1%. they're basically rolling back the tax cuts that george bush gave them. all this fearmongering. somebody's coming for our sugary drinks, they're going to take it away from families trying to fish at a lake. that's all i know, there's a lot of fearmongering doctor on. that alone would pay for it. >> can they sell it, sam? >> of course they can. i'll tell you how. all these centrist democrats asking for more time. this is what you say will cost you more time. 140,000 people will lose their insurance in the next three weeks. if they delay this health care reform package. those are the statistics you should be hearing from the white house. i'm surprised they haven't pushed this angle, that there is a human suffering component to delaying on health care. why are we hearing about costs when people are literally going to be struggling to pay their bills, losing their insurance, in some cases dying because of a lack of health care coverage. >> what do you make of the comments senator jim demint of south carolina saying this is going to be obama's waterloo, make sure he fails on this.

what about that? >> i don't want president obama to fail. i don't want the country to fail. but i do want this health care reform to be moderated. everybody agrees -- i thought that was a good statement the president gave today, because what he sketched out was there are a whole series of reforms on which republicans and democrats agree. where we don't agree is raising the tax rates to the highest point that they've been in 25 years. that was the front page of "usa today" and that is not going to be a an easy sell to raise the tax rate to 45%. >> thanks for your time, i appreciate it. earlier on this show i asked will the new cbo report derail the democrats on health care? here's what you said. 27% say yes. 73% say no. that's "the ed show." i'm ed schultz. for more information on "the ed show" go to ed.msnbc.com or check out wegoted.com. going to be in madison, wisconsin, this sunday night, 7:00, we'll have our cameras and

microphones so you can speak up about health care and what kind of reform you want. that will be in madison, wisconsin, at the barrymore theater sunday night. "hardball" starts right now on msnbc. the president strikes back. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm lawrence o'donnell in for chris matthews. leading off tonight, the president pushes back in the health care debate. as the cost argument rages on capitol hill, conservative opponents of president obama's plan to reform the nation's health care system have hit upon a new weapon to help defeat it. abortion. kansas republican todd tiahrt took to the floor of the house last night and said federal financing of abortions could give some women an incentive to end pregnancies. then he went one very ugly step

further. >> our president grew up in similar circumstances. if that financial incentive was in place, is it possible that his mother may have taken advantage of it? clarence thomas, supreme court justice, if those circumstances were in place, is it possible we'd have been denied his great mind? >> you heard right. congressman todd tiahrt is suggesting barack obama and clarence thomas' mothers might have chosen abortion if the procedure simply had been free. we'll have more on that virulently racist logic. plus, the relentlessly vexatious problems of navigating the costs and financing of health care reform in just a moment. and never mind the affair. now mark sanford's reputation of being tight-fisted with taxpayer money is in jeopardy. there are reports that sanford has a history of treating himself to first-class travel and hotel accommodations on the public dime. will that be the straw that

breaks the back of his republican support? also, what have the sonia sotomayor hearings taught us about affirmative action? is her nomination proof that affirmative action works or that it unfairly discriminates against white men? and if you need proof that having 60 democrats in the senate guarantees nothing, look no further than the failure of the union's top priority, the employee free choice act or card check. why 60 doesn't always equal 60 in the united states senate in tonight's "politics fix." plus, we'll have the latest tweets from sarah palin in the "hardball sideshow." we begin tonight with that battle over health care reform. nbc's kelly o'donnell joining us from capitol hill, and also with us is washingtonpost.com's chris cillizza. kelly and chris, let's listen to what president obama had to say this afternoon. >> now we've got to get over the finish line, and part of this process is figuring out how to

pay for it. i've said that health insurance reform cannot add to our deficit over the next decade, and i mean it. >> now, it seems to me that this was a direct response to what cbo director douglas elmendorf testifying on thursday had to say. let's listen to that. >> we do not see the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount. on the contrary, the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility for health care costs. >> kelly o'donnell, the president came out with an unscheduled statement about health care today. was it in direct response to this guy that no one's ever heard of but that you know very well, the cbo director that came out with estimates that indicated the health care reform plan was indeed going to add to the deficit and not, as they say, bend the cost curve

downward? >> watching this unfold today it was as if president obama had his own rapid response team. because what you just heard, the cbo director talking about the problems with cost, really took the air out of some democrats here in the senate. and gave republicans new ammunition to try to derail what's going on with health care reform. one of the things that it has really brought to light is the question of timing. could there be more time to try to resolve these differences? and so the president, as you pointed out, this was not on his public schedule, they made the plans for him to come out and really hammer at a couple of key points. wanting to make clear that his deadline, which is august, is something he will not move off of, and that is important to know because there has been a parade of lawmakers going over to the white house in direct meetings with the president and with the chief of staff and in letter form asking for more time. democrats and republicans. the president is saying no. >> chris cillizza, let's look at

