tv Kasie DC MSNBC January 19, 2020 4:00pm-6:00pm PST
4:00 pm
millions of americans can have access to 5g on t-mobile. this is just the beginning. t-mobile, the first and only nationwide 5g network. welcome to "kasie d.c." i'm kasie hunt. democrats pulled their case together and the president mounts his own defense tonight in texas. i'll talk to mazie hirono whether we'll hear from witnesses. and prince harry speaks publicly for the first time saying he and the duchess had,
4:01 pm
quote, no other option but to step back from royal duties. and we're going to hear from senator chuck schumer. the house democrats, who will prosecute the case in the senate, have been here all weekend on capitol hill. we got the first sense on how they're planning to lay out their case. both the democrats and republicans filing paper briefs. those arguments are spread out across 120 pages. we can sums are them for you in about 60 seconds. >> the president withheld hundreds of millions in military aid to an ally at war with russia, withheld a meeting the president of ukraine sought with his adversary in order to force ukraine to help them cheat. >> the articles of impeachment are two noncriminal actions,
4:02 pm
namely obstruction of congress and abuse of power. >> even if all the evidence is laid out -- >> through the weekend, the stage has literally been set with staff moving big screen tvs on stands, pushing in tables, making room for the legal teams and wiring for video and computers. and still, the process for all of this, is very much in question, including how long the trial is going to last and how long each day of testimony will go. >> that proposal will look similar to 24 hours of presentation by the house managers over two days. then 24 hours of presentation by the president's team over two days. and 16 hours of questions submitted by the members in writing to the chief justice. >> that's right. starting tuesday we could see 12-hour days of opening statements. and then there's the question of witnesses. the house judiciary committee is
4:03 pm
sending over an abundance of new material in the form of lev parnas's personal documents and his selfie folder. so many in the president's orbit of knowing what he was up to. here with me politics editor for "the daily beast." sam stein. and josh letterman. senior washington news correspondent and nmsnbc contributor, beverly atkins. and former assistant director for counterintelligence msnbc analyst. welcome all. sam stein, let me start with you for the big picture. because we're on the verge of a historic week on capitol hill. i feel like as we've learned more about how the president's team is approaching this, the two sides could not be farther apart and it's clear we're setting the stage for political
4:04 pm
theater. >> 12 hours of political theater per day -- >> too much for everyone. >> i don't think anyone wants that. >> can you imagine chief justice roberts? >> they might not want 12-hour days to be honest with you. it is remarkable how stable politically this all has been in the midst of how radical, from an evidentiary standpoint it's been. you still see the same arguments being levelled by both sides, even as all this new stuff comes forward from lev parnas and others. what's struck me honestly -- and this is consistent throughout -- is not what the new material is. but what hasn't come forward. through it all, as far as i can tell, not been exonerating evidence put forwrtd ward by th
4:05 pm
administration and the white house. they've had months to say hold on, we need look at this element of the ukrainian aid we're sending and we don't have any paper whatsoever. at this point you're thinking you would see that. i think that, itself, is the more damming element. we know each camp is going to its side. >> and it is remarkably different from evenen the clinton impeachment trial rubric. this is really, i think -- while, yes, this is the argument for the hungry people in the room. this is a chance for the house managers to speak to the american public. we've heard nancy pelosi talk about bringing them along as a driving force. and this is the first chance -- adam schiff is in the spotlight -- that he has to lay out this case in a way that potentially millions will watch
4:06 pm
and be convinced by or not. what is the task at hand for him? and do you think there might be people moved by the case he has to make? >> it's also the ulothers that have been appointed as well. two new household names. one is hakeem jeffries and -- you think that lower tier did an incredeble good job during the time in the second go round of all this. i think they're going to stick to the game plan right now. that is to present the facts as was developed through both the intel and judiciary committee. there's been no exculpatory evidence laid out to exonerate the president in any way shape or form. i think this will be a made-for-tv event with all the lawyers coming in, whether it's ken starr --
4:07 pm
the only thing missing is johnny cochran and the glove. just like donald trump was made for television. this is an extension of his television career. it's all come down to this week. >> and to that very point, that's partly how donald trump beat hillary clinton in 2016. does that give him an edge going to the impeachment trial? it's a tall order to go against somebody who has so much experience building that kind of an argument in public. >> the president clearly thinks so. it's clear from what people have been telling us is this is all about the process. this is all about the messaging. normally they send their answers saturday to the impeachment charges. and usually there is a legal argument in there. and it was not. it was pure attack on the process . saying the democrats are trying
4:08 pm
to undue an election. all political messaging. and donald trump is picking the lawyers who are television lawyers, who he has seen and liked. their messaging on this. that's how they see it, i think. it's not about siting cases or precedent or anything. this is a kind of battle he wants, not just these lawyers but the republicans who are backing him on the hill, to wage. >> i can imagine there are some people out there watching, listening to that, i take it. but it's a little cynical to say we have this process steeped in history designed to be a trial with a fair jury. if you take kimberley's argument, and i think it's a valid one, none of it matters. >> they don't have to go into all of nat. there's not a strong prospect there's a vote at the end of this where they get a majority. so why dredge up all of this
4:09 pm
stuff? it's all a sham. the president completely denies any culpability. there was a moment as we watched the senators being sworn in where it felt different than what happened in the house. it felt more solemn and somehow less like team red and blue slinging mud from both sides. and i guess the question is whether there's any sense of that continuing? whether the senate, who's historically been able to do that, smaller group of people, less of the fringes from both sides, maintain a sense of here we are, as opposed to both parties taking pot shots at each other. >> you're shaking your head. >> i think we have enough to be incredibly cynical about this. you're the white house, right? the first time this call becomes public transcript, the initial reaction is well, if there's a
4:10 pm
quid pro quo, that's pretty bad. and then you have your chief of staff, mick mulvaney say, darn right there was a quid pro quo and gordon sondland say there was a quid pro quo and the republicans say maybe it's not so bad. if you're the white house, of course you're feeling confident and don't feel you need to get into the weeds of the law. you can make public presentations. because you have a political party that almost uniformly will back him up. could the solemnity of it all weigh on them? sure. i just don't see a scenario in which there's ever that type of vote. and more importantly whether there's a silver bullet break through that convinced the republican law makers. >> the big question has been the new evidence from lev parnas. and in his interview, parnas
4:11 pm
named quite a few household names. >> president trump knew exactly what was going on. i wouldn't do anything without the consent of rudy giuliani or the president. attorney general barr was basically on the team. mr. bolton was definitely involved in the loop because of the firing of marie yovanovitch. >> do you know if vice president pence was aware of the quid pro quo, of the trade and that is why his inaugural visit was called off? >> i'm going to use a famous quote by mr. sondland, everybody was in the loop. >> and the president and vice president have said they don't know parnas. the attorney general called the claims 100% false. frank, weigh in here on how you see parnas as part of this. because i have to say talking to democrats on capitol hill, while some are interested in knowing
4:12 pm
what parnas has, they want to see that evidence, they actually do have questions about his credibility as a witness. what's your take on that? . >> in case of the clip you just played, portrays why parnas would make an excellent witness and why he'll probably never be called. this is a rabbit hole i don't think anybody wants to go down, particularly the republican members of the senate. he's got records you cannot ignore. he's implicating pompeo and barr and vice president pence. and he's one step away from the president portraying himself as an emsary of the white house through giuliani. so, he's not going away. one purpose he serves is to set up this stark contrast we're about to see this week. the stark contrast between senator whose don't want any witnesses and who are going to defend the president by saying what he did isn't impeachable.
4:13 pm
and then the democrats are going to say wait a minute, we've got facts on our side. and alan dershowitz who said when i don't have the facts, i play to the media. so, we're going to have a media circish from the republicans and the democrats saying no, we have facts. this whole fight is go to tooking -- going to ensue whether we're held to what the house held before christmas. >> and questions about what is going to sink in. you've got new reporting on parnas. >> in the past few days, we had the combination of him coming forward, implicating people. he brought receipts. thousands of pages of encrypted text messages, document said, photographs. a lot of them showing how involved he was and the president acting -- rudy giuliani acting with the president's knowledge and consent was the phrase that was
4:14 pm
used in a letter from giuliani to president zelensky. and in addition to that, we had a whole additional story line about potential monitoring and surveillance about ambassador yovanovitch that's raised alarm bells on who was surrounding lev parnas. we've got investigations in two countries into what happened there. one of the things this has done is put this on two tracks. because we're going to have a senate trial playing out, based largely on the evidence from last year and at the same time new details coming out, even as the senate trial is happening. is any of that going to sway senators? >> it's going to continue to thrust the details into spotlight as we get close and closer to the president's reelection in november.
