invasion they came back. >> are you serious? >> he wanted another round, they parked in front of your place, did a little surveillance, sculpted out, and jason scott wanted to come back in and even the score. >> i didn't know that, that's scary. >> could've been your picture on the 11:00 news. >> that's. right >> how does one person cause so much damage and so much her in so much loss for so many people? it still blows my mind. >> that's all for this edition of dateline thank you for watching. this sunday, criminal charges? the january 6th committee is considering voting on at least three criminal charges against donald trump. >> donald trump's role was far more central than inciting.

>> each of these efforts to overturn the elections is independently serious. each deserves attention both by congress and by our department of justice. and border surge. migrants are gathering at the border, with the covid era policy known as title 42 set to expired. >> to secure our border is our responsibility. >> now bracing for more illegal crossings. >> they have ignored the problem and played politics with the problem. >> sherrod brown, and asa hutchinson my guests. and karen bass declares a state of emergency on homelessness on her first day of

office. >> it's a humanitarian crisis. >> i'll talk to the mayor about this big problem in america's second largest city. finally, the lives we lost, remembering the legends we lost in 2022. joining me for insight and analysis are carol lee, politico playbook co-author eugene daniels. stephen hayes, editor of "the dispatch." and former congresswoman donna edwards. welcome to sunday, it's "meet the press." >> announcer: the longest running show in television history, "meet the press" with chuck todd. a good sunday morning. as we wrap up the year and prepare to enter a new one, entrenched political warfare, both parties are still struggling with the same problems of the last few years, this congress and the next one are two of the most closely divided in the past century.

republicans will have a ten-seat majority in the house. the senate has moved from a 50-50 senate control to a 51-49 split. not exactly a mandate for the democrats. after a disappointing midterm cycle, republican leaders are under fire right now. the head of the national committee is mired in a bitter fight over who will lead the party. kevin mccarthy is scrambling to get the votes he needs to be speaker of the house, saying hardline members on the right are not moving. a major announcement was an infomercial of trading cards. even too much for former adviser steve bannon to defend. democrats meanwhile may have a false sense of security, acting like they won the midterm. they did lose the house and did lose the popular vote.

president biden's approval rating is stuck from a year ago, in the mid 40s, the succeeded in the mid terms programs came off from the excesses of the trump right. this is the backdrop of the current immigration debate, the current policy that allowed to competent migrants from the borders quickly. it's been mired in government inaction. in fact some democrats have criticized. >> the government has not been up to the task. >> more importantly, who is listening to our border communities. >> i've written letters to president to not lift title 42. >> there's no question in my mind we are not prepared for a post-title 42 world, and we need to reconcile the fact that the federal government is not

committed to comprehensive reform. >> senator brown, welcome back to "meet the press." >> good to be back, thank you. >> let me start with title 42. i would like to respond what govern newsom said, he thinks it's clear, regardless of what you think of the policy as it stands, whether it should have been used or not, do you agree with him that essentially government is not ready for a post-title 42 border yet. >> i'm quoting chuck todd, i think you said mired in government inaction. that is the issue here. maybe, maybe, maybe, with this new rep house and democratic senate, we finally get serious about the immigration reform, instead of pointing fingers, saying disaster is about to happen.

i think the administration will figure it out short term. instead of bashing on immigrants or appealing to new citizens, whatever, we've got to get serious about it. >> i talked with others that said senator sinema and tillis were close, to finally create a -- for daca recipients, it would have given authority that was similar to title 42. it seemed like the perfect compromise. what killed it? >> i think it was -- i couldn't speak for either senator, but probably looking across the capitol and seeing the chaos in the house right now, even if we were able to do something in the

senate. but i appreciated their focus on dreamer kids, who are essentially americans but for the paperwork. i think we should focus on them first, and of course our national security. but those kids have been waiting. it's terrible we have not moved as a body. >> you brought up, i think rightfully, how it's been demagogued. i think about the state you represent. you know there's a lot of folks in the middle not very empathetic to what's happening at the border. how do you get them to accept a compromise? >> i think they will. i think my voters in ohio are reasonable. we're a slightly leaning republican state. i don't hear much about immigration from voters, except for people on the far right that

always want to gain political advantage by talking about it. when serious-minded people talk about it, they're looking for something like they were suggesting, and they're also emphasizing the dreamer kids, the daca kids, who are, as i said, essentially americans but without the paperwork. so the question about what to do about crypto, and i've got to play what the u.s. attorney from the southern district of new york said earlier this week. >> i think it's fair to say by anyone's light this is one of the biggest financial frauds in american history. >> a big part of this financial fraud is how much frankly sam bankman-fried, his executives took advantage of the hunger for

political contribution and used it to create the illusion of credibility for what many people think is a ponzi scheme. my goodness, that's a huge vulnerable in our system, is it not? >> of course it is. too much money in politics, too much unreported cash in politics, ftx is only one huge part. when i took over almost two years ago as chair, it was called the banking committee, because it was essentially the committee for wall street. we have taken an aggressive start, about what we've done in small towns and big cities, and we had our sixth committee hearing to educate the public about the danger.

