1 in 3 chance that the dems will actually lose control of the house of representatives and that a republican will be elected speaker of the house. could the prospect of losing their seats next november cause many democrats this november to vote against health care? and we have a very american story to tell you tonight about a true patriot named william care. as his friends describe him, he always wanted to be out there defending his country. that's why he became a journalist. that's why he ran for congress. and that's why he became a marine. it was as a marine that william care died last week while out on patrol. another terrible loss in a war being fought largely under the radar. we'll look at william care's life and at the war he died fighting. also, i think one story that's been overlooked recently is hillary clinton's terrific work in africa. we'll give her the credit she's due in "the politics fix" tonight. and dancing with the hammer? can you believe tom delay is going to be "dancing with the stars"? that's right tom freaking texas two step delay. that's in the "hardball sideshow". we begin with the fight for health care reform. congressman jim cooper of

tennessee is a democrat and u.s. congressman phil begin gri is a republican from georgia. both members of the all powerful energy and commerce committee. i want to start with jim cooper. jim, i watched you over the years be the moderate democrat from the middle part of the country from tennessee and i watched the role you played back in '94 trying to craft a more moderate version of health care up against the clintons. i saw the clintons go down in terrible defeat. they lost dozens and dozens of house seats, as you know, in '94. they blew it. you could say. i watched ted kennedy blow it back in the '70s when nixon wanted to push through a complete employer an dait, a much more radical health care bill than we're even talking about now. democratic liberals keep saying we want it all, they keep losing it all. what's going to happen this time? >> i think we can get a good health reform bill done this year on the president's time table. i think this dispute over the public option really depends on how you define it. i think we can get a good public option through that even the u.s. senate would think is a

good reform. but it's very important that we define it carefully so that it appeals to folks in all 50 states. that he is a lot of unnecessary concern about it today because a lot of folks think there would not be a level playing field. it's very important that the government plan not have any unfair advantage. i think we can construct one that does the key thing, and this is the most important issue and president obama stressed it again and again. keep the insurance companies honest. we can put together a good public option that does exactly that. >> and you believe it could pass with 51 or rather 60 democrats in the senate, perhaps 60 including a couple republicans, and get 218 in the house? could we get a bill? >> i think we can. >> this fall? >> this fall. the key hurdle though is 60 votes in the senate because reconciliation will not apply to any real health care reform bill, so you have to really be aiming, as tom daschle said in his confirmation hearings, for 70 or 80 votes, but you at least have to get 60. that means it's got to be bipartisan to have a health care reform bill become law. >> you're talking against kent conrad who is chairman of the budget committee, and he says you can't get a public option through the senate. >> but it depends on how you define t he says a co-op might work and that's a real public option if you define the co-op

carefully so it protects consumer rights. and the key thing is not only keeping insurance companies honest, but also benchmark pricing. so you know what a fair deal is on a good health insurance policy. today a lot of americans don't know that. >> let me go to congressman begin gri. it seems like the republicans talk alternatives when the democrats have a health care bill but you don't get anything through when you guys are in charge. what's the story? >> well, chris -- >> is there a free-standing republican approach? is there a republican plan for health care? >> there is definitely a plan for health care and i could list about six items that we are in favor of, and i think the democrats i'm sure jim cooper, a strong blue dog and a good fiscal conservative, would agree with our plan, that the one thing we do not agree on is this idea is the public option, and that is what the american people

are telling the president, telling democratic members across the country. you know, we don't want this. we do not want the government taking over health care, and why do we have to have a government option keeping the health insurance industry honest? same thing for the automobile industry or every industry across the country. the government has to be in there to keep corporate m.a.s.h. industry. the steel industry for example? the american people are saying we want health care reform. the republicans are saying we want health care reform, but we don't want a government takeover. we don't want socialized medicine and national health care. >> those words are frightening to a lot of people. let me ask you this about a moderate forum, what congressman cooper just mentioned. what do you think of a co-op? >> well, chris, i'm not sure we know what that co-op is. kent conrad has talked about it. all the machinations going on in the senate finance committee, it's all been kept close to the vest. i don't think the american

people really know what this co-op would look like. i want to look at it closely. just like senator shelby said on sunday, let's take a look at it and let's make sure. i think anything is better than this government option that's in there competing with an unfair advantage on an unequal playing field. >> let me ask, mr. cooper, congressman, would you try to sell mr. gingrey on some sort of modified public plan that would not offend people concerned about socialism? >> phil is a good friend of mine, but he's tough to sell on these things. a co-op is really used over three-quarters of the land area of america so we buy our electricity that way. it's a creature of the new deal. it's worked really pretty well overall of the country for 70 or 80 years. it's owned by the customers, not owned by the government. it works. it works real well. there are good ways to solve this problem.

