this meeting comes at corner of the recognition of so many challenges that face all of us and that should come together and unite and put all efforts together, serious efforts put together by the walls so that the wall will defeat these challenges which constitute command common enemy to all of us. challenges of climate, challenges of international crises or economic capital deterioration and the food cry -- perhaps this swine virus

may be one of those viruses created in the laboratory and it got out of control because it was meant in the beginning to be used as -- as well as military -- the nuclear proliferations as well as the hypocrisy and detroit rags and detroit radiations -- as you know, the united nations was established -- by countries where -- where -- against the german at a time. the united nations that we have today is different but the united nations that was -- that it is the -- the countries or

the nations that come together against the second world war, these countries constituted or made -- and give -- its own members and granted defeat to -- we were not present at the time. and the united nations was tailored according to these countries and wanted from us to wear the clothes or the suit that was tailored against the german and this is substance and contents of the united nations as it was signed 40 or 60 years ago. this was -- happened during the absence of 1,000 -- over 165 countries with the ratios 1 of 8 and one was a president and eight were absent. those -- they -- or they made the charter and you know, i have

the charter -- and once -- charter of the united nations, the preamble of the united nations is different from the provisions and the articles. how this came to existence, those who attend in san francisco 1945, they -- they -- they all participated in the preamble but they left the articles and the provisions and the procedures of the -- intelligent procedures of the -- council they left it to the job of the experts and the -- and the countries who are interested which are the countries who created the security council and which came together against the germans. the preamble is very tempting and no one is objecting to it but everything that came after that is completely with the -- this is what -- this is what we are objecting and we should never continue it. this came to an end during the second world war.

the -- the preamble says that the nations are equal, whether they are small or big. does -- are we equal in the permanent seats? no. we are not equal an preamble says all nations are equal whether they are small nations or whether they are big nations as far as license. do we have the license are we equal? the preamble says that we are equal in our rights. whether we are big or small. this is what -- and this is what we have agreed in the preamble. so the veto is against the

charter, the -- are against the -- the charter. we do not accept it and we do not acknowledge it. neither do we recognize it. the charter states that we -- in the preamble, i i mean, that we are -- that we shall not resort to the military -- military force unless it is a common interest. this is the preamble which we we happy and we signed and we joined the united nations because we -- we wanted the charter to be like that. it says that the armed forces only use it when it is of common interest to all nations, but after that, what happened 65 -- broke out after the establishment of the united nations and after the establishment of the security council. newspaper of this establishment. 65 and victims are millions more

than the victims of second world war out of these wars and -- and -- was used in 65 wars in the interest of the common interest of all of us. no. intention of one country or three countries or four countries or one country but not in interest of all the nations and we shall come and discuss about the wars whether these wars broke out, was interest of one country or one -- in the whole nations. this is in full contradictions and full intervention of the united nations charter and we saying that unless we do things in the charter of the united nations according to which we agreed on the rise which we don't speak -- we are not afraid, we don't cover everything, and we were not being -- anybody. we are talking about the future of the -- is there no -- no

hypocrisy and no diplomatsy. understanding and hypocrisy and created to 65 words after the establishment of the united nations. the preamble states also that if there is -- if there is a use of force, then -- then there must be -- then -- and then -- then it must be the united nations first so the united nations military -- according to the joint ventures of the united nations you not country, not country or one, two, country or country using the force or -- the united nations all of it will decide to go to war to maintain peace and world security.

and if there is any aggression by one country against another after the -- fortifies -- after the establishment of this united nations, if there is any aggression against any country, the united nations all together should deter and stop this aggression. and should the -- check this aggression. i mean, if -- if country -- any country, libya, for instance, makes an attack against or aggression against france the whole united nations should check against france because france is a member state and dependent state in the united general assembly and of the united nations and all of us that we have to protect sovereignty of all nations collectively but -- but 65 wars, aggressive war took place without any actions from the united nations to stop and check

these wars and a fierce big wars and victims of these wars among millions may or negotiated bit countries will have member states and lead to those countries who -- who are believed that would maintain the sovereignty and independence of the people these countries actually use aggressive force against -- against peoples. we wanted -- believe that these countries will make peace and security in the war and protected the people, these countries actually in order to aggressive wars and -- wars and as a matter of fact they enjoyed the veto given to them and by themselves and enjoyed the member states and security council and at times they had the war which amounted to millions of victims. so in this charter, there is

nothing that the united nations will interfere and which will be the few business of the internal affairs. i mean, the government. it is the internal affairs of a certain government. no country has the right to interfere in this affair. so the government. whether it is -- socialist capitalist system or whether it is action of a progressive, this is the responsibility of the society. it is an internal matter of the people concerned of a certain country. rome -- rome, one day the senators of rome gave amendment to be a dictator because at the time it was a good for rome. no one can say to rome at the time that you give -- you -- you -- case -- or cesar this veto.

