skin. it works like a dream. why didn't someone think of this sooner? >> we're going to start with breaking news on capitol hill. >> mounting questions over the future of tiktok in the us. >> reporting from philadelphia. >> el paso. >> in the palisades, virginia. >> from msnbc world headquarters here in new york. >> president trump's first 100 days. watch. >> i'm going to be here five days a week again. >> read and listen. >> staying up half the. >> night reading. >> executive orders. >> for this defining time in the second trump presidency. stay with msnbc. >> all right. that's going to do it for me tonight. i will see you again tomorrow. and every night this week at 9 p.m. eastern here on msnbc. in the meantime, you can always find me on blue sky if you don't have blue sky yet. why don't you try it? it might not make you want to die. i'm on blue sky at msnbc.com. i find it to be a

more constructive experience there than on other social media properties. that's just what i think on msnbc.com. all right, now it's time for the last word with the great lawrence o donnell. good evening. lawrence. >> rachel, it's not just what you think. it's what i think, too, about blue sky. which is why i followed you to blue sky. rachel. so this was one of those nights when i'm walking through the hallways to get here. and the silent tv monitors that i'm walking by show you with some pretty important breaking news about birthright citizenship. and i can't hear a word of it. all i know is there's this thing at the bottom of the screen that says, you know, this really important thing has happened. by taking a quick look at the breaking news report on it. and it's a trump appointed judge is saying, no, you know, this this this case can be handled through the standard procedures. the and it's not an emergency. we don't

have to go into an emergency mode to deal with your attempt to like, hand rewrite the constitution. >> yeah. and it's actually it's very well written. it's written like in in non legalese. yeah. judges are charged to reach their decisions apart from ideology or political preference. when we decide issues of significant public importance and political controversy hours after we finish reading the final brief, we should not be surprised if the public questions whether we are politicians in disguise. in recent times, nearly all judges and lawyers have attended seminar after seminar discussing ways to increase public trust in the legal system. moving beyond wringing our hands and wishing things were different. one concrete thing we can do is to decline to decide or pre-decide cases on an emergency basis. when there is no emergency warranting a deviation from our normal deliberate practice, because they are going to appeal this on an emergency basis to the supreme court. and here's this appeals court judge in the ninth circuit. being like this

is a lot of things. an emergency is not one of them. you're just trying to change the constitution. >> yeah. and this is this is the same supreme court that was in absolutely no rush to hear jack smith's appeal to the supreme court about the whole issue of presidential immunity. they wanted to they wanted to deal with that one as slowly as they possibly could. >> yeah. but this one is trump trying to change the constitution? so you're no longer an american if you're born in america. the idea that this has to be taken up on some emergency basis, i mean, we'll see what the we'll see what the what the supreme court does as justice department tries to rocket this to, to the supreme court. but this pushback from this three judge panel at the ninth circuit is, is pretty strong. >> yeah, he's trump's on a losing streak with this one so far. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> thanks. >> thank you rachel. thank you. well, today at 2:31 p.m. exactly. the white house posted

on social media. congestion pricing is dead. manhattan and all of new york is saved. long live the king. president donald j. trump, and i'm sparing you what was attached underneath those utterly insane words. it was a deeply perverse rendition of donald trump on what was designed to appear to be a fake time magazine cover, with him wearing a gold crown that he imagines kings wear every day. there was a time when new york city was governed by the king of england, but the people living in new york city and the other colonies joined together to kill as many british soldiers as necessary to remove a king from their lives forever. of course, not a single republican objected to anything about that social

media posting today. and although republicans will constantly tell you that government is best when left to the state and local officials, especially on health care issues or education, for example, education should be as local as possible. none of those republicans objected today about donald trump interfering in the most local possible issue traffic jams. at the beginning of this year, new york city tried something that i, for one, did not think was going to work, and i thought it was going to be a lot of political trouble. it was an idea that had been kicking around think tanks and urban planning seminars for at least 40 years that i'm personally aware of, was talked about in subcommittee hearings in washington decades and decades ago. but it was the kind of idea that usually scared most

politicians, the new york politicians who supported the idea in the state legislature and got and the ones who supported in the city got very scared of the idea. the closer it came to being a reality, the idea of congestion pricing to try to control traffic in manhattan. so they delayed the idea. they delayed the idea that long held dream of urban planners, congestion pricing, in effect, electronic tolls invisibly applied to cars venturing below 60th street in manhattan. it was a desperate attempt to try to do something about 100 years of increasingly unbearable new york city traffic, and as the deadline for implementing congestion pricing approached, politicians began to fear the wrath of every new york city car driver. while the governor had to worry about the wrath of suburban new york. drivers. also, politicians who

supported congestion pricing as the implementation day approached, worried that they wouldn't get any gratitude at all from most new york city residents who don't even own cars. new york city is the only city in the country where most people do not own cars, and at the last minute, they dramatically reduced the toll pricing in the congestion pricing plan. and the first day that congestion pricing went into effect in new york city, a miracle was upon us. i got into a car in lower manhattan and speeded up to midtown on the fdr drive at the highway speeds that road was designed to allow for. for the first time in my life, the ride that normally would take at least 45 minutes took 20. i went into an office where the first person i spoke to was from staten island. her commute

