thing that's allegedly thought of as a virtue in order to undermine other things that are virtues. and it seems that people have not gamed out that that's the game plan and that's the strategy and they continue -- success. >> jelani cobb and ben collins, thank you both for making time tonight. i guess there's some breaking news that betsy devos resigning. thank you both for making time tonight. i guess there's some breaking news on betsy devos resigning? she's got only a few days left. that is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts now. good evening, rachel. >> the "wall street journal" is, in fact, reporting that betsy devos has resigned. we are working to confirm it at this moment, but so far, that's a "journal" report. and you know, who knows, chris, at which point, do you bother counting the dominos or just put them in the bag and wait to start the next game? >> yeah, and whether this is, like, this is serious and this means that something's going to happen, or whether people had enough vacation days saved up that they're ready to head to the beach. >> yeah. the idea that they've just had, you know, the straw broke the camel's back, yeah. >> it's a little hard thing. >> thank you, polichris. and thank you at home for being with us this hour at this

remarkable time in our country's history. the sergeant-at-arms in the house is responsible for security concerns at the house of representatives. house speaker nancy pelosi today demanded the resignation of the house sergeant-at-arms, and he complied with that demand and he has now resigned. the senate sergeant-at-arms is responsible for security concerns at the u.s. senate. the majority leader in the senate, of course, is republican mitch mcconnell. just in the last hour, he, too, asked for the resignation of the senate sergeant-at-arms, who then resigned immediately. senator chuck schumer, who is the democratic senate leader, he had said earlier today that if the senate sergeant-at-arms didn't resign by the time schumer and the democrats take over with the majority two weeks from now, schumer said that he would fire the senate sergeant-at-arms on day one. well, now mcconnell has asked for that resignation, and the senate sergeant-at-arms has resigned effective immediately. speaker pelosi today also called for the resignation of the head of the u.s. capitol police. after some sort of unexplained dithering over that, over the

course of the afternoon and then a statement by the u.s. capitol police union blasting their own leadership, ultimately, the head of the u.s. capitol police also announced that he, too, will be resigning. oddly, he says he will resign next weekend, next saturday, four days before the inauguration. why then? i don't know, but that's when he says he would like to go. we'll see. but the house sergeant-at-arms, the senate sergeant-at-arms, the head of the capitol police, all their heads are apparently going to roll. and we've heard from multiple members of congress, including to the relevant oversight committees that the catastrophic security failures that allowed the mob of trump supporters yesterday to storm through the u.s. capitol, looting, reportedly shooting, vandalizing some offices, ransacking others, menacing members of congress, attacking outnumbered police officers -- all of that which the mob was bent on but which adequate security preparations should have been fairly easily

able to fend off, we are being told by multiple members of congress that those security failures that led to this will be investigated, and now know we'll have new leadership for security around the capitol, et cetera, et cetera. let's hope they get their ducks in a row by 13 days from now for the inauguration. so, on the security side, narrowly defined, we've got firings and resignations and some recrimination. but it's kind of starting to look like that might be it, like, maybe those will be the only recriminations, like what happened yesterday on capitol hill was equivalent to a spate of purse snatchings or maybe some cars that got broken into, or maybe there was some vandalism. i mean, just listen to this. listen to maryland's governor, larry hogan, today, explaining what happened during the height of the rioting at the u.s. capitol yesterday. larry hogan is a republican. he's actually one of three republican governors now, along

with phil scott from vermont and charlie baker of massachusetts, who have called on president trump to resign immediately or be removed from office now, before the end of his term. but just, this didn't get a lot of widespread attention today, but listen to what we heard today from maryland's governor, larry hogan. listen to what he described happening in the middle of his day yesterday. he was at work in maryland, which, of course, is just outside of washington, d.c. >> right in the middle of that meeting, with our security team, i got a phone call from house majority leader steny hoyer, who was calling me, saying that he and speaker pelosi and senator schumer were all together in an undisclosed bunker. they had been spirited off to some undisclosed location, that the u.s. capitol police was overwhelmed, that there was no federal law enforcement presence, and that the leaders

of congress were pleading with me, as the governor of maryland, for assistance from maryland's national guard and state police. i informed speaker hoyer and the other leaders that a force of specially trained riot police equipped to respond to civil disturbances along with members of allied and local law enforcement agencies were already en route to the capitol. i also told them that i authorized the mobilization of the maryland national guard and that i was ready, willing, and able to immediately deploy them to the capitol. however, we were repeatedly denied approval to do so. under federal law, the mayor of the district of columbia does not have authority over the guard, and we must receive approval from the secretary of defense before we're able to send our maryland national guard across the border into the federal city, into the district of columbia. so, we had a little

