in order to stir up what he says is opposition to offshore drilling. what will the right think of -- what will they think of next. and let me bring you tonight and three cheers for people who have been maligned daily by the right wing, but who last night got their man, the federal government. let's start with the latest on the arrest of the suspected times square bombing, faisal shahzad and the arrest of as many as eight others in pakistan. michael isikoff is a nbc contributor and roger a analyst. roger cressey, i want you to go first, how did we catch him? >> by using craigslist and then using an email address and ultimately a phone number. that began a process a that ultimately led to shahzad's arrest. what the fbi and the nypd did is pull the string on his electronic communications after interviewing the individual who sold shahzad the nissan pathfinder. that was the first big break in the case. once that happened, then they're able to quickly move to the point where through additional

phone number checking and between pakistan and here, ultimately led them to shahzad and that's why he's in custody today. >> and how did we stop him from flying away? how did we catch him on the plane? who gets responsibility for catching him? >> the last line of defense there was the department of homeland security. it was the customs and border police. they were the ones that picked him up. i think there's going to be some discussion about how did he get from the fbi monitoring him, surveying him, to the point where he ultimately got on the plane. there may have been a disconnect there at some point. but i frankly think some of the discussion we've heard now about how if he got on the emirates plain, he would have gotten away, is overblown. that's a flight i have taken a lot. it's a 13-hour nonstop, it could have either been directed to jfk. it could have been diverted to london, other friendly airports. or if it ended up dubai, our level of cooperation with the dubai police is strong enough, we could have taken him there. >> why wasn't he on the watch list that was looked at by the emirates airliner? why didn't they catch him when his name showed up on the

schedule, when he had a reservation? the minute he got a reservation, why didn't they catch him? >> right. i think there's two things here. the first, things were moving so fast. i think there was a coordination issue. particularly at the very lower levels. he was only added to the no-fly list within a period of hours after his name was identified. and then i think there was a disconnect somewhere in the broader jfk security perimeter. what we don't know the answer as to why that happened yet. >> let me go to michael isikoff, who is very good at getting to the heart of some of this -- well, let's see what happened here. was this just a good job by the cops? they caught the bad guy? >> in part. there was some good police work there as roger indicated. one element that he didn't mention, is you know, it started with getting the v.i.n. numb on that nissan truck that had the bomb. and they, it had been, it had been deleted or altered on the front of the car. but the cops went under and

found the pin number -- the vin number underneath, and that's how they were able to link it up with the craigslist ad. >> the story to tell is that you have a vehicle identification number, a v.i.n. number hidden throughout your car apparently, right? >> yes. >> it's there a numb of places, you can't find all the places it is. the police will always be one step ahead of you of finding a place on your car for the vehicle identification number. that's the lesson here. >> look, i think, basically, this was good police work, good detective work, good intelligence work. putting all of these pieces together. but there are some questions about him getting on the plane. my understanding is that the, his inclusion on the no-fly list was an added, wasn't downloaded by the airlines quickly enough. so that he was able to pay cash and board the plane. even though he was on the no-fly list. i think there's going to be some questions about that. but more broadly, there's still a lot of things we don't know here. -- holder at his press

conference said, attorney general holder, said he's providing useful information after being questioned by the joint terrorism task force. first without having been read his miranda rights. then having been read his miranda rights. he waived them. and they say he continued to talk, he continued to cooperate. and while he has admitted that he had been in pakistan, northwest pakistan last year during his five months trip to that country, his native homeland. and received some training there. he insists that what he was doing here in this plot, he was acting alone. and i've talked to some intelligence and law enforcement officials today who are skeptical of that. who, one said, i don't think anybody believes that. now he may be telling the truth, he may not be. but until we know whether he was working with other people in the united states, you know, we're going to have to reserve judgment as to how big of a success this was. >> his name is faisal shahzad and here's some of the things we know about the fellow, he's a 30-year-old naturalized citizen.

he's originally from pakistan and has family there. he travelled to pakistan last year. spent eight months over there. he's already confessed to training at a terrorist camp in waziristan. which is where the pakistan and taliban operates. as an american nothing is more depressing than the prospect that people who choose to join us and become naturalized americans then choose to betray us. to try to kill us. you like to think that when a person goes through the process of naturalization, that made a commitment to us as a country. here's a guy who changed his mind. >> what i hope doesn't happen, chris, is that there's this broad pendulum swing, that says we need to be on the lookout for every naturalized citizen who comes from an islamic country, because that's foolish, too. >> get to my point, not to your point. please don't change the point. profiling. that's not what i'm talking about. i'm disheartened to hear that an individual in this case changed his mind.