to midtown manhattan usually was at least 90 minutes each way, sometimes two hours. and that day, for the first time in her life, it was 45 minutes and she wasn't even driving. she was riding the express bus from staten island. and that's when i realized congestion pricing just might turn out to be the most popular thing that has happened in government in new york city in a very long time, because the bus riders were very happy. new york city roadways intersect with the interstate highway system. so there are three levels of governmental interest involved in congestion pricing the government of new york city, the government of new york state, and the federal government. within a couple of days, most people in new york politics breathed a huge sigh of relief, realizing that not only had the plan worked exactly as intended, even better than intended by breaking gridlock, but it could end up being the

most popular thing they've ever done. president biden signed off on the federal government's okay for new york city's congestion pricing plan last year. and today, 2:31 p.m. donald trump announced that the king was ending it all or trying to end it. donald trump revoked the federal approval of congestion pricing, and governor hochul announced that new york was rushing into court to try to preserve the only new thing ever devised to reduce traffic in new york city. in donald trump's entire 78 years of life, the only thing that has actually worked at a press conference about donald trump's attempt to block congestion pricing this afternoon, governor hochul was asked a two part question about two different things. >> and what would it take for you to determine that mayor eric adams was no longer able to

govern new york city? >> i'm ignoring the second part of the question because i said, that's another day. >> okay. the first part of the question, which we missed, was actually about congestion pricing. and then there was a question thrown in there about eric adams, which the governor then didn't want to answer. the governor then turned to legal experts with help for the questions about congestion pricing and where that case was going to go. now it has been falsely reported day in and day out, pretty much everywhere in the news media that the governor of new york has the power to summarily fire the mayor of new york. that is not true, as i explained here last night, but it bears explaining again, since it's apparently a difficult lesson for people to learn, especially in the news media. the governor of new york only has the power to initiate a process that has never been tried before to remove the mayor of new york, only after a hearing in which the mayor would be allowed to defend himself and be represented by as many

lawyers as he wants, who would be allowed to call as many witnesses as they want. the rules for such a hearing do not exist. they would have to be created by the governor, because in this kind of hearing, which has never occurred, the governor plays the role of the judge and therefore would have to be there every minute. the governor also plays the role of the prosecutor in that hearing, presenting the evidence against the governor. and the governor plays the role of the jury in that hearing, and would have to make the final fact finding and render a verdict. every aspect of that process that has never been used before and has been never tested for due process, every bit of it could be appealed in court, and such appeals could be fought all the way to the united states supreme court, and that could take years. so no, the governor

does not have the power to fire the mayor, just have a hearing about the possibility of removing the mayor. and in that hearing, if the governor decided to have one, she would not be able to use any of the criminal evidence collected by the fbi and presented to a federal grand jury, which led to the criminal indictment of mayor eric adams on bribery and other charges. so there would be zero criminal evidence available to the governor to consider in such a hearing. zero. and so the magic bullet firing scenario that you've been hearing from people who literally, in every real sense, don't know what they're talking about, is impossible. also, at exactly 2:31 p.m. today, the trump white house issued their proclamation from their king about congestion pricing. exactly 2:31 p.m. and

at that very minute, mayor eric adams was testifying under oath for the very first time in the criminal case of the united states of america versus eric adams. federal judge dale ho, who has been presiding over the case of the united states of america versus eric adams, was hearing a motion by donald trump's justice department to just dismiss the charges against mayor adams, a motion that was opposed by all of the new york city federal prosecutors who were handling the case. in all, eight federal prosecutors in new york city and washington have resigned over what they believe is an illegal scheme to dismiss the case for political purposes. one of the briefs filed in the case today included a letter from danielle sassoon, who was the acting u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york. her eight page letter offering her resignation and her refusal to file the motion to dismiss, accused acting deputy attorney general emil bove of entering a

quid pro quo for the dismissal, the letter said. mr. bové proposes dismissing the charges against adams in return for his assistance in enforcing the federal immigration laws. the reasons advanced by mr. bové for dismissing the indictment are not ones i can, in good faith, defend, as in the public interest and as consistent with the principles of impartiality and fairness that guide my decision making. danielle sassoon's letter also reveals that she and her team of prosecutors were ready to bring an additional indictment against mayor adams, saying, we have proposed a superseding indictment that would add an obstruction conspiracy count based on evidence that adams destroyed and instructed others to destroy evidence and provide false information to the fbi, and that would add further factual allegations regarding his participation in a fraudulent straw donor scheme. emil bove could not find any attorney in the justice department willing to stand in front of the judge today and