i think the key is to be open-minded, to not use alarmist rhetoric, to focus on the real problem of 47 million uninsured americans today. unaffordable health care for everybody and a runaway health care system that does not provide the quality we deserve in america. we can solve any problem we want to in this great country. let's put our minds together and calmly and rationally solve this problem. we can do it and we can do it without a big government solution. >> mr. gingrey injure response? >> my response is i agree with jim. things like association health plans equalizing the tax treatment, making sure people that get their insurance through a small employer our individual market get the same tax benefit, tax break, discounted insurance, making sure that we create statewide high-risk pools so people that have pre-existing

conditions don't pay -- certainly don't pay more than 1.5 to 2 times the standard rates, and they also get an opportunity to get a subsidy if they need that from the federal government if they're low income, say below 300% of the federal poverty level. >> any chance -- do you think there's any chance of a compromise? i mean, seriously, if we get something that's -- if it's just something -- suppose the bill had the following elements, gentlemen. it basically tells young people who are healthy, hey you have to get some health insurance. you have to share some of the costs and risks of health insurance. employers, you will get some encouragement to have a health care plan. you won't be forced to. poor people have to do their bit and kick in what they can afford for health care, but you will get some sort of subsidy. some general approach that basically gets everybody on the road towards coverage? congressman, could you support that or would you still basically take a free enterprise approach and not really want the government even to go that far? >> well, chris, i could support that, and quite honestly, i believe i could sit down with

jim cooper, people like us on a bipartisan basis and we could work this out. you talk about young people wanting to encourage them to have health insurance, but at the same time why would we do something like destroy these high deductible low premium policies combined with a health savings account, the very thing that the young people want and need so they have catastrophic coverage according to h rsmth 3200 we would actually be destroying that and creating more in the ranks of the uninsured, not less. >> you know, i understand there's a left and a right, and i understand people really disagree, mr. cooper, but let me ask you this. you spoke about it this weekend. you come from the center part of the country. with he know the issue of the second amendment. it's part of our law, part of our constitution, part of our heritage, we live with it. it can be dangerous but we prefer rights over control of people's lives. that given, why is the gun smsh come into this? why are people toting firearms to these -- and a couple of cases, more than a couple cases now, people are bricking loaded revolvers to these town meetings. one showed up the other day, we had him on the show, in portsmouth, new hampshire. why do people who care about gun rights, which seems to be somewhat separate from in issue, getting involved in the health care debate?

>> chris, it's a free country and under our constitution the second amendment is just as important as the first amendment or any other amendment in our bill of rights. so that's the way that it is, and we need -- >> but why are they bringing it up here in this health care debate? why are people showing up armed and ready, and i'm serious, it's not funny, because one of these times somebody is going to pull one of these guns out. i don't know what their rules of engagement are, but if you bring a loaded gun somewhere, sooner or later somebody is going to use one because they will get provoked. i just wonder what you think the connection is between the second amendment, which we accept under the constitution, it's there, it's a right in the bill of rights, why is that an issue in the health care debate? >> well, all i know is there's a lot of emotion right now, and if everyone would just be calm and rational and fair to each other and listen to both sides, we can solve this problem and any other problem. the key is clear communication. america is the greatest country in the history of the world. with he have to allow our great citizens to talk clearly to each other and we can do it.

>> what is the connection between the second amendment and health care. this isn't something cooked up by us. this is something bringing guns to these public meetings. why? >> well, chris, they may have every right to do that. >> we know that. >> these may be off-duty police officers. you don't know, but if they've got a permit to carry, then absolutely they can show that and prove that they have the right. >> but why would you bring a gun to where the president was speaking? why would you bring a gun -- i know it's a right. but why would you do it? under what conditions would you choose to use it? you don't bring a gun somewhere you don't intend to ever use it so why would you bring a gun into a situation like a public meeting? i have never seen this in my life before. people coming armed to public debates about health care? >> chris, it just so happens these very people would take that same weapon anywhere they go, jen where they're permitted to carry a concealed weapon. they have the right to do that.

