♪♪ ask your dermatologist about skyrizi today. replace. >> nobody likes a cracked windshield. >> i but at least. >> you can go to safe flight.com and schedule a fix in minutes. >> can't confirm. >> their easy. >> safe flight can come to you for free. and our highly trained techs can replace your windshield right at your home. >> safelite repair safelite replace. >> go to safelite.com and schedule a replacement today. >> this is the emirates premium economy seat. >> i don't.

the way i approach work post fatherhood, has really trying to understand the generation that we're building devices for. here in the comcast family, we're building an integrated in-home wifi solution for millions of families like my own. in the average household, there are dozens of connected devices. connectivity is a big part of my boys' lives. it brings people together in meaningful ways. invisible on the skin. it works like. >> a dream. >> why didn't someone think. >> of this sooner? >> that does it for us from all of our colleagues across the

networks of nbc news. thanks for staying up late. see you at the end of tomorrow. >> at the end of last night's show, you might remember we were counting down to a midnight deadline that had been given to the trump administration by a federal judge. a judge had ordered the trump administration to restart funding on foreign aid. now, this is a judge who had previously ordered the trump administration to restart that funding, and they had not. he had then brought trump administration lawyers back into his courtroom this week and said, it doesn't seem like you're complying with my earlier order. can you tell me what steps are being taken to comply with my order? the trump administration lawyer then responded by basically going, homina homina homina homina homina. the judge at that point, we got we got the transcript. actually, the judge at that point said quote, hey, i guess i'm not sure why i can't get a straight answer from you on this. hey, after that, just

humiliation of the trump administration's lawyer unable to explain why the trump administration was defying this lawful order, that judge issued what's called a motion to enforce. and he set this midnight deadline for midnight last night, by which the trump administration had to do what he said had to restart that aid funding. so that's what we were talking about last night at the top of the show. and then just as we were going off the air at the end of the show last night, the trump administration ran to the u.s. supreme court. and just before we went off the air, just before the end of last night show, the trump administration obtained an order from the supreme court, saving them from that midnight deadline. right. so they're less than three hours away from that deadline. and the supreme court at the very last second steps in and says, no, no, no, trump administration. you don't have to release that funding by midnight, after all. and we want briefing on this by

noon on friday. so we'll see what happens by noon on friday. by by tomorrow noon at the us supreme court. but because of the supreme court's intervention that usaid funding did not start flowing last night at midnight, and this confrontation and this series of events raises like a whole niagara falls of issues and consequences. i mean, first of all, most importantly, it's the substance of it, right? i mean, what's that funding for? well, among other things, it's for the magnificently successful and successful, world renowned us aids treatment programs that have been interrupted. that puts tens of millions of lives at risk with that funding not flowing, those programs aren't restarting. the new work that is, is not being done because that funding hasn't restarted includes little things like, i don't know, work on the

previously unknown brand new hemorrhagic fever that has just broken out in congo. it killed three little kids in congo over the course of three days, and then immediately within like ten more days, the death toll was 53, and now it's in at least two different locations in congo. and they don't know what it is or how it spreads. it is a disease they have never seen before. it does seem to have an alarmingly high death rate, something like a 12% death rate, which for a hemorrhagic fever, an infectious disease, is a massive death rate. and even scarier than that, those it kills, it seems to kill within 48 hours. right. this is bad. an outbreak spreading fast of a previously undiscovered unknown hemorrhagic fever that is already killing humans by the dozens. that's the kind of thing that united states global health programs would be all over. usually, to identify this thing,

to contain it, to treat people and keep them alive, to stop this thing from spreading, among other things, to make sure that it does not come here to the united states. but we're not doing the foreign aid funding anymore. stopping usaid means stopping efforts to combat things like that. it also means, you know, stopping america's traditional and leading and totally irreplaceable work to help and contain the damage when not just hemorrhagic fevers break out, like ebola in uganda and marburg in tanzania, both of which are happening right now, but also to stop things like tuberculosis and malaria. domestically here in this country. this confrontation, this drama with the supreme court getting involved means that we are about to have the us supreme court meaningfully weigh in on this sledgehammer that trump and his top campaign donor

have taken to the us government thus far, with no seeming regard for either the law or the constitution. so we will see, probably for the first time, how the supreme court is oriented toward this radical change that has happened over the last five and a half weeks in our country. and honestly, this is also important because the way this came up, that midnight deadline we were looking at last night was set so firmly and so urgently by the federal judge who was hearing this case, because he had to do it by motion to enforce. he had to do a motion to enforce, because trump really was ignoring that court's previous orders. right. and so when we look to see how the supreme court handles this tomorrow at noon, we're going to be looking to see how the supreme court handles that very scary issue, how this supreme court is going to treat the prospect of this president, this administration potentially

ignoring the court's. they have been joking about this and making, you know, macho sounding bluffs about this for a long time now, particularly from the vice president, jd vance. how is the supreme court going to deal with it now that it's real? do they try to give him what he wants from the courts so that trump doesn't break that glass? doesn't, you know, smash through the brightest bright line that we have and effectively end the republic. do they appease him because they. oh, he's so scary. we better not make him defy a court order. we better make sure all court orders go his way. or do they make clear to him that his power is, as president? actually, don't allow him to defy the courts, to tell him that he's not always going to get what he wants from the courts. and when the courts tell him something he doesn't like, he has to obey the courts anyway. do they tell him that if he does try to defy the courts, he is effectively declaring war on the united states of america?

