Skip to main content

tv   The Rachel Maddow Show  MSNBC  December 7, 2009 9:00pm-10:00pm EST

9:00 pm
restaurants, van starts arocking. so she helped him change a tire? oh, you mean -- oh! try to get to sleep with that tiger woods slapping image in your head, by the way. thanks, appledaily. that's countdown for this, the 2,412th day since the previous president declared mission accomplished in iraq. i'm keith olbermann. good night and good luck. now, again, trying to steer out of my skid, with the latest on the health care reforms with senator ron wyden, here's rachel maddow. >> keith, how long do you think it is before we have to start hiring teams of animators in order to get news stories across on our shows? >> look over your shoulder. what was all that noise from the newsroom before? they're installing the equipment now. >> thank you, keith. i hope they're union. thanks to you at home for staying with us for the next hour. all right, the single most ridiculous ad of the anti-health care reform campaign has materialized.
9:01 pm
have you seen this yet? retire the prize. melissa lacewell harris will be here with her analyst of the "i must be a racist campaign." and the climate change summit kicks off in copenhagen and america is well represented by former bush administration officials all set to deny the whole problem exists. and we're preparing for tomorrow night's appearance on this show by the man who cures people from being gay by cuddling them. his teachings may have influenced uganda's homicidal anti-gay proposal. and tonight, there is videotape of the man in action. oh, yes, much, much, much more all to come, but we begin tonight with the exciting formation of a new gang in washington, d.c. it's not often that the emergence of a gang in a major american city can be described as good news, but in this case, it may actually be good news, at least for the prospects of getting health reform passed this year. senate majority leader harry reid has commissioned a new senate gang, called the gang of
9:02 pm
ten, which is currently holding secret closed-door meeting to forge a compromise that would allow the senate to pass health reform. now, this gang stuff can admittedly get a little bit confusing over time, but it doesn't have to be confusing. for example, this new gang of ten is not to be confused with the gang of six. that was six conservative senators on the finance committee who had tried to forge consensus on health reform earlier this year. this new gang is also not to be confused with the gang of 14. that was the 14 conservative senators who tried to stop judicial filibusters during the bush administration. this new gang, also not to be confused with the gang of four. that would be the radical proponents of china's murderous cultural revolution. all four were arrested in 1976. this new gang, also not to be confused with the other gang of four, the awesome british post punk bands. ♪
9:03 pm
we really have a disco ball, all this time? sorry. no, this new gang is not is awesome british post punk band or the 1970s widow of mow gang, or max baucus' gang of six, or the save the filibusters gang of 14. no, this is the brand-spanking new gang of ten. ten democratic senators picked to meet in the capital to save health reform. recently, when liberals have heard about new gangs in the senate, it's a bad thing, because generally speaking, it's conservative democrats agreeing to make democratic policy more conservative. see, the gang of six in the senate finance committee. that's how we got the public option bargained away in the first place. but this new gang is not a plot to get conservative democrats to
9:04 pm
bargain away democratic goals to republicans. this new gang actually includes liberals. it's five liberal democratic senators. chuck schumer, jay rockefeller, sherrod brown, tom harkin, russ feingold paired with five conservative democratic senators. ben nelson, blanche lincoln, mary landrieu, tom carper and mark pryor. it's thought their job might be to find a compromise on the public option. in its current form, as you know, the public option has been whittled down to basically nothing. not nothing, but pretty close. it would only cover about 1% of americans, about 2 million or 3 million people. it would only be available in states that choose to allow it. it wouldn't be able to negotiate cheaper waits the way that programs like medicare do. and its premiums would be expected to be more expensive than private insurance. still, connecticut senator joe lieberman says he will filibuster all of health reform and block any reform at all if even that lame public option
9:05 pm
stays in. liberals on the gang of ten may, therefore, have been charged with bargaining to get some progressive concessions in exchange for the now super compromised weak public option. if that's true, what might they get in return for it? well, among the ideas that have been floated so far are expanding medicare. medicare is so popular among the people who are on it now that republicans have recently been put in the awkward position of defending it, after having attacked it for generations. right now, you can only get medicare if you're age 65 or older. sam stine at huffing ton post reporting today that one idea being floated to inspire some progressive faith in health care reform again would be to lower medicare eligibility age to 60 or 55. another option out there is giving more americans access to the choices that members of congress have for health insurance. a government negotiated plan available in the health insurance exchange that would be run by a private insurer. this current debate isn't by any
9:06 pm
stretch of the imagination a liberal debate. if it were, we'd be talking about what kind of single payer system we're going to have or what kind of fully nationalized health care system we'd have. we're not talking about that. but what is being considered right now, and more importantly, who's doing the considering, tells you that at least relatively speaking, compared to the rest of this debate and how it's gone, liberals are wielding some power right now. as republicans continue to stay legislatively irrelevant in the health care fight, liberals have been busy going after conservatives in their own ranks. conservative democrats. like, say, joe lieberman, who now finds himself under attack from the progressive change campaign committee. and the party he started that abandoned the connecticut for lieberman party. >> as chair of the connecticut for lieberman party, i would like to explain joe lieberman's opposition to the public health insurance option. we know that connecticut voters support it three to one. but joe never forgets who he ran to represent, himself.