>> we're looking at it -- you guys -- i have an advantage on you. i am looking at a gentleman who has guns on her holsters. they're not concealed. they're displaying their weaponry. armed weaponry at these little meetings. what's going on? why are people coming armed to public meetings? >> well, chris, if they have the right to do that, i have no fear of it. i have had five town hall meetings. i have six more. i don't plan to wear bullet proof vests. i have no fear. >> how about this, would you discourage americans regardless of race, color, creed, or political identification, not to come armed to public meetings? would you discourage them from doing that? >> my answer is yes. >> no, i would not -- yeah. >> congressman cooper says he's

a moderate. i guess i would today's terminology a moderate is somebody who says, please don't come armed to public meetings. mr. gingrey, you're opportunity. you can say what you want. do you think people should come armed to public meetings to discuss health care or not? >> i would think that they should exercise their rights under the second amendment. >> thank you very much. you made yourself clear congressman, nothing is worse than doing nothing. should democrats be concerned about the upcoming midterm elections? we think they do have something to worry. that may cause some of them to vote no on this health care bill just out of fear. you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc. coming up, he was a mall si, but i've still got room for the internet. with my new netbook from at&t. with its built-in 3g network, it's fast and small, so it goes places other laptops can't. i'm bill kurtis, and wherever i go, i've got plenty of room for the internet.

and the nation's fastest 3g network. gun it, mick. (announcer) sign up today and get a netbook for $199.99 after mail-in rebate. with built-in access to the nation's fastest 3g network. only from at&t. the sparkly flakes. the honey-baked bunches! the magic's in the mix. my favorite part? eating it. honey bunches of oats. taste the joy we put in every spoonful. honey bunches of oats. we call the bunches in honey bunches of oats the prize in the box. well, now there's a prize inside the prize. pecans! pecans! baked into crunchy oat bunches. taste the delicious surprise in every spoonful. new honey bunches of oats with pecan bunches. beautiful. coming up, he was a washington reporter who joined the marines at a late age to fight for his country. last week sergeant bill care was killed in afghanistan. we're going to learn more about this american hero, and he is one, when "hardball" returns.

( sheets buffeting ) ( man ) whoa ! ♪ summer days were not good to my skin. (announcer) new neutrogena total skin renewal. it's clinically tested to help undo the look of a year's worth of skin aging in just one week. do-overs do exist. (announcer) total skin renewal neutrogena. it's much easier to find money at esurance. great auto insurance rates and lots of discounts! got insurance already? save more with esurance's "switch & save (tm) discount"! it also pays to shop online. you get esurance's "fast 5 (tm) discount" just for getting an instant online quote. - thanks, professor. - don't forget the good student discount. and there's even more discounts! it's no "secret" that you can save hundreds with esurance.

welcome back to "hardball." ever since world war ii, the new president's party has lost seats in congress the first time out in the congressional elections coming up the year later. some notable years, 1966 when president lyndon johnson lost four senate seats and 47 house seats. in '94 bill clinton lost eight senate seats and 52 house seats. will the trend continue for president obama come 2010 next year? joining me to look ahead, msnbc political analyst pat buchanan and the national journal's charles cook. well, this is a bit for political junkies but we have some who watch. the reason i think it's topical, i think a lot of members of congress, especially from swing district who is managed to get in by 52%, 53% are thinking next year and thinking how they're going to vote. charlie cook, are you along -- are you with those who think that there's a real possible chance, 1 in 3, 1 in 4, that the house could go republican next time? >> i think --

>> they'd have to lose about 30, 40 seats. >> 40 seats. i think that's too high. obviously it's possible. we saw in 1994, but i think it's pretty unlikely, but i think the odds of them losing say 20 seats getting their margin cut in half, that's a very real possibility. what political -- >> that would still give them control, 236 seats with about an 18-seat majority for control. >> and arguably the people they would lose, a lot of those are some of the blue dogs who are not voting with them anyway, but the thing is you like to have that cushion, and it would reflect on the president. >> what's your gut -- i know you don't like to make too many predictions but at this point nobody is going to remember you made it. is it your sense this is going to be a typical off year? >> i think it's going to be fairly typical. right now we have democrats losing about nine seats. my guess is it will get up to 20 or so. >> george bush, sr. lost nine. >> yeah. >> that's about an average.

>> reagan lost -- >> and he was pretty popular. >> reagan lost 26 in bad economic times in '82, but i think george w. bush gained seats in 2002, which is astonishing. >> because he did a brilliant job, i don't like it, he forced the democrats to vote on the war before we went to the war. >> i agree with charlie. i think you're talking 20 to 25 seats. i think obama is in problem. the tremendous black turnout, 13%, is going to fall back. the white turnout which was depressed, i think is coming out. you have these populist folks out there angry -- >> anger drives the voters. >> plus bush is gone. jo you don't think they can whack them again? >> they'll try to be very foolish. i think they have real problems. chris, i think people have handled these -- these crowds out there terribly. 40% of democrats think the protesters are behaving properly. 64% of moderates think. these are the swing voters. they're the hillary democrats that obama -- >> let me ask. television can be selective in

