for you to, what do you mean by that? >> i mean, this is now an executive that's saying they're going to use their power to encroach against, you know, the legislative branch, the judicial branch. and they're using the idea that trans people aren't supported to give the president more authority. and we have already seen how that's going to impact everybody. but this is a dangerous precedent that they're setting targeting trans people. so if we don't disrupt the narrative of our monstrosity, then that is just going to fuel their they don't care about us, they care about power, and they're using us to get more. >> chase strangio, thank you so much for coming in tonight. really good to see you. that is all in on this thursday night. the rachel maddow show starts right now. good evening rachel. >> good evening chris. that was a stunning interview. thanks. really, really well done. your explanation also of what's going on with andrew tate, the influencer guy was the first person who has explained it to me in a way that i have understood. oh, that's i feel like, yes, both your interview with mr. strangio and the andrew

tate explainer, and now i finally get it. i feel like i owe a lot to you already tonight. >> that's good. that's our job. >> all right. thanks. thanks, my friend, and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. at the end of last night's show, you might remember we were counting down to a midnight deadline that had been given to the trump administration by a federal judge. a judge had ordered the trump administration to restart funding on foreign aid. now, this is a judge who had previously ordered the trump administration to restart that funding, and they had not. he had then brought trump administration lawyers back into his courtroom this week and said, it doesn't seem like you're complying with my earlier order. can you tell me what steps are being taken to comply with my order? the trump administration lawyer then responded by basically going, how many hummina hummina hummina hummina? the judge at that point we got we got the transcript. actually, the judge at that point said quote, hey, i guess i'm not sure why i can't get a straight answer from you on

this. hey, after that, just humiliation of the trump administration's lawyer unable to explain why the trump administration was defying this lawful order, that judge issued what's called a motion to enforce. and he set this midnight deadline for midnight last night, by which the trump administration had to do what he said had to restart that aid funding. so that's what we were talking about last night at the top of the show. and then just as we were going off the air at the end of the show last night, the trump administration ran to the u.s. supreme court. and just before we went off the air, just before the end of last night's show, the trump administration obtained an order from the supreme court, saving them from that midnight deadline. right. so they're less than three hours away from that deadline. and the supreme court at the very last second steps in and says, no, no, no, trump administration. you don't have to release that funding by midnight, after all.

and we want briefing on this by noon on friday. so we'll see what happens by noon on friday. by by tomorrow noon at the us supreme court. but because of the supreme court's intervention that usaid funding did not start flowing last night at midnight, and this confrontation and this series of events raises like a whole niagara falls of issues and consequences. i mean, first of all, most importantly, it's the substance of it, right? i mean, what's that funding for? well, among other things, it's for the magnificently successful, successful, world renowned us aids treatment programs that have been interrupted that puts tens of millions of lives at risk with that funding, not flowing. those programs aren't restarting. the new work that is, is not being done because that funding hasn't restarted includes little things

like, i don't know, work on the previously unknown brand new hemorrhagic fever that has just broken out in congo. it killed three little kids in congo over the course of three days, and then immediately within like ten more days, the death toll was 53, and now it's in at least two different locations in congo. and they don't know what it is or how it spreads. it is a disease they have never seen before. it does seem to have an alarmingly high death rate, something like a 12% death rate, which for a hemorrhagic fever, an infectious disease, is a massive death rate. and even scarier than that, those it kills, it seems to kill within 48 hours, right? this is bad. an outbreak spreading fast of a previously undiscovered unknown hemorrhagic fever that is already killing humans by the dozens. that's the kind of thing that united states global health programs would be all over.

usually, to identify this thing, to contain it, to treat people and keep them alive, to stop this thing from spreading, among other things, to make sure that it does not come here to the united states. but we're not doing the foreign aid funding anymore. stopping usaid means stopping efforts to combat things like that. it also means, you know, stopping america's traditional and leading and totally irreplaceable work to help and contain the damage when not just hemorrhagic fevers break out, like ebola in uganda and marburg in tanzania, both of which are happening right now, but also to stop things like tuberculosis and malaria. domestically here in this country. this confrontation, this drama with the supreme court getting involved means that we are about to have the us supreme court meaningfully weigh in on this sledgehammer that

trump and his top campaign donor have taken to the us government thus far, with no seeming regard for either the law or the constitution. so we will see, probably for the first time, how the supreme court is oriented toward this radical change that has happened over the last five and a half weeks in our country. and honestly, this is also important because the way this came up, that midnight deadline we were looking at last night was set so firmly and so urgently by the federal judge who was hearing this case, because he had to do it by motion to enforce. he had to do a motion to enforce, because trump really was ignoring that court's previous orders. right. and so when we look to see how the supreme court handles this, tomorrow at noon, we're going to be looking to see how the supreme court handles that very scary issue, how this supreme court is going to treat the prospect of this president, this

administration potentially ignoring the court's. they have been joking about this and making, you know, macho sounding bluffs about this for a long time now, particularly from the vice president, jd vance. how is the supreme court going to deal with it now that it's real? do they try to give him what he wants from the courts so that trump doesn't break that glass? doesn't, you know, smash through the brightest bright line that we have and effectively end the republic. do they appease him because they. oh, he's so scary. we better not make him defy a court order. we better make sure all court orders go his way. or do they make clear to him that his power is, as president? actually, don't allow him to defy the court's to tell him that he's not always going to get what he wants from the courts. and when the courts tell him something he doesn't like, he has to obey the courts anyway. do they tell him that if he does try to defy the courts, he is effectively declaring war on the united states of america?