what the chairman of the finance committee had to say about the president's involvement in this. he's actually quoted in "the new york times" in commenting about what obama's willing to do and not willing to do in terms of the health care plan. the finance committee is thinking about possibly taxing some health care benefits that people get, which is to say removing the exemption of that, so the chairman of the finance committee said basically the president is not helping us. that's what he told reporters outside his office. he said, the president does not want the exclusion. that's making it difficult. this is very familiar. this is starting to feel very much like 1994. i was working for the chairman of the finance committee at the time. he had his tensions with the white house. they tended not to be as public as what we just saw with chairman baucus. is this starting to look like 1994 all over again. >> you know, lawrence, i don't think it's there yet. i think there are parallels, but i don't think it's there yet. remember, on that part i think you had members of congress feeling as though they were excluded largely, and, therefore, there was months and

months to build up their particular dislike of the fact that a plan was being crafted in secret. the obama administration has worked in opposition to that and said, look, we're open to suggestions, but i think time -- kelly made this point and i think it's the most important thing -- time is critical. the white house knows that the more time that politicians have to hear from constituents, to sort of raise electoral worries, that works against getting something passed. remember, think back to when sonia sotomayor was nominated by the president. republicans said we can't possibly do this before august recess. there's no way there can be a vote. and the white house said there will be a vote. we are sticking to this. they will never have enough time or as much time as they would like. the white house knows that august recess is a potentially dangerous time if health care reform is still flailing out there, nothing's been done, you have statements like from the cbo director that republicans can use to politically beat up democrats. they know that that's a

dangerous political time. that's why they want to get this done before. it's why you saw the president come out today. it's why, my guess, you will see him focus heavily in his opening statement on wednesday on health care. >> they're always very worried about that long august recess when members go home and they can hear a lot of negative things from their constituents about what they've been up to lately. let's listen to more of what the president had to say today. >> i realize that the last few miles of any race are the hardest to run, but i have to say now is not the time to slow down, and now is certainly not the time to lose heart. make no mistake, if we step back from this challenge at this moment, we are consigning our children to a future of skyrocketing premiums and crushing deficits. there's no argument about that. if we don't achieve health care reform, we cannot control the costs of medicare and medicaid, and we cannot control our long-term debt and our long-term deficits.

>> kelly, was that the president playing offense or defense today? >> my sense was that there was more defense in it, in part because he was so sensitive about the timing of this. when he came out, he spoke of the 24-hour news cycle. as political junkies, we're all into that. of course, on a late friday letting things hang to the sunday morning shows where all of this will be talked about again, it was my sense that he really wanted to try to pull back some of the message and to regain some control because i think the white house was very aware that that cbo report about the costs was eroding some support and could potentially gain speed that would go in the wrong direction for them. so that was my take on it, that he was being very sensitive to timing. gave some praise too, we need to point that out. he thanked those members of congress who have been working, burning the midnight oil. and he cited some of the areas of agreement, but the stuff that stands out to all of us is where he was really hitting hard. >> lawrence, just real quickly,

just to magnify kelly's point, the white house may decry the 24-hour news cycle, but president obama got elected president because he understands it and knows how to manipulate and use it. this is a smart use, that they know the white house can serve as a bully pulpit. they know when he gives remarks, no matter when it is, it's going to get huge coverage and people like us will talk about it. it will drive the news cycle through the sunday talk shows. that will proof its own headlines. then we get to wednesday, another press conference here. now looking at four or five days in which the white house is driving the narrative they want driven on health care as opposed to having that narrative dictated to them. it's a smart use of the 24-hour news cycle they often talk bad about. >> whenever there's a huge legislative vehicle moving like this moving through the congress, there's always a crazy corner of the debate. we have had things coming out in the last couple of days about the president's surgeon general choice. is she perhaps a little too overweight and does that send the wrong health care message at a time like this? nutty stuff like that. let's listen to kansas republican congressman todd

tiahrt last night on the house floor. >> there's a financial incentive that will be put in place paid for by tax dollars that will encourage women who are single parents living below the poverty level to have the opportunity for a free abortion. if you take that scenario and apply it to many of the great minds we have today, who would we have been deprived of? our president grew up in similar circumstances. if that financial incentive was in place, is it possible that his mother may have taken advantage of it? clarence thomas, supreme court justice, if those circumstances were in place, is it possible that we would have been denied his great mind? >> chris cillizza, i don't think i've heard the health care debate go in a crazier direction than that. house members talking about would women want to abort their black babies and only their black babies. i didn't hear any other babies he's referring to in there.

