>> i mean, by nonsense, do you mean the suggestion that aid should be conditioned and that they don't deserve assistance? that kind of nonsense, that kind of stuff? i think what we talked about a bit also was the role of somebody like elon musk, who had to firefighters had to explain to him what the facts on the ground are. that's what they're dealing with. so it doesn't feel good. and we talked about this too. when you've lost your home, you've lost your school, you've lost your church, your place of worship, and you are dealing with absurd political debates when that has never historically been the case. i mean, louisiana is a place where and he talked about this. he was proud to support funding after hurricane katrina. mike johnson is a person who's saying aid should be conditioned. that's not lost on people. >> jen psaki. thank you. you can see more of jen's conversation with governor newsom later tonight on the 11th hour with stephanie ruhle. jen will be

here with me again tomorrow night for our special coverage of the farewell address by her former boss, president joe biden. that's right. here at 8 p.m, we'll be joined by joy reid, rachel maddow and, of course, the great alex wagner, whose show begins right now, a little late. thanks to you, my friend. >> we're going to get right to it. it was 63 days ago that donald trump announced his intention to nominate fox news host pete hegseth as his secretary of defense. and in those 63 days, the american public learned a lot about pete hegseth. there were his controversial public positions, like his defense of accused and convicted war criminals, his contempt for the geneva conventions, and his repeated insistence that women in the military should not serve in combat roles. and then came a flood of revelations about his personal life. first, there was the discovery that he had entered into a settlement with a woman who accused him of sexually assaulting her. at a conference in 2017. hegseth denied that allegation, but soon other stories were surfacing. stories about his reputation for drunkenness on the job, both as the head of two veterans organizations and as a weekend

host on fox news. there were also stories about his financial mismanagement of the organizations he led, and stories alleging a history of cruel and offensive public behavior like drunkenly chanting kill all muslims at a bar in ohio. all of that made it look like pete hegseth might, just might just fail to get the republican support he needed to become trump's next defense secretary. and a lot of the attention about hegseth fate fell on one senator in particular, senator joni ernst of iowa. senator ernst is herself a sexual assault survivor, something she has spoken openly about in the past. >> abuse is not something you can just simply forget. it stays with you forever. and i know this personally. as a survivor and as a united states senator, i feel it is important to be a voice for the thousands of

victims across iowa and so many more across our nation who have fallen prey to sexual assault, to rape, to harassment and other forms of abuse. >> again, that is senator joni ernst saying she feels it is important to be a voice for victims of sexual assault and rape and harassment. senator ernst is also a veteran, which made his comments about women in the military seemingly a particularly tough pill for her to swallow. here is how senator ernst spoke about pete hegseth just last month. >> i did have a very long, lengthy discussion with pete yesterday, and i do appreciate his service to the nation. i also am a combat veteran, so we talked about a number of those issues, and we will continue with the vetting process. i think that that is incredibly important. so again, all i'm

saying is we had a very frank and productive discussion, and i know that we will continue to have conversation in the upcoming months. okay. >> it doesn't sound on your answer that you've gotten to a yes if i'm wrong about that, correct me. and if that is the case, it sounds to me as if the hearing will be critical for his nomination. am i right about that? >> i think i think you are right. i think for a number of our senators, they want to make sure that any allegations have been cleared, and that's why we have to have a very thorough vetting process. >> now, senator ernst, signaling that pete hegseth did not necessarily have her support was a big deal because it would take only four republican defections to kill his nomination as a veteran and a sexual assault survivor. ernst's vote was especially critical. and just last month, senator ernst was very much on the fence, as you can see in that interview. but in the days since republican senators and especially joni

ernst have been on the receiving end of an unprecedented pressure campaign from donald trump and his allies, and elon musk backed pressure groups spent more than half $1 million on ads supporting hegseth, including this ad, which reportedly targeted ernst's home state of iowa. >> pete hegseth is a patriot. the deep state is trying to stop his nomination, but pete isn't backing down. call your senator today and urge them to confirm pete hegseth for secretary of defense. >> that is just the tip of the iceberg. as the new yorker's jane mayer reports this week, the amount of private money being spent on the effort to confirm hegseth is staggering. for a cabinet nominee, the sum is rivaled only by the cash that has been spent to pressure senators into confirming supreme court justices. one group, american leadership pac, reportedly plans to spend $1 million to muscle wavering republican senators in five states into approving hegseth, according to the most recent fec

records. the group barely exists other than as a political piggy bank for four enormously wealthy right wing mega-donors. those four mega-donors are timothy dunn, a texas oil magnate. bill koch, a member of the right wing mega rich koch family. richard uihlein, the wisconsin billionaire who happens to be a major funder of election conspiracy groups. and thomas klingenstein, the head of the ultra conservative claremont institute, which he founded. with trump's election denying coconspirator john eastman. and all of that money appears to have been well spent, it has paid off. at today's hearing, senator ernst began her questioning by entering into the official record a letter of support for pete hegseth, and from there it was pretty clear where this is going. ernst spent half of her time asking about hegseth commitment to auditing the pentagon, before asking some perfunctory questions about women and sexual assault in the military, largely agreeing with hegseth dancers on both. it was