the pictures we take. you have seen the pick tufs we've seen. not just the few guys with guns, but these people really manically yelling at congress people. >> some of them are very angry but you know what most folks are saying? 2 to 1 they identify with them. people are angry, especially the white working middle class in particular. >> i don't condone the way they do it, the screaming and yelling, waving the fingers and all that, but the thing about it for the blue dogs, those are their constituents. this was giving i think the left of the democratic party a little window into the lives of these -- >> because they never get that lesson. they never learn. i worked -- the trouble with the guys in the big cities and the women from the big cities, the minority congress people, don't know what a general election looks like, do they? >> no -- >> the suburban guys, the guys from rural areas who manage to squeak in with 52% are always

thinks about that 3% they have to hold. >> i think it will be easier for president obama to dump the pub lib option because of the town meetings. sort of like it's a dose -- it's a bucket of ice water on the heads of -- >> pretty smart. do you agree with that? that's pretty smart. >> i do. i also think dumping the physician counselors, aka death -- >> it's gone. because of the way it's been interpreted by its enemies. >> look at specter in pennsylvania. there's going to be no provision for health insurance, free health insurance for illegal aliens. all these -- >> did he say that? >> yes, he did. all these things set those folks off. get all of that out there. >> let me tell you one thing -- we don't agree on many things, but one thing you can say about national health insurance, you have to have an i.d. card. you have to be who you claim you are. nobody is going to get free national health insurance without identifying themselves personally. it's crazy. there's going to have to be some identification of people. they can't come in and bs their way into free health care. they have to be here legally or not. but, pat -- that's the point. >> sure. >> i don't think post people

believe you should get anything free if you're here illegally. >> you should have your social security card and run the card through the system. >> verify. >> here is my sense. the president is sitting there with rahm emanuel right now looking at next year's election and looking at what we're talking about saying, look, it's time to drop the baggage and go with what we need to get across the finish line. some kind of individual mandate that says young people -- we have to get everybody in health insurance in some way. some kind of encouragement to employers, not a law. not like nixon wanted to go with a mandate, but something to get employers to kick in. and third subsidies for working people who are willing to do their bit but don't have enough to pay health insurance and then clean up this crap about pre-existing conditions and portability. a bill like that to me would be historic. that could pass the senate -- >> and i think obama -- but can he sell that as a victory? >> who does he have to sell it to? who won't take that as a victory? >> a lot of people will say he tried to get government control now he's scaling back. it wasn't for lack of trying. >> i agree with you and i can't see how liberal democrats will vote against something like that which does 60% of what they want done. how could you vote against this? >> what's this 100 votes that will vote against the bill if

they don't have the public option. >> that's baloney. >> and jim cooper was positioning himself as a guy who wants the public option. if they don't get it, he won't be blamed for it. >> public option -- >> did you notice that? >> sure. and he lied -- >> let me ask you, you don't like making predictions but i have to do it here. will there be a health care bill? >> oh, yeah. >> will there be a health care bill? >> yes. >> we will have a signing ceremony and will it change anything? will it be good for the country? >> i'm not sure i think the republicans got the taste of blood. i think they're really going after this. i think there's so much rage and anger and this co-op is so confusing, there might not be,

but i think any republican who thinks this thing is completely dead is mistaken. >> i think kent conrad is right, 60 votes is hard to get t you can't get it from public option. you will end up getting 61 votes probably for health care in the senator because senator kennedy is ill. bobby byrd is always tricky but he will make the vote. i think he will get olympia snowe and mike enzi. >> wyoming. >> and i think that's going to do it. in the house he will end up getting 218 because they can lose. they can lose about 40 and still win it. so you get to 218 in the house. 61 in the senate and you pass the thing. that's what i think. don't you agree? >> that's my feeling they can do t i'm not saying they will do it. >> it will seen as a fraction -- >> i think politics work. i think the crazy town meetings help. that was a brilliant assessment, charles cook. that's why you're so good. in a weird way the guys with the guns have probably helped them. >> which will make thaem suicidal. >> i take it back. you're not that brit yant.

up next house majority leader tom delay has been called the hammer for good reason. now he's the dancer. can you see this guy do the cha-cha cha, the tango? might be the texas two step. we're looking at this guy. does everybody want to be on the stage? you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc. mr. delay is coming back. so many arthritis pain relievers -- i just want fewer pills and relief that lasts all day. take 2 extra strength tylenol every 4 to 6 hours?!? taking 8 pills a day...