9:07 pm
see, connecticut for lieberman, not vice versa. so joe has a message for democrats and all the voters who want him to support the public option. it's not about you. it's all about joe. >> that's what it looks like when liberals push back. then there's conservative democratic senator ben nelson, who introduced his big anti-abortion amendment today, which, among other things, allows women to buy separate abortion coverage. mr. nelson got verbally smacked down by a number of his female democratic colleagues shortly after introducing it. >> what an insulting, humiliating thing to say, if you want an abortion, go buy a rider. i think it demonizes women. why don't you go into the workplace and pay a scarlet letter on your head. hawthorne still lives in the nelson amendment. >> this amendment would be the biggest rowback to a woman's right to choose in decades. we didn't ask for this fight,
9:08 pm
madame president. we didn't plan for this fight. we don't want this fight. >> right now liberals appear to be exerting some influence on this health reform debate, at long last. the question is, what will that yield? joining us now is democratic senator ron wyden of oregon. he's a member of the senate finance committee. senator wyden, thanks very much for coming back on the show. nice to see you. >> thank you, rachel. >> let me talk to you about your assessment of the public option. in your view, is the public option so weak right now that liberals maybe should try to trade it away for something more meaningful? >> it certainly has been getting weaker. the fact of the matter is progressives have been working all across the country for a public option that isn't just an empty label. the whole point of the public option is to turn the tables on the insurance lobby, to put the consumer in the driver's seat, to stop these anti-competitive practices. so we are going to negotiate, particularly tomorrow.
9:09 pm
there's an effort to try to get an agreement tomorrow. i hope that's possible. but this is on a fast track. we've got a good group of people at the table. progressives are well represented. and at the end of the day, we want to be able to give an ultimatum to the insurance industry, which is, in effect, you treat the consumer right or they're going to take their business somewhere else. >> it's hard for those of us who are trying to watch this from outside with washington, who are not part of the senate and not on senate staff, it's hard for us to know what exactly the dynamics are inside the debate. are you saying that the dynamics are such that the public option could get stronger? from outside washington, it feels like the public option might go away. >> the people that are at the table, you listed a number of progressives, or people who have fought in the trenches for the grassroots of this country. they have put a lot of time in this. they've been spending their political capital, mobilizing folks in their communities. these are not people who are going to go quietly into the night. the idea of just taking what we have today, this network of
9:10 pm
private insurance companies that engage in outrageous practices and slapping some sticker on it and calling it a public option, that's not going to be acceptable to the progressive folks who are at the table. we are going to insist on real reform and i believe we've got a good chance to get it. >> would you support the idea of medicare being made available to people who are younger than age 65? >> i'm certainly open that. here are some of the issues. first of all, rachel, we've got to understand, folks between 55 and 64 today -- and 65 are essentially in a world of hurt. i mean, many of them are faced layoffs in a tough economy. they get discriminated against in the insurance market, certainly giving them a boost makes some sense. the only consideration i have is i don't want to forget about somebody who's 47 or 48. i mean, if we can make sure that there's real reform in the private insurance market and get some help for those who are over 55, but before medicare, that would be real reform. >> on the issue of abortion, your colleague, senator ben
9:11 pm
nelson, did introduce his anti-abortion amendment in the senate today. it mirrors the one that had been passed by the house. does abortion still have the potential to really blow up unity in the democratic caucus? >> look, we are a big tent. we are stretching that tent to try to make sure that we get everybody under it. ben nelson is very sincere in his views, but i'm against the amendment. i think it is a slippery slope. look, we have a rough consensus in this country. we protect roe versus wade. there isn't public funding of abortions. and, unfortunately, the nelson amendment would unravel that consensus. this would be a great mistake to pass this amendment and roll back the clock on women's rights. >> do you think that there's any potential that the nelson language will pass? >> no. i think that, particularly, based on today's debate, i expect we'll have supporters on both sides of the aisle. look. this is a critical question with respect to privacy as well.
