Skip to main content

tv   The Rachel Maddow Show  MSNBC  July 13, 2020 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT

9:00 pm
this. so wear a mask. we're just saying this because not everyone knows. bye. >> little girl from new york, the onetime epicenter in all of this, a city that recorded zero deaths from coronavirus just today. that's our effort for this monday evening as we start a new week together. thank you so very much for being here with us. on behalf of all my colleagues at the networks of nbc news, good night. rachel, as you can see, has the night off. officials on the japanese island of okinawa had thought they had the upper hand when it came to coronavirus. for more than two months, the island had zero new cases of coronavirus. from may 1st to july 7th, while the pandemic was exploding in this country, okinawa, japan, was virus-free.
9:01 pm
and honestly that's no small feat given its size. the island of okinawa has a population roughly the same size as dallas, texas. but whereas dallas has been reporting something like 1,100 new cases a day, okinawa has had just 148 confirmed cases total since february. but in less than a week, all that good work has essentially been thrown out the window. okinawa now has nearly 100 new cases thanks to outbreaks on the various u.s. military bases on the island. local reports say fourth of july parties that were held both on and off the bases are the cause of the huge spike. according to those same reports, hundreds if not thousands of personnel and employees were said to have attended those events. not surprisingly, the governor of okinawa is angry. this weekend he openly questioned whether the united states was doing enough to stop the spread of covid-19, saying that he had, quote, serious
9:02 pm
doubts about the measures being taken by u.s. military officials. he also requested that the military stop transferring new troops from the united states given the unabated surge that we are seeing in this country. think about this. america has now reached a point where we are posing a threat to some of our strongest allies, and that's just scratching the surface. really when you look at all the damage that's being done back here at home. case numbers are growing in 39 states, which is incredible when you consider we only have 50 of them. as "the washington post" reports, quote, deaths are trending up sharply in almost every part of the country. five states, arizona, california, florida, mississippi, and texas broke records for average daily fatalities this weekend. florida, meanwhile, has emerged as a particularly bleak example of how the united states has failed to get a handle on this pandemic. on sunday, the state reported more than 15,000 new cases.
9:03 pm
that shattered the previous one-day records that were set by california and new york. new york, which was the epicenter of this infection. today the state reported the second highest number -- this is florida -- reported the second highest number of new cases that this country has ever seen with more than 12,000 new infections reported in just the last 24 hours in florida. florida is grappling with an outbreak that's so large, it's bigger than what the vast majority of nations are dealing with. here's the way reuters summed it up. quote, if florida were a country, it would rank fourth in the world for the most new cases a day behind the united states, brazil, and india. more than 40 hospitals across florida have maxed out their icu bed capacity or are close to running out of icu beds. in miami-dade county, things are especially dire. in just that area, six hospitals have already reached capacity. doctors in the area are no longer mincing words when it comes to describing the
9:04 pm
situation on the ground. in a conference call with the mayor of miami-dade this morning, one local infectious disease expert actually pleaded with the public saying, quote, we really need your help. miami is now the epicenter of the pandemic. what we are seeing, what we were seeing in wuhan five or six months ago, now we are there. and yet in the midst of all of this, the state is still struggling when it comes to basic things like testing. in miamied to, residents began lining up overnight, some at 1:30 in the morning, just to make sure that they got tests before the site ran out of supplies for the day. that is the position that florida is in right now, problems with testing, records being smashed each and every day, hospitals teetering on the edge. but despite that, it remains open for business. this weekend one of the biggest theme parks in the country, disney world opened for the first time. meanwhile the republican national convention is just six
9:05 pm
weeks away and white house officials say they plan to move forward withholding the event in jacksonville because why not? we are now five months into this pandemic, and yet the federal response remains as incoherent as it was on day one. and because of that, state and local governments are having to go it alone. today the governor of california, gavin newsom, announced a sweeping rollback of the state's reopening plan saying that he would impose new statewide restrictions, putting an end to indoor dining and closing movie theaters, zoos, and museums. bars were also ordered to cease all operations. in california's hardest hit counties, home to roughly 80% of that state's population, closures are even more extensive including places of worship, certain offices, and hair salons. the decision in california today comes as more and more state and local leaders are starting to take actions that they deem necessary to protect their residents, even if it means going out ahead of the federal
9:06 pm