back-and-forth, trying to get that authorization. approximately an hour and a half later, i got a call on my cell phone from the secretary of the army, ryan mccarthy, who gave us the authority that we needed to be able to move into the city. the initial contingent of maryland national guard members were the first to arrive in washington from out of state. >> okay. so, that's a remarkable window into what happened yesterday, for which we have to think about what recrimination, what repercussions there will be, what consequences there will be. i mean, here's a congressman, the number two democrat in the house under nancy pelosi. it's steny hoyer. he happens to be a congressman from maryland, which happens to be the state right next door to washington, d.c. steny hoyer is in hiding with the other leadership in the house and senate, while an armed mob has taken over the capitol. the capitol police are overrun. there's no federal law enforcement presence that they can see at all. and steny hoyer, because he happens to be from maryland, he

happens to have the phone number on him of the governor of maryland. so, he's hunkered down, in hiding, under fire, and that's who he calls for help. governor, can you please send some troops or something from maryland? and maryland says, sure. maryland governor says, yeah, we have civil disturbance trained police. we've got hundreds of guard troops that are ready to go. yes. just say the word. but he can't just say so on his own, right? you can't just send them into d.c. on your own say so. you need federal authorization. you need the trump administration to thoauthorize . and the trump administration is aw awol. they won't authorize it. nobody can get a call returned. >> governor, what did the secretary of defense say in denying authorization to the maryland national guard? what was the reason given? >> well, none of us really spoke to the secretary of defense, but we were repeatedly being told by

the national guard at the national level that we did not have authorization. i was actually on the phone with leader hoyer, who was pleading with us to send the guard. he was yelling across the room to schumer, and they were back and forth, saying, we do have the authorization. and i'm say 'i'm telling you, we do not have the authorization. and so, we had multiple times, the general was -- we were running up the flag pole, we're ready -- don't have authorization, don't have authorization. and then i get a call an hour and a half later, out of the blue, not from the secretary of defense, not through what would be normal channels, you know, i got a number i don't recognize on my phone. i pick it up anyway. larry hogan. and it's like, this is ryan mccarthy, secretary of the army, governor, can you come as soon as possible? it was like, yeah, we've been waiting. we're ready.

i can't tell you what was going on, on the other end, on the decision-making process. there's been lots of speculation in the media about that, but i'm not privy to what was going on inside the white house or inside the pentagon. >> governor, should the department resign? should we invoke the 25th amendment? where are you on that discussion? >> look, here's where i am. i think there's no question that america would be better off if the president would resign or be removed from office and if mike pence, vice president of the united states, would conduct a peaceful transition of power over the next 13 days until president biden is sworn in. now, how the details of -- if that's going to happen or how that should happen, i don't know. >> as i mentioned, that's a republican governor, the republican governor of maryland. he's one of three republican governors who have now called on the president to resign or be immediately removed from office. before the end of his term.

but think about what governor hogan is describing there in terms of how this went, right? an angry and apparently armed mob is overrunning the capitol. the leadership of the congress calls him to say they are in hiding, they are under assault, there is no visible federal law enforcement response as far as they can see, and the capitol police are overrun. and at that point, the governor of maryland says, yeah, i've got assets to deploy, i just need the secretary of defense, i just need the administration to okay it, to give me the authorization. and apparently, the secretary of defense is not taking calls. apparently, the secretary of defense is not taking calls when nearby states are offering to send in troops while a riot is under way at the u.s. capitol. and the president doesn't make that happen and the secretary of defense, who's a junior guy who was just appointed to the secretary job since the election, and nobody knows why. he apparently doesn't make that happen. it's guys from maryland who know each other, trying to get the troops in there without the authorization, and then finally,

from outside the chain of command, the army secretary, who has nothing to do with this authorization, an hour and a half into this calls the governor and says, hey, do you have any troops you can send? it's like, yeah, i've got plenty of troops. i need authorization to send them in. i'm not supposed to be getting the authorization from you, but i guess you'll do? what are the repercussions of that? what are the consequences of that? who pays for that? who answers for that? that's part of what happened here. not only did this violent insurrection happen at the u.s. capitol, but forces were denied authorization to come in and stop it, after the capitol police were completely overwh r. now, why were the capitol police overrun? there will be answers to that eventually, and the head of the capitol police is resigning, as is the sergeant of arms in the house and the sergeant of arms in the senate. but you know, the president incited a mob to march on the capitol. he promised them it would be wild.

