or if you're in columbia come on by. really appreciate it. looking forward to it. i should also note a lot of election coverage and other news coming up next on "hardball" with chris matthews. a president's duty. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews from washington. u.s. markets had another steshl day, with the dow jones dropping nearly 1,200 points over global concerns about the coronavirus. today's drop is the biggest one-day point decline in history. and it's the worst week for the market since the financial crisis back in 2008. amid the growing crisis trump is facing intense scrutiny and a growing credibility crisis. aides to the president tell the associated press that the more pressing concern at the white

house is not the possibility of the widespread outbreak but the downstream effects of the virus on the global economy and public sentiment. moments ago president trump praised his own handling of the crisis and tried to downplay fears about the spread of it. >> we're almost all better now. but we do things, and it would be really nice if we could be recognized by the press fairly. and you know, it would be really nice that if we do something wrong we get criticized by the press. but i gave a press conference yesterday that was really a very good press conference. and some people thought it was great, and most of you people saw it. it was covered like what are the advantages is that i get covered live all the time. and i like that better because they can't chop that up. i'd rather be live. but it was a very good press conference. basically it was a calming press conference. it was a press conference to say we're doing well. >> at the same time president trump was trying to assure the public that the spread of the virus was under control a new

case was confirmed in california of a person who had not traveled to affected areas. in that state california's currently monitoring 8,400 people who had traveled to affected countries. 33 of which have been tested positive. globally seven new countries including brazil, greece, and georgia have reported cases in just the past 24 hours. here in the u.s. the cdc has warned that the spread of the virus is inevitable. well, during his press conference yesterday president trump continued to make statements that contradicted his own health officials. >> the vaccine is coming along well, and in speaking to the doctors we think this is something that we can develop fairly rapidly. >> although this is the fastest we have ever gone from a sequence of a virus to a trial, it still would not be any applicable to the epidemic unless we really wait about a year to a year and a half. >> we're ready to adapt and we're ready to do whatever we

have to as the disease spreads, if it spreads. >> we do expect more cases. and this is a good time to prepare. >> do you trust your health officials to give you good information? or do you trust your instincts more? >> i don't think i have. they've said it could be worse. and -- >> you said you don't believe it's inevitable. it contradicts -- >> no, i don't believe it's inevitable. >> and tonight breaking newsa larmz about how the government is responding to the virus. according to the "new york times" a whistle-blower is claiming that federal personnel may have been unnecessary exposed to the coronavirus and "then scattered into the general population." for more i'm joined by u.s. congressman amid barry, a democrat from california. he's a physician. dr. natalie azar is a medical contributor. and aaron blake a senior medical reporter with the "washington post." i want to go to the congressman first. how would you counter -- how would you compare the president's calming words as he

put it in yesterday's press conference with the medical information itself? >> look, the president's got a bit of a credibility problem here. sacramento county is my home district and i talked to my former colleagues at uc davis. this is a patient who's being cared for in solano county who is positive now. so you've had health care workers exposed and others that we now have to get down there and quickly trace. the other big thing is when this patient arrived at uc davis last week they asked to test him for coronavirus. they said no, he doesn't have it. well, low and behold we found out that he did have -- that this patient does have coronavirus. well, you know, we've got to revive our testing criteria. it also took 72 hours to get the test results back. we've got to do better than this. >> how do you get it without having been affected by someone who has it in the area where it's prominent or prevalent? >> that is called community transmission.

and you've seen it happen in other countries. this is the first case of community transmission where it's not because someone traveled to the region or has knowingly come -- been exposed to someone we know has the diagnosis of coronavirus. that's what we've been worried about. and again, we've got to be very careful here. we've thought that this was going to pop up. you've heard cdc officials suggest that you might have community cases. this is the first one we know about. >> what does community case mean in popular jargon? what does it mean? how do you get it? if you don't get it from someone who has it. >> in popular jargon you could -- we know the virus lives on inanimating objects. we don't know exactly how long. >> i see. >> they could pick it up from that. they could pick it up from casual exposure. they could pick it up from asymptomatic patients who don't know they have the disease. we don't know exactly where this patient picked up the coronavirus. we do know that they were very sick, that they had to be

intubated and put on a vent laitor and then sent up to uc davis. kudos to the physicians at uc davis. they took infection -- controlled measures. i think they're going to be okay. but i worry about the health care workers who are at the national hospital who you're putting a tube down someone's throat, you're going to get exposed to a lot of respiratory droplets and secretions. and if you don't think this person has coronavirus, you probably just got exposed. >> what did you make of the president's casual comments? i have no idea where he gets his advice. but he was giving advice to our country of 330 million people. and he said don't touch railings unless you have to. what did you make of that bit of advice? >> yeah. i don't think that's the right health measure. i am glad that we're encouraging folks to wash their hands and be vigilant and be cautious. take the same measures they would to try to prevent the flu. but we've still got a lot to learn about this virus. and again, i think the president should be very careful here.

