finally, the late-night reviews are in on sarah palin's first overseas speech in hong kong. here's a sample -- >> today former alaska governor sarah palin gave a speech in china. that's right. yeah, the topic of her speech was, are you sure you're not japan? >> sarah palin, still a gift to late-night comedians. more of that on the "hardball sideshow." first, massachusetts governor deval patrick. thank you for your time. appreciate it. give me the degree of difficulty, if you could, one to ten, ten being the most difficult, in arriving who you chose to fill ted kennedy's senate seat? >> well, you know, mike, i give it probably an eight. you know, it's a headache in a way politically that i don't need, but i think when you think about the greater good, the interest of the commonwealth of massachusetts and the people -- people's interests who are being voted on in the next few weeks and months in the congress, we

need that second voice to help john kerry and to have a full complement of votes on those issues. so i think having the depth of talent, political talent that we do in massachusetts as you well know, and a very strong field of finalists, about six in number, half of them women, a couple of people of color as well, and thinking mainly about the need for stewardship, someone who will respect and continue the values and missions of ted kennedy, paul kirk is a perfect choice. >> and here was paul kirk earlier today, governor, if we could listen to this. >> it is a profound honor and i accept it with sincere humility. to also have the encouragement and support of his family that i be a voice and a voice and a vote for his causes and his

constituents in the senate that he loved is a blessing i can only repay by giving my very best efforts to be the best public servant i can be in the few months ahead. >> you know, governor, most people, everybody in politics actually and a lot of people in america are familiar, vaguely familiar, some very familiar, with the comedy show that took place in illinois with governor blagojevich. tell us, if you can, about any pressures that were brought to bear upon you by the family, the kennedy family, by the white house? or what kind of pressures did you feel in the course of coming up with paul kirk? >> well, i had lots of calls, you know. many that i initiated. some that were volunteered supporting either actual candidates, would-be candidates or rumored candidates. and i listened carefully to all of them. we did a certain amount of sort of standard vetting of, you know, background information and

affiliations and financial information to make sure that the individuals would be consistent with and compliant with the senate ethics rules. but as i say, mainly i was thinking about what is best for massachusetts? who's going to deliver on constituent needs? who's going to pay attention to transportation and education reform, to health care reform? who's going to pay attention to climate change and so forth? all of those issues. it's an unusual concentration of them that are important to massachusetts as they are to the nation that will be voted on in the next -- in the next few weeks. as i say, i think when you think about stewardship as being the main driving idea here, knowing that the people get to know in a special election and elect -- and choose their own senator in january of next year, stewardship was really what i was looking for. and paul kirk is a perfect steward. >> one last question on the senate seat before i'd like to talk to you about health care a bit. why paul kirk and not former governor dukakis?

>> well, like i said, we've got a lot of political talent. i love mike dukakis. i think he brings a lot to the table. when you think about all of the factors and contributions and, again, this point of stewardship, i think paul kirk is the right one. i prefer to talk about why him than why not -- why not others. there is a -- there is one thing i will say that is so -- has been so humbling about this experience, and that is looking at this extraordinary field of candidates, and appreciating their deep sense of service. and that was certainly true of mike dukakis as it was of paul kirk as it was of the other finalists. >> you know, the health care debate that's going on now in the senate and in the house in washington, that has consumed the nation. it's consumed much of the country with all of the town hall meetings this past summer. massachusetts health care reform that was initiated several years ago that joined former governor mitt romney and the late senator

kennedy, how is that working out? how is that working out? >> well, look, we are probably further along than any other state in the country in terms of health care reform. it is very much a public/private hybrid approach. 97-plus percent of our residents are now insured with reliable, affordable health care. we are tackling now the issues of cost. but the overall, the costs added to our state budget is about 1%. so it hasn't been a budget buster. it's a challenge during these economic times, as everything is. but it's been enormously important to us, and i think it has offered a lot of lessons for the national debate as well. >> but in terms of the cost, i mean, haven't -- haven't you had to deal with eliminating some people from the health care provisions of the bill because of costs? >> well, that was a proposal, mike, as you know in the budget, and as we negotiated and the population that was suggested be taken out is a population of