we'll see. we don't know how the us supreme court is going to handle this, and we don't know how directly they're going to get at this key issue. but this case moves to them tomorrow at noon eastern time. so eyes wide open on that and take it with all the seriousness it deserves. we've got the top senate democrat on the judiciary here, judiciary committee here tonight to talk about what happened yesterday in the senate when trump nominees for senior justice department positions, told him and other members of the judiciary committee that they weren't sure that trump should always obey court rulings that happened in the senate yesterday. the leading democrat on the senate judiciary committee is going to be here talking with us about it in just a moment, ahead of tomorrow's supreme court actions on this case. it's a very chilling subject. it's one i take very seriously. it is absolutely the end game discussion for us as a republic. it is as serious as it gets. meanwhile, this is what it

looked like in washington, d.c. today as workers from that agency from usaid were each given a grand total of 15 minutes by the trump administration to come into usaid headquarters and retrieve their belongings from their offices. while they were doing that, people showed up in big numbers to support them and clap for them and to say thank you. >> thank you. lirr. and. >> there's so. >> many emotions. >> i already cried this morning when i arrived. >> you know. >> someone said. you know, thanks for being here. >> and i just burst into tears. yeah. >> thank you. we're here. >> we thank you. >> this is. >> not happening in the dark. >> that was washington, d.c. today as people showed up to

support and thank usaid workers who the trump administration is trying to fire as they try to shut down that agency, even though they pretty clearly are just legally not allowed to do that. people turning out to protest, but also support the people who are at the sharp end of this stick. one of the tools the trump administration has been using to try to destroy usaid and to disassemble so many other agencies, is wholesale firing en masse, firing everybody who is considered a probationary employee. and you've heard that term. over this last couple of weeks, when they have been using this as the basis for firing people, being a probationary employee, it usually means you're in your first year or two on the job. it can also mean that you've transferred into a new job, or you've been promoted within the last year or two. probationary makes it sound like you've been in trouble, right? and you're like, you're on probation. we're watching you because you did something wrong. it's not that

at all. it is a meaningless category in terms of the importance of the work that's being done by that employee their skill level, their performance, their value to the government and to their agency. but nevertheless, the trump administration has ordered mass firings of people based purely on that classification, just because they thought it would be easy to get away with that, legally speaking. turns out, not so fast. tonight, a federal judge on the west coast, a federal judge in california, has just ruled that the trump administration's instructions to agencies about indiscriminately firing all these people, thousands and thousands of probationary employees thus far, a judge just ruled tonight that the instruction from the trump administration to all the agencies about firing these people is, quote, illegal and, quote, should be stopped, rescinded. federal judge william alsup said from the bench in his ruling tonight, quote, the office of personnel management does not have any authority

whatsoever under any statute in the history of the universe to hire and fire employees within another agency. he said, quote, it can hire its own employees. yes, can fire them, but it cannot order or direct some other agency to do so. judge alsup further ordered tonight from the bench that the rescinding of the trump administration directive to fire probationary employees. he ordered that the rescinding of that directive should be conveyed tonight to the pentagon, to the u.s. defense department. and i think that's because tomorrow is the day on which the pentagon was otherwise expected to march. more than 5000 fired employees out the door. well, again, the judge said the defense department needs to be informed of my ruling tonight, not tomorrow. tonight. so whether or not they still try to fire those 5000

plus employees tomorrow at defense department, it may not happen because of this judge's order. we shall see. we don't think that this order from this judge tonight means that all the other probationary employees who have already been fired are going to be reinstated. we don't think that's the implication of this ruling, but we're going to have to wait to see his written order in this case, which we expect tomorrow. again, he ruled from the bench tonight. he ordered that his ruling from the bench be conveyed to the pentagon. but we expect his his written ruling tomorrow. today, noaa, the national oceanic and atmospheric administration, which, among other things, gives us, you know, the weather forecast. they sent out notices today that they are indiscriminately firing hundreds of employees from that agency. the trump administration also today announced plans to close hundreds of help centers, places people can go to get free help and advice on their taxes. oh,

good. these are the so-called taxpayer assistance centers. they're going to close 110 of those all around the country. you can't possibly have taxpayer assistance. that announcement comes as the irs was told to fire more than 6000 people this past week, just as tax filing season is getting underway. we're also going to be talking tonight with the reporter on va issues tonight. trump has just fired more than 2000 people from the va, from the agency that serves our nation's veterans, including people who work to support the veterans crisis line. yeah, there's a lot a lot of fraud, waste and abuse there. got to cut that. trump also cut funding for veterans cancer care. seriously. and for veterans cemeteries. seriously. before good journalism about those cuts and a resulting huge outcry yesterday forced them to

reinstate some of those things, but they did try to cut them. we'll have more on that coming up tonight. but these cuts that i'm talking about, the impact of these cuts that i'm talking about, the legal fight over these cuts, but also the pushback against these, these cuts and what they're doing. it's not at all a washington story by now. it really is by now, everywhere. >> one of the places where we've already seen impacts from those federal cuts is right here at the detroit va. on a day that would have been his one year anniversary at the detroit, va. >> when i. >> first got that email, i was shocked. >> you know, quite. >> frankly shocked. >> elliott spray. >> is instead unemployed. the ten point veteran, one of the thousands of federal employees terminated in the last few weeks as the trump administration and the department of government efficiency worked to slash what they say is government waste. a rally in livonia tuesday, bringing out. dozens of seniors concerned about social. >> security and medicare. and

