i started reading about it last week in the standard. the law has said that no federal money pays for abortions. it has been the law of the land and they're trying to change it. >> whatever the merits are, as ruben said and as you're saying now, this is just a fight that president obama does not need. there are other problems with the health care bill. first of all, what it's going to look like, is there going to be a true public option, how are you going to pay for this $1 trillion program? you don't need to add in a hot-button issue like abortion. to most americans, abortion is a settled issue. >> the right to an abortion. >> don't bother us about it. >> he goes over to see the pope and says they're going to reduce the number of abortions. in that same week, he pushes to subsidize abortion. he can't do that. >> i think last week is a week the white house would like to have back. he had certain responsibilities, but he did moscow, rome, ghana. at the same time he's saying, i want to have this health care

bill on my desk by august. it's mid-july. it was sort of a week where the eye got taken off the ball. >> i think he's got to drop all unnecessary features and go with the substance and follow the rahm emanuel rule. the rahm emanuel rule, the only thing we cannot accept is defeat here. he's got to get the core of this bill through. he can't afford the trappings like abortion and paying for abortion with something that's considered a critical health issue. abortion is another matter, it seems to me. but your thoughts? >> it seems like the tragedy is, as rahm emanuel would say, don't accept defeat, keep talking about how you're not going to derail this, we're going to get this done, but bush made that mistake with regard to immigration. he treated it as if it were a done deal. and people don't like hearing that. it takes congress and says, what you do isn't important and there's a parallel here. likewise, obama on health care, they've got to be positive, but they've got to understand and be respectful for congress. stop saying it's a done deal. it's not a done deal. >> okay, great. thank you very much, roger simon.

thanks, ruben nafrette. "countdown with keith olbermann" starts right now. which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow? the confirmation hearings, confirmation that the senior republican is deliberately, knowingly twisting sonia sotomayor's words. words which condemned judging based on personal experience, which he pretends were words endorsing judging based on personal experience. >> philosophy can't impact your judging. i think it's much more likely to reach full flower if you sit on the supreme court. >> confirmation, the dishonesty of jeff sessions, senator from alabama. and a judge's calm, plotting, almost too gentle effort to disprove his lying.

>> i do not believe that any ethnic, racial, or gender group has an advantage in sound judgment. dick cheney's got a secret. now "the washington post" confirms it was an assassination squad kept from congress because it failed, utterly. but cia officials tell "time" magazine it might have been another illegal use of the agency to spy on americans. what the hell, this is dick cheney, you're probably both right. >> the american people need to understand the very serious and grave damage this is doing to our intelligence ability. >> but you are liz and dick cheney, you don't have any intelligence ability. sarah palin of "the washington post." an op-ed on cap and trade. is this the higher calling serving alaskans, shilling for big oil? and is america crawling with cat people, stinking with sen taurs. fortunately, senator sam

brownback has introduced the human/animal prohibition act of 2009, to ban the animal of human-animal hybrids. those part-human, part-animal creatures which are created in laboratories that blur the line between species. is this a huge problem? was the island of dr. ma roe and nobody freaking told me? >> lab-grown man-goat robert bore. >> wow, apparently it's worse than i expected. all that and more now on "countdown." good evening from new york. according to the american bar association and others, she might be the most qualified judge nominated to the supreme court in 70 years. according to the ranking republican on the senate judiciary committee, who himself was denied a federal judgeship by the republican controlled

senate judiciary committee two decades for being a racist, she is nothing more than a reverse racist. even after she fully explained herself to him. again. our fifth story in the countdown, the confirmation hearings for judge sonia sotomayor, morphing today into the confirmation hearings of the prejudice, the narrowness, and the intellectual dishonesty of republican senator jeff sessions of alabama. near the start of today's questions, the judge saying of her often-misquoted "wise latina" statement, quote, no words i have ever spoken or written have ever exchanged so much attention. her exchanges with the republican members of the judiciary committee would bear that out, most especially, a lengthy dialogue with ranking republican sessions of alabama. >> i assume, senator, that you are referring to a remark that i made in a duke law student dialogue. i think if my speech is heard outside of the minute and a half that youtube presents and its