he told them to show strength. his lawyer told them this would be trial by combat. his son said to members of congress, we're coming for you! and then the mob did exactly whal they were told to do, and they rioted and they ransacked the place, and the military response was throttled by the administration, by the president, by his new acting defense secretary, and four people died. a woman was shot inside the capitol. three others dead outside, in addition to more than a dozen capitol police injured yesterday. ohio congressman tim ryan says tonight that one capitol police officer's in critical condition tonight because of serious injuries sustained in yesterday's riot. there had been earlier reports that that police officer had died. we are now told that that officer is in critical condition. and you know, so far, the consequences of all that are police leadership being fired, which is a little bit like firing the bodyguard who wasn't able to protect his vip, but you let the hit man who fired the shots at the vip, you let the hit man run free.

the people who have resigned from the trump administration thus far over the president inciting yesterday's attack on the capitol, it's kind of a weird list. the white house social secretary. the first lady's chief of staff. a deputy in the white house press office. the deputy national security adviser. the chair of the council of economic advisers, which is a thing that doesn't actually exist anymore. he was the only one left. the administration's envoy to northern ireland, who used to be white house chief of staff, also a senior cybersecurity guy. and now two members of the trump cabinet. just in the last few minutes, the education secretary, betsy devos, has announced her resignation. that's now been confirmed by nbc news. that came after the resignation earlier today from transportation secretary elaine chao. secretary chao, of course, married to the top republican in the senate, mitch mcconnell, which makes it maybe more interesting than your run of the mill cabinet resignation, but,

you know. you might ask with betsy devos and elaine chao now resigning if they were so troubled by the president's behavior, one other option would have been to stay in the cabinet and with votes there for the invocation of the 25th amendment to remove the president from power. the way the 25th amendment works is actually simple. it's sort of an arcane part of the constitution. nobody ever really had to pay attention to it, except when presidents got colonoscopies in the past and needed to be anesthetized for authority periods. but the 25th amendment we've all learned a lot about in the most unstable, disquieting presidency in american history under donald trump. used to be arcane, but it is simple. the vice president and a majority of the cabinet vote that the president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. that's it. by doing so, they can temporarily remove him from power that way. elaine chao and betsy devos' resignation tonight means that they will not be yes votes in the cabinet if the cabinet ever moves to take that step.

the top democrat in the senate, chuck schumer, house speaker nancy pelosi, are both calling on the cabinet to take that step, to invoke the 25th amendment and remove the president. they both say they will try to impeach the president again, if the president and the cabinet don't act. this editorial is going to run as a full page in "usa today" tomorrow -- "our view, invoke the 25th amendment." usa today's editorial board says "by egging on this deadly insurrection and hailing the rioters, the president forfeit aid his moral authority to hold the nation's highest office, even for 13 more days. more urgent, he reinforced profound questions and raised new ones about his judgment and ability to fulfill his most minimal responsibilities to the country that he's supposed to lead and protect. trump's continuous in office poses unacceptable risks to america. the president appears mentally incapacitated, living in a fantasy world of voting fraud, unable to accept being labeled a loser, checking out of his job, even as thousands of americans are dying every day from the

raging coronavirus. invoking the 25th amendment, they say, would represent a temporary guardrail for democracy, a needed return to sanity and decency in the white house until joe biden assumes office at noon eastern on january 20th. now is the time for the vice president and members of the cabinet to prove they are patriots. instead, they appear to be starting to resign, one by one, for the first two cabinet resignations today. but that editorial will run in "usa today" tomorrow, as a full page. this editorial will run on the deeply conservative, deeply snarky pages of the "wall street journal" editorial page tomorrow. they're calling on the president to resign, rather than face the humiliation of having the 25th amendment invoked, or rather than being impeached again. "wall street journal" editorial board seems most against that latter possibility of impeachment because it would give democrats too much satisfaction, because that's very important that we guard against that.

