movement that said, there can be a different type of tennessee, and a different type of america. >> tennessee state representative, justin jones, you have such a powerful voice. you never back down, you always speak out, no matter what the issue is. whether it's gun violence, or you speak out, obviously, about what you saw on the streets, we are just trying to enjoy your weekend. i am so appreciative of your voice, thank you for coming on tonight, and for always calling out what you see out there. really, i appreciate it. that does it for me tonight, i will be here, tomorrow night, at eight pm eastern. do not worry, chris hayes will be back next week. he is on vacation, taking a well deserved, well needed, break. certainly, he has earned it, but i am happy to be in for him tonight, and tomorrow night. for now, it is time for alex wagner tonight. a minimal mohyeldin is in for alex as well. hey man, how are you? man, how great, you've been burning the candle on both ends. enjoy the rest of your evening, if you get to have one.

>> you too, and i will be watching your show first with my heels off. have a great show. >> take care, my friend, good to see you. thank you at-home for joining me tonight. i am ayman mohyeldin, in for alex wagner, who also has the night off. last night, the campaign for nikki haley sent out this cryptic message to reporters. haley said to deliver a state of the race speech in her home state of south carolina. right now, polls show haley trailing donald trump, in her home state, by almost 30 points. so, as you can imagine, rumors spread haley, maybe, was preparing to drop out of the presidential race. then, today, haley got up there and said this. >> south carolina will vote on saturday. but, on sunday, i will still be running for president. i am not going anywhere. people have a right to have their voices heard, and they

deserve a real choice. not a soviet election, where there is only one candidate, and he gets 99% of the vote. we do not anoint kings in this country. we have elections. donald trump, of all people, should know that we do not to rig elections. >> that is hail east numerous itch, i guess. it does not matter that she is on track to lose her home state by a bigger margin than any presidential candidate in modern history. she is staying in this race. to put her money where her mouth is, the haley campaign, now, spending more than a half million dollars running this new ad in the state of michigan where republicans will choose the candidate next week. >> congress is the most exclusive nursing home in america. washington keeps failing, because politicians, from yesterday, cannot lead us into tomorrow. we need term limits, mental competency tests, and a plan to

defeat china, and restore our economy. we need to leave behind the chaos, and drama, of the past for the new generation, and a new conservative president. >> america needs a new generation. honestly, that message is a little rich, coming from haley. a politician, who has been on the national stage for well over a decade. but, despite her empty rhetoric, and abysmal poll numbers, you can see a certain kind of logic in nikki haley's decision to stay in this race. it is not because she has a very real chance of beating donald trump, no, nothing to suggest that she does at this point. instead, nikki haley may be pinning her hopes on being the deus ex machina candidate, the candidate waiting in the wings, just in case something takes donald trump out of this race before the republican convention later this summer. that is not a totally absurd idea. right now, donald trump's manhattan criminal trial, scheduled to go forward on

march 25th, the federal trial over his attempts to overturn the election could begin as soon as early summer, depending on how the supreme court responds to trump's claims that he is immune from criminal prosecution. donald trump faces the real possibility of being a convicted felon, well before election day. nikki haley knows that, but the trump campaign knows that as well. today, trump's campaign launched a new memo, outlining their path to the nomination by march 19th. six days, before his first trailer set to begin. at the same time, trump is tightening his grip on the official republican party apparatus. he has successfully pushed republican national committee chair, ronna mcdaniel, out of the job. mcdaniel plans to step down shortly after the south carolina primary. he has begun advocating for new rnc leadership, stocked with loyalists, including his own daughter and law. today, the daily beast reports, some trump

allies are now predicting a full purge of the rnc, driving out any member who does not pledge absolute fealty to donald trump. the rnc is the only body that can, actually, remove trump from their ticket after he has locked up the nomination, and trump is about to take it over. so, we are fast approaching a scenario in which the republican party is stuck with trump, no matter what happens to him in a court of law. joining me now, mark leibovich, staff writer at the atlantic, and thank you for your servitude. also with me, charlie sykes, cofounder, and former editor at large of the bulwark, and author of how the wright lost its mind. thank you to both of you for being here tonight. chairman, i start with you. i guess with this takeover of the republican apparatus, this inevitable takeover, is there any path left for republicans to ditch donald trump as their nominee, at, or after, a conviction, if he is -- at the

convention, rather, if he is convicted? >> there is a chance, but it is now slim, and none. with the stipulation that nikki haley often disappoints, and will not beat donald trump, i must say, i am glad she is continuing to stay in this race, and continue to push donald trump. there is short term, and long term. in the very short term, she is getting voices to that part in the party that is insane, right now, to be abandoning ukraine, and to be appeasing vladimir putin. longer term, i think that she is trying to articulate that you don't, necessarily, have to be a partisan democrat to look at trump and say, this is crazy. this man is losing it, he is erratic, he rents, and raves, and faces all of these legal problems. yes, it is a losing cause, but there may be some scraps in the short term, and