4:15 pm
>> and let's just say it's part of the calculus for republican whose want to push this through. now for something completely different. prince harry is speaking publicly for the first time since his exit from the royal family. this is big news on the royal front, which is why we're covering it for you. it happened at a speech in a charity event where he told the crowd he and his wife, meghan markle, were left with, quote, no other option. and joining me is matt bradley, who we often see in war zones across the globe covering very serious, intense news. but who is at buckingham palace. i'm sure this is everything you dreamed of covering. i love meghan markle. so i've been covering every twist and turn in the story. >> reporter: it's a pleasure a classy place. tonight we had another classy event.
4:16 pm
prince harry was addressing a charity he himself founded 14 years ago to help children affected by hiv in subsaharan africa. now the prince gets a say. >> i must say i can only imagine what you may have heard. >> reporter: in his first public comments since splitting with the royal family. >> i want you to hear the truth from me, as much as i can share, not as a prince or a duke, but as harry. >> reporter: the prince telling the audience he and his wife had planned for a more private life. >> the decision i have made for my wife and i to step back is not one i made lightly. it was so many months of talks after so many years of challenges and i know i haven't always got it right but as far as this right, there really was no other option. >> reporter: torn between a desire for privacy and an obligation for duty. >> what i want to make clear is we're not walking away and we certainly aren't walking away from you.
4:17 pm
our hope was to continue serving the queen, the commonwealth and my military associations but without public funding. unfortunately, that wasn't possible. >> reporter: invoking the memory of his late mother, princess dianna. >> when i lost my mom, you took me under your wing and looked out for me for so long but the media is a powerful force. my hope is one day our collective support can be more powerful because this is so much bigger than just us. >> reporter: a step forward for his own young family. >> together you have given me an education about living and this role has taught me more about what is right and just than i could ever have imagined . we are taking a leap of faith, so thank fruio giving this courage to take this next step. >> reporter: and he said something that's been on the minds of a lot of brits here. he said britain is a country he
4:18 pm
loves a place that will always be his home. kasie. >> matt bradley, thank you very much. we look forwrard to welcoming yu to nofrgt america. pqts and it appears they are not in lock step on everything in the case. also coming up, senator mazie hirono and that they got a better briefing on the drone strike on qassem soleimani. he de strike on qassem soleimani can the hilton app help us win? hey, hey-we're all winners with the hilton price match guarantee, alright? man, you guys are adorable! alright, let's go find your coach, come on! book with the hilton app. expect better. expect hilton. and now for their service to the community, we present limu emu & doug with this key to the city. [ applause ] it's an honor to tell you that
4:19 pm
liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. and now we need to get back to work. [ applause and band playing ] only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ when youyou spend lessfair, and get way more. so you can bring your vision to life and save in more ways than one.
4:20 pm
for small prices, you can build big dreams, spend less, get way more. shop everything home at wayfair.com remember, you have out the hilton app. can the hilton app help us win? hey, hey-we're all winners with the hilton price match guarantee, alright? man, you guys are adorable! alright, let's go find your coach, come on! book with the hilton app. expect better. expect hilton. oh no, here comes gthe neighbor probably to brag about how amazing his xfinity customer service is. i'm mike, i'm so busy. good thing xfinity has two-hour appointment windows. they have night and weekend appointments too. he's here. bill? karolyn? nope! no, just a couple of rocks. download the my account app to manage your appointments making today's xfinity customer service simple, easy, awesome. i'll pass.
4:22 pm
perhaps no one summed up the impeachment case better than the speaker who oversaw the last impeachment. let's see, speaker pelosi sends in schiff and nadler and president trump sends in alan dershowitz. dershowitz wasn't even willing to stand by the trump's legal team's argument that the goa was wrong when they said the president acted illegally by withholding aid from ukraine. >> i didn't sign that brief. it's constitutionally authorized criteria for impeachment. >> and ken starr was at baylor
4:23 pm
when he mishandled an inquiry on football players. and potentially running for president in 1999, quote, starr's a freak. i bet heigate somethi got somet closet. good to have you, as always. we talked a little bit earlier about the trump legal team and how we're squarely made for television. and really aimed at helping everybody relive that period of time in the '90s that the president did over and over and over again in 2016, ultimately to the detriment of democrats. >> and we've been talking about in the show. the president wants a made-for-tv team, household names. people he's seen and thinks have been defending him. says a lot of positive things
4:24 pm
about these players recently. there's obviously the senators in the actual trial. but he's also thinking more broadly about this as he's running for reelection on how he's messaging this to the american country and push this idea he's being purse kuersecut this is an unfair case. >> can you talk about ken starr for a second. i mean, what are we going to get from him? i've been watching old footage of ken starr. the americans the president needs to convince, does ken starr help that case? i'm slightly mystified. >> we're seeing this as a made-for-tv legal team. this is a plucked-from-tv legal team. this is who he sees on the air waves and what we get from ken
4:25 pm
starr is probably what we get from alan dershowitz, which is people not privy about the intricacies of the ukrainian mishaps but can make lucid and convincing sounding legal arguments about the constitutionality of it all. if they have that type of debate, have to say it's probably better off for them. they can make an argument is it really obstruction? is it really abuse of power? and you can have these broad, philosophical arguments about the constitution. it becomes trickier when you get in the specifics. and of course alan dershowitz and ken starr don't have that much because they're not the president's actual lawyers. that's what i expect the be the next couple of days. >> and is that night kind of the point, that they're not steeped
4:26 pm
the in case the democrats are trying to make? the democrats want to blow right past it. >> at the may be what he's thinking, if athing at all. people are familiar with and let's have them on my side. they're outsiders from washington. here's the danger in that, kasie. the danger is people are going to start focusing on the defenders, rather than the defense. and he starts scratching not too deeply on dershowitz. you're going to find creepy things about both of them including allegations of underage sex and dershowitz writing an op-ed in the "l.a. times" where he says the age of consent could be 14. we're getting blown out of shape on statutory rape. and starr who was basically walked out of baylor university because he was looking the other way while football players were doing horrible things with coeds.
4:27 pm
it could focus more on the defenders than the defense they're launching. >> congressman crowley, what's the best strategy for adam schiff and this upcoming team of managers you mentioned? how can they most effectively push back? >> i think they're going to stick to the facts, as they were laid out in the judiciary and intel committee. i think we're going to call for more evidence to be entered in. and i think lev parnas may have more information we may want to know about. >> selfies to share. >> exactly. i think it's going to put up more pressure for those, for lack of a better word, modern senators on whether they should have witnesses or not. the more the evidence is out there, we really need hear from mick mulvaney, bolton. we need to hear from those others who have real knowledge of what the president said when
4:28 pm
he said it and that matters. i think for cory gardner, for collins p much more difficult for them. >> i think bolton, in particular, because of his first-hand experience, is something that might move the needle, perhaps. >> i appreciate you giving us part of your sunday night. ahead what the president is saybug hind closed doors. about the air strike that killed qassem soleimani. mazie hirono joins us next. and we're awaiting a news conference with chuck schumer. conference with chuck schumer. whatever happens out there today, remember, you have the hilton app. can the hilton app help us win? hey, hey-we're all winners with the hilton price match guarantee, alright?
4:29 pm
4:30 pm
so chantix can help you quit slow turkey. along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in behavior or thinking,
4:31 pm
aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life-threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. talk to your doctor about chantix.
4:32 pm
welcome back to "kasie d.c." president trump spent his friday night telling donors at his mar-a-lago resort about the air strike that killed iranian general, qassem soleimani, according to audio the "washington post" obtained over the weekend ppt said soleimani was, quote, saying bad things about your country and i said, listen, how much of this expletive do we have to listen to, right?