not just the ponzi schemes or the lack of regulation, but also national security. financing of terrorism and all the things that can come out of the crypto. i have already gone to the secretary of treasury, as sort of the lead economics person in the administration, asked her to do a government-wide assessment. s.e.c. is particularly aggressive, and we need to move forward that way and legislatively if it comes to that. i've spent much of the last year and a half in this job educating my colleagues, trying to educate the public about crypto, and the dangers it presents to our security as a nation, and the consumers getting hoodwinked by them. >> are you at all concerned that it's actually giving a green

light to maybe some folks think all to be banned. senator tester isn't sure it should be legal. >> i share that thought. i think what we need to do now is getting the different agencies -- the ones that have stepped up is the s.e.c. and commodities commission. we want them to do what they need to do. although banning it is definitely difficult. this is a complicated, unregulated pot of money in so many ways. sam bankman-fried was worth at $30 billion and now zero -- but that's how the focus started, but we've discussing every other

nook and cranny in our economy where these people rear their heads. >> do you think the democratic party should support senator sinema's reelection bid. >> i assume a democrat will run for that seat, and then it plays out. i'm less focused on arizona politics than my own, and i know what we need to do to win in ohio. workers are the agenda. if our party would focus on that more, we would win more seats. >> that final question is, why do you think you're going to be able to find 50% plus one in the state of ohio. tim ryan came up short. it's a state that seems to drift

to the right here even when you were on the ballot on 2018. >> i won by seven points. i win because i focus on workers. i look at the last 18 months as huge accomplishments. what we did with senator portman, the strongest buy america provisions ever in federal law. what we did on the pact act to help the veterans with diagnosed illnesses, they'll get coverage. this was a year and a half of great accomplishments, accomplishments i'll take those home to voters overwhelmingly support, i believe, all those issues we took and measures we passed not to mention the child tax credit, not to mention ohio union members have had their

pensions protected. i know that sounds like a campaign speech, but you asked for it, chuck. >> i did. in fairness, what do we expect to hear from the january 6th committee tomorrow, making former criminal referrals to the justice department? do you think that's helpful or hurtful to what the justice department is currently doing with the former president and january 6th? >> i'm not a lawyer, but you follow the law, and follow the evidence, and it's pretty clear from a congressman from mississippi, and the congresswoman from wyoming have done both those things, all of them. so i support what they're doing. i think they have shown courage. they stood up in some cases to their own political party and

stood up to a president who has clearly flouted, or worse, the law. i applaud their efforts. are you guys going to be able to pass a budget before christmas, or are you coming back to wrap things up? >> we're coming back monday, finish in the next few days, and the country will be better off because we have done it right. >> i hope for the sake of all your families you do get home for christmas. thank you for sharing your views, and enjoy the holidays. >> thank you. joining me from the other side of the aisle is governor asa hutchinson. >> great to be with you this morning, chuck. >> let me start with something the "wall street journal" editorialized this weekend. they're frustrated and write this -- the gop dysfunction won't matter if it teaches

republicans that their only chance of influencing policy is to stay united. on the evidence so far, however, republicans are the gang that couldn't shoot straight except at one another. do you disagree with anything they wrote there? >> well, i certainly agree that the republican party has to come together, the american people put the republicans in charge of the house. we're expected to unite together. absolutely that point is well taken. secondly, we have to stop focusing on each other within

our caucus, our party and focus on the failures of the biden administration, which we're about to see once again when title 42 is lifted. we have an immigration crisis. we have challenges with our economy that will not change in the short term. that's what we have to focus on. >> you've had to deal with similar problems even in your state. there's a small faction of the party that seems to be influence. at the rnc, with the speaker fight for kevin mccarthy, even a challenge to senator mcconnell. sort of two thirds of the party speaks with the same voice, but one third seems to hold the rest hostage. why is that? >> well, sometimes we fail in leadership. so republican leadership should not be listening to the loudest voice in the world, so let's get back to working for middle america, leadership that's not yielding, so when you look at