>> az said "the new york times" reporting right now the federal health employees may have interacted with americans generally in the world out there outside their own offices, possibly exposed to the coronavirus without proper training or equipment. the exposed staff members move freely around and off the bases with at least one person staying in a nearby hotel and leaving california on a commercial flight. the news comes from a whistle-blower report filed with the office of special counsel and alleges that the team was improperly deployed to two military bases in california to assist the processing of americans who had been evacuated from coronavirus hot zones in china and elsewhere. again, according to the "new york times," federal officials admonday shds the staff members and deemed the complaint as a nuisance. what do you make of this kind of a -- is this what's going to happen, these cases where you're going to hear about disturbing news that someone may have gotten a disease or exposed to

it and didn't take it seriously? >> well, it is certainly concerning, chris, that anyone would come into contact with people who are in quarntd who haven't had the proper training. i mean, this is something that hospitals across the country have been, number one, implementing for years and have even with influenza have a protocol and we have a protocol for respiratory isolation and precautions and things like that, and it takes time to train personnel properly and they have to be fitted with the respirators, the particulate respirators. you really -- it is not at all appropriate to send people in who may be exposed who haven't had the proper training and who don't have the appropriate personal protective equipment. i mean, i can't comment specifically on what happened here. i'm hearing it as we all are in this whistleblower account. >> let me ask you something that's useful to the viewers right now. this is generally a political show but i do want to have some value to them in terms of their personal protect here. we hear a lot during the flu

season get your flu shots, go to cvs wherever you get one, maybe free, but people always want to take it seriously. then the other day the president threw out that number of 25,000 to 69,000 a year on average, or somewhere in that range of people die from flu. most people -- i was surprised at that big number but of course this is a country of 330 million people. you say it's not you, it's someone else. but a lot of people. what would you say as a physician as to what people should do right now if they're concerned? >> well, you bring up the flu shot. and we actually -- i just was discussing this with patients of mine yesterday and today that getting your flu shot, getting your pneumonia vaccine is incredibly vaccine in general for populations in whom it's indicated. but especially now because once you have one respiratory infection, for example if you do get the flu, you are theoretically more susceptible to developing, you know, something like coronavirus and vice versa. and to your point about the

lethality of flu or at least the number of fatalities that we have every year in this country, we have thousands of deaths every single year, from the flu in this country, we have around 29 million cases of flu, we're going to get the updated numbers tomorrow. 29 million cases of flu already. but the scales are very different. you know, we have a smaller number of coronavirus cases. the fatality of coronavirus at least with the numbers we're working with right now seems to be a little bit higher than influenza, which is certainly disturbing because the number of coronavirus cases increases and that fatality rate of 2% is valid we're going to see a tremendous number of fatalities from the coronavirus. >> well, moments ago president trump said he would welcome criticism if he deserved it but he assured americans that the virus could disappear. >> if we were doing a bad job we should also be criticized. but we have done an incredible job. we are going to continue. it's going to disappear.

one day it's like a miracle, it will disappear. and from our shores, you know, it could get worse before it gets better. it could maybe go away. we'll see what happens. nobody really knows. the fact is the greatest experts i've spoken to them all, nobody really knows. >> on the reporting on this we have to be macro, the whole country. as i said, 330 million people here. some of them for good reason worried, some people not worried. but the politics of this seems to always go back to the president's credibility because he would argue about ridiculous things like crowd sizes. and here he is, you know, sthangz that things that it was the democratic debate, the presidential debate we all covered on tuesday night that caused the stock market to go down 1,000 points on monday and tuesday, two days -- actually more than hours before the democratic debate, which was a nonsensical claim. >> yeah. so it's one thing to have 16,000 false or misleading claims, which the president is up to right now. many of those things, as you mentioned, are trivial. crowd size stuff. don't really affect people's lives. two things come to mind here.

one is two months ago when the u.s. government took out quas elm soleimani. the president said there was an imminent threat. that was the justification. we found later that wasn't in the white house's report here. the other thing is when we had the hurricane in florida and alabama the president said alabama is going to be hit here, i have it on good authority. well, it turned out that wasn't in the forecast at that point. he of course used the map, he drew the sharpie on the map and showed how it could potentially -- >> there was a political race there at the time. he wanted to show his interest in it. >> but even something like that he was telling people who were not in harm's way that they were in harm's way. the risk wasn't that people wouldn't take something seriously. here it's reversed. we have a situation where people could potentially be exposed to something. they're being told by the president that maybe it's not going to be a big deal, maybe they won't take it as seriously. there is a huge both societal and political risk in that. right now he seems much more concerned about the stock market momentarily, but a short-term