4:33 pm
he went on to describe the minutes leading up to the strike, counting down the minutes soleimani and those he was with had left to live. the detailed account is a bit different than mark esper, explaining that intelligence surrounding the strike cannot be widely shared. >> the bottom line is we had exquisite intelligence. that was revealed to the gang of eight. i understand the frustration of the broader members of congress. they're not going to have access to that information. >> and "politico" reporting they've cancelled two briefings this week. this move has frustrated law makers and staffers looking for more information about the air strike. joining me now, hawaii senator, mazie hirono, a member of the judiciary committee. >> before i started, i'd like to
4:34 pm
extend my deepest condolences to the family and friends of the two police officers that were killed tragically in hawaii and the firefighters fighting flames, as we speak, of the homes that were basically set on fire. >> thank you for mentioning that. let's start with what the president was talking about at his mar-a-lago resort. there was considerable frustration. is it frustrating to hear the president give a friends and an audience more information than you all received. ? >> he doesn't have a filter when he talks to people at mar-a-lago or the russians. the first explanation was there was an imminent danger. there is very little information. so this after-the-fact
4:35 pm
explanation. there was no imminent danger we were facing. we all agree he was terrible person. the point is the president should not bring house to brink of war without intel that allows him to kill the number two person in iran and without thinking about what the consequences may be and they still haven't given us, in my view, the straight scoop, the information. we did have a briefing. from the the cia and all those people, but a lot of us, including mike d, who came out of that briefing and said we didn't get the kind of information we should have gotten. >> do you have any concerns overall about the president revealing what would typically be a pretty closely held national security secret to, in a public forum like this?
4:36 pm
>> it goes to show once again the president makes decisions and talks in a very impulsive way. that endangers national security, in my view. >> let's talk about impeachment. big questions still out there about how mitch mcconnell is going to set up the ground rules. have you learned anything more about how this is going to play out? >> i think he's going to pretty much spring everything on us tuesday. i pretty much know he doesn't want any witnesses. he wants it to basically be what i would call a white wash, we won't have witnesses, documents and that's how mitch wants to do this. and there's a big rush to have the road taken with all the republicans presumably not voting to convict the president before the state of the union so the president can run around saying he was exonerated, just after the mueller report. we should take the time
4:37 pm
necessary for the president's people -- we're still waiting for his people to mount a reasonable defense, rather than just calling this a witch hunt. >> i mean, we did see the initial filings from the president's team, essentially saying neither one of these charges are impeachable charges under the constitution. >> their position is what i call he did it so what? defense. or what mulvaney, get over it, dfsz. >> what is the democratic plan out of the gate on tuesday to try -- i know senator schumer, the minority leader, has pulled together some motions aimed at highlighting this witness issue. >> what's going to happen is probably mitch mcconnell will represent his motion to get the trial going and chuck schumer will get up and say we knew bolton -- they will probably counter with we want hunter
4:38 pm
biden. we'll agree hunter biden is irrelevant. there will be votes taken, not just in the beginning part of the trial but possibly during the trial itself, as the house members -- they themselves can move to have certain evidence, certain documents and certain witnesses called. and those will also go to a vote. we've been hearing it's possible the trial could go late in the night to accelerate the time table. do you think there's a political motivation or an impact on the fairness of the trial if it is happening way into the evening, 10:00, 11:00, 12:00 at night. >> i say yes to both of them. there's dp there's definitely a political motivation. this began with the politically-motivated president blackmailing another country and using our money.
4:39 pm
do you think the american people are going to stay up 12 hours or however many to wuch this? they're they're expecting a fair trial, which means witnesses and appropriate documents. unlike both richard nixon and bill clinton, produced zero documents, 71 document requests. and he sent out a directive that nobody in the administration should testify. so you have all these departments, dod, department of defense, all not producing a single piece of evidence. so, when i hear the republicans going on and on about how this was no due process, i want to say give me a break, guys. why don't we do the american people a service and have an actual trial? >> well, it's certainly going to be a dramatic week in the senate. i'll be there.
4:40 pm
in fact, i think we all will be. thank you for your time. whqts we come back, some senators find themselves facing uncomfortable questions about impeachment. and later, the strange case of republican congressional candidate, robert hyde, now under state department investigation. robert hyde, now under state department investigation. 'm still 25. that's why i take osteo bi-flex, to keep me moving the way i was made to. it nourishes and strengthens my joints for the long term. osteo bi-flex - now in triple strength plus magnesium. the good news? our comfort lasts all day. the bad news? so does his energy. depend® fit-flex underwear offers your best comfort and protection guaranteed. because, perfect or not, life's better when you're in it. be there with depend®. stimulant laxatives forcefully stimulate i switched to miralax for my constipation. the nerves in your colon. miralax works with the water in your body to unblock your system naturally. and it doesn't cause bloating, cramping, gas, or sudden urgency. miralax. look for the pink cap.
4:41 pm
[happy ♪irthday music] ♪ don't get mad, put those years to work with e*trade. eh, not enough fiber- chocolate would be good- snacking should be sweet and simple. the delicious taste of glucerna gives you the sweetness you crave while helping you manage your blood sugar. glucerna. everyday progress made it myself. i love this place! made that myself, too. order up. fries on the side. right where i like 'em. don't forget the grease fire.
4:42 pm
burn, baby -- wait, what? -[ alarm beeping ] -i said grease fire. what are you doing on the counter? when owning a small business gets real... sorry. can i get a to-go box? ...progressive helps protect what you built -with customizable coverage. -aah! ...progressive helps protect what you built ♪ do you recall, not long ago ♪ we would walk on the sidewalk ♪ ♪ all around the wind blows ♪ we would only hold on to let go ♪ ♪ blow a kiss into the sun
4:43 pm
♪ we need someone to lean on ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we needed somebody to lean on ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ all we need is someone to lean on ♪ the impeachment trial is tough political territory for a number of vulnerable senators, especially republicans up for reelection in stat. senator susan collins is now the most unpopular senator in the country, 52% disproval rating and says she's very likely to vote for more witnesses and
4:44 pm
documents but wants to hear both sides present their case first. then senator cory gardner airing ads and questions like this. >> are you against more witnesses in the senate trial? >> we have a trial and that's where we're at right now. >> so, sam stein, susan collins is in, once again, the sort of central position here. and i think certainly a lot of democrats are a little tired of it f i talked to him the privately. she did this with kavanaugh only to side with republicans. we touched on this earlier. but how real do you think it is that these moderate republicans could go against mitch mcconnell? >> probably not that real. i was thinking back the '90s.
4:45 pm
inevitably you would hear talk of a gang forming, gang of eight. and it was a group of moderates on both sides who have their own meetings and they would try to forge a compromise and force it upon the parties. >> and this is what happened in clinton. on the outline for the rules of the trial. >> what's interesting here is there's not even talk of gangs. >> a gang of however many meeting in years probably. >> it says a lot about the sentive structure. and susan collins would have branded her a centerist, deal maker and thrust her in the spotlight in a positive way. but now it will make her a target for president trump and for mcconnell. so, she's stuck in this position where she has to plakate her
4:46 pm
base and -- >> kimberley, atkins, i think mcconnell is acutely aware of the pressure. he wants to remain majority leader. and that means trying to make sure susan collins has the option to vote for documents and witnesses if that's what she needs. is that ultimately why we're going to see votes on documents? >> i think that's right. i think mcconnell understands vulnerable senators need to vote the way their voters need them to. everybody is motivated by different things. catering to voters in maine is different than romney, who was very popular in his state might be making. so the motivation is entirely different. it's hard to draw them in together. that statement you put out,
4:47 pm
clarifying her position, that she might vote for articles and might not, depends on what happened and we'll see. >> it's crazy to me because they're advocating the power they have. if susan collins sat down with doug jones and joe mansion and say we're not going to agree to -- there has to be this type of rule structure. they could force it and decide yes, he understands the vulnerability of his members. and president trump has, in the past, gone after mitch mcconnell, most notably failing to get an obamacare through the senate. >> congressman, what do you think the underlying dynamics are here? do you think there is a realistic posesibility the tria could play out in a way that's
4:48 pm
different than it started? >> it's hard to say that knowing mcconnell and that he'll make a deal and know he'll win the vote. i think what's happening is true dynamics. one is the primary for republicans. the primary is going to happen oofr this trial and it's a fine line for them. if they go too far, they'll lose the primary vote. then the problem with the general election, in the hopes this will be forgotten by november. and the solemnity of the oath that was taken. and at the same time they know if witnesses are allowed, that's a jump ball. you're heading to territory where no one can predict what will happen if you can have bolton testify. flr that's why you don't see the gang of eight, two, three, four, because if they did do that, they know they will have a mystery out there. >> thank you see much.