9:12 pm
there's great concern among folks on the far right about government getting too big. why in the world would you want to let big government make these decisions that now belong to women? >> democratic senator ron wyden of oregon, thanks for shedding some light on what's going on in washington tonight. appreciate it. >> thank you. the big climate summit in copenhagen kicks off today. when remember senator inhofe said he was going to lead a summit there. we'll have that information in a moment. i know you're dyinging to find out who it is. later, our investigation continues as well into american evangelicals who inspired murderous anti-gay legislation abroad. tonight, we learn way more than we ever wanted to know about what they call sexual reorientation therapy. oh, boy. but first, one more thing about capitol hill gangs and their would-be members. senator max baucus of montana was not only on this year's gang
9:13 pm
of six, he was essentially its leader. but senator baucus had nothing to do with this weekend's gang of ten. perhaps that's because he was preoccupied dealing with other big weekend news. it came to light this weekend that senator baucus recommended to the president his one-time state director, a woman named melodee hanes, to be a u.s. attorney. according to all available accounts, miss hanes is qualified to do that job. however, melodee hanes is also senator baucus' girlfriend, which probably should have disqualified her from being his nominee for that job. quite awkward. miss hanes has long since withdrawn her name from consideration for the job. incidentally, the job would have been in montana and she has since moved to washington to live with senator baucus. so despite shocks from republicans, democratic majority leader harry reid is saying senator baucus is a-okay with him on this point, but senator baucus has proven that love is not only blind, it doesn't even know how to recognize a big appearance of a conflict of interest.
9:14 pm
hi, ellen! hi, ellen! hi, ellen! hi, ellen! we're going on a field trip to china! wow. [ chuckles ] when i was a kid, we -- we would just go to the -- the farm. [ cow moos ] [ laughter ] no, seriously, where are you guys going? ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! [ female announcer ] the new classroom. see it. live it. share it. on the human network. cisco. it's time for holiday bargain hunting. which requires a razor sharp eye and blazing speed. especially if you're shopping for a chevy. can we speed this up? not only do they come with the best deals of the year, they come with the best coverage in america. you snooze you lose. hey! i'll take it! let the chevy red tag event begin. now during the chevy red tag event, get 0 percent apr for 72 months on most '09 models. see red and save green. now at your local chevy dealer.
9:15 pm
every so often, politics sends us a blessing. a sort of personal, straight from heaven, blessing. like this one. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess we're racist. >> hmm? >> and you're thinking, is this really? is this a satire? it can't be real. no, actually it is. it's the latest commercial against health reform. people saying they're racist. lots more on this. brighten, hydrate, smooth, even tone, reduce the look of lines and pores, and lock in moisture. 7-in-1 olay total effects. because with national, i roll past the counter... and choose any car in the aisle. choosing your own car? now that's a good call. go national. go like a pro.
9:16 pm
9:17 pm
let's say you're casting about for a way to show that people of all ages, races,
9:18 pm
backgrounds are coming together on your issue. that your cause transcends the differences between people. that we're all willing to sacrifice for something greater than ourselves. let's say you're looking for a way to demonstrate that. >> the terrible penalty of crucifixion has been set aside on the single condition that you identify the body or the living person of the slave called spartac spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! >> i'm spartacus! i'm spartacus! that later turned into a way to
9:19 pm
eulogize martyrs, to show that someone that was killed or derided was actually identified with by other people, that that martyr's message would move on, like in this iconic scene from "malcolm x." >> i'm malcolm x! >> i am malcolm x! >> i am malcolm x! >> there's also this real-life moment from the documentary "eyes on the prize." >> and the next thing i know, here one of our eighth grade boys, he jumped and said, i am fred hampton. and another girl jumped up and said, i'm fred hampton. and before you knew it, the whole church, kids were all shouting, i am fred hampton. >> you see the theme, right? i we talked about this last week with dave zirin, "the nation's"
9:20 pm
sports columnist, i am spartacus, i am malcolm x., i'm an athlete selling you nike sporting goods. >> i'm tiger woods. >> i'm tiger woods. >> i'm tiger woods. >> i'm tiger woods. >> i'm tiger woods. >> i'm tiger woods. >> that ad, of course, now has an all new and embarrassing connotation, of course, but you get the point. i am spartacus, the to-be crucified roman slave backs i am fred thomson becomes i am malcolm x. turns i am a black athlete selling you polo shirts. the commercialization of the "i am proper noun" mean brought it pretty far from its original meaning. pretty far from identifying with martyred people and with the oppressed. but it hasn't brought it nearly as far as this mean has been stretched now. >> i guess i'm racist.