terrified. >> my life. >> would. change drastically without social security. >> and that's. >> our money. we put that in. nobody gave us that money. we loaned it to the government. >> everything that that is happening. >> right now is impacting so many people. >> dalia sharp in the crowd after. >> losing her job on friday. >> when the department of education grants she was hired. >> under. >> was terminated. >> department of education cuts. the potential elimination of the department of education is one of two categories of actions the trump administration and republicans in washington are taking that have potentially catastrophic effects, not just on the people whose who are served by those agencies or the people who work there, but also on the states. if the federal education department disappears, which nbc news reports is their plan to just eliminate that department and everything it does. if they kill the federal education department, and if

they go ahead with these massive medicaid cuts that are slated in the budget that republicans have just started to pass in washington, both of those things are going to just be nuclear bombs on the state budgets of just about every state in the country. those folks in michigan on tuesday, including the woman who's just lost her job because of department of education cuts. they were protesting, among other things, what what trump is doing to social security. they protested outside the social security administration building. reporters this week, including dave dayen at the american prospect, have warned that trump's cuts at the social security administration might be fully 50% of the workforce at social security. meanwhile, the expected cuts to medicaid, which again, would be devastating not just to the people who work to administer that be devastating to the tens of millions of people who get medicaid in this country, would be devastating to

state budgets in every state in this country. the expected cuts to medicaid specifically led to this protest yesterday in wisconsin. >> where many. >> of those who gathered on wednesday. >> it just goes on and. >> on with stories. >> i have a. >> 23 year. old son. >> who has. >> developmental disabilities. >> he has been on. >> medicaid since. >> he was. >> a toddler. >> and photos. >> i think. >> people need to. >> see that there are real people being impacted. >> telling how medicaid has affected their lives. >> they have not. >> been able to. >> receive those. >> therapies without it. >> they believe the budget plan approved by. >> the house of representatives. >> on tuesday means cuts to medicaid. >> medicaid is. >> an essential. >> program for these, and we. cannot let it be cut. >> they need. >> to. listen to the people. the wisconsin department of health and human services reported 1.47. >> million. wisconsinites were enrolled. >> in medicaid in 2023. heartbreaking to see how many people. >> are going to be affected.

>> senator johnson. >> did not. >> appear in person, but said in a statement the rally has, quote, no basis in truth or fact. >> senator ron johnson of wisconsin never misses an opportunity to share how much he respects his constituents. i has no basis in truth or fact. yeah, these dummies with their disabled children rallying at his office, he doesn't see the need to respond. they don't know anything. you might have seen the headline in the washington post yesterday about how the quote, resistance is beginning to quote wake in earnest post highlighted, among other things, the fact that senator bernie sanders just held a couple of town hall events in two red states in iowa, where he went to iowa city, and in nebraska, where he held an event in omaha. you can see from some of the local news coverage and the footage we've been able to get that these events were sort of stuffed to the gills and beyond in omaha. the organizers of that town hall event with senator

sanders said they had an inkling that the response was going to be pretty big. so they arranged for a really big venue for his event. they planned for 1000 people to show up. they got a venue that seated 1000 people on the night of the event, though the actual turnout was between 3000 504,000 people in nebraska in february to go to a meeting with bernie sanders. in iowa city. his talk there was at noontime, the des moines register reports that thousands of people turned up in iowa city. they started lining up at 7:30 a.m. for an event that wouldn't start until noon. the des moines register reports that lines to get in stretched multiple city blocks, and they had to set up a whole separate overflow event in iowa in february to go to a noontime meeting with bernie sanders. and this is not just a bernie sanders phenomenon. this, for

example, was the no special occasion regular organizing meeting last night for the indivisible chapter in collingswood, new jersey. they again had guessed that there might be an unusually large amount of interest, given everything that's going on. so they booked a hall that could hold a huge number of people for just a regular organizing meeting. on a wednesday night, they booked a hall that could hold 450 people, but they filled that 450 seat room, and then another 200 people showed up and could not get in, and they decided they would just meet in the parking lot instead. you might have also seen recent headlines just over the past few days about how republican members of congress are being advised now to please stop holding town halls with their constituents because they aren't enjoying the national and local news coverage that those things are engendering. look at this out of midlothian, virginia. this gives you some sense of why republicans might not want to be anywhere near their constituents right now, not when this is what it's like for them. even in

republican congressional districts. >> the event. whitman's office held today was called mobile office hours. congressman whitman wasn't in attendance, nor was he ever scheduled to be. however, that didn't stop his constituents from giving his staff an earful from angry chants. >> don't patronize us. >> with your nonsense. >> shame, shame, shame. >> to passionate pleas. >> we want to know. we want to know. >> and even. >> here's who. >> is representing me and congress. >> constituents from across the first congressional district filed into a midlothian american legion post on wednesday. that's where republican congressman rob whitman's office was holding what his team calls. mobile office hours. >> he needs. >> to answer to his constituents. >> and stop hiding. >> his constituents, saying they're concerned about the gop budget resolution, which whitman voted for on tuesday that some,