legal residents, tax paying, working members of our community. we came up with a compromise so that we could continue to cover those individuals who should be covered in any system that is about universal care. so i'm very proud of that. but i will say this -- you know, what we learned, maybe two lessons that we learned from the national debate, if i may make them, that came from massachusetts, one here is we decided we had something better than or more than the usual two choices, which was between a perfect solution and no solution at all. and so we tried something. and the other lesson of all of this is that that broad coalition of providers and advocates and hospitals, doctors and insurers and so forth and policymakers that came together to invent this experiment have stayed together to make adjustments as we've gone along. and i think that will be necessary, both of those lessons will be important on the federal level as well.

>> you know, speaking about the national debate, race has been injected into several elements of it, the national debate. most recently by former president carter. i have paid attention to your career. i watched you run for governor, and i think that you were an african-american when you ran for governor, as was barack obama when he ran for president. >> before, yes, indeed. >> what's your take on former president carter's take on it, on race in american politics with regard to the president, what's your personal take on it? >> well, look, race is with us in this country. i think we always struggle to strike a balance between acknowledging the extraordinary progress we've made in this country, much of it during my lifetime. i'm 53. really incredible transformations. and at the same time acknowledging that we still have work to do. that is a balance that we i think in this country struggle

with. some people say nothing is happening. and other people say it's all over. we still have work to do. i think there are high and broad emotions on both sides of the health care debate. and i'm not at all convinced that all of that is driven or even much of it is driven by race. i think that it has to do with -- a whole lot to do with the unknown. and that for many people, we're talking about stepping out into new territory. but that new territory is about the greater good, and i think that what has been great about this country at moments of our greatness, has been when we have acknowledged the greater good and we have linked arms across all kinds of differences and stepped forward. and i think that's what's at stake right now with the health care debate, and i think we'll get there. >> when you say the unknown, what do you mean by the unknown? >> well, i think an awful lot of people haven't seen up close what we're doing in massachusetts, which is bringing both private sector and public

sector together to try to address the question of the uninsured, and then the question of how we get system costs down and pass those savings on to premium payers. those are enormous challenges facing individuals and companies and families all across the country, governments, too, for that matter. and the notion of trying to solve it in a -- in sort of a hybrid fashion by coming together is unfamiliar to a lot of people. but i think that is what the president and the congress are working towards. i think it is a very, very worthy goal, and because we've tried it in massachusetts and have had tremendous success with it, it's not so scary for us, and i hope it won't be in the end for the american people. >> one last question. on the coming together thing, we keep hearing every time something occurs, the election of barack obama, your election, your campaign for re-election, when race is discussed, everybody says, well, it's going to be nice because now we're

finally going to have a good national conversation about race. i don't think we ever had one. do you? do you think we've -- >> not really. not really. in some ways we're hungry for it, and in other ways we're not entirely ready for it. but it will come. i think the most important thing is to acknowledge that race is with us but it doesn't explain everything that goes wrong in my life, private or political, or in the lives of other people of color and people of color know that, by the way. and i think most of the general population does as well. >> governor deval patrick, thank you so much for your time. we appreciate it. >> thank you. coming up -- president obama says he wants a new era of engagement with the world. will the world engage with him? you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc. national car rental knows i'm picky.

so, at national, i go right past the counter... and you get to choose any car in the aisle. choose any car? you cannot be serious! okay. seriously, you choose. go national. go like a pro. when it comes to italian sauce, some people prefer this jar. but more people prefer this sauce. winner of the blind taste test. the sweet and savory taste of prego. it's in there.

a sanctuary. a command center. ( both revving ) a sophisticated sedan. a sports car. together. nissan maxima, the four-door sports car. now get a new nissan maxima for 0% apr financing

welcome back to "hardball." president obama drew a sharp contrast with his predecessor george w. bush and came to the united nations general assembly this week seeking to usher in a new era of diplomacy. here's what he said -- >> those who used to chastise america for acting alone in the world cannot now stand by and wait for america to solve the world's problems alone. we have sought in word and deed a new era of engagement with the world, and now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges. >> but can the president get world leaders to work with him on countering iran's nuclear ambitions, solving middle east peace and stabilizing afghanistan?