full context examined, that it is very clear that i was talking about the policy ramifications of precedent, and never talking about appellate judges or courts making the policy that congress makes. >> judge alan, just say i don't think it's that clear. >> true, senator sessions. if you do all of your research on youtube, the senator was especially fond of quoting sotomayor back to her. >> but you repeatedly made this statement. quote, i accept the proposition -- i accept the proposition -- that a difference there will be, by the presence of women and people of color on the bench, and that my experiences affect the facts i choose to see as a judge. how is it appropriate for a judge ever to say that they will choose to see some facts and not others? >> it's not a question of

choosing to see some facts or another, senator. i didn't intend to suggest that and in the wider context, what i believe i was -- the point i was making was that our life experiences do permit us to see some facts and understand them more easily than others. but in the end, you're absolutely right. that's why we have appellate judges. >> senator sessions also seeking to discredit judge sotomayor by misquoting back to her past instances in which sotomayor had reportedly taken issue with the views of another judge named miriam cedarbow, which is when perfectly analogied by a blogger, judge sotomayor experienced a real-life version of what woody alan created, her version of his marshal moment. >> in the past, you've repeatedly said this -- i wonder whether achieving the goal of impartiality is possible at all

in even most cases and i wonder whether by ignoring our differences, as women, men, or people of color, we do a disservice to both the law and society. i will just note, you made that statement in individual speeches about seven times over a number of years' span, and it's concerning to me. so i would just say to you, i believe in judge cedarbaum's formulation. >> my friend, judge cedarbaum is here this afternoon, and we are good friends, and i believe that we both approach judging in the same way, which is looking at the facts of each individual case and applying the law to those facts. >> happen to have mr. mccluen right here. and now you're getting an idea why senator sessions was rejected in this committee in 1996 for a federal judgeship. despite sotomayor's many explanations that included the full context of her speech and

otherwise answering senator session' half-hour's worth of questions, the man who could not win confirmation from the committee, apparently hearing only what he wanted to hear. >> so philosophy can't impact your judging, i think it's much more likely to reach full flower if you sit on the supreme court than it will on a lower court where you're subject to review by your colleagues in the higher court. >> the democratic chairman of the committee, senator leahy of vermont, then raising the ricci case. judge sotomayor's rulings in the new haven firefighter's reverse discrimination lawsuit, having been overturned two weeks ago by the supreme court. >> how do you react to the supreme court's decision in the new haven firefighters' case? >> the issue was not what we would do or not do, because we were following precedent. the panel concluded that the city's decision in that particular situation was lawful

under established law. the supreme court in looking and reviewing that case applied a new standard. >> when senator sessions brought up ricci, the leaders of the committee arguing with each other. >> you must have agreed with it and agreed with the opinion and stayed with it until it was reversed by the court. let me just mention this. in 1997 -- >> is that a question or -- >> well, that was a response to some of what you said, mr. chairman, because you misrepresented, factually, what the -- how the posture of the case. in 19 -- >> i obviously will disagree with that, but we'll have a chance to vote on this issue. >> if yesterday, meanwhile, senator graham could have been credited with a rare republican moment of honesty, today the south carolina senator apparently having eaten a big old plate of crazy at lunch by raising anonymous criticism from lawyers about the temperament of the seemingly always calm,

ever-deliberate nominee. >> i do ask tough questions at oral arguments. >> are you the only one that asks tough questions in oral arguments? >> no, no, not at all. i can only explain what i'm doing. which is, when i ask lawyers tough questions, it's to give them an opportunity to explain their positions on both sides and to persuade me that they're right, lots of lawyers who are unfamiliar with the process in the second circuit find that tough bench difficult and challenging. >> if i may interject, judge, they find you difficult and challenging more than your colleagues. i never liked appearing before a judge that i thought was a bully. do you think you have a

temperament problem? >> no, sir. >> do i have to compare it to john mccain's temperament? and if you had miguel estrada president sonia sotomayor confirmation hearing drinking games, hope you enjoyed your two-day bender. possibly the most absurd of several republican strategies officially entering into the record of the sotomayor hearings, complaints about the democrats having successfully filibustered the nomination of one of president bush's appellate court nominees apparently because he, too, had a hispanic name. >> and i'm puzzled why mr. estrada keeps coming up. mr. estrada had no judicial experience. the nominee before us has considerable judicial experience. mr. estrada wouldn't answer questions presented to him. this nominee, i think, has been very straightforward -- >> well, we should remember that mr. estrada is not the nominee here. just as with all the statements made about president obama's