who knows was the likelihood of any of those things are? do you believe that vice president mike pence and the majority of the trump cabinet are going to vote to temporarily remove the president from office? do you believe, if the house got it together, to lightning-fast impeach donald trump, that republicans in the senate would see the light and say, you know what, this team, we will vote to convict and remove? do you think so? as best as i can tell, president trump thinks yesterday was a win. his supporters pulled off a violent, armed insurrection, attacking the u.s. capitol, and then they all just walked away to go tell their war stories about it and brag about it. the president offended some of the more norms-respecting members of his party, maybe, but he loves that! he's not out there to win everybody to his side. he's out to destroy the norms of democratic governance so they don't exist anymore so he can run the country without them. the more he and his movement make enemies out of those who

still respect democratic norms, the cleaner the fight is for him. after the rioting and the attack on the capitol yesterday, eight republican senators last night -- eight! still voted to defy the results of the presidential election and continue nursing and stoking this fantasy grievance that joe biden didn't really win, and somehow, trump must still be declared the winner. eight republican senators. and a huge majority of the republicans in the house. republicans in the house voted for the conspiracy theory and the grievance by a nearly 2-1 margin, including the number one and number two house republicans, kevin mccarthy and representative scalise. yesterday was a win for the violent insurrectionism that is now the apex of the republican party. i mean, the biggest disappointment for the president's supporters appears to be fear of missing out,

regret that they weren't there, if they weren't there, regret that they didn't go farther, if they were, regret that they didn't do similar damage in other parts of the country. there was a bomb threat phoned into the michigan statehouse. the republican governor of utah had his staff evacuated from the statehouse there. secretary of state in georgia and his staff had to be evacuated from the georgia state capitol. they rolled out a guillotine amid an armed protest at the state capitol in arizona, in phoenix. in kansas, they stormed the rotunda, too, at their state capitol and said they'd be back and armed this weekend. the washington governor's residence had its gates broken down and the grounds stormed by armed men. state police were on the scene there. they chose not to arrest any of those people, even after they broke down the gates, because they didn't want to upset anybody. the pipe bombs found outside the headquarters of the rnc and the dnc in washington were both, reportedly, real bombs. they were not hoax devices.

they were operable pipe bombs, capable of causing, quote, great harm, according to the capitol police bomb squad. one of the lawyers who filed pro-trump lawsuits after the election in the state of georgia is now calling for vice president mike pence to be a first one before the firing squad. if the point of authoritarian seizure is to get rid of democratic norms and restrictions so that the country isn't governed by them anymore, so that leaders aren't restrained by them anymore, to clear the way for the claiming and indefinite holding of power, sheerly by force, what about yesterday didn't prove to be a successful dry run for them? tell me about the consequences for them, that they're now shaking their heads over, ruing their decisions, wishing they hadn't done it, recognizing they had finally gone too far?

what wasn't a success for them with what happened yesterday? i mean, the republican party, by a large margin, is absolutely still on board. i mean, senator josh hawley and senator ted cruz, who led this thing in the senate, they're real contenders now, right? the way they kept carrying the torch to promote the big lie about the election, even amid the dead bodies at the capitol. but sure, you know, some police leaders will get fired, so there's that. "the new york times" reported overnight that white house aides believe that the president appeared to be enjoying the footage of the attack yesterday while it was under way. he liked it. it was a good day for him. yesterday was a big success. a few times over the past four years, honestly, at times when things have been particularly woolly, we have booked here on the show a man named timothy snyder. he wrote something at the very beginning of the trump administration that has proven to be a real anchor for these times. it's this little pocket-sized book. it's called "on tyranny: 20 lessons from the 20th century."

a pocket-sized book that's just been a real lodestar for those of us worried about our democracy, our way of life, our system of government, and how well it could withstand a well and truly committed authoritarian leader in the white house, and one of our two major political parties willing to indulge basically anything from him, anything at all. and the thing about "on tyranny," why i have been carrying it around for four years now is because it's practical stuff. as i said, the sub title is "20 lessons from the 20th century." lesson one -- do not obey in advance. in times like these, individuals think ahead about what a more repressive government will want and then offer themselves without being asked. a citizen who adapts in this way is teaching power what it can do. that's lesson one. tim snyder calls that anticipatory obedience. don't do that. lesson two -- defend institutions. institutions do not protect themselves. they fall one after the other, unless each is defended from the

beginning. so choose an institution you care about, a court, a newspaper, a law, a labor union, and take its side. it's practical. it goes on like that. it's 20 lessons. this week, we hit some of the scariest lessons in the book, the ones i used to read ahead to and sort of hope we'd never get there. but this week -- i mean, before this week -- but we're definitely at lesson six now. lesson six is, bewary of paramilitaries. it is impossible to carry out democratic elections or try cases at court or design and enforce laws, or indeed, manage any of the other quiet business of government when agencies beyond the state also have access to violence. for just this reason, people and parties who wish to undermine democracy and the rule of law create and fund violent organizations that involve themselves in politics. such groups can take the form of a paramilitary wing of a political party or the personal bodyguard of a particular politician or, apparently spontaneous citizens'