do you know why he changed his mind? >> no, none of us do yet. because he's still being questioned. he's still being questioned. we're going to find out the answer to that. was he radicalized before he became a naturalized american? did he get radicalized after that? i mean that's a fundamental question in the interrogation. >> it's also conceivable that he had been radicalized before and he went through the naturalization process because he knew that that would give him greater access to things. i mean we don't know. this is speculation at this point. we don't know. >> well let me ask you about the training. did we get all this -- is he the singing terrorist. roger, we're finding out a lot just from him. >> primarily. much like the christmas day attempt, chris, with farouk abumuttalab. he volunteered all the information. he was pretty accurate with what he said. >> roger, as we reported a little while ago, there's still some skepticism as to whether he's telling the whole story and i think that's a cautionary point to make. >> i get that, all i'm saying is

that sometimes these guys do tell a modicum of truth, not the whole story. and in this case, shahzad is going to say things we're going to verify. corroboration with pakistani officials and our own intelligence community. so you're going to get a lot of it first-hand and then you're going to start to pull the string through the electronic information, telephone and emails and interviews with people in pakistan. that's going to paint the broader mosaic of who drove this guy, what drove him to put this pathfinder in times square on saturday. >> there seems to be an intuitive tendency on or part, a penchant to think if it's a well-organized plot, something like 9/11, or the '93 plot on the world trade center, it seems to have a international thought. a lot of people, a although of minds, preparation, organization. and when it's a screw-up like this, when everything seems to be wrong, then you would assume it was a one person? operating as an individual.

is that a fair way to look at it, that it was such a screw-up, that it may possibly not have been coordinated. >> we use sophisticated when we talk about terrorism plots. it doesn't have to be sophisticated because there are multiple pieces of coordination. it could be sophisticated for other reasons. in this case, this wasn't a sophisticated device. it was a crude device that wasn't going to work. so his capability was not that impressive. but his intent was very, very serious. we've got to split those two and look at each one. >> do we know -- mike, let me ask about, this because i guess when it gets to criminal charges, we're going learn down the road how serious a charge this guy gets hit with. i guess because it was so badly handled by him. but was there an attempt to kill hundreds of people? what do you think this was about? >> clearly, he was try to kill as many people as he could. there's sort of the good news/bad news aspect. the good news, is it was so primitive. in this sense, the guy is a screw up.

but on the other hand, it is worth sort of taking a step back. you know, a few years ago, all the terrorism, almost all the terrorism cases that the fbi had made in this country, were sort of lone wolves inspired on the internet without any apparent connection to people overseas. and we've had quite a few over the last year in which it's precisely the opposite. it's people who have connections, who have been to pakistan, who have gotten training and come back. and i think there's is a sense among counterterrorism officials that this is part of the pattern, part of the trend, they're sending everybody they can back into this country, using what assets they can have in this country to wage attacks. and that pakistan-taliban view over the weekend in which it was claimed that they will retaliate for the drone attacks. i think there is an aspect of that that does make people a

little nervous. >> well for that blow-back it seems to be heavily incompetent. are you surprised, roger, that if they're very angry, our use of drones effectively in that region. the northwest frontier. do you think they would send back such an incompetent? >> that may be the reality of what they have to work with these days. if you play out michael's theory here. we've had such great success with the predator program and the pakistani military, in attriting that capability over there, the talent pool they have at their disposal to come back to the united states is simply not as good as they may have hoped. so part of the good news story here is even though this was a serious attempt, like the attorney general said, he wasn't that good. and that may be a sign of the type of threat we have to deal with. it doesn't mean the threat is not real, it just means the talent pool used to staff it not what we were used to, 9/11, and even with najy buelah azazi.