including the mother of a child with lung disease, believe could lead to massive cuts to medicaid. >> you take. >> away medicaid funds, you are saying. >> that's okay for this child to die. >> plus, cuts to other key social services like snap benefits. >> and rob whitman. >> voted last night to cut. >> that by 23%. >> constituents also upset with president donald trump's firing of thousands of federal workers, like chesterfield. resident ebony turner. she says she was fired from the irs last week. >> the termination was. >> not based on my performance nor conduct. my agency's leadership will attest to that. >> whitman's office turned down our interview request to address his constituents concerns. but in a statement, the congressman said while he believes, quote, enhancing government efficiency is important, he believes that goal should be, quote, pursued with greater compassion. on

potential cuts to social services. whitman repeatedly did not address our specific questions. >> the congressman repeatedly did not address our specific questions, nor did he show up in person to face that from his constituents in his republican district last night. that report from wrva in virginia from last night, one of the things that does keep cropping up at these town halls and also at protests that we're seeing all over the country, is just rage and expressions of disgust at the president putting his top campaign donor in charge of destroying the government. that has also led increasingly to protests that specifically target that campaign donor elon musk. like this one a few days ago in cherry hill, new jersey, on the street outside, the tesla dealer in that town. pretty considerable turnout outside that tesla dealership in cherry hill. there was another protest

targeting elon musk, specifically at the spacex and starlink offices in redmond, washington. this was yesterday. they seem to have had a pretty good turnout there. up in redmond, washington, it will also be interesting to see what kind of turnout there is this saturday, march 1st, in hawthorne, california, which is right near lax, right near the airport in la. they're telling people to dress up like elon musk for the protest at that spacex headquarters building on saturday. so if nothing else, it should be funny. they specifically went out of their way to say, if you do dress up like mr. musk for the protest, please do not choose to express your opinion of him by dressing up as a nazi. they do not want anybody there in nazi elon musk outfits. thank you. thank you. please, no. that protest at spacex global headquarters in la again expected saturday as the concerns and objections to elon musk now are starting to extend, not just to what he's doing to the rest of the government, but

what he's doing for himself as he is taking apart the government. the washington post is now following on reporting that initiated with bloomberg news and other outlets that musk has, has now apparently just somehow engineered the overriding of an existing faa contract with verizon to instead install his own company in its place to instead install starlink at the faa. they're just doing that. is that legal? aren't there rules for like, contracts and conflicts of interest and stuff? as we get to that part of the definition of oligarchy? already right away, one of the more unnerving things that mr. musk has developed an interest in in recent days appears to be the american judicial system. now, on top of everything else he is doing in his capacity as the president's top donor, musk has also started railing publicly that american judges and the judiciary are the real problem in this country, and that therefore we need to

start, in his words, firing judges because courts should not be allowed to stop him and to stop donald trump from doing whatever they want. naturally, republican members of congress are obliging. they've started filing impeachment proceedings against multiple federal judges who've had the temerity to rule against trump. and this seems sort of at the same time, to be just the natural evolution of where these guys have always been heading. but it also seems to be the single brightest bright line we have as a country when it comes to figuring out whether the authoritarian takeover they are attempting will be stopped, or whether it will go all the way. americans, from sea to shining sea are turning out in huge and increasing numbers. to say they are not down with this, they do not want any of this. and amid this fight and amid this drama and the amid the american people being so palpably mad about what they are doing, the single most

important line that just cannot be crossed ever is to have a president defying the law and defying the courts, because that is the end. and on that, senator dick durbin joins us next. stay with us. >> buying a car is kind. >> of a big deal. >> there's like a. >> million options and you deserve something you love. >> at cargurus. >> we get it as the. >> number one most. >> visited car shopping site. we >> visited car shopping site. we make sure your big deal power e*trade's award-winning trading app makes trading easier. with its customizable options chain, easy-to-use tools and paper trading to help sharpen your skills, you can stay on top of the market from wherever you are. e*trade from morgan stanley. power e*trade's easy-to-use tools make complex trading less complicated. custom scans can help you find new trading opportunities, while an earnings tool helps you plan your trades and stay on top of the market. e*trade from morgan stanley. ♪♪ for more than a decade

farxiga has been trusted again and again, and again. [crowd chant] far-xi-ga ask your doctor about farxiga. ♪♪ i guess what i'm looking for from you is, i mean, i know how the fire affected me, and there's always a constant fear that who's to say something like that won't happen again? that's fair. we committed to underground, 10,000 miles of electric line. you look back at where we were 10 years ago and we are in a completely different place today, and it's because of how we need to care for our communities and our customers. i hope that's true. [joe] that's my commitment. [ambient noise]

the skin. it works like a dream. why didn't someone think of this sooner? >> during a confirmation hearing yesterday, something happened that i don't think has ever happened before. multiple nominees for senior justice department jobs said during their confirmation hearings out loud that they're not sure that presidents have to obey rulings from the courts. not always. >> there is no. >> hard and. >> fast rule about. >> whether in some in every. >> instance. >> a public official is bound by a court decision. generally. >> if there is a direct court order that binds a federal or state. >> official. >> they should follow it. >> why do you say generally give me an exception? >> i suppose. >> one could. >> imagine hypotheticals. in extreme cases. >> the president.