initiatives, which usually turn out to have been organized by a party or its leader. armed groups first degrade a political order, then transform it. and here's the last one. lesson number 18, which rings quite true for me today. be calm when the unthinkable arrives. modern tyranny is terror management. when the terrorist attack comes, remember that authoritarians exploit such events in order to consolidate power. that's all from "on tyranny." today, professor tim snyder said this -- i think to try to give us some clarity, to try to shore us up after what happened yesterday. because i mean, what happened yesterday isn't likely to be the end, not when it was such a manifest success for those who carried it out and called it into being. here's what he said today. "the claim that trump won the election is a big lie." to believe it, people must disbelieve their senses, distrust their fellow citizens, and live in a world of faith. a big lie demands conspiracy

thinking. a big lie undoes a society, since it divides citizens into believers and unbelievers. a big lie destroys democracy, since people who are convinced that nothing is true but the utterances of their leader, those people ignore voting and its results. a big lie must bring violence, as it has. a big lie can never be told just by one person. trump is the originator of this big lie, but it could never have flourished without his allies on capitol hill. political futures now depend on this big lie. senators hawley and cruz are running for president on the basis of this big lie. but then he says this -- there is a cure for the big lie. there is a cure for what we are going through right now. the violence and the shock of yesterday, turns out, is not self-correcting. you're all familiar with the idea of an alcoholic hitting bottom, right? the idea of an alcoholic hitting bottom is that from the bottom, that's the place from which the

alcoholic seeks help, but there's nothing about hitting bottom inherently that causes you to seek help. sometimes hitting bottom just opens up new floors. what happened yesterday is not self-correcting. the republican party was not shocked by what they wrought. they did not look at what happened yesterday and decide to repent and change course. there is a cure. here. but it is something that has to be done, not something we can just wait to happen. joining us now is timothy snyder, a professor of history at yale university, best-selling author of "on tyranny" and most recently "our mallday: lessons in liberty from a hospital diary." professor, thank you for staying up late to join us. it's good to have you here tonight. >> of course. >> let me just ask you if i've put any of your thoughts here in the wrong context or put the emphasis in the wrong place here, if you feel like what i'm saying is resonating to you? >> no, i'm flattered that you paid so much attention to it, so

let's talk some more. >> so, you've been warning us for a long time not to underestimate where trump's election lies could go. one of the things i wanted to ask you about today was the president telling his followers -- remember this day forever. he said that yesterday. it was one of the tweets that was ultimately deleted before he was taken off of all social media. he's simultaneously -- his followers simultaneously are now denying it was them, saying it was antifa, it was the other side, it was the leftists who are making them pay a price for this, even though it was the other side. how do we make sense of them gloating about this, remembering it forever, celebrating it, and also trying to say, it wasn't us, it was our enemies? >> yeah, one of the lessons in the book is believe in truth, and i think that's where one has to start. i think it's the kinds of things that you emphasized in the beginning of the show that we really need to know exactly what happened and establish that. that's very important. we also have to recognize that none of this happens without a

concerted effort to keep this big lie going from the beginning. and then finally, i think it's very clear that how this story is recalled in the future is going to matter a great deal for our republic. i mean, mr. trump, who's quite clever about these things, understands that, and that's why he's using the word forever. from my point of view, it seems very important that we remember that, for example, senators cruz and hawley were on the side of the big lie and that senators cruz and hawley and others effectively encouraged the very insurrection by domestic terrorists that interfered with the count of the vote the other day. >> you've explained that the cure to the big lie, the way out of this, is to tell the truth, as you said. and in part, that means being specific about it, telling the truth about what happened in this election, what the result was, the reality of this election result and refusing to budge from that. i wonder if you -- i wonder how you also feel about the question

of accountability? i am distressed today by the fact that i do feel like, for the president, thus far, this is a win for the people who committed these crimes in his name yesterday and committed this violence in his name. they walked away and are telling war stories and enjoying the fact that they did it. to what extent is prosecution, criminal prosecution of these kinds of acts either helpful or hurtful to the long-term project that our country needs to engage in here? >> yeah, i think truth and accountability are both parts of this long-term project, and i think they work hand in hand. i've been thinking a lot about truth these last few days, and it seems to me that there's a larger lesson here, which is that you can't lie your way to freedom. if you indulge in the big lie, if you believe in the big lie, if you act on the basis of the big lie, you're not really free. you're the creature of someone else. and i think we have a problem in this country, which is that we've defined freedom as just doing the thing that you feel like doing and saying the thing you feel like saying, whether it's true or whether it's false. but when you take part in these big, false stories, you're not actually free, right?