not an adversarial line of questioning. in fact, it was hardly questioning. at the same time, the new yorker reports that senator ernst turned down offers to hear privately from hegseth sexual assault accuser. now, earlier tonight, senator ernst denied that reporting, saying she never received a request from the accuser or her lawyer. either way, any meeting between senator ernst and the victim is unlikely to happen. despite ernst's announced desire to have any allegation cleared and to be a voice for victims of sexual assault. and that meeting is unlikely to happen because shortly after the hearing, senator ernst told a conservative radio host that she will now officially support pete hegseth s nomination. >> i thought it was good hearing for him. does he have your vote? >> i am breaking news, simon. i figured you would ask this. so yes, i will be supporting president trump's pick for secretary of defense, pete

hegseth. >> now, senator ernst was not the only republican who effectively rolled over today when it came to vetting pete hegseth. in fact, a lot of the questioning from republicans was utterly embarrassing. >> how many genders are there? >> tough one, senator, there are two genders. >> how many push ups can you do? >> i did five sets of 47 this morning. >> the only reason why i'm here and not in prison is because my wife loved me too. tell me something about your wife that you love. >> maybe if you could spend a minute. just elaborate a little bit about the wokeness, where it comes from, and who will be held accountable. >> despite all of that, democrats did their best to hold hegseth accountable for his controversial past, including and especially senator tim kaine, democrat of virginia. >> you've admitted that you had sex at that hotel in october

2017. you said it was consensual. isn't that correct? anything you've admitted that it was consensual and you were still married and you just had a child by another woman. you had just fathered a child two months before by a woman that was not your wife. i am shocked that you would stand here and say, you're completely cleared. can you so casually cheat on a second wife and cheat on the mother of a child that had been born two months before? and you tell us you were completely cleared? how is that a complete clear? one of your colleagues said that you got drunk at an event at a bar and chanted, kill all muslims. another colleague, not anonymous. we have this said that you took coworkers to a strip club. you were drunk, you tried to dance with strippers, you had to be held off the stage and one of your employees, in that event filed a sexual harassment charge as a result of it. now, i know you denied these things, but isn't that the kind of behavior that, if true, would be disqualifying for somebody to

be secretary of defense? >> senator? anonymous false charges, they're not anonymous. >> joining me now to discuss all of this is senator tim kaine of virginia. senator, thank you so much for being here tonight. let me first, just get your reaction to the news. we got just about an hour ago that senator joni ernst, who has long been seen as maybe one of the republican linchpins to pete hegseth nomination, is going to indeed vote for his confirmation. what are your thoughts? >> alex? i'm shocked, but not surprised. >> can you elaborate on that a little bit more? for a while there, it looked like she was not going to be an easy vote. it looked like she, given her background and her priorities, was going to try and hold hegseth to perhaps a higher standard than other republicans. what's your estimate of what happened in the interim between then and now? >> i think you laid it out pretty well in the introduction. i have worked closely with senator ernst on a variety of

issues on the committee, including battling a culture that that for too long was too tolerant of sexual harassment of women military members. but when she raised legitimate questions and didn't just sign on board with the nomination, the amount of pressure that's been applied to her from from the trump team and, you know, you focused on things like ads on tv. but this is also things like personal threats and the kinds of things that you you unleash. you know, again, i'm shocked that her focus on the needs of people who have been on the receiving end of sexual assault or sexual harassment has faded. but i'm not surprised because the pressure applied to her has been so significant. it's a sad day to hear that. but, you know, i think at the hearing today, democrats did a pretty good job of shining a spotlight on the character of this individual.

and it is the, you know, my belief that we walked out of that hearing with many, many more questions than when we walked into the hearing. >> i want to play some of your line of questioning, which was, you know, absolutely something that people paid attention to in terms of how tenacious you were compared to a lot of other people in that room. this is about hegseth and his doling out of ndas to alleged victims. let's just take a listen to that exchange. >> in finalizing divorces from your first and second wives, were there nondisclosure agreements in connection with those divorces? >> senator, not that i'm aware of, but if there were, you would agree to release them from a confidentiality. senator, that's not my responsibility. >> did you ever engage in any acts of physical violence against any of your wives? >> senator? absolutely not. >> can you elaborate, senator, on what you were trying to get at there? >> well, a couple of things. the i think the record show that

pete hegseth has nondisclosure agreements. potentially with respect to his first two wives. i believe with at least one of the two veterans organizations that he worked for and sort of ran into the ground. he has a confidentiality agreement with the person that filed a sexual assault complaint against him that he ended up settling, making a cash payment to and entering into a confidentiality agreement. he had the nerve to say in the hearing today, hey, i'm an open book. and i pointed out. yeah, but you've got all kinds of people tied up with confidentiality agreements that can't share with us what they want to share with us. the other thing i was trying to get at was this i need to be careful here because of some of what i know is either from classified or from committee only materials, but i have deep concerns about his abuse of women. his drunkenness on the job, his creation of toxic work culture.

