>> when you say coming for you to. what do you mean by that? >> i mean, this is. >> now an executive that's saying they're going to use their power to encroach against, you know, the legislative branch, the judicial branch. and they're. using the idea that trans people aren't supported to give the president more authority. and we have already seen how that's going to impact everybody. but this is a dangerous precedent that they're setting targeting trans people. so if we don't disrupt the narrative of our monstrosity, then that is just. >> going to. >> fuel their they don't care about us, they care about power, and they're using us to get more. >> chase strangio, thank you so much for coming in tonight. really good to see you. that is all in on this thursday night. the rachel maddow show starts right now. good evening rachel. >> good evening chris. that was a stunning interview. thanks. really really well done. your explanation also of what's going on with andrew tate, the influencer guy, was the first person who was explained it to me in a way that i have understood. oh that's good. i feel like, yes, both your interview with mr. strangio and

the andrew tate explainer. now i finally get it. i feel like i owe a lot to you already tonight. >> that's good. that's our job. >> all right. thanks. thanks, my friend, and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. at the end of last night's show, you might remember we were counting down to a midnight deadline that had been given to the trump administration by a federal judge. a judge had ordered the trump administration to restart funding on foreign aid. now, this is a judge who had previously ordered the trump administration to restart that funding, and they had not. he had then brought trump administration lawyers back into his courtroom this week and said, it doesn't seem like you're complying with my earlier order. can you tell me what steps are being taken to comply with my order? the trump administration lawyer then responded by basically going hummina hummina hummina hummina hummina the judge. at that point, we got we got the transcript. actually, the judge at that point said quote, hey, i guess i'm not sure why i can't get a straight answer from you

on this. hey, after that, just humiliation of the trump administration's lawyer unable to explain why the trump administration was defying this lawful order, that judge issued what's called a motion to enforce. and he set this midnight deadline for midnight last night, by which the trump administration had to do what he said had to restart that aid funding. so that's what we were talking about last night at the top of the show. and then just as we were going off the air at the end of the show last night, the trump administration ran to the u.s. supreme court. and just before we went off the air, just before the end of last night show, the trump administration obtained an order from the supreme court, saving them from that midnight deadline. right. so they're less than three hours away from that deadline. and the supreme court at the very last second steps in and says, no, no, no, trump administration. you don't have to release that funding by midnight, after all.

and we want briefing on this by noon on friday. so we'll see what happens by noon on friday. by by tomorrow noon at the us supreme court. but because of the supreme court's intervention that usaid funding did not start flowing last night at midnight, and this confrontation and this series of events raises like a whole niagara falls of issues and consequences. i mean, first of all, most importantly, it's the substance of it, right? i mean, what's that funding for? well, among other things, it's for the magnificently successful, successful, world renowned us aids treatment programs that have been interrupted that puts tens of millions of lives at risk with that funding. not allowing those programs aren't restarting. the new work that is not being done because that funding hasn't

restarted includes little things like, i don't know, work on the previously unknown brand new hemorrhagic fever that has just broken out in congo. it killed three little kids in congo over the course of three days, and then immediately within like ten more days, the death toll was 53, and now it's in at least two different locations in congo. and they don't know what it is or how it spreads. it is a disease they have never seen before. it does seem to have an alarmingly high death rate, something like a 12% death rate, which for a hemorrhagic fever, an infectious disease, is a massive death rate. and even scarier than that, those it kills, it seems to kill within 48 hours, right? this is bad. an outbreak spreading fast of a previously undiscovered unknown hemorrhagic fever that is already killing humans by the dozens. that's the kind of thing that united states global health

programs would be all over. usually, to identify this thing, to contain it, to treat people and keep them alive, to stop this thing from spreading, among other things, to make sure that it does not come here to the united states. but we're not doing the foreign aid funding anymore. stopping usaid means stopping efforts to combat things like that. it also means, you know, stopping america's traditional and leading and totally irreplaceable work to help and contain the damage when not just hemorrhagic fevers break out, like ebola in uganda and marburg in tanzania, both of which are happening right now, but also to stop things like tuberculosis and malaria. domestically here in this country, this confrontation, this drama with the supreme court getting involved means that we are about to have the us supreme court meaningfully weigh in on this sledgehammer that

trump and his top campaign donor have taken to the us government thus far, with no seeming regard for either the law or the constitution. so we will see, probably for the first time, how the supreme court is oriented toward this radical change that has happened over the last five and a half weeks in our country. and honestly, this is also important because the way this came up, that midnight deadline we were looking at last night was set so firmly and so urgently by the federal judge who was hearing this case, because he had to do it by motion to enforce. he had to do a motion to enforce, because trump really was ignoring that court's previous orders. right. and so when we look to see how the supreme court handles this, tomorrow at noon, we're going to be looking to see how the supreme court handles that very scary issue, how this supreme court is going to treat the prospect of this president, this

administration potentially ignoring the court's. they have been joking about this and making, you know, macho sounding bluffs about this for a long time now, particularly from the vice president, jd vance. how is the supreme court going to deal with it now that it's real? do they try to give him what he wants from the courts so that trump doesn't break that glass, doesn't, you know, smash through the brightest bright line that we have and effectively end the republic. they appease him because they oh, he's so scary. we better not make him defy a court order. we better make sure all court orders go his way. or do they make clear to him that his power is, as president? actually, don't allow him to defy the court's to tell him that he's not always going to get what he wants from the courts. and when the courts tell him something he doesn't like, he has to obey the courts anyway. do they tell him that if he does try to defy the courts, he is effectively declaring war on the united states of america?