long term. the medium-range? it is not a pretty picture for the republican party. >> to that point, mark, nikki haley was -- she was on another news channel, earlier this evening, and had this to say about donald trump. take a listen. >> my strategy is to make sure that the american people have their voices heard. it is also acknowledging the realities that he will be in court march, april, may, and june. more judgments, or court cases will be heard. he, himself, said he will spend more time this year in a courtroom, that he will on the campaign trail. that is a problem. >> i am not sure if that is a pitch to voters, or an explanation as to why she is sticking around in this race. >> what it is is a much sharper message, frankly, than anything she's had to this point. that's the tip of the iceberg. she has talked, a lot, about how trump's behavior has spiraled into a more unhinged

place, lately. frankly, this is sharper than anything we heard from her going into the new hampshire primary. frankly, she overperformed. look, i think her prospects are bleak in south carolina, but if you really listen to what she's saying, there are many orders of magnitude, like layers of truth, to what she has been saying, compared to before. also, there is some hope, maybe, that not only will she stay in the race, but fight in a real way. not just hang around and hope to inherit the whirlwind, if, for some reason, donald trump is not viable come the summer. that sounds a little farfetched at this point. i do have some hope that not only will she stick around, but she will stick around in a fairly scrappy, purposeful, way, that actually serves the republican party in the long run . >> i also must think about what this means, charlie, for national security. trump's total takeover of the party comes, obviously, at a difficult time for ukraine, and for opponents of vladimir

putin. take a listen to what former congresswoman, liz cheney, said about this over the weekend. >> i think we need to take donald trump seriously, and we need to take seriously the extent to which you, now, have a putin wing of the republican party. i believe that the issue, this election cycle, is ensuring that the putin wing of the republican party does not take over the west wing of the white house. >> charlie, is there still a wing of the party that is willing to oppose trump on russia? if so, who, and where, are they? >> there is, and it is shrinking, and aging out. if, in fact, we did have a vote in the house of representatives, is speaker mike johnson wanted to do the right thing, and have an upper down vote on the ukraine, it would pass overwhelmingly, with a substantial number of republicans. we saw a substantial number of republicans who voted for the ukraine aid, in the united states senate, but having said

that, this is a party that continues to be in the thrall of donald trump. donald trump is the number one american cheerleader for american -- vladimir putin. he is incapable of criticizing putin, even after the murder of alexei navalny. you can see which way the trends are going, but it is not over, quite yet. there is a remnant. there is a vestige there. you can still see it in the senate to, and in the house. i do not want to overstate it, but, the fact that nikki haley is calling out donald trump, along with liz cheney, and saying, these are the stakes. put aside the buffoonery. the future of the western world is at stake. the future of the nato alliance is at stake. this has implications for the world, for the united states, as well. i think it is important to have somebody who is articulating that, at this point. again, donald trump controls the republican party, but the putin wing it takeover is, probably,

coming, but not there yet. so, the last readout is still holding. >> mark, to that point, you would think that if there was ever a moment for nikki haley to distinguish herself from trump with the national security, it would be with the death of alexei navalny, in this moment. but, i guess, the question is, are there any republican voters listening to the argument, or who actually care about navalny right now? >> one would hope. liz cheney took the messaging to the next level, by calling him the putin wing of the republican party. as dan pfeiffer, i think, pointed out today in his substack about messaging, republicans, and democrats, vladimir putin is not popular. yes, donald trump likes him, tucker carlson likes him, he has this boom going among some celebrity spokespeople of the party, but ultimately, this is

not a system that republicans, or certainly, democrats, revere at this point. i would also point out, liz cheney and nikki haley are both robust voices. neither of them is likely to be the republican nominee anytime soon, but are not aging out, either. they both make a compelling case, and i'm glad that nikki haley leads with this. trump isn't ducking this issue, either. i think, and laura ingraham earlier tonight, said something to the effect of, the legal judgments will cost him hundreds of millions of dollars is a form of navalny. it's a weird construction, but he's wrapping himself in the martyrdom of alexander navalny, which is absurd, offensive, on many levels. i guess it is good that there is a counter point to that, within the party, and at least in an active sense. >> charlie, it feels like if some republicans are just trying to wait trump out, it may not be successful with his takeover of the party