philosophy, his confirmation hearing was last november. >> let's turn now to "newsweek" magazine's senior washington correspondent and political columnist and msnbc political analyst, howard fineman. howard, good evening. >> hi, keith. >> overall picture, first. those who remember the name of the democratic senator john stennis who was very hard of hearing and often asked for things to be repeated because, frankly, he admitted, he couldn't hear every word that was said, are the republicans on this committee trying to pretend to be him? it's as if they are only hearing every third thing that has been said. >> well, i think the point here is that their attempts to really hang the "wise latina" remark and speech around judge sotomayor -- i was in the committee room all day today, it didn't feel like they really got to her. just the opposite, as a matter of fact. very carefully, very well rehearsed, very well thought through. she followed an old practice i know as a lawyer called

confession and avoidance. you admit the problem and explain it with other facts. she said that the remark was a bad one because it gave the wrong impression. she said that she would not say that any ethnic, religious, or racial group or gender had any special purchase on justice. and most important of all, she repeatedly cited, as did her democratic allies, the more than 3,000 cases that she's been involved in as a district court judge and as an appellate judge in which is there is no evidence and the republicans had no evidence that she was somehow allowing her biases or her personal emotions or her pride in being a latina to somehow affect her judgment. they don't have that case to make. this was all they had and it didn't feel in the courtroom like they really made it very well. >> did this other judge that they invoked work, and i mean jose cabranes, because at one point, senator sessions discussed her league in the second circuit and said, had you voted with judge cabranes, who

was a conservative judge, himself of puerto rican ancestry, had you voted with him, you could have changed that case. how poorly executed was that strategy when it produces, in an attempt to prove racism, it instead seems to prove racism on the part of the person asking the question? >> i've got to say, keith, and this is perhaps a little mean, but it reminded me of the terrible press release put out by the swim club in philadelphia about changing the complexion of the pool. it was way too revealing, and even some republicans staffers were shaking their heads at that, because the point of that about cabranes, her fellow judge on the second circuit, had nothing to do with his ethnicity whatsoever. and thus, senator sessions was kind of betraying the kind of race they thinking that he was criticizing sotomayor for and it did undercut his credibility at that point. >> skpand also, we quoted this

characterization in the blog about the moment from "annie hall," just the mechanics, leave out racism, leave out political wisdom of doing this, the wise alabamaens in the audience, leave it all out, just talk about political stagecraft. isn't it imperative if you're going to invoke another judge and say, i agree with that judge, don't you think you should know whether that judge is a really good friend of the judge you're trying to humiliate and is sitting behind her and she can turn around and point to him and make it look like you shouldn't be in that room unless you bought a ticket. >> that's emphatic of the point that the republicans really aren't putting up a big fight about this. you don't hear anything from the rnc or very little, you don't hear anything from the republican leadership in the senate. the republicans in this committee are not particularly well organized and not that thorough, it seems to me. whereas the white house and the democrats are really on the muscle here. they're issuing press releases every ten minutes.

they're running it like they run a spin room in a presidential debate. they're really on it, the republicans are not. they're really a little confused. the feeling in the room is one that they're sort of, to some extent, going through the motions, however odious those motions sometimes are. >> also, they probably didn't tell senator sessions that's that was what the idea here was. howard fineman of "newsweek" and msnbc, thank you, good night. that there are no senate cheney hearings going on defies all logic. "the washington post" now confirming that the program cheney demanded the cia keep secret from congress was an assassination squad and the reason he demanded that it kept secret was what we guessed at here last night was that it was lousy and ineffective. but "time" magazine is offering a comfortable alternative. maybe it was justs a cheney domestic spy operation. that's a relief.

fair, straight-forward pricing. that's what td ameritrade stands for. think about it. why pay investing fees you shouldn't have to? or account fees that aren't clear? like inactivity fees? or maintenance fees? it's not right. and you know it. and the thing is, the other investment firms know it. but they do it anyway. and that's just not fair or straight-forward. td ameritrade. independence is the spirit that drives america's most successful investors. to speaker pelosi because the cia does not lie.

so when the cia admitted it kept an operation secret from congress for eight years at the behest of dick cheney and liz cheney said that wasn't true, didn't she just say the cia lies? later in the middle of a million crisis, these are the senators who know what's important. brownback, landrieu, bunning, byrd, chapel brisz, kyle, martinez, mccain, voinovich and ricer. the sponsors of a vital legislation that will forever outlaw spider-man and mammals. could someone toss me

an eleven sixteenths wrench over here? here you go. eleven sixteenths... (announcer) from designing some of the world's cleanest and most fuel-efficient jet engines... to building more wind turbines than anyone in the country... the people of ge are working together... creating innovation today for america's tomorrow. thanks!