we'll see. we don't know how the u.s. supreme court is going to handle this, and we don't know how directly they're going to get at this key issue. but this case moves to them tomorrow at noon eastern time. so eyes wide open on that and take it with all the seriousness it deserves. we've got the top senate democrat on the judiciary here, judiciary committee here tonight to talk about what happened yesterday in the senate when trump nominees for senior justice department positions, told him and other members of the judiciary committee that they weren't sure that trump should always obey court rulings that happened in the senate yesterday. the leading democrat on the senate judiciary committee is going to be here talking with us about it in just a moment, ahead of tomorrow's supreme court actions on this case. it's a very chilling subject. it's one i take very seriously. it is absolutely the end game discussion for us as a republic. it is as serious as it

gets. meanwhile, this is what it looked like in washington, d.c. today as workers from that agency, from usaid were each given a grand total of 15 minutes by the trump administration to come into usaid headquarters and retrieve their belongings from their offices. while they were doing that, people showed up in big numbers to support them and clap for them and to say thank you. >> thank you. and. >> there's so many. >> emotions. >> i already cried this morning when i arrived. >> you know, someone. >> said, you know, thanks for being here. >> and i just. >> burst into tears. >> yeah. >> thank you for helping. we're here. >> we thank you. >> this is. >> not happening in the dark. >> that was washington, d.c.

today as people showed up to support and thank usaid workers who the trump administration is trying to fire as they try to shut down that agency, even though they pretty clearly are just legally not allowed to do that. people turning out to protest, but also support the people who are at the sharp end of this stick. one of the tools the trump administration has been using to try to destroy usaid and to disassemble so many other agencies, is wholesale firing en masse, firing everybody who is considered a probationary employee. and you've heard that term over this last couple of weeks, when they have been using this as the basis for firing people, being a probationary employee, it usually means you're in your first year or two on the job. it can also mean that you've transferred into a new job, or you've been promoted within the last year or two. probationary makes it sound like you've been in trouble, right? and you're

like, you're on probation. we're watching you because you did something wrong. it's not that at all. it is a meaningless category in terms of the importance of the work that's being done by that employee their skill level, their performance, their value to the government and to their agency. but nevertheless, the trump administration has ordered mass firings of people based purely on that classification, just because they thought it would be easy to get away with that, legally speaking. turns out not so fast. tonight, a federal judge on the west coast, a federal judge in california, has just ruled that the trump administration's instructions to agencies about indiscriminately firing all these people, thousands and thousands of probationary employees thus far, a judge just ruled tonight that the instruction from the trump administration to all the agencies about firing these people is, quote, illegal and, quote, should be stopped, rescinded, federal judge william alsup said from the bench in his ruling tonight, quote, the

office of personnel management does not have any authority whatsoever under any statute in the history of the universe to hire and fire employees within another agency. he said, quote, it can hire its own employees. yes, can fire them, but it cannot order or direct some other agency to do so. judge alsup further ordered tonight from the bench that the rescinding of the trump administration directive to fire probationary employees. he ordered that the rescinding of that directive should be conveyed tonight to the pentagon, to the u.s. defense department. and i think that's because tomorrow is the day on which the pentagon was otherwise expected to march. more than 5000 fired employees out the door. well, again, the judge said the defense department needs to be informed of my ruling tonight, not tomorrow, tonight. so whether or not they

still try to fire those 5000 plus employees tomorrow at defense department, it may not happen because of this judge's order. we shall see. we don't think that this order from this judge tonight means that all the other probationary employees who have already been fired are going to be reinstated. we don't think that's the implication of this ruling, but we're going to have to wait to see his written order in this case, which we expect tomorrow. again, he ruled from the bench tonight. he ordered that his ruling from the bench be conveyed to the pentagon. but we expect his his written ruling tomorrow. today, noah, the national oceanic and atmospheric administration, which among other things, gives us, you know, the weather forecast. they sent out notices today that they are indiscriminately firing hundreds of employees from that agency. the trump administration also today announced plans to close hundreds of help centers, places people can go to get free help

and advice on their taxes. oh, good. these are the so-called taxpayer assistance centers. they're going to close 110 of those all around the country. yeah. can't possibly have taxpayer assistance. that announcement comes as the irs was told to fire more than 6000 people this past week, just as tax filing season is getting underway. we're also going to be talking tonight with the reporter on va issues tonight. trump has just fired more than 2000 people from the va, from the agency that serves our nation's veterans, including people who work to support the veterans crisis line. yeah, there's a lot a lot of fraud, waste and abuse there. got to cut that. trump also cut funding for veterans cancer care. seriously and for veterans cemeteries seriously before good journalism about those cuts and