tony blankley is a syndicated columnist and former press secretary to newt gingrich. and jennifer palmieri is the with the center for american progress. tony, i heard a rumor today that you had actually said -- today, some very nice things about president obama's appearance before the u.n. what's the story? >> well, don't take it too far. i read his remarks a number of times overnight because i think that he's saying more than just he's going to be better than bush. i think he is suggesting that the great power diplomacy that america has practiced really since world war ii, where we wandered around the world, pushed people around, told people how to act, sold our values, that time is is over. now we're going to push back and be in a cooperative approach to solve the world's problems and advancing our interests. so it will be fascinating to see how that plays out. already the question will be, what is he going to accomplish at the g-20 tomorrow?

well, based on his formula now, it's not up to him. it's up to china and germany and japan and everybody else to work cooperatively together. but i do think this is an more than important moment and we shouldn't just judge his tactics by our old strategy because he's suggesting something different. >> jennifer, this is a new president. it's a new presidency. there are a whole range of problems that aren't new. you just heard tony's assessment of the speech. what's yours? >> i think i take a slightly different view of what obama was trying to achieve than i think what tony laid out. the way that i heard that was that in the short time he's been president is he's done what he can to restore the world's faith in the united states. and i think that he was calling them out, if you will, and saying, you no longer have the excuse of saying the united states is uncooperative, and you no longer have the excuse of saying the united states won't listen to anyone. we have shown by closing guantanamo, we have shown by

banning torture, that this is a different -- this is a presidency that is going to have a different approach in dealing with the rest of the world. but these are your responsibilities, too. and it was easy for some of these countries during the bush administration to say, well, the united states isn't listening to us. they're not going to cooperate so we're not going to cooperate with them on afghanistan or whatever it may be, and i think he was challenging them to say that you're going to need to step up to the plate, too. but not saying that it's not the united states' problem. it certainly is. >> tony, you've been around a while and you've been around a couple of presidents and more than a few speakers of the house. so you can -- my theory is, you can only dance on someone else's dime for so long. and now president obama is at the point where in his administration, it's his war in afghanistan. it's his problem, israelis and palestinians. it's his situation in north korea. what does he do? >> yes, it's wonderful.

i think saying he's not bush is not enough anymore. and it's not going to be enough for the g-20. the first two times in april people were glad he wasn't bush and now he has to be obama, whoever that is. but, yes, i mean, i was saying this morning at another place that i -- i wonder whether the president is really going to listen to and take the recommendation from the pentagon. i said it reminded me a little bit of jack kennedy after the bay of pigs. before he took the advice of the general and found out that wasn't so great and started making up his mind afterwards, particularly in the cuban missile crisis. obama hasn't had a bay of pigs. but i wonder if he hasn't shifted and decided that he's not going to simply take the advice of the establishment in this town. he's got his own vision of where he wants to take the country and he's going to do it substantially on his own authority and his own judgment. so i'm not convinced he's going to go into afghanistan. i think he may very well decide to try to take a path that

doesn't have more troops and gets out pretty quickly and takes the consequences -- take the consequences of contradicting what he had said only a few weeks ago. >> jennifer, tony's clearly referencing the general mccrystal's report to the white house that was leaked sunday and monday actually to "the washington post" and bob woodard. who do you figure leaked it? what element of the government leaked it? and why do you think they leaked it? off of tony's view, which i'm inclined to agree with, by the way. >> i'm inclined to agree with tony's view as well. it feels like the white house is building up to not doing -- not accepting at least in total mccrystal's recommendations. and i worked -- i worked in the white house for eight years under bill clinton and predicting -- trying to figure out where relief comes from is a very perilous business. it does feel like the military may have done that to try to force the president's hand.