are guys like him going to be getting more chances at the microphone or are republicans going to want to quiet them down and stay on the cost argument? >> i would guess the latter, lawrence. i think it's the right thing. this is not an argument that they want to put forward. the truth of the matter is if federal financing of abortions, if that were an issue, you weren't going to vote for this bill anyway. todd tiahrt was not voting for the health care bill anyway. this is something he's citing, but i don't think that's as persuasive. go back and look at what the cbo director said. cost, not a huge decrease in cost and an addition to the debt. that's what republicans want to be talking about. i'll be honest, i'm sure they're unhappy about the tiahrt comments are getting as much attention as they are frankly because it's distracting them from a much stronger issue, which is questions about whether barack obama is doing the right thing by growing government. whether it's the economic stimulus, the health care plan. that's a place they actually, polling suggests, they can win

with the american people. arguments about abortions or hypothetical abortions is not where you want to go. interesting side note, tiahrt is running in a republican primary in kansas for the senate. you never know if that factors into his decision making. obviously, a very conservative electorate out there in kansas. >> we're going to leave it there for today. thank you kelly and chris. kelly, when we come back after the break, we're going to answer the multiple choice question, is kelly o'donnell my sister, my wife, or none of the above. coming up, new revelations that south carolina governor mark sanford, a staunch fiscal conservative, traveled first class on the taxpayers' dime all around the world, including trips to see his mistress in argentina. we'll dig into that little hypocrisy next.

come on in. you're invited to the chevy open house. where getting a new vehicle is easy. because the price on the tag is the price you pay on remaining '08 and '09 models. you'll find low, straightforward pricing. it's simple. now get an '09 silverado xfe with an epa estimated 21 mpg highway for under 28 thousand after all offers. go to chevy.com/openhouse for more details.

well, get on out of that department store. and into covergirl outlast. no department store longwear gives you so many different ways to last through breakfast lunch and dinner. more choices, more shades, more outlast. ♪ covergirl

welcome back to "hardball." south carolina governor mark sanford may have damaged his standing with social conservatives after admitting to an extramarital affair and now his reputation as a frugal republican politician is coming into question. the politico reports that sanford, the same fiscal conservative who tried to reject federal stimulus money and who criticized other politicians for lavish spending, has been a big spender of the taxpayers' dime when it came to high-end airline travel and pricey hotel stays. andy barr is with the politico, and john o'connor is the political reporter for "the state newspaper" in south carolina. andy barr, give us the dimensions of the new luxury living scandal with sanford. >> first, a little bit of the backstory here. you remember when this first came out there was questions about other trips, whether he used state funded money.

initially his staff returned the money he used to travel to argentina. then a lot of reporters including ken vogel at politico went back through these records and found he was going on a lot of trips, using a lot of state money, to fly business class, first class, all over the world, all over the country. obviously not all to meet his mistress there in argentina, but certainly brings into question those fiscal conservative credentials that he has, which is the one thing that really had brought him from being a member of congress to really one of the people on the brink of being a leader of the party. >> john o'connor, christians are very, very good and very practiced at forgiving sin. how about republicans forgiving lavish spending? >> it seems to be a little less forgiving there, especially in south carolina. i mean, folks are really interested -- when the story first broke the big question was did he spend state money? and i think the story that was out today on, you know, his use

of business class and first-class tickets is raising even more questions among state residents. >> all right. governor sanford talked about his faith when he confessed to having an extramarital affair. let's listen. >> and in this regard let me throw one more apology out there, and that is to people of faith across south carolina or for that matter across the nation because i think that one of the big disappointments when, believe it or not, i have been a person of faith all my life, if somebody falls within the fellowship of believers or the walk of faith, i think it makes that much harder for believers to say, well, where did that person come from or folks that weren't believers to say where, indeed, was that person coming from? >> john o'connor, how is his theological argument about this working in south carolina? >> it depends on who you ask. among a lot of folks, they're willing to accept it. they're willing to give him another chance. i have spoken with a number of people though who are somewhat

offended by it in that they note that, you know, in forgiveness there must also be a move towards redemption. some folks feel the governor is asking for forgiveness before he's really earned it. >> now, it seems that republicans have set up some sort of support group of sorts in washington for men in trouble, and governor sanford reports having consulted with this group, the c street group. they are roommates who live in this townhouse on c street, the c street bible study group as they call it. and he referred to that during his press conference last month. let's listen to that. >> as far as the group called c street, when i was in washington it was, believe it or not, a christian bible study, some folks who asked members of congress hard questions that i think were very, very important, and i have been working with them.