apparatus. it suggests, trumpism is poised to outlive trump himself, within the gop, for years to come. >> i think that is true. by the way, mark is right, i am not referring to nikki haley when i say aging out, i'm thinking more than mitch mcconnell wing of the united states senate. the younger senators, the ones more likely to vote against the aid to ukraine. to your point, i do think that we ought to realize, this is a longer fight. this is not going to end in 2024, whatever the results of the election are. the trumpism is going to be around for a very very long time . there are a generation of young trumpists, coming into power, into politics, who will be around for 20, or 30 years. it is difficult to see a place for a liz cheney, or and nikki haley, in the republican party, in the near future. so, again, it is easy to be caught in the horse race, right now, what happens in the next two, three, four months. but, this will be a long term

struggle. the republican party has, for more than 80 years, and internationalist party. now, it is making a turn to being in isolationist, american first party. that has long term implications, and will not end when donald trump exits the stage. >> important point, there charlie sykes, mark leibovich, gentlemen, thank you both for starting us off tonight. coming up, a new report today, saying that allies close to donald trump are planning on making christian nationalism a key part of a second trump administration. we speak to the author of that report, ahead. first, new york the tourney general says, she is ready to seize trump's properties, if necessary, to make him pay the massive fraud penalty, issued by a judge last week. trump's legal woes, that is next. that is nex because liberty mutual customized my car insurance and i saved hundreds. that's great. i know, right? i've been telling everyone. baby: liberty.

did you hear that? ty just said her first word. can you say “mama”? baby: liberty. can you say “auntie”? baby: liberty. how many people did you tell? only pay for what you need. jingle: ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ baby: ♪ liberty. ♪ are you still struggling with your bra? it's time for you to try knix. makers of the world's comfiest wireless bras. for revolutionary support without underwires, and sizes up to a g-cup, find your new favorite bra today at knix.com love you. have a good day, behave yourself. like she goes to work at three in the afternoon and sometimes gets off at midnight. she works a lot, a whole lot. we don't get to eat in the early morning. we just wait till we get to the school. so, yeah. right now here in america, millions of kids like victoria and andre live with hunger, and the need to help them has never been greater.

when you join your friends, neighbors and me to support no kid hungry, you'll help hungry kids get the food they need. if we want to take care of our children, then we have to feed them. your gift of just $0.63 a day, only $19 a month at helpnokidhungry.org right now will help provide healthy meals and hope. we want our children to grow and thrive and to just not have to worry and face themselves with the struggles that we endure. nobody wants that for their children. like if these programs didn't exist me and aj, we wouldn't probably get lunch at all. please call or go online right now with your gift of just $19 a month. and when you use your credit card, you'll receive this limited edition t-shirt to show you're part of the team that's helping feed kids and change lives. if you're coming in hungry, there's no way you can listen to me teach, do this activity, work with this group. so starting their day with breakfast

and ending their day with this big, beautiful snack is pretty incredible. whether kids are learning at school or at home, your support will ensure they get the healthy meals they need to thrive. because when you help feed kids, you feed their hopes, their dreams, and futures. kids need you now more than ever. so please call this number right now to join me in helping hungry kids or go online to helpnokidhungry.org and help feed hungry kids today.

here's why you should switch fo to duckduckgo on all your devie duckduckgo comes with a built-n engine like google, but it's pi and doesn't spy on your searchs and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooi and creepy ads that follow youa from google and other companie. and there's no catch. it's fre. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you aroud join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on all your devices today.

if he does not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we will seek a judgment enforcement mechanism in court, and we will ask the judge to seize his assets. >> that was new york attorney general, letitia james, vowing to make trump pay the 355 million dollar plus interest penalty from the fraud trial. even if it means taking buildings owned by the former president. however, trump appears to be resorting to alternative means to pay his legal debts. over the weekend, the donald launch, yes, he is never surrender, gold high top sneakers. they retail online for the low, low, low price of only $399. the former president would need to sell 1 million pairs of sneakers to pay the penalty from his new york fraud trial, which could take, i would argue, sometime. meanwhile, trump is waiting on to supreme court decisions that could come down at any moment.

one of the issues of immunity, which will determine whether trump's federal decision interference case, or rather, federal election interference case can proceed to trial, and another, deciding whether or not to uphold a colorado decision to remove trump from the ballot. murray joins me now to discuss this, and more. a professor of nyu law, and the co-host of the strict scrutiny podcast. great to see you melissa, thank you for coming on the program. letitia james, tonight, saying she is prepared to seize trump's buildings if he cannot pay his civil fraud define. how do you see this judgment playing, out financially, and politically, for trump? how much will it hurt his bottom line? >> it is, obviously, a massive judgment. not just the almost 400 million from actual penalties, but also, 100 million in pretrial interest, that has already accrued, and continues to accrue. this is a sizable judgment. the kind of judgment that could,