government. in houston where we've now seen countless headlines of hospitals at or near capacity, local leaders are demanding a shutdown, including the city's mayor, sylvester turner, who today tweeted, quote, i do believe we need a two-week shutdown at the minimum of two weeks, and i've proposed this to the governor. the head of county's, lina hidalgo, echoed that. >> since we last spoke, what we feared to happen is coming to pass. at the end of may, covid patients were 15% of patients in the icu. today we are at 48%, and the number keeps rising. we're crossing or approaching hospital surge capacity day after day as a matter of course. what this means is reports of people having to wait for an icu bed when they need it, icu beds
9:07 pm
becoming more and more scarce, having to import doctors and nurses to keep up with the demand. hospitals continue to rise. if it wasn't clear before, it's obvious now that having so much still open from restaurants to all size indoor events to water parks is not going to turn this thing around, which is why i continue to call for an enforceable stay-home order. >> joining us now is judge lina hidalgo, head of harris county's governing body. thank you for being with us tonight. it is fascinating to watch this unfold and sad to watch this unfold in harris county. you have within your county boundaries the largest hospital complex in america, one of the largest and best in the entire world, and your hospitals are filling up. your icus are diverting people to other hospitals. >> that's right, ali. we have the largest medical
9:08 pm
center in the world here in harris county, which is home to houston and 33 other cities. and what we are learning the hard way is that this strategy of seeing how far we can stretch our hospital beds and trying to fill them up while also not making aggressive public policy is not a good strategy. it is wrong morally. it is not adequate public health policy. it is not adequate economic policy. and it's simply not working. those beds are continuing to fill, and the halfway measures we've had so far are simply not cutting it. today that's the saddest part is you could go to a water park. you could go to a restaurant. yes, some things are happening, but until we take strong action, we're not going to see that curve turn around. we're not going to see that curve flatten, or we're not going to see it come down. >> judge, tell me how you solve this problem because you and
9:09 pm
mayor sylvester turner and others just like we're seeing in arizona, there are municipal leaders who are asking their governors to do something. your governor has said, according to a local news report today, he said there are rumors out there that there will be an imminent shutdown. that is not the case. he is not really hearing you on this. >> look, we've got to look at the data here. we have to be honest with ourselves, and we have to hear the cries of the community, the folks who are hurting economically, who have loved ones in the hospital, and recognize that it's no time for politics. it is time for evidence-based action, and we see communities not just around the country but around the world, those who didn't just flatten the curve but crushed it, brought it all the way down and began reopening in a slow, measured fashion are the ones doing well. so if we want to look at the economic angle, we need to set up the economy for long-term
9:10 pm
success, and the only way we do that is by controlling those cases, sharpening our tools of contact tracing, of testing. of course from a health standpoint, that's the right thing to do. i've tried everything we can here. a few weeks ago we put our community on red alert. that means stay home. everybody got a notification to their cell phones. today we had broadcast and radio broadcast as well with notifications. i'm constantly trying to share this. but, look, i continue to plead for that tool. that's why i've continued to ask the governor for him to give me that authority or for him to do it himself. i used to have that authority. that's how we brought down the curve in march. and now we've got to do it again, and we've got to do it better because back then we opened before the curve actually came down. we simply flattened it, and then, you know, we gave up too early, and we can't afford to do that again. >> so, judge, i want you to explain what this means, that you had the authority and you don't have it now, because right now the issue is that you are asking for an enforceable stay-at-home order, not a recommended stay-at-home order.
9:11 pm
what's changed in your ability to enforce an order? >> so legally as the county executive, i had the authority to issue this order, orders for folks to wear face coverings and so on and so forth. now, when the governor began reopening the state, his reopening orders included a provision that basically undid my ability or removed that authority to issue those kinds of orders. so now all i can do is recommend and i can do whatever authority he positively grants me. and so right now we're at the point where we've seen that a strategy of incrementalist restrictions doesn't work. the virus is very difficult. there's many things we don't understand. but what we do know is that to control the spread, we've got to have a stay-home order. we've got to keep it in place until the curve comes down. we can't give ourselves arbitrary deadlines and that will set us up to succeed for
9:12 pm
the long haul. we're seeing something very crushing in our minority communities even that just shows you this strategy ends up hurting real people. hispanics in our population are 65%, sometimes 50%, they hover there, of the hospitalizations, whereas they're only 44% of the population. we've got zip codes, the majority hispanic zip codes. they're seeing incredibly high positive tifity rates, up to 50. this is terrible not just for this community. eventually this catches up to all of us. you can't be so callous of this strategy to say let's see how much we can stress these hospital beds and cross our fingers and hope it works. we continue to plead with the community to stay home, but of course it's so much stronger if we have an order and we know that it works because when we did it back in march, people buckled down. they got together. they flattened the curve. of course then, you know, the state decided to reopen before we had a chance to really bring