4:49 pm
thank you guys so much for your reporting. appreciate it. coming up next the state department is investigating whether robert hyde was running a surveillance operation against the u.s. ambassador to ukraine. i need all the breaks that i can get. at liberty butchemel... cut. liberty mu... line? cut. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. cut. liberty m... am i allowed to riff? what if i come out of the water? liberty biberty... cut. we'll dub it. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ can be a sign your feeling digestive systemhed down isn't working at its best. taking metamucil every day can help. its psyllium fiber forms a gel that traps and removes the waste that weighs you down. it also helps lower cholesterol and slows sugar absorption, promoting healthy blood sugar levels. so, start feeling lighter and more energetic
4:50 pm
by taking metamucil every day. take the metamucil two-week challenge, lighten up. just take metamucil every day for two weeks. available at your local retailer. i had no idea that my grandfatherfe changing moment for me. was a federal judge in guatemala. he was an advocate for the people... a voice for the voiceless. bring your family history to life like never before. get started for free at ancestry.com ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ wherever we want to go, we just have to start. autosave your way there with chase. chase. make more of what's yours. if you're living with hiv, and ask your doctor about biktarvy.
4:51 pm
biktarvy is a complete, one-pill, once-a-day treatment used for hiv in certain adults. it's not a cure, but with one small pill, biktarvy fights hiv to help you get to and stay undetectable. that's when the amount of virus is so low it can't be measured by a lab test. research shows people who take hiv treatment every day and get to and stay undetectabe can no longer transmit hiv through sex. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a buildup of lactic acid and liver problems. do not take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin. tell your doctor about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b, do not stop taking biktarvy without talking to your doctor. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. if you're living with hiv, keep loving who you are. and ask your doctor if biktarvy is right for you.
4:53 pm
secretary of state mike pompeo says he will investigate claims of surveillance operation against former ambassador to ukraine marie yovanovitch. this comes after the public from indicted rudy giuliani associate lev parnas. tin colluded messages between pars in and robert hyde, where the two men appear to discuss tracking yovanovitch. that's where things get interesting. here to explain everything is chris keating. he just interviewed robert hyde. josh letterman is back with us as well. chris, let me start with you. you just sat down with mr. hyde. the story line is nothing, if not bizarre. walk us through what you learned. >> yeah, it was restaurant strange.
4:54 pm
there was no question he was texting back and forth and was close with lev parnas. now he says he never had the ambassador under surveillance at all and thought the whole thing was a joke, that he was joking back and forth with parnas. but there's a series of text messages that said, i know at this moment that the ambassador's computer is off. that seemed and sounded like electronic surveillance of some sort. >> so i think we have a little bit of the interrue you just concluded. let's take a look at it. >> i thought they were joking because everybody said they were jokers, conmen, losers, scum bags. so when they are sending me these texts, under surveillance, just joking, nobody ever really knew that -- i had never pi pictured anything was real. >> so josh letterman, just get your reaction to that.
4:55 pm
do you buy this was just all a joke? >> so far, we don't have any evidence that there actually was a surveillance operation on her. but we know that this was not just robert hyde. there was this other character we learned about. this apparently dutch citizen who was conveying all of this information to robert hyde he was then passing along to pars that. one of the things that left parnas said in his interview with rachel maddow, he said it was likement coming out of a cult. one of the things this whole episode with robert hyde exposed is how the president has created this environment around himself that's become this breeding ground for basically these trump superfans to bring themselves into his orbit by hanging around at the bar, at the trump hotel like robert hyde did regularly, by projecting proximity to the president, by donating and getting selfies at these various
4:56 pm
fundraisers at martin bashchat. it's allowed people to come into the orbit that should not be close to the president. such as people who seriously or jokingly would talk about running a surveillance operation on a u.s. ambassador. >> what was your take away from sitting down with this man? you get a measure of a person. did you feel as though there were contributions in your interview? anything that stood out to you that we should sort of pay attention to in the coming days? >> sometimes it was hard to follow. i mean, this guy hyde has a million pictures of himself with donald trump, ivanka trump, donald trump jr. he wants to be a player. he's running r for congress b in connecticut. he was very concerned that nobody knew where we were r or where we were talking. the interview started out on the telephone. i told him i wanted to do it in person. he didn't tell me. he drove to where i was. and we ended up doing it in person. it didn't start that way. he didn't tell me he was coming. you never knew from one minute
4:57 pm
to the next what was going to happen. >> so just to be clear here. he was concerned for security reasons a about you knowing his physical location? did you get a sense of why? >> the fbi is looking for him. i went to his house. the fbi went to his house. they couldn't find him. the fbi went to his office and couldn't find hill. he's not been staying at his house. he told me he stays at a friend's house, wherever that is. i don't know. he wouldn't say. people are looking for him. he knows it. the thing with me was i had no idea he was driving to where i was. >> this just keeps getting more and more bizarre. thank you both so much. i'm sure we're going to be following r your reporting on this. we have another hour of "kasie d.c." chuck schumer was holding a a news conference. and the legendary mike barnacle is going to join me.
4:58 pm
we're going to talk about another scandal. sign stealing in major league baseball. and an impeachment-themed addition of dvr. of dvr. ♪ or more on car insurance.s could save you fifteen percent everybody knows that. well, did you know pinocchio was a bad motivational speaker? i look around this room and i see nothing but untapped potential. you have potential. you have-oh boy. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. take dayquil severe with vicks vapocool.d, (acapella) whoa! (vo) and vaporize it with an intense rush of vicks vapors. (acapella) ahhhhhhhhhhh! (vo) dayquil severe with vicks vapocool. the daytime coughing, stuffy head,
4:59 pm
vaporize your cold, medicine. there areand the best.s... which egg tastes more farm-fresh and delicious? only eggland's best. with more vitamins d and e and 25% less saturated fat? only eggland's best. better taste, better nutrition, better eggs. before we talk about tax-s-audrey's expecting... new? -twins! ♪ we'd be closer to the twins. change in plans. at fidelity, a change in plans
5:00 pm
is always part of the plan. whatever happens out there you have the hilton app. will the hilton app help us pick the starters? great question, no. but it can help you pick your room from the floor plan. can the hilton app help us score? you know, it's not that kind of thing, but you can score free wi-fi. can it help us win? hey, hey! we're all winners with the hilton price match guarantee, alright? man, you guys are adorable! alright, let's go lose this soccer game, come on! book with the hilton app. if you find a lower rate, we match it and give you 25% off that stay. expect better. expect hilton. here, it all starts withello! hi!... how can i help? a data plan for everyone. everyone? everyone. let's send to everyone! wifi up there? uhh. sure, why not? how'd he get out?! a camera might figure it out. that was easy! glad i could help. at xfinity, we're here to make life simple. easy. awesome. so come ask, shop, discover
5:01 pm
at your local xfinity store today. i don't use some waxy cover up. i use herpecín l, it penetrates deep to treat. it soothes moisturizes and creates a spf 30 barrier to protect against flare ups caused by the sun. herpecín l. it does more for a cold sore. the senate impeachment trial of president trump -- >> are you still open mind? >> people were important of a case say should have called them in the house. >> we did try to get witnesses in the house.