the veto is not mentioned in the charter. if they -- we joined in -- because we thought we are equals and then one country -- country that can object to all of the decisions that we make and it has a member -- who has given this country this member state? these four countries, they have given themselves member states. only country that we have avoided in this general assembly is china. china we avoided to give china member stand in this particular country. this was done democratally but the other member seats was not democratic was imposed upon us and we should not be accepted and victorian procedure that was done against our will. united, the reform is not -- is not -- is not the increasing of

the member states. it is just to make things worse. i don't know how this will be translated but it will be more muddy, this is -- this is typical -- till typical to -- to sometimes -- i mean to make things worse and to make things even worse by how, because -- because many big countries will be added further to the form of big countries that we already have and unlike this, it will be our way so we will have more -- and then from here, we reject having any more seats done in this way. the solution is not in having more seats and the most dangerous one if we have more superqualities to already

superpowers that we already have, this will crash down the peoples of all small people of pilgrim countries which now are -- are -- are -- are coming together in what may be called the g-100. there are 100 small countries coming together in a forum that is called -- member called forum -- forum of small states. these countries will be -- these countries will be crushed by civil cuts because further superpowers say big countries will be added to already -- those should be closed and we reject that strongly and categorical categorically. then you open the door to have more seats in the security council. this will add more -- more injustice and more intention

that the world deliver and more competition at the level of this -- and then we shall have -- there will be high competition between certain countries between italy, german, indonesia and pakistan and philippines, philippines, japan, brazil, nigeria, argue ten argentine yeah and libya, egypt, congo and south africa and tanzania, turkey, iran, greekgreece. all of these countries will have to have seat in the security council and like this shall have race or competitions then -- then it will be impractical, so what is the solution?

the solution is that for the solution presided by the certificate dr for the general assembly by turkey which will be abiding resolutions taken by the general assembly which not taking any other quarter. the solution is that we shall close the administration of member states and we -- and we don't have any more member states. this is an item that is provided for the general assembly presided by -- right now. and in a place of that will be the -- will be the -- will be the achievement of the -- democracy based on equality between member states. there should be equality between member states and commission of the powers and demand of the security council to general assembly and the membership will

be for the associations not for the countries because if we open the door for more members and more membership for the countries because this will -- this will give the right for the country to have a member seat in country and the preamble allow that. no country can say to it that -- if you don't have a seat in this security council, if a seat is given to germany, italy will -- will -- germany maybe for the argument of it say that it was not -- a country and was defeat in the second world war and if we give india, india a seat and say this is -- pakistan both will say that we are nuclear countries and we are at war and pakistan that will be a dangerous thing and if we give -- if we give it to -- then -- the biggest muslim country in the world and then turkey and italy or kenya will

have the same rights. what can we say to them? brazil, libya, libya that discarded the -- grand because it will desert a member state because it then has then said word security by starting this program and south africa will do the same and anyone do the same. all of these countries are important and kenya may be have ask this -- should be -- this is pursued and this is an exposed trick and if we want united nations and bring more super powers and more countries and then we add more to the already big super powers which did a lot of suffering to us and then like this, then the solution is to achieve democracy at the level of -- of -- at the level of the general congress of the horn which is the general assembly which is the transformations of the security council power to the general assembly and this

security council will be just an instrument to implement decisions taken by the general assembly. it will be the parliament of the war and just -- assembly of the war and this is democracy and security council should be responsible before the general assembly and we should not accept it. these are the legislators of which is the members of the general assembly and the resolution should be binding. it is said that the general assembly should could and this and recommendation of the security council. the country. the security council should do this and that according to the rules and the orders of the -- because these are the united nations who are all included all of the members of the world. not the security council which include only ten member states. how can we be happy about the world peace and security if four

countries or ten countries are controlled by the whole world? we are 190 nations and countries and we are like the -- i mean, we speak and nobody is implementing our decisions. we are like a decor. you made like a decor. you are like hyde park and you are -- i mean, without any real -- a real -- real -- real substance. it's just according to speaker like the decor, the speakers of the hyde park corner. no more, no less. you just make a speech and then disappear. these who are you are right now. the security council is an executive -- an executive body