argue in support of that motion. we saw the unique spectacle of an acting deputy attorney general appearing as a litigator in court, which they virtually never do. one of the prosecutors who quit, rather than stand up and tell the judge what he believes to be lies in the courtroom today, said in his resignation letter last week that he was confident that emil bove would be able to find, quote, enough of a fool to do it. emil bove did it. emil bove told the judge i'm here personally to answer your honor's questions, to give you the assurance you need to sign this. judge ho began the hearing by asking eric adams under oath if he was on drugs. that is actually a standard question for defendants in hearings like this to establish that they actually comprehend the proceedings that they are in. the judge clarified that the trump justice department intends to hold out the possibility of bringing

these exact charges against eric adams against him again, whenever they want to the court. mr. bové, if and when the motion is granted, can these charges be brought against mr. bové? they could be in the department's discretion. yes. judge the court. okay, so mayor adams could be re indicted at a future date. mr. bové, it's possible the court is the government committing to stopping any additional investigative steps with respect to mayor adams, mr. bové? no, that answer contradicts what emil bové put in writing in his order to danielle sassoon to ask for dismissal in the case in that order, which she refused. emil bové said there shall be no further targeting of mayor adams or additional investigative steps. now, you really don't want politicians like eric adams to know that the fbi has been ordered not to investigate him.

the judge asked mayor adams, has anything been promised to you to induce you to consent to the motion? the defendant? not at all, your honor. the court. okay. has anyone threatened you in any way to induce you to consent to the motion? the defendant? no, your honor. >> if he doesn't. >> come through. i'll be back in new york. >> city and we won't be. >> sitting on the couch. i'll be in his office, up, up his. >> butt. >> saying. >> where the hell is the agreement? >> we came to? >> that video was not part of the record of the hearing today to emil bove, the judge said, i just want to confirm my understanding that the motion contains no statement about the government's views regarding the strength of the case, in terms of the facts or the legal theory. mr. bové. that's correct. and less than a minute later, in his very next answer, emil bové contradicted that answer he had just given when he said he believed that the indictment, quote is an abuse of

the criminal justice process. emil bové advanced the novel theory that no candidate for office should ever be charged with a crime. he said to the judge, i mean, frankly, i think the fact that mayor adams is sitting to my left right now is part of the problem. he's not able to be out running the city and campaigning. i think that is actual interference with the election. so according to the new trump justice department theory, any candidate in any party anywhere in the country cannot be charged with a crime of any kind because that is interference with the election, even if the election isn't even that year. presidential campaigns are four years long, remember, emil bove also advanced the novel legal theory that you cannot indict the new york city police commissioner because the duties of that job

are so important. the judge asked, would a rationale like this, this ability to govern rationale potentially apply to other public officials with significant public safety, national security responsibilities here in new york, like the police commissioner, for example? could it potentially be applicable in the event that the police commissioner were subject to some sort of investigation or prosecution? mr. bove yes, absolutely. in the long history of police corruption in the city of new york, no one has ever before advanced the theory that the new york city police commissioner cannot be indicted. the last new york city police commissioner to go to prison was mayor rudolph giuliani's police commissioner, bernard kerik, who decades later was of course, pardoned by donald trump. leading off our discussion tonight is andrew weissmann, former fbi general counsel and former chief of the criminal division in the eastern district of new york. he's also an msnbc legal analyst. adam klasfeld is also with us. he was in the courtroom covering today's hearing for us. and, adam, i

just want to begin with the way this played out in the courtroom. the transcript, which i've read, shows the judge being very, very careful and solicitous to beauvais as much as he possibly could, very polite, not turning over his cards in any way about what he was actually thinking about it. >> that's absolutely correct. he was. even deferential. >> i looked through the. >> transcript as well after the hearing, and i think he apologized before questions about 12 times. so this. >> was a. >> hearing where he was. >> being. >> very careful, but he was also being very careful in his questioning. one of the moments that i found really interesting was through the hearing there. >> there were these two. >> parties in intense agreement. trump's d.o.j. and adams's attorneys. but they disagreed one time. and that time was when the judge asked adams about his. security clearance. and this is a part the judge. >> said, is mayor adams currently. >> in the process of obtaining his security clearance.

>> or does that hinge on the resolution. >> of the motion? adams's attorney says it hinges. >> on the. >> resolution of the motion, and at that time, beauvais interjected, just a correction. i don't think it hinges on that. it hinges his security clearance because the security clearance issue is another executive power. so in that moment when he's asking that question, he's undermining the stated rationale that they were given. so that here's a judge who is being very deferential, very cautious, but he's not tipping his hand. >> yeah. and andrew, the judge actually had it emerged and the judge questioning the of course donald trump can just give him a security clearance anytime he wants to, just like he did with jared kushner. it's completely within donald trump's power. >> yeah. so that. >> once it's that's. >> conceded. >> that means that the excuse that you need to dismiss these charges without prejudice because that security. clearance

evaporates. i did think there were some other questions. >> that. >> i was kind of hoping the judge would ask when emile beauvais says, basically, we can do this. frankly, we can do this even if there is a quid pro quo. that was sort of remarkable to me, and i want a judge. i think i would have asked, so are you saying that if eric adams dropped a bag of cash off with. >> the. >> deputy attorney general, that that would be legal? and what's the difference here? why is if there is that quid pro quo, if. >> you can't. >> do the bag of cash, why can you do this? and then also when why is it that you want to reinstate these charges? >> would it be. >> if he doesn't toe the. line and then just sort of pressing a little bit more on why it is that this is something they want to do without prejudice, as opposed to saying, look, we think it's a political prosecution, so we want it dismissed forever. and i think that is really the flaw in what the government is trying to do here is that sort of damocles,