the circumstances surrounding his two divorces, including multiple allegations of infidelity. and i was trying to get him to just be candid with the american public. should committing a sexual assault be disqualifying to be secretary of defense? not a hard question. should spousal abuse be disqualifying to be sexual secretary of defense? not a hard question. should drunkenness on the job be disqualifying to be secretary of defense? not a hard question. he wouldn't answer any of them. and that was very telling to me. >> i got to ask. i mean, given what you're floating here, some of it's new, some of it there's been rumors of some of it's been reported on. it just seems like this is someone who is deserving of a really thorough fbi background check, not just for democrats, but also for republicans and the people who are hiring him, the trump administration. and yet, jane mayer reports in the new yorker, for example, the fbi's

background investigation failed to interview fox news personnel who described hegseth to nbc news as smelling of alcohol on the job as recently as last fall. instead, sources say that the bureau settled for an interview with a public relations official at fox. is that unprecedented? >> it's at no. it's outrageous. alex. and i haven't even seen the fbi report. they won't give it to me. they gave it to the chairman of the committee, senator wicker, and the ranking member, senator reed. but in my discussions with senator reed, it's very plain that the fbi did not interview many people who had been directly identified in other documents that had been made available. they didn't bother to interview them. and that is just outrageous. you saw pete hegseth in the committee hearing today, try to say all these claims were anonymous smears. these are not anonymous smears. the materials that i've read with the allegations about his behavior, each behavior is connected directly to an

individual who in many cases, i believe, was not interviewed by the vetters and the individuals named in the documents we've received even include his own mother, who wrote him an extremely painful and blunt letter when he was undergoing a second divorce, calling him a serial abuser of women. and the facts just line up one after the next, whether it's what his colleague's work colleagues in three organizations have said about him, what he has written or said about women in his own books and writings. in the circumstances of his two divorces, in the circumstances of the criminal allegation against him, which did not lead to a criminal conviction, but it did lead to a settlement and a payment and a nondisclosure agreement. there is real investigation that needs to be done by someone here, but even on a paltry record that is largely notable for what it omits rather than what it

includes, the facts are extremely troubling about the character of this individual. >> senator tim kaine, you may not have the answers under oath, but you at least are asking the question. sir. thank you so much for coming on the program tonight. really appreciate it. >> good to be with you, alex. thanks. >> in advance of today's hearing, ben rhodes, former deputy national security advisor for president obama, penned this opinion piece in the new york times. pete hegseth is dangerous, but not for the reasons you think. trump's choice of mr. hegseth is born out of right wing grievances that have been building for a long time over the failures of the wars in iraq and afghanistan. the accusations of sexual assault and excessive drinking, which mr. hegseth has denied, also converged with other maga interests, including being unburdened by woke social mores. what kind of military emerges from this worldview? presumably one that seeks to roll back the social and cultural changes of recent decades within its ranks, disrupting cohesion and devaluing diversity as a source of strength. a maga military.

joining me now is ben rhodes, of course, former deputy national security advisor under president obama. ben, i feel like this is such essential reading because we're obviously talking about one aspect of pete hegseth nomination. but you you put it into context in a longer historical lens, how hegseth is kind of the fruition of nearly 20 years of conservative grievance starting after nine over 11. can you put that into a finer point on that, on that for people who haven't yet read this great op ed? >> yeah, i mean, the quick version, alex, right, is if you're in the. >> pete hegseth. right. right after nine over 11, you are promised great victories in iraq and afghanistan, and you are lied to and misled by george w bush and dick cheney. and after the kind of outburst of jingoism around those wars on the right, you know, if you're a fox news person, all you were told for the bush years is we're on the precipice of some great victory. there was a lot of anger and resentment about how those wars turned out. but importantly, and this is not unusual when superpowers fail to win wars,

that anger didn't get channeled kind of at foreign policy. it got channeled at an enemy within. and if you take seriously, as i do, what pete had said, that said and written for many years, he is railing against liberals. he's railing against islam. he's railing against, you know, quote unquote woke culture. he's railing against women in combat, gays in the military. it's all these enemies within. and he shares that with trump, and he shares trump's interest in having a secretary of defense who's totally loyal. so i think that these allegations of personal misconduct, of course, are important. but i actually think that's a debate kind of that the right wing wants to have, you know, here are the democrats, you know, trying to scold somebody over their personal conduct. i think we have to look at what he actually wants to do. if he gets in this position. it's an immensely powerful position of secretary of defense. and i think what he wants to do is shaped by the same grievance mindset that donald trump has given voice to over the course of the last decade. >> yeah, he's an expression of that and what he practically

wants or could do. you also outline in the piece what happens if the military is asked to support the political interests of the president or participate in mass deportations or suppress political protests? the united states would struggle to return to an apolitical military serving a constitutional citizenry rather than an individual or ideology. i mean, then there's some caveats in the piece, but that seems like a very real possibility. and reversing that would be equally difficult. >> yeah. if you look at what hegseth has said, he he has advocated for the pardon of service members that were convicted of war crimes. he's, you know, essentially said that the u.s. should not follow the laws of war. the geneva conventions that were arrived at after the painful experiences of world war one and world war two. he said he doesn't think women should serve in combat. he said that gays shouldn't serve in the military. he's lamented so-called diversity hires, in his words, that include, by the way, the current chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, who's black, who he said should be fired. right. he has embraced

the big lie of donald trump. we know that donald trump wanted to use the military to quash protests after george floyd in 2020. we know that there's a potential that some people around trump have talked about using the u.s. military in the mass deportation plans that they have. these are very substantive questions about what the makeup and mission and nature of the united states military is, which is an apolitical institution that is supposed to serve all americans and abide by the law. that, to me, is the real story of what is happening here with this nomination and seemingly imminent confirmation. and i think that's what we have to be focused on. >> yeah, i think what needs to happen is the linkage between pete hegseth past and what it could portend for his future. and yes, both are very alarming. ben rhodes, an excellent op ed in the new york times. thank you for your time tonight, my friend. >> thanks, alex. >> we have much more to get to tonight, including republicans

