since the start of those tensions between ukraine and russia. we've got our team standing by live here in washington and around the world. and pentagon press secretary john kirby here one-on-one with

us in just a minute to talk about it all. we're also following several breaking headlines in the january 6th investigation including the national archives putting donald trump on alert this afternoon. they say they're getting ready to send over more white house records this time from the other guy on-screen, his then-vice president mike pence. we've got new deiltas on when and what maybe could stop it. plus our team there when jeffrey clark arrived on the hill. what we know about what exactly the former trump doj official said or didn't say. i'm hallie jackson in washington with a lot going on this afternoon. shannon pettypiece is outside the white house and matt bradley live for us in ukraine. at the end of the remarks i think folks watched here live on msnbc, president biden discussing a different topic on this cancer moon shot. i think he took a couple of questions i know it wasn't on camera about this troop deployment. >> reporter: this wasn't any sort of formal address or

remarks he was making. this was basically it appeared to be a response to a question from a reporter as she was walking out of the room from this cancer event. what the president said from those brief remarks is that this troop deployment is consistent what he's been saying and telling putin since really the beginning of this escalation that if putin continues to act aggressively, u.s. is going to be there to support and back up its allies and to abide by this article v commitment to support those nato allies from a threat. this is a line we have been hearing consistently from the white house today as they have been complaining this troop deployment saying there's still no intention to send troops into ukraine. these troops are not being positioned so they can quickly go into ukraine but this is to be there to support and reassure our nato allies in that region and to potentially provide some deterrence to putin against his increasing aggressiveness. but this is about those nato

countries. now, it opens up the question a little bit as to whether or not the u.s. thinks there could be some sort of attack on one of the nato allies by russia. and press secretary jen psaki was asked about that earlier today and she left the door open for that a little bit saying that the aggression putin has been showing towards ukraine seems to indicate he has an aggressive posture and the u.s. wants to have troops in that region to offer those reassurances to the allies. and of course, as i said, present some sort of deterrence and show the significance the u.s. is taking these moves by russia over the past weeks. >> we heard from president biden about this, we heard from the white house. it was the pentagon who took the lead on making this announcement publicly. talk about the details of this new deployment because there's some sticking points here, right? >> that's right. we saw a bit on the screen a moment ago while shannon was talking and that is 2,000 u.s. troops will move from the

continental united states forward to germany and poland. and then another 1,000 will move from germany to romania. so that's basically doubling the size of the u.s. military presence in romania, by the way. there's about 9,000 there right now. one is temporary. these are not permanent deployments. we keep hearing about bolstering nato partners and alliances and defenses. that's what this is. another thing we've been hearing is that this is not part of the 8,500 troop deployment order we heard about several days ago. and that still remains in effect. there's still somewhere in the neighborhood about 8,500 u.s. military forces on standby on a heightened state of alert or prepared to deploy as the military calls it that they might have to move forward, and they would be attached to the nato response force. according to most of the officials i've been speaking

with including to jan stoltenberg, it seems that will not be activated unless russia invades ukraine. this unilateral military movement is under way with these orders being issued now. >> the administration is already coming under fire perhaps somewhat predictability from some republicans on this front. matt, i'm curious about the response there. we know there's this continued troop buildup by vladimir putin, by the kremlin. talk to us about some of these moving pieces overseas. >> yeah, i mean, hallie, as far as people here are concerned and we've been saying this over and over and over again this is an eighth year war. everyone here has been fighting this in the trenches on the front lines for a very long time, and as far as they're concerned there's nothing new here. and we're hearing that from the presidency on down to soldiers in the bunkers to people walking down the street. this is another turn in the screw in a long drama that's

been going on for quite a while. and actually i was at the front lines just yesterday and i spoke with some of those soldiers. not on the front lines with russia but they're on the front lines with russian backed separatists or russian led separatists many of whom -- most of them are actually ukrainians. and again, they've been fighting there for eight years. and i i didn't speak to them about this most recent announcement because i was there yesterday, but they've been through many different sorts of these announcements and i imagine they wouldn't have much to say more. here's what they said to say to me yesterday. >> it's a mistake to send more american troops to europe at this time. it's just another foreign policy crisis. >> sorry, matt. >> reporter: so doesn't sound like you guys have that audio. that's no problem. basically what we heard from them this is something they've been preparing for eight years. they had a dummy up there they