9:21 pm
>> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm a racist. >> jesse jackson recently said you can't vote against health care and call yourself a black man. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess we're racist. >> hmm? >> this is an anti-health reform ad, believe it or not. >> i guess i'm a racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> the ad, which its makers tell us is running today and tomorrow during newscasts washington, d.c., has something to do with connecting opposition to health reform to allegations of racism. >> if a person is racist just for opposing obama's government health plan, than a lot of people in this country are racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm a racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> i guess i'm racist. >> the person behind this ad is conservative filmmaker ray griggs. one of the people pictured in the ad, this guy, is an elected state representative, republican
9:22 pm
robert schaf of missouri, and he's now officially nationally famous for making a political ad proclaiming that he's a racist. welcome to the national stage, representative. joinings now, melissa harris-lacewell, professor of african-american studies at princeton university. melissa, nice to see you again. thanks for joining us. >> i am rachel maddow! >> no, you're not! help me understand what is going on in this ad. can you x-ray this for me with your big brain? >> you know, when your producers sent this to me, and i have to say, you have the smartest producers in the business, but my first thought is, they haven't done enough research. this must be a joke. this must be a spoof ad. no one could possibly, seriously be attempting to enter into public conversation on an issue as important as health care reform with something like this. it is, i think, obscene is the
9:23 pm
best word i can use to describe something that really, i think, sucks -- as i would say, sucks all the rhetorical air out of the room. we now can't have a conversation about either structural racism, which exists in the health care system, the ways in which race might be motivating some of the critiques of barack obama, nor can we even have a decent conversation about what's wrong with the assertions about what the health care reform plan is, because it's such an appalling message. >> well, at the surface level, it's the ultimate straw man, right? it's like saying, i'm against the reliable replacement warhead, and that doesn't make me a complete idiot. well, nobody said you were an idiot, people said you were against the reliable replacement of a warhead. it's saying, you can't argue against me because these allegations you haven't made against me aren't true and i'll defend myself against those allegations. that's what's happening on the surface level, but there is something going on about race. and famously, race in american
9:24 pm
political ads, we think of the jesse helms ad, showing a white person whose job has been lost to an affirmative action candidate, or the corker ad, showing a white woman soliciting affections from harold ford. does this fall into some of those same categories? are they talking about race in the same way? >> they're pretty unique. what we would say about the jesse helms commercial, the harold ford commercial, they played the race card implicitly. a variety of code words, people like my colleagues holly m mendelberg have both describe how racial code words have been used to prompt racial understandings and evoke latent racial anxieties. but this is different. this is going right to the core of it and suggesting that, first of all, racism is primarily something that an individual has, not a structure. so it says, basically it's
9:25 pm
saying, i'm not a racist. i'm not a racist. it's a weird kind of defensiveness that defines racism as solely sort of residing in the heads or brains of individuals. when the racism that we need to be worried about are racially disparate outcomes. we need to be worried about the fact that we have in this country still huge gaps in education, in income, in wellness, health. all of these areas around health care, but when we frame race and racism as simply about whether or not any given individual ever uses the "n" word, then it sort of flattens our ability to really talk about racial inequality in the ways that are more useful. >> but it makes a real fun epithet for political ads on both sides, as we're learning. incredible stuff. melissa harris-lacewell, thanks very much for coming on the show tonight. >> thanks for having me. oklahoma senator james inhofe once said that global warming was the second biggest
9:26 pm
hoax ever played on the american people, after the separation of church and state. good thing he, his truth squad, and some corporate-sponsored grats tea party types are headed for copenhagen. details, next. powered by the wind on the plains. there's a hospital where technology has a healing touch. there's a factory giving old industries new life. and there's a train that got a whole city moving again. somewhere in america, the toughest questions are answered every day. because somewhere in america, 69,000 people spend every day answering them. siemens. answers. even after waiting a month for my appointment, and spending two hours in the chair. there's nothing like feeling the open air freedom of my jeep wrangler.