for the resolution taken by the general assembly only and in this case, the skourt -- there will be no competition for the security council member states because once the security council becomes -- implemented resolution taken by general assembly no need for any competitions. the security council should just be representative for all nations but not by a state. this is what submitted now to the general assembly. but permanent seat for all space, for all union, i mean. the -- and 27 countries for the european union they should have permanent seat in the security council. african union should have a member stet in the security council 53 countries. and latin america should have a permanent seat and -- should have a permanent street and this

young country -- two or three countries have a seat. everybody should have a permanent seat. the united states of america which is the 50 countries, it has already permanent member seat security council -- once it is -- once it is established or about to be established and have a member seat. -- should have a member seat. 22 countries. islamic country, 45 countries should have also member state. life movement should have a permanent member seat and security council. then we have the g-100, then we think about perhaps all small countries, the forum of small countries, perhaps they would have a member state, permanent member seat also if there are countries, like the -- that i

mentioned maybe we can assign a permanent seat will be given to them by rotation every six months -- but -- australia, union, australia or another country but perhaps not join the -- or russian or not a member in the year of being union or -- or latin america union or the african union but perhaps a country will be given -- this is a solution. that now this is -- now this is for -- meant for -- for the security council -- for the general assembly take a vote. this is vital important issue and an idea mentioned, general assembly is the congress of the world, the parliament of the world, the master of the world! and no one should object! we are the nation! anyone outside this general assembly we do not recognize and doctor and trekky and ban ki-moon, secretary of state

general of the united nations will make the draft, the legal draft and sit up there, set up necessary committees to submit this for voting. that security council will, from now, will be -- of unions. this is just -- this is democracy! and then we put an end to the security council will be occupied by the countries which one has a nuclear weapons and which one has acknowledge technology! this is terrorism. we cannot live -- security council! countries which have the super powers. this is terrorism in itself. if you want a war that live in peace, united, we should do that. if we want to live in a world it's up to you and then we have conflict and then we shall continue frighten each other or a conflict until the doom is there until the end of the world. these men d these members which have a veto or they don't have a

veto! all security council they should have their right to veto. all these unions belonging to the seats, we shall -- cancel the whole veto with new formation. this is real security council! and anyhow, the new security council that submitted to the new proposals are submitted to the general assembly for voting will be executive council will be under the control of the general assembly, the general assembly which will have the real power and real -- like this all countries will be equal in the security council in the same way they are equal in the general assembly. we are in the general assembly. we have equal votes. we should also be equals in the next door which is the security council. country has a veto.

a country doesn't have a veto. a country has a member seat and then a country should not have a member seat. we should not accept it and we should be -- from now and we should not be subject and we should not accept any resolution taken but security council -- it now. we were -- we are independent and now we are here to decide the future of the world in a democratic way -- security all people small and big are small -- are equals. this is terrorism. like the terrorism of the crime. this is terrorism. terrorism is not just a crime but it can be also in other forms. we should resort to the maturity of the votes of the general assembly alone and should not go, if the general assembly takes a vote, then it should be implemented and should be taken and if taken a decision it should be -- and no one should say i'm above and high the

general assembly! anyone who says that i'm higher or above the general assembly should leave the united nations and be alone! the democracy is not for the rich or for -- for the rich or for the -- so for the one who is more profit than us should have democracy, no. the higher war, the war should be to all nations as equal footing. now security council is security -- for those who have permanent seats. protected by them and they are used against them. against us. it's not -- they should be called security council. they should be called the terror council. ow. all right.

you see my brothers, that now -- life and political life. that the security council is used against us, then they go to the security council. they resort to the security council. if they have no need to use it against then go to the security council. if the charter, they have interest and extra grind to use against us, they respect charter, they look for seven chapter of the security council -- chapter to be against subordination but if they violate the charter they would ignore the charter as if it doesn't exist at all.

permanent seat given to the one who has the power is injustice and terrorism that will not be accepted by us and we should not believe under the shadow of these injustice and this terror. super powers have interests, comicketed and they use the power of the united nations to protect their interests and these terrorize third world and third world is terrified and being terrorized and living under fear of terror. the security council since established in '49 did not provide us with security. but provided us under a country terror and sanctions. it is used against us only.