>> michaelis acould have, i love it. we're going to cover this story throughout the show tonight. coming up, we look at the pakistan connection. eight arrests over there and two former cia officials. how much came from a blowback from what we're trying to do. of trying to catch the guys in that region in pakistan. but the race gets tighter in pennsylvania between senator arlen specter who became a democrat, and democrat joe sestak, the little engine that could, apparently. he's getting close. you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc. national car rental?

that's my choice. because with national, i roll past the counter... and choose any car in the aisle. oh, buck chooses the blue one! [ male announcer ] go national. go like a pro. choosing your own car? now, that's a good call. two weeks to go now. two wednesdays from now, a big primary in pennsylvania, where arlen specter will go against sestak. specter is leading by just eight points among likely voters. last month, specter had a 21-point lead. what an upset this would be.

be right back. in what? imported ice? yeah! i mean, people love imported water. so this is the next logical step. i think i'll stick with following my green line. oh, come on! hey, working with my guy at fidelity could have me retiring in a few years. and besides, couldn't people just freeze their imported water? don't be ridiculous. work with the company that's helping more people reach retirement than anyone else -- because when it comes to investing, you should never settle.

welcome back to "hardball." we now know that the times square bomb suspect trained at a terror camp in pakistan. what does that tell us about the current state of play in the world of terrorism? quite a lot, i'd expect. tyler drumheuer served as chief of operation for the c.i.a. in europe. bob bear was a cia field officer. tyler, your general big thoughts based on your experience what it all adds up to. eight months of training over there in pakistan. a faulty attempt to cause real mayhem in times square? >> i think in my opinion, i think this is what's happening now is what happened in europe about five, six, seven years ago. that you have people who are getting caught up in this general idea of the united states being at war with islam. and people are being recruited off the internet or they're fascinated or they have some problem here that leads them back to their homeland and then

when they get there, they're indoctrinated, given some training. i suspect this guy wasn't given a tremendous amount of training because the bomb wasn't very effective. then they're released back in. without a great battle plan, but to carry something out, and with some sort of context. obviously they knew he was going to do it, they took credit for it right before or shortly after it was to happen. >> let me go to bob on that. same picture. what's it about? >> we're at war in pakistan. we just can't forget that. we're killing dozens of people every week with these predator attacks. we've taken sides in that war. and it doesn't surprise me that these, these chance and families living in the united states are fighting against the united states. it's just almost inevitable. and that is what we're facing in this war, the longer it goes on, the more likely we're going to get attacked. and i'm afraid the next one going to be successful. >> are you surprised they send a klutz to do had job in times square? >> i'm a bit of a dissident on this opinion.

if he had made acouple of adjustments to those propane tanks, and the rest of it, they might have gone off. and the kill radius in that car, if those tanks had really caught fire would have been 50 feet. he would have done killed a lot of people. >> really. so you're open to the idea that maybe he may have been well-trained and missed a couple of steps? >> it's dicey, getting these things lighted. if he had been lucky, as the mayor said, mayor bloomberg, we would have had a lot of casualties. so he was a klutz and they could have made a lot better bomb. but when these people are trained on the fly and recruited on the fly, a lot of these operations are going to fail. >> you know, roger cressey made a point earlier, about how they recruit overseas, we've been very successful and i know we are, about assimilating people, it's our great strength. you can become an american in very few years, you learn a bit of the language, you make an effort, you get into our culture, our values, you're an american damn quick. and the danger, of course, is

some people don't have that motive, they may be doing all kinds of things to hurt us. how do you figure this guy's radicalization occurred? >> i think the assimilation of the islamic community in the united states has protected us to this point. but i think as things go along. in his case it could be an economic problem. >> i think you're onto it. >> i think you're on to the economic problem. >> his house was being foreclosed on. it's the same thing. what you saw in europe. i keep going to that, because i think that's an important lesson to learn. you have a group of disgruntled people or a disgruntled guy. all they need to do is run into one person that's a serious recruiter or a trainer or something like that. and like bob said, they end up in a camp, they get a degree of training. they go back. for the people in pakistan, they see this as a war with us. we, we should not think that we can attack them and they're not going to retaliate. so this, it's, i think it would be a mistake to think that we're looking for a specific plan, like go to times square and blow it up. i think what they did was, train

him and if he had an opportunity do something like this. which makes it much more dangerous. it would be easier if it was a highly-organized thing because that would be easier to penetrate. >> everybody knows some people who emigrate some successfully, others not. a lot of people came here from ireland, for example, and most made it, some diplomat make it here, they didn't fit in. is this an opportunity for recruitment? >> absolutely. the way that immigration is going up, we're getting a lot more people. the state department effectively does not screen people immigrating to this country. is barely cursory. we don't know who's inside our borders. we're nothing like israel who keeps track of people for obvious reasons. we're still very nonmilitarized country. but you know, we simply don't know who is in our borders. a lot of people still don't speak english. a lot of the people, their primary loyalties are outside the country. >> but a lot of people coming from pakistan do speak the lang language, don't they? >> no, they don't speak it well, they're moving out into communities in connecticut and