a resulting huge outcry yesterday forced them to reinstate some of those things, but they did try to cut them. we'll have more on that coming up tonight. but these cuts that i'm talking about, the impact of these cuts that i'm talking about, the legal fight over these cuts, but also the pushback against these, these cuts and what they're doing. it's not at all a washington story by now. it really is by now, everywhere. >> one of the places where we've already seen impacts from those federal cuts is right here at the detroit va. >> on a day. >> that would have been his one year work anniversary at the detroit va. >> when i. >> first got that email, i was shocked. >> you know. >> quite frankly, shocked. >> elliott spray is. >> instead unemployed. the ten year veteran, one of the thousands of federal employees terminated in the last few weeks as the trump administration and the department of government officially work to slash what they say is government waste. a rally in livonia tuesday bringing out dozens of seniors concerned about.

>> social security and medicare. >> i'm terrified. my life would change drastically without social security, and that's our money. we put that in. nobody gave us that money. we loaned it to the government. >> everything that that is happening. >> right now. >> is impacting. >> so many people. >> delia sharp in the crowd after. >> losing her job on friday. >> when the department of education grant she was hired under was terminated. department of education cuts. the potential elimination of the department of education is one of sort of two categories of actions the trump administration and republicans in washington are taking that have potentially catastrophic effects, not just on the people whose who are served by those agencies or the people who work there, but also on the states. if the federal education department disappears, which nbc news reports is their plan to just eliminate that department and everything it does if they

kill the federal education department, and if they go ahead with these massive medicaid cuts that are slated in the budget that republicans have just started to pass in washington, both of those things are going to just be nuclear bombs on the state budgets of just about every state in the country. those folks in michigan on tuesday, including the woman who's just lost her job because of department of education cuts, they were protesting, among other things, what what trump is doing to social security. they protested outside the social security administration buildin. reporters this week, including david dayen at the american prospect, have warned that trump's cuts at the social security administration might be fully 50% of the workforce at social security. meanwhile, the expected cuts to medicaid, which again, would be devastating not just to the people who work to administer that be devastating to the tens of millions of people who get medicaid in this

country. they'd be devastating to state budgets in every state in this country. the expected cuts to medicaid specifically led to this protest yesterday in wisconsin. >> where many of those who gathered on wednesday. >> it just goes. >> on. >> and on with stories. >> i have a. >> 23 year. old son. >> who. >> has developmental disabilities. >> he has been. >> on. >> medicaid since he was. >> a toddler. >> and photos. >> i think. >> people need to. >> see that there are real people being impacted. >> telling how medicaid has affected their lives. they have. not been able to receive. >> those. >> therapies without it. >> they believe the budget plan approved by the house of. representatives on tuesday means cuts to medicaid. >> medicaid is. >> an essential. >> program for these folks, and we cannot let it be cut. they need to listen to the people. >> the wisconsin department of health and human services reported 1.47. >> million. wisconsinites were enrolled. >> in medicaid in 2023.

heartbreaking to see how. >> many people are going to be affected. >> senator johnson did not. >> appear in. >> person, but said in a statement the rally has, quote, no basis in truth or fact. >> senator ron johnson of wisconsin never misses an opportunity to share how much he respects his constituents, but has no basis in truth or fact. yeah, these dummies with their disabled children rallying at his office, he doesn't see the need to respond. they don't know anything. you might have seen the headline in the washington post yesterday about how the quote resistance is beginning to quote wake in earnest post highlighted, among other things, the fact that senator bernie sanders just held a couple of town hall events in two red states in iowa, where he went to iowa city, and in nebraska, where he held an event in omaha. you can see from some of the local news coverage and the footage we've been able to get that these events were sort of stuffed to the gills and beyond.

in omaha, the organizers of that town hall event with senator sanders said they had an inkling that the response was going to be pretty big. so they arranged for a really big venue for his event. they planned for 1000 people to show up. they got a venue that seated 1000 people on the night of the event, though the actual turnout was between 3500 and 4000 people in nebraska in february to go to a meeting with bernie sanders. in iowa city. his talk there was at noontime, the des moines register reports that thousands of people turned up in iowa city. they started lining up at 7:30 a.m. for an event that wouldn't start until noon. the des moines register reports that lines to get in stretched multiple city blocks, and they had to set up a whole separate overflow event in iowa in february to go to a noontime meeting with bernie sanders. and this is not just a bernie

sanders phenomenon. this, for example, was the no special occasion regular organizing meeting last night for the indivisible chapter in collingswood, new jersey. they again had guessed that there might be an unusually large amount of interest, given everything that's going on. so they booked a hall that could hold a huge number of people for just a regular organizing meeting. on a wednesday night, they booked a hall that could hold 450 people, but they filled that 450 seat room, and then another 200 people showed up and could not get in, and they decided they would just meet in the parking lot instead. you might have also seen recent headlines just over the past few days about how republican members of congress are being advised now to please stop holding town halls with their constituents because they aren't enjoying the national and local news coverage that those things are engendering. look at this out of midlothian, virginia. this gives you some sense of why republicans might not want to be anywhere near their constituents right now, not when this is what