that choke chain that is being put on eric adams. that just has to be something that the law forbids. >> andrew, the judge is extremely limited here. it would be extraordinary for him to try to prevent the dismissal at this point. but, i mean, i have seen judges in hearings like this where no one feels as though they were pushed around by the judge, but the judge is actually just sitting there collecting, you know, all this crazy information that he needs to use against you because he went down some roads that were utterly insane, that you cannot indict, you know, the new york city police commissioner, in effect, you cannot indict a candidate anywhere in america as long as they're a candidate. i mean, he really and the judge did not test him on just how far do you want that statement to go? the judge left them there as indefinite statements that could

be just as wild as they sounded. >> yeah. >> you know, i was reminded of the presidential immunity case where there was the famous line in the court of appeals, which is, are you saying that the president can order seal team six to kill a political adversary under your theory? and this is this. is that wacky? but unfortunately, one, as you said, lawrence, the law here is very, very favorable to the government in their discretion. and two, we have a supreme court that is bending over backwards to find this this sort of overwhelming executive power to the exclusion of common sense. >> and frankly. >> i think sort of the traditional ways we think of the rule of law, it's the reason that you see so many people resigning. >> yeah. and to andrew's point, adam, the one question that i, that i was wondering why it wasn't there is the judge not specifically asking, why aren't

you asking to dismiss it with prejudice? i mean, because given the reasons you just gave, you know, why isn't that a dismissal with prejudice? >> and that was entirely absent. i think one of the things that was a common theme from the beginning to end, the judge said. right at the outset that he has very little discretion over things. >> and everything that we've been. >> watching over the past week, these principled resignations, the sassoon letter that you highlighted in your opening. none of that is officially before the court now. bovie said. >> that he. >> should not even recognize that evidence because it is brought forward by the amici. who the judge has not made the decision to recognize. >> yeah, but he incorporated that decision in the entire decision. he's going to decide whether he will accept those documents as part of the record. but, you know, like that fox news video is never going to be part of the record. there's a there's a context that we all know out here in the world that the courtroom will never allow

within the playing field of this issue in the courtroom. and so this is one of those issues where we are more informed than the judge will be, even though the judge will be correctly, legally informed. andrew weissman adam klasfeld, thank you both very much for starting us off tonight. thank you. you're welcome. coming up, our next guest is from a place that used to be ruled by the king of england. and so he had a little something to say today when donald trump declared himself a king. senator sheldon whitehouse joins us. that's next. >> your life is pretty smart. but when it's time to eat, suddenly you feel out of sync. refresh your routine with factor chef prepared meals delivered with a tap ready in two minutes. imagine dinner on autopilot and enjoying tuscan tomato chicken without lifting a finger.

upgrade your plate. optimize upgrade your plate. optimize your nutrition. we are people living with afib. ♪♪ and over half a million of us have left blood thinners behind. for life. ♪♪ we've cut our stroke risk... ...and said goodbye to our bleeding worry. with the watchman implant. we may be getting older, but we've never squeezed more out of life. ♪♪ and we are just getting started. join us at watchman.com watchman. it's one time, for a lifetime. this side? >> have you seen these videos all over social media and said to yourself. how is that real? it's called plexaderm. and plexaderm is clinically studied to help reduce the appearance of under-eye puffiness, wrinkles and fine lines, with results that last up to ten hours. so

don't wait. try plexaderm today don't wait. try plexaderm today for just with fatigue and light-headedness, i knew something was wrong. then i saw my doctor and found out i have afib, and that means there's about a 5 times greater risk of stroke. symptoms like irregular heartbeat, heart racing, chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, or light-headedness, can come and go. but if you have afib, the risk of stroke is always there. if you have one or more symptoms, get checked out. making that appointment can help you get ahead of stroke risk. this is no time to wait. >> easy to tackle subscriptions with. experience easy, i'll go tackle those. >> quarterbacks even though it's hard. >> download the. >> app now. >> introducing a revolution in pain relief. absorbing junior pro. the strongest numbing pain relief available. it's the only

solution with two max strength anesthetics for fast, anesthetics for fast, penetrating relief ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ get 0% apr for 60 months on 2024 gmc ev models. that's up to $17,200 in average finance savings. ♪♪ the way i approach work post fatherhood, in average finance savings. has really trying to understand the generation that we're building devices for. here in the comcast family, we're building an integrated in-home wifi solution for millions of families like my own. in the average household, there are dozens of connected devices. connectivity is a big part of my boys' lives. it brings people together in meaningful ways.