were using for target practice that had vladimir putin's face on it. when it comes to reassurances from the west, pledges of troops and support these men, they've heard it all. they're not necessarily waiting for any support. as far as they're concerned ukraine has always been alone. it's always been used as a tool of the west versus the east or the east versus the west. and ukraine will continue to be alone. they're not expecting the west to put pay to their pledges of support. and sure enough as you heard from the pentagon and others in the past couple of weeks they're sending troops, sending material. most of those troops -- all of those troops aren't going to be going to here in ukraine. ukraine is not a member of nato. nato nations are not enjoined by that article 5 to defend ukraine. so ukraine is vulnerable and will continue to be alone even if russia moves in. >> matt bradley live for us in ukraine. great reporting from the pentagon, shannon pettypiece

same from the white house. thank you. we're joined now by pentagon press secretary john kirby. thank you for being back on the show. >> thanks for having me, hallie. >> of course. let me start with the timing here, with the most recent deployment announced today. why now? >> i think this is the result of many conversations we've had with allies and partners about their increasing concern what russia has been doing, this build up consistent now over so many weeks. so these were not decisions made in a snap format. they were the result of a lot of consultations with our allies. and we continue to see a build up that threatens ukraine's sovereignty and territory and obviously is increasing concerns inside nato's eastern flank and their country's concerns about their own territorial integrity and sovereignty. >> i think the latest number we have the kremlin has put something like 30,000 troops near the ukrainian border. do you have an update for us?

>> we're trying to stay away from exact numbers but we certainly agree it's north of 20,000. and it's not just the numbers but the combined arms capability he's putting in these places. this is aviation support, certainly armor as well as a range of other capabilities that will give him even more options available to him should he decide some military action against ukraine is in the offing. >> let me try to get some clarity here on where some doors are open and where some doors are closed. you've been very clear as our colleague as you know well courtney kube said at the top of the show temporary is a word here. but if russia invades ukraine could that change? >> the president has been very clear u.s. troops will not be on the ground fighting in ukraine. i think he's been very, very concise and clear and consistent

on that. these troops are going to bolster our nato's eastern flank. and yes, we're sending a few thousand more here but just on any given day we have upwards of 80,000 u.s. personnel on the european continent all the time. >> so clarity on -- and the administration has been clear they're not going there to fight in ukraine, but could they go in to help evacuate people from ukraine? would that be an option or a possibility at some point down the road? or is the door totally shut to them? >> look, these forces were sent on multi-missions. they're capable of conducting operations across a range of contingencies. that would include evacuation help if it was needed. that's not the main purpose here, but they certainly would be prepared to do that if they have to. again, we're not there yet and i wouldn't want to speculate. >> i hear you. does sound like the doors are open to that, though, if need be. >> they're capable of a range of operation.

these are multi-mission troops and we're very confident in their readiness. >> you mention the number of troops already overseas supporting nato allies. we know this is a separate number, separate from what i think you and i talked about a couple weeks ago 8,500 troops on this heightened state of readiness. additional forces on alert. what is the number here? can you help us quantify that? are we talking into the thousands? >> i think without getting into too specifics several thousand more had been placed on prepare to deploy orders or heightened alert status, if you will. but it's not on exorbitant amount. we've got lots of troops in europe available to be moved rotational troops as well as permanently based there. we have a lot of options. that would include perhaps increasing the readiness of several thousand more. >> is it possible more -- let me make sure i'm understanding correctly. could more u.s. troops deploy as