for this reason, we are not committed to adhere to the security council resolutions after the -- this speech of the 40th anniversary. 64 wars took place -- took -- broke out against the war -- against the war -- against small wars. i, it is frightening but countries order -- by superpowers against big countries against us and united nations ordered security council did not take actions to stop these wars and agregs in violation of the charter of the united nations against small nations and small people and the general assembly will lsh will -- will -- will -- will vote for these historic resolutions. either we continue together as one nation or we go into -- break into two. have its own general assembly, its own security council.

belonging to it where they have equal footings, standing on equal footings or -- and the big countries who have permanent seats who have the rights will stay in their own councils whether they are 43 and they should -- decide against themselves and this is not about interests. and this day, if they want to stay in permanent seats, okay, that's okay, but permanent is threat for our neighbor we should never stay under the supervision or control of the veto and the right to veto to give to countries who -- we are not full to give the right to veto for big to use us and we are treated like second class and despised by nations.

we have not decided that. these are big nations, respected nations and these are the nations of the world that represent 190 countries! we know that now ignoring resolutions of the security council now it is unjust and only used against us and if not used against the big countries who have the permanent seats or those countries who have the right of veto. they never use any resolution against them. in the country it is used against us so any resolutions taken against us it has become -- of the united nations and it has become wars and violations of independent states and committing war crimes and genocide. they are security council and nobody cares about security council and even though now each now each country has each

community have become security council establishing own security council and with the security council in its own formation now it has -- the security council next to us has become isolated. america will have security council and not alignment 120 countries will have -- will have its own peace and security council. this means we have already lost trust in the security council which we have not provided us with security and now creating peace securities. or region and security councils. we are not committed to obey the rules or the resolutions of the security councils which in this formation because it is

undemocratic and just and no one can force us to be a member of the security councils and to bay or adhere to resolutions or that is given by the security councils in its -- composition as it is right now. now, brothers, there is no respect to the united nations. no regard to the general assembly which constitutes -- the -- in the united nations and which it has no decisions that is a abiding. the international court of justice it is judicial international body and resolutions only implemented against small countries, small nations and big countries rejected to implement against big countries and resolutions to court orders taken against these big countries but they have been refused to be implemented

against them. the international -- the if it is international one then all of the countries of the world should be under jurisdictions of this one. if it is not international, then we close the door and from this speech we shall close the door and not accept it and -- and -- general assembly, he -- he will talk to the director of the brother or the one assistant and they will ask him do you inspect

the nuclear supplies of all -- do you -- do you supervise the increase of this nuclear storage, then if js is it, then we accept that and be under control but if he says we cannot go to these countries who have the nuclear powers and i cannot have any jurisdictions, then we should close the door and not accept it to be under its control. for your information, i called -- when we had the problem of the nuclear bomb and said i called him and i told him, mr. -- the -- the agreements to -- to decrease the nuclear -- the nuclear supplies between the super powers is it under control and under provisions and if it is in a country increase nuclear heads are you aware of that? he said to me now, these big powers, i cannot go so close to

it, i cannot ask them. so you only come to us. i said this is not international organization. so it is meant only for us security councils or against us international countries and international against us and they are free. this not injustice. this is not justice. this is not united nations. this is rejected totally. >> if you want to -- whether -- united nations or not -- be afford the -- historic decisions against -- decisions africa need now is now permanent member seat in the security council because this is our understanding. even if we are not talking about the united nations reforum.

africa was isolated and persecuted. was treated like animals, was treated like slaves, was treated colonies, colonized and booked under the -- this country is african union deserves a permanent seat for the past. it's an outstanding -- like china and it has nothing to do with the united nations forums. this is a priority and high on the agenda for the general assembly and no one can say the african union does not deserve a permanent seat. who has the -- anyone can talk to me even right now, would argue with me. any proof that the african unit does not deserve -- or african nation does not deserve a permanent seat. no one can argue or no one can refute what i am saying.

it is also important for the general assembly for compensation to countries -- and why so no more -- of colonization and no more use of -- will of the peoples and why africans should go to europe and why africans go to europe? why -- go to yurps europes? why do latin american people go to europe? because europe was colonized by -- they took the minds, the waerlt, other resources of latin america and they took fruit and vegetables and stock and people and they used them. now the new generation whether it is asian or latin america or

africa now they are looking for these -- which have been stolen. now, when i stop -- africa -- i told them -- they told me i am going to take my -- if you break my -- i don't go. i stop. who can bring back the wealth that was given to me? make a decision to bring all these resources and wealth so no more jim -- immigration from philippines to latin america to -- to any -- let us have the world that was taken from us and from africa deserves compensati compensation. 37.7.