playing politics with disaster aid as the southern california fires continue to rage. but first, how many of you have ever shown up to work drunk? that was a real question that a real united states senator asked his colleagues today in defense of donald trump's pick to lead the department of defense. we're going to have more on the rise of maga masculinity coming up next. >> here you go. >> is there any way to get a better price on this? >> have you checked single care? >> whenever my customers ask how to get a better price on their meds, i tell them about single care. >> it's a free app accepted at pharmacies nationwide. before i pick up my prescription, i always check the single care price. >> it's quick, easy, and totally free to use. >> single care can literally beat my insurance copay. >> you just search for your prescription and show your single care coupon at the pharmacy. >> so i just show the coupon and get this price. >> that's right. >> go to single care.com and start saving today. >> when you realize bloating and discomfort don't have to be

routine, everything changes. try rize mushroom coffee with six functional mushrooms that heal your gut, improve digestion, and boost immunity. a better routine starts here. >> you want to stay warm when you're feeling chilled, but you don't want to raise your heating bill. and adding layers of blankets to keep warm is so frustrating. now you can just plug in and warm up with handy heater turbo heat. the new whole room space heater that plugs into the wall and takes up no space at all. so powerful it heats up any room up to 250ft!s with warm, soothing air, yet runs for just pennies a day. using thermal imaging, you can actually see it warm up this chilly basement by 20 degrees. amazing cold morning showers and freezing floors in the bathroom are such a pain. now go from chilly and cold to warm and toasty with ease. turbo heat is whisper quiet, perfect for

reading, watching tv, or getting a warm and cozy night's sleep. up until now, space heaters have been big and take up a lot of space. turbo heat's unique thermal ceramic design reduces the size and gives you incredible heat. the adjustable thermostat lets you control the temperature and the two speed fan circulates the air, keeping any room warm and cozy. no more clunky heaters or messy wires. turbo heat plugs right into the wall and takes up no space at all. easily warm up the office, dorm room, rv, and more. it's even great for winter traveling. bulky heaters can cost $100 or more, but act now and get handy. heater turbo heat for just 29.99. for more heat, we'll send you a second one free. just pay a separate fee. we'll even ship it for free. that's two for one low price, so stop shivering and warm up with turbo heat. order

now. to order, call 1-800-453-0359 or go online at viterbo heat. com call 1-800-453-0359 or go online at bi-turbo. heat. com order now. >> when you call us for help, we answer even at 3:00 in the morning. try us. holidays, nights and weekends because justice never sleeps.

1-800-403-7539. that's one (800) 403-7539. when you need brutal honesty, when you need answers first thing in the morning, when you need to go deep inside washington and hear from someone who's been there. you need your morning joe weekdays at 6:00 only on msnbc. >> president elect trump will likely inherit a chaotic situation in the middle east. >> we are getting a picture of what a donald trump cabinet will look like in el paso from philadelphia in israel, new hampshire from msnbc world headquarters. >> what if you showed up drunk

to your job? how many senators have showed up drunk to vote at night? have any of you guys asked him to step down and resign from their job? and don't tell me you haven't seen it because i know you have. and then how many senators do you know have gotten a divorce before cheating on their wives? did you ask them to step down? no, but it's for show. you guys make sure you make a big show and point out the hypocrisy. because the man's made a mistake. and you want to sit there and say that he's not qualified. give me a joke. >> give me a break. i mean, who among us hasn't arrived to vote drunk? pete says confirmation is not just about republicans handling handing donald trump his first nomination win. it is also about the resurgence of patriarchal political power, something donald trump ran on explicitly. and this highly retrograde to traditionalism for pete hegseth is rooted in a growing right wing evangelical

movement, one that seeks a theocratic state in which traditionalist christian men lead the military and other essential government institutions. joining me now is michelle goldberg, who's an opinion columnist for the new york times. michelle, thank you for being here this evening. so, first of all, markwayne mullin, just i guess everyone shows up to drunk on the senate floor, which tells you a lot. >> it's astonishing that this isn't a matter of controversy. >> right? >> that when mark kelly asked him over and over again, it wasn't no, this is false. >> it was. these are smears. and so sort of no one is denying this. and also who doesn't cheat on their wives before asking for a divorce. i think he actually got the timeline inaccurate wrong in that. but that i think was the essence of it. and it goes to this notion that, like republicans sanction the bad behavior and now are openly, openly embracing it. and it has become sort of like a foundational value in this neo sort of trad family structure that they seem to be embracing. >> i think part of the promise

of donald trump, and it wasn't even that much. >> it wasn't even that subtextual was the promise of impunity was the promise that, you know, after the metoo era, we're going to go back to a time where this behavior won't be punished, where it won't be an impediment to your career. >> and so and what's interesting is that on the one hand, you know, pete hegseth is this avatar of christian nationalism from this extremely right wing church. >> but i think the innovation here, the part that makes it that neo, is that it's kind of all of the sanctimonious force of religious fundamentalism with none of the expected constraints. yes. right. you know, show up drunk, have affairs, but also be the patriarch. and i want to play a little bit of sound from this podcast that pete hegseth was on. he is on the podcast. it is being hosted by a member of pete hegseth church. the church is called pilgrim hill. and this is kind of how they explain their theology. >> and then the father is given the authority of the home. so in