but i think the white house has been very clear that even though mccrystal, that his military recommendations are what they are, they are based on the theory that there's a functioning afghani partner, functioning afghani government, and they've made i think clear and when they talk about how they're trying to make this decision, that they're concerned that's not the case and you need to have a functioning partner in order for the military strategy to work. they don't feel like they're going to be bullied into this by the military pressuring them to make this decision. as he may have tried to do with other democratic presidents. and i think that tony's right in that this president seems to be willing to step back and say, i'm not just taking the military advice. i'm looking at the whole picture in understanding that there's a lot more at play here. >> you know, i think more interesting than who leaked it is how "the washington post" has discussed it this week. they had an editorial earlier this week which was as sarcastic an editorial i have seen "the post" charge at an republican, even with a democratic president. they were very concerned with

obama slipping away. they said, doesn't he remember what he said two weeks ago? doesn't he remember what he said two months ago? so what you have is the great liberal institution of "the washington post" chastising the president sarcastically for fear that he's going to slip away from what his commitment is. >> and the same paper who criticized bush for not reacting to facts on the ground and being stubborn. >> what's interesting, when they attack a democratic president. it's interesting. >> they love to attack a democratic president. >> you know, last element here, tony and jennifer, what is really interesting nugget, at least to me and i think maybe out in the country, is that you clearly have a difference of opinion between vice president biden's assessment of afghanistan and what is supposedly the administration's assessment of afghanistan. where do you think that's headed? >> i think it's not as clean as that. biden's plan, which by the way hasn't fully been leaked yet. i think we need to hear a more complete leak to understand it,

is essentially a withdrawal from afghanistan and doing some stuff regarding pakistan. but i think the general jones is very questionable about supporting what was the president's plan. it's not even clear that hillary clinton, secretary of state, who has taken the more hawkish position, is definitely on that side. i sense a general retreat on the part of this administration from the position that it held into a few weeks ago. and i don't think it's because of the election. because everybody knew it was going to be corrupt. we were all on tv before the election saying, how are they going to deal with a corrupt election? so this is nothing new. >> jennifer palmieri, with one last word quickly. go ahead. >> i think it wasn't anything we haven't brought into this discussion was that the president is reacting to just how facts change on the ground. and i think that you do want the decision-making process that is constantly taking into account how the realities on the ground are changing and i think that's what's behind from the mccrystal policy that they put forward in march and reconsidering now,

mccrystal thinks he needs more troops to get it done and the president is deciding if what the facts on the ground are now, if that's what's warranted to do. to have this kind of checking at this point seems like a smart and responsible thing to do, not a change in strategy. >> i'm for keeping talking. jennifer palmieri and tony blankley, thanks very much. up next -- a late-night comics have a field day on sarah palin's speech in hong kong. that's next on the "sideshow." you're watching msnbc. new >> she was very tough on president obama. she attacked president obama on foreign soil. i'm sure the women who attacked the dixie chicks will be going after her. in the shower? if you're using other moisturizing body washes, you might as well be. you see, their moisturizer sits on top of skin, almost as if you're wearing it. only new dove deep moisture has nutriummoisture, a breakthrough formula with natural moisturizers... that can nourish deep down. it's the most effective natural nourishment ever.

new dove deep moisture with nutriummoisture. superior natural nourishment for your skin. welwas shopping for ♪ which one's me - a cool convertible or an suv? ♪ with nutriummoisture. ♪ too bad i didn't know my credit was whack ♪ ♪ 'cause now i'm driving off the lot in a used sub-compact. ♪ ♪ f-r-e-e, that spells free credit report dot com, baby. ♪ ♪ saw their ads on my tv ♪ thought about going but was too lazy ♪ ♪ now instead of looking fly and rollin' phat ♪ ♪ my legs are sticking to the vinyl ♪ ♪ and my posse's getting laughed at. ♪ ♪ f-r-e-e, that spells free- credit report dot com, baby. ♪ teeth. check. bottom. needs work. sorry, son. introducing new charmin ultra strong. its new enhanced diamondweave texture is soft and more durable. more durable so you're left with a more dependable clean. fewer pieces left behind. bottom. check. [ female announcer ] and that charmin softness.

new charmin ultra strong. look for it in the new red package. for those who prefer moist wipes, try new charmin freshmates for a cleaner clean.