and if i take it for 10 days -- that's 80 pills. just 2 aleve can last all day. perfect. choose aleve and you can be taking four times... fewer pills than extra strength tylenol. just 2 aleve have the strength to relieve arthritis pain all day. maybe one of the most important... for me to keep my bones strong but even with calcium, vitamin d, and exercise, i still got osteoporosis. i never thought i could do more than stop my bone loss. then my doctor told me i could,

with once-monthly boniva. boniva works with your body to help stop and reverse bone loss. studies show, after one year on boniva, nine out of ten women stopped and reversed their bone loss. i know i did. (announcer) don't take boniva if you have low blood calcium, severe kidney disease or can't sit or stand for at least one hour. follow dosing instructions carefully. stop taking boniva and tell your doctor if you have difficult or painful swallowing, chest pain or severe or continuing heartburn, as these may be signs of serious upper digestive problems. if jaw problems or severe bone, joint, and/or muscle pain develop, tell your doctor. i've got this one body, and this one life, so i wanted to stop my bone loss. but i did more. i reversed it with boniva. ask your doctor if boniva can help you stop losing, and start reversing. (announcer) for a free trial offer, call 1-800-4-boniva.

back to "hardball." time for the "sideshow." first, a sugar plum for the ages. go ahead, guess, who is just joining the cast of "dancing with the stars." mr. tom delay. that's tom delay to you. the 62-year-old texas hard as nails congressman and soddy buster to the inth degree. he says he's been working out like crazy to compete next month with 15 other reality contestants. he'll be on "hardball" tomorrow night to talk about it. we'll ask him how that texas two-step is coming. i dare not even talk about his possible cha-cha cha. next the blooper heard

around the world. that's what paul krugman is charitably calling this latest piece of misinformation from the right wing editorial board over at investors business daily. the newspaper was looking to make an xampl out of stephen hawking who is paralyzed. in an editorial entitled how house bill runs over grandma, the business daily took a shot at the government-run british health care system writing, quote, catch this, people such as scientist stephen hawking wouldn't have a chance in the uk where the national health service would say the life of this brilliant man because of his physical handicaps is essentially worthless. here is the skinny. hawking was born in the uk and has lived his entire life with health care from the national health service in britain. so now the newspaper has printed a correction and hawking put out his own statement praising the british national health system for what he called its high quality treatment saying he wouldn't be here today without that health care system in england. wasn't the truth breathtaking. finally a shout out to the mayor of milwaukee, mayor tom barrett was leaving the wisconsin state fair this weekend when he heard the

screams of a woman he discovered was trying to protect her baby granddaughter from a young man in what's being described by police as a domestic dispute. after mayor barrett tried to help the woman protect her granddaughter, the man involved hit him with a lead pipe. the mayor fought back and the guy fled the scene. result, the woman and baby are fine. the guy was arrested. the mayor now a hometown hero is recovering with just a fractured hand and other injuries at a local hospital. time for tonight's big number it has some bad news for the president. in a new usa today gallup poll, how many people say they don't believe the stimulus package is working? 57%. a solid majority. 57% of americans don't believe

their stimulus dollars are going to work for them. that's tonight's "big number." that said, as my hero winston churchill put it, there are two kinds of success, initial and ultimate. let's see how this recovery works out. up next, the story of a a true american hero whose life changed on september 11th. a journalist who joined the marine corps with the hope of making a difference. he just died in afghanistan. when "hardball" returns. what's our favorite part of honey bunches of oats?

the sparkly flakes. the honey-baked bunches! the magic's in the mix. my favorite part? eating it. honey bunches of oats. taste the joy we put in every spoonful.

hello, everyone. here's what's happening. a miami man is under arrest for on line credit card theft in u.s. history. the 28-year-old is suggestion inspected of stealing 130 million credit and debt card numbers. they came from a bank processing

center. on monday, a california grand jury indicted sunday schoolteacher melissa huckabee on charges she kidnapped, raped, and killed 7-year-old sandra cantu. a trial date has not been set. a jury in texas sent a person to 99 years in prison. she was convicted of mutilating her infant son by cutting off his genitals. the prosecutors say she was high on drugs at the time. the first hurricane of the atlantic season is strengthening quickly. hurricane bill a category 2 storm packing winds of almost 100 miles an hour. right now bill is expected to pass near bermuda on saturday. that's the latest. now back to "hardball." i said when i announced this strategy there will be more difficult days ahead. the insurgency in afghanistan

didn't just happen overnight and we won't defeat it overnight. this will not be quick, nor easy. but we must never forget, this is not a war of choice. this is a war of necessity. those who attacked america on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. if left unchecked, the taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven. >> welcome back to "hardball." that was president obama this afternoon talking about the war in afghanistan at the vfw convention in phoenix and of course his warning of difficult days ahead ring true for the family of sergeant william cahir who was killed in afghanistan last thursday. he enlisted in the marine corps reserves after 9/11. it hit him so hard, 9/11. he served two tours of duty in iraq before his deployment in afghanistan. sergeant cahir was a journalist and last year a democratic congressional candidate up in pennsylvania, in state college. his wife renee is expecting twins. bret lieberman is a close friend of sergeant cahir. they worked together.