it's like for them. even in republican congressional districts. >> the event. >> whitman's office held today was called mobile office hours. congressman whitman wasn't in attendance, nor was he ever scheduled to be. however, that didn't stop his constituents from giving his staff an. earful from angry chants. >> don't patronize. >> us with your nonsense. >> shame, shame, shame. >> to passionate, please. >> we want. >> to know. >> we want. >> to know. >> and even tears. >> who is. >> representing me in congress. >> constituents from across the first congressional district filed into a midlothian american legion post on wednesday. that's where republican congressman rob whitman's office was holding, what his team calls. mobile office hours. >> he needs. >> to answer. >> to his. >> constituents and. >> stop hiding. >> his constituents. >> saying they're concerned about the gop budget resolution,

which whitman voted for on tuesday that some, including the mother of a child with lung disease. believe could lead to massive cuts to medicaid. >> you take. >> away medicaid funds, you are saying that's okay for this. >> child to die? >> plus, cuts to other key social services like snap benefits. >> and rob whitman voted last. night to. >> cut back. >> by 23%. >> constituents also upset with president donald trump's firing of thousands of federal. >> workers like chesterfield resident. >> ebony turner. she says she was fired from the irs. last week. >> the termination was. not based on my performance. >> nor conduct. my agency's leadership will attest to that. >> whitman's office. >> turned down our interview request to address his constituents concerns. but in a statement, the congressman said while he believes. >> quote. >> enhancing government efficiency is important, he believes that goal.

>> should be, quote. pursued with. >> greater compassion on potential cuts to social services. whitman repeatedly did not address our specific questions. >> the congressman repeatedly did not address our specific questions, nor did he show up in person to face that from his constituents in his republican district last night. that report from wabe in virginia from last night, one of the things that does keep cropping up at these town halls and also at protests that we're seeing all over the country, is just rage and expressions of disgust at the president putting his top campaign donor in charge of destroying the government. that has also led increasingly to protests that specifically target that campaign donor elon musk. like this one a few days ago in cherry hill, new jersey, on the street outside the tesla dealer in that town are pretty considerable turnout outside

that tesla dealership in cherry hill. there was another protest targeting elon musk, specifically at the spacex and starlink offices in redmond, washington. this was yesterday. they seem to have had a pretty good turnout there up in redmond, washington. it will also be interesting to see what kind of turnout there is this saturday, march 1st, in hawthorne, california, which is right near lax, right near the airport in la. they're telling people to dress up like elon musk for the protest at that spacex headquarters building on saturday. so if nothing else, it should be funny. they specifically went out of their way to say, if you do dress up like mr. musk for the protest, please do not choose to express your opinion of him by dressing up as a nazi. they do not want anybody there in nazi elon musk outfits. thank you, thank you. please no. that protest at spacex global headquarters in la again expected saturday as the concerns and objections to elon musk now are starting to extend,

not just to what he's doing to the rest of the government, but what he's doing for himself as he's taking apart the government. the washington post is now following on reporting that initiated with bloomberg news and other outlets that musk has, has now apparently just somehow engineered the overriding of an existing faa contract with verizon to instead install his own company in its place to instead install starlink at the faa. they're just doing that. is that legal? aren't there rules for like, contracts and conflicts of interest and stuff? as we get to that part of the definition of oligarchy already right away, one of the more unnerving things that mr. musk has developed an interest in in recent days appears to be the american judicial system. now, on top of everything else he is doing in his capacity as the president's top donor, musk has also started railing publicly that american judges and the judiciary are the

real problem in this country, and that therefore we need to start, in his words, firing judges because courts should not be allowed to stop him and to stop donald trump from doing whatever they want. naturally, republican members of congress are obliging. they've started filing impeachment proceedings against multiple federal judges who've had the temerity to rule against trump. and this seems sort of at the same time, to be just the natural evolution of where these guys have always been heading. but it also seems to be the single brightest bright line we have as a country when it comes to figuring out whether the authoritarian takeover they are attempting will be stopped, or whether it will go all the way. americans, from sea to shining sea are turning out in huge and increasing numbers. to say they are not down with this, they do not want any of this. and amid this fight and amid this drama, and amid the american people being so palpably mad about what

they are doing, the single most important line that just cannot be crossed ever is to have a president defying the law and defying the courts, because that is the end. and on that, senator dick durbin joins us next. stay dick durbin joins us next. stay my skin? she gets thirsty. and venus gets it. so, when i shave, it's the new venus moisture glide. it's got five blades and bars with a touch of argan oil that lock in moisture. feel the power of smooth. my skin. my way. venus. hate and extremism in the united states are on the rise. in fact, there are more than 1400 hate groups in our country today. groups that vilify others for their race, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity. and extremist groups that spread dangerous conspiracies and encourage violent acts. this is a dark chapter in our history, but it can be rewritten. since 1971, the southern poverty law center has been fighting has been fighting hate