correction is a very small price to pay for people being safe and for the ultimate risk of this not being realized. >> so you think he's concerned more about the bad pr in terms of the election than he is about the reality facing the country? >> the president has shown over and over again that he takes the stock market very personally. he points to it when it's up. he points elsewhere when it's down. and that's pretty much what he's doing right now. >> and blaming the democratic debate on tuesday night. i'm going to go over that again because the time travel involved in that is insane. anyway, "the new york times" reporting the white house is looking to "tighten control of coronavirus messaging." catch that word? messaging by government officials. directing them to clear all statements and public appearance with the office of vice president mike pence. dr. anthony fauci told associates that the white house had instructed him not to say anything else without clearance. and early this week aides told the "washington post" that president trump was angered by what he saw as "extreme warnings from the centers for disease control and prevention." congressman, i guess this gets back to the question.

we always talk about how free a society do we have? how much does the government of the united states care about us more than it cares about the politicians? these are fundamental american questions. we have to be alert to them. and here we are again with the word going out that all government officials who know what they're talking about have been gagged so that the president, who doesn't know what he's talking about, can speak for them. >> yeah, it's very disconcerting. i as a member of congress don't work for the president of the united states. i work for the people of my district, as we all do as members of congress. we've got to step up in a non-partisan way and make sure the citizens of this country get the accurate information. it is disturbing if he's going to try to muzzle dr. anthony fauci, who's a legend in the health care community for his work on hiv, et cetera. let the scientists discuss the science and put the facts out there. and our first priority has to be protecting the american public, not worrying about the stock market or worrying about presidential re-election. that should be the president's first priority. and it's disappointing that

that's not what we're hearing. >> i'm afraid we're hearing about the coronavirus from the president the way we heard about the mueller report from bill barr. not exactly sfrt horse's mouth, is it? thank you so much. u.s. congressman ami be rachlt of california. dr. natalie azar. and aaron black of the "washington post." coming up, joe biden needs a victory in south carolina this saturday and a new poll shows he might just get that victory. can he parlay that success on saturday it looks like he's going to have to super tuesday? he might be able to do that. things are changing a bit in this democratic fight for president. plus the democrats haven't had a brokered convention since 1952. could it happen again? and what happens if bernie sanders gets the most delegates but can't get the majority which you need to clinch the nomination? he says whoever gets the most votes should win. but what about the rules? we've got much more to get to tonight. stick with us. i'm your mother in law.

and i like to question your every move. like this left turn. it's the next one. you always drive this slow? how did you make someone i love? that must be why you're always so late. i do not speed. and that's saving me cash with drivewise. my son, he did say that you were the safe option. and that's the nicest thing you ever said to me. so get allstate. stop bossing. where good drivers save 40% for avoiding mayhem, like me. this is my son's favorite color, you should try it. [mayhem] you always drive like an old lady? [tina] you're an old lady. ♪ ♪ everything your trip needs,

for everyone you love. expedia. that's unnecessarily complicated. make ice. making ice. but you're not because you have e*trade which isn't complicated. their tools make trading quicker and simpler so you can take on the markets with confidence. don't get mad get e*trade.

welcome back to "hardball."

the south carolina primary is two days away. it's a make or break moment of course for former vice president joe biden, who's staking his presidential run this year on a victory in the first in the south contest. a new monmouth university poll, out today, shows him with a commanding lead at 36%. that's 20 points ahead of senator bernie sanders down there in the palmetto state, who's got 16%. tom steyer's got 15%. no other candidate in south carolina's got even double digits. a poll shows that biden with even a rarnlger lead among african-americans in that state. biden has the support of 45% of black voters. he's followed by the way in that category by steyer at 17 points and sanders at 13. steyer's doing better than sanders among african-americans. but biden put most of his resources in south carolina. he hasn't done any campaigning or not much in super tuesday states in recent weeks. "the new york times" ireports that interviews with party leaders in half a dozen states point out that the same

vulnerabilities that plagued mr. biden in iowa, subpar organization, late reach out to local democrats and a late start to campaigning are holding him back in the states that next week will throw out a third of the total delegates in the democratic primaries. even with those concerns polls show there are a number of super tuesday states that biden could potentially win. for more i'm joined by democratic party chair in south carolina. zerlina maxwell, senior director of progressive programming for sears xm. and howard fineman, contributing continental for real politics -- real clear politics. i love real clear politics. let me go to travel in this. south caroli south carolina is in the deep south. tell us about biden's -- let's do something for fun. let's do something positive. we need positive news. jim clyburn strikes me as one of the last people on this planet, certainly in the united states, who really has the ability to endorse anything, even a product, but it looks like he's got some real street cred.