5:02 pm
>> the the house has a weak hand. >> the house was unfair. it's all hearsay. bring in the people who were in the room. >> i think it all depends on four republican senators. >> my personal preference would be to see this thing dismissed. >> the idea of dismissing the case is not going to happen. >> adan dirk wits takes a unique position. >> you needed proof of a crime. >> i was surprised to hear him say that. >> is than argument you have to make if the facts are set against you. >> abuse of power, it's so open-ended. >> abuse of power is poorly defined. >> abuse of power is at the center of what the framers intended to be. >> it's all over the federalist papers. >> alexander hamilton. >> what is tuesday going to look like? >> we're proposing to do exactly what we did during the chin ton hearing. >> we're going to proceed. >> when it comes to donald trump, nancy pelosi made privately what she's orchestrated the church of holy
5:03 pm
hell. >> welcome back to "kasie d.c." we are awaiting a news conference from chuck schumer. we're going to bring that to you as soon as we have it. after a remarkable week, we are now just two day was from if the official start of the senate impeachment trial. >> we have very exciting days, more than most presidents, times ten we like to keep it that way. >> it is the most high profile platform for democrats in congress to make their case that president trump should be impeached from office. as 2020 presidential candidates try to make overlapping arguments on the came pain trail. there are many questions to consider tonight. can congressman adam schiff and others sway the american people? especially undecided voters in wisconsin, michigan and pennsylvania. will predictions like these hold any water in november? >> the time we get to 2020,
5:04 pm
donald trump may not even be president. in fact, he may not even be a free person. >> speaking of the election, will democrats grasp a crucial opportunity to make their argument for 2020. and will the president's team of made for tv lawyers give the president the performance he wants. perhaps the most important question of all, does any of it matter? will enough people actually be watching at home? or is it just going to be another political flash point that doesn't breakthrough with the broader public. i'd like to welcome in my panel for this hour. sue davis, senior washington news correspondent and msnbc contributor kimberly atkins,
5:05 pm
brandon buck, and in massachusetts the legendary mike barnacle, who is also an msnbc contributor. i'm sorry we don't have the "morning joe" sound effect loaded. i have to get our control room on that. i appreciate having you here. >> as am i. >> on this broader question of whether or not this is all going to matter, it does seem to me sitting here going into this week, the halls of congress every day, it feels incredibly historic, momentous, not something that we do every day. but when you listen to the president on the campaign trail and think about how voters may or may not be absorbing this, some of it seems like it's another episode in what has become politics as usual. do you think that this is something that's actually going to sway or perhaps the question is are there even undecided voters left to sway by what's going to unfold this week? >> that last point you made is a critical point.
5:06 pm
i don't think anybody in america is undecided ant donald trump, about his presidency or him as the individual. and does it matter? yes, it matters to history. but in terms of swaying the american people, a as you indicated earlier, i think my instinct is that large segments of the american population are semiinterested in this. the coverage is spotty for them in terms of its rolling thunder and ever presence and people tend to tune it out after awhile. and i think the largest segment of the american public is just sitting there quietly saying, i get it. i sort of know what's going on. wake me up on election day and i'll take care of it. >> it's funny you say that. one thing i sort of when i was out on leave that i spent a lot of time thinking about is trying to consume the news, be part of the news cycle in the way that i
5:07 pm
imagine most american who is have jobs outside of this business do. they take in some big event, they watch the news and read the paper. try to keep themselves informed. it was interesting to see what kind of broke through for me. my question from that perspective for the democrats in particular, what do they need to do in the next two days to breakthrough what you describe as that sort of rolling thunder of the everyday news cycle so people stop and say, hey, i learned something new that matters to me. >> i don't know. i don't know the answer to that. that's a tough question for the democrats. because voters, ordinary people are exhausted by what has happened over the last three years. the back and forth, the constant tweets from the president. there's a level of exhaustion this this country that has people removed a bit from the everyday politics. removed a lot from the politics. in terms of breaking through,
5:08 pm
the coverage right now of the impeachment trial, as it begins, is going to be minimal liezed by the senate rules, the new rules enforced, keeping reporters at bay, keeping television coverage restricted to just cameras, controlled by the united states senate. not even c-span controlling the cameras. so it's going to be tough, i think, to get people involved in this. >> brandon buck, you are certainly familiar with orchestrate iing optics around things like this in your many years with the house speaker paul ryan. what is your take on these bigger questions, especially because this president has shown that he has very adept at overloadsing the information that americans receive with his version of the truth. it's like blunt force trauma all the time. is there any way for democrats to cut through that here? >> into a certain subset of the voters, which has been the most important thing of all of this. the house did a really good job.
5:09 pm
substantively getting witnesses to come and make testimony that was pretty damning. but on the politic, i think the president actually won this because democrats sort of played by the old rules. it's notable there's relatively high percentage of americans who support impeachment and think he's should be removed from office. much higher than the clinton era. but that's not how things work anymore. house republicans or senate republicans don't care about national polls. they care about what people back home think. the president did a really good job talking to voters, going around the mainstream media or talking on fox doing a rally like he did firing people up, having them hear it was a rigged process or out to get him from the start. that's what they hear. that filters back to members of congress and they come up to washington and act the way they do because that's what constituents are saying. when it comes to politics, they are acting rationally. >> i'm going to just underscore for the record that you said something nice about nancy pelosi's house democrats. >> the fact that we got so much
5:10 pm
testimony after the president said they weren't going to participate at all, it was remarkable. that's probably the biggest problem for democrats. we know what happened. we have all this testimony. it just didn't move enough people to actually make a difference in the votes. >> so sue, you're on capitol hill every ta. all of us kind of pounding the marble floors. what is your sense of how democrats are going to try to take on this challenge? is he right they are doing it under a set of rules that don't apply? >> the thing to watch for, the two wild cards is adam schiff. can he deliver a disciplined, clear message that make it is really difficult for those four republicans they are looking for to vote for more witnesses to say no. and he goes in with some challenges. i think adam schiff is seen in this very political time, republicans see him as a partisan player. i think he's got a lot to do to try to find those votes. the wild card is how the white house defense team performs on the senate floor. this is the first time we will be hearing from the white house in this official process.
5:11 pm
there's been a lot of fight on television. obviously, the president has communications through twitter and his rallies. but they need to make a clear defense before the senate to make this job for mitch mcconnell easier. we don't know how they are going to perform. we haven't seen that yet. and these two performances are going to determine so much about whether we do hear more testimony or see more documents. if it does change any of the calculations. >> do you think the white house and mitch mcconnell are on the same page? >> the white house lawyers aren't all on the same page. we have seen that today. so i think that remains to be seen. but i think what will happen is you're right about the case being made to the american people. the political case being made by the president at the psalm time the democrats are focused on making a legal case. they have the impeachment managers who are lawyers and former prosecutors, former police chief. it depends on who the audience is. is the audience convincing the american people or the audience trying to get the four potentially swing voters within the senate to do things like allow witnesses and go with them
5:12 pm
on the motions that they are going to be putting forward. you have to make different arguments to appeal to both things. that's the fine line they will have to watch walk. >> outside of washington, where we are living in this constant impeachment fight, there's a growing argument between senator bernie sanders and former vice president joe biden this time over social security. we have been following the campaign and joins me live from manchester, new hampshire. you look cold. i normally would be out and about in iowa and new hampshire. also cold, but this year we're still here in washington covering this impeachment trial. what have we missed as to the what are the really the final days before critical voting begins. >> reporter: it's crunch time that we're seeing right now. the latest that we saw was this weekend between joe biden and senator bernie sanders. it was on saturday when in response to a question from iowa
5:13 pm
voter, vice president booiden demanded an apology from the sanders campaign. he claimed that the campaign has been sending around a doctored video of him supporting cuts to social security. now there's no doctored video that we have seen, but the sanders campaign for weeks through the staff have been sending around different tweets and videos suggesting that biden has been a little too cozy or too willing to entertain cuts and reforms to social security program. and that's what vice president biden took issue with. one of those videos was misleading it out of context. but if we take a step back from this back and forth over the video, this is the debate that the sanders campaign wants to get into, especially 15 days until the iowa caucus. it helps them shift the attention away from the back and forth with elizabeth warren. you remember it was this week when they were going back and forth arguing essentially over who lied about the other on
5:14 pm
national television. and it helps the campaign focus the attention squarely on vice president biden, which is their top target. in addition, it helps senator sanders focus on a key voting group that he doesn't do well. he does well 35 years and younger, but older voters who care about social security, he doesn't do as well with those voters. that's why they are willing to have this conversation. that's why the advisers have been turning attention to biden's comments on social security. and that's why this kind of has been a debate over the course of this weekend here in new hampshire and other early states. >> it's a great point. i remember being on the bernie sanders trail in 2016. i am thinking of you, as you head towards these start voting. thank you so much. let's bring in somebody who has represented the state of vermont alongside senator and current presidential candidate bernie sanders. former vermont governor peter shumland. it's great to have you on the program.