9:27 pm
to make vanity... fly right out the window. i live. i ride. i am. jeep. - sure, cake or pie? - pie. - apple or cherry? - cherry. oil or cream? oil or cream? cream. some use hydrogenated oil. reddi-wip uses real dairy cream. nothing's more real than reddi-wip. if you're using other moisturizing body washes, you might as well be. you see, their moisturizer sits on top of skin, almost as if you're wearing it. only new dove deep moisture has nutriummoisture, a breakthrough formula with natural moisturizers... that can nourish deep down. it's the most effective natural nourishment ever. new dove deep moisture with nutriummoisture. superior natural nourishment for your skin.
9:28 pm
there's crest pro-health multi-protection rinse. it provides all these benefits... without the burn of alcohol. crest pro-health multi-protection rinse.
9:29 pm
the top adviser to president george w. bush on the environment, in both of bush's terms in office, is now an executive at constellation
9:30 pm
energy, which operates about three dozen power plants all over the country. and the chief of staff to that top environmental adviser to president bush, the first one left the bush administration to join a little environmental start-up firm you might have heard of called exxonmobil. the man who became environmental chief of staff after the first guy, the exxonmobil guy left, his post-bush administration job is a lobbyist for the american petroleum institute. the director of communications for the top environmental adviser to president bush from the middle of the bush years, that person became director of communications for the national petrochemical and refiner's association. you noticing a theme here? it goes even further down the masthead. president bush's associate director of the council on environmental quality for environmental protection is now a lobbyist for shell oil. yes, this very well-trod career path from environmental job in the bush administration to oil-soaked corporate fat cat in the energy industry was charted
9:31 pm
today in a new report from citizens for responsibility and ethics in washington. it's helpful to keep in mind that as the world convenes in denmark to try to do something about climate change, and as america's conservatives lead the charge to stop the world from doing anything about climate change. republican senator jim inhofe of oklahoma has for months been breathlessly talking up his own planned trip to copenhagen to try to undermine president obama's visit there next week. >> now, i'm going to go to copenhagen. i think somebody has to be there -- a one-man truth squad. i have been the lead senator standing up and exposing the science, the cost, and the hysteria behind global warming alarmism. and i will be traveling to copenhagen, leading what has been called in the media as the truth squad. >> the truth squad, his one-man truth squad is actually now a three-man truth squad, because senator inhofe has persuaded a couple of friends to go with him
9:32 pm
to copenhagen. senator john barrasso of wyoming will be going and someone whose identity senator inhofe said until recently was a secret. >> john barrasso's going with you, right? >> yeah. >> john barrasso? >> barrasso and there's another secret person going with me. we're going to have a team of three. a truth squad of three. >> there's another secret person going with me. a secret person! after lots of speculation about who senator inhofe's secret person might be, his secret climate change-denying friend, could it be sarah palin? today we finally learned out who it actually is. the identity of the third member of the jim inhofe climate change denialist truth squad going to copenhagen has been revealed in a cloud of anticlimax. it is roger wicker. roger wicker, who not many people know, is a united states senator from mississippi. he's actually the man who was pointed to replace trent lott as senator so mr. lott could retire
9:33 pm
urgently to become a lobbyist. again, there's that theme. cutting out the lobbyist middleman, oil billionaire, david koch, who inherited the giant oil and chemical company, koch industries from his dad, david koch is using his tea party pressure group, americans for prosperity, to send its own political operatives to copenhagen to try to undercut president obama there. they had planned to broadcast live from copenhagen on the same day president obama was planning to visit the conference. that plan itself was undercut when the president changed his travel plans to not be going until the end of next week. as president obama prepares for his trip to copenhagen next week, today he met with former vice president al gore in the oval office. as he prepares to go now, at least there's no mystery and really no subtlety at all about who and what he is up against. joining us now is melanie sloan, executive director of crew, citizens for responsibility and
9:34 pm
ethics in washington. thanks for joining the show. i have to ask if you were surprised by your own report at how many top administrations and officials from the bush administration are now working for the energy company? >> right. maybe it's a little bit of a misnomer to call them environmental officials in the first place. maybe anti-environmental officials. it's not really a surprise. most of them were busy carrying the industry's water while they were in the bush administration in the first place. >> is there an important takeaway from all of this, politically? is there something we should be learning from this information about the career choices of the, as you say, sort of environmental officials from the bush administration? >> yeah. i think you could take away that when people come from the oil companies and the energy companies and go into the administration to work on environmental matters, they're probably not worrying about the interest of the american people as much as they are worrying about the interest of the big oil companies that helped get them there in the first place. >> well, two of the former bush administration officials who you cited in the crew report have another employer in common on