we don't do this enough. this guy was like us in a way but better. i mean, he was a journalist. he ran for office. tell me about your friend. this guy just got killed in afghanistan. >> yeah. he wasn't like us in the sense that he didn't like to be on the sidelines. everything he did he wanted to change something, be involved. he didn't want to just cover the news at a school. he went to work on the hill. he wanted to change things. he worked for ted kennedy there. he became a journalist. he serves the community. he really cared about the communities he covered. just completely dedicated to the facts. after 9/11 like a lot of people he was touched by what happened. wanted to make a difference but he didn't want to just cover it. he wanted to be actively making a difference. felt the best way to do that was join the marines and he was 34 at the time. >> he had to push the age thing. >> he had to get a waiver, get

permission, and, you know, he had to give up a career. he was a reservist, i was able to go back, but at age 34 he was in there with kids half his age. drill sergeants, you know, gave him a tough time. he was a college graduate. he really gave up a lot, but that was part of the commitment that bill had. >> did he know -- i mean nobody knows going into battle what the outcome is going to be. did he know what he was facing? >> he knew. before he deployed, he got an e mail. a lot of people say oh, no, when they heard they're going for a third deployment. he said i knew i signed up for it. this is what i committed to. >> he was like 40, right? >> he turned 40 last december. but he felt like, you know what? this is an honest job. he actually wrote that in the e-mail and he wanted to make a difference. he felt this is the best way he could do it. >> and he loved his beautiful wife behind pregnant with two -- with twins. i don't usually do this, but this isn't a usual situation. what should we do about this? >> we started a fund.

the bill cahir memorial fund launched online today. billcahir memorial.org. anything you can do to help out the family. >> c-a-h-a-i-r. this will help pay for the kids growing up. >> clothes, college, you name it. it won't make up for the loss but it will help and it will -- >> i hope everybody sees that. we don't do this enough. we talk about wars around here and we talk about politics of wars and we disagree with some wars and i think afghanistan has been recognized as a war of necessity by everybody, and that's where the enemy came from on nev. that's where he went and fought and that's where he died. >> that's why bill felt it was important to go. >> thank you very much. what a pal you are. what a good guy you are. we're going to come back and talk politics. we have a lot to talk about today. there it is, by the way. thank you. the fund that's been set up for sergeant cahir's family.

donations can be sent to bill cahir memorial fund at burke and herbert bank at p.o. box 268 alexandria, virginia, 22313. when i was seventeen summer days were not good to my skin.

(announcer) new neutrogena total skin renewal. it's clinically tested to help undo the look of a year's worth of skin aging in just one week. do-overs do exist. (announcer) total skin renewal neutrogena. coming up, hillary clinton has now finished her africa trip. bill clinton is backing up the president on the urgency of health care. how is the coalition going these days? it looks like it's working. announcer: transitions lenses adjust to changing light to reduce glare and help protect your eyes from uv damage so you can see better today... and tomorrow. live your vision. transitions. healthy sight in every light. for help finding your right pair of eyeglasses, just log onto eyeglassguide.com and check out the new transitions eyeglass guide. turning eyeglasses into my glasses. if you're using other moisturizing body washes,

you might as well be. you see, their moisturizer sits on top of skin, almost as if you're wearing it. only new dove deep moisture has nutriummoisture, a breakthrough formula with natural moisturizers... that can nourish deep down. it's the most effective natural nourishment ever. new dove deep moisture with nutriummoisture. superior natural nourishment for your skin.

they have been more focused on a co-op, not for profit co-op as a competitor as opposed to a straight government-run program, and i think what's important is choice and competition, and i'm convinced at the end of the day

the plan will have both of those, but that is not the essential element. >> well, back time for "the politics fix" with usa today's susan page, who is elsewhere in washington, and there she is, and the chicago tribune's clarence page. let me ask you both about these headlines. here is today's front pages. of course, "the new york times," quote, public option and health plan may be dropped. that's right at the top. "the washington post," key feature of obama health plan may be out. susan's paper, the usa today, public insurance gets iffy. well, susan, it seems to me that these are the way that is the administration has chosen to do this. they're going with what they believe they need, i think, an individual mandate, people have to participate in health care, a subsidy for working people, some kind of push for employers to insure people and reform in terms of pre-existing conditions and portability. in other words, they're going for a health reform bill rather than a big, big bill that would