5:15 pm
>> it's great to be with you. >> sir, you have endorsed joe biden. i just want to be clear about that with viewers. we noticed in particular something that you wrote about in the past few days as bernie sanders has been arguing with elizabeth warren. shaq just lid out for us. you wrote about that. what i have seen in politics is he and his team feel they are holier than the rest. what you're seeing in the end, if he considers you a friend like elizabeth warren, bernie will come first. that's the pattern we have seen in vermont and now we are seeing that nationally. those are pretty sharp words. do these words that you wrote about warren also apply in the spat between biden and bernie over social security? >> i think it's another example of exactly what we don't want to happen in this race. there's never been a time in my
5:16 pm
lifetime where we have had a president of the united states where things could be so bad. and i think the one thing that could really kill us here is if democrats progressives start fighting with each other. last we saw bernie go out and say, hey, first they sound on talking points saying they are going to portray elizabeth warren as corporate and bureaucratic. only representing the elite. they got caught doing that and tried to become away. next thing, the women can't win presidential races. kind of astounding. this week you see them going after joe biden. joe biden has fought for social security and medicare as all democrats have. if he was going to undo social security or medicare, he and president obama would have done that while in power. this is not an unknown candidate. this is absurd. there's no one that cares more about ensuring. the point is the one thing that i have known about this race is lest look at whpd to h1n1.
5:17 pm
bernie and the team, went out of their way to portray hillary clinton who has been a graets public servant. as corporate and untrusty. donald trump ran with it. a gift to donald trump. he won an election he never should have won. now we have a replay of that in the last few weeks whether going after your friend elizabeth warren or going after joe biden who served the public for so long. what concerns me is what we're help iing is we cannot afford t do that. what's the difference between bernie and other candidates, it's pretty simple. he will be the first to tail light you he's not a democrat. he's aulgs seen many democrats as only sharply better. my point is we have to contain it. >> what does this say? i take your point. there was a lot of anger among many people who have been with the democratic party for a long time. there still is about bernie around this. but there's a lot of enthuse yampl and excitement for him
5:18 pm
among a bunch of voters who were not part of the process and listened to comments like yours and say, hey, this is politics as usual. that's in the what i'm interested in signing up for. what do you say to those voters? >> what i say is thanks for coming into the process. we need you. thank you, bernie sanders, for helping to bring folks in. i'm not anti-bernie. all i'm saying is the one thing that can garn tee a donald trump victory is if we let bernie sanders or any other democrat attack each other instead of going after donald trump. you don't see elizabeth warren whacking away merciless ly at je biden and other democrats. you don't see amy doing it. we have got to be sure that at the expense of winning a revolution, we don't reelect donald trump. that's what should concern all of us together. what i say is listen, there's never been a time. we have joe biden president is more important. we have to put this country back together again. we all agree.
5:19 pm
all the people running. we have to expand medicare, thot destroy it. that's what joe biden cares about. we all agree we have to lift up social security and not destroy it. it's very clear from the comments that were made by joe biden about paul ryan and is that dialogue that biden was fight for getting rid of the taxes for the rich and helping those that need help. that's where he stands. >> governor, thank you so much for your time. we appreciate it. we have much more to come tonight. but i think we have to go live now to the senate minority leader chuck schumer speaking live. >> senators swore to do impartial justice in the impeachment trial of president trump. in the coming days, senate republicans are going to face a choice. will they take their cues from the white house as leader mcconnell clearly stated and engage in a cover-up for president trump or will they in this most sacred of undertakings prescribed by the constitution vote for a fair trial with
5:20 pm
witnesses and document ls that a allow all the facts to come out. the charges are serious. let's make no mistake about it. if a president can interfere and get -- if a president can get a foreign power to interfere in our elections and determine the outcome, that is against the whole the american people should determine who their president and senator and congressmen are. not a foreign power. in that starts to happen, our democracy is in peril. the fundamental democracy that has blessed this country for 200 years. and second, can a president so stone wall that no information about serious charges comes out. again, that's totally against what the founding father stated.
5:21 pm
it was up to congress to impeach. it was up to congress to determine documents. there's no executive privilege here. and in fact, since the president has talked about everything that's happened, any claim of executive privilege is gone. the president is afraid of the truth. most americans, my guess is even republicans know what the truth is. and know he's hiding it. we democrats aim to get the truth and make no mistake about it. we will force votes on witnesses and documents. it will be up to four republicans to side with the constitution to side with our democracy. to side with rule of law. and not side in blind bee to suppress the truth. in my judgment, he probably thinks he's guilty. today i read the house managers brief. i was in washington today.
5:22 pm
it was smart, thoughtful, sharp, laid out a compelling case and reflects the serious nature of the charges. then i read the president's council's response to the summons. it read more like a transcript of one of his campaign rallies. where six pages of tweets rather than a legal defense. instead of a legal document, it seemed like a rant. i hope for the president's sake when their brief is released tomorrow it's better than that. it's not just screaming and jumping up and down and pounding the table. but it actually answers some questions. as we know since the president was impeached in december, additional explosive information came out. michael duffy in an e-mail 90 minutes after the presidential conversation said hide it and keep it hush hush. and in a later e-mail, he said
5:23 pm
that it was from direction are from the president to withhold the aid. a "new york times" story that detailed who were the four people who most knew exactly what happened sglsh we're going to keep listening into the minority leader. we'll bring you news as we get it. we have so much more to come tonight. will congress investigate major league baseball again? this time over a scandal that hz already cost three managers their jobs. we're so fortunate to have mike barnacle here for this one. and later bill clinton's impeachment will in many ways be the model for how this one gets handled in the senate. now another arkansas goov north joins me live. he was one of clinton's impeachment managers. that's all ahead on "kasie d.c." s that's all ahead on "kasie d.c." e and help keep you active and well-rested. because hey, tomorrow's coming up fast. nature's bounty. because you're better off healthy. nature's bounty. ♪ do you recall, not long ago ♪ we would walk on the sidewalk ♪
5:24 pm
♪ all around the wind blows ♪ we would only hold on to let go ♪ ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we need someone to lean on ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we needed somebody to lean on ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ all we need is someone to lean on ♪ itso chantix can help you quit slow turkey. along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures,
5:25 pm
new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life-threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. quit smoking slow turkey. talk to your doctor about chantix.