back to "hardball." time for the "sideshow." first up, palin mania. you can bet the late-night shows were happy to have sarah palin back in the headlines. here are the reviews of palin's big speeches overseas. >> today former alaskan governor sarah palin gave a speech in china.

that's right. yeah, the topic of her speech was, are you sure you're not japan? >> she was very tough on president obama. she attacked president obama on foreign soil. while i'm sure the people that went after the dixie chicks will be going after her right now. >> the people who heard the speech said it was articulate. it was well prepared. it was compelling. a year late. but -- and if it was that good, i'm thinking it must have been tina fey. >> that's what happened. >> that's great. next up, hammer time. mr. tom delay, known as the hammer back when he was house majority leader, made his debut on "dancing with the stars" earlier this week with a routine set to, what else? "wild thing." though delay earned a respectable 16 out of 30 for that performance, he was on the show's chopping block last night. >> tom on monday your cha-cha to

"wild thing" left carrie ann and good portions of the nation speechless. do the viewers want to see more? the next couple definitely safe to dance next week is -- tom and cheryl. >> yes! he stays in. let's see what old twinkle toes tommy comes up with next week. time now for tonight's "big number." when soon to be senator paul kirk of massachusetts is sworn in tomorrow, how many appointees in total will be serving in the united states senate? with replacements already in for former senators obama, biden, clinton, salazar and martinez, that makes six appointees. doesn't come close to the record, though. in the 1940s, 13 appointees served at one time. at any rate, we've got six appointees serving in the united states senate right now. that's tonight's "big number."

up next -- after the white house pressured new york's struggling governor david paterson not to run for election, paterson strikes back, blaming the president's governing style for his own misfortune. is paterson really a match for obama, and should obama be taking sides in the democratic primary fight? you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc. (music plays) boy: is that your new car? uh...yeah. boy: cool. thanks. i knew i wanted the new subaru legacy. i went back and forth on the hood scoop. but i'm glad i went for it.

the all-new subaru legacy. feel the love. the all-new subaru legacy. get wrapped up in the luscious taste of butternut squash, blended with delicate herbs. v8 golden butternut squash. from campbell's. a soup so velvety and delicious you won't be able to contain yourself. campbell's v8 soups. you know why i sell tools? tools are uncomplicated? nothing complicated about a pair of 10 inch hose clamp pliers. you know what's complicated? shipping. shipping's complicated. not really. with priority mail flat rate boxes from the postal service shipping is easy. if it fits, it ships anywhere in the country for a low flat rate. that's not complicated. come on. how about...a handshake. alright. priority mail flat rate boxes only from the postal service. a simpler way to ship. now your card comes with a way to plan for what matters to you. introducing blueprint. blueprint is free and only for chase customers.

it lets you choose what purchases you want to pay in full to avoid interest...with full pay. and those you split... you decide how to pay over time. if having a plan matters. chase what matters.

here's what's happening. foed ral authorities have officially indicted an afghan national living near denver on terror charges. he's accused of plotting to build and set off bombs in the united states. he recently bought bomb-making materials. zazi allegedly attending al

qaeda explosive training in afghanistan. michael fenton allegedly drove a car packed with what he thought were explosives into the building's garage, tried to set them off. but fbi agents had already replaced those explosives with inactive replicas. seven people, including north carolina resident daniel boyd, has been charged with plotding a terrorist attack on u.s. soil. boyd and his associates may have been planning an assault on a marine base in quantico, virginia. back to "hardball." welcome back to "hard boil." hard boil? that's good. "hardball," how about that? turmoil in the new york's governor race is drawing in president obama and involving

some of the biggest names in politics, including andrew cuomo, rudy giuliani, even caroline kennedy. with a 17% approval rating, new york state governor david paterson would be a huge liability atop the democratic slate in 2010. white house advisers are concerned he could drag down the whole party in new york. they'd like him to go but he's standing firm, and he will make his case this sunday on "meet the press." what's going on here? joining us, "the new york post" great fred dicker and new york one's dominic fred carter. fred, you have been covering new york and politics in new york since al smith was governor, i think. >> your hero, mike. >> that's exactly right. my basic question to you is how crazy is this stuff? >> you know, the last three years here in new york, mike, have been extraordinary. so is it equal to say eliot spitzer announcing that the sheriff of wall street is also a patronizer of prostitutes? i'm not sure it's at that level.