easily, be satisfied with the seizure of a massive asset, like a building. letitia james has mentioned the trump 40 wall street building a, number of times, at this point. but yes, this is a standard way. other assets could be used to satisfy that judgment, and this is, pretty much, standard operating procedure. there are other judgments, there is also the e. jean carroll defamation verdict, and that judgment was about $88 million. this isn't the only financial problem he has on the horizon. >> let's turn to trump's criminal exposure, and the issue of immunity, currently before the supreme court. trump has already lost on this question of immunity, twice. tanya chutkan ruled against him, and then, the d.c. circuit upheld chutkan's decision. what are trump's chances of getting the supreme court to grant this temporary stay? >> i think it is unlikely that the court will grant a temporary stay. i think it is also very,

highly, likely that the court may just allow the d.c. circuit decision to stand. let me be clear, it is not a question of what the court does, it's a question of when the court will. the longer the court spends deliberating on this question, of whether or not to grant certain things, to stay the ruling, means that donald trump has won. we have already blown past the march 4th deadline to begin the trial in d.c., and the further we get from an actual trial date, the more likely it is that donald trump will not go on trial at all. so, the supreme court has a role to play here. the role is and making a decision, and doing so, with some measure of expedition. >> if trump is granted this temporary state by the supreme court, when should we expect to see this trial get underway? >> well, if the state is granted, then, i think, all bets are off. we also have the disqualification hearing that was, i guess, last week, or a few weeks ago, that the supreme

court must also a decision on. i think there is -- thinking of the optics here, seems very likely from the oral argument in the disqualification hearing that it was unlikely for the court to side with colorado. that is a win for donald trump, to stay on the ballot, in colorado. i think it just making sure that the court remains above the fray, as this political cycle is underway, is very likely that the court will be looking for a way to deliver, kind of, a loss to donald trump, so it can appear even handed. again, a loss that comes with the big expanse of time is not a loss at all. in fact, it is a win, fernando trump. >> let me ask you about that colorado decision, and whether you think it will come down to whether the supreme court believes that the states have the right to, basically, determine if this candidate, or this person who seeks office was involved in an insurrection. they would not be saying this if it came down to an age limitation, or age qualification, they know the

states have that right. would it come down to interpretation, or why do you think the supreme court would not side with colorado? >> there was a number of different theories floating at that argument. one is this idea that in order for section three at the 14th amendment to be operative, congress must pass a statute, it can't just happen at the state level. congress needs to authorize it. that seems to be where they were going with regard to the zero argument, although, many different theories were floated . all i will say about the congress has i act is there a number of different provisions within the 14th amendment, including section five of the 14th amendment, authorizing congress to act, legislate, in furtherance of the aims of the 14th amendment, which secure civil rights, equal rights, due process, to all americans. this cortez taken a narrow view of congress is enforcement power under section five of the 14th amendment, so it would be highly ironic, and even inconsistent, if they determined here that congress needed to first act

before prohibiting the states from doing something when they have been willing to let states move forward without having congressional approval in advance. >> i was going to say, i would not be surprised if this court, in fact, is inconsistent with its decisions, especially this one. let me ask, you finally, and switching gears a little, on the supreme court. i do have to bring this up. this headline, today. justice alito, renews criticism of landmark ruling on same sex marriage. your response to that? >> it is not the first time we've heard this from justice alito. he was a dissenter in 2015, which legalize same-sex marriage across the nation. in 2020, he, and justice thomas, also issued a separate opinion in a denial that raised questions about obergefell. so, this is something that we have heard before. it is not surprising. i think in the wake of dobbs, and the overruling of roe v. wade, it raises real questions about whether this appetite has an appetite for staying the

course with established precedence, or whether they will seek the opportunities to revisit cases that have been settled. >> troubling headline from justice alito, but again, not surprising. thank you so much, it was a pleasure, thank you for joining us. still to come tonight, a bombshell report about plans to make a second trump administration a haven for christian nationalism. plus, harrowing images out of the gaza strip, moving people to call for a cease-fire. why did america just say no to one? more on that with pawed save the world, ben rhodes, next. relie, try vicks vapocool drops. with two times more menthol per drop, and powerful vicks vapors to vaporize sore throat pain. vicks vapocool drops. vaporize sore throat pain. ♪(song in french)♪ (♪♪)

(♪♪) (♪♪) (♪♪) book in the hotels.com app to find your perfect somewhere.