9:13 pm
things under control. but we're going to keep fighting with our public health tools, fighting with the communication tools we have. but frankly this is really sad to watch, that this is what's happening in our hospitals and at the same time i can go have any size indoor event as long as it's indoors and i can go to a restaurant and sit in a crowded patio right now in my community while people are dying and filling up our hospitals. hidal joining us tonight. lina hidalgo is the hed of harris county's governing body. with cases surging all across the country, the white house has decided to focus its efforts on discrediting the nation's top infectious disease expert because of his blunt warnings about the coronavirus. an administration official on sunday sent nbc news and other media outlets a list of dr. anthony fauci's past statements on the coronavirus saying, quote, several white house officials are concerned about the number of times dr. fauci has been wrong on things. in many ways, the document resembled campaign opposition research as opposed to an
9:14 pm
official white house document. it comes as fauci has been essentially sidelined by the administration. according to "the washington post," fauci no longer briefs donald trump and is never in the oval office anymore. he reportedly last spoke to the president during the first week of june. certainly not the best time to be discrediting and pushing away one of the most respected scientific voices in the country. joining me now, dr. zeke emanuel, author of "which country has the world's best health care." zeke, good to see you again. thank you for being with us. i'm really puzzled by the fauci thing. if you don't like somebody who is doing a job for the administration, donald trump has had no hesitation in generally speaking getting rid of them. this is weird. the degree to which they are undermining fauci. peter navarro was on this show with me over a week ago, and he had started by sort of undermining and discrediting fauci. what do you think's going on here? >> well, they want to character
9:15 pm
assassination attempt here. it's reckless. it's cruel. and it's absolutely wrong. nobody in this whole pandemic has gotten everything right because it's brand-new. lots of uncertainty, and you're trying to make predictions and projections in the midst of that kind of uncertainty, and you mix in human behavior. will people follow stay-at-home orders or not? but dr. fauci has gotten it right a lot, and most importantly i was going to say when he's wrong, he's very upfront about it. one of the things dr. fauci does is he always qualifies what he's going to say as to what he really knows and what he is guessing at and what he's making an estimation at. and correcting errors, that's part of science, right? we all make projections and try to estimate things. >> he's thoughtful and deliberate in the way he's done things. but this is calling for you to
9:16 pm
speculate. fauci's useful to the country right now. is it less useful that he's not got access to the president, that they're not really letting him speak freely? could he be doing something else? >> in the country? he could be doing a lot of things, but i do think -- you know, it's an important thing to contrast how often he's been wrong with the president, who said that the virus was going to disappear in the warm weather, who said hydroxychloroquine was going to work, who recommended we maybe take bleach or put light in our bodies. this is not the way to run a public health emergency, to take your best scientist, the one who has proven over, you know, almost four decades now that he has real knowledge of infectious disease, real knowledge how to combat it, real knowledge how to actually save lives and to sideline him. it is unconscionable, and the president needs good advisers who really know the science and what he's doing is surrounding himself with people who like
9:17 pm
what he has to say and won't push back when he is wrong. and that just, you know, the whole country is suffering because of it. >> one of the things dr. fauci did say is we might get to a point where we've got 100,000 cases a day. if you recall, zeke, you and i were on tv one night talking about when the president said we weren't going to get to 100,000 cases at all, certainly not 100,000 deaths. we're way past that. but let's take a look at the record on friday. we have topped 70,000 new cases on friday. talk to me about what we need to do now, zeke, because you've never been -- you know, you like a lot of americans think that people want to get out. people want to get back to work. people have to earn an income. but you just heard my conversation with the chief executive of harris county in texas. this is what happens when we don't follow rules. >> look, if you look at all other countries, and i think i said this with you, ali, four months ago in march, all the
9:18 pm
other countries, it goes up for four weeks, and then it comes down four weeks. it's a pretty symmetric curve, or goes up for four weeks and come down for five, six weeks. that's the time period we have. we have to be disciplined for that time period. we're talking about eight to ten weeks where we have to be disciplined. then you can bring the curve down. you can bring the transmission rate below one, and you can see this work. you know how we know? look at new york. today, no cases of transmission. washington, d.c., four straight days, no cases. you can do this. >> zero. >> with discipline. and you just need leadership and consistent messaging and consistent embodiment of that messaging by your leader instead of trying to sow this disharmony, suspicion of the virus and what it can actually do and the damage it can cause. you know, we had -- >> but the sowing of suspicion -- go ahead.