>> has now asserted. >> that he has the. right. >> basically to do. >> what he thinks. >> is necessary. >> to save. >> the country. >> and i'm asking. >> whether that. >> includes violating. >> a supreme. >> court order. i represented president. >> trump for two years. i've never. >> been put in any. >> situation like that. >> and i. >> don't know. >> i just got to say, mr. chairman, that's a. >> little bit frustrating. >> that's a little bit frustrating. you may have recognized one of those nominees, the guy with the raspy voice, he's named john sauer. he is the lawyer who told a federal appeals court that donald trump would be within his rights to order a team of navy seals to assassinate his political opponents, that that donald trump could not be prosecuted for, for giving such an order. mr. sauer is now up for the job of solicitor general, which is the person who represents the united states government before the supreme court. the unnerving refusal by him and other trump justice department nominees yesterday to say that the president must always obey the federal courts. that prompted a

stern and somewhat unexpected admonition from one republican senator from john kennedy of louisiana. >> you're all adults. you're all officers of the court. some will give you some advice. i may be wrong, but i doubt it. don't ever, ever take. >> the. >> position that you're not. going to follow the order of a federal court ever. >> now, you can. >> disagree with it. >> within the. bounds of legal ethics. >> you can criticize it. >> you can. >> appeal it. >> or you can resign. >> joining us now is illinois

senator dick durbin. he is the second highest ranking democrat in the senate. he's the ranking member on the senate judiciary committee. senator durbin, it's a rare pleasure to be able to have you here on the show tonight. thank you so much for making time. >> thanks, rachel. good to be with you. >> i know that you have had a strong reaction to those nominees, playing with the idea that donald trump doesn't have to obey court orders. in an interview today, you called it breathtaking. you said it raises serious existential constitutional questions. we've got to step back and have an honest discussion about this. why do you feel so strongly about that? what can you explain to our viewers about the seriousness of this issue that you've that you've now come across in these confirmation hearings? >> rachel, you and i have heard many people use the phrase constitutional crisis and try to define exactly when it reaches the point of breaking point with our constitution. and it seems to me that the final question is the one i raised with these witnesses. if you were given a court order that says to this

president or any president for that matter, that there are certain actions that they cannot take or should not take or have to take, are you going to follow that order? and it turned out to be a debating topic. i thought the answer was a clear yes and let's move on. but they wanted to debate it. you heard one of them qualify it, say, well, generally, yes. and we had these equivocal answers. the most definitive answer came from john kennedy, as you noted, a republican of louisiana who made it clear what i think the law is. you may hate the order of the court, but you follow it or resign, period. i can't think of an exception to that. they tried to use an illustration. korematsu, dred scott, those terrible decisions one of the republican senators used is an illustration of a court order that you could morally rationalize opposing. but the bottom line is, you cannot take a subjective test on this issue. if you did, you'd have someone who might be a racist who says

brown versus board of education integrating our schools. i don't believe in that. that's morally reprehensible to me, and i will not enforce that order in my administration of education. so you see, that's the slippery slope. so i think we've raised a threshold question for the department of justice appointments by this administration, and we better debate it out because it gets to the heart of our democracy. >> it does get to the heart of our democracy. it is the closest thing that we have to an existential question. i think, in terms of our republic, to see the wholesale destruction of the federal government, which i think they're trying to do, to see them appearing to ignore laws when it comes to doing what they're trying to do to the us government, is a bad thing, as far as i'm concerned. disobeying the law seems to be bad. but the prospect that when a court corrects that when a court declares it to be illegal and orders them to change course, that they will not do it, we are just in a territory that that's

that's like where the roadrunner runs off the end of the cliff, and then there's nothing there and it just drops. i have to ask you, because i think you do very clearly see the seriousness of this. what sort of contingency plans elected democrats have for further sounding the alarm and for trying to correct course and pull that roadrunner back onto the cliff? if, if, if they go as far as they're signaling, they might. >> well, i can tell you, i think this is going to be a standard inquiry of all those appointed to serve in the administration, particularly in the department of justice. as i said, i was a little bit surprised, not totally, because we've seen some rather amazing things done by this administration so far. but i was surprised by the answers yesterday. we cannot take for granted that any of these nominees in the trump administration will follow the basic tenets of our

constitutional law. we have to ask the question, and if the answer comes back no, as did yesterday, or at least qualified as it did yesterday, it is right for us to continue to press the case as the minority. it's a frustration that we don't have controlling votes on the question, but i am hopeful, and i hope john kennedy is an illustration, that there will come a moment when republican senators will come out of hiding and speak up clearly on something as basic as this principle of constitutional law. because if we abandon this, i'm afraid we've abandoned our democracy. >> senator dick durbin of illinois, ranking democrat on the judiciary committee, senior democrat in the senate. sir, thank you for your time tonight. i do really appreciate you being here. >> thanks, rachel. >> all right. much more news >> all right. much more news ahead here [coughing] copd is an ugly reality. do you have his medical history? i watch as his world just keeps getting smaller. but then, trelegy helped us see things a little differently.