part of this bolstered support to nato in this round? >> yes. i think it's entirely possible. we're keeping that option on the table we could be deploying or repositioning inside europe more forces, forces like the ones going to romania coming from germany. it is certainly not out of the realm of the possible. but, again, i don't want to get ahead of decisions that haven't been made. we want to make sure the president has those options, and we're going to keep those conversations with allies going. >> couple more questions. is there any concern on the part of the pentagon this increased troop presence by the u.s. and its allies could end up being used by the kremlin as a pretext to invade? >> i think we're already starting to see a bit of that rhetoric out of mr. putin. and it's a serious case of what aboutism. make no mistake mr. putin and

russia are the aggressors here. they're the ones increasing the tensions. and actually mr. putin has options available to him short of military force. he could choose a diplomatic path forward. we've proven our sincerity to try to find a diplomatic way forward. he could move some of those forces away and automaticically take the tensions down. >> one of the key pieces of this entire thing, right, has been the u.s. insistence we will not cede to putin's demand that ukraine will be barred from entering nato. questioning the need for any eeventuality that would include ukraine entering nato. >> i would say we've bip very consistent about this. mr. putin does not get a veto on who associates with nato and who

nato gets to, you know, have join as a member. that's not up to mr. putin. in fact, it's not up to any one state. it's up to the alliance. the alliance gets to decide who's going to be a member and who's not. and ukraine because they're a sovereign state they get to decide who they're going to associate with. and i think that's a core principle here at stake, a fundamental principle and we want to make sure that's preserved. >> i know we're getting close to being out of time. let me ask you something else, a different topic i know is important to the pentagon and that is covid vaccines, making sure that the force is protected. secretary austin has made clear just this week national guard troops are not exempted from the dod covid vaccine mandate. it looks like this is going to escalate most likely with these republican governors into a further legal battle. are you prepared for that? >> certainly, we're prepared. we understand there could be additional states that might

render lawsuits about this mandate, and we will obviously work closely with the department of justice on the proper legal way forward. i don't want to get into all that right now, but i can tell you, hallie, we're rock solid and convinced that the secretary has the legal authority to mandate these vaccines. mandatory vaccines are nothing new in the military. we've been doing it since george washington at valley forge. this is a way of making sure our troops are ready, our units are prepared to defend this country, and frankly it's the right thing to do for their own families and teammates. this mandate is absolutely solid in terms of our thoerts, and we're going to continue to pursue a mandatory vaccine regimen for the rest of the force. i would also add a vast majority of the troops both active duty and in the reserves are doing the right thing of getting the vaccine. we're well up to 90% of the active duty force being

vaccinated. it shows how serious the troops are taking this. >> do you think this push back on the national guard front is mostly political? >> i can't speak for the national guard and those governors and how they're doing this. all i can tell you is we know we have the authority to extend these vaccines into the national guard and military. >> great to have you on the show. thank you so much for your time. coming up some significant developments just into us on the january 6th investigator's request for former vice president mike pence's records. plus a brand new high profile appearance before the select committee. >> and new details also in this afternoon on investigation into bomb threats at more than a dozen hbcus. we just got an update from the fbi. and another state on the verge of making an anti-trans sports bill become law with a second bill it seems

close behind. we'll be joined by a trans athlete. tran snacking can mean that pieces get stuck under mike's denture. but super poligrs athlete.hi. to help block out food particles. so he can enjoy the game. super poligrip. real cowboys get customized car insurance with liberty mutual, so we only pay for what we need. -hey tex, -wooo. can someone else get a turn? yeah, hang on, i'm about to break my own record. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

gordan ramsey onl this is a cold call!ed. nfl teams are turning to cold with tide. will you? that will never work! if it works on nfl jerseys it'll work for you. and it's cold. so you will turn to cold? fine! that guy needs to chill out!

yep, it's go time with wireless on the most reliable network. ok, that jump was crazy! but what's crazier? you get unlimited for just 30 bucks. nice! but mine has 5g included. wait! 5g included? yup, even these guys get it. nice ride, by the way. and the icing on the cake? saving up to 400 bucks? exactly. wait, shouldn't you be navigating? xfinity mobile. it's wireless that does it all and saves a lot.

like a lot, a lot.