>> current residents of 133 c street include pennsylvania congressman mike doyle, michigan congressman bart stupak, tennessee congressman zach wamp, and yes, nevada senator john ensign and oklahoma senator tom coburn. republicans did during the presidential campaign like to throw around guilt by association. president obama was talked about as having palled around with terrorists by sarah palin and others, and we're not going to get into that here. we're not going to be andy. we're not going to throw around notions of palling around with adulterers, but what is going on at 133 c street, andy barr? >> well, i mean, you know, for sanford, a lot of these guys he's been connected to for a long time. going back to that republican revolution in '94. ensign, too, somebody not only a member of this, but also a member of the promise keepers. a lot of these guys have problems with statements and tenets they've held to in the past all of a sudden coming back really to bite them and exposing them in ways that is very damaging.

for someone who's held up that social conservative banner for a long time. >> john o'connor, how does this bit of it play in south carolina? that for help and counseling, he goes up to washington, d.c., to get advice on the moral direction of his life? i think that might be the first time anyone has gone to washington, d.c., for that. >> well, the whole c street angle is still very mysterious down here. there are a lot of folks who are interested in it. we haven't had a chance to talk to the governor about it, but the idea of this organization up there, this kind of mysterious organization, really strikes a lot of people as something that needs -- the governor needs to answer to. >> and how much more access are you expecting from the governor in this territory? do you think you're going to get another chance at, say, a press conference in south carolina or another chance at follow-up questions given how much material has developed since the last time he talked to the press? >> we've got no real indication that they're willing to sit down and talk to us about it again. the governor's last statement on

this was that he was done talking about it. the governor's spokesman is at times refused to answer questions about it. we have no indication that he wants to talk about this again. >> all right. we're done talking about it for today, but we're going to be talking about it some more. thank you john o'connor and andy barr. up next, sarah palin is tweeting. she promises to be less politically correct when she leaves the governorship in nine days. more on palin's tweeting next in the "sideshow." depression is a serious medical condition that can take so much out of you. i feel like i have to wind myself up just to get out of bed. then...well...i have to keep winding myself up to deal with the sadness, the loss of interest, the trouble concentrating, the lack of energy. if depression is taking so much out of you, ask your doctor about pristiq®. (announcer) pristiq is a prescription medicine proven to treat depression. pristiq is thought to work by affecting the levels of two chemicals in the brain,

serotonin and norepinephrine. tell your doctor right away if your depression worsens or you have unusual changes in mood, behavior, or thoughts of suicide. antidepressants can increase suicidal thoughts and behaviors in children, teens and young adults. pristiq is not approved for children under 18. do not take pristiq with maois. taking pristiq with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners may increase bleeding risk. tell your doctor about all your medications, including those for migraine, to avoid a potentially life-threatening condition. pristiq may cause or worsen high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or glaucoma. tell your doctor if you have heart disease... or before you reduce or stop taking pristiq. side effects may include nausea, dizziness and sweating. (woman) for me, pristiq is a key in helping to treat my depression. (announcer) ask your doctor about pristiq.

in helping to treat my depression. the same is true with bath tissue too. new charmin ultra soft. its new ultra soft design is softer than before. and it has so much absorbency, you can use 7 sheets vs. 28. new charmin ultra soft. america's softest bath tissue. we're our own bs and our own employees and our own everything else. running a b&b is not a desk job. i have to climb stairs probably 20-30 times a day. announcer: now joint comfort is easier. introducing nature made triple flex liquid softgels. the first liquid softgel joint health supplement formulated to work in as little as 7 days with glucosamine, hyaluronic acid, and chondroitin complex. we've never been happier. get a free sample of new triple flex liquid softgels at tripleflex.com. nature made. fuel your greatness.

back to "hardball." the answer to our "hardball" quiz question about kelly o'donnell in the first segment tonight is, c, none of the above. if you missed the question, you can rewind your tivo to the first segment or wait for the encore performance much later tonight.