7.77 trillion. that's the compensation that africa deserves from countries who -- africa. africa will call for that. and if you don't give us these -- this amount 7.7 africans will go to where you have taken these trillions. they have the right. they will have to follow, bring the money back and then -- no illegal immigration to -- why no illegal immigration to italy? because italy -- compensation for libyan people and accepted compensation and signed -- agreement with italian -- with libyan and it was endorsed by the italian parliament and italy accepted that was wrong and we should not be -- again and italy would not accept to be attacked whether by air or sea by libyan

people and libya would xebt for compensate for the next 20 years would pay quarter of billions and build hospitals for the libyans who are -- lost their members or their hand or fingers because of the second world war when the mines were laid possible lynnian. it is apology and said it would never be a country occupy, another country -- terrorism of other country and since it was -- if it was a kingdom and it was -- during the -- and italy has done glorified -- glorified thing and civilized thing and should be commended by berlusconi and did own contribution to achieve this result. the third world call is for a conversation. why? so we don't have any more --

colonization so we have repeat of colonization and so that no country will be big and will cover colonize another country so this country will know there will be compensation and when colonization. colonization should be incriminated and countries who -- should pay compensation who have done damage to the people during the colonization area and be compensated for the damage and the suffering that they have inflicted during their colonial power. other point i would hope that we have to face patiently but before i say this point it is

rather sensitive to certain extent. there are sentences between two brackets i would like to shed some light upon and mention. we -- we as a matter of fact did he we africans are happy, proud that one son of africans -- united states of america -- africa. this is historic event. one day the black doesn't go well. the white go and cannot be where the white now american people, they black, african, kenyan, young voted for him and made him a president. this is a great thing and we are proud of that. you are the beginning of a change. he did go for a change but as far as i'm concerned obama is a glimpse in the dark for the 40 years or the next eight years

and i'm afraid that we may go back to square one. who will -- how can you get -- obama can you guarantee after obama how america would be governed? no one can guarantee america. we are content and happy if obama can stay forever as a president in america. the speech made by obama just before me. completely different when an american president that we have witnessed or we have lived with or the americans used to say and

i quote, they say we shall send you the -- the -- the -- the -- the -- the -- work men. we shall send you the -- the -- and sandstorms and rolling thunder and shall send you poison throes to the libyan children. this was the logic. american refrused to -- we shall send you the rolling thunder like -- like the one was sent to vietnam. we shall send you the rolling thunder the same way that was sent vietnam and -- like it was

sandstorm like it was sent to iraq. we shall send you -- deny as it was sent to -- sent to egypt in '65 even though america was -- 56 even though america was against the operations and send you -- that they can -- they can send to the libyan children. can you imagine a president -- president of permanent country, a big country has a permanent seat, security council has the right to veto. we thought america would protect us and send us peace and what is it? these are -- guided bombs sent to us according to the -- airplane. this was the logic and we shall lead the war and we shall punish the war -- punish anyone -- punish anyone whether you like it or not, we shall punish

anyone who will be against us. now, what he said is completely different today. quote/unquote afforded this government or of the proliferation of nuclear weapons and we shall applaud that and america cannot solve the problem alone and the whole world should come together and he said that the position we are at now we shall not continue. we are making a speech it should not be like that. we accept it. we applaud it and then united nations also we have come here to -- united nations to talk against each other. it's true that we come here, we should have ql footing and equal unions and equal associations and then he says that the democracy not -- american president says we should impose democracy against iraq and so and so and so and so. he did say this is internal affairs of everybody. this was lost words and what --

what we hear right we hear righe sense of the word when he said that democracy cannot be imposed from our side. so we have to -- we have to be cautious and -- my sensitive remark on the whole -- the whole world has so many problems. all one. listen. listen. a world of so many problems should be like that. can't we have nations on equal footing? let's have an answer. anyone have an answer that it is better to have a world of so many -- why can't we have equal

standing? should have we have a bombs? should we have guns? why should we have a world of so many -- we accept -- we don't -- we do not accept that a world living not equal, big and small. the other point that is sensitive, the quarters of the united nations. please, can i have your attention? please, can i have your attention? all of you came across the atlantic, crossing the atlantic oceans, the asian continent, the african continent, to reach this place. why? is this jerusalem? is this the vatican?