new jersey, they're sticking together, we don't really know who they are. this is a big statement. but we, but fbi, let's put it this way, cannot keep track of every immigrant in this country. what happened in times square was not an intelligence failure. in fact it was a brilliant wrap-up of this guy. but what i'm really afraid, chris, is the next time one of these guys are going to get through. and what's it going to do to this country? it's going to rip it apart. because people are going to be looking for quick, immediate answers. >> how so? >> you know, they're going to look, you know, crack down on who knows where it's going to end up. you're going to see the tea party being strengthened. you're going to see people blaming the white house for a situation it didn't create. it could affect the united states for a long time. look, it got us into a war in iraq we didn't need to be in. >> by the way, coming up on airplanes, i thought this was the christmas bomber. i thought there was going to be -- i'll predict it right now.

we get a real bad airplane situation in the next couple of years, we're going to have all kinds of stuff going on about who gets on airplanes, we're going to be so close to israel in the way that they do it, don't you think? >> people are going to demand it. >> i think it's going to go more and more in that direction. i think the other thing to worry about is this is the reaction of the extreme right, you have a counter reaction against these communities, it adds to bring in more recruits. >> explain how that happens? >> it's because -- as, as these attacks occur, it feeds a certain, certain part of the extreme right that looks on immigration as a threat to the american identity and then they react, in a violent fringe of that reacts violently against muslims in some part of the country. and the recruiters or the people on the internet, if they're doing it remotely play on this and see, this is america, hates muslims. you hear that more and more when you talk to young muslims.

that it's not, it's not a majority, but it's bob knows more about this, about that part of the world than i do. >> bob, the problem is not really so much people who have a lot of contact with people from the middle east or south asia, like i do. it's people who don't meet anybody. so they make the generalization, i assume. >> yeah. >> obviously they can't differentiate among the 99% that want to become americans and the small element is are misfits, open to recruitment. it's a situation that tarks a little bit of thought. but when it comes to airplanes, people aren't going to be so discriminating. they're going to want to know who's going to be getting on that airplane. if we have another problem like christmas. tyler drumheller, every time we have you on i know it's not for a good reason. and it's usually not a good reason. it's not exactly like christmas eve around here. and thank you, bob, same with you, we have you guys on when we have trouble. all you have to do is watch the screen on msnbc. because we see your faces. gentlemen, in all seriousness, it's great to have expertise, thank you.

more on this story tonight as we go along with "hardball" tonight. the story, they caught the bad guy at the airport just as he was getting on a plane to the emirates. good police work. up next, how much does florida's republican parties did like republican charlie crist? check out the "sideshow," they really don't like this show. you're watching "hardball". good-time charlie isn't too popular with the republicans down there. you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc

before they could get their offer together. we really missed a great opportunity -- dodged a bullet there. [ banker ] so we talked to them about the wells fargo priority buyer preapproval. it lets people know that you are a serious buyer because you've been credit-approved. we got everything in order so that we can move on the next place we found. which was clear on the other side of town. [ male announcer ] wells fargo. with you when you're ready to move.

back to "hardball." now for the "sideshow," jon stewart and stephen colbert both mocked reaction. to the failed bomb plot in times square. here they go. >> it was an amateurish type of bomb. >> it looked amateurish is a nice way to phrase it. >> it was an incompetent bomber. >> this was frankly, pretty pitiful. >> this was so incompetent. >> it was a failure, guys. >> no, guys, it was scary, don't you remember?

hi mr. terrorist, whoever they are those people are just jealous, that was a wonderful bomb and we're all sufficiently terrified. there's no need to try again, okay! >> at about 6:30 this last night, an alert t-shirt vendor who is a vietnam veteran noticed an unoccupied suspicious vehicle. he alerted police officer wane rhatigan who was with the nypd mounted unit. who was on his horse, migs, patrolling times square. >> i'm sorry, mr. mayor, mr. mayor. jon stewart, daily show. what type of vendor and what war did he serve in and what was the name of the horse. and do you have any information that matters! >> i'm not trying to tell the mayor how to do his job but the best look for the bomb scare press conference probably isn't the old richie rich. >> it's just mike bloomberg