we'll see. we don't know how the u.s. supreme court is going to handle this, and we don't know how directly they're going to get at this key issue. but this case moves to them tomorrow at noon eastern time. so eyes wide open on that and take it with all the seriousness it deserves. we've got the top senate democrat on the judiciary here, judiciary committee here tonight to talk about what happened yesterday in the senate when trump nominees for senior justice department positions, told him and other members of the judiciary committee that they weren't sure that trump should always obey court rulings that happened in the senate yesterday. the leading democrat on the senate judiciary committee is going to be here talking with us about it in just a moment, ahead of tomorrow's supreme court actions on this case. it's a very chilling subject. it's one i take very seriously. it is absolutely the end game discussion for us as a republic. it is as serious as it

gets. meanwhile, this is what it looked like in washington, d.c. today as workers from that agency, from usaid were each given a grand total of 15 minutes by the trump administration to come into usaid headquarters and retrieve their belongings from their offices. while they were doing that, people showed up in big numbers to support them and clap for them and to say thank you. >> thank you. >> oh, there's so many emotions. i already cried this morning when i arrived. you know, someone said, you know, thanks for being here. and i just burst into tears. >> yeah. thank you. we're here. we thank you. this is not happening in the dark. >> that was washington, d.c.

today as people showed up to support and thank usaid workers who the trump administration is trying to fire as they try to shut down that agency, even though they pretty clearly are just legally not allowed to do that. people turning out to protest, but also support the people who are at the sharp end of this stick. one of the tools the trump administration has been using to try to destroy usaid and to disassemble so many other agencies, is wholesale firing en masse, firing everybody who is considered a probationary employee. and you've heard that term over this last couple of weeks, when they have been using this as the basis for firing people, being a probationary employee, it usually means you're in your first year or two on the job. it can also mean that you've transferred into a new job, or you've been promoted within the last year or two. probationary makes it sound like you've been in trouble, right? and you're like, you're on probation. we're

watching you because you did something wrong. it's not that at all. it is a meaningless category in terms of the importance of the work that's being done by that employee their skill level, their performance, their value to the government and to their agency. but nevertheless, the trump administration has ordered mass firings of people based purely on that classification, just because they thought it would be easy to get away with that, legally speaking. turns out not so fast. tonight, a federal judge on the west coast, a federal judge in california, has just ruled that the trump administration's instructions to agencies about indiscriminately firing all these people, thousands and thousands of probationary employees thus far, a judge just ruled tonight that the instruction from the trump administration to all the agencies about firing these people is, quote, illegal and, quote, should be stopped, rescinded, federal judge william alsup said from the bench in his ruling tonight, quote, the office of personnel management

does not have any authority whatsoever under any statute in the history of the universe to hire and fire employees within another agency. he said, quote, it can hire its own employees. yes, can fire them, but it cannot order or direct some other agency to do so. judge alsup further ordered tonight from the bench that the rescinding of the trump administration directive to fire probationary employees. he ordered that the rescinding of that directive should be conveyed tonight to the pentagon, to the u.s. defense department. and i think that's because tomorrow is the day on which the pentagon was otherwise expected to march. more than 5000 fired employees out the door. well, again, the judge said the defense department needs to be informed of my ruling tonight, not tomorrow, tonight. so whether or not they

still try to fire those 5000 plus employees tomorrow at defense department, it may not happen because of this judge's order. we shall see. we don't think that this order from this judge tonight means that all the other probationary employees who have already been fired are going to be reinstated. we don't think that's the implication of this ruling, but we're going to have to wait to see his written order in this case, which we expect tomorrow. again, he ruled from the bench tonight. he ordered that his ruling from the bench be conveyed to the pentagon. but we expect his his written ruling tomorrow. today, noah, the national oceanic and atmospheric administration, which among other things, gives us, you know, the weather forecast. they sent out notices today that they are indiscriminately firing hundreds of employees from that agency. the trump administration also today announced plans to close hundreds of help centers, places people can go to get free help and advice on their taxes. oh,

good. these are the so-called taxpayer assistance centers. they're going to close 110 of those all around the country. yeah. can't possibly have taxpayer assistance. that announcement comes as the irs was told to fire more than 6000 people this past week, just as tax filing season is getting underway. we're also going to be talking tonight with the reporter on va issues tonight. trump has just fired more than 2000 people from the va, from the agency that serves our nation's veterans, including people who work to support the veterans crisis line. yeah, there's a lot a lot of fraud, waste and abuse there. got to cut that. trump also cut funding for veterans cancer care. seriously. and for veterans cemeteries seriously before good journalism about those cuts and a resulting huge outcry