is this mecca? all of you are tired having jet lag, suffering from jet lag, tired, had sleepless nights. and very tired and physically speaking you are -- one just arrived now. a flight 20 hours. and then you want him to make a speech and talk about this when all of you are asleep. all of you are tired. it is clear that all of you are lacking the energy because of having to travel a long journey. why do that? your country, now some of our countries are nighttime, and they are asleep. and now you should be asleep because your biological hour or your biological mind is accustomed to be asleep at this time. i wake up 4:00 new york time, before dawn, because in libya it

is 11:00 in the morning. because when i came up at 11:00 i am supposed to be there. 4:00, i am awake. think about it. if this was put in '45, should we keep it up till now? why can't we think about a place that is comfortable, the other point, america, the hosting country that bears the consequence -- the expenses and the looking after the headquarters and looking after the peace and security of heads of state who come here, very strict, and they spend a lot of money in new york and all of america being very tight. i want to relieve america from this hardship. we should thank america. and we say to america, thank you

for all of the problem and care. we say thanks to america. we want to honor america. we want to make america secure, new york secure. they should not have the responsibility to look after the security. perhaps somebody will do a -- a terrorist will make an explosion. and then this place is a target -- targeted by al qaeda. this very same place. the same building. if it was -- and why. that was beyond their power. the next target, that would be -- i'm not saying this out of the record. we have members of al qaeda being detained in libyan prisons. very scary. this makes america lives under tension and, perhaps, you never

know what will happen. perhaps america will be attacked by a rocket or perhaps -- we want america -- to relieve america from this worry. and we shall save the place -- a place where it is not targeted. now after 50 years, it should be taken to another part of the hemisphere. 50 years in the western hemisphere. now for the next 50 years it should be in the eastern hemisphere or in the middle hemisphere. now 60 or 40 years, now we have extra 14 years over the 50 years that the -- this is not any insult to america. this is a service to america. we should thank america. this was possible in 1945. but we should not accept it now. of course, this is -- this is

also put for vote in the general assembly. because article 23 of the agreement 64, it says that -- [ speaking in foreign language ]

>> translator: america has the right fo to make any tight security because america is tarted tart targeted by terrorists and al qaeda. they have the right to take security measure. we're not blaming america for that. we don't tolerate this. we don't have to come to new york. we don't have to be submitted to all these measures. one president told me that your co-pilot should not come to america because there are insurgents. he said how can i cross the atlantic without a kco-pilot? why? why? he doesn't have to. he doesn't have to come here. when another person complains that his guard cannot -- his only guard cannot come because there is some misunderstanding in his visa. one other president came, he said my own doctor, he couldn't get a visa and he cannot come to america because he was not granted an entry visa.

you see the security. the security is very strict. of course, if there is any problem that a country has with america, then they will put restrictions for the movement of the member delegations like in guantanamo. is this a member state or a prison in guantanamo that you cannot allow free movement? so this is what is submitted for voting for the united -- for the general assembly. the transformation or the moving of the headquarters. if 51% say, then we come to the second vote. to the middle of the globe or to the eastern part of the globe. if we say that we have to change

headquarters, then whether the middle -- whether the the central hemisphere, why don't we go to -- if you can't come even without a visa, once you come with a birth certificate to secure countries. we are not going to restrict you to 100 or 500 visas. libya has no -- against anybody. if the vote is, say, that we shall have to take it to the eastern part, then it would be in beijing, china, the capital of china or the capital city of india. and this is logical to me, my brothers. and i don't think there will be any objection to that. and then you will say that you thank me for this proposal for eliminating the suffering and the trouble of flying over 20

hours, over 10 hours to come to this place. and no one can blame america. can say that america will reduce its contributions. no. nobody should have this bad thought. america, i'm sure, will be committed to its international obligations and america will not be angry and america will thank you for e leaalleviating the hap of america. america should thank us for taking all the hardship and all the restrictions for the -- this, even though this place is targeted by terrorists. then we come to the -- we come to the issues that will -- that will be taken by the general assembly. we have to try ourselves. either we do the right thing or whether we have -- this is not a normal meeting. this is not a normal gathering.

this is -- even my son obama said, he said this is a historical one. this is not a normal gathering. this is not a normal one. now the wars that took place after the establishment of -- why did it happen? where was the united nations? there should be investigations. there should be court orders. and why there was massacres. we start with the korean war. this was taken after the establishment of the united nations. how a war broke out and millions of people fell victims, and perhaps there was even a nuclear -- a nuclear -- the war was about -- the world was about to witness a nuclear war. and those who are responsible and those who caused the war should be tried and should pay the consequence. then we come to the suez canal war in 1956.