you're not actually free. and one way for the truth to come home is for you to have to take account -- is for you to have to take responsibility. and it seems to me that as a very practical matter, we have to make sure we're capable of prosecuting people who do things like trespass in state and capitols or national capitols. these people might be seen as a mob, but they're also individuals who found themselves doing very specific things. and this is a matter of truth about what happened, but it's also a matter, very practically, of preventing this from escalating. there are, unfortunately, logical steps that follow from this. if you can get away with this, what's the next thing you're going to do? so, it's very important, i think, that people not get away with this. >> and i think that underscores a lot of the concern about the president remaining in office another 13 days, what he'll do with his presidential power in 13 days, if he sees what happened yesterday as something that advanced him toward his final goals. timothy snyder, author of "on tyranny," professor of history at yale university. sir, thank you for your time

this evening, particular giving the time given where you are. i really appreciate it. >> my pleasure. thank you. >> we've got a lot more to get to tonight. stay with us. more to get to tonight stay with us

but we've always used brita. it's two stage-filter... doesn't compare to zerowater's 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff, or dissolved solids, gets left behind. our tap water is 220. brita? 110... seriously? but zerowater- let me guess. zero? yup, that's how i know it is the purest-tasting water. i need to find the receipt for that. oh yeah, you do.

as i stand here today, delivering the house's closing argument, president trump's constitutional crimes, his crimes against the american people and the nation remain in progress. >> his crimes remain in progress. that was congresswoman val demings, one of the managers, the impeachment managers during president donald trump's first impeachment trial, just one year

ago. i say first, because that's now a live issue again. congresswoman demings, you may know, is the former chief of police of orlando, florida. after yesterday's violent attack on the capitol by the president's supporters, congresswoman demings is now calling for the president to be removed from office by the 25th amendment or by a second impeachment. she is also calling for him to face criminal charges for his actions. joining us now is congresswoman demings. she sits on the judiciary and intelligence and homeland security committees. as i noted, prior to being elected to congress, she served as chief of police in orlando, florida. congresswoman demings, it's a real honor to have you with us tonight. thanks so much. >> great to be back with you, rachel. >> let me just ask you what the last 36 hours or so have been like for you? i know yesterday was a trauma for everybody who was in that capitol building. >> you know, listening to the video from the impeachment trial, hearing his crimes remain in progress, wow. they still do.

and i believe they culminated at the u.s. capitol on yesterday. rachel, it was unbelievable that trump's supporters, incited by him, breached the capitol, disregarded the lawful orders of the capitol police, came in, and just basically had their way. you know, we had to hunker down. members of congress on the floor, scrambling, trying to get gas masks on, then being evacuated. i could not believe this was happening on a day that was supposed to be just a normal, procedural, casual day as we certified the electoral college, but this is trump's america. and i hope the american people were watching and paying attention. >> we've had resignations now from the house sergeant-at-arms, the senate sergeant-at-arms, the chief of the capitol police. all of those resignations demanded, i should say, by congressional leaders. having been a leader of a large city police department yourself, i wanted to get your reaction to

those resignations. i'm struck that that's the first sign of accountability we've had for what happened yesterday. while the security failures were obvious, it does feel like a sort of secondary, a sort of second-tier concern. >> well, you know, i certainly had a lot of questions about the operational plan yesterday, or the lack thereof, the response of the capitol police, and the chief's resignation today, i think, certainly helps to answer some of the questions that i had that these were not line officers' decisions, based on what we saw yesterday, but it was a failure perhaps in leadership. we still are trying to do an investigation to understand the operational plan, why they did not call for additional assistance before the protesters got there and what are the future protocols? in terms of the cabinet members who have resigned, rachel, you know, it may have been -- we may

not be at this point, had they stood up and exercised accountability months ago or years ago and held the president accountab accountable. they have been silent. and you know, i really wish, as you indicated, in my tweet, one of the options -- we certainly are looking at impeachment -- but the enactment of the 25th amendment. and so, is this a way for them to avoid having to do that responsibility, by resigning 13 days before he will be removed from office? but it's time to hold the president accountable, and i am hoping that the cabinet will help us do that. if not, the house is prepared to do that. >> do you have any expectation the cabinet might do it, or do you think that it's a pipe dream? >> no, i'm disappointed by the resignations, because what that signals to me is that they don't have the courage, the guts to really hold him accountable. that is an option that is