we got a little bit of breaking news coming into us this hour with the national archives saying they will turn over white house records from former vice president mike pence to the january 6th select committee by early march unless former president trump tries to stop them. the archives this afternoon have released a letter they sent to the former president. you see it here. telling the former vp's documents will be given to the committee march 3rd unless there's some kind of court order preventing that. as you know mr. trump has tried and failed in the past to prevent courts including the supreme court to block the release of documents he claimed as privileged. also we saw jeffrey clark, the doj official now famous for his debunked election conspiracy theories seen here walkalling out of the committee room just after spending over 90 minutes

or so there. i want to bring in leanne caldwell, danny sovalos and bunch bowl co-founder john breznahan. let me start with the significance of these national archives. >> and obviously what vice president mike pence did at the time leetding up and on january 6th is really important to the committee. now, we don't know specifically what is dead in these documents the january 6th select committee wants, but we got a bit of insight into the category and range of it. in a letter from the white house the biden top official -- excuse me -- top attorney sent to the archives saying that many of the records as to which the former president has made a claim of privilege in this set of documents were communications concerning the former vice

president's responsibilities as present of the senate and certifying the vote of presidential electors on january 6th. and we now know that the archives has acknowledged that request and is going to fulfill that request. now it's up to former president donald trump to try to stop it as we know he has done in the courts before, but he's not won in those court cases. so within a month they could be getting these documents. >> let me pick up on that point with danny because, danny, we've seen this movie play out before. the former president's team trying to stop the release of these documents, trying to raise this privilege claim. wouldn't work then. why would it be different now? >> it feels like ground-hog day, that's true. in this case you may see president trump again challenge the release of these records possibly based on privilege, but it seems that the courts do this as they did many years ago when executive privilege was defined, so to speak, that a former

president has some right to be heard on issue of executive privilege and whether documents are released by the archives. but whatever that voice is it's certainly not as strong as the current incumbent president's power in this area. and it looks like the committee is proceeding in exactly the way you would in civil discovery. in advance of the presumed or hopeful deposition or testimony they're gathering documents so that when that time comes they can sharpen a pencil and go through each and every document and ask him about that. >> bres, let me go to you on somebody else the committee has already heard from and that's jeffy clark. we showed some of the video from the team out there showing all the movements related to these conversations. what do you make of his i want to say participation. we don't know how fulsomely

although the suitcase kind of a potential hit. >> i wouldn't go there. he was in there at least 90 minutes. he could have -- i think it's speculation. he could have given them something. this is a key player here. this was a person they were looking at -- trump was looking at installing potentially as attorney general to help him to challenge the election results. i mean this was a huge person in this whole drama. so to have him there is a big moment for the committee. again, i don't think we can speculate at this point just on what he may have told them. but he certainly is an important person. and i think it shows the committee is working very hard. got to give credit of benny thompson and the chair and vice chair. they're really working hard.

they've gotten another agreement today on one of the oath keepers who was involved in the january 6th insurrection, so pulling a lot of threads and trying to get information as they can. whether or not he told them anything i don't think we can say right now. >> you talked about the committee is wanting to talk to a lot of people. we know they'd like to talk to ivanka trump and former attorney general bill barr. you probably know this on the group chat from the hill team about what we heard from chairman thompson, but he apparently just told one of our colleagues i think it was kyle stewart they're not sure if the committee will meet with ivanka trump this week. they had proposed meeting with her later this week, i think thursday or friday. but simes he says things slide to another day or another week.

bill barr when asked whether he'll cooperate, chairman thompson said we have no indication he'll not cooperate. and those are as bres is talking about key people the committee wants to hear from those are certainly two of them. >> yeah, absolutely. and this would be big news and good news for the committee. it's interesting how many people talk to this committee after being subpoenaed and some voluntarily. we have new numbers on how many people have actually spoken to this committee, and i was just pulling those up on my phone. they've heard from 475 people. obviously the big names are in the names and the ones aren't complying are pleading the fifth or talking about the most are the ones closest to the former president or former vice president. they've also received 60,000 pages of documents, and of course those 700 pages from the national archives from the former president. and so the committee is chugging along actually rather quickly