9:19 pm
>> we had the governor of florida who sort of, you know, dismissed all of this early march, april, may, not going to happen here. and sure enough, it was as clear as day. anyone who's been studied epidemiology knows you have those parties on the beaches. you open indoor restaurants. you open bars. you open all these amusement facilities. you're going to have the spread. it is inevitable, and it's come home to roost in a state that has a huge population of elderly people who are all at very high risk. >> i'm trying to get my head around from a public health perspective where the president is getting his advice from. there was a story in "the daily beast" today describing the fact that donald trump re-tweeted the former game show host chuck woolery. the tweet said, the most outrageous lies are the ones about covid-19. everybody is lying. the cdc, media, democrats, our doctors, not all but most, that we are told to trust. i think it's all about the
9:20 pm
election and keeping the economy from coming back, which is about the election. i'm sick of it. so chuck woolery tweets this out. the president re-tweets this. but this attack on science, this attack on truth and now this attack on doctors and an attack on public health efforts, i just didn't know this could happen, but the president's fully at the front of this train. >> look, one of the things that political scientists who study this phenomenon, study populism find out is that one of the victims of this is expertise. the fact that people actually know something and what they know is valuable to actually addressing a problem. and we have had an attack on expertise lo more than 20 years in this country as the populism of the republican party has gone up. and that is what you're seeing. you don't like the facts, attack the messenger. that is not a good way to actually survive, and we know that biology, you can't bamboozle it.
9:21 pm
you cannot just through rhetoric and "we're great" and our response is fantastic, you're not going to beat this virus. the virus can withstand all of that because it doesn't really care about the rhetoric. it cares about science, and it behaves by biological laws. and we know how to beat that. we've seen around the world countries that have beaten it. you know, look at italy. italy, you know, has had its >> but over ten weeks, brought the virus down, and now you can open up safely once it's down. a few cases pop up, you can actually suppress them. but if you've got 10,000, 12,000 cases a day, you cannot suppress it, and you will not beat that virus. >> zeke, always good to see you, my friend. thank you. coming up next, the president kept his longtime adviser roger stone out of prison by commuting his sentence
9:22 pm
on friday. there's a stunning development as a friday night news dump goes. in a broader context, it turns out there's actually more here to see. i'll have that story after this. . ♪ don't just think about where you're headed this summer. think about how you'll get there. and now that you can lease or buy a new lincoln remotely or in person... discovering that feeling has never been more effortless. accept our summer invitation to get 0% apr on all 2020 lincoln vehicles. only at your lincoln dealer. people are surprising themselves the moment realize they can du more with less asthma. thanks to dupixent, the add-on treatment for specific types
9:23 pm
of moderate-to-severe asthma. dupixent isn't for sudden breathing problems. it can improve lung function for better breathing in as little as 2 weeks and help prevent severe asthma attacks. it's not a steroid but can help reduce or eliminate oral steroids. dupixent can cause serious allergic reactions including anaphylaxis. get help right away if you have rash, shortness of breath, chest pain, tingling or numbness in your limbs. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection and don't change or stop your asthma treatments, including steroids, without talking to your doctor. du more with less asthma. talk to your doctor today about dupixent. if your financial situation has changed, we may be able to help. if youall the way out heren just for a blurry photo of me. oh, that's a good one. wait, what's that? that's just the low-battery warning. oh, alright. now it's all, "check out my rv," and, "let's go four-wheeling." maybe there's a little part of me that wanted to be seen.
9:24 pm
well, progressive helps people save when they bundle their home with their outdoor vehicles. so they've got other things to do now, bigfoot. wait, what'd you just call me? bigfoot? ♪ my name is daryl.