time for the "sideshow." first up, an unlikely trio. remember this surprising three shot at the white house back in may? well, if you were taken aback, you weren't the only one. here is president obama last night touting education reform at the naacp. >> and let me say this, if al sharpton, mike bloomberg, and newt gingrich can agree that we need to solve the education problem, then that's something all of america can agree we can solve. those guys came into my office. they're sitting in the oval office. i kept on doing a double-take. >> mr. president, we all did that double-take with you. next up, counting the days. it sounds like sarah palin's planned exit date, july 26th, couldn't come soon enough for her. check out what the soon-to-be ex-governor of alaska posted on

her twitter page this morning about her newfound freedom. quote, alaska will progress, plus side benefit equals ten days to less politically correct twitters fly from my fingertips outside state site. she later added, i'll stay in touch with whomever wants via personal twitter site launch july 26. sarah palin, that princess of perfect political correctness, will finally be free to tell us what she really thinks. that's your cue, tina fey. now, for tonight's "big number." judge sonia sotomayor more than held her own during confirmation hearings this week. so when it comes to the upcoming confirmation vote, it's not so much a question of if, but by how much. according to the online bookies at the dublin-based intrade.com, what are the chances that judge sotomayor will be confirmed with a strong majority, 75 or more votes? 77.5%.

i don't know how they figured out the u.s. senate from the other side of the atlantic, but they're getting sonia sotomayor has a 77.5 shot of winning three-mothers of the senate to vote for her in confirmation hearings. and that's tonight's "big number." up next, has sonia sotomayor's confirmation hearings this week changed how affirmative action is viewed in this country? is her nomination proof that it creates opportunity or that it discriminates against white men? we'll get at those questions when we return. what's the #1 mascara launch in recent history?

it's lash blast! for the biggest, boldest lashes of your life! this big brush doubles the size of lashes. 6 million women have doubled theirs. try lash blast. only from easy, breezy beautiful... covergirl. you all want to run your businesses more efficiently, so we've brought in a team of experts to help. one suggestion is to make your shipping more efficient with priority mail flat rate boxes from the postal service. call or go online for a free supply and up to $160 in offers from authorized postage vendors. shipping's a hassle! weighing every box... actually, with flat rate boxes you don't need to weigh anything under 70 pounds. if it fits, it ships for a low flat rate.

ok, but i ship all over the country. you can ship anywhere in the country for a low flat rate. ship international, too. yes, but i ship hundreds of things, in all sizes. great, because flat rate boxes come in four sizes. call now and we'll send a free supply, plus up to $160 in offers. when you're ready to ship, we'll even pick them up for free, no matter how many you have. priority mail flat rate boxes only from the postal service. a simpler way to ship.

here's what's happening. authorities say eight americans are among dozens injured in last night's deadly blast at luxury

hotels in indonesia, at least eight killed. suicide bombers were able to smuggle bombmaking materials massachusetts the jakarta marriott, the bombs reportedly put together in one of the hotel rooms and brought to the lobbies in suitcases. a british soldier was among 12 killed in two bomb attacks in afghanistan. the british casualty brings the number of nato soldiers killed in afghanistan this month to 48. the space shuttle "endeavour" successfully docked with the international space station today. astronauts are carrying out a detailed inspection of "endeavor's" heat shield after a large piece of foam insulation broke off during wednesday's launch. wall street the dow scraped out a gain to bring a rally to a positive close. the dow jones industrials added 32. nasdaq added 1.5. now back to "hardball."

welcome back to "hardball." sonia sotomayor is the first hispanic nominated to the supreme court. what has her nomination told us about where the country stands on affirmative action? former senator john danforth represented the state of missouri for 18 years serving on the senate finance committee. he also guided justice clarence thomas through the nomination process. senator danforth is currently a partner at the law firm bryan cave. senator danforth, there was a discussion this week about affirmative action in america. there certainly was back during the clarence thomas nomination. what similarities and what differences do you see between the clarence thomas week of discussion about that and this week's? >> every case is different. i think the point is that never again is the supreme court going to be made up exclusively of white males. that's just not going to happen. any president is going to be looking for diversity on the court.

any president is going to be considering women, african-americans, hispanics on the court, and maybe others as well. that doesn't mean a reduction in quality. it simply means that all other things considered, namely the ability of the judge and the judicial philosophy of the judge, presidents are going to be on a lookout for a diverse court. >> senator, do you see this truth that you're speaking of, we're done with the white male supreme court, we're obviously going to have african-americans, we're going to have latinos and latinas now, and women, do you see that as a political inevitability and just a political fact or is there also an argument to be made for the possibly synergistic flares of intelligence you get by having people from different backgrounds in a room together who are highly intellectual and highly educated discussing these subjects from those perspectives?