and have loads of information. of course they want these big players because they were the closest to it, but they can get some of this information through the periphery, too. >> when you hear about the 500 witnesses interviewed, 600 pages of records and more than 700 pages so far of documents from the trump white house that have been turned over to the select committee, does that seem to you like a committee that's in the thick of doing the bulk of its work, maybe on the tail end here? we know they're likely to be doing some of these public hearings likely in march. >> i still think thore in the middle of this. i still think they've got a lot of legal fire going on right now. he won't win but i fully expect

him to do that. i think the real question here is if you've gotten to ivanka trump, you've gotten this close to the oval office, mark meadows -- gone after mark meadows, gone after others, soon or later they're going to have to try to speak to trump or seek information, do they subpoena him? that could be a long legal battle. i think at some point they get their witness list, they've gone as far as they can and go to the public hearings to share with us and share with the american people. but it's an extraordinary number of witnesses, 475. the fbi called this the biggest investigation in its history. this is probably one of the biggest investigations in congressional history. and the time frame for doing this, remember congress is not a criminal investigative body. it's not what congress is really setup to do but when they're trying to do it and the resources they're expending and the effort they're expending

it's impressive. we'll see the product and see at the end. i think we'll get a sense of it when they do public hearings. but clearly they're building a case. maybe a criminal referral. i don't know. and then of course there'll be a legislative recommendation. it's a case against trump, and i think there are good lawyers working for this committee, and i think they're trying to put together a strong case. >> thank you for your reporting. thanks to all of you. new reporting on the investigation into bomb threats at more than a dozen hbcus. what we're learning about some of the hi-tech ways these folks try to cover it up. the founder of the change the mascot campaign is going to join us one-on-one on what he calls an important moment for native-americans, civil rights advocates, sports fans and for future generations. advocates, sports fans and for future

riders, the lone wolves of the great highway. all they nee generations a. their only friend? the open road. i have friends. [ chuckles ] well, he may have friends, but he rides alone. that's jeremy, right there! we're literally riding together. he gets touchy when you talk about his lack of friends. can you help me out here? no matter why you ride, progressive has you covered with protection starting at $79 a year. well, we're new friends. to be fair. eh, still.

i was injured in a car crash. eh, still. i had no idea how much my case was worth. i called the barnes firm. when a truck hit my son, i had so many questions about his case. i called the barnes firm. it was the best call i could've made. your case is often worth more than insuran call the barnes firm to find out i could've made. what your case could be worth. we will help get you the best result possible. ♪ the barnes firm, injury attorneys ♪ call one eight hundred,est resul eight million ♪ ♪ thafter my car accident, injury attorneys ♪ cali wondered what myd,est case was worth.llion ♪ so i called the barnes firm. when that car hit my motorcycle, insurance wasn't fair. so i called the barnes firm. it was the best call i could've made. atat t bararnefirmrm, our r inry a attneysys wk hahard i could've made. atat t bararnefirmrm, to get you the best result possible. call us now and find out

what your case could be worth. you u mit bebe sprisised ♪ the barnes firm injury attorneys ♪ ♪ call one eight hundred, eight million ♪ imagine a world where we have the tools ♪ the barnes firm to sell things thatneys ♪ mean something. like a sunscreen made for melanated skin that blends in. proof that things don't have to be the way that they've always been. the world's been waiting for what you do. thinkorswim® by td ameritrade is more than a trading platform. it's an entire trading experience. that pushes you to be even better. and just might change how you trade—forever. because once you experience thinkorswim® by td ameritrade ♪♪♪ there's no going back. we're following an update this hour into the federal investigation into those bomb threats targeting historically black colleges and universities. you've got the fbi joint

terrorism task forces leading the investigation into the threats calling them, quote, the highest priority for the bureau, saying they're being investigated as racialo or ethnically motivated or as hate crimes. earlier a source telling nbc news law enforcement has identified six person of interest in the case. talk to us about where the latest this investigation stands. >> reporter: the statement was a strong statement emphasizing how important this is to the fbi and saying that they are investing a lot of resources in solving this. and i think that's heartening to the folks out on these campuses. where there was a bomb threat either this week or yesterday or the day before. and another important statement they said the fbi is that so far they've not found any explosive devices at any of these