the family. so the father has actual authority over his wife and children, and then the wife has authority over the children, too. but ultimately it's a patriarchal vision. and then the state god has given authority, primarily the tool that god has given the state is the sword. we see this in romans 13. they are to execute justice, to protect the righteous from the wicked. >> so two things are interesting. first of all, the patriarchy is outlined explicitly, but also it's the embedded sort of violence or punitive streak to this new form of sort of traditional christianity, neo traditional christianity that strikes me as almost a playbook for people like pete hegseth, right? if they come at you and they say you're unqualified, hit them back with your proverbial sword, fight back aggressively. i mean, there's you know, i've been writing about christian nationalism for a long time. >> this rhetoric is super familiar. >> it's kind of almost standard. i think what's what's different is that the movement that he's

part of used to be at least the very explicit theocratic vision, used to maybe be more on the fringes of the conservative movement. now it's at the dead center of the republican party. but and it's also interesting the way, like, as you said, every time pete hegseth had to answer for the many, many sins, frankly, you know, mistakes, catastrophes, debacles that he's been involved in, he would talk about being saved by jesus christ. right. but at no point did he talk about that, instilling any sort of new, you know, either either figurative or literal sobriety. right, right. his alleged, his alleged controversies are met with just a fierce zealotry. the proclamation of the, you know, jesus christ being his lessons being visited upon him, but no sort of moral reexamination or reexamination of his own morals. there are a lot of comparisons being drawn to the sort of playbook that's being run with pete hegseth and that of brett kavanaugh, not just in terms of

the outside conservative money that's flooded this zone, but just in terms of, well, i'd ask you what you see as the sort of the thread that ties these two particular men together. well, i wouldn't compare these two because, i mean, you know, brett kavanaugh, although i wish he hadn't been confirmed, he was a plausible nominee. he wasn't a preposterous nominee. i mean, any and he wasn't. i don't think that republicans in their heart of hearts, saw brett kavanaugh as a joke, that they were sort of being forced to condone as a test of loyalty, whereas this is just such a farce. >> but i think that what you see is that what happened to christine blasey ford was a very powerful demonstration for anyone else who would come forward. >> and so when you think about the republican organizer who filed this police report accusing pete hegseth of sexual assault, you know, there is a i would assume that she looks at what's happened to women like christine blasey ford and thinks, no, thank you.

>> and so there's a reason i would assume that she has not come forward. >> well, and i would say that same pressure campaign in a different way is being exerted upon the republicans who might stand in line and potentially talk to that victim. you know, it is it is worth noting that the drivers behind this kind of neo christian, neo neo traditionalist christianity that people like pete hegseth are a part of is the drivers are really interesting and they are cultural. the usa today reports that the founder of pete hegseth church, pilgrim hill, said that one of the main drivers for enrollment in his church was the black lives matter protests, which pottinger characterized as a huge satanic tactic to corrupt the gospel. he also mentioned that covid 19 and the related lockdowns were also part of it. and i wonder, you know, sort of what that tells you about the political aspirations or the political implications of this kind of christianity being

embraced by so many people who are at the top echelons of the trump administration. well, i mean, i think that there is there's been there's a kind of broader cultural turn towards the manosphere among at least a lot of powerful men. you know, you see mark zuckerberg talking about how they need to bring more masculine energy to corporate america. there's just this unbelievable backlash to the efflorescence of feminist activism that we saw during trump's first term, and what this form of christian nationalist nationalism does is it gives it a kind of theological scaffolding. yeah, it does absolutely. to battle against literally any social, cultural, sociocultural progress or inclusivity that might be a hallmark of the 21st century. here we go. buckle up, michelle goldberg. inauguration day is on monday. it's great to see you. thank you for your time tonight. still to come this evening, even as deadly wildfires continue to rage through southern california, republicans are looking for ways to capitalize on tragedy politically. we'll

have more on that next. >> if you love cleanliness as much as your cat, you have to try pretty litter. i love that it's low dust and it traps smells, but that's not why i founded pretty litter. i made this litter with a built in health monitor to let you know if your cat is experiencing a potential health issue. is it pretty litter.com? >> when you call us for help, we answer even at 3:00 in the morning. >> try us holidays, nights and weekends because justice never sleeps. >> morgan and morgan for the people.com. >> do not buy generic viagra until you check out this program. >> giving away 100mg generic viagra for just $0.87. cvs and walgreens don't want you to know about this, because they sell the same tablets for 30 to $40 each. >> don't believe me? >> look at this. this is from cvs. look.

>> nine tablets, 100mg sildenafil, aka generic viagra for $406. >> that's $45 a tablet. this is from walgreens, $417 for nine tablets of 100mg sildenafil or $46 a tablet. you can now get the same nine tablets, the same 100mg strength from friday. plans for just $0.87 each to get generic viagra from friday plans. >> text see h o p chop to 69069. once you text, they will send you a special link and all you need to do is select why you need generic viagra, the quantity you need, and the dosage. >> i'll pick 100mg. >> thank you very much. >> and then their system will see if you qualify. give it a second to find the best deal. >> and boom look at that $0.87 for each 100mg generic viagra tablet. the prescription and shipping are free. friday plans

delivers your medication in a plain white package just like this in 2 to 3 days. once you open it, you'll find this inside. >> each tablet comes individually wrapped so you can tear one off and put it in your wallet. guys, if you need generic viagra, you need to take advantage of this program right now. >> friday plans is offering a special deal for new customers. >> $10 off your first package. >> the prescription is free and the shipping is free as well. do not wait. >> text c h o p chop to 69069 today. >> oh, and i need these items printed with our logo by friday. >> certainly. >> are you for imprint certain? >> well, we are for imprint. certainty matters like the certainty of finding the perfect promo gear for gifting at for imprint exclusive items and quality brands to wow your clients, your customers and your

team delivered on time. go to for imprint.com and find some. >> wow now for imprint for certain. >> to avoid digital threats, just turn on nordvpn, improve your protection against trackers, malicious websites and malware ridden downloads. >> get the deal now when you call us for help, we answer even at 3:00 in the morning. >> try us holidays, nights and weekends because justice never sleeps. >> dave's been very excited about saving big with the comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. five years? -five years. and he's not alone. -high five. it's five years of reliable gig speed internet. five years of advanced securit.