>> i think the most important part of it is it says to the american people that the country as a whole is present on the u.s. supreme court and at all levels of government. that's a very important message to get buy-in from the american people for our system of justice. >> now, senator, when you were in the senate, you were always one of those republicans who the democrats would look at. when i was chief of staff of the finance committee under chairman moynahan, we were always looking over to the danforth chair wondering if we might have his vote this time. what's your sense of the possible republican vote for sonia sotomayor both on the judiciary committee and then on the senate floor? >> you know, i don't have a vote count, and most of the people on the senate now weren't there when i was there, but she will surely get some republican votes. i don't know how many. i don't think -- this is not going to be a squeaker. i think this will be a very decisive victory for her. >> and what do you think -- where do you think the discussion of affirmative action this week has left us?

do you think that the net result of it was the argument that affirmative action worked because sonia sotomayor, for example, may not have gotten into princeton exclusively on her test scores, but then when she graduates at the very top of her class, doesn't she then prove that using just test scores you would end up with the wrong princeton class. you'd end up rewarding the people who did well in high school instead of properly predicting who was going to do well at princeton? >> princeton and most colleges are going to be looking for a class made up of various components, people of various backgrounds, various ethnicity, various skills. they will want a balanced class, but they will also want to make sure that when people graduate from princeton, they are able and that they have benefited from the education, and that they can compete in the world,

and i think that that is exactly what judge sotomayor has shown. i mean, here is a woman who is clearly very, very capable, very smart. she has excelled. in princeton she won the pine prize, which is for the outstanding student in the class. so that's some doing. so i think that she has definitely shown she's a very capable person. >> what do you make of the pat buchanan side of the world that wants to argue with everything, including her academic achievement, that none of it was legitimately earned by her. in fact, senator, i'm going to let you listen to pat buchanan earlier on "hardball" earlier this week. let's listen to him now. >> she said herself she was an affirmative action baby her whole life. she didn't get the grades -- >> her words. >> her words. yeah, and she also said, look, in college i had to read classic children's books in order to learn english a little better.

she's been advanced her whole career. she got on yale law review. here are her l-sat scores? where are her s.a.t. scores getting into high school and college? where has she written something in the law review that's really -- where is an opinion of her we've seen that's really brilliant? you might disagree with it. none of that is there. >> you want sarah palin for president. >> well, i mean, sarah palin is accomplished on her own right. no affirmative action there, boy. >> senator, you and pat buchanan seem to represent opposite ends of republican thinking about what they saw in sonia sotomayor. where do you think the most republican voters are leaning? are they leaning in your direction or pat's direction? >> i can't believe that there are very many people who would say that she is not qualified to be on the u.s. supreme court. i can't believe that there are very many people who would say that she doesn't have the mental ability or that she doesn't have the background to be on the court.

now, people could say, well, i don't agree with her jurisprudence as i understand it. maybe she's got the wrong view of the relationship between the court and the rest of the country. people could argue that one way or another, but i think that it would be almost -- really a silly argument to try to take the point of view that this person is not qualified to be on the court. sure she is. >> thank you, senator danforth. joining me now is cliff sloan, who guided justice stephen breyer through the nomination process. cliff sloan is the author of "the great decision." you watched this affirmative action debate play out this week including having a couple of the new haven firefighters testify at the hearing. where do you think the politics of affirmative action is now in this country at the end of this week? >> i think it's a very inspiring story for the country, and because i think, first of all, with judge sotomayor that image that she gave in her opening statement, which was brilliant,

about her and her brother and her mother sitting around the kitchen table late at night working, it is a classic american success story, working hard to get ahead. but, you know, the same thing is true of the new haven firefighters, and that image lasts as well. mr. ricci and mr. vargas, they worked very hard. and whether one agrees with them or disagrees with them, whether one agrees with her or disagrees with her in that case, i think that one of the very positive things at the end of the week, you have these success stories, and it actually became less personal. you have lindsey graham reminding the firefighters that just a generation ago, people were excluded from positions in fire departments because of their race or because of their last name. and very importantly, you had the firefighters taking the high road. they didn't make personal attacks on her, and, in fact, when senator specter said do they think that judge sotomayor acted in other than good faith in their case in ruling against them, they said, gee, we can't really speak to that. we can just tell you about our own experience.