and defending justice and equality in the u.s. but we can't do it without support from people like you. please call now or go online to helpfighthate.org to become a friend of the center. for just $19 a month, only $0.63 a day, you can support the fight for justice. in recent years, hate crimes against black, jewish and lgbtq americans have nearly doubled across the us. this violence has no place in a just society. hate and extremism are dividing us like never before, but together we can protect our communities and continue providing no cost legal help to those impacted by hate violence. so please call or go to helpfighthate.org and give just $19 a month. when you use your credit card, you'll receive the special fight hate t-shirt to show your standing up for civil rights. the fate of our country is in our hands. we can and will build a more just future.

but it won't come without a fight. that's why we need your support today. southern poverty law center staff are in the courts defending freedom and in the halls of power, advocating for change and working hard to prevent recruitment into extremist groups throughout the united states. together, we can push back against this wave of hate and extremism. become a friend of the center today. call or go online to helpfighthate.org right now. if you have heart failure or chronic kidney disease, farxiga can help you keep living life, because there are places you'd like to be. (♪♪) serious side effects include increased ketones in blood or urine and bacterial infection between the anus and genitals, both which may be fatal, severe allergic reactions, dehydration, urinary tract or genital yeast infections, and low blood sugar. stop taking and tell your doctor right away if you have nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, tiredness, rash,

swelling, trouble breathing or swallowing. tell your doctor about lightheadedness, weakness, fever, pain, tenderness, redness or swelling between the anus and genitals. ask your doctor about farxiga today. ♪ far-xi-ga ♪ (♪♪)

happened that i don't think has ever happened before. multiple nominees for senior justice department jobs said during their confirmation hearings out loud that they're not sure that presidents have to obey rulings from the courts. not always. >> there is no. >> hard and. >> fast rule about. >> whether in some, in every. >> instance. >> a public official is bound by a court decision. >> generally, if there is a direct court order that binds a federal or state. >> official. >> they should follow it. >> why do you say generally give me an exception?

>> i suppose. >> one could imagine. >> hypotheticals in extreme cases. >> the president. >> has now. asserted that. >> he has the right basically. >> to do. >> what he thinks is. >> necessary to. >> save the country. and i'm asking. >> whether. >> that includes. >> violating a supreme court order. >> i represented. >> president trump for. >> two years. i've never. >> been. put in any. >> situation like that. >> and i don't know. >> i just got to say, mr. chairman, that's a. >> little bit frustrating. >> that's a little bit frustrating. you may recognize one of those nominees, the guy with the raspy voice, he's named john sauer. he is the lawyer who told a federal appeals court that donald trump would be within his rights to order a team of navy seals to assassinate his political opponents, that that donald trump could not be prosecuted for, for giving such an order. mr. sauer is now up for the job of solicitor general, which is the person who represents the united states government before the supreme court. the unnerving refusal by him and other trump justice department nominees

yesterday to say that the president must always obey the federal court's. that prompted a stern and somewhat unexpected admonition from one republican senator from john kennedy of louisiana. >> you're all adults. you're all officers of the court. some will give you some advice. i may be wrong, but i doubt it. don't ever, ever. >> take the. >> position that you're not. going to follow the order of a federal court, ever. now, you can disagree with. >> it. >> within the bounds of. >> legal ethics. >> you can criticize it. >> you can. >> appeal it.

>> or you can resign. >> joining us now is illinois senator dick durbin. he is the second highest ranking democrat in the senate. he's the ranking member on the senate judiciary committee. senator durbin, it's a rare pleasure to be able to have you here on the show tonight. thank you so much for making time. >> thanks, rachel. good to be with you. >> i know that you have had a strong reaction to those nominees, playing with the idea that donald trump doesn't have to obey court orders. in an interview today, you called it breathtaking. you said it raises serious existential constitutional questions. we've got to step back and have an honest discussion about this. why do you feel so strongly about that? what can you explain to our viewers about the seriousness of this issue that you've that you've now come across in these confirmation hearings? >> rachel, you and i have heard many people use the phrase constitutional crisis and try to define exactly when it reaches the point of breaking point with our constitution. and it seems to me that the final question is the one i raised with these

witnesses. if you were given a court order that says to this president or any president for that matter, that there are certain. actions that they cannot take or should not take or have to take, are you going to follow that order? and it turned out to be a debating topic. i thought the answer was a clear yes and let's move on. but they wanted to debate it. you heard one of them qualify and say, well, generally, yes. and we had these equivocal answers. the most definitive answer came from john kennedy, as you noted, a republican of louisiana who made it clear what i think the law is. you may hate the order of the court, but you have to follow it or resign, period. i can't think of an exception to that. they tried to use an illustration, korematsu, dred scott, those terrible decisions one of the republican senators used is an illustration of a court order that you could morally rationalize opposing. but the bottom line is, you cannot take a subjective test on