have a big public program involved, public option. it looks like it. still a possibility of a co-op. what do you think is going to happen? >> you know, i thought it was surprising this morning when we heard about tom delay being on "dancing with the stars." i thought it was not surprising that the administration is backing away from the public option. there's been a lot of signals that that is not what they consider to be critical. that's not something that they go to the mat for, and it's probably not something they can hold onto if they want to get the support, not just of republicans, but of some conservative democrats. so i thought we saw this was kind of a reality check on what the final package is likely to look like. >> clarence? >> that's true. they never had the votes in the senate for the -- >> they never had the 60. >> exactly. and i think the administration decided it's time to let

everybody know what reality is, and especially on the left because they are going to get hammered for that. some folks already -- some of the congressional democrats are already saying, well, what's the point if you haven't got a public option, but nobody know what is a co-op is exactly. i think they're going to try to package something that comes close without being government-run. a co-op is run by the members, but, you know, it's a nice squishy concept right now they're hoping will cushion the blow they're gsh. >> maybe, clarence, my friend, you might be to my left on this one, but that's a safe place for me to be. and susie, you don't take any position, but it seems to me if you can walk away at thanksgiving time if you're president of the united states and say for the first time in american history young people, healthy people who think they're immune to sickness are now going to have to participate in the health care system to share the costs and risks of high health care with everybody, you're going to have a system of subsidies for working people to help them afford health insurance, you will encourage

employers to pay for health insurance and solve problems like portability and pre-existing conditions, that's better than nothing. >> nobody knows how it's going to work. it's not as simple of a concept as the public option which would be in general something like medicare for everybody. that's easier to say and explain than something that's going to be kind of a hybrid between medicare and a rural co-op or -- >> medicare is free. medicare is absolutely free. for the richest people in america, it's still absolutely free. once you have worked after a couple years of retirement, all the contributions you have made. it doesn't take long. then the rest of it is free for life. no plan is ever going to be that good, is it? >> no plan is perfect. >> go ahead, susan. >> i was going to say the hospital portion of medicare is free, but you do pay for medicare part "b" and you pay a premium for medicare part "d." so it's not entirely free, but it certainly is a system that seniors are pretty happy with.

i actually think one helpful thing for the administration from these raucous town halls we've seen is that, you know, liberals who might be very upset by losing the public option may think that health care is in some trouble because it is getting a lot of pushback and maybe more willing to accept, you know, a co-op instead of a public option as opposed to getting nothing at all. >> so it's kind of like a rope-a-dope situation in a weird way without stretching the comparison between mohammed ali getting hit until the other guy runs out of juice. the idea he's getting hit so hard teaches the left, if you will, the left is a good enough term for me, that maybe they're lucky to get a bill. >> and, of course, democrats really want to get a bill. think how -- think what a big issue this was last year in the campaign and how long democrats have been trying to do this, since the clinton years, since the truman years. pretty close now, i thinks the argument president obama is trying to make, we're pretty close, we just need a little bit more to get us over the finish line for some kind -- the bill they're going to get this year

is not going to solve every single health care problem. what they're aiming to do is get something you can build on that has maybe an individual mandate. that would be a critical part -- >> i think he will be george akin and declare victim. here is the president's poll numbers. his approval is going down and his disapproval is going up. they're about to converge. >> i think -- take a look at this. here's the president's poll numbers as this debate's heated up. his approval is going down. look at that black line. his disapproval's going up. they're about to converge. here's the question. is it better for him to get a health care bill or not? >> he's got to do it. this is a defining issue. >> he has to get isn't it. >> he's got to get it. to lose on his biggest initiative, that would be really bad for him. >> here's the question. you're a rural democrat. i imagine you're a congress person from, oh, iowa, anywhere in the country, anywhere besides the big cities where people tend to be automatically democrat. are you better off with a bill that you have to defend or better off with a bill that's going down? >> if you're a democrat in a rural area? i think if you're a democrat you're better off with a bill

that says we promise to tackle this issue. i don't see where any democrat gets an advantage if they don't succeed. we've got 60 votes in the senate and a big majority in the house and the white house and they didn't get a bill through on their top priority? that is not a great selling point. >> if that's true then i'll vote for it. we know how they say. here's the president today. let's listen. >> one thing that reform won't change is veterans health care. no one is going to take away your benefits. that is the plain and simple truth. we're expanding access to your health care, not reducing it. >> clarence, susan and i crafted the question.