at some point in every

labored right-wing contortion, the fabricators and spinners twist themselves around to such an extent that they find themselves with their metaphorical head up their metaphorical butt. first house speaker nancy pelosi explained it was plausible that she did not know about cia waterboarding because sometimes the cia lies to congress. the right wing, which loves the government, said the cia never lies to anybody. then the new cia director told congress dick cheney ordered the cia to lie. leaving daughter liz cheney today to argue that that's not true. in other words, the cia is lying. well played, madame. miss cheney filibustering on msnbc today, claiming there is no evidence her father told the cia to keep congress in the dark. the word of the cia, of course, not evidence to her. >> was there any attempt by your father, in any way, to keep the cia from telling congress information they should have heard? >> well, i think you have to look, for example, at what general hayden said yesterday. general hayden, the former director of the cia came out

publicly on the record and said he was under absolutely to restraint from briefing congress and that he had a series of triggers about when congress needed to be briefed and that those triggers were not met with this particular program. i think it does a disservice to former directors of the cia to politicize this issue and i think it does a disservice to the bush administration, frankly. we kept the nation safe for eight years. >> first, miss cheney, general hayden became director of the cia in 2006. that would be two years after george tenet of the cia shelled the program. and he said he was, quote, speaking only of his time at the agency and not of the early period after 2001 when cheney might have intervened. third, miss cheney, you have said before that democrats politicized this by leaking details of the cia program. no, cia officials themselves brought this to panetta's attention. the democrats revealed only that they had beenlied to. who revealed the details of the

program? the intelligence officials did. that also did not stop cohort karl rove from repeating the same mantra that congress is not to be trusted with classified information, even though rove and cheney were at the center of leaking the covert operative valerie plame's identity. alberto gonzalez also not denying mr. panetta's story, but claiming he can't talk about it because it's classified. circumspect now after the bush justice had found out that he had handled highly classified documents. but fourth, miss cheney, and most obscenely, you kept us safe for eight years? you let 3,000 people die. your father delayed his first long-requested meeting about al qaeda, wait until september 10th. your president told the cia agent who tried to warn him about al qaeda on august 6th that he was just covering his ass, you know, lying. let's bring in msnbc political analyst, eugene robinson, also pulitzer prize winning columnist of "the washington post."

eugene, good evening. >> evening, keith. >> the right wing is now saying the cia is lying when it lied because the cia never lies? >> this is like one of those logic puzzles. you know, i am lying now, but you can't be lying, you must be telling the truth. it's a ridiculous position, i think, that is being taken here by liz cheney and one supposes, by dick cheney, although he's been talking about everything else, he doesn't seem to want to talk about this incident himself. but the thing that drives me a bit nuts about this whole thing is the way that cheney and rove are creating the impression that the minute you brief the intelligence committees as required by law, everything that you tell them automatically leaks. that, obviously, is not the case. it is simply not true. and they're creating some impressions to justify what seemed to be an egregious violation of the statute in this

case, which was to brief congress on intelligence activities the way the law requires. >> and the house intelligence committee according to the associated press today asked the cia for documents, which would pave the way to investigate both exactly what this program was and how it was, in fact, concealed from congress. you appeared with miss cheney on msnbc this morning. was it your sense that that is exactly what she was trying to prevent happening? >> my impression was that the creation of this kind of wall of smoke was to prevent a further investigation of exactly what happened. did her father, in fact, tell the cia not to disclose this program to the committees as was required by law? and is that not, or would that not have been a violation of law that would leave him open to some sort of sanction? you can't just -- there's no point inning having a law if the vice president -- not just the

president, but the vice president has no constitutional authority, really, to do anything, can just ignore it. it's outrageous, to me. >> your newspaper today reported that the bush administration kept this from congress because the program, the al qaeda assassination program or whatever it was called, that dick cheney's got a secret program. they kept it from congress because it didn't get anywhere. "time" magazine says the bush cia decided to go after al qaeda, or that if they went after al qaeda this way, it would be too risky. does this not sound in real life, from the pages of recent history, exactly like what the gop always accuses democrats of being, in caricature, soft and incompetent when faced with actual terrorists? >> well, it does sound if it may be this -- the gang involved with this program couldn't shoot straight. but, again, we don't know, really, what it was. presumably, there are a lot of intelligence programs that get started that don't work out quite the way they were intended