kevin mccarthy, he's got to win simply because you can't yield to the loudest voice that's disruptive, that could bring our party down. you have to be strong. wherever i ran, i had somebody with a loud voice that ran against me, and i won with 70% of the vote. that means 30%, close to it, didn't like the views i had, but that's the majority that we won with, and we're able to accomplish a great deal with that. that's how we have to lead as republicans. >> can you imagine that you couldn't take office until you had 100% of the republican party supporting you before you could take office. that's what mccarthy is facing. >> it is. you have to embrace the diversity, but at the same time if you're not going to operate as a team on certain fundamental levels, like being able to elect

the leader of our party in the house, we are failing the american people. we have to come together so we can get the important work done, to looking at controlling federal spending that's adding to inflation, and policies enforcing the rule of law, which the failure to do that is leading to crime in our streets and really a lack of confidence in public safety. these are the fundamental issues that we're good at, and we just need to get through the leadership part and we'll be effective on this next year. if you're thinking about running for president in 2024, if you were the leader of the party right now, how would you deal with somebody who says the following. i want to play this piece of sound from marjorie taylor greene. >> if we had organized that, we would have won. [ cheers and applause ]

>> not to mention it would have been armed. >> that was marjorie taylor greene, saying if steve bannon and her were in charge, it would have been, i guess, a more armed insurrection. she's becoming quite influential in your party. what do you do? >> you know, the first thing is that you win on the ideas and the constitution. so you don't back away from going to the same audience she does and say january 6th was a serious affront to our democracy. we have to treat that seriously. we can't defend what happened on that day, and we stand up for the constitution, and so i've always gone to the tough audiences, explained that, and guess what? they listened, and there's always some that disagree, but you have to win in the marketplace of ideas.

as a leader of the party, that's what you've got to do. >> you spent a lot of 2021 trying to get some skeptics to take the backseat in arkansas, so i'm curious what you think of what desantis is doing. >> my message is the vaccines protect you, get vaccinated. >> like anything, you take an mrna shot. the way to view it is what are the benefits and the drawbacks? it seems like our medical establishment never wanted to be honest with people about the potential drawbacks. >> he's leaning into vaccine skepticism at a time when i know health officials are trying to get people to take these

boosters so we can prevent the 300 deaths a day that we're still averaging in america. do you have any thoughts? >> we shouldn't undermine science and the medical community that's important to our public health. whenever you look at how i handled the pandemic in arkansas, we didn't have mandates of government forcing people to take the vaccine, but i did go out into the communities. i had the medical experts educating them as to how this is beneficial. i had local community doctors addressing that. i think we're not good as a society, it's not the right direction, if we diminish the facts, diminish all the best information we have from science at the time. sure, during the pandemic, things changed from time to time. we had to adjust. that's what leaders do, but i don't think it's good to go

back, whether you're going back to the 2020 election or going back and trying to relitigate everything that happened. that's not helpful for where we are. we do need to make sure we get the protection, whether it's a flu shot or covid vaccine. everybody makes their decision. i'm for the education and science behind it. >> it wouldn't be "meet the press" if i didn't try to pinpoint when you're running for president. what is your timeline? and what would make you decide not to run for president? >> the timeline would be i finish january 10th after two terms as governor of arkansas. i can focus at that point more on the future. the fact that president trump has already announced accelerates everyone's time frame, so the first quarter of

next year, you either need to be in or out. of course, an important factor is not what president trump is doing necessarily, but what's the level of support out there, and that's important to know. i expect a decision to be made first part of next year. >> governor hutchinson, be safe out there. >> you got it. thank you, chuck. the referrals of criminal charges to president trump. it's something that's never happened with an american president. the panel is here. not having the energy to do the things that i wanted to do. before dexcom g6, i was frustrated. all of that finger-pricking and all of that pain, my a1c was still stuck. there is a better way to manage diabetes. the dexcom g6 continuous glucose monitoring system eliminates painful fingersticks, helps lower a1c, and it's covered by medicare.