being mayor of gotham. next, don't taze me, bro. last night at the phillies-cardinals game, a 17-year-old phillies fanatic ran out onto the field and ran around before being brought down in front of 40,000 fans by a taser gun. authorities are now investigating whether use of the stun gun went too far. editorial point here, i know philly fans are tough, but couldn't they have just tackled the guy. finally, cleaning house. the republican party of florida has posted an oil painting of governor charlie crist on ebay. the painting was originally commissioned. from party headquarters in tallahassee. but his decision to drop out of the republican primary has made him persona nongrata within the party. case in point. catch the painting's description on ebay. canvas naturally sensitive to changes in temperature and humidity. just as charlie crist's are subject to fluctuations in poll numbers. which brings us to tonight's "big number."

what's the going rate on ebay for charlie crist's painting? $6,000. six days to make your bid. for a portrait of "good-time charlie. " 6,000 bucks. going once, going twice. tonight's big number. up next, former fema director, michael brown. the guy blamed for bungling katrina says president obama deliberately delayed action on this oil spill in the gulf to stir up opposition to offshore drilling. michael brown, the inimitable. joins us next. you're watching "hardball," only on msnbc really, brian? what?

you know that dunking is for oreo cookies only. if dunking oreo cakesters were acceptable, there would be a song about it. there is. ♪ ice cold milk and an oreo cakester ♪ no. no, that is not -- no, that is wrong. [ male announcer ] dunk or don't dunk. choose your side. your p.a.d. isn't just poor circulation in your legs causing you pain. ok. what is it? dad, it more than doubles your risk of a heart attack or stroke. you'd better read about plavix. if you have p.a.d., plavix can help protect you from a heart attack or stroke. plavix helps keep blood platelets from sticking together and forming clots- the cause of most heart attacks and strokes. talk with your doctor about plavix? i'll do it. promise. (announcer) people with stomach ulcers or other conditions that cause bleeding should not use plavix. taking plavix alone or with some other medicines, including aspirin, may increase bleeding risk, so tell your doctor when planning surgery. certain genetic factors and some medicines, such as prilosec, may affect how plavix works. tell your doctor all the medicines you take, including aspirin, especially if you've had a stroke. if fever, unexplained weakness or confusion develops,

tell your doctor promptly. these may be signs of ttp, a rare but potentially life-threatening condition, reported sometimes less than two weeks after starting plavix. other rare but serious side effects may occur. than two weeks after starting plavix. ♪ (announcer) right now, all over the country, discover card customers are getting five percent cashback bonus at home improvement stores. it pays to get more, it pays to discover.

i'm melissa rehberger. a terror suspect was able to board a plane for due bain despite being placed on a no-fly list. faisal shahzad was charged with terror-related offenses today in new york. repair crews are preparing to lower a containment structure over that damaged oil well in the gulf of mexico. and there are unconfirmed

reports of oil beginning to come ashore along the louisiana coast. thousands of nashville residents are without power and fresh water after weekend storms flooded underground electrical relays. a defiant iranian president blasted the u.s. at the united nations today, saying new sanctions would doom u.s.-iranian relations. investors flook flock to the dollar. and former rocker bret michaels has been released from a california hospital after suffering a brain hemorrhage. he is expected to make a full recovery. back to "hardball." it will be interesting to me, and i'm not trying to introduce a conspiracy theory. but was this deliberate? you know, you have to wonder -- >> sabotage? >> if there was sabotage involved. >> what better way to head off

more oil drilling, nuclear plants, then by blowing up a rig. i'm just noting the timing here. >> welcome back to "hardball." those are some of the comments from people on the right about the oil spill in the gulf yesterday on neil cavuto's show. former fema director, michael brown, said this. >> only now is the president appearing to be engaged. and i think the delay was this -- it's pure politics. they don't say these things without it being coordinated. so now you're looking at this oil slick approaching the louisiana shore. according to certain noaa and other places, if the winds are right, it will go up the east coast. this is exactly what they want. because now he can pander to the environmentalists and say, i'm going to shut it down. because it's too dangerous. >> michael brown, you have a thought here. why don't you repeat that again, live. what do you believe is going on here in the gulf in terms of the president's behavior, the whole whole, the business right down there. >> hey, chris, i think there's two things.