five years of a great rate that won't change. it's back. but only for a limited time. high five. five years? -nope. comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. powering five years of savings. powering possibilities. comcast business. 1-800-403-7539. that's one 804 037539. >> los angeles is now entering its second week of fighting the largest fires the city has ever seen. the fires have already collectively burned an area more than two and a half times the size of manhattan, displacing more than 100,000 people and killing at least 25. so while

those fires are still actively burning, while authorities are literally still searching burned out houses for the dead, how is the republican leader of the house, mike johnson? how is he responding? he's threatening to hold hostage federal disaster aid. >> i think there should probably be conditions on that aid. that's my personal view. >> we'll see what the consensus is. >> i haven't had a chance to socialize that with any of the members over the weekend, because we've all been very busy, but it'll be part of the discussion for sure. >> that was the speaker of the house saying that federal aid for these wildfires in california should have conditions. mind you, speaker johnson represents the disaster prone state of louisiana. and for the last year, we have data 2022. louisiana received $34 billion more from the federal government than the state paid the federal government. in that same year, california paid $83 billion more to the federal government than the state got in return. 2022 isn't an anomaly.

california is the fifth biggest economy in the world on its own. the state literally subsidizes the rest of this country year after year. but because california is a blue state, republicans want it to have california bend to the will of the gop in order to get disaster relief. >> do you expect, though, that congress and republicans will still help these americans in need, even if they don't like their local politics in the party? >> i expect that there will be strings attached to money that is ultimately approved. >> we will certainly help those thousands of homes and families who have been devastated, but we also expect you to change bad behavior. >> they don't deserve anything, to be honest with you, unless they show us they're going to make some changes. >> not to belabor the point here, but the republicans you just heard there were senator john barrasso of wyoming, representative zach nunn of iowa, and senator tommy tuberville of alabama, all representatives of red states that receive far more money from the federal government than they

give the federal government. well, again, the blue state of california literally subsidizes their existence. just last month, congress allocated $100 billion in disaster relief to help the six states impacted by hurricanes helene and milton. all but one of those states is led by a republican governor, and that aid did not have conditions. apparently, the moral calculus was very clear. but now that the blue state of california needs help, well, republicans think disaster relief should be a bargaining chip. dan pfeiffer, former white house senior advisor to president barack obama and co-host of pod save america, joins me to discuss how democrats should respond to this. coming up next. >> an evening in front of the fire can be so relaxing, but dangerous creosote buildup can cause a chimney fire if not removed. help protect your home with csl the creosote sweeping log, it helps clean your chimney while it burns inside your chimney walls, there's a constant buildup of flammable

tar and creosote. the active minerals in csl will reduce those dangerous deposits, making your next fire safer. it's so easy. burn just once every 60 fires. csl the creosote sweeping log. get csl available at lowe's ace do it best and walmart. >> when you call us for help, we answer even at 3:00 in the morning. try us holidays, nights and weekends because justice never sleeps. >> morgan and morgan for the people.com. >> tired of sciatic nerve pain radiating down your leg and lower back? get relief. >> finally with magnilife leg and back pain relief, a combination of four active ingredients that get to work fast. so get living. >> available at your local retailer. >> my experience with empire was amazing. >> the price that i got along with the service, the special attention, the one on one. you can't beat that. >> (800) 588-2300 and party

today. >> ocd is more than what you see on tv and in the movies. >> it comes with unrelenting intrusive images, thoughts and urges. if you have ocd and need help, you can get better with specialized treatment. go to nocd.com to learn more. >> framing is hard, but frame bridge is easy. custom frames, premium materials, transparent pricing. get started at framebridge comm or visit a store today. >> what's up guys? what i'm about to show you is going to change the way you shave your head forever. >> you can shave your head in 90s or less with no cuts or nicks. >> introducing remington's new and improved balder boss with increased flex and five dual track floating head design. get over 60% more head coverage for a faster, closer shave and skin close results and only through this exclusive tv offer. now you can try it in your home for 30 days for just 14.99. baldur boss

is the fast, easy, safe way to shave your head, wet or dry in 90s or less without nicks or cuts. >> no nicks, no scrapes fit in the palm of my hand and the results were amazing. >> the 360 degree pivoting neck contours closely around your head. curves for maximum contact anytime, anywhere in 90s or less with exclusive wet tech technology. shave in the shower or with any foam or gel. japanese grade steel blades and turbo power plow through the thickest of hair yet gentle enough it won't irritate skin with pure lithium power that lasts up to an incredible 60 minutes. that's like one full month of use without a recharge, then easily rinses clean. there's even a pop up trimmer to complete your perfect groom. now you can try the remington balder boss in your home for 30 days for just 14.99. but wait, order now and we'll ship it to you absolutely free. you can also get our ear, nose and brow

trimmer for the ultimate groom free. just pay separate processing and handling. every balder boss comes with a five year limited warranty where durability is guaranteed, plus a 100% satisfaction guarantee. if you don't absolutely love it, send it back. but keep the trimmer as our gift. just for trying. >> i got a clean, nice, smooth shave in under 90s. >> no nicks, no cuts. >> so order now. >> you who? you're making everything orange. >> we're showing we're consumer. cellular gets great coverage. we use the same powers as big wireless. so you get the same coverage. >> wow. >> for unlimited talk and text with reliable coverage. >> and your second month free call consumer cellular. >> if you love cleanliness as much as your cat, you have to try pretty litter. i love that it's low dust and it traps smells, but that's not why i found it pretty litter. i made this litter with a built in health monitor to let you know if your cat is experiencing a potential health issue.