on the skin. it works like a dream. why didn't someone think of this sooner? >> every day feels like, you know, trying to put 10 pounds of news into a 5 pound bag. do you think it matters that people are standing up for usaid and foreign aid in the history of the agency? has any other president ever tried to remove a member of the board the way donald trump tried to remove you? what do you think democrats can do right now in opposition, to try to mitigate some of the harm that's being caused as they

dismantle the federal government? the opposition is now awake and increasingly emboldened. tells you it's on. it is on. >> elon musk's crew now has access to classified material in some government agencies today. the atlantic reports an employee in senior leadership at usaid told us that elon musk's department of government efficiency now has full, unrestricted access to the agency's digital infrastructure, including total control over systems that americans working in conflict zones rely on the ability to see and manipulate financial systems that have historically awarded tens of billions of dollars, and perhaps much more. the employees account, along with the accounts of several others across federal agencies, offers the clearest portrait yet of just how deep the department of government efficiency has burrowed into the systems of the federal government and the sensitive

information of countless americans. nbc news reports that employees from elon musk's team are now at the pentagon, arriving for the first time yesterday. pentagon officials are refusing to share their names or explain what musk's team is doing. and the most conservative so-called think tank in washington, the cato institute, said today elon musk is not going to find waste, fraud and abuse at social security, cato said. the amount of fraud is likely minuscule. and oh yeah, donald trump said he's a king today. joining us now is democratic senator sheldon whitehouse. he's a member of the senate judiciary committee, finance committee and the budget committee. he's the top democrat on the environment and public works committee. senator, thank you very much for joining us tonight. and i know you are from a part of our world, rhode island, that used to be ruled by the king of england. and i noticed that you took notice today of donald trump declaring himself a king.

>> yeah. i thought it was a little bit preposterous what he was saying, and took a little poke at it. >> we usaid, in all of the work it does at certain points, intersects with classified information as obviously pentagon, full of classified information. we're going to have absolutely no idea what the musk crew is up to with any of that. >> no. >> but what we do know as this musk crew, who i refer to as the muskrats, that when they go into all of these different government data systems, whether it's our healthcare data, our social security data, our labor department data, or now usaid data, they have an undeniable motive, which is that the tech bros who. >> were there. >> at trump's inauguration and

elon musk. >> there. >> whatever he is boss, i guess. they think this data is immensely valuable. they operate systems in which data is the coin of the realm, and as they go into ai, more data becomes more valuable. and so question one is are they building in back doors, particularly to have something like god mode or administrator mode? you have the ability to actually change the wiring of how the system runs, and you can put in a back door so you can get in later, and then exfill data that you want, or let somebody else do that. so there's a huge data security problem, and they have a huge motive to violate americans privacy in all of these things. then you get into separate issues of do they really have the authority to be there? do they have the security clearances. >> to be there?

>> are they competent to mess in these complex systems and not do something inadvertently stupid? and there's no way to find out much of anything about all of that, because the whole thing is shrouded in secrecy. >> well, i think we do know that there's no positive answer to any of those questions that that, of course, they're they're all capable of being wrong, looking at something they've never seen before, working with things they've never seen before. they obviously had no comprehension of social security data and how that works. and they kept thinking they were staring at 150 year old people in there getting social security checks, which they're not, because they don't know what they're looking at. >> yeah. >> and so the gradient here is somewhere between, let's hope, only a small amount of bad stuff happens from all of this over to they break something really big or they leave an access into the

data that they themselves or tech bros, or perhaps even foreign interests can find a way into. and as best i can tell, there's nobody. >> in the. >> government who's watching that, who is checking on that, who is going to go back and try to see what patches need to be made. if you had a break in a corporate system, the first thing you do would be to bring the it experts in and try to make sure that your systems had not been corrupted and not been compromised, and there's no sign of anybody trying to do that either. >> senator sheldon whitehouse, i've got to squeeze in a commercial break here. when we come back, i want to ask you about something donald trump is doing we've never seen before. he's trying to be the first american president to change sides in the middle of a war. that's next. >> so i can take the steak home. yeah. and as many butterflies

shrimp as i want cake. >> you can take home everything. >> ice cream machine, everything. dessert bar, everything. fork. everything. that guy's had everything. careful. careful. >> or it's going ever feel like a spectator in your own life with chronic migraine? 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting 4 hours or more. botox® prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine. in a survey, 91% of users wish they'd started sooner. so why wait? talk to your doctor. botox® effects may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as trouble swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. those with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. side effects may include allergic reactions like rash, breathing problems, dizziness, neck and injection site pain, and headache. don't receive botox® if there's a skin infection. tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions like als, myasthenia gravis, or lambert-eaton syndrome and medicines like botulinum toxins, which may increase the risk of serious side effects. chronic migraine may still keep you from being there.