but this is extraordinary. but in my three decades at the capital, i'm have not seen anything like it. we have a governor being widely described as being in the political death throes. and it does look that way. >> being widely describe in the political death throes is one thing but what about his balance, just his equilibrium in terms -- his mental equilibrium in dealing with this stuff. >> well, yesterday he looked like he was melting down in front of the public. it was like a statewide therapy session as he declared he never wanted this job. well, if he didn't want the job, why are you saying now that you want to run for election next year? why are you prepared to defy the president? i mean, he's been contradictory in many ways. he does not have a good reputation. he's known for mendacity, for flip humor in inappropriate times. most importantly, he's widely seen as you noted in the intro by the people of new york as a failure as governor. he's now the least popular governor in the united states. that has to do with his

policies, his appointments, his style, and even the president of the united states is, as extraordinary as that is, recognizes what a liability he is for democrats, and that is absolutely true. >> hey, dominic, let's play this out in terms of some other characters here, because it seems, at least according to news reports, fred dicker is reporting in "the new york post" today there's a lot of finger-pointing going on in albany, from the governor, even from his wife trying to drag andrew cuomo into this. what's your read on it? >> mike, i just want to be clear about this before answering the question. and you were right in your introduction because no one knows the state legislature of new york better than fred dicker does. the man is an expert. so with that said, you know, for the governor's wife, michelle, to comment on this, it was a little bit surprising, mike, given that she has not had much to say about political matters. but one would expect for her to defend her husband.

she's been an active first lady in terms of social issues. but the handwriting is on the wall. you said it in the introduction. 17% approval rating. whether you like it or not, or agree with it or not, all the white house did was express to the governor the will of the people based on the polls, that it's basically over. anything can happen, but it's not looking good for david paterson. >> fred, would you be surprised if -- if governor paterson went on "meet the press" this sunday and said, you know, i'm done. i'm pulling the plug. i'm not going to be on the ballot? >> i wouldn't be all that surprised. although i think the timing would be surprising. i wish he would do it in "the new york post" if he's going to do it and not give it nbc. with that said -- >> or new york. >> new york one. absolutely. we should note that about a month and a half ago, the governor was nice enough to cite dominic carter and myself as his leading enemies in the press corps, apparently ignoring the fact he's brought this on himself.

and a year ago, he was a very popular governor. just quickly the expectation is he will make up his mind in consultation with his family, his wife, famous father, probably sometime between thanksgiving and christmas. that it's probably still a couple of months away before he decides. >> dominic, fred just informs us that the governor, in addition to awful his other issues, has an enemy's list, like nixon used to have an enemy's list and you two guys are on it. so my question to you is i think i heard earlier in the week that congressman charlie rangel is sort of supporting the governor. sort of saying, cut it out. leave him alone. he's going to be okay. if that's true, how can that be? >> well, keep in mind the so-called gang of four in harlem, mike, in terms of rangel has a long-standing relationship with the governor's father. but i just want to point out that i have been told by two people with direct knowledge that claim that this also has a lot to do with the white house -- it's payback time as

far as how it all went down with caroline kennedy. this is the governor that came in with great, great promise. good approval numbers. one can make a case that for a while he was on top of the world. but his indecisiveness, the caroline kennedy mess, it's been -- it just hasn't been good for david paterson at all. >> fred, i can understand that story line. but i don't buy it. given the fact that the governor becomes governor and like within a week, he's having a press conference announcing that both he and his wife have had extramarital affairs, immediately the thing goes off the trolley tracks. so tell me now, andrew cuomo, rudy giuliani, what's your best assessment? what are they going to run for next year, if anything? >> well, i think the white house was trying to prevent giuliani from getting in the race by singling -- signaling early that andrew cuomo is going to be the nominee and he's their preferred nominee. i think it's going to work. the sense is rudy giuliani just does not have the fire in the belly. certainly doesn't want to take on andrew cuomo.