before dexcom g6, i couldn't enjoy a single meal. i was always trying to out-guess my glucose and it was awful. (female announcer) dexcom g6 is a small wearable that sends your glucose numbers to your phone or dexcom receiver without painful fingersticks. the arrow shows the direction your glucose is heading: up, down, or steady, so you can make better decisions about food, insulin, and activity in the moment. it can even alert you before you go too low or when you're high. oh, the fun is absolutely back. after dexcom g6, i can, on the spot, figure out what i'm gonna eat and how it's gonna affect my glucose. when a friend calls and says, "hey, let's go to breakfast," i can get excited again. after using dexcom g6, my diabetes doesn't slow me down at all. i lead line dancing three times a week, i exercise, and i'm just living a great life now. i have eight grandchildren. now i'm able to keep up with them again. we're not afraid anymore. it's so easy to use. dexcom g6 has given me confidence and control that everything i need is right there on my phone.

if you have diabetes, then getting on the dexcom g6 is the single most important thing you can do. once a patient gets on dexcom g6, it's like the lights come on. (david) within months, my a1c went down to 6.9. (earl) my a1c has never been lower. (donna) at my last checkup, my a1c was 5.9. (female announcer) dexcom g6 is the #1 recommended cgm system, and it's backed by 24/7 tech support. call now to get started. you'll talk to a real person. don't wait, this one short call could change your life. (bright music)

back now with the panel. all right, guys, i want to start with the news we expect tomorrow

the potential criminal referrals from the january 6th committee. they've had ten public hearings so far, tomorrow will be number 11. there's been over 100 known subpoenas, over 1,000 interviews and/or depositions. some of them were just interviews, not technically depositions. of course, they've had hundreds of thousands of documents that have been examined. now we expect three criminal referrals, eugene daniels, it's your news organization that broke the news about all three. how significant will this moment be tomorrow, because we don't think it would be that influential on the justice department. thoughts? >> i think it starts with the fact we have never seen this in this country before. we have never seen members of congress put out a report and

refer charges to the justice department but also, you know, it seems more likely than not that they're going to do this, that that will be a part of that document. right now it's still in there. three different types of charges, and you still have members of the committee doing interviews, calling donald trump guilty. they spent a lot of time during the committee hearings talking about those, and they feel they have proven that he did those. when you look at the actual chapter titles that have been in the drafts, seven of the eight, trump's name is in there, so it's squarely focused on him. i think it's more likely than not they do it. >> we suspect this committee will not present them as

guide divided. does that make it more impactful? >> they have gone to great lengths to try to stay unified. one of the things they would be looking at is insurrection. if they recommended criminal charges on insurrection for former president trump, it's worth noting that those have not been among the crimes of others charged. that would be new and significant. how it resonates with the american public remains to be seen. i can tell you from the white house's perspective, they're going to distance themselves, punt to doj, stay away from it as much as they can, and yet it benefits the president's message. just this week he was touting the record, and one of those things was his efforts to restore the soul of the nation. there would not be an embrace at least from the white house. >> there's a bunch of people

that would like to see trump go, but they could be caught celebrating of trump being charged. >> i think the committee expanded in a pretty dramatic way how much the information the public had on that and how much republican lawmakers had on that, and telling the story through republican witnesses, they in effect gave political cover to elected republicans, who frankly were too cowardly to speak out. i think the committee's job to this point was to say it's time to hold people accountable, and they're going to turn it over to other entities to actually hold people accountable.

>> donna, this would be perceived pressure on the justice department, is that a fairway to read it? >> well, i think it's going to be an important marker for the department of justice, that referrals coming from congress directly to them really compels the department of justice, to the extent it wasn't acting. frankly, i think the department of justice is acting, but will give them, i think, more leverage to continue their investigations. the important thing, though, is this is coming from congress. this is the people's house, you know, saying that they believe that there has been some criminal behavior. i think that's important for the american public to hear. i want to shift slightly. by the end of the week, carol

lee, we expect to hear from the president on a bigger picture, yes what a week we'll have. we'll have the committee, and then the end of title 42. >> i'm told the president will speak to the american people before the end of the week, before the christmas holiday, just outline what he sees as his accomplishments to hit the notes of unity and bipartisanship, to try to sell the table for some of the benefits in the legislation he signed that will take effect in the new year. it was described not necessarily a victory lap, but more of a celebration and the holiday spirit. this is further than where they were a year ago, and now when you talk about the fdr comparisons, when you talk to white house officials, they all are back. >> donna, i'm curious, do you