9:25 pm
call it a tale of three
9:26 pm
books. three books about the president of the united states. see if you can spot which of these is being treated differently by the white house. in the midst of the fire hose of news at the end of last week, donald trump's lawyer michael cohen was sent back to prison after having been released to home detention earlier this year. and you may or may not care all that much about where mr. cohen is serving out his sentence for tax fraud and lying to congress. but here's what quickly became concerning about michael cohen suddenly being locked up again. cohen's lawyers say he was sent back to prison because he did not want to sign paperwork that would have blocked him from talking to the media or publishing the book he's been working on. in other words, keep silent or go back behind bars. how unusual is an ultimatum like that? cnn spoke to several defense attorneys and legal experts, none of whom had ever seen anything like cohen's media and book publishing ban. ryan goodman at just security
9:27 pm
reached out to several leading first amendment scholars. they looked at the prohibition and described it with phrases like, quote, patently unconstitutional, a profound affront to the first amendment, indefensible. so, again, whether you view michael cohen as a sympathetic character or not, what it looks like is happening here is pretty chilling. the trump administration gave michael cohen a choice -- sign this paper saying you won't write a book or go back to prison. silence or prison, your choice. then there's the book by donald trump's niece slated for official publication tomorrow. donald trump and his family have been in court up through today trying to block the book from being published and to block mary trump from saying anything about the book, which feels ridiculous because you probably feel like you've already read it since just about every media outlet on the planet has gotten a copy and dissected it already. well, this evening donald trump and his family lost that court fight. a new york state supreme court judge rejected the trump
9:28 pm
family's attempt to block the book, ruling that, quote, the potential enormous cost and logistical nightmare of stopping the publication, recalling and removing hundreds of thousands of books from all types of booksellers, brick and mortar and virtual, libraries and private citizens, is an insurmountable task at this time. the judge then quotes a different judge in another case donald trump lost when he tried to block the publication of his former national security adviser john bolton's book. quote, by the looks of it, the horse is not just out of the barn, it is out of the country. mary trump's book can go forward, and also mary trump is now free to speak publicly about it, which should be interesting. so michael cohen's book, mary trump's book, the president, his family, his white house doing everything they can to prevent them from coming out up to and including sending michael cohen back to prison. but today we learned about a third book. now, see if you can spot the difference. today the justice department released the actual executive
9:29 pm
order commuting the prison sentence of roger stone. you can see the president's unmistakable sharpie signature there. the president commuted his old friend's sentence on friday night, but it was not clear how broad the commutation was. in fact, the judge in stone's case demanded to see the actual order to determine whether it covered just stone's prison time or his probation as well. well, now we know that the president took care of everything for his old friend -- prison time, supervised release, $20,000 fine, all of it, poof, gone. and today roger stone announced that he's celebrating by writing a book. that's right. so if you testify unflatteringly about the president and you try and write a book, you get to go back to prison. if you withhold information from congress and prosecutors to get your prison sentence erased, and you can publish to your heart's content. joining us now, barbara mcquade, former u.s. attorney for the eastern district of michigan. barbara, good to see you.
9:30 pm
thank you for joining us tonight. talk to me about this. we've heard in certain extreme cases about convicted felons not being able to profit from their crimes, typically in the case of murders and things like that. but how unusual is this development to you? >> i've never heard about anything like it. and in fact, ali, i've been talking with colleagues to ask them if they've ever seen anything like this, and i haven't found anybody who has. you know, after the son of sam killings, many states passed these laws called son of sam laws that prevented people from profiting from their crimes. and so the idea was if an offender wrote a book about his crime, it could be the case that those profits could be disgorged and returned to victims of crimes. and that's true in the federal rules as well. but there's no law that says a person can't even write a book. in fact, the supreme court has held that such a rule would be unconstitutional. so i think if michael cohen were to challenge this condition, he would win. >> it is interesting, though, that, you know, the president
9:31 pm
did something completely contrary to that with the erasure of roger stone's conviction or at least, you know, vacating the things that he had to do as part of that conviction. it does seem a little bit stark. >> if i were cynical, ali, i would suggest that perhaps president trump is trying to control who writes stories about him, who tells their story, people who have unflattering things to say are hit with lawsuits and efforts are made to stop them and to suppress them and keep those stories from being told. people who have flattering things to say about president trump are released from prison so that they get a chance to tell those stories. i don't know that president trump will be able to stop these unflattering stories forever. he also files lawsuits against journalists for things he alleges are defamatory that i don't think are going to be held up. but it seems he at least tries to keep the dam from bursting before the election. if he can keep these bad things
9:32 pm
from being out in the public before the election, then perhaps he can control that narrative before it has an ability to affect the outcome of the election. but i don't think he's going to be successful. you know, prior restraint, which is any ruling, any order, any law that prohibits someone from sharing information, are highly disfavored. so, you know, you can work out money damages later in these lawsuits, but the idea of suppressing someone's information is highly disfavored. >> so the normalization of these characters in the trump administration is worth study. the list of commutations and the list of pardons is interesting because some of it are people that president trump wants to pardon. some of them, he seemed to just be softening us up for. but between those and the tweets about who's been witch hunted or unfairly treated, the president has sort of normalized the idea that he does this sort of thing. it wasn't a surprise to us that he commuted the sentence of
9:33 pm
roger stone. but robert mueller, in his op-ed for "the washington post," wanted to underscore the point. he writes, a jury determined that stone repeatedly lied to members of congress. he lied about the identity of his intermediary to wikileaks. he lied about the existence of -- he in fact updated senior campaign officials repeatedly about wikileaks, and he tampered with a witness, imploring him to stonewall congress. mueller's trying to make the point that as normal as trump wants to make this feel, roger stone's a convicted felon. >> yeah. i was so gratified to see robert mueller come out with this op-ed. you know, he is a stoic marine who does not complain, does not speak up. and for him to write this, even in its fairly subdued tones, is the equivalent of screaming for anybody else. so i think he is trying to say this is not normal. you know, president trump has granted pardons and clemency for
9:34 pm
people like rod blagojevich, others who have committed crimes of corruption, perhaps trying to say corruption is no big deal. what's different about this is it's not just corruption. it relates specifically to trump itself. it is an effort to cover up his crimes. as judge jackson said herself at stone's sentencing, roger stone was not standing up for president trump. roger stone was covering up for president trump. and so this clemency really seems like an abuse of the pardon power. >> barbara, good to see you as always. thank you for joining me. barbara mcquade is a former u.s. attorney for the eastern district of michigan. still ahead, if you ignore, fumble and botch the response to a crisis as serious as a global pandemic, you can expect political consequences for that. we'll have the latest snapshot on red state races that are now surprisingly in play after this break. after this break. : a bad mood related to a sluggish gut. miralax is different. it works naturally with the water in your body to unblock your gut.