5:27 pm
welcome back. should witnesses testify during president trump's senate trial? a similar debate played out during bill clinton's impeachment. shouldn't the jurors who must finally decide the guilt or innocence of the president of the united states have the opportunity to hear the testimony upon which they must cast their vote? shouldn't they have the opportunity to ask questions through justice william rend kwis. shouldn't they hear lawyers cross examine the witnesses for efds? or should we merely leave the nagging questions unexamined? join iing me now is the
5:28 pm
impeachment manager who wrote that op-ed in the "new york times" former congressman and current governor of arkansas asa hutchinson. it's good to have you. >> good to be with you. >> can you explain to our viewers why there should or should not be witnesses in the case of president trump, considering what you had to say during president clinton's impeachment? >> we made the case for witnesses and the president clinton's impeachment trial. we were following the same procedure this year, which means both sides have an opportunity to present their case. the house managers as well as the president's defense team and then after that, which is what they did during the clinton impeachment. then you file a notimotion to dismiss or make the decision to go on to witnesses. buts senator shoochumer just ma his case for witnesses. that's the case you have to make over the next two weeks as the
5:29 pm
house managers present their case. they have to show it's constitutionally sound. that it's a high crime and misdemeanor and the facts are there. and then the senate will make a judgment. but they are try ing ing to getd of the game. they will be playing games on tuesday filing motions to make judgments before they actually present their case and make a decision by the senate as to where to go from there. >> would you like to hear from former national security adviser john bolton in the course of this impeachment trial? >> i can see where he would have relevant information that pertains to what happened on the call with the president of the ukraine. but you have to first look at every allegation that the house has made, house democrats have made. in my judgment, it does not
5:30 pm
arise to a high crime or misdemeanor. you can say that's not an ideal call. i don't think i would want to vote for a person that made that kind of suggestion on a telephone call with a foreign leader. you can make that judgment, but it's not a basis to remove somebody from office. so while people might be curious as to what others will say, you have to determine whether it's relevant and whether it could lead to information that might constitute a high crime and i don't believe it does this this case. >> do you think president trump did anything wrong? >> i have said before that that's not an ideal call, in my judgment. it was a congratulatory call that turned into a discussion about investigations. so that kind of thing should have been handled by the attorney general. but no, that's not the kind of call i would like to see made. but at the psalm same time,
5:31 pm
again, i listened to the house testimony. i have read the house brief. and i think they are going to have to lay out the case and try to persuade them that there's opportunity that should be opportunity for witnesses. lelt me emphasize there's two big differences as to what happened 20 years ago. one, there was a more complete investigation on the house side. there's not in this case. secondly, here we survived a motion to dismiss filed by robert bird, that led us to witnesses. let's see if they meet that same birdie of proof. >> sir, one last question before i let you go. what advice do you have for the house managers in this case? there are very few people who can say they have ever done this before in the history of the republic. you are one of them. several of them will be come ing to the floor of the senate coming up tuesday or wednesday. what did you learn when you did it that you would advise, even
5:32 pm
though they are members of the opposite party, on how to go forward? >> stick with substance, avoid political inferences. i think this is particularly important for the lead manager, mr. schiff, that he's got to present this in a substantiative, factual way. and try to even though it's a political conversation, it's a political judgment the senate will make in the end. i think the house managers need to approach it like a federal prosecutor or like someone presenting a case in a courtroom. i think that's what will be most appreciated by the senate and set the right tone for the american public. it's going to be a lot of hard work for them. they have on both sides really topnotch lawyers. and we'll see where it goes. >> all right, governor, thank you very much part for your time. i appreciate it. >> thank you. we have much more "kasie d.c." coming up next. we'll be right back. more "kasie d.c." coming up next we'll be right back. as a caricature artist,
5:33 pm
5:34 pm
♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ can be a sign your feeling digestive systemhed down isn't working at its best. taking metamucil every day can help. its psyllium fiber forms a gel that traps and removes the waste that weighs you down. it also helps lower cholesterol and slows sugar absorption, promoting healthy blood sugar levels. so, start feeling lighter and more energetic by taking metamucil every day. take the metamucil two-week challenge, lighten up. just take metamucil every day for two weeks.
5:35 pm
available at your local retailer. whatever happens out there you have the hilton app. will the hilton app help us pick the starters? great question, no. but it can help you pick your room from the floor plan. can the hilton app help us score? you know, it's not that kind of thing, but you can score free wi-fi. can it help us win? hey, hey! we're all winners with the hilton price match guarantee, alright? man, you guys are adorable! alright, let's go lose this soccer game, come on! book with the hilton app. if you find a lower rate, we match it and give you 25% off that stay. expect better. expect hilton.
5:36 pm
5:37 pm
people thought we were going to hear. that was bad. i don't think it's impeachable. the president has shown no tolerance for that. on the sunday show and said just that. and got hammered for it. had to walk it back. this is what eventually democrats in the '90s got to with bill clinton. i don't approve of what he did, but i don't think it's impeachable. donald trump does not allow the slightist bit of criticism. so when he goes back and hammers members, hammers people back home. there's no room for that. and that's the type of thing you rarely hear anymore. it should be obvious. that was not a good call. but nobody says that in washington. at least on the republican side anymore. it's interesting that he outside of the washington bubble here is able to say that. >> the argument your going to hear a lot here that you didn't hear in clinton, because he wasn't up for reelection. the most compelling argument that republicans have is they
5:38 pm
are going to be point to the fact there's an election coming in ten months. maybe it's not our job to decide the fate of this president. we should leave it up to the country. that's the spot that a lot of republicans will land in. they are going to say, i don't want to get ahead of the electorate. they made similar comments. that's the landing spot where republicans think they can say that and not completelying a degree vat the white house. sdwl it does seem rather common sense. this is where we landed with bill clinton. the behavior was bad, but perhaps if you're a democrat, you don't think he should be impeached for it. the country seem ed ed to rewar him. the approval ratings went up. but we are seeing a different strategy for most washington republicans. a little i think we were all a little surprised to hear hitchen son say that was bad, even if i don't think he should be impeached for it. >> the argument that brendon pointed toward is the note that
5:39 pm
you hear when you engage people in conversation about the potential impeachment. many of them don't understand what did he do that was really wrong. he's absurd, he's foolish, he's loud, he's ignorant, but really did he do anything wrong? they don't grasp the seriousness of what he did. but it's taken hold. and the significant percentage of the american public. the thing that obviously popped into my mind during the discussion here is what would have happened to bill clinton had twitter existed 20 years ago. because twitter drives so much of this argument on both sides of the argument. but more important than that, i think it deprives us of an attention span that we had 20 years ago that doesn't exist today. >> i think you're right. and i'm shifting through here because one of our producers found a clip from peter baker's
5:40 pm
great book "the breach" talking about how clinton would sit at the white house at 11:00 p.m. after a day of watching all these hearings firing off phone calls to people just wanting to talk about the whole thing. that seems to be rather similar, you can see it on the screen here. the concerted effort to protect the image of a president focused on the job was something of a faca facade. they walk through here what clinton would actually do. not unb like the current president of the united states. as you point out, no twitter for bill clinton. so it was all kind of kept private. there also has been conversation today about who will testify and what's going to happen during the senate trial. there's one particular exchange from a sunday morning show this morning that for a moment brought us back to the basics. hear is richard shelby. >> setting aside whether it's an impeachable offense dorks you think it was proper for the president to solicit foreign interference in the the
5:41 pm
election? >> i don't know that has been actually proven. that's all in dispute of what happened when the russians were involve d in it. whether ukrainian bs r were involved in it, who was involved and to what extent. but i have never seen anything that where trump actually was involve involved. >> i asked if it was okay to solicit. we have seen the president ask to get involved. ask the chinese to get involved. well those are just statements political. they make them all the time. >> so it's okay? >> i didn't say it was okay. i said people do things. things happen. >> this is the president of the united states. >> it's still the president of the united states is human. he's going to make mistakes of judgment and everything else. they have historically, both parties, both from the beginning of our republic. >> kimberly atkins, to an earlier point, this is what we have gotten used to hearing from republicans. they are so afraid to criticize
5:42 pm
the president on any of this. >> that's what you get when you take the talking point away this was something that shouldn't have done or wish he hadn't done it, but it's not impeachable. you have to defend the behavior. so it's either the president made a mistake, didn't know what he was doing, he's human. or that the aid was never really withheld. you see them twisting themselves in circles on the facts of the situation to try to explain it in a way in order to not run afoul to what the president might want them to say. >> it also explains why they would limit access to senators of the impeachment process. because when you engage senators in these conversations and ask those questions, they often times sound like richard health is pit. they are not comfortable embracing the lines of the defense that the white house has put forward. and yo you end up having a lot of conversations that sound like that. >> it's why private conversations with republicans are different than the ones you see playing out on television. thank you very much. we appreciate your perspective.
5:43 pm
when we return, a week of remarkable candor from women in politi politics. n politi politics -daily 3-in-1 copd treatment. ♪ trelegy ♪ the power of 1,2,3 ♪ trelegy ♪ 1,2,3 ♪ trelegy man: with trelegy and the power of 1, 2, 3, i'm breathing better. trelegy works three ways to open airways, keep them open and reduce inflammation, for 24 hours of better breathing. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. trelegy is not for asthma. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. think your copd medicine is doing enough? maybe you should think again. ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy and the power of 1, 2, 3. ♪ trelegy, 1,2,3 man: save at trelegy.com.
5:44 pm
5:45 pm
don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with... ...an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. whoh no, that looks grossit. what is that? you gotta try it, it's terrible. i don't wanna tray it if it's terrible. it's like mango chutney and burnt hair. no thank you, i have a very sensitive palate. just try it! hey guys, i think we should hurry up. if you taste something bad, you want someone else to try it. it's what you do. i can't get it out of my mouth! if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. dog, dog, dog.