and that's to be expected if you're going to have a cia, that not everything it's going to try to do is going to work. but if you're going to have a cia, you do have to run it according to the law and you have to brief the intelligence committees and that's really the violation here. and all this other stuff, you know, is ancillary, including this -- we kept you safe for eight years, well, not quite eight years, as you pointed out. but that is besides the point. it's not the ends justifying the meaning, it's the law requiring actions that were not taken. >> well said. eugene robinson, pulitzer-prize winning columnist of "the post" and of msnbc when we have him. thanks. did you know the berlin wall is made out of giant dominos? and an army reserve major is suing to keep president obama from sending him to afghanistan because, see, obama isn't really president, see. the worst person in the world

ahead on "countdown." [ sighs ] [ clears throat ] [ female announcer ] tired of waiting for great hair? [ woman ] hey! [ female announcer ] no worries! [ woman ] yes! [ woman #2 ] all right! [ female announcer ] aussie makes naturally beautiful hair simply happen. add some roo to your do! announcer: here's ryan getting ready to make his approach... to the men's room. second announcer: looks like he needs to go urgently. true. and there's casey, about to drive... also to the men's room. he has been going over and over. they ought to see their doctors. could be male urinary symptoms due to bph, an enlarged prostate. for many guys, prescription flomax reduces their urinary symptoms due to bph in one week. and if their doctors do prescribe flomax, they could get up to $40 off new or refill prescriptions. so guys already on flomax can also save. only your doctor can tell if you have bph,

not a more serious condition like prostate cancer. avoid driving or hazardous tasks for 12 hours after your first dose or increase in dose, as a sudden drop in blood pressure may occur, rarely resulting in fainting. if considering cataract surgery, tell your eye surgeon you've taken flomax. common side effects are runny nose, dizziness and decrease in semen. ask your doctor if flomax is right for you. and call 877-4-flomax for more information and to see if you qualify for up to $40 off new or refill prescriptions. for many men, flomax can make a difference in one week.

"best" in a moment. if you're going to smuggle stuff in your golf clubs, at least you know the best-known of golf terms. the coincidence is hard to believe, but on this date in 1927 was born john chancellor who anchored "nbc nightly news." and born was john edwards who anchored cbs evening news.

and was born george putnam who delivered comments on the dumont "nightly news" and was one of ted knight's models. let's play "oddball." we begin in germany, where this year marks the 20th anniversary of the fall of the berlin wall. to commemorate the historic of the germany capital, it will be recreated by toppling 1,000 mattress-sized dominos. this is a dry run featuring just 100 dominos. each domino will be custom painted by german high school students, students who only know about the wall from what they read in textbooks. these kids weren't even born in 1989, when ronald reagan personally took a sledgehammer to the wall while he whistled "winds of change."

to new zealand where we meet logan campbell, who looks like he finished 16th for his country at last year's olympic beijing games, but there's much more to his story. desperate for the fun before he returned to the london olympics, campbell has opened his own brothel. he expects london to cost twice the $120,000 he spent to get to beijing and this time his parents are unwilling to foot the bill, but they are on board with the whore house. tune in to see if new zealand lets the male madame play in the games in london. okay, i'm fired. the palin higher calling was to shill for big oil? evidently, from "the washington post" op-ed she wrote. and senators brownback and landrieu not shown in your picture leading the fight the prevent the creation of human/pig hybrid people porkers. first, "countdown's" best

three people in the world. dateline, houston. number three. best honest criminal, unnamed pistol-wielding stickup man at the bank on tom ballparkway. he and his shotgun bearing partner made off with an unnamed amount of cash. he said, i'm only doing this to eat. best dumb criminal, katie elya drier, drug mule. customs officials became suspicious when they asked her about her golf game. what's your handicap, they asked. she didn't know what they meant. dateline, austin, texas. best george orrwell impersonation. the state board's members who have proposed the following revisions to social study standards. in the list of americans who changed the course of history, replace thurgood marshall with sam houston.

and delete all references to anne hutchinson. from transformational leaders of the 20th century, insert the reverend billy graham for participation in the democratic process. drop union activist cesar chavez. he's hardly the kind of role model who ought to be held up for our children, wrote one of the reviewers, reverend peter marshall. because televangelists mean more to this country than those who tried to end the use of slaves. . population 49 million. right now, 1.5 million people are on a conference call. 750,000 wish they weren't. - ( phones chirping ) - construction workers are making 244,000 nextel direct connect calls. 1 million people are responding to an email. - 151 accidentally hit "reply all." - ( foghorn blows ) that's happening now. america's most dependable 3g network bringing you the first wireless 4g network.