yesterday forced them to reinstate some of those things, but they did try to cut them. we'll have more on that coming up tonight. but these cuts that i'm talking about, the impact of these cuts that i'm talking about, the legal fight over these cuts, but also the pushback against these, these cuts and what they're doing. it's not at all a washington story by now. it really is by now, everywhere. >> one of the places where we've already seen impacts from those federal cuts is right here at the detroit va. on a day that would have been his one year anniversary at the detroit va. >> when i first got that email, i was shocked, you know, quite frankly, shocked. >> elliott spray is instead unemployed. the ten point veteran, one of the thousands of federal employees terminated in the last few weeks as the trump administration and the department of government officially work to slash what they say is government waste. a rally in livonia tuesday bringing out dozens of seniors concerned about social security

and medicare. >> i'm terrified my life would change drastically without social security, and that's our money. we put that in. nobody gave us that money. we loaned it to the government. >> to do. >> everything that that is happening right now is impacting so many people. >> lilia sharp in the crowd after losing her job on friday when the department of education grants she was hired under was terminated. >> department of education cuts the potential elimination of the department of education is one of sort of two categories of actions. the trump administration and republicans in washington are taking that have potentially catastrophic effects, not just on the people whose who are served by those agencies or the people who work there, but also on the states. if the federal education department disappears, which nbc news reports is their plan to just eliminate that department and everything it does if they kill the federal education

department, and if they go ahead with these massive medicaid cuts that are slated in the budget that republicans have just started to pass in washington, both of those things are going to just be nuclear bombs on the state budgets of just about every state in the country. those folks in michigan on tuesday, including the woman who's just lost her job because of department of education cuts, they were protesting, among other things, what what trump is doing to social security. they protested outside the social security administration buildin. reporters this week, including david dayen at the american prospect, have warned that trump's cuts at the social security administration might be fully 50% of the workforce at social security. meanwhile, the expected cuts to medicaid, which again, would be devastating not just to the people who work to administer that be devastating to the tens of millions of people who get medicaid in this

country. it'd be devastating to state budgets in every state in this country. expected cuts to medicaid specifically led to this protest yesterday in wisconsin. >> many of those who. >> gathered on wednesday. >> it just goes on and on. >> with stories. >> i have a 23 year old son who has developmental disabilities. he has been on medicaid since he was a toddler. >> and photos. >> i think people need to see that there are real people being impacted. >> telling how medicaid has affected their lives. >> may have not been able to receive those therapies without it. >> they believe the budget plan approved by the house of representatives on tuesday means cuts to medicaid. >> medicaid is an essential program for these folks, and we cannot let it be cut. >> they need to listen to the people. >> the wisconsin department of health and human services reported 1.47 million wisconsinites were enrolled in medicaid in 2023. >> heartbreaking to see how many

people are going to be affected. >> and senator johnson did not appear in person, but said in a statement the rally has, quote, no basis in truth or fact. >> senator ron johnson of wisconsin never misses an opportunity to share how much he respects his constituents. i has no basis in truth or fact. yeah, these dummies with their disabled children rallying at his office, he doesn't see the need to respond. they don't know anything. you might have seen the headline in the washington post yesterday about how the quote, resistance is beginning to quote wake in earnest post highlighted, among other things, the fact that senator bernie sanders just held a couple of town hall events in two red states in iowa, where he went to iowa city, and in nebraska, where he held an event in omaha. you can see from some of the local news coverage and the footage we've been able to get that these events were sort of stuffed to the gills and beyond.

in omaha, the organizers of that town hall event with senator sanders said they had an inkling that the response was going to be pretty big. so they arranged for a really big venue for his event. they planned for 1000 people to show up. they got a venue that seated 1000 people on the night of the event, though the actual turnout was between 3000 504,000 people in nebraska in february to go to a meeting with bernie sanders. in iowa city. his talk there was at noontime, the des moines register reports that thousands of people turned up in iowa city. they started lining up at 7:30 a.m. for an event that wouldn't start until noon. the des moines register reports that lines to get in stretched multiple city blocks, and they had to set up a whole separate overflow event in iowa in february to go to a noontime meeting with bernie sanders. and this is not just a bernie sanders phenomenon. this, for

example, was the no special occasion regular organizing meeting last night for the indivisible chapter in collingswood, new jersey. they again had guessed that there might be an unusually large amount of interest, given everything that's going on. so they booked a hall that could hold a huge number of people for just a regular organizing meeting. on a wednesday night, they booked a hall that could hold 450 people, but they filled that 450 seat room, and then another 200 people showed up and could not get in, and they decided they would just meet in the parking lot instead. you might have also seen recent headlines just over the past few days about how republican members of congress are being advised now to please stop holding town halls with their constituents because they aren't enjoying the national and local news coverage that those things are engendering. look at this out of midlothian, virginia. this gives you some sense of why republicans might not want to be anywhere near their constituents right now, not when this is what it's like for them. even in

republican congressional districts. >> the event whitman's. >> office held today was called mobile office hours. congressman whitman wasn't in attendance, nor was he ever scheduled to be. however, that didn't stop his constituents from giving his staff an earful from angry chants. don't patronize us. >> with your nonsense. >> shame, shame, shame. >> to passionate, please. >> we want to know. we want to know. >> and even here's. >> who is representing me in congress. >> constituents from across the first congressional district filed into a midlothian american legion post on wednesday. that's where republican congressman rob whitman's office was holding what his team calls mobile office hours. >> he needs to answer to his constituents and stop hiding. >> his constituents, saying they're concerned about the gop budget resolution, which whitman