9:35 pm
free your gut, and your mood will follow.
9:36 pm
what if your clothes could stay fresh for weeks? now they can! downy unstopables in-wash scent boosters keep your laundry smelling fresh way longer than detergent alone. pour a cap of downy unstopables into your washing machine before each load and enjoy fresher smelling laundry for up to 12-weeks. this towel has already been used and it still smells fresh. if you want laundry to smell fresh for weeks make sure you have
9:37 pm
downy unstopables in-wash scent boosters. to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. [grunting noise] i'll take that. woohoo! 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. ensure max protein. with nutrients to support immune health.
9:38 pm
ensure max protein. and the hidden smiles. the foggy glasses, and the muffled laughs. a simple piece of fabric makes a big statement: i care. wear a mask. let's all do our part to slow the spread. the explosion of new coronavirus cases in texas is translating into immediate
9:39 pm
political pain for president trump. a new dallas morning news poll finds that just 38% of texas voters are pleased with the president's handling of the virus while an overall majority, 52%, disapprove. and while those numbers may or may not concern the president, the top-line number from that same poll almost certainly will. trump currently trails joe biden by five points in texas. it's not a national poll. this is not a swing state poll. in the headline, it calls it "red texas." this latest poll is not an outlier by the way. the realclearpolitics average of all texas polls currently has biden and trump tied. at the national level, the president's historically weak standing at this stage in the race has some democrat strategists urging biden to go big and try to expand the map in states like georgia, ohio, and texas. what's more, the president's bungling of the virus response has republican senators avoiding
9:40 pm
any mention of him in their campaign ads while his drop in the polls has democrats salivating about their chances of taking back the upper chamber. asked today whether republicans would hang on to the senate, senator mitch mcconnell could muster only that he was hopeful that they would. now, tomorrow voters in texas, maine, and alabama had to the polls for primary contests with direct implications for control of the senate in november. let's start in texas. democrats are going to select a senate challenger to take on the republican incumbent john cornyn. while cornyn ultimately remains favored to hold his seat, his recent comments about not knowing whether children can catch the coronavirus at the same that his state reported that over 500 kids have tested positive isn't helping him. in alabama, another red state that has seen a recent surge in coronavirus cases, republicans will choose between former college football coach and trump endorse the candidate tommy tuberville on the left, and
9:41 pm
trump's former attorney general-turned-foe jeff sessions. the winner is going to take on the democrats' most vulnerable incumbent, doug jones, who pulled off a shocking victory in 2017. in maine, democrats will choose a senate candidate to take on vulnerable incumbent susan collins. the current front-runner in the democratic primary, maine house speaker sara gideon currently leads collins in public polling. and seeming a little vulnerable this early, susan collins has company. polls show republican senators are also facing tough races in colorado, arizona, iowa, north carolina, and montana. trump won montana by 20 points four years ago. in the montana senate race, a new poll today finds the popular governor and democratic challenger steve bullock leading the incumbent by two points. meanwhile the latest senate poll out of arizona shows the democratic challenger mark kelly beating republican incumbent martha mcsally by four points,
9:42 pm
which might not be surprising considering the republican-led state has continued to set all the wrong records for coronavirus. the latest from the crisis in arizona is right after this break. didn 't know meant so much. but we're all going at our own speed. at enterprise, peace-of-mind starts with our complete clean pledge, curbside rentals and low-touch transactions. with so many vehicles of so many kinds, you can count on us to help you get everywhere you want to go... again. whenever you're ready, we're ready for you. enterprise. wow. jim could you ipop the hood for us?? there she is. -turbocharged, right? yes it is. jim, could you uh kick the tires? oh yes. can you change the color inside the car? oh sure. how about blue? that's more cyan but. jump in the back seat, jim. act like my kids. how much longer? -exactly how they sound. it's got massaging seats too, right? oh yeahhhhh. -oh yeahhhhh. visit the mercedes-benz summer event
9:43 pm
or shop online at participating dealers. get 0% apr financing up to 36 months on select new and certified pre-owned models.