(♪♪) there's two things a young man wanna be - a cowboy or a gangster. and a gangster's outta style. i got back to my roots... we come from a long line of cowboys. my grandfather, my great-grandfather, my aunt even rode horses. when i see all of us out here on this ranch, i see how far our legacy can go. (♪♪)

jordan's sore nose let out a fiery sneeze, so dad grabbed puffs plus lotion to soothe her with ease. puffs plus lotion is gentle on sensitive skin and locks in moisture to provide soothing relief. a nose in need deserves puffs indeed. america's #1 lotion tissue. these underwear are period-proof. and sneeze-proof. and sweat-proof. they're leakproof underwear, from knix. comfy & confident protection that feel just like normal. with so many styles and colors to choose from,

switching is easy at knix.com democrats agree. with so many styles and colors conservative republican steve garvey is the wrong choice for the senate. ...our republican opponent here on this stage has voted for donald trump twice. mr. garvey, you voted for him twice... as your own man, what is your decision? garvey is wrong for california. but garvey's surging in the polls. fox news says garvey would be a boost to republican control of the senate. stop garvey. adam schiff for senate. i'm adam schiff, and i approve this message. this ad? typical. politicians... "he's bad. i'm good." blah, blah. let's shake things up. with katie porter. porter refuses corporate pac money. and leads the fight to ban congressional stock trading. katie porter. taking on big banks to make housing more affordable. and drug company ceos to stop their price gouging. most politicians just fight each other. while katie porter fights for you. for senate - democrat katie porter. i'm katie porter and i approve this message.

israel's war against hamas has reached yet another inflection point. fighting has escalated througut the gaza strip, including in the southern city of khan yunis, where israeli forces have conducted raids on the nasr hospital complex. one of the last surviving medical facilities inside of the strip. now, following those raids, the world health organization says nasr hospital, no longer, is functioning. this means there are now, zero working hospitals in all of gaza. today, u.n. agencies began evacuating critical patience to rafah, where thousands have fled, after israel declared it

safe. though, recent strikes contradict that claim. over 1 million civilians are squeezed into this last corner of gaza. many, intent cities, with very little food, or clean water. it is images, like these, that are moving more and more people, around the world, to call for an immediate cease fire. one, allowing the release of israeli hostages held by hamas, and would allow aid to get into gaza. not america. america says, the war should go on. that the images you see can keep happening. despite reports citing unnamed biden administration officials describing biden venting his frustrations about his israeli prime minister, benjamin netanyahu's tactics behind closed doors, what is reportedly said in private does not match what the u.s. is saying, and doing, in public. today, the u.s. vetoed a u.n. resolution, demanding immediate, humanitarian cease-fire.

the u.s. ambassador to the u.n. argued a cease-fire, that is not conditioned on hamas releasing all of the more than 100 israeli hostages, still being held inside of gaza, would fail to bring it durable peace. so, the stalemate continues. meanwhile, things may soon get much worse for gazans crowded into rafah. last week, israeli officials unveiled next steps for their ground invasion of gaza. plans, including, invading rafah with troops. the u.s., and western allies, quickly denouncing that plan for the obvious humanitarian crisis it would provoke, but netanyahu insists, israel will not bow to international pressure, and over the weekend, a member of his war cabinet delivered an ultimatum. the promised ground invasion will begin, if all of the hostages are not released by ramadan. that is march 10th. so, the question is, what happens now? joining me now, ben rhodes, former deputy of national security advisers under president obama, and co-host of pod save the world. ben, it is

great to see you again. i'm sorry it is under the circumstances, but no one better to talk to about this. do you think that there is a cognitive dissonance that is emerging here? that is reflected here? especially in the united states veto at the united nations security council today? >> i think so. clearly, the united states does not think it's a good idea for this operation in rafah to go forward. it would be a humanitarian catastrophe, it does not rescue the hostages. you can't rescue the hostages that scale, militarily, with that kind of operation. it would not achieve its military objective of destroying hamas. you are escalating an already horrific humanitarian circumstance over the objections of the u.s.. i think the challenge is, we keep hearing about this private messaging, but if the public embrace -- the israeli government, let's be clear, it's not just israel talk about, as prime minister netanyahu in his government. if those continue, those vetoes continue, if the military assistance continues that

condition, netanyahu, essential, e does not see a red light for this rafah operation. i think that is the dissonance. if we do not think it is the right thing for them to go into rafah like this, at some point, you need to draw a line with your actions, and not just the words you say in private. >> that is the crux of the question on trying to get to, which is that the u.s. has tools in his box to pressure israel, which it has done, and used, in the past. if saying publicly to the world, we care about a cease- fire, and the release of hostages, and to prevent a ground invasion in rafah, why is it not to using those tools? what the u.s. proposed after its veto is a deal that would tie a temporary cease-fire to a hostage release, but, it is also notable to save, major ground offensive in rafah, as you noted, should not proceed under current circumstances. >> well, i think what the u.s. would like to happen, what the biden administration would like to happen, clearly, is a lengthy

pause. we can call it a cease-fire, or a pause, in the hostilities allowing for the release of hostages, and the provision of a significant amount of assistance into gaza. let's be clear, people are desperate for food, water, and medical attention. then, use that window to build out diplomatic initiative. dealing with the future palestinian aspirations, future israeli security concerns. this makes sense. i think the problem is, netanyahu is not on board with that approach. so, ultimately, there is a decision here. can you get done that type of approach, association of hostilities, and release of hostages, an improvement in the management situation, if you do not have a fundamental break with netanyahu? they seem to not want to change tack, yet, in terms of this idea, that if we do this privately with netanyahu, we bring him along to our position. look, if they succeed, that's great. i think the concern many of us have watching this from the outside is, we see netanyahu