ask your doctor about botox® today. learn how abbvie can help you save. help people customize and save hundreds on car insurance with liberty mutual. >> you're just a flightless bird. >> no. >> he's a dreamer, frank. >> and doug. >> well. i'll be. that bird really did it. >> only pay for what. >> you need. >> liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty. >> you know when i need to relax? nope. almost. yes. i play goldfish casinoslots, the free to play mobile slots game with an underwater appeal. download goldfish casino slots for free and get 100 million coin bonus goldfish casino slots. go for the gold. >> here you go. >> is there any way to get a

better. >> price. >> on this? >> have you checked single care? >> before i pick up my prescription? >> i always. >> check the single. >> care price. >> it's quick. >> easy, and totally free to use. >> single care can literally. >> beat my insurance co-pay. >> go to. >> single care.com. >> and start. saving today. >> that credit is here to say yes, even when other lenders won't apply online in minutes and get funds deposited the next and get funds deposited the next business day or sooner. said with dexcom g7, managing your diabetes just got easier. so, what's your glucose number right now? good thing you don't need to fingerstick. how's all that food affect your glucose? oh, the answers on your phone. what if you're heading low at night? [phone beeps] wow, it can alert you?! and you can even track your goals. manage your diabetes with confidence with dexcom g7. the most accurate cgm. ♪♪ learn more at dexcom.com

with a bed, nightstand. >> dresser and mirror. >> but mine has. >> hidden storage and costs >> hidden storage and costs $1,000 do i smell okay? [sniff] mhm. why are you shimmying? oh! unstopables has odor blocker so i'll feel fresh all day, even after a red eye. we all use unstopables. looks like he does too! smell unstopable.

1-800-403-7539. that's one (800) 403-7539. >> the united states of america has never changed sides in the middle of a war. the classic model for changing sides in the middle of a war is the big mistake adolf hitler made in world war two, when he decided to turn against his ally, the soviet union. after soviet dictator joseph stalin got over the initial shock of hitler changing sides in the middle of the war, he joined in an alliance with great britain and eventually the united states to crush adolf hitler. donald trump has already changed sides in the war in ukraine, and now it's

just a question of whether he can get the rest of the american government to change sides with him. for the first time, and betray the people of ukraine. yesterday, in a flight of sheer dementia, donald trump blamed ukraine for starting the war, which began only when russia invaded ukraine. that is exactly like blaming poland for starting world war two, when adolf hitler invaded poland. it's exactly the same thing. and no one in human history has blamed poland for starting world war two, not even adolf hitler. today, donald trump called the heroic ukrainian president volodymyr zelensky a dictator, which is a lie. president zelensky was elected with a larger share of the vote than donald trump has ever won. and donald trump continues to tell the lie that millions of russians and ukrainians have been killed in the war. the last time millions

were killed in a war in europe was world war two. once again, the total number of war dead on the ukraine side is 46,000. the total number of war dead on the russian side is 854,280, not millions. still, with us senator sheldon whitehouse, who's just returned from the munich security conference. senator, today, some republicans disagreed. you know, the careful about their language, but they certainly disagreed about with donald trump, about calling zelensky a dictator. >> yeah, i think most all disagree. i will tell you that in the meetings we had in munich, there was a very substantial array of republican senators, including very senior ones like lindsey graham, who runs the foreign ops account for appropriations, the chairman of the armed services committee,

the chairman of the foreign relations committee. and what the our guests heard over and over again was their absolute support for ukraine and for victory in ukraine. and the house chairman. >> of. >> armed services, mike rogers, even said any resolution to this has to be a defeat for vladimir putin and has to be seen to be a defeat for vladimir putin. so it's going to be a real test of what you might call trump's surveillance in the republican party, to see how many will push back against this. we are already seeing push back. the trump is you know, he's flagrantly, flagrantly lying. and the worst thing is that not just the president of the united states is lying about something where he's obviously lying, but that his lies track perfectly with the talking points of

vladimir putin. so if you go back to remember trump, russia, the mueller report said there was trump, russia, bipartisan senate intelligence report said there was trump. russia repeated trials brought in evidence showing there was trump. russia there was is and ever shall be trump. russia. this is trump russia rearing its ugly head again. and i think a lot of my colleagues on the republican side are going to be pushing back hard behind the scenes on the white house in the days ahead. >> senator whitehouse, i just tried to write the word trump surveillance without looking down so i could keep my eye contact with the camera, and actually came out pretty good on my notes. but now i'm going to read it more carefully. thank you for that word. you'll be hearing it here. senator sheldon whitehouse, thank you very much for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> coming up, the republicans are very close to putting in writing exactly how much they want to cut from social security, medicare and medicaid. even though donald trump has

even though donald trump has promised never to cut those ever feel like a spectator in your own life with chronic migraine? 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting 4 hours or more. botox® prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine. in a survey, 91% of users wish they'd started sooner. so why wait? talk to your doctor. botox® effects may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as trouble swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. those with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. side effects may include allergic reactions like rash, breathing problems, dizziness, neck and injection site pain, and headache. don't receive botox® if there's a skin infection. tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions like als, myasthenia gravis, or lambert-eaton syndrome and medicines like botulinum toxins, which may increase the risk of serious side effects. chronic migraine may still keep you from being there. ask your doctor about botox® today. learn how abbvie can help you save.