9:44 pm
(brad) more renters find their place than any other site.as helped by digitally upgrading every one of our employees...physically. now, everybody at apartments.com can, and does, give one hundred and ten percent. [rapid typing and clicking]
9:45 pm
apartments-dot-com. the most popular place to find a place. try wayf♪ r. you got this! ♪ perfect. -you're welcome. i love it. how'd you do all this? told ya! wayfair. let's talk dining tables. yes! blow it up. ♪ wayfair you've got just what i need ♪ it won't wait for a convenient time. or for hospitals to get back to normal again. that's why, at cancer treatment centers of america, we aren't waiting. we're right here, still focused on the only thing we do, providing world-class cancer care, all under one roof. because cancer isn't just what we do, it's all we do.
9:46 pm
cancer treatment centers of america. call now for an appointment. these last couple days have been kind of hectic. right now when i left, we were holding approximately ten patients for the intensive care units. obviously the intensive care unit is full. no place for them to go. some patients in the e.r. beds were being doubled up. we had makeshift sort of curtains to kind of separate beds, to kind of take one spot and make it into two. there's no place to put people. we've been on diversion for much of the night. diversion means an ambulance wants to come to your place, and you say, we can't accept it. we're saturated. but unfortunately if the next
9:47 pm
closest hospital is also on diversion, you kind of share it, and you're forced to go back on and accept patients after a few hours. so we've been playing that game all night where we've been on diversion, the next closest hospital a few miles away is on diversion, and we're still receiving patients. the majority are still covid. >> that e.r. doctor in hard-hit phoenix, arizona, saying his hospital is full up. got no room for patients but they keep their doors up because the next closest hospital is full of covid patients too. according to "the new york times," there are 39 states in the country seeing an increase in new coronavirus infections plus d.c., puerto rico, and the u.s. virgin islands. the covid outbreak is growing in the majority of the country right now, but there's one state that sticks out. you can see it. it clearly stands out in this stack of charts from "the times." take a look at arizona. new coronavirus infections have been on ae in
9:48 pm
arizona for weeks now since the state's republican governor began one of the earliest reopenings in the country to appease trump. this weekend the number of icu beds and ventilators being used by coronavirus patients hit an all-time high in arizona. that's the hard data behind the experience that that phoenix e.r. doctor was just describing. with all the numbers still trending up, the governor of arizona, doug ducey, has not enacted any significant new restrictions to slow the spread. he's not closed businesses. there's no statewide mask requirement. and so with more people in arizona getting sick than the hospitals can keep up with, officials on the local level are pushing on the governor to change his mind. this weekend the mayors from five of arizona's biggest cities sent the governor of arizona this letter, asking the governor to enact a statewide mask requirement, to increase testing and contact tracing, to ask arizonans to stay home. but also for the governor to step up and enact statewide strategy to stop the coronavirus
9:49 pm
from ripping through the state because the mayors are tired of trying to solve a public health crisis all on their own. quote, as arizona mayors, we are deeply concerned about the current response to the covid-19 pandemic in our state. any further actions to curb the spread must provide statewide direction. covid-19 does not stop at city or county limits. we need statewide action to effectively combat this public health crisis. that letter, which is basically a public sos letter to the governor is signed by the mayors of tucson, phoenix, flagstaff, actual ason, and tempe. joining me now, will humble, the former director of the arizona department of health services, now the executive director of the arizona public health. you and i talked two week ago, and you described something to me about something called care standards. you said your hospitals were starting to use care standards, which i think in common parlance is some version of triage,
9:50 pm
determining who gets what treatment. that was two weeks ago. now you've got what this e.r. doctor describes as diversion, actually turning patients away. >> yeah. that's what he was describing. dr. low vecchio, who i know, was describing actually crisis standards of care in operation. that's what it means. he talked about repurposing emergency department rooms because they were unable to send those patients to intensive care beds out of necessity because they don't have the staff within their hospital, and then they check the surge line and were unable to find a similar hospital to treat those patients. so they're doing the best they can. you know, the terrible thing here is that there's no end in sight. i mean the number of cases continues to rise. the policy decisions have not been adjusted to make the situation any better. and further, there are administrative things that could be done like improving the turnaround time with testing, using care act money by the way. it's not state funds that are needed.