getting up and, publicly, rebuking the united states, and saying rafah will go forward, and there will never be a palestinian state. under those circumstances, at some point, you need to use your leverage. ayman, let's be clear. israel cares about this. they don't want the diplomatic isolation of the united states voting that way, at the security council, and a half of the cease-fire. this is why they put effort in trying to prevent that outcome. they do not want to see, obviously, conditions on military assistance. so, there is leverage. the question is, do you use your leverage, or use persuasion? thus far, they are still trying to use persuasion. bibi netanyahu, i can tell, you from experience, is not a persuadable person, particularly when dealing with the democratic president. >> it's an important point that you bring up. look, you and i speak to a lot of officials in the region, and many of them say, netanyahu's political future is tied to this war. he does not want to end this. the united states, as you said, is trying to thread the needle between public pressure, and private pressure, but if that

does not work, can we see, and we saw state department matthew miller saying that they would like to see a humanitarian pause before ramadan starts. is it, even at this point, relevant? is it even possible given everything that has happened to change course? in that determination that netanyahu has to go into rafah? . >> you make an important point, because netanyahu has the right wing coalition. these are the people, like national security minister, ben- gvir, who displaced people out of gaza. making a palestinian state impossible. netanyahu cares more about what those people think than what joe biden says to him. those are the people who keep him in power. that is the fundamental challenge that he isn't interested in the perpetuation of this war. again, i do not think it is likely that he will change course, and embrace the u.s. proposal of a cease-fire,

in exchange for the release of hostages, and then some broader diplomatic initiatives. we will see if that bears results. certainly, i hope it does. i hope that there is a deal to be had here. but, right now, it does not feel like the momentum is moving in that direction. it feels like the momentum is moving in the opposite direction. the question is, given that reality, when do you change from these private words that you then read out in public? they're not that private at this point? when you change to a more public position of wanting a cease fire, and saying, that there will be some kind of conditions, if there is not one reached. i think rafah will be the threshold for that. i would hope it's before rafah, because you don't want this to move forward. you don't want to see that kind of awful escalation, taking place in the city of 1 million people, packed like that. let's hope it doesn't happen. >> you need to wonder, why does the administration stay on this course, and not change? ben rhodes, stick around, we have a lot more to talk to you about after the break,

including the fall of the ski town in eastern ukraine to russian forces, and support for ukraine among republicans in washington remains in limbo. that is next, stay with us. millions of children are fighting to survive

due to inequality, conflict, poverty and the climate crisis. save the children® is working alongside communities to provide a better life for children. and there's a way you can help. please call or go online to give just $10 a month. only $0.33 a day. we urgently need 1000 new monthly donors in the next 30 days to help the children we support around the world. you can help provide food, medicine, care and protection, plus so much more that a child needs by calling right now and giving just $10 a month. all we need are 1000 monthly donors in the next 30 days. please call or go online now with your monthly gift of just $10. thanks to generous government grants, every dollar you give can have up to ten times the impact. and when you call with your credit card, we will send you this save the children®

tote bag as a thank you for your support. your small monthly donation of just $10 could be the reason a child in crisis survives. please call or go online to hungerstopsnow.org to help save lives today.

liberty mutual customized my car insurance and i saved hundreds. that's great. i know, i've bee telling everyone. baby: liberty. oh! baby: liberty. how many people did you tell? only pay for what you need. jingle: ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ baby: ♪ liberty. ♪

breathing claritin clear is like... (♪♪) is he? confidently walking 8 long haired dogs and living as if he doesn't have allergies? yeah. fast relief of your worst allergy symptoms, like nasal congestion. this is footage put out by a pro russian journalist, and an official at the russian foreign ministry, over the weekend. purporting to show russian troops, lowering the ukrainian

flag, and raising the russian flag, in the eastern ukrainian town of avdiivka. was just four days until the two year anniversary of the russian invasion of ukraine, and less than a month until the russian presidential election, russia is capturing of of deep gonna, the first major military victory in months, is handed russian president vladimir putin a major political win. the biden administration is not being coy about why they think ukraine lost this specific battle. biden's national security adviser, jake sullivan, on a call today with reporters from the white house. >> this happened, in large part, because ukraine is running out of weapons do, to congressional inaction. if ukrainian troops didn't have the supplies that needed to stop the russian advance. >> last week, the senate passed a bill with 60 billion dollars of aid to support ukraine in this war, passing the bill to the house, where republican speaker of the house, mike johnson, says he will not be