i think it's a very positive story for the country. >> frank ricci wasn't the only plaintiff in that case who testified to the committee. also testifying was firefighter ben vargas from new haven, who i think shows the complexity of where the affirmative action discussion stands now. let's listen to him. >> i am hispanic and proud of the heritage and background that judge sotomayor and i share, and i congratulate judge sotomayor on her nomination. i think it important for you to know what i did, that i played by the rules, and then endured a long process of asking the courts to enforce those rules. i was shocked when i was not rewarded for this hard work and sacrifice, but i actually was penalized for it. i became not ben vargas, the fire lieutenant who proved himself qualified to be captain, but a racial statistic. >> cliff sloan, that testimony certainly indicated that the 21st century version of the affirmative action discussion is

more complex than it was in the '80s and '90s, don't you think? >> absolutely. look, these are tough issues, and the supreme court split 5-4 on the case. whichever side you come down on, i think anybody has to say these are very, very difficult issues, and that's why i think the attack on judge sotomayor on the basis of this case which we heard a lot about the case, but it doesn't really go anywhere because people recognize however you come down on it, it's a very difficult issue that people are sorting their way through. absolutely. it's much more complex than it used to be with the sort of one-liners about it. >> cliff sloan, my experience working in the senate and watching people trying to coach senators on their performance, their actual delivery of self into a tv camera, it always failed. you always ended up with who that politician actually is. they're not actors. they're not good at this. how about these supreme court nominees? you guys do a lot of coaching to them about how to present themselves, but they're going to be hanging out there as we saw

this week. for hours and hours and hours on end. and my guess is, i've never been involved in what you've done, but my guess is there's a real limit to how much you can coach them in terms of performance and that after a while what we're watching is who that person really is. >> oh, that's absolutely right. i mean, there's a real limit for two reasons. one is just because, you know, ultimately over the course of that many hours and under the questioning, as you say, the real person is going to come out. you know, that's all there is. and really the most effective thing that you can do is show them how they could possibly be misunderstood by some of the things that they're doing and so how to let themselves come through more clearly. but there's also an important substantive issue because while it's very important for the white house to be working with the nominee and helping the nominee prepare, there is a limit to what the white house should be telling the nominee. you know, a very important moment in these confirmation hearings was when judge sotomayor said that nobody from

the white house had asked her about her views on abortion or what she would say about them, and there is a very appropriate line beyond which the white house should not go in, quote, coaching a supreme court nominee. >> cliff, we got seconds left but i can't let you go without -- you've counted these votes before. give us your prediction on the sotomayor final vote on the senate floor. >> at least 80 for her. >> okay, over -- 78 is the magic number. that was roberts' number. you think they're going to get above that. >> yes, i do. >> thank you, cliff sloan. up next, with the clock ticking on the president's health care reform, what does the president have to do next? undefeated professional boxer floyd "money" mayweather has the fastest hands boxing has ever seen. so i've come to this ring to see who's faster... on the internet. i'll be using the 3g at&t laptopconnect card.

he won't. so i can browse the web faster, email business plans faster. all on the go. i'm bill kurtis and i'm faster than floyd mayweather. (announcer) switch to the nation's fastest 3g network and get the at&t laptopconnect card for free.

but now that i'm breathing better with advair... i can enjoy the zoo with my grandkids. (announcer) for people with copd including chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or both, great news. advair helps significantly improve lung function. while nothing can reverse copd, advair is different from most other medications because it contains both an anti-inflammatory and a long-acting bronchodilator working together to help you breathe better. advair won't replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be use more than twice a day. people with copd taking advair may have a higher chance of pneumonia. advair may increase your risk of osteoporosis and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking advair. we had a great day, grandpa! we sure did. ask your doctor how advair helps improve lung function for better breathing. (announcer) find out how to get your first full prescription free at advaircopd.com.

come on in. you're invited to the chevy open house. where getting a new vehicle is easy. because the price on the tag is the price you pay on remaining '08 and '09 models. you'll find low, straightforward pricing. it's simple. now get an '09 malibu 1lt with an epa estimated 33 mpg highway. get it now for around 21 thousand after all offers.

go to chevy.com/openhouse for more details. we're back. time for "the politics fix" with politico's roger simon and maria teresa kumar who is also an msnbc contributor. the sotomayor hearings this week reopened the subject of affirmative action because of the new haven firefighters case. let's listen to new haven firefighter frank ricci. >> i studied harder than i ever had before, reading, making flash cards, highlighting, reading again.