available to them, starting with vice president pence. i'm glad that he did carry out his responsibilities yesterday without political influence from the president, but the fact that we are seeing these resignations signals to me that they're not willing to exercise this option that is clearly available to them. >> congresswoman val demings of florida, from the judiciary, intelligence, homeland security committees, congresswoman, it's a pleasure to have you here tonight, especially with your experience in these matters. thanks for taking time to be here. >> thank you so much. take care. >> will do. i will mention, congresswoman demings there talking about the cabinet resignations. there have now been two today, the secretary of transportation, elaine chao, and secretary of education, betsy devos, have both resigned. since we've been on the air, there's also been another resignation. it's not the cabinet level. it is the assistance secretary of health for mental health and substance use. her name is eleanor mccants-katz. she, too, has resigned now in response to the violent takeover

of the capitol building yesterday, in her words. we'll be right back. to us. erday, in her words. we'll be right back. to us.

the ups and downs of frequent mood swings can take you to deep, depressive lows. or, give you unusually high energy, even when depressed. overwhelmed by bipolar i? ask about vraylar. some medicines only treat the lows or highs. vraylar effectively treats depression, acute manic and mixed episodes of bipolar i in adults. full-spectrum relief for all bipolar i symptoms, with just one pill, once a day. elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about unusual changes in behavior or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children and young adults. report fever, stiff muscles, or confusion, which may mean a life-threatening reaction, or uncontrollable muscle movements, which may be permanent. side effects may not appear for several weeks. high cholesterol and weight gain, high blood sugar, which can lead to coma or death, may occur. movement dysfunction, sleepiness, and stomach issues are common side effects. when bipolar i overwhelms, vraylar helps smooth the ups and downs.

in 2017, three-plus years ago, some members of the clergy staged a small, peaceful protest inside the u.s. capitol. they were protesting budget cuts being pushed by the president and the senate republicans. nbc affiliate in atlanta covered it in this report. watch. >> a large clergy group from all over the country, from all different religions, chanted and sang in the rotunda of the u.s. capitol today. ♪ pastor of ebenezer baptist church, martin luther king jr.'s church, reverend raphael warnock. moments later, during a prayer, officers moved in. warnock and several others were taken away in handcuffs. >> hauled off in handcuffs by capitol police, arrested for quietly praying while others

sang hymns in the russell rotunda. the reverend warnock in that report from 2017 is the same reverend warnock who is now georgia's first african-american senator. compare that treatment, that arrest to the hours-long siege at the u.s. capitol building yesterday, the same u.s. capitol, where they broke windows and doors and they ransacked lawmakers' offices and they forced lawmakers into hiding for hours. capitol police were outnumbered, and obviously, unprepared. but when reinforcements did appear, the level of restraint they had for that mob that had violently swarmed and attacked and looted and ransacked the u.s. capitol was -- is astonishing the right word? to many people, it was infuriating. joining us now is sherrilyn ifill, president and counsel of the naacp legal defense and educational fund. in response to yesterday's attack on the capitol, her organization has called for the president's resignation or removal from office immediately. sherrilyn ifill, it's great to see you. thank you for taking time

tonight. >> thank you, rachel. >> what do you feel like is missing from the national discussion in response to what happened yesterday? >> well, i think we're missing the two levels of conversation that we need to be having, and i'll confess to you, rachel, that before i came on tonight, i reviewed again a conversation you and i had in august of 2017 after charlottesville. and i'm embarrassed to say that many of the things i would want to say tonight i said in that segment with you. and the two things i wanted to say is that we need to be doing two things at the same time, which is dealing with the issue of accountability for the individuals who stormed the capitol, who engaged in that violent conduct, and who did it with the intention of overthrowing our government. there has to be individual accountability for these actions, without question. but it is also true that at the same time, that we watched, you know, these videos of thousands of people milling about and then storming the capitol and

engaging in this outrageous conduct, those are the people we can see on camera. but there are many people not on camera who also bear responsibility for what this nation has been brought to. they sit in newsrooms. they sit in c suites of fortune 500 companies. they sit in law offices. they sit in churches. they sit in the halls of congress. they sit in statehouses. they are the people who have tolerated, condoned, and in some instances, supported, egged on, and championed the thuggery of donald trump. they have been willing to allow our democracy to be debased in this way. and what we saw yesterday is the culmination of that. the individual actions of those we saw, but also the failures of those that we don't see on camera. i've been in meetings with facebook for more than a year about the use of the platform for violence and the use of the platform by this president to