i think one, we're seeing rahm emanual rule number one taking effect. and that is, let no crisis go unused. this is an opportunity for a president who wants to bankrupt the coal industry and get rid of the oil and gas industry, to shut down offshore drilling in the gulf of mexico. i think the other thing that we're seeing is, is this -- i don't know why it is in this country. but we have a plan from 1994, that says how we're going to deal with these fires and these platforms collapsing. janet napolitano did not implement that plan until seven days after the leaks first started. and then we find out we don't have the equipment. i mean to me it's like katrina all over. because people at the top are not paying attention to what's going on on the ground. >> what do you make of bp's role here with regard to the ploeout preventer and the fact that that was sort of the final way to deal with the situation as horrific as this? do you think they had the right management? were they following procedure?

where's the blame lie in terms of letting this catastrophe occur in the first instance? >> i don't think we know yet, chris. i heard the clip from dana preno and the others, i think we have to get the robots on the seabed, get the equipment up above sea level, get it on to some docks and let's see what happens. right now i don't know. you either had faulty equipment. you had some problem with bp and some people speculate maybe there was some sabotage. >> what do you make of that speculation? what do you make of that speculation about sabotage? why would somebody sabotage something to cause this kind of damage to our planet, really? >> well, because i think there are terrorists in the world who would like to do that sort of thing. terrorists don't give a rat's butt about the ecology or anything else. all they care about is hurting america. >> well do you think based upon what we know, there's any indication of terrorism? >> no, not yet. there's not. >> what do you make of the political charge from the right

that it would, that the president, one of his supporters did this in order to discredit offshore drilling? do you give any credibility to that? >> no. no, and in fact, they did not do this. but i think that if you use rahm emanual's rule, they're taking advantage of it. >> what do you, how do you -- let me, we started off with your quote, michael. and i just wonder how you know things like this you say only now is the president appearing to be engaged. you, what do you know about him not appearing to be -- you're suggesting he's not really engaged in leading this effort to deal with this catastrophe. he's faking it. you say appearing to be engaged. you think he's not engaged in this effort to try to prevent this disaster? >> look, in politics and the white house, it is about appearances. >> but do you think he's faking it? he's not trying to deal with this horrific situation? >> no, no, i think -- chris, now i think he is. i think he's -- >> so you didn't mean appearing to be. you say, i think the delay was -- >> i think he's disengaged like another president we know. >> you say it was pure politics,

the timing of his activities here. you saying he is systematically or deliberately paused to allow this wreckage, this terror, this horrible environmental damage to occur, that he systemically chose for pure politics, timed his actions to to be slower than they should have been? are you serious? >> i think he was very ill-served, chris. >> no, no, you're saying that i think the delay was this. it's pure politics. are you saying that he somehow delayed his response to encourage worse disaster here? worse damage to the environment? >> no, i don't -- one, he didn't want people to die. he doesn't want to see oil on the shores. he doesn't want to see any of that. but i do believe, i believe this very sincerely. when he comes out and says he would like to see the coal industry bankrupted, i think they see a crisis like this and they say, how can, because this is rahm emanual's rule number one. how do we take advantage of this situation.

and i think -- >> you're leaping there, michael. you're leaping so far away. you're saying this -- the president delayed his reaction to this disaster so that he could hurt the coal industry? i'm confused. >> no, no, hang on. he said in 2008 that he wants a cap-and-trade bill that is so onerous that carbon-based industries like the coal industry, if they try to do anything new, they'll go bankrupt. the president is very anti-carbon energy. i understand that. i get it, i just disagree with it. i think in this case, he saw an opportunity to say, look how bad oil and gas drilling is. look at all this harm it's causing. >> he just came out for offshore oil drilling. >> chris, i'm glad you asked that. he came out and said, look, i'm going to approve oil and gas drilling. and all you guys are going to say, look what a great guy he is, trying to reach out to everybody else. all he did was approved two existing leases on the northeast coast and shut down all the other proposed leases on the west coast and the southeast

coast. there was nothing new in what he did. >> don't you know what you're saying to a third party, not somebody like myself or somebody like yourself, listening to you, thinks that you're sounding insane. you're saying that the president of the united states went into slow-mo here, somehow seemed to be working faster than he really was, but was really quite slow to get there, because he saw an opportunity to exploit a disaster so that he could reap discredit on to the coal industry. and by the way, a couple of weeks ago, he came down for offshore drilling so he could discredit it when this thing occurred. are you somehow suggesting he knew this would happen and that's why he came out for offshore drilling? is that what you're saying? it sounds crazy. >> the way you just put it. it sounds crazy to me, too. >> let me just rephrase your thoughts. you said the president came out for offshore drilling so he could discredit it. but the only way he could discredit it, if we had this oil