voted for on tuesday that some, including the mother of a child with lung disease, believe could lead to massive cuts to medicaid. >> you take away medicaid funds, you are saying that's okay for this child to die? >> plus, cuts to other key social services like snap benefits. >> and rob whitman voted last night to cut that by 23%. >> constituents also upset with president donald trump's firing of thousands of federal workers like chesterfield resident ebony turner, she says she was fired from the irs last week. >> the termination was not based on my performance nor conduct. my agency's leadership will attest to that. >> whitman's office turned down our interview request to address his constituents concerns. but in a statement, the congressman said while he believes, quote, enhancing government efficiency is important, he believes that goal should be, quote, pursued

with greater compassion on potential cuts to social services whitman repeatedly did not address specific questions. >> the congressman repeatedly did not address our specific questions, nor did he show up in person to face that from his constituents in his republican district last night. that report from wabe in virginia from last night, one of the things that does keep cropping up at these town halls and also at protests that we're seeing all over the country, is just rage and expressions of disgust at the president putting his top campaign donor in charge of destroying the government. that has also led increasingly to protests that specifically target that campaign donor elon musk. like this one a few days ago in cherry hill, new jersey, on the street outside the tesla dealer in that town. pretty considerable turnout outside that tesla dealership in cherry

hill. there was another protest targeting elon musk, specifically at the spacex and starlink offices in redmond, washington. this was yesterday. they seem to have had a pretty good turnout there up in redmond, washington. it will also be interesting to see what kind of turnout there is this saturday, march 1st, in hawthorne, california, which is right near lax, right near the airport in la. they're telling people to dress up like elon musk for the protest at that spacex headquarters building on saturday. so if nothing else, it should be funny. they specifically went out of their way to say, if you do dress up like mr. musk for the protest, please do not choose to express your opinion of him by dressing up as a nazi. they do not want anybody there in nazi elon musk outfits. thank you, thank you. please no. that protest at spacex global headquarters in la again expected saturday as the concerns and objections to elon musk now are starting to extend, not just to what he's doing to

the rest of the government, but what he's doing for himself as he's taking apart the government. the washington post is now following on reporting that initiated with bloomberg news and other outlets that musk has, has now apparently just somehow engineered the overriding of an existing faa contract with verizon to instead install his own company in its place to instead install starlink at the faa. they're just doing that. is that legal? aren't there rules for like, contracts and conflicts of interest and stuff? as we get to that part of the definition of oligarchy already right away, one of the more unnerving things that mr. musk has developed an interest in in recent days appears to be the american judicial system. now, on top of everything else he is doing in his capacity as the president's top donor, musk has also started railing publicly that american judges and the judiciary are the real problem in this country,

and that therefore we need to start, in his words, firing judges because courts should not be allowed to stop him and to stop donald trump from doing whatever they want. naturally, republican members of congress are obliging. they started filing impeachment proceedings against multiple federal judges who've had the temerity to rule against trump. and this seems sort of at the same time, to be just the natural evolution of where these guys have always been heading. but it also seems to be the single brightest bright line we have as a country when it comes to figuring out whether the authoritarian takeover they are attempting will be stopped, or whether it will go all the way. americans, from sea to shining sea are turning out in huge and increasing numbers. to say they are not down with this, they do not want any of this. and amid this fight and amid this drama, and amid the american people being so palpably mad about what they are doing, the single most

important line that just cannot be crossed ever is to have a president defying the law and defying the courts, because that is the end. and on that, senator dick durbin joins do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy - even a term policy - for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have $100,000 or more of life insurance, you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit coventrydirect.com to find out if your policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance. vacuum? hy folks, joe fowler here with my favorite cleaning partner, the duck, a super compact back with ultra powerful suction. this is

a small but mighty duck, making it quick and easy to clean up any mess. just duck it up. the compact design can reach the tightest places. it's smaller than a water bottle. oh, but look at this. it even fits inside my pocket. so store it in any drawer where it's always at your fingertips. plus, it dumps out with ease so it's ready to clean again. >> i used to have to drag out this huge thing they call a portable vacuum cleaner. now i keep the duck in my kitchen drawer and i clean up messes in two seconds. >> the turbocharged motor is engineered to create a powerful vortex of suction, while the hepa filter helps remove dust and allergens. let's prove the power of the duck. i attach it to the hose. it's going to pull the water right up through the tube. clean up that mess in the kitchen, the spill on the sofa, even the sawdust and screws in the workshop. plus it's rechargeable. got messy pets? duck power picks up pet hair from anywhere. you can even store it in your glove box for the ultimate carve out. clean

seats, the floor and deep into those hard to reach places. i promise the duck will change the way you clean. >> get the. >> horsepower duck handbag. >> for just 39.99. >> order right now and we'll upgrade you to the duck pro package. a $30 value. yours free. you get the bendable tube to get under appliances, the crevice nozzle to reach into those cracks and crevices, and the brush nozzle to vacuum with no scratches. you'll get the duck with all the deluxe attachments, but supplies are limited, so there's a strict limit of three per order. this may be your last chance to get yours at this low, low price, so don't delay. duck it up today. >> call 1-800-910-3841 or visit duck. com so call 1-800-910-3841 or visit duck back.com order now. >> ba ba. >> ba ba. >> ba ba. >> with for imprint. you get more than promo products. you get the certainty of personal service, design expertise and unmatched quality to make your moment shine before imprint

certain at for imprint.com. >> for imprint for certain. >> shopping online. >> comes with digital threats. >> so turn on nordvpn and encrypt your online traffic. get 72% off dave's been very excited about saving big with the comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. five years? -five years. and he's not alone. -high five. it's five years of reliable gig speed internet. five years of advanced securit. five years of a great rate that won't change.