- sprint. the now network. - ( whoosh sound ) deaf, hard of hearing and people with speech disabilities access www.sprintrelay.com. it was tough news to hear. everything changed. i didn't know what to do. right about then, our doctor mentioned the exelon patch. he said it releases medicine continuously for 24 hours. he said it could help with her cognition which includes

things like memory, reasoning, communicating and understanding. (announcer) the most common side effects of exelon patch are nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. the likelihood and severity of these side effects may increase as the dose increases. patients may experience loss of appetite or weight. patients who weigh less than 110 pounds may experience more side effects. people at risk for stomach ulcers or who take certain other medicine should talk to their doctor because serious stomach problems, such as bleeding may worsen. mom's diagnosis was hard to hear, but there's something i can do. (announcer) visit exelonpatch.com for free caregiving resources. from brink's home security... you can now expect from broadview security - for home and business. call now to get the proven technology of a broadview security system installed for just $99. day or night, broadview is on the job, ready to respond when trouble strikes. i'm sending help right now. (announcer) the same professional monitoring you expect from brink's home security, you can now expect from broadview security -

for home and business. broadview security - the next generation of brink's home security. call now. when john mccain called sarah palin one of america's greatest energy expert, it was not because of her bs in communications, it was not because of her experience as a sports caster. her energy expertise began with a spot on an alaska oil and gas commission in 2004, a job she quit after less than one year. our third story on the

countdown, did the higher calling for which palin just quit as governor include going back into the energy business in the role of shill? she wrote an op-ed piece in today's "washington post" using the "sky is falling scare tactic" to make her attack on cap and trade policy. too bad the facts got in the way of talking points. palin wrote, i am deeply concerned about president obama's cap and trade energy plan. the americans hit hardest will be those already struggling to make ends meet. but according to the congressional budget off, low-income people would end up paying loss. she wrote that job losses due to cap and trade would be certain and even more american jobs would be threatened under the rising cost of doing business under the cap and tax plan. according to the centers for american progress, the plan would create 1.7 billion jobs and help every state in the country, this as a new cbs news poll show that most people think she resigned not for the good of

her state, but for the good of sarah palin. 52% saying she did it for her political future, more saying she did it for herself, than for alaska. let's bring in chris hayes. as i understand it, from what the governor has been saying in her resignations and postscripts, there was a higher calling, it would enable her to better serve alaskans. there was no cannibalism involved, no pun on the word "served." is this it? what was in "the post" today. is she turning into a big oil shill? >> well, i think transforming herself into a kind of palemical figure of the reaction narrow right, ideologically, and also trying to create some patina of substantive expertise. i think that's why you have the op-ed in "the washington post." there's some general sense that she knows something about energy, since she comes from a state that produces a tremendous amount of energy. i think this was kind of her first step to try to create an

image of the post-governor sarah palin, who's sort of an expert that muses on national issues. >> now, the op in op-ed could have stood for facts optional here. is the next stop actual spokesmanship? is she going to be doing tv ads against cap and trade? if i'm that actress, brooke alexander, that does the energy tomorrow ads and she smoothly telling us we have to drill through oil right through all the bunnies and through grandma's house's floor, should i try to get my old job back hosting soap opera highlights? >> that wouldn't be crazy to me if she were to end up doing that. one of the reasons she hinted that legal costs are such -- when you are a figure like sarah palin, and this is across the ideological spectrum and partisan divide, there's a lot of money to be made on the speaking circuit. there are people out there that are going to paid sarah palin tons of money, six figures, for sure, to come speak to them. and there's a lot of money sloshing around right now, the

world of right-wing opposition, particularly corporate opposition, to things like health care, domestically, and climate change legislation. there's a lot of money to be had there and there's a whole sort of cottage industry that's been set up on the right in corporate america to oppose those kinds of reforms. that's a place that seems like kind of a natural space for her to up a. >> and you can get to that six-figure range with about a morning's work if you're doing a tv studio, cutting an ad, even an issue ad for somebody like energy tomorrow or whatever. put this in context, though. the other thing in the cbs news poll, more remarkable than all of the numbers that we've looked at, overall favorable view of governor palin right now is 23%. the question was, was palin have the ability to have an effective president, no, 65%. what could she do to change those numbers or is that no longer part of this equation?