>> is it pretty litter.com? when you call us for help, we answer even at 3:00 in the morning. try us holidays, nights and weekends because justice never sleeps. >> morgan and morgan for the people.com. >> multiple times, mr. trump has threatened to withhold aid for california wildfires, both as president and now again as president elect. are you worried that he might actually do that? >> i mean, he's done it. utah. he's done it. michigan native puerto rico, he did it to california back before i was even governor in 2018, until he found out folks in orange county voted for him. and then he decided to give the money. >> that was california governor gavin newsom speaking about his fears that as of next week, next week, his state's recovery will be in the hands of president elect donald trump, house speaker mike johnson and even some republican members of california's own congressional delegation have signaled that they may demand conditions before sending any more relief money to california, conditions

that, at least according to speaker johnson, reportedly may include tying recovery money to one of donald trump's key political demands raising the debt ceiling. joining me now is dan pfeiffer, former white house senior adviser to president obama and co-host of pod save america. dan, thank you for being here. i have a lot of strategy questions to ask you because, i mean, first, what's the right? what is the right response from gavin newsom, governor newsom on down? i mean, when republicans say you can't have money to rebuild your burned down city and help people find homes again, unless you raise the debt ceiling. should they play ball? >> absolutely not. >> look, let's start with how you respond to this. and that begins with pointing out very clearly and very forthrightly that what the republicans are doing is they're playing politics with people's lives. right. california is a blue state, but there are 6 million people in the state who voted for donald trump. those are the people that are denying aid to as well. and so we should call that out. we should point out that every other time strings

have not been put on aid for states, because that is what we do in this country, because the fires may be in california, but the impact of that is felt across the country, just like with hurricanes in north carolina and hurricanes in florida. so making that we just have to call out what they're doing here. and then you get to the specific point of the debt ceiling, right? that is an absurd idea. i'm not sure that idea is going to fly. i don't know that the freedom caucus is going to fall for that. i don't think the senate's going to fall for that. but we should call that out again, right? this is about people's lives. people need help now. and trying to use the lives and livelihoods of people suffering from one of the worst wildfires in this country's history. to solve a political problem for donald trump is ridiculous, but we have to be vocal about that fact. >> i'm all. i'm with you. i mean, it's if past is prolog. you know, trump was convinced to release disaster aid when his aides pointed out, like, oh, orange county was affected and they voted for you. but you now have members, as politico is reporting, of california's republican congressional delegation saying, yeah, no, you should tie disaster relief to a debt ceiling raise, or you

should establish preconditions before you release the funds. i mean, it seems like trump's and his allies, the misinformation they've been spinning about democratic mismanagement of the state has caused even republicans in the state to believe the lies enough so that they're willing to sort of sacrifice the immediate release of relief aid, i guess. i wonder how much you think misinformation is giving republicans a leg to stand on here. the suggestion that governor newsom didn't like, you know, let enough water into the state because he was protecting smelt, roe or whatever, all of which governor newsom has set up a website to debunk. but like, how critical is that as a kind of foundational aspect to the denial of aid? >> well, misinformation is a huge problem, and it's one that, as mark zuckerberg made clear the other day, is going to get much worse as time goes on here. i think what is what is causing problems with these republican members of congress is as much as their attempt to be as loyal to donald trump as humanly possible, to be as obsequious to donald trump as humanly possible

as it is misinformation. because what? so there are two issues here. there are strings on the aid, and then there's a debt ceiling. let's put the debt ceiling aside for one second. what strings are they talking about? none of these people have mentioned them. they just keep saying strings. what is it they actually want? what do they think is going to help here? what is going to solve? what is the problem they are trying to solve? we should push back on that and call that out. what is it? what are they actually talking about? because there are answers to this, right? the smelt issue is an absurd issue. the water from north from northern california doesn't go to southern california. it's not where the water comes from, the reservoirs. there are answers to all these things, but we have to push the republicans, and specifically the republican members of congress from california on what it is they're actually talking about here. so they're not just vomiting up talking points in the hope of getting invited to a white house reception in two weeks. >> no comment on that, the vomit or the reception, but i wonder what you think the road ahead looks like for blue state governors independent of, you know, for this particular disaster in california, as trump tries to use the federal

government to tries to weaponize the federal government to enact his political agenda. you know, if you're a blue state governor and trump wants to conduct federal mass deportation or deport workplace raids in your state, and you want to stand against it, but you also need help from the federal government or at least cooperation on urgent matters, whether it's disaster aid or something like that. you know, is there a calibration? is there a choreography here? can you do both? can you both be an adversary to trump and serve your state in a time of need? do you think such a thing is possible knowing what you know about donald trump? >> it's a tricky balancing act, and governor newsom is in a very challenging position here. he has been aggressive about pushing back on some of the misinformation for calling out, as in the clip he played the previous time. donald trump has played politics with disaster aid, but he also has trump coming to his state next week. and he knows that, unlike in any previous presidency other than trump's previous one, politics are going to play a role here and you have to sort of walk that fine line. ultimately, i think democrats cannot. we