it's back. but only for a limited time. high five. five years? -nope. comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. powering five years of savings. powering possibilities. comcast business. that i don't think has ever happened before. multiple nominees for senior justice department jobs said during their confirmation hearings out loud that they're not sure that presidents have to obey rulings from the courts. not always. >> there is no hard and fast rule about whether in some in every instance, a public official is bound by a court decision. >> generally, if. >> there is a direct court order that binds a. >> federal or state official. >> they should. >> follow it. >> why do you say generally give me an exception? >> i suppose one could imagine hypotheticals in extreme cases.

the president has now. asserted that he has the right basically to do what he thinks is necessary to save the country. and i'm asking whether that includes violating a supreme court order. i represented president trump for two years. i've never been put in any situation like that. and i don't know, i just got to say, mr. chairman, that's a little bit frustrating. >> that's a little bit frustrating. you may recognize one of those nominees, the guy with the raspy voice, he's named john sauer. he is the lawyer who told a federal appeals court that donald trump would be within his rights to order a team of navy seals to assassinate his political opponents, that that donald trump could not be prosecuted for, for giving such an order. mr. sauer is now up for the job of solicitor general, which is the person who represents the united states government before the supreme court. the unnerving refusal by him and other trump justice department nominees yesterday to say that the president must always obey the federal courts. that prompted a

stern and somewhat unexpected admonition from one republican senator from john kennedy of louisiana. >> you're all adults. you're all officers of the court. some will give you some advice. i may be wrong, but i doubt it. don't ever, ever take the position that you're not going to follow the order of a federal court, ever. now, you can disagree with it within the bounds of legal ethics. you can criticize it. you can appeal it. or you can resign.

>> joining us now is illinois senator dick durbin. he is the second highest ranking democrat in the senate. he's the ranking member on the senate judiciary committee. senator durbin, it's a rare pleasure to be able to have you here on the show tonight. thank you so much for making time. >> thanks, rachel. good to be with you. >> i know that you have had a strong reaction to those nominees, playing with the idea that donald trump doesn't have to obey court orders. in an interview today, you called it breathtaking. you said it raises serious existential constitutional questions. we've got to step back and have an honest discussion about this. why do you feel so strongly about that? what can you explain to our viewers about the seriousness of this issue that you've that you've now come across in these confirmation hearings? >> rachel, you and i. >> have heard many people use the phrase constitutional crisis and try to define exactly when it reaches the point of breaking point with our constitution. and it seems to me that the final question is the one i raised with these witnesses. if you are given a court order that says to

this president or any president for that matter, that there are certain actions that they cannot take or should not take or have to take, are you going to follow that order? and it turned out to be a debating topic. i thought the answer was a clear yes and let's move on. but they wanted to debate it. you heard one of them qualify it, say, well, generally, yes. and we had these equivocal answers. the most definitive answer came from john kennedy, as you noted, a republican of louisiana who made it clear what i think the law is. you may hate the order of the court, but you have to follow it or resign, period. i can't think of an exception to that. they tried to use an illustration. korematsu, dred scott, those terrible decisions one of the republican senators used is an illustration of a court order that you could morally rationalize opposing. but the bottom line is, you cannot take a subjective test on this issue. if you did, you'd have someone who might be a

racist who says brown versus board of education integrating our schools. i don't believe in that. that's morally reprehensible to me, and i will not enforce that order in my administration of education. so you see, that's the slippery slope. so i think we've raised a threshold question for the department of justice appointments by this administration. and we better debate it out because it gets to the heart of our democracy. >> it does get to the heart of our democracy. it is the closest thing that we have. to an existential question. i think, in terms of our republic, to see the wholesale destruction of the federal government, which i think they're trying to do, to see them appearing to ignore laws when it comes to doing what they're trying to do to the us government, is a bad thing as far as i'm concerned. disobeying the law seems to be bad. but the prospect that when a court corrects that when a court declares it to be illegal and orders them to change course, that they will not do it, we are

just in a territory that that's that's like where the roadrunner runs off the end of the cliff, and then there's nothing there and it just drops. i have to ask you, because i think you do very clearly see the seriousness of this. what sort of contingency plans elected democrats have for further sounding the alarm and for trying to correct course and pull that roadrunner back onto the cliff. if, if, if they go as far as they're signaling, they might. >> well, i can tell you, i think this is going to be a standard inquiry of all those appointed to serve in the administration, particularly in the department of justice. as i said, i was a little bit surprised, not totally, because we've seen some rather amazing things done by this administration so far. but i was surprised by the answers yesterday. we cannot take for granted that any of these nominees from the trump administration will follow the