campuses. and overnight and through the day there have been no reports of anymore bomb threat calls. they identified six persons of interests, not suspects. you would think they have these people under surveillance. they've them under surveillance. that may be why there's no more threat if these were the people behind it. some of the people i spoke to at howard university yesterday said they have to take this seriously. even though there's no devices being found and it sounds like you think this could be a wacky guy making a phone call. they were saying they worry there might be copy cats out out there and if just one device happens to go off at any of these campuses, it it could cause a huge calamity. students and faculty and anybody on campus was ordered to shelter in place, and that went on for some time until the area in

question could be searched and once it was all clear the school went back to normal activities. one of the officers in florida explained some of the threats and telephone made were specific and sounded credible. the caller the officer said there were several duffel bags and backpacks with explosives packed in them and that after that happened there would be a shooter who would then follow up afterwards. and so while that may sound standard it can also sound very chilling to an officer who hears this and relays this information to the college campus as well. so they are on heightened alert, and a lot of people are very disturbed by this especially because these are threats but also because it's black history month. and a lot of people think it's no coincidence that these is why these threats are happening. >> ron allen with the update for us there. thank you very much for that

reporting. just today here in washington, d.c. the nfl team revealed its new name, the washington commanders. with the team president jason wright, saying in a today show explosive that commanders, quote, embodies the values of service and leadership for the dmv and those who live in this community. the team dropped their old name, the slur for native-americans in july 2020 changing to a temporary name to washington football team until today. it is so great to have you with us, ray. thank you for joining us. >> well, thank you for having me on your show. >> your reaction and i know you've advocated this for a long time, your reaction to the name change. >> well, that's a cause for a victory celebration, but also it's not just the rebranding. we must remember what it took to get us here, all the suffering, all the efforts by so many

national organizations, the native-american national council of american indians, bipartisan political leaders, civil rights organizations and groups throughout the country. and, you know, there is this lack of acknowledgement by the nfl of the wrong that was done and, you know, a simple apology is sometimes just saying you're sorry is very valuable. >> usually you have to hear that from the league. >> well, i think it'd be good. why do things simply for financial reasons? why not do things for the right reason? and just because you're wealthy doesn't mean you should profit from humanity but you should be humane yourself. >> this is a step in the right direction but there are still other steps to take. i think about, for example, the kansas city team name, there is some action building around there. can you talk about your advocacy

on that front? >> we've seen such a radical change from our efforts that began ten years ago and such an awareness what these names mean. i believe there's a broader discussion to be had about these names because we were never included in any of the discussions in the use of this name that affects our children. it especially in this situation is about our future generations. >> yeah. to that end, talk about what you hope the end game is here, right? because while this moment is kind of a milestone or a bench mark for justice here, it is certainly not the end of the fight. >> right. it's a victory. i mean, it's always going to be a struggle. wealthy organizations don't always necessarily pay too much attention to others who are not in their position. but here's a victory for society globally because all societies that want to have more incluse

sievety, more respect for one another, you should take note here. you need to talk to the people who were affected, include them in the conversation. it would have made all this unnecessary. >> thank you for your time and importantper spective for sharing that on the show today. next up more breaking news with spy agencies revealing or at least some panels sharing some new conclusions on havana syndrome. what some experts have zeroed in on as possible causes. this is just out. we're going to have ken dilanian jumping in front of a camera for us in just a second. front of into a sourdough finisher. so when you learn your chronic dry eye is actually caused by reduced tear production due to inflammation you take it on, by talking to your eyecare professional us in just a second. which may help you make more of your own tears with continued use twice a day, every day. restasis® helps increase your eye's natural ability to produce tears,

which may be reduced by inflammation due to chronic dry eye. restasis® did not increase tear production in patients using anti-inflammatory eye drops or tear duct plugs. to help avoid eye injury and contamination, do not touch bottle tip to your eye or other surfaces. wait 15 minutes after use before inserting contact lenses. the most common side effect is a temporary burning sensation. ask your eye care professional about restasis®. now to trick out these lights. visit restasis.com to learn more. ♪♪ as a dj, i know all about customization. that's why i love vliberty mutual.om to learn more. they customize my car insurance, so i only pay for what i need. how about a throwback? ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪

♪ ♪making your way in the world today♪ ♪takes everything you've got♪ ♪ ♪taking a break from all your worries ♪ ♪sure would help a lot ♪

♪wouldn't you like to get away? ♪ ♪ ♪ sometimes you want to go ♪ ♪where everybody knows your name ♪ ♪ ♪and they're always glad you came ♪ we just moved. so there's millions of - dahlias in bloom. over nine acres. when we started, we grew a quarter of an acre. now i'm taking on new projects on the regular. we always dreamed of having this property, so - i want to make my yard look as beautiful as butters, here. butters. how are you doing over there? we do both vegetables and large mouth bass. yep. we've got tons of them, don't we, buddy? there are millions of ways to make the most of your land. learn how to make the most of yours at deere.com

new developments today about that mysterious so-called havana syndrome. a panel of experts concluding it's caused by -- i'm quoting here -- pulsed electromagnetic energy delivered by an external device. aka microwave energy.

since 2016 hundreds of officials have reported suspected cases of havana syndrome. ken, talk to us about what we know about this new report and the reaction we're already hearing. >> reporter: hey, hallie. this is coming from a panel of scientific experts working for u.s. intelligence agencies, and they found this mysterious and sudden set of brain injuries suffered by a small group of american diplomats and spies overseas was most plausibly caused by pulsed electromagnetic energy delivered by an external device. the panel's findings are full of caveats and didn't look into the question of who might be to blame, but the findings are consistent of what had been a long-standing advarsary most likely russia is responsible for at least some of the symptoms suffered by the victims commonly known as havana syndrome.

the panel's conclusion is also winter with last month's assessment that most of the people have symptoms that can be explained by other factors. but the emphasis in today's report is very different. now the assessment doesn't rule out what it calls a sustained global campaign by hostile foreign powers to injure americans which led a lot of people to believe havana syndrome was basically made up. but the cia found two dozen cases where it could not rule out a hostile cause, and those were the cases this expert panel appeared to be focusing on. many were the original diplomats and spies who first exhibited symptoms. a lot reported hearing a sound and pressure in their ear and vertigo. although, quote, information gaps exist. now, the panel did not identify any device capable of inflicting these injuries, but the bottom line here, hallie, is we are still looking at a series of

possible attacks on americans abroad. the group of victims is not nearly as large as the ones seen, but even two dozen people attacked would be a significant issue, hallie. >> ken dilanian, thank you for staying on top of this story. next up the new moves to roll back trans rights in south dakota, the latest on sports and bathroom bills there. new developments from around the country. there new developments from around the new developments from around the country. inner voice (sneaker shop owner): i'm using hand gestures and pointing... ...so no one can tell i'm unsure about my business finances. inner voice (furniture maker): i'm constantly nodding... ...because i know everythi about furniture... ...but with the business side... ...i'm feeling a little lost. quickbooks can help. an easy way to get paid, pay your staff and know where your business stands. new business? no problem. yeah. success starts with intuit quickbooks.

people everywhere living with yeah. type 2 diabetes are waking up to what's possible... with rybelsus®. the majority of people taking rybelsus® lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. wake up to the possibility of lower a1c with rybelsus®. you may pay as little as $10

for up to a 3-month prescription. ask your healthcare provider about rybelsus® today. throughout history i've observed markets shaped by the intentional and unforeseeable. for investors who can navigate this landscape, leveraging gold, a strategic and sustainable asset... the path is gilded with the potential for rich returns.