if you're better off having voted for a bill and the bill having passed, why wouldn't most democrats, in fact almost all democrats, vote for it? it's better for them politically. >> most of them will. the blue dogs are the difficulty i hear. they don't want a bill that's too far to the left. but the fact is a majority of the public -- >> they ain't going to get it. >> obviously not. most of the public does want some kind of health care reform. how do you define reform? that's the question. it's better to have a specific bill to defend than what they've got now, which is just a lot of rumors floating around. >> back at '46 when they passed the employment act and committed this country to full employment, at least try every year to do that, that was a plus. try it with health care, at least get the commitment. we'll be right badge with clarence page and susan page -- that's interesting. >> not married. >> hillary clinton. no jokes. let's get serious about hillary clinton, what she did over there, because i think it is important. what's our favorite part of honey bunches of oats?

the sparkly flakes. the honey-baked bunches! the magic's in the mix. my favorite part? eating it. honey bunches of oats. taste the joy we put in every spoonful.

clarence page and susan page with "the politics fix." let me start with susan. seems to me secretary of state clinton went to africa and spent 12 days in some unpleasant countries. countries at war, countries that pose danger to her as visitor. talked about blood diamonds. talked about women's rights which are not honored in the world many places. she got no credit for it. all she got is the cheap shot because of what she got when she lost it a bit with that question from that kid, what she thought was a question about her

husband's thinking, not hers. what do you make of all of this? >> i'm sure it was very frustrating for her. it was a long trip focused on issues that americans are and american diplomats often don't pay that much attention to. in places like congo. but it is true that it was -- her husband was getting a lot more attention in north korea, and one incident at a news conference sort of is the thing that the public will -- the information the public got about the trip that she made. i'm sure that's disappointing. >> you know, to start there, on a family trip with my wife i met a kid out in the middle of nowhere who was totally concerned with michael jackson. just to make the point -- the papers are covered with obama stuff. there are always -- millions and millions of africans are watching us all the time. they want us to show some respect and interest in our concerns. here's a person, the first person in a long time, who says, i'm going to give you 12 days. >> right.

>> your thoughts? >> well, she was very -- well, for one thing the clintons are very much respected, very much liked in africa. that particular place where she was where that incident occurred she was getting more pointed questions and comments there than in most places. but they were right on point for the most part, dealing with women's issues especially, which she's very strong on. as you know, problems, rape, aids, et cetera, very serious in africa. and she was raising the profile on that. but then she got upstaged. >> serious business. you've got the blood diamond trade where the whites are involved in it too. a lot of people -- the money over there, the bloodshed that goes on, the killing, the old tribal disputes have always been there but they're getting worse because of the fight over diamonds.

the aid thing isn't going away. thank god george bush took an interest over there, susan, and he gets credit for it over there. the american people, a lot of us americans came from that part of the world and we all ultimately came from there, no matter what the anti-evolutionists think. we all come back to lucy in some day. hillary clinton, how's this shaping up? what i call the coalition between the clintons and the obama faction. >> you see a little bit of a coalition with bill clinton as well as with hillary clinton. you saw him not just do the north korea trip but also go to a net roots convention the other day in pittsburgh where he advocated strongly for the obama health care plan. you know, there's a certain amount of scar tissue from last year's campaign between the obamas and the clintons. but bill clinton does offer barack obama some credentials with some more conservative democrats, maybe some democrats in the south, that -- where obama could use maybe a little bit of a boost. >> he's going to need a bigger

boost next year. my theory is that the clintons are really going to be necessary to this coalition come next november when bill clinton's got to help with the white working class. >> notice ow often the clintons are important to obama in the clinch. during the campaign last year, against mccain, now at this point bill clinton speaking out for the health care reform last week. and hillary clinton, they've both been very good soldiers. >> i think it's a hell of a coalition. a strong phalanx for the democratic party. thank you. join us tomorrow for more "hardball." "countdown" with keith olbermann starts right now. which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow? uh-oh. the public option, whether we have it or we don't have it, is not the entirety of health care reform. >> no, actually, mr. president, you're wrong. it is. remember? you just said the insurance companies were holding us hostage? >> that is not the essential element. >> no, actually, madame secretary, you're wrong.

it is. it is the break on the out of control engine that is insurance greed well, at least you get something of a first step, one that grandma plug puller grassley can sell to the death eaters as a good deal. >> it isn't a good deal if i can't sell my product to more republicans. >> well, at least they're opposing it on principle not political calculus. howard fineman on politics. lawrence o'donnell on the pushback. howard dean on the nate silver, that the number of solid votes is 43 or as low as 41. arianna huffington on the accidental emission of truth on the subject during "meet the press." >> this is a really important point. the antihealth care reform lobby thinks that medicare is tyranny. okay? >> worse, welcome to the public schools of texas where teaching the bible is now mandatory. and tom delay on "dancing with the stars" is not dancing. he's crushing cockroaches. michelle bachman says she will run for president if she hears god telling her to. i hate to tell you this. that's not god.