your thoughts. >> well, we have 46 counties in south carolina, chris, and he has 18 of the 46 counties in his congressional district. and that's pretty, pretty significant as it is one of the super minority majority districts in south carolina. so his endorsement does in fact carry a lot of weight. congressman joe cunningham whose district adjoins congressman clyburn's has made his statement as to what we want to south carolina as opposed to socialism. so you've got both of our congressmen actually speaking out in this particular primary. >> first in the south, zerlina. what's it mean? >> i think it means that -- >> go ahead. >> the majority black voters in south carolina. i mean, that's when i joined the campaign, chris, because in 2016 the hillary clinton campaign understood that after that loss in new hampshire it was absolutely critical to perform well in nevada and then subsequently south carolina.

so, you know, 60% of the electorate there is african-american. and what you're seeing here in some of this polling i think should be explained in this way. you're seeing a generational divide among african-americans. bernie sanders does particularly well among african-americans under the age of 40. but joe biden does a lot better with african-american women in particular. the churchgoing types of women like my mom. over 45. that's the base of the democratic party writ large. but especially in south carolina because those are the folks on the bus going to the polls. and i want to hear your family discussion. give us a little taste because we have some of those in our family too. >> yeah. >> tell me what's going on between mother and daughter, if you will, or at least from mother. >> well, i've been having conversations with my parents all year long, trying to figure out, you know, where they land on a large slate of candidates. my dad talked about kamala harris being his favorite,

julian castro his second favorite. and they're no longer in the race. and so now he's looking at this slate of candidates. he's very much opposed to bernie sanders. i would say that. but i think that black people are under no illusions, that a second term of donald trump would be worse than any of the possible democrats that we have to choose from. so i think what bernie sanders can do in order to attract some of these older black voters is to articulate in detail how he's going to get us to medicare for all, how he's going to pay for it. he needs to make those folks feel comfortable because it's not so much about the label socialism as much as it's the fear of the unknown of what that even means and what it will do to, you know, upend people's lives. >> i like that he has to get 60 votes knot u.s. senate. but that's an insider's question. if biden wins does he have a chance to jump out? i was looking at some of these states where he's doing pretty well in alabama, tennessee. he's really strong.

he could possibly win a handful of states coming out of super tuesday. >> yes. and i think that will be based on the same history and the same experience as what's going on in south carolina. it's the cotton south. it's the place where martin luther king and others fought for civil rights, where they were branded as communists for doing so, and where a generation of black voters got to become full participants politically at least and economically to a large extent in that region. those people remember that. and they also remember barack obama. and they remember that joe biden was a loyal and effective vice president for barack obama, with barack obama. that vote is pretty solid for joe biden, and it's one that doesn't require that much organization on his part. you were talking about his lack of organization. >> i love it. >> that's still a push -- >> you're so smart. >> that's still a pushback thing. >> let's get to this. some voters don't need encouragement.

they don't need a pulling operation. that's when you send a car around. to get to the polls. they get to the church on time, they get to the polls on time. they're regular people with great family discipline. if you get older people, older african-americans or any voter really, older voters are much better at that. your thoughts about south carolina. >> oh, i think you're exactly right. and the truth is that joe biden's support appears to be extremely strong among older african-american voters in south carolina. and the fascinating thing is i think that bernie sanders' emergence as well as tom steyer's in south carolina has really forced the biden campaign to actually become a little more self-disciplined and invest a little more in an organization here to his benefit to make sure that those voters weren't just voting for him because of name i.d., that they're actually with him 100%. and i think you can actually feel on the ground here the actual momentum that his campaign is receiving and getting and the sanders campaign and the steyer's campaign too.

but you've got elizabeth warren waiting in the wings. she's had a staff on the ground for a very long time here. >> really? let me go to mike bloomberg with that question. he'll be on the ballot this saturday. he's going to be on the ballot. he's go to make his debut on super tuesday rather. he won't be on the ballot this saturday. >> right. >> he's been waiting. next tuesday. he's already spent $172 million blanketing the airwaves in the states that are voting next tuesday. but all of that spending may not be enough to help the former new york mayor who has started to see his rise in the polls stall after his performance in last week's las vegas debate. politico's reporting, for example, that several sources close to and involved in the campaign of mike bloomberg have acknowledged concerns about his recent internal and public polling. zerlina, let's take a look at that. you're on the air all the time about this. is there a point of diminishing returns with spending money? i've always wondered if you just have a zillion dollars can you be the next president just because you put the ads on the air. is there a point where people say i get, it i've seen the ad, i'm voting for someone else? >> i think there is a diminishing return. and i say that as a former

organizer for president obama. and the reason why is because advertisements -- you know, when you get close to election time, particularly in those battleground states and those folks who are watching know this is true. every single commercial is a political advertisement. so at a certain point you're just going to the kitchen to get your snacks during these political advertisements. so the impact i do think are diminishing. his barack obama advertisements and the radio advertisements were particularly effective because they were in barack obama's voice. and so a lot of folks were mistaking, thinking that president obama had endorsed michael bloomberg. now that that is very much cleared up and wasn't the case in the first instance, i think folks are looking at his record. and stop and frisk, the central park 5, exonerated 5, rather, and other issues, the nda issue, i think that elizabeth warren bringing out some of those vulnerabilities, a lot of people i think are taking a second look and re-examining whether or not he would be a good choice.