basic tenets of our constitutional law. we have to ask the question, and if the answer comes back no, as did yesterday, or at least qualified as it did yesterday, it is right for us to continue to press the case as the minority. it's a frustration that we don't have controlling votes on the question, but i am hopeful, and i hope john kennedy is an illustration, that there will come a moment when republican senators will come out of hiding and speak up clearly on something as basic as this principle of constitutional law. because if we abandon this, i'm afraid we've abandoned our democracy. >> senator dick durbin of illinois, the ranking democrat on the judiciary committee, senior democrat in the senate, sir, thank you for your time tonight. i do really appreciate you being here. >> thanks, rachel. >> all right. much more news ahead here tonight. stay with us. >> when that passenger airbag exploded, he lost his nose. he lost his right eye. you still have 40 million plus vehicles

globally that are driving around with a potential ticking time bomb, a grenade in either their steering wheel or their dashboard. morgan or morgan has a national reach in terms of handling and prosecuting cases. notwithstanding the team of lawyers that we have collected that focus only on product liability day in and day out. >> shopping online comes with digital threats. so turn on nordvpn and encrypt your online traffic. get 72% off nordvpn and up to one year for free. >> hi grandma, i played baseball today. >> oh that's great. >> what position did you play? >> first base. >> that's what grandpa used to play when our hearing wouldn't allow us to use a regular phone. it made us feel isolated. >> it became difficult to communicate with our friends and family. >> clear captions was an easy solution for us. >> clear captions provides

captions on a phone. like captioning on your tv so you can see what the caller is saying live as they say it. >> making it easy to understand and respond immediately. >> there is no insurance or medicare required. clear caption service is provided at no cost to you through a federally funded program. we deliver, install and train you on how to use your phone, all at no cost to you. >> give your loved ones the independence and connection they deserve. >> call now to see if you qualify to get a clear captions phone at no cost to you, call 1-800-714-2088. that's 1-800-714-2088. >> shopping for insurance? >> watch out! >> whoa! >> the unexpected. >> can happen to any of us. >> that's why select quote. >> makes it easy to get. >> the life insurance coverage you need to protect your family for less than a dollar a day. >> select quote found me a $500,000 policy for only $16 a

month. >> we can help you save more. >> than 50% on life insurance. >> visit select quote.com. we shop, you save. after glow cleaned our place for $19. we fired our old housekeeper home aglow. tackled everything from our kitchen to our bathroom, all our laundry. you just pick a date, pick a cleaner and enjoy a spotless house for $19. >> here you go. >> is there any way to get a better. >> price on this? >> how do you check single care? whenever my customers ask how to get a better price on their meds, i tell them about single care. it's a free app accepted at pharmacies nationwide. >> before i pick up my prescription, i always check the single care price. >> it's quick, easy, and totally free to use. >> single care can literally beat my insurance copay. >> you just search for your prescription and show your single care coupon at the pharmacy. >> so i just. show the coupon. >> and get. >> this price. >> that's right. go to single care.com and start saving today. >> i'm certain. >> it's level five. >> are you for certain?

>> i'm certain. >> it's level five. >> certainty matters. like the certainty of four. imprint your home for high quality promotional gear, including exclusive items and brands they love. printed perfectly and guaranteed to arrive on time to wow your clients and nail your next dude, i really need a new phone. check out my new samsung galaxy s25 ultra. it's got galaxy ai. imagine this thing running on our superfast xfinity mobile network. and i also heard that it can do multiple things

with a single command. —with google gemini. let me try it. add recipes with overripe bananas to my “dessert ideas” note. that's what you chose to ask it? i had other things planned. ask how to get up to one thousand dollars off the new samsung galaxy s25 ultra with xfinity mobile. >> do not let anyone tell you that push back does not matter. look at this. this was the headline tuesday night at the washington post doge to cancel government contracts that help veterans records show, quote, the 875 contracts on the chopping block, help cover medical services, fund cancer programs, recruit doctors and provide burial services to veterans, according to internal va documents. also, a contract to, quote, safely dispose of chemical waste. yeah, who needs that? look, the word waste is

right there. let's cut that. so this is the va. this is health care for american military veterans. here's donald trump announcing proudly as president. right. we're slashing funding for cancer care for american military veterans. also burial services, literally burial services for veterans. and hey, just toss that chemical waste out back behind the shed. it'll be fine. but put that back up there. that was the that was the headline at the washington post tuesday night, doge to cancel government contracts that help veterans. this was tuesday night. but then look at this. this was less than 24 hours later. thing under pressure va halts contract cancellations in a major reversal. after one night and one day of shock and outrage at what trump was doing. hey, turns out they decided to reverse it. not going to do it.