age is just a number. and mine's unlisted. try boost® high protein with 20 grams of protein for muscle health. versus 16 grams in ensure high protein. boost® high protein also has key nutrients for immune support. boost® high protein. what happens when we welcome change? bowe can transform ourso workforce overnight out of convenience, or necessity. we can explore uncharted waters, and not only make new discoveries, but get there faster, with better outcomes. with app, cloud and anywhere workspace solutions, vmware helps companies navigate change-- meeting them where they are, and getting them where they want to be. faster. vmware. welcome change. (vo) verizon is going ultra! and so is manny! event planning with our best business unlimited plan ever! with 5g ultra wideband now in many more cities and up to 10

times the speed at no extra cost, the downloads are flying fast! verizon is going ultra, so your business can too. we have breaking news just in from capitol hill with learning more about the recovery of new mexico senator who we learned this week suffered a stroke. i want to bring in capitol hill correspondent leighann caldwell. >> reporter: we heard from two top lujan sources that the senator that suffered a stroke last week is expected to return in four to six weeks. this timeline is critically important. it bars a complications unforeseen but this is an important timeline because after suffering a stroke you could be out for months. and there's been concern up here

in washington not only for the health of the senator and the recovery but does impact the democrats' agenda and an evenly split senate so with him being out they don't have the majority and can't pass legislation along partisan lines and especially with the supreme court nominee coming up. so four to six week timetable is incredibly fast and a sign to recover and function in his current position and that he's going to be able to have a full recovery from his stroke which is expected. this is big and good news. not only for the senator but also for senate democrats who have an agenda that they still want to pass. >> thank you very much. the senator for now expected to make a full recovery, thankfully. south dakota a signature from banning trans gender

athletes from competing. the law would require all athletes to compete with competitors matching the sex they were assigned with at birth and another bill to ban students to choose which bathroom they use. oh legislatures are considering or passing them weeks into the session. i want to bring in chris moser. thank you for being on the show with us this afternoon. >> thank you. >> talk to me about the bills that do to an athlete looking to focus on the sport and competing. >> yeah. it is quite heart breaking me as a trans gender athlete to see younger versions of myself will get from playing sports. not only impact the athletes banned from participating with

the peers and further othering them it also impacts the way that we talk about and treat trans people in our country and when we have the lawmakers saying that -- likening us to the terrorists as was happening in south dakota, in a way that acknowledges the pronouns and identities this is a situation to see why last year was the year the most violence against the transcommunity. >> so what is the message to the state officials and the parents concerned that cis gendered art lets will be edged out? >> there's no reason to believe there that. there's no proof. trans people have not dominated in sports. the truth is that some athletes

might be good competitors but for the people that are worried remember what this is about and this is about young people playing sports with their friends and gaining the incredit nl benefits that come with playing sports. we are not talking about the most elite right now. we are not talking about the elite competitors but young people having a same opportunities as peers and what we need to focus on. >> i'm struck by something you said when you said that you see yourself in some of these younger athletes and could you share about what this means to you personally? >> yeah. absolutely. as somebody still competing on team usa i take seriously a role as a role model and someone to inspire youpg people across the country to be their authenticselves and don't have

to compromise and incredibly difficult to do that with elected officials making rules and policies based in political movements not in any reality or any sort of harms out there and so when i think about my younger version of myself and not accessing the benefits of sports and sports are my life now and so many people that i work with and mentor in the same situation and i think that we need to remember the humanity of the people that we are talking about here. trans people are people and we play sports for the same reasons and every person should have that opportunity and need to keep in mind we talk about young people that we're talking about people and that this has very real impacts on the mental health, the ability to feel like we can access the same things that the peers access whether it's sports or a safe place in

the classroom or in the office. >> chris, thank you so much for being with us and for sharing the perspective here on the show today. that does it for us for this hour. "deadline: white house" starts right after the break. " starts right after the break. >> woman: what's my safelite story? i see inspiration right through my glass. so when my windshield cracked, i chose safelite. they replaced the glass and recalibrated my safety system. that's service i can trust. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪

hi there, everyone. 4:00 in new york. the stuff of dictators and banana republics. that's now january 6 select committee jamie raskin describe it is attempt to try to seize voting machines across the country and trump's role in what could have been a dangerous abuse of power reportedly now under investigation by the select committee. from "the new york times" reporting, the house january 6 committee is scrutinizing former president trump's involvement in proposals to seize voting machines after the 2020 election. includgff