this issue. if you did, you'd have someone who might be a racist who says brown versus board of education integrating our schools. i don't believe in that. that's morally reprehensible to me, and i will not enforce that order in my administration of education. so you see, that's a slippery slope. so i think we've raised the threshold question for the department of justice appointments by this administration. and we'd better debate it out, because it gets to the heart of our democracy. >> it does get to the heart of our democracy. it is the closest thing that we have to an existential question, i think, in terms of our republic, to see the wholesale destruction of the federal government, which i think they're trying to do, to see them appearing to ignore laws when it comes to doing what they're trying to do to the us government, is a bad thing as far as i'm concerned. disobeying the law seems to be bad. but the prospect that when a court corrects that when a court declares it to be illegal and

orders them to change course, that they will not do it, we are just in a territory that that's that's like where the roadrunner runs off the end of the cliff, and then there's nothing there and it just drops. i have to ask you, because i think you do very clearly see the seriousness of this. what sort of contingency plans elected democrats have for further sounding the alarm and for trying to correct course and pull that roadrunner back onto the cliff. if, if, if they go as far as they're signaling, they might. >> well, i can tell you, i think this is going to be a standard inquiry of all those appointed to serve in the administration, particularly in the department of justice. as i said, i was a little bit surprised, not totally, because we've seen some rather amazing things done by this administration so far. but i was surprised by the answers yesterday. we cannot take for granted that any of these

nominees from the trump administration will follow the basic tenets of our constitutional law. we have to ask the question, and if the answer comes back no, as did yesterday, or at least qualified as it did yesterday, it is right for us to continue to press the case as the minority. it's a frustration that we don't have controlling votes on the question, but i am hopeful and i hope john kennedy is an illustration, that there will come a moment when republican senators will come out of hiding and speak up clearly on something as basic as this principle of constitutional law. because if we abandon this, i'm afraid we've abandoned our democracy. >> senator dick durbin of illinois, the ranking democrat on the judiciary committee, senior democrat in the senate. sir, thank you for your time tonight. i do really appreciate you being here. >> thanks, rachel. >> all right. much more news ahead here tonight. stay with ahead here tonight. stay with us. [♪♪] do you own a dishwasher, but only use it for storage or as a drying rack? get better results than hand washing,

with your dishwasher and cascade complete. your dishwasher does the work for you, with temperatures up to 140 degrees - too hot for hands. some dishwashers even have a sanitizing cycle. load pots, pans and tableware at the bottom, with plastic and glassware on top. cascade complete removes visible and invisible residue, for virtually spot-free and shiny dishes. blink. switch to your dishwasher, and cascade complete. relief. work. play. blink. relief. >> the only. >> 3 in. >> 3 in. when the time comes to act. are you all in for the things that really matter? i am all in for racial justice. i'm all in for voting rights. i'm all in for women's rights. i'm all in for civil rights. the time is now to stand up for a future you believe in.

to be all in for the rights of black communities across the u.s.. to keep advancing the future we envision for the america we love. you can do it now by supporting the naacp®. call or go online now to become a champion for change. your donation of just $19 a month, only $0.63 a day, will help naacp® keep advancing in the fight for equity and justice. your support will help ensure that all students can learn. businesses can thrive, communities can advance, and everyone can vote. and together, we'll create a tomorrow in which all people can thrive. the naacp® is on the front line in the fight for equality. but we need your support now to keep advancing the cause of racial justice in america, because we won't go back. so please join us. call or go to keepadvancing.org and give just $19 a month.

when you use your credit card, you'll receive this special i'm all in t-shirt to show you're helping advance the rights of black americans. i'm all in for a great education. i'm all in for health equity. i'm all in to lead the fight for equality. we're all in for the naacp®. this is the moment to use your power for good. so please become an naacp® champion for change today. call or go online to keepadvancing.org right now. you've got some place to go? introducing pocket air pro by bullseye the compact compressor that goes anywhere to fill it up with air. equipped with a 4000 milliamp hour rechargeable lithium ion battery, it puts the power of a

full size air compressor in your pocket. that's enough power to take this car tire from flat to filled. get your complete pocket air pro system today. pocket air air pro system today. pocket air ♪♪ grandma! ♪♪ still taking yours? everyday! made to care for you, every day. nature made, the #1 pharmacist recommended vitamin and supplement brand.