don't let anybody tell you that pushback doesn't work. that said, it's not like they're leaving veterans alone. the trump administration fired 1000 people who work at the va two weeks ago this week. they fired 1400 more people who work at the va. leo shane reporting at the military times, quote, officials said the moves did not impact any mission critical jobs, but, quote, did not provide any specifics of the types of assignments that were eliminated. one va official telling nbc news, quote, it's leading to paralysis and nothing is getting done. the official described absolute chaos at the agency, with even trump political appointees afraid to misstep and incur a backlash from either the white house or the public. as bad as this already is, though, heads up that the kinds of cuts we've seen this far might be an order of magnitude smaller than the cuts that trump has coming next. the american prospect was first

to report that the social security administration is preparing to slash fully 50% of its workers. that would mean filing nearly 30,000 people who work on getting people their social security checks. social security administration has already lost thousands of employees in the last decade. they want to cut 30,000 people. now, that kind of a mass firing, called a reduction in force, is reportedly being planned all across federal agencies. but slashing jobs and programs for veterans in particular, is not something the trump administration is going to be able to do quietly with no pushback. that's obvious military times, says leo shane was on a call with lawmakers this afternoon about federal workers being fired. he posted this quote from virginia senator tim kaine, quote, i think donald trump in six weeks has already achieved the record of having fired more veterans than any president in the history of the united states. that is not a distinction. he says, quote, that is a disgrace. joining us

now is leo shane. he's deputy editor at military times. mr. shane, leo, it's nice to see you. thank you very much for being back. >> i appreciate the invite. >> what's your understanding of how this 24 hour reversal went down at the va? they announced all these cuts and then they they took it all back. what happened? >> yeah. i'm not sure that they have taken it all back. we've gotten an official word from va that they are reviewing these contracts and that that they will make sure that there's no impact, there's concerns about it. but i've talked to two sources within the va and some of these offices. they haven't gotten official word that these have been rescinded. they're still working under the assumption that these will eventually go away, that at least most of the contracts they've started looking at will will disappear at some point in the future here. so there's just a lot of uncertainty, i think. i think the va is now realizing just how deep some of these cuts are, and they're trying to claw back. maybe some of these will will be reversed, but but at least officially, these offices haven't been told that they're in the clear.

>> i mean, burial services for veterans, cancer care for in terms of veterans health care, disposal of hazardous waste and medical waste from va facilities. i mean, this is the kind of stuff this is. i mean, are they making a substantive case that these are legitimately things that veterans should not have? or is the idea that some of these things were a mistake and they didn't notice they were such core services? >> the common theme with these contracts seems to be that they're not direct services. these aren't like doctors who are working directly with a patient or, you know, someone who's actually taking a taking over a funeral and actually transporting a casket or doing things like that. these are support services. so it may be a contract to, you know, helps coordinate that. i've heard from folks who are involved in in benefits processing who aren't directly doing the benefits claims themselves. but what they are doing is they're helping guide veterans through that process, making it easier for them. so clearly a very valuable

service. but at least in the eyes of someone in the administration, it's not a direct benefit to veterans. so that's what seems to be the trip up here. you know, the va is insisting that they're not going to hurt anything that would benefit veterans, beneficiaries, families. but it feels like they're they're going after these secondary services that are still very valuable, but maybe don't directly touch veterans in in connecting them to medical care or some sort of disability payout. >> and they fired more than 2000 people who work there already. leo, i have to ask you tonight about a late breaking legal development. tonight. there's been this ruling from a federal judge in california that the memos from the trump administration, from opm directing the firing of employees, probationary employees, that was that was illegal advice. and the judge tonight has ordered that opm should communicate this to the defense department right now, ahead of planned mass firings

tomorrow. do you have any sense of what impact this ruling might have on on planned mass firings at the defense department or at the va? >> yeah, right now we're right now we're just guessing. i have heard that there were scheduled mass firings at va tomorrow as well with the defense department. so those might be on hold at this point. i mean, as you said, the judge's ruling, we've just got loose, loose parameters of it right now. he did. he does say that he doesn't have the power to reinstate anyone, but that opm also doesn't have the power to fire anyone. so it feels like this might just end up in a situation where va has to actually take the take the step of being the ones who order the dismissals, being the ones who actually accept responsibility for it. and that's not a that's not a small task. as as you referenced, there's a lot of lawmakers out there who are furious with secretary doug collins for not standing up for veterans, for not, you know, not doing his part to say everything in va should be protected. so, you know, we'll see in the next,

you know, next few days here exactly what it means for those folks who've been dismissed. >> well, i may be calling you during business hours tomorrow, leo, to try to get a handle on on what happens here and that as we try to as we try to put some specifics on this evolving story. leo shane, deputy editor at military times, thank you, as always, for your time. thank you. you. >> we'll be (♪♪) years of hard work. decades of dedication. committed to giving back. you've been there, done that. and you're still here for more. so now that you're 50 or older, and at increased risk for pneumococcal pneumonia and ipd be proactive with capvaxive- a vaccine specifically designed for adults to help protect against pneumonia and invasive disease caused by certain types of pneumococcal bacteria. capvaxive is the only vaccine that helps protect against the strains that cause 84% of ipd in adults 50 or older compared with up to 52%