spill. >> no, he came out for offshore drilling in an attempt to apiece those on the right who want more drilling. >> he came out for a compromise. >> which was not a compromise at all. he only approved existing leases that were already in effect. you guys failed to report that what he announced was nothing. now, he announced that. so he could get, you know, health care passed or something else. >> i think he did it so he could get a climate bill passed as part of an energy bill. that's what i think he was trying to do. we can agree on that. >> yeah, the climate bill. but then what happens is, this crisis occurs in the gulf. janet napolitano does not even implement the oil spill response plan of 1994 until i think like april 27th, seven days after the disaster. there's no explanation for that whatsoever. >> i just think, i think it's dangerous for people like dana parino to say there's sabotage by the left. dangerous for rush limbaugh to

say the president or one of his supporters somehow blew up the oil rig to create havoc. and somehow have some sort of bounce out of it. >> i tell you, michael, i think your arguments are not strong about the coal industry, because i don't think this relates to coal. i think you made a case there that he wants to discredit offshore drilling. if he didn't anticipate this catastrophe. and i don't knowow you can accuse this president of such powers as knowing this catastrophe was coming down the line. >> chris, i don't think he anticipated this catastrophe at all. i think they took advantage of it. which is what rahm's rule is, take advantage of a crisis. >> thanks for coming on. michael brown. great to have you on. up next, will the right-wing praise the obama administration for catching the attempted terrorist? give him a little credit, the fact that an attack was even attempted. he might get blamed for that. howard dean joins us next to assess the politics of everything that's going on right now. and in one minute, a lot of support for the new illegal immigrant law down in arizona. surprising national support you might say if you're on the liberal side of things it may

disturb you to hear how strong the support is for that bill. this is "hardball," only on msnbc.

is well take a look at this poll number from "the new york times"/cbs news poll. when asked about the new illegal immigration law in arizona, 51% said it's about right. tag on another 9% who say the law doesn't go far enough and that's six in ten american who is support the new law. this is a tough attitude in the country right now. six in ten, a good indicator why politicians on both sides, right and left are afraid to go after this baby. "hardball" will come back in a moment.wúy%

we're back. in the same week that some republicans are suggesting that the obama administration purposely slowed down the response to the gulf oil spill disaster now some republicans are questioning whether the obama administration deserves credit even for capturing the guy in the times square bombing incident out at the airport tonight. here's former new york governor, george pataki on msnbc. let's listen. >> this is another case where this administration, we're responding after something is attempted. we saw it with the christmas day airplane bomber. we saw it in times square. we were lucky in both cases. and then we saw it in fort hood where we were not so lucky and 13 of our great young heroes put their lives on the line to defend us, were murdered. i think this administration just has got to change its approach. >> that's what happens to an office-holder when he runs out of staff and has to think up this stuff on his own. we have joining us now, a man who needs no staff to help him,

doctor, governor, a medical doctor and a cnbc contributor. dr. dean, it seems to me that the republicans are so desperate. we saw an example of michael brown saying the president was slowing down his efforts in the gulf of mexico so he could attack the coal industry. that is a bank shot even i can't follow. >> well, you know, first of all, the question is why is michael brown giving his track record on television talking to anybody. >> we invited him and he came. you can't put everybody off the street on television. >> he was head of fema for all of those years. it wasn't like we just came up with the guy. >> precisely the point, precisely the point and look what they did so he may have been reflecting on how things were running in the previous white house. but i don't think he has much knowledge about how they were running in this white house. knowledge of how they are run in this white house. the president is doing the best he can. he has a big job, this oil

spill, this terror plot, turning the economy around, a health care bill that is not so popular. i think he has accomplished an enormous amount. it is sad to see what lengths the republicans will go to. if you want to question his policies, be my guest. don't question his motives. what pataki said is what people said on the fringe left, bush knew about 9/11 before it happened. this is ridiculous nonsense and somebody like george pataki shouldn't be talking like that. >> i was surprised. i have always had a lot of respect for him. >> that is the influence of the tea party. people feel they have to say outlandish things because they are interested in running for office. it doesn't serve the country well. >> don't you think beck is pulling people that are sort of pretty far right but not crazy like o'reilly and sean hannity, i think beck is pulling them all further over and pulling the