so i think we're going to have a pretty easy race next year for the next democratic governor of new york, if that all holds true. >> dominic, what's your assessment? you have a senate seat up next year, too. >> i agree. andrew cuomo, it appears, may be the democratic nominee. and if that's the case, and let me just make this quick point, mike, as far as mr. cuomo, it's one thing as attorney general that he has to be careful about because you get to pick and choose your issues. it's another thing when you're the governor of the state. but with that said, it looks like cuomo will likely run, it looks that way, and will be the nominee. if that's the case, in all likelihood, giuliani will not run. >> you guys are great. and you have a great job, both of you. you get to cover the big apple circus, the zoo every single day. >> you can say that again, mike. >> we're watching the disintegration of new york. >> well, that's sad. but, you know, there's a certain amount of accuracy to that. fred dicker, dominic carter, thank you very much. we appreciate it. up next -- bill clinton's media blitz. can he sell health care reform

better than president obama? the "politics fix" is next. and this sunday on "meet the press," david gregory will interview both bill clinton and the aforementioned new york governor david paterson. that's sunday on "meet the press." welcome to progressive. how may i help you? i'm looking for a deal on car insurance. i think i might have a coupon in here. there's an easier way. we've got the "name your price" option. you do? follow me. you tell us how much you want to pay, and we'll build you a policy that fits your budget. and i still get great coverage? uh-huh. go ahead. you're the boss. i'm the boss of savings. more like the c.e.o. oh, oh. no glass ceiling. the freedom to name your price. now, that's progressive. call or click today. how to get rich, by america's health insurance companies. raise health insurance premiums 4 times faster than wages. pay your ceo twenty four million dollars a year. deny payment for 1 out of every 5

treatments doctors prescribe. if the insurance companies win, you lose. tell congress to rewrite the story. we want good health care we can afford with the choice of a public health insurance option. coming up -- the republican party is getting the big boost from donors. does that mean bad news for the democrats in 2010 midterms? the "politics fix" is next when "hardball" returns. my inner-workings a work of art. a digestive tract that should be bronzed. and an immune system so stunning... [ low growl ] my vet thinks i'm the eighth wonder of the world. [ female announcer ] introducing iams with prebiotics. prebiotics work inside, clinically proven to promote strong defenses. healthy inside... healthy outside. [ dog ] oh hi girls, nice day, huh? i am an iams dog. [ female announcer ] learn more about prebiotics at iams.com.

we're back. here's what joe conason wrote this week in the daily beast, a terrific website, by the way, about bill clinton. quote, in short, clinton is doing global business as usual, and as usual, he is mocking the widespread predictions last winter that his wife's new role as secretary of state would somehow sideline him and his foundation or that he would prove to be an irritant to her

and president obama, end quote. joe conason joins us now, along with thewashingtonpost.com chris cillizza for the "politics fix." gentlemen, i would like both of you to listen to what president clinton -- he was on with larry king, you know, first-time caller from pomona, earlier this week. let's listen. >> and they somehow believe that miraculously we should be the only rich country in the world that can't figure out how to cover everybody and keep shoveling literally $900 billion a year at health care. you think about how much our deficit is today. think about how much we're at a competitive disadvantage with other countries in manufacturing. we're throwing $900 billion away in health care that has nothing to do with good health and doesn't even cover everybody. so the people that are getting the big chunk of that money don't want to give it up and they're ready to stoke all of these fires. that's the fight barack obama wants. he wants to fight this on the merits, and i respect that and he's right about it.