with 3 medicines in 1 inhaler, trelegy keeps airways open for a full 24 hours and prevents future flare-ups. once-daily trelegy also improves lung function, so he can breathe more freely all day and night. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. ♪♪ ♪what a wonderful world♪ ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy for copd because breathing should be beautiful, all day and night. nothing is more important than family. a family you're born into, a family you choose or a family you make. i'm padma lakshmi. i came to this country when i was four years old

with my mother. we came here because it was a land of opportunity. but for many, that's not the case. immigrant families are being separated. black and brown families are torn apart by a broken legal system. lgbtq people suffer discrimination in adoption and health care. the need to protect and defend the civil liberties we all hold dear is more urgent than ever because families belong together. you can help by joining the american civil liberties union today. call or go online now and become an aclu guardian of liberty. all it takes is just $19 a month. only $0.63 a day. the aclu has fought to allow lgbtq couples to marry, for racial justice. to stop a family separation.

we can't do this work without you. together we can defend our democracy, ensure liberty and justice for all, and keep families strong. so please call the aclu now or go to my aclu.org when you use your credit card, you'll receive this special member kit to show you're part of a movement to defend free speech, protect our civil liberties, and keep families together. i hope you'll join me in supporting the aclu today. because we the people means all of us. call or go online to my aclu.org to become a guardian of liberty today. after. >> this year lose stubborn fat permanently with sono bella. one visit that removal i wanted the

results of a tummy tuck, but not the downtime. i'm so happy. >> i'm loving life. >> i'm loving my body. >> i'm loving all my loose. >> fitting clothes. >> my waist is contoured. my belly is flat. there's no pooch anymore. >> schedule your our xfinity network is built for streaming all the stuff people love. how can it get any better? -i'm just spitballin' here, but, what if we offer people apple tv+, netflix and peacock? for one low monthly price. -yes. so, people could stream the shows they love. and we could call it... xfinity streamsaver!

mmmmm. what about something like: streamsaver? ooooooo. -i love that. add streamsaver with apple tv+, netflix and peacock included for only $15 a month... and stream all your favorite entertainment, all in one place. casino slots. go for the gold. >> hey, that's my line. >> do not let anyone tell you that pushback does not matter. look at this. this was the headline tuesday night at the washington post doge to cancel government contracts that help veterans records show, quote, the 875 contracts on the chopping block helped cover medical services, fund cancer programs, recruit doctors and provide burial services to veterans, according to internal va documents. also, a contract to, quote, safely dispose of chemical waste. yeah, who needs that? look, the word waste is right there. let's cut that. so

this is the va. this is health care for american military veterans. here's donald trump announcing proudly as president. right. we're slashing funding for cancer care for american military veterans. also, burial services, literally burial services for veterans. and hey, just toss that chemical waste out back behind the shed. it'll be fine. but put that back up there. that was the that was the headline at the washington post tuesday night, doge to cancel government contracts that help veterans. this was tuesday night. but then look at this. this was less than 24 hours later. thing under pressure va halts contract cancellations in major reversal. after one night and one day of shock and outrage at what trump was doing. hey, turns out they decided to reverse it. not going to do it.

don't let anybody tell you that pushback doesn't work. that said, it's not like they're leaving veterans alone. the trump administration fired 1000 people who work at the va two weeks ago this week. they fired 1400 more people who work at the va. leo shane reporting at the military times, quote, officials said the moves did not impact any mission critical jobs, but, quote, did not provide any specifics of the types of assignments that were eliminated. one va official telling nbc news, quote, it's leading to paralysis and nothing is getting done. the official described absolute chaos at the agency, with even trump political appointees afraid to misstep and incur a backlash from either the white house or the public. as bad as this already is, though, heads up that the kinds of cuts we've seen this far might be an order of magnitude smaller than the cuts that trump has coming next. the american prospect was first to report that the social security administration is

preparing to slash fully 50% of its workers. that would mean filing nearly 30,000 people who work on getting people their social security checks. social security administration has already lost thousands of employees in the last decade. they want to cut 30,000 people. now, that kind of a mass firing, called a reduction in force, is reportedly being planned all across federal agencies. but slashing jobs and programs for veterans in particular, is not something the trump administration is going to be able to do quietly with no pushback. that's obvious military times, says leo shane was on a call with lawmakers this afternoon about federal workers being fired. he posted this quote from virginia senator tim kaine, quote, i think donald trump in six weeks has already achieved the record of having fired more veterans than any president in the history of the united states. that is not a distinction. he says, quote, that is a disgrace. joining us now is leo shane. he's deputy editor at military times. mr.

shane, leo, it's nice to see you. thank you very much for being back. >> i appreciate the invite. >> what's your understanding of how this 24 hour reversal went down at the va? they announced all these cuts and then they they took it all back. what happened? >> yeah. >> i'm not sure that they have taken. >> it. >> all back. we've gotten an official word from va that they are reviewing these contracts and that that they will. >> make sure that there's no impact, there's. >> concerns about it. >> but i've talked. >> to two sources within the va and some of these offices. they haven't gotten official word that these have been rescinded. they're still working under the assumption that these will eventually go away, that at least most of the contracts they've started looking at will will disappear at some point in the future here. so there's just a lot. of uncertainty, i think. i think the va is now realizing just how deep some of these cuts are, and they're trying to claw back. maybe some of these will will be reversed, but but at least officially, these offices haven't been told that they're in the clear. >> i mean, burial services for