unravel our democracy. i have met with business leaders of some of the most important companies in this country to beg them months before the election to speak. we have engaged with my own profession, lawyers, as we have watched what the department of justice has done. you know, rachel, many of us -- we saw you choked up and we were choked up with you, the night you talked about family separation involving tender-age children. we watched all of this. this was apparent. this was not something secret. this was not in some chat room on the dark web. and those who are in positions of authority who allowed this, who participated in it, are also responsible, and there must be accountability for them. there must be a full reckoning. we can't be afraid in this new era to confront those, even those in high places who have participated in this. and so, i think those are the two things that we have to focus on. and to the extent that the

discussion, absent either of those two -- the need for full accountability of what happened, what was the involvement of any law enforcement, what did we know before, why were officers appearing to stand down? we've got to deal with that. but we also have to deal with the larger question. and then we also have to deal with what you were just showing, which is, this is the moment in which it is laid bare what is true in this country about law and race, because what we saw -- we know that if that had been thousands of black people marching on the capitol, entering the capitol, pounding out windows, ransacking nancy pelosi's office, we know what would have happened. we represent protesters in louisville and in philadelphia who were protesting against unconstitutional policing at the end of may and june of last year, and we know what happened to so many who were arrested. we heard bill barr saying, you have to dominate the streets, and sending out federal officers

to bring federal charges against people protesting unconstitutional policing. if we can't confront this now, we never will be able to confront it. and so, it begins with the resignation, the calls for resignation, and if no resignation, then impeachment of this president. this is too dangerous. the idea that we would be sitting around for the next ten days, hoping that the president doesn't do anything terrible and inflammatory. he needs to be permanently barred from these online platforms. and then this country has to look at itself. we need the profession, the law profession to look at itself, congress to look at itself, the media to look at itself. this is a reckoning for our democracy, not for one man. >> sherrilyn ifill is the president of the naacp legal defense and education fund and the person i most wanted to talk to when things went off like a match yesterday. thank you for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> rachel. >> stay with us. >> thank you.

>> rachel. >> stay with us.

almost every attacker involved in yesterday's assault on the u.s. capitol walked away from the carnage and have so far

faced no consequences at all. there have been a handful of arrests and the first defendants started appearing in court today. 55 people, so far, face various charges, including unlawful entry, assault, theft. eight people face gun charges. one man arrested with a semi-automatic rifle and 11 molotov cocktails, which the federal prosecutor for d.c. called, quote, ready to go. that u.s. attorney also said under questioning from reporters today that he wouldn't rule out investigating president trump's personal role in deliberately instigating the violence at the capitol. but there is still one particularly alarming episode from yesterday that nobody's been yet charged with, at least as far as we know, and that's those two pipe bombs that were discovered quite near the u.s. capitol but outside the capitol grounds. capitol police describe these explosives as capable of causing great harm. a federal law enforcement source told abc news that the suspected pipe bombs were not hoax devices or imitation devices. they were real bombs. one was found outside the

national headquarters of the republican party, the other outside the democratic party national headquarters. both of those buildings were evacuated yesterday after the bombs were discovered. the fbi said its bomb technicians blasted these devices apart with water cannons to make them safe. the investigators are now examining the pieces of the blown-apart bombs for evidence. but again, as far as we know, no arrests or suspects in conjunction with the planting of those explosive devices. if there are people involved in yesterday's attacks who are willing and able to build and plant operable pipe bombs on political targets, those are people who obviously need to be found as quickly as possible. watch this space, i guess. watch this space, i guess.

i don't know what to tell you to watch for in tomorrow's news. we did hear stark warnings, demands today from the top democrat in the house and the senate, nancy pelosi and chuck schumer. the cabinet and the vice president must act immediately to remove the president from power, using the 25th amendment. and if he doesn't, that the house, at least, will move forward with impeachment proceedings. to move quickly, to try to force him out of office. i don't know if that starts tomorrow or if we should expect immediate action on that if there's no move on the 25th amendment front, but this is -- i mean, unpredictable times. "way too early with kasie hunt" is up next.

developing news overnight. a u.s. capitol police officer died after being injured in wednesday's riots. with homicide detectives now investigating, the question is, will anyone be charged for his death? plus, top officials responsible for security at the capitol resign amid the colossal security failure. the question is, why weren't they prepared? and president trump acknowledges for the first time in public that he will not be president after january 20th. with calls for his removal intensifying, the question is, will he make it that long? it's "way too early" for this.