>> joe conason, right there you had the former president of the united states in about 35 seconds sort of giving an outline of the health care reform issues. i think in a far more cogent way than the incumbent president has. what's going on with bill clinton? >> well, you know, bill clinton i think really does support president obama's attempt to reform health care. he said it many times. he's supported the public option in some of his remarks. and i think he does have a great talent for summing up and helping people understand the issues from his perspective. i mean, that's always just been true of him, mike. this week at his clinton global initiative, he asked the chilean president, michelle bachelet, he was talking how they cover nerve chile, he said how much is the per capita income in your country? she said, $13,500 a year and he laughed. he said, boy, if i were a member

of congress i would be ashamed that you can do it and we can't. >> and what joe just said what happened at the global initiative this week and president clinton's performance with larry king, extended performance as well, it makes you wonder is there something larger for former president clinton to do on behalf of the obama administration, because he's pretty good at this stuff? >> you know, mike, whether you like him or don't like him, and there are a lot of people in both of those camps, the guy is a very gifted communicator. i remember in iowa -- this is probably a week and a half, two weeks before the caucuses that his wife came in third, for one full hour -- he was one full hour late and then he spoke for one full hour without stop. the guy delivered a captivating address. no one got up

yeah, that makes sense, i never thought of it that way. that's his unique gift. but, of course, with bill bad. he does carry some negatives from his time, although those are fading, but -- as a president. he:/b8ú does carry some negativ from his time during the"q+ñ presidential campaign, though those are fading. or all bad. mt,sx he is clearly among if no the best communicator in the democratic party or.fqdp in pol in general about personalize being it, aboutp people's everyday lives, taking these dry factoids and$/c@u say this matters to you and here is why. >> i agree with that assessment, chris.thf@ and joe, given the fact, first president is a highly-skilled communicator. there is no doubt about that. we have the proof of it in the fact that)] >> that's correct. >> but former president clinton, wayb#wh of taking all of these complexy,yñ issues-@&t.z and right downx9÷pí÷ sidewalk level where people nod their heads and say, oh, i get it.

what could bill clinton, do you think, whatsb( could he do for think, whatsb( coul0 e do for can't do for himself? the white house, i might , sending president clinton out to speak about health care reform in some of luqe representatives and senators who are pushing back against it. especially democrats. i/dna mean, i think, you know, privately, i know he's talked to some democrats about this. and his home state and ÷svñ elsewhere. why they should be supporting health care reform. maybe one would turn up the heat a little bit and say, you know ñ speech or some state wherenty there's who need to be persuaded gently to change7$o a little bit. >> you v=gknow, mike, i would j take -- i think joe is exactly right. i would take it one step further and i wou%ap take it from gentl

persuasion to more aggressive persuasion. if you look attaykyañ who the w house has in terms of communicators, they don't have tim kaine clearly notblvñj"z comfortable in that role. howard dean, who is more comfortable isn't in a position to do it. president obama shouldn't be doing 0rñit. bill clinton has shown over the years,r4! he's very much willio deliver those sortstú5á of atta and the truth of politics is, it's just not all candyfl÷óéxvj lollipops and happiness. sometimes you have to say it's either this or it's that. bill clinton has shown a willingness to do it, and has shown an effectiveness most of the 4a obviously, he slipped up badly in south carolina in termshv of attack. but he is someone who could be that attack dog, and i don't sa% delivers that negative messaging thatc(c some of these members ì% a little differently. i would say what he could do is z places and asks the questions that are hard to answer.

why are you defending this system? why are you defending ap",o sy that doesn't cover everyone, that delivers worst outcomes in other countries that cover want to preserve? and those are hard questions for a lot of politiczh, to answer now. >> we'rehl":g going to be back v fix," you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc. eep. because the better you sleep, the better you feel. sea salts vary in color and taste. one tops them all. adding it helps us use less salt than before in campbell's tomato soup while keeping the famous flavor. ♪ so many, many reasons ♪ it's so m'm! m'm! good! ♪

getting an early flu shot is the best thing you can do... to protect you and your loved ones from the flu. it's also one of the easiest things you can do...

because walgreens is now offering seasonal flu shots... every day of the week with convenient hours guaranteed. so you can just stop in. our 16,000 dedicated pharmacists... and take care clinic nurse practitioners... are waiting to help you beat the flu... in neighborhoods nationwide. at walgreens we want you to know, there's a way to stay well.

q#ñ)5fl÷ back w

!s chris, you follow politics the way i follow the american league wild card.ífbs >> is that a good thing? >> yeah, i think it is a gook th me, i know that. today governor patrick in@gñq88 ⌟ kennedy ally,irhgñ to the unite senate. of that leaves people in5(c