5:46 pm
5:47 pm
women's march blurring out signs that were critical of president trump. officials say they plurd the protest signs in the photograph hanging in the women's suffrage exhibit in an attempt to stay apolitical. on saturday the gallery released a new statement apologizing and promising a a thorough review. precisely the same time, thousands braved the cold ask rain to take part in the fourth annual women's march. evelyn yang, the wife of andrew yang, spoke to demonstrators in new york. she was one of two women who stepped forward this week to share hard truths a about their private lives. yang revealed she was sexually assaulted in 2012 by a new york gynecologist accused of abusing more than three dozen other patients. when she was pregnant with her first child. it was only after yang learn ed that others had made allegations against the doctor and that he was being prosecuted did she tell her husband about the
5:48 pm
assault. meanwhile, massachusetts congresswoman ayanna pres lee disclosed she has alopecia. it's a condition that results in the loss of hitter. she discussed her bald debut with joy reid earlier today. >> i was sufficient ring suffering in silence and felt shackled by the silence and the shame and isolation. and i felt firmly that in order for me to lead authentically that i would need to be transparent. >> she lost the last of her hair the night before the house vote to impeach president trump and described herself as feeling naked, vulnerable, embarrassed, ashamed. evelyn yang said she froze like a deer in headlights when she was assaulted. but both women said despite their shame and embarrassment, it was voters that spurred them to share their stories. >> as terrifying as it was to
5:49 pm
share my story on a national stage, i had to believe that coming forward would help me reclaim my voice and help others reclaim theirs. thank you for letting me share my story. i hope for those listening, you know that you are seen. your story matters. and that you deserve to be heard. thank you. >> remarkable for both of these women. and kimberly atkins, particularly for ayanna presley. she looks amazing. it just takes guts to do something like that, to appear that way. but black hair particular is politicized. >> it's not just the bravery of providing cover for other people to step forward and talk about these very private issue, but for black women, black women's
5:50 pm
hair is political. i have spoken to her many times. it's everything from her trying to find somebody who would braid her hair in d.c. to constituents saying how important it was for they am to see themselves in he. as a black woman, i wouldn't straighten my hair because it i important that thit was a reall big deal. >> of course, this part of a broader movement we're seeing across the country in the context of #metoo and women looking for solidarity. >> very different things that vim have confronted. but they are reflective of a cultural change we see. more women in positions of power and in government. i don't think if there were fewer women and we were having these conversations they would have felt as important to come forward with these stories.
5:51 pm
i don't know if she would have felt that she had the back up and the feeling. you have these historic levels of women in the congress. i think the conversation around sexual assault, the way women are treated in the workplace and everywhere has become more mainstream and normalized. i think that is a good thing that people are more willing to have conversations in the quiet and the dark out in the public. >> it was all #metoo but behind closed doors. thank you both so much for your insights tonight. coming up rn, huge news out major league baseball. the first female coach on a major league staff in baseball history when she was named an assistant for the giants this week. after the break, the other baseball news, a massive cheating scandal is uncovered and now there are calls for a congressional investigation. that's coming up next. we used to love going out with julia and mike,
5:52 pm
but since they bought their new house... which menu am i looking at here? start with "ta-paz." -oh, it's tapas. -tapas. get out of town. it's like eating dinner with your parents. sandra, are you in school? yes, i'm in art school. oh, wow. so have you thought about how you're gonna make money? at least we're learning some new things. we bundled our home and auto with progressive, saved a bunch. oh, we got a wobbler. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents, but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us. that's what the extra menu's for. you should be mad your neighbor always wants to hang out. and you should be mad your smart fridge is unnecessarily complicated. make ice. making ice. but you're not mad because you have e*trade which isn't complicated. their tools make trading quicker and simpler
5:53 pm
so you can take on the markets with confidence. don't get mad get e*trade and start trading commission free today. (honk!) i hear you sister. that's why i'm partnering with cigna to remind you to go in for your annual check-up, and be open with your doctor about anything you feel - physically and emotionally. but now cigna has a plan that can help everyone see stress differently. just find a period of time to unwind. a location to de-stress. an activity to enjoy. or the name of someone to talk to. to create a plan that works for you, visit cigna.com/mystressplan. cigna. together, all the way. visit cigna.com/mystressplan. if you're living with hiv, and ask your doctor about biktarvy. biktarvy is a complete, one-pill, once-a-day treatment used for hiv in certain adults. it's not a cure, but with one small pill, biktarvy fights hiv to help you get to and stay undetectable. that's when the amount of virus is so low it can't be measured by a lab test. research shows people who take hiv treatment every day
5:54 pm
and get to and stay undetectabe can no longer transmit hiv through sex. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a buildup of lactic acid and liver problems. do not take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin. tell your doctor about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b, do not stop taking biktarvy without talking to your doctor. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. if you're living with hiv, keep loving who you are. and ask your doctor if biktarvy is right for you.
5:55 pm
5:56 pm
skippering. >> houston astros manager a. j. hinch now famous for a very different reason. on monday, hinch and the general manager were suspended by major league baseball and then fired by the astros after an investigation by the league revealed details of a sign stealing scheme used by the team during their 2017 championship winning season. the very next day, the red sox parted ways with manager alex cora, who was a bench coach for the astros in 2017 and was implicated in the investigation as well. and then on thursday, carlos beltran, a player on that team, resigned from his post with the mets before managing a single game. now congressman bobby rush is calling for a congressional investigation. back with us, mike barnacle. my husband is a mets fan. so in our house, the beltran news was particularly at the forefront of the story. but, you know, i find myself -- i mean, i'm an orioles fan so
5:57 pm
baseball has been a terrible place for me to be lately. but what can we take away from this? obviously this isn't the first time congress has had to step in with a major league baseball scandal. but amid everything else that's going on around the country, it's pretty demoralizing to feel as though even america's past time is rigged. >> well, first of all, congress should stay out of this. they have enough to do that's important. this is important, but on another scale. you know, kasie, what happened here, when everybody got caught, when it was exposed this week and rob manafort stepped up and suspended people for a year and they got fired as a result of the report that was issued, it was inevitable what happened. many front offices had been populated by an increasing number of smart sports academic type. and they were focussed on the
5:58 pm
analytics of baseball. there is no sport, no professional sport that endures its own numbers more than does baseball. they eventually mary analytics to technology and this is what happens. and it's sad. it's depressing, but baseball will go on. you know, it was obviously an advantage to many hitters, but they still had to hit the ball. and for people who say no the advantage was such that they were going to hit the ball away, i would say look at a home run derby at the all star game. they know what pitch is coming and they still can't hit the home runs multiple times. >> yeah. i mean, is it -- are we at a point where a scheme like this -- how much difference do you think it really was making for them? is this a team that still would have won this championship or not? >> that's the most interesting question, kasie. first of all, there are cheaters in the hall of fame.
5:59 pm
g gaylord perry. steroid abuse. there are people on steroids in the hall of fame. so cheating has always been part of the game. this advanced technology, analytic cheating is kind of obscene when you think of it. >> yeah. >> and all in terms of pursuit of a competitive edge. but, you know, can they hit the ball? i think the better hitters, a 300 hitter, he's got too much on his mind, focussed in the batter's box to really respond to outside signals. it might help a .260 or .270 hitter but not as much as a professional hitter. >> mike, thank you very much. i really appreciate you sticking with us. >> i'm sorry about the orioles. >> i know. luckily, i love the nats as well, but it's still sad. all right. that's going to do it for us tonight here on kasie d.c. we will be back with you next week from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m.
6:00 pm
eastern. coming up, ari melber replays the impeachment of trump. join us for msnbc's special live coverage of the senate trial. and i will be there in the halls of congress as well. for now, good night from washington. good evening. welcome to our msnbc special "trump on trial." this week the most high stakes political event in a decade. the senators have taken their oaths and new role as jurors. the house managers preparing their high stakes opening arguments. donald trul's team doing the same. tonight donald trump's fate is formally out of his hands. he will be watching, maybe tweeting as his impeachment trial gets underway.
182 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
MSNBC West Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on