i'm thinking of updating my kitchen... —yeah? —yes! ...this year, we are finally updating our kitchen... ...doing subway tile in an ivory, or eggshell... —cream?... —maybe bone?... don't get me started on quartz. a big big island... you ever heard of a waterfall counter?... for everyone who talks about doing that thing, and, over there. but never does that thing... a sweet little breakfast nook. chase has financial guidance. let's see how you can start saving to make this happen. —really? —really? really. at home or in-person. you could also check out a chase money skills workshop. that's guidance from chase. make more of what's yours. not premium wireless for $15 a month? who am i kidding? premium wireless for $15 a month will always premium wireless for $15 a month, and sometimes premium wireless for $15 a month every time. no points for subtlety, right? let's be honest. premium wireless for $15 a month, am i

right? let's just. right? let's just. >> stop. cidp is no walk in the park. that's true. but i take vyvgart hytrulo. same! it's the first major innovation in cidp treatment in over 30 years. vyvgart hytrulo has been proven to significantly reduce the risk of symptoms getting worse. and my cidp can be treated with once-weekly injections that take about 30 to 90 seconds. do not use vyvgart hytrulo if you have a serious allergy to any of its ingredients. serious allergic reactions, like trouble breathing and decrease in blood pressure leading to fainting, and allergic reactions such as rashes, swelling under the skin, shortness of breath, and hives have been reported. the most common side effects are respiratory and urinary tract infections, headache, and injection site reactions. it may increase the risk of infusion-related reactions and infection. tell your doctor if you have a history of infections or symptoms of an infection. i'm hittin' fairways with the fellas. i'm hittin' the road with my number 1. ♪♪ that's how we live vyvidly with vyvgart hytrulo. visit livevyvidly.com or talk to your neurologist.

♪♪ just breached has my social security number from the credit. >> check. >> 75% of americans have had their social security number exposed due to recent data breaches. >> that's why lifelock. >> monitors millions of data points for identity theft. if there's a problem, we fix it. guaranteed. >> nail fungus. >> is nasty. nail starts improving the. appearance of fungus damaged toenails in. just two days. it's clinically proven. >> formula penetrates the nail >> formula penetrates the nail for results you can cafe owner: we're finally opening! shingles doesn't care. but shingrix protects! only shingrix is proven over 90% effective. shingrix is a vaccine used to prevent shingles in adults 50 years and older. shingrix doesn't protect everyone and isn't for those with severe allergic reactions

to its ingredients or to a previous dose. tell your healthcare provider if you're pregnant or breastfeeding. increased risk of guillain-barré syndrome was observed after getting shingrix. fainting can happen so take precautions. most common side effects are pain, redness, and swelling where injected, muscle pain, tiredness, headache, shivering, fever, and upset stomach. ask your doctor about shingrix today. one minute. >> and look at the difference. >> my eyes look brighter and. >> whiter for up to eight hours. >> lumify really works. >> see for yourself. >> five. >> today in a social media post, donald trump said we need both chambers to pass the house budget to kick start the reconciliation process and move all of our priorities to the concept of one big, beautiful bill. the republican controlled house is scheduled to vote on their trump endorsed budget resolution next week. that resolution calls for $4.5

trillion in tax cuts and orders, trillions of dollars of spending cuts. the budget resolution orders the committee that has jurisdiction over medicaid to reduce spending by $880 billion. it's impossible to cut the amount of spending republicans are talking about without cutting social security, medicare or medicaid. but last night, donald trump said this. >> social security won't be touched other than this fraud or something. we're going to find it's going to be strengthened but won't be touched. medicare, medicaid, none of that stuff is going to be touched. >> nothing. >> joining us now is congressional historian norm ornstein. he's an emeritus scholar at the american enterprise institute. and norm, as you know, the audience might not know that the budget resolution is just a set of instructions to committees telling them how much money they want them to cut, raise, whatever. and so it's hard for a citizen to read that and make sense of it. it's never going to say cut medicaid, but you have

to know when it orders that committee to cut $800 billion. medicaid is the only thing they have to do it. and so we'll get to much more specifics at the next stage, which is the reconciliation bill, where all those cuts get specified. so we're we're marching up toward the specifics now. >> and there's one other thing to keep in mind, lawrence, which is that spending runs out on march 14th, so they have to do at least a stopgap spending measure, even as they do this budget resolution, deal with appropriations and then do their big reconciliation bill, which we should note. they've said they want to increase the debt. ceiling by $4 trillion as well. you and i have been around long enough. you and your time at the finance committee me even longer around the house and senate to see farcical budget debates take place. this one is going to take the cake, i believe. and what we know. >> is that. >> the reason, primary reason, as we saw in his statement that

donald trump endorsed this house budget resolution, even though it. >> will. >> violate his. >> pledge. >> is because the senate one with lindsey graham, is going to give money to ukraine and the house one does not. so he'll abandon everything else so that he can continue to abandon ukraine. and we're going to see whether, as sheldon whitehouse has said, republicans will talk tough not just behind the scenes, but in their votes and whether the house will be able to get republican votes. and frankly, given this farce, any democrat in the house or senate that votes to save the bacon of these republicans going through this horrific exercise would be nuts. >> yeah. and obviously, the reconciliation package they will present will greatly increase the deficit and the debt. and i suspect that what their argument is going to be is ignore the