i think that that argument was pretty persuasive. i'm interested to see if on super tuesday in those states that he's in second place elizabeth warren may supplant him in some of those states. in my opinion. it's just a prediction. she has a lot of staff on the ground all over. so i'd be curious to see if she can take advantage since she was the one to bring out so many of those vulnerabilities. >> yeah. there must be a lot of conversation -- go ahead. i'm sorry, trav. go ahead. >> i think the caveat to that, i was in oklahoma several weeks ago for a wedding and i just happened to stop by two of bloomberg's events. and you know, there were 750 people that showed up to one, 250 people showed up to another one. but my question is this. i believe elizabeth warren did some serious damage to him, but he's participating in areas that have seen no candidate for president, and that's going to benefit him i think. >> okay, thank you. howard, quickly.

quickly. can he get through this? he's had two miserable debates. mike bloomberg. >> i think he's been badly damaged. in a way all the money that you spend can double back on you whiplash style if you don't deliver in person. >> you have to look like your ads. >> you have to look like your ads, and he didn't. he hasn't in either debate. >> it's been rough treatment too. anyway, apparently he's going to have a hard time every single one of these debates. trav robertson, thank you. zerlina maxwell. and thank you, howard fineman. a quick programming note. i'm headed to south carolina tomorrow ahead of this week's primary. "hardball" will be live 7:00 eastern tomorrow night broadcasting from home team barbecue. i like north carolina barbecue. let's see what the other kind's like in charleston. i'll be back there on saturday at 5:00 p.m. eastern for special coverage of the south carolina primary. i did go to unc. up next some democrats are in a full-fledged panic at the thought of bernie sanders at the top of the ticket. we know that. but could efforts to keep him from getting the nomination be even more destructive, more destructive and create even more chaos than letting him win

because he's got the most delegates? you're watching "hardball." i . and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. by consolidating your credit card debt into one monthly payment. and get your interest rate right so you can save big. get a no-fee personal loan up to $100k. get a no-fee personal loan through the at&t network, edge-to-edge intelligence gives you the power to see every corner of your growing business. from managing inventory... to detecting and preventing threats...

to scaling up your production. giving you a nice big edge over your competition. that's the power of edge-to-edge intelligence.

wh(fake gagging noises) ♪ it's the easiest because it's the cheesiest. kraft. for the win win. they grew their first tomatoes right here. and when it snows, the kids go sledding right there. the frels family runs with us on a john deere 1 series tractor. because this is more than just land, it's home. search "john deere 1 series" for more. but allstate helps you. with drivewise. feedback that helps you drive safer. and that can lower your cost now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? ♪ applebee's new irresist-a-bowls now starting at $7.99. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.

if i or anybody else goes into the democratic convention with a substantial plurality, i believe that individual, me or anybody else, should be the candidate of the democratic party. and if one candidate comes out on top to say to the country you

voted for that candidate but by the way, we don't think that candidate should be the nominee, i think that would be a serious, serious problem for the democratic party. >> wow. that was bernie sanders, who's not actually a member of the party yet. not yet. arguing again this week that the candidate with the most delegates heading into the convention this summer should become the party's nominee. in all fairness, he said a substantial plurality. in other words, up to the high 30s or 40s. however, to secure the democratic nomination a candidate must win a majority of the delegates. that's the rules. that are up for grabs during the primary season. even if the candidate has more dl gas than anyone else they're not guaranteed the nomination unless they reach that magic number of half. half the delegates available. those are the rules, and house speaker nancy pelosi made clear today that the party's going to stick by those rules. >> rules are very clear. the person we nominate will be the person who has the majority.

that may happen before they ever get to the convention. but we'll see. >> if senator sanders or any candidate falls short of a majority the democrats would have to duke it out in open convention in milwaukee, and that means party officials would be allowed to cast votes as so-called super delegates beginning with the second ballot. now, "the new york times" has interviewed 93 of those super delegates. reporting that they "found overwhelming opposition to hanged the vermont senator the nomination if he arrived with the most delegates but fell short of a majority. he they are not just worried about mr. sanders' candidacy but they're also willing to risk intraparty damage to stop his nomination," according to interviews with the "times." in other words, if sanders doesn't win outright there he have a tough time emerging? meanwhile, sanders continues to question the rules guiding the process. one of his opponents says he's challenging the rules that he himself wrote. and that's coming up next. you're watching "hardball." 's whr of 1, 2, 3 medicines with trelegy. the only fda-approved once-daily 3-in-1 copd treatment. ♪ trelegy ♪ the power of 1,2,3

♪ trelegy ♪ 1,2,3 ♪ trelegy man: with trelegy and the power of 1, 2, 3, i'm breathing better. trelegy works three ways to open airways, keep them open and reduce inflammation, for 24 hours of better breathing. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. trelegy is not for asthma. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. think your copd medicine is doing enough? maybe you should think again. ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy and the power of 1, 2, 3. ♪ trelegy, 1,2,3 man: save at trelegy.com. (burke) we've seen almost everything, so we know how to cover almost anything. even a "gold medal grizzly." (sports announcer) what an unlikely field in this final heat.