9:51 pm
they could do it now. so there's several of these things that do make a real difference. but as you mentioned, you know, it takes some leadership to really turn the tide. >> the thing, though, will, about the human mind is our ability to learn from things and try not to repeat mistakes or not habitually repeat mistakes. but in fact we've seen exactly what's happening in arizona happen elsewhere, and we thought we wouldn't have to go through this again. we were hoping. people like me who come from new york were hoping that arizona and texas and florida would not have to go through this. and, in fact, they did not have to go through this. >> well, that's right. and we didn't have to go through it either by the way. the playbook was written in the northeast part of the country where they had a responsible playbook really for how to emerge from the stay-at-home order and preserve the sacrifices made by the folks in your state. and we didn't follow that playbook. we basically, i think what we did is adopt the swedish model really and implement that. and, you know, i was on chris hayes' show a few days ago, and
9:52 pm
i said, look, i just hope that the other states out there recognize what not to do. don't follow the arizona example because this is a bad experiment. it's not working out well. and if you come out of a stay-at-home order, for crying out loud,n a responsible way with performance measures that you can document and get compliance with some of these cdc mitigation measures and make sure that you've got the kind of testing capacity that will help you with your contact tracing. all of these marks were off. >> in fact when you look at the three things they asked for in the mayor's letter to the governor, it is those three things. when you look at places like japan or south korea or taiwan or new zealand, the cdc mitigation matters, they're simple. this isn't high science. we're not asking for a treatment or cure or vaccine. that will come later. we're just asking for basic stuff that has been shown to mitigate the spread of this infection. >> right. all these things are layers, you know. the testing capacity leads into contact tracing, which that contact tracing is a layer.
9:53 pm
complying with the cdc mitigation measures in retail stores, bars, restaurants, et cetera, that's a mitigation measure. we need to have all the layers in place, which by the way are manageable things. we're not talking about another stay-at-home order. we're talking about policy decisions and administrative action that if taken can stem the tide, move the needle, and get us to the vaccine so that we don't have to do another stay-at-home order, which has tremendous collateral damage in public health and otherwise. >> will, good to see you again. thank you for being with us. i'm sorry that we have to talk as frequently as we do, but we appreciate the time that you take to keep us up to speed. coming up, state officials have managed to push back on trump administration policies by taking the president to court. today the states are trying again in a fight with big implications for all of us. we'll tell you about that next.
9:54 pm
9:55 pm
9:56 pm
9:57 pm
9:58 pm
when donald trump first ran for president, he said a lot of racist and homophobic things about immigrants and how he was going to build a wall to keep many of them out. he also said this. >> i want people to come into our country legally. i want to have a big, fat, beautiful open door. >> a big, fat, beautiful open door for legal immigrants. that's how donald trump tried to convince the american people and the voters that it wasn't really about hating immigrants. it was just about the rule of law, getting the so-called bad hombres out if you recall. donald trump has done many things both during that election and in the four years since that made it really clear that he really is prejudiced against immigrants of all stripes or maybe of most stripes and doesn't seem to care much about the rule of law either. but some level of welcome for immigrants, some level of acknowledgement that immigration is actually important to america's economy was mainstream republican consensus at the
9:59 pm
time. as recently as last year, administration officials were still telling reporters trump actually wanted to increase the number of visas for highly skilled workers. but here's the thing. donald trump has repeatedly and emphatically slammed his big, fat, beautiful door in the faces of those same immigrants that his party once tried to make epgs sepgss for. the latest example is the trump administration's announcement of a new policy for international students who study at an american college and whose studies have moved online during the pandemic. the trump administration essentially told those students to go back to where they came from, revoking their right to stay in the united states. the decision doesn't just upend the lives of those international students. it's another discouragement of them to study and potentially build their lives in america. we're shutting the door on some of the world's best and brightest minds, giving up on their contributions to american business, to research, innovation, and society now and down the road. harvard law school professor writes that the effect of
10:00 pm
pushing these students away will, quote, likely be an exodus of academic talent to schools in europe or elsewhere, an intellectual catastrophe of historic proportions with long-term economic ramifications. there is so much at stake in this and for all of us that today the attorneys general of 16 states and d.c. joined the ad of massachusetts in suing the administration to try and stop the policy. they're asking a federal court in boston to block the policy as the case moves forward. no word yet. but as rachel says, watch this space. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again tomorrow. now it is time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. >> good evening. i was settling into the chair here. i got the ear piece in just in time to hear you say donald trump slammed his big, fat -- and i thought, where is this going? and then it was beautiful door and then i -- and then i