9:35 pm
their resumes. they had been employed by republican senator jim inhofe of the climate change denying truth squad. i'm assuming that's really no coincidence, that this is a rather tight-knit and self-promoting group. >> right. that seems unlikely to be a coincidence. one of them worked for inhofe before he joined the council on environmental equality and one joined inhofe after he left the council. although, both ended up working for energy. one worked for first energy and the other worked for the national petrochemical association, a trade industry group. >> c.r.e.w. has done much to monitor, sort of, and document, really, the revolving door between industry and administration officials. but one of the things that i think is important in policy development, generally, is the expertise of former officials. people who have had policy-making jobs in previous administrations who therefore have the expertise about how legislation affects what the government actually does, about how policy actually hits the road when it actually goes into effect. and that those people can be a real asset in the debate, even
9:36 pm
globally, going forward, about what countries ought to do about the problems that vex us. are we in sort of a unique situation, where the people who ought to have the policy expertise about the environment are all people who are tied up in industry, and so there really aren't any disinterested people who are able to contribute the way that other former officials have? >> well, that does seem to be a particular problem here, but i would say that there are probably officials who could have handled these jobs, but the bush administration always had a goal. and that was to undercut climate change from day one. so the people they brought in, to the administration, were there to help undercut climate change, as we saw with phil cooney, for example, the ceq chief of staff who was busy rewriting scientific data and ultimately had to leave over that. but they were there to undercut climate change. and so it's no surprise that they come in to undercut climate change and then go back to the energy companies where they come from in the first place. i think you would not see such a thing from the obama administration, for example. it seems very unlikely that people are coming to the council
9:37 pm
on environmental quality and are going to leave and promptly turn around and work for shell oil. >> unless something really profound happens to shell oil. >> agree with crow. >> melanie sloan, executive director of c.r.e.w., citizens for responsibility skpand ethicn washington. thanks for being here. we have some unearthed some videotape tonight whose american activist whose teachings are at the root of uganda's anti-gay legislation. the legislation that would provide execution for the crime cough being gay. his method, he says he can cure gay men of their homosexuality by cuddling with them. you want to see the terrifying cuddle videotape? it's coming up.
9:38 pm
9:39 pm
hi, i just switched jobs, and i want to roll over my old 401(k) into a fidelity ira. man: okay, no problem. it's easy to get started. i can help you with the paperwork. um... this green line just appeared on my floor. that's guidance from fidelity. it's the route to your financial goals. could you hold on a second?
9:40 pm
whatever your destination, fidelity has the people, guidance and investments to help you find your way. this is going to be helpful. contact us today. still ahead on "countdown," keith looks at sarah palin's first semester and only semester of college in hawaii. her father reportedly said he left hawaii because the number of asians there made her uncomfortable. and ahead on this show, happy birthday wishes to the most beloved blood thirsty predator in the world. they're so cute at that age. but, first, it's 9:40
9:41 pm
eastern time. do you know where your nobel peace prize winner is? >> these additional american and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to afghan forces and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of afghanistan in july of 2011. just as we have done in iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground. >> when president obama announced his afghanistan strategy last week, he announced a fast surge of 30,000 troops. but then also promised at least a starting date for when troops would come home. it seems, then, that the big issue that remained to be clarified was whether just the 30,000 extra troops would start to come home then or whether all of our troops in afghanistan would start to come home in 2011. turns out that worry is beside the point. the real outstanding question is whether or not any of our troops will definitely start to come home in 2011 or whether that's
9:42 pm
just a maybe, a hope, a might do. but the day after the president's speech, it seemed like that withdrawal day, that starting to leave date, was for real. >> mr. chairman, it is july 2011 is when we expect the transition process to begin. our view is that -- >> is that date conditions-based or not? >> no, sir. >> no, sir, not conditio conditions-based. we're just coming home, july 2011, no matter what. that same day, cbs' chip reid reported that he asked press secretary robert gibbs whether the july 2011 date for beginning to withdraw troops was locked in. reid reported gibbs' response as, "there is no flexibility, troops will start coming home in july 2011, period. it's etched in stone. gibbs even said he had the chisel." that was wednesday.