republican over. gresham's law, bad money drives good money out of circulation. they are driving good ideas out of circulation going so far right. >> this is why michael steele made an enormous mistake as chairman of the republican party when he backed down to rush limbaugh. he began to kowtow. you may not believe what the rest of the american people believe, but you have to stand your ground. this stuff is not only going to hurt the country but it is going to destroy the republican party. who is going to vote for this stuff? there will be some because there is a lot of anger, but the country is not going to be taken over by a far right conspiracy theorist and if it is the country is in trouble. >> you are a democrat, a progressive. if something screws up under the government with the democrats in charge they can say i told you government sucks. democrats have a stake, they

believe in progressive policies. it seems to me a higher standard. is the president meeting it? >> i think he is. senator session, very conservative anti-government senator from alabama on his trip with the president in the south where all the terrible oil damage is occurring and about to occur said that the government really needs to step up to the plate here. people need to rely on government when times are really bad. all this anti-government rhetoric is silly. the government got us out of the depression in 1932 or 1933 when it began. excuse me. it began in 1929. when roosevelt came in the government began to turn it around. government is important in times like this. government was important to stop terrorism. because the new york city police in a very alert and terrific american citizens on the street, we did avert a tragedy in times square.

government responded and government did a job and government got that guy off the plane. >> how much score, one to ten, the performance with regard to the times square terrorist. >> what? >> how is the government doing? >> an eight on that one. >> how about dealing with the gulf catastrophe with the oil spill? one to ten? >> we don't know yet. the truth is this is a huge potential national disaster. people said this could never happen. it has happened. it is going to require reassessing drilling and so forth and so on. it is a huge problem. we don't know yet. >> i agree on all counts. thank you for coming on "hardball." when we return i have thoughts on people who got their man last night, the federal government despite daily criticism from the right wing, they got the job done. you are watching "hardball" only on msnbc.

it can happen anytime. an everyday moment can turn romantic at a moment's notice. and when it does, men with erectile dysfunction can be more confident in their ability to be ready with cialis for daily use. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven, low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment's right for you and your partner. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications

and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed back ache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. ask your doctor if cialis for daily use is right for you. for a 30-tablet free trial offer, go to cialis.com. and only allstate pays you an extra bonus to do it. get one of these every six months you go without an accident. [ judy ] what are you waiting for? call or click today for a free quote or to find an allstate agent.

let me finish tonight with that arrest at john f. kennedy airport. it is good to know our government can do the job. people like competence. men like men who are competent, women like men who are competent, women like women who are competence. we don't want a woody allen country running the country or our household. annie hall was a comedy. what killed president bush's

credibility? saying we went to war in iraq searching for weapons. he ended up looking like an incompetent when we fought our way into that country and still fighting our way out only to find out there were no nuclear weapons onhand. the incompetence became complete when the chief pranced on mission accomplished. katrina, browny, you are doing a heck of a job. competence, we are watching what happens in the gulf of mexico, the oppositions to cap that gusher a mile down in the water. at least we nabbed that guy heading off from the new york airport. the big change in the american government from world war ii to the 1960s was the belief government could do the job. we beat the nazis, built the interstate highway system, built a middle class, got to the moon. it showed up in the poles.

3/1994 of the country said government could do what it set out to do. it is an american thing catching that guy at the airport. real dragnet stuff. don't you think people like we love to see we can do what we set out to do. that is "hardball." "countdown with keith olbermann" starts right now. which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow. from times square to arrested in 53 hours and 30 minutes. and a president is not crowing and not trying to terrify the citizens for whom he works. >> as americans and as a nation, we will not be terrorize td. >> the suspect is faisal shahzad and he is singing like a bird. >> he has been talking to us and providing useful information. >> providing it before and after he was read his miranda rights, such as he was trained in a pakistani terror camp, arrests

there, despite pete king's moronic quote, despite john mccain calling the mirandizing a serious mistake. general paul eaton saying king and mccain are putting american lives at risk and my special comment, what part of america does john mccain actually love? republicans push for more offshore drilling even as the cataclysm from the destroyed gulf rig gets worse and closer. nashville, fema arrives. 19 dead in tennessee alone. we go live. >> mother nature can be cruel and certainly she's dealt us a bad hand. >> "worsts" the latest lie from charles krauthammer. no successful attacks under bush. what were the anthrax letters, junk mail? and stuff my dad says. a parents is only as good as their dumbest kid. if one wins a nobel prize and the other gets robbed by a ok