>> get any two. leggings for just $24. >> when you sign up as a new fabletics vip. >> do not let anyone tell you that push back does not matter. look at this. this was the headline tuesday night at the washington post doge to cancel government contracts that help veterans. records show, quote, the 875 contracts on the chopping block helped cover medical services, fund cancer programs, recruit doctors and provide burial services to veterans, according to internal va documents. also, a contract to, quote, safely dispose of

chemical waste. yeah, who needs that? look, the word waste is right there. let's cut that. so this is the va. this is health care for american military veterans. here's donald trump announcing proudly as president, we're slashing funding for cancer care for american military veterans. also, burial services, literally burial services for veterans. and hey, just toss that chemical waste out back behind the shed. it'll be fine. but put that back up there. that was the that was the headline at the washington post tuesday night. doge to cancel government contracts that help veterans. this was tuesday night. but then look at this. this was less than 24 hours later. ding under pressure va halts contract cancellations in a major reversal. after one night and one day of shock and outrage at what trump was doing.

hey, turns out they decided to reverse it. not going to do it. don't let anybody tell you that pushback doesn't work. that said, it's not like they're leaving veterans alone. the trump administration fired a thousand people who work at the va. two weeks ago this week, they fired 1400 more people who work at the va. leo shane, reporting at the military times, quote, officials said the moves did not impact any mission critical jobs, but, quote, did not provide any specifics of the types of assignments that were eliminated. one va official telling nbc news, quote, it's leading to paralysis and nothing is getting done. the official described absolute chaos at the agency, with even trump political appointees afraid to misstep and incur a backlash from either the white house or the public. as bad as this already is, though, heads up that the kinds of cuts we've seen this far might be an order of magnitude smaller than the

cuts that trump has coming next. the american prospect was first to report that the social security administration is preparing to slash fully 50% of its workers. that would mean filing nearly 30,000 people who work on getting people their social security checks. social security administration has already lost thousands of employees in the last decade. they want to cut 30,000 people. now, that kind of a mass firing called a reduction in force, is reportedly being planned all across federal agencies. but slashing jobs and programs for veterans in particular, is not something the trump administration is going to be able to do quietly, with no pushback. that's obvious. military times says leo shane was on a call with lawmakers this afternoon about federal workers being fired. he posted this quote from virginia senator tim kaine, quote, i think donald trump in six weeks has already achieved the record of having fired more veterans than any president in the history of the

united states. that is not a distinction. he says, quote, that is a disgrace. joining us now is leo shane. he's deputy editor at military times. mr. shane, leo, it's nice to see you. thank you very much for being back. >> i appreciate the invite. >> what's your understanding of how this 24 hour reversal went down at the va? they announced all these cuts and then they they took it all back. what happened? >> yeah. >> i'm not sure that they have taken it all back. we've gotten an official word from va that they're reviewing these contracts and that that they will make sure that there's no impact. there's concerns about it. but i've talked to two sources within the va and some of these offices. they haven't gotten official word that these have been rescinded. >> they're still working under. >> the assumption that these will eventually go away. >> that at. >> least most of the contracts they've started looking at, will will disappear at some point in the future here. so there's just a lot of uncertainty. i think i think the va is now realizing just how deep some of these cuts are, and they're trying to claw back. maybe some of these will

will be reversed, but but at least officially, these offices haven't been told that they're in the clear. >> i mean, burial services for veterans, cancer care for in terms of veterans health care, disposal of hazardous waste and medical waste from va facilities. i mean, this is the kind of stuff this is. i mean, are they making a substantive case that these are legitimately things that veterans should not have? or is the idea that some of these things were a mistake and they didn't notice they were such core services? >> the common theme with these contracts seems to be that they're not direct services. these aren't like doctors who are working directly with a patient or, you know, someone who's actually taking a taking over a funeral and actually transporting a casket or doing things like that. these are support services. so it may be a contract to, you know, help coordinate that. i've heard from folks who are involved in, in benefits processing. >> who aren't. >> directly doing the benefits claims themselves. but what they

are doing is they're helping guide veterans through that process, making it easier for them. so clearly a very valuable service, but at least in the eyes of someone in the administration, it's not a. direct benefit to veterans. so that's what seems to be the trip up here. you know, the va is insisting that they're not going to hurt anything that would benefit the veterans, beneficiaries, families, but it feels like they're they're going after these secondary services that are still very valuable, but maybe don't directly touch veterans. in connecting them to medical care or some sort of disability payout. >> and they fired more than 2000 people who work there already. leo, i have to ask you tonight about a late breaking legal development. tonight, there's been this ruling from a federal judge in california that the memos from the trump administration, from opm directing the firing of employees, probationary employees, that was that was illegal advice. and the judge tonight has ordered that opm

should communicate this to the defense department right now, ahead of planned mass firings tomorrow. do you have any sense of what impact this ruling might have on on planned mass firings at the defense department or at the va? >> yeah, right now. >> we're right. >> now we're just guessing. i have heard that there were scheduled mass firings in va tomorrow as well with the defense department. so those might be on hold at this point. i mean, as you said, the judge's ruling, we've just got the loose, loose parameters of it right now. he did. he does say that he doesn't have the power to reinstate anyone. but that opm also doesn't have the power to fire anyone. so it feels like this might just end up in a situation where va has to actually take the take the step of being the ones who order the dismissals, being the ones who actually accept responsibility for it. and that's not a that's. not a small task. as as you referenced, there's a lot of lawmakers out there who are furious with secretary doug collins for not standing up for

veterans, for not, you know, not doing his part to say everything in va should be protected. so, you know, we'll see in the next, you know, next few days here exactly what it means for those folks who've been dismissed. >> well, i may be calling you during business hours tomorrow, leo, to try to get a handle on on what happens here and that as we try to as we try to put some specifics on this evolving story. leo shane, deputy editor at military times, thank you, as always. thank you. >> leo. we'll be tracking. >> all. >> of it, i appreciate it. >> indeed. i know you will. we're grateful for it. >> we. >> hourly amazon employees earn >> hourly amazon employees earn an average of over $22 hey we're going big tonight let's go safety whoa! should i call mom? no, no don't tell your mother anything we shall overcome.