9:43 pm
by this weekend, the july 2011 date for leaving was apparently no longer locked in and any talk of a firm deadline, pasha. >> again, there's no time line, no ramp, nothing like that. >> we're not talking about an exit strategy or a drop-dead deadline. >> in our strategic interests in south asia that should not be measured in terms of finite times. >> i think that, you know, again, i don't want to put a deadline on it, okay? >> forget that whole deadline, etched in stone, thing. between last wednesday and this weekend, someone lost his chisel, and we as a nation apparently lost our afghanistan exit date. and finally with, the obama administration seems to have had the rarest of things in washington. a program that actually costs less than originally anticipated. this is like the river dolphin of politics, it exists, but is almost never seen in the wild. by the end of this year, the government thinks it will get
9:44 pm
back about a third of the money it spent on the troubled assets relief program, t.a.r.p., the big bank bailout by the treasury department started 19 in the last few months of the bush administration. when you combine the repayment schedule with the fact that the bank had to bail out a lot fewer institutions than originallial projected, the who will program will cost about $200 billion less than originally believed. and that $200 billion windfall, thanks to the economy, not permanently seizing and dying like an engine running without oil is apparently set to be directed to the worst consequence of the wall street meltdown recession. and that worst consequence, of course, would be unemployment. close your eyes and think of it. $200 billion jobs program. president obama set to deliver a speech on jobs tomorrow, so expect to hear a lot more about this then. and no matter what's proposed, expect republicans to say it's the worst idea they've ever heard and none of them will vote for it, no matter what it is.
9:45 pm
good news, bad news, it doesn't really matter. take comfort in knowing that some things can be predicted with confidence. it can be tough living with copd... but i try not to let it slow me down. i go down to the pool for a swim... get out and dance... even play a little hide-n-seek. i'm breathing better... with spiriva. announcer: spiriva is the only once-daily inhaled maintenance treatmen for both forms of pd, which includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. i take it every day. it keeps my airways open.. to help me breathe better all day long.
9:46 pm
and it's not a steroid. announcer: spiriva does not replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms. stop taking spiriva and call your doctor if your breathing suddenly worsens, your throat or tongue swells, you gehives, or have vision changes or eye pain. tell your doctor if you have glaucoma, problems passing urine or an enlarged prostate, as these may worsen with spiriva. also discuss the medicines you take, even eye drops. side effects may include dry mouth, constipation and trouble passing urine. every day could be a good day to breat better. announcer: ask your doctor if once-daily spiriva is right for you. (announcer) they've been tested, built and driven like no other. and now they're being offered like no other. come to the winter event and get an exceptional offer on the mercedes-benz of your dreams. it's our way of showing a little holiday spirit. hurry before the offer ends january 4th.
9:47 pm
shakes off dry winter skin with 2 separate ribbons. the white ribbon that cleanses and the body butter ribbon that moisturizes continuously leaving skin satiny smooth. goodbye dry winter skin.
9:48 pm
an american activist who says men can be cured of homosexuality by cuddling with him. who says that beating a pillow with a tennis rack et while
9:49 pm
screaming at your parents is another path to being cured of the gay. this activist has seen his i can cure homosexuality tour taken out on the road. and the road show version appears to have helped to inspire the proposed law in another country to impose the death penalty for being gay. his name is richard cohen. he describes himself as formerly gay. he's also formerly a member of the unification form of sung young moon. he is also the author of the book, "coming out straight: understanding and healing homosexuality." a couple years ago, his ideas about how to rid oneself of one's sexuality was the feature of a short feature on cnn. >> he shows us touch therapy, in which he encourages rob to seek
9:50 pm
out mentors to create a healthy bond. >> it's nonsexual. it so he didn't experience this growing up with his dad. >> rob, do you feel a sexual connection right now? >> no, i don't. i feel very safe and very comforted, and it just feels wonderful. >> after illustrating that part of his therapy, mr. cohen explained how tennis rackets can also play a role in un-gaying people. >> another technique, bioenergetics designed to help clients release memories stored in the muscles, in this case by hitting a pillow with a tennis racket. >> i was angry at my mother, so i started saying, mom, mom, mom, mom, why did you do that to me! >> the publicity surrounding this interview did not stop mr. cohen from going on tv shows to
9:51 pm
demonstrate with tennis rackets and pillows or appearing in a documentary about the ex-gay movement called "chasing the devil." >> we have a south and a north. and a north and a south. what's going to happen? >> opposites attract. >> they love each other. they love it, baby. they love it. okay. let's flip this around. we have two north and two south. what's going to happen? >> repel. >> wa-wa-wa. they can't do it. >> so it's proven, right? it's important to note no actual magnets were hurt but actual people i cannot give you the same assurance. what could most charitably described as unorthodox teachings of mr. cohen, believe it or not, have been directly inspirational to the forces in uganda that have pushed for this new legislation to kill people for being gay. an employee of richard cohen's organization, the international healing foundation, and two other american anti-gay activists who purport to be able
9:52 pm
to cure homosexuality led a so-called pray away the gay conference in uganda in march. the post conference workshops led directly to the drafting of the kill the gays legislation. and here is video obtained by the think tank political research associates showing an organizer of that conference that led to the kill the gays bill specifically and explicitly crediting richard cohen's teachings about how homosexuality is curable.