budget projections, because elon is going to give us trillions more in spending cuts when he gets finished with his work. so just ignore what the congressional budget office says about how much this is going to increase the debt. >> the other. >> thing that's going on here a little bit in their discussions behind the scenes, as you know, with reconciliation, there's a kind of a farce. you're not allowed to increase the debt after ten years. so they passed these ridiculous budget cuts. bush did it. and trump has done it in 2017, enormous cuts for the wealthy that expire after ten years. what they're doing now is continuing those ones starting next year, ostensibly for another ten. but you've got a bunch of republicans in the house and senate saying, let's just ignore those rules. we'll rule over the parliamentarian and make them permanent, because we don't want to risk having them go away even after another ten years, ignoring their own

rules, blowing up the budget, lying about where they're going to make the cuts. i mean, this is unlike anything that i have seen in more than 50 years of being around these institutions, and i've seen plenty. lawrence. >> yeah, and that's why i think the musk thing integrates with this, because it's giving people the idea that you can these there are these magic cuts that can happen that's never been in the mix here before. in one of these reconciliation packages. >> no. >> and you know, what we have seen often in the past is republicans talk a good game about cutting government. and then they find that all of these programs actually work for their own constituents. what's going on now? all of these republican house members and senators plaintively pleading to donald trump not to let elon musk and doge go through with these cuts for their constituents. and we're going to see, i think, the same sort of thing happen down the road. let them decide their

own fate and fail at it. and let's make sure that it's on the backs of those republicans and trump and musk. >> norm ornstein, thank you very >> norm ornstein, thank you very much for joining us tonight. [tv announcer] premium meat for natural diet. most people don't realize how processed typical dog food is. at the farmer's dog we believe dogs should be able to get their daily nutrition without the excess processing. the digestibility is just better. we have the right amount of protein, the right amount of fat, the right amount of nutrients being added, but it's real food. everybody wants to take care of their dog in the best way that they can. our mission is just to help them do that. always dry scoop before you run. listen to me, the hot dog diet got me shredded. it's time we listen to science. one a day is formulated with key nutrients to support whole body health. one a day. science that matters. the itch and rash of moderate to severe eczema

disrupts my skin. despite treatment, it's still not under control. but now i have rinvoq. a once-daily pill that reduces the itch and helps clear the rash of eczema —fast. some felt significant itch relief as early as 2 days— and some achieved dramatic skin clearance as early as 2 weeks. many saw clear or almost-clear skin. plus, many had clearer skin and less itch, even at 3 years. rinvoq can lower ability to fight infections. before treatment, test for tb and do bloodwork. serious infections, blood clots, some fatal; cancers, including lymphoma and skin; serious allergic reactions; gi tears; death; heart attack; and stroke occurred. cv event risk increases in age 50 plus with a heart disease risk factor. tell your doctor if you've had these events, infection, hep b or c, smoked, are pregnant or planning. don't take if allergic or have an infection. disrupt the itch and rash of eczema. talk to your dermatologist about rinvoq. dexcom g7 sends your glucose numbers

to your phone and watch, so you can always see where you're heading without fingersticks. dexcom g7 is the most accurate cgm, so you can manage your diabetes with confidence. ♪♪ with fatigue and light-headedness, i knew something was wrong. then i saw my doctor and found out i have afib, and that means there's about a 5 times greater risk of stroke. symptoms like irregular heartbeat, heart racing, chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, or light-headedness, can come and go. but if you have afib, the risk of stroke is always there. if you have one or more symptoms, get checked out. making that appointment can help you get ahead of stroke risk. this is no time to wait. minutes and get funds deposited the next business day or sooner. the next business day or sooner. >> when you when you experience advanced technology in the buick envision.

(♪♪) equipped with the largest-in-class ultrawide 30-inch diagonal display and google built-in compatibility, innovation is at your fingertips. buick. exceptional by design. yeah, it is weird that we still call these things phones. buick. well, yeah. they're more like mini computers. precisely, next slide. xfinity mobile customers are connected to wifi 90% of the time. that's why our network has powerboost with wifi speeds up to a gig where you need it most. so, this whole meeting could have been remote? oh, that is my ex-husband who i don't speak to.

hey! no, i'm good to talk! xfinity internet customers, cut your mobile bill in half for your first year with xfinity mobile. plus, ask how to get the new samsung galaxy s25+ on us. how much you can save. >> tonight's last word, thanks to senator sheldon whitehouse, is trump servants. the 11th hour with stephanie ruhle starts now. >> tonight, d.o.j. targets the pentagon. >> elon musk's. team now focusing on military spending as the defense secretary considers firing top generals. then president trump ratchets up attacks on ukraine's leader, calling president zelensky a dictator after blaming ukraine for russia's invasion. and a judge grills a top doj prosecutor about the move to drop a c