hear any rumblings about challenges to joe biden in the party? it seems like they disappeared. >> i don't. i think they have, and a good thing. i think it's important as democrats go into a divided congress for there to be unity in the party. that's what you're hearing. until or unless joe biden makes another decision, you will not hear anything coming from democrats. they will stand united against republicans in this next congress. that will be the platform for which joe biden will be able to jump. for what it's worth, it's my understanding that this holiday season, when they make a decision, if it's a go, we'll know early. they will not delay telling the american people. up next, on her first day of office, she declared a state of emergency. i'm going to talk to the new mayor of los angeles, karen bass, about her plans for

running america's second largest city. enough was enough. i talked to an asthma specialist and found out my severe asthma is driven by eosinophils, a type of asthma nucala can help control. now, fewer asthma attacks and less oral steroids that's my nunormal with nucala. nucala is a once-monthly add-on injection for severe eosinophilic asthma. nucala is not for sudden breathing problems. allergic reactions can occur. get help right away for swelling of face, mouth, tongue, or trouble breathing. infections that can cause shingles have occurred. don't stop steroids unless told by your doctor. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. may cause headache, injection site reactions, back pain, and fatigue. talk to your asthma specialist to see if once-monthly nucala may be right for you. and learn about savings at nucala.com there's more to your life than asthma. find your nunormal with nucala.

plan a didn't work out? get plan b one-step. plan b helps prevent pregnancy before it starts, and it won't impact your ability to get pregnant in the future. find it yourself in the family planning aisle no prescription, no id. i've got this. ♪♪

welcome back. in a recent survey of mayors, 73% of the cities' leaders say they're highly held accountable over homelessness, but only 19% said they had any control over that. karen bass wants to change that. she began her term at the emergency operation, rather than at city hall. she explains. >> in los angeles, 40,000 people sleeping on the street every day. i believe that times of inflection require reflection. it's time for angelenos, my first act is to issue a state of

emergency on homelessness. >> the new mayor of los angeles, karen bass. mayor bass, congratulations. welcome back to "meet the press." >> thank you. thanks for having me on. i want to start with what's going to be different this time. what i mean by this time is, in 2015, this was pre-pandemic obviously, eric garcetti declared a version of a state of emergency. yours is a bit more comprehensive, but freed up $100 million and tried to tackle the homeless problem he was dealing with. it didn't work. what's going to make what you're doing more successful than what mayor garcetti attempted to do. >> first of all, it's not just about the money, but it's really about the arcane bureaucratic

process. you talk to developers. it's just so difficult to get anything done. when i declared a state of emergency, and issued following executive directives, it basically allows the process to be centralized. chuck, the other day i did a press conference on a piece of land where the builder had been working for 16 years, and it just finally broke ground. so it's about bursting past the bureaucratic maze and developers having no idea when approvals will be done. now i'm requiring that approvals and the process be moved within 30 to 60 days. >> there's a few issues that people run into all the time when it comes to dealing with homelessness. what about people who don't want to leave, don't want to move, don't want to go into shelters? >> you know, what we have found in the community organizations

we're bringing in to do this work is you can get 95% of the people housed. people will go. it takes a while, you have to do outreach. what the community programs do is they work with people who are formerly unhoused. people are unhoused for a variety of different reasons. some are profoundly mentally ill, some are profoundly addicted. you have to address the reasons why they ended up unhoused. so we'll have a program called inside safe, to address the people in the tents -- it won't address everybody, but hopefully a significant number, but we'll put them in motels and hotels immediately. it's interesting. it's lessons learned from the pandemic. some community organizations have been trying to get the city to master lease out entire hotels and motels for years. >> are you going to allow lapd

and sanitation officers to do they sweeps? >> no, these are not sweeps at all. this is getting people to move on their own. then after the person leaves, sanitation will absolutely have to be there. this is not coercing people, ticketing people. this is moving people from tents to hotels or motels. >> we know some of this is -- we know that you run across a bit of mental health challenges here with the homeless population. mayor adams in new york city is talking about temporary institutions to help on those with mental health problems. do you think we need to bring some institutions like that into play to help you in los angeles? >> well, let me just say that one of our challenges in l.a. is the division between the city and the county. the county provides the services. we're doing this process jointly

so we know the people on the street, again there's not enough services, but there will be some. in the state of california, the legislature passed something, too, if somebody is profoundly mentally ill, they can be hospitalized. >> i'm curious, you talk about the issues you have with developers. the biggest issue the city sometimes has when it comes to tackling these housing issues are these homeowner associations. they're extraordinarily litigious and extraordinarily powerful. does your emergency declaration give you any more authority in dealing with these powerful institutions or not? >> well, it does give me more authority to do that, but i do think there's a way to get neighborhoods to cooperate. you know, this problem is so severe in our city. literally five people a day die on our streets. it's so severe that i think some