veterans, cancer care for in terms of veterans health care, disposal of hazardous waste and medical waste from va facilities. i mean, this is the kind of stuff this is. i mean, are they making a substantive case that these are legitimately things that veterans should not have? or is the idea that some of these things were a mistake and they didn't notice they were such core services? >> the common theme with. >> these. >> contracts seems to be that they're not direct services. these aren't like doctors who are working directly with a patient or. >> you know, someone who's. >> actually taking a taking over a funeral and actually transporting a casket or doing things like that. these are support services. so it may be a contract to, you know, helps coordinate that. i've heard from folks who were. >> involved in. >> in benefits processing who aren't directly doing the benefits claims themselves. but what they are doing is they're helping guide veterans through that process, making it easier for them. so clearly a very valuable service. but at least

in. >> the. >> eyes of someone in the administration, it's. >> not a direct. >> benefit to veterans. so that's what seems to be the trip up here. you know, the va is insisting that they're not going to hurt anything that would benefit veterans, beneficiaries, families. but it feels like they're they're going after these secondary services that are still very valuable, but maybe don't directly touch veterans. >> in in. >> connecting them to medical care or some sort of disability payout. >> and they fired more than 2000 people who work there already. leo, i have to ask you tonight about a late breaking legal development. tonight, there's been this ruling from a federal judge in california that the memos from the trump administration, from opm directing the firing of employees, probationary employees, that was that was illegal advice. and the judge tonight has ordered that opm should communicate this to the defense department right now, ahead of planned mass firings tomorrow. do you have any sense

of what impact this ruling might have on on planned mass firings at the defense department or at the va? >> yeah. >> right now we're right now we're just guessing. i have heard that there were scheduled mass firings at va tomorrow as well with the defense department. so those might be on hold at this point. i mean, as you said, the judge's. >> ruling. >> we've just got the loose, loose parameters of it right now. he he does say that he doesn't have the power to reinstate. >> anyone. >> but that opm. >> also. >> doesn't have the power to fire anyone. so it feels like this might just end up in a situation where va has to actually take the take the step of being the ones who order the dismissals, being the ones who actually accept responsibility for it. and that's not a that's. >> not. >> a small task. as as you referenced, there's a lot of lawmakers out there who are furious with secretary doug collins for not standing up for veterans, for not, you know, not doing his part to say everything in va should be protected. so, you know, we'll see in the next, you know, next few days here

exactly what it means for those folks who've been dismissed. >> well, i may be calling you during business hours tomorrow, leo, to try to get a handle on on what happens here and that as we try to as we try to put some specifics on this evolving story. leo shane, deputy editor at military times, thank you, as always, for your time. thank you. >> we'll be tracking. all of it. i appreciate. >> it indeed. i know you will. we're grateful for it. >> we love hourly. >> amazon employees earn an >> amazon employees earn an average of over $22 hey we're going big tonight let's go safety whoa! should i call mom? no, no don't tell your mother anything blink. relief. work. play. blink.

relief. >> the only. >> 3 in. >> 1 extended relief formula for dry eyes. >> blink. >> hi. >> i'm ellen. >> i'm portia. >> we're talking to cameras that are in our living. >> room about. >> kind science. >> i used to think. >> the. more money i spent on. >> my skincare, the more effective. >> it. >> would be. >> the better it would. >> be, the. >> better i'd look. >> but it's not true. >> with kind science, my. skin feels cleaner. it feels more hydrated. >> i noticed. >> a difference in my skin. >> i noticed a. difference in yours. >> people see you. and they make a big deal about your skin. >> and it feels really good. >> and that's all thanks to. >> kind science. >> tons of. >> customers have. >> seen results. >> the bags under her eyes. >> yeah. >> it looks smooth. >> yeah. >> smooth. smooth. >> well, who. >> doesn't want smooth? >> who doesn't? >> so here's what i'm going to do. >> something i've never done before. i am going to. >> give a. kind science. >> generous deal. clever. yeah. because my name. i got it. yeah.

okay. what are you offering? you'll get four. >> of. >> my favorite products. >> the gentle cleanser. >> the micro. >> exfoliant, which i love. i use. >> it as a mask. and then. >> the firming serum. they're going to get that. >> i love the firming serum so much because it firms it up. >> firms it up. >> keep it firm. the hydration cream is amazing because it really does feel like your face just took a drink of water. >> yes, but it does. yeah it does. >> actually does. >> a clinical. study of kind science. >> users 94%. >> had. >> less visible lines and wrinkles. >> that's so great. well. >> because it's great product. >> so i'm. >> also going. >> to give some. >> gifts, you know. >> the brush that you love so much. >> the facial. yeah. >> so the brush. >> the. radiance oil. >> which is a. >> really great. >> product and free shipping. >> that's $200. >> worth of products for 49.95. >> this whole. >> thing is under 50 bucks. >> yes, 49.95. >> that's amazing. >> really? i know. >> 60 day money. >> back guarantee. >> you guys. >> this generous deal. won't last forever. scan the code. go to kind science.com, or call