>> politics is remarkable insofar as is the capacity for self-transformation tends to be endless. it's hard to close a door on anyone. there are things she can do. the most important thing for her is to create some perception of credibility, even if that's detached from actual expertise, and that's what we saw with the op-ed. keep in mind, 33% sounds like a very low number, and it is, obviously, if you were running a campaign or an election against one other opponent, but when you're talking about how you get to the nomination of the republican party, you have a kind of checkers situation, where you have to win iowa or win new hampshire early on and that's a field with five or six candidates. you need a small number of very committed supporters. the intensity of preference if the republican base is strong enough, even if she's not overwhelmingly popular in the beginning, she has a shot early on. >> to the other point, let's never forget, ronald reagan, your host of general electric theater. chris hayes of "the nation," thanks always, for your time. >> thank you, keith.

the united states senate will soon take up legislative vital to the prevention of the spread of genetically engineered man-cows. seriously. and newt gingrich's plan to topple the regime in iran by sabotaging that nation's only gas refinery. what do you mean it has nine gas refineries? oops. and when rachel joins you at the top of the hour, her special guest, general colin wilkerson on dick cheney's ability to keep a secret cia program -- i don't think that's the right tape -- there he is -- secret there congress. access to favorite courses

chef's meal with pommes frites perhaps a night at the theater with extra special seats additional hotel night, our treat your world in perfect harmony: priceless look for world on your mastercard to get rewards and offers that matter to you. an eleven sixteenths wrench over here? here you go. eleven sixteenths... (announcer) from designing some of the world's cleanest and most fuel-efficient jet engines... to building more wind turbines than anyone in the country... the people of ge are working together... creating innovation today for america's tomorrow. thanks! no problem!

"worst," newt gingrich, super genius has a plan to topple ahmadinejad to destroy their only gas refinery. and a major suing to avoid going to afghanistan because he says obama is not really president. that's why you don't want to get sent to afghanistan. and the senator dedicated to keeping you safe from the terror

that is, the prospect of genetically engineered wear wolves and mermaids.

[ thud ] [ woman sighs ] [ horn honks ] [ sigh ] a lot goes through your mind after an accident. but with liberty mutual, insurance issues won't, because we offer unlimited rental coverage, new car replacement, and accident forgiveness to help ease your mind. and that's our policy. liberty mutual insurance. time for domestic and international churning, with an economy wobbling and the criminality of the last administration far worse than we ever expected, 21 united states senators are pushing a bill to make it illegal to create human hybrids. i say man bear pig today, man bear pig tomorrow, man bear pig forever.

that's next. tonight's worst persons in the world. lebron to gingrich, the correct american policy towards iran should be about special ops and midnight raids and sabotagy. not exactly bombing iran's iran's oil refineries. quote, i called for sabotage, not bombing. fundamental difference. the only purpose of sabotaging them would be to create a gasoline-led crisis to try to replace the regime. i'm against using tactics that don't have any strategic meaning. where mr. lewis says, you precipitate by provoking a gas crisis by black ops sabotage. and gingrich suggested iran has only the one gas refinery, which he and rambo would have to sabotagy and someone had to break it to him that it actually has nine refineries. the runner-up, the right-wing media. when the state used the public records request to get e-mails

sent to and from the governor mark sanford while he was hiking the old appalachian trail, e-mails from news conservative outlets trying to suck up to sanford from a right wing tv host. having known the governor for years and even worked with him wheld host radio shows for me, i find this story and the media frenzy surrounding it to be absolutely ridiculous. please give him my best. from a staffer at "the washington times," if you all want to speak on this publicly, you're welcome to washington times radio. you know that you will be on friendly ground here. from an opinion editor at "the wall street journal," someone at wsj should be fired for today's story. ridiculous. nice. bury your own paper under the bus. one more stroke job ended up in the e-mail trolling. if the governor is looking for a friendly place to make light of what i think is a small story that got blown out of scale, i would be happy to have him on, in person, here, on the phone, or in south carolina, stay