of the resistance that we've experienced in the past i'm hoping will be softened. there's some neighborhoods that want buildings to be built in certain areas, but it is still within their general neighborhood. you cannot address 40,000 people without building housing everywhere. you can't just in the low-income areas that are already severely overcrowded. >> give me a metric which you should be judged in in four years. is it number of people on the streets? number of tent encampments? what's a fair way to address your success or failure. >> encampments should be significantly down, if not eliminated. there should be housing being built underway at a much more rapid pace. there should not be 40,000 people who are unhoused, that's for sure. >> mayor karen bass, i

appreciate you getting up super early on the west coast to share your perspective. good luck, and congratulations. we'll be following your progress. >> thank you. when we come back, we're going to look back at the lives we lost this year. ♪ ♪ ♪♪ voltaren. the joy of movement. ♪♪

welcome back. as we do every year, we want to take a moment to remember and

reflect and celebrate some of the iconic people whom we lost in the last 12 months. >> i didn't make it, and why? not because of my athletic prowess or good looks. i made it because i worked hard. ♪♪ >> i have not found that being a woman is a handicap. in fact, i've found it a terrific gender to be. ♪♪

♪♪ >> we must restore the culture of compromise and respect that used to exist here. ♪♪

♪♪ >> every institution, city, monarchy, whatever, should expect to be free from the scrutiny of those who give it their loyalty and support, not to mention those who don't. ♪♪ ♪♪ >> see, i never, never considered myself as a leader or anything like that. one thing i wanted to make sure,

that i never did anything that my father would be ashamed of. ♪♪ >> i arrived in hollywood at the age of 22, in a time different than today's, a time in which the odds against my standing here tonight 53 years later would not have fallen in my favor. ♪♪ we are back.

one of the odder moments of the week was when the former president, donald trump, teased

everybody about a major announcement, and it turned out to be this. >> hello, everyone. this is donald trump, hopefully your favorite president of all time, better than lincoln, better than washington, with an important announcement to make. i'm doing my first official nft collection right here and right now, called trump digital trading cards. >> that made you uncomfortable, you're not alone. here's steve bannon. >> he's one of the greatest presidents in history, but whoever on the team, but we're at war. they ought to be fired today. >> when it's too much for steve bannon, what do you say, stephen? >> yeah, better than lincoln, better than washington?

it's a bit rich for the people who have been in on the grift to now call it a grift. i think they're more upset that they're no longer getting their cut. if you're surprised by this at this point, you haven't been paying attention, but it ought to remind republicans every time they make a compromise with donald trump, either on a policy issue or by backing him when they shouldn't, it's not a temporary pass to get you beyond this immediate moment, it's tying you deeper to somebody who had do something like this, and claim in what would appear to be an argument, that he's a better president than abraham lincoln or george washington. >> eugene, we go through this a lot, but my word, seriously? >> you know, for weeks and weeks, republicans have been seriously starting to back away from donald trump. we've seen it show up in polls. i think they were fine with

these weird things. since the midterms that's not been the case. we're not even winning and still getting dragged into these things. i think we've been here before, in 2016 when he was running, during his presidency many times after the election and after january 6th, you know, cautioned everybody, including myself to think that the party is going to move away, because it's going to take an actual head-on collision with donald trump to really make the republicans move away from him. >> i do want to point out, though, carol lee, rupert murdoch is calling donald trump a con artist. of course, so did marco rubio at some point. my, this could be the breaking point for some.

>> i've been talking to trump supporters over the weekend, including republicans who are also close to governor desantis in florida. the feeling is there was a lot of excitement around the former president when he first announced. since his supporters just can't find him. imagine you're a supporter and you want information, where do you go? furthermore, if you're a republican and you're looking for a leader, where do you go? so you see governor desantis filling a void. then you see him taking these positions where he's trying to get to the right of trump on vaccines, for instance. that's something that the former president's team has taken notice of. yet, still there are no plans for him to do the things that his supporters say they want, which is rallies, things like that. he has still very much expected to do these smaller events,

focused on policy, so they say this is something he could turn around. if he doesn't, it's himself to blame. unfortunately i have to leave it there. thank you for watching. we'll be back next week even on christmas because if it is sunday, it is "meet the press." ." i think the president has violated multiple criminal laws and he has to be treated like any other american who breaks the law and you have to be progression cuted. >> adam schiff giving a preview of what is coming today on capitol hill as the january 6

comm