rushed to pass it. he didn't even bring it to the floor last week, and now, congress is on recess. what does this delay mean for allies and ukraine? what can president biden do if congress will not do its job, and act? joining us again, ben rhodes, former deputy security adviser for the obama white house. ben, the biden administration, tying the loss of vedika, very directly, to the lack of usaid because of congressional inaction. is this a good strategy on the part of the white house? to try to ratchet up pressure on gop lawmakers holding up the eight? >> yes. look, this is not hyperbole. you and i, sometimes, argue about how you put pressure on hypothetical futures, but it is the case that this is now an artillery battle, a small arms battle, along a long front line. what has happened is that the russians have ramped up their capacity, churned out the kind

of weaponry for their troops at the front line. they have also backfill that their supplies from north korea, of all places. the ukrainians are running short . they just do not have the kind of pipelines of supplies that they need to be in this frontline battle with a larger, russian, army, and a larger, russian, army. i think it is okay to point out the stakes involved here. it's not just about getting the ukrainian some new capability, the kind of thing that we're talking about over the last year or so. do they get f-16s, are these kinds of tanks, this is about, literally, whether or not they will have to have a lifeline of supplies they need to hold out against a larger russian military. absolutely, it is absurd that the reason why we can't have a vote on this is because some speaker of the house is worried about losing his job to a bunch of lunatics in his caucus. we know if it was put to a straight up or down vote in the house, it would pass, with a healthy amount of republican support.

so, i think it is worth dialing the pressure here, because that is what the stakes are in the real life, the real world, not in the maga world of republican politics in washington. >> to your point, and you certainly know washington better than i do, is that biden's path year to go through mike johnson's, or anything that biden can do to help the situation in ukraine without needing to work with, as liz cheney called, at the putin wing of the republican party, including people like maga mike johnson? >> i think the only way you get the kind of robust package that is, absolutely, required, is to work through mike johnson, or find some other, procedural, way, to force a vote in the house of representatives. obviously, mike johnson brings that bill to the floor tomorrow, if he wants to. there are other, length year, more problematic, and challenging procedural ways to force the vote, that, frankly, takes time that is not guaranteed to succeed. absent that, absent passing a supplemental, there are things that the administration can do to move around stockpiles in

europe, try to resupply the ukrainians that way, but let's be clear, it is not, anywhere, near the efficiency of just passing this bill, or anywhere near the scale of what the ukrainians need. so, i think, after a long time of trying to work with republicans, and detach border provisions to fit in the senate, all of that, the months, that have been put in to make this easier for the republican party to move this forward, i think the only way is real pressure. pointing out the real life stakes that are involved in this . >> let me ask, you quickly, about sanctions. president biden said that the u.s. will unveil sanctions against russia on saturday, in response to the killing of opposition leader, alexei navalny. if you are in charge of the sanctions, what would they entail? what would they look like? what would be inappropriate response here? >> you, know frankly, i just don't think that there is some additional sanction that makes a difference. the russians have learned to live, evade, and work around, robust sanctions.

i think that a few things you want on the table is that there are several hundred billion dollars in frozen russian reserves. trying to expedite ways to get money into the hands of ukrainians, i think, should be looked at. frankly, another thing, as someone who spoke with alexei navalny over the years, doing a bit of what he did it, which is exposing the corruption, and the kleptocracy of the russian regime, and their cronies. taking up the mantle of spotlighting the uncomfortable things that putin didn't want spotlighted. whether his wealth, the wealth of his cronies, or how he steals money. there are things that can be done, i think, in addition to whatever sanctions are introduced. i also think that there should be open-ended efforts to pursue accountability, and justice, for the people who killed navalny. i don't think that this will necessarily yield results, immediately, but you want people to know, in the russian system, that so long as they are around, there will be efforts to hold them accountable. there is a range of things that i think, can, and should, be done. i don't think we should sit here and pretend like a few

more sanctions will have a huge consequence here. >> the important message is accountability, no matter how long. ben rhodes, always a pleasure, great to see you, thank you for your time tonight. we have one more story for you tonight. the plan by trump, and his allies, to infuse a second term administration with christian nationalism. the journalist behind this new reporting, joining me, next. m. are you still struggling with your bra? it's time for you to try knix. makers of the world's comfiest wireless bras. for revolutionary support without underwires, and sizes up to a g-cup, find your new favorite bra today at knix.com when i was diagnosed with h-i-v, i didn't know who i would be. but here i am... being me. keep being you... and ask your healthcare provider about the number one prescribed h-i-v treatment, biktarvy.