(burke) not exactly a skinny dipper, but we covered it. at farmers, we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. so call 1-800 farmers to get a quote. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ double dozen big! it's captain d's new double dozen shrimp. yeah, you heard that right. two dozen golden, crispy shrimp piled high on one plate! time to double down when the captain is callin'. captain d's. time to double down when the captain is callin'. i am totally blind. and non-24 can make me show up too early... or too late. or make me feel like i'm not really "there." talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424.

to give his money to charity, giving pledge when this californian walked away from his billion dollar company for good. he drives a chevy volt, flies commercial, and spends his days building grassroots campaigns for social and environmental justice. why? tom steyer believes every child deserves the same opportunities as his. a healthy planet. good schools. quality healthcare, living wage jobs, and life without fear of discrimination. tom: i'm tom steyer and i approve this message. should the person with the

most delegates at the end of this primary season be the nominee even if they are short of a majority? >> i think the will of the people should prevail. yes. those folks should become the nominee. >> that's senator sanders arguing the candidate with the most delegates should win the nomination. even if the rules make clear that you need a majority of the delegates to become the democratic nominee. and senator elizabeth warren pointed out last night, sanders is now challenging the rules even though he helped to write them back in 2016. here she goes. >> can you explain why the will of the voters should not matter if no candidate reaches a majority of delegates? >> so you do know that was bernie's position in 2016. >> not necessarily, no. >> the way i see this is you write the rules before you know where everybody stands and then you stick with those rules. those are the rules that he wanted to write and others wanted to write. everybody got in the race thinking that was the set of rules. i don't see how come you get to

change it just because he now thinks there's an advantage to him for doing that. >> i'm joined now by former democratic senator from indiana joe donnelly. and michelle goldberg who writes a great column for the "new york times." i'll let you start, michelle. what is your position? should it be majority of the delegates or the plurality of the delegates that gives the winner the win? >> oh, i think bernie is right when he said substantial plurality. and before i say anything, full disclosure, my husband is consulting for elizabeth warren. but i think in this particular case i think that if bernie -- >> substantial majority, 45%? give us a guesstimate. what's a substantial majority. >> i don't know off the top of my head. but if it's not just kind of one or two points ahead of the next person, the next runner-up. i think if it's pretty clear who's gotten the most votes, then not even -- to me this isn't even about fairness. it's about winning. it's about what it would do to

the party if you kind of told bernie's voters that having won a substantial plurality we're going to kind of go into a back room or go into some sort of dnc process they already have a lot of paranoia and distrust about the dnc and the democratic party. i think you would shatter the party. you would cleave off these young people who are the future of the party and possibly disillusion them for years into the future. i think bernie's a really risky general election candidate. and i've written a lot about my concerns about his electability. but the candidate who comes out of a process that alien yates that substantial a part of the party i think is even less electable. >> i heard every word you said. senator? >> well, there are rules. and there's a reason that we have rules. is that you follow them. and that's how it -- >> one of the reasons for the rules of the majority, it has to be a majority, what's the point of it? >> well, bernie sanders -- >> what's the point of it? >> the point is to make sure

somebody has 50% plus one. so you're not close. for instance, if you're in a softball game in the third inning you're feeling pretty good. let's send it to the seventh. no, you play this out and you get a majority. and what the supporters of every candidate need to know is look, do you want to beat donald trump and change our country or do you want to simply say if i don't get what i want i take and pack my bag and go home? >> that's the political argument. what about this? i thought for both of you that the reason we had these rules all these years -- the democratic party. michelle, i'll start with you again. the democratic party was never a party of harmony. the north and the south. there was the northern liberals from the big cities of course. a lot of ethnic groups involved. we know that rich -- diversity of the party. then there was the southern conservatives, the segregationists in fact. and the way they put it together was say we're never going to ram anybody down your throat, we're going to have to have -- for a long time it was 2/3 majority. you know, that was the way they kept the party together. they would put mild-mannered liberals like adlai stevenson with sparkman as his running