cannot, you know, avoid calling out trump for what he is doing when it's wrong. right. you're going to have to you have to do your politics. we saw a lot of people doing this during covid. unfortunately, when it's about whether you're going to get ppe or masks or whatever else from the federal government when trump was president, but you're going to have to walk a fine line. one thing i think democratic governors can do here. i think newsom has done a pretty good job of this is in times of crisis, when there is misinformation flying at you at all times. the way to respond to that is to overcommunicate to be out all the time, as much press as you possibly can to grab every single microphone and bullhorn you can find and shout out the truth. it's not always going to work. there are going to be people who are have motivated reasoning to believe what they want to believe. you have members of congress who will say what will get them in good favor with trump, but be out there all the time. newsom has done a very good job of that. i think some other california officials, particularly down in la, have done a less good job of that. but that is the model for how you communicate, especially when you have a president who is using his microphone or an incoming president, united states, to push that very same

misinformation. >> everything everywhere, all at once. that's the new playbook. both sides of the aisle. dan pfeiffer, thank you for joining me tonight, my friend. appreciate you. thank you. still to come this evening, a view of the vast devastation left behind by wildfires in los angeles. nbc correspondent ellison barber joins me to discuss what she saw joins me to discuss what she saw and what is expected next. what are folks 60 and older learning these days? new perspectives! ♪♪ how to fix things. ♪♪ fun recip... (high pitched sound) (high pitched sound) (high pitched sound) >> when you call us for help, we answer even at 3:00 in the morning. try us holidays, nights

and weekends because justice never sleeps. >> morgan and morgan for the people.com ocd is more than what you see on tv and in the movies. >> it comes with unrelenting intrusive images, thoughts and urges. if you have ocd and need help, you can get better with specialized treatment. go to nocd.com to learn more. >> a heart attack. >> do they have life insurance? no, but we have life insurance. >> john, i'm trying to find something we can afford. >> fortunately, in only a few minutes, selectquote found john a $500,000 policy for only $29 a month and his wife, anne, a $500,000 policy for only $21 a month. go to selectquote.com now and get the insurance your and get the insurance your family needs at a price y (auctioneer) let's start the bidding at 5 million dollars. thank you, sir. (man) these people of privilege... hoarding the financial advantages for far too long. (auctioneer) 7.5 at the back.

(man) look at them — unaware that robinhood gold members now enjoy the vip treatment — a 3% ira match on retirement contributions. (auctioneer) 11 million sir. (man) once they discover their privileges are no longer exclusive... their fragile reality will plunge into disarray. ♪ four active ingredients that get four active ingredients that get to work fast. so get most people call leaffilter when their gutters are clogged and they notice one of the many issues that can bring. sometimes it's the smell of mildew when water has seeped into the interior walls. or maybe they've spotted mold in the attic. but most often it's the more obvious signs of damage like rotten soffit, fascia, or water pooling near their foundation. you can get ahead of costly damage by protecting your home's gutters today. we're in your neighborhood and ready to help.

schedule your free gutter inspection today, call 833 leaffilter, or visit leaffilter.com weekends because justice never sleeps. for all those making it big out there... ...shouldn't your mobile service be able to keep up with you? get wifi speeds up to a gig at home and on the go. introducing powerboost, only from xfinity mobile. now that's big.

one (800) 403-7539. that's one (800) 403-7539. >> parts of southern california are bracing for another critical fire warning tonight. and joining me now from pasadena, near the eaton fire, which has been burning for 77 seven days and is currently 35% contained, is nbc news correspondent ellison barber. ellison, what can you tell us about the expectations for tonight? hey, alex. yes. so we moved and we're actually in an area. >> we're in malibu, and it's just because this is where we got off of a helicopter that we flew on with cal poly, cal fire looking at some of the damage. but we have spent most of our time since we've been here reporting this team in altadena, near the eaton fire. i mean, the

expectation heading into tonight is still the concern about those high winds right there was they weren't as high as expected today and that is good. but fire officials have been very clear weather forecasters. that threat is not over. the high risk warnings for wind continues until tomorrow. the fire officials, they have said they have pre-positioned fire engines and patrol all across the la region, particularly in unimpacted high risk fire areas, because the concern is the possibility still for new fires. but they say they are ready for them and they have pre-positioned to be in a position to be able to respond. but when you look at the toll here, and that's what we saw today when we were flying with cal fire, of how hard this community has been hit. we talked so much in numbers, right. 12,000 over 12,000 structures have been destroyed, mostly in the eaton and palisades fire and structures. sounds so bland. but when you go and look in these communities, when you fly above them, you are

reminded that we are talking about homes, we are talking about businesses, we are talking about familiar sites that have been integral parts of these communities for years, decades, generations even now, entirely gone. and for so many people, alex, they're trying to get through tonight worried about what could happen in other parts of los angeles and the los angeles county region, and also trying to just process how they pick up their lives because they have nothing left here. >> alex. just a staggering amount of destruction. that video footage from the helicopter gives you a sense of those wind gusts. nbc news correspondent ellison barber doing some real essential reporting on the ground. thank you for hanging late tonight. i appreciate it. that is our show for tonight. way too early with ali. vitali is coming up next. >> in june of 2020, then-president trump directed former secretary of defense mark esper to shoot protesters in the legs in downtown d.c, an order. secretary esper refused