by other pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. don't get capvaxive if you're allergic to the vaccine or its ingredients. tell your doctor if you have a weakened immune system. common side effects include injection-site reactions, feeling tired, headache, muscle aches, and fever. whether you've had another pneumococcal vaccine or not ask your doctor or pharmacist about capvaxive. (♪♪) ah, these bills are crazy. she has no idea she's sitting on a goldmine. well she doesn't know that if she owns a life insurance policy of $100,000 or more she can sell all or part of it to coventry for cash. even a term policy. even a term policy? even a term policy! find out if you're sitting on a goldmine. call coventry direct today at the number on your screen, or visit coventrydirect.com. wo drag out that bulky vacuum? hey

folks, joe fowler here with my favorite cleaning partner, the duck, a super compact back with ultra powerful suction. this is a small but mighty duck, making it quick and easy to clean up any mess. just duck it up. the compact design can reach the tightest places. it's smaller than a water bottle. oh, but look at this. it even fits inside my pocket. so store it in any drawer where it's always at your fingertips. plus, it dumps out with ease so it's ready to clean again. >> i used to have to drag out this huge thing they call a portable vacuum cleaner. now i keep the duck in my kitchen drawer and i clean up messes in two seconds. >> the turbocharged motor is engineered to create a powerful vortex of suction, while the hepa filter helps remove dust and allergens. let's prove the power of the duck. i attach it to the hose. it's going to pull the water right up through the tube. clean up that mess in the kitchen, the spill on the sofa, even the sawdust and screws in the workshop. plus it's rechargeable. got messy pets?

duck power picks up pet hair from anywhere. you can even store it in your glove box for the ultimate car back. clean seats the floor and deep into those hard to reach places. i promise the duck will change the way you clean. >> get the horsepower duck handbag for just 39.99. order right now and we'll upgrade you to the duck pro package. a $30 value. yours free. you get the bendable two to get under appliances, the crevice nozzle to reach into those cracks and crevices, and the brush nozzle to vacuum with no scratches. you'll get the duck with all the deluxe attachments, but supplies are limited, so there's a strict limit of three per order. this may be your last chance to get yours at this low, low price, so don't delay. duck it up today. >> call 1-800-910-3841 or visit duck back.com. so call one 809 101 or visit.com. order now. baba baba baba. >> for people with diabetic nerve pain of the feet, it's time for great feets. help get

them with the only topical prescription treatment approved to help reduce diabetic nerve pain of the feet. great feets. the day to day ordinary things that seem extraordinary when your feet feel better is different. one 30 minute application in your doctor's office can provide up to three months of diabetic foot pain relief. a healthcare provider must apply. cusenza can cause severe irritation of eyes, mucous membranes, respiratory tract and skin pain. severe burns and reduced sensation may occur where applied during and after treatment. most common side effects are redness, pain, and itching. tell your doctor right away if any side effect becomes severe. talk to your doctor about how it may help reduce pain in your feet so you can get on to your own great feet. learn more@cusenza.com. >> this is at the iowa state capitol this week. big crowds

rallying to support trans people and their rights as the trump administration and republicans everywhere accelerate their efforts to frankly persecute and take rights away from trans people. tonight in iowa, after this show of force in support of the iowa trans community. tonight, iowa republicans nevertheless passed a radical bill to rescind state civil rights protections for transgender people in iowa. the vote was largely along party lines, except for five republicans who sided with the democrats in voting no. iowa's republican governor is expected to sign the bill into law. it will roll back protections that have been in place in iowa for 18 years. the des moines register notes tonight that while businesses in iowa generally supported vocally and actively supported the lgbt rights bill that became law in the state in 2007, major, major employers and business groups in iowa have stayed silent on the anti-trans bill that's now on its way to the governor's desk, one advocate for lgbt rights tells the paper, quote, i think

these groups have abdicated their responsibility to iowans, and i think they're being penny wise and pound foolish with their own workforce. we're watching tonight for continued reaction in iowa and around the reaction in iowa and around the country. [coughing] copd isn't pretty. from the struggle to breathe... to getting stopped in your tracks. bye, grandma. ♪♪ but with trelegy, i can finally move forward. with 3 medicines in 1 inhaler, trelegy keeps my airways open for a full 24 hours and prevents future flare-ups. once-daily trelegy also improves lung function, so i can breathe more freely all day and night. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain,

mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes or eye pain occur. ♪what a wonderful world♪ ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy for copd because breathing should be beautiful, all day and night. our xfinity network is built for streaming because breathing should be beautiful, all the stuff people love. how can it get any better? -i'm just spitballin' here, but, what if we offer people apple tv+, netflix and peacock? for one low monthly price. -yes. so, people could stream the shows they love. and we could call it... xfinity streamsaver! mmmmm. what about something like: streamsaver? ooooooo. -i love that. add streamsaver with apple tv+, netflix and peacock included for only $15 a month... and stream all your favorite entertainment, all in one place.

>> all right. that's going to do it for me for now. heads up that the new episode of alex wagner's podcast, trumpland just came out. it's really good. she's looking in this episode at the trump administration's strengthening ties to russia and russian authoritarianism. as ukrainians in the us mark the third anniversary of russia invading ukraine. if you want to listen to the podcast, it's great. just scan that little circular code on your screen with your phone and it will take you right to it. it's easy. way too early with ali. vitali is next. >> think of it. a modestly successful comedian, a dictator without elections. zelensky, better move fast or he's not going to have