mate. you know how they did it in the old days. and they did it with johnson and kennedy. they always had to build a bridge. is that why it's good to have the 50%? i'm just asking. does that make sense? >> i think it makes sense that that's why they did it that way but i think you have now a couple of generations who have the expectation that the candidate's going to be democratically elected. right? so brokered conventions were not such a freakish thing in the past that would run the party because they had some legitimacy. i think even though it has legitimacy now under the rules a lot ever voters would not regard it as a legitimate process. >> i can see what can happen. senator, it will drive you crazy. michelle might live with it. i might live with it. how about this? bernie gets 37% of the delegates. elizabeth warren gets 13%. that adds up to 50. that's your so-called -- and he's the nominee and she's the vp nominee. >> that's exactly right. that's how it works, is you need

to get a majority. and it brings people together as well. so what we have to do is be aware of the fact that everybody's vote counts and in this process as you look at it you can't say i'm ahead, let's call the game right now. you play it out till it concludes. bernie has the lead now. he may have a very significant lead near the end of the convention time. he and then he gets together with an elizabeth or somebody else and goes over the top. that's how this is done. but you can't say you want certain rules in 2018 and then have completely different rules in 12020 because they favor you and it's a good lesson for supporters. you don't always get what you want. >> you're not afraid of a walkout by the bernie people if they don't get the nomination in that situation? >> i'd be looking at them going really? it's time to grow up. what you have to do is you fight for what you believe in. if you don't -- >> to a 27-year-old, grow up, that's a way to win their hearts. >> it's what i say to my kids every day. >> well, they're not your kids.

thank you so much. michelle, you're great. i love your column. former senator joe donnelly, notre dame guy. michelle -- not michelle. i was going to say something like hoosier. you're a hoosier. up next, no dissent allowed. the party of trump boos the name mitt romney after the republican senator was disinvited from this year's cpac conservative gathering. the bizarre scene from the conservative summit coming up next. stick around for the show. you're watching "hardball." car, i appreciate what makes each person unique. that's why i like liberty mutual. they get that no two people are alike and customize your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. almost done. what do you think? i don't see it. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. and then what happened? where's our family from? was he my age? so nana and pops eloped? ...and then what happened, daddy? well, before us, there were your great,

great, great grandparents. turn questions you've always had into stories you can't wait to share; with ancestry. turn questions you've always had into stories doctor bob, what should i take for back pain? before you take anything, i recommend applying topical relievers first. salonpas lidocaine patch blocks pain receptors for effective, non-addictive relief. salonpas lidocaine. patch, roll-on or cream. hisamitsu. t-mobile has the first and only, nationwide 5g network. and with it, you can shape the future. we've invested 30 billion dollars and built our new 5g network for businesses like yours. while some 5g signals only go a few blocks, t-mobile 5g goes for miles.

no other 5g signal goes farther or is more reliable in business. tomorrow is in your hands. partner with t-mobile for business today. theso i would understand.ng every aspect of my treatment tomorrow is in your hands. they cared about my victories. they're my second family. call us at cancer treatment centers of america. (sensei) beautiful. but support the leg! when i started cobra kai, the lack of control over my business made me a little intense. but now i practice a different philosophy. quickbooks helps me get paid, manage cash flow, and run payroll. and now i'm back on top... with koala kai. hey! more mercy. (vo) save over 40 hours a month with intuit quickbooks. the easy way to a happier business.

welcome back to "hardball." last month 2012 republican presidential nominee mitt romney was officially uninvited from the annual conservative political action conference after he voted to allow witnesses in trump's krim paecht trial. and that was before he voted to convict trump on one of the articles of impeachment. at the time cpac chair matt schlapp said romney was disinvited because schlapp was worried about his physical safety. >> we won't credential him as a conservative. i suppose if he wants to come as a non-conservative and debate an issue with us, maybe in the future we would have him come. this year i would actually be afraid for his physical safety, people are so mad at him. >> well, today's crowd at cpac made it clear that this is the party of trump and anyone else is persona non grata. >> the republican party of mitt romney --

[ boos ] correct answer, by the way. correct. every time his name is mentioned you should respond that way. because he lied to every single person in this room that knocked on doors for him, that made phone calls for him, that donated to his campaign. because we thought that he was going to be a crusader against the marxist president that preceded donald trump. and now he asks and he begs for the endorsement of donald trump for the senate in utah and then he goes and votes for that sham unconstitutional impeachment. [ cheers and applause ] he embodies the very same political class that president trump ran against. >> barack obama was a marxist? i'm joined now by republican strategist susan del perch. i think that shot at a moderate, moderate democrat, barack obama being a marxist, puts sort of the axis of where the cpac convention is. it's a pretty right-wing crowd. but now it's become sort of a trump crowd. not normal ideologically, just a cult it seems.

