ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ ♪

good evening and welcome to a special holiday edition of "last word." what a difference a year makes. this time last year the speaker of the house was a republican. alexandria ocasio-cortez wasn't a member of congress yet, neither was katie porter. congresswoman porter will join us in this hour to discuss the achievements of the democratic house of representatives and the hundreds of bills they have passed which mitch mccomis blocking in the senate. a year ago the president of ukraine was still a standup comedian and not the recipient of the most important phone call of the year. the phone call that got the president of the united states impeached. a year ago when