biktarvy is a complete, one-pill, once-a-day treatment used for h-i-v in many people whether you're 18 or 80. with one small pill, biktarvy fights h-i-v to help you get to undetectable—and stay there whether you're just starting or replacing your current treatment. research shows that taking h-i-v treatment as prescribed and getting to and staying undetectable prevents transmitting h-i-v through sex. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a buildup of lactic acid and liver problems. do not take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin. tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b do not stop taking biktarvy without talking to your healthcare provider. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. no matter where life takes you, biktarvy can go with you. talk to your healthcare provider today.

sara federico: at st. jude, we don't care who cures cancer. we just need to advance the cure. it's a bold initiative to try and bump cure rates all around the world, but we should. it is our commitment. we need to do this. if you have chronic kidney disease you can reduce the risk of kidney failure with farxiga. because there are places you'd rather be. farxiga can cause serious side effects, including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration, urinary tract, or genital yeast infections, and low blood sugar. a rare, life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking farxiga and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this infection,

an allergic reaction, or ketoacidosis. ♪ far-xi-ga ♪ are you still struggling with your bra? it's time for you to try knix. makers of the world's comfiest wireless bras. for revolutionary support without underwires, and sizes up to a g-cup, find your new favorite bra today at knix.com here's why you should switch fo to duckduckgo on all your devie duckduckgo comes with a built-n engine like google, but it's pi and doesn't spy on your searchs and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooi and creepy ads that follow youa from google and other companie. and there's no catch. it's fre. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you aroud join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on all your devices today.

new reporting from politico points to a broad concerted effort for donald trump and his allies to implement christian nationalism should he win a second term. political reports the person leading this is russell vote, the center for renewing america. a think tank, in a leading conservative consortion, preparing a second trump term. vote sees his, and his organization's mission, as a

renewing of consensus of america, as a nation under god, for a statement to cra's website. freedom of religion, remaining a protective right, but vote, and his ideological brethren, would use his administration it is a new public policy with it. joining me now, the national investigative correspondent for politico, heidi, great to see you again, thank you so much for making time for us, russell vote, he served as trump's director of management, and budget but he is the trump chief of staff in a possible second term. how does he gain this level of influence with donald trump? >> that is why we are writing about him, because he is the one with the influence. we know he speaks with trump regularly, and we have already seen trump echo some of these ideas in terms of withdrawing from nato. as we know, he has very strong opinions on the border, he says

that jesus was not on an open border person, but this goes beyond that, and that is why we're writing this story. the christian nationalism we are talking about is also influenced by william wolf. we know that he is close to the former trump official, and his ideas are much more extremist. we are talking about on isolationism, immigration, we are talking about ending same- sex marriage, abortion, reducing access to contraceptives, but also, surrogacy, no fault divorce, sex education, public schools, this is what he has already written about. he has attracted all of the tweets he's put out, and about these issues, we know that he is an inspiration for russell vote, the d is very close, and that according to the documents we have the, difference between where we have been in the past with christian nationalism, and in religion, influencing

conservatives is that they have an actual plan, right? we know that we're talking about bullet points to make this a top priority for the administration, which is why we are drilling down on the specifics of this possibly mean beyond what russell said, publicly, a man? >> the interesting thing here, heidi, is that the vote center for renewing the american think tank, is really, not the only group focused on trump's second term. you talk a little bit more about the realities it is the heritage foundation is project 25 but it is the effort to uproot the deep state bureaucracy what do they do if their interests overlap at all? >> interesting you brought this up, because he is advising project 2025. project 2025 has the it is they say, in their mandate for leadership, which is a 900-page document is that they

explicitly want to put god, and christiane eddy, back into civic life in america. they have some very specific ideas here. i would point your attention to pieces of this puzzle and project 2025, which is, really, their roadmap. they want to do a lot for the department of health and human services, as well as the fda, when it comes to, we know, the abortion bill, attentional withdrawing approval for that. contraceptive coverage, and then, also, groups like the ethics and public policy center which have been, openly, targeting issues like ivf, as well as hormonal birth control. this may come as a shock to folks who are listening right now, because we have, always, talked and christian conservative circles about a couple of issues like abortion, and same-sex marriage, that this would go so far as to target issues like reducing access to contraception, but this is not fringe, a man. we are already seeing this in

the influencer community. with turning point usa, with the recent conference for young women, where they said, look, you need to ditch your hormonal birth control, it is unhealthy, they also talked about criticizing daycare, for instance. if you look at the roots of a lot of this, there is a belief in orthodox christian communities that the family has been breaking down over the past decade, and that at the heart of it, the root of it, is the sexual revolution, which was based on access, by women, to hormonal birth control. >> you are starting to see some of those signals make their way to the supreme court, even with the headline that we read earlier in the show from samuel alito, questioning whether same- sex marriage remains legal, or should remain legal, in this country? heidi, always a pleasure, thank you for your time, and for your excellent reporting. that is our show for tonight. alex wagner will