>> chris, you and i both remember, in the '80s cpac was a place where sure, there were some fringe players, but there was a place of ideas. they were conservative ideas. you didn't have to agree with them, but they were well thought out and we respected each other on both sides of the aisle. what i saw just now is a disgrace. let's not forget when this time four years ago when donald trump was running for president he came in third at cpac with 15% of the vote behind ted cruz's 40% and marco rubio's 30%. so it certainly is a different place. and i guess what kellyanne conway said in 2017 is right, they're going to change the name of it from cpac to tpac. and they might as well make it the party of trump. they have now shown that they have no values, no standards, and no political beliefs. >> who happened to all those young americans for freedom, all those people who believed in free trade, they believed in a limited power for the executive, they believed congress should make the calls? it was very constitutional. they had very strong principles

about limited government. and now they've got trump to defend. it's a total 180 from all those principles of jeffersonian limitations on power. is is that too obvious to say this? i don't know. >> look who's in the senate and in the house right now. look how they have fallen off the wagon of what was good principled republican and conservative ideas and principles. so it's not surprising to see some of the younger people coming up and tloingz osand thr out the window because they don't know what it means to actually have core values, chris. that is what we're missing. that's why we're only hearing about certain extremes, whether it's these folks at cpac and donald trump and to an extent bernie sanders going off as a democratic socialist. people don't want to hear a complete revolution against government. they want to hear about working together, getting things done, disagreeing on ideas, for the betterment of our society.

>> well, this coronavirus would be a great case if it was all us working together. unfortunately we're not thanks to the president. and other politicians too. vice president pence was one of today's speakers at cpac and he of course had nothing but glowing praise for the president. >> four years ago a movement was born. a movement of everyday americans from every walk of life. from big cities and small towns. all of you here at cpac believed we could be strong again. you believed we could be prosperous again. you here at cpac said yes to president donald trump in 2016, and i know you're going to say yes to four more years of president donald trump in 2020! >> ronald reagan said it was morning in america, and president donald trump made america great again. >> he sounds more like a high priest than a politician. >> mike pence needs to be careful because he has now been

set up for the full blame of this country not being prepared for the coronavirus to fall on him. president trump said you're in charge, mike pence. and mike pence can't just go out there and trot the lines of the president. this is an important part -- >> is he sticking him out there? >> i think so. i think that's the easy -- >> is this to make room for nikki haley? >> i don't know if it's too make room for nikki haley but i know president trump takes no responsibility for anything and haley's winning to put it on anyone, even those who have been loyal to him. >> thank you very much. susan del percio. you're a tough person but i love it. you're supposed to be. up next donald trump once again opts to 2ki6d the country instead of uniting it. this time against a common foe the coronavirus. why is he dividing us against something that can hurt us all? is that too obvious? you're watching "hardball." ♪

if you have moderate to severe psoriasis, little things can become your big moment. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated... ...with an increased risk of depression.

tell your doctor if you have a history of depression... ...or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines, and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. the united i liexplorer card. makes things easy. traveling lighter. taking a shortcut. woooo! taking a breather. rewarded! learn more at the explorer card dot com.

and my lack of impulse control,, is about to become your problem. ahh no, come on. i saw you eating poop earlier. my focus is on the road, and that's saving me cash with drivewise.

the coronavirus offers a chance for this country to get its act together. confronting its spread in an honest fashion, doing what can be done to contain it, to treat people who become infected, could all be the kind of challenge that elevates this country to its best. in other words, when we got together and used the full power of an effective government to meet the common challenge. why can't president trump see it this way? why does he see the coronavirus as an opportunity to once again

divide the country, not unite it? yesterday he blamed the stock market drops of monday and tuesday on tuesday night's democratic debate. not market concerns about the coronavirus. >> i think the financial markets are very upset when they look at the democrat candidates standing on that stage making fools out of themselves and they say if we had to have a president like this, and there's always a possibility, it's an election, you know, who knows what happens -- i think we're going to win. i think we're going to win by a lot. but when they look at the statements made by the people standing behind those podiums i think that has a huge effect. >> why would he say something that's impossible? it makes no logical sense. how can what happened on tuesday night have caused what happened on monday and tuesday during the daytime? why say something that a reasonable person would see as ridiculous? and that's been a real problem with trump. polls show a majority of registered voters now giving the president a very poor rating, that's the phrase, very poor, on being honest and trustworthy.

and that's not a good situation for him but more so for the country. there are times and events like the threat of the coronavirus when we need to trust what government health officials are saying. and that tluz the person at the top. this isn't about the crowd size at his inauguration. and that's "hardball" for now. "all in" with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on a special edition of "all in" live from charleston, south carolina -- >> hello, charleston! >> two days from the democratic primary here, and things are getting intense. [ speaking simultaneously ] tonight, why that intensity is totally normal. >> these had the gall to go after my mother. >> then, the stock market plummets as we get new information about the administration's incompetent handling of the coronavirus. >> everybody happy with your 401(k)? plus, the stakes in this election -- >> there is an enormously