strong, signed steven colbert, who barely gets away with this because he is a native south carolinian and an old school gentleman who mistakenly thought hiking the old appalachian trail meant hiking the old appalachian trail. but seeking a federal court order in georgia to delay his upcoming deployment to afghanistan. he believes that president barack obama is not a national-born citizen of the united states and therefore is ineligible to serve as commander in chief of u.s. armed forces. he believes he was be engaging in military actions outside of the united states under this president's command, simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties. tate is an obama birther who has fired other delusional lawsuits about the president's birth certificate, a certificate who

has been validated by the website worldnetdaily. the major is a poster at the website we told you about yesterday, freerepublic. when i was a kid in the ea'60s thinking ahead to possibly getting drafted, i thought, i'm not going to invent some sudden ep epipha epiphany, i'm going to say, i don't want to get shot in vietnam or anywhere else. too bad he doesn't have the guts to say that, then he might be deserving of his rank rather than an embarrassment. don't ask, don't tell is still throwing out men and women who are willing to die for their country, but somehow we have room for this jack ass. remember, country first. today's "worst persons" in the world. who can give you the financial advice you need?

where will you find the stability and resources to keep you ahead of this rapidly evolving world? these are tough questions. that's why we brought together two of the most powerful names in the industry. introducing morgan stanley smith barney. here to rethink wealth management. here to answer... your questions. morgan stanley smith barney. a new wealth management firm with over 130 years of experience. when morning comes in the middle of the night... rooster crow.

...it affects your entire day. to get a good night's sleep, try 2-layer ambien cr. the first layer dissolves quickly to help you fall asleep. and unlike other sleep aids, a second dissolves slowly to help you stay asleep. when taking ambien cr, don't drive or operate machinery. sleepwalking, and eating or driving while not fully awake with memory loss for the event as well as abnormal behaviors such as being more outgoing or aggressive than normal, confusion, agitation and halluciations may occur. don't take it with alcohol as it may increase these behaviors. allergic reactions such as shortness of breath, swelling of your tongue or throat may occur and in rare cases may be fatal. side effects may include next-day drowsiness, dizziness, and headache. in patients with depression, worsening of depression, including risk of suicide may occur. if you experience any of these behaviors or reactions contact your doctor immediately. wake up ready for your day-ask your healthcare

as you know, the nation is currently in a state of abject crisis. a recent study by a board of irresponsible people found that americans were worried about in desending order, the economy, terrorism, mermaids, climate change, centaurs, cat women, spidermen, man-cows, werewolves, sasquatches, and humanezes, a disturbing trend is emerge. senator sam brownback has stepped up to the plate and introduced the bill of 2009. the former presidential candidate introducing a bill that would ban the formation of part human, part animal creatures which are created in laboratories and blur the line between species. brownback trumpeting the bill via twitter, facebook, and his senate blog. this legislation is both philosophical and practical as

it has a direct bearing upon the very essence of what it means to be human. creating human-animal hybrids will challenge the very definition of what it means to be human and is a grave injustice. another grave injustice, the bill has 20 cosponsors, including one democrat, mary landrieu of louisiana. perhaps worried that the island of dr. merooux is some show on "e." joined by senators ensign and coburn, who apparently had time, as did senator ensign, to support this bill on their way back from fedex. this is the dream story, and we're joined now by comedian christian finnegan, because sighman mccorkendale was not available tonight. christian, good evening. >> nice to be with you. i got lucky on that one.

>> senator landrieu's support of this is apparently explained by the fact that governor jindal of louisiana just got a bill like this passed there. so i'm guessing there have been a lot of human-animal hybrid sightings in louisiana lately that nobody heard about? >> well, if you've seen the hbo show "trueblood," you know that louisiana is a genetic freak show. but i think issues like this should be handled on the state level. i don't need the federal government telling me i can't combine by dna with a chimpanzee, be it in the lab or the old-fashioned way. >> that's our old friend -- >> i'm saying i want to have sex with animals, keith. >> i want to say, has this legislation overlooked the human-animal hybrids that are already in existence? a situation like teen wolf. i mean, this not only effects michael j. fox, but also jason bateman. they're in big trouble. >> i'm sure jason bateman would love everyone to remind you of his performance in teen