all my listening to prepared tapes. i went before numerous panels to prepare for the oral assessment. i was a virtual absentee father and husband for months because of it. in 2004 the city of new haven felt not enough minorities would be promoted and that the political price for complying with title seven, the city civil service rules, and the charter would be too high. therefore, they chose not to fill the vacancies. >> maria teresa kumar, frank ricci was a very sympathetic witness. he told his story straight. he wasn't a bitter, angry man. he was simply telling how we got to here. however, he provoked a lot of angry reaction, including from msnbc's crazy uncle pat buchanan who really, really let it fly over affirmative action like, you know, he's been waiting to for years. where do you think we stand in this country at the end of this week on the discussion of affirmative action? are we better off from the discussion we've had this week

or has there been a setback? have we regressed in our understanding of where we stand on affirmative action? >> i think we've regressed. and the reason i say that lawrence, by the way it's nice to have you hosting tonight. but the reason i say that is because at the end of the day when women are still earning 70 cents on the dollar for equal pay and we still have the majority of our minorities, less than 7% of our minorities, latinos graduating from four-year universities, we still have a long way to go. that's not to say affirmative action is foolproof and it's all the right answers. i think what we have to start doing as a country is looking at solutions and other goals in order to measure the purposefulness. that is also to say that we do have a lot of folks that -- we have the joe plumbers that are angry and frustrated because of the economic times. we need to have a frank discussion. pointing fingers at one ethnic group and saying that it's your fault that i'm not in the position of power, that's a

policemen. that's a problem. >> roger simon, one of my favorite pat buchanan moments of the week, in his many, many rants on this subject, came when he simply presumed that he had higher test scores than sonia sotomayor. on what basis, i have no idea, other than some ugly thought about what it means to be born a latina in this country. what does pat represent? here's a former candidate for president who led a very kind of angry mob of voters that was all about the buchanan backlash against liberal america and specifically things like affirmative action. who does pat represent now? how big a constituency is out there listening to that? >> pat represents all those guys who are not getting onto the supreme court. judge sotomayor is. take, that pat. i think where pat goes wrong on this is that judge sotomayor is an example of why affirmative action works well. studies show, i think i'm right on this, that when you give minorities an opportunity, that

they wouldn't normally have -- he's right that you probably -- she probably didn't have the test scores to get into princeton or get into yale law, but studies show that we give minorities a boost and give them the opportunity, they perform very well. and they do do very well. so you give this woman a chance to get into a prestigious undergraduate university and law school, and what happens? she does very well. she becomes a prosecutor. she becomes a successful federal district court judge, federal appellate court judge. now she's going to become a u.s. supreme court judge. this is why affirmative action is a good thing and not a bad thing. giving some people an opportunity works. i'm sorry that sometimes it is a zero sum gain and sometimes people like ricci do lose out, although he's getting his promotion. and that's unfortunate. but in the long run, i think we help people who, you know -- let's face it, as someone said, if you gain just latinos and

blacks jobs for the next 75 years, it wouldn't balance the books on how much they've been discriminated against in the history of the united states. so i think a little balance is fair. >> affirmative action -- i'm sorry. >> go ahead. >> the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action, folks forget, have been women. i think that is something that when we start talking about affirmative action, it's not just race based but also gender based. we're richer for it as a result. that's all of a sudden why we can have a secretary of state who is a woman and we don't think twice about it. hopefully a woman someday can become president, we don't think twice about it. that's one of the reasons why president obama can become president of the united states. we have come a long way. we still have a long way to go. and when -- >> we'll be back with roger simon and maria teresa kumar for more of "the politics fix." everyday acids can cause irreversible loss of enamel. new crest pro-health enamel shield protects... ...against enamel loss by forming a micro-thin shield against acid attack.

only crest pro-health toothpastes protect all these areas. new crest pro-health enamel shield. protect all these areas. (groans) a lot of people are gonna be kicking themselves for not buying in this market. (woman) visit remax.com where you can see all the listings in thousands of cities and towns. where do you want to be? just don't feel like they used to. are you one of them? remember when you had more energy... for 18 holes with your buddies?

more passion for the one you love? more fun with your family and friends? could be an easily treatable condition called low t. c'mon, stop living in the shadows. you've got a life to live. so don't blame it on aging. go to isitlowt.com to find out more.

we're back with roger simon and maria teresa kumar. for more of "the politics fix." betting against health care reform has been a very safe bet for the last 60 years or so. let's listen to what president obama had to say about that today. >> that's why those who are betting against this happening this year are badly mistaken. we are going to get this done. we will reform health care. it will happen this year. i'm absolutely convinced of that. i bee