9:53 pm
>> richard cohen's "coming out straight" convincing foreign audiences that people are gay by choice, that he can cure them if they want to be cured and thereby directly inspiring legislation to kill or imprison anyone who doesn't take advantage of the miraculous curative options like cuddling. richard cohen is booked to be a guest live on this show tomorrow. no tennis, no pillows. don't even think about the prospect of cuddling. for what matters to you. introducing blueprint. blueprint is free and only for chase customers. it lets you choose what purchases you want to pay
9:54 pm
and those you split... interest...with full pay. you decide how to pay over time. if having a plan matters. chase what matters. eate your own blueprint at chase.com/blueprint. goodbye weekend. brauseries 3 with its special sving hea cuts short hairs just as well as long ones and helps to minimize skin irritation for incrediblymooth skin. new series 3 from braun. because with national, i roll past the counter... and choose any car in the aisle. choosing your own car? now that's a good call. go national. go like a pro. now that's a good call. somewhere in america, there's a home by the sea powered by the wind on the plains. there's a hospital where technology has a healing touch. there's a factory giving old industries new life. and there's a train that got a whole city moving again.
9:55 pm
somewhere in america, the toughest questions are answered every day. because somewhere in america, 69,000 people spend every day answering them. siemens. answers. to get out of those tubs? when we want. when we're in the mood. it's our choice. announcer: today, guys with erectile dysfunction can be ready with another dosing option from cialis. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. so relax and take your time. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision
9:56 pm
stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. announcer: today you have options, 36-hour cialis or cialis for daily use. ask your doctor about cialis today so when the moment is right, you can be ready.
9:57 pm
we turn now to our ma-million icons correspondent. >> mammalian icons. i think now would be a good time to check in on the a 00-pound poster boy of climate change. we all know him. canuck, the world's most famous polar bear, turned 3 years old over the weekend. the zoo threw him a party with a cake and dinner roll shaped like a 3 and sushi really, really fresh. seems just yesterday canuck was rejected by his mother and then raised by slightly creepy german zoo keepers. and cute, ugh, he was brutally, offputtingly cute. come on, that's not right! superstardom followed. within weeks he was in the one-name club -- madonna,
9:58 pm
beyonce, kanute. climate change finally had a face and it was hairier than al gore. then, inevitably decline. kanute went through a way less cute growing spurt phase and you know what that means. people moved on. but now look at him. fat and happy, three hots and a cot. matu mature, handsome. even hooked him up with an italian girlfriend. what happened to you, man? with the climate change debate still raging worldwide, we don't need this domesticated homer shrimpson kanute. we need a fierce, furry, eco-warrior. get out of that cushy crib, big guy, hop on the first plane to copenhagen and have a friendly chat about climate change with james inhofe. come on, see the bear! be the bear! >> did he really have a girlfriend? >> he does. i think it's still going on.
9:59 pm
>> who would name a polar bear jianna. >> german zoo keepers. >> i'm glad to see he's growing into himself. a cocktail moment for you. i drove the dreaded i-95 this weekend. i drove from new york city down to visit friend in annapolis. and i'm a pretty good driver. i think of myself as an above average driver, always proud of my defensive skills. i did the worst driving i'ven done. i was so distracted looking for darpo weather balloons and turns out there was one in delaware but i didn't see it. there were the ten -- eight-foot red weather balloons put up all around the country on saturday. and the -- by the pentagon, there was a $40,000 cash prize. and it -- the winning team, it only took them eight hours and 56 minutes to find all ten balloons. it was a team from m.i.t. led by

140 Views

1 Favorite

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on