we shall overcome. the struggle for equal rights in the united states has been hard fought, but even today, we're still fighting for racial justice, for voting rights, and against hate and extremism. you can help us win the fight and envision a future where all americans can thrive. by joining the southern poverty law center today. please call now or go online to helpfighthate.org to become a friend of the center. all it takes is just $19 a month, only $0.63 a day. we shall live in peace. we shall live in peace. for more than 50 years we've been defending the rights of people facing discrimination, racism and bigotry in the u.s,

and we do it all at no cost to our clients. but the civil rights movement is not just in the past. it's our movement right now. so please call or go to helpfighthate.org and join us. when you use your credit card you'll receive this special fight hate t-shirt to show your standing up for civil rights. the future of our country is in our hands. but it won't come without a fight. that is why we need your support today. deep in my heart. i do believe we shall overcome someday. with your support, we will overcome hate and injustice. so please call or go online to helpfighthate.org today. doug.

>> you'll be back. >> emus can help people customize and save. >> hundreds on car insurance with liberty mutual. >> you're just a flightless bird. >> no. >> he's a dreamer, frank. >> doug emhoff and doug. >> well. i'll be. that bird really did it. >> only pay for what. >> you need. liberty, liberty. liberty, liberty. work, play. blink. relief. work. play. blink. relief. >> the only. >> the only. >> 3 in 1 extended r head & shoulders is launching something huge. ♪♪ the bare minimum. anti-dandruff shampoo made with only nine ingredients. no sulfates, silicones or dyes. and packaged with 45% less plastic.

giving you outstanding dandruff protection. and leaving hair beautiful and moisturized. major dandruff protection, minimal ingredients. job done. head & shoulders bare. state capitol this week. big crowds rallying to support trans people and their rights as the trump administration and republicans everywhere accelerate their efforts to frankly persecute and take rights away from trans people. tonight in iowa, after this show of force in support of the iowa trans community tonight, iowa republicans nevertheless passed a radical bill to rescind state civil rights protections for transgender people in iowa. the vote was largely along party lines, except for five republicans who sided with the democrats in voting no. iowa's republican governor is expected to sign the bill into law. it will roll back protections that have been in place in iowa for

18 years. the des moines register notes tonight that while businesses in iowa generally supported vocally and actively supported the lgbt rights bill that became law in the state in 2007, major, major employers and business groups in iowa have stayed silent on the anti-trans bill that's now on its way to the governor's desk. one advocate for lgbt rights tells the paper, quote, i think these groups have abdicated their responsibility to iowans, and i think they're being penny wise and pound foolish with their own workforce. we're watching tonight for continued reaction in iowa and around the reaction in iowa and around the country. right now across the u.s., people are trying to ban books from public schools and public libraries. yes, libraries. we all have a first amendment right to read and learn different viewpoints. that's why every book belongs on the shelf. yet book banning in the u.s. is worse than i've ever seen.

it's people in power who want to control everything. well, i say no to censorship. and i say yes to freedom of speech and expression. if you do too, please join us in supporting the american civil liberties union today. for over 100 years, the aclu has fought for your rights and mine. including the right to read all manner of books. so please call or go online to myaclu.org. for just $19 a month, only $0.63 a day. you can become a guardian of liberty and help protect all the rights promised to us by the u.s. constitution. make no mistake, this move to ban books is a coordinated attack on students right to learn. this is a clear violation of free speech. that's why the aclu is working to fight against censorship in all its forms. it is so important now more than ever.

so please call or go to myaclu.org and become an aclu guardian of liberty, for just $19 a month. use your credit card and you'll get this special we the people t-shirt and more to show you're helping to protect the rights of all people. the aclu is in all 50 states, d.c. and puerto rico defending our first amendment right of free speech and all of your constitutional rights. because we the people, means all of us. so please, call or, go online to myaclu.org today.

our xfinity network is built for streaming so please, call or, go online to all the stuff people love. how can it get any better? -i'm just spitballin' here, but, what if we offer people apple tv+, netflix and peacock? for one low monthly price. -yes. so, people could stream the shows they love. and we could call it... xfinity streamsaver! mmmmm. what about something like: streamsaver? ooooooo. -i love that. add streamsaver with apple tv+, netflix and peacock included for only $15 a month... and stream all your favorite entertainment, all in one place. for now. heads up that the new episode of alex wagner's podcast trump land just came out. it's really good. she's looking in this episode at the trump administration's strengthening ties to russia and russian authoritarianism.