856. ellen. that's 850. 6elen to order right now. >> i just want people to try kind. >> science safelite repair. safelite replace. >> nobody likes a cracked windshield. >> but at least you. >> can. >> go. >> to. >> safelite.com and schedule a fix in minutes. go to safelite.com and schedule a replacement today. >> repair safelite replace. >> this is at the iowa state capitol this week. big crowds rallying to support trans people and their rights as the trump administration and republicans everywhere accelerate their efforts to frankly persecute and take rights away from trans people. tonight in iowa, after this show of force in support of the iowa trans community. tonight, iowa republicans nevertheless passed a radical bill to rescind state civil rights protections for transgender people in iowa. the vote was largely along party lines, except for five republicans who sided with the democrats and voting no. iowa's

republican governor is expected to sign the bill into law. it will roll back protections that have been in place in iowa for 18 years. the des moines register notes tonight that while businesses in iowa generally supported vocally and actively supported the lgbt rights bill that became law in the state in 2007, major, major employers and business groups in iowa have stayed silent on the anti-trans bill that's now on its way to the governor's desk. one advocate for lgbt rights tells the paper, quote, i think these groups have abdicated their responsibility to iowans, and i think they're being penny wise and pound foolish with their own workforce. we're watching tonight for continued reaction in iowa and around the reaction in iowa and around the country. ugh, when is my allergy spray going to kick in? -you need astepro. -astepro? it's faster, bro. 8x faster than flonase. it's faster, bro! it's faster, bro! it's faster, bro! it's mom to you. astepro starts working in 30 minutes. astepro and go! i'm thinking of updating my kitchen... ...thinking of redoing our kitchen.

...we are finally updating our kitchen. for all those people who never seem to get around to it... —...a breakfast nook. —chase has financial guidance. let's see how you can start saving... —really? —really? at home or in-person. that's guidance from chase. ♪ ♪ the flag replacement program got started by a good friend of mine, a navy vet, saw a flag at the office that needed to be replaced and said wouldn't this be great if this could be something that we did for anyone? comcast has always been a community driven company. this is one of those great examples of the way we're getting out there. >> safelite repair safelite replace. >> nobody likes a cracked windshield. >> are. >> but at. >> least you. >> can. >> go to safelite.com and schedule a fix in minutes. go to (fisher investments)nutes. go to at fisher investments we may look like other money managers,

but we're different. (other money manager) you can't be that different. (fisher investments) we are. we have a team of specialists not only in investing, but also in financial and estate planning and more. (other money manager) your clients rely on you for all that? (fisher investments) yes. and as a fiduciary, we always put their interests first. (other money manager) but you still sell commission- based products, right? (fisher investments) no. we have a simple management fee structured so we do better when our clients do better. (other money manager) huh, we're more different than i thought! (fisher investments) at fisher investments, we're clearly different. when i was diagnosed with h-i-v, i didn't know who i would be. but here i am... ...being me. keep being you... ...and ask your healthcare provider about the number one prescribed h-i-v treatment, biktarvy. biktarvy is a complete, one-pill, once-a-day treatment used for h-i-v in many people—whether you're 18 or 80. with one small pill, biktarvy fights h-i-v to help you get to undetectable—and stay there whether you're just starting or replacing your current treatment. research shows that taking h-i-v treatment as prescribed and getting to and staying undetectable prevents transmitting h-i-v through sex. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure.

rare, life-threatening side effects include a buildup of lactic acid and liver problems. don't take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin. tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding or have kidney or liver problems. if you have hepatitis b, don't stop taking biktarvy without talking to your healthcare provider. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. no matter where life takes you, biktarvy can go with you. talk to your healthcare provider today. tap into etsy for home and style finds like custom shelving for less than 50 dollars to make more space. or linen robes under 75 to get you cozy. for affordable pieces to help you welcome big changes, etsy has it. to our. >> armpits every day. it's a part of the routine, right? so why do we put up with odors on other parts of our body between showers? it's time you discovered lumi. whole body deodorant for pits, privates and

beyond. i tried it, and i noticed a difference right away. everywhere. you won't. realize the body odor you've just been. >> living with until. >> you try. lumi. and it's gone. give lumi whole body deodorant to try and start controlling your body odor better everywhere. >> you've got a subscription for. streaming movies and music. >> maybe even. >> one for food. but what about when it's your water. line that's streaming? >> repairs are expensive. good contractors. >> hard to find. >> the plan. >> from homeserve is like a subscription for peace of mind for one small monthly fee. when a covered system breaks, we'll send a. >> qualified contractor. >> and pay for the repair. >> why worry? get homeserve. >> and chill plans from homeserve. start at just 4.99 a month. call 183337354495. >> or visit homeserve.com. >> all right. that's going to do it for me for now. heads up that the new episode of alex wagner's podcast, trumpland just came out. it's really good. she's looking in this episode at the trump administration's strengthening ties to russia and

russian authoritarianism. as ukrainians in the us mark the third anniversary of russia invading ukraine. if you want to listen to the podcast, it's great. just scan that little circular code on your screen with your phone and it will take you right to it. it's easy. now it's time for the last word with lawrence o'donnell. good evening. >> good evening. rachel. you know, i have had my disappointments. i guess i'll put it from time to time about the white house press corps and how they handle certain things and things they don't do. today was kind of great because we have a winner. we have a winner tonight for best question asked by a member of the white house press corps. and the winner is going to join us during during this program. i'm going to give him the award and through the screen because he's in washington and it's a joy to do that because, you know, i'm